Search Results: "vela"

31 August 2026

Russ Allbery: Review: The Hands of the Emperor

Review: The Hands of the Emperor, by Victoria Goddard

Series:	Lays of the Hearth-Fire #1
Publisher:	Underhill Books
Copyright:	January 2019
ISBN:	1-988908-15-9
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	739

The Hands of the Emperor is a self-published political fantasy novel. It's the recommended first book (although not the first published book) in a complicated set of interrelated series. I was not able to definitively confirm that Underhill Books is Goddard's self-publishing press name, but the press does not appear to have an Internet presence apart from Goddard's books and her books appear to be using the standard self-publishing channels. Cliopher Mdang is the personal secretary of the last emperor of Astandalas, the magical heart of Zunidh, a man worshiped as a god. The emperor's word is absolute, his magic supports the health of the entire world, and he cannot be physically touched without risking physical damage and severe political and religious punishment. Cliopher is one of the emperor's closest associates, but the distance between them is still vast. It therefore represents a terrifying and dangerous breach of etiquette for him to suggest the emperor may enjoy a vacation on a tropical island near Cliopher's remote home. The emperor's acceptance of the invitation is even more startling. The emperor has opinions about his life as the emperor that no one had guessed. Cliopher has not assimilated as completely into the bureaucratic machinery of the empire as it first may appear. And Cliopher's family have vastly misunderstood the nature of his role in the emperor's government. I find the marketing blurb for this book unfortunate since, at least to me, the emphasis on physical touch and intimacy implies that The Hands of the Emperor is a romance novel or at least has significant romantic elements. I've been aware of this book for years but put off reading it because I wasn't quite in the mood for that story. This is not a romance novel; there is no romance in this book whatsoever. It is a political fantasy, both in the sense that it is set in a secondary fantasy world with magic and (apparently) some form of interplanetary travel, and in the sense that it is a fantasy of governance. When I say that this book blew up in certain corners of the Internet during the pandemic, I think you will still underestimate the passion of its advocates. I heard about this book constantly, in a way that reminded me of Kushiel's Dart and the time when fans of Jacqueline Carey would bring her up in every fantasy conversation, or when we created a Usenet newsgroup for The Wheel of Time mostly to get the voluminous conversations off of the regular SFF newsgroup. I'm one of those mildly contrarian people for whom that degree of enthusiasm is a little off-putting, which is another reason why I resisted buying a copy for years and only read it in 2026. It's delightful, although also a bit embarrassing, when the book everyone was in love with turns out to be just as good as everyone said it was. I adore stories about friendship, and this is one of the best stories about friendship that I've ever read. It is a very, very slow burn, but I also thought the first three quarters of the book was exquisitely paced. There were long sections where not very much was happening, and yet I couldn't put the book down because there was so much subtle character work just beneath the surface. Almost all of the novel is told in tight third person from Cliopher's perspective, and I thought that was an excellent choice. Neither Cliopher nor the narrator comment on things that Cliopher finds obvious, which is both immersive and critical to the pacing. There are discoveries for the reader throughout the book, the sort of discoveries that make pieces fit together satisfyingly in retrospect, and the reader stays sufficiently ahead of the misunderstandings of Cliopher's friends and family that one also gets the joy of watching other people discover things that one figured out a hundred pages earlier. It helps that I truly liked nearly everyone in this book. There are no real villains, only a few supporting characters whose role is to be irritating or corrupt. If you're looking for a lot of conflict and drama, you may want to save this book for a different mood, but if you're in the mood for a varied collection of fundamentally good characters working methodically through the complexities and obstacles of politics and social systems to improve the world, there are few books I would recommend more. Goddard achieves one of the hardest tricks of slow burns: steady forward progress that does not rely on reversals, misunderstandings, or the friendship equivalent of the third-act breakup. This book spends 700 pages building towards a climax that managed to be worthy of all 700 pages without ever annoying me with artificial obstacles, and that's quite a feat. I've not said much about the details of the plot. There is one it's not just character work but I think this book benefits immensely from going in as blind as possible. I found the twists and turns and growing revelations so deeply satisfying that I don't want to rob any other reader of the experience. The fantasy world-building is intriguing but a bit unsatisfying because it is so unexplained. We get a few details of the magic system, but since Cliopher has no magic, he isn't that interested in the details. There is a catastrophic magical event in the world background, and we learn some of the details of its practical effects, but the nature of the world before the cataclysm is so obvious to the characters that it's never explained. I'm not even certain that this civilization is interplanetary; that feels like the implication of how characters talk about multiple worlds, but the method of travel is left entirely undefined. This might be frustrating to some genre readers, but I personally enjoy books where the world-building is a bit mysterious. It's a good reason to read more of Goddard's books set in the same universe. This was my favorite of the books I've read so far this year, but I do have one caution and a couple of caveats. The caution is that Cliopher comes from an island culture based heavily on (I think) Polynesian cultures. That culture is very central to the story and is treated with considerable respect, but I still get a bit nervous when a Canadian author from Nova Scotia with an academic background in European medieval studies writes a story focused this deeply on a non-European culture. Nothing about her portrayal seemed off to me (although there is a very clunky and ham-handed scene about a different native culture that worries me), and for all I know she has family background or other connections to the culture she is borrowing from, but it's possible I missed serious problems. The flip side of that caution is that I'm delighted to see a fantasy author drawing on a non-European culture, and I thought the clash of cultures was very well-handled. The first caveat is that the story is very focused on good governance, but both the process and the details of that governance are not going to satisfy someone reading primarily for the politics. The policies and reforms are very standard 21st century progressive material that felt a bit out of place in a quasi-medieval world with magic and airships. Their implementation is not the point of the story, and is therefore heavily backgrounded, but that means Goddard barely mentions the inevitable practical implementation difficulties and does not discuss how they're overcome. The world structure also means that Goddard can make use of the favorite cheat of political reformers in fiction: Absolute monarchy lets you enact a political agenda without having to do the hard and frustrating work of persuasion or political (or actual) warfare. This objection is not entirely fair because we do get some memorable scenes of persuasion, but the political portion of the plot is unrealistically devoid of setbacks or resistance that goes beyond token arguments. Whether this will bother you will depend heavily on what parts of the book you'd rather focus on. I can see why this was such a popular pandemic read: The Hands of the Emperor is focused tightly on the joy of competent people fixing things and does not focus on the arguments, division, or polarization. The heart of the book is the friendship and characterization of some deeply admirable people, and the political reform is incidental background material. I suspect this is the right choice for readers who aren't political junkies, but I kept having the niggling objection that the politics felt a bit too pat and simplistic. Goddard stressed that the characters were investing considerable effort, but even still, it is not this easy to change the direction of a political system and idealistic plans usually do not work out this neatly. The second caveat is that, as previously mentioned, I thought the pacing was excellent for about three quarters of the book. Goddard is building towards a grand climax, and I think she built a little too much and tried to make the climax a bit too grand and risked over-egging the pudding. That made the payoff feel a bit belabored to me. I still enjoyed it, and parts of it are wonderfully emotional, but I think the ending might have been stronger if Goddard had dialed Cliopher back just a little and tightened up the climax a touch. That said, this book fully commits to being a sprawling slow burn and that's part of its appeal, so it's probably better for Goddard to err in that direction than it would have been to cut short the denouement. This is one of those books that I'm not sure would exist without self-publishing. It's a little too long, a little too political in the wrong ways, a little too devoid of the typical sorts of conflicts expected in a fantasy book, and too determined to be its own peculiar thing. I think it would scare off publishers. Unlike some self-published books, though, I didn't notice any obvious editing flaws or lack of polish. It's one of those glorious novels that is so very much its own type of story that it provides an experience that would be hard to replicate with another book. I was so deeply satisfied by this book. It's a wish-fulfillment political fantasy full of diligent restraint and competence porn, so you have to be in the mood for that. This is not the book to read when you're feeling cynical, or are in the mood for action and high drama. But if you're in the mood for a long, slow, open-hearted story of friendship that offers the fantasy of giving truly good people enough power to be effective, I highly recommend this one. Followed in the direct sequel sense by At the Feet of the Sun, but there is a very complex story progression in this world that I think I'd have to read all the other books to understand. This was such a satisfying and complete experience that I'm not in a hurry to figure out which Goddard book to read next, but I'm sure I'll be returning to this world at some point. Rating: 9 out of 10

23 August 2026

Wouter Verhelst: Programming and GR 2026 002

Programming language generations When I was young, I learned about a model of classifying programming language: the system of programming language generations. In this model, first generation programming languages are, basically, where you program the computer in the language that is defined by its architecture. On a Von Neumann machine, with its load-and-store architecture, you do that by inputting a string of numbers. The first programmer in human history -- her name was Ada Lovelace -- wrote in a first-generation language. 1GLs aren't so much invented as they are a byproduct of the computers for which they're created. Second-generation languages are the assembler languages. Because humans are not computers, and because decoding long lines of numbers to understand what the computer is doing, when programming became a full-time job, the programmers that did it decided that doing all this assembling manually is too complicated, so they quickly wrote assemblers to automate the process for them. They still could understand the 1GL output of the 2GL assembler, but most of them quickly forgot how to write software in a first-generation language. Not that anyone cared, as the translation from a 2GL to a 1GL is lossless and you can just revert it. Third-generation languages are higher-level languages. When the first 3GLs were invented (such as COBOL and, more famously, FORTRAN) in the late 1950s and early 1960s, it was believed by some that the work of programming a computer so accessible to non-programmers that the job of programmer would eventually cease to exist, and people would just ask the computer what they needed by entering COBOL instructions. This of course was ridiculous and incorrect, because converting algorithms to computer instructions, whether at the 2GL or 3GL level, is a specialized skill that some automation can perhaps make simpler but never completely take away the need for. At the time, some people also felt to some extent that using 3GL wasn't the same thing as actually programming 3GLs, but eventually the world moved on and embraced things. The invention of 3GL environments reduced, but did not completely take away, the need for people to understand 2GLs, as compiler and operating system authors still need to understand them, and some highly optimized code still continues to be written in 2GLs to this day. Fourth-generation languages abstract away some or all of the process of programming. For instance, a database-related 4GL will hide away the complexities of storing data in particular locations, how to fetch that data, how to index it such that you can fetch it efficiently, how to loop over the data to get you a summary of that data, and instead allows you to express the required information in an abstract way, expecing the computer to fill in the blanks. When SQL, an early 4GL, was invented, some people believed that the language made accessing databases so simple that the requirement to implement database applications would eventually cease to exist and we would just hand SQL prompts to users who need to access data. This of course was ridiculous and incorrect, because understanding data schemas and using that understanding to query data from a database is a specialized skill that perhaps a higher abstraction can help you make simpler, but that in the longer run it can never completely take away the need for. The invention of 4GLs also reduced, but did not completely take away, the need for people to understand how to do the things that the 4GLs automate for you manually, as the people who do write those things still need to understand them, and there are also environments where these particular 4GLs are rather not appropriate or just very slow. The first definition of programming language generations that I read about in the 1980s simply stated that fifth-generation languages did not yet exist, but that they would in the future, and that in those, you would "tell the computer what to do, and it would then do that". Now that we have a way of doing so, it could be said that by some definition, we now actually do have a number of 5GLs. The existence of these LLM systems has caused some, especially the people who build and exploit these systems, to exclaim that programming as we know it today is going to cease to exist, and everyone will just ask an LLM to generate a program, which will then do so. That is of course ridiculous and incorrect, as no automaton can generate software from nothing; input is still required for the model to be able to produce something that approaches usability, and being able to word that input in a correct and productive fashion will be a skill that future programmers can benefit from. I ran some experiments a while back, and from that concluded that, if we look only at the technical side, LLM use can, in some niches, increase productivity for a programmer. There are certainly things that you shouldn't use an LLM for, but equally there can be cases where use of an LLM to perform some task that traditionally would have been done by a programmer would be a net positive. But LLMs, as they exist today, are highly problematic. They require vast amounts of data to build the model. The companies that build these models are disrespectful of people who run web services, and as a result, everyone now has to implement various types of application firewalls just to not make systems fall over from the overwhelming requests for data. They are also disregarding the licenses that are attached to these vast amounts of data, which makes me, as a person who believes in the tenets of free software, sad. They require vast amounts of energy, causing an already-critical global warming crisis to, well, not improve. They require vast amounts of coolant to dissipate the energy concentrated in their data centers, causing further environmental effects. In this, they are problematic and to be avoided. But these are side states of the current state of affairs; I do not believe that they are inherently implied to be able to build and operate an LLM -- any LLM. I guess it's fair to say that my feelings towards LLM usage are complex and many-faceted. I haven't been involved in many debates about the subject, debates that to me seem to be mostly focused on "LLM good" vs "LLM bad" arguments that aren't as nuanced as the position that I would believe is more accurate. This is not because I don't care, but partially because I've been busy in my personal life recently and partially because the whole thing seems somewhat disheartening. But then Debian popped up GR 2026-002, meaning, I now have to come up with an opinion about various candidate statements in the context of the above, which is... not easy. But I did it anyway. There are 8 choices on the ballot, and they all have some truth and some falsehood to them. My position about LLMs can be summarized as:

The current state of affairs wrt LLMs is disastrous and we should not encourage them

However, there's no technical reason why this must remain true for all time

And so any statement should keep in mind what might happen in the future and that the current disastrousness of the whole thing isn't guaranteed to continue to exist for all eternity.

With that, let's go over them.

GR vote options

Proposal A Its summary, from the GR text:
This proposal aims to expressly forbid any contributions to Debian written with the use or assistance of large language models (LLMs) or other generative AI tools.
This falls squarely in the "LLM bad" camp, outlawing all generative-AI contributions, disregarding potential future ones where the problematic situations that exist today are not present. It makes a change to the social contract, which is especially difficult to reverse (on purpose), and which therefore also will require a 3:1 supermajority, but if we want to ban LLM-assisted contributions, this is probably the best way to do it.

Proposal B This one tries to allow AI-assisted contributions under certain conditions. It's mostly an "LLM good" proposal, with some caveats that can be discribed as "make sure you know what you're doing".

Proposal C This proposal is both a weaker (in some places) and stronger (in other places) version of Proposal A. It makes changes to the code of conduct instead of to the social contract, and it also wants to, at least, suggest policy to parties beyond the Debian project. By not changing the social contract, however, it is more likely to reach its simple majority requirement than proposal A. I don't think the language that it wants to add to the code of conduct is particularly well phrased, however.

Proposal D This is a weaker form of proposal B. The language is more compact and there are a few requirements that are spelled out in proposal B that are not spelled out in proposal D, but if you read between the lines you'll see that the requirement is still there really and I don't understand why proposals B and D were not merged into one.

Proposal E This proposal tries to hold a middle ground between "LLM good" and "LLM bad". It appreciates that things are quite muddled at the present time, and that perhaps the situation might might change in the future. It acknowledges that certain questions remain unanswered and that perhaps future considerations might therefore be different. But it essentially refuses to take a stance on whether LLMs should be accepted by the project or not.

Proposal F Similar to proposal E, this proposal tries to discourage Debian contributors from using LLMs, while still allowing people to use it should they want to, but with some requests and requirements to mark LLM-assisted contributions to account for those people who don't want to interact with LLM-generated software. As such, it is a proposal similar to proposal E that leans closer to the "LLM bad" camp.

Proposal G
This proposal aims to ensure that contributions directly to Debian are created by humans, while at the same time avoiding restrictions on the tools those humans may choose to use when contributing
Another "LLM bad" proposal, it however restricts the "bad" bits to only the direct output of the LLM. If you use an LLM to do something and then clean-room re-implement the same thing yourself, that's apparently fine.

Proposal H This proposal condemns the use of LLM for its environmental and moral problems, but explicitly not for its technical considerations. I feel that it is closest to my position as explained above.

Voting Expressing a vote on a ballot so convoluted and complicated like this one takes time. I have to read and understand every ballot option, and formulate an order of them. And I shouldn't just state which option has my preference; Debian's voting process allows a rich expression of opinion on ballot options. Anyway, I eventually ended up voting in a way that I think is consistent with my opinion. But it wasn't easy.

27 June 2026

Russ Allbery: Review: The Folded Sky

Review: The Folded Sky, by Elizabeth Bear

Series:	White Space #3
Publisher:	Saga Press
Copyright:	June 2025
ISBN:	1-6680-7812-0
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	483

The Folded Sky is a far-future space opera and a fairly direct sequel to Ancestral Night, but with a different protagonist. You do not need to have a vivid memory of the previous book to read this one. It is somewhere around Elizabeth Bear's 31st (!) novel, depending on how one counts and what one includes. Sunyata Song is an archinformist, which is sort of an archaeologist, sort of a librarian, and sort of a historian. She recovers, decodes, and organizes information so that it can be preserved and made usefully available. As the book opens, she is, after an exceedingly long white space journey in an actively hostile ship with a (to Sunya at least) an atavistically off-putting crew, reaching her goal: a vast artifact that I won't describe further to avoid any spoilers for Ancestral Night. She is eager to get to work, an eagerness that is both heightened and made more anxious by the discovery that her academic rival and abusive ex has arrived before her. The pirate attack doesn't help, nor (at least at first) does the surprise appearance of her wife and kids. The opening of this book is a lot of infodumping mixed with nearly stream-of-consciousness emotional dumping. The style shift in this series continues to surprise me; previously, Elizabeth Bear books avoided reader hand-holding to the point of bafflement if you weren't paying close attention. Not here. The Folded Sky takes the shift perhaps too far, and I almost stalled out at the start of this book when Sunya's near-constant self-conscious litany and analysis of fears and concerns started feeling like whining. The book picks up considerably after the attempted murder. About a third of the way through, The Folded Sky feels like it's settling into a recognizable subgenre of murder mystery except set in the far future with fascinating technology and aliens. There has been an attempted murder on a closed station besieged by pirates. There is a law enforcement officer present, but they don't have a lot of investigative experience. For various reasons, Sunya decides to start poking around while being conscious she has no idea what she's doing. The bumbling detective is a common trope, so I thought that was where the story was headed. It is, sort of. There is a mystery and Sunya is involved in solving it. But that's only a small fraction of what's going on, and by the end of the book the plot has shifted firmly back to the genre of space opera, with a side note of family... drama is the wrong word. Whatever one would call a story about raising a rebellious teenager while trying very hard to not turn conflicts into actual drama. I am fascinated by the characterization of this book. Sunya is something of an emotional mess, but Bear doesn't use that fact in the ways that I would normally expect. Similar to Ancestral Night, I finished this book thinking that The Folded Sky is primarily an examination of rightminding, but a more subtle one than the previous novel. Rightminding is a central technology of the White Space series, and I suspect its intended thematic core. Humans in this civilization are equipped with near-universal implants that allow conscious manipulation of one's neurotransmitters and thus emotional state, either by the wearer or by a helpful nearby AI. The fox, the implant used to accomplish this, comes with some other features such as sensory recordings and the ability to load ayatanas (James White style personality recordings to provide some bit of necessary expertise), but rightminding is its primary and most frequently-used function. It is the critical technology that allowed humans to break out of cycles of endless war and join the other peaceful inhabitants of the galaxy in a shared civilization. The name is (intentionally, I assume) Orwellian because Bear knows that many readers, particularly those from the US who have been steeped in simplistic libertarian ideas, will find the idea profoundly creepy. (This was a major plot point in Grail.) This book is not the argument for the technology, though; Bear dealt with that in Ancestral Night. This book is a look at its practical messiness for a person who needs a lot of psychological support. Sunya is anxious, prone to catastrophizing, hates surprises, has some PTSD-style symptoms around space habitats due to earlier trauma, and is also dealing with the unwelcome reappearance of her ex-girlfriend who stole her work. Her first-person narration tends towards insecurity and anxiety spirals, and in another book this might signal an unreliable narrator. In this book, though, there are no dramatic emotional revelations or backstory twists the way there were in Ancestral Night, and the resolution of her troubled relationship with her daughter only partly hinges on plot developments. Instead, Sunya muddles through, with a lot of self-analysis, help from her fox, and a great deal of support from her wife. This makes it sounds like the emotional mess at the start of the book is left unresolved at the end, but that's not true at all. The muddling through works! Sunya keeps doing things that I thought were foreshadowing some catastrophe, but she knows herself better than the reader does. Bear largely avoids the sudden ruptures that are normally used to resolve emotional problems in fiction. Instead, Sunya spends a lot of time and energy working on her thinking and her relationships while trying to be ethical and useful, and those efforts slowly bear fruit. I'm worried this makes the book sound boring; rest assured that it isn't. This emotional subplot is only an undercurrent in the novel, and the main plot has enough weird science, alien aliens, and space opera drama to satisfy my page-turning desires. I'm focusing on the emotional arc in this review because I find it so unusual and so oddly compelling, particularly in retrospect. This is not how one normally does emotional development in a novel. Sunya's fox and rightminding aren't even the focus except when the pirates express their typical libertarian disgust for the idea. Rightminding is an entirely normal part of Sunya's life that she relies on. It doesn't solve all of her problems, but it gives her a foundation from which to tackle them in the slow and frustrating and inconsistent way that is required outside of novels, via a long series of small decisions to be the person she wants to be. I think The Folded Sky will be more hit and miss for readers than the other books of this series. Sunya was, for me at least, a much harder character to like early in the book, and it takes quite a while for the plot to get going. But this is one of those books that I've not stopped thinking about since I finished it. I think it makes a fascinating pair with Ancestral Night. The first book makes the philosophical argument for rightminding, and this book shows the practical reality with all of its messiness. The Synarche has some significant flaws (including the status of AIs, which is another interesting subplot), but it's a workable system. It feels rare to read a science fiction novel that shows this level of messiness without pairing it with an argument for radical change, and as frustrating as it was to read in places, I am intrigued by the overall effect. Sometimes acknowledging problems and working on them within an existing framework works. Followed by a book tentatively titled Shipwreck Star that does not yet have a release date. Rating: 7 out of 10

12 March 2026

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in February 2026

Welcome to the February 2026 report from the Reproducible Builds project! These reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, highlighting items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. As ever, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please see the Contribute page on our website.

reproduce.debian.net The last year has seen the introduction, development and deployment of reproduce.debian.net. In technical terms, this is an instance of rebuilderd, our server designed monitor the official package repositories of Linux distributions and attempt to reproduce the observed results there. This month, however, Holger Levsen added suite-based navigation (eg. Debian trixie vs forky) to the service (in addition to the already existing architecture based navigation) which can be observed on, for instance, the Debian trixie-backports or trixie-security pages.

Tool development diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made a number of changes, including preparing and uploading versions, `312` and `313` to Debian. In particular, Chris updated the post-release deployment pipeline to ensure that the pipeline does not fail if the automatic deployment to PyPI fails [ ]. In addition, Vagrant Cascadian updated an external reference for the `7z` tool for GNU Guix. [ ]. Vagrant Cascadian also updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version `312` and `313`.

Distribution work In Debian this month:

26 reviews of Debian packages were added, 5 were updated and 19 were removed this month adding to our extensive knowledge about identified issues.

A new debsbom package was uploaded to unstable. According to the package description, this package generates SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials) for distributions based on Debian in the two standard formats, SPDX and CycloneDX. The generated SBOM includes all installed binary packages and also contains Debian Source packages.

In addition, a `sbom-toolkit` package was uploaded, which provides a collection of scripts for generating SBOM. This is the tooling used in Apertis to generate the Licenses SBOM and the Build Dependency SBOM. It also includes `dh-setup-copyright`, a Debhelper addon to generate SBOMs from DWARF debug information, which are extracted from DWARF debug information by running `dwarf2sources` on every ELF binaries in the package and saving the output.

Lastly, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another openSUSE monthly update for their work there.

Miscellaneous news

S ren Tempel (nmeum) wrote up their insightful notes on Debugging Reproducibility Issues in Rust Software after nondeterministic issues were found and investigated for `pimsync` in the GNU Guix review process

Jeremy Bicha reported a bug in GNOME Clocks after they noticed that version `50.beta` regressed in reproducibility compared to `49.0`. Specifically, the new generated `.oga` files differ in their `Serial No.` and `Checksum` [fields] . However, Jeremy ended up fixing the issue by replacing `ffmpeg` with `oggenc`.

kpcyrd shared some information from the `archlinux-dev-public` mailing list on our mailing list this month after a discussion at our latest Summit meeting on the topic of Link-Time Optimisation (LTO) specifically on the reasons why LTO often needs to be disabled in relation to Arch Linux s approach to binary hardening.

Janneke Nieuwenhuizen posed a question to our list about whether there might be situations where using the UNIX epoch itself (i.e. `0`) may materially differ from using `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`) when a situation demands the use of a fixed timestamp.

Laurent Huberdeau announced that they had recently finished their masters thesis arguing for the use of POSIX shell for diverse double-compilation and reproducible builds . Laurent also presents `pnut`, a C compiler capable of bootstrapping itself and TCC from any POSIX-compliant shell and human-readable source files.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Bernhard M. Wiedemann:

`aiohttp`

`lima`

`meson`

`obs-studio`

`paracon`

`pyshark`

`python-flake8-comprehensions`

`server`

`vlang`

Gioele Barabucci:

#1127641 filed against `bitsnpicas`.

#1127643 filed against `fonts-topaz-unicode`.

#1128901 filed against `bitsnpicas`.

Documentation updates Once again, there were a number of improvements made to our website this month including:

Aman Sharma added a Java reproducible builds paper to the Academic publications page. [ ]

Chris Lamb added a reference to the `repro-build` to the Tools page. [ ]

Michiel Hendriks corrected an issue on the JVM page in relation to `.properties` files. [ ]

kpcyrd added Homebrew to the Who is involved page. [ ][ ]

Four new academic papers Julien Malka and Arnout Engelen published a paper titled Lila: Decentralized Build Reproducibility Monitoring for the Functional Package Management Model:
[While] recent studies have shown that high reproducibility rates are achievable at scale demonstrated by the Nix ecosystem achieving over 90% reproducibility on more than 80,000 packages the problem of effective reproducibility monitoring remains largely unsolved. In this work, we address the reproducibility monitoring challenge by introducing Lila, a decentralized system for reproducibility assessment tailored to the functional package management model. Lila enables distributed reporting of build results and aggregation into a reproducibility database [ ].
A PDF of their paper is available online.
Javier Ron and Martin Monperrus of KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, also published a paper, titled Verifiable Provenance of Software Artifacts with Zero-Knowledge Compilation:
Verifying that a compiled binary originates from its claimed source code is a fundamental security requirement, called source code provenance. Achieving verifiable source code provenance in practice remains challenging. The most popular technique, called reproducible builds, requires difficult matching and reexecution of build toolchains and environments. We propose a novel approach to verifiable provenance based on compiling software with zero-knowledge virtual machines (zkVMs). By executing a compiler within a zkVM, our system produces both the compiled output and a cryptographic proof attesting that the compilation was performed on the claimed source code with the claimed compiler. [ ]
A PDF of the paper is available online.
Oreofe Solarin of Department of Computer and Data Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, published It s Not Just Timestamps: A Study on Docker Reproducibility:
Reproducible container builds promise a simple integrity check for software supply chains: rebuild an image from its Dockerfile and compare hashes. We built a Docker measurement pipeline and apply it to a stratified sample of 2,000 GitHub repositories that contained a Dockerfile. We found that only 56% produce any buildable image, and just 2.7% of those are bitwise reproducible without any infrastructure configurations. After modifying infrastructure configurations, we raise bitwise reproducibility by 18.6%, but 78.7% of buildable Dockerfiles remain non-reproducible.
A PDF of Oreofe s paper is available online.
Lastly, Jens Dietrich and Behnaz Hassanshahi published On the Variability of Source Code in Maven Package Rebuilds:
[In] this paper we test the assumption that the same source code is being used [by] alternative builds. To study this, we compare the sources released with packages on Maven Central, with the sources associated with independently built packages from Google s Assured Open Source and Oracle s Build-from-Source projects. [ ]
A PDF of their paper is available online.

Finally, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

IRC: `#reproducible-builds` on `irc.oftc.net`.

Mastodon: @reproducible_builds@fosstodon.org

Mailing list: `rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org`

3 January 2026

Russ Allbery: Review: Challenges of the Deeps

Review: Challenges of the Deeps, by Ryk E. Spoor

Series:	Arenaverse #3
Publisher:	Baen
Copyright:	March 2017
ISBN:	1-62579-564-5
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	438

Challenges of the Deeps is the third book in the throwback space opera Arenaverse series. It is a direct sequel to Spheres of Influence, but Spoor provides a substantial recap of the previous volumes for those who did not read the series in close succession (thank you!). Ariane has stabilized humanity's position in the Arena with yet another improbable victory. (If this is a spoiler for previous volumes, so was telling you the genre of the book.) Now is a good opportunity to fulfill the promise humanity made to their ally Orphan: accompaniment on a journey into the uncharted deeps of the Arena for reasons that Orphan refuses to explain in advance. Her experienced crew provide multiple options to serve as acting Leader of Humanity until she gets back. What can go wrong? The conceit of this series is that as soon as a species achieves warp drive technology, their ships are instead transported into the vast extradimensional structure of the Arena where a godlike entity controls the laws of nature and enforces a formal conflict resolution process that looks alternatingly like a sporting event, a dueling code, and technology-capped total war. Each inhabitable system in the real universe seems to correspond to an Arena sphere, but the space between them is breathable atmosphere filled with often-massive storms. In other words, this is an airship adventure as written by E.E. "Doc" Smith. Sort of. There is an adventure, and there are a lot of airships (although they fight mostly like spaceships), but much of the action involves tense mental and physical sparring with a previously unknown Arena power with unclear motives. My general experience with this series is that I find the Arena concept fascinating and want to read more about it, Spoor finds his much-less-original Hyperion Project in the backstory of the characters more fascinating and wants to write about that, and we reach a sort of indirect, grumbling (on my part) truce where I eagerly wait for more revelations about the Arena and roll my eyes at the Hyperion stuff. Talking about Hyperion in detail is probably a spoiler for at least the first book, but I will say that it's an excuse to embed versions of literary characters into the story and works about as well as most such excuses (not very). The characters in question are an E.E. "Doc" Smith mash-up, a Monkey King mash-up, and a number of other characters that are obviously references to something but for whom I lack enough hints to place (which is frustrating). Thankfully we get far less human politics and a decent amount of Arena world-building in this installment. Hyperion plays a role, but mostly as foreshadowing for the next volume and the cause of a surprising interaction with Arena rules. One of the interesting wrinkles of this series is that humanity have an odd edge against the other civilizations in part because we're borderline insane sociopaths from the perspective of the established powers. That's an old science fiction trope, but I prefer it to the Campbell-style belief in inherent human superiority. Old science fiction tropes are what you need to be in the mood for to enjoy this series. This is an unapologetic and intentional throwback to early pulp: individuals who can be trusted with the entire future of humanity because they're just that moral, super-science, psychic warfare, and even coruscating beams that would make E.E. "Doc" Smith proud. It's an occasionally glorious but mostly silly pile of technobabble, but Spoor takes advantage of the weird, constructed nature of the Arena to provide more complex rules than competitive superlatives. The trick is that while this is certainly science fiction pulp, it's also a sort of isekai novel. There's a lot of anime and manga influence just beneath the surface. I'm not sure why it never occurred to me before reading this series that melodramatic anime and old SF pulps have substantial aesthetic overlap, but of course they do. I loved the Star Blazers translated anime that I watched as a kid precisely because it had the sort of dramatic set pieces that make the Lensman novels so much fun. There is a bit too much Wu Kong in this book for me (although the character is growing on me a little), and some of the maneuvering around the mysterious new Arena actor drags on longer than was ideal, but the climax is great stuff if you're in the mood for dramatic pulp adventure. The politics do not bear close examination and the writing is serviceable at best, but something about this series is just fun. I liked this book much better than Spheres of Influence, although I wish Spoor would stop being so coy about the nature of the Arena and give us more substantial revelations. I'm also now tempted to re-read Lensman, which is probably a horrible idea. (Spoor leaves the sexism out of his modern pulp.) If you got through Spheres of Influence with your curiosity about the Arena intact, consider this one when you're in the mood for modern pulp, although don't expect any huge revelations. It's not the best-written book, but it sits squarely in the center of a genre and mood that's otherwise a bit hard to find. Followed by the Kickstarter-funded Shadows of Hyperion, which sadly looks like it's going to concentrate on the Hyperion Project again. I will probably pick that up... eventually. Rating: 6 out of 10

30 November 2025

Russ Allbery: Review: The Last Soul Among Wolves

Review: The Last Soul Among Wolves, by Melissa Caruso

Series:	The Echo Archives #2
Publisher:	Orbit
Copyright:	August 2025
ISBN:	0-316-30404-2
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	355

The Last Soul Among Wolves is urban high fantasy with strong mystery vibes. It is a direct sequel to The Last Hour Between Worlds. You need the previous book for some character setup (and this book would spoil it badly), but you don't have to remember the first book in detail. Only the main plot outcomes are directly relevant and the characters will remind you of those. Kembrel Thorne is a Hound, the equivalent of a police detective in the medieval-inspired city setting of this series, but this book does not open with an official assignment. Instead, she has been dragged by her childhood friend Jaycel Morningrey as company for a reading of the will of old lady Lovegrace, reclusive owner of a gothic mansion on an island connected to the city by an intermittent sandbar. A surprise reunion with her gang of childhood friends ensues, followed by the revelation that they are all in serious trouble. Shortly after Kem left the group to become a Hound, the remaining four, plus several other apparently random people, got entangled with a powerful Echo artifact. Now that Lovegrace has died, one of them will inherit the artifact and the ability to make a wish, but only one. The rest will be killed at decreasing intervals until only the winner is left alive. The Last Hour Between Worlds was fae fantasy built around a problem that was more of a puzzle than a mystery. The Last Soul Among Wolves is closer to a classic mystery: A cast of characters are brought together and semi-isolated in a rural house, they start dying, and it's up to the detective to solve the mystery of their death before it's too late. In this case, the initial mechanism of death is supernatural and not in doubt the challenge instead is how to stop it from happening again but Kem's problems quickly become more complicated. As mystery plots go, this is more thriller than classical despite the setting. There are a few scenes of analyzing clues, but Kem is more likely to use the time-honored protagonist technique of throwing herself into danger and learning what's going on via the villain monologues. As readers of the previous book would expect, Rika Nonesuch is here too, hired by another of Kem's old friends, and the two navigate their personal feelings and the rivalry between their guilds in much the way that they did in the Last Hour Between Worlds. As in the first book, there is a sapphic romance subplot, but it's a very slow burn asexual romance. The best part of this series continues to be the world-building. The previous book introduced the idea of the Echoes and sent the characters exploring into stranger and stranger depths. This book fleshes out the rules in more detail, creating something that feels partly like a fae realm and partly like high fantasy involving gods, but diverges from both into a logic of its own. The ending satisfyingly passes my test of fantasy mysteries: Resolving the mystery requires understanding and applying the rules of the setting, which are sufficiently strange to create interesting outcomes but coherent enough that the reader doesn't feel like the author is cheating. There are some hissable villains here, but my favorite part of this book was the way Caruso added a lot of nuance and poignancy to the Echoes rather than showing them only as an uncanny threat. That choice made the world feel deeper and richer. It's not yet clear whether that element is setup for a longer-term series plot, but I hope Caruso will develop the story in that direction. It felt to me like Caruso is aiming for an ongoing series rather than a multi-volume story with a definite ending. She avoids a full episodic reset Rika, in particular, gets considerable character development and new complications that bode well for future volumes but it doesn't feel like the series is building towards an imminent climax. This is not a complaint. I enjoy these characters and this world and will happily keep devouring each new series entry. If you liked The Last Hour Between Worlds, I think you will like this. It doesn't have the same delight of initial discovery of the great world-building, but the plot is satisfying and a bit more complex and the supporting characters are even better than those in the first book. Once again, Caruso kept me turning the pages, and I'm now looking forward to a third volume. Recommended. The third book in the series has not yet been announced, but there are indications on social media that it is coming. Rating: 7 out of 10

27 November 2025

Russ Allbery: Review: A Matter of Execution

Review: A Matter of Execution, by Nicholas & Olivia Atwater

Series:	Tales of the Iron Rose #0
Publisher:	Starwatch Press
Copyright:	2024
ISBN:	1-998257-08-8
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	131

A Matter of Execution is the introductory novella that kicked off the Tales of the Iron Rose series. It is steampunk fantasy with airships. I previously read and reviewed the subsequent novel, Echoes of the Imperium. As noted in that review, I read the novel first. That was a mistake; this is a much better place to start. A Matter of Execution was clearly intended as the introduction of all of these characters. More importantly, I think reading the novella first would have given me enough affinity with the characters to not mind the worst part of Echoes of the Imperium: the extremely slow first half that seemed filled with the protagonist's impostor syndrome. A Matter of Execution opens, fittingly, with Captain William Blair, a goblin, former Imperial soldier, Oathbreaker, and series first-person protagonist being carted to his execution. He is not alone; in the same prison wagon is an arrogant (and racist) man named Strahl, the killer of one of the rulers of Lyonesse. Strahl is rather contemptuous of Blair's claim to be a captain, given that he's both a goblin and an Oathbreaker. Strahl quickly revises that opinion when Blair's crew, somewhat predictably given that he is the series protagonist, creates a daring escape for both of them. The heat of action gives both a chance to gain some respect for the other, which explains why Blair is not only willing to invite Strahl to join his crew, but to go back for Strahl's companion. Breaking out Strahl's companion will be a more difficult, and surprising, problem. Nicholas Atwater is a role-playing game GM, something that you will learn in the "about the author" section at the end of this novella but probably will have guessed by then. Even more than Echoes of the Imperium, this novella feels like a (good) write-up of an RPG adventure. A wildly varied cast of characters come together and form a party with a well-defined objective that has some surrounding mysteries and surprises. Each of those characters get their individual moments to show off their specific skills. Readers with a certain gaming background will know exactly where to insert the Borderlands-style title card with a slightly demented description of each character. This is not a complaint. You may be able to see the bones of the setup adventure for a long-running campaign, but I like this style of character introduction and the story moves right along. There are a ton of varied characters, some interesting villains and maybe-villains, a rather satisfying heist setup, and some good chemistry and a bit of banter. This is not a deep story it's clearly an introductory episode for both the characters and the world background but it's a fun way to spend a few hours. I think the best part of this series is the world-building. If you have read my review of Echoes of the Imperium, you have unfortunately been mildly spoiled for the revelation in this novella. I don't think it hurt the story that much; you will be able to predict what obvious gaps in the novel backstory the novella is going to fill in, but it's just as enjoyable to see how that happens. But the Atwaters aren't going to drop any of the big world-building bombs in the introductory novella, of course. Instead, you get a gradual introduction to the nature of magic in this world, some of the political setup of the recent war, and a quick introduction to the capabilities of Strahl's mysterious companion. If you've not yet read this series, I recommend starting here. It's a quick investment to see if you'll be interested. The novel is heavier and slower, and the pacing of the first half isn't great, but the world-building is even better. If you've already read the novel, this is still worth reading as long as you enjoyed it. You'll have a few moments of "oh, that's how that happened," and it's a fun and fast-moving way to spend a bit more time with the characters. Followed by Echoes of the Imperium. The back matter of the novella says that The Winds of Fortune is supposedly forthcoming. Rating: 7 out of 10

13 November 2025

Freexian Collaborators: Debian Contributions: Upstreaming cPython patches, ansible-core autopkgtest robustness and more! (by Anupa Ann Joseph)

Debian Contributions: 2025-10 Contributing to Debian is part of Freexian s mission. This article covers the latest achievements of Freexian and their collaborators. All of this is made possible by organizations subscribing to our Long Term Support contracts and consulting services.

Upstreaming cPython patches, by Stefano Rivera Python 3.14.0 (final) released in early October, and Stefano uploaded it to Debian unstable. The transition to support 3.14 has begun in Ubuntu, but hasn t started in Debian, yet. While build failures in Debian s non-release ports are typically not a concern for package maintainers, Python is fairly low in the stack. If a new minor version has never successfully been built for a Debian port by the time we start supporting it, it will quickly become a problem for the port. Python 3.14 had been failing to build on two Debian ports architectures (hppa and m68k), but thankfully their porters provided patches. These were applied and uploaded, and Stefano forwarded the hppa one upstream. Getting it into shape for upstream approval took some work, and shook out several other regressions for the Python hppa port. Debugging these on slow hardware takes a while. These two ports aren t successfully autobuilding 3.14 yet (they re both timing out in tests), but they re at least manually buildable, which unblocks the ports. Docutils 0.22 also landed in Debian around this time, and Python needed some work to build its docs with it. The upstream isn t quite comfortable with distros using newer docutils, so there isn t a clear path forward for these patches, yet. The start of the Python 3.15 cycle was also a good time to renew submission attempts on our other outstanding python patches, most importantly multiarch tuples for stable ABI extension filenames.

ansible-core autopkgtest robustness, by Colin Watson The ansible-core package runs its integration tests via `autopkgtest`. For some time, we ve seen occasional failures in the `expect`, `pip`, and `template_jinja2_non_native` tests that usually go away before anyone has a chance to look into them properly. Colin found that these were blocking an openssh upgrade and so decided to track them down. It turns out that these failures happened exactly when the `libpython3.13-stdlib` package had different versions in testing and unstable. A setup script removed `/usr/lib/python3*/EXTERNALLY-MANAGED` in order that `pip` can install system packages for some of the tests, but if a package shipping that file were ever upgraded then that customization would be undone, and the same setup script removed apt pins in a way that caused problems when `autopkgtest` was invoked in certain ways. In combination with this, one of the integration tests attempted to disable system apt sources while testing the behaviour of the `ansible.builtin.apt` module, but it failed to do so comprehensively enough and so that integration test accidentally upgraded the testbed from testing to unstable in the middle of the test. Chaos ensued. Colin fixed this in Debian and contributed the relevant part upstream.

Miscellaneous contributions

Carles kept working on the missing-relations (packages which Recommends or Suggests packages that are not available in Debian). He improved the tooling to detect Suggested packages that are not available in Debian because they were removed (or changed names).

Carles improved po-debconf-manager to send translations for packages that are not in Salsa. He also improved the UI of the tool (using rich for some of the output).

Carles, using po-debconf-manager, reviewed and submitted 38 debconf template translations.

Carles created a merge request for distro-tracker to align text and input-field (postponed until distro-tracker uses Bootstrap 5).

Rapha l updated `gnome-shell-extension-hamster` for GNOME 49. It is a GNOME Shell integration for the Hamster time tracker.

Rapha l merged a couple of trivial merge requests, but he did not yet find the time to properly review and test the bootstrap 5 related merge requests that are still waiting on salsa.

Helmut sent patches for 20 cross build failures.

Helmut refactored `debvm` dropping support for running on bookworm . There are two trixie features improving the operation. `mkfs.ext4` can now consume a tar archive to populate the filesystem via `libarchive` and `dash` now supports `set -o pipefail`. Beyond this change in operation, a number of robustness and quality issues have been resolved.

Thorsten fixed some bugs in the printing software and uploaded improved versions of `brlaser` and `ifhp`. Moreover he uploaded a new upstream version of `cups`.

Emilio updated `xorg-server` to the latest security release and helped with various transitions.

Santiago worked on and reviewed different Salsa CI MR to address some regressions introduced by the move to sbuild+unshare. Those MR included stop adding the salsa-ci user in the build image to the sbuild group, fix the suffix path used by mmdebstrap to create the chroot and update the documentation about how to use aptly repos in another project.

Santiago supported the work on the DebConf 26 organisation, particularly helping with an implemented method to count the votes to choose the conference logo.

Stefano reviewed Python PEP-725 and PEP-804, which hope to provide a mechanism to declare external (e.g. APT) dependencies in Python packages. Stefano engaged in discussion and provided feedback to the authors.

Stefano prepared for Berkeley DB removal in Python.

Stefano ported the backend to `reverse-depends` to Python 3 (yes, it had been running on 2.7) and migrated it to git from bzr.

Stefano updated miscellaneous packages, including `beautifulsoup4`, `mkdocs-macros-plugin`, `python-pipx`.

Stefano applied an upstream patch to `pypy3`, fixing an AST Compiler Assertion error.

Stefano uploaded an update to `distro-info-data`, including data for two additional Debian derivatives: eLxr and Devuan.

Stefano prepared an update to `dh-python`, the python packaging tool, merging several contributed patches and resolving some bugs.

Colin upgraded OpenSSH to 10.1p1, helped upstream to chase down some regressions, and further upgraded to 10.2p1. This is also now in trixie-backports.

Colin fixed several build regressions with Python 3.14, scikit-learn 1.7, and other transitions.

Colin investigated a malware report against tini, making use of reproducible builds to help demonstrate that this is highly likely to be a false positive.

Anupa prepared questions and collected interview responses from women contributors in Debian to publish the post as part of Ada Lovelace day 2025.

31 October 2025

Russell Coker: Links October 2025

Informative video about the way corporations charge different rates based on location and even type of device used on the web site [1]. This should be illegal everywhere! Bruce Schneier with Heather Adkins and Gadi Evron wrote an insightful post about AI Hacking and the Future of Cybersecurity, the future seems grim [2]. Slaughterbots is an interesting Dust SciFi movie exploring the future of autonoms weapons [3]. Arstechnica has an intersting article on a genetically engineered plant with a more efficient system for photosynthesis [4]. If this goes to plan it could revolutionise agriculture! David Brin wrote an insightful blog post about the Seldon Paradox [5]. Also he wrote the final book in the Foundation series so he is the current living export on Hari Seldon. Charles Stross wrote an insightful blog post about the pivot away from fossil fuels and the future of computers without Moore s Law [6]. Audrey Woods wrote an insightful article about the end of Moore s Law, we can get more transistors from multichip modules bit it s only small linear improvements not exponential [7]. Bruce Schneier and Barath Raghavan wrote an interesting article about AI s OODA loop problem, it s a good way of thinking about some of these issues [8]. I think that LLM security is a losing game. Getting them to mostly not tell people how to commit crimes is the limit of controls. Manga telling the story of Revelations in all it s drug inspired madness [9]. When I read the entire Bible I skipped Revelations because it s too obviously the product of mental illness. CNN has an interesting article about bitcoin ARMs which are almost exclusively used for crime [10].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PL1d0xiHRhg
[2] https://tinyurl.com/242xna4c
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-2tpwW0kmU
[4] https://tinyurl.com/2yyj3tgz
[5] https://tinyurl.com/2ytuvkfp
[6] https://tinyurl.com/2b2a98kr
[7] https://tinyurl.com/2a6csfk9
[8] https://tinyurl.com/2y7zk5zz
[9] https://www.electricsheepcomix.com/apocamon/
[10] https://tinyurl.com/27ge7gcf

28 October 2025

Russ Allbery: Review: Those Who Wait

Review: Those Who Wait, by Haley Cass

Publisher:	Haley Cass
Copyright:	2020
ISBN:	979-8-9884929-1-7
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	556

Those Who Wait is a stand-alone self-published sapphic romance novel. Given the lack of connection between political figures named in this book and our reality, it's also technically an alternate history, but it will be entirely unsatisfying to anyone who reads it in that genre. Sutton Spencer is an English grad student in New York City. As the story opens, she has recently realized that she's bisexual rather than straight. She certainly has not done anything about that revelation; the very thought makes her blush. Her friend and roommate Regan, not known for either her patience or her impulse control, decides to force the issue by stealing Sutton's phone, creating a profile on a lesbian dating app, and messaging the first woman Sutton admits being attracted to. Charlotte Thompson is a highly ambitious politician, current deputy mayor of New York City for health and human services, and granddaughter of the first female president of the United States. She fully intends to become president of the United States herself. The next step on that path is an open special election for a seat in the House of Representatives. With her family political connections and the firm support of the mayor of New York City (who is also dating her brother), she thinks she has an excellent shot of winning. Charlotte is also a lesbian, something she's known since she was a teenager and which still poses serious problems for a political career. She is therefore out to her family and a few close friends, but otherwise in the closet. Compared to her political ambitions, Charlotte considers her love life almost irrelevant, and therefore has a strict policy of limiting herself to anonymous one-night stands arranged on dating apps. Even that is about to become impossible given her upcoming campaign, but she indulges in one last glance at SapphicSpark before she deletes her account. Sutton is as far as possible from the sort of person who does one-night stands, which is a shame as far as Charlotte is concerned. It would have been a fun last night out. Despite that, both of them find the other unexpectedly enjoyable to chat with. (There are a lot of text message bubbles in this book.) This is when Sutton has her brilliant idea: Charlotte is charming, experienced, and also kind and understanding of Sutton's anxiety, at least in app messages. Maybe Charlotte can be her mentor? Tell her how to approach women, give her some guidance, point her in the right directions. Given the genre, you can guess how this (eventually) turns out. I'm going to say a lot of good things about this book, so let me get the complaints over with first. As you might guess from that introduction, Charlotte's political career and the danger of being outed are central to this story. This is a bit unfortunate because you should not, under any circumstances, attempt to think deeply about the politics in this book. In 550 pages, Charlotte does not mention or expound a single meaningful political position. You come away from this book as ignorant about what Charlotte wants to accomplish as a politician as you entered. Apparently she wants to be president because her grandmother was president and she thinks she'd be good at it. The closest the story comes to a position is something unbelievably vague about homeless services and Charlotte's internal assertion that she wants to help people and make real change. There are even transcripts of media interviews, later in the book, and they somehow manage to be more vacuous than US political talk shows, which is saying something. I also can't remember a single mention of fundraising anywhere in this book, which in US politics is absurd (although I will be generous and say this is due to Cass's alternate history). I assume this was a deliberate choice and Cass didn't want politics to distract from the romance, but as someone with a lot of opinions about concrete political issues, the resulting vague soft-liberal squishiness was actively off-putting. In an actual politician, this would be an entire clothesline of red flags. Thankfully, it's ignorable for the same reason; this is so obviously not the focus of the book that one can mostly perform the same sort of mental trick that one does when ignoring the backdrop in a cheap theater. My second complaint is that I don't know what Sutton does outside of the romance. Yes, she's an English grad student, and she does some grading and some vaguely-described work and is later referred to a prestigious internship, but this is as devoid of detail as Charlotte's political positions. It's not quite as jarring because Cass does eventually show Sutton helping concretely with her mother's work (about which I have some other issues that I won't get into), but it deprives Sutton of an opportunity to be visibly expert in something. The romance setup casts Charlotte as the experienced one to Sutton's naivete, and I think it would have been a better balance to give Sutton something concrete and tangible that she was clearly better at than Charlotte. Those complaints aside, I quite enjoyed this. It was a recommendation from the same BookTuber who recommended Delilah Green Doesn't Care, so her recommendations are quickly accumulating more weight. The chemistry between Sutton and Charlotte is quite believable; the dialogue sparkles, the descriptions of the subtle cues they pick up from each other are excellent, and it's just fun to read about how they navigate a whole lot of small (and sometimes large) misunderstandings and mismatches in personality and world view. Normally, misunderstandings are my least favorite part of a romance novel, but Sutton and Charlotte come from such different perspectives that their misunderstandings feel more justified than is typical. The characters are also fairly mature about working through them: Main characters who track the other character down and insist on talking when something happens they don't understand! Can you imagine! Only with the third-act breakup is the reader dragged through multiple chapters of both characters being miserable, and while I also usually hate third-act breakups, this one is so obviously coming and so clearly advertised from the initial setup that I couldn't really be mad. I did wish the payoff make-up scene at the end of the book had a bit more oomph, though; I thought Sutton's side of it didn't have quite the emotional catharsis that it could have had. I particularly enjoyed the reasons why the two characters fall in love, and how different they are. Charlotte is delighted by Sutton because she's awkward and shy but also straightforward and frequently surprisingly blunt, which fits perfectly with how much Charlotte is otherwise living in a world of polished politicians in constant control of their personas. Sutton's perspective is more physical, but the part I liked was the way that she treats Charlotte like a puzzle. Rather than trying to change how Charlotte expresses herself, she instead discovers that she's remarkably good at reading Charlotte if she trusts her instincts. There was something about Sutton's growing perceptiveness that I found quietly delightful. It's the sort of non-sexual intimacy that often gets lost among the big emotions in romance novels. The supporting cast was also great. Both characters have deep support networks of friends and family who are unambiguously on their side. Regan is pure chaos, and I would not be friends with her, but Cass shows her deep loyalty in a way that makes her dynamic with Sutton make sense. Both characters have thoughtful and loving families who support them but don't make decisions for them, which is a nice change of pace from the usually more mixed family situations of romance novel protagonists. There's a lot of emotional turbulence in the main relationship, and I think that only worked for me because of how rock-solid and kind the supporting cast is. This is, as you might guess from the title, a very slow burn, although the slow burn is for the emotional relationship rather than the physical one (for reasons that would be spoilers). As usual, I have no calibration for spiciness level, but I'd say that this was roughly on par with the later books in the Bright Falls series. If you know something about politics (or political history) and try to take that part of this book seriously, it will drive you to drink, but if you can put that aside and can deal with misunderstandings and emotional turmoil, this was both fun and satisfying. I liked both of the characters, I liked the timing of the alternating viewpoints, and I believed in the relationship and chemistry, as improbable and chaotic as some of the setup was. It's not the greatest thing I ever read, and I wish the ending was a smidgen stronger, but it was an enjoyable way to spend a few reading days. Recommended. Rating: 7 out of 10

21 October 2025

Emmanuel Kasper: How configuration is passed from the BinderHub helm chart to a running BinderHub

Context: At $WORK I am doing a lot of datascience work around Jupyter Notebooks and their ecosystem. Right now I am setting BinderHub, which is a service to start a Jupyter Notebook from a git repo in your browser. For setting up BinderHub I am using the BinderHub helm chart, and I was wondering how configuration changes are propagated from the BinderHub helm chart to the process running in a Kubernetes Pod. After going through this I can say I am not right now a great fan of Helm, as it looks to me like an unnecessary, overengineered abstraction layer on top of Kubernetes manifests. Or maybe it is just that I don t want to learn the golang templating synthax. I am looking forward to testing Kustomize as an alternative, but I havn t had the chance yet. Starting from the list of config parameters available: Although many parameters are mentioned in the installer document, you have to go to the developer doc at https://binderhub.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/ref-index.html to get a whole overview. In my case I want to set the hostname parameter for the Gitlab Repoprovider. This is the relevelant snippet in the developer doc:

hostname c.GitLabRepoProvider.hostname = Unicode('gitlab.com')
    The host of the GitLab instance

The string c.GitLabRepoProvider.hostname here means, that the value of the hostname parameter will be loaded at the path config.GitLabRepoProvider inside a configuration file. Using the yaml synthax this means the configuration file should contain a snippet like:

config:
  GitlabRepoProvider
    hostname: my-domain.com

Digging through Kubernetes constructs: Helm values files When installing BinderHub using the provided helm chart, we can either put the configuration snippet in the config.yaml or secret.yaml helm values files. In my case I have put the snippet in config.yaml, since the hostname is not a secret thing, I can verify with yq that it correctly set:

$ yq --raw-output '.config.GitLabRepoProvider.hostname' config.yaml
my-domain.com

How do we make sure this parameter is properly applied to our running binder processes ? As said previouly this parameter is passed as a value file to helm ( value or -f option) in the command:

$ helm upgrade \                                                                                  
    binderhub \                                                                                     
    jupyterhub/binderhub \                                                                          
    --install \                                                                                     
    --version=$(RELEASE) \                                                                          
    --create-namespace \                                                                            
    --namespace=binderhub \                                                                         
    --values secret.yaml \                                                                                
    --values config.yaml \                                                                                
    --debug

According to the helm documentation in https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_install/ the values file are concatenated to form a single object, and priority will be given to the last (right-most) file specified. For example, if both myvalues.yaml and override.yaml contained a key called Test , the value set in override.yaml would take precedence:

$ helm install --values myvalues.yaml --values override.yaml  myredis ./redis

Digging through Kubernetes constructs: Secrets and Volumes When helm upgrade is run the helm values of type config are stashed in a Kubernetes secret binder-secret: https://github.com/jupyterhub/binderhub/blob/main/helm-chart/binderhub/templates/secret.yaml#L12

stringData:
   - /*
    Stash away relevant Helm template values for
    the BinderHub Python application to read from
    in binderhub_config.py.
  */ 
  values.yaml:  
     - pick .Values "config" "imageBuilderType" "cors" "dind" "pink" "extraConfig"   toYaml   nindent 4

We can verify that our hostname is passed to our Secret:

$ kubectl get secret binder-secret -o yaml   yq --raw-output '.data."values.yaml"'    base64 --decode
...
  GitLabRepoProvider:
    hostname: my-domain.com
...

Finally a configuration file inside the Binder pod is populated from the Secret, using the Kubernetes Volume construct. Looking at the Pod, we do see a volume called config, created from the binder-secret Secret:

$ kubectl get pod -l component=binder -o yaml   grep --context 4 binder-secret
    volumes:
    - name: config
      secret:
        defaultMode: 420
        secretName: binder-secret

That volume is mounted inside the pod at /etc/binderhub/config:

      volumeMounts:
      - mountPath: /etc/binderhub/config/
        name: config
        readOnly: true

Runtime verification Looking inside our pod we see our hostname value available in a file underneath the mount point:

oc exec binder-74d9c7db95-qtp8r -- grep hostname /etc/binderhub/config/values.yaml
    hostname: my-domain.com

21 September 2025

Gunnar Wolf: We, Programmers A Chronicle of Coders from Ada to AI

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for We, Programmers A Chronicle of Coders from Ada to AI , a book published in Addison-Wesley

When this book was presented as available for review, I jumped on it. After all, who doesn t love reading a nice bit of computing history, as told by a well-known author (affectionaly known as Uncle Bob ), one who has been immersed in computing since forever? What s not to like there? Reading on, the book does not disappoint. Much to the contrary, it digs into details absent in most computer history books that, being an operating systems and computer architecture geek, I absolutely enjoyed. But let me first address the book s organization. The book is split into four parts. Part 1, Setting the Stage, is a short introduction, answering the question Who are we? ( we being the programmers, of course). It describes the fascination many of us felt when we realized that the computer was there to obey us, to do our bidding, and we could absolutely control it. Part 2 talks about the giants of the computing world, on whose shoulders we stand. It digs in with a level of detail I have never seen before, discussing their personal lives and technical contributions (as well as the hoops they had to jump through to get their work done). Nine chapters cover these giants, ranging chronologically from Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace to Ken Thompson, Dennis Richie, and Brian Kernighan (understandably, giants who worked together are grouped in the same chapter). This is the part with the most historically overlooked technical details. For example, what was the word size in the first computers, before even the concept of a byte had been brought into regular use? What was the register structure of early central processing units (CPUs), and why did it lead to requiring self-modifying code to be able to execute loops? Then, just as Unix and C get invented, Part 3 skips to computer history as seen through the eyes of Uncle Bob. I must admit, while the change of rhythm initially startled me, it ends up working quite well. The focus is no longer on the giants of the field, but on one particular person (who casts a very long shadow). The narrative follows the author s life: a boy with access to electronics due to his father s line of work; a computing industry leader, in the early 2000s, with extreme programming; one of the first producers of training materials in video format a role that today might be recognized as an influencer. This first-person narrative reaches year 2023. But the book is not just a historical overview of the computing world, of course. Uncle Bob includes a final section with his thoughts on the future of computing. As this is a book for programmers, it is fitting to start with the changes in programming languages that we should expect to see and where such changes are likely to take place. The unavoidable topic of artificial intelligence is presented next: What is it and what does it spell for computing, and in particular for programming? Interesting (and sometimes surprising) questions follow: What does the future of hardware development look like? What is prone to be the evolution of the World Wide Web? What is the future of programming and programmers? At just under 500 pages, the book is a volume to be taken seriously. But space is very well used with this text. The material is easy to read, often funny and always informative. If you enjoy computer history and understanding the little details in the implementations, it might very well be the book you want.

9 August 2025

Valhalla's Things: MOAR Pattern Weights

Six hexagonal blocks with a Standard Compliant sticker on top: mobian (blue variant), alizarin molecule, Use Jabber / Do Crime, #FreeSoftWear, indigotin molecule, The internet is ours with a cat that plays with yarn.

I ve collected some more Standard Compliant stickers.

A picture of the lid of my laptop: a relatively old thinkpad carpeted with hexagonal stickers: Fediverse, a Debian swirl made of cat paw prints, #FreeSoftWear, 31 years of Debian, Open Source Hardware, XMPP, Ada Lovelace, rainbow holographic Fediverse, mobian (blue sticker), tails (cut from a round one), Use Jabber / Do Crime, LIFO, people consensually doing things together (center piece), GL-Como, Piecepack, indigotin, my phone runs debian btw, reproducible builds (cut from round), 4 freedoms in Italian (cut from round), Debian tea, alizarin, Software Heritage (cut from round), ournet.rocks (the cat also seen above), Python, this machine kills -9 daemons, 25 years of FOSDEM, Friendica, Flare. There are only 5 full hexagonal slots free.

Some went on my laptop, of course, but some were selected for another tool I use relatively often: more pattern weights like the ones I blogged about in February. And of course the sources:

the stickers I designed;
instructions for making the pattern weights (includes a link to the 3d model);
source for the cat sticker;
I couldn t find the sources for the blue mobian sticker, only for other variants.

I have enough washers to make two more weights, and even more stickers, but the printer is currently not in use, so I guess they will happen a few months or so in the future.

29 December 2024

Russ Allbery: Review: The Last Hour Between Worlds

Review: The Last Hour Between Worlds, by Melissa Caruso

Series:	The Echo Archives #1
Publisher:	Orbit
Copyright:	November 2024
ISBN:	0-316-30364-X
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	388

The Last Hour Between Worlds is urban, somewhat political high fantasy with strong fae vibes. It is the first book of a series, but it stands alone quite well. Kembral Thorne is a Hound, a member of the guild that serves as guards, investigators, and protectors. Kembral's specialty is Echo retrieval: rescues of people and animals who have fallen through a weak spot in reality into one of the strange, dangerous, and malleable layers called Echoes. Kem once rescued a dog from six layers down, an almost unheard-of feat. Kem is also a new single mother, which means her past two months have been spent in a sleep-deprived haze revolving exclusively around her much-beloved infant. Dona Marjorie Swift's year-turning party is the first time she's been out without Emmi since she gave birth, and she's only there because her sister took the child and practically shoved her out the door. Now, she's desperately trying to remember how to be social and normal, which is not made easier by the unexpected presence of Rika at the party. Rika Nonesuch is not a Hound. She's a Cat, a member of the guild of thieves and occasional assassins. They are the nemesis of the Hounds, but in a stylized and formalized way in which certain courtesies are expected. (The politics of this don't really make sense; you just have to go with it.) Kem has complicated feelings about Rika's grace, banter, and intoxicating perfume, feelings that she thought might be reciprocated until Rika drugged her during an apparent date and left her buried under a pile of garbage. She was not expecting Rika to be at this party and is definitely not ready to have a conversation with her. This emotional turmoil is rudely interrupted by the death of nearly everyone at the party via an Echo poison, the appearance of a dark figure driving a black sword into someone, and the descent of the entire party into an Echo. This was one of those books that kept getting better the farther into the book I read. I was a bit leery at first because the publisher's blurb made it sound more like horror than I prefer, but this is more the disturbing strangeness of fae creatures than the sort of gruesomeness, disgust, or body horror that I find off-putting. Most importantly, the point of this book is not to torture the characters or scare the reader. It's instead structured a bit like a murder mystery, but one whose resolution requires working out obscure fantasy rules and hidden political agendas. One of the currencies in the world of Echos is blood, but another is emotion, revelation, and the stories that bring both, and Caruso focuses the story more on that aspect than on horrifying imagery.

Rika frowned. "Resolve it? How?" "I have no idea." I couldn't keep my frustration from leaking through. "Might be that we have to delve deep into our own hearts to confront the unhealed wounds we've carried with us in secret. Might be that we have to say their names backward, or just close our eyes and they'll go away. Echoes never make any damned sense." Rika made a face. "We'd better not have to confront our unhealed wounds, or I'm leaving you to die."

All of The Last Hour Between Worlds is told in the first person from Kem's perspective, but Rika is the best character in this book. Kem is a rather straightforward, dogged, stubborn protector; Rika is complicated, selfish, conflicted, and considerably more dynamic. The first obvious twist in her background I spotted so long before Kem found out that it was a bit frustrating, but there were multiple satisfying twists after that. As advertised in the blurb, there's a sapphic romance angle here, but it's the sort that comes from a complicated friendship and a lot of mutual respect rather than love at first sight. Some of their relationship conflict is driven by misunderstanding, but the misunderstanding happens before the novel begins, which means the reader doesn't have to sit through the bit where one yells at the characters for being stupid. It helps that the characters have something concrete to do, and that driving plot problem is multi-layered and satisfying. Each time the party falls through a layer of reality, it's mostly reset to the start of the book, but the word "mostly" is hiding a lot of subtlety. Given the clock at the start of each chapter and the blurb (if one read it), the reader can make a good guess that the plot problem will not be fully resolved until the characters fall quite deep into the Echoes, but the story never felt repetitive the way that some time loop stories can. As the characters gain more understanding, the problems change, the players change, and they have to make several excursions into the surrounding world. This is the sort of fantasy that feels a bit like science fiction. You're thrown into a world with a different culture and different rules that are foreign to the reader and natural to the characters. Part of the fun of reading is figuring out the rules, history, and backstory while watching the characters try to solve the puzzles they're faced with. The writing is good but not great. Characterization was good enough for a story primarily focused on action and puzzle-solving, but it was a bit lacking in subtlety. I think Caruso's strengths showed most in the world design, particularly the magic system and the rules followed by the Echo creatures. The excursions outside of the somewhat-protected house struck a balance between eeriness and comprehensibility that reminded me of T. Kingfisher or Sandman. The human politics were unfortunately less successful and rested on some tired centrist cliches. Thankfully, this was not the main point of the story. I should also warn that there is a lot of talk about babies. Kem's entire identity at the start of the novel, to the point of incessant monologue, is "new mother." This is not a perspective we get very often in fantasy, and Kem eventually finds a steadier balance between her bond with her daughter and the other parts of her life. I think some readers will feel very seen. But Caruso leans hard into maternal bonding. So hard. If you don't want to read about someone who is deliriously obsessed with their new child, you may want to skip this one. Right after I finished this book, I thought it was amazing. Now that I've had a few days to think about it, the lack of subtlety and the facile human politics brought it down a notch. I'm a science fiction reader at heart, so I loved the slow revelation of mechanics; the reader starts the story by knowing that Kem can "blink step" but not knowing what that means, and by the end of the story one not only knows but has opinions about its limitations, political implications, and interactions with other forms of magic. The Echo worlds are treated similarly, and this type of world-building is my jam. But the cost is that the human characters, particularly the supporting cast, don't get the same focus and therefore are a bit straightforward and obvious. The subplot with Dona Vandelle was particularly annoying. Ah well. Kem and Rika's relationship did work, and it's the center of the book. If you like fantasy mechanics but are a bit leery of fae stories because they feel too symbolic or arbitrary, give this a try. It's the most satisfyingly constructed fae story that I've read in a long time. It's not great literary fiction, but it's also not trying to be; it's a puzzle adventure, and a well-executed one. Recommended, and I will definitely be reading the sequel. Content notes: Lots of violent death and other physical damage, creepy dream worlds with implied but not explicit horror, and rather a lot of blood. Followed by The Last Soul Among Wolves, not yet published at the time I wrote this review. Rating: 8 out of 10

2 December 2024

Russ Allbery: Review: Long Live Evil

Review: Long Live Evil, by Sarah Rees Brennan

Series:	Time of Iron #1
Publisher:	Orbit
Copyright:	July 2024
ISBN:	0-316-56872-4
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	433

Long Live Evil is a portal fantasy (or, arguably more precisely, a western take on an isekai villainess fantasy) and the first book of a series. If the author's name sounds familiar, it's possibly because of In Other Lands, which got a bunch of award nominations in 2018, She has also written a lot of other YA fantasy, but this is her first adult epic fantasy novel. Rae is in the hospital, dying of cancer. Everything about that experience, from the obvious to the collapse of her friendships, absolutely fucking sucks. One of the few bright points is her sister's favorite fantasy series, Time of Iron, which her sister started reading to her during chemo sessions. Rae mostly failed to pay attention until the end of the first book and the rise of the Emperor. She fell in love with the brooding, dangerous anti-hero and devoured the next two books. The first book was still a bit hazy, though, even with the help of a second dramatic reading after she was too sick to read on her own. This will be important later. After one of those reading sessions, Rae wakes up to a strange woman in her hospital room who offers her an option. Rather than die a miserable death that bankrupts her family, she can go through a door to Eyam, the world of Time of Iron, and become the character who suits her best. If she can steal the Flower of Life and Death from the imperial greenhouse on the one day a year that it blooms, she will wake up, cured. If not, she will die. Rae of course goes through, and wakes in the body of Lady Rahela, the Beauty Dipped in Blood, the evil stepsister. One of the villains, on the night before she is scheduled to be executed. Rae's initial panic slowly turns to a desperate glee. She knows all of these characters. She knows how the story will turn out. And she has a healthy body that's not racked with pain. Maybe she's not the heroine, but who cares, the villains are always more interesting anyway. If she's going to be cast as the villain, she's going to play it to the hilt. It's not like any of these characters are real. Stories in which the protagonists are the villains are not new (Nimona and Hench come to mind just among books I've reviewed), but they are having a moment. Assistant to the Villain by Hannah Nicole Maehrer came out last year, and this book and Django Wexler's How to Become the Dark Lord and Die Trying both came out this year. This batch of villain books all take different angles on the idea, but they lean heavily on humor. In Long Live Evil, that takes the form of Rae's giddy embrace of villainous scheming, flouncing, and blatant plot manipulation, along with her running commentary on the various characters and their in-story fates. The setup here is great. Rae is not only aware that she's in a story, she knows it's full of cliches and tropes. Some of them she loves, some of them she thinks are ridiculous, and she isn't shy about expressing both of those opinions. Rae is a naturally dramatic person, and it doesn't take her long to lean into the opportunities for making dramatic monologues and villainous quips, most of which involve modern language and pop culture references that the story characters find baffling and disconcerting. Unfortunately, the base Time of Iron story is, well, bad. It's absurd grimdark epic fantasy with paper-thin characters and angst as a central character trait. This is clearly intentional for both in-story and structural reasons. Rae enjoys it precisely because it's full of blood and battles and over-the-top brooding, malevolent anti-heroes, and Rae's sister likes the impossibly pure heroes who suffer horrible fates while refusing to compromise their ideals. Rae is also about to turn the story on its head and start smashing its structure to try to get herself into position to steal the Flower of Life and Death, and the story has to have a simple enough structure that it doesn't get horribly confusing once smashed. But the original story is such a grimdark parody, and so not my style of fantasy, that I struggled with it at the start of the book. This does get better eventually, as Rae introduces more and more complications and discovers some surprising things about the other characters. There are several delightful twists concerning the impossibly pure heroine of the original story that I will not spoil but that I thought retroactively made the story far more interesting. But that leads to the other problem: Rae is both not very good at scheming, and is flippant and dismissive of the characters around her. These are both realistic; Rae is a young woman with cancer, not some sort of genius mastermind, and her whole frame for interacting with the story is fandom discussions and arguments with her sister. Early in the book, it's rather funny. But as the characters around her start becoming more fleshed out and complex, Rae's inability to take them seriously starts to grate. The grand revelation to Rae that these people have their own independent existence comes so late in the book that it's arguably a spoiler, but it was painfully obvious to everyone except Rae for hundreds of pages before it got through Rae's skull. Those are my main complaints, but there was a lot about this book that I liked. The Cobra, who starts off as a minor villain in the story, is by far the best character of the book. He's not only more interesting than Rae, he makes everyone else in the book, including Rae, more interesting characters through their interactions. The twists around the putative heroine, Lady Rahela's stepsister, are a bit too long in coming but are an absolute delight. And Key, the palace guard that Rae befriends at the start of the story, is the one place where Rae's character dynamic unquestionably works. Key anchors a lot of Rae's scenes, giving them a sense of emotional heft that Rae herself would otherwise undermine. The narrator in this book does not stick with Rae. We also get viewpoint chapters from the Cobra, the Last Hope, and Emer, Lady Rahela's maid. The viewpoints from the Time of Iron characters can be a bit eye-roll-inducing at the start because of how deeply they follow the grimdark aesthetic of the original story, but by the middle of the book I was really enjoying the viewpoint shifts. This story benefited immensely from being seen from more angles than Rae's chaotic manipulation. By the end of the book, I was fully invested in the plot line following Cobra and the Last Hope, to the extent that I was a bit disappointed when the story would switch back to Rae. I'm not sure this was a great book, but it was fun. It's funny in places, but I ended up preferring the heartfelt parts to the funny parts. It is a fascinating merger of gleeful fandom chaos and rather heavy emotional portrayals of both inequality and the experience of terminal illness. Rees Brennan is a stage four cancer survivor and that really shows; there's a depth, nuance, and internal complexity to Rae's reactions to illness, health, and hope that feels very real. It is the kind of book that can give you emotional whiplash; sometimes it doesn't work, but sometimes it does. One major warning: this book ends on a ridiculous cliffhanger and does not in any sense resolve its main plot arc. I found this annoying, not so much because of the wait for the second volume, but because I thought this book was about the right length for the amount of time I wanted to spend in this world and wish Rees Brennan had found a way to wrap up the story in one book. Instead, it looks like there will be three books. I'm in for at least one more, since the story was steadily getting better towards the end of Long Live Evil, but I hope the narrative arc survives being stretched out across that many words. This one's hard to classify, since it's humorous fantasy on the cover and in the marketing, and that element is definitely present, but I thought the best parts of the book were when it finally started taking itself seriously. It's metafictional, trope-subverting portal fantasy full of intentional anachronisms that sometimes fall flat and sometimes work brilliantly. I thought the main appeal of it would be watching Rae embrace being a proper villain, but then the apparent side characters stole the show. Recommended, but you may have to be in just the right mood. Content notes: Cancer, terminal illness, resurrected corpses, wasting disease, lots of fantasy violence and gore, and a general grimdark aesthetic. Rating: 7 out of 10

8 November 2024

Freexian Collaborators: Debian Contributions: October s report (by Anupa Ann Joseph)

Debian Contributions: 2024-10 Contributing to Debian is part of Freexian s mission. This article covers the latest achievements of Freexian and their collaborators. All of this is made possible by organizations subscribing to our Long Term Support contracts and consulting services.

rebootstrap, by Helmut Grohne After significant changes earlier this year, the state of architecture cross bootstrap is normalizing again. More and more architectures manage to complete rebootstrap testing successfully again. Here are two examples of what kind of issues the bootstrap testing identifies. At some point, `libpng1.6` would fail to cross build on `musl` architectures whereas it would succeed on other ones failing to locate `zlib`. Adding `--debug-find` to the `cmake` invocation eventually revealed that it would fail to search in `/usr/lib/<triplet>`, which is the default library path. This turned out to be a bug in cmake assuming that all linux systems use glibc. `libpng1.6` also gained a baseline violation for `powerpc` and `ppc64` by enabling the use of AltiVec there. The `newt` package would fail to cross build for many 32-bit architectures whereas it would succeed for `armel` and `armhf` due to `-Wincompatible-pointer-types`. It turns out that this flag was turned into `-Werror` and it was compiling with a warning earlier. The actual problem is a difference in signedness between `wchar_t` and `FriBidChar` (aka `uint32_t`) and actually affects native building on `i386`.

Miscellaneous contributions

Helmut sent 35 patches for cross build failures.

Stefano Rivera uploaded the Python 3.13.0 final release.

Stefano continued to rebuild Python packages with C extensions using Python 3.13, to catch compatibility issues before the 3.13-add transition starts.

Stefano uploaded new versions of a handful of Python packages, including: dh-python, objgraph, python-mitogen, python-truststore, and python-virtualenv.

Stefano packaged a new release of `mkdocs-macros-plugin`, which required packaging a new Python package for Debian, python-super-collections (now in NEW review).

Stefano helped the mini-DebConf Online Brazil get video infrastructure up and running for the event. Unfortunately, Debian s online-DebConf setup has bitrotted over the last couple of years, and it eventually required new temporary Jitsi and Jibri instances.

Colin Watson fixed a number of autopkgtest failures to get ansible back into testing.

Colin fixed an ssh client failure in certain cases when using GSS-API key exchange, and added an integration test to ensure this doesn t regress in future.

Colin worked on the Python 3.13 transition, fixing problems related to it in 15 packages. This included upstream work in a number of packages (postgresfixture, python-asyncssh, python-wadllib).

Colin upgraded 41 Python packages to new upstream versions.

Carles improved po-debconf-manager: now it can create merge requests to Salsa automatically (created 17, new batch coming this month), imported almost all the packages with debconf translation templates whose VCS is Salsa (currently 449 imported), added statistics per package and language, improved command line interface options. Performed user support fixing different issues. Also prepared an abstract for the talk at MiniDebConf Toulouse.

Santiago Ruano Rinc n continued the organization work for the DebConf 25 conference, to be held in Brest, France. Part of the work relates to the initial edits of the sponsoring brochure. Thanks to Benjamin Somers who finalized the French and English versions.

Rapha l forwarded a couple of zim and hamster bugs to the upstream developers, and tried to diagnose a delayed startup of gdm on his laptop (cf #1085633).

On behalf of the Debian Publicity Team, Anupa interviewed 7 women from the Debian community, old and new contributors. The interview was published in Bits from Debian.

6 November 2024

Bits from Debian: Bits from the DPL

Dear Debian community, this is Bits from DPL for October. In addition to a summary of my recent activities, I aim to include newsworthy developments within Debian that might be of interest to the broader community. I believe this provides valuable insights and foster a sense of connection across our diverse projects. Also, I welcome your feedback on the format and focus of these Bits, as community input helps shape their value. Ada Lovelace Day 2024 As outlined in my platform, I'm committed to increasing the diversity of Debian developers. I hope the recent article celebrating Ada Lovelace Day 2024 featuring interviews with women in Debian will serve as an inspiring motivation for more women to join our community. MiniDebConf Cambridge This was my first time attending the MiniDebConf in Cambridge, hosted at the ARM building. I thoroughly enjoyed the welcoming atmosphere of both MiniDebCamp and MiniDebConf. It was wonderful to reconnect with people who hadn't made it to the last two DebConfs, and, as always, there was plenty of hacking, insightful discussions, and valuable learning. If you missed the recent MiniDebConf, there's a great opportunity to attend the next one in Toulouse. It was recently decided to include a MiniDebCamp beforehand as well. FTPmaster accepts MRs for DAK At the recent MiniDebConf in Cambridge, I discussed potential enhancements for DAK to make life easier for both FTP Team members and developers. For those interested, the document "Hacking on DAK" provides guidance on setting up a local DAK instance and developing patches, which can be submitted as MRs. As a perfectly random example of such improvements some older MR, "Add commands to accept/reject updates from a policy queue" might give you some inspiration. At MiniDebConf, we compiled an initial list of features that could benefit both the FTP Team and the developer community. While I had preliminary discussions with the FTP Team about these items, not all ideas had consensus. I aim to open a detailed, public discussion to gather broader feedback and reach a consensus on which features to prioritize.

Accept+Bug report

Sometimes, packages are rejected not because of DFSG-incompatible licenses but due to other issues that could be resolved within an existing package (as discussed in my DebConf23 BoF, "Chatting with ftpmasters"[1]). During the "Meet the ftpteam" BoF (Log/transcription of the BoF can be found here), for the moment until the MR gets accepted, a new option was proposed for FTP Team members reviewing packages in NEW:

Accept + Bug Report This option would allow a package to enter Debian (in unstable or experimental) with an automatically filed RC bug report. The RC bug would prevent the package from migrating to testing until the issues are addressed. To ensure compatibility with the BTS, which only accepts bug reports for existing packages, a delayed job (24 hours post-acceptance) would file the bug.

Binary name changes - for instance if done to experimental not via new

When binary package names change, currently the package must go through the NEW queue, which can delay the availability of updated libraries. Allowing such packages to bypass the queue could expedite this process. A configuration option to enable this bypass specifically for uploads to experimental may be useful, as it avoids requiring additional technical review for experimental uploads. Previously, I believed the requirement for binary name changes to pass through NEW was due to a missing feature in DAK, possibly addressable via an MR. However, in discussions with the FTP Team, I learned this is a matter of team policy rather than technical limitation. I haven't found this policy documented, so it may be worth having a community discussion to clarify and reach consensus on how we want to handle binary name changes to get the MR sensibly designed.

Remove dependency tree

When a developer requests the removal of a package whether entirely or for specific architectures RM bugs must be filed for the package itself as well as for each package depending on it. It would be beneficial if the dependency tree could be automatically resolved, allowing either:

a) the DAK removal tooling to remove the entire dependency tree
   after prompting the bug report author for confirmation, or
b) the system to auto-generate corresponding bug reports for all
   packages in the dependency tree.

The latter option might be better suited for implementation in an MR for reportbug. However, given the possibility of large-scale removals (for example, targeting specific architectures), having appropriate tooling for this would be very beneficial. In my opinion the proposed DAK enhancements aim to support both FTP Team members and uploading developers. I'd be very pleased if these ideas spark constructive discussion and inspire volunteers to start working on them--possibly even preparing to join the FTP Team. On the topic of ftpmasters: an ongoing discussion with SPI lawyers is currently reviewing the non-US agreement established 22 years ago. Ideally, this review will lead to a streamlined workflow for ftpmasters, removing certain hurdles that were originally put in place due to legal requirements, which were updated in 2021. Contacting teams My outreach efforts to Debian teams have slowed somewhat recently. However, I want to emphasize that anyone from a packaging team is more than welcome to reach out to me directly. My outreach emails aren't following any specific orders--just my own somewhat na ve view of Debian, which I'm eager to make more informed. Recently, I received two very informative responses: one from the Qt/KDE Team, which thoughtfully compiled input from several team members into a shared document. The other was from the Rust Team, where I received three quick, helpful replies one of which included an invitation to their upcoming team meeting. Interesting readings on our mailing lists I consider the following threads on our mailing list some interesting reading and would like to add some comments. Sensible languages for younger contributors Though the discussion on debian-devel about programming languages took place in September, I recently caught up with it. I strongly believe Debian must continue evolving to stay relevant for the future. "Everything must change, so that everything can stay the same." -- Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa, The Leopard I encourage constructive discussions on integrating programming languages in our toolchain that support this evolution. Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" A recent thread on the debian-project list discussed the "Open Source AI Definition". This topic will impact Debian in the future, and we need to reach an informed decision. I'd be glad to see more perspectives in the discussions particularly on finding a sensible consensus, understanding how FTP Team members view their delegated role, and considering whether their delegation might need adjustments for clarity on this issue. Kind regards Andreas.

20 October 2024

Bits from Debian: Ada Lovelace Day 2024 - Interview with some Women in Debian

Ada Lovelace Day was celebrated on October 8 in 2024, and on this occasion, to celebrate and raise awareness of the contributions of women to the STEM fields we interviewed some of the women in Debian. Here we share their thoughts, comments, and concerns with the hope of inspiring more women to become part of the Sciences, and of course, to work inside of Debian. This article was simulcasted to the debian-women mail list. Beatrice Torracca 1. Who are you? I am Beatrice, I am Italian. Internet technology and everything computer-related is just a hobby for me, not my line of work or the subject of my academic studies. I have too many interests and too little time. I would like to do lots of things and at the same time I am too Oblomovian to do any. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? As a user I started using newsgroups when I had my first dialup connection and there was always talk about this strange thing called Linux. Since moving from DR DOS to Windows was a shock for me, feeling like I lost the control of my machine, I tried Linux with Debian Potato and I never strayed away from Debian since then for my personal equipment. 3. How long have you been into Debian? Define "into". As a user... since Potato, too many years to count. As a contributor, a similar amount of time, since early 2000 I think. My first archived email about contributing to the translation of the description of Debian packages dates 2001. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? Yes!! I use testing. I have it on my desktop PC at home and I have it on my laptop. The desktop is where I have a local IMAP server that fetches all the mails of my email accounts, and where I sync and back up all my data. On both I do day-to-day stuff (from email to online banking, from shopping to taxes), all forms of entertainment, a bit of work if I have to work from home (GNU R for statistics, LibreOffice... the usual suspects). At work I am required to have another OS, sadly, but I am working on setting up a Debian Live system to use there too. Plus if at work we start doing bioinformatics there might be a Linux machine in our future... I will of course suggest and hope for a Debian system. 5. Do you have any suggestions to improve women's participation in Debian? This is a tough one. I am not sure. Maybe, more visibility for the women already in the Debian Project, and make the newcomers feel seen, valued and welcomed. A respectful and safe environment is key too, of course, but I think Debian made huge progress in that aspect with the Code of Conduct. I am a big fan of promoting diversity and inclusion; there is always room for improvement. Ileana Dumitrescu (ildumi) 1. Who are you? I am just a girl in the world who likes cats and packaging Free Software. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? I was tinkering with a computer running Debian a few years ago, and I decided to learn more about Free Software. After a search or two, I found Debian Women. 3. How long have you been into Debian? I started looking into contributing to Debian in 2021. After contacting Debian Women, I received a lot of information and helpful advice on different ways I could contribute, and I decided package maintenance was the best fit for me. I eventually became a Debian Maintainer in 2023, and I continue to maintain a few packages in my spare time. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? Yes, it is my favourite GNU/Linux operating system! I use it for email, chatting, browsing, packaging, etc. 5. Do you have any suggestions to improve women's participation in Debian? The mailing list for Debian Women may attract more participation if it is utilized more. It is where I started, and I imagine participation would increase if it is more engaging. Kathara Sasikumar (kathara) 1. Who are you? I'm Kathara Sasikumar, 22 years old and a recent Debian user turned Maintainer from India. I try to become a creative person through sketching or playing guitar chords, but it doesn't work! xD 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? When I first started college, I was that overly enthusiastic student who signed up for every club and volunteered for anything that crossed my path just like every other fresher. But then, the pandemic hit, and like many, I hit a low point. COVID depression was real, and I was feeling pretty down. Around this time, the FOSS Club at my college suddenly became more active. My friends, knowing I had a love for free software, pushed me to join the club. They thought it might help me lift my spirits and get out of the slump I was in. At first, I joined only out of peer pressure, but once I got involved, the club really took off. FOSS Club became more and more active during the pandemic, and I found myself spending more and more time with it. A year later, we had the opportunity to host a MiniDebConf at our college. Where I got to meet a lot of Debian developers and maintainers, attending their talks and talking with them gave me a wider perspective on Debian, and I loved the Debian philosophy. At that time, I had been distro hopping but never quite settled down. I occasionally used Debian but never stuck around. However, after the MiniDebConf, I found myself using Debian more consistently, and it truly connected with me. The community was incredibly warm and welcoming, which made all the difference. 3. How long have you been into Debian? Now, I've been using Debian as my daily driver for about a year. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? It has become my primary distro, and I use it every day for continuous learning and working on various software projects with free and open-source tools. Plus, I've recently become a Debian Maintainer (DM) and have taken on the responsibility of maintaining a few packages. I'm looking forward to contributing more to the Debian community Rhonda D'Vine (rhonda) 1. Who are you? My name is Rhonda, my pronouns are she/her, or per/pers. I'm 51 years old, working in IT. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? I was already looking into Linux because of university, first it was SuSE. And people played around with gtk. But when they packaged GNOME and it just didn't even install I looked for alternatives. A working colleague from back then gave me a CD of Debian. Though I couldn't install from it because Slink didn't recognize the pcmcia drive. I had to install it via floppy disks, but apart from that it was quite well done. And the early GNOME was working, so I never looked back. 3. How long have you been into Debian? Even before I was more involved, a colleague asked me whether I could help with translating the release documentation. That was my first contribution to Debian, for the slink release in early 1999. And I was using some other software before on my SuSE systems, and I wanted to continue to use them on Debian obviously. So that's how I got involved with packaging in Debian. But I continued to help with translation work, for a long period of time I was almost the only person active for the German part of the website. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? Being involved with Debian was a big part of the reason I got into my jobs since a long time now. I always worked with maintaining Debian (or Ubuntu) systems. Privately I run Debian on my laptop, with occasionally switching to Windows in dual boot when (rarely) needed. 5. Do you have any suggestions to improve women's participation in Debian? There are factors that we can't influence, like that a lot of women are pushed into care work because patriarchal structures work that way, and don't have the time nor energy to invest a lot into other things. But we could learn to appreciate smaller contributions better, and not focus so much on the quantity of contributions. When we look at longer discussions on mailing lists, those that write more mails actually don't contribute more to the discussion, they often repeat themselves without adding more substance. Through working on our own discussion patterns this could create a more welcoming environment for a lot of people. Sophie Brun (sophieb) 1. Who are you? I'm a 44 years old French woman. I'm married and I have 2 sons. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? In 2004 my boyfriend (now my husband) installed Debian on my personal computer to introduce me to Debian. I knew almost nothing about Open Source. During my engineering studies, a professor mentioned the existence of Linux, Red Hat in particular, but without giving any details. I learnt Debian by using and reading (in advance) The Debian Administrator's Handbook. 3. How long have you been into Debian? I've been a user since 2004. But I only started contributing to Debian in 2015: I had quit my job and I wanted to work on something more meaningful. That's why I joined my husband in Freexian, his company. Unlike most people I think, I started contributing to Debian for my work. I only became a DD in 2021 under gentle social pressure and when I felt confident enough. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? Of course I use Debian in my professional life for almost all the tasks: from administrative tasks to Debian packaging. I also use Debian in my personal life. I have very basic needs: Firefox, LibreOffice, GnuCash and Rhythmbox are the main applications I need. Sruthi Chandran (srud) 1. Who are you? A feminist, a librarian turned Free Software advocate and a Debian Developer. Part of Debian Outreach team and DebConf Committee. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? I got introduced to the free software world and Debian through my husband. I attended many Debian events with him. During one such event, out of curiosity, I participated in a Debian packaging workshop. Just after that I visited a Tibetan community in India and they mentioned that there was no proper Tibetan font in GNU/Linux. Tibetan font was my first package in Debian. 3. How long have you been into Debian? I have been contributing to Debian since 2016 and Debian Developer since 2019. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? I haven't used any other distro on my laptop since I got introduced to Debian. 5. Do you have any suggestions to improve women's participation in Debian? I was involved with actively mentoring newcomers to Debian since I started contributing myself. I specially work towards reducing the gender gap inside the Debian and Free Software community in general. In my experience, I believe that visibility of already existing women in the community will encourage more women to participate. Also I think we should reintroduce mentoring through debian-women. T ssia Cam es Ara jo (tassia) 1. Who are you? T ssia Cam es Ara jo, a Brazilian living in Canada. I'm a passionate learner who tries to push myself out of my comfort zone and always find something new to learn. I also love to mentor people on their learning journey. But I don't consider myself a typical geek. My challenge has always been to not get distracted by the next project before I finish the one I have in my hands. That said, I love being part of a community of geeks and feel empowered by it. I love Debian for its technical excellence, and it's always reassuring to know that someone is taking care of the things I don't like or can't do. When I'm not around computers, one of my favorite things is to feel the wind on my cheeks, usually while skating or riding a bike; I also love music, and I'm always singing a melody in my head. 2. How did you get introduced to Debian? As a student, I was privileged to be introduced to FLOSS at the same time I was introduced to computer programming. My university could not afford to have labs in the usual proprietary software model, and what seemed like a limitation at the time turned out to be a great learning opportunity for me and my colleagues. I joined this student-led initiative to "liberate" our servers and build LTSP-based labs - where a single powerful computer could power a few dozen diskless thin clients. How revolutionary it was at the time! And what an achievement! From students to students, all using Debian. Most of that group became close friends; I've married one of them, and a few of them also found their way to Debian. 3. How long have you been into Debian? I first used Debian in 2001, but my first real connection with the community was attending DebConf 2004. Since then, going to DebConfs has become a habit. It is that moment in the year when I reconnect with the global community and my motivation to contribute is boosted. And you know, in 20 years I've seen people become parents, grandparents, children grow up; we've had our own child and had the pleasure of introducing him to the community; we've mourned the loss of friends and healed together. I'd say Debian is like family, but not the kind you get at random once you're born, Debian is my family by choice. 4. Are you using Debian in your daily life? If yes, how? These days I teach at Vanier College in Montr al. My favorite course to teach is UNIX, which I have the pleasure of teaching mostly using Debian. I try to inspire my students to discover Debian and other FLOSS projects, and we are happy to run a FLOSS club with participation from students, staff and alumni. I love to see these curious young minds put to the service of FLOSS. It is like recruiting soldiers for a good battle, and one that can change their lives, as it certainly did mine. 5. Do you have any suggestions to improve women's participation in Debian? I think the most effective way to inspire other women is to give visibility to active women in our community. Speaking at conferences, publishing content, being vocal about what we do so that other women can see us and see themselves in those positions in the future. It's not easy, and I don't like being in the spotlight. It took me a long time to get comfortable with public speaking, so I can understand the struggle of those who don't want to expose themselves. But I believe that this space of vulnerability can open the way to new connections. It can inspire trust and ultimately motivate our next generation. It's with this in mind that I publish these lines. Another point we can't neglect is that in Debian we work on a volunteer basis, and this in itself puts us at a great disadvantage. In our societies, women usually take a heavier load than their partners in terms of caretaking and other invisible tasks, so it is hard to afford the free time needed to volunteer. This is one of the reasons why I bring my son to the conferences I attend, and so far I have received all the support I need to attend DebConfs with him. It is a way to share the caregiving burden with our community - it takes a village to raise a child. Besides allowing us to participate, it also serves to show other women (and men) that you can have a family life and still contribute to Debian. My feeling is that we are not doing super well in terms of diversity in Debian at the moment, but that should not discourage us at all. That's the way it is now, but that doesn't mean it will always be that way. I feel like we go through cycles. I remember times when we had many more active female contributors, and I'm confident that we can improve our ratio again in the future. In the meantime, I just try to keep going, do my part, attract those I can, reassure those who are too scared to come closer. Debian is a wonderful community, it is a family, and of course a family cannot do without us, the women. These interviews were conducted via email exchanges in October, 2024. Thanks to all the wonderful women who participated in this interview. We really appreciate your contributions in Debian and to Free/Libre software.

17 September 2024

Russ Allbery: Review: The Book That Broke the World

Review: The Book That Broke the World, by Mark Lawrence

Series:	Library Trilogy #2
Publisher:	Ace
Copyright:	2024
ISBN:	0-593-43796-9
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	366

The Book That Broke the World is high fantasy and a direct sequel to The Book That Wouldn't Burn. You should not start here. In a delightful break from normal practice, the author provides a useful summary of the previous volume at the start of this book to jog your memory. At the end of The Book That Wouldn't Burn, the characters were scattered and in various states of corporeality after some major revelations about the nature of the Library and the first appearance of the insectile Skeer. The Book That Wouldn't Burn picks up where it left off, and there is a lot more contact with the Skeer, but my guess that they would be the next viewpoint characters does not pan out. Instead, we get a new group and a new protagonist: Celcha, whose sees angels who come to visit her brother. I have complaints, but before I launch into those, I should say that I liked this book apart from the totally unnecessary cannibalism. (I'll get to that.) Livira is a bit sidelined, which is regrettable, but Celcha and her brother are interesting new characters, and both Arpix and Clovis, supporting characters in the first book, get some excellent character development. Similar to the first book, this is a puzzle box story full of world-building tidbits with intellectually-satisfying interactions. Lawrence elaborates and complicates his setting in ways that don't contradict earlier parts of the story but create more room and depth for the characters to be creative. I came away still invested in this world and eager to find out how Lawrence pulls the world-building and narrative threads together. The biggest drawback of this book is that it's not new. My thought after finishing the first book of the series was that if Lawrence had enough world-building ideas to fill three books to that same level of density, this had the potential of being one of my favorite fantasy series of all time. By the end of the second book, I concluded that this is not the case. Instead of showing us new twists and complications the way the first book did throughout, The Book That Broke the World mostly covers the same thematic ground from some new angles. It felt like Lawrence was worried the reader of the first book may not have understood the theme or the world-building, so he spent most of the second book nailing down anything that moved. I found that frustrating. One of the best parts of The Book That Wouldn't Burn was that Lawrence trusted the reader to keep up, which for me hit the glorious but rare sweet spot of pacing where I was figuring out the world at roughly the same pace as the characters. It surprised me in some very enjoyable ways. The Book That Broke the World did not surprise me. There are a few new things, which I enjoyed, and a few elaborations and developments of ideas, which I mostly enjoyed, but I saw the big plot twist coming at least fifty pages before it happened and found the aftermath more annoying than revelatory. It doesn't help that the plot rests on character misunderstandings, one of my least favorite tropes. One of the other disappointments of this book is that the characters stop using the Library as a library. The Library at the center of this series is a truly marvelous piece of world-building with numerous fascinating features that are unrelated to its contents, but Livira used it first and foremost as a repository of books. The first book was full of characters solving problems by finding a relevant book and reading it. In The Book That Broke the World, sadly, this is mostly gone. The Library is mostly reduced to a complicated Big Dumb Object setting. It's still a delightful bit of world-building, and we learn about a few new features, but I only remember two places where the actual books are important to the story. Even the book referenced in the title is mostly important as an artifact with properties unrelated to the words that it contains or to the act of reading it. I think this is a huge lost opportunity and something I hope Lawrence fixes in the last book of the trilogy. This book instead focuses on the politics around the existence of the Library itself. Here I'm cautiously optimistic, although a lot is going to depend on the third book. Lawrence has set up a three-sided argument between groups that I will uncharitably describe as the libertarian techbros, the "burn it all down" reactionaries, and the neoliberal centrist technocrats. All three of those positions suck, and Lawrence had better be setting the stage for Livira to find a different path. Her unwillingness to commit to any of those sides gives me hope, but bringing this plot to a satisfying conclusion is going to be tricky. I hope I like what Lawrence comes up with, but it feels far from certain. It doesn't help that he's started delivering some points with a sledgehammer, and that's where we get to the unnecessary cannibalism. Thankfully this is a fairly small part of the tail end of the book, but it was an unpleasant surprise that I did not want in this novel and that I don't think made the story any better. It's tempting to call the cannibalism gratuitous, but it does fit one of the main themes of this story, namely that humans are depressingly good at using any rule-based object in unexpected and nasty ways that are contrary to the best intentions of the designer. This is the fundamental challenge of the Library as a whole and the question that I suspect the third book will be devoted to addressing, so I understand why Lawrence wanted to emphasize his point. The reason why there is cannibalism here is directly related to a profound misunderstanding of the properties of the library, and I detected an echo of one of C.S. Lewis's arguments in The Last Battle about the nature of Hell. The problem, though, is that this is Satanic baby-killerism, to borrow a term from Fred Clark. There are numerous ways to show this type of perversion of well-intended systems, which I know because Lawrence used other ones in the first book that were more subtle but equally effective. One of the best parts of The Book That Wouldn't Burn is that there were few real villains. The conflict was structural, all sides had valid perspectives, and the ethical points of that story were made with some care and nuance. The problem with cannibalism as it's used here is not merely that it's gross and disgusting and off-putting to the reader, although it is all of those things. If I wanted to read horror, I would read horror novels. I don't appreciate surprise horror used for shock value in regular fantasy. But worse, it's an abandonment of moral nuance. The function of cannibalism in this story is like the function of Satanic baby-killers: it's to signal that these people are wholly and irredeemably evil. They are the Villains, they are Wrong, and they cease to be characters and become symbols of what the protagonists are fighting. This is destructive to the story because it's designed to provoke a visceral short-circuit in the reader and let the author get away with sloppy story-telling. If the author needs to use tactics like this to point out who is the villain, they have failed to set up their moral quandary properly. The worst part is that this was entirely unnecessary because Lawrence's story-telling wasn't sloppy and he set up his moral quandary just fine. No one was confused about the ethical point here. I as the reader was following without difficulty, and had appreciated the subtlety with which Lawrence posed the question. But apparently he thought he was too subtle and decided to come back to the point with a pile-driver. I think that seriously injured the story. The ethical argument here is much more engaging and thought-provoking when it's more finely balanced. That's a lot of complaints, mostly because this is a good book that I badly wanted to be a great book but which kept tripping over its own feet. A lot of trilogies have weak second books. Hopefully this is another example of the mid-story sag, and the finale will be worthy of the start of the story. But I have to admit the moral short-circuiting and the de-emphasis of the actual books in the library has me a bit nervous. I want a lot out of the third book, and I hope I'm not asking this author for too much. If you liked the first book, I think you'll like this one too, with the caveat that it's quite a bit darker and more violent in places, even apart from the surprise cannibalism. But if you've not started this series, you may want to wait for the third book to see if Lawrence can pull off the ending. Followed by The Book That Held Her Heart, currently scheduled for publication in April of 2025. Rating: 7 out of 10

16 September 2024

Russ Allbery: Review: The Wings Upon Her Back

Review: The Wings Upon Her Back, by Samantha Mills

Publisher:	Tachyon
Copyright:	2024
ISBN:	1-61696-415-4
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	394

The Wings Upon Her Back is a political steampunk science fantasy novel. If the author's name sounds familiar, it may be because Samantha Mills's short story "Rabbit Test" won Nebula, Locus, Hugo, and Sturgeon awards. This is her first novel. Winged Zemolai is a soldier of the mecha god and the protege of Mecha Vodaya, the Voice. She has served the city-state of Radezhda by defending it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, for twenty-six years. Despite that, it takes only a moment of errant mercy for her entire life to come crashing down. On a whim, she spares a kitchen worker who was concealing a statue of the scholar god, meaning that he was only pretending to worship the worker god like all workers should. Vodaya is unforgiving and uncompromising, as is the sleeping mecha god. Zemolai's wings are ripped from her back and crushed in the hand of the god, and she's left on the ground to die of mechalin withdrawal. The Wings Upon Her Back is told in two alternating timelines. The main one follows Zemolai after her exile as she is rescued by a young group of revolutionaries who think she may be useful in their plans. The other thread starts with Zemolai's childhood and shows the reader how she became Winged Zemolai: her scholar family, her obsession with flying, her true devotion to the mecha god, and the critical early years when she became Vodaya's protege. Mills maintains the separate timelines through the book and wraps them up in a rather neat piece of symbolic parallelism in the epilogue. I picked up this book on a recommendation from C.L. Clark, and yes, indeed, I can see why she liked this book. It's a story about a political awakening, in which Zemolai slowly realizes that she has been manipulated and lied to and that she may, in fact, be one of the baddies. The Wings Upon Her Back is more personal than some other books with that theme, since Zemolai was specifically (and abusively) groomed for her role by Vodaya. Much of the book is Zemolai trying to pull out the hooks that Vodaya put in her or, in the flashback timeline, the reader watching Vodaya install those hooks. The flashback timeline is difficult reading. I don't think Mills could have left it out, but she says in the afterword that it was the hardest part of the book to write and it was also the hardest part of the book to read. It fills in some interesting bits of world-building and backstory, and Mills does a great job pacing the story revelations so that both threads contribute equally, but mostly it's a story of manipulative abuse. We know from the main storyline that Vodaya's tactics work, which gives those scenes the feel of a slow-motion train wreck. You know what's going to happen, you know it will be bad, and yet you can't look away. It occurred to me while reading this that Emily Tesh's Some Desperate Glory told a similar type of story without the flashback structure, which eliminates the stifling feeling of inevitability. I don't think that would not have worked for this story. If you simply rearranged the chapters of The Wings Upon Her Back into a linear narrative, I would have bailed on the book. Watching Zemolai being manipulated would have been too depressing and awful for me to make it to the payoff without the forward-looking hope of the main timeline. It gave me new appreciation for the difficulty of what Tesh pulled off. Mills uses this interwoven structure well, though. At about 90% through this book I had no idea how it could end in the space remaining, but it reaches a surprising and satisfying conclusion. Mills uses a type of ending that normally bothers me, but she does it by handling the psychological impact so well that I couldn't help but admire it. I'm avoiding specifics because I think it worked better when I wasn't expecting it, but it ties beautifully into the thematic point of the book. I do have one structural objection, though. It's one of those problems I didn't notice while reading, but that started bothering me when I thought back through the story from a political lens. The Wings Upon Her Back is Zemolai's story, her redemption arc, and that means she drives the plot. The band of revolutionaries are great characters (particularly Galiana), but they're supporting characters. Zemolai is older, more experienced, and knows critical information they don't have, and she uses it to effectively take over. As setup for her character arc, I see why Mills did this. As political praxis, I have issues. There is a tendency in politics to believe that political skill is portable and repurposable. Converting opposing operatives to the cause is welcomed not only because they indicate added support, but also because they can use their political skill to help you win instead. To an extent this is not wrong, and is probably the most true of combat skills (which Zemolai has in abundance). But there's an underlying assumption that politics is symmetric, and a critical reason why I hold many of the political positions that I do hold is that I don't think politics is symmetric. If someone has been successfully stoking resentment and xenophobia in support of authoritarians, converts to an anti-authoritarian cause, and then produces propaganda stoking resentment and xenophobia against authoritarians, this is in some sense an improvement. But if one believes that resentment and xenophobia are inherently wrong, if one's politics are aimed at reducing the resentment and xenophobia in the world, then in a way this person has not truly converted. Worse, because this is an effective manipulation tactic, there is a strong tendency to put this type of political convert into a leadership position, where they will, intentionally or not, start turning the anti-authoritarian movement into a copy of the authoritarian movement they left. They haven't actually changed their politics because they haven't understood (or simply don't believe in) the fundamental asymmetry in the positions. It's the same criticism that I have of realpolitik: the ends do not justify the means because the means corrupt the ends. Nothing that happens in this book is as egregious as my example, but the more I thought about the plot structure, the more it bothered me that Zemolai never listens to the revolutionaries she joins long enough to wrestle with why she became an agent of an authoritarian state and they didn't. They got something fundamentally right that she got wrong, and perhaps that should have been reflected in who got to make future decisions. Zemolai made very poor choices and yet continues to be the sole main character of the story, the one whose decisions and actions truly matter. Maybe being wrong about everything should be disqualifying for being the main character, at least for a while, even if you think you've understood why you were wrong. That problem aside, I enjoyed this. Both timelines were compelling and quite difficult to put down, even when they got rather dark. I could have done with less body horror and a few fewer fight scenes, but I'm glad I read it. Science fiction readers should be warned that the world-building, despite having an intricate and fascinating surface, is mostly vibes. I started the book wondering how people with giant metal wings on their back can literally fly, and thought the mentions of neural ports, high-tech materials, and immune-suppressing drugs might mean that we'd get some sort of explanation. We do not: heavier-than-air flight works because it looks really cool and serves some thematic purposes. There are enough hints of technology indistinguishable from magic that you could make up your own explanations if you wanted to, but that's not something this book is interested in. There's not a thing wrong with that, but don't get caught by surprise if you were in the mood for a neat scientific explanation of apparent magic. Recommended if you like somewhat-harrowing character development with a heavy political lens and steampunk vibes, although it's not the sort of book that I'd press into the hands of everyone I know. The Wings Upon Her Back is a complete story in a single novel. Content warning: the main character is a victim of physical and emotional abuse, so some of that is a lot. Also surgical gore, some torture, and genocide. Rating: 7 out of 10

Next.