John Goerzen: Why You Should (Still) Use Signal As Much As Possible
As I write this in March 2025, there is a lot of confusion about Signal messenger due to the recent news of people using Signal in government, and subsequent leaks.
The short version is: there was no problem with Signal here. People were using it because they understood it to be secure, not the other way around.
Both the government and the Electronic Frontier Foundation recommend people use Signal. This is an unusual alliance, and in the case of the government, was prompted because it understood other countries had a persistent attack against American telephone companies and SMS traffic.
So let s dive in. I ll cover some basics of what security is, what happened in this situation, and why Signal is a good idea.
This post isn t for programmers that work with cryptography every day. Rather, I hope it can make some of these concepts accessible to everyone else.
What makes communications secure?
When most people are talking about secure communications, they mean some combination of these properties:
Communications infrastructure snooping
Let s say you used no encryption at all, and connected to public WiFi in a coffee shop to send your message. Who all could potentially see it?
Protecting yourself
So how can you protect yourself against these attacks? Let s consider:
Conclusion
Signal is practical security. Do you want phone companies reading your messages? How about Facebook or X? Have those companies demonstrated that they are completely trustworthy throughout their entire history?
I say no. So, go install Signal. It s the best, most practical tool we have.