Search Results: "mattice"

13 September 2011

Christian Perrier: 10 years being Debian Developer - part 4: NM process

So, this story begins in January 2001, when I applied in the Debian New Maintainer Process. I wanted to maintain Geneweb, which I was using to publish my genealogy research results. And I wanted to keep it up-to-date while upstream was doing a quite fast development. Moreover, I quickly noticed that Geneweb had big trouble in respecting the way data is organized on a Debian system, and respect the FHS. How to have weveral users able to publish their data on the same server without compromizing the overall system security, etc. Upstream development didn't really care about that. Daniel de Rauglaudre is an excellent genealogist and developer but he was not interested in making Geneweb clean "the Debian way". For instance, at that time, it wasn't easy to setup a server, where genealogy databases could be published without having to manually launch a daemon in user mode at each reboot. Arranging this was indeed my first contribution. I contributed a few patches to make it easier to turn Geneweb into something FHS-compliant...and I developed init scripts and an organization allowing one to have shared databases after system reboots. That was rapidly a great introduction to Debian maintainer scripts and even security-related challenges. And all this....because I needed it. Basically, in 2001, the geneweb package adopted the organization it still has in Debian and Ubuntu, 10 years later: While doing so, I was going through the New Maintainer Process. The Debian developer who had signed my key was Sam Tardieu, of of those longstanding "Freenix" dudes I was sometimes hanging around. I don't remember who did write my advocacy. Michael Mattice was my first Application Manager. Interestingly, here are the three first questions he asked my as part of the Policy and Procedures check : Mike actually asked the questions on February 17th and I probably answered immediately. Unfortunately it seems that I lost my answers. Maybe they are in some archive somewhere. Would be interesting to see how I ended giving an answer about the TeX exception.:-) Immediately, Mike moved to the Tasks and Skills step and checked my geneweb and lifelines packages (I already prepared a package for that other genealogy software). From my records, he found a few lintian warnings, which I probably made my best to fix, then later on, on March 12th, he answered me that thigns were OK and he was marking the T&S step as passed...handing things over to the NM database, asking me what username I wanted on debian.org (obviously, you know what I answered to this!). Then nothing happened..:-) I was not that impatient, but finally, around June 27th, I politely mailed NM Frontdesk (I guess) to get news...and I got a very quick answer by Martin Michlmayr. Martin was indeed worried about the situation (he told me I was on his radar....fun as, many years later, as many DDs, Martin probably went on mine because of pending localization work..:-)) Finally, Martin decided he was not entirely happy with the (maybe too short) processing for P&P and proposed me (very politely, you know how Martin is!) to do it again. So, some more questions...:-) Here, I have the answers. Really fun ro read. Hang on, pure bubulle style, very verbose! What a bunch of questions..:-). Reading my answers ten years after, I see that some answers are somehow naive but, after all, they're not so bad. I really remember spending hours in writing them (my English was somehow more shaky at that time) The last question was: "Please tell me about about yourself and what you intend to do for Debian". Here, Martin opened a big can of worms..:-) So, you'll learn about this in the next episode..:-)