Debian participation in Italy's CAD68 committee (The initial policy change discussed in this document is a couple of years old now, but it took about the same time to be fully implemented, and AFAIK the role Debian played in it has not been documented yet.) In October 2012 the Italian government, led at the time by Mario Monti, did something rather innovative, at least for a country that is not usually ahead of its time in the area of information technology legislation. They decided to change the main law (the "CAD", for Codice dell'Amministrazione Digitale) that regulates the acquisition of software at all levels of the public administration (PA), giving an explicit preference to the acquisition of Free Software. The new formulation of article 68 of the CAD first lists some macro criteria (e.g., TCO, adherence to open standards, security support, etc.) that public administrations in Italy shall use as ranking criteria in software-related calls for tenders. Then, and this is the most important part, the article affirms that the acquisition of proprietary software solutions is permitted only if it is impossible to choose Free Software solutions instead; or, alternatively, to choose software solutions that have already being acquired (and paid for) by the PA in the past, reusing preexisting software. The combined effect of these two provisions is that all new software acquisitions by PAs in Italy will be Free Software, unless it is motivated in writing, challengable by a judge that it was impossible to do otherwise. Isn't it great? It is, except that such a law is not necessarily easy to adhere to in practice, especially for small public administrations (e.g., municipalities of a few hundred people, not uncommon in Italy) which might have very little clue about software in general, and even less so about Free Software. This is why the government also tasked the relevant Italian agency to provide guidelines on how to choose software in a way that conforms with the new formulation of article 68. The agency decided to form a committee to work on the guidelines (because you always need a committee, right? ). To my surprise, the call for participation to be part of the committee explicitly listed representatives of Free Software communities as privileged software stakeholders that they wanted to have on the committee kudos to the agency for that. (The Italian wording on the call was: Costituir titolo di preferenza rivestire un ruolo di [ ] referenti di community del software a codice sorgente aperto.) Therefore, after various prods by fellow European Free Software activists that were aware of the ongoing change in legislation, I applied to be a volunteer CAD68 committee member, got selected, and ended up working over a period of about 6 months (March-September 2013) to help the agency writing the new software acquisition guidelines. Logistically, it hasn't been entirely trivial, as the default meeting place was in Rome, I live in Paris, and the agency didn't really have a travel budget for committee members. That's why I've sought sponsorship from Debian, offering to represent Debian views within the committee; Lucas kindly agreed to my request. So what did I do on behalf of Debian as a committee member during those months? Most of my job has been some sort of consulting on how community-driven Free Software projects like Debian work, on how the software they produce can be relied upon and contributed to, and more generally on how the PA can productively interact with such projects. In particular, I've been happy to work on the related work section of the guidelines, ensuring they point to relevant documents such as the French government guidelines on how to adopt Free Software (AKA circulaire Ayrault). I've also drafted the guidelines section on Free Software directories, ensuring that important resources such as FSF's Free Software Directory are listed as starting points for PAs that looking for software solutions for specific needs. Another part of my job has been ensuring that the guidelines do not end up betraying the principle of Free Software preference that is embodied in article 68. A majority of committee members came from a Free Software background, so that might not seem a difficult goal to accomplish. But it is important to notice that: (a) the final editor of the guidelines is the agency itself, not the committee, so having a "pro-Free Software" majority within the committee doesn't mean much per se; and (b) lobbying from the "pro-proprietary software" camp did happen, as it is entirely natural in these cases. In this respect I'm happy with the result: I do believe that the software selection process recommended by the guidelines, finally published in January 2014, upholds the Free Software preference principle of article 68. I credit both the agency and the non-ambiguity of the law (on this specific point) for that result. All in all, this has been a positive experience for me. It has reaffirmed my belief that Debian is a respected, non-partisan political actor of the wider software/ICT ecosystem. This experience has also given me a chance to be part of country-level policy-making, which has been very instructive on how and why good ideas might take a while to come into effect and influence citizen lives. Speaking of which, I'm now looking forward to the first alleged violations of article 68 in Italy, and how they will be dealt with. Abundant popcorn will certainly be needed. Links & press If you want to know more about this topic, I've collected below links to resources that have documented, in various languages, the publication of the CAD68 guidelines.

• official material:
  • announcement (it) by the agency
  • guidelines (.pdf, it)
• press releases:
  • FSFE press release (en), also covered by LWN (en)
  • April press release (fr), also in english
• press/blog coverage:
  • on Joinup (en), European Commission blog dedicated to Free Software adoption in Europe, with comments by yours truly and Carlo Piana
  • on OpenSource.com (en), popular blog for FOSS-related topics
  • by Carlo Piana (it), fellow member of the CAD68 committee, representing KDE and FSFE
  • on Punto Informatico (it), popular Italian tech blog
  • on Apogeo online (it), blog of a popular Italian publisher of IT books
  • on Agenda Digitale EU (it), blog dedicated to digital innovation in the Italian PA
  • by Simone Aliprandi (en), lawyer who followed closely the work of CAD68 committee
• interviews:
  • on My Solution (it), by yours truly
  • radio interview (it) by yours truly for Caterpillar, RAI Radio 2

I recently ranted about my frustration with GStreamer in a SoundCloud command-line client written in Ruby. Well, it turns out that there was quite a bit confusion going on. I still haven't figured out why my initial tries resulted in an error regarding $DISPLAY not being set. But now that I have played a bit with gst-launch-1.0, I can positively confirm that this was very likely not the fault of GStreamer. THe actual issue is, that ruby-gstreamer is assuming gstreamer-1.0, while soundCLI was still written against the gstreamer-0.10 API. Since the ruby gst module doesn't have the Gstreamer API version in its name, and since Ruby is a dynamic language that only detects most errors at runtime, this led to all sorts of cascaded errors. It turns out I only had to correct the use of query_position, query_duration, and get_state, as well as switching from playbin2 to playbin. soundCLI is now running in the background and playing my SoundCloud stream. A pull request against soundCLI has also been opened. On a somewhat related note, I found a GCC bug (ICE SIGSEGV) this weekend. My first one. It is related to C++11 bracketed initializers. Given that I have heard GCC 5.0 aims to remove the experimental nature of C++11 (and maybe also C++14), this seems like a good time to hit this one. I guess that means I should finally isolate the C++ regex (runtime) segfault I recently stumbled across.

For a little toy project of mine (a wikipedia XML dump word counter) I wrote a little C++11 helper class to distribute work to all available CPU cores. It took me many years to overcome my fear of threading: In the past, whenever I toyed with threaded code, I ended up having a lot of deadlocks, and generally being confused. It appears that I finally have understood enough of this crazyness to be able to come up with the small helper class below.

exercism.io is a croud-sourced mentorship platform for learning to program. In my opinion, they do a lot of things right. In particular, an exercise on exercism.io consists of a descriptive README file and a set of test cases implemented in the target programming language. The tests have two positive sides: You learn to do test-driven development, which is good. And you also have an automated validation suite. Of course, a test can not give you feedback on your actual implementation, but at least it can give you an idea if you have managed to implement what was required of you. But that is not the end of it. Once you have submitted a solution to a particular exercise, other users of exercism.io can comment on your implementation. And you can, as soon as you have submitted the first implementation, look at the solutions that other people have submitted to that particular problem. So knowledge transfer can happen both ways from there on: You can learn new things from how other people have solved the same problem, and you can also tell other people about things they might have done in a different way. These comments are, somewhat appropriately, called nitpicks on exercism.io. Now, exercism has recently gained a C++ track. That track is particularily fun, because it is based on C++11, Boost, and CMake. Things that are quite standard to C++ development these days. And the use of C++11 and Boost makes some solutions really shine.

Yet another update from my internship at Mozilla, as part of the OPW. An online triage workshop One of the most interesting thing I've done during the last weeks has been to held an online Bug Triage Workshop on the #testday channel at irc.mozilla.org.
That was a first time for me: I had been a moderator for a series of training sessions on IRC organized by Debian Women, but never a "speaker".
The experience turned out to be a good one: creating the material for the workshop had me basically summarize (not too much, I'm way too verbose!) all what I've learned in this past months about triaging in Mozilla, and speaking of it on IRC was a sort of challenge to my usual shyness. And I was so very lucky that a participant was able to reproduce the bug I picked as example, thus confirming it! How cool is that? ;) The workshop was about the very basics of triaging for Firefox, and we mostly focused on a simplified lifecycle of bugs, a guided tour of bugzilla (including the quicksearch and the advanced one, the list view, the individual bug view) and an explanation of the workflow of the triager. I still have my notes, and I plan to upload them to the wiki, sooner or later. I'm pretty satisfied of the outcome: the only regret is that the promoting wasn't enough, so we have few participants.
Will try to promote it better next time! :) about:crashes Another thing that had me quite busy in the last weeks was to learn more about crashes and stability in general.
If you are unfortunate enough to experience a crash with Firefox, you're probably familiar with the Mozilla Crash Reporter dialog box asking you to submit the crash report. But how does it works? From the client-side, Mozilla uses Breakpad as set of libraries for crash reporting. The Mozilla specific implementation adds to that a crash-reporting UI, a server to collect and process crash reported data (and particularly to convert raw dumps into readable stack traces) and a web interface, Socorro to view and parse crash reports. Curious about your crashes? The about:crashes page will show you a list of the submitted and unsubmitted crash reports. (And by the way, try to type about:about in the location bar, to find all the super-secret about pages!) For the submitted ones clicking on the CrashID will take you to the crash report on crash-stats, the website where the reports are stored and analyzed. The individual crash report page on crash-stats is awesome: it shows you the reported bug numbers if any bug summaries match the crash signature, as well as many other information. If crash-stats does not show a bug number, you really should file one! The CrashKill team works on these reports tracking the general stability of the various channels, triaging the top crashes, ensuring that the crash bugs have enough information and are reproducible and actionable by the devs.
The crash-stats site is a mine of information: take a look at the Top Crashes for Firefox 34.0a1.
If you click on a individual crash, you will see lots of details about it: just on the first tab ("Signature Summary") you can find a breakdown of the crashes by OS, by graphic vendors or chips or even by uptime range.
A very useful one is the number of crashes per install, so that you know how widespread is the crashing for that particular signature. You can also check the comments the users have submitted with the crash report, on the "Comments" tab. One and Done tasks review Last week I helped the awesome group of One and Done developers, doing some reviewing of the tasks pages. One and Done is a brilliant idea to help people contribute to the QA Mozilla teams.
It's a website proposing the user a series of tasks of different difficulty and on different topics to contribute to Mozilla. Each task is self-contained and can last few minutes or be a bit more challenging. The team has worked hard on developing it and they have definitely done an awesome job! :) I'm not a coding person, so I just know that they're using Django for it, but if you are interested in all the dirty details take a look at the project repository. My job has been only to check all the existent tasks and verify that the description and instruction are correct, that the task is properly tagged and so on. My impression is that this an awesome tool, well written and well thought with a lot of potential for helping people in their first steps into Mozilla. Something that other projects should definitely imitate (cough Debian cough). What's next? Next week I'll be back on working on bugs. I kind of love bugs, I have to admit it. And not squashing them: not being a coder make me less of a violent person toward digital insects. Herding them is enough for me. I'm feeling extremely non-violent toward bugs. I'll try to help Liz with the Test Plan for Firefox 34, on the triaging/verifying bugs part.
I'll also try to triage/reproduce some accessibility bugs (thanks Mario for the suggestion!).

Something straight out from the real world: Menu cards in restaurants are not nice to deal with if you are blind. It is an old problem we grow used to ignoring over time, but still something that can be quite nagging. There are a lot of psychological issues involved in this one. Of course, you can ask for the menu to be read out to you by the staff. While they usually do their best, you end up missing out on some things most of the time. First of all, depending on the current workload in the restaurant, the staff will usually try to cut some time and not read everything to you. What they usually do is to try to understand what type of meal you are interested in, and just read the choices from that category to you. While this can be considered a service in some situations (human preprocessing), there are situations were you will definitely miss a highlight on the menu that you would have liked to choose if you knew that it was there. And even if the staff decides to read the complete menu to you (which is rare), you are confronted with the 7-things-in-my-head-at-once problem. It is usually rather hard to decide amongst a list of more then 7 items, because our short-term memory is sort of limited. What the sighted restaurant goers do, is to skip back and forth between the available options, until they hit a decisive moment. True, that can take a while, but it is definitely a lot easier if you can perform "random access reads" to the list of choices yourself. However, if someone presents a substantial number of choices to you in a row, as sequential speech, you loose the random access ability. You either remember every choice from the beginning and do your choosing mentaully (if you do have extraordinary mental abilities), or you end up asking the staff to read previous items aloud again. This can work, but usually it doesn't. At some point, you do not want to bother the staff anymore, and you even start to feel stupid for asking again and again, while this is something totally normal to every sighted person, just that "they" do their "random access browsing" on their own, so "they" have no need to feel bad about how long it takes them to decide, minus the typical social pressure that arises after a a certain time for everyone, at least if you are dining in a group. In very rare cases, you happen to meet staff that is truly "awake", doing their best to not let you feel that they might be pressed on time, and really taking as much time as necessary to help you make the perfect decision. This is rare, but if it happens, it is almost a magical moment. One of these moments, where there are no "artificial" barriers between humans doing communcation. Anyway, I am drifting away. The perfect solution to this problem is to provide random access browsing of a restaurant menu with the help of digital devices. Trying to make braille menus available in all restaurants is a goal which is not realistically reachable. Menus go out of date, and need changing. And getting a physical braille copy updated and reprinted is considerably more involved as with digital media. Restaurant owners will also likely not see the benefit to rpvide a braille card for a very small circle of customers. With a digital online menu, that is a completely different story. These days, almost every blind person in at least my social circles owns an iOS (or similar) device. These devices have speech synthesis and web browsers. Of course, some restaurants especially in urban areas do already have a menu online. I have found them manually with google and friends sometimes in the past, which has already given me the ability to actually sit back, and really comfortably choose amongst the available offerings myself, without having to bother a human, and without having to feel bad about (ab)using their time. However, the case where a restaurant really has their menu online is rather rare still in the area where I am. And, it can be tedious to google for a restaurant website. Sometimes, the website itself is just marginally accessible, which makes it even more frustrating to get a relaxed dinner-experience. I have discovered a location-based solution for the restaurant-menu problem recently. Foursquare offers the ability to provide a direct link to the menu in a restaurant-entry. I figured, since all you need to do is write a single webpage where the (common) menu items are listed per restaurant, that I could begin to create restaurant menus for my favourite locations, on my own. Well, not quite, but almost. I will sometimes need help from others to get the menu digitized, but that's just a one-time piece of work I hopefully can outsource :-). Once the actual content is in my INBUX, I create a nice HTML page listing the menu in a rather speech-based browser friendly way. I have begun to do this today, with the menu of a restaurant just about 500 meters away from my apartment. Unterm goldenen Dachl now has a menu online, and the foursquare change request to publish the corresponsing URL is already pending. I don't fully understand how the Foursquare change review process works yet, but I hope the URL should be published in the upcoming days/weeks. I am using Foursquare because it is the backend of a rather popular mobile navigation App for blind people, called Blindsquare. Blindsquare lets you comfortably use Open Street Map and Foursquare data to get an overview of your surroundingds. If a food place has a menu entry listed in Foursquare, Blindsquare conveniently shows it to you and opens a browser if you tap it. So there is no need to actually search for the restaurant, you can just use the location based search of Blindsquare to discover the restaurant entry and its menu link directly from within Blindsquare. Actually, you could even find a restaurant by accident, and with a little luck, find the menu for it by location, without even knowing how the restaurant is called. Isn't that neat? Yeah, that's how it is supposed to work, that's as much independence as you can get. And, it is, as the title suggests, croudsourced accessibility. Becuase while it is nice if a restaurant owner cares to publish their menu themselves, if they haven't, you can do it yourself. Either as a user of assistive technologies, to scratch your own itch. Or as a friend of a person with a need for assistive technologies. Next time you go to lunch with your blind friend, consider making available the menu to them digitally in advance, instead of reading it. Other people will likely thank you for that, and you have actually achieved something today. And if you happne to put a menu online, make sure to submit a change request to Foursquare. Many blind people are using blindsquare these days, which makes it super-easy for them to discover the menu.

In short: I love my MacBook Air. It is the best (laptop) hardware I ever owned. I have seen hardware which was much more flaky in the past. I can set the display backlight to zero via software, which saves me a lot of battery life and also offers a bit of anti-spy-acroos-my-shoulder support. WLAN and bluetooth work nicely. And I just love the form-factor and the touch-feeling of the hardware. I even had the bag I use to carry my braille display modified so that the Air just fits in. I can't say how it behaves with X11. Given how flaky accessibility with graphical desktops on Linux is, I have still not made the switch. My MacBookAir is my perfect mobile terminal, I LOVE it. I am sort of surprised about the recent rant of Paul about MacBook Hardware. It is rather funny that we perceive the same technology so radically different. And after reading the second part of his rant I am wondering if I am no longer allowed to consider myself part of the "hardcore F/OSS world", because I don't consider Apple as evil as apparently most others. Why? Well, first of all, I actually like the hardware. Secondly, you have to show me a vendor first that builds usable accessibility into their products, and I mean all their products, without any extra price-tag attached. Once the others start to consider people with disabilities, we can talk about apple-bashing again. But until then, sorry, you don't see the picture as I do. Apple was the first big company on the market to take accessibility seriously. And they are still unbeaten, at least when it comes to bells and whistles included. I can unbox and configure any Apple product sold currently completely without assisstance. With some products, you just need to know a signle keypress (tripple-press the home button for touch devices and Cmd+F5 for Mac OS/X), and with others, during initial bootup, a speech synthesizer even tells you how to enable accessibility in case you need it. And after that is enabled, I can perform the setup of the device completely on my own. I don't need help from anyone else. And after the setup is complete, I can use 95% of the functionality provided by the operating system. And I am blind, part of a very small margin group so to speak. In Debian circles, I have even heard the sentiment that we supposedly have to accept that small margin groups are ignored sometimes. Well, as long as we think that way, as long as we strictly think economically, we will never be able to go there, fully. And we will never be the universal operating system, actually. Sorry to say that, but I think there is some truth to it. So, who is evil? Scratch your own itch doesn't always work to cover everything. How do we motivate contributors to work on things they don't personally need (yet)? How can we ensure that complicated but seldomly used features stay stable and do not fall to dust just because some upstream decides to rewrite an essential subcomponent of the dependency tree? I don't know. All I know is that these issues need to be solved in an universal operating system.

I have begun to push some of the Emacs Lisp Packages I have been working on over the last years to GNU ELPA, the Emacs Lisp Package Archive. That means you can use "M-x list-packages RET" to install them in GNU Emacs 24.

I used to read Slashdot, many many years ago. However, when they started to do more and more "Your rights online" articles, I gradually stopped to read them. Someone just sent me a link to a slashdot article: m.slashdot.org. If I try to open this with Lynx, I get the following error page:

It looks like your browser doesn't support JavaScript or it is disabled.
Please use the desktop site instead.

OK FaceBook^WSlashdot, all the geeks formerly employed by you have obviously left. And no, I am not going to read you anytime soon. BTW, the link to the "desktop site" goes here, which looses the reference to the particular story, if you notice. So your redirection site is totally useless. Thanks for nothing. Hush hush, to the ethernal internet graveyard where you belong.

The aaddition of lambdas in C++11 has greatly improved the flexibility of the language as a whole. C++14 will add a few more abilities. C++ Truths has a very nice and brief overview of what C++14 will allow. Part 1 goes from the very basics via closures to a small demonstration of partial function application. And Part 2 continues by showing recursive lambdas, overloaded lambdas, pattern matching, in-place parameter pack expansion (neat) and finally even memoisation. These code examples have been the most inspiring ones I have seen lately. If you have any interest in C++, go read them.

There is a strange bug in Planet Debian I am seeing since I joined. It is rather minor, but since it is an accessibility bug, I'd like to mention it here. I have written to the Planet Debian maintainers, and was told to figure it out myself. This is a pattern, accessibility is considered wishlist, apparently. And the affected people are supposed to fix it on their own. It is better if I don't say anything more about that attitude.

I have been looking for an App like this since I got my first iOS device in december 2011. Finally, it is here! A single-player (bot-driven) poker app for iOS, THETA Poker Pro, fully accessible and usable with VoiceOver. AppleVis has a review. It doesn't happen very often, but App programmers in the iOS Universe do indeed sometimes think about Accessibility support, and the APIs provided by Apple are useful enough to allow programmers to write very accessible apps. You can say about Apple whatever you want, currently, it is the company providing the best accessibility support on the market. Why? Because they made accessibility a first-class citizen of their platform(s). This is where policy helps. If you can dictate top-down that you support people with disabilities, things actually start to happen. If you have to ask, hope, and wait, like it is with free software, things do not really progress as fast as the users need it. Back to THETA Poker Pro: The default configuration is already very useable with VoiceOver. However, if you want the cards placed on the board announced to you, so that you do not have to discover them manually by touch, you can enable the "Card Announcement" item in the Options menu. You can also set message delay a bit slower, such that all messages are actually fully spoken and not cut off sometimes. With these two settings adjusted, and maybe "Animation" set to "Very fast", the game feels extremely nice. There is actually nothing I would want to change, which does not happen very often when I test a program for its accessibility. With these settings changed, game play is very smooth with VoiceOver, you basically just have to tap your cards to check, tap the deck to fold, or tap your chips to raise. Very simple, and these three "buttons" are on the bottom of the screen, so rather easy and quick to find. All other activity is automatically announced by VoiceOver. I have played a few hundred hands already with this App. It is a wonderful way to pass time. For instance, I don't like to go to my doctor, because I usually wait up to two or three hours. I had to pay her a visit on monday. While waiting, I played "a few" hands, and suddenly, I was already called in. When I came out again, I checked the time and was rather surprised that yes, I have waited two hours again, but this time, I didn't notice! :-) Special thanks go to the author(s) of this app. It is a good example of an App that was not specially made for the blind, but which feels like it was. Thanks, you've made my week!

Between 2001 and 2004, John Wielgley wrote emacs-chess, a rather complete Chess library for Emacs. I found it around 2004, and was immediately hooked. Why? Because Emacs is configurable, and I was hoping that I could customize the chessboard display much more than with any other console based chess program I have ever seen. And I was right. One of the four chessboard display types is exactly what I was looking for, chess-plain.el:

  
8 tSlDjLsT 
7 XxXxXxXx 
6         
5         
4         
3         
2 pPpPpPpP 
1 RnBqKbNr 
  
  abcdefgh

This might look confusing at first, but I have to admit that I grew rather fond of this way of displaying chess positions as ASCII diagrams. In this configuration, initial letters for (mostly) German chess piece names are used for the black pieces, and English chess piece names are used for the white pieces. Uppercase is used to indicate if a piece is on a black square and braille dot 7 is used to indicate an empty black square. chess-plain is completely configurable though, so you can have more classic diagrams like this as well:

  
8 rnbqkbnr 
7 pppppppp 
6  + + + + 
5 + + + +  
4  + + + + 
3 + + + +  
2 PPPPPPPP 
1 RNBQKBNR 
  
  abcdefgh

Here, upper case letters indicate white pieces, and lower case letters black pieces. Black squares are indicated with a plus sign. However, as with many Free Software projects, Emacs Chess was rather dormant in the last 10 years. For some reason that I can not even remember right now, my interest in Emacs Chess has been reignited roughly 5 weeks ago.

It is that time of the year again, Debian is electing the Project Leader for 2014/15. Whenever a Debian vote is in progress, I find myself rather happy to rediscover that Debian is providing text mode voting graphs. These are quite accessible to me as a braille user. It is rather unusual for me as a blind person to be able to access any graphs on the internet at all. All this has been made possible by gnuplots ability to generate text plots, and Manoj's willingness to implement it during his term as project secretary. Thanks to Gnuplot and Manoj, and thanks to the current secretary for keeping this feature, it is (at least to me) a very nice to have, and actually makes Debian rather unique. I personally don't know of any other major projects which provide text graphs. We are indeed setting a very good example here. It would be nice if other projects would adopt this as well. This is bridging the digital divide for me. For completeness sake I should probably mention that text graphs are not an universal solution for blind users. Those of us who do not use braille will probably have a very hard time extracting any meaningful information from this ASCII character salad. But to a braille user used to reading two dimensional information from the screen, it does actually work rather well. Some solutions from the 90s, when people didn't have graphical terminals readily available everywhere, are still very good accessibility workarounds. I am going to post another article about how I play chess on a computer, with newsgroup-style chessboard diagrams. Now that I think of it, these two topics are very related. There are some rather nifty solutions floating around from the good old text mode days which we need to revive before they finally get forgotten on the internet.

Although there wasn't too many comments on my what would you pay for? post I did get some mails. I was reminded about this via Mario Langs post, which echoed a couple of private mails I received. Despite being something that I take for granted, perhaps because my hosting comes from the Bytemark, people do seem willing to pay money for DNS hosting. Which is odd. I mean you could do it very very very cheaply if you had just four virtual machines. You can get complex and be geo-fancy, and you could use anycast on a small AS, but really? You could just deploy four virtual machines0 to provide a.ns, b.ns, c.ns, d.ns, and be better than 90% of DNS hosters out there. The thing that many people mentioned was Git-backed, or Git-based DNS. Which would be trivial if you used tinydns, and no much harder if you used bind. I suspect I'm "not allowed" to do DNS-things for a while, due to my contract with Dyn, but it might be worth checking... ObRandom: Beat me to it. Register gitdns.io, or similar, and configure hooks from github to compile tinydns records. In other news I started documenting early thoughts about my caching reverse proxy, which has now got a name stockpile. I wrote some stub code using node.js, and although it was functional it soon became callback hell:

• Is this resource cachable?
• Does this thing exist in the cache already?
• Should we return the server's response to the client, archive to memcached, or do both?

Expressing the rules neatly is also a challenge. I want the server core to be simple and the configuration to be something like:

is_cachable ( vhost, source, request, backened )
 
    /**
     * If the file is static, then it is cachable.
     */
    if ( request.url.match( /\.(jpg png txt html? gif)$/i ) )  
        return true;
     
    /**
     * If there is a cookie then the answer is false.
     */
    if ( request.has_cookie? )   return false ;  
    /**
     * If the server is alive we'll now pass the remainder through it
     * if not then we'll serve from the cache.
     */
    if ( backend.alive? )  
        return false;
     
    else  
        return true;
     
 

I can see there is value in judging the cachability based on the server response, but I plan to ignore that except for "Expires:", "Etag", etc ,etc) Anyway callback hell does make me want to reexamine the existing C/C++ libraries out there. Because I think I could do better.

There is a rather infamous multilingualisation bug in almost every screen reader I have ever used. As a german native speaker, I usually set my operating system user interface language to german. However, since I do a lot of technical work, I frequently end up on english websites. But if I temporarily switch my speech synthesis language to english, certain user interface elements and key names are not translated! So the screen reader continues to say "Eingabe" or "Leertaste", but with an english accent! I consider this behaviour hilarious, especially in 21st century. To demonstrate how hilarious it actually is, I have made a little browser audio game. Voice snippets have been contributed by my girlfriend. A natural voice is still a lot better than sampled speech synthesizers, and sounds more fun as we think. The idea is simple: Angela will announce a key name, and you are supposed to hit it on the keyboard as fast as possible. After a round of 50 guesses (time to answer will decrease with every guess) a final score will be announced. I usually don't write any JavaScript. I still managed to hack this up (with a little help from Simon) in roughly 2 hours of browsing Stackoverflow. The game is here. The code is on GitHub. If you have any problems getting this to work, please let me know or send a pull request. I'd like to get it working at least on iOS as well (after all, it is the touch device platform with best accessibility support currently), however, I could not get mobile safari to behave. So patches to enable use on touch devices are welcome. It should be simple, just add a few buttons which call the pressed function with the appropriate character as parameter. However, I tried, and something is fishy regarding window.setTimeout since it does not behave the same way as if you use it with Firefox. Oh, and my favourite key name is "Runt Glamour Zoo" :-) Now, this was funny. But it is also very sad. If you play this game, remember that blind and visually impaired computer users really have to cope with such accented pronounciations on a daily basis. We grew used to it, but if I take a step backward, it's really unacceptable that we still have to cope with this daily. And this is the simple part of the bug, since it is only dealing with key labels, which are internal to the system. It gets much worse if you want your screen reader to automatically switch to the correct synthesis language. Language detection is apparently not good enough to be implemented, at least that's what they tell me. And if the document (HTML) specifies a language, it's wrong in more than 50% of the cases. This is a disaster. Come to think of it, that is probably a reason why I prefer braille over speech. With braille, this problem goes away completely.

I used to host my internet infrastructure at Hurricane Electric. It all started in october 1998 with POP3/SMTP, HTTP and DNS. In the coming years, I began to host all services except DNS on my own. But I kept using he.net for its DNS management interface. It was dead simple, and therefore accessible. All they had was a basic textarea with BIND alike configuration in it. I could log in to their admin interface and change my DNS records as desired. A few years ago, they auto-upgraded my account to their new shiny DNS panel, which, surprise surprise, is no longer accessible with a simple text browser. After a bit of bitching with support, they ended up downgrading my account back to the old functionality, so I was happy again. However, as you might guess, last time I needed to change a DNS record, I found that the DNS panel has been ugpraded yet again and is again no longer accessible to me. So it was time to leave the sinking ship. But I needed to find an accessible DNS hosting service. Not an easy task, given that everyone seems to do more or less the same thing these days.

When I installed Debian on my MacBookAir4,1 in 2012, there was no way to do it without manual intervention yet. I followed a tutorial on how to boot GRUB from the EFI Boot option in the MacBook EFI Menu. I did not want to fiddle with rEFIt, and I didn't want to boot GRUB by default. When I want to boot Linux, I press the Option key during power up and select EFI Boot from the Apple boot menu. Unfortunately, I neglected to collect notes about how I did it manually. However, Linux 3.2 is getting a bit old, so I finally wanted to replace my manual boot configuration with something handled by the package system. In case you don't have /boot/efi in /etc/fstab yet, you need to mount /dev/sda1 on /boot/efi for the following to work. The documentation I found on the net suggested to just reinstall grub-efi-amd64 and everything should work. That is not quite true. When I do Nothing changes in /boot/efi. I sort of expected that /boot/efi/EFI/debian would be created, and the EFI image should be placed in there. However, that did not happen. Why is that? It turns out that when I installed grub-efi-amd64 manually in 2012, I created /boot/efi/EFI/boot/bootx64.efi which is the EFI fallback location, and apparently exactly what I want on this MacBook which does not support multiple boot options. Matthew Garrett posted an interesting article called Booting with EFI which sheds light on this issue, go and read it. Looking at /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-efi-amd64.postinst revealed that /boot/efi/EFI/debian needs to be created manually first. If this directory does not exist, grub-efi-amd64 basically does nothing on reinstall. Running grub-install will actually create a new EFI image. However, it is being created in the wrong place for this machine. does the trick. Now /boot/efi/EFI/debian/grubx64.efi gets created. However, since I don't want to make GRUB the default, there is yet another manual step to do: Now I can select EFI Boot after pressing the Option key during startup. GRUB is loaded and Linux 3.13 gets booted. Strike! Looking more closely reveals that there is actually a way to tell grub-install that it should install to the fallback location directly. The --removable option does that. For the faint of heart, what does grub-install actually do on an EFI system? It does not directly write to the disk, therefore it does not need a device specified. It looks for files in /boot/efi and assumes the EFI partition is mounted there. So for my use case, the correct way to upgrade to a current GRUB EFI image should have been: Meanwhile I've been made aware of Bug#708430. I guess it would be nice to have an option in /etc/default/grub which would indicate that installation to the fallback location is desired. While this is a rather ugly hack to work around a stupid limitation, it is still what I'd like on this MacBook. At least since I don't have a triplle boot situation. Fallback location works fine with just two OSes coexisting.