Search Results: "lelutin"

24 February 2026

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - February 2026

Our Debian User Group met on February 22nd for our first meeting of the year! Here's what we did: pollo: lelutin: viashimo: tvaz: lavamind: Pictures This time around, we held our meeting at c gep du Vieux Montr al, the college where I currently work. Here is the view we had: View from my office We also ordered some delicious pizzas from Pizzeria dei Compari, a nice pizzeria on Saint-Denis street that's been there forever. The pizzas we ate Some of us ended up grabbing a drink after the event at l'Am re boire, a pub right next to the venue, but I didn't take any pictures.

10 October 2025

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - September 2025

Our Debian User Group met on September 27th for our first meeting since our summer hiatus. As always, it was fun and productive! Here's what we did: pollo: sergiodj: LeLutin: tvaz: viashimo: tassia: Pictures This time again, we were hosted at La Balise (formely ATS ). It's nice to see this community project continuing to improve: the social housing apartments on the top floors should be opening this month! Lots of construction work was also ongoing to make the Espace des Possibles more accessible from the street level. Group photo Some of us ended up grabbing a drink after the event at l'Isle de Garde, a pub right next to the venue, but I didn't take any pictures.

9 February 2025

Antoine Beaupr : A slow blogging year

Well, 2024 will be remembered, won't it? I guess 2025 already wants to make its mark too, but let's not worry about that right now, and instead let's talk about me. A little over a year ago, I was gloating over how I had such a great blogging year in 2022, and was considering 2023 to be average, then went on to gather more stats and traffic analysis... Then I said, and I quote:
I hope to write more next year. I've been thinking about a few posts I could write for work, about how things work behind the scenes at Tor, that could be informative for many people. We run a rather old setup, but things hold up pretty well for what we throw at it, and it's worth sharing that with the world...
What a load of bollocks.

A bad year for this blog 2024 was the second worst year ever in my blogging history, tied with 2009 at a measly 6 posts for the year:
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ curl -sSL https://anarc.at/blog/   grep 'href="\./'   grep -o 20[0-9][0-9]   sort   uniq -c   sort -nr   grep -v 2025   tail -3
      6 2024
      6 2009
      3 2014
I did write about my work though, detailing the migration from Gitolite to GitLab we completed that year. But after August, total radio silence until now.

Loads of drafts It's not that I have nothing to say: I have no less than five drafts in my working tree here, not counting three actual drafts recorded in the Git repository here:
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ git s blog
## main...origin/main
?? blog/bell-bot.md
?? blog/fish.md
?? blog/kensington.md
?? blog/nixos.md
?? blog/tmux.md
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ git grep -l '\!tag draft'
blog/mobile-massive-gallery.md
blog/on-dying.mdwn
blog/secrets-recovery.md
I just don't have time to wrap those things up. I think part of me is disgusted by seeing my work stolen by large corporations to build proprietary large language models while my idols have been pushed to suicide for trying to share science with the world. Another part of me wants to make those things just right. The "tagged drafts" above are nothing more than a huge pile of chaotic links, far from being useful for anyone else than me, and even then. The on-dying article, in particular, is becoming my nemesis. I've been wanting to write that article for over 6 years now, I think. It's just too hard.

Writing elsewhere There's also the fact that I write for work already. A lot. Here are the top-10 contributors to our team's wiki:
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git shortlog --numbered --summary --group="format:%al"   head -10
  4272  anarcat
   423  jerome
   117  zen
   116  lelutin
   104  peter
    58  kez
    45  irl
    43  hiro
    18  gaba
    17  groente
... but that's a bit unfair, since I've been there half a decade. Here's the last year:
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git shortlog --since=2024-01-01 --numbered --summary --group="format:%al"   head -10
   827  anarcat
   117  zen
   116  lelutin
    91  jerome
    17  groente
    10  gaba
     8  micah
     7  kez
     5  jnewsome
     4  stephen.swift
So I still write the most commits! But to truly get a sense of the amount I wrote in there, we should count actual changes. Here it is by number of lines (from commandlinefu.com):
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git ls-files   xargs -n1 git blame --line-porcelain   sed -n 's/^author //p'   sort -f   uniq -ic   sort -nr   head -10
  99046 Antoine Beaupr 
   6900 Zen Fu
   4784 J r me Charaoui
   1446 Gabriel Filion
   1146 Jerome Charaoui
    837 groente
    705 kez
    569 Gaba
    381 Matt Traudt
    237 Stephen Swift
That, of course, is the entire history of the git repo, again. We should take only the last year into account, and probably ignore the tails directory, as sneaky Zen Fu imported the entire docs from another wiki there...
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ find [d-s]* -type f -mtime -365   xargs -n1 git blame --line-porcelain 2>/dev/null   sed -n 's/^author //p'   sort -f   uniq -ic   sort -nr   head -10
  75037 Antoine Beaupr 
   2932 J r me Charaoui
   1442 Gabriel Filion
   1400 Zen Fu
    929 Jerome Charaoui
    837 groente
    702 kez
    569 Gaba
    381 Matt Traudt
    237 Stephen Swift
Pretty good! 75k lines. But those are the files that were modified in the last year. If we go a little more nuts, we find that:
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ $ git-count-words-range.py    sort -k6 -nr   head -10
parsing commits for words changes from command: git log '--since=1 year ago' '--format=%H %al'
anarcat 126116 - 36932 = 89184
zen 31774 - 5749 = 26025
groente 9732 - 607 = 9125
lelutin 10768 - 2578 = 8190
jerome 6236 - 2586 = 3650
gaba 3164 - 491 = 2673
stephen.swift 2443 - 673 = 1770
kez 1034 - 74 = 960
micah 772 - 250 = 522
weasel 410 - 0 = 410
I wrote 126,116 words in that wiki, only in the last year. I also deleted 37k words, so the final total is more like 89k words, but still: that's about forty (40!) articles of the average size (~2k) I wrote in 2022. (And yes, I did go nuts and write a new log parser, essentially from scratch, to figure out those word diffs. I did get the courage only after asking GPT-4o for an example first, I must admit.) Let's celebrate that again: I wrote 90 thousand words in that wiki in 2024. According to Wikipedia, a "novella" is 17,500 to 40,000 words, which would mean I wrote about a novella and a novel, in the past year. But interestingly, if I look at the repository analytics. I certainly didn't write that much more in the past year. So that alone cannot explain the lull in my production here.

Arguments Another part of me is just tired of the bickering and arguing on the internet. I have at least two articles in there that I suspect is going to get me a lot of push-back (NixOS and Fish). I know how to deal with this: you need to write well, consider the controversy, spell it out, and defuse things before they happen. But that's hard work and, frankly, I don't really care that much about what people think anymore. I'm not writing here to convince people. I have stop evangelizing a long time ago. Now, I'm more into documenting, and teaching. And, while teaching, there's a two-way interaction: when you give out a speech or workshop, people can ask questions, or respond, and you all learn something. When you document, you quickly get told "where is this? I couldn't find it" or "I don't understand this" or "I tried that and it didn't work" or "wait, really? shouldn't we do X instead", and you learn. Here, it's static. It's my little soapbox where I scream in the void. The only thing people can do is scream back.

Collaboration So. Let's see if we can work together here. If you don't like something I say, disagree, or find something wrong or to be improved, instead of screaming on social media or ignoring me, try contributing back. This site here is backed by a git repository and I promise to read everything you send there, whether it is an issue or a merge request. I will, of course, still read comments sent by email or IRC or social media, but please, be kind. You can also, of course, follow the latest changes on the TPA wiki. If you want to catch up with the last year, some of the "novellas" I wrote include: (Well, no, you can't actually follow changes on a GitLab wiki. But we have a wiki-replica git repository where you can see the latest commits, and subscribe to the RSS feed.) See you there!

4 January 2025

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - December 2024

Our Debian User Group met on December 22nd for our last meeting of 2024. I wasn't sure at first it was a good idea, but many people showed up and it was great! Here's what we did: pollo: anarcat: lelutin: lavamind: tvaz: mjeanson and joeDoe: Some of us ended up grabbing a drink after the event at l'Isle de Garde, a pub right next to the venue. Pictures This time around, we were hosted by l'Espace des possibles, at their new location (they moved since our last visit). It was great! People liked the space so much we actually discussed going back there more often :) Group photo at l'Espace des possibles

13 November 2024

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - November 2024

Our Debian User Group met on November 2nd after a somewhat longer summer hiatus than normal. It was lovely to see a bunch of people again and to be able to dedicate a whole day to hacking :) Here is what we did: lavamind: pollo: anarcat: LeLutin: tvaz: tassia: Pictures This time around, we went back to Foulab. Thanks for hosting us! As always, the hacklab was full of interesting stuff and I took a few (bad) pictures for this blog post: Two old video cameras and a 'My First Sony' tape recorder An ALP HT-286 machine with a very large 'turbo' button A New Hampshire 'IPROUTE' vanity license plate

6 February 2024

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - February 2024

New Year, Same Great People! Our Debian User Group met for the first of our 2024 bi-monthly meetings on February 4th and it was loads of fun. Around twelve different people made it this time to Koumbit, where the meeting happened. As a reminder, our meetings are called "Debian & Stuff" because we want to be as open as possible and welcome people that want to work on "other stuff" than Debian. Here is what we did: pollo: LeLutin: mjeanson: lavamind: viashimo: tvaz & tassia: joeDoe: anarcat: Pictures I was pretty busy this time around and ended up not taking a lot of pictures. Here's a bad one of the ceiling at Koumbit I took, and a picture by anarcat of the content of his boxes of loot: A picture of the ceiling at Koumbit The content of anarcat's boxes of loot

21 June 2022

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - June 2022

As planned, we held our second local Debian meeting of the year last Sunday. We met at the lovely Eastern Bloc (an artists' hacklab) to work on Debian (and other stuff!), chat and socialise. Although there were fewer people than at our last meeting1, we still did a lot of work! I worked on fixing a bunch of bugs in Clojure packages2, LeLutin worked on podman and packaged libinfluxdb-http-perl and anarcat worked on internetarchive, trocla and moneta. Olivier also came by and worked on debugging his Kali install. We are planning to have our next meeting at the end of August. If you are interested, the best way to stay in touch is either to subscribe to our mailing list or to join our IRC channel (#debian-quebec on OFTC). Events are also posted on Quebec's Agenda du libre. Many thanks to Debian for providing us a budget to rent the venue for the day and for the pizza! Here is a nice picture anarcat took of (one of) the glasses of porter we had afterwards, at the next door brewery: A glass of English Porter from Silo Brewery

  1. Summer meetings are always less populous and it also happened to be Father's Day...
  2. #1012824, #1011856, #1011837, #1011844, #1011864 and #1011967.

28 April 2022

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal's Debian & Stuff - April 2022

After two long years of COVID hiatus, local Debian events in Montreal are back! Last Sunday, nine of us met at Koumbit to work on Debian (and other stuff!), chat and socialise. Even though these events aren't always the most productive, it was super fun and definitely helps keeping me motivated to work on Debian in my spare time. Many thanks to Debian for providing us a budget to rent the venue for the day and for the pizzas! Here are a few pictures I took during the event: Pizza boxes on a wooden bench Whiteboard listing TODO items for some of the participants A table with a bunch of laptops, and LeLutin :) If everything goes according to plan, our next meeting should be sometime in June. If you are interested, the best way to stay in touch is either to subscribe to our mailing list or to join our IRC channel (#debian-quebec on OFTC). Events are also posted on Quebec's Agenda du libre.

5 September 2021

Antoine Beaupr : Automating major Debian upgrades

It's major upgrade time again! The Debian project just published the Debian 11 "bullseye" release, and it's pretty awesome! This makes me realized that I have never written here about my peculiar upgrade process, and figured it was worth bringing that up to a wider audience. My upgrade process also has a notable changes section which includes major version changes (e.g. Inkscape 1.0!), new packages (e.g. podman!) and important behavior changes (e.g. driverless scanning and printing!). I'm particularly interested to hear about any significant change I might have missed. If you know of a cool new package that shipped with bullseye and that I forgot, do let me know! But that's for the cool new stuff. We need to talk about the problems with Debian major upgrades.

Background I have been maintaining detailed upgrade guides, on my wiki, starting with the jessie release, but I have actually written such guides for Koumbit.org as far back as Debian squeeze in 2011 (another worker wrote the older Debian lenny upgrade guide in 2009). Koumbit, since then, has kept maintaining those guides all the way to the latest bullseye upgrade, through 7 major releases! Over the years, those guides evolved from a quick "cheat-sheet" format copied from the release notes into a more or less "scripted" form that I currently use. Each guide has a procedure made of a few steps that can be basically copy-pasted to batch-upgrade a host (or multiple hosts in parallel) as quickly as possible. There is also the predict-os script which allows you to keep track of progress of the upgrades in a Puppet cluster.

Limitations of the official procedure In comparison with my procedure, the official upgrade guide is mostly designed to upgrade a single machine, typically a workstation, with a rather slow and exhaustive process. The PDF version of the upgrade guide is 14 pages long! This, obviously, does not work when you have tens or hundreds of machines to upgrade. Debian upgrades are notorious for being extremely reliable, but we have a lot of packages, and there are always corner cases where the upgrade will just fail because of a bug specific to your environment. Those will only be fixed after some back and forth in the community (and that's assuming users report those bugs, which is not always the case). There's no obvious way to deploy "hot fixes" in this context, at least not without fixing the package and publishing it on an unofficial Debian archive while the official ones catch up. This is slow and difficult. Or some packages require manual labor. Examples of this are the PostgreSQL or Ganeti packages which require you to upgrade your clusters by hand, while the old and new packages live side by side. Debian packages bring you far in the upgrade process, but sometimes not all the way. Which means every Debian install needs to be manually upgraded and inspected when a new release comes out. That's slow and error prone and we can do better.

How to automate major upgrades I have a proposal to automate this. It's been mostly dormant in the Debian wiki, for 5 years now. Fundamentally, this is a hard problem: Debian gets installed in so many different environments, from workstations to physical servers to virtual machines, embedded systems and so on, that it's extremely hard to come up with a "one size fits all" system. The (manual) procedure I'm using is mostly targeting servers, but I'm also using it on workstations. And I'll note that it's specific to my home setup: I have a different procedure at work, although it has a lot of common code. To automate this, I would factor out that common code with hooks where you could easily inject special code like "you need to upgrade ferm first", "you need an extra reboot here", or "this is how you finish the PostgreSQL upgrade". With Debian getting closer to a 2 year release cycle, with the previous release being supported basically only one year after the new stable comes out, I feel more and more strongly that this needs better automation. So I'm thinking that I should write a prototype for this. Ubuntu has do-release-upgrade that is too Ubuntu-specific to be reused. An attempt at collaborating on this has been mostly met with silence from Ubuntu's side as well. I'm thinking that using something like Fabric, Mitogen, or Transilience: anything that will allow me to write simple, portable Python code that can run transparently on a local machine (for single systems upgrades, possibly with a GUI frontend) to remote servers (for large clusters of servers, maybe with canaries and grouping using Cumin). I'll note that Koumbit started experimenting with Puppet Bolt in the bullseye upgrade process, but that feels too site-specific to be useful more broadly.

Trade-offs I am not sure where this stands in the XKCD time trade-off evaluation, because the table doesn't actually cover the time frequency of Debian release (which is basically "biennial") and the amount of time the upgrade would take across a cluster (which varies a lot, but that I estimate to be between one to 6 hours per machine). Assuming I have 80 machines to upgrade, that is 80 to 480 hours (between ~3 to 20 days) of work! It's unclear how much work such an automated system would shave off, however. Assuming things are an order of magnitude faster (say I upgrade 10 machines at a time), I would shave off between 3 and 18 days of work, which implies I might allow myself to spend a minimum of 5 days working on such a project.

The other option: never upgrade Before people mention those: I am aware of containers, Kubernetes, and other deployment mechanisms. Indeed, those may be a long-term solution, we currently can't afford to migrate everything over to containers right now: that is a huge migration and a total paradigm shift. At that point, whatever is left might not even be Debian in the first place. And besides, if you run Kubernetes, you still need to run some OS underneath and upgrade that, so that problem never completely disappears. Still, maybe that's the final answer: never upgrade. For some stateless machines like DNS replicas or load balancers, that might make a lot of sense as there's no or little data to carry to the new host. But this implies a seamless and fast provisioning process, and we don't have that either: at my work, installing a machine takes about as long as upgrading it, and that's after a significant amount of work automating that process, partly writing my own Debian installer with Fabric (!).

What is your process? I'm curious to hear what people think of those ideas. It strikes me as really odd that no one has really tackled that problem yet, considering how many clusters of Debian machines are out there. Surely people are upgrading those, and not following that slow step by step guide, right? I suspect everyone is doing the same thing: we all have our little copy-paste script we batch onto multiple machines, sometimes in parallel. That is what the Debian.org sysadmins are doing as well. There must be a better way. What is yours?

My upgrades so far So far, I have upgraded 2 out of my 3 home machines running buster -- others have been installed directly in bullseye -- with only my main, old, messy server left. Upgrades have been pretty painless so far (see another report, for example), much better than the previous buster upgrade. Obviously, for me personal use, automating this is pointless. Work-side, however, is another story: we have over 80 boxes to upgrade there and that will take a while. The last stretch to buster cycle took about two years to complete, so we might be done by the time the next release (12, "bookworm") is released, but that's actually a full year after "buster" becomes EOL, so it's actually too late... At least I fixed the installers so that new the machines we create all ship with bullseye, so we stopped accumulating new buster hosts...
Thanks to lelutin and pabs for reviewing a draft of this post.

3 July 2017

Antoine Beaupr : My free software activities, June 2017

Debian Long Term Support (LTS) This is my monthly Debian LTS report. This time I worked on Mercurial, sudo and Puppet.

Mercurial remote code execution I issued DLA-1005-1 to resolve problems with the hg server --stdio command that could be abused by "remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and consequently execute arbitrary code, by using --debugger as a repository name" (CVE-2017-9462). Backporting the patch was already a little tricky because, as is often the case in our line of work, the code had changed significantly in newer version. In particular, the commandline dispatcher had been refactored which made the patch non-trivial to port. On the other hand, mercurial has an extensive test suite which allowed me to make those patches in all confidence. I also backported a part of the test suite to detect certain failures better and to fix the output so that it matches the backported code. The test suite is slow, however, which meant slow progress when working on this package. I also noticed a strange issue with the test suite: all hardlink operations would fail. Somehow it seems that my new sbuild setup doesn't support doing hardlinks. I ended up building a tarball schroot to build those types of packages, as it seems the issue is related to the use of overlayfs in sbuild. The odd part is my tests of overlayfs, following those instructions, show that it does support hardlinks, so there maybe something fishy here that I misunderstand. This, however, allowed me to get a little more familiar with sbuild and the schroots. I also took this opportunity to optimize the builds by installing an apt-cacher-ng proxy to speed up builds, which will also be useful for regular system updates.

Puppet remote code execution I have issued DLA-1012-1 to resolve a remote code execution attack against puppetmaster servers, from authenticated clients. To quote the advisory: "Versions of Puppet prior to 4.10.1 will deserialize data off the wire (from the agent to the server, in this case) with a attacker-specified format. This could be used to force YAML deserialization in an unsafe manner, which would lead to remote code execution." The fix was non-trivial. Normally, this would have involved fixing the YAML parsing, but this was considered problematic because the ruby libraries themselves were vulnerable and it wasn't clear we could fix the problem completely by fixing YAML parsing. The update I proposed took the bold step of switching all clients to PSON and simply deny YAML parsing from the server. This means all clients need to be updated before the server can be updated, but thankfully, updated clients will run against an older server as well. Thanks to LeLutin at Koumbit for helping in testing patches to solve this issue.

Sudo privilege escalation I have issued DLA-1011-1 to resolve an incomplete fix for a privilege escalation issue (CVE-2017-1000368 from CVE-2017-1000367). The backport was not quite trivial as the code had changed quite a lot since wheezy as well. Whereas mercurial's code was more complex, it's nice to see that sudo's code was actually simpler and more straightforward in newer versions, which is reassuring. I uploaded the packages for testing and uploaded them a year later. I also took extra time to share the patch in the Debian bugtracker, so that people working on the issue in stable may benefit from the backported patch, if needed. One issue that came up during that work is that sudo doesn't have a test suite at all, so it is quite difficult to test changes and make sure they do not break anything.

Should we upload on fridays? I brought up a discussion on the mailing list regarding uploads on fridays. With the sudo and puppet uploads pending, it felt really ... daring to upload both packages, on a friday. Years of sysadmin work hardwired me to be careful on fridays; as the saying goes: "don't deploy on a friday if you don't want to work on the weekend!" Feedback was great, but I was surprised to find that most people are not worried worried about those issues. I have tried to counter some of the arguments that were brought up: I wonder if there could be a disconnection here between the package maintainer / programmer work and the sysadmin work that is at the receiving end of that work. Having myself to deal with broken updates in the past, I'm surprised this has never come up in the discussions yet, or that the response is so underwhelming. So far, I'll try to balance the need for prompt security updates and the need for stable infrastructure. One does not, after all, go without the other...

Triage I also did small fry triage: Hopefully some of those will come to fruitition shortly.

Other work My other work this month was a little all over the place.

Stressant Uploaded a new release (0.4.1) of stressant to split up the documentation from the main package, as the main package was taking up too much space according to grml developers. The release also introduces limited anonymity option, by blocking serial numbers display in the smartctl output.

Debiman Also did some small followup on the debiman project to fix the FAQ links.

Local server maintenance I upgraded my main server to Debian stretch. This generally went well, althought the upgrade itself took way more time than I would have liked (4 hours!). This is partly because I have a lot of cruft installed on the server, but also because of what I consider to be issues in the automation of major Debian upgrades. For example, I was prompted for changes in configuration files at seemingly random moments during the upgrade, and got different debconf prompts to answer. This should really be batched together, and unfortunately I had forgotten to use the home-made script I established when i was working at Koumbit which shortens the upgrade a bit. I wish we would improve on our major upgrade mechanism. I documented possible solutions for this in the AutomatedUpgrade wiki page, but I'm not sure I see exactly where to go from here. I had a few regressions after the upgrade:
  • the infrared remote control stopped working: still need to investigate
  • my home-grown full-disk encryption remote unlocking script broke, but upstream has a nice workaround, see Debian bug #866786
  • gdm3 breaks bluetooth support (Debian bug #805414 - to be fair, this is not a regression in stretch, it's just that I switched my workstation from lightdm to gdm3 after learning that the latter can do rootless X11!)

Docker and Subsonic I did my first (and late?) foray into Docker and containers. My rationale was that I wanted to try out Subsonic, an impressive audio server which some friends have shown me. Since Subsonic is proprietary, I didn't want it to contaminate the rest of my server and it seemed like a great occasion to try out containers to keep things tidy. Containers may also allow me to transparently switch to the FLOSS fork LibreSonic once the trial period is over. I have learned a lot and may write more about the details of that experience soon, for now you can look at the contributions I made to the unofficial Subsonic docker image, but also the LibreSonic one. Since Subsonic also promotes album covers as first-class citizens, I used beets to download a lot of album covers, which was really nice. I look forward to using beets more, but first I'll need to implement two plugins.

Wallabako I did a small release of wallabako to fix the build with the latest changes in the underlying wallabago library, which led me to ask upstream to make versionned releases. I also looked into creating a separate documentation site but it looks like mkdocs doesn't like me very much: the table of contents is really ugly...

Small fry That's about it! And that was supposed to be a slow month...

6 February 2015

Antoine Beaupr : Migrating from Drupal to Ikiwiki

TLPL; j'ai chang de logiciel pour la gestion de mon blog. TLDR; I have changed my blog from Drupal to Ikiwiki. Note: since this post uses ikiwiki syntax (i just copied it over here), you may want to read the original version instead of this one. will continue operating for a while to
give a chance to feed aggregators to catch that article. It will also
give time to the Internet archive to catchup with the static
stylesheets (it turns out it doesn't like Drupal's CSS compression at
all!) An archive will therefore continue being available on the
internet archive for people that miss the old stylesheet. Eventually, I will simply redirect the anarcat.koumbit.org URL to
the new blog location, . This will likely be my
last blog post written on Drupal, and all new content will be
available on the new URL. RSS feed URLs should not change.

Why I am migrating away from Drupal because it is basically impossible to
upgrade my blog from Drupal 6 to Drupal 7. Or if it is, I'll have to
redo the whole freaking thing again when Drupal 8 comes along. And frankly, I don't really need Drupal to run a blog. A blog was
originally a really simple thing: a web blog. A set of articles
written on the corner of a table. Now with Drupal, I can add
ecommerce, a photo gallery and whatnot to my blog, but why would I do
that? and why does it need to be a dynamic CMS at all, if I get so
little comments? So I'm switching to ikiwiki, for the following reason:
  • no upgrades necessary: well, not exactly true, i still need to
    upgrade ikiwiki, but that's covered by the Debian package
    maintenance and I only have one patch to it, and there's no data migration! (the last such migration in ikiwiki was in 2009 and was fully supported)
  • offline editing: this is a a big thing for me: i can just note
    things down and push them when I get back online
  • one place for everything: this blog is where I keep my notes, it's
    getting annoying to have to keep track of two places for that stuff
  • future-proof: extracting content from ikiwiki is amazingly
    simple. every page is a single markdown-formatted file. that's it.
Migrating will mean abandoning the
barlow theme, which was
seeing a declining usage anyways.

What So what should be exported exactly. There's a bunch of crap in the old
blog that i don't want: users, caches, logs, "modules", and the list
goes on. Maybe it's better to create a list of what I need to extract:
  • nodes
    • title ([[ikiwiki/directive/meta]] title and guid tags, guid to avoid flooding aggregators)
    • body (need to check for "break comments")
    • nid (for future reference?)
    • tags (should be added as \[[!tag foo bar baz]] at the bottom)
    • URL (to keep old addresses)
    • published date ([[ikiwiki/directive/meta]] date directive)
    • modification date ([[ikiwiki/directive/meta]] updated directive)
    • revisions?
    • attached files
  • menus
    • RSS feed
    • contact
    • search
  • comments
    • author name
    • date
    • title
    • content
  • attached files
    • thumbnails
    • links
  • tags
    • each tag should have its own RSS feed and latest posts displayed

When Some time before summer 2015.

Who Well me, who else. You probably really don't care about that, so let'S
get to the meat of it.

How How to perform this migration... There are multiple paths:
  • MySQL commandline: extracting data using the commandline mysql tool (drush sqlq ...)
  • Views export: extracting "standard format" dumps from Drupal and
    parse it (JSON, XML, CSV?)
Both approaches had issues, and I found a third way: talk directly to
mysql and generate the files directly, in a Python script. But first,
here are the two previous approaches I know of.

MySQL commandline LeLutin switched using MySQL requests,
although he doesn't specify how content itself was migrated. Comments
importing is done with that script:
echo "select n.title, concat('  [[!comment  format=mdwn  username=\"', c.name, '\"  ip=\"', c.hostname, '\"  subject=\"', c.subject, '\"  date=\"', FROM_UNIXTIME(c.created), '\"  content=\"\"\" ', b.comment_body_value, ' \"\"\"]]') from node n, comment c, field_data_comment_body b where n.nid=c.nid and c.cid=b.entity_id;"   drush sqlc   tail -n +2   while read line; do if [ -z "$i" ]; then i=0; fi; title=$(echo "$line"   sed -e 's/[    ]\+ .*//' -e 's/ /_/g' -e 's/[:(),?/+]//g'); body=$(echo "$line"   sed 's/[^ ]*  //'); mkdir -p ~/comments/$title; echo -e "$body" > ~/comments/$title/comment_$i._comment; i=$((i+1)); done
Kind of ugly, but beats what i had before (which was "nothing"). I do think it is the good direction to take, to simply talk to the
MySQL database, maybe with a native Python script. I know the Drupal
database schema pretty well (still! this is D6 after all) and it's
simple enough that this should just work.

Views export [[!img 2015-02-03-233846_1440x900_scrot.png class="align-right" size="300x" align="center" alt="screenshot of views 2.x"]] mvc recommended views data export on Lelutin's
blog. Unfortunately, my experience with the views export interface has
been somewhat mediocre so far. Yet another reason why I don't like
using Drupal anymore is this kind of obtuse dialogs: I clicked through those for about an hour to get JSON output that
turned out to be provided by views bonus instead of
views_data_export. And confusingly enough, the path and
format_name fields are null in the JSON output
(whyyy!?). views_data_export unfortunately only supports XML,
which seems hardly better than SQL for structured data, especially
considering I am going to write a script for the conversion anyways. Basically, it doesn't seem like any amount of views mangling will
provide me with what i need. Nevertheless, here's the [[failed-export-view.txt]] that I was able to
come up with, may it be useful for future freedom fighters.

Python script I ended up making a fairly simple Python script to talk directly to
the MySQL database. The script exports only nodes and comments, and nothing else. It makes
a bunch of assumptions about the structure of the site, and is
probably only going to work if your site is a simple blog like mine,
but could probably be improved significantly to encompass larger and
more complex datasets. History is not preserved so no interaction is
performed with git.

Generating dump First, I imported the MySQL dump file on my local mysql server for easier
development. It is 13.9MiO!!
mysql -e 'CREATE DATABASE anarcatblogbak;'
ssh aegir.koumbit.net "cd anarcat.koumbit.org ; drush sql-dump"   pv   mysql anarcatblogbak
I decided to not import revisions. The majority (70%) of the content has
1 or 2 revisions, and those with two revisions are likely just when
the node was actually published, with minor changes. ~80% have 3
revisions or less, 90% have 5 or less, 95% 8 or less, and 98% 10 or
less. Only 5 articles have more than 10 revisions, with two having the
maximum of 15 revisions. Those stats were generated with:
SELECT title,count(vid) FROM anarcatblogbak.node_revisions group
by nid;
Then throwing the output in a CSV spreadsheet (thanks to
mysql-workbench for the easy export), adding a column numbering the
rows (B1=1,B2=B1+1), another for generating percentages
(C1=B1/count(B$2:B$218)) and generating a simple graph with
that. There were probably ways of doing that more cleanly with R,
and I broke my promise to never use a spreadsheet again, but then
again it was Gnumeric and it's just to get a rough idea. There are 196 articles to import, with 251 comments, which means an
average of 1.15 comment per article (not much!). Unpublished articles
(5!) are completely ignored. Summaries are also not imported as such (break comments are
ignored) because ikiwiki doesn't support post summaries.

Calling the conversion script The script is in [[drupal2ikiwiki.py]]. It is called with:
./drupal2ikiwiki.py -u anarcatblogbak -d anarcatblogbak blog -vv
The -n and -l1 have been used for first tests as well. Use this
command to generate HTML from the result without having to commit and
push all:
ikiwiki --plugin meta --plugin tag --plugin comments --plugin inline  . ../anarc.at.html
More plugins are of course enabled in the blog, see the setup file for
more information, or just enable plugin as you want to unbreak
things. Use the --rebuild flag on subsequent runs. The actual
invocation I use is more something like:
ikiwiki --rebuild --no-usedirs --plugin inline --plugin calendar --plugin postsparkline --plugin meta --plugin tag --plugin comments --plugin sidebar  . ../anarc.at.html
I had problems with dates, but it turns out that I wasn't setting
dates in redirects... Instead of doing that, I started adding a
"redirection" tag that gets ignored by the main page.

Files and old URLs The script should keep the same URLs, as long as pathauto is enabled
on the site. Otherwise, some logic should be easy to add to point to
node/N. To redirect to the new blog, rewrite rules, on original blog, should
be as simple as:
Redirect / http://anarc.at/blog/
When we're sure:
Redirect permanent / http://anarc.at/blog/
Now, on the new blog, some magic needs to happen for files. Both
/files and /sites/anarcat.koumbit.org/files need to resolve
properly. We can't use symlinks because
ikiwiki drops symlinks on generation. So I'll just drop the files in /blog/files directly, the actual
migration is:
cp $DRUPAL/sites/anarcat.koumbit.org/files $IKIWIKI/blog/files
rm -r .htaccess css/ js/ tmp/ languages/
rm foo/bar # wtf was that.
rmdir *
sed -i 's#/sites/anarcat.koumbit.org/files/#/blog/files/#g' blog/*.mdwn
sed -i 's#http://anarcat.koumbit.org/blog/files/#/blog/files/#g' blog/*.mdwn
chmod -R -x blog/files
sudo chmod -R +X blog/files
A few pages to test images:
  • http://anarcat.koumbit.org/node/157
  • http://anarcat.koumbit.org/node/203
There are some pretty big files in there, 10-30MB MP3s - but those are
already in this wiki! so do not import them! Running fdupes on the result helps find oddities. The meta guid directive is used to keep the aggregators from finding
duplicate feed entries. I tested it with Liferea, but it may freak out
some other sites.

Remaining issues
  • postsparkline and calendar archive disrespect meta(date)
  • merge the files in /communication with the ones in /blog/files
    before import
  • import non-published nodes
  • check nodes with a format different than markdown (only a few 3=Full
    HTML
    found so far)
  • replace links to this wiki in blog posts with internal links
More progress information in [[the script drupal2ikiwiki.py]] itself.