Search Results: "grant"

11 June 2025

John Goerzen: I Learned We All Have Linux Seats, and I m Not Entirely Pleased

I recently wrote about How to Use SSH with FIDO2/U2F Security Keys, which I now use on almost all of my machines. The last one that needed this was my Raspberry Pi hooked up to my DEC vt510 terminal and IBM mechanical keyboard. Yes I do still use that setup! To my surprise, generating a key on it failed. I very quickly saw that /dev/hidraw0 had incorrect permissions, accessible only to root. On other machines, it looks like this: 
crw-rw----+ 1 root root 243, 16 May 24 16:47 /dev/hidraw16
And, if I run getfacl on it, I see: 
# file: dev/hidraw16
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rw-
user:jgoerzen:rw-
group::---
mask::rw-
other::---
Yes, something was setting an ACL on it. Thus began to saga to figure out what was doing that. Firing up inotifywatch, I saw it was systemd-udevd or its udev-worker. But cranking up logging on that to maximum only showed me that uaccess was somehow doing this. I started digging. uaccess turned out to be almost entirely undocumented. People say to use it, but there s no description of what it does or how. Its purpose appears to be to grant access to devices to those logged in to a machine by dynamically adding them to ACLs for devices. OK, that s a nice goal, but why was machine A doing this and not machine B? I dug some more. I came across a hint that uaccess may only do that for a seat . A seat? I ve not heard of that in Linux before. Turns out there s some information (older and newer) about this out there. Sure enough, on the machine with KDE, loginctl list-sessions shows me on seat0, but on the machine where I log in from ttyUSB0, it shows an empty seat. But how to make myself part of the seat? I tried various udev rules to add the seat or master-of-seat tags, but nothing made any difference. I finally gave up and did the old-fashioned rule to just make it work already: 
TAG=="security-device",SUBSYSTEM=="hidraw",GROUP="mygroup"
I still don t know how to teach logind to add a seat for ttyUSB0, but oh well. At least I learned something. An annoying something, but hey. This all had a laudable goal, but when there are so many layers of indirection, poorly documented, with poor logging, it gets pretty annoying.

6 June 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in May 2025

Welcome to our 5th report from the Reproducible Builds project in 2025! Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please do visit the Contribute page on our website. In this report:
  1. Security audit of Reproducible Builds tools published
  2. When good pseudorandom numbers go bad
  3. Academic articles
  4. Distribution work
  5. diffoscope and disorderfs
  6. Website updates
  7. Reproducibility testing framework
  8. Upstream patches

Security audit of Reproducible Builds tools published The Open Technology Fund s (OTF) security partner Security Research Labs recently an conducted audit of some specific parts of tools developed by Reproducible Builds. This form of security audit, sometimes called a whitebox audit, is a form testing in which auditors have complete knowledge of the item being tested. They auditors assessed the various codebases for resilience against hacking, with key areas including differential report formats in diffoscope, common client web attacks, command injection, privilege management, hidden modifications in the build process and attack vectors that might enable denials of service. The audit focused on three core Reproducible Builds tools: diffoscope, a Python application that unpacks archives of files and directories and transforms their binary formats into human-readable form in order to compare them; strip-nondeterminism, a Perl program that improves reproducibility by stripping out non-deterministic information such as timestamps or other elements introduced during packaging; and reprotest, a Python application that builds source code multiple times in various environments in order to to test reproducibility. OTF s announcement contains more of an overview of the audit, and the full 24-page report is available in PDF form as well.

When good pseudorandom numbers go bad Danielle Navarro published an interesting and amusing article on their blog on When good pseudorandom numbers go bad. Danielle sets the stage as follows:
[Colleagues] approached me to talk about a reproducibility issue they d been having with some R code. They d been running simulations that rely on generating samples from a multivariate normal distribution, and despite doing the prudent thing and using set.seed() to control the state of the random number generator (RNG), the results were not computationally reproducible. The same code, executed on different machines, would produce different random numbers. The numbers weren t just a little bit different in the way that we ve all wearily learned to expect when you try to force computers to do mathematics. They were painfully, brutally, catastrophically, irreproducible different. Somewhere, somehow, something broke.
Thanks to David Wheeler for posting about this article on our mailing list

Academic articles There were two scholarly articles published this month that related to reproducibility: Daniel Hugenroth and Alastair R. Beresford of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and Mario Lins and Ren Mayrhofer of Johannes Kepler University in Linz, Austria published an article titled Attestable builds: compiling verifiable binaries on untrusted systems using trusted execution environments. In their paper, they:
present attestable builds, a new paradigm to provide strong source-to-binary correspondence in software artifacts. We tackle the challenge of opaque build pipelines that disconnect the trust between source code, which can be understood and audited, and the final binary artifact, which is difficult to inspect. Our system uses modern trusted execution environments (TEEs) and sandboxed build containers to provide strong guarantees that a given artifact was correctly built from a specific source code snapshot. As such it complements existing approaches like reproducible builds which typically require time-intensive modifications to existing build configurations and dependencies, and require independent parties to continuously build and verify artifacts.
The authors compare attestable builds with reproducible builds by noting an attestable build requires only minimal changes to an existing project, and offers nearly instantaneous verification of the correspondence between a given binary and the source code and build pipeline used to construct it , and proceed by determining that t he overhead (42 seconds start-up latency and 14% increase in build duration) is small in comparison to the overall build time.
Timo Pohl, Pavel Nov k, Marc Ohm and Michael Meier have published a paper called Towards Reproducibility for Software Packages in Scripting Language Ecosystems. The authors note that past research into Reproducible Builds has focused primarily on compiled languages and their ecosystems, with a further emphasis on Linux distribution packages:
However, the popular scripting language ecosystems potentially face unique issues given the systematic difference in distributed artifacts. This Systemization of Knowledge (SoK) [paper] provides an overview of existing research, aiming to highlight future directions, as well as chances to transfer existing knowledge from compiled language ecosystems. To that end, we work out key aspects in current research, systematize identified challenges for software reproducibility, and map them between the ecosystems.
Ultimately, the three authors find that the literature is sparse , focusing on few individual problems and ecosystems, and therefore identify space for more critical research.

Distribution work In Debian this month:
Hans-Christoph Steiner of the F-Droid catalogue of open source applications for the Android platform published a blog post on Making reproducible builds visible. Noting that Reproducible builds are essential in order to have trustworthy software , Hans also mentions that F-Droid has been delivering reproducible builds since 2015 . However:
There is now a Reproducibility Status link for each app on f-droid.org, listed on every app s page. Our verification server shows or based on its build results, where means our rebuilder reproduced the same APK file and means it did not. The IzzyOnDroid repository has developed a more elaborate system of badges which displays a for each rebuilder. Additionally, there is a sketch of a five-level graph to represent some aspects about which processes were run.
Hans compares the approach with projects such as Arch Linux and Debian that provide developer-facing tools to give feedback about reproducible builds, but do not display information about reproducible builds in the user-facing interfaces like the package management GUIs.
Arnout Engelen of the NixOS project has been working on reproducing the minimal installation ISO image. This month, Arnout has successfully reproduced the build of the minimal image for the 25.05 release without relying on the binary cache. Work on also reproducing the graphical installer image is ongoing.
In openSUSE news, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another monthly update for their work there.
Lastly in Fedora news, Jelle van der Waa opened issues tracking reproducible issues in Haskell documentation, Qt6 recording the host kernel and R packages recording the current date. The R packages can be made reproducible with packaging changes in Fedora.

diffoscope & disorderfs diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 295, 296 and 297 to Debian:
  • Don t rely on zipdetails --walk argument being available, and only add that argument on newer versions after we test for that. [ ]
  • Review and merge support for NuGet packages from Omair Majid. [ ]
  • Update copyright years. [ ]
  • Merge support for an lzma comparator from Will Hollywood. [ ][ ]
Chris also merged an impressive changeset from Siva Mahadevan to make disorderfs more portable, especially on FreeBSD. disorderfs is our FUSE-based filesystem that deliberately introduces non-determinism into directory system calls in order to flush out reproducibility issues [ ]. This was then uploaded to Debian as version 0.6.0-1. Lastly, Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 296 [ ][ ] and 297 [ ][ ], and disorderfs to version 0.6.0 [ ][ ].

Website updates Once again, there were a number of improvements made to our website this month including:

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. However, Holger Levsen posted to our mailing list this month in order to bring a wider awareness to funding issues faced by the Oregon State University (OSU) Open Source Lab (OSL). As mentioned on OSL s public post, recent changes in university funding makes our current funding model no longer sustainable [and that] unless we secure $250,000 in committed funds, the OSL will shut down later this year . As Holger notes in his post to our mailing list, the Reproducible Builds project relies on hardware nodes hosted there. Nevertheless, Lance Albertson of OSL posted an update to the funding situation later in the month with broadly positive news.
Separate to this, there were various changes to the Jenkins setup this month, which is used as the backend driver of for both tests.reproducible-builds.org and reproduce.debian.net, including:
  • Migrating the central jenkins.debian.net server AMD Opteron to Intel Haswell CPUs. Thanks to IONOS for hosting this server since 2012.
  • After testing it for almost ten years, the i386 architecture has been dropped from tests.reproducible-builds.org. This is because that, with the upcoming release of Debian trixie, i386 is no longer supported as a regular architecture there will be no official kernel and no Debian installer for i386 systems. As a result, a large number of nodes hosted by Infomaniak have been retooled from i386 to amd64.
  • Another node, ionos17-amd64.debian.net, which is used for verifying packages for all.reproduce.debian.net (hosted by IONOS) has had its memory increased from 40 to 64GB, and the number of cores doubled to 32 as well. In addition, two nodes generously hosted by OSUOSL have had their memory doubled to 16GB.
  • Lastly, we have been granted access to more riscv64 architecture boards, so now we have seven such nodes, all with 16GB memory and 4 cores that are verifying packages for riscv64.reproduce.debian.net. Many thanks to PLCT Lab, ISCAS for providing those.

Outside of this, a number of smaller changes were also made by Holger Levsen:
  • reproduce.debian.net-related:
    • Only use two workers for the ppc64el architecture due to RAM size. [ ]
    • Monitor nginx_request and nginx_status with the Munin monitoring system. [ ][ ]
    • Detect various variants of network and memory errors. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Add a prominent link to reproducible-builds.org. [ ]
    • Add a rebuilderd-cache-cleanup.service and run it daily via timer. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Be more verbose what sources are being downloaded. [ ]
    • Correctly deal with packages with an epoch in their version [ ] and deal with binNMUs versions with an epoch as well [ ][ ].
    • Document how to reschedule all other errors on all archs. [ ]
    • Misc documentation improvements. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Include the $HOSTNAME variable in the rebuilderd logfiles. [ ]
    • Install the equivs package on all worker nodes. [ ][ ]
  • Jenkins nodes:
    • Permit the sudo tool to fix up permission issues. [ ][ ]
    • Document how to manage diskspace with OpenStack. [ ]
    • Ignore a number of spurious monitoring errors on riscv64, FreeBSD, etc.. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Install ntpsec-ntpdate (instead of ntpdate) as the former is available on Debian trixie and bookworm. [ ][ ]
    • Use the same SSH ControlPath for all nodes. [ ]
    • Make sure the munin user uses the same SSH config as the jenkins user. [ ]
  • tests.reproducible-builds.org-related:
    • Disable testing of the i386 architecture. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Document the current disk usage. [ ][ ]
    • Address some image placement now that we only test three architectures. [ ]
    • Keep track of build performance. [ ]
  • Misc:
    • Fix a (harmless) typo in the multiarch_versionskew script. [ ]
In addition, Jochen Sprickerhof made a series of changes related to reproduce.debian.net:
  • Add out of memory detection to the statistics page. [ ]
  • Reverse the sorting order on the statistics page. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
  • Improve the spacing between statistics groups. [ ]
  • Update a (hard-coded) line number in error message detection pertaining to a debrebuild line number. [ ]
  • Support Debian unstable in the rebuilder-debian.sh script. [ ] ]
  • Rely on rebuildctl to sync only arch-specific packages. [ ][ ]

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Finally, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

27 May 2025

Ravi Dwivedi: Singapore Visa Process

In November 2024, Badri and I applied for a Singapore visa to visit the country. To apply for a Singapore visa, you need to visit an authorized travel agent listed by the Singapore High Commission on their website. Unlike the Schengen visa (where only VFS can process applications), the Singapore visa has many authorized travel agents to choose from. I remember that the list mentioned as many as 25 authorized agents in Chennai. For my application, I randomly selected Ria International in Karol Bagh, New Delhi from the list. Further, you need to apply not more than a month before your travel dates. As our travel dates were in December, we applied in the month of November. For your reference, I submitted the following documents: I didn t have my photograph in the specified dimensions, so the travel agent took my photo on the spot. The visa application was 2,567. Furthermore, I submitted my application on a Saturday and received a call from the travel agent on Tuesday informing me that they had received my visa from the Singapore High Commission. The next day, I visit the travel agent s office and picked up my passport and a black and white copy of my e-visa. Later, I downloaded a PDF of my visa from the website mentioned on it, and took a colored printout myself. Singapore granted me a multiple-entry visa for 2 months, even though I had applied for a 4-day single-entry visa. We were planning to add more countries to this trip; therefore, a multiple-entry visa would be helpful in case we wanted to use Singapore Airport, as it has good connectivity. However, it turned out that flights from Kuala Lumpur were much cheaper than those from Singapore, so we didn t enter Singapore again after leaving. Badri also did the same process but entirely remotely he posted the documents to the visa agency in Chennai, and got his e-visa in a few days followed by his original passport which was delivered by courier. He got his photo taken in the same dimensions mentioned above, and printed as matte finish as instructed. However, the visa agents asked why his photo was looking so faded. We don t know if they thought the matte finish was faded or what. To rectify this, Badri emailed them a digital copy of the photo to them (both the cropped version and the original) and they handled the reprinting on their end (which he never got to see). Before entering Singapore, we had to fill an arrival card - an online form asking a few details about our trip - within 72 hours of our arrival in Singapore. That s it for now. Meet you in the next post. Thanks to Badri for reviewing the draft.

21 April 2025

Gunnar Wolf: Want your title? Here, have some XML!

As it seems ChatGPT would phrase it Sweet Mother of God! I received a mail from my University s Scholar Administrative division informing me my Doctor degree has been granted and emitted (yayyyyyy! ), and before printing the corresponding documents, I should review all of the information is correct. Attached to the mail, I found they sent me a very friendly and welcoming XML file, that stated it followed the schema at https://www.siged.sep.gob.mx/titulos/schema.xsd Wait! There is nothing to be found in that address! Well, never mind, I can make sense out of a XML document, right? XML sample Of course, who needs an XSD schema? Everybody can parse through the data in a XML document, right? Of course, it took me close to five seconds to spot a minor mistake (in the finish and start dates of my previous degree), for which I mailed the relevant address But What happens if I try to undestand the world as seen by 9.8 out of 10 people getting a title from UNAM, in all of its different disciplines (scientific, engineering, humanities ) Some people will have no clue about what to do with a XML file. Fortunately, the mail has a link to a very useful tutorial (roughly translated by myself):
The attached file has an XML extension, so in order to visualize it, you must open it with a text editor such as Notepad or Sublime Text. In case you have any questions on how to open the file, please refer to the following guide: https://www.dgae.unam.mx/guia_abrir_xml.html
Seriously! Asking people getting a title in just about any area of knowledge to Install SublimeText to validate the content of a XML (that includes the oh-so-very-readable signature of some universitary bureaucrat). Of course, for many years Mexican people have been getting XML files by mail (for any declared monetary exchange, i.e. buying goods or offering services), but they are always sent together with a render of such XML to a personalized PDF. And yes the PDF is there only to give the human receiving the file an easier time understanding it. Who thought a bare XML was a good idea?

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: One last Bookworm for the road report from the Montreal 2025 BSP

Hello, hello, hello! This report for the Bug Squashing Party we held in Montreal on March 28-29th is very late ... but better late than never? We're now at our fifth BSP in a row1, which is both nice and somewhat terrifying. Have I really been around for five Debian releases already? Geez... This year, around 13 different people showed up, including some brand new folks! All in all, we ended up working on 77 bugs, 61 of which have since been closed. This is somewhat skewed by the large number of Lintian bugs I closed by merging and releasing the very many patches submitted by Maytham Alsudany (hello Maytham!), but that was still work :D For our past few events, we have been renting a space at Ateliers de la transition socio- cologique. This building used to be nunnery (thus the huge cross on the top floor), but has since been transformed into a multi-faceted project. A drawing of the building where the BSP was hosted BSPs are great and this one was no exception. You should try to join an upcoming event or to organise one if you can. It is loads of fun and you will be helping the Debian project release its next stable version sooner! As always, thanks to Debian for granting us a budget for the food and to rent the venue. Pictures Here are a bunch of pictures of the BSP, mixed in with some other pictures I took at this venue during a previous event. Some of the people present on Friday, in the smaller room we had that day A picture of a previous event, which includes many of the folks present at the BSP and the larger room we used on Saturday A sticker on the door of the bathroom with text saying 'All Employees Must Wash Away Sin Before Returning To Work', a tongue-in-cheek reference to the building's previous purpose A wall with posters for upcoming events A drawing on one of the single-occupancy rooms in the building, warning people the door can't be opened from the inside (yikes!) A table at the entrance with many flyers for social and political events
  1. See our previous BSPs in 2017, 2019, 2021 and 2023!

18 April 2025

Sven Hoexter: Trixie Upgrade and X11 Clipboard Manager Madness

Due to my own laziness and a few functionality issues my "for work laptop" is still using a 15+ year old setup with X11 and awesome. Since trixie is now starting its freeze, it's time to update that odd machine as well and look at the fallout. Good news: It's mostly my own resistance to change which required some kick in the back to move on. Clipboard Manager Madness For the past decade or so I used parcellite which served me well. Now that is no longer available in trixie and I started to look into one of the dead end streets of X11 related tooling, searching for an alternative. Parcellite Seems upstream is doing sporadic fixes, but holds GTK2 tight. The Debian package was patched to be GTK3 compatible, but has unfixed ftbfs issues with GCC 14. clipit Next I checked for a parcellite fork named clipit, and that's when it started to get funky. It's packaged in Debian, QA maintained, and recently received at least two uploads to keep it working. Installed it and found it's greeting me with a nag screen that I should migrate to diodon. The real clipit tool is still shipped as a binary named clipit.real, so if you know it you can still use it. To achieve the nag screen it depends on zenity and to ease the migration it depends on diodon. Two things I do not really need. Also the package description prominently mentions that you should not use the package. diodon The nag screen of clipit made me look at diodon. It claims it was written for the Ubuntu Unity desktop, something where I've no idea how alive and relevant it still is. While there is still something on launchpad, it seems to receive sporadic commits on github. Not sure if it's dead or just feature complete. Interim Solution: clipit Settled with clipit for now, but decided to fork the Debian package to remove the nag screen and the dependency on diodon and zenity (package build). My hope is to convert this last X11 setup to wayland within the lifetime of trixie. I also contacted the last uploader regarding a removal of the nag screen, who then brought in the last maintainer who added the nag screen. While I first thought clipit is somewhat maintained upstream, Andrej quickly pointed out that this is not really the case. Still that leaves us in trixie with a rather odd situation. We ship now for the second stable release a package that recommends to move to a different tool while still shipping the original tool. Plus it's getting patched by some of its users who refuse to migrate to the alternative envisioned by the former maintainer. VirtualBox and moving to libvirt I always liked the GUI of VirtualBox, and it really made desktop virtualization easy. But with Linux 6.12, which enables KVM by default, it seems to get even more painful to get it up and running. In the past I just took the latest release from unstable and rebuild that one on the current stable. Currently the last release in unstable is 7.0.20, while the Linux 6.12 fixes only started to appear in VirtualBox 7.1.4 and later. The good thing is with virt-manager and the whole libvirt ecosystem there is a good enough replacement available, and it works fine with related tooling like vagrant. There are instructions available on how to set it up. I can only add that it makes sense to export VAGRANT_DEFAULT_PROVIDER=libvirt in your .bashrc to make that provider change permanent.

12 April 2025

Kalyani Kenekar: Nextcloud Installation HowTo: Secure Your Data with a Private Cloud

Logo NGinx Nextcloud is an open-source software suite that enables you to set up and manage your own cloud storage and collaboration platform. It offers a range of features similar to popular cloud services like Google Drive or Dropbox but with the added benefit of complete control over your data and the server where it s hosted. I wanted to have a look at Nextcloud and the steps to setup a own instance with a PostgreSQL based database together with NGinx as the webserver to serve the WebUI. Before doing a full productive setup I wanted to play around locally with all the needed steps and worked out all the steps within KVM machine. While doing this I wrote down some notes to mostly document for myself what I need to do to get a Nextcloud installation running and usable. So this manual describes how to setup a Nextcloud installation on Debian 12 Bookworm based on NGinx and PostgreSQL.

Nextcloud Installation

Install PHP and PHP extensions for Nextcloud Nextcloud is basically a PHP application so we need to install PHP packages to get it working in the end. The following steps are based on the upstream documentation about how to install a own Nextcloud instance. Installing the virtual package package php on a Debian Bookworm system would pull in the depending meta package php8.2. This package itself would then pull also the package libapache2-mod-php8.2 as an dependency which then would pull in also the apache2 webserver as a depending package. This is something I don t wanted to have as I want to use NGinx that is already installed on the system instead. To get this we need to explicitly exclude the package libapache2-mod-php8.2 from the list of packages which we want to install, to achieve this we have to append a hyphen - at the end of the package name, so we need to use libapache2-mod-php8.2- within the package list that is telling apt to ignore this package as an dependency. I ended up with this call to get all needed dependencies installed. 
$ sudo apt install php php-cli php-fpm php-json php-common php-zip \
  php-gd php-intl php-curl php-xml php-mbstring php-bcmath php-gmp \
  php-pgsql libapache2-mod-php8.2-
  • Check php version (optional step) $ php -v 
PHP 8.2.28 (cli) (built: Mar 13 2025 18:21:38) (NTS)
Copyright (c) The PHP Group
Zend Engine v4.2.28, Copyright (c) Zend Technologies
    with Zend OPcache v8.2.28, Copyright (c), by Zend Technologies
  • After installing all the packages, edit the php.ini file: $ sudo vi /etc/php/8.2/fpm/php.ini
  • Change the following settings per your requirements: 
max_execution_time = 300
memory_limit = 512M
post_max_size = 128M
upload_max_filesize = 128M
  • To make these settings effective, restart the php-fpm service $ sudo systemctl restart php8.2-fpm

Install PostgreSQL, Create a database and user This manual assumes we will use a PostgreSQL server on localhost, if you have a server instance on some remote site you can skip the installation step here. $ sudo apt install postgresql postgresql-contrib postgresql-client
  • Check version after installation (optinal step): $ sudo -i -u postgres $ psql -version
  • This output will be seen: psql (15.12 (Debian 15.12-0+deb12u2))
  • Exit the PSQL shell by using the command \q. postgres=# \q
  • Exit the CLI of the postgres user: postgres@host:~$ exit

Create a PostgreSQL Database and User:
  1. Create a new PostgreSQL user (Use a strong password!): $ sudo -u postgres psql -c "CREATE USER nextcloud_user PASSWORD '1234';"
  2. Create new database and grant access: $ sudo -u postgres psql -c "CREATE DATABASE nextcloud_db WITH OWNER nextcloud_user ENCODING=UTF8;"
  3. (Optional) Check if we now can connect to the database server and the database in detail (you will get a question about the password for the database user!). If this is not working it makes no sense to proceed further! We need to fix first the access then! $ psql -h localhost -U nextcloud_user -d nextcloud_db or $ psql -h 127.0.0.1 -U nextcloud_user -d nextcloud_db
  • Log out from postgres shell using the command \q.

Download and install Nextcloud
  • Use the following command to download the latest version of Nextcloud: $ wget https://download.nextcloud.com/server/releases/latest.zip
  • Extract file into the folder /var/www/html with the following command: $ sudo unzip latest.zip -d /var/www/html
  • Change ownership of the /var/www/html/nextcloud directory to www-data. $ sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/www/html/nextcloud

Configure NGinx for Nextcloud to use a certificate In case you want to use self signed certificate, e.g. if you play around to setup Nextcloud locally for testing purposes you can do the following steps.
  • Generate the private key and certificate: $ sudo openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout nextcloud.key -out nextcloud.crt $ sudo cp nextcloud.crt /etc/ssl/certs/ && sudo cp nextcloud.key /etc/ssl/private/
  • If you want or need to use the service of Let s Encrypt (or similar) drop the step above and create your required key data by using this command: $ sudo certbot --nginx -d nextcloud.your-domain.com You will need to adjust the path to the key and certificate in the next step!
  • Change the NGinx configuration: $ sudo vi /etc/nginx/sites-available/nextcloud.conf
  • Add the following snippet into the file and save it. 
# /etc/nginx/sites-available/nextcloud.conf
upstream php-handler  
    #server 127.0.0.1:9000;
    server unix:/run/php/php8.2-fpm.sock;
 

# Set the  immutable  cache control options only for assets with a cache
# busting  v  argument

map $arg_v $asset_immutable  
    "" "";
    default ", immutable";
 

server  
    listen 80;
    listen [::]:80;
    # Adjust this to the correct server name!
    server_name nextcloud.local;

    # Prevent NGinx HTTP Server Detection
    server_tokens off;

    # Enforce HTTPS
    return 301 https://$server_name$request_uri;
 

server  
    listen 443      ssl http2;
    listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
    # Adjust this to the correct server name!
    server_name nextcloud.local;

    # Path to the root of your installation
    root /var/www/html/nextcloud;

    # Use Mozilla's guidelines for SSL/TLS settings
    # https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/
    # Adjust the usage and paths of the correct key data! E.g. it you want to use Let's Encrypt key material!
    ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/nextcloud.crt;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/nextcloud.key;
    # ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/nextcloud.your-domain.com/fullchain.pem; 
    # ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/nextcloud.your-domain.com/privkey.pem;

    # Prevent NGinx HTTP Server Detection
    server_tokens off;

    # HSTS settings
    # WARNING: Only add the preload option once you read about
    # the consequences in https://hstspreload.org/. This option
    # will add the domain to a hardcoded list that is shipped
    # in all major browsers and getting removed from this list
    # could take several months.
    #add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains; preload" always;

    # set max upload size and increase upload timeout:
    client_max_body_size 512M;
    client_body_timeout 300s;
    fastcgi_buffers 64 4K;

    # Enable gzip but do not remove ETag headers
    gzip on;
    gzip_vary on;
    gzip_comp_level 4;
    gzip_min_length 256;
    gzip_proxied expired no-cache no-store private no_last_modified no_etag auth;
    gzip_types application/atom+xml text/javascript application/javascript application/json application/ld+json application/manifest+json application/rss+xml application/vnd.geo+json application/vnd.ms-fontobject application/wasm application/x-font-ttf application/x-web-app-manifest+json application/xhtml+xml application/xml font/opentype image/bmp image/svg+xml image/x-icon text/cache-manifest text/css text/plain text/vcard text/vnd.rim.location.xloc text/vtt text/x-component text/x-cross-domain-policy;

    # Pagespeed is not supported by Nextcloud, so if your server is built
    # with the  ngx_pagespeed  module, uncomment this line to disable it.
    #pagespeed off;

    # The settings allows you to optimize the HTTP2 bandwidth.
    # See https://blog.cloudflare.com/delivering-http-2-upload-speed-improvements/
    # for tuning hints
    client_body_buffer_size 512k;

    # HTTP response headers borrowed from Nextcloud  .htaccess 
    add_header Referrer-Policy                   "no-referrer"       always;
    add_header X-Content-Type-Options            "nosniff"           always;
    add_header X-Frame-Options                   "SAMEORIGIN"        always;
    add_header X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies "none"              always;
    add_header X-Robots-Tag                      "noindex, nofollow" always;
    add_header X-XSS-Protection                  "1; mode=block"     always;

    # Remove X-Powered-By, which is an information leak
    fastcgi_hide_header X-Powered-By;

    # Set .mjs and .wasm MIME types
    # Either include it in the default mime.types list
    # and include that list explicitly or add the file extension
    # only for Nextcloud like below:
    include mime.types;
    types  
        text/javascript js mjs;
        application/wasm wasm;
     

    # Specify how to handle directories -- specifying  /index.php$request_uri 
    # here as the fallback means that NGinx always exhibits the desired behaviour
    # when a client requests a path that corresponds to a directory that exists
    # on the server. In particular, if that directory contains an index.php file,
    # that file is correctly served; if it doesn't, then the request is passed to
    # the front-end controller. This consistent behaviour means that we don't need
    # to specify custom rules for certain paths (e.g. images and other assets,
    #  /updater ,  /ocs-provider ), and thus
    #  try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php$request_uri 
    # always provides the desired behaviour.
    index index.php index.html /index.php$request_uri;

    # Rule borrowed from  .htaccess  to handle Microsoft DAV clients
    location = /  
        if ( $http_user_agent ~ ^DavClnt )  
            return 302 /remote.php/webdav/$is_args$args;
         
     

    location = /robots.txt  
        allow all;
        log_not_found off;
        access_log off;
     

    # Make a regex exception for  /.well-known  so that clients can still
    # access it despite the existence of the regex rule
    #  location ~ /(\. autotest ...)  which would otherwise handle requests
    # for  /.well-known .
    location ^~ /.well-known  
        # The rules in this block are an adaptation of the rules
        # in  .htaccess  that concern  /.well-known .

        location = /.well-known/carddav   return 301 /remote.php/dav/;  
        location = /.well-known/caldav    return 301 /remote.php/dav/;  

        location /.well-known/acme-challenge      try_files $uri $uri/ =404;  
        location /.well-known/pki-validation      try_files $uri $uri/ =404;  

        # Let Nextcloud's API for  /.well-known  URIs handle all other
        # requests by passing them to the front-end controller.
        return 301 /index.php$request_uri;
     

    # Rules borrowed from  .htaccess  to hide certain paths from clients
    location ~ ^/(?:build tests config lib 3rdparty templates data)(?:$ /)    return 404;  
    location ~ ^/(?:\. autotest occ issue indie db_ console)                  return 404;  

    # Ensure this block, which passes PHP files to the PHP process, is above the blocks
    # which handle static assets (as seen below). If this block is not declared first,
    # then NGinx will encounter an infinite rewriting loop when it prepend  /index.php 
    # to the URI, resulting in a HTTP 500 error response.
    location ~ \.php(?:$ /)  
        # Required for legacy support
        rewrite ^/(?!index remote public cron core\/ajax\/update status ocs\/v[12] updater\/.+ ocs-provider\/.+ .+\/richdocumentscode(_arm64)?\/proxy) /index.php$request_uri;

        fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+?\.php)(/.*)$;
        set $path_info $fastcgi_path_info;

        try_files $fastcgi_script_name =404;

        include fastcgi_params;
        fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
        fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $path_info;
        fastcgi_param HTTPS on;

        fastcgi_param modHeadersAvailable true;         # Avoid sending the security headers twice
        fastcgi_param front_controller_active true;     # Enable pretty urls
        fastcgi_pass php-handler;

        fastcgi_intercept_errors on;
        fastcgi_request_buffering off;

        fastcgi_max_temp_file_size 0;
     

    # Serve static files
    location ~ \.(?:css js mjs svg gif png jpg ico wasm tflite map ogg flac)$  
        try_files $uri /index.php$request_uri;
        # HTTP response headers borrowed from Nextcloud  .htaccess 
        add_header Cache-Control                     "public, max-age=15778463$asset_immutable";
        add_header Referrer-Policy                   "no-referrer"       always;
        add_header X-Content-Type-Options            "nosniff"           always;
        add_header X-Frame-Options                   "SAMEORIGIN"        always;
        add_header X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies "none"              always;
        add_header X-Robots-Tag                      "noindex, nofollow" always;
        add_header X-XSS-Protection                  "1; mode=block"     always;
        access_log off;     # Optional: Don't log access to assets
     

    location ~ \.woff2?$  
        try_files $uri /index.php$request_uri;
        expires 7d;         # Cache-Control policy borrowed from  .htaccess 
        access_log off;     # Optional: Don't log access to assets
     

    # Rule borrowed from  .htaccess 
    location /remote  
        return 301 /remote.php$request_uri;
     

    location /  
        try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php$request_uri;
  • Symlink configuration site available to site enabled. $ ln -s /etc/nginx/sites-available/nextcloud.conf /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/
  • Restart NGinx and access the URI in the browser.
  • Go through the installation of Nextcloud.
  • The user data on the installation dialog should point e.g to administrator or similar, that user will become administrative access rights in Nextcloud!
  • To adjust the database connection detail you have to edit the file $install_folder/config/config.php. Means here in the example within this post you would need to modify /var/www/html/nextcloud/config/config.php to control or change the database connection. 
---%<---
    'dbname' => 'nextcloud_db',
    'dbhost' => 'localhost', #(Or your remote PostgreSQL server address if you have.)
    'dbport' => '',
    'dbtableprefix' => 'oc_',
    'dbuser' => 'nextcloud_user',
    'dbpassword' => '1234', #(The password you set for database user.)
--->%---
After the installation and setup of the Nextcloud PHP application there are more steps to be done. Have a look into the WebUI what you will need to do as additional steps like create a cronjob or tuning of some more PHP configurations. If you ve done all things correct you should see a login page similar to this: Login Page of your Nextcloud instance

Optional other steps for more enhanced configuration modifications

Move the data folder to somewhere else The data folder is the root folder for all user content. By default it is located in $install_folder/data, so in our case here it is in /var/www/html/nextcloud/data.
  • Move the data directory outside the web server document root. $ sudo mv /var/www/html/nextcloud/data /var/nextcloud_data
  • Ensure access permissions, mostly not needed if you move the folder. $ sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/nextcloud_data $ sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/www/html/nextcloud/
  • Update the Nextcloud configuration:
    1. Open the config/config.php file of your Nextcloud installation. $ sudo vi /var/www/html/nextcloud/config/config.php
    2. Update the datadirectory parameter to point to the new location of your data directory. 
  ---%<---
     'datadirectory' => '/var/nextcloud_data'
  --->%---
  • Restart NGinx service: $ sudo systemctl restart nginx

Make the installation available for multiple FQDNs on the same server
  • Adjust the Nextcloud configuration to listen and accept requests for different domain names. Configure and adjust the key trusted_domains accordingly. $ sudo vi /var/www/html/nextcloud/config/config.php 
  ---%<---
    'trusted_domains' => 
    array (
      0 => 'domain.your-domain.com',
      1 => 'domain.other-domain.com',
    ),
  --->%---
  • Create and adjust the needed site configurations for the webserver.
  • Restart the NGinx unit.

An error message about .ocdata might occur
  • .ocdata is not found inside the data directory
    • Create file using touch and set necessary permissions. $ sudo touch /var/nextcloud_data/.ocdata $ sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/nextcloud_data/

The password for the administrator user is unknown
  1. Log in to your server:
    • SSH into the server where your PostgreSQL database is hosted.
  2. Switch to the PostgreSQL user:
    • $ sudo -i -u postgres
  3. Access the PostgreSQL command line
    • psql
  4. List the databases: (If you re unsure which database is being used by Nextcloud, you can list all the databases by the list command.)
    • \l
  5. Switch to the Nextcloud database:
    • Switch to the specific database that Nextcloud is using.
    • \c nextclouddb
  6. Reset the password for the Nextcloud database user:
    • ALTER USER nextcloud_user WITH PASSWORD 'new_password';
  7. Exit the PostgreSQL command line:
    • \q
  8. Verify Database Configuration:
    • Check the database connection details in the config.php file to ensure they are correct. sudo vi /var/www/html/nextcloud/config/config.php
    • Replace nextcloud_db, nextcloud_user, and your_password with your actual database name, user, and password. 
---%<---
    'dbname' => 'nextcloud_db',
    'dbhost' => 'localhost', #(or your PostgreSQL server address)
    'dbport' => '',
    'dbtableprefix' => 'oc_',
    'dbuser' => 'nextcloud_user',
    'dbpassword' => '1234', #(The password you set for nextcloud_user.)
--->%---
  1. Restart NGinx and access the UI through the browser.

11 April 2025

Gunnar Wolf: Culture as a positive freedom

This post is an unpublished review for La cultura libre como libertad positiva
Please note: This review is not meant to be part of my usual contributions to ACM's Computing Reviews . I do want, though, to share it with people that follow my general interests and such stuff.
This article was published almost a year ago, and I read it just after relocating from Argentina back to Mexico. I came from a country starting to realize the shock it meant to be ruled by an autocratic, extreme right-wing president willing to overrun its Legislative and bent on destroying the State itself not too different from what we are now witnessing on a global level. I have been a strong proponent and defender of Free Software and of Free Culture throughout my adult life. And I have been a Socialist since my early teenage years. I cannot say there is a strict correlation between them, but there is a big intersection of people and organizations who aligns to both sides And rtica (and Mariana Fossatti) are clearly among them. Freedom is a word that has brought us many misunderstanding throughout the past many decades. We will say that Freedom can only be brought hand-by-hand with Equality, Fairness and Tolerance. But the extreme-right wing (is it still bordering Fascism, or has it finally embraced it as its true self?) that has grown so much in many countries over the last years also seems to have appropriated the term, even taking it as their definition. In English (particularly, in USA English), liberty is a more patriotic term, and freedom is more personal (although the term used for the market is free market); in Spanish, we conflate them both under libre. Mariana refers to a third blog, by Rolando Astarita, where the author introduces the concepts positive and negative freedom/liberties. Astarita characterizes negative freedom as an individual s possibility to act without interferences or coertion, and is limited by other people s freedom, while positive freedom is the real capacity to exercise one s autonomy and achieve self-realization; this does not depend on a person on its own, but on different social conditions; Astarita understands the Marxist tradition to emphasize on the positive freedom. Mariana brings this definition to our usual discussion on licensing: If we follow negative freedom, we will understand free licenses as the idea of access without interference to cultural or information goods, as long as it s legal (in order not to infringe other s property rights). Licensing is seen as a private content, and each individual can grant access and use to their works at will. The previous definition might be enough for many, but she says, is missing something important. The practical effect of many individuals renouncing a bit of control over their property rights produce, collectively, the common goods. They constitute a pool of knowledge or culture that are no longer an individual, contractual issue, but grow and become social, collective. Negative freedom does not go further, but positive liberty allows broadening the horizon, and takes us to a notion of free culture that, by strengthening the commons, widens social rights. She closes the article by stating (and I ll happily sign as if they were my own words) that we are Free Culture militants not only because it affirms the individual sovereignty to deliver and receive cultural resources, in an intellectual property framework guaranteed by the state. Our militancy is of widening the cultural enjoying and participation to the collective through the defense of common cultural goods ( ) We want to build Free Culture for a Free Society. But a Free Society is not a society of free owners, but a society emancipated from the structures of economic power and social privilege that block this potential collective .

14 March 2025

Ravi Dwivedi: Libreoffice Conference 2024 in Luxembourg

Last year, I attended the annual LibreOffice Conference in Luxembourg with the help of a generous travel grant by The Document Foundation (TDF). It was a three-day event from the 10th to the 12th of October 2024, with an additional day for community meetup on the 9th. Luxembourg is a small (twice as big as Delhi) country in Western Europe. After going through an arduous visa process, I reached Luxembourg on the 8th of October. Upon arriving in Luxembourg, I took a bus to the city center, where my hotel Park Inn was located. All the public transport in Luxembourg was free of cost. It was as if I stepped in another world. There were separate tracks for cycling and a separate lane for buses, along with good pedestrian infrastructure. In addition, the streets were pretty neat and clean.
Luxembourg's Findel Airport
Separate cycling tracks in Luxembourg
My hotel was 20 km from the conference venue in Belval. However, the commute was convenient due to a free of cost train connection, which were comfortable, smooth, and scenic, covering the distance in half an hour. The hotel included a breakfast buffet, recharging us before the conference.
This is what trains look like in Luxembourg
Pre-conference, a day was reserved for the community meetup on the 9th of October. On that day, the community members introduced themselves and their contributions to the LibreOffice project. It acted as a brainstorming session. I got a lovely conference bag, which contained a T-Shirt, a pen and a few stickers. I also met my long time collaborators Mike, Sophie and Italo from the TDF, whom I had interacted only remotely till then. Likewise, I also met TDF s sysadmin Guilhem, who I interacted before regarding setting up my LibreOffice mirror.
Conference bag
The conference started on the 10th. There were 5 attendees from India, including me, while most of the attendees were from Europe. The talks were in English. One of the talks that stood out for me was about Luxchat a chat service run by the Luxembourg government based on the Matrix protocol for the citizens of Luxembourg. I also liked Italo s talk on why document formats must be freedom-respecting. On the first night, the conference took us to a nice dinner in a restaurant. It offered one more way to socialize with other attendees and explore food at the same time.
One of the slides of Italo's talk
Picture of the hall in which talks were held
On the 11th of October, I went for a walk in the morning with Biswadeep for some sightseeing around our hotel area. As a consequence, I missed the group photo of the conference, which I wanted to be in. Anyway, we enjoyed roaming around the picturesque Luxembourg city. We also sampled a tram ride to return to our hotel.
We encountered such scenic views during our walk
Another view of Luxembourg city area
The conference ended on the 12th with a couple of talks. This conference gave me an opportunity to meet the global LibreOffice community, connect and share ideas. It also gave me a peek into the country of Luxembourg and its people, where I had good experience. English was widely known, and I had no issues getting by. Thanks to all the organizers and sponsors of the conference!

8 March 2025

Debian Brasil: MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024 - a brief report

From April 27th to 30th, 2024, MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024 was held at the Pampulha Campus of UFMG - Federal University of Minas Gerais, in Belo Horizonte city. MiniDebConf BH 2024 banners This was the fifth time that a MiniDebConf (as an exclusive in-person event about Debian) took place in Brazil. Previous editions were in Curitiba (2016, 2017, and 2018), and in Bras lia 2023. We had other MiniDebConfs editions held within Free Software events such as FISL and Latinoware, and other online events. See our event history. Parallel to MiniDebConf, on 27th (Saturday) FLISOL - Latin American Free Software Installation Festival took place. It's the largest event in Latin America to promote Free Software, and It has been held since 2005 simultaneously in several cities. MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024 was a success (as were previous editions) thanks to the participation of everyone, regardless of their level of knowledge about Debian. We value the presence of both beginner users who are familiarizing themselves with the system and the official project developers. The spirit of welcome and collaboration was present during all the event. MiniDebConf BH 2024 flisol 2024 edition numbers During the four days of the event, several activities took place for all levels of users and collaborators of the Debian project. The official schedule was composed of: MiniDebConf BH 2024 palestra The final numbers for MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024 show that we had a record number of participants. Of the 224 participants, 15 were official Brazilian contributors, 10 being DDs (Debian Developers) and 05 (Debian Maintainers), in addition to several unofficial contributors. The organization was carried out by 14 people who started working at the end of 2023, including Prof. Lo c Cerf from the Computing Department who made the event possible at UFMG, and 37 volunteers who helped during the event. As MiniDebConf was held at UFMG facilities, we had the help of more than 10 University employees. See the list with the names of people who helped in some way in organizing MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024. The difference between the number of people registered and the number of attendees in the event is probably explained by the fact that there is no registration fee, so if the person decides not to go to the event, they will not suffer financial losses. The 2024 edition of MiniDebconf Belo Horizonte was truly grand and shows the result of the constant efforts made over the last few years to attract more contributors to the Debian community in Brazil. With each edition the numbers only increase, with more attendees, more activities, more rooms, and more sponsors/supporters. MiniDebConf BH 2024 grupo

MiniDebConf BH 2024 grupo Activities The MiniDebConf schedule was intense and diverse. On the 27th, 29th and 30th (Saturday, Monday and Tuesday) we had talks, discussions, workshops and many practical activities. MiniDebConf BH 2024 palestra On the 28th (Sunday), the Day Trip took place, a day dedicated to sightseeing around the city. In the morning we left the hotel and went, on a chartered bus, to the Belo Horizonte Central Market. People took the opportunity to buy various things such as cheeses, sweets, cacha as and souvenirs, as well as tasting some local foods. MiniDebConf BH 2024 mercado After a 2-hour tour of the Market, we got back on the bus and hit the road for lunch at a typical Minas Gerais food restaurant. MiniDebConf BH 2024 palestra With everyone well fed, we returned to Belo Horizonte to visit the city's main tourist attraction: Lagoa da Pampulha and Capela S o Francisco de Assis, better known as Igrejinha da Pampulha. MiniDebConf BH 2024 palestra We went back to the hotel and the day ended in the hacker space that we set up in the events room for people to chat, packaging, and eat pizzas. MiniDebConf BH 2024 palestra Crowdfunding For the third time we ran a crowdfunding campaign and it was incredible how people contributed! The initial goal was to raise the amount equivalent to a gold tier of R$ 3,000.00. When we reached this goal, we defined a new one, equivalent to one gold tier + one silver tier (R$ 5,000.00). And again we achieved this goal. So we proposed as a final goal the value of a gold + silver + bronze tiers, which would be equivalent to R$ 6,000.00. The result was that we raised R$7,239.65 (~ USD 1,400) with the help of more than 100 people! Thank you very much to the people who contributed any amount. As a thank you, we list the names of the people who donated. MiniDebConf BH 2024 doadores Food, accommodation and/or travel grants for participants Each edition of MiniDebConf brought some innovation, or some different benefit for the attendees. In this year's edition in Belo Horizonte, as with DebConfs, we offered bursaries for food, accommodation and/or travel to help those people who would like to come to the event but who would need some kind of help. In the registration form, we included the option for the person to request a food, accommodation and/or travel bursary, but to do so, they would have to identify themselves as a contributor (official or unofficial) to Debian and write a justification for the request. Number of people benefited: The food bursary provided lunch and dinner every day. The lunches included attendees who live in Belo Horizonte and the region. Dinners were paid for attendees who also received accommodation and/or travel. The accommodation was held at the BH Jaragu Hotel. And the travels included airplane or bus tickets, or fuel (for those who came by car or motorbike). Much of the money to fund the bursaries came from the Debian Project, mainly for travels. We sent a budget request to the former Debian leader Jonathan Carter, and He promptly approved our request. In addition to this event budget, the leader also approved individual requests sent by some DDs who preferred to request directly from him. The experience of offering the bursaries was really good because it allowed several people to come from other cities. MiniDebConf BH 2024 grupo Photos and videos You can watch recordings of the talks at the links below: Thanks We would like to thank all the attendees, organizers, volunteers, sponsors and supporters who contributed to the success of MiniDebConf Belo Horizonte 2024. MiniDebConf BH 2024 grupo Sponsors Gold: Silver: Bronze: Organizers

5 March 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in February 2025

Welcome to the second report in 2025 from the Reproducible Builds project. Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. As usual, however, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. Table of contents:
  1. Reproducible Builds at FOSDEM 2025
  2. Reproducible Builds at PyCascades 2025
  3. Does Functional Package Management Enable Reproducible Builds at Scale?
  4. reproduce.debian.net updates
  5. Upstream patches
  6. Distribution work
  7. diffoscope & strip-nondeterminism
  8. Website updates
  9. Reproducibility testing framework

Reproducible Builds at FOSDEM 2025 Similar to last year s event, there was considerable activity regarding Reproducible Builds at FOSDEM 2025, held on on 1st and 2nd February this year in Brussels, Belgium. We count at least four talks related to reproducible builds. (You can also read our news report from last year s event in which Holger Levsen presented in the main track.)
Jelle van der Waa, Holger Levsen and kpcyrd presented in the Distributions track on A Tale of several distros joining forces for a common goal. In this talk, three developers from two different Linux distributions (Arch Linux and Debian), discuss this goal which is, of course, reproducible builds. The presenters discuss both what is shared and different between the two efforts, touching on the history and future challenges alike. The slides of this talk are available to view, as is the full video (30m02s). The talk was also discussed on Hacker News.
Zbigniew J drzejewski-Szmek presented in the ever-popular Python track a on Rewriting .pyc files for fun and reproducibility, i.e. the bytecode files generated by Python in order to speed up module imports: It s been known for a while that those are not reproducible: on different architectures, the bytecode for exactly the same sources ends up slightly different. The slides of this talk are available, as is the full video (28m32s).
In the Nix and NixOS track, Julien Malka presented on the Saturday asking How reproducible is NixOS: We know that the NixOS ISO image is very close to be perfectly reproducible thanks to reproducible.nixos.org, but there doesn t exist any monitoring of Nixpkgs as a whole. In this talk I ll present the findings of a project that evaluated the reproducibility of Nixpkgs as a whole by mass rebuilding packages from revisions between 2017 and 2023 and comparing the results with the NixOS cache. Unfortunately, no video of the talk is available, but there is a blog and article on the results.
Lastly, Simon Tournier presented in the Open Research track on the confluence of GNU Guix and Software Heritage: Source Code Archiving to the Rescue of Reproducible Deployment. Simon s talk describes design and implementation we came up and reports on the archival coverage for package source code with data collected over five years. It opens to some remaining challenges toward a better open and reproducible research. The slides for the talk are available, as is the full video (23m17s).

Reproducible Builds at PyCascades 2025 Vagrant Cascadian presented at this year s PyCascades conference which was held on February 8th and 9th February in Portland, OR, USA. PyCascades is a regional instance of PyCon held in the Pacific Northwest. Vagrant s talk, entitled Re-Py-Ducible Builds caught the audience s attention with the following abstract:
Crank your Python best practices up to 11 with Reproducible Builds! This talk will explore Reproducible Builds by highlighting issues identified in Python projects, from the simple to the seemingly inscrutable. Reproducible Builds is basically the crazy idea that when you build something, and you build it again, you get the exact same thing or even more important, if someone else builds it, they get the exact same thing too.
More info is available on the talk s page.

Does Functional Package Management Enable Reproducible Builds at Scale? On our mailing list last month, Julien Malka, Stefano Zacchiroli and Th o Zimmermann of T l com Paris in-house research laboratory, the Information Processing and Communications Laboratory (LTCI) announced that they had published an article asking the question: Does Functional Package Management Enable Reproducible Builds at Scale? (PDF). This month, however, Ludovic Court s followed up to the original announcement on our mailing list mentioning, amongst other things, the Guix Data Service and how that it shows the reproducibility of GNU Guix over time, as described in a GNU Guix blog back in March 2024.

reproduce.debian.net updates The last few months have seen the introduction of reproduce.debian.net. Announced first at the recent Debian MiniDebConf in Toulouse, reproduce.debian.net is an instance of rebuilderd operated by the Reproducible Builds project. Powering this work is rebuilderd, our server which monitors the official package repositories of Linux distributions and attempt to reproduce the observed results there. This month, however, Holger Levsen:
  • Split packages that are not specific to any architecture away from amd64.reproducible.debian.net service into a new all.reproducible.debian.net page.
  • Increased the number of riscv64 nodes to a total of 4, and added a new amd64 node added thanks to our (now 10-year sponsor), IONOS.
  • Discovered an issue in the Debian build service where some new incoming build-dependencies do not end up historically archived.
  • Uploaded the devscripts package, incorporating changes from Jochen Sprickerhof to the debrebuild script specifically to fix the handling the Rules-Requires-Root header in Debian source packages.
  • Uploaded a number of Rust dependencies of rebuilderd (rust-libbz2-rs-sys, rust-actix-web, rust-actix-server, rust-actix-http, rust-actix-server, rust-actix-http, rust-actix-web-codegen and rust-time-tz) after they were prepared by kpcyrd :
Jochen Sprickerhof also updated the sbuild package to:
  • Obey requests from the user/developer for a different temporary directory.
  • Use the root/superuser for some values of Rules-Requires-Root.
  • Don t pass --root-owner-group to old versions of dpkg.
and additionally requested that many Debian packages are rebuilt by the build servers in order to work around bugs found on reproduce.debian.net. [ ][[ ][ ]
Lastly, kpcyrd has also worked towards getting rebuilderd packaged in NixOS, and Jelle van der Waa picked up the existing pull request for Fedora support within in rebuilderd and made it work with the existing Koji rebuilderd script. The server is being packaged for Fedora in an unofficial copr repository and in the official repositories after all the dependencies are packaged.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Distribution work There as been the usual work in various distributions this month, such as: In Debian, 17 reviews of Debian packages were added, 6 were updated and 8 were removed this month adding to our knowledge about identified issues.
Fedora developers Davide Cavalca and Zbigniew J drzejewski-Szmek gave a talk on Reproducible Builds in Fedora (PDF), touching on SRPM-specific issues as well as the current status and future plans.
Thanks to an investment from the Sovereign Tech Agency, the FreeBSD project s work on unprivileged and reproducible builds continued this month. Notable fixes include:
The Yocto Project has been struggling to upgrade to the latest Go and Rust releases due to reproducibility problems in the newer versions. Hongxu Jia tracked down the issue with Go which meant that the project could upgrade from the 1.22 series to 1.24, with the fix being submitted upstream for review (see above). For Rust, however, the project was significantly behind, but has made recent progress after finally identifying the blocking reproducibility issues. At time of writing, the project is at Rust version 1.82, with patches under review for 1.83 and 1.84 and fixes being discussed with the Rust developers. The project hopes to improve the tests for reproducibility in the Rust project itself in order to try and avoid future regressions. Yocto continues to maintain its ability to binary reproduce all of the recipes in OpenEmbedded-Core, regardless of the build host distribution or the current build path.
Finally, Douglas DeMaio published an article on the openSUSE blog on announcing that the Reproducible-openSUSE (RBOS) Project Hits [Significant] Milestone. In particular:
The Reproducible-openSUSE (RBOS) project, which is a proof-of-concept fork of openSUSE, has reached a significant milestone after demonstrating a usable Linux distribution can be built with 100% bit-identical packages.
This news was also announced on our mailing list by Bernhard M. Wiedemann, who also published another report for openSUSE as well.

diffoscope & strip-nondeterminism diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 288 and 289 to Debian:
  • Add asar to DIFFOSCOPE_FAIL_TESTS_ON_MISSING_TOOLS in order to address Debian bug #1095057) [ ]
  • Catch a CalledProcessError when calling html2text. [ ]
  • Update the minimal Black version. [ ]
Additionally, Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 287 [ ][ ] and 288 [ ][ ] as well as submitted a patch to update to 289 [ ]. Vagrant also fixed an issue that was breaking reprotest on Guix [ ][ ]. strip-nondeterminism is our sister tool to remove specific non-deterministic results from a completed build. This month version 1.14.1-2 was uploaded to Debian unstable by Holger Levsen.

Website updates There were a large number of improvements made to our website this month, including:

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. In January, a number of changes were made by Holger Levsen, including:
  • reproduce.debian.net-related:
    • Add a helper script to manually schedule packages. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Fix a link in the website footer. [ ]
    • Strip the emojis from package names on the manual rebuilder in order to ease copy-and-paste. [ ]
    • On the various statistics pages, provide the number of affected source packages [ ][ ] as well as provide various totals [ ][ ].
    • Fix graph labels for the various architectures [ ][ ] and make them clickable too [ ][ ][ ].
    • Break the displayed HTML in blocks of 256 packages in order to address rendering issues. [ ][ ]
    • Add monitoring jobs for riscv64 archicture nodes and integrate them elsewhere in our infrastructure. [ ][ ]
    • Add riscv64 architecture nodes. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Update much of the documentation. [ ][ ][ ]
    • Make a number of improvements to the layout and style. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Remove direct links to JSON and database backups. [ ]
    • Drop a Blues Brothers reference from frontpage. [ ]
  • Debian-related:
    • Deal with /boot/vmlinuz* being called vmlinux* on the riscv64 architecture. [ ]
    • Add a new ionos17 node. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Install debian-repro-status on all Debian trixie and unstable jobs. [ ]
  • FreeBSD-related:
    • Switch to run latest branch of FreeBSD. [ ]
  • Misc:
    • Fix /etc/cron.d and /etc/logrotate.d permissions for Jenkins nodes. [ ]
    • Add support for riscv64 architecture nodes. [ ][ ]
    • Grant Jochen Sprickerhof access to the o4 node. [ ]
    • Disable the janitor-setup-worker. [ ][ ]
In addition:
  • kpcyrd fixed the /all/api/ API endpoints on reproduce.debian.net by altering the nginx configuration. [ ]
  • James Addison updated reproduce.debian.net to display the so-called bad reasons hyperlink inline [ ] and merged the Categorized issues links into the Reproduced builds column [ ].
  • Jochen Sprickerhof also made some reproduce.debian.net-related changes, adding support for detecting a bug in the mmdebstrap package [ ] as well as updating some documentation [ ].
  • Roland Clobus continued their work on reproducible live images for Debian, making changes related to new clustering of jobs in openQA. [ ]
And finally, both Holger Levsen [ ][ ][ ] and Vagrant Cascadian performed significant node maintenance. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

9 February 2025

Philipp Kern: 20 years

20 years ago, I got my Debian Developer account. I was 18 at the time, it was Shrove Tuesday and - as is customary - I was drunk when I got the email. There was so much that I did not know - which is also why the process took 1.5 years from the time I applied. I mostly only maintained a package or two. I'm still amazed that Christian Perrier and Joerg Jaspert put sufficient trust in me at that time. Nevertheless now feels like a good time for a personal reflection of my involvement in Debian.
During my studies I took on more things. In January 2008 I joined the Release Team as an assistant, which taught me a lot of code review. I have been an Application Manager on the side.
Going to my first Debconf was really a turning point. My first one was Mar del Plata in Argentina in August 2008, when I was 21. That was quite an excitement, traveling that far from Germany for the first time. The personal connections I made there made quite the difference. It was also a big boost for motivation. I attended 8 (Argentina), 9 (Spain), 10 (New York), 11 (Bosnia and Herzegovina), 12 (Nicaragua), 13 (Switzerland), 14 (Portland), 15 (Germany), 16 (South Africa), and hopefully I'll make it to this year's in Brest. At all of them I did not see much of the countries as I prioritized all of my time focused on Debian, even skipping some of the day trips in favor of team meetings. Yet I am very grateful to the project (and to my employer) for shipping me there.I ended up as Stable Release Manager for a while, from August 2008 - when Martin Zobel-Helas moved into DSA - until I got dropped in March 2020. I think my biggest achievements were pushing for the creation of -updates in favor of a separate volatile archive and a change of the update policy to allow for more common sense updates in the main archive vs. the very strict "breakage or security" policy we had previously. I definitely need to call out Adam D. Barratt for being the partner in crime, holding up the fort for even longer.In 2009 I got too annoyed at the existing wanna-build team not being responsive anymore and pushed for the system to be given to a new team. I did not build it and significant contributions were done by other people (like Andreas Barth and Joachim Breitner, and later Aurelien Jarno). I mostly reworked the way the system was triggered, investigated when it broke and was around when people wanted things merged.
In the meantime I worked sys/netadmin jobs while at university, both paid and as a volunteer with the students' council. For a year or two I was the administrator of a System z mainframe IBM donated to my university. We had a mainframe course and I attended two related conferences. That's where my s390(x) interest came from, although credit for the port needs to go to Aurelien Jarno.
Since completing university in 2013 I have been working for a company for almost 12 years. Debian experience was very relevant to the job and I went on maintaining a Linux distro or two at work - before venturing off into security hardening. People in megacorps - in my humble opinion - disappear from the volunteer projects because a) they might previously have been studying and thus had a lot more time on their hands and b) the job is too similar to the volunteer work and thus the same brain cells used for work are exhausted and can't be easily reused for volunteer work. I kept maintaining a couple of things (buildds, some packages) - mostly because of a sense of commitment and responsibility, but otherwise kind of scaled down my involvement. I also felt less connected as I dropped off IRC.Last year I finally made it to Debian events again: MiniDebconf in Berlin, where we discussed the aftermath of the xz incident, and the Debian BSP in Salzburg. I rejoined IRC using the Matrix bridge. That also rekindled my involvement, with me guiding a new DD through NM and ending up in DSA. To be honest, only in the last two or three years I felt like a (more) mature old-timer.
I have a new gig at work lined up to start soon and next to that I have sysadmining for Debian. It is pretty motivating to me that I can just get things done - something that is much harder to achieve at work due to organizational complexities. It balances out some frustration I'd otherwise have. The work is different enough to be enjoyable and the people I work with are great.

The future
I still think the work we do in Debian is important, as much as I see a lack of appreciation in a world full of containers. We are reaping most of the benefits of standing on the shoulders of giants and of great decisions made in the past (e.g. the excellent Debian policy, but also the organizational model) that made Debian what it is today.Given the increase in size and complexity of what Debian ships - and the somewhat dwindling resource of developer time, it would benefit us to have better processes for large-scale changes across all packages. I greatly respect the horizontal effects that are currently being driven and that suck up a lot of energy.A lot of our infrastructure is also aging and not super well maintained. Many take it for granted that the services we have keep existing, but most are only maintained by a person or two, if even. Software stacks are aging and it is even a struggle to have all necessary packages in the next release.Hopefully I can contribute a bit or two to these efforts in the future.

5 February 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in January 2025

Welcome to the first report in 2025 from the Reproducible Builds project! Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the world of software supply-chain security when relevant. As usual, though, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. Table of contents:
  1. reproduce.debian.net
  2. Two new academic papers
  3. Distribution work
  4. On our mailing list
  5. Upstream patches
  6. diffoscope
  7. Website updates
  8. Reproducibility testing framework

reproduce.debian.net The last few months saw the introduction of reproduce.debian.net. Announced at the recent Debian MiniDebConf in Toulouse, reproduce.debian.net is an instance of rebuilderd operated by the Reproducible Builds project. Powering that is rebuilderd, our server designed monitor the official package repositories of Linux distributions and attempt to reproduce the observed results there. This month, however, we are pleased to announce that in addition to the existing amd64.reproduce.debian.net and i386.reproduce.debian.net architecture-specific pages, we now build for a three more architectures (for a total of five) arm64 armhf and riscv64.

Two new academic papers Giacomo Benedetti, Oreofe Solarin, Courtney Miller, Greg Tystahl, William Enck, Christian K stner, Alexandros Kapravelos, Alessio Merlo and Luca Verderame published an interesting article recently. Titled An Empirical Study on Reproducible Packaging in Open-Source Ecosystem, the abstract outlines its optimistic findings:
[We] identified that with relatively straightforward infrastructure configuration and patching of build tools, we can achieve very high rates of reproducible builds in all studied ecosystems. We conclude that if the ecosystems adopt our suggestions, the build process of published packages can be independently confirmed for nearly all packages without individual developer actions, and doing so will prevent significant future software supply chain attacks.
The entire PDF is available online to view.
In addition, Julien Malka, Stefano Zacchiroli and Th o Zimmermann of T l com Paris in-house research laboratory, the Information Processing and Communications Laboratory (LTCI) published an article asking the question: Does Functional Package Management Enable Reproducible Builds at Scale?. Answering strongly in the affirmative, the article s abstract reads as follows:
In this work, we perform the first large-scale study of bitwise reproducibility, in the context of the Nix functional package manager, rebuilding 709,816 packages from historical snapshots of the nixpkgs repository[. We] obtain very high bitwise reproducibility rates, between 69 and 91% with an upward trend, and even higher rebuildability rates, over 99%. We investigate unreproducibility causes, showing that about 15% of failures are due to embedded build dates. We release a novel dataset with all build statuses, logs, as well as full diffoscopes: recursive diffs of where unreproducible build artifacts differ.
As above, the entire PDF of the article is available to view online.

Distribution work There as been the usual work in various distributions this month, such as:
  • 10+ reviews of Debian packages were added, 11 were updated and 10 were removed this month adding to our knowledge about identified issues. A number of issue types were updated also.
  • The FreeBSD Foundation announced that a planned project to deliver zero-trust builds has begun in January 2025 . Supported by the Sovereign Tech Agency, this project is centered on the various build processes, and that the primary goal of this work is to enable the entire release process to run without requiring root access, and that build artifacts build reproducibly that is, that a third party can build bit-for-bit identical artifacts. The full announcement can be found online, which includes an estimated schedule and other details.

On our mailing list On our mailing list this month:
  • Following-up to a substantial amount of previous work pertaining the Sphinx documentation generator, James Addison asked a question pertaining to the relationship between SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable and testing that generated a number of replies.
  • Adithya Balakumar of Toshiba asked a question about whether it is possible to make ext4 filesystem images reproducible. Adithya s issue is that even the smallest amount of post-processing of the filesystem results in the modification of the Last mount and Last write timestamps.
  • James Addison also investigated an interesting issue surrounding our disorderfs filesystem. In particular:
    FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace) filesystems such as disorderfs do not delete files from the underlying filesystem when they are deleted from the overlay. This can cause seemingly straightforward tests for example, cases that expect directory contents to be empty after deletion is requested for all files listed within them to fail.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

diffoscope diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 285, 286 and 287 to Debian:
  • Security fixes:
    • Validate the --css command-line argument to prevent a potential Cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. Thanks to Daniel Schmidt from SRLabs for the report. [ ]
    • Prevent XML entity expansion attacks. Thanks to Florian Wilkens from SRLabs for the report.. [ ][ ]
    • Print a warning if we have disabled XML comparisons due to a potentially vulnerable version of pyexpat. [ ]
  • Bug fixes:
    • Correctly identify changes to only the line-endings of files; don t mark them as Ordering differences only. [ ]
    • When passing files on the command line, don t call specialize( ) before we ve checked that the files are identical or not. [ ]
    • Do not exit with a traceback if paths are inaccessible, either directly, via symbolic links or within a directory. [ ]
    • Don t cause a traceback if cbfstool extraction failed.. [ ]
    • Use the surrogateescape mechanism to avoid a UnicodeDecodeError and crash when any decoding zipinfo output that is not UTF-8 compliant. [ ]
  • Testsuite improvements:
    • Don t mangle newlines when opening test fixtures; we want them untouched. [ ]
    • Move to assert_diff in test_text.py. [ ]
  • Misc improvements:
    • Drop unused subprocess imports. [ ][ ]
    • Drop an unused function in iso9600.py. [ ]
    • Inline a call and check of Config().force_details; no need for an additional variable in this particular method. [ ]
    • Remove an unnecessary return value from the Difference.check_for_ordering_differences method. [ ]
    • Remove unused logging facility from a few comparators. [ ]
    • Update copyright years. [ ][ ]
In addition, fridtjof added support for the ASAR .tar-like archive format. [ ][ ][ ][ ] and lastly, Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 285 [ ][ ] and 286 [ ][ ].
strip-nondeterminism is our sister tool to remove specific non-deterministic results from a completed build. This month version 1.14.1-1 was uploaded to Debian unstable by Chris Lamb, making the following the changes:
  • Clarify the --verbose and non --verbose output of bin/strip-nondeterminism so we don t imply we are normalizing files that we are not. [ ]
  • Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0. [ ]

Website updates There were a large number of improvements made to our website this month, including:

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. In January, a number of changes were made by Holger Levsen, including:
  • reproduce.debian.net-related:
    • Add support for rebuilding the armhf architecture. [ ][ ]
    • Add support for rebuilding the arm64 architecture. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Add support for rebuilding the riscv64 architecture. [ ][ ]
    • Move the i386 builder to the osuosl5 node. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Don t run our rebuilders on a public port. [ ][ ]
    • Add database backups on all builders and add links. [ ][ ]
    • Rework and dramatically improve the statistics collection and generation. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Add contact info to the main page [ ], thumbnails [ ] as well as the new, missing architectures. [ ]
    • Move the amd64 worker to the osuosl4 and node. [ ]
    • Run the underlying debrebuild script under nice. [ ]
    • Try to use TMPDIR when calling debrebuild. [ ][ ]
  • buildinfos.debian.net-related:
    • Stop creating buildinfo-pool_$ suite _$ arch .list files. [ ]
    • Temporarily disable automatic updates of pool links. [ ]
  • FreeBSD-related:
    • Fix the sudoers to actually permit builds. [ ]
    • Disable debug output for FreeBSD rebuilding jobs. [ ]
    • Upgrade to FreeBSD 14.2 [ ] and document that bmake was installed on the underlying FreeBSD virtual machine image [ ].
  • Misc:
    • Update the real year to 2025. [ ]
    • Don t try to install a Debian bookworm kernel from backports on the infom08 node which is running Debian trixie. [ ]
    • Don t warn about system updates for systems running Debian testing. [ ]
    • Fix a typo in the ZOMBIES definition. [ ][ ]
In addition:
  • Ed Maste modified the FreeBSD build system to the clean the object directory before commencing a build. [ ]
  • Gioele Barabucci updated the rebuilder stats to first add a category for network errors [ ] as well as to categorise failures without a diffoscope log [ ].
  • Jessica Clarke also made some FreeBSD-related changes, including:
    • Ensuring we clean up the object directory for second build as well. [ ][ ]
    • Updating the sudoers for the relevant rm -rf command. [ ]
    • Update the cleanup_tmpdirs method to to match other removals. [ ]
  • Jochen Sprickerhof:
  • Roland Clobus:
    • Update the reproducible_debstrap job to call Debian s debootstrap with the full path [ ] and to use eatmydata as well [ ][ ].
    • Make some changes to deduce the CPU load in the debian_live_build job. [ ]
Lastly, both Holger Levsen [ ] and Vagrant Cascadian [ ] performed some node maintenance.
If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

2 February 2025

Joachim Breitner: Coding on my eInk Tablet

For many years I wished I had a setup that would allow me to work (that is, code) productively outside in the bright sun. It s winter right now, but when its summer again it s always a bit. this weekend I got closer to that goal. TL;DR: Using code-server on a beefy machine seems to be quite neat.
Passively lit coding Passively lit coding

Personal history Looking back at my own old blog entries I find one from 10 years ago describing how I bought a Kobo eBook reader with the intent of using it as an external monitor for my laptop. It seems that I got a proof-of-concept setup working, using VNC, but it was tedious to set up, and I never actually used that. I subsequently noticed that the eBook reader is rather useful to read eBooks, and it has been in heavy use for that every since. Four years ago I gave this old idea another shot and bought an Onyx BOOX Max Lumi. This is an A4-sized tablet running Android and had the very promising feature of an HDMI input. So hopefully I d attach it to my laptop and it just works . Turns out that this never worked as well as I hoped: Even if I set the resolution to exactly the tablet s screen s resolution I got blurry output, and it also drained the battery a lot, so I gave up on this. I subsequently noticed that the tablet is rather useful to take notes, and it has been in sporadic use for that. Going off on this tangent: I later learned that the HDMI input of this device appears to the system like a camera input, and I don t have to use Boox s monitor app but could other apps like FreeDCam as well. This somehow managed to fix the resolution issues, but the setup still wasn t as convenient to be used regularly. I also played around with pure terminal approaches, e.g. SSH ing into a system, but since my usual workflow was never purely text-based (I was at least used to using a window manager instead of a terminal multiplexer like screen or tmux) that never led anywhere either.

VSCode, working remotely Since these attempts I have started a new job working on the Lean theorem prover, and working on or with Lean basically means using VSCode. (There is a very good neovim plugin as well, but I m using VSCode nevertheless, if only to make sure I am dogfooding our default user experience). My colleagues have said good things about using VSCode with the remote SSH extension to work on a beefy machine, so I gave this a try now as well, and while it s not a complete game changer for me, it does make certain tasks (rebuilding everything after a switching branches, running the test suite) very convenient. And it s a bit spooky to run these work loads without the laptop s fan spinning up. In this setup, the workspace is remote, but VSCode still runs locally. But it made me wonder about my old goal of being able to work reasonably efficient on my eInk tablet. Can I replicate this setup there? VSCode itself doesn t run on Android directly. There are project that run a Linux chroot or in termux on the Android system, and then you can VNC to connect to it (e.g. on Andronix) but that did not seem promising. It seemed fiddly, and I probably should take it easy on the tablet s system.

code-server, running remotely A more promising option is code-server. This is a fork of VSCode (actually of VSCodium) that runs completely on the remote machine, and the client machine just needs a browser. I set that up this weekend and found that I was able to do a little bit of work reasonably.

Access With code-server one has to decide how to expose it safely enough. I decided against the tunnel-over-SSH option, as I expected that to be somewhat tedious to set up (both initially and for each session) on the android system, and I liked the idea of being able to use any device to work in my environment. I also decided against the more involved reverse proxy behind proper hostname with SSL setups, because they involve a few extra steps, and some of them I cannot do as I do not have root access on the shared beefy machine I wanted to use. That left me with the option of using a code-server s built-in support for self-signed certificates and a password: 
$ cat .config/code-server/config.yaml
bind-addr: 1.2.3.4:8080
auth: password
password: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cert: true
With trust-on-first-use this seems reasonably secure. Update: I noticed that the browsers would forget that I trust this self-signed cert after restarting the browser, and also that I cannot install the page (as a Progressive Web App) unless it has a valid certificate. But since I don t have superuser access to that machine, I can t just follow the official recommendation of using a reverse proxy on port 80 or 431 with automatic certificates. Instead, I pointed a hostname that I control to that machine, obtained a certificate manually on my laptop (using acme.sh) and copied the files over, so the configuration now reads as follows: 
bind-addr: 1.2.3.4:3933
auth: password
password: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cert: .acme.sh/foobar.nomeata.de_ecc/foobar.nomeata.de.cer
cert-key: .acme.sh/foobar.nomeata.de_ecc/foobar.nomeata.de.key
(This is getting very specific to my particular needs and constraints, so I ll spare you the details.)

Service To keep code-server running I created a systemd service that s managed by my user s systemd instance: 
~ $ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/code-server.service
[Unit]
Description=code-server
After=network-online.target
[Service]
Environment=PATH=/home/joachim/.nix-profile/bin:/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
ExecStart=/nix/var/nix/profiles/default/bin/nix run nixpkgs#code-server
[Install]
WantedBy=default.target
(I am using nix as a package manager on a Debian system there, hence the additional PATH and complex ExecStart. If you have a more conventional setup then you do not have to worry about Environment and can likely use ExecStart=code-server. For this to survive me logging out I had to ask the system administrator to run loginctl enable-linger joachim, so that systemd allows my jobs to linger.

Git credentials The next issue to be solved was how to access the git repositories. The work is all on public repositories, but I still need a way to push my work. With the classic VSCode-SSH-remote setup from my laptop, this is no problem: My local SSH key is forwarded using the SSH agent, so I can seamlessly use that on the other side. But with code-server there is no SSH key involved. I could create a new SSH key and store it on the server. That did not seem appealing, though, because SSH keys on Github always have full access. It wouldn t be horrible, but I still wondered if I can do better. I thought of creating fine-grained personal access tokens that only me to push code to specific repositories, and nothing else, and just store them permanently on the remote server. Still a neat and convenient option, but creating PATs for our org requires approval and I didn t want to bother anyone on the weekend. So I am experimenting with Github s git-credential-manager now. I have configured it to use git s credential cache with an elevated timeout, so that once I log in, I don t have to again for one workday. 
$ nix-env -iA nixpkgs.git-credential-manager
$ git-credential-manager configure
$ git config --global credential.credentialStore cache
$ git config --global credential.cacheOptions "--timeout 36000"
To login, I have to https://github.com/login/device on an authenticated device (e.g. my phone) and enter a 8-character code. Not too shabby in terms of security. I only wish that webpage would not require me to press Tab after each character This still grants rather broad permissions to the code-server, but at least only temporarily

Android setup On the client side I could now open https://host.example.com:8080 in Firefox on my eInk Android tablet, click through the warning about self-signed certificates, log in with the fixed password mentioned above, and start working! I switched to a theme that supposedly is eInk-optimized (eInk by Mufanza). It s not perfect (e.g. git diffs are unhelpful because it is not possible to distinguish deleted from added lines), but it s a start. There are more eInk themes on the official Visual Studio Marketplace, but because code-server is a fork it cannot use that marketplace, and for example this theme isn t on Open-VSX. For some reason the F11 key doesn t work, but going fullscreen is crucial, because screen estate is scarce in this setup. I can go fullscreen using VSCode s command palette (Ctrl-P) and invoking the command there, but Firefox often jumps out of the fullscreen mode, which is annoying. I still have to pay attention to when that s happening; maybe its the Esc key, which I am of course using a lot due to me using vim bindings. A more annoying problem was that on my Boox tablet, sometimes the on-screen keyboard would pop up, which is seriously annoying! It took me a while to track this down: The Boox has two virtual keyboards installed: The usual Google ASOP keyboard, and the Onyx Keyboard. The former is clever enough to stay hidden when there is a physical keyboard attached, but the latter isn t. Moreover, pressing Shift-Ctrl on the physical keyboard rotates through the virtual keyboards. Now, VSCode has many keyboard shortcuts that require Shift-Ctrl (especially on an eInk device, where you really want to avoid using the mouse). And the limited settings exposed by the Boox Android system do not allow you configure that or disable the Onyx keyboard! To solve this, I had to install the KISS Launcher, which would allow me to see more Android settings, and in particular allow me to disable the Onyx keyboard. So this is fixed. I was hoping to improve the experience even more by opening the web page as a Progressive Web App (PWA), as described in the code-server FAQ. Unfortunately, that did not work. Firefox on Android did not recognize the site as a PWA (even though it recognizes a PWA test page). And I couldn t use Chrome either because (unlike Firefox) it would not consider a site with a self-signed certificate as a secure context, and then code-server does not work fully. Maybe this is just some bug that gets fixed in later versions. Now that I use a proper certificate, I can use it as a Progressive Web App, and with Firefox on Android this starts the app in full-screen mode (no system bars, no location bar). The F11 key still does t work, and using the command palette to enter fullscreen does nothing visible, but then Esc leaves that fullscreen mode and I suddenly have the system bars again. But maybe if I just don t do that I get the full screen experience. We ll see. I did not work enough with this yet to assess how much the smaller screen estate, the lack of colors and the slower refresh rate will bother me. I probably need to hide Lean s InfoView more often, and maybe use the Error Lens extension, to avoid having to split my screen vertically. I also cannot easily work on a park bench this way, with a tablet and a separate external keyboard. I d need at least a table, or some additional piece of hardware that turns tablet + keyboard into some laptop-like structure that I can put on my, well, lap. There are cases for Onyx products that include a keyboard, and maybe they work on the lap, but they don t have the Trackpoint that I have on my ThinkPad TrackPoint Keyboard II, and how can you live without that?

Conclusion After this initial setup chances are good that entering and using this environment is convenient enough for me to actually use it; we will see when it gets warmer. A few bits could be better. In particular logging in and authenticating GitHub access could be both more convenient and more safe I could imagine that when I open the page I confirm that on my phone (maybe with a fingerprint), and that temporarily grants access to the code-server and to specific GitHub repositories only. Is that easily possible?

21 January 2025

Ravi Dwivedi: The Arduous Luxembourg Visa Process

In 2024, I was sponsored by The Document Foundation (TDF) to attend the LibreOffice annual conference in Luxembourg from the 10th to the 12th of October. Being an Indian passport holder, I needed a visa to visit Luxembourg. However, due to my Kenya trip coming up in September, I ran into a dilemma: whether to apply before or after the Kenya trip. To obtain a visa, I needed to submit my application with VFS Global (and not with the Luxembourg embassy directly). Therefore, I checked the VFS website for information on processing time, which says:
As a rule, the processing time of an admissible Schengen visa application should not exceed 15 calendar days (from the date the application is received at the Embassy).
It also mentions:
If the application is received less than 15 calendar days before the intended travel date, the Embassy can deem your application inadmissible. If so, your visa application will not be processed by the Embassy and the application will be sent back to VFS along with the passport.
If I applied for the Luxembourg visa before my trip, I would run the risk of not getting my passport back in time, and therefore missing my Kenya flight. On the other hand, if I waited until after returning from Kenya, I would run afoul of the aforementioned 15 working days needed by the embassy to process my application. I had previously applied for a Schengen visa for Austria, which was completed in 7 working days. My friends who had been to France told me they got their visa decision within a week. So, I compared Luxembourg s application numbers with those of other Schengen countries. In 2023, Luxembourg received 3,090 applications from India, while Austria received 39,558, Italy received 52,332 and France received 176,237. Since Luxembourg receives a far fewer number of applications, I expected the process to be quick. Therefore, I submitted my visa application with VFS Global in Delhi on the 5th of August, giving the embassy a month with 18 working days before my Kenya trip. However, I didn t mention my Kenya trip in the Luxembourg visa application. For reference, here is a list of documents I submitted: I submitted flight reservations instead of flight tickets . It is because, in case of visa rejection, I would have lost a significant amount of money if I booked confirmed flight tickets. The embassy also recommends the same. After the submission of documents, my fingerprints were taken. The expenses for the visa application were as follows:
Service Description Amount (INR)
Visa Fee 8,114
VFS Global Fee 1,763
Courier 800
Total 10,677
Going by the emails sent by VFS, my application reached the Luxembourg embassy the next day. Fast-forward to the 27th of August 14th day of my visa application. I had already booked my flight ticket to Nairobi for the 4th of September, but my passport was still with the Luxembourg embassy, and I hadn t heard back. In addition, I also obtained Kenya s eTA and got vaccinated for Yellow Fever, a requirement to travel to Kenya. In order to check on my application status, I gave the embassy a phone call, but missed their calling window, which was easy to miss since it was only 1 hour - 12:00 to 1:00 PM. So, I dropped them an email explaining my situation. At this point, I was already wondering whether to cancel the Kenya trip or the Luxembourg one, if I had to choose. After not getting a response to my email, I called them again the next day. The embassy told me they would look into it and asked me to send my flight tickets over email. One week to go before my flight now. I followed up with the embassy on the 30th by a phone call, and the person who picked up the call told me that my request had already been forwarded to the concerned department and is under process. They asked me to follow up on Monday, 2nd September. During the visa process, I was in touch with three other Indian attendees.1 In the meantime, I got to know that all of them had applied for a Luxembourg visa by the end of the month of August. Back to our story, over the next two days, the embassy closed for the weekend. I began weighing my options. On one hand, I could cancel the Kenya trip and hope that Luxembourg goes through. Even then, Luxembourg wasn t guaranteed as the visa could get rejected, so I might have ended up missing both the trips. On the other hand, I could cancel the Luxembourg visa application and at least be sure of going to Kenya. However, I thought it would make Luxembourg very unlikely because it didn t leave 15 working days for the embassy to process my visa after returning from Kenya. I also badly wanted to attend the LibreOffice conference because I couldn t make it two years ago. Therefore, I chose not to cancel my Luxembourg visa application. I checked with my travel agent and learned that I could cancel my Nairobi flight before September 4th for a cancelation fee of approximately 7,000 INR. On the 2nd of September, I was a bit frustrated because I hadn t heard anything from the embassy regarding my request. Therefore, I called the embassy again. They assured me that they would arrange a call for me from the concerned department that day, which I did receive later that evening. During the call, they offered to return my passport via VFS the next day and asked me to resubmit it after returning from Kenya. I immediately accepted the offer and was overjoyed, as it would enable me to take my flight to Nairobi without canceling my Luxembourg visa application. However, I didn t have the offer in writing, so it wasn t clear to me how I would collect my passport from VFS. The next day, I would receive it when I would be on my way to VFS in the form of an email from the embassy which read:
Dear Mr. Dwivedi, We acknowledge the receipt of your email. As you requested, we are returning your passport exceptionally through VFS, you can collect it directly from VFS Delhi Center between 14:00-17:00 hrs, 03 Sep 2024. Kindly bring the printout of this email along with your VFS deposit receipt and Original ID proof. Once you are back from your trip, you can redeposit the passport with VFS Luxembourg for our processing. With best regards,
Consular Section GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG
Embassy in New Delhi
I took a printout of the email and submitted it to VFS to get my passport. This seemed like a miracle - just when I lost all hope of making it to my Kenya flight and was mentally preparing myself to miss it, I got my passport back exceptionally and now I had to mentally prepare again for Kenya. I had never heard of an embassy returning passport before completing the visa process before. The next day, I took my flight to Nairobi as planned. In case you are interested, I have written two blog posts on my Kenya trip - one on the OpenStreetMap conference in Nairobi and the other on my travel experience in Kenya. After returning from Kenya, I resubmitted my passport on the 17th of September. Fast-forward to the 25th of September; I didn t hear anything from the embassy about my application process. So, I checked with TDF to see whether the embassy reached out to them. They told me they confirmed my participation and my hotel booking to the visa authorities on the 19th of September (6 days ago). I was wondering what was taking so long after the verification. On the 1st of October, I received a phone call from the Luxembourg embassy, which turned out to be a surprise interview. They asked me about my work, my income, how I came to know about the conference, whether I had been to Europe before, etc. The call lasted around 10 minutes. At this point, my travel date - 8th of October - was just two working days away as the 2nd of October was off due to Gandhi Jayanti and 5th and 6th October were weekends, leaving only the 3rd and the 4th. I am not sure why the embassy saved this for the last moment, even though I submitted my application 2 months ago. I also got to know that one of the other Indian attendees missed the call due to being in their college lab, where he was not allowed to take phone calls. Therefore, I recommend that the embassy agree on a time slot for the interview call beforehand. Visa decisions for all the above-mentioned Indian attendees were sent by the embassy on the 4th of October, and I received mine on the 5th. For my travel date of 8th October, this was literally the last moment the embassy could send my visa. The parcel contained my passport and a letter. The visa was attached to a page in the passport. I was happy that my visa had been approved. However, the timing made my task challenging. The enclosed letter stated:
Subject: Your Visa Application for Luxembourg
Dear Applicant, We would like to inform you that a Schengen visa has been granted for the 8-day duration from 08/10/2024 to 30/10/2024 for conference purposes in Luxembourg. You are requested to report back to the Embassy of Luxembourg in New Delhi through an email (email address redacted) after your return with the following documents:
  • Immigration Stamps (Entry and Exit of Schengen Area)
  • Restaurant Bills
  • Shopping/Hotel/Accommodation bills
Failure to report to the Embassy after your return will be taken into consideration for any further visa applications.
I understand the embassy wanting to ensure my entry and exit from the Schengen area during the visa validity period, but found the demand for sending shopping bills excessive. Further, not everyone was as lucky as I was as it took a couple of days for one of the Indian attendees to receive their visa, delaying their plan. Another attendee had to send their father to the VFS center to collect their visa in time, rather than wait for the courier to arrive at their home. Foreign travel is complicated, especially for the citizens of countries whose passports and currencies are weak. Embassies issuing visas a day before the travel date doesn t help. For starters, a last-minute visa does not give enough time for obtaining a forex card as banks ask for the visa. Further, getting foreign currency (Euros in our case) in cash with a good exchange rate becomes difficult. As an example, for the Kenya trip, I had to get US Dollars at the airport due to the plan being finalized at the last moment, worsening the exchange rate. Back to the current case, the flight prices went up significantly compared to September, almost doubling. The choice of airlines also got narrowed, as most of the flights got booked by the time I received my visa. With all that said, I think it was still better than an arbitrary rejection. Credits: Contrapunctus, Badri, Fletcher, Benson, and Anirudh for helping with the draft of this post.
  1. Thanks to Sophie, our point of contact for the conference, for putting me in touch with them.

19 January 2025

Fran ois Marier: Blocking comment spammers on an Ikiwiki blog

Despite comments on my ikiwiki blog being fully moderated, spammers have been increasingly posting link spam comments on my blog. While I used to use the blogspam plugin, the underlying service was likely retired circa 2017 and its public repositories are all archived. It turns out that there is a relatively simple way to drastically reduce the amount of spam submitted to the moderation queue: ban the datacentre IP addresses that spammers are using.

Looking up AS numbers It all starts by looking at the IP address of a submitted comment: From there, we can look it up using whois: 
$ whois -r 2a0b:7140:1:1:5054:ff:fe66:85c5
% This is the RIPE Database query service.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions.
% See https://docs.db.ripe.net/terms-conditions.html
% Note: this output has been filtered.
%       To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag.
% Information related to '2a0b:7140:1::/48'
% Abuse contact for '2a0b:7140:1::/48' is 'abuse@servinga.com'
inet6num:       2a0b:7140:1::/48
netname:        EE-SERVINGA-2022083002
descr:          servinga.com - Estonia
geoloc:         59.4424455 24.7442221
country:        EE
org:            ORG-SG262-RIPE
mnt-domains:    HANNASKE-MNT
admin-c:        CL8090-RIPE
tech-c:         CL8090-RIPE
status:         ASSIGNED
mnt-by:         MNT-SERVINGA
created:        2020-02-18T11:12:49Z
last-modified:  2024-12-04T12:07:26Z
source:         RIPE
% Information related to '2a0b:7140:1::/48AS207408'
route6:         2a0b:7140:1::/48
descr:          servinga.com - Estonia
origin:         AS207408
mnt-by:         MNT-SERVINGA
created:        2020-02-18T11:18:11Z
last-modified:  2024-12-11T23:09:19Z
source:         RIPE
% This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.114 (SHETLAND)
The important bit here is this line: 
origin:         AS207408
which referts to Autonomous System 207408, owned by a hosting company in Germany called Servinga.

Looking up IP blocks Autonomous Systems are essentially organizations to which IPv4 and IPv6 blocks have been allocated. These allocations can be looked up easily on the command line either using a third-party service: 
$ curl -sL https://ip.guide/as207408   jq .routes.v4 >> servinga
$ curl -sL https://ip.guide/as207408   jq .routes.v6 >> servinga
or a local database downloaded from IPtoASN. This is what I ended up with in the case of Servinga: 
[
  "45.11.183.0/24",
  "80.77.25.0/24",
  "194.76.227.0/24"
]
[
  "2a0b:7140:1::/48"
]

Preventing comment submission While I do want to eliminate this source of spam, I don't want to block these datacentre IP addresses outright since legitimate users could be using these servers as VPN endpoints or crawlers. I therefore added the following to my Apache config to restrict the CGI endpoint (used only for write operations such as commenting): 
<Location /blog.cgi>
        Include /etc/apache2/spammers.include
        Options +ExecCGI
        AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
</Location>
and then put the following in /etc/apache2/spammers.include: 
<RequireAll>
    Require all granted
    # https://ipinfo.io/AS207408
    Require not ip 46.11.183.0/24
    Require not ip 80.77.25.0/24
    Require not ip 194.76.227.0/24
    Require not ip 2a0b:7140:1::/48
</RequireAll>
Finally, I can restart the website and commit my changes: 
$ apache2ctl configtest && systemctl restart apache2.service
$ git commit -a -m "Ban all IP blocks from Servinga"

Future improvements I will likely automate this process in the future, but at the moment my blog can go for a week without a single spam message (down from dozens every day). It's possible that I've already cut off the worst offenders. I have published the list I am currently using.

17 January 2025

Russell Coker: Systemd Hardening and Sending Mail

A feature of systemd is the ability to reduce the access that daemons have to the system. The restrictions include access to certain directories, system calls, capabilities, and more. The systemd.exec(5) man page describes them all [1]. To see an overview of the security of daemons run systemd-analyze security and to get details of one particular daemon run a command like systemd-analyze security mon.service . I created a Debian wiki page for a systemd-analyze security goal [2]. At this time release goals aren t a serious thing for Debian so this won t result in release critical bug reports, but it is still something we can aim for. For a simple daemon (EG BIND, dhcpd, and syslogd) this isn t difficult to do. It might be difficult to understand the implications of some changes (especially when restricting system calls) but you can do some quick tests. The functionality of such programs has a limited scope and once you get it basically working it s done. For some daemons it s harder. Network-Manager is one of the well known slightly more difficult cases as it could do things like starting a VPN connection. The larger scope and the use of plugins makes it difficult to test the combinations. The systemd restrictions apply to child processes too unlike restrictions by SE Linux and AppArmor which permit a child process to run in a different security context. The messages when a daemon fails due to systemd restrictions are usually unclear which makes things harder to setup and makes it more important to get it right. My mon package (which I forked upstream as etbe-mon [3] is one of the difficult daemons as local test can involve probing large parts of the system. But I have got that working reasonably well for most cases. I have a bug report about running mon with Exim [4]. The problem with this is that Exim has a single process model which means that the process doing local delivery can be a child of the process that initially received the message. So the main mon process needs all the access for delivering mail (writing to /home etc). This also means that every other child of mon will get such access including programs that receive untrusted data from the Internet. Most of the extra access needed by Exim is not a problem, but /home access is a potential risk. It also means that more effort is needed when reviewing the access control. The problem with this Exim design is that it applies to many daemons. Every daemon that sends email or that potentially could send email in some configuration needs extra access to be granted. Can Exim be configured to have it s sendmail -T type operation just write a file in a spool directory for another program to process? Do we need to grant permissions to most of the system just for Exim?
Related posts:
  1. Systemd Notes A few months ago I gave a lecture about systemd...
  2. systemd a Replacement for init etc The systemd projecct is an interesting concept for replacing init...
  3. Ethernet Interface Naming With Systemd Systemd has a new way of specifying names for Ethernet...

9 January 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in December 2024

Welcome to the December 2024 report from the Reproducible Builds project! Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the world of software supply-chain security when relevant. As ever, however, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. Table of contents:
  1. reproduce.debian.net
  2. debian-repro-status
  3. On our mailing list
  4. Enhancing the Security of Software Supply Chains
  5. diffoscope
  6. Supply-chain attack in the Solana ecosystem
  7. Website updates
  8. Debian changes
  9. Other development news
  10. Upstream patches
  11. Reproducibility testing framework

reproduce.debian.net Last month saw the introduction of reproduce.debian.net. Announced at the recent Debian MiniDebConf in Toulouse, reproduce.debian.net is an instance of rebuilderd operated by the Reproducible Builds project. rebuilderd is our server designed monitor the official package repositories of Linux distributions and attempts to reproduce the observed results there. This month, however, we are pleased to announce that not only does the service now produce graphs, the reproduce.debian.net homepage itself has become a start page of sorts, and the amd64.reproduce.debian.net and i386.reproduce.debian.net pages have emerged. The first of these rebuilds the amd64 architecture, naturally, but it also is building Debian packages that are marked with the no architecture label, all. The second builder is, however, only rebuilding the i386 architecture. Both of these services were also switched to reproduce the Debian trixie distribution instead of unstable, which started with 43% of the archive rebuild with 79.3% reproduced successfully. This is very much a work in progress, and we ll start reproducing Debian unstable soon. Our i386 hosts are very kindly sponsored by Infomaniak whilst the amd64 node is sponsored by OSUOSL thank you! Indeed, we are looking for more workers for more Debian architectures; please contact us if you are able to help.

debian-repro-status Reproducible builds developer kpcyrd has published a client program for reproduce.debian.net (see above) that queries the status of the locally installed packages and rates the system with a percentage score. This tool works analogously to arch-repro-status for the Arch Linux Reproducible Builds setup. The tool was packaged for Debian and is currently available in Debian trixie: it can be installed with apt install debian-repro-status.

On our mailing list On our mailing list this month:
  • Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote a detailed post on his long journey towards a bit-reproducible Emacs package. In his interesting message, Bernhard goes into depth about the tools that they used and the lower-level technical details of, for instance, compatibility with the version for glibc within openSUSE.
  • Shivanand Kunijadar posed a question pertaining to the reproducibility issues with encrypted images. Shivanand explains that they must use a random IV for encryption with AES CBC. The resulting artifact is not reproducible due to the random IV used. The message resulted in a handful of replies, hopefully helpful!
  • User Danilo posted an in interesting question related to their attempts in trying to achieve reproducible builds for Threema Desktop 2.0. The question resulted in a number of replies attempting to find the right combination of compiler and linker flags (for example).
  • Longstanding contributor David A. Wheeler wrote to our list announcing the release of the Census III of Free and Open Source Software: Application Libraries report written by Frank Nagle, Kate Powell, Richie Zitomer and David himself. As David writes in his message, the report attempts to answer the question what is the most popular Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)? .
  • Lastly, kpcyrd followed-up to a post from September 2024 which mentioned their desire for someone to implement a hashset of allowed module hashes that is generated during the kernel build and then embedded in the kernel image , thus enabling a deterministic and reproducible build. However, they are now reporting that somebody implemented the hash-based allow list feature and submitted it to the Linux kernel mailing list . Like kpcyrd, we hope it gets merged.

Enhancing the Security of Software Supply Chains: Methods and Practices Mehdi Keshani of the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands has published their thesis on Enhancing the Security of Software Supply Chains: Methods and Practices . Their introductory summary first begins with an outline of software supply chains and the importance of the Maven ecosystem before outlining the issues that it faces that threaten its security and effectiveness . To address these:
First, we propose an automated approach for library reproducibility to enhance library security during the deployment phase. We then develop a scalable call graph generation technique to support various use cases, such as method-level vulnerability analysis and change impact analysis, which help mitigate security challenges within the ecosystem. Utilizing the generated call graphs, we explore the impact of libraries on their users. Finally, through empirical research and mining techniques, we investigate the current state of the Maven ecosystem, identify harmful practices, and propose recommendations to address them.
A PDF of Mehdi s entire thesis is available to download.

diffoscope diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 283 and 284 to Debian:
  • Update copyright years. [ ]
  • Update tests to support file 5.46. [ ][ ]
  • Simplify tests_quines.py::test_ differences,differences_deb to simply use assert_diff and not mangle the test fixture. [ ]

Supply-chain attack in the Solana ecosystem A significant supply-chain attack impacted Solana, an ecosystem for decentralised applications running on a blockchain. Hackers targeted the @solana/web3.js JavaScript library and embedded malicious code that extracted private keys and drained funds from cryptocurrency wallets. According to some reports, about $160,000 worth of assets were stolen, not including SOL tokens and other crypto assets.

Website updates Similar to last month, there was a large number of changes made to our website this month, including:
  • Chris Lamb:
    • Make the landing page hero look nicer when the vertical height component of the viewport is restricted, not just the horizontal width.
    • Rename the Buy-in page to Why Reproducible Builds? [ ]
    • Removing the top black border. [ ][ ]
  • Holger Levsen:
  • hulkoba:
    • Remove the sidebar-type layout and move to a static navigation element. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Create and merge a new Success stories page, which highlights the success stories of Reproducible Builds, showcasing real-world examples of projects shipping with verifiable, reproducible builds. These stories aim to enhance the technical resilience of the initiative by encouraging community involvement and inspiring new contributions. . [ ]
    • Further changes to the homepage. [ ]
    • Remove the translation icon from the navigation bar. [ ]
    • Remove unused CSS styles pertaining to the sidebar. [ ]
    • Add sponsors to the global footer. [ ]
    • Add extra space on large screens on the Who page. [ ]
    • Hide the side navigation on small screens on the Documentation pages. [ ]

Debian changes There were a significant number of reproducibility-related changes within Debian this month, including:
  • Santiago Vila uploaded version 0.11+nmu4 of the dh-buildinfo package. In this release, the dh_buildinfo becomes a no-op ie. it no longer does anything beyond warning the developer that the dh-buildinfo package is now obsolete. In his upload, Santiago wrote that We still want packages to drop their [dependency] on dh-buildinfo, but now they will immediately benefit from this change after a simple rebuild.
  • Holger Levsen filed Debian bug #1091550 requesting a rebuild of a number of packages that were built with a very old version of dpkg.
  • Fay Stegerman contributed to an extensive thread on the debian-devel development mailing list on the topic of Supporting alternative zlib implementations . In particular, Fay wrote about her results experimenting whether zlib-ng produces identical results or not.
  • kpcyrd uploaded a new rust-rebuilderd-worker, rust-derp, rust-in-toto and debian-repro-status to Debian, which passed successfully through the so-called NEW queue.
  • Gioele Barabucci filed a number of bugs against the debrebuild component/script of the devscripts package, including:
    • #1089087: Address a spurious extra subdirectory in the build path.
    • #1089201: Extra zero bytes added to .dynstr when rebuilding CMake projects.
    • #1089088: Some binNMUs have a 1-second offset in some timestamps.
  • Gioele Barabucci also filed a bug against the dh-r package to report that the Recommends and Suggests fields are missing from rebuilt R packages. At the time of writing, this bug has no patch and needs some help to make over 350 binary packages reproducible.
  • Lastly, 8 reviews of Debian packages were added, 11 were updated and 11 were removed this month adding to our knowledge about identified issues.

Other development news In other ecosystem and distribution news:
  • Lastly, in openSUSE, Bernhard M. Wiedemann published another report for the distribution. There, Bernhard reports about the success of building R-B-OS , a partial fork of openSUSE with only 100% bit-reproducible packages. This effort was sponsored by the NLNet NGI0 initiative.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. In November, a number of changes were made by Holger Levsen, including:
  • reproduce.debian.net-related:
    • Add a new i386.reproduce.debian.net rebuilder. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Make a number of updates to the documentation. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Run i386.reproduce.debian.net run on a public port to allow external workers. [ ]
    • Add a link to the /api/v0/pkgs/list endpoint. [ ]
    • Add support for a statistics page. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Limit build logs to 20 MiB and diffoscope output to 10 MiB. [ ]
    • Improve the frontpage. [ ][ ]
    • Explain that we re testing arch:any and arch:all on the amd64 architecture, but only arch:any on i386. [ ]
  • Misc:
    • Remove code for testing Arch Linux, which has moved to reproduce.archlinux.org. [ ][ ]
    • Don t install dstat on Jenkins nodes anymore as its been removed from Debian trixie. [ ]
    • Prepare the infom08-i386 node to become another rebuilder. [ ]
    • Add debug date output for benchmarking the reproducible_pool_buildinfos.sh script. [ ]
    • Install installation-birthday everywhere. [ ]
    • Temporarily disable automatic updates of pool links on buildinfos.debian.net. [ ]
    • Install Recommends by default on Jenkins nodes. [ ]
    • Rename rebuilder_stats.py to rebuilderd_stats.py. [ ]
    • r.d.n/stats: minor formatting changes. [ ]
    • Install files under /etc/cron.d/ with the correct permissions. [ ]
and Jochen Sprickerhof made the following changes: Lastly, Gioele Barabucci also classified packages affected by 1-second offset issue filed as Debian bug #1089088 [ ][ ][ ][ ], Chris Hofstaedtler updated the URL for Grml s dpkg.selections file [ ], Roland Clobus updated the Jenkins log parser to parse warnings from diffoscope [ ] and Mattia Rizzolo banned a number of bots and crawlers from the service [ ][ ].
If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

5 January 2025

Jonathan McDowell: Free Software Activities for 2024

I tailed off on blog posts towards the end of the year; I blame a bunch of travel (personal + business), catching the flu, then December being its usual busy self. Anyway, to try and start off the year a bit better I thought I d do my annual recap of my Free Software activities. For previous years see 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 + 2023.

Conferences In 2024 I managed to make it to FOSDEM again. It s a hectic conference, and I know there are legitimate concerns about it being a super spreader event, but it has the advantage of being relatively close and having a lot of different groups of people I want to talk to / see talk at it. I m already booked to go this year as well. I spoke at All Systems Go in Berlin about Using TPMs at scale for protecting keys. It was nice to actually be able to talk publicly about some of the work stuff my team and I have been working on. I d a talk submission in for FOSDEM about our use of attestation and why it s not necessarily the evil some folk claim, but there were a lot of good talks submitted and I wasn t selected. Maybe I ll find somewhere else suitable to do it. BSides Belfast may or may not count - it s a security conference, but there s a lot of overlap with various bits of Free software, so I feel it deserves a mention. I skipped DebConf for 2024 for a variety of reasons, but I m expecting to make DebConf25 in Brest, France in July.

Debian Most of my contributions to Free software continue to happen within Debian. In 2023 I d done a bunch of work on retrogaming with Kodi on Debian, so I made an effort to try and keep those bits more up to date, even if I m not actually regularly using them at present. RetroArch got 1.18.0+dfsg-1 and 1.19.1+dfsg-1 uploads. libretro-core-info got associated 1.18.0-1 and 1.19.0-1 uploads too. I note 1.20.0 has been released recently, so I ll have to find some time to build the appropriate DFSG tarball and update it. rcheevos saw 11.2.0-1, 11.5.0-1 + 11.6.0-1 uploaded. kodi-game-libretro itself had 20.2.7-1 uploaded, then 21.0.7-1. Latest upstream is 22.1.0, but that s tracking Kodi 22 and we re still on Kodi 21 so I plan to follow the Omega branch for now. Which I ve just noticed had a 21.0.8 release this week. Finally in the games space I uploaded mgba 0.10.3+dfsg-1 and 0.10.3+dfsg-2 for Ryan Tandy, before realising he was already a Debian Maintainer and granting him the appropriate ACL access so he can upload it himself; I ve had zero concerns about any of his packaging. The Debian Electronics Packaging Team continues to be home for a bunch of packages I care about. There was nothing big there, for me, in 2024, but a few bits of cleanup here and there. I seem to have become one of the main uploaders for sdcc - I have some interest in the space, and the sigrok firmware requires it to build, so I at least like to ensure it s in half decent state. I uploaded 4.4.0+dfsg-1, 4.4.0+dfsg-2, and, just in time to count for 2024, 4.4.0+dfsg-3. The sdcc 4.4 upload lead to some compilation issues for sigrok-firmware-fx2laf so I uploaded 0.1.7-2 fixing that, then 0.1.7-3 doing some further cleanups. OpenOCD had 0.12.0-2 uploaded to disable the libgpiod backend thanks to incompatible changes upstream. There were some in-discussion patches with OpenOCD upstream at the time, but they didn t seem to be ready yet so I held off on pulling them in. 0.12.0-3 fixed builds with more recent versions of jimtcl. It looks like the next upstream release is about a year away, so Trixie will in all probability ship with 0.12.0 as well. libjaylink had a new upstream release, so 0.4.0-1 was uploaded. libserialsport also had a new upstream release, leading to 0.1.2-1. I finally cracked and uploaded sg3-utils 1.48-1 into experimental. I m not the primary maintainer, but 1.46 is nearly 4 years old now and I wanted to get it updated in enough time to shake out any problems before we get to a Trixie freeze. Outside of team owned packages, libcli had compilation issues with GCC 14, leading to 1.10.7-2. I also added a new package, sedutil 1.20.0-2 back in April; it looks fairly unmaintained upstream (there s been some recent activity, but it doesn t seem to be release quality), but there was an outstanding ITP and I ve some familiarity with the space as we ve been using it at work as part of investigating TCG OPAL encryption. I continue to keep an eye on Debian New Members, even though I m mostly inactive as an application manager - we generally seem to have enough available recently. Mostly my involvement is via Front Desk activities, helping out with queries to the team alias, and contributing to internal discussions. Finally the 3 month rotation for Debian Keyring continues to operate smoothly. I dealt with 2023.03.24, 2023.06.24, 2023.09.22 + 2023.11.24.

Linux I d a single kernel contribution this year, to Clean up TPM space after command failure. That was based on some issues we saw at work. I ve another fix in progress that I hope to submit in 2025, but it s for an intermittent failure so confirming the fix is necessary + sufficient is taking a little while.

Personal projects I didn t end up doing much in the way of externally published personal project work in 2024. Despite the release of OpenPGP v6 in RFC 9580 I did not manage to really work on onak. I started on the v6 support, but have not had sufficient time to complete anything worth pushing external yet. listadmin3 got some minor updates based on external feedback / MRs. It s nice to know it s useful to other folk even in its basic state. That wraps up 2024. I ve got no particular goals for this year at present. Ideally I d get v6 support into onak, and it would be nice to implement some of the wishlist items people have provided for listadmin3, but I ll settle for making sure all my Debian packages are in reasonable state for Trixie.

23 December 2024

Joey Hess: the twenty-fifth year of my free software career

I've been lucky to be able to spend twenty! five! years! developing free software and making a living on it, and this was a banner year for that career. To start with, there was the Distribits conference. There's a big ecosystem of tools and projects that are based on git-annex, especially in scientific data management, and this was the first conference focused on that. Basically every talk involved git-annex in some way. It's been a while since I was at a conference where my software was in the center like that -- reminded me of Debconf days. I gave a talk on how git-annex was probably basically feature complete. I have been very busy ever since adding new features to it, because in mapping out git-annex's feature set, I discovered new possibilities. Meeting people and getting a better feel for the shape of that ecosytem, both technically and funding wise, led to several big developments in funding later in the year. Going into the year, I had an ongoing source of funding from several projects at Dartmouth that use git-annex, but after 10 years, some of that was winding up. That all came together in my essentially writing a grant proposal to the OpenNeuro project at Stanford, to spend 6 months building out a whole constellation of features. The summer became a sprint to get it all done. Signficant amounts of very productive design work were done while swimming in the river. That was great. (Somehow in there, I ended up onstage at FOSSY in Portland, in a keynote panel on Open Source and AI. This required developing a nuanced understanding of the mess of the OSI's Open Source AI definition, but I was mostly on the panel as the unqualified guy.) Capping off the year, I have a new maintenance contract with Forschungszentrum J lich. This covers the typical daily grind kind of tasks, like bug triage, keeping on top of security, release preparation, and updating dependencies, which is the kind of thing I've never been able to find dedicated funding for before. A career in free software is a succession of hurdles. How to do something new and worthwhile? How to make any income while developing it at all? How to maintain your independant vision when working on it for hire? How to deal with burn-out? How to grow a project to be more than a one developer affair? And on and on. How does a free software project keep paying the bills once it's feature complete? Maybe I am starting to get a glimpse of an answer.

Next.