Search Results: "frb"

3 November 2022

Arturo Borrero Gonz lez: New OpenPGP key and new email

Post logo I m trying to replace my old OpenPGP key with a new one. The old key wasn t compromised or lost or anything bad. Is still valid, but I plan to get rid of it soon. It was created in 2013. The new key id fingerprint is: AA66280D4EF0BFCC6BFC2104DA5ECB231C8F04C4 I plan to use the new key for things like encrypted emails, uploads to the Debian archive, and more. Also, the new key includes an identity with a newer personal email address I plan to use soon: arturo.bg@arturo.bg The new key has been uploaded to some public keyservers. If you would like to sign the new key, please follow the steps in the Debian wiki.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=UABf
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
If you are curious about what that long code block contains, check this https://cirw.in/gpg-decoder/ For the record, the old key fingerprint is: DD9861AB23DC3333892E07A968E713981D1515F8 Cheers!

22 November 2021

Paul Tagliamonte: Be careful when using vxlan!

I ve spent a bit of time playing with vxlan - which is very neat, but also incredibly insecure by default.When using vxlan, be very careful to understand how the host is connected to the internet. The kernel will listen on all interfaces for packets, which means hosts accessable to VMs it s hosting (e.g., by bridged interface or a private LAN will accept packets from VMs and inject them into arbitrary VLANs, even ones it s not on.I reported this to the kernel mailing list to no reply with more technical details.The tl;dr is:
  $ ip link add vevx0a type veth peer name vevx0z
  $ ip addr add 169.254.0.2/31 dev vevx0a
  $ ip addr add 169.254.0.3/31 dev vevx0z
  $ ip link add vxlan0 type vxlan id 42 \
    local 169.254.0.2 dev vevx0a dstport 4789
  $ # Note the above 'dev' and 'local' ip are set here
  $ ip addr add 10.10.10.1/24 dev vxlan0
results in vxlan0 listening on all interfaces, not just vevx0z or vevx0a. To prove it to myself, I spun up a docker container (using a completely different network bridge with no connection to any of the interfaces above), and ran a Go program to send VXLAN UDP packets to my bridge host:
$ docker run -it --rm -v $(pwd):/mnt debian:unstable /mnt/spam 172.17.0.1:4789
$
which results in packets getting injected into my vxlan interface
$ sudo tcpdump -e -i vxlan0
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
listening on vxlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
21:30:15.746754 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746773 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746787 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746801 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746815 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746827 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746870 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746885 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746899 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
21:30:15.746913 de:ad:be:ef:00:01 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 64: truncated-ip - 27706 bytes missing! 33.0.0.0 > localhost: ip-proto-114
10 packets captured
10 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
(the program in question is the following:)
  package main
  import (
      "net"
      "os"
      "github.com/mdlayher/ethernet"
      "github.com/mdlayher/vxlan"
  )
  func main()  
      conn, err := net.Dial("udp", os.Args[1])
      if err != nil   panic(err)  
      for i := 0; i < 10; i++  
          vxf := &vxlan.Frame 
              VNI: vxlan.VNI(42),
              Ethernet: &ethernet.Frame 
                  Source:      net.HardwareAddr 0xDE, 0xAD, 0xBE,
0xEF, 0x00, 0x01 ,
                  Destination: net.HardwareAddr 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF ,
                  EtherType:   ethernet.EtherTypeIPv4,
                  Payload:     []byte("Hello, World!"),
              ,
          
          frb, err := vxf.MarshalBinary()
          if err != nil   panic(err)  
          _, err = conn.Write(frb)
          if err != nil   panic(err)  
      
  
When using vxlan, be absolutely sure all hosts that can address any interface on the host are authorized to send arbitrary packets into any VLAN that box can send to, or there s very careful and specific controls and firewalling. Note this includes public interfaces (e.g., dual-homed private network / internet boxes), or any type of dual-homing (VPNs, etc).

13 April 2020

Giovanni Mascellani: DKIM for Debian Developers

What is DKIM? DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail), as Wikipedia puts it, "is an email authentication method designed to detect forged sender addresses in emails (email spoofing), a technique often used in phishing and email spam". More prosaically, one of the reasons email spam is so abundant is that, given a certain email message, there is no simple way to know for certain who sent it and how reputable they are. So even if people having addresses @debian.org are very nice and well-behaving, any random spammer can easily send emails from whatever@debian.org, and even if you trust people from @debian.org you cannot easily configure your antispam filter to just accept all emails from @debian.org, because spammers would get in too. Since nearly ten years DKIM is there to help you. If you send an email from @debian.org with DKIM, it will have a header like this:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=debian.org;
    s=vps.gio.user; t=1586779391;
    bh=B6tckJy2cynGjNRdm3lhFDrp0tD7fF8hS4x0FCfLADo=;
    h=From:Subject:To:Date:From;
    b=H4EDlATxVm7XNqPy2x7IqCchBUz1SxFtUSstB23BAsdyTKJIohM0O4RRWhrQX+pqE
     prPVhzcfNALMwlfExNE69940Q6pMCuYsoxNQjU7Jl/UX1q6PGqdVSO+mKv/aEI+N49
     vvYNgPJNLaAFnYqbWCPI8mNskLHLe2VFYjSjE4GJFOxl9o2Gpe9f5035FYPJ/hnqBF
     XPnZq7Osd9UtBrBq8agEooTCZHbNFSyiXdS0qp1ts7HAo/rfrBfbQSk39fOOQ5GbjV
     6FehkN4GAXFNoFnjfmjrVDJC6hvA8m0tJHbmZrNQS0ljG/SyffW4OTlzFzu4jOmDNi
     UHLnEgT07eucw==
The field d=debian.org is the domain this email claims to be from and the fields bh= and b= are a cryptographic public key signature certifying this fact. How do I check that the email is actually from @debian.org? I use the selector s=vps.gio.user to fetch the public key via DNS, and then use the public key to verify the signature.
$ host -t TXT vps.gio.user._domainkey.debian.org
vps.gio.user._domainkey.debian.org descriptive text "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; s=email; h=sha256; p=" "MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAsM/W/kxtKWT58Eak0cfm/ntvurfbkkvugrG2jfvSMnHHkFyfJ34Xvn/HhQPLwX1QsjhuLV+tW+BQtxY7jxSABCee6nHQRBrpDej1t86ubw3CSrxcg1mzJI5BbL8un0cwYoBtUvhCYAZKarv1W2otCGs43L0s" "GtEqqtmYN/hIVVm4FcqeYS1cYrZxDsjPzCEocpYBhqHh1MTeUEddVmPHKZswzvllaWF0mgIXrfDNAE0LiX39aFKWtgvflrYFKiL4hCDnBcP2Mr71TVblfDY0wEdAEbGEJqHR1SxvWyn0UU1ZL4vTcylB/KJuV2gMhznOjbnQ6cjAhr2JYpweTYzz3wIDAQAB"
There it is! Debian declares in its DNS record that that key is authorized to sign outbound email from @debian.org. The spammer hopefully does not have access to Debian's DKIM keys, and they cannot sign emails. Many large and small email services have already deployed DKIM since years, while most @debian.org emails still do not use it. Why not? Because people send @debian.org emails from many different servers. Basically, every DD used their @debian.org address sends email from their own mail server, and those mail servers (fortunately) do not have access to Debian's DNS record to install their DKIM keys. Well, that was true until yesterday! :-) A few weeks ago I poked DSA asking to allow any Debian Developer to install their DKIM keys, so that DDs could use DKIM to sign their emails and hopefully reduce the amount of spam sent from @debian.org. They have done it (thank you DSA very much, especially adsb), and now it is possible to use it! How do I configure it? I will not write here a full DKIM tutorial, there are many around. You have to use opendkim-genkey to generate a key and then configure your mail server to use opendkim to digitally sign outbound email. There are a few Debian-specific things you have to care about, though. First the have to choose a selector, which is a string used to distinguish many DKIM keys belonging to the same domain. Debian allows you to installa a key whose selector is <something>.<uid>.user, where <uid> is your Debian uid (this is done both for namespacing reasons and for exposing who might be abusing the system). So check carefully that your selector has this form. Then you cannot edit directly Debian's DNS record. But you can use the email-LDAP gateway on db.debian.org to install your key in a way similar to how entries in debian.net are handled (see the updated documentation). Specifically, suppose that opendkim-genkey generated the following thing for selector vps.gio.user and domain debian.org:
vps.gio.user._domainkey IN  TXT ( "v=DKIM1; h=sha256; k=rsa; "
      "p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAsM/W/kxtKWT58Eak0cfm/ntvurfbkkvugrG2jfvSMnHHkFyfJ34Xvn/HhQPLwX1QsjhuLV+tW+BQtxY7jxSABCee6nHQRBrpDej1t86ubw3CSrxcg1mzJI5BbL8un0cwYoBtUvhCYAZKarv1W2otCGs43L0sGtEqqtmYN/hIVVm4FcqeYS1cYrZxDsjPzCEocpYBhqHh1MTeUE"
      "ddVmPHKZswzvllaWF0mgIXrfDNAE0LiX39aFKWtgvflrYFKiL4hCDnBcP2Mr71TVblfDY0wEdAEbGEJqHR1SxvWyn0UU1ZL4vTcylB/KJuV2gMhznOjbnQ6cjAhr2JYpweTYzz3wIDAQAB" )  ; ----- DKIM key vps.gio.user for debian.org
Then you have to carefully copy the content of the p= field (without being fooled by it being split between different strings) and construct a request of the form:
dkimPubKey: vps.gio.user MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAsM/W/kxtKWT58Eak0cfm/ntvurfbkkvugrG2jfvSMnHHkFyfJ34Xvn/HhQPLwX1QsjhuLV+tW+BQtxY7jxSABCee6nHQRBrpDej1t86ubw3CSrxcg1mzJI5BbL8un0cwYoBtUvhCYAZKarv1W2otCGs43L0sGtEqqtmYN/hIVVm4FcqeYS1cYrZxDsjPzCEocpYBhqHh1MTeUEddVmPHKZswzvllaWF0mgIXrfDNAE0LiX39aFKWtgvflrYFKiL4hCDnBcP2Mr71TVblfDY0wEdAEbGEJqHR1SxvWyn0UU1ZL4vTcylB/KJuV2gMhznOjbnQ6cjAhr2JYpweTYzz3wIDAQAB
and then send it GPG-signed to changes@db.debian.org:
echo 'dkimPubKey: vps.gio.user blahblahblah'   gpg --clearsign   mail changes@db.debian.org
Then use host -t TXT vps.gio.user._domainkey.debian.org to chech the key gets published (it will probably take some minutes/hours, I don't know). Once it is published, you can enable DKIM in you mail server and your email will be signed. Congratulations, you will not look like a spammer any more! You can send an email to check-auth@verifier.port25.com to check that your setup is correct. They will reply with a report, including the success of DKIM test. Notice that currently Debian's setup only allows you to use RSA DKIM keys and doesn't allow you to set other DKIM fields (but you probably won't need to set them). EDIT DSA made an official announcement about DKIM support, which you might want to check out as well, together with its links. EDIT 2 Now ed25519 keys are supported, the syntax for specifying keys on LDAP is a little bit more flexible and you can also insert CNAME records. See the official documentation for the updated details. So we have solved our problems with spam? Ha, no! DKIM is only a small step. Useful, also because it enable other steps to be taken in the future, but small. In particular, DKIM enables you to say: "This particular email actually comes from @debian.org", but doesn't tell anybody what to do with emails that are not signed. A third-party mail server might wonder whether @debian.org emails are actually supposed to be signed or not. There is another standard for dealing with that, which is called DMARD, and I believe that Debian should eventually use it, but not now: the problem is that currently virtually no email from @debian.org is signed with DKIM, so if DMARC was enabled other mail servers would start to nuke all @debian.org emails, except those which are already signed, a minority. If people and services sending emails from @debian.org will start configuring DKIM on their servers, which is now possible, it will eventually come a time when DMARC can be enabled, and spammers will find themselves unable to send forged @debian.org emails. We are not there yet, but todays we are a little step closer than yesterday. Also, notice that having DKIM on @debian.org only counters spam pretending to be from @debian.org, but there is much more. The policy on what to accept is mostly independent on that on what you send. However, knowing that @debian.org emails have DKIM and DMARC would mean that we can set our spam filters to be more aggressive in general, but whitelist official Debian Developers and services. And the same can be done for other domains using DKIM and DMARC. Finally, notice that some incompatibilities between DKIM and mailing lists are known, and do not have a definitive answer yet. Basically, most mailing list engines modify either the body of the headers in forwarded emails, which means that DKIM does not validate any more. There are many proposed solutions, possibly none completely satisfying, but since spam is not very satisfying as well, something will have to be worked out. I wrote a lot already, though, so I wont't discuss this here.

23 April 2010

Jonathan McDowell: Out, damn'd PGP v3

Nearly a year ago people starting worrying about the complexity of SHA-1 being reduced and the potential availability of viable attacks against things such as PGP keys that used SHA-1. Many people (myself included) generated a new key, or updated preferences on keys that were otherwise strong enough. There were worries about what this might mean for Debian. We were getting ahead of ourselves a bit though. Firstly there haven't been any public viable attacks that I'm aware of (though of course this doesn't mean we shouldn't continue to migrate away), but secondly there's a much easier method of attack. PGP v3 keys. To quote RFC4880:

V3 keys are deprecated. They contain three weaknesses. First, it is relatively easy to construct a V3 key that has the same Key ID as any other key because the Key ID is simply the low 64 bits of the public modulus. Secondly, because the fingerprint of a V3 key hashes the key material, but not its length, there is an increased opportunity for fingerprint collisions. Third, there are weaknesses in the MD5 hash algorithm that make developers prefer other algorithms. See below for a fuller discussion of Key IDs and fingerprints.
At the time of writing Debian has 21 remaining v3 keys. This is a significant improvement over a year ago, when we had 200, but it's still 21 more than I'd like. I've been chasing people since last May (starting with those who had v3 + v4 keys, all of whom now only have a v4 key) and we're down to the stragglers. So it's time to name and shame, in the hope of kicking them into action. The following keys are what's left (doesn't match the currently active keyring because we've had a few replacements since the last promote):

0x0D2156BD3D97C149 Michael Stone <mstone>
0x225FD911CD269B31 Carlos Barros <cbf>
0x31E73F14E298966D James R. Van Zandt <jrv>
0x366CD3FEEBC11B01 Chris Waters <xtifr>
0x37A73FE355E8BC4D Frederic Lepied <lepied>
0x3E973117DCC528E9 Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo>
0x5C7A46637953F711 Rich Sahlender <rsahlen>
0x5D6560F85F30F005 Craig Brozefsky <craig>
0x6B0E322836129171 Jim Westveer <jwest>
0x723724B4A5B6DD31 Christian Meder <meder>
0x7629B22ED71DAABD Adrian Bridgett <bridgett>
0x8FFC405EFD5A67CD Adam Di Carlo <aph>
0xB0D269DE17F3D4D1 Matthew Vernon <matthew>
0xBC151FC8D2A913A1 Peter S Galbraith <psg>
0xC1A0A171C2DCD3B1 Jim Mintha <jmintha>
0xC3168EBA23F5ADDB Ian Jackson <iwj>
0xCE951B1160D74C7D Patrick Cole <ltd>
0xE82A8B0D57137FE5 Paul Seelig <pseelig>
0xF20E242CE77AC835 Brian White <bcwhite>
0xFBAA570C3087194D Alan Bain <afrb2>
0xFFD1B4AC7C19FD19 David Engel <david>

Of these keys only 2 voted in the recent DPL election. 8 have failed to make any response to my mails (3 since last August). Only 9 have uploaded a package since August 2008. And 10 were already known to the MIA database. Some of them have stated they'll sort out a new key, but not yet done so.

If you are one of these people, please either get a new key sorted and signed and reply to the mails I've sent you, or reply and say you no longer wish to be involved in Debian. And if you know any of these people, encourage them to get a new key sorted and offer to sign it for them.