This is a copy of an email I sent at work. I'm not sure I should be making noise about this here, feedback welcome.

What's happening? Some places in the world implement what is called Daylight saving time or DST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time Normally, you shouldn't have to do anything: computers automatically change time following local rules, assuming they are correctly configured, provided recent updates have been applied in the case of a recent change in said rules (because yes, this happens, and happened this year, and yes, you need to upgrade your software!). Of course, appliances like your microwave oven will likely not change time and will need to adjusted unless they are so-called "smart", in which case they are part of the skynet botnet and should be destroyed. If your clock is flashing "0:00" or "12:00", you have no action to take to adapt to this change, lucky you. If you haven't changed time in six months, congratulations, your clock will be accurate again! In any case, you should still consider DST because it might affect some of your meeting schedules, particularly if you set up a new meeting schedule in the last 6 months and forgot to consider this change.

If your location does not have DST Properly scheduled meetings affecting multiple time zones are set in UTC time, which does not change. So if your location does not observer time changes, your (local!) meeting time will not change. But be aware that some other folks attending your meeting might have the DST bug and their meeting times will change. Be kind to those poor souls which might be missing meetings by a full hour because time flies backwards for them.

If you do observe DST If you are affected by daylight savings, your local meeting times will change for UTC meetings. Normally, your meeting times are scheduled to take this into account and the new hours should be reasonable. But now is a good time to verify that. Take a look at your schedule for the next couple of weeks and reschedule meetings before the daylight saving come up to avoid too much disruption. You have only a couple of weeks to do so right now.

When do times change, how, and and where? As regular readers will remember, the rule of thumb is:

Spring forward, fall backwards.

That is, during the season of Spring, the clocks move forward, and during the Fall (like right now), they move backwards. That is in the northern hemisphere, but then the southern hemisphere is often saner and doesn't switch anyways. So time will move backwards which means an extra hour of sleep. Unless you have children or bad sleep, in which case your body doesn't care about what the clock says and will wake up one hour earlier than what it should. And of course, this doesn't happen everywhere at once, so let's see when it happens where.

Europe The dance starts in Europe. The change happens on the last Sunday in October at 01:00 UTC (not local time!), that is October 25th. If you are in the central European timezone, also known as Amsterdam, Berlin, or Paris time depending on your national affiliation, that essentially means that at 2:59 local the clocks will fall back to 2:00 instead of going to 3:00. Concretely, set your watch back one hour before going to bed, go to bed at the normal time, and enjoy an extra hour of sleep or leisure. If you have kids, you might want to start getting them to bed slightly earlier every day for a week before the change so they take time getting used to the change. If you have trouble sleeping in the morning, find your inner child and do that to yourself as well.

USA / Canada Then it's the US[1] and Canada[2] joining the dance, on the First Sunday in November at 02:00 local (not UTC!), that is, I believe, November 1st 2026. This means that, at 1:59, the clocks will flip to 1:00, instead of 2:00. Concretely, do like the Europeans and tweak your clock before going to bed. That is a little less than four weeks from now. [1] except Arizona (except the Navajo nation), US territories, and Hawaii [2] except Yukon, Saskatchewan, (newly) British Columbia, (newly) Alberta, (newly) Northwest Territories, (newly) Manitoba, one island in Nunavut (Southampton Island), one town in Ontario (Atikokan) and small parts of Quebec (Le Golfe-du-Saint-Laurent)

Other places with DST This time again, I must apologize to the people of Cuba, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, Chile, Australia, and New Zealand, as you fine folks all have your own DST rules that are omitted here for brevity. I rely on this page from Wikipedia to be updated by time nerds accurately for this message, and it should provide you with a rough idea of what's coming: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_by_country In general, changes also happen in October, but either on different times or different days, except in the south hemisphere, where they might happen in September (oops, sorry NZ folks, I'm late!).

Places without DST Everyone else, enjoy, you're on the right side of history, and we thank you for the good example you give us.

Changes since last time There's been lots of changes since last time:

• British Columbia moved to permanent -07 on 2026-03-09, that is it will not change to normal time in November
• Alberta moved to permanent -06 on 2026-06-18, similar to BC above.
• Canada s Northwest Territories moved to permanent -06 on 2026-08-21, matching Alberta.
• Manitoba moves to permanent -05 on 2026-10-31.
• Morocco moves to permanent +00 on 2026-09-20.
• Moldova has used EU transition times since 2022, but the tz database only noticed in 2026

This is my interpretation of the changes announced on the tzdata mailing list here: https://lists.iana.org/hyperkitty/list/tz-announce@iana.org/latest If the eastward trend continues, Canada should adopt country-wide "no daylight savings" rules by 2027, although there's actually no sign of the other provinces (Ontario, Qu bec and so on) currently running bills to change those rules just yet. Poor Canadians like me confused about time in their countries can refer to this section of Wikipedia for details: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_in_Canada#By_province_and_territory ... and particularly the image featured there: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canada_time_zone_map-en.svg It also seems like the US government might finally adopt a permanent daylight saving change bill in 2026, as the "Sunshine protection act" pass the house in July: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunshine_Protection_Act True to form, this was associated with absolutely ridiculous pressure from Donald Trump against republicans (his own party!) objecting to the change:

On July 14, 2026, the House passed a Sunshine Protection Act bill backed by President Trump. Nevertheless, the bill was opposed in the Senate by Republicans, including Senator Cotton. In response, on October 3, 2026, Trump shared a post on Truth Social urging Cotton to approve the bill, where he revealed Cotton's personal cellphone number and called on people to call him.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/03/trump-tom-cotton-daylight-saving-time Given that the last time the US did a major change to the daylight savings policy (in 2005), Canada followed suit to stay in sync, it's quite possible Trump's mad dash might actually finish getting rid of DST in North America: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Change_to_daylight_saving_time

Previous implementation Akvorado connects 2 elements to build its RIB:

1. a prefix tree, and
2. a list of routes attached to each prefix.

Akvorado BMP RIB implementation without sharding. One single read/write lock.

In the diagram above, the RIB stores five IPv4 prefixes and two IPv6 prefixes. One of them, 2001:db8:1::/48, contains three routes:

• from peer 3, next hop 2001:db8::3:1, AS 65402, AS path 65402, community 65402:31,
• from peer 4, next hop 2001:db8::4:1, same ASN, AS path, and community,
• from peer 5, next hop 2001:db8::5:1, AS 65402, AS path 65401 65402, community 65402:31.

The rib structure is defined in Go as follows:

type rib struct  
    tree          *bart.Table[prefixIndex]
    routes        map[routeKey]route
    nlris         *intern.Pool[nlri]
    nextHops      *intern.Pool[nextHop]
    rtas          *intern.Pool[routeAttributes]
    nextPrefixID  prefixIndex
    freePrefixIDs []prefixIndex
 

The prefix tree uses the bart package, an adaptation of Donald Knuth s ART algorithm. The benchmarks demonstrate it outperforms other packages for lookups, insertions, and memory usage.³ Plus, the author is quite helpful.

Storing routes in a map The list of routes for each prefix is not stored directly in the prefix tree: it would put too much pressure on the garbage collector by allocating per-prefix arrays. Instead, the RIB assigns a unique 32-bit prefix identifier for each prefix, either by picking the last available prefix identifier from the freePrefixIDs array if any, or using the nextPrefixID value before incrementing it. Then, the routes are stored in the routes map, leveraging the optimized Swiss table in Go. To retrieve routes attached to a prefix, we look them up one by one in the routes map with a 64-bit key combining the 32-bit prefix index with a 32-bit route index matching the position of the route in the list. Akvorado scans routes from the first to the last to find the best one.⁴ It knows there is no more route if the route key returns no result.

type prefixIndex uint32
type routeIndex uint32
type routeKey uint64

Interning routes A route contains a BGP peer identifier, a partial NLRI⁵, the next hop, and the attributes.

type route struct  
    peer       uint32
    nlri       intern.Reference[nlri]
    nextHop    intern.Reference[nextHop]
    attributes intern.Reference[routeAttributes]
    prefixLen  uint8
 
type nlri struct  
    family bgp.Family
    path   uint32
    rd     RD
 
type nextHop netip.Addr
type routeAttributes struct  
    asn              uint32
    asPath           []uint32
    communities      []uint32
    largeCommunities []bgp.LargeCommunity
 

To save memory and allocations, NLRI, next hops, and route attributes are interned : a 32-bit integer replaces the real value. The mechanism predates the unique package introduced in Go 1.23. We keep it because it has different trade-offs:

• It uses explicit reference counting instead of relying on weak pointers.
• It works with non-comparable values implementing Hash() and Equal() methods.⁶
• It uses explicit pool instances. This will be useful for sharding.
• It has better performance. See for example this benchmark.
• It consumes half the memory thanks to unsigned 32-bit references instead of pointers.
• But it is not safe for concurrent use.

Why does it not scale?

Note At AS 12322, we don t use BMP yet.⁷ But Gerhard Bogner had the patience, availability, and technical skills to help me debug this issue.

The global read/write lock is a bottleneck in this implementation. But how? There are several users of the RIB, each with its own set of constraints:

• The Kafka workers look up the RIB to enrich flows with routing information. They are bound by the number of Kafka partitions.⁸ Akvorado also adjusts their number to ensure efficient batching to ClickHouse. On our setup, the number of workers oscillates between 8 and 16. As we want to observe the latest data, we cannot afford for the Kafka workers to lag too much.
• The monitored routers send route updates through the BMP protocol. When connecting, they can send millions of routes.⁹ After the initial synchronization, updates are sent continuously and may spike from time to time. The router detects a stuck BMP station when its TCP window is full and resets the session in this case. While Akvorado implements a large incoming buffer, it still needs to update the received routes with the write lock held fast enough to avoid being detected as stuck.
• When a remote BGP peer goes down, Akvorado flushes the associated routes by walking the RIB with the write lock held. When a monitored router goes down, Akvorado waits a bit but eventually flushes all the associated routes.

In short: on a busy setup, lock contention is high for both readers and writers, and neither can lag too much behind.

RIB sharding

First step: basic sharding To remove the global lock, the RIB is split into several shards, each one handling a subset of the prefixes:

Akvorado BMP RIB implementation with sharding.

The prefix tree stays global and is protected by a single lock. Each shard gets its read/write lock, its route map, and its intern pools to store NLRIs, next hops, and route attributes, which would not have been possible with Go s unique package. The prefix indexes are also sharded: the 8 most significant bits are the shard index and the 24 remaining bits are the local prefix index. Gerhard confirmed that after this blind change, the BMP receiver chugged steadily. Later, I wrote a concurrent benchmark over half a million synthetic but plausible routes¹⁰ partitioned over 0 to 8 writers, churning routes as fast as possible, while 1 to 16 readers continuously look up a set of 10,000 routes. I don t know if this benchmark is realistic, but it confirms the improvements for both read and write latencies:

Read and write latency performance improvement after sharding.

It also shows that a high number of writers degrades read latency.

Second step: lock-free reads The single read/write lock protecting the prefix tree is the next target. The bart package provides alternative mutation methods returning an updated tree using copy-on-write. Readers don t need the global lock any more, leaving it only to synchronize writers. The prefix tree is boxed in an atomic pointer.

Akvorado BMP RIB implementation with sharding and lock-free reads.

Without a lock, readers can now fetch a stale prefix index when walking their copy of the tree if a concurrent writer removes the last route attached to this prefix index and recycles it for another prefix. To avoid this issue, we combine the prefix index with a generation number and store them in the tree:

type generation uint32
type prefixRef struct  
    idx prefixIndex
    gen generation
 
type rib struct  
    mu     sync.Mutex
    tree   atomic.Pointer[bart.Table[prefixRef]]
    shards []*ribShard
 

Each shard stores the generation number for each local prefix index. The generation number increases by one if the associated prefix index is freed. When looking up the routes attached to a prefix index, the reader checks if the generation number matches. Otherwise, it assumes the index was recycled and the list of routes is empty.¹¹ You can see this case in the diagram above for prefix index 5, stored with a generation index of 3, while the current value in the []generations array is 4. The generation number could overflow, but it is not a problem as lookups are quick. Running the concurrent benchmark against this new implementation shows the improvements for the read latency as soon as the cost of the copy-on-write prefix tree is amortized.

Read and write latency performance improvement after lock-free reads. The middle column shows the cumulative improvements of both steps.

---

Among the multiple attempts to optimize the BMP component, RIB sharding is one of the more satisfying. Akvorado 2.2 implements the first step. PR #2433, drafted while writing this blog post, implements the second step and was released with Akvorado 2.4.

---

1. Each router exporting flows doesn t need to send its routes. When Akvorado does not find a route from a specific device, it falls back to a route sent by another device. It is up to the operator to decide if this is a good enough approximation.
2. I made many attempts to scale the BMP component. See for example PR #254, PR #255, PR #278, PR #2244, and PR #2245. Despite these efforts, this component remained problematic for some users. See discussion #2287 as the latest example.
3. It keeps improving: bart 0.28.0 features a new implementation that trades a bit of memory for greater lookup performance. I did not test it yet, as I have been preparing this blog post for a couple of months already.
4. Akvorado prefers the route matching the exact next hop. Otherwise, it falls back to any other route. This is an approximation. An alternative would be to have one prefix tree for each BGP peer but it would require configuring all routers to export their routes. pmacct s BMP daemon implements this approach.
5. If we consider the BGP RIB as a database, the Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) is the primary key. Its content depends on the BGP family. With IPv4 or IPv6 unicast, this is the prefix. For VPNv4 and VPNv6 families, it includes the route distinguisher. If you enable the ADD-PATH extension, the NLRI also contains a path identifier. In our implementation, we don t store the prefix as we get it from the looked-up IP address using the prefix length stored separately.
6. The Hash() methods rely on the hash/maphash package and on the unsafe package to avoid memory copies. See for example the Hash() function for the nlri structure.
7. Despite being an author or co-author of the first BMP-related RFCs since 2016 (RFC 7854, RFC 8671, RFC 9069), Cisco did not implement it in a usable way in IOS XR until version 24.2.1. We still need to upgrade a few routers to enable this feature.
8. KIP-932 introduces, in Kafka 4.2, the concept of share groups to enable cooperative consumption on the same partition. This is not supported in Akvorado yet.
9. You can configure BMP to send routes for each BGP peer before or after applying the incoming policies. In this case, you can get more than one million routes for each transit peer. You can also tell BMP to send the local RIB, which only contains the best path for each prefix.
10. The prefixes are random, but the prefix size distribution and the AS path length distribution follow the data provided by Geoff Huston.
11. Alternatively, we could retry the lookup, but it would be pointless: the RIB is an eventually consistent database, and an empty list was a correct answer at some point in the recent past.

This post is an unpublished review for As Answers Get Cheaper, Questions Grow Dearer

Note: I have not published blog posts about my academic papers over the past few years. To ensure that my blog contains a more comprehensive record of my published papers and to surface these for folks who missed them, I will be periodically (re)publishing blog posts about some older published projects. This post is closely based on a previously published post by Kaylea Champion on the Community Data Science Blog.

Many individuals use Tor to reduce their visibility to widespread internet surveillance.

Tor users attempting to contribute to Wikipedia are shown a screen that informs them that they are not allowed to edit Wikipedia.

• Many contributions were quotidian attempts to add to the encyclopedia. Tor-based editors added facts, fixed typos, and updated train schedules. There s no way to know whether these individuals knew they were just getting lucky in their ability to edit or were patiently reloading to evade the ban.
• Second, we found harassing comments and vandalism. Unwelcome conduct is common in online environments, and it is sometimes more common when the likelihood of being identified decreases. Some of the harassing comments we observed were direct responses to being banned as a Tor user.

• We observed activism: when a contributor tried to draw attention to journalistic accounts of environmental and human rights abuses committed by a mining company, only to have editors linked to the mining company repeatedly remove their edits. Another example involved an editor trying to diminish the influence of proponents of alternative medicine.
• We also observed quality maintenance activities when editors used Wikipedia s rules on appropriate sourcing to remove personal websites being cited in conspiracy theories.
• We saw edit wars with Tor editors participating in a back-and-forth removal and replacement of content as part of a dispute, in some cases countering the work of an experienced Wikipedia editor whom even other experienced editors had gauged to be biased.
• Finally, we saw Tor-based editors participating in non-article discussions, such as investigations into administrator misconduct and protests against the Wikipedia platform s mistrust of Tor editors.

An exploratory mapping of our themes in terms of the value a type of contribution represents to the Wikipedia community and the importance of anonymity in facilitating it. Anonymity-protecting tools play a critical role in facilitating contributions on the right side of the figure, while edits on the left are more likely to occur even when anonymity is impossible. Contributions toward the top reflect valuable forms of participation in Wikipedia, while edits at the bottom reflect damage.

This work was published as a paper at CSCW: Kaylea Champion, Nora McDonald, Stephanie Bankes, Joseph Zhang, Rachel Greenstadt, Andrea Forte, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2019. A Forensic Qualitative Analysis of Contributions to Wikipedia from Anonymity Seeking Users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 3, CSCW, Article 53 (November 2019), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359155

This project was conducted by Kaylea Champion, Nora McDonald, Stephanie Bankes, Joseph Zhang, Rachel Greenstadt, Andrea Forte, and Benjamin Mako Hill. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (awards CNS-1703736 and CNS-1703049) and included the work of two undergraduates supported through an NSF REU supplement.

$ git diff --shortstat v1.11.5
 493 files changed, 25015 insertions(+), 21135 deletions(-)

New outlet service The major change in Akvorado 2.0 is splitting the inlet service into two parts: the inlet and the outlet. Previously, the inlet handled all flow processing: receiving, decoding, and enrichment. Flows were then sent to Kafka for storage in ClickHouse:

Akvorado flow processing before the introduction of the outlet service

Network flows reach the inlet service using UDP, an unreliable protocol. The inlet must process them fast enough to avoid losing packets. To handle a high number of flows, the inlet spawns several sets of workers to receive flows, fetch metadata, and assemble enriched flows for Kafka. Many configuration options existed for scaling, which increased complexity for users. The code needed to avoid blocking at any cost, making the processing pipeline complex and sometimes unreliable, particularly the BMP receiver.¹ Adding new features became difficult without making the problem worse.² In Akvorado 2.0, the inlet receives flows and pushes them to Kafka without decoding them. The new outlet service handles the remaining tasks:

Akvorado flow processing after the introduction of the outlet service

This change goes beyond a simple split:³ the outlet now reads flows from Kafka and pushes them to ClickHouse, two tasks that Akvorado did not handle before. Flows are heavily batched to increase efficiency and reduce the load on ClickHouse using ch-go, a low-level Go client for ClickHouse. When batches are too small, asynchronous inserts are used (e20645). The number of outlet workers scales dynamically (e5a625) based on the target batch size and latency (50,000 flows and 5 seconds by default). This new architecture also allows us to simplify and optimize the code. The outlet fetches metadata synchronously (e20645). The BMP component becomes simpler by removing cooperative multitasking (3b9486). Reusing the same RawFlow object to decode protobuf-encoded flows from Kafka reduces pressure on the garbage collector (8b580f). The effect on Akvorado s overall performance was somewhat uncertain, but a user reported 35% lower CPU usage after migrating from the previous version, plus resolution of the long-standing BMP component issue.

Other changes This new version includes many miscellaneous changes, such as completion for source and destination ports (f92d2e), and automatic restart of the orchestrator service (0f72ff) when configuration changes to avoid a common pitfall for newcomers. Let s focus on some key areas for this release: observability, documentation, CI, Docker, Go, and JavaScript.

Observability Akvorado exposes metrics to provide visibility into the processing pipeline and help troubleshoot issues. These are available through Prometheus HTTP metrics endpoints, such as /api/v0/inlet/metrics. With the introduction of the outlet, many metrics moved. Some were also renamed (4c0b15) to match Prometheus best practices. Kafka consumer lag was added as a new metric (e3a778). If you do not have your own observability stack, the Docker Compose setup shipped with Akvorado provides one. You can enable it by activating the profiles introduced for this purpose (529a8f). The prometheus profile ships Prometheus to store metrics and Alloy to collect them (2b3c46, f81299, and 8eb7cd). Redis and Kafka metrics are collected through the exporter bundled with Alloy (560113). Other metrics are exposed using Prometheus metrics endpoints and are automatically fetched by Alloy with the help of some Docker labels, similar to what is done to configure Traefik. cAdvisor was also added (83d855) to provide some container-related metrics. The loki profile ships Loki to store logs (45c684). While Alloy can collect and ship logs to Loki, its parsing abilities are limited: I could not find a way to preserve all metadata associated with structured logs produced by many applications, including Akvorado. Vector replaces Alloy (95e201) and features a domain-specific language, VRL, to transform logs. Annoyingly, Vector currently cannot retrieve Docker logs from before it was started. Finally, the grafana profile ships Grafana, but the shipped dashboards are broken. This is planned for a future version.

Documentation The Docker Compose setup provided by Akvorado makes it easy to get the web interface up and running quickly. However, Akvorado requires a few mandatory steps to be functional. It ships with comprehensive documentation, including a chapter about troubleshooting problems. I hoped this documentation would reduce the support burden. It is difficult to know if it works. Happy users rarely report their success, while some users open discussions asking for help without reading much of the documentation. In this release, the documentation was significantly improved.

$ git diff --shortstat v1.11.5 -- console/data/docs
 10 files changed, 1873 insertions(+), 1203 deletions(-)

The documentation was updated (fc1028) to match Akvorado s new architecture. The troubleshooting section was rewritten (17a272). Instructions on how to improve ClickHouse performance when upgrading from versions earlier than 1.10.0 was added (5f1e9a). An LLM proofread the entire content (06e3f3). Developer-focused documentation was also improved (548bbb, e41bae, and 871fc5). From a usability perspective, table of content sections are now collapsable (c142e5). Admonitions help draw user attention to important points (8ac894).

Example of use of admonitions in Akvorado's documentation

Continuous integration This release includes efforts to speed up continuous integration on GitHub. Coverage and race tests run in parallel (6af216 and fa9e48). The Docker image builds during the tests but gets tagged only after they succeed (8b0dce).

GitHub workflow to test and build Akvorado

End-to-end tests (883e19) ensure the shipped Docker Compose setup works as expected. Hurl runs tests on various HTTP endpoints, particularly to verify metrics (42679b and 169fa9). For example:

## Test inlet has received NetFlow flows
GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/prometheus/api/v1/query
[Query]
query: sum(akvorado_inlet_flow_input_udp_packets_total job="akvorado-inlet",listener=":2055" )
HTTP 200
[Captures]
inlet_receivedflows: jsonpath "$.data.result[0].value[1]" toInt
[Asserts]
variable "inlet_receivedflows" > 10
## Test inlet has sent them to Kafka
GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/prometheus/api/v1/query
[Query]
query: sum(akvorado_inlet_kafka_sent_messages_total job="akvorado-inlet" )
HTTP 200
[Captures]
inlet_sentflows: jsonpath "$.data.result[0].value[1]" toInt
[Asserts]
variable "inlet_sentflows" >=   inlet_receivedflows  

Docker Akvorado ships with a comprehensive Docker Compose setup to help users get started quickly. It ensures a consistent deployment, eliminating many configuration-related issues. It also serves as a living documentation of the complete architecture. This release brings some small enhancements around Docker:

• an example to configure Traefik for TLS with Let s Encrypt (1a27bb),
• HTTP compression (bee9a5), and
• support of IPv6 (a74a41).

Previously, many Docker images were pulled from the Bitnami Containers library. However, VMWare acquired Bitnami in 2019 and Broadcom acquired VMWare in 2023. As a result, Bitnami images were deprecated in less than a month. This was not really a surprise⁴. Previous versions of Akvorado had already started moving away from them. In this release, the Apache project s Kafka image replaces the Bitnami one (1eb382). Thanks to the switch to KRaft mode, Zookeeper is no longer needed (0a2ea1, 8a49ca, and f65d20). Akvorado s Docker images were previously compiled with Nix. However, building AArch64 images on x86-64 is slow because it relies on QEMU userland emulation. The updated Dockerfile uses multi-stage and multi-platform builds: one stage builds the JavaScript part on the host platform, one stage builds the Go part cross-compiled on the host platform, and the final stage assembles the image on top of a slim distroless image (268e95 and d526ca).

# This is a simplified version
FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM node:20-alpine AS build-js
RUN apk add --no-cache make
WORKDIR /build
COPY console/frontend console/frontend
COPY Makefile .
RUN make console/data/frontend
FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM golang:alpine AS build-go
RUN apk add --no-cache make curl zip
WORKDIR /build
COPY . .
COPY --from=build-js /build/console/data/frontend console/data/frontend
RUN go mod download
RUN make all-indep
ARG TARGETOS TARGETARCH TARGETVARIANT VERSION
RUN make
FROM gcr.io/distroless/static:latest
COPY --from=build-go /build/bin/akvorado /usr/local/bin/akvorado
ENTRYPOINT [ "/usr/local/bin/akvorado" ]

When building for multiple platforms with --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64,linux/arm/v7, the build steps until the highlighted line execute only once for all platforms. This significantly speeds up the build. Akvorado now ships Docker images for these platforms: linux/amd64, linux/amd64/v3, linux/arm64, and linux/arm/v7. When requesting ghcr.io/akvorado/akvorado, Docker selects the best image for the current CPU. On x86-64, there are two choices. If your CPU is recent enough, Docker downloads linux/amd64/v3. This version contains additional optimizations and should run faster than the linux/amd64 version. It would be interesting to ship an image for linux/arm64/v8.2, but Docker does not support the same mechanism for AArch64 yet (792808).

Go This release includes many changes related to Go but not visible to the users.

Toolchain In the past, Akvorado supported the two latest Go versions, preventing immediate use of the latest enhancements. The goal was to allow users of stable distributions to use Go versions shipped with their distribution to compile Akvorado. However, this became frustrating when interesting features, like go tool, were released. Akvorado 2.0 requires Go 1.25 (77306d) but can be compiled with older toolchains by automatically downloading a newer one (94fb1c).⁵ Users can still override GOTOOLCHAIN to revert this decision. The recommended toolchain updates weekly through CI to ensure we get the latest minor release (5b11ec). This change also simplifies updates to newer versions: only go.mod needs updating. Thanks to this change, Akvorado now uses wg.Go() (77306d) and I have started converting some unit tests to the new test/synctest package (bd787e, 7016d8, and 159085).

Testing When testing equality, I use a helper function Diff() to display the differences when it fails:

got := input.Keys()
expected := []int 1, 2, 3 
if diff := helpers.Diff(got, expected); diff != ""  
    t.Fatalf("Keys() (-got, +want):\n%s", diff)
 

This function uses kylelemons/godebug. This package is no longer maintained and has some shortcomings: for example, by default, it does not compare struct private fields, which may cause unexpectedly successful tests. I replaced it with google/go-cmp, which is stricter and has better output (e2f1df).

Another package for Kafka Another change is the switch from Sarama to franz-go to interact with Kafka (756e4a and 2d26c5). The main motivation for this change is to get a better concurrency model. Sarama heavily relies on channels and it is difficult to understand the lifecycle of an object handed to this package. franz-go uses a more modern approach with callbacks⁶ that is both more performant and easier to understand. It also ships with a package to spawn fake Kafka broker clusters, which is more convenient than the mocking functions provided by Sarama.

Improved routing table for BMP To store its routing table, the BMP component used kentik/patricia, an implementation of a patricia tree focused on reducing garbage collection pressure. gaissmai/bart is a more recent alternative using an adaptation of [Donald Knuth s ART algorithm][] that promises better performance and delivers it: 90% faster lookups and 27% faster insertions (92ee2e and fdb65c). Unlike kentik/patricia, gaissmai/bart does not help efficiently store values attached to each prefix. I adapted the same approach as kentik/patricia to store route lists for each prefix: store a 32-bit index for each prefix, and use it to build a 64-bit index for looking up routes in a map. This leverages Go s efficient map structure. gaissmai/bart also supports a lockless routing table version, but this is not simple because we would need to extend this to the map storing the routes and to the interning mechanism. I also attempted to use Go s new unique package to replace the intern package included in Akvorado, but performance was worse.⁷

Miscellaneous Previous versions of Akvorado were using a custom Protobuf encoder for performance and flexibility. With the introduction of the outlet service, Akvorado only needs a simple static schema, so this code was removed. However, it is possible to enhance performance with planetscale/vtprotobuf (e49a74, and 8b580f). Moreover, the dependency on protoc, a C++ program, was somewhat annoying. Therefore, Akvorado now uses buf, written in Go, to convert a Protobuf schema into Go code (f4c879). Another small optimization to reduce the size of the Akvorado binary by 10 MB was to compress the static assets embedded in Akvorado in a ZIP file. It includes the ASN database, as well as the SVG images for the documentation. A small layer of code makes this change transparent (b1d638 and e69b91).

JavaScript Recently, two large supply-chain attacks hit the JavaScript ecosystem: one affecting the popular packages chalk and debug and another impacting the popular package @ctrl/tinycolor. These attacks also exist in other ecosystems, but JavaScript is a prime target due to heavy use of small third-party dependencies. The previous version of Akvorado relied on 653 dependencies. npm-run-all was removed (3424e8, 132 dependencies). patch-package was removed (625805 and e85ff0, 69 dependencies) by moving missing TypeScript definitions to env.d.ts. eslint was replaced with oxlint, a linter written in Rust (97fd8c, 125 dependencies, including the plugins). I switched from npm to Pnpm, an alternative package manager (fce383). Pnpm does not run install scripts by default⁸ and prevents installing packages that are too recent. It is also significantly faster.⁹ Node.js does not ship Pnpm but it ships Corepack, which allows us to use Pnpm without installing it. Pnpm can also list licenses used by each dependency, removing the need for license-compliance (a35ca8, 42 dependencies). For additional speed improvements, beyond switching to Pnpm and Oxlint, Vite was replaced with its faster Rolldown version (463827). After these changes, Akvorado only pulls 225 dependencies.

Next steps I would like to land three features in the next version of Akvorado:

• Add Grafana dashboards to complete the observability stack. See issue #1906 for details.
• Integrate OVH s Grafana plugin by providing a stable API for such integrations. Akvorado s web console would still be useful for browsing results, but if you want to build and share dashboards, you should switch to Grafana. See issue #1895.
• Move some work currently done in ClickHouse (custom dictionaries, GeoIP and IP enrichment) back into the outlet service. This should give more flexibility for adding features like the one requested in issue #1030. See issue #2006.

---

I started working on splitting the inlet into two parts more than one year ago. I found more motivation in recent months, partly thanks to Claude Code, which I used as a rubber duck. Almost none of the produced code was kept:¹⁰ it is like an intern who does not learn.

---

1. Many attempts were made to make the BMP component both performant and not blocking. See for example PR #254, PR #255, and PR #278. Despite these efforts, this component remained problematic for most users. See issue #1461 as an example.
2. Some features have been pushed to ClickHouse to avoid the processing cost in the inlet. See for example PR #1059.
3. This is the biggest commit:

   $ git show --shortstat ac68c5970e2c   tail -1
   231 files changed, 6474 insertions(+), 3877 deletions(-)
   

4. Broadcom is known for its user-hostile moves. Look at what happened with VMWare.
5. As a Debian developer, I dislike these mechanisms that circumvent the distribution package manager. The final straw came when Go 1.25 spent one month in the Debian NEW queue, an arbitrary mechanism I don t like at all.
6. In the early years of Go, channels were heavily promoted. Sarama was designed during this period. A few years later, a more nuanced approach emerged. See notably Go channels are bad and you should feel bad.
7. This should be investigated further, but my theory is that the intern package uses 32-bit integers, while unique uses 64-bit pointers. See commit 74e5ac.
8. This is also possible with npm. See commit dab2f7.
9. An even faster alternative is Bun, but it is less available.
10. The exceptions are part of the code for the admonition blocks, the code for collapsing the table of content, and part of the documentation.

• [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSpzAVpnXo4
• [2] https://tinyurl.com/25rpmgxx
• [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYhncB9Ftt8
• [4] https://diziet.dreamwidth.org/19480.html
• [5] https://tinyurl.com/287ahynt
• [6] https://cheriot.org/
• [7] https://tinyurl.com/28x64xyc
• [8] https://tinyurl.com/237qycbw
• [9] https://drgabormate.com/trump-clinton-trauma/
• [10] https://tinyurl.com/22wmyogu

Comparison of architecture and mainstream adoption potential

Protocol	Identity System	Example	Storage model	Cost for end users	Potential
Mastodon	Tied to server domain	@ottok@mastodon.social	Federated instances	Free (some instances charge)	High
Bluesky	Portable (DID)	ottoke.bsky.social	Federated instances	Free	Moderate
Farcaster	ENS (Ethereum)	@ottok	Blockchain + off-chain	Small gas fees	Moderate
Lens	NFT-based (Polygon)	@ottok	Blockchain + off-chain	Small gas fees	Niche
Nostr	Cryptographic Keys	npub16lc6uhqpg6dnqajylkhwuh3j7ynhcnje508tt4v6703w9kjlv9vqzz4z7f	Federated instances	Free (some instances charge)	Niche

1. Mastodon (ActivityPub) Mastodon was created in 2016 by Eugen Rochko, a German software developer who sought to provide a decentralized and user-controlled alternative to Twitter. It was built on the ActivityPub protocol, now standardized by W3C Social Web Working Group, to allow users to join independent servers while still communicating across the broader Mastodon network. Mastodon operates on a federated model, where multiple independently run servers communicate via ActivityPub. Each server sets its own moderation policies, leading to a decentralized but fragmented experience. The servers can alternatively be called instances, relays or nodes, depending on what vocabulary a protocol has standardized on.

• Identity: User identity is tied to the instance where they registered, represented as @username@instance.tld.
• Storage: Data is stored on individual instances, which federate messages to other instances based on their configurations.
• Cost: Free to use, but relies on instance operators willing to run the servers.

The protocol defines multiple activities such as:

• Creating a post
• Liking
• Sharing
• Following
• Commenting

Example Message in ActivityPub (JSON-LD Format)

json Copy

"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "type": "Create", "actor": "https://mastodon.social/users/ottok", "object": "type": "Note", "content": "Hello from #Mastodon!", "published": "2025-03-03T12:00:00Z", "to": ["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"]

 
 "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
 "type": "Create",
 "actor": "https://mastodon.social/users/ottok",
 "object":  
 "type": "Note",
 "content": "Hello from #Mastodon!",
 "published": "2025-03-03T12:00:00Z",
 "to": ["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"]
  
 

Servers communicate across different platforms by publishing activities to their followers or forwarding activities between servers. Standard HTTPS is used between servers for communication, and the messages use JSON-LD for data representation. The WebFinger protocol is used for user discovery. There is however no neat way for home server discovery yet. This means that if you are browsing e.g. Fosstodon and want to follow a user and press Follow, a dialog will pop up asking you to enter your own home server (e.g. mastodon.social) to redirect you there for actually executing the Follow action on with your account. Mastodon is open source under the AGPL at github.com/mastodon/mastodon. Anyone can operate their own instance. It just requires to run your own server and some skills to maintain a Ruby on Rails app with a PostgreSQL database backend, and basic understanding of the protocol to configure federation with other ActivityPub instances.

Popularity: Already established, but will it grow more? Mastodon has seen steady growth, especially after Twitter s acquisition in 2022, with some estimates stating it peaked at 10 million users across thousands of instances. However, its fragmented user experience and the complexity of choosing instances have hindered mainstream adoption. Still, it remains the most established decentralized alternative to Twitter. Note that Donald Trump s Truth Social is based on the Mastodon software but does not federate with the ActivityPub network. The ActivityPub protocol is the most widely used of its kind. One of the other most popular services is the Lemmy link sharing service, similar to Reddit. The larger ecosystem of ActivityPub is called Fediverse, and estimates put the total active user count around 6 million.

2. Bluesky (AT Protocol) Interestingly, Bluesky was conceived within Twitter in 2019 by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey. After being incubated as a Twitter-funded project, it spun off as an independent Public Benefit LLC in February 2022 and launched its public beta in February 2023. Bluesky runs on top of the Authenticated Transfer (AT) Protocol published at https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto. The protocol enables portable identities and data ownership, meaning users can migrate between platforms while keeping their identity and content intact. In practice, however, there is only one popular server at the moment, which is Bluesky itself.

• Identity: Usernames are domain-based (e.g., @user.bsky.social).
• Storage: Content is theoretically federated among various servers.
• Cost: Free to use, but relies on instance operators willing to run the servers.

Example Message in AT Protocol (JSON Format)

json Copy

"repo": "did:plc:ottoke.bsky.social", "collection": "app.bsky.feed.post", "record": "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post", "text": "Hello from Bluesky!", "createdAt": "2025-03-03T12:00:00Z", "langs": ["en"]

 
 "repo": "did:plc:ottoke.bsky.social",
 "collection": "app.bsky.feed.post",
 "record":  
 "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
 "text": "Hello from Bluesky!",
 "createdAt": "2025-03-03T12:00:00Z",
 "langs": ["en"]
  
 

Popularity: Hybrid approach may have business benefits? Bluesky reported over 3 million users by 2024, probably getting traction due to its Twitter-like interface and Jack Dorsey s involvement. Its hybrid approach decentralized identity with centralized components could make it a strong candidate for mainstream adoption, assuming it can scale effectively.

3. Warpcast (Farcaster Network) Farcaster was launched in 2021 by Dan Romero and Varun Srinivasan, both former crypto exchange Coinbase executives, to create a decentralized but user-friendly social network. Built on the Ethereum blockchain, it could potentially offer a very attack-resistant communication medium. However, in my own testing, Farcaster does not seem to fully leverage what Ethereum could offer. First of all, there is no diversity in programs implementing the protocol as at the moment there is only Warpcast. In Warpcast the signup requires an initial 5 USD fee that is not payable in ETH, and users need to create a new wallet address on the Ethereum layer 2 network Base instead of simply reusing their existing Ethereum wallet address or ENS name. Despite this, I can understand why Farcaster may have decided to start out like this. Having a single client program may be the best strategy initially. One of the decentralized chat protocol Matrix founders, Matthew Hodgson, shared in his FOSDEM 2025 talk that he slightly regrets focusing too much on developing the protocol instead of making sure the app to use it is attractive to end users. So it may be sensible to ensure Warpcast gets popular first, before attempting to make the Farcaster protocol widely used. As a protocol Farcaster s hybrid approach makes it more scalable than fully on-chain networks, giving it a higher chance of mainstream adoption if it integrates seamlessly with broader Web3 ecosystems.

• Identity: ENS (Ethereum Name Service) domains are used as usernames.
• Storage: Messages are stored in off-chain hubs, while identity is on-chain.
• Cost: Users must pay gas fees for some operations but reading and posting messages is mostly free.

Example Message in Farcaster (JSON Format)

json Copy

"fid": 766579, "username": "ottok", "custodyAddress": "0x127853e48be3870172baa4215d63b6d815d18f21", "connectedWallet": "0x3ebe43aa3ae5b891ca1577d9c49563c0cee8da88", "text": "Hello from Farcaster!", "publishedAt": 1709424000, "replyTo": null, "embeds": []

 
 "fid": 766579,
 "username": "ottok",
 "custodyAddress": "0x127853e48be3870172baa4215d63b6d815d18f21",
 "connectedWallet": "0x3ebe43aa3ae5b891ca1577d9c49563c0cee8da88",
 "text": "Hello from Farcaster!",
 "publishedAt": 1709424000,
 "replyTo": null,
 "embeds": []
 

Popularity: Decentralized social media + decentralized payments a winning combo? Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin (warpcast.com/vbuterin) and many core developers are active on the platform. Warpcast, the main client for Farcaster, has seen increasing adoption, especially among Ethereum developers and Web3 enthusiasts. I too have an profile at warpcast.com/ottok. However, the numbers are still very low and far from reaching network effects to really take off. Blockchain-based social media networks, particularly those built on Ethereum, are compelling because they leverage existing user wallets and persistent identities while enabling native payment functionality. When combined with decentralized content funding through micropayments, these blockchain-backed social networks could offer unique advantages that centralized platforms may find difficult to replicate, being decentralized both as a technical network and in a funding mechanism.

4. Hey.xyz (Lens Network) The Lens Protocol was developed by decentralized finance (DeFi) team Aave and launched in May 2022 to provide a user-owned social media network. While initially built on Polygon, it has since launched its own Layer 2 network called the Lens Network in February 2024. Lens is currently the main competitor to Farcaster. Lens stores profile ownership and references on-chain, while content is stored on IPFS/Arweave, enabling composability with DeFi and NFTs.

• Identity: Profile ownership is tied to NFTs on the Polygon blockchain.
• Storage: Content is on-chain and integrates with IPFS/Arweave (like NFTs).
• Cost: Users must pay gas fees for some operations but reading and posting messages is mostly free.

Example Message in Lens (JSON Format)

json Copy

"profileId": "@ottok", "contentURI": "ar://QmExampleHash", "collectModule": "0x23b9467334bEb345aAa6fd1545538F3d54436e96", "referenceModule": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "timestamp": 1709558400

 
 "profileId": "@ottok",
 "contentURI": "ar://QmExampleHash",
 "collectModule": "0x23b9467334bEb345aAa6fd1545538F3d54436e96",
 "referenceModule": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
 "timestamp": 1709558400
 

Popularity: Probably not as social media site, but maybe as protocol? The social media side of Lens is mainly the Hey.xyz website, which seems to have fewer users than Warpcast, and is even further away from reaching critical mass for network effects. The Lens protocol however has a lot of advanced features and it may gain adoption as the building block for many Web3 apps.

5. Primal.net (Nostr Network) Nostr (Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays) was conceptualized in 2020 by an anonymous developer known as fiatjaf. One of the primary design tenets was to be a censorship-resistant protocol and it is popular among Bitcoin enthusiasts, with Jack Dorsey being one of the public supporters. Unlike the Farcaster and Lens protocols, Nostr is not blockchain-based but just a network of relay servers for message distribution. If does however use public key cryptography for identities, similar to how wallets work in crypto.

• Identity: Public-private key pairs define identity (with prefix npub...).
• Storage: Content is federated among multiple servers, which in Nostr vocabulary are called relays.
• Cost: No gas fees, but relies on relay operators willing to run the servers.

Example Message in Nostr (JSON Format)

json Copy

"id": "note1xyz...", "pubkey": "npub1...", "kind": 1, "content": "Hello from Nostr!", "created_at": 1709558400, "tags": [], "sig": "sig1..."

 
 "id": "note1xyz...",
 "pubkey": "npub1...",
 "kind": 1,
 "content": "Hello from Nostr!",
 "created_at": 1709558400,
 "tags": [],
 "sig": "sig1..."
 

Popularity: If Jack Dorsey and Bitcoiners promote it enough? Primal.net as a web app is pretty solid, but it does not stand out much. While Jack Dorsey has shown support by donating $1.5 million to the protocol development in December 2021, its success likely depends on broader adoption by the Bitcoin community.

Will any of these replace X/Twitter? As usage patterns vary, the statistics are not fully comparable, but this overview of the situation in March 2025 gives a decent overview.

Platform	Total Accounts	Active Users	Growth Trend
Mastodon	~10 million	~1 million	Steady
Bluesky	~33 million	~1 million	Steady
Nostr	~41 million	~20 thousand	Steady
Farcaster	~850 thousand	~50 thousand	Flat
Lens	~140 thousand	~20 thousand	Flat

Mastodon and Bluesky have already reached millions of users, while Lens and Farcaster are growing within crypto communities. It is however clear that none of these are anywhere close to how popular X/Twitter is. In particular, Mastodon had a huge influx of users in the fall of 2022 when Twitter was acquired, but to challenge the incumbents the growth would need to significantly accelerate. We can all accelerate this development by embracing decentralized social media now alongside existing dominant platforms. Who knows, given the right circumstances maybe X.com leadership decides to change the operating model and start federating contents to break out from a walled garden model. The likelyhood of such development would increase if decentralized networks get popular, and the encumbents feel they need to participate to not lose out.

Past and future The idea of decentralized social media is not new. One early pioneer identi.ca launched in 2008, only two years after Twitter, using the OStatus protocol to promote decentralization. A few years later it evolved into pump.io with the ActivityPump protocol, and also forked into GNU Social that continued with OStatus. I remember when these happened, and that in 2010 also Diaspora launched with fairly large publicity. Surprisingly both of these still operate (I can still post both on identi.ca and diasp.org), but the activity fizzled out years ago. The protocol however survived partially and evolved into ActivityPub, which is now the backbone of the Fediverse. The evolution of decentralized social media over the next decade will likely parallel developments in democracy, freedom of speech and public discourse. While the early 2010s emphasized maximum independence and freedom, the late 2010s saw growing support for content moderation to combat misinformation. The AI era introduces new challenges, potentially requiring proof-of-humanity verification for content authenticity. Key factors that will determine success:

• User experience and ease of onboarding
• Network effects and critical mass of users
• Integration with existing web3 infrastructure
• Balance between decentralization and usability
• Sustainable economic models for infrastructure

This is clearly an area of development worth monitoring closely, as the next few years may determine which protocol becomes the de facto standard for decentralized social communication.

Books

Elif Batuman: Either/Or (2022) Stella Gibbons: Cold Comfort Farm (1932) Michel Faber: Under The Skin (2000) Wallace Stegner: Crossing to Safety (1987) Gustave Flaubert: Madame Bovary (1857) Rachel Cusk: Outline (2014) Sara Gran: The Book of the Most Precious Substance (2022) Anonymous: The Railway Traveller s Handy Book (1862) Natalie Hodges: Uncommon Measure: A Journey Through Music, Performance, and the Science of Time (2022)Gary K. Wolf: Who Censored Roger Rabbit? (1981)

Films Recent releases

• 20 Days in Mariupol (Mstyslav Chernovm, 2023)
• All the Beauty and the Bloodshed (Laura Poitras, 2022)
• Anora (Sean Baker, 2024)
• La Chimera (Alice Rohrwacher, 2023)
• Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World (Radu Jude, 2023)
• Evil Does Not Exist (Ryusuke Hamaguchi, 2023)
• Godland (Hlynur P lmason, 2022)
• The Remarkable Life of Ibelin (Benjamin Ree, 2024)
• R.M.N. (Cristian Mungiu, 2022)
• Robot Dreams (Pablo Berger, 2023)
• The Zone of Interest (Jonathan Glazer, 2023)
• Good One (India Donaldson, 2024)

• Angel (Ernst Lubitsch, 1937)
• Come and See (Elem Klimov, 1985)
• The Fly (David Cronenberg, 1986)
• Gaslight (Thorold Dickinson, 1940)
• Harakiri (Masaki Kobayashi, 1962)
• Make Way for Tomorrow (Leo McCarey, 1937)
• Man with a Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929)
• Manhunter (Michael Mann, 1986)
• Purple Noon (Ren Cl ment, 1960)
• Shoah (Claude Lanzmann, 1985)
• Squid and the Whale (Noah Baumbach, 2005)
• Xala (Ousmane Semb ne, 1975)

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for 50 years of queries , a article published in Communications of the ACM

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for How computers make books from graphics rendering, search algorithms, and functional programming to indexing and typesetting , a book published in Manning

References

1. S nchez y G ndara, A.; Magari os Lamas, F.; Wolf, K. B., Manual de lenguaje y tipograf a cient fica en castellano. Trillas, Mexico City, Mexico, 1986, https://www.fis.unam.mx/~bwolf/manual.html
2. Knuth, D. E. Digital typographyCSLI Lecture Notes: CSLI Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1999, https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/dt.html

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for Hacks, leaks and revelations The art of analyzing hacked and leaked data , a book published in No Starch Press

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for Constructed truths truth and knowledge in a post-truth world , a book published in Springer Link

Wayland First up, I read Antoine Beaupr s Wayland to Sway migration with interest. While he said it s done and dusted or something similar, the post shows there s still quite a ways to go. I wouldn t say it s done or whatever till it s integrated so well that a person installs it and doesn t really need to fiddle with config files as an average user. For specific use-cases you may need to, but that should be outside of a normal user (layperson) experience. I have been using mate for a long long time and truth be told been very happy with it. The only thing I found about Wayland on mate is this discussion or rather this entry. The roadmap on Ubuntu Mate is also quite iffy. The Mate Wayland entry on Debian wiki also perhaps need an updation but dunno much as the latest update it shares is 2019 and it s 2022. One thing to note, at least according to Antoine, things should be better as and when it gets integrated even on legacy hardware. I would be interested to know how it would work on old desktops and laptops rather than new or is there some barrier? I, for one would have liked to see or know about why lightdm didn t work on Wayland and if there s support. From what little I know lightdm is much lighter than gdm3 and doesn t require much memory and from what little I have experienced works very well with mate. I have been using it since 2015/16 although the Debian changelog tells me that it has been present since 2011. I was hoping to see if there was a Wayland specific mailing list, something like debian-wayland but apparently there s not :(. Using mate desktop wayland (tried few other variations on the keywords) but search fails to find any meaningful answer :(. FWIW and I don t know the reason why but Archwiki never fails to amaze me. Interestingly, it just says No for mate. I probably would contact upstream in the coming days to know what their plans are and hopefully they will document what their plans are on integrating Wayland in both short-term and long-term with an update, or if there is something more recent they have documented elsewhere, get that update on the Debian wiki so people know. The other interesting thread I read was Russel Coker s Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen5 entry. I would be in the market in a few months to find/buy a Thinkpad but probably of AMD rather than Intel because part of recent past history with Intel as well as AMD having a bit of an edge over Intel as far as graphics is concerned. I wonder why Russel was looking into Intel and not AMD. Would be interested to know why Intel and not AMD? Any specific reason ???

Hearing Aids I finally bought hearing aids about a couple of weeks back and have been practicing using them. I was able to have quite a few conversations although music is still I m not able to listen clearly but it is still a far cry from before and for the better. I am able to have conversations with people and also reply and they do not have to make that extra effort that they needed to. Make things easier for everybody. The one I bought is at the starting range although the hearing aids go all the way to 8 lakhs for a pair (INR 800,000), the more expensive ones having WiFi, Bluetooth and more channels, it all depends on how much can one afford. And AFAIK there is not a single Indian manufacturer who is known in this business.

One thing I did notice is while the hearing aids are remarkably sturdy if they fall down as they are small, yet you have to be careful of both dust and water . That does makes life a bit difficult as my house and city both gets sand quite a bit everyday. I don t think they made any India-specific changes, if they had, would probably make things better. I haven t yet looked at it, but it may be possible to hack it remotely. There may or may not be security issues involved, probably would try once I ve bit more time am bit more comfortable to try and see what I can find out. If I had bought it before, maybe I would have applied for the Debian event happening in Kerala, if nothing else, would have been to document what happened there in detail. I probably would have to get a new motherboard for my desktop probably in a year or two as quite a few motherboards also have WiFi (WiFi 6 ?) think on the southbridge. I at least would have a look in new year and know more as to what s been happening. For last at least 2-3 years there has been a rumor which has been confirmed time and again that the Tata Group has been in talks with multiple vendors to set chip fabrication and testing business but to date they haven t been able to find one. They do keep on giving press conferences about the same but that s all they do :(. Just shared the latest one above.

The Long War Terry Pratchett, Stephen Braxter Long Earth Terry Pratchett, Stephen Braxter ISBN13: 9780062067777 Last month there was also a seconds books sale where I was lucky enough to get my hands on the Long War. But before I share about the book itself, I had a discussion with another of my friends and had to re-share part of that conversation. While the gentleman was adamant that non-fiction books are great, my point as always is both are equal. As I shared perhaps on this blog itself, perhaps multiple times, that I had seen a YT video in which a professor shared multiple textbooks of physics and shared how they are wrong and have been wrong and kept them in a specific corner. He took the latest book which he honestly said doesn t have any mistakes as far as he know and yet still kept in that same corner denoting that it is highly possible that future understanding will make the knowledge or understanding we know different. An example of physics in the nano world and how that is different and basically turns our understanding than what we know. Now as far as the book is concerned, remember Michael Crichton s Timeline. Now that book was originally written in the 1960 s while this one was written by both the honorable gentleman in 2013. So almost 50+ years difference between the two books, and that even shows how they think about things. In this book, you no longer need a big machine, but have something called a stepper machine which is say similar to a cellphone, that size and that frame, thickness etc. In this one, the idea of multiverse is also there but done a tad differently. In this, we do not have other humans or copy humans but have multiple earths that may have same or different geography as how evolution happened. None of the multiverse earths have humans but have different species depending on the evolution that happened there. There are something called as trolls but they have a much different meaning and way about them about how most fantasy authors portray trolls. While they are big in this as well, they are as gentle as bears or rabbits. So the whole thing is about real estate and how humans have spread out on multiple earths and the politics therein. Interestingly, the story was trashed or given negative reviews on Goodreads. The sad part is/was that it was written and published in 2013 when perhaps the possibility of war or anything like that was very remote especially in the States, but now we are now in 2022 and just had an insurrection happen and whole lot of Americans are radicalized, whether you see the left or the right depending on your ideology. An American did share few weeks ago how some shares are looking at Proportional Representation and that should make both parties come more towards the center and be a bit more transparent. What was interesting to me is the fact that states have much more rights to do elections and electioneering the way they want rather than a set model which everyone has common which is what happens in India. This also does poke holes into the whole Donald Trump stolen democracy drama but that s a different story altogether. One of the more interesting things I came to know about is that there are 4 books in the long series and this was the second book in itself. I do not want to dwell on the characters themselves as frankly speaking I haven t read all the four books and it would be gross injustice on my part to talk about the characters themselves. Did I enjoy reading the book, for sure. What was interesting and very true of human nature is that even if we have the ability or had the ability to have whole worlds to ourselves, we are bound to mess it up. And in that aspect, I don t think he is too far off the mark. If I had a whole world, wouldn t I try to exploit it to the best or worse of my ability. One of the more interesting topics in the book is the barter system they have thought of that is called as favors. If you are in multiple worlds, then having a currency, even fiat money is of no use and they have to find ways and means to trade with one another. The book also touches a bit on slavery but only just and doesn t really explore it as much as it could have.

Identity Now this has many meanings to it. Couple of weeks ago, saw a transgender meet. For the uninitiated or rather people like me, basically it is about people who are born in one gender but do not identify with it but the other and they express it first through their clothes and expression and the end of the journey perhaps is with having the organs but this may or may not be feasible, as such surgery is expensive and also not available everywhere. After section 377 was repealed few years ago, we do have a third gender on forms as well as have something called a Transgender Act but how much the needle has moved in society is still a question. They were doing a roadshow near my house hence I was able to talk with them with my new hearing aids and while there was lot of traffic was able to understand some of their issues. For e.g. they find it difficult to get houses on rent, but then it is similar for bachelor guys or girls also. One could argue to what degree it is, and that perhaps maybe. Also, there is a myth that they are somehow promiscuous but that I believe is neither here or there. Osho said an average person thinks about the opposite sex every few seconds or a minute. I am sure even Freud would have similar ideas. So, if you look in that way everybody is promiscuous as far as thought is concerned. The other part being opportunity but that again is function of so many other things. Some people are able to attract a lot of people, others might not. And then whether they chose to act on that opportunity or not is another thing altogether. Another word that is or was used is called gender fluid, but that too is iffy as gender fluid may or may not mean transgender. Also, while watching some nature documentary few days/weeks back had come to know that trees have something like 18 odd genders. That just blows me out of the mind and does re-question this whole idea of sexuality and identity to only two which seems somewhat regressive at least to me. If we think humans are part of nature, then we need to be open up perhaps a bit more. But identity as I shared above has more than one meaning. For e.g. citizenship, that one is born in India is even messier to know, understand and define. I had come across this article about couple of months back. Now think about this. Now, there have been studies and surveys about citizenship and it says something like 60% birth registrations are done in metro cities. Now Metro cities are 10 as defined by Indian state. But there are roughly an odd 4k cities in India and probably twice the number of villages and those are conservative numbers as we still don t record things meticulously, maybe due to the Indian oral tradition or just being lazy or both, one part is also that if you document people and villages and towns, then you are also obligated to give them some things as a state and that perhaps is not what the Indian state wants. A small village in India could be anywhere from few hundreds of people to a few thousand. And all the new interventions whether it is PAN, Aadhar has just made holes rather than making things better. They are not inclusive but exclusive. And none of this takes into account Indian character and the way things are done in India. In most households, excluding the celebs (they are in a world of pain altogether when it comes to baby names but then it s big business but that s an entire different saga altogether, so not going to touch that.) I would use or say my individual case as that is and seems to be something which is regular even today. I was given a nickname when I was 3 years old and given a name when I was 5-6 when I was put in school. I also came to know in school few kids who didn t like their names and couple of them cajoled and actually changed their names while they were kids, most of us just stayed with what we got. I do remember sharing about nakushi or something similar a name given to few girls in Maharashtra by their parents and the state intervened and changed their names. But that too is another story in itself. What I find most problematic is that the state seems to be blind, and this seems to be by design rather than a mistake. Couple of years back, Assam did something called NRC (National Register of Citizens) and by the Govt s own account it was a failure of massive proportions. And they still want to bring in CAA, screwing up Assam more. And this is the same Govt. went shown how incorrect it was, blamed it all on the High Court and it s the same Govt. that shopped around for judges to put somebody called Mr. Saibaba (an invalid 90 year adivasi) against whom the Govt. hasn t even a single proof as of date. Apparently, they went to 6 judges who couldn t give what the decision the Govt. wanted. All this info. is in public domain. So the current party ruling, i.e. BJP just wants to make more divisions rather than taking people along as they don t have answers either on economy, inflation or issues that people are facing. One bright light has been Rahul Gandhi who has been doing a padhyatra (walking) from Kanyakumari to Kashmir and has had tremendous success although mainstream media has showed almost nothing what he is doing or why he is doing that. Not only he had people following him, there are and were many who took his example and using the same values of inclusiveness are walking where they can. And this is not to do with just a political party but more with a political thought of inclusiveness, that we are one irrespective of what I believe, eat, wear etc. And that gentleman has been giving press conferences while our dear P.M. even after 8 years doesn t have the guts to do a single press conference. Before closing, I do want to take another aspect, Rahul Gandhi s mother is an Italian or was from Italy before she married. But for BJP she is still Italian. Rishi Sunak, who has become the UK Prime Minister they think of him as Indian and yet he has sworn using the Queen s name. And the same goes for Canada Kumar (Akshay Kumar) and many others. How the right is able to blind and deaf to what it thinks is beyond me. All these people have taken an oath in the name of the Queen and they have to be loyal to her or rather now King Charles III. The disconnect continues.

What is Neo-Colonialism? The term "neo-colonialism" was coined by Kwame Nkrumah, first president of Ghana. In Neo-Colonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism (1965), he wrote:

In place of colonialism, as the main instrument of imperialism, we have today neo-colonialism ... [which] like colonialism, is an attempt to export the social conflicts of the capitalist countries. ... The result of neo-colonialism is that foreign capital is used for the exploitation rather than for the development of the less developed parts of the world. Investment, under neo-colonialism, increases, rather than decreases, the gap between the rich and the poor countries of the world.

So basically, if colonialism is Europeans bringing genocide, war, and its religion to the Africa, Asia, and the Americas, neo-colonialism is the Americans (note the "n") bringing capitalism to the world. Before we see how this applies to the Internet, we must therefore make a detour into US history. This matters, because anyone would be hard-pressed to decouple neo-colonialism from the empire under which it evolves, and here we can only name the United States of America.

US Declaration of Independence Let's start with the United States declaration of independence (1776). Many Americans may roll their eyes at this, possibly because that declaration is not actually part of the US constitution and therefore may have questionable legal standing. Still, it was obviously a driving philosophical force in the founding of the nation. As its author, Thomas Jefferson, stated:

it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion

In that aging document, we find the following pearl:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

As a founding document, the Declaration still has an impact in the sense that the above quote has been called an:

"immortal declaration", and "perhaps [the] single phrase" of the American Revolutionary period with the greatest "continuing importance." (Wikipedia)

Let's read that "immortal declaration" again: "all men are created equal". "Men", in that context, is limited to a certain number of people, namely "property-owning or tax-paying white males, or about 6% of the population". Back when this was written, women didn't have the right to vote, and slavery was legal. Jefferson himself owned hundreds of slaves. The declaration was aimed at the King and was a list of grievances. A concern of the colonists was that the King:

has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

This is a clear mark of the frontier myth which paved the way for the US to exterminate and colonize the territory some now call the United States of America. The declaration of independence is obviously a colonial document, having being written by colonists. None of this is particularly surprising, historically, but I figured it serves as a good reminder of where the Internet is coming from, since it was born in the US.

A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace Two hundred and twenty years later, in 1996, John Perry Barlow wrote a declaration of independence of cyberspace. At this point, (almost) everyone has a right to vote (including women), slavery was abolished (although some argue it still exists in the form of the prison system); the US has made tremendous progress. Surely this text will have aged better than the previous declaration it is obviously derived from. Let's see how it reads today and how it maps to how the Internet is actually built now.

Borders of Independence One of the key ideas that Barlow brings up is that "cyberspace does not lie within your borders". In that sense, cyberspace is the final frontier: having failed to colonize the moon, Americans turn inwards, deeper into technology, but still in the frontier ideology. And indeed, Barlow is one of the co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (the beloved EFF), founded six years prior. But there are other problems with this idea. As Wikipedia quotes:

The declaration has been criticized for internal inconsistencies.[9] The declaration's assertion that 'cyberspace' is a place removed from the physical world has also been challenged by people who point to the fact that the Internet is always linked to its underlying geography.[10]

And indeed, the Internet is definitely a physical object. First controlled and severely restricted by "telcos" like AT&T, it was somewhat "liberated" from that monopoly in 1982 when an anti-trust lawsuit broke up the monopoly, a key historical event that, one could argue, made the Internet possible. (From there on, "backbone" providers could start competing and emerge, and eventually coalesce into new monopolies: Google has a monopoly on search and advertisement, Facebook on communications for a few generations, Amazon on storage and computing, Microsoft on hardware, etc. Even AT&T is now pretty much as consolidated as it was before.) The point is: all those companies have gigantic data centers and intercontinental cables. And those are definitely prioritizing the western world, the heart of the empire. Take for example Google's latest 3,900 mile undersea cable: it does not connect Argentina to South Africa or New Zealand, it connects the US to UK and Spain. Hardly a revolutionary prospect.

Private Internet But back to the Declaration:

Do not think that you can build it, as though it were a public construction project. You cannot. It is an act of nature and it grows itself through our collective actions.

In Barlow's mind, the "public" is bad, and private is good, natural. Or, in other words, a "public construction project" is unnatural. And indeed, the modern "nature" of development is private: most of the Internet is now privately owned and operated. I must admit that, as an anarchist, I loved that sentence when I read it. I was rooting for "us", the underdogs, the revolutionaries. And, in a way, I still do: I am on the board of Koumbit and work for a non-profit that has pivoted towards censorship and surveillance evasion. Yet I cannot help but think that, as a whole, we have failed to establish that independence and put too much trust in private companies. It is obvious in retrospect, but it was not, 30 years ago. Now, the infrastructure of the Internet has zero accountability to traditional political entities supposedly representing the people, or even its users. The situation is actually worse than when the US was founded (e.g. "6% of the population can vote"), because the owners of the tech giants are only a handful of people who can override any decision. There's only one Amazon CEO, he's called Jeff Bezos, and he has total control. (Update: Bezos actually ceded the CEO role to Andy Jassy, AWS and Amazon music founder, while remaining executive chairman. I would argue that, as the founder and the richest man on earth, he still has strong control over Amazon.)

Social Contract Here's another claim of the Declaration:

We are forming our own Social Contract.

I remember the early days, back when "netiquette" was a word, it did feel we had some sort of a contract. Not written in standards of course -- or barely (see RFC1855) -- but as a tacit agreement. How wrong we were. One just needs to look at Facebook to see how problematic that idea is on a global network. Facebook is the quintessential "hacker" ideology put in practice. Mark Zuckerberg explicitly refused to be "arbiter of truth" which implicitly means he will let lies take over its platforms. He also sees Facebook as place where everyone is equal, something that echoes the Declaration:

We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth.

(We note, in passing, the omission of gender in that list, also mirroring the infamous "All men are created equal" claim of the US declaration.) As the Wall Street Journal's (WSJ) Facebook files later shown, both of those "contracts" have serious limitations inside Facebook. There are VIPs who systematically bypass moderation systems including fascists and rapists. Drug cartels and human traffickers thrive on the platform. Even when Zuckerberg himself tried to tame the platform -- to get people vaccinated or to make it healthier -- he failed: "vaxxer" conspiracies multiplied and Facebook got angrier. This is because the "social contract" behind Facebook and those large companies is a lie: their concern is profit and that means advertising, "engagement" with the platform, which causes increased anxiety and depression in teens, for example. Facebook's response to this is that they are working really hard on moderation. But the truth is that even that system is severely skewed. The WSJ showed that Facebook has translators for only 50 languages. It's a surprisingly hard to count human languages but estimates range the number of distinct languages between 2500 and 7000. So while 50 languages seems big at first, it's actually a tiny fraction of the human population using Facebook. Taking the first 50 of the Wikipedia list of languages by native speakers we omit languages like Dutch (52), Greek (74), and Hungarian (78), and that's just a few random nations picks from Europe. As an example, Facebook has trouble moderating even a major language like Arabic. It censored content from legitimate Arab news sources when they mentioned the word al-Aqsa because Facebook associates it with the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades when they were talking about the Al-Aqsa Mosque... This bias against Arabs also shows how Facebook reproduces the American colonizer politics. The WSJ also pointed out that Facebook spends only 13% of its moderation efforts outside of the US, even if that represents 90% of its users. Facebook spends three more times moderating on "brand safety", which shows its priority is not the safety of its users, but of the advertisers.

Military Internet Sergey Brin and Larry Page are the Lewis and Clark of our generation. Just like the latter were sent by Jefferson (the same) to declare sovereignty over the entire US west coast, Google declared sovereignty over all human knowledge, with its mission statement "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful". (It should be noted that Page somewhat questioned that mission but only because it was not ambitious enough, Google having "outgrown" it.) The Lewis and Clark expedition, just like Google, had a scientific pretext, because that is what you do to colonize a world, presumably. Yet both men were military and had to receive scientific training before they left. The Corps of Discovery was made up of a few dozen enlisted men and a dozen civilians, including York an African American slave owned by Clark and sold after the expedition, with his final fate lost in history. And just like Lewis and Clark, Google has a strong military component. For example, Google Earth was not originally built at Google but is the acquisition of a company called Keyhole which had ties with the CIA. Those ties were brought inside Google during the acquisition. Google's increasing investment inside the military-industrial complex eventually led Google to workers organizing a revolt although it is currently unclear to me how much Google is involved in the military apparatus. Other companies, obviously, do not have such reserve, with Microsoft, Amazon, and plenty of others happily bidding on military contracts all the time.

Spreading the Internet I am obviously not the first to identify colonial structures in the Internet. In an article titled The Internet as an Extension of Colonialism, Heather McDonald correctly identifies fundamental problems with the "development" of new "markets" of Internet "consumers", primarily arguing that it creates a digital divide which creates a "lack of agency and individual freedom":

Many African people have gained access to these technologies but not the freedom to develop content such as web pages or social media platforms in their own way. Digital natives have much more power and therefore use this to create their own space with their own norms, shaping their online world according to their own outlook.

But the digital divide is certainly not the worst problem we have to deal with on the Internet today. Going back to the Declaration, we originally believed we were creating an entirely new world:

This governance will arise according to the conditions of our world, not yours. Our world is different.

How I dearly wished that was true. Unfortunately, the Internet is not that different from the offline world. Or, to be more accurate, the values we have embedded in the Internet, particularly of free speech absolutism, sexism, corporatism, and exploitation, are now exploding outside of the Internet, into the "real" world. The Internet was built with free software which, fundamentally, was based on quasi-volunteer labour of an elite force of white men with obviously too much time on their hands (and also: no children). The mythical writing of GCC and Emacs by Richard Stallman is a good example of this, but the entirety of the Internet now seems to be running on random bits and pieces built by hit-and-run programmers working on their copious free time. Whenever any of those fails, it can compromise or bring down entire systems. (Heck, I wrote this article on my day off...) This model of what is fundamentally "cheap labour" is spreading out from the Internet. Delivery workers are being exploited to the bone by apps like Uber -- although it should be noted that workers organise and fight back. Amazon workers are similarly exploited beyond belief, forbidden to take breaks until they pee in bottles, with ambulances nearby to carry out the bodies. During peak of the pandemic, workers were being dangerously exposed to the virus in warehouses. All this while Amazon is basically taking over the entire economy. The Declaration culminates with this prophecy:

We will spread ourselves across the Planet so that no one can arrest our thoughts.

This prediction, which first felt revolutionary, is now chilling.

Colonial Internet The Internet is, if not neo-colonial, plain colonial. The US colonies had cotton fields and slaves, we have disposable cell phones and Foxconn workers. Canada has its cultural genocide, Facebook has his own genocides in Ethiopia, Myanmar, and mob violence in India. Apple is at least implicitly accepting the Uyghur genocide. And just like the slaves of the colony, those atrocities are what makes the empire run. The Declaration actually ends like this, a quote which I have in my fortune cookies file:

We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before.

That is still inspiring to me. But if we want to make "cyberspace" more humane, we need to decolonize it. Work on cyberpeace instead of cyberwar. Establish clear code of conduct, discuss ethics, and question your own privileges, biases, and culture. For me the first step in decolonizing my own mind is writing this article. Breaking up tech monopolies might be an important step, but it won't be enough: we have to do a culture shift as well, and that's the hard part.

Appendix: an apology to Barlow I kind of feel bad going through Barlow's declaration like this, point by point. It is somewhat unfair, especially since Barlow passed away a few years ago and cannot mount a response (even humbly assuming that he might read this). But then again, he himself recognized he was a bit too "optimistic" in 2009, saying: "we all get older and smarter":

I'm an optimist. In order to be libertarian, you have to be an optimist. You have to have a benign view of human nature, to believe that human beings left to their own devices are basically good. But I'm not so sure about human institutions, and I think the real point of argument here is whether or not large corporations are human institutions or some other entity we need to be thinking about curtailing. Most libertarians are worried about government but not worried about business. I think we need to be worrying about business in exactly the same way we are worrying about government.

And, in a sense, it was a little naive to expect Barlow to not be a colonist. Barlow is, among many things, a cattle rancher who grew up on a colonial ranch in Wyoming. The ranch was founded in 1907 by his great uncle, 17 years after the state joined the Union, and only a generation or two after the Powder River War (1866-1868) and Black Hills War (1876-1877) during which the US took over lands occupied by Lakota, Cheyenne, Arapaho, and other native American nations, in some of the last major First Nations Wars.

Appendix: further reading There is another article that almost has the same title as this one: Facebook and the New Colonialism. (Interestingly, the <title> tag on the article is actually "Facebook the Colonial Empire" which I also find appropriate.) The article is worth reading in full, but I loved this quote so much that I couldn't resist reproducing it here:

Representations of colonialism have long been present in digital landscapes. ( Even Super Mario Brothers, the video game designer Steven Fox told me last year. You run through the landscape, stomp on everything, and raise your flag at the end. ) But web-based colonialism is not an abstraction. The online forces that shape a new kind of imperialism go beyond Facebook.

It goes on:

Consider, for example, digitization projects that focus primarily on English-language literature. If the web is meant to be humanity s new Library of Alexandria, a living repository for all of humanity s knowledge, this is a problem. So is the fact that the vast majority of Wikipedia pages are about a relatively tiny square of the planet. For instance, 14 percent of the world s population lives in Africa, but less than 3 percent of the world s geotagged Wikipedia articles originate there, according to a 2014 Oxford Internet Institute report.

And they introduce another definition of Neo-colonialism, while warning about abusing the word like I am sort of doing here:

I m loath to toss around words like colonialism but it s hard to ignore the family resemblances and recognizable DNA, to wit, said Deepika Bahri, an English professor at Emory University who focuses on postcolonial studies. In an email, Bahri summed up those similarities in list form:

1. ride in like the savior
2. bandy about words like equality, democracy, basic rights
3. mask the long-term profit motive (see 2 above)
4. justify the logic of partial dissemination as better than nothing
5. partner with local elites and vested interests
6. accuse the critics of ingratitude

In the end, she told me, if it isn t a duck, it shouldn t quack like a duck.

Another good read is the classic Code and other laws of cyberspace (1999, free PDF) which is also critical of Barlow's Declaration. In "Code is law", Lawrence Lessig argues that:

computer code (or "West Coast Code", referring to Silicon Valley) regulates conduct in much the same way that legal code (or "East Coast Code", referring to Washington, D.C.) does (Wikipedia)

And now it feels like the west coast has won over the east coast, or maybe it recolonized it. In any case, Internet now christens emperors.

• [1] https://tinyurl.com/yhrq5887
• [2] https://tinyurl.com/yhmog5ex
• [3] https://tinyurl.com/ygnmjm9j
• [4] https://www.bitsnbites.eu/three-fundamental-flaws-of-simd/
• [5] https://www.dailydot.com/debug/ghostezra-telegram-fued-qanon/
• [6] https://tinyurl.com/yhvganlc
• [7] https://tinyurl.com/yfljnlq5
• [8] https://tinyurl.com/yft5qwbc
• [9] https://tinyurl.com/yjjnnyfu
• [10] https://tinyurl.com/yjxq8c2v
• [11] https://tinyurl.com/y7hhrxuz
• [12] https://tinyurl.com/yj33txpj