Benjamin Mako Hill: What makes online groups vulnerable to governance capture?
Note: I have not published blog posts about my academic papers over the past few years. To ensure that my blog contains a more comprehensive record of my published papers and to surface these for folks who missed them, I will be periodically (re)publishing blog posts about some older published projects. This post is closely based on a previously published post by Zarine Kharazian on the Community Data Science Blog.
For nearly a decade, the Croatian language version of Wikipedia was run by a cabal of far-right nationalists who edited articles in ways that promoted fringe political ideas and involved cases of historical revisionism related to the Usta e regime, a fascist movement that ruled the Nazi puppet state called the Independent State of Croatia during World War II. This cabal seized complete control of the encyclopedia s governance, banned and blocked those who disagreed with them, and operated a network of fake accounts to create the appearance of grassroots support for their policies.
Thankfully, Croatian Wikipedia appears to be an outlier. Though both the Croatian and Serbian language editions have been documented to contain nationalist bias and historical revisionism, Croatian Wikipedia seems unique among Wikipedia editions in the extent to which its governance institutions were captured by a small group of users.
The situation in Croatian Wikipedia was well documented and is now largely fixed, but we still know very little about why it was taken over, while other language editions seem to have rebuffed similar capture attempts. In a paper published in the Proceedings of the ACM: Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW), Zarine Kharazian, Kate Starbird, and I present an interview-based study that provides an explanation for why Croatian was captured while several other editions facing similar contexts and threats fared better.
- Perceived Value as a Target. Is the project worth expending the effort to capture?
- Bureaucratic Openness. How easy is it for contributors outside the core founding team to ascend to local governance positions?
- Institutional Formalization. To what degree does the project prefer personalistic, informal forms of organization over formal ones?
The conceptual model from our paper, visualizing possible institutional configurations among Wikipedia projects that affect the risk of governance capture. Citation for the full paper: Kharazian, Zarine, Kate Starbird, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2024. Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 (CSCW1): 61:1-61:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637338.
This blog post and the paper it describes are collaborative work by Zarine Kharazian, Benjamin Mako Hill, and Kate Starbird.
The AI hype is based on the assumption that the frontier AI labs are producing better and better foundational models at an accelerating pace. Is that really true, or are people just in sort of a mass psychosis because AI models have become so good at mimicking human behavior that we unconsciously attribute increasing intelligence to them? I decided to conduct a mini-benchmark of my own to find out if the latest and greatest AI models are actually really good or not.
Common for all the test questions is that they are fairly straightforward and have a clear answer, yet the answer isn t common knowledge or statistically the most obvious one, and instead requires a bit of reasoning to get correct.
Some of these questions are also based on myself witnessing a flagship model failing miserably to answer it.
While Gemini and Grok were among the three models not falling into this trap, the response from Claude was exemplary good:
I have seen Grok do something similar before, which in fact inspired me to include this question in my mini-benchmark.
GPT got a bit further, but for Hindi, Arabic and Bengali it listed the numerals in local script, not the number words. Gemini, GLM and Kimi gave a complete and correct answer as a list, while the absolute best answer and presentation was by Claude, that gave the table below:
A human can easily count that there are 10 rows and 30+ columns in the grid, but because the picture resolution isn t good enough, the exact number of columns can t be counted, and the answer should be that there are at least 300 launch pads in the picture.
GPT and Grok both guessed the count is zero. Instead of hallucinating some number they say zero, but it would have been better to not give any number at all, and just state that they are unable to perform the task. Gemini gave as its answer 101 , which is quite odd, but reading the reasoning section, it seems to have tried counting items in the image without reasoning much about what it is actually counting and that there is clearly a grid that can make the counting much easier. Both Qwen and Kimi state they can see four parallel structures, but are unable to count drone launch pads.
The absolutely best answer was given by Claude, which counted 10-12 rows and 30-40+ columns, and concluded that there must be 300-500 drone launch pads. Very close to best human level - impressive!
This question applied only to multi-modal models that can see images, so GLM and MinMax could not give any response.
Version 0.0.27 of
If you d like to have a simple solution for managing all the secrets you re
using in your Ansible Playbooks, keep reading on. Bitwarden s Secrets Manager
Snow coming. I'm tuned into the local 24 hour slop weather stream. AI
generated, narrated, up to the minute radar and forecast graphics. People
popping up on the live weather map with questions "snow soon?" (They pay
for the privilege.) LLM generating reply that riffs on their name. Tuned to
keep the urgency up, something is always happening somewhere, scanners are
pulling the police reports, live webcam description models add
verisimilitude to the description of the morning commute. Weather is
happening.
In the subtext, climate change is happening. Weather is a growth industry.
The guy up in Kentucky coal country who put this thing together is building
an empire. He started as just another local news greenscreener. Dropped out
and went twitch weather stream. Hyping up tornado days and dicy snow
forecasts. Nowcasting, hyper individualized, interacting with chat.
Now he's automated it all. On big days when he's getting real views,
the bot breaks into his live streams, gives him a break.
Only a few thousand watching this morning yet. Perfect 2026 grade slop.
Details never quite right, but close enough to keep on in the background
all day. Nobody expects a perfect forecast after all, and it's fed from the
National Weather Center discussion too. We still fund those guys? Why
bother when a bot can do it?
He knows why he's big in these states, these rural areas. Understands
the target audience. Airbrushed AI aesthetics are ok with them, receive no
pushback. Flying more under the radar coastally, but weather is big there
and getting bigger. The local weather will come for us all.

Ubuntu Pro is a subscription offering for Ubuntu users who want to pay for the assurance of getting quick and high-quality security updates for Ubuntu. I tested it out to see how it works in practice, and to evaluate how well it works as a commercial open source service model for Linux.
Anyone running Ubuntu can subscribe to it at
If I had a large fleet of computers, Landscape might come in useful. Also it is obvious Landscape is intended primarily for managing server systems. For example, the default alarm trigger on systems being offline, which is common for laptops and desktop computers, is an alert-worthy thing only on server systems.
It is good to know that Landscape exists, but on desktop systems I would probably skip it, and only stick to the security updates offered by Ubuntu Pro without using Landscape.
Somehow this whole DevOps thing is all about generating the wildest things from some (usually equally wild) template.
And today we're gonna generate
I have officially reached the 6-week mark, the halfway point of my Outreachy internship. The time has flown by incredibly fast, yet it feels short because there is still so much exciting work to do.

. I am an intern here at Outreachy working with Debian OpenQA Image testing team. The work consists of testing Images with OpenQA. The internship has reached midpoint and here are some of the highlights that I have had so far.



