Percentage of Debian Developers preferring new elections to having AJ as
DPL in
March/April:
17.3%.
Percentage of Debian Developers preferring new elections to having AJ as
DPL in
October: 14.8%
That's right. contrary to what one would expect from merely reading the
mailinglists, an even larger majority now finds AJ acceptable as DPL. This
does not render the objections of the couple dozen DDs irrelevant though,
diversity is a great good. However, diversity can easily escalate to
divisiveness when different opinions or more accurately the ways they are
voiced start to severely hinder activity by others. I myself have been quite
demotived by the whole discussion, as has happened to me multiple times
before. We Developers do not seem to be able to have constructive discussion
without getting extremely heated up.
I believe that this inability to hold discussions about tricky subjects is
way more hurting the project than any of the "tricky subjects" themselves.
Actually, the tidbit in my DPL-elections platform about
Communication
among Debian contributors is still equally relevant.
Several potential improvements have been proposed in the past, including
debating by
wiki, debating inside a smaller taskforce, or even having a
representative
democracy.
Let's explore the representative democracy principle a bit further: In
general, I consider making decisions by GR (or to draw a parallel to country
government, referendum) bad: A majority of voters doesn't have adequate and
balanced information to make a reasonable decision, that takes doing quite
some research. Instead, any discussion (vote winning?) is going to be
significantly depending on emotions. Take the voting-down of the European
constitution by France and the Netherlands: Hardly anyone has adequate
information to really make a tradeoff, still quite a number of people voted,
and supposedly one of most prevalent considerations was fear of this "Europe"
thingy. Therefore, I'd really prefer that issues like firmware are dealt with
by smallish team of people who really can look into the issue well, consider
all arguments either way, and make a decision. As with every decision in
Debian, it can be overturned by GR, but still. Note that we don't need any
consitutional change for this, the DPL already has the power to delegate a
person or group of people to make some decision nobody else specifically is
responsible for already. A complicating factor is though that it's hard to
compose such a taskforce that will have the project's support once a
discussion is 'heated up'.
In other news, rumour has it that -private has blown up today. I'm so looking
forward to opening that mailfolder.