Search Results: "spa"

30 April 2007

Russell Coker: comment spam

The war on comment-spam has now begun. It appears that Blogger might have some anti-spam measures of which I was unaware. Otherwise it s a strange coincidence that I get a huge number of comment spams for extremely hard-core porn from the Ukraine so soon after starting a Wordpress blog.

About 24 hours before the spam attack there was a strange blog comment that linked to google (with no offensive or spammy content). It appears that leaving it online was my mistake, when I left that online for a day the spammer decided that I might also leave porn spam online. I arrived home this evening to find almost 100 spams in the form of comments and track-backs, and more arriving by the minute. So I used iptables to block a /20 related to the spam and things are quiet now.

The moral of the story is to delete anything unusual ASAP in case it encourages the idiots.

I ve also tightened the anti-spam measures on my blog too.

Russell Coker: comment spam

The war on comment-spam has now begun. It appears that Blogger might have some anti-spam measures of which I was unaware. Otherwise it’s a strange coincidence that I get a huge number of comment spams for extremely hard-core porn from the Ukraine so soon after starting a Wordpress blog. About 24 hours before the spam attack there was a strange blog comment that linked to google (with no offensive or spammy content). It appears that leaving it online was my mistake, when I left that online for a day the spammer decided that I might also leave porn spam online. I arrived home this evening to find almost 100 spams in the form of comments and track-backs, and more arriving by the minute. So I used iptables to block a /20 related to the spam and things are quiet now. The moral of the story is to delete anything unusual ASAP in case it encourages the idiots. I’ve also tightened the anti-spam measures on my blog too.

29 April 2007

MJ Ray: Disruptive Library Technology Jester

Ben O commented:
"One blog that spans the divide between paper-bound librarians and the digital world is the Disruptive Library Technology Jester I found it as we both are working with a piece of software called 'Fedora' (not the RedHat distro, but http://www.fedora.info/ an interesting open source XML-centric file repository software.)"

Evan Prodromou: 9 Flor al CCXV

Ah, beautiful Sunday! This is the first day this week we've had a little peace around the house. It'll all go crazy on Monday, of course, but it's nice to have something like a day off. tags:

BarCampMontreal2 I had a great time yesterday at BarCampMontreal2. It was pretty fortunate that my parents are visiting this week, because it meant that both Maj and I could go to the event together. We also had our friend and fellow Wikitraveller Jani Patokallio visiting from Singapore, so we brought him along with us. Jani's a community and technology hacker and he's a lot of fun, too. This was our first event in the new BarCamp venue at the SAT, and it turned out to be a good one. The space is really big, with about 3 huge spaces. We used the back room, which is wide enough for a lot of video displays, to good advantage. The front area became an informal caf and it was really great for personal talks -- isolated from the main presentation area. Damian DiFede gave a great talk about his Ajax-based MUD, Mujax. I think it looks really cool -- I hope he can get the kind of participation and content to make it a more immersive space. I gave the second talk. I'd really wanted to do a talk about The Keiki Project, our upcoming venture, but it was too soon for a real hands-on demo. So I'd planned to do a presentation about RDF and our use of Wikitravel:Turtle RDF on Wikitravel, but I kind of got too busy by the end of the week. So I ended up recycling my talk about Commercialization of Wikis (see Talks/SXSW07), which got a lot of positive feedback. I liked seeing Sylvain Carle's presentation on what he'd learned in Silicon Valley. Sylvain is one of the best presenters at BarCampMontreal -- he's a big goofball who loves his work and communicates that passion with intelligence and sincerity. For example, he themed his talk with songs by Quebec rocker Robert Charlebois. Candid and ingenious. Also great was Hugh McGuire's talk about lessons learned in development of the cool podcasting platform Collectik. His talk came down to one great point: that you have to be able to communicate the purpose of your Web site (or other project) in one sentence. He didn't do that for Collectik, and now he's trying to figure out how to. It's great hearing people talk about their mistakes. Maj gave a great talk about Wikitravel Extra, the new personal-opinion and -experience platform that we've built to complement the objective, consensus information in Wikitravel. I keep forgetting what a good public speaker she is. She did a good job talking about the needs we were trying to fill, and she demo'd the platform (flawlessly). I think she's got a good presentation to take to other conferences now (lucky dog). Another talk I found fascinating was Chris Car's discussion of his past project, MeshCube. The MeshCube is a tiny mesh networking tool that Chris and a partner developed in Hamburg. Chris talked about what worked and what didn't work with that project, showed off some cool hacks (mesh network robots!) and was (like Hugh) open about mistakes. Sitting in the middle of about 8 WiFi networks (in my home office) as I type this, I'm really interested in mesh networking and I was glad to hear from Chris why it doesn't currently work and what can be done to make it work. Probably the most important talk, for me, was Martine Pag 's discussion of what we need to do to bring more women to technology conferences. She did a great, fair overview of the topic, and then opened the floor to discussion. We had a really great, frank talk about -- both men and women -- and a lot of diverse points of view were expressed. I'm really appreciative of Martine opening up this discussion, and I'm glad we're going to be more proactive in the Montreal technical community about being inclusive of the really great women working in technology in this city. There were some other good talks, of course: apenwarr gave a good talk about the new, new way to have a startup; the mysterious and elusive Madame Woo talked about traveling alone; and Australian visitor Moomlyn gave a great description of lucid dreaming. There were good demos of Cake Mail and My Carpool Station. All in all a great set of presentations. I also liked meeting up with some of the people there. Patrick Tanguay gave a great lunchtime standup symposium about the state of Montreal's coworking space and where we're going from here. I also liked talking with Tamu Townsend, who I hadn't met before. Probably my best talk was with Sylvain and Martine about what the boundaries of BarCamp are. Why do we have talks about solo travel, digital photography, and lucid dreaming? Sylvain had a great answer: BarCamp comes out of the hacker ethic: that spirit of curiosity, humor, passion and playfulness that makes working on computers so enjoyable for so many. If someone can communicate that same passion and intellectual captivation with another subject, it's going to go over well at BarCamp, no problem. Well said!

Pros and cons Here are some things I liked and didn't like about BarCampMontreal2. First, things I liked:
  • The people. Yet again, meeting up with my favourite technologists in Montreal. Many people I first met at BarCampMontreal1, and it was nice to see how our friendships have developed in the 6 months since then.
  • Diversity. I was really glad that there were many more women at this vent than at previous ones. My guess is somewhere around 20-25%, which isn't anywhere near where it should be but a big improvement over the 5-10% we had at BarCampMontreal1. Special props to Hugh, whose invite to women was, I think, pretty helpful. And of course to all the women who took the extra step to show up at a majority-male event.
  • The presentations. Almost uniformly really, really good. Some were just excellent.
  • Lunch. Simple and easy, didn't get in the way of socializing.
  • The Bar. I liked having the bar open at lunch. Having a beer with friends really changes the dynamic of the event; and SAT has a decent selection of brews and friendly barstaff.
  • The screens. A-V was great this time around -- good job by SAT on this.
  • The space. It was cool having the back room at SAT. It's a really nice place for this kind of event.
  • Powerpoint Karaoke. A great idea (people have to give 5-minute presentations based on off-topic slidesets they've never seen before), but I think the scheduling was off. It would have been great to spread these out between other sessions during the day for comic relief, rather than clumped all together at once.
Second, things I wasn't happy about:
  • Registration. It was really great being welcomed at BarCampMontreal1, and this was distinctly missing at our second event. We had a pile of nametags on the table by the door, and no other form of greeting. For a space like SAT, this just didn't work. I'm going to volunteer to help out with this step at future events, since it's so important.
  • Coffee. I realize I'm a coffeeholic, but it would have been nice to have a coffee table out. It's nice to have on a rainy Saturday, and it gives shy people something to do.
  • T-shirts. I think every BarCamp should be an event worthy of a t-shirt. Fred gave out some shirts left over from BarCampMontreal1, but it would have been nice to have new ones for this event, too.
  • Tables. I realize they're expensive to rent, but dang, they're really great to have if you've got your laptop and other techno doodads. It changes the event from being a show to being a symposium.
  • Schedule timing. The (very important) talk by Martine about women in tech conferences ran far over schedule and wiped a few talks off the board. I think that was a mistake. After it was done, the joke segment of Powerpoint Karaoke started. By the time it was finished, 60% of the audience was gone, even though there were 4 serious talks still to go. We need to do a better job with timing this kind of thing so we keep the energy going through the entire day.
  • Too much noise from the caf area. As people drifted off from the main presentation area, the caf filled up, making for lots of loud chatter that drowned out the presentations. We should probably figure out how to fix this problem; it would be nice to stimulate this casual conversation while still being respectful to the speakers. Maybe more breaks (one in the morning and one in the afternoon)?
  • <100% participation. It seemed like there were a lot of spectators this time around, which drags down the participative nature of the event. I think that asking registrants how they're going to participate when they come to the door is a great way to gently remind people that they're expected to be involved (we do this for Burning Man events sometimes). I think Powerpoint Karaoke and other exercises would be a great way to get better hands-on participation by people who didn't prepare talks. (I hope that MadameWoo does a talk in the future about how to do an ad-hoc talk at BarCamp.)
My net feeling about the event was extremely positive, and I'm making these notes not to criticize anyone but to remind myself to do something about them for the next BarCampMontreal. I think that we can continuously improve this event to be inclusive, stimulating, fun and exciting, and I hope we keep this great barcamp spirit going in this city for a long time. tags:

28 April 2007

Eddy Petri&#537;or: moto frenzy

GREAT!

This is the word that can describe what I felt today at the moto exhibition that takes place here, in Bucharest (until the 1st of May).

Hondas, Yamahas, Aprilias, Harleys, Suzukis, BMWs... all kinds of bikes, speeders, choppers, cruisers, naked...

Of course, I couldn't resist and I touched, sat on, admired and analysed them all that I could (the Honda and the Ducatti people were the most uptight about this subject).

I was with a friend and he made pictures, but I will have them only on Monday...


And all of these after I met my father this morning before he left for a ride up to Vama Veche (a known rebels' meeting point at the Black Sea). I met him and gave him a pair of chaps for the ride with the beautiful Virago he bought a month ago!


I just need to pass over the formalities, take the driving license exam for A category (motorcycles are in that category, here in Romania; I already have a B category, for cars) and get on with riding myself... on the driver's seat...


Today I felt alive...



P.S.: I would be really cool to go to DebConf7 with the bike and meet some people, but I don't think that is legal for me to drive outside my country in the first year after taking the driving license (although I don't know yet if that would apply to me, having already a B driving license). More than that, the long ride alone I would have to make until I meet with others seems a little risky (you never know what the trip has to offer).

Alastair McKinstry: Gliese 581 c : An Ocean Planet ?

Now that the weekend is here, I've been catching up on the news of this weeks big astronomy announcement: the discovery of a possible "Super-Earth" exo-planet, Gliese 581 c. This is the first exoplanet likely to be within the so-called "Habitable zone" around its star, where life as we know it could be possible. Unfortunately the Irish Times "World Apart" weekend supplement article has been quite disappointing. Like Greg Laughlin at UCO Lick I get depressed when people give misleading information . It includes a very misleading "Artists impression" picture, simultaneously showing details we don't know and being incorrect about the few things we do know. Its easy to get annoyed at the concentration of facts that are guesswork or probably wrong in this article. Gl 581c is not 5 Earth masses: thats its minimum mass: due to radial velocity measurements, we can only measure M sin(i), where i is the inclination, currently unknown. It could easily be far more, and hence all predictions of what the planet is like become moot. Similarly, the radius is not necessarily 1.5 times Earths: thats a prediction, based on the mass, and current theories. Unfortunately, there is no mention that current theories of planetary size are coming under scrutiny as they fail to match other recent exoplanet discoveries. This makes other speculation about the planet such as the gravity on the surface quite misleading. The BBC News summary is much better: it refers to the radius as "the radius should be", rather than "is". But it too includes the incorrect picture. While its article is couched in more conservative language, it doesn't explain what facts it quotes are speculation and why they may be wrong. None of the media reports I have yet seen mention current missions, such as COROT, which is the most likely to find Earth-sized planets in the near future (launched late last year, it is due to finish its first observing run in April. Results awaited with anticipation). They also ignore Darwin and the The Terrestrial Planet Finder, the most likely missions to discover life on other planets, but currently sitting in funding limbo. Concentration on purely the known facts would of course make the news reports short and boring. Instead they should emphasise more of the work of the scientists involved: we teach science as a set of cut-and-dried facts that often bore school students and drive them away. Instead, when faced as the cutting edge of an important discovery like this, we could show how an amateur could be partially credited with getting this result; with the fact that, since the planet has a short "year" astronomers are already lining up to investigate transit measurements of it on May 7 and that with a magnitude of 10.6 (only 20 light years from Earth, after all) its within range of amateur astronomers to observe and determine its true size and details. How about getting people excited to get involved themselves?

David Watson: The first duck was still firmly under his arm

Don't you just love the subject lines on spam.

Eddy Petri&#537;or: The answer ...

I just received a weird SMS which, surely, was not addressed to me... And I deleted it...

"Message 42 was deleted"

I guess 42 is the answer! :-)

Russell Coker: more on presentations

Here's an amusing video about how not to do presentations.

27 April 2007

Eddy Petri&#537;or: change www.debian.org look, but don't forget wiki.debian.org

Lately, there has been a lot of discussion around reorganizing the layout and looks of the www.debian.org site and related sites.

Gustavo made a mock-up of the site with methors.debian.net/debian-live.alioth.debian.org theme.

All fine and dandy, but please, don't forget about wiki.debian.org.

P.S.: I am thinking of remaking the theme I did for wiki.debian.org to match this theme.

Russell Coker: more on presentations

Here’s an amusing video about how not to do presentations.

David Welton: Stuff To Do for everyone

As mentioned previously in this space, I've been thinking about what exactly to work on, and one of the conclusions that I've come to is that Stuff To Do is a very handy tool, but there are already too many similar applications out there. Even if they might not have quite the mix of features that makes me like Stuff To Do and keep me using it, it's not the best space for me to be competing in. So, with that in mind, I dropped the price to 6 USD a month, and opened it up so that anyone can use the group enabled version for free as long as they don't mind a few adsense ads. Paying the money gets you an ad free version and a warm fuzzy feeling. We'll see how things go with those parameters, and of course I reserve the right to change things in the future. Depending on how things go, I suppose I might even consider open sourcing it in the future, although since it does what I need, and I don't want to be responsible for trying to manage it as an open source project, I'm not sure, yet. Now... on to the next thing...

Gustavo Franco: Debian.org website meets mentors layout

UPDATE: Thanks for your feedback, for those commenting about the 'grey-on-white' thing. I don't really know if that's bad or not for a11y. I've keratoconus (right eye) and it's ok for me. The point is that we can easily change the colors and implement the new CSS and "migrate" the index was trivial. Take a look at Christoph Haas GPLed CSS (mentors.debian.net) and give your shot on the colors, please.

I was thinking about the two threads going on debian-www mailing list, one about our website look&feel and other about the navigational structure. I've decided to take a break reading and arguing and do a mockup based on mentors.debian.net (and also now live.debian.net).

Pros:
Took me less than an hour to move the entire index content and then decided what to keep and what remove.
Looks cleaner, IMHO.

Cons:
Need to get rid of the swirl and debian.org text adding the official logo there on top

Notes:
Well, I don't think that debian-www will take my mockup seriously, but it's actually the easier to implement over our current infrastructure (again, jmo).

If somebody wants to mirror cvs.d.o:webwml (cvssuck didn't work for me), run tailor over that migrating for svn and experiment with new web site layouts over all the pages we've, let me know!

John Goerzen: Online Internet Bank Review

Back in mid-2000, I set up my first Internet bank account. I have been using the same bank ever since. The whole notion of Internet banks has changed a lot since then, since virtually every bank offers varying degrees of online access these days. Lately I checked on banks to see if I was still using the best one. Here are my reviews of the two banks.

Internet Banks

Let's first talk about what makes a bank an "Internet bank" or "online bank". So many banks let you manage your account online now, that the distinction is blurry. But generally, I would say that unique features of Internet banks are:



There are a few to highlight.

Real-time transaction posting is a great thing to have. If you go to the website and transfer money from your savings to your checking account, you can go to the ATM *now* and withdraw it, and when you get back to your desk, the ATM transaction shows up. There are none of these confusing "business day" rules with cutoff times that traditional banks seem to love. And none of this annoying "process all withdrawals first" business that large traditional banks (hello, Bank of America) love to do in order to screw with customers.

High interest rates. Don't even bother with an online bank if the savings interest rate is less than 3% (or checking less than 1%, in my opinion). It is almost impossible to find a traditional bank with these rates.

Note: if you're reading this after April, 2007, these guidelines may no longer apply due to interest rate changes.

Electronic transfers from other banks. Another great feature. A number of banks let you set up, and then initiate, electronic transfers to and from your accounts at other banks. This is usually free if you are using the feature to transfer money into your account, and with a flat per-transaction fee (usually about the same as a foreign ATM fee) for transferring money out.

Ability to do all business without visiting a branch. Not only should this be possible, but routine business (such as making deposits) should be easy to do without visiting a branch. You should be able to order new checks online.

Now let's look at the individual banks.

First Internet Bank of Indiana

FirstIB (they provide nationwide service, despite the name) is the bank I signed up with in 2000. I had found a bank in Dallas that I really liked, but when I moved to Indianapolis, I tried two and liked neither. They all seemed to have really poor interest rates, offer few useful services, and fees for so many conditions that it was hard to avoid them. (More on that in the traditional banks section below)

I looked at the online banking scene at the time, and wound up opening a checking and savings account with FirstIB. FirstIB started as an online-only bank, but recently acquired a bricks-and-mortar bank as well.

I found FirstIB's customer service at the time to be top-notch; I would dial their toll-free number, select *one* option from a menu, and a rep would answer *immediately*. (Take that, Bank of America, with your 45-minute hold times...) Since FirstIB was based in Indianapolis, I actually visited their offices a couple of times. They had a locked lobby. You picked up a phone, pressed 0, and went into the same queue that callers to the 800 number did, then just asked them to come to the lobby and transact your business. (They would not give out cash there, but could take new account paperwork and deposits and the like)

Their interest rates have consistently outperformed traditional banks, and they offer all the online banking amenities listed above. They did not offer online statements at first, but these days online statements are the norm (there is a fee if you want paper statements). Check ordering is accomplished using a linking with the Deluxe check printers. The web interface uses Digital Insight, and the ACH transfer interface uses CashEdge.

FirstIB will actually reimburse you, at the end of the month, for ATM fees that other banks charge you, up to $6/mo. They also provide an unlimited supply of free postage-paid deposit envelopes, and have a PDF of deposit slips that you can print out should you run out.

FirstIB's customer service has slipped in recent times. I know of some people that have been impacted by some errors that FirstIB has made (simply not processing paperwork that they should have processed). Wait times have gone up for the phone line, and a lot of the great "small bank" feel (where they actually knew their customers, and you might actually know the reps) is gone.

Presidential Bank, FSB

Presidential Bank is the bank I'm looking at now. I was initially drawn to them by their extraordinarly high interest rates (5.25% for savings!), but some other things have convinced me to use them.

Initially, I was suspicious. Presidential is a bricks-and-mortar operation that has been around for awhile, and was one of the very first Internet banks. Their website says that they started offering Internet accounts in 1995, and very much looks like it hasn't been updated since. (Thankfully, the account management interface is more modern). I almost thought the site was a fraud up front, a "too good to be true" deal with the high interest rates and bad-looking website. But after doing some research, realized that it is quite real.

Before setting up accounts with them, I had a few questions (such as whether or not transactions post in real time). Presidential has a simple email address for people that want to send in questions (unlike FirstIB's obvious queue system). I sent an email, and got a response an hour or two later, from a real person with a first and last name, and a personal e-mail address I could use to follow up. Nice. I also had occasion to talk to people on the phone. They were polite, speedy, and helpful.

So I set up my accounts with them. I activated the online access, bill payment, and money transfer features. All worked as expected. I did have a couple more occasions to call them after the account was set up (a more crucial test than the pre-account calls), and they remained helpful. Strangely, this bank, which seems to be a much larger operation than FirstIB, had a more small bank feel. Several times, as I started talking to a rep, he or she would say something like "Oh, I remember processing the setup paperwork on this account last week" or "I think I talked to you about this before?"

Customer service is one of those things you rarely need after the first month or so of an account. But with your bank, it is vital that the reps know what they are doing and are willing to help you when you call -- which Presidential is doing better than FirstIB these days.

Presidential does not rebate ATM fees like FirstIB does. They do provide a few deposit envelopes with your initial account setup packet, but they are not postage paid or unlimited. However, because Presidential's interest rates are so much better than FirstIB's, it doesn't take much in your account to more than balance out that difference. Plus, with so many retail stores offering "cash back" when you use an ATM or debit card, it isn't too bad to get cash for free with Presidential. (And, most employers offer direct deposit, so we rarely use deposit-by-mail) One other trick is to find some local bank and open a no-minimum free checking account with them. You can deposit checks there and withdraw cash from their ATM, and use Presidential's free incoming ACH to electronically transfer the funds to Presidential when you get too much in the local account. (Chances are that these local accounts will not pay any interest)

Presidential offers a few features FirstIB does not. First, they scan all your deposits (not just your canceled checks) and offer to let you view them online. Secondly, they automatically send you an email when they've received a bank-by-mail deposit (you can opt out of that, of course). Third, they let you view *all* of your old statements online (FirstIB only lets you view the last 6 months worth, though both have the complete history available in the web interface).

Like FirstIB, Presidential uses DigitalInsight for the web interface and CashEdge for the ACH feature.

Internet Bank Comparison Both banks offer two primary checking and two primary savings accounts. This table compares all four accounts.

FeatureCheckingSavings
FirstIBPresidentialFirstIBPresidential
AccountInterestFreeInternet PlusInternetMoney MktRegPremierInternet
APY1.26%0%4.50%1.25%3.90%2.75%5.25%1.50-2.50%
Min Balance$500$0$1000$500$4000$1000$0$100
Min MethodAvg DailyDailyAvg DailyDaily
Min to Open$100$25$1500$500$100$100$5000$100
Online Bill Pay$0$4.95/mo$0$5.95/mo (up to 10 payments)Not available
ATM surchage rebate$6$0$0$0
Online Canceled Check ImagesFreeN/A
Online Deposit ImagesNoFreeNoFree
Email Deposit NotificationsNoFreeNoFree
Email Balance AlertsFree
ACH policyFree when initiated at other end; free for deposits when initiated at the bank's website; small fee for withdrawals when initiated at bank's website




Online options at traditional banks

As I mentioned, Presidential is a traditional bank that has offered Internet accounts for some time now. Some other traditional banks do that as well, but look carefully at them, especially if they're a big nationwide bank.

I looked at options from Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC USA, ETrade Bank, and some other large national banks. In general, these were just regular bank accounts with a web interface (HSBC and ETrade being somewhat of exceptions). Read the fine print and you'll find poor interest rates and traditional banking hassles (lack of immediacy in transactions, predatory posting practices, fees for just about everything).

Plus I can tell from personal experience that Bank of America customer service is downright awful. One example: they used to pressure me to open a credit card with them every time I visited a branch. I declined every time, and had to be forceful about it sometimes. Then one day, not long after a visit with a particularly annoying employee, I got a Bank of America credit card -- which I had specifically refused -- in the mail. Hmmmmmm.

They also, unlike any other bank I've ever used, charged a fee to receive wire transfers. Which they had not disclosed. Then, of course, they apply withdrawals before deposits, and caused an overdraft from the undisclosed fee, even though the wire transfer was a *deposit* that would have very easily covered it. That was the last straw for me. After nearly an hour on the phone with them, I got them to agree to reverse both the fee and the overdraft charge. THEN I said I wanted to close my account.

When traditional banks are better

There are a few situations where Internet banks don't work out so well:

Living paycheck to paycheck. If you are constantly running out of money, and it is vital that any deposits get posted *NOW*, you probably don't want an Internet bank (and wouldn't benefit from their higher interest anyway). When you mail in a check, it can take some time before you have access to the money; the postal service has to deliver it, and then most of your checks will be subject to the "non-local" availability policy and held for about a week (though interest will start to accrue immediately).

Not being able to meet minimum balances. Internet banks do tend to offer a variety of accounts, but if you aren't able to regularly maintain $500 to $1000 in your checking account or $2000 to $5000 in your savings, you will likely fall into a category with lower interest and fewer free benefits. These accounts may not have many benefits over traditional banks, and may in fact be worse in some ways. The interest rate gap won't make that much of a difference either. There are several online banks that offer savings accounts only, with high interest rates and low minimums, that you may want to investigate -- though you will have availability into your checking account measured in days, not seconds. Presidential's savings has no minimum, but requires $5000 to open. (They do have lower-interest savings accounts without that requirement) Watch out for FirstIB's accounts; you can open an account with less than the monthly minimum balance, and will run into fees unless you deposit enough to meet the minimums.

Romain Francoise: Installing Debian etch

.flickr-photo border: solid 2px #000000; .flickr-yourcomment .flickr-frame text-align: left; padding: 3px; .flickr-caption font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;

Installing Debian etch, originally uploaded by orebokech.

J. rescued this old laptop from the trash and now that it's running a real operating system, it works beautifully. With a PIII 650 CPU and 192MB of RAM, it happily runs GNOME and Iceweasel... not bad for a free machine!

26 April 2007

Biella Coleman: Abbot and the Slimy Politics of Drug Patents

For those of you who like to follow cutting edge developments in the politics of intellectual property law, do not miss today’s Democracy Now program AIDS Activists Call for Global Boycott of Abbott for Withholding Drug Sales in Thailand. It is sort of stunning in that empowering and disempowering way. The show discusses protests launched again the large pharmaceutical company Abbot who in reaction–no, make that retaliation–to Thailand’s decision to issue compulsory licenses on AIDS drugs, and import generic drugs acted in highly questionable ways:
“Abbott responded in a way that shocked many AIDS activists - the company announced it would withhold seven new drugs from sale in Thailand including a new AIDS drugs and treatments for arthritis and high blood pressure.”
It is great to see countries use the very slim rights granted to them by organizations like the WTO but in order for the rights to have any punch, these countries *must* be given the space to make these decisions without the deep intimation and that is exactly what Abbot is up to. To learn more, read the transcript, listen to the show. And if you want to go on, I have pasted the “favorite” part of the show: (more…)

Russell Coker: paper about ZCAV

This paper by Rodney Van Meter about ZCAV (Zoned Constant Angular Velocity) in hard drives is very interesting. It predates my work by about four years and includes some interesting methods of collecting data that I never considered.

One interesting thing is that apparently on some SCSI drives you can get the drive to tell you where the zones are. If I get enough spare time I would like to repeat such tests and see how the data returned by disks compares to benchmark results.

It's also interesting to note that Rodney's paper shows a fairly linear drop of performance on higher sector numbers (while he notes that it would be expected to fall off more quickly at higher sector numbers). One of my recent tests with a 300G disk showed the greater than linear performance drop (see my ZCAV results page for more details). It might require modern large disks to show this performance characteristic.

I also found it very interesting to see that a modified version of Bonnie was used for some of the tests and that it gave consistent results! I assumed that any filesystem based tests of ZCAV performance would introduce unreasonable amounts of variance into my tests and instead wrote my ZCAV test program to directly read the disk and measure performance.

It's times like this that I wish for a "groundhog day" so that I could spend a year doing nothing but reading technical papers.

Gunnar Wolf: tbm's Release Management talk

Thanks to Romain Francoise, I found and watched Martin Michlmayr's Release Management in Large Free Software Projects talk on Google Video's Open Source Speaker series. Martin: Thanks a lot, great talk. I've been following your presentations lately, as I've given some talks on this topic - Quality Assurance on Free Software Projects (Spanish only) - However hard I try to remain faithful to the subject, I end up giving a talk on what Free Software is and how its processes are naturally more prone to yielding better quality than propietary projects.
Anyhow, with this post I want to do basically three things:

25 April 2007

Chris Lamb: Hi, Planet Debian.

In the upcoming holidays I’ll be working with Daniel Baumann on a graphical user interface to Debian Live thanks to the Google Summer of Code (I posted my full proposal to debian-live-devel if you want to read more). Thanks to Daniel for agreeing to be my mentor. This is my first post to Planet Debian, by the way. A few people might have met me at certain events, but if you haven’t I’m a kinda average hacker-type with a short attention span, long hair, broken sleeping patterns and above-average caffeine requirements. I’m currently a student at the University of Warwick and first started using Debian with “Slink”. If I’m missing anything, or you just want to say hi, please post a comment.

Romain Francoise: On Debian's release cycle

Martin Michlmayr: "Yes, deadlines are real, targets can be met, and the project can release on time."

Next.

Previous.