Since I am on "maternity leave" now and basicly run the household and try to keep the children entertained, my time to get things done is randomly fragmented and I want to plan the things better that I have on the plate. Liw's blog post reminded me of GTD and today I was looking for planning tools. On Wikipedia's GTD page they mention two: A Firefox plugin to use with gmail (and therefor everywhere where I would have internet) and ThinkingRock, a java app which aparently would fit on a USB key. Of course i wonder which one might be better? The ThinkingRock one seems to be a heavy weight GTD tool. Does that spoil GTD's light weight character? I watched the demos and it seems to be pretty feature complete. I would like to hear from people who use GTD and am interested in their oppinions. Thanks!

Debian Work Meetings - Extremadura evaluation
8 people already managed to send in their evaluations or feedback mails to me regarding the Extremadura work meetings. That is surprisingly few, given the fact that we had 6 meetings with an average of 20 people. And so far I got only one reply from someone who could not attend eventhough she was very interested, explaining why (different continent, too far, too expensive) etc. I had expected more replies in that category, given that we had mostly europeans coming to Extremadura and I had intended to spread out future meetings over the globe more evenly. So I ask both those that attended and did not manage to send in some evaluation and also those that would have liked to come and could not to mail me!

Note: This post grew larger than originally intended. It drifted away from Vista to general rants about Microsoft and the content industry towards the end of the post, so just skip the rest if this is not of interest to you.
The latest thing I heard about Vista is that Microsoft bribes bloggers with Vista notebooks. As the article points out, this is plain wrong. Apart from crossing the line by not only giving away their own product to reviewers for free, but by actually providing an additional benefit (in the form of the notebook), they also did it wrong because - as the article on tech.blorge.com linked above points out - they don’t understand the way blogging “works”. Too many will be more or less angry because they didn’t get a free notebook (if anything at all).

In my opinion though, this is by far the least important mistake they made with Vista. All their content protection stuff is far worse. It basically does what current copy protection mechanisms already do, but to a much larger extend: Bother the legitimate users while users of pirated copies are uneffected. I don’t think they can avoid pirated copies for a minute. A friend already has a nice HD video player (HDDVD IIRC) and a nice HDCP capable TFT-display, both bought in december. Problem is that the HDCP protected connection resets every few minutes, causing a dropout in both video and sound for a few seconds each time. Seems HDCP compatible player and HDCP compatible display doesn’t necessarily mean that the two work together. Fortunately, in this case, there is some “secret” code you can enter on the players remote to disable HDCP completely. Of course, technically, this is not legal use, but if he didn’t use that hack, he wouldn’t be able to watch his legitimately bought video with his legitimate player and display. Given this problem, I can only shudder when thinking what will happen on Windows Vista with all those encrypted and signed communication channels (drive->memory->videocard->display, just to name the most obvious ones). And there is also the degradation of totally unrelated audio and video stuff while some “premium content” is played. Assume that I play some premium audio stuff. According to the hardware and driver specs for Vista, the availability of any premium content means that any non-encrypted channels need to be turned off or artificially degraded (like downsampling video from 1080p to VGA and upsampling it again since the display might be limited to only display 1080p). This is oh-so-stupid.
And there is also their EULA, as reviewed by Ed Foster. I won’t go into details here, but let’s just say that the EULA is the final nail in Vista’s coffin for me. I’ve been a Windows user since Windows for Workgroups came out (though I’ve used Linux on my machines since 1993 - and almost exclusively since 1998), but I won’t buy Vista, not even when it would be included with a new PC. By the way: This also most likely means that I won’t buy any HD video stuff at all, since the Vista content protection stuff was mostly dictated by the big Hollywood studios. Seems like I will be saving quite some money over the next years. (Which I actually need to do anyway.) Other interesting links regarding Vista:

• The Inquirer - Charlie Demerjian: Microsoft Vista is not an option
• The Register - Scott Granneman: Surprises inside Microsoft Vista’s EULA
• Juha Saarinen: DRM behind lack of Windows Vista drivers… and fear the new content protection
• Techworld.com - Chris Mellor: Vista crippled by content protection
• The Register - Andrew Orlowski: Vista’s Suicide Bomb: Who gets hurt?

I said they did it all wrong because they forgot that they are selling Windows not to the content industry but to the consumers. Sure, the consumers want to see what Microsoft calls premium content, but I’m also sure that they don’t want all that content protection nonsense Microsoft built into Vista for the sake of the content providers. They lost the balance between avoiding pirated copies (which I think the content protection stuff will have no big effect on) and bothering users of legitimate copies. Heck, I already use “pirate” copies of most of the (Windows-based) games I play because I don’t want to be bothered by their original-CD-checks, even though I own at least one legal copy of all the games I play. Would I need to download pirate copies of the HD movies I want to watch because I don’t want to be bothered by whatever side-effects VCP will have, even if I own legal copies of the same movies? Dear Microsoft, dear Content-Industry (TimeWarner, Disney, whoever), please re-think who you want to sell your content to. I already avoid DVDs which carry additional copy protection (apart from CSS), and if they were available at all, I would prefer to buy DVDs without even CSS. The same is true for CDs (except that they obviously don’t have CSS). Consequently, I’m likely to avoid buying HD videos which impose unpleasant restrictions on me, including those that disable the S/PDIF output of my player (no matter wether PC or standalone) since I paid a lot of money for decent HIFI equipment two years ago and I sure as hell won’t want to by new equipment within the next few years. Luckily, I didn’t yet buy any HD video gear, though my notebook, when equipped with a HDDVD or Blueray drive should be capable of playing HD video - if MS and the content industry wouldn’t impose stupid restrictions.

Happy New Year! Happy 2007!

And a really happy one!

After the cloud of ideas and subjects on the last post, giving the clear idea that I should keep this blog more up-to-date, here is an important note that is missing (including old news that I should had post but didn't, sorry for that). I'm aware that a few people are interested in how the Debian NM process evolves from person to person, on my last update on that topic, I told you that I was recommended to the DAM by my AM. Almost three months later (2006-11-18) Myon (Christoph Berg, Front Desk Member) couldn't find my final report, he pinged my AM and one week later everything was fine again and I got approved to the next step: DAMnation. On the Christmas' evening I got a nice gift from Joerg, DAM approval. Yesterday (2007-01-02) I got the nice e-mail with the subject: New Debian maintainer Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (Thanks to James Troup, aka, elmo). The entire process took me 8 months and 10 days. I would like to say thanks to everybody that helped me pass thru this experience: Otavio Salvador (my advocate and mentor), Christian Perrier and Luk Claes (Mentors and Uploaders), Clément Stenac (my AM), Christoph Berg (Front Desk), Joerg Jaspert and James Troup (DAMs). They are directly involved in my NM process, but they were not alone, thanks for every single person that helped me with tips and hints, that took some time to teach me and all the people behind different projects in Debian (I really start naming everybody but then I realize that it got very large for Planet): Debian Brasil, Debian Volatile (aba, zobel, sgran), Release Team, Debian Women, Debian i18n Task Force and Debian l10n Brazilian Portuguese, Debian Weekly News Team, buildd.net project, Alioth admins and staff, Debian Installer Team, Debian Kernel Team, Debian Mentors, DebConf Team, OFTC Staff, Debian QA Team, Debian Doc Team, Debian WWW Team, Debian Admin Team (DSA)! People, you know who you are, thank you VERY much! You can check my Status Page to see more details about my NM process and more information about the acronyms used on this post. Now, Brazil has 17 Debian Developers (not counting the one that already retired). :-)

Another problematic meme is the idea that no-one need tolerate anyone - even those who are tolerant (known as the Rabid Right meme). When someone has no tolerance for others (for example, flaming people who expect any attempt at fairness, or who follow different social interaction patterns) then they have no place in a community such as Debian. They should clear off to some hard-hierarchy project - it's not like there's any shortage of Rabid Right hackers in this world. </sarcasm> For what it's worth, I believe life should be fair (idealism) and life is not fair (pragmatism). It is possible for those two beliefs to coexist. Expulsion could be fair, but (IIRC) every expulsion proposed so far would have been unfair and based on personal issues, rather than repeated offences: we may be reaching the point where a fair expulsion could happen. It seems a shame none of those who hold them are willing to use the smaller penalties in a Non-Discriminatory way. The "can't take their job away" meme seems more myth than meme, but it does need sorting out in the few places where it occurs. I doubt it will happen under this DPL.

Then I look at the destruction these cats have caused. I look at the damage to the really nice dining suite we bought shortly before moving over here. The leather chairs are scratched terribly. The nice wooden table top has scratches in it as well, because they liked to use it as a playground. I was setting the table tonight because we ve got people coming round for dinner (it s been a while), and I saw first hand the extent of the damage. I was so pissed off I could have cried.

If you have a little patience, you can cut their nails either with a cat nail trimmer (5 euros I paid, and that s the best money I ever spent on these cats, aside from neutering) or plain normal human nail clippers.

I have been doing it for Vi and Emacs since they were kittens, and then for Jazz when he replaced Emacs and who had never had his nails trimmed. I even do it for Lola, who is declawed and a very alpha female cat, on her back paw's nails.

Sure, it takes patience, it is best not to do it by force, so wait until they are happily asleep and pet them, then cut one. Get them used to you touching their nails, by making them go out of their claw when you pet them. Do one nail at a time, until they are all used to it and will just let you go through the whole 4 paws at once.

You can google around for techniques, but start reading this. The whole about.com site is filled with great advice for cat owners.

My furniture is still in good shape after two years of cats at home, yes, they love to bite the curtains, they scratch my favourite chair, they drop stuff on the floor and break it, they help me in whatever I am doing (painting, sawing, making the bed...), and they steal cat toys away from me and hide them in secret cat hiding places.

But things are just things, stuff is just stuff, curtains are replaceable, so is furniture. Start trimming their nails the sooner the better, and do not regret these three furry friends found you.

Well, mirror.linux.org.au has been cut over to the new hardware. It wasn't particularly pretty, and the old hardware is no longer available as a reference (for a little while), because it's in Steve Walsh's car boot on the way to Melbourne. So far, I think the only things I overlooked were /etc/aliases and /etc/proftpd.conf. The former is a mild inconvenience, the latter left FTP busted for a couple of days until I realised. I also spent far too many hours this afternoon head-butting the keyboard over what I presumed to be an Apache configuration problem (and technically it was) with respect to Drupal. So, if you're reading this and you discover some aspect of the mirror to be broken, drop the admin address an email, and it'll go into the tracking system. The Debian mirror is current resyncing. Now I'm going to go and see in the New Year...

My brother Nate and his girlfriend Kristen live in the Laurel Heights area of San Francisco, just north of Presidio Heights, across the street from Laurel Village on California Street. They invited us up for dinner at their house last night, and since my Mom and Dad hadn't seen their apartment yet, they decided to join us, too. Maj, Amita June and I went up early yesterday afternoon, right after naptime. (That's our main measure of time -- before naptime, after naptime, before bedtime, after the baby goes to sleep.) We initially planned to go downtown and do some post-Christmas shopping, but we hit gruesome traffic getting off North 280 into China Basin. Friday afternoon traffic in San Francisco is pretty crappy any day of the month, but yesterday was Critical Mass, which really tangles things up downtown. So we juked west and headed out to Ocean Beach instead. I parked at the end of Golden Gate Park by the giant windmills. We all walked out onto the beach -- Amita at 0.5 mph, of course, and rarely in the correct direction -- just at sunset, which was great. It was our second beach day in a row, but it was great being out there. The baby chased dogs and waves, and we got to watch the sun go down. There were kites everywhere -- I explained to Amita how people had to hold their strings so that they could keep flying. It's so counterintuitive. We dropped into the Beach Chalet on the Great Highway for a late afternoon snack. Amita June had her trademark grilled cheese sandwich, Maj and I split a plate of calamari. The chalet does its own beers, so Maj had a Christmas ale and I tried the more than decent stout. We got to Nate's place just after 6, and they ordered Indian food from Rotee in the Lower Haight. It was excellent -- we got some tandoori fish and about 12 different curries. Maj's brother Brian came too, and we stayed up pretty late talking. Maj and I stayed over at Nate and Kristen's last night, then shared coffees this morning from Peet's. There's a really nice Cuban place, Caf Lo Cubano right up the street, but we wanted bagels from Noah's, so it's just natural to get Peet's, too. We had a long ride home, though -- Maj and I are both feeling sick, and the baby's not too happy about long car rides anymore. But we got home for a good nap and a radio interview. tags: san francisco laurel heights golden gate park rotee beach chalet cafe lo cubano kites beach

Get Connected Radio I did an interview today on Get Connected Radio about Wikitravel. It was pretty fun -- the interviewers were pretty clued-in about wikis, so we got to talk a bit more about the interesting travel aspects. Also cool that they emphasized the "open source" aspect, which is something a lot of media don't cover. tags: get connected radio wikitravel interview

I spent some time playing with haskell over the past month or so. One of the most incredible things about it is the wonderful community that has sprung up around the language. The haskell homepage is a treasure trove of information, excited users throw all sorts of new articles at reddit every day, and the #haskell channel is exactly what you want out of an irc channel. A nice bonus for Debian types is the incredibly close ties the haskell community has with our distro.

Comparing this to Debian is instructive. The haskell community seems to be having a ton of fun using their language. The sense in #debian, or from whatever Debian tutorials I read, is that people aren't using their system to have fun any more. The air of joy and occasional whimsy that traces its way through #haskell (and also very strongly through the ruby community) seems to be somewhat surpressed in Debian, as though we're so big and cool and technically competent that we don't have time for frivolity. It's hard to have fun and create a warm and inviting community with this kind of attitude. Turf wars, protocol, and politics only compound the problem.

Doing something fun for its own sake should be a part of the Debian experience the same way that it's inherently part of the free software experience. It's way too easy to lose that in the mountain of packages, emails, and bug reports. Using Debian makes me happy, and I want to try and let that spirit out to play a little more.

Since I have been having a digital camera since a few weeks now, I've had a need for an application to manage my pictures. The two applications that people have pointed me to are f-spot and digiKam, which also seem to be the most popular applications in this category for Linux. Since I use neither KDE nor GNOME as my user interface, it doesn't matter much to me which I install; so I've tried them both. Their feature set is quite different; unfortunately, though, they both have some features which the other doesn't, which makes choosing for one or the other rather hard. Since their on-disk format is rather different, it's impossible to use them both at the same time—at least not if I don't want to enter commentary and tags each and every time; so I'll have to choose one or the other based on their features. Since that requires me to actually compare them, I thought I might as well make a blog post out of that. Note, though, that this comparison is in no way intended to be complete; it only compares those features which I really care about. Features digiKam

• Stores pictures in albums; these albums can be created hierarchically, and are created on disk as the directory lay-out in which to store pictures. One picture can be chosen as an example picture per album.
• Pictures can have tags, comments, and a score (on a scale of one to five stars) applied to them. Tags can be created hierarchically; the default tagset is empty. Tags can be made to have icons that are otherwise available to KDE attached to them, to make them more immediately visually recognizable, but selecting pictures to fulfill that function seems impossible.
• Has an interface to manage pictures in gallery and gallery 2; it can view, add, and remove pictures in that gallery.
• The selector dialog which is used to upload pictures is rather spartanic; it allows one to select pictures by filename and by album; pictures aren't even shown before upload (bug filed).
• Pictures can be filtered by tag, album, or date; I haven't been able to find an interface to filter pictures by score (it is possible to sort them by score in any view, though).
• A KDE application, so written in C++, which is a compiled language; i.e., rather fast.

F-spot

• Does not know the concept of albums
• Pictures can have tags and comments applied to them. Tags can be created hierarchically; the default tag set contains (amongst others) People, Places, and Events, suggesting that f-spot encourages the use of tags where Albums would be used in the case of digiKam. Tags can have icons which are otherwise available to gnome selected as their icon, or one can select a picture to fulfill that function (in fact, it selects the first picture which receives a tag to do that by default)
• Does not know the concept of scoring; instead, the default tagset contains a tag Favourites, suggesting a scoring system with a binary scale.
• Uploading pictures can be done by selecting them, and choosing the right option in the menu system. As a result, all filtering options otherwise available can be used to select which pictures to export (just filter the view, then select all pictures in the view).
• Uploading pictures will optionally also export comments that were applied to it.
• Since it does not know the concept of albums, pictures cannot be stored in a one-directory-per-album lay-out. Instead, pictures are stored in a one-directory-per-day layout, using a yyyy/mm/dd format. Unfortunately, this also means that no picture metadata (tags, comments) is easily available to command-line applications.
• Apart from the ability to upload pictures to gallery or gallery 2, does not interface with it in any way; gallery is a write-only storage medium to f-spot.
• Written for mono, a system that requires a runtime environment to translate instructions at runtime from some sort of virtual machine code, and which uses garbage collection all over; i.e., rather slow, especially after you've been using it for a while.

My opinion After having used f-spot for a few weeks before I tried digiKam, I have to be honest and say that I don't like the concept of albums. They do not add value; everything they allow you to express can equally well be expressed with tags. Additionally, one can categorize a picture in only one album, whereas it's possible to categorize pictures in as many tags as you would want. Just creating one album which contains all my pictures, with tagging used for categorizing, doesn't help either; that way, digiKam would store all my pictures in a single flat directory, which would become problematic when the number in the picture filenames wraps around. I do love the scoring thing in digiKam. A favourites tag just doesn't cut it; and creating five tags for scoring would make things like find all pictures that have a score of three or above rather cumbersome, and sort by score outright impossible. However, the fact that it's not possible to filter by score makes it all rather useless. The export to gallery function in digiKam is horrible. I have to select my pictures blindly; none of the metadata which I tack on them can be used to help select which pictures I want. Workaround: use whatever filtering is available to select the right pictures and add them to a temporary album from which I then upload all pictures, but that's silly (and requires disk space for no good reason). Additionally, there seems to be a bug in the interface, which means that I have to babysit an upload (with no workaround). And I can't even view my pictures to spend the time waiting. Bah. F-spot isn't without problems of its own. Due to a bug in mono, it crashes rather often on my PowerPC laptop. When that happens, it can't be restarted until the X server is restarted. Workaround: use Xnest, but that makes it impossible to view pictures in full-screen mode. Also, since f-spot is a GNOME application, its options dialog is as helpful as a pair of soccer shoes when you're out swimming. No surprises there. Conclusion Which one do I prefer? I'm not sure. The digiKam upload interface is positively annoying, especially the bug which requires me to click continue after every picture. For that alone, I might ditch it. On the other hand, it has a slew of interesting features (the scoring, to name one) that f-spot lacks, and that pull me more towards digiKam. I guess I'll have to give it a few days of thought. But hey, at least I know where I stand now.

Regarding my previous posting, the first thing that I wanted to release is called "Stuff To Do", and is a simple, elegant priority queue for getting things done. It lets you reprioritize, track time spent on tasks, generate reports on time spent, and most importantly, share with other users. You can create groups of people who can view one another's tasks, and give tasks to other users, all via a very intuitive interface (javascript is, however, required). It's all meant to stay out of your way as much as possible, even the time tracking requires only that you visit the browser window every so often to let it know you're there, rather than fiddling with (and sooner or later forgetting about) start and stop buttons. Perhaps it's not accurate down to the second, but the idea is to give you a general idea of what you've been up to, rather than something you have to slavishly click on all the time. The group interface is also meant to be easy to use to get a quick idea of what other people are working on, or share tasks with other people. For instance, if you're a project manager, you could create a bunch of tasks, and then just drag and drop them to other people in the system. You can't change other people's priorities (yet), because I think it's better if you simply ask them yourself - technology isn't a substitute for communication! While I work on the paypal interface (I looked into Google Checkout, but it's still got some limitations), I'm going to let people sign up for the group-enabled version with six months for free. It won't cost too much per user when I roll it out in any case, probably somewhere south of $20. The basic version is likely to remain free as long as I can cover hosting costs. I've been using it myself at work and home for the past month or so, along with a few of my colleagues, and it seems to fill a nice niche in between more heavyweight issue tracking tools like JIRA, and the index cards/bulletin board we'd been using. Check it out - I hope you like it! In any case, let me know what you think.

Phil Wainewright: “The idea, by the way, that users are going to keep their own private backup somewhere else, as Google’s PR rep suggested in an email to TechCrunch, is patently absurd. The whole point of storing email in the cloud, surely, is to avoid having to download hundreds of megabytes to your hard disk every night just in case the service falls over.”

Russel pointed me to Andre Pang's blog entry.  Yep, I share this annoyance.  Especially because I recently received an email with a 3 or 4 line disclaimer at the top of the email, and an additional, longer one at the bottom.  Occasionally, I use that one:

The content of this message may or may not reflect the opinion of me, my
employer, my girlfriend, my cat or anybody else, regardless of the fact
whether such an employer, girlfriend, cat, or anybody else exists.  I
(or my employer, girlfriend, cat or whoever) disclaim any legal
obligations resulting from the above message.  You, as the reader of
this message, may or may not have the permission to redistribute this
message as a whole or in parts, verbatim or in modified form, or to
distribute any message at all.

(Daniel Baumann: Please note the spaces I've added in this post, extra for you!)

Andre Pang blogs about the annoyance of email disclaimers. For a while I had a .sig indicating that it was a condition of sending email to me that the sender agrees to legalistic terms in their .sig being inapplicable to me.

220 smtp.sws.net.au ESMTP Postfix - by sending email to this server you agree that any legalistic sig in your message does not apply to anyone who receives the message through this service.

Now I have changed my Postfix greeting to the above. Anyone who sends me mail agrees that their .sig does not apply to me. Suggestions for improvements to the above text are welcome.

Katherine's father bought her mother a laptop for Christmas. I am ashamed to admit that although I was responsible for the specification it was purchased from PC World. There is a lack of shops in Northern Ireland where you can walk in and purchase a reasonably cheap laptop unfortunately. The model we ended up with was an Advent 8111 (Dixons link as it's saner than the PC World one). It's not actually a bad spec; Core Duo 1.6GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, wireless/ethernet/modem, 15.4" 1280x800 widescreen TFT. I think it claims up to 3 hours battery life and I certainly had 2+ out of it though not under heavy use. I decided that it was getting Linux; Katherine's mum isn't used to any form of computer so there are no preconceptions about Windows to get over. While I'm a Debian person myself I felt it was time to give Ubuntu a chance; mjg59 (and others I'm sure) has spent a lot of time trying to get it happy on laptops and make sure things Just Work. I didn't have a lot of time to sit fiddling with the setup, so a shiny out-of-the-box distro seemed ideal. I downloaded ubuntu-6.10-desktop-i386.iso and burnt myself a CD. Dropped it in the drive and it booted into the live CD installer fine. The install process was simple and it managed to resize the Windows partition without problems (I would have deleted it but I couldn't convince the Windows rescue CD creator to work and I don't want to burn my bridges until I'm sure Linux works out ok for the owner). Rebooting into the freshly installed system I was surprised at the time the boot process took. It certainly felt a lot longer than it takes my (lower speced) laptop to boot to a GDM prompt under Debian. Also the display looked a bit fuzzy. Further investigation led to the discovery that although X correctly detected a panel size of 1280x800 it was only using 1024x768. Much searching found me i915resolution which did some magic that made things work. However this doesn't appear to be part of Ubuntu proper so I'm not sure if was the correct solution or if I should have done something else? Getting to the point where I could download i915resolution was interesting too. My parents have a WEP encrypted wireless network (to prevent casual use rather than because it's secure). I was expecting Ubuntu (which detected the Intel wireless card fine) to pop up some sort of dialog saying it had found a network and would I like to connect (if I provided the key). Something network-managery. But no. Even when I went to the network control panel and added all the details the connection didn't seem to come up. I gave up and did it manually with iwconfig and dhclient (I needed it to work quickly and at present it won't need wireless usually). Once I had the display working happily my other task was to tame the modem. It's an Intel HDA thing and I'd hoped sl-modem-daemon would drive it. Of course it didn't. Although it's an Intel chipset it has a bloody Conexant codec on it. Which of course there are no free or Free drivers for. I ended up trying the trial Linuxant driver, which did work fine at 14.4k, but that's really painful so I gave up and paid for the full version. I'd really rather have voted with my feet and ended up with some proper modem hardware, but it would have been an extra set of wires and cost more. I hate Conexant. Anyway, the drivers work (though seem to break sound; I haven't had enough time to prod this and the modem is much more important to have working). Hopefully in time I'll convince them they really want ADSL, but at present I think it would be quite hard as they don't have a high expected use. Once the modem was working I needed an easy way to dial up. I started playing with modem monitor, which had been installed by default. However I just couldn't figure out how to get it to allow me to dialup and dial down - the activate/disable options stayed greyed out. So I installed GNOME PPP which seems to work fine and be easy enough to drive - put a nice link to it on the desktop and stored all the details so it's a double click to launch and then a click of the "Connect" button. My final issue was that once I actually took the laptop to Katherine's house to show her mum how to use it it started hanging on boot. Booting into recovery mode showed a soft lockup error message around the point where it was setting up the network interfaces. I think this might have had something to do with me hitting the wireless kill switch (no point having it on when there's no wireless in the house), as disabling the device in the BIOS made the problem go away. I didn't have enough time to do a fully exhaustive check, but will look at it in the future. I wait with interest to see how use of the laptop goes. Expected usage to being with is mainly web and email (provided by the Ubuntu defaults of Firefox and Evolution) so hopefully it shouldn't be too problematic now I've fought the install process. I was really quite surprised at the problems I encountered (well, aside from the modem drivers); I'd expected a much smoother install that would leave me with everything working fine out of the box. I haven't yet filed any bugs or done more investigation - I only had about a day to setup the machine so couldn't prod it more just yet. I will of course try to do so when I get a free moment, but if I missed some obvious stuff please do point it out to me! (As if you wouldn't...) Oh, and here's some lspci output for anyone interested in some more details about the laptop:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS/940GML and 945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 02)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev e2) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode])
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GBM (ICH7-M) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 02)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family) Serial ATA Storage Controller IDE (rev 02) (prog-if 80 [Master])
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8055 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 10)
05:01.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments Unknown device 8039
05:01.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments Unknown device 803a (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
05:01.2 Mass storage controller: Texas Instruments Unknown device 803b
05:01.3 Class 0805: Texas Instruments Unknown device 803c (prog-if 01)

As of this writing, the DNS/infrastructure hasn't quite caught up, but ofbiz.apache.org ought to be live soon. "Apache Open For Business", aka OFBiz, has been promoted out of the incubator (the term the ASF uses for projects hoping to become full-fledged ASF projects) to its own top level project. As J Aaron Farr mentions, they managed most everything on their own, and were a project that wouldn't have looked out of place as part of the ASF even from the beginning of the incubation period, which made my job as a "mentor" pretty easy. What will be interesting is to track the project going forward. It has tremendous potential, because it focuses very much on providing not only the low level tools (which is still where most open source is), but also on creating good business models and processes, which is relatively newer terrain in the open source world. I think they face a couple of important challenges. First and foremost, a way to lower the barrier to entry. OFBiz is a big collection of code that in some ways tends to stand alone compared to the "mainstream" in that it uses its own tools in terms of the framework. Also, since it encompasses so much, it's a lot to come to terms with when you get started. This means that the initial step of the "learning curve" is pretty high, and I imagine that a lot of people stumble. Clearly, it's not a simple application, but I think efforts to make it more approachable will pay off in terms of attracting more users (and eventually, developers). The broader challenge is simply the fact that in some ways, this is uncharted territory for free software, so it remains to be seen what sort of "ecosystem" (if you'll pardon the buzzword) grows up around it. For instance, at this point in time, no one, least of all the core developers, sees it as a program that you simply download and run, but rather as a place to start from for integrators and developers who mould the code to fit the needs of the particular firm adopting it. That's working right now, but perhaps at some point it will be more of an out of the box system. Or maybe not - attempting to make it work well for a vague 'everyone' might just be chasing taillights and prove ultimately fruitless. Unfortunately, I still haven't had the opportunity to use it "in anger", as they say, so I don't have much to say about it technically, but from a business point of view, I really like their data model, and the system of processes they've put together, which allows you to capture a great deal of use cases in a very flexible way, which is no mean feat. In any case, a big round of congratulations to the core developers, and best wishes for the future!

I had received some gift certificates for the Fnac for christmas, and also some plain money. So today I went there, and spent it on a few DVDs containing the Star Wars original trilogy. Since this is the 2006 DVD release, it contains two versions of every movie: the original theatrical version, as it appeared in cinema at the time of their release, and the more "modern" version, which had some computer alterations to make the special effects be more stunning. And which led to the now infamous "Han shot first T-shirts. The DVD also contains a commentary audio track for the modern version of the movie, as can be expected from most modern DVD sets these days. Intrigued about the fact that they actually went ahead and did another alteration on the movie just because fans were not happy with the new version, I switched on the commentary track and went ahead to the problematic scene 22. The commentary starts off with "There was a bit of controversy when I told everyone I was going to...", so one would think he's going to mention the whole 'Han Shot First' controversy. But he's not; he goes on with "... shoot this scene with subtitles"; the commentary during that scene simply explains how huttese (the language spoken by poor Greedo) came to be. Why they had to do that there (instead of waiting until Jabba actually joins in), I don't know. They probably wanted to talk about something else there...

Now either I'm really astonished or somebody has seriously strange metrics. I suspect it's the second. According to Aleksandar Vasovic (working at the university of K ln (Cologne) in Germany):

[...] we analysed the debian mailing list archives, especially the debian-devel mailing list, as it is a good representation of the whole network. [...] we identified the 100 main actors and therefor came across your email address.

So, somebody who talks quite a bit on the mailing lists, but really only maintains one package is already one of the top 100 "actors" in Debian? I seriously doubt it. (And yes, receiving the mail I quoted and seeing that the questionnaire is not online yet(?) does not improve my impression either.) Now (more talk) of course the right thing to do would be to define as many metrics as possible and see how often I am in the top 100. Anyway, when I feel I have to say something I will continue to do so, and otherwise just thank the (at most 99 ;-) people who do more for Debian than I for creating and maintaining all the cool stuff I can use for free. And, obviously, I also have to mention the upstream authors who make Debian possible in the first place. Still, metrics got me thinking. One metric I'd be really interested in is a weighted "I respect person X" one: everybody submits rankings of people who (s)he thinks do a very good job in Debian and who tend to do the "right" things, both in technical matters but also regarding community or organisation stuff. Then, from these rankings, a overall ranking is calculated, but with a twist: have the opinions of people high in the overall ranking count more than those with lower rankings - after all, the latter are inclined to trust the former people's judgement. Now, the obvious thing to do would be to elect the DPL with this ranking. But it could go further: maintain the ranking continuously (i.e. let people adjust their ranking at any time) instead of only polling once a year, publish the ranking (or perhaps just the top 20 or top 50?), let the top 5 be a leadership team instead of having a single DPL, adjust the leadership team as often as necessary as the top 5 of the ranking change (minimum terms of 3 months and only change the team when somebody falls out of the top 5 for at least a month or so to keep things from boiling over too quickly). Obviously, rankings have their problems, and this approach wouldn't suddenly solve all of the project's problems and would probably also introduce new ones, but I feel the continuous monitoring by the project's members might make those leaders more realistic when stating their goals by eliminating the campaign frenzy. #include stuff about people not actually wanting to be part of the leadership team and stuff about requiring some regular confirmation from the electorate to weed out people who just recorded a ranking at some time but don't follow events anymore. Ok, now this was absolutely in the Talk Is Cheap™ category.