
Since the closure of SoFlow and adding myself
to LinkedIn, I've been thinking a bit about
Professional Associations and using
Social Networks (SNs) for business.
I've not worked out my answers, so
this is a "dear lazyweb, what pieces of this jigsaw am I missing?" post.
Much of the recent mainstream news has been
about the legal problems of SNs
- for example, see
BBC: Web networkers 'at risk of fraud'
(which was also in items on
a recent Click show on BBC World and News24)
and
BBC: Facebook site faces fraud claim
- or about how they could Save The World, like
BBC: Social net offers new perspective
I think there's a bigger problem which will
stop SNs making a deep-change to
online activity. Each time
a SN like SoFlow closes, it
wastes some resources of its members.
I'm starting to side with other developers
in being tired of seeing my input turn to
bitrot, through buggy software or buggy
business models. I'm not alone: see
Gunnar Wolf: On social networks
for example.
A good idea seems to be on
Slashdot: It's Time for Social Networks to Open Up
but how? Each SN seems to guard
its dark corners as vital elements of its
business model. Should we look to our
Professional Associations to create new
Open Social Networks (OSNs)? After all,
SNs aren't the core money-makers for
professional associations.
But, the biggest problem with
Professional Associations is picking
a trustworthy one - one which will do what it
says on the tin, instead of
taking your subscription,
then undermining you.
Consider the British Computer Society
and its OSSG License: how
many of its members
really
wanted another
software copyright
licence? Fortunately, it was spotted -
Volunteer brickbat thrower needed in London (Tuesday 24th 6pm)
- and the
Report from BCS OSSG meeting on a new FS license
suggests the negative feedback was loud and
clear, so hopefully we won't see that again.
If I was a BCS member, I'd probably not renew
after helping to fund that harmful activity.
librarian.net: choosing your battles and choosing your professional associations
talks a little about some library associations
as a sort of case study which many will
recognise as familiar,
but there's an interesting comment from
Blake
there:
"I think there's an association out there for everyone."
Is there? What association is out there for
liberal hackers and webmasters?
I don't think I've found it yet.
So,
should we be looking at ourselves, rather
than existing professional associations?
Can we do Open Social Networks
peer-to-peer in a meaningful way?
Are we already doing it with blog feeds?
How should we expand on that?
Although I disagree with the conclusion that using another Social Network site with an uncertain business model is
How to succeed with social networking,
the article also mentions that
"social networking is in its infancy and that it will not really get underway until we have portable profiles and interconnectivity"
In other words, it's our revolution -
let's steal it back.
(Update: 2007-09-27: 1 comment)