Gunnar Wolf: Nice electoral results
Of course, this post is about the results for the recent Debian Project Leader elections. Although I've written quite a bit about politics in my country, I cannot sadly hold any hopes for decent electoral (or post-electoral, or political in general) results here in Banana-land. All hail our de-facto president, BTW.Anyway, on to happier realms. The DPL elections are over. Voter turnout was low, as Manoj pointed out, but it's not as low as I feared. And, /methinks, not only because of the shortened period - but because this was generally an easy-going election, with three quite good candidates. As CMOT pointed out in my previous posting on this topic, many people would have voted 111- (which means, for the casual reader, any of them is quite OK with me). Debian elections are voted with a very interesting system, the Condorcet method. Developers don't vote just for their favorite option, but rank all of the available options (including none of the above, or NOTA) according to their personal preference.
The final numbers are very worth noting - Excuse me for hot-linking the image, but I know many non-Debian people read this:

What is so unique this time? First, as I anticipated on my previous posting, all of the candidates are above NOTA. Not only that, they are all well over NOTA, with the smallest distance being 237 votes (out of a 401 total votes received).
Second, something very positive as well, the distance between the three candidates is quite large this time. In 2006, the distance between first and second place was 6 votes (reason for which, together with the proximity in their platforms of course, Steve was appointed Second in Command or 2IC by AJ). In 2007, Steve was (again) second place, eight votes under Sam. Looking a bit into the history, in 2003, the closest election we have had, Martin beat Bdale by four and Branden by 11 votes... No, the distance is not really that important in the end, as we are quite far from having political quarrels over vote results - But still, having nice, clear numbers feels much better. And as I said in a previous message as well, it somehow speaks of Debian being a more mature, stable project.
Anyway - Congratulations, Steve! Best wishes for a stressful year, quite probably full of travelling, presentations and work in general!
I can t possibly summarize all that has happened to me since my last post. The short explanation is that I had to serve in Brazilian army for a year, and that kind of disorganized my life. While I was in the army, I was forbidden to blog, and when that year ended, my life was too messy to keep up and I ve been procrastinating my come back! Now, finally, I am back.
Just in time, I would say. 
If you upload a new package to the Debian archive which contains a setuid or setgid binary please please ask for a security audit, or carry out one yourself.
I certainly accept that the
Ubuntu's live CD installer, Ubiquity, needs to suppress desktop
automounting while it's doing partitioning and generally messing about with
mount points, otherwise its temporary mount points end up busy on unmount
due to some smart-arse desktop component that decides to open a window for
it.
To date, it employs the following methods, each of which was sufficient
at the time:
It's been a long time since I've written on my blog; longer than I'd like. I really want to get back in the swing of it, if only to keep this entire site from bitrotting interminably. My
Limited Liability Partnerships are a
relatively new company form here, but it
has some
interesting opportunities for cooperatives.
I work for one
Last week I
I had an "Aha!" moment today when I came to a Wittgensteinian realization that while the sense of a piece of code corresponds to the formal behaviour of that code, the meaning of the snippet is the set of possible contexts where this code could be used. This idea has changed my view of teaching programming (I have been teaching Python in a