Russell Coker: Creepy Social Networking
Cory Doctorow wrote an interesting article about social networking [1]. One of his points is “Imagine how creepy it would be to wander into a co-worker’s cubicle and discover the wall covered with tiny photos of everyone in the office, ranked by “friend” and “foe,” with the top eight friends elevated to a small shrine decorated with Post-It roses and hearts“, another concerns the issue of forced “friends” where colleagues and casual acquaintances demand to be added to a friends list.
He speculates that the reason for social networking systems to be a fad is that once too many people you don’t really like force themselves into your friends list then you will feel compelled to join a different service.
I believe that the practice of ranking friends is simply a bad idea and wonder whether anyone who has completed high-school has ever used it seriously. If you publicly rank your friends then you will alienate other friends (particularly any who might have ranked you more highly than you ranked them). Everyone who has used social networking systems has discovered the pressure to avoid alienating people that you don’t actually like. It seems obvious that alienating people who you do like is even more of a problem.
In my previous post about Better Social Networking [2] I suggested having multiple lists on your social networking server that are published to different people. That would allow segregating the lists as a way of dealing with some demands to be listed. People who are associated with work (colleagues, managers, and in an example Cory used students at a school where a teacher worked) would be on a work list. The work list would point to the work profiles of other people which would match whatever the standards are for the industry in question (which would still allow quite a range, the standards for sys-admins of ISPs differ significantly from those for primary school teachers). I’m sure that someone who worked for an ISP in Amsterdam would understand that a work-based friend request made to someone who teaches primary school in a part of the world that is religiously conservative would understand why that request would be declined (but the same person might add them to a personal friends list).
Another way of alleviating such problems is to not require that listing be bi-directional. Current social networking systems involve one party making a friend request to another which is listed as pending in the GUI for both parties. The options are to either leave it in that state (which is an annoyance) or reject it (which may cause offence). With a uni-directional listing one party would add the other and hope for the best. If they aren’t obsessive about such things they may not even notice that the other party didn’t reciprocate. Also it would allow for famous people receiving links from many people to their public profile without any expectation of reciprocation. Of course a distributed social networking system such as I suggest would inherently have uni-directional links as there would be no central repository to force them to be all bi-directional.
These are all just 'first-builds' so problems could well lie ahead but I have now built a set of cross built packages for Emdebian (ARM) that edos-debcheck says is installable for a basic GPE installation. Only one package remains as a problem - gpe-filemanager builds fine but the current dependencies of libgnomevfs mean that gconf is required which doesn't give an option to disable ldap which is something I would rather do without. Certainly, existing GPE installations do without ldap but that could just be because these tend to use older versions of the particular libraries.
When Ubuntu announced public availability of Personal Package Archives, I
thought it might be good to use it to provide up to date Gammu related
packages. After successful registration I uploaded Gammu package and no
reaction so far, so I'll wait.
However this memorised me that I wanted to use OpenSUSE Build Service for same
purpose some time ago. I filled in registration and as I didn't receive any
email about being accepted, I absolutely forgot about that. Now just tried to
log in and it works. So you can now have access to latest Gammu, python-gammu
and Wammu packages for most recent RPM distributions (Fedora 7, Fedora 8,
Mandriva 2006, Mandriva 2007, openSUSE 10.2, openSUSE 10.3, openSUSE Factory,
SLES 9 and SLE 10). I could not test them so any feedback is welcome :-). You
can find all packages on
Of all of the
Long weekend of travel and family, and now we're back on our way to
It seems there is a long standing tradition to post a “Hello Planet” entry when being added to a new planet.
Well Hello
Apparently some people worry that Gforge may be abandoned, or on the
verge of being superseded with the proprietary "Gforge Advanced
Server" rewrite. Let it be known that I for one have no plans to
switch to Gforge AS, for all the reasons you'd expect from a free
software user and advocate: I don't have access to the source code
(it's made illegible by some sort of industrial PHP obfuscator), I
can't hack it because the license doesn't allow me to, I can't audit
it for security flaws, I can't adapt it to particular needs, etc.
Since a significant part of my income comes from maintaining Gforge
instances for clients, with local modifications for their particular
needs, it's an economical necessity that Gforge stays free. And
evolving.
Right. Having said that, I guess I have to show concrete evolutions
in addition to principles and ideals. So what changed recently?
I am making a small project with
Last night I finally got around to having a play with Clutter.
Considering I'd never used it before, I'm really impressed with just how
easy the API is to use. Within half an hour I had images fading in and
out, and this morning I built Eye of Gnome and rewrote my hack as a
slideshow plugin. There is no point releasing the code just (patches
required, and a nasty bug remaining), but I did make a screencast.
A week or two ago, I went to the local
Better than just a party, it s a bug squashing party! 
My blog is syndicated on 

Rmetrics now comprosises over twenty individual packages. Eleven new
packages were added in the 260.72 release for R 2.6.0, and they required
eight other new packages from
One says the eyes are the mirror of the soul. I made this experience back in easter for the first time. I was over at my brother's place for easter celebration when I got up in the morning, went into the bath and looked into the mirror for morning toilet. I washed my face like always with cold water to refresh myself, and when I removed my hands... I was sure I was looking into a female face. It quite a lot bewildered me; it was the first time this happened. And I wasn't even properly shaved...