Gunnar Wolf: Awesome!
For about eight years, I was a very happy WindowMaker user. It was very lightweight, aesthetically pleasing, and I had interiorized its behaviour and keybindings so much, I didn't feel I'd ever switch away. I periodically tried (forced myself even!) to use any of the other, more en vogue environments... Experimented using Gnome for a week, KDE for a week, XFCE for a week (so I would have enough time to learn their ways)... And always came back to my good, well-known wmaker.In 2006, when we held DebConf6 in Mexico, I saw how other people worked with ion3. I fell immediately in love with it. Not because it is prettier, snappier or has nicer widgets than other window managers - but because it is enormously more usable. Quoting Tuomo Valkonen, the ion3 author,
Ion is not perfect and certainly not for everyone, but neither is any user interface. Usability is subjective.Using a keyboard-oriented, tiling window manager represented -for the first time in 20 years (I had my first contact with a Macintosh in 1986)- a radical user interface change. For my way of working, I just don't need a desktop, I don't need having a background space or overlapping windows. What I need is a way to functionally organize the windows I have open at any given time, quickly switch between them (and not depending on the mouse, please!), maximizing screen space and all that. ion3 was godsent.
Now, in 2007 there was (yet another) huge flamefest. Valkonen basically does not want distributors distributing any version of ion3 that's not the latest, and introducing changes not approved by him - He basically demands ion to be non-free. So, it was moved to the non-free section of Debian where only Womble decided to keep giving it support. And, of course, by September 2007 Julien Danjou announced he had written another window manager: Awesome.
My main motivation for switching away from ion3 is that... I don't want to use non-free software. But I was very comfortable with ion3. It was only after I saw many other people using Awesome at DebConf8 I decided to bite the bullet and switch. It looked at least as comfortable as ion3.
But... Well, I cannot come up with better phrasing than what Joey said when he switched to Awesome, almost exactly a month ago. When changing between the mainstream window managers, the differences are mostly cosmetic. But with these really different window managers... I cannot but reproduce Joey's words:
I wish I had a good analogy to explain to my nontechnical readers what changing to a new window manager is about.So, what's so different?
One way to think about it is that it's like driving a car down the road, and suddenly swapping the steering wheel and brakes out for a tiller and gear shifter. And having to downshift for braking until you learn that the brakes moved to the turn indicator lever. By trial and error.
But that's really only part of it. Another way to look at it is adopting a new philosophy. Or, in some cases a cult. (In some cases, with crazy cult leaders.) Whether they use Windows or a Mac, or Linux, most computer users are members of a big established religion, with some implicit assumptions, like "thy windows shall be overlapping, like papers on the desktop, and thou shalt move them with thy mouse".
So, changing to a new window manager is a process of being dumped into a different environment, where nothing works like you've come to expect, and trying to construct a mental model that you can use to make sense of it. But it's also a process of modifying that environment to behave the way you like.
And when done whole-heartedly, this doesn't just mean trying to make it like the environment you were used to before. It means trying to absorb the underlying philosopy of the window manager, and think up new ways of doing things, inspired by that philosopy, and modify the environment to allow doing those things.
So ideally, "I switched to a new window manager" doesn't mean "my screen has some different widgets on it now". It means "I'm looking at the screen with new eyes."
Besides learning some new keybindings (expected, of course), Awesome has several suggested layouts to help you organize your workflow, usually (although not always) consisting of a main area and a side area, tiled side by side (or one above the other, or several stranger ways). This sounds rigid, but it is incredibly comfortable - and I've only been an Awesome user for three days!
But what sets Awesome apart from basically anything else is the concept of tags. Whey you see an Awesome session, you recognize something similar to the very well known workspaces concept we have had in any Unix-like environment for many years, right? Well, but they are not workspaces. They are tags. What is the difference?
When I work with workspace, each of my windows can be in a different workspace. So in one, I'll have my mail-related stuff. In another one, I might be browsing. In another one, I have my development things, and I might be following some logfiles in yet another one.
Awesome allows you to use tags for categorization in much a more flexible way.
For example: I am mostly a web-oriented developer. I usually need four things when developing a system: A browser, Emacs, the log for my development server, and a console where I can peek and poke at my objects and interactions. Of course, cramming them all into the same screen makes no sense - It would be better to follow the good ol' desktop metaphore, and just switch the focus and raise the window, right?
In Awesome, I can have them all set to the maximum screen size - _and_ use the most common combinations as well. Each of the windows can be tagged to more than one workspace (and yes, this is immensely more flexible than the always visible hint on traditional WMs).
To begin with, I'll give each major process a tag to itself, to work full-screen. Emacs is on tag 1, my browser on tag 2. The log and the console share a terminal (i.e. via screen or terminator).
This console by itself is not too useful, so I'll set it to tag 4, and we will go back to it later.
So if I'm building a view or following online documentation, I will add tag 3 to both Emacs and the browser.
I'm also setting tag 4 to the browser - That allows me to use it next to my terminal, following the results of my website-clicking.
And, of course, tag 5 will be set to Emacs and to the console, so I can quickly check any quick API-related question that does not need the documentation or look at a newly written method.
By the way, have you noticed CapsLock is the most stupid key invented, ever? Ok, I gave a good use to it: It's called Mod4. Imagine it is just an extra Ctrl, Alt or Meta key.
So, Mod4-1 gives me Emacs. Mod4-2 gives me the browser. Mod4-3 gives Emacs+browser, Mod4-4 gives browser+console, and Mod4-5 gives Emacs+console. And, of course, the handy Mod4-0 gives me all of my open windows tiled side by side.
Even this is a pattern of being a newbie, I know - I could keep 4 and 5 free, and just tag several simultaneous tags to be active. How? Switch to tag 1 exclusively (Mod4-1), and activate tag2 as well (Ctrl-Mod4-2). There, I have Emacs and browser side by side. Want to get the console instead of the browser? Simple. Ctrl-Mod4-2 (toggle off tag 2), Ctrl-Mod4-3 (toggle on tag 3).
Anyway - As you can see, I am excited at finding a very new and nice tool to help me work better. Today I was playing a bit with the Awesome widgets, but that's something to be talked about later.
In Debian, we are at a crossing point: Awesome is just reaching ion3's popularity. And I'm adding my two main machines' votes to Awesome.
This is Awesome. Quoting (yes, one last quote) the official Awesome site, This gonna be LEGEN... wait for it... DARY!.
Xen-Hosting
Do you know this experience: A program,
It's the X Development Summit in Edinburgh this week, so I've been hanging out with the graphics crowd. There hasn't been a huge amount of work done in the field of power management in graphics so far - Intel have framebuffer compression and there's the
I recently announced that German and French reached 100% completion in
unstable for po-debconf translations (by the way, both are now 100% in
lenny as well).
However, l10n efforts also happen for many languages in that area, so it's time to highlight them as well:
Here some news from the Smuxi front. As you might already know
I don't know what it says about Debian but while the political content of my last post was ignored, I have received a steady stream of email today saying Michael Palin was in fact the lumberjack in "And Now For Something Completely Different" Obviously I am unfit to be a heartbeat away from the
I've been too busy to follow GCC development recently and haven't done any
testing of development snapshots during the GCC 4.4 development phase so
far. However, GCC 4.4 moved to stage 3 yesterday, the development stage
dedicated to bug fixes and documentation. Given that GCC is now in stage 3
and that Debian unstable has fairly little churn because of the freeze,
it's an ideal time to do some archive rebuilds.
I started archive rebuilds on amd64 and powerpc last night and added ia64
today. I also tried to build GCC on armel, alpha and sparc but there are
compiler errors during bootstrap. mips builds fine but I haven't started
any archive rebuilds.
I found and reported 9 compiler errors so far. Most of them have already
received some attention and one of them has been fixed in the meantime.
I'm not looking at build failures of packages at the moment since that's
very time consuming and I'm not sure whether I'll find the time to report
build failures later as GCC becomes more stable, but we'll see.
Here are my notes on growing a KVM disk image’s root filesystem. I had a few 4G partitions that really needed to be bigger. This shows how to get a report on the sizes of the disk images, convert them to raw, work on the partition tables, grow the root filesystem, and rebuild the swap partition with the original UUID. With some work, it could probably become fully scripted, but since the partition layout may not always be the same from VM to VM, the “fdisk” step needs human interaction to delete and rebuild the partition table. Note that the method below also maintains the sparseness of the images.
gksu-polkit gets pipe support
One of the features I really wanted to get into
gksu-policykit early was working correctly with pipes. With
the current gksu you cannot do something such as echo
blah gksu tr a-z A-Z. It is actually very hard to
work correctly with input/output with su and sudo bellow. I
do think it also has something to do with me not being too
clever in UNIX file descriptors at the time I originally
planned how gksu works. I did get an email from someone at
Sun offering to write support for that who never mailed me
again, but anyway…
gksu-policykit is currently able to get all the input and
output forwarded to/from the process by using an interface
similar to glib’s g_spawn_async_with_pipes. Here’s what we
are able to do already:
This is 'back to school' season aroun here. So on Saturday we went and set up
two desks for our two kids. And with that I finally converted 'their'
computer to a working multi-seat setup. At first, I had fiddled with
two distinct (ATI Radeon) graphics cards. Somehow I never got x11 to
recognise both cards properly.
But two cards are not needed. As the machine is running a standard Kubuntu
setup, I just followed this
Sorry, ever since Debconf I've been busy, ill and otherwise
distracted. I'm still catching up... Stuff that's happened:
Dude, you're married! For the second year running,
I had to leave Debconf a day early to attend a wedding party. My good
friend Matthew married Oxana last Monday. I've just put my