Biella Coleman: Does the patent system make you queasy?
Peer to Patent Summer Research FellowshipCompensation The fellow will receive a monthly stipend of $3,000 (based on full time work status). Job Qualification
New York Law School
Summer 2009 Background
Peer to Patent is the groundbreaking program developed by New York Law School and run in cooperation with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, along with the assistance of a number of private stakeholders. It harnesses the power of citizen-experts to assist patent examiners by searching for, identifying, and annotating prior art relevant to pending patent applications. A first Peer to Patent pilot was launched in June 2007. During the first year the project participants (peer reviewers) assisted in the prior art searches on 40 patent applications, generating 173 items of prior art. These items of prior art were the basis of rejection in over ten of the patent applications considered. In June 2008 the pilot was continued for a second year, and was recently extended to encompass a pilot program in the United Kingdom. Research Issue
Although Peer to Patent has attracted over 350 active peer reviewers, the project team has little or no idea as to the motivations that cause these individuals voluntarily to contribute their substantial time to the project. The average reviewer spent approximately six hours searching and annotating individual patent applications. The project team also does not fully understand the best means for attracting additional peer reviewers to the project. In order for the project to scale to larger volumes of applications, both of these points need to be understood and addressed. More generally and theoretically, the motivations of citizens in producing material for governmental use are not well-understood. This fellowship seeks to provide an account of this sort of activity, as well as generate a design for a controlled study of incentive mechanisms for these sorts of activities. Research Activity
The selected fellow will conduct interviews among a meaningful number of currently active peer reviewers to elicit their motivations for participating in the project and contributing their time. The fellow will review the non-profit motivation literature to provide a number of alternative methods of reward to determine whether any or all of them would induce the participants to continue their participation, increase their participation, encourage others to participate, or cease their participation altogether. Potential rewards may include: (a) basic recognition; (b) monetary interest; (c) cash awards; (d) prominent public recognition; (e) some other form of reward; or (f) no reward whatsoever. The fellow will develop a survey to be conducted among a wider segment of active and potential peer reviewers to test for validation of the data gathered in the initial sampling. From the results of the initial sampling, literature review, and survey, the fellow will develop findings on which to base an incentive program to attract and retain peer reviewers. The fellow will develop an experimental design to test the efficacy of each of these incentive possibilities. Term
The fellowship will commence on or about June 1, 2009 and will continue until on or about August 31, 2009. The fellowship is a full time position for the three months stipulated; but this is open to negotiation for an exceptional candidate.
It is expected that the fellow will be pursuing (ABD) or have completed a PhD in psychology, economics, policy, or communications; or some other relevant field involving the motivation of content producers. Application Deadline April 30, 2009. Application Procedure
Applicants should send (1) a letter of application detailing their qualification for the position, (2) a resum , and (3) a list of three referees, to: Ms Naomi Allen Administrator, Institute for Information Law & Policy New York Law School 57 Worth Street New York NY 10013 Naomi.Allen@nyls.edu Questions relating to the scope and nature of the fellowship can be directed to: Prof. Mark Webbink,
Director, Center for Patent Innovations
New York Law School
mhwebbink@yahoo.com Prof. Dan Hunter
Director, Institute for Information Law & Policy
New York Law School
dhunter@nyls.edu New York Law School is an equal opportunity employer that encourages excellence through diversity. Women and minority candidates are encouraged to apply.
Following the ACCEPT on packages on NEW during my vacations and
the ack from the release team, I've just uploaded all Xfce 4.6
packages to unstable. Packages for your architectures should arrive
on your mirror along the weekend.
the NEWS.Debian (which will be displayed if you use
apt-listchanges (which is a good idea)) will warn you about some
upgrade precautions to take. I'm reproducing it here:
In case you missed it:
I don't use Emacs myself, and I don't recall a single Emacs user
In the last few weeks, I spent quite some time wondering about how to arrange the hard disk layout of my productive
systems in the future. This article outlines my thoughts and would like to ask the lazyweb for comments.
I try to keep my Debian servers as identically as possible, making it possible to talk non-linux persons remotely
through the system without having to worry about this particular box configuration.
I have been especially worrying about:
My patch for initial kernel support for the QNAP TS-119 and TS-219
Turbo NAS got accepted and will be in 2.6.30. I can run Debian on
a USB disk without any problems but there are some issues left (some
severe, some cosmetic):
Well, I normally despise of thinks like this link collection, but I thought I might add it anyway, since these are useful links for me and if I don t post them here, I m likely to forget where to find them in the near future:
As
I decided to change a bit short term plans for