Over the years far too many years I have
occasionally chronicled the slow death of my mother, a death of mind, personality, really person that comes with Alzheimers. She has officially had the illness for 7 years now but had symptoms prior to this time, in the form of perceptual disturbances that are the defining feature of the rare type of Alzheimers she has,
Benson s syndrome.
As her illness progressed and we saw her doctors they would always ask: what other illnesses or health problems does Vera have? And I would answer none. Without fail and almost immediately, the inquiring doctor would respond back none? often with a slightly raised eyebrow, the one word uttered not to challenge the veracity of my answer, but used instead to convey another meaning, often bathed in some mixture of compassion and pity. It was an acknowledgement of the future that awaited us, basically stating with no other illness, this is going to be on heck of long and difficult haul of a life experience, which has indeed been the case.
However, after nearly two years of being bed bound in a nursing home, physical health problems are now creeping in and my mother is descending into different type of hell, especially since she can no longer communicate the physical pain she might be in. The words she knows are few: no and a few other words (she likes to tell people they are loco and indeed I can only imagine how true this accusation of crazy is given that we are keeping her alive against her wishes). Her consistent and persistent wailing, agitation and crying do of course communicate the depth of suffering this being the hardest thing to bear witness to. She does have periods of calm, coaxed in part by the drugs she is given but these are not enough to override the pain she and we feel.
About two months ago, her body started to give, the first problem being a fracture that led to significant internal bleeding and required a blood transfusion and a brace she is still wearing. A few weeks ago when I was visiting her, she basically developed these black and red welts on the bottom of her feet in a manner of two days, so instead of boarding a plane to NYC, I took her to the emergency room and stayed a full week while she was pumped with intravenous antibiotics. At first, doctors thought it might be gangrene, which was mortifying mostly because of all the associations that come with it. The doctors determined that it was not in fact gangrene but that she has a bone infection technically called osteomyelitis a tricky condition to treat that requires at minimum 45 days of IV antibiotics.
The hospital/doctors who had originally determined she would stay there for her treatment, changed their mind unexpectedly and announced their intention to ship her to a long-term care facility, which in theory we were not opposed to, except for the fact that it is very far from where my sister lives, and also it is a facility we had not verified for ourselves. On top of it, we knew she had a legal right stay in the hospital (though some doctors informed us otherwise). We preferred the hospital because it is so close to our house, we would be able to hire someone to visit her when my sister is at work, and we suspect that she will have additional complications from 45 days of IV abx so why not stick around and receive treatment and care from the same internist who had been nothing but a great doctor.
The story took a turn toward the surreal when the infectious disease doctor decided to release her to her nursing home with a treatment of oral antibiotics, even though every single doctor we saw from the emergency room doctor to the weekend internist who subs for her regular doctor, repeatedly informed us the only treatment is IV antibiotics for at least 45 days, possibly more (which is the normal treatment protocol).
Since so many people don t know how to maneuver complaints and take action in hospitals, doctors and other staff can exploit this to make medically dogdy decisions (which happened in fact when a feeding tube was put into my mom, but that is another long story I don t think I ever wrote about here). I am sure also that some doctor s are less willing to take questionable action with certain patients depending on the class and background of their family members but I bet the first impression I give off to doctors, to invoke Erving Goffman s work on self-presentation, is not someone willing to take swift action.
In the hospital, I have the sense that most doctors don t take me all that seriously, probably thinking that I am 5 foot slacker/artistic type that I admittedly do look like as I dress in jeans, a hoodie and a winter cap because the hospitals are so effing, ridiculously cold in PR (and I can t help my height nor the fact that I look 24 or so). So it usually comes as a surprise when I bring out my mind ninja tactics developed over years of being and thinking like an academic, whose craft is research, whose passion is arguing, and for some of us who are politically inclined, who love the challenge of righting wrongs.
So when this happened I contacted lawyer-friends, talked to the social worker and promptly complained to the head of client services/ombudsperson and made a stink but of a very particular sort: it was packaged in massive tact. I was very deferential (especially since those folks have nothing to do with the mess, they are there to help and are your allies), repeatedly pointed out how the doctor s decision amounts to medical negligence, and made it clear that I was willing to take action, leave my work if need be and get my ass down there, and casually mention how in the 5 hours between their decision and my phone calls, I have already taken action (how I have contacted lawyers on the island, etc).
Needless to say, the hospital decided that my mom is staying put in the hospital and I am relieved. But this solace is only of the tiniest sort. I am still reeling from the absurdity of her condition and her suffering. She is only alive because of a feeding tube that I am opposed to, her state of being a modern day zombie that in reality, or at least from my perspective perpetuates her suffering.
For this reason, truth be told and at one level relieved that her body is finally failing, that there is a chance, a light at the end of this lonely, now horrific tunnel that her life will end sooner than later. This, however, makes it no easier emotionally nor ethically as it is my mother who must journey alone through significant pain and suffering as her body now goes elsewhere a journey we can watch in person yet are powerless in its face.
The story behind it
Recently, I decided to set up a subscription with a VoIP provider, Phonzo, here in Norway. On their webpage, Phonzo advertised a VoIP service which actually gave you the SIP information and allowed the user to connect their own equipment to this service. That s really cool , I thought. I can play with Asterisk on the PSTN now! . They also advertised an offer with rent of a Linksys SPA2102 included, at a very affordable rate.
Now, I suspected that the box might be locked as I d heard they were with some providers so I searched all over their webpage for any hint that it might be. None was to be found and since they included the specific model designation of the adapter rather than mentioning a generic Analogue Telephone Adapter , I basically assumed it wouldn t be crippled.
But when it did arrive (impeccable delivery time, and telephony worked out of the box, btw), I found to my dismay that the box was indeed locked. So I sent a polite email to customer service, saying basically that I know this is a matter mostly interesting to enthusiasts, but they ve advertised an SPA2102 , and what I have receieved is a crippled SPA2102 . They basically replied It says rent , so it belongs to us. I replied Renting does not exempt you from marketing laws; you ve sold me something else than what I paid for . I got the reply: We can t open it, it contains sensitive information and it s not crippled, it s optimized for Phonzo service[sic] (!). Yeah, that s really what they said.
A few more emails back and forth, and nothing of value came forth. When I received a letter from customer service saying Stop your nonsense, we re providing you a service and the adapter is a part of it I realized I wasn t getting anywhere there. I ve sent an email to the address in the SSL certificate (who also seems to be one of the founders) hoping I d get in touch with someone of relevance, but I don t have great hopes. (There s a copy of the correspondance in Norwegian, if you re interested.)
So over to my plan B.
The Linksys SPA2102 has two interfaces for an administrator: The first is the HTTP interface bog-standard, with an admin password. The second is the Interactive Voice Response menu you know the kind, Press 1 for x, 2 for y, . Now, this menu has several different options, including one to enable HTTP access on the WAN port . By default, this option is set to False, and changing it requires an administrator password. But how do you enter an alphanumeric password on a DTMF dialpad? Aha the admin passnumber is derived from the admin password! The mapping is 1=1, [2ABCabc] = 2, [3DEFdef] = 3, , (everything else) = 0. This reduces the keyspace quite dramatically!
So basically, what I ve done is kludged together a shell script which tries the different combinations and sounds them out using a software DTMF tone generator, with earphones serving as acoustic couplers. (For now, I ve skipped numbers containing a 1 . The number 1 only represents itself, and thus its value is quite low.) It then tries port 80 on its WAN IP every 100 attempts to see if a passnumber has succeeded. The shellscript is accessible here: http://simula.gunkies.org/~toresbe/dtmfbruteforce.bash.
The phone adapter has two lines, but the second one is locked by Phonzo however, it is not possible to disable the IVR menu on this thing, so I have full use of the box while this is happening. (It nearly goes without saying that I ve spoofed the DNS so it connects to my Asterisk box. 
)
I m now averaging about one passkey per second. According to my calculations of each passkey representing the number of symbols per digit raised to the power of the number of digits, I am trying 16807 passwords per second and will be trying 117649 passwords per second when I get to six digits. I have a quite technical readership so please do correct me in the comments if I ve made an error in either the calculations or anywhere else. If there are any Phonzo users out there with an SPA2102, I would very much appreciate it if you contacted me brute force works a whole lot better when it s parallelized.
I am currently at #302362. I have not yet been contacted by anyone in the same situation.
This is it. We know the faces of people who will count in Europe during the 2009-2014 period. And we can count on them to make the EU weigh even less than it did until now.
Jos Manuel Dur o Barroso, president of the European Commission. For 5 years, this ultra-liberal brought in his fanatic views of the free market, leading to unprecedented removals of regulations and legislations that could prevent large corporations to extort money from citizens. He holds a non-negligible responsibility on the (still unsolved) bank crisis of 2007. Yet, citizens voted en masse earlier this year for the EPP all across Europe, leading to his renewal. You get the commission you deserve.
Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council. This is no secret that this transparent non-leader was the choice of Sarkozy after Tony Blair turned out to be an unsustainable choice. Yet, none of the 26 other members of the Council dared to raise a single finger against this choice. Sarkozy has completely lost his credit in France, but that doesn t prevent this council of cowards from trusting him, apparently. It s not as if there weren t good candidates, like Jean-Claude Juncker or Vaira V e-Freiberga. But having a competent, Europe-friendly president who actually knows his files and speaks many languages would have cast shadows on those who don t (see below).
Catherine Ashton, foreign ministry of the EU. If there was any worse possible choice, I don t know which. This was the only position supposed to be affected to a socialist. And since the Labour party is still member of the PASD, despite their insane liberal economic policy and their full-scale paranoia leading to unprecedented freedom hunting in the UK, the position was given to someone from this party. And among them, they chose a person with a reputation of sloppiness and incompetence, who doesn t speak correctly a single foreign language. It is probable that, just like Van Rompuy s going to be Sarkozy s puppet, she s going to be the UK Foreign Office s servant. And we continentals all love the Foreign Office s policy, which is often in complete opposition to what the rest of Europe feels like.
Jerzy Buzek, president of the European Parliament. You don t know him? Neither do I. A weak parliament goes with a weak parliament president. This way, the European Council has its hands free for behind-the-curtains arrangements, rather than letting the citizens representatives take action.
Martin Schultz, president of the PASD group at the European Parliament. In order to ensure his place as president of the Parliament for the second half of the period, he betrayed his own people, and accepted any rotten compromise the EPP would propose for the key positions. Socialists have never been so weak in Brussels, and the total absence of leadership has something to do with it.
Makes you proud to be European, heh? And of course you already know the real faces of Europe for the next years.
Sarkozy, Merkel, Berlusconi, Brown. The main leaders from Western Europe, with their rotten governments who swore to slay any of the remaining personal freedoms in each of their countries. What a great image for EU in the world. What a great example to set.
But again, you get the leaders you deserve. That s the whole point of democracy.
It s great to discover this 
I wonder if it's possible to identify link spammers (you know, these bots that
mass-submit a link into as many blogs/etc they can find in order to boost their
page rank) by the simple measure of how many of the links to their site are
marked 'nofollow'.Say, a regular page should have less than 5% (and less than 20) nofollow links;
a site that goes significantly above this value probably employs some spam bot.The only really hard thing is how to avoid attacks on a site using this ...
say, I write a bot that spams links to Microsoft on as many sites as it can
find that DO use 'nofollow', in order to get that site above the limit, and
have google penalize it.So in general I don't think Google would automatically penalize such things,
still it could be used to e.g. have a human check the destination site for
useful content, and then only blacklist when it doesn't seem to be useful.P.S. Which BTW is a reason why some of the SEO "do nots" are bullshit: it would
be too easy to deliberately use these to blacken a competitor. So a 'link farm'
will at most do nothing to raise your ranking; but Google must not allow you to
actually lower a competitors ranking by setting up a link farm to him!)P.P.S. On another side note: Who guarantees that Google actually ignores
"nofollow" links? They could also just be assigned a lower weight or a penalty,
so that a "nofollow" link from a strong site such as Wikipedia would still be
worth a lot, while the average blog comments page link goes down to 0. Say a
"nofollow" link from a PR 6 site is as much worth as a regular link from a PR 4
site, and PR 2 becomes PR 0. Would already do much of the trick in discouraging
the use of blog spam bots. Because after all, ignoring the links on Wikipedia
for page rank would be quite stupid. In German Wikipedia, the page contents are
even "sighted" (aka: peer reviewed); this is a rather trustworthy source,
especially when you take time effects into account. A link being constantly in
Wikipedia on a popular page for more than a month very likely is good.
Este post tambi n est escrito en espa ol 
I am pleased to announce that 
Every now and then
I have a demoralising experience with the quality of Debian packages in sid.
That's to be expected, sid is a development distribution, but it still
sometimes gets on my nerves. I've decided to write about some of my
experiences.
Some rules: I may not rant without
Earlier in the week I was interested in doing some very simple video editing.
A bit of searching and I come across the name of a potentially useful program:
'pitivi'. As luck would have it, there's a Debian package! However, 
Just wanted to share comments on some movies I've watched recently.
