
Another
zero-day announcement of a Software in the Public Interest online meeting
has been posted.
The announcement mentions "one motion has been raised" but
the agenda
doesn't include any motions, so I'm not sure what.
Also, the agenda lists "Debian logo licence" as up for discussion but I thought
last month's meeting
resolved that.
I watch SPI fairly closely and I'm confused.
How about the rest of you?
SPI isn't alone in this: many software organisations seem
to suffer from similar problems. For example, I ranted
in passing about
Free Software Manchester
yesterday, who just posted
the notes from their own zero-day meeting
and I've suggested possible ways of reforming
debian's currently-stalled New Maintainer process
more than once.
Are free software users particularly bad at the basics
of running an interest society (like welcoming and
expiring members, calling meetings, publishing routine
communications, and so on), have I been spoiled
by cooperatives with
their friendly Member Services departments or secretariats,
or what?
Is this why so many free software orgs seem to include
self-perpetuating leadership groups?
Is this a serious problem if, as reported,
Software Development is a Team Sport [etbe]?
Are there fully-working free software mass participation
groups out there?
I feel a lot of these problems are caused by attempting
to order our inherently entropy-filled world completely
and insisting everything follows petty rules, such as refusing
to answer a question because the "wrong" member asked it.
The world will not become less random just because hackers
try to impose arbitrary rules. Sometimes it's good to
put down minimum standards (because calling zero-day meetings
is a mostly-avoidable way of excluding some members) but it
will always be a poor alternative to
trying to do the best you can for others.
How do we get past this? My
pro-cooperation-and-better-business platform for SPI board
went pretty badly and I've had some anti-cooperative flames
back from someone starting another free software group
this month, so I don't think I can fix these existing
organisations any time soon. About 1 in 6 people in the UK
are members of a cooperative, so even if that is reflected
among hackers (and I think it's lower), all of them
would not be enough to reform much.
One of the most common memes in free software is "show us
the code" and the few other free software cooperatives I've
seen have mostly failed, with a few surviving but hitting a size limit.
As a result, I'm currently negotiating the start of a new
free software cooperative. So far, I'm really happy
with how that's going. Many cooperators learn at the feet of
large consumer cooperatives like
the Cooperative Group
who run training courses for new members about putting
cooperative values and principles
into practice,
which we smaller groups couldn't run ourselves.
As a result, most cooperators already know how to work
well together.
Should large software societies like SPI try commissioning
similar courses?