John Goerzen: Moral obligations of Free Software authors?
I ve got a bit of a problem.
I enjoy writing software. I often write software to solve some sort of problem that I ve had. Usually virtually any code I write winds up in my git repositories, on the theory that it might be useful to someone else. Some of the code that I think might really be useful to people gets even better treatment. OfflineIMAP, for instance, has a very comprehensive manpage, heavily commented example config file, wiki, mailing list, public bug tracker, etc. Most of these I did the majority of the work to create, but OfflineIMAP does occasionally receive code and documentation contributions from others.
Now here s my dilemma. For my purposes, OfflineIMAP is, well, finished. It does everything I ever wanted it to do, and does it better than I ever expected it would. There are some people that would like it to do other things; for instance, optimize performance for IMAP folders with 100,000 messages in them, do UTF-8 folder name translation, and retry a sync if a connection is lost rather than crash (OfflineIMAP was designed to crash gracefully and be automated, so this has never bothered me.)
None of these are features that I care about, and I don t have much time to devote to OfflineIMAP these days. It is not an interesting problem to me anymore as, well, I ve solved it already.
Yet I ll be honest and say I feel guilty about the bug reports that are stacking up in the OfflineIMAP bug tracking system. OfflineIMAP is used by people that have an expectation for improvement. My efforts to hand over maintainership of OfflineIMAP have failed (the people have gone AWOL shortly after agreeing to maintain it).
This problem is even more acute for hpodder, my command-line podcatcher. hpodder works great and is simple. But I no longer listen to podcasts. At all. (I blame my Kindle for that.) Therefore I no longer even use hpodder. Again, I feel guilty for not working on it; for instance, when language changes broke its UTF-8 support, I haven t gone in to fix it. Neither has anybody else, for that matter.
This leads me to a dilemma. If I do nothing with my code but toss it on git.complete.org, few people will benefit from it. Most people need documentation, packages for their distribution, etc. git repos don t tend to show up highly in search engines. So, although technically I ve shared things with the world by putting them there, practically speaking I haven t done people many favors.
On the other hand, if I go the whole responsible maintainer route, writing documentation, wiki, mailing list, Debian packages, etc., then I have the problem of, well, actual users who want actual support. I feel bad if I m not in a position to give it to them. Many people seem to have the expectation that software is never finished and will continue to be improved. (Ah, if only my name were Knuth I might stand a chance to evade that one. But only a chance, given all the TeX spinoffs.) This expectation, in turn, reduces my enthusiasm for publishing my code online as Free Software. Because now I can t just toss it up there and say help yourselves . Now I get angry emails about all the bug reports piling up. On the other hand, I also get occasional small contributions via my PayPal tip jar , which are awesome and motivating.
Despite my grumbling, I do continue to maintain OfflineIMAP, primarily as a patch reviewer these days. I take an aggressive stance on quality, and when I get patches that add features without documentation, I usually write documentation for them before committing them. If I have evidence that a patch hurts quality, I yank it (as I had to do with IDLE support, which was a great feature, but the patch caused all sorts of stability problems due to its requirement of imaplib2.py). For that reason, I suspect, forks haven t taken off.
So what s a person that writes niche software to do? OfflineIMAP isn t at the level of popularity of something like Gnome, or even debhelper, and never will be; its userbase consists of people that think that IMAP support in $MUA isn t good enough. hpodder is the somewhat small domain of console-loving podcast listeners.
What are your suggestions? Should I abolish the bug trackers and just go for simple? Is there something more I could be doing to make the community feel more empowered? Is simple posting on git.complete.org not as bad as I thought?
That was a pretty good weekend. I set up someone s new Samsung N150 netbook with 
PS 3 shameless plug! The
mythical
Monday saw us at the 34 week mark. Yesterday was the point in Sarah's first
pregnancy that we lost Joshua. So we're in scary uncharted territory now.
Sarah's OB has said that he doesn't want her to go past 39 weeks, given prior
history, and he won't induce because of her heart (and they don't induce for
a VBAC anyway), so if we want a
The DPL vote is over. I did not win, apparently. Let me start off by
thanking the other candidates for running, and congratulating Stefano
for winning.
My own results aren't too bad; I beat 'none of the above' by a
comfortable margin of almost 10 to 1, and ended up defeating
Charles Plessy by a slightly smaller margin. My margin to NOTA was far
better than during the previous DPL election that I participated in,
though I did end up defeating more than half of the other candidates
back then, which I didn't this time around. All in all, not enough to
win, but enough to conclude that I might have a chance some other time.
Margarita and Stefano were just better candidates this time around.
My own vote was:
For those of you who don t know, I occasionally write for
It s no surprise that information visualization and related fields have been active research topics in the past decade. The widespread availability of large, valuable data sets has created a need for improved tools and techniques for making sense of it. This is highly technical work, requiring expertise in design, mathematics, software and other fields, and there is a vibrant community of professionals and amateurs who experiment and critique the latest methods. In the geeky blogs that I follow, I see more and more amateur interest in visualization.
Visualization is starting to take on political significance as well, as evidenced by the appointment of information design pioneer
My blog is written in English, even though I sometimes post content relevant locally. Anyway, I want this to be as widely known as possible. We are about to launch a website/community for my University's cyclists,
Only for running junkies: 