Search Results: "tar"

5 December 2014

Iustin Pop: Jump!

Jump!!! What Why At the end of November, we had a team offsite planned, with lots of fun and exciting activities in a somewhat exotic location. I was quite looking forward to it, when - less than two weeks before the event - a colleague asked if anyone is interested in going skydiving as an extra activity. Without thinking too much, I said "yes" immediately, because: a) I've never done it before, and b) it sounded really cool! Other people said yes as well, so we were set up to have a really good time! Of course, as the time counted down and we were approaching the offsite, I was thinking: OK, this sounds cool, but: will I be fine? do I have altitude sickness? All kinds of such, rather logistical, questions. In order to not think too much, I did exactly zero research on the topic (all mentions of Wikipedia above are from post-fact reading). So, we went on the offsite - which was itself cool - and then, on the last day, right before going back, the skydive event! How it went The weather on the day of the jump was nice, the sky not perfectly clear, just a bit of small clouds and some haze. We waited for our turn, got the instruction for what to do (and not to do!), got hooked into the harness, prepared everything, and then boarded the plane; it needed only a very short run before taking off the ground. It took around ten minutes or so to get to the jump altitude, which I spent partially looking forward to it, partially trying to calm the various emotions I had - a very interesting mix. It was actually annoying just having to wait and wait the ten long minutes, I wished that we actually get to the jumping altitude faster. The altimeter on the instructor's hand was showing 4'000, then 4'100, 4'150, then he reminded me again what I need to do (or rather, not to do), and then - people were already jumping from the plane! I was third from our team to jump, and I had the opportunity to see how people were not simply "exiting" the plane, but rather - exiting and then immediately disappearing from view! Finally we were on the edge of the door, a push and then - I'm looking down, more than two and a half miles of nothing between me and the ground. Just air and the thought - "Why did I do this"? - as I start falling. For the first around ten seconds, it's actually a free fall, gaining speed almost at standard acceleration, and the result - Weightlessness - it's the weirdest feeling ever: all your organs floating in your body, no compression or torsion forces. Much more weird a roller-coaster that never ends; then most I had on roller-coasters was around one second of such acceleration, and you still are in contact with the chair or the restraints, whereas this long fall was very confusing for my brain - it felt somewhat like when you're tripping and you need to do something to regain balance, except in sky-diving you can't do anything, of course. There's nothing to grab, nothing to hold on, and you keep falling. After ten long seconds we reached terminal velocity, phase 1 ends, and phase 2 begins, in which - while still falling - the friction with the air compensates exactly the earth's pull and one is falling at a constant speed and it's the most wonderful state ever. Like floating on the air, except that you're actually falling at almost 200kph, and yes, the closest feeling to flying, I guess. It doesn't hurt that you're no longer weightless, which means back to some level of normality. The location of the skydive was very beautiful: the blue ocean beneath, the blue sky above, somewhere to the side the beach, and the air filling the mouth and lungs without any effort is the only sign that I'm moving really fast. The way this whole thing feels is very alien if you never jumped before, but one gets accustomed to it quite fast - and that means I got too comfortable and excited and forgot the correct position to keep my legs in, the instructor reminded me, and as I put my legs back in the correct position, which is (among others) with the soles of the feet pointing up, I felt again the air going strongly into my shoes, and a thought crossed my mind: what if I the air blows off one of my shoes (the right one, more precisely) and I lose it? How do I get to the airport for the trip back? Will I look suspicious at the security check? The banality of this thought, given that I was still up in the air somewhere and travelling quite fast, was so comical that I started laughing And then, an unexpected noise, the chute opens, and I feel like someone is pulling me strongly up. Of course nobody is pulling "up", I'm just slowing down very fast on this final phase (Wikipedia says: 3 to 4g). And then, once at the new terminal velocity, the lack of wind noise and the quietness of everything around gives a different kind of awesome - more majestic and serene this time, rather than the adrenaline-filled moments before. Because one is still up and the beach looks small, you actually feel that you're suspended in the air, almost frozen. Of course, that feeling goes away quickly when the instructor start telling me to pull the strings, and we enter a fast spin - so fast that my body is almost horizontal again - a reminder that we're still in the air, going somewhat fast, and not in "normal" conditions. I'm again reminded of the speed once we get closer to the earth, the people on the beach start to get bigger fast, and now we're gliding over the beach and finally land in the sand. The adventure is over, but I'm still pumped up and my body is still full of adrenaline, and I feel like you've just been in heaven - which is true, for some definitions of . The first thing I realise is that the earth is very solid. And not moving at all. Everything is very very slow which is both good and bad. My body is confused at the very fast sequence of events, and why did everything stop?? Conclusion I learned all about the terminal velocity, how fast you get there, and so on a day later, from Wikipedia and other sources. It helped explain and clarify the things I experienced during the dive, because there in the air I was quite confused (and my body even more so). Knowing this in advance would have spoiled the surprise, but on the other hand would have allowed me to enjoy the experience slightly better. Looking back, I can say a few of things. First, it was really awesome - not what I was expecting, much more awesome (in the real sense of awe) than I thought, but also not as easy or trivial as I believed from just seeing videos of people "floating" during their dive. Yep, worth doing, and hard to actually put in words (I tried to, but I think this rambling is more confusing than helping). Phase one was too long (and a bit scary), phase two was too short (and the best thing), phase three was relaxing (and just the right length). I also wonder how it is to jump alone - without the complicated and heavy harness, without an instructor, just you up there. Oh, and the parachute. And the reserve parachute , of course. Point is, this was awesome, but I was mostly a passive spectator, so I wonder what it feels like to be actually in control (as much as one can be, falling down) and responsible. And finally, as we left the offsite location just a couple of hours after the skydive, and we had a 4 hours flight back, I couldn't believe myself how slow everything was. I never experienced quite such a thing, I was sitting in this normal airplane flying high and fast, but for me everything was going in slow motion and I was bored out of my mind. Adrenaline aftershock or something like that? Also interesting!

Enrico Zini: the-smell-of-email

The smell of email This was written in response to a message with a list of demotivating behaviours in email interactions, like fingerpointing, aggressiveness, resistance when being called out for misbehaving, public humiliation for mistakes, and so on There are times when I stumble on an instance of the set of things that were mentioned, and I think "ok, today I feel like doing some paid work rather than working on Debian". If another day I wake up deciding to enjoy working on Debian, which I greatly do, I try and make sure that I can focus on bits of Debian where I don't stumble on any instances of the set of things that were mentioned. Then I stumble on Gregor's GDAC and I feel like I'd happily lose one day of pay right now, and have fun with Debian. I feel like Debian is this big open kitchen populated by a lot of people: I have fun cooking and tring out the food. I have fun being around people who cook and try out the food. The fun in the kitchen seems to be correlated to several things, one of which is that it seems to be inversely proportional to the stink. I find this metaphore interesting, and I will start thinking about the smell of a mailing list post. I expect it should put posts into perspective, I expect I will develop an instinct for it, so that I won't give a stinky post the same importance of a post that smells of food. I also expect that the more I learn to tell the smell of food from the smell of shit, the more I can help cleaning it, and the more I can help telling people who repeatedly contribute to the stink to please try cooking instead, or failing that, just try and stay out of the kitchen.

Michael Meskes: Conferences in Q4

Together with members of almost all credativ offices world-wide I travelled to Madrid in October to attend PGConf Europe, the most important European PostgreSQL event. The conference, as usual, was greatly organized and had a lot of interesting presentations and thus, was rightfully sold-out. It again brought together a lot of the PostgreSQL community. My non-technical presentation about whether Open Source is a blessing or a curse attracted a sizeable audience despite starting early. Also we got into a good discussion about some of the points raised which again showed that Open Source in general and PostgreSQL in particular are more and more considered because of their strategic importance.Then in November I was invited to do a presentation at Open Source India Days 2014 in Bangalore or as it nowadays is called again Bengaluru. I was able to conveniently combine the trip to the conference with a scheduled visit to our office there.The conference was a very pleasant surprise. Despite being called the largest Open-Source conference in Asia I never made it there before. And, frankly, I was impressed about the size. Maybe not so surprisingly the conference was dominated by presentations about cloud solutions and technology.I, however, talked about the importance of community for businesses in particular pointing to Debian and PostgreSQL as very successful community projects. And again a large audience listened ini showing again the interest in strategic aspects of Open Source. Due to time constraints we weren't able to do a discussion during the presentation, or even allow questions/answers at the end, but a lot of people caught me afterwards to discuss points or make valuable remarks.Both events are very worthy entries for next year's schedule.

Russell Coker: BTRFS Status Dec 2014

My last problem with BTRFS was in August [1]. BTRFS has been running mostly uneventfully for me for the last 4 months, that s a good improvement but the fact that 4 months of no problems is noteworthy for something as important as a filesystem is a cause for ongoing concern. A RAID-1 Array A week ago I had a minor problem with my home file server, one of the 3TB disks in the BTRFS RAID-1 started giving read errors. That s not a big deal, I bought a new disk and did a btrfs replace operation which was quick and easy. The first annoyance was that the output of btrfs device stats reported an error count for the new device, it seems that btrfs device replace copies everything from the old disk including the error count. The solution is to use btrfs device stats -z to reset the count after replacing a device. I replaced the 3TB disk with a 4TB disk (with current prices it doesn t make sense to buy a new 3TB disk). As I was running low on disk space I added a 1TB disk to give it 4TB of RAID-1 capacity, one of the nice features of BTRFS is that a RAID-1 filesystem can support any combination of disks and use them to store 2 copies of every block of data. I started running a btrfs balance to get BTRFS to try and use all the space before learning from the mailing list that I should have done btrfs filesystem resize to make it use all the space. So my balance operation had configured the filesystem to configure itself for 2*3TB+1*1TB disks which wasn t the right configuration when the 4TB disk was fully used. To make it even more annoying the btrfs filesystem resize command takes a devid not a device name. I think that when BTRFS is more stable it would be good to have the btrfs utility warn the user about such potential mistakes. When a replacement device is larger than the old one it will be very common to want to use that space. The btrfs utility could easily suggest the most likely btrfs filesystem resize to make things easier for the user. In a disturbing coincidence a few days after replacing the first 3TB disk the other 3TB disk started giving read errors. So I replaced the second 3TB disk with a 4TB disk and removed the 1TB disk to give a 4TB RAID-1 array. This is when it would be handy to have the metadata duplication feature and copies= option of ZFS. Ctree Corruption 2 weeks ago a basic workstation with a 120G SSD owned by a relative stopped booting, the most significant errors it gave were BTRFS: log replay required on RO media and BTRFS: open_ctree failed . The solution to this is to run the command btrfs-zero-log , but that initially didn t work. I restored the system from a backup (which was 2 months old) and took the SSD home to work on it. A day later btrfs-zero-log worked correctly and I recovered all the data. Note that I didn t even try mounting the filesystem in question read-write, I mounted it read-only to copy all the data off. While in theory the filesystem should have been OK I didn t have a need to keep using it at that time (having already wiped the original device and restored from backup) and I don t have confidence in BTRFS working correctly in that situation. While it was nice to get all the data back it s a concern when commands don t operate consistently. Debian and BTRFS I was concerned when the Debian kernel team chose 3.16 as the kernel for Jessie (the next Debian release). Judging by the way development has been going I wasn t confident that 3.16 would turn out to be stable enough for BTRFS. But 3.16 is working reasonably well on a number of systems so it seems that it s likely to work well in practice. But I m still deploying more ZFS servers. The Value of Anecdotal Evidence When evaluating software based on reports from reliable sources (IE most readers will trust me to run systems well and only report genuine bugs) bad reports have a much higher weight than good reports. The fact that I ve seen kernel 3.16 to work reasonably well on ~6 systems is nice but that doesn t mean it will work well on thousands of other systems although it does indicate that it will work well on more systems than some earlier Linux kernels which had common BTRFS failures. But the annoyances I had with the 3TB array are repeatable and will annoy many other people. The ctree coruption problem MIGHT have been initially caused by a memory error (it s a desktop machine without ECC RAM) but the recovery process was problematic and other users might expect problems in such situations.

4 December 2014

MJ Ray: Autumn Statement #AS2014, the Google tax and how it relates to Free Software

One of the attention-grabbing measures in the Autumn Statement by Chancellor George Osborne was the google tax on profits going offshore, which may prove unworkable (The Independent). This is interesting because a common mechanism for moving the profits around is so-called transfer pricing, where the business in one country pays an inflated price to its sibling in another country for some supplies. It sounds like the intended way to deal with that is by inspecting company accounts and assessing the underlying profits. So what s this got to do with Free Software? Well, one thing the company might buy from itself is a licence to use some branding, paying a fee for reachuse. The main reason this is possible is because copyright is usually a monopoly, so there is no supplier of a replacement product, which makes it hard to assess how much the price has been inflated. One possible method of assessing the overpayment would be to compare with how much other businesses pay for their branding licences. It would be interesting if Revenue and Customs decide that there s lots of Royalty Free licensing out there including Free Software and so all licence fees paid to related companies are a tax avoidance ruse. Similarly, any premium for a particular self-branded product over a generic equivalent could be classed as profit transfer. This could have amusing implications for proprietary software producers who sell to sister companies but I doubt that the government will be that radical, so we ll continue to see absurdities like Starbucks buying all their coffee from famous coffee producing countries Switzerland and the Netherlands. Shouldn t this be stopped, really?

3 December 2014

Diego Escalante Urrelo: Link pack #01

Following the lead of my dear friend Daniel and his fantastic and addictive Summing up series, here s a link pack of recent stuff I read around the web. Link pack is definitely a terrible name, but I m working on it.
How to Silence Negative Thinking
On how to avoid the pitfall of being a Negatron and not an Optimist Prime. You might be your own worst enemy and you might not even know it:
Psychologists use the term automatic negative thoughts to describe the ideas that pop into our heads uninvited, like burglars, and leave behind a mess of uncomfortable emotions. In the 1960s, one of the founders of cognitive therapy, Aaron Beck, concluded that ANTs sabotage our best self, and lead to a vicious circle of misery: creating a general mindset that is variously unhappy or anxious or angry (take your pick) and which is (therefore) all the more likely to generate new ANTs. We get stuck in the same old neural pathways, having the same negative thoughts again and again.
Meet Harlem s Official Street Photographer
A man goes around Harlem with his camera, looking to give instead of taking. Makes you think about your approach to people and photography, things can be simpler. Kinda like Humans of New York, but in Harlem. And grittier, and on film but as touching, or more:
I tell people that my camera is a healing mechanism, Allah says. Let me photograph it and take it away from you.
What Happens When We Let Industry and Government Collect All the Data They Want
Why having nothing to hide is not about the now, but about the later. It s not that someone is going to judge for pushing every detail of your life to Twitter and Instagram, it s just that something you do might be illegal a few years later:
There was a time when it was essentially illegal to be gay. There was a time when it was legal to own people and illegal for them to run away. Sometimes, society gets it wrong. And it s not just nameless bureaucrats; it s men like Thomas Jefferson. When that happens, strong privacy protections including collection controls that let people pick who gets their data, and when allow the persecuted and unpopular to survive.
The Sex-Abuse Scandal Plaguing USA Swimming
Abusive coaches and a bullying culture in sports training are the perfect storm for damaging children. And it s amazing the extent to which a corporation or institution is willing to look the other way, as long as they save face. Very long piece, but intriguing to read. What Cities Would Look Like if Lit Only by the Stars
Thierry Cohen goes around the world and builds beautiful and realistic composite images of how would big cities look like if lit only by stars. The original page has some more cities: Villes teintes (Darkened Cities). On Muppets & Merchandise: How Jim Henson Turned His Art into a Business
Lessons from how Jim Henson managed to juggle both art and business without selling out for the wrong reasons. Really interesting, and reminds you to put Henson in perspective as a very smart man who managed to convince everyone to give him money for playing with muppets. The linked video on How the Muppet Show is Made is also cool. Made me curious enough to get the book. Barbie, Remixed: I (really!) can be a computer engineer
Mattel launched the most misguided book about empowering Barbie to be anything but a computer engineer in a book about being a computer engineer. The internet did not disappoint and fixed the problem within hours. There s now even an app for that (includes user submitted pages).

Craig Small: WordPress 4.0.1 fixes for Debian stable

Previously I posted a short article about the WordPress package for Debian and how that SID was getting the updated WordPress 4.0.1 which had some security fixes. The question a lot of people were asking was: What about stable (or Wheezy). After way too much time due to other pressing issues, I have just uploaded the patched WordPress debian package for stable. The fixed version has the catchy number of 3.6.1~deb7u5. This package has all of the relevant patches that went in from WordPress 3.7.4 to 3.7.5 and there are even CVE IDs for this package (and 4.0.1 which all this stems from). Stolen from the 3.6.1 changelog, these are the fixes: I d like to thank the Debian security team especially Salvatore for their assistance and checking the package looked ok. Backporting and Git Part of the delay in getting the wordpress stable package out is that backporting is fiddly. I m currently using pdebuild with a custom pbuilderrc file that points to wheezy. Getting things to that point took a lot of trial and error; with one of the errors being that the pbuilder puts the files in a result directory, not the parent. This also means that the wheezy backports are out of the git repository. I see that there is a git-pbuild but to me it looks like yet another workflow which will slow me right down. Anyone got some good and simple suggestions on having a wheezy track (branch?) and requiring backporting that doesn t get complicated or broken quick? sbuild died in a wave of permission denieds within the chroot.

2 December 2014

Daniel Leidert: WISO Steuer-Sparbuch unter Debian Linux

Ich bin begeistert, denn meine USB-Stick Installation vom WISO Steuer-Sparbuch l sst sich ganz einfach unter Debian Linux mit Wine nutzen:
wine32 /media/pfad/mein/stick/WISO/Steuersoftware\ 2014/usbstart.exe
Es gab berhaupt keine Probleme w hrend der mehrst ndigen Arbeit!! Die Update-Funktion werde ich bei Gelegenheit noch testen, genauso wie die Installation auf den USB-Stick unter Wine. F r letzteres hatte ich noch auf Windows zur ckgegriffen. Genial :)

Sven Hoexter: Out of the comfort zone: Backporting net-snmp from CentOS 7 to CentOS 5 and 6

Lately I faced the requirement to create a backport of net-snmp 5.7.2, which is part of CentOS 7, to a largely CentOS 5 and 6 based infrastructure. Due to some prior adventures in the rpm world I already knew about Mock (the Fedora equivalent to pbuilder). The easy part was the backporting to CentOS 6. Here the major objectiv is ripping out the newly added systemd support. That boils down to just ripping out a patch, removing a configure flag, some %post, %preun, %postun script snippets and the corresponding %install magic from the spec file. Builds fine but leaves us with the issue that the init script ships in a package net-snmp-sysvinit but the whole chkconfig registration magic is gone. I put that aside for a moment and moved on to CentOS 5. It did not even start to build.
  1. There is no tcp_wrappers-devel in CentOS 5.
  2. The perl libraries are in the main perl package and not in perl-devel.
  3. lm_sensors-devel is not at version 3.
I lowered the versioned build-dep on lm_sensors, disabled via a spec file toggle the tcp-wrapper support and changed the perl build-dep. This time it failed in the configure script due to DTLS support issues with the ancient openssl in CentOS 5. Decided to drop that one as well from the list of configure flags since we do not use it. Tried to build it again, now it failed somewhere down the road post compilation when assembling the package. Not cool. At that time we pushed a few other ideas back and forth. We found an isolated patch for net-snmp 5.6 that could fix our most pressing issue and someone had a look if that could be backported to CentOS 5 easily. Nope, internal structure of net-snmp changed a lot in between. So back to backporting. After staring long enough at the build log I could understand that the variable % RPM_BUILD_ROOT is empty in the CentOS 5 world. And indeed the BuildRoot stanza is also gone from the spec file. So I reintroduced that one and later even found documentation in the Fedora Wiki about this issue. If you know it it's easy to work around it, so I just defined it by hand:
BuildRoot: % _tmppath /% name -% version -% release -root
%global RPM_BUILD_ROOT % buildroot 
About ten minutes later I had a set of rpm files for CentOS 5. Tried to install it, failed due to a depedency on libmysqlclient15 which is part of the mysql package in CentOS 5. Yes, eight years back RedHat did not split off the lib packages and that would mean for us to install a mysql database on every system. So no, we won't do it and we just removed the mysql support. Left with only the init script setup missing I tried to be clever and failed miserable. Be warned, this would've also been a bad idea in the Debian world. Since we have the init script in a seperate binary package I thought I could just use something like
Requires: net-snmp-sysvinit
in the main net-snmp package and re-add the old %post, %preun and %postun magic. Of course that failed at install time for a good reason. In the second (desperate) try to work around it I tried something similar to "PreDepends"
Requires(post): net-snmp-sysvinit 
That works at install time but still breaks on a removal/update. So I think I did the right thing in the end (after reading some more documentation) and just added the scripts to the net-snmp-sysvinit package. It's just about adding the package name to the %post macro invocation. My initial plan included the wish to have one spec file that is usable to build on CentOS 5 and 6 but now I'm left with a number of special cases for CentOS 5. I already knew about the %if %endif conditional macro you can use in rpm spec files, so what was missing was a proper variable to base my decisions on. Every CentOS release ships with a "/etc/rpm/" directory that includes several macro file. Within those one can find the % rhel variable that defines an int we can use.
%if % rhel  <= 5
BuildRequires: perl
%else
BuildRequires: perl-devel
%endif
And finally I could build from one spec file a backport for CentOS 5 and 6. My diff against the CentOS 7 spec is at https://sven.stormbind.net/centos/netsnmp-bp-el56/net-snmp-backport.from_el7.diff Drawbacks of the resulting packages:
  1. No tcp-wrapper support, we don't care but that should be just another package name issue for the conditional Requires, simililar to the perl isssue.
  2. No mysql support. We do not care, one could change that and/or make it conditional or build against newer mysql releases where the -lib package is split.
  3. No DTLS support on CentOS 5. We do not care and that is not easy to fix.
  4. You've to install the net-snmp-sysvinit script to get back the usual setup you'd expect.
  5. We ripped out the systemd support, I did not investigate yet if it's possible to keep that included and just not enable it.
By now CentOS 5 is old. It's painful to backport to it. But it's still possible. Another strategy someone tried was packaging the current net-snmp upstream release based on the CentOS 5 spec file. That would've meant throwing away all 106 patches RedHat includes in that package at the moment and to depend on new upstream releases for your own security support. In case we start using CentOS 7 we would also diverge on the version of snmpd we use. So we decided to stick with the RedHat sources and keep the version consistent on our infrastructure even if we can not keep feature parity. After all the issues one encounters while backporting packages in the rpm world are similar to those in the dpkg world. Still it feels different if you're not familar with the toolchain. For example
  1. If you build a src.rpm with mock you've to copy it out of the result directory before you rebuild it with mock to create the binary package. Mock deletes everything from the result directory when starting a new build. So I guess parallel builds for the same chroot will not work.
  2. Depedencies on files instead of packages are a strange thing.
  3. How on earth do you maintain a patchset of over a hundred patches without something like quilt? I guess you always have to apply them in a for loop on your source directory and then you create a copy of that to implement your modifications and create another patch. I'm pretty sure eight years ago Fedora was far away from using git so I would rule out patch branches in a VCS for the moment. Not sure what they invented inside RedHat to keep track of it.

Rapha&#235;l Hertzog: My Free Software Activities in November 2014

My monthly report covers a large part of what I have been doing in the free software world. I write it for my donators (thanks to them!) but also for the wider Debian community because it can give ideas to newcomers and it s one of the best ways to find volunteers to work with me on projects that matter to me. Debian LTS This month I have been paid to work 18 hours on Debian LTS (14h allocated by Freexian + 4h I did not spend last month). I did the following tasks: Updating the linux source package took a good half of the allocated time. We opted to update the kernel to the upstream version 2.6.32.64. I integrated the upstream patches and identified about 130 patches that we had to disable (because they were already integrated upstream). Then I updated our openvz flavor patch to apply on top of the new kernel. This required quite a bit of manual conflict resolution and there are even parts where I was not sure that I took the correct decision. I was not able to find an upstream openvz git tree on this kernel version to to double check. Instead I asked Ben Hutchings to review my patch. He told me that he did not volunteer to work on LTS, but that he would be open to contribute to it for money. Following this remark, as the coordinator of Freexian s offer, I offered him to join to the set of paid LTS contributors to take care of the kernel and he accepted. So hopefully we will be able to wrap this linux upload in the first week of december. We had no uploads of the kernel in Squeeze since July so it s good to know that we now have someone who will be able to handle it in priority. Distro Tracker No new developments this month. Instead I spent some time to import old historic news so that when you lookup removed packages you have some actual content instead of a 404 error. For example you can look at python2.1. Another thing that I did is to tag some bugs with the newly-announced tag newcomer . Those are easy bugs that are ideal targets for new contributors who d like to get started: here s the list. It s up to you now! ;-) DEP-14: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories I have drafted an initial version of a document called Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories and submitted it for discussion on debian-devel. The discussion has been interesting and constructive (yes this is still possible in Debian!). I have a bunch of improvements in my local copy and needs to process a few more feedback before submitting an updated draft. It s not a revolution but it s a good step to try to standardize tags and branches naming conventions. Systemd, the tech-ctte and our mailing lists As an old-timer, I care a lot about the governance of Debian and it s annoying to see how the systemd debate brought back some of our old daemons in terms of hostile atmosphere on our mailing lists. We can disagree on a lot of things, but we must respect each other and we are here to work together on solutions for everybody. As such I wrote to the persons who cross the line to invite them to behave better. And I m glad that our listmasters are backing up our calls with bans when appropriate. I believe we must go further in that direction and I shared an idea (on a debian-private thread that should have never existed, much like most of the traffic on that list) that I shall formalize and share on debian-project@l.d.o at some point. At the same time, we also had another governance-related discussion with the idea to impose some turnover in the technical committee. I m glad to see that we will soon vote on this topic. This is a good thing in general even though we just had 3 tech-ctte members who retired. Misc stuff I sponsored an upload of galette and of 3 of its plugins. I reviewed jitsi-videobridge and jitsi-meet on mentors.debian.net. I filed a few bugs: Thanks See you next month for a new summary of my activities.

No comment Liked this article? Click here. My blog is Flattr-enabled.

Matthias Klumpp: How to build a cross-distro package with Limba

Disclaimer: Limba is stilllimba-small in a very early stage of development. Bugs happen, and I give to guarantees on API stability yet. Limba is a very simple cross-distro package installer, utilizing OverlayFS found in recent Linux kernels (>= 3.18). As example I created a small Limba package for one of the Qt5 demo applications, and I would like to share the process of creating Limba packages it s quite simple, and I could use some feedback on how well the resulting packages work on multiple distributions. I assume that you have compiled Limba and installed it how that is done is described in its README file. So, let s start. 1. Prepare your application The cool thing about Limba is that you don t really have to do many changes on your application. There are a few things to pay attention to, though: This needs to be done so your application will find its data at runtime. Additionally, you need to write an AppStream metadata file, and find out which stuff your application depends on. 2. Create package metadata & install software 1.1 Basics Now you can create the metadata necessary to build a Limba package. Just run
cd /path/to/my/project
lipkgen make-template
This will create a pkginstall directory, containing a control file and a metainfo.xml file, which can be a symlink to the AppStream metadata, or be new metadata. Now, configure your application with /opt/bundle as install prefix (-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/bundle, prefix=/opt/bundle, etc.) and install it to the pkginstall/inst_target directory. 1.2 Handling dependencies If your software has dependencies on other packages, just get the Limba packages for these dependencies, or build new ones. Then place the resulting IPK packages in the pkginstall/repo directory. Ideally, you should be able to fetch Limba packages which contain the software components directly from their upstream developers. Then, open the pkginstall/control file and adjust the Requires line. The names of the components you depend on match their AppStream-IDs (<id/> tag in the AppStream XML document). Any version-relation (>=, >>, <<, <=, <>) is supported, and specified in brackets after the component-id. The resulting control-file might look like this:
Format-Version: 1.0

Requires: Qt5Core (>= 5.3), Qt5DBus (>= 5.3), libpng12
If the specified dependencies are in the repo/ subdirectory, these packages will get installed automatically, if your application package is installed. Otherwise, Limba depends on the user to install these packages manually there is no interaction with the distribution s package-manager (yet?). 3. Building the package In order to build your package, make sure the content in inst_target/ is up to date, then run
lipkgen build pkginstall/
This will build your package and output it in the pkginstall/ directory. 4. Testing the package You can now test your package, Just run
sudo lipa install package.ipk
Your software should install successfully. If you provided a .desktop file in $prefix/share/applications, you should find your application in your desktop s application-menu. Otherwise, you can run a binary from the command-line, just append the version of your package to the binary name (bash-comletion helps). Alternatively, you can use the runapp command, which lets you run any binary in your bundle/package, which is quite helpful for debugging (since the environment a Limba-installed application is run is different from the one of other applications). Example:
runapp $ component_id -$ version :/bin/binary-name
And that s it! :-) I used these steps to create a Limba package for the OpenGL Qt5 demo on Tanglu 2 (Bartholomea), and tested it on Kubuntu 15.04 (Vivid) with KDE, as well as on an up-to-date Fedora 21, with GNOME and without any Qt or KDE stuff installed: qt5demo-limba-kubuntuqt5demo-limba-fedora I encountered a few obstacles when building the packages, e.g. Qt5 initially didn t find the right QPA plugin that has been fixed by adjusting a config file in the Qt5Gui package. Also, on Fedora, a matching libpng was missing, so I included that as well. You can find the packages at Github, currently (but I am planning to move them to a different place soon). The biggest issue with Limba is at time, that it needs Linux 3.18, or an older kernel with OverlayFS support compiled in. Apart from that and a few bugs, the experience is quite smooth. As soon as I am sure there are now hidden fundamental issues, I can think of implementing more features, like signing packages and automatically updating them. Have fun playing around with Limba!

Martin-&#201;ric Racine: GNOME is destroying the whole GTK universe

When GNOME 3.14 components were uploaded into Debian (just a few days before the Jessie freeze started), GNOME stopped working on two video platforms: Geode (xf86-video-geode) and NVIDIA (xf86-video-nouveau). On Geode, GDM launches into a black screen. On NVIDIA, GDM launches as expected, but then the GNOME session itself barfs with the dreaded "Oh No! Something went wrong. [Logout]" dialog during session initialization. Basically, components in GNOME have become too tightly dependent upon some video driver features. Thinking out loud, I figured that reverting to a desktop environment that is based upon GTK+3, without GNOME's bells and whistles, would at least restore operation on my NVDIA hosts. Alas, it does not: Cinnamon, too, barfs during session initialization. Great. Now what?

1 December 2014

Gregor Herrmann: GDAC 2014/1

this morning I received no less than two private "thank you" mails from fellow debian contributors. thanks guys, this made a good start into the week!
this posting is part of GDAC (gregoa's debian advent calendar), a project to show the bright side of debian & why it's fun for me to contribute.

Iustin Pop: SSD adventures

SSD adventures and fun times! TL;DR: Oh boy. Things work now, but I'm not sure exactly what happened :( When it all worked fine almost In June, I bought a new laptop, and a new SSD for it. I used that model of SSD before (Samsung 840 Evo), although not for a long time, so I wasn't expecting anything unusual. Since the laptop is a slower one, I installed Debian as follows: connect SSD to my workstation, do an install on it (via Virtualbox connected to the raw device), disconnect and install in the laptop. First sign of trouble was that the SSD didn't boot reliably. I said - maybe my Virtualbox method (new method) wasn't right - so I reinstalled on the laptop, and everything was mostly OK. Mostly OK because rarely the laptop had issues with seeing the SSD. Maybe not cold booting, requiring a restart, or giving some ATA errors on boot (bot nothing afterwards). I didn't use the laptop too much - I mostly use it when travelling - so I didn't investigate further. Trouble begins Fast forward to two weeks ago: I was preparing to leave on a trip, so I booted the laptop (everything OK), apt-get dist-upgrade, synced my git trees, etc. Everything was fine. The next day, in the airport between two flights, the laptop doesn't boot - doesn't see the SSD at all. I tried rebooting a gazillion times, nothing. I was quite upset - at the hardware, and at me for not paying attention to the unreliability signs before. Once I arrived at the destination, I opened the laptop, tried re-seating the SSD, nothing. I bought a SATA-to-USB bridge, and surprise! Boots from the first, no issues. Diagnosis A: Laptop SATA connector has issues. I work with this SATA-to-USB bridge for a couple of days, but it was quite slow (~20MB/s), so I buy a SATA-to-USB3 cradle, which should be much faster. But the SSD was not visible in this cradle. Not only that, but it was causing the laptop to hang in the POST screen - reliably. Turn the cradle off, the laptop passes POST, turn it on, the laptop took 2 minutes to pass the POST. OK, the cradle is broken. Connect the SSD back to the USB2 thing not booting For about five minutes, it was like "dead". After that, it booted and behaved normally. I didn't know what to think, I just put it aside. So worked for the rest of the week on the USB2 bridge, with no issues (once it the SSD dropped off, but I think that was just USB being USB). So at the end of the week, diagnosis (A) still was the main contender. On the flight back home, I worked from the plane for a good number of hours, again no issue. Laptop/SSD were fully powered off before the flight, powered with no issues, worked fine. At the end of the flight I completely shut down my laptop. Diagnosis A still on top. Real trouble now After getting home and sleeping a bit, I wanted to power up the laptop just to transfer the code I wrote on the plane. But it didn't power up. No problem, I said, now I actually have access to running Linux machines and I can check what's happening. And to my surprise, the SSD was behaving erratically: The looked like this (when connected over SATA):
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: ATA-9: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500GB, EXT0BB6Q, max UDMA/133
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
20:22:57 kernel: scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      Samsung SSD 840  EXT0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
20:22:57 kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] 488397168 512-byte logical blocks: (250 GB/232 GiB)
20:22:57 kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off
20:22:57 kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
20:22:57 kernel: sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x2 SErr 0x400001 action 0x6 frozen
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: SError:   RecovData Handshk  
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: cmd 60/08:08:68:01:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 1 ncq 4096 in
20:22:57 kernel:         res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: status:   DRDY  
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: hard resetting link
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: EH complete
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x400000 SErr 0x400001 action 0x6
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: irq_stat 0x44000008
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: SError:   RecovData Handshk  
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: cmd 60/08:b0:08:03:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 22 ncq 4096 in
20:22:57 kernel:         res 41/84:00:08:03:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x410 (ATA bus error) <F>
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: status:   DRDY ERR  
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: error:   ICRC ABRT  
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: hard resetting link
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: failed to get NCQ Send/Recv Log Emask 0x1
20:22:57 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
20:22:57 kernel: ata2: EH complete
Note that all of the messages were in short order (during boot, they show the same timestamp but I don't think it was actually the same second). I tried connecting the SSD over USB2 (partially working), over USB3 (not working!), and directly over SATA (initially not working). I connected another SSD I had around (same model, just smaller capacity) over all three, it worked (so the USB3 bridge was working, at least). Diagnosing (A) was out the door now, and the situation was very clear: SSD dying/dead/almost gone. So I connected both broken SSD and empty SSD to my workstation over SATA, and started copying data (once I managed to boot with the old one being visible and working). During the data copy, I saw that the "broken" SSD behaved erratically indeed: it was copying data off it with either ~40MB/s, ~70MB/s, and ~160MB/s. Not other speed, at least not for long time, just cycling between these three; and this is a very slow speed for this SSD model. And then I remembered that there is, for this model (Samsung 840 Evo), an advisory/firmware fix that old data gets harder to access (slower and slower), due to how TLC cells levels are read/etc. I don't know exactly what "old" means, but since the partition table was written only once, it should be the oldest thing written, which would make it the most susceptible to the slowdown, and could explain the cfdisk slowness. So after the data copy, I tested this: So yes, it is something related to this, probably. Diagnosis B: "just" the Samsung Evo bug. So I proceed to (try to) upgrade the firmware: Uh oh, so it's more than this - the SSD seems to be actually broken. I don't have much experience with SSDs, I used for many years an Intel X25-M and more recently I have a couple of Samsung 840 Pro, but I never had issues until now, so maybe the cheap Evo is just cheap and fast Note that during all this drama, SMART gives good info about SSD, and SMART tests are perfect (short/long). Just a number of UDMA CRC errors so thanks for nothing. I try to the firmware upgrade a few times, I give up. Diagnosis C: SSD is just plain broken. I'll send the SSD for a replacement/fix, so (even though it's encrypted), let's try to erase it first (as I can still read/write to it). And since just dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX is too common, let's try a builtin (ATA) erase! After fighting with hdparm and the fact that my BIOS does indeed "security freeze" on the drives (so you can't change the security settings nor erase the drives), and finding an article on the net that gives a few workaround, I manage to "unfreeze" it by not only live unplugging the SATA cable, but also the power cable, and plugging them back in. Time to erase. Side-note here: So, especially given the very fast ENHANCED erase, I now believe the SSD is truly broken. Diagnosis C rules. And finally, just confusion After the SSD erase, reading (the zeros) from the SSD is really fast: more than 500MB/s, as expected. I also try once more to upgrade the firmware for the Evo bug, and it works flawlessly this time. Even rebooting the machine many times works without problems, the SSD is seen every single time. I still can't make it work well over the USB3 bridge (but I'm not very convinced that device work well, since Linux does apply quirks when it detects it). But it doesn't give any ATA errors this time, and it works (read and write) consistently fast (as per the Evo specs). I still have to let it go through a long burnin with verification, but a short one works fine, so at this point I'm just very confused as what was (is?) the actual problem with this device, and why it behaves so strange Was the laptop broken? Clearly no. Was the SSD broken, or just impacted by the slowdown issue? Time will tell. I'll put it through the paces, and see. But unless I replace it, I'll keep this just for "fast cache" use cases, and not to hold real data. Yep, computers are fun!

Joey Hess: snowdrift - sustainable crowdfunding for free software development

In a recent blog post, I mentioned how lucky I feel to keep finding ways to work on free software. In the past couple years, I've had a successful Kickstarter, and followed that up with a second crowdfunding campaign, and now a grant is funding my work. A lot to be thankful for. A one-off crowdfunding campaign to fund free software development is wonderful, if you can pull it off. It can start a new project, or kick an existing one into a higher gear. But in many ways, free software development is a poor match for kickstarter-type crowdfunding. Especially when it comes to ongoing development, which it's really hard to do a crowdfunding pitch for. That's why I was excited to find Snowdrift.coop, which has a unique approach. Imagine going to a web page for a free software project that you care about, and seeing this button: 1283 patrons will donate MORE when you pledge That's a lot stronger incentive than some paypal donation button or flattr link! The details of how it works are explained on their intro page, or see the ever-insightful and thoughtful Mike Linksvayer's blog post about it. When I found out about this, I immediately sent them a one-off donation. Later, I got to meet one of the developers face to face in Portland. I've also done a small amount of work on the Snowdrift platform, which is itself free software. (My haskell code will actually render that button above!) Free software is important, and its funding should be based, not on how lucky or good we are at kickstarter pitches, but on its quality and how useful it is to everyone. Snowdrift is the most interesting thing I've seen in this space, and I really hope they succeed. If you agree, they're running their own crowdfunding campaign right now.

30 November 2014

Gregor Herrmann: RC bugs 2014/47-48

these are the RC bugs I've worked on during the last two weeks:

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in November 2014

FTP assistant In contrast to the last month, this month has been rather quiet and I really liked that :-) . The stress has moved to the next team. So all in all I marked 101 packages for accept and had to reject 27 packages. As I mostly reviewed really new packages, I didn t have to file any RC bug this month. Squeeze LTS This was my fifth month that I did some work for the Squeeze LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. This month I got assigned a workload of 14.25h and I spent these hours to upload new versions of: I also uploaded [DLA 85-1] libxml-security-java security update, but as nobody of the LTS sponsors had any interest in this package, I did this in my spare time. A package with security in its name should not be affected by security issues. This month my failure of the month has been the binutils package. Although the security team prepared the way for finding the correct patches for all those CVEs, I somehow managed to not find them. This is embarassing I am also a bit disappointed by current LTS users. All important packages have been made available for testing before uploading them to the archive. Apart from some brave fellow DDs, no other feedback was reported on debian-lts. Complaints arrived only when the packages have been finally uploaded. Do admins have enough time nowadays and don t need to use some kind of testbed? Times are changing Other packages This month I even found some time to sponsor uploads, so please welcome a new version of fastaq in experimental and patiently wait for aegaen and kmc to pass NEW. At this point I also want to mention the Debian Med Advent Calendar, which was announced in this email and already mentioned by Andreas in his latest Debian Med bits. Everybody is invited to take care of as much as possible poor souls. Support If you would like to support my Debian work you could either be part of the Freexian initiative (see above) or consider to send some bitcoins to 1JHnNpbgzxkoNexeXsTUGS6qUp5P88vHej. Contact me at donation@alteholz.eu if you prefer another way to donate. Every kind of support is most appreciated.

Enrico Zini: cxx11-talk-notes

C++11 talk notes On 2014-11-27 I gave a talk about C++ and new features introduced with C++11: these are the talk notes. See cxx11-talk-examples for the examples. (note: I had to add U+2063 INVISIBLE SEPARATOR to prevent noreturn statements to be misinterpreted by the blog formatter. If you copypaste the code and encounter issues, you may want to delete the noreturn statements and retype them) Overview of programming languages
It has to be as fast as possible, so interpreted languages are out. You don't want to micro manage memory, so C is out. You don't want to require programmers to have a degree, so C++ is out. You want fast startup and not depend on a big runtime, so Java is out. [...] (Bram Moolenaar)
C++ secret cultist protip
Do not call up what you cannot put down.
C++ is a compiled language It is now possible to use the keyword constexpr to mark functions and objects that can be used at compile time:
/*
 * constexpr tells the compiler that a variable or function can be evaluated at
 * compile time.
 *
 * constexpr functions can also be run at run time, if they are called with
 * values not known at compile time.
 *
 * See http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constexpr for more nice examples
 *
 * It can be used to avoid using constants in code, and using instead functions
 * for computing hardware bitfields or physical values, without losing in
 * efficiency.
 */
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
constexpr int factorial(int n)
 
    return n <= 1 ? 1 : (n * factorial(n-1));
 
int main()
 
    cout << "Compile time factorial of 6: " << factorial(6) << endl;
    cout << "Enter a number: ";
    int a;
    cin >> a;
    cout << "Run time factorial of " << a << ": " << factorial(a) << endl;
 
See also this for more nice examples. See this and this for further discussion. Multiline strings
        const char* code = R"--(
          printf("foo\tbar\n");
          return 0;
        )--";
See this. C++ memory management protip RAII: Resource Acquisition Is Instantiation This is not new in C++11, but in my experience I have rarely seen it mentioned in C++ learning material, and it does make a huge difference in my code. See this and this for details. Constructors and member initializer lists Initializers in curly braces now have their own type: std::initializer_list:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <unordered_set>
using namespace std;
// std::initializer_list< >
//   will have as its value all the elements inside the curly braces
string join(initializer_list<string> strings)
 
    string res;
    for (auto str: strings)
     
        if (!res.empty())
            res += ", ";
        res += str;
     
    return res;
 
int main()
 
    unordered_set<string> blacklist  ".", "..", ".git", ".gitignore"  ;
    cout << join(  "antani", "blinda"  ) << endl;
 
See this for details, including the new uniform initialization trick of omitting parentesis in constructors so that you can call normal constructors and initializer_list constructors with the same syntax, which looks like an interesting thing when writing generic code in templates. Type inference I can now use auto instead of a type to let the compiler automatically compute the value of something I assign to:
        auto i = 3 + 2;
        // See also https://github.com/esseks/monicelli
        vector<string> names  "antani", "blinda", "supercazzola"  ;
        for (auto i = names.cbegin(); i != names.cend(); ++i)
            cout << i;
        template<typename T>
        T frobble(const T& stuff)
         
             // This will work whatever type is returned by stuff.read()
             auto i = stuff.read();
             //  
         
See this for more details. Range-based for loop C++ now has an equivalent of the various foreach constructs found in several interpreted languages!
        for (auto i: list_of_stuff)
                cout << i << endl;
        for (auto n:  0,1,2,3,4,5 )
                cout << n << endl;
        // This construct:
        for (auto i: stuff)
        // If stuff is an array, it becomes:
        for (i = stuff, i < stuff + sizeof(stuff) / sizeof(stuff[0]); ++i)
        // If stuff has .begin() and .end() methods it becomes:
        for (i = stuff.begin(); i != stuff.end(); ++i)
        // Otherwise it becomes:
        for (i = begin(stuff); i != end(stuff); ++i)
        // And you can define begin() and end() functions for any type you
        // want, at any time
See this and this for details. Lambda functions and expressions Lambdas! Closures! Something like this:
// JavaScript
var add = function(a, b)   return a + b;  
# Python
add = lambda a, b: a + b
Becomes this:
auto add = [](int a, int b)   return a + b;  
And something like this:
// JavaScript
var a = 0;
$.each([1, 2, 3, 4], function(idx, el)   a += el  );
Becomes this:
unsigned a = 0;
std::for_each(  1, 2, 3, 4  , [&a](int el)   return a += el;  );
See this, this and this. Tuple types C++ now has a std::tuple type, that like in Python can be used to implement functions that return multiple values:
        tuple<int, string, vector<string>> parse_stuff()
         
                return make_tuple(id, name, values);
         
        string name; vector<string> values;
        // std::ignore can be used to throw away a result
        tie(ignore, name, values) = parse_stuff();
        // std::tie can also be used to do other kind of
        // multi-operations besides assignment:
        return tie(a, b, c) < tie(a1, b1, c1);
        // Is the same as:
        if (a != a1) return a < a1;
        if (b != b1) return b < b1;
        return c < c1;
See here, here and here. Regular expressions We now have regular expressions!
        std::regex re(R"((\w+)\s+(\w+))");
        string s("antani blinda");
        smatch res;
        if (regex_match(s, res, re))
            cout << "OK " << res[1] << " -- " << res[2] << endl;
The syntax is ECMAScript by default and can be optionally changed to basic, extended, awk, grep, or egrep. See here and here. General-purpose smart pointers There is std::unique_ptr to code memory ownership explicitly, and std::shared_ptr as a reference counted pointer, and smart pointers can have custom destructors:
    unique_ptr<dirent, std::function<void(void*)>> dirbuf((dirent*)malloc(len), free);
See here and here. Miscellaneous other cool things Standard attribute specifiers
string errno_str(int error)
 
    char buf[256];
#if (_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L   _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 600) && ! _GNU_SOURCE
    strerror_r(errno, buf, 256);
    string res(buf);
#else
    string res(strerror_r(errno, buf, 256));
#endif
    return res;
 
[ [noreturn]] void throw_libc_error(int error)
 
    throw runtime_error(errno_str(error));
 
See here. Hash tables See here and look at the new containers unordered_set, unordered_map, unordered_multiset, and unordered_multimap. Multithreading There is a standard threading model, with quite a bit of library support: see here, here, here, and here for atomic data structures. Variadic templates Templates can now take variable number of arguments, and that opens possibilities for interesting code generation, like implementing a generic, type-safe printf statement, or something like this:
db.query(R"(
   INSERT INTO table NAMES (id, name, description)
     VALUES (?, ?, ?)
)", 4, "genio", "fantasia, intuizione, decisione, e velocit  di esecuzione");
See here and here. Essential tools You need at least g++ 4.8 or clang 3.3 to have full C++11 support. They will be both available in jessie, and for wheezy you can use the nightly clang packages repository. I cannot think of a good excuse not to use -Wall on new code. scan-build from clang is another nice resource for catching even more potential problems at compile time. valgrind is a great tool for runtime code analysis: valgrind --tool=memcheck (the default) will check your program for wrong memory accesses and memory leaks. valgrind --tool=callgrind will trace function calls for profiling, to be analyzed with kcachegrind. valgrind --tool=helgrind can check multi-threaded programs for suspicious concurrent memory accesse patterns. And of course gdb: a nice trick with C++ is to issue catch throw to get a breakpoint at the point where an exception is being thrown. help catch provides a list of other interesting catch examples. Coredump tips: ulimit -c to enable core dumps, triggering a core dump with ^\, opening a core with gdb program core, and more details on man 5 core. An extra gdb tip, which is not related to C++ but helped me considerably recently, is that it can be attached to running python programs to get a live Python traceback.

Johannes Schauer: simple email setup

I was unable to find a good place that describes how to create a simple self-hosted email setup. The most surprising discovery was, how much already works after:
apt-get install postfix dovecot-imapd
Right after having finished the installation I was able to receive email (but only in in /var/mail in mbox format) and send email (bot not from any other host). So while I expected a pretty complex setup, it turned out to boil down to just adjusting some configuration parameters.

Postfix The two interesting files to configure postfix are /etc/postfix/main.cf and /etc/postfix/master.cf. A commented version of the former exists in /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist. Alternatively, there is the ~600k word strong man page postconf(5). The latter file is documented in master(5).

/etc/postfix/main.cf I changed the following in my main.cf
@@ -37,3 +37,9 @@
mailbox_size_limit = 0
recipient_delimiter = +
inet_interfaces = all
+
+home_mailbox = Mail/
+smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination permit_sasl_authenticated
+smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
+smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
+smtp_helo_name = my.reverse.dns.name.com
At this point, also make sure that the parameters smtpd_tls_cert_file and smtpd_tls_key_file point to the right certificate and private key file. So either change these values or replace the content of /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key. The home_mailbox parameter sets the default path for incoming mail. Since there is no leading slash, this puts mail into $HOME/Mail for each user. The trailing slash is important as it specifies qmail-style delivery'' which means maildir. The default of the smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter is permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination so this just adds the permit_sasl_authenticated option. This is necessary to allow users to send email when they successfully verified their login through dovecot. The dovecot login verification is activated through the smtpd_sasl_type and smtpd_sasl_path parameters. I found it necessary to set the smtp_helo_name parameter to the reverse DNS of my server. This was necessary because many other email servers would only accept email from a server with a valid reverse DNS entry. My hosting provider charges USD 7.50 per month to change the default reverse DNS name, so the easy solution is, to instead just adjust the name announced in the SMTP helo.

/etc/postfix/master.cf The file master.cf is used to enable the submission service. The following diff just removes the comment character from the appropriate section.
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@
#smtpd pass - - - - - smtpd
#dnsblog unix - - - - 0 dnsblog
#tlsproxy unix - - - - 0 tlsproxy
-#submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-# -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
-# -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-# -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-# -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
-# -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
+submission inet n - - - - smtpd
+ -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
+ -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
+ -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
+ -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
+ -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
#smtps inet n - - - - smtpd
# -o syslog_name=postfix/smtps
# -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes

Dovecot Since above configuration changes made postfix store email in a different location and format than the default, dovecot has to be informed about these changes as well. This is done in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf. The second configuration change enables postfix to authenticate users through dovecot in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf. For SSL one should look into /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf and either adapt the parameters ssl_cert and ssl_key or store the correct certificate and private key in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.pem and /etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem, respectively. The dovecot-core package (which dovecot-imapd depends on) ships tons of documentation. The file /usr/share/doc/dovecot-core/dovecot/documentation.txt.gz gives an overview of what resources are available. The path /usr/share/doc/dovecot-core/dovecot/wiki contains a snapshot of the dovecot wiki at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/. The example configurations seem to be the same files as in /etc/ which are already well commented.

/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf The following diff changes the default email location in /var/mail to a maildir in ~/Mail as configured for postfix above.
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#
# <doc/wiki/MailLocation.txt>
#
-mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
+mail_location = maildir:~/Mail

# If you need to set multiple mailbox locations or want to change default
# namespace settings, you can do it by defining namespace sections.

/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf And this enables the authentication socket for postfix:
@@ -93,9 +93,11 @@


# Postfix smtp-auth
- #unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
- # mode = 0666
- #
+ unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
+ mode = 0660
+ user = postfix
+ group = postfix
+

# Auth process is run as this user.
#user = $default_internal_user

Aliases Now Email will automatically put into the '~/Mail' directory of the receiver. So a user has to be created for whom one wants to receive mail...
$ adduser josch
...and any aliases for it to be configured in /etc/aliases.
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
-# See man 5 aliases for format
-postmaster: root
+root: josch
+postmaster: josch
+hostmaster: josch
+webmaster: josch
After editing /etc/aliases, the command
$ newaliases
has to be run. More can be read in the aliases(5) man page.

Finishing up Everything is done and now postfix and dovecot have to be informed about the changes. There are many ways to do that. Either restart the services, reboot or just do:
$ postfix reload
$ doveadm reload
Have fun!

Hideki Yamane: Kadokawa Course Internet vol.2 "Open Source - composes Internet, evolution of software"

Now it's out -you can get Kadokawa Course Internet vol.2 "Open Source - composes Internet, evolution of software" ( (2) ) at a bookstore.

Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto, probably you know as programming language "Ruby" author, is supervisor for this book but more people involved in it. What I wrote is a basic overview for Open Source Software Licensing (with 32 pages in Japanese) because I've learned some about software license through my activity in Debian (thanks! :-)

It was though a bit because its deadline is really tight, so I had to write it even during DebConf14 in Portland (this is the reason why I didn't go to Pub to drink beer in the last night ;)
Hope you enjoy it (Wasshoi!!).

Next.

Previous.