I am building a realtime notification system as my final semester project. The end product is a simple API that can be used by third party to push real time notification to client applications running on multiple platforms that include browsers and devices. Ideally, if your device can connect to the internet, it should be able to receive notifications. The non functional system requirements are pretty ambitious with scalability, availability and latency guarantees being the most important. Maybe little too ambitious for someone like me but then I will learn a lot in this process and its more fun when its challenging. To address the scalability issues, we ll have to distribute the system. A single system will not scale beyond a point and we need to be able to distribute the load over nodes effectively to be able to serve clients while maintaining the quality of service guarantees. With distribution comes a whole lot of other problems like latency, coordination and handling failures. We have a theorem that officially states that you cannot have the pie and eat it too; its called the CAP theorem. It says that you cannot have have a system that is Consistent, Available and Partition tolerant at the same time (Partition tolerance here refers to the ability of a system to continue operating in the event of partial failures). You can have any two but not all three in varying degrees. In a way this is good because you do not go chasing the holy grail because you know it doesn t exist. CAP Twelve Years Later: How the Rules Have Changed is a good read for some sensible advice when applying CAP theorem to real world scenarios. Reading Notes on Distributed Systems for Young Bloods by Jeff Hodges is highly recommended for anyone starting to work on distributed systems. All the commons assumptions that you may have when you are building a distributed system is wrong, so wrong that it is sort of standardized now under the title Fallacies of Distributed Computing. A more detailed article is available here. I will be using concepts as given in the Amazon Dynamo paper to make the system highly available. This one is big and will a get a blog post of its own. The notification service that I am building at its core is a Publish/Subscribe system with soft real time guarantees. Right now I am clueless about how to deal with latency guarantees but I hope to figure it out soon. Websockets will be the application layer protocol that ll be used to push to browsers and for the trasport layer protocol I hear the MQTT protocol fits to a T. More on this later. I will updating my blog as the project progresses, documenting all the design decisions and the rationale behind them. The code will be available online. This is not something new and I am aware of tools that can do this. While I will try to improve on what already exists, the point is, as mentioned earlier, to learn something new and build what will be considered good software. I have never attended a distributed systems theory class, so I am reading up on that as well. Vector clocks are really cool, if you ask me. If you think this is too big, to be accomplished by a single student programmer in a semester s worth of effort, I wouldn t deny that but then when you pick the right tools for a job, things become a lot more easier and you can afford to be ambitious. Erlang for the win! Feel free to comment on what I am building as I may be potentially unaware of a lot of things I should be knowing. I could use all your suggestions/advice to make things better.

The Debian package of the Linux kernel is based on Linux 3.2, but has some additional features. This continues from parts 1, 2 and 3, and covers new and improved hardware support. DRM drivers from Linux 3.4 (proposed) Some recent Intel and AMD graphics chips were not supported well or at all by the DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) drivers in Linux 3.2. Although many bug fixes have been included in 3.2.y stable updates, we are considering updating them to the versions found in Linux 3.4. (We did something similar for Debian 6.0 'squeeze'.) Julien Cristau has been working on this and has prepared binary packages. To install, run as root:

gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg --export 310180050905E40C   apt-key add -
echo deb http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/wheezy-drm34/ ./ > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jcristau-wheezy-drm34.list
apt-get update
apt-get install linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64  # or -486, or -686-pae

Please test these and report your results to bug #687442. I would suggest testing suspend/resume (if applicable), use of internal and external displays on laptops, and 3D accelerated graphics (games and compositing window managers such as GNOME Shell). Remember that AMD/ATI graphics chips require the firmware from the firmware-linux-nonfree package for 3D acceleration and many other features. amilo-rfkill driver I wrote a standard rfkill driver for the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo A1655 and M7440, based on the out-of-tree fsaa1655g and fsam7440 drivers. Unlike those, it should work with the rfkill command, Network Manager, etc. ALPS touchpads Newer touchpads made by ALPS use different protocols for reporting scroll and pinch gestures. Jonathan Nieder backported the changes to support these. Wacom tablets Jonathan Nieder updated the wacom driver to the version in Linux 3.5, adding support for the Intuos5, Bamboo Connect, Bamboo 16FG and various other models. Emulex OneConnect 'Skyhawk' Sarveshwar Bandi at Emulex contributed a backport of the be2net driver from Linux 3.5, adding support for their 'Skyhawk' chip. Marvell Kirkwood Marvell's Kirkwood SoCs have been supported upstream for some time and in Debian since release 6.0 'squeeze'. However new models and boards generally require specific support. Arnaud Patard backported support for the 6282 rev A1 chip found in QNAP TS-x19P II models, and for the Marvell Dreamplug and Iomega Iconnect. Miscellaneous

• ITE IT8728F hardware monitor
• Ralink RT5392, RT5390R and RF5372 wifi chips
• Synaptics USB touchpad devices
• JMicron JM362 SATA controller
• IguanaWorks USB IR transceiver

More to come Missing hardware support is an important bug that can be fixed by kernel updates during a freeze and throughout the lifetime of a stable release. If you know that new hardware isn't supported by the Debian kernel, please open a bug report. I can't promise that it will be fixed, but we need to know what's missing. Hardware vendors that maintain their own drivers upstream (not out-of-tree) are especially welcome to contribute tested backports that add support for the latest hardware. Send mail to debian-kernel@lists.debian.org if you have any questions about this.

Update: They got & reported him. Most of you will have seen the news about various private files being hosted on github as this little has taken the Internet by storm yesterday. Obviously most of those files can be found via Google and other means as well, but this exposure is a bit worse inasmuch people will keep on updating their secret information automagically and continuously. Personal favourites that used to work until yesterday include

• secring.gpg
• id_rsa
• id_dsa
• known_hosts (not hashed and in combination with the above...)
• cert.pem
• .my.cnf
• .zsh_history
• .bash_history

And various other config and history files for AWS, RT, whatnot. Plus, it was really easy to search for certain actions like so. Another fun thing look for were ENV variables setting passwords, hosts, etc. Ironically, having the SSH identity files means anyone is able to change pretty much anything about a person's repositories on github. This includes files like .zshrc which basically allows complete takeover of any account and often machine that file is sourced from. Which reminds me that I still need to add a way for vcsh to only merge commits that have a tag signed with a trusted key and warn for everything else, but I digress. None of this is a problem with github specifically, it's a problem with users who don't think their actions through. And this is non-trivial for github or anyone else to fix as there are potentially endless sources of otherwise secret information. Initially, I sent email to github's quite responsive security team asking them to forbid certain queries and to email users who checked in their private data by accident and left it at that. They got back to me extremely fast, promising to do their best (as of right now, no queries I tried work any more) and after some conversation asked me to link to their help article on removing sensitive data if I were to blog about this. The topic itself has been covered extensively, github did their best to keep user data private, and so the above could have been done without, but... ...I have gotten word of 4chan's /g/ sleuthing their way through various files and at least one incident of people finding direct evidence of child pornography in a Zsh history file. Sadly, this story found its way to me without a link and the person who saw the thread read it on a tablet, preserving neither the URL nor local cache. They saw it on 2013-01-24 at around 2200 UTC. If you, or someone you know, saw anything plainly illegal, immoral, and simply wrong... please report it to the relevant authorities or at least github. As I suspect that there's some overlap between the subscribers of the various planets I am aggregated on and /g/, this may reach the right eyes. Between the account name, a verified email address, access logs with IPs, and possibly a real name, it should be comparatively easy to find anyone you report.

You probably know reCAPTCHA already: for the webmasters and the end user, it is an antispam system which asks you to read distorted words in order to prove that you are a human and not a spamming bot. This service has another end: instead of generating its distorted texts, it takes them from printed books to help digitalizing them.The problem In theory, this is an excellent idea, which should help preserving and distributing parts of the human culture. And, in the beginning, it was used in such a way, with reCAPTCHA participating in the Gutenberg project which digitalizes books from the public domain to offer them freely (as in free speech) to everyone. In 2009 however, reCAPTCHA was bought by Google. Now they do not participate in the Gutenberg project any more, instead they are digitalizing stuff from the New York Times and from Google Books. They do not provide much detail about that, but it does not seem that they distribute them in a free way afterwards . To put it boldly: they use people's brain power to digitalize books for their own exploitation monopoly, which is wrong. These books should be made available under a free license. Suggestion Do not help reCAPTCHA. If you are a webmaster, try to use another more ethical system. If you are an end user, and you are facing a reCAPTCHA test, avoid putting the exact answer but try inserting small mistakes (not big ones, which get detected and make you fail the test). And ask Google to free the books they digitalized using your brain. Notes

1. I may be wrong but I learnt to be suspicious in the context of digital culture. Please Google, if you do publish your books digitalized with reCAPTCHA under a free license, tell me, or rather, tell it to everyone and display it proudly in the reCAPTCHA website.

After this announcement about the future of GNOME in Debian, I received several requests to look at SolusOS and their Consort fork of GNOME. On the paper, this doesn t look like a too bad idea, since they only forked gnome-panel and metacity, the two key components that are no longer maintained upstream. Still, starting a plain fork at the very moment when the former maintainer decided to give the key to anyone who wanted to, looked like a very destructive way of acting. Even if the fork gains momentum (which remains speculative), the amount of effort to rename packages makes you think twice before such a switch. I decided to go talk about it with them on IRC nevertheless. Mind you, they work on a GNOME fork and a Debian derivative, but deliberately use their own IRC server (you ll soon understand why). Just in case you would want to cooperate with SolusOS, you d have to use their infrastructure. It is an euphemism to say that the conversation didn t go well. This could have ended there, but thankfully for your already widening eyes, Ikey (the charming person I had the opportunity to discuss with) made the log public, in an attempt at public shaming that would soon gather his followers, chanting out loud how the revolutionary SolusOS would quickly replace every other Linux distribution. (As a side note, of the hundreds of such claims that were made public in the last 10 years, only one came true, and it was from a billionnaire who hired dozens of developers. Just saying.) Then you can understand why the specific IRC server: it is to K-line people who don t behave with enough deference to Ikey, because kickban is not enough. This log and the claims made in the comments look very ironical, if only for presenting a person working in a team of 10+ on the most popular desktop on one of the most popular desktop distributions, as a beggar. Even more ironical when it is the person who spent the most time on making GNOME Classic available and working nicely for wheezy. So when a dozen kids go chanting that Consort is so much better than GNOME and will replace it, while it just re-does the work I already did, let me at least smile. So what is SolusOS, after all? If you want to see where this story is going, there s a place that tells you: the consortium and consort-panel repositories. Here you will find interesting things:

• the work started from a tarball, instead of forking the git repositories (just in case you wanted to pull some of their patches);
• there is only one active contributor, who happens to be the founder of SolusOS, and the same person who K-lines people on his IRC channel;
• he seems to commits stuff randomly, without any cleanup, and with a lot of 4-letter words;
• most commits are here to rename everything to the Consort brand;
• even in debian/changelog, he retroactively renamed every mention of the former package names;
• some changes were made prior to creating the repository, so they are completely lost in history;
• among those changes I noted the reversion of a GNOME 3.0 change, which is to require Alt+right-click to edit a panel (and anyone who thinks this is a bug has never had to manage a help desk where disappearing notification areas were in the Top 5 incidents);
• nevermind the change was done in a hackish way and even mentions that in a comment, while the upstream commit is still available in git history;
• this also includes committing directly Debian-specific patches without a further look at why they hadn t been pushed upstream.
• For example, he pushed the menus renaming, which is a very Debuntu-specific stuff which will yield empty menus on other distributions.
• Or a bugfix that will only build with Debian s modified libwnck.

I ve stopped looking there. We re facing an ego issue, but not something that can improve the desktop for our users. In the end, I m sorry for those who genuinely thought we could do better by sharing some maintenance load with SolusOS, but it doesn t look like a big loss anyway.

On praising people, and on success This morning I was pointing out to friends how excellent is mako's post on Aaron Swartz, and I thought it'd be nice if we didn't have to wait for people to die before telling the world how awesome and inspirational they are. Then Russ posted an article about work, success and motivation and I went to tell my friends how awesome and inspirational he is. I, too, see myself as somehow successful, and I, too, don't identify in the usual stereotype of success. I don't want to stop being a craftsman to become a manager, I don't get a high from having power over other people, I don't define my value in terms of my profits. At a glance, people don't see me as successful, until they get to know me better. They they realise that I'm not at all unhappy about my life. I have a job that I like, I write Free Software and it gets used and appreciated, my colleagues are friends, who respect me and my opinion, and I respect them and theirs. I can work from home. In fact, I can work from everywhere as long as I have my laptop with me. I can sustain a long distance relationship because I can work from the house of my partner when I'm visiting. Two days ago I worked from the bar of a farm on top of a hill, because I was on the road, it was close by, and what the hell, it's a wonderful place to be. To me success means that I can care about the quality of my life, that I have the luxury of caring about little things that make my day, of trying to make good ideas sustainable, of working a bit more when I'm on fire, and of working a bit less when there's something wonderful in the world to see, or someone interesting in the world to meet. Russ, the way I read your article, you are questioning what "success" means, and you are spot on. People should be able to define "success" as whatever works for them and pursue it freely. Only then success becomes something that is worth praising when it is achieved. Only then it becomes inspirational. I like how you managed to put into words something that has been for a long time in some corner of my mind and I hadn't yet managed or bothered to bring into the spotlight. You have the insight and the confidence of seeing something in an insightful but non-mainstream way, and say "you know what? That actually makes sense." Sometimes I read your post, nod a lot and realise how important something actually is, how that is actually such an important part of myself. And now that you took it out for me to see it, I can appreciate how valuable it is, and make sure I don't accidentally lose it. Thanks! That's another one I owe you. It's just the kind of thing I shouldn't wait before letting you know.

This post is about the port bootstrap build ordering tool (naming suggestions welcome) which was started as a Debian Google Summer of Code project in 2012 and continued to be developed afterwards. Sources are available through gitorious. In the end of November 2012, I managed to put down an approximation algorithm to the feedback arc set problem which allowed to break the dependency graph into a directed acyclic graph with only few removed build dependencies. I wrote about this effort on our mailinglist but didnt mention it here because it was still too much of a proof-of-concept. Later, in January 2013, I mentioned the result of this algorithm in an email wookey and me wrote to debian-devel mailinglist. Many things happened since November 2012:

Processing pipeline instead of monolithic tools The tools I developed so far tried to accomplish everything by themselves, reusing functionality implemented in a central library. Therefor, if one wanted to try out even trivial new things, it mostly meant to hack some OCaml code. Pietro Abate suggested to instead develop smaller tools which could work independently of each other, would only execute one algorithm each and could easily be connected together in different ways to achieve different effects. This switch is now done and all functionality from the old tools is moved into a new toolset. The exchange format between the tools is either plain text files in deb822 control format (Packages/Sources files) or a dependency graph. The dependency graph is currently marshalled by OCaml but future versions should work with just passing a GraphML (an XML graph format) representation around. This new way of doing things seems close to the UNIX philosophy (each program does one thing well, data is stored as text, every program is a filter). For example the deb822 control output can easily be manipulated using grep-dctrl(1) and there exist many tools which can read, analyze and manipulate GraphML. It is a big improvement over the old, monolithic tools which did not allow to manipulate any intermediate result by external, existing tools. Currently, a shell script (native.sh) will execute all tools in a meaningful order, connecting them together correctly. The same tools will be used for a future cross.sh but they will be connected differently. I wrote about a first proposal of what the individual tools should do and how they should be connected in this email from which I also linked a confusing overview of the pipeline. This overview has recently been improved to be even more confusing and the current version of the lower half (the native part) now looks like this: Solid arrows represent a flow of binary packages, dottend arrows represent a flow of source packages, ovals represent a set of packages, boxes with rounded corners represent set operations, rectangular boxes represent filters. There is only one input to a filter, which is the arrow connected to the top of the box. Outgoing arrows from the bottom represent the filtered input. Ingoing arrows to either side are arguments to the filter and control how the filter behaves depending on the algorithm. I will explain this better once the pipeline proved to be less in flux. The pipeline is currently executed like this by native.sh.

Two new ways to break dependency cycles have been discovered So far, we knew of three ways to formally break dependency cycles:

• remove build dependencies through build profiles
• find out that the build dependency is only used to build arch:all packages and therefor put it into Build-Depends-Indep
• cross compile some source packages

Two new methods can be added to the above:

• if a dependency relationship is not strong (pdf), then a different installationset can be chosen
• if a depended upon package is Multi-Arch:foreign then a binary package of an existing architecture might be able to satisfy the dependency.

Dependency graph definition changed Back in September when I was visiting irill, Pietro found a flaw in how the dependency graph used to be generated. He supplied a new definition of the dependency graph which does away with the problem he found. After fixing some small issues with his code, I changed all the existing algorithms to use the new graph definition. The old graph is as of today removed from the repository. Thanks to Pietro for supplying the new graph definition - I must still admit that my OCaml foo is not strong enough to have come up with his code.

Added complexity for profile built source packages As mentioned in the introduction, wookey and me addressed the debian-devel list with a proposal on necessary changes for an automated bootstrapping of Debian. During the discussiong, two important things came up which are to be considered by the dependency graph algorithms:

• profile built source packages may not create all binary packages
• profile built source packages may need additional build dependencies

Both things make it necessary to alter the dependency graph during the generation of a feedback arc set and feedback vertex set beyond the simple removal of edges. Luckily, the developed approximation algorithms can be extended to support such changes in the graph.

Different feedback arc set algorithms The initially developed feedback arc set algorithm is well suited to discover build dependency edges which should be dropped. It performs far worse when creating the final build order because it only considers edges by itself and not how many edges of a source package can be dropped by profile building it. The adjusted algorithm for generating a build order is more of a feedback vertex set algorithm because instead of greedily finding the edge with most cycles through it, it greedily finds the source package which would break most cycles if it was profile built.

Generating a build order with less profile built source packages After implementing all the features above I now feel more confident to publish the current status of the tools to a wider audience. The following test shows a run of the aforementioned ./native.sh shell script. Its final output is a list of source packages which have to be profile built and a build order. Using the resulting build order, starting from a minimal build system (essential:yes, build-essential and debhelper), all source packages will be compiled which are needed to compile all binary packages in the system. The result will therefor be a list of source and binary packages which fulfill the following property:

• all binary packages can be built from the available source packages
• all source packages can be built with the available binary packages

I called this a "reduceded distribution" in earlier posts. The interesting property of this specific selection is, that it contains the biggest problem set of Debian when bootstrapping it: a 900 to 1000 nodes big strongly connected component. Here is a visualization of the problem: Source packages do not yet come with build profiles and the cross build situation can not yet be analyzed, so the following assumptions were made:

• the minimal build system can be cross compiled from nothing
• the reduced build dependencies harvested from Gentoo and supplied by Daniel Schepler, Patrick McDermott, Thorsten Glaser and Wookey are correct
• the current list of weak build dependencies can be dropped from any source package
• even when profile built, all source packages build all binary packages
• the 14 forcefully broken build dependencies do not significantly change the output in real life

The last point is about 14 build dependencies which were decided to be broken by the feedback arc set algorithm but for which other data sources did not indicate that they are actually breakable. Those 14 are dynamically generated by native.sh. If above assumptions should not be too far from the actual situation, then not more than 73 source packages have to be modified to bootstrap a reduced distribution. This reduced distribution even includes dependency-wise "big" packages like webkit, metacity, iceweasel, network-manager, tracker, gnome-panel, evolution-data-server, kde-runtime, libav and nautilus. By changing one line in native.sh one could easily develop a build order which generates gnome-desktop or really any given (meta-)package selection. All of native.sh takes only 80 seconds to execute on my system (Core i5, 2.5 GHz, singlethreaded). Here is the final build order which creates 2044 binary packages from 613 source packages.

1. nspr, libio-pty-perl, libmcrypt, unzip, libdbi-perl, cdparanoia, libelf, c-ares, liblocale-gettext-perl, libibverbs, numactl, ilmbase, tbb, check, libogg, libatomic-ops, libnl($), orc($), libaio, tcl8.4, kmod, libgsm, lame, opencore-amr, tcl8.5, exuberant-ctags, mhash, libtext-iconv-perl, libutempter, pciutils, gperf, hspell, recode, tcp-wrappers, fdupes, chrpath, libbsd, zip, procps, wireless-tools, cpufrequtils, ed, libjpeg8, hesiod, pax, less, dietlibc, netkit-telnet, psmisc, docbook-to-man, libhtml-parser-perl, libonig, opensp($), libterm-size-perl, linux86, libxmltok, db-defaults, java-common, sharutils, libgpg-error, hardening-wrapper, cvsps, p11-kit, libyaml, diffstat, m4
2. openexr, enca, help2man, speex, libvorbis, libid3tag, patch, openjade1.3, openjade, expat, fakeroot, libgcrypt11($), ustr, sysvinit, netcat, libirman, html2text, libmad, pth, clucene-core, libdaemon($), texinfo, popt, net-tools, tar, libsigsegv, gmp, patchutils($), dirac, cunit, bridge-utils, expect, libgc, nettle, elfutils, jade, bison
3. sed, indent, findutils, fastjar, cpio, chicken, bzip2, aspell, realpath, dctrl-tools, rsync, ctdb, pkg-config($), libarchive, gpgme1.0, exempi, pump, re2c, klibc, gzip, gawk, flex-old, original-awk, mawk, libtasn1-3($), flex($), libtool
4. libcap2, mksh, readline6, libcdio, libpipeline, libcroco, schroedinger, desktop-file-utils, eina, fribidi, libusb, binfmt-support, silgraphite2.0, atk1.0($), perl, gnutls26($), netcat-openbsd, ossp-uuid, gsl, libnfnetlink, sg3-utils, jbigkit, lua5.1, unixodbc, sqlite, wayland, radvd, open-iscsi, libpcap, linux-atm, gdbm, id3lib3.8.3, vo-aacenc, vo-amrwbenc, fam, faad2, hunspell, dpkg, tslib, libart-lgpl, libidl, dh-exec, giflib, openslp-dfsg, ppl($), xutils-dev, blcr, bc, time, libdatrie, libpthread-stubs, guile-1.8, libev, attr, libsigc++-2.0, pixman, libpng, libssh2, sqlite3, acpica-unix, acl, a52dec
5. json-c, cloog-ppl, libverto, glibmm2.4, rtmpdump, libdbd-sqlite3-perl, nss, freetds, slang2, libpciaccess, iptables, e2fsprogs, libnetfilter-conntrack, bash, libthai, python2.6($), libice($), libpaper, libfontenc($), libxau, libxdmcp($), openldap($), cyrus-sasl2($), openssl, python2.7($)
6. psutils, libevent, stunnel4, libnet-ssleay-perl, libffi, readline5, file, libvoikko, gamin, libieee1284, build-essential, libcap-ng($), lcms($), keyutils, libxml2, libxml++2.6, gcc-4.6($), binutils, dbus($), libsm($), libxslt, doxygen($)
7. liblqr, rarian, xmlto, policykit-1($), libxml-parser-perl, tdb, devscripts, eet, libasyncns, libusbx, icu, linux, libmng, shadow, xmlstarlet, tidy, gavl, flac, dbus-glib($), libxcb, apr, krb5, alsa-lib
8. usbutils, enchant, neon27, uw-imap, libsndfile, yasm, xcb-util, gconf($), shared-mime-info($), audiofile, ijs($), jbig2dec, libx11($)
9. esound, freetype, libxkbfile, xvidcore, xcb-util-image, udev($), libxfixes, libxext($), libxt, libxrender
10. tk8.4, startup-notification, libatasmart, fontconfig, libxp, libdmx, libvdpau, libdrm, libxres, directfb, libxv, libxxf86dga, libxxf86vm, pcsc-lite, libxss, libxcomposite, libxcursor, libxdamage, libxi($), libxinerama, libxrandr, libxmu($), libxpm, libxfont($)
11. xfonts-utils, libxvmc, xauth, libxtst($), libxaw($)
12. pmake, corosync, x11-xserver-utils, x11-xkb-utils, coreutils, xft, nas, cairo
13. libedit, cairomm, tk8.5, openais, pango1.0($)
14. ocaml, blt, ruby1.8, firebird2.5, heimdal, lvm2($)
15. cvs($), python-stdlib-extensions, parted, llvm-2.9, ruby1.9.1, findlib, qt4-x11($)
16. xen, mesa, audit($), avahi($)
17. x11-utils, xorg-server, freeglut, libva
18. jasper, tiff3, python3.2($)
19. openjpeg, qt-assistant-compat, v4l-utils, qca2, jinja2, markupsafe, lcms2, sip4, imlib2, netpbm-free, cracklib2, cups($), postgresql-9.1
20. py3cairo, pycairo, pam, libgnomecups, gobject-introspection($)
21. gdk-pixbuf, libgnomeprint, gnome-menus, gsettings-desktop-schemas, pangomm, consolekit, vala-0.16($), colord($), atkmm1.6
22. libgee, gtk+3.0($), gtk+2.0($)
23. gtkmm2.4, poppler($), openssh, libglade2, libiodbc2, gcr($), libwmf, systemd($), gcj-4.7, java-atk-wrapper($)
24. torque, ecj($), vala-0.14, gnome-keyring($), gcc-defaults, gnome-vfs($)
25. libidn, libgnome-keyring($), openmpi
26. mpi-defaults, dnsmasq, wget, lynx-cur, ghostscript, curl
27. fftw3, gnupg, libquvi, xmlrpc-c, raptor, liboauth, groff, fftw, boost1.49, apt
28. boost-defaults, libsamplerate, cmake, python-apt
29. qjson, qtzeitgeist, libssh, qimageblitz, pkg-kde-tools, libical, dwarves-dfsg, automoc, attica, yajl, source-highlight, pygobject, pygobject-2, mysql-5.5($)
30. libdbd-mysql-perl, polkit-qt-1, libdbusmenu-qt, raptor2, dbus-python, apr-util
31. rasqal, serf, subversion($), apache2
32. git, redland
33. xz-utils, util-linux, rpm, man-db, make-dfsg, libvisual, cryptsetup, libgd2, gstreamer0.10
34. mscgen, texlive-bin
35. dvipng, luatex
36. libconfig, transfig, augeas, blas, libcaca, autogen, libdbi, linuxdoc-tools, gdb, gpm
37. ncurses, python-numpy($), rrdtool, w3m, iproute, gcc-4.7, libtheora($), gcc-4.4
38. libraw1394, base-passwd, lm-sensors, netcf, eglibc, gst-plugins-base0.10
39. libiec61883, qtwebkit, libvirt, libdc1394-22, net-snmp, jack-audio-connection-kit($), bluez
40. redhat-cluster, gvfs($), pulseaudio($)
41. phonon, libsdl1.2, openjdk-6($)
42. phonon-backend-gstreamer($), gettext, libbluray, db, swi-prolog, qdbm, swig2.0($)
43. highlight, libselinux, talloc, libhdate, libftdi, libplist, python-qt4, libprelude, libsemanage, php5
44. samba, usbmuxd, libvpx, lirc, bsdmainutils, libiptcdata, libgtop2, libgsf, telepathy-glib, libwnck3, libnotify, libunique3, gnome-desktop3, gmime, glib2.0, json-glib, libgnomecanvas, libcanberra, orbit2, udisks, d-conf, libgusb
45. libgnomeprintui, libimobiledevice, nautilus($), libbonobo, librsvg
46. evas, wxwidgets2.8, upower, gnome-disk-utility, libgnome
47. ecore, libbonoboui
48. libgnomeui
49. graphviz
50. exiv2, libexif, lapack, soprano, libnl3, dbus-c++
51. atlas, libffado, graphicsmagick, libgphoto2, network-manager
52. pygtk, jackd2, sane-backends, djvulibre
53. libav($), gpac($), ntrack, python-imaging, imagemagick, dia
54. x264($), matplotlib, iceweasel
55. strigi, opencv, libproxy($), ffms2
56. kde4libs, frei0r, glib-networking
57. kde-baseapps, kate, libsoup2.4
58. geoclue, kde-runtime, totem-pl-parser, libgweather, librest, libgdata
59. webkit
60. zenity, gnome-online-accounts
61. metacity, evolution-data-server
62. gnome-panel
63. tracker

The final recompilation of profile built source packages is omitted. Source packages marked with a ($) are selected to be profile built. All source packages listed in the same line can be built in parallel as they do not depend upon each other. This order looks convincing as it first compiles a multitude of source packages which have no or only few build dependencies lacking. Later steps allow fewer source packages to be compiled in parallel. The amount of needed build dependencies is highest in the source packages that are built last.

(This is going to be long and rambling. Hopefully at some point I'll be able to distill it into something shorter.) In preparation for a tech leads retreat tomorrow, several of us at work were asked to watch Simon Sinek's TED talk, "How great leaders inspire action". I'll be honest with you: I hated this talk. Sinek lost me right at the start by portraying his idea as the point of commonality among great leaders (don't get me started on survivorship bias; it's a pet peeve) and then compounded the presentation problem with some dubious biology about brain structure. So, after watching it, I ranted a bit about how much I disliked it (to, as it turns out, people who had gotten a lot out of it). (Don't do this, btw. It's nearly always worthwhile to suppress negativity about something someone else enjoyed. I say this to increase the pool of people who can remind me of what I said the next time I forget. Which, if my normal pattern holds, will be about five minutes from now.) Thankfully, I work with tolerant and forgiving people who kindly pointed out the things they saw in the video that I missed, and we ended up having a really good hour and a half discussion, which convinced me that there's an idea under here that's worth talking about. It also helped clarify for me just how much I hate the conventional construction of both leadership and success. This talk is framed around getting other people to do things, which is one of the reasons why I had such a negative reaction to it. It's right there in the title: leaders inspiring action. This feeds into what at least in the United States is an endemic belief that the world consists of leaders and followers, and that the key to success in the world (in business, in politics, in everything else) is to become one of the leaders and accumulate followers (most frequently as customers, since we have a capitalist obsession). This is then defined as success. I think this idea of success is bullshit. Now, that statement requires an immediate qualification. Saying that the societal definition of success is bullshit is a statement from privilege. I have the luxury of saying that because I am successful; I'm in a position where I have a lot of control over my own job, I'm not struggling to make ends meet, and I can spend my time pondering existential questions like how to define success. If I were a little less lucky, success would be whatever put food on the table and kept a roof over my head. I'm making an argument from the top of Maslow's hierarchy. But that is, in a roundabout way, my point: why is defining and constructing success still so hard, and why do we do such a bad job at it, even when we're at the top of the pyramid and able to focus on self-actualization? The context of this talk for my group is pre-work for a discussion about, in Sinek's construction, the "why?" of our group. Why are we here, what is our purpose, and what do we care about? By the mere fact that we are able to ask questions like that, you can correctly surmise that we're already successful. The question, therefore, is what should we do with that success? I normally hear one or more of the following answers, all of which I find unsatisfying or problematic.

• Do more of the things that made us successful. This is useful in that not being successful sucks, so one does want to do some amount of maintenance, but it's also profoundly unsatisfying to me personally. What's the point in being successful if one can't use that success to do something more interesting, exciting, or fulfilling? It feels like an argument from fear: the most important thing to do with success is to ensure that one stays successful.
• Use that power to change the world. Now, I want to be very careful here: there are some people who embrace this approach to success and do, in fact, change the world for the better. I would never want to say that this is a bad choice in general. But the problem I personally have with this approach is that the failure rate for changing the world is quite high. You are probably not going to change the world. That doesn't mean don't try; sometimes you do, and when it happens, it's awesome. But the way my mind works argues against setting this as an explicit goal for me. Setting explicit goals that I fail at messes me up: I care too much about not failing and then I burn out. It works better for me psychologically to treat this as a possibility and a side effect of another goal.
• Teach other people how to be successful. Full points for altruism. But let's face it: most of being successful is basically luck, and there's that survivorship bias problem again. It's occasionally possible to do some actual scientific studies and figure out what leads to success, but most of the time you'll instead make up good-sounding stories about things that you believe strongly in and present them as your method for achieving success. I'm sure they're great stories, and they're probably quite inspiring. But they also probably don't have much to do with why you're successful.

So, what should I do with success? Or, put another way, since I have the luxury of figuring out a "why?", what's my "why?" This question comes at a good time. As I've mentioned the last couple of days here, I've just come off of two days of the most fun I've had at work in the last several years. I spent about 25 hours total building a log parsing infrastructure that I'm quite fond of, and which may even be useful to other people. And I did that in response to a rather prosaic request: produce a report of user agents by authenticated unique users, rather than by hits, so that we can get an idea of what percentage of our community uses different devices or browsers. This was a problem that I probably could have solved adequately enough for the original request in four hours, maybe less, and then moved on to something else. I spent six times that long on it. That's something I can do because I'm successful: that's the sort of luxury you get when you can define how you want to do your job. So, apparently I have an answer to my question staring me in my face: what I do with success, when I have it, is use that leeway to produce elegant and comprehensive solutions to problems in a way that fully engages me, makes the problem more interesting, and constructs infrastructure that I can reuse for other problems. Huh. That sounds like a "why?" response that's quite common among hackers and software developers. Nothing earth-shattering there... except why is that so rare in a business context? Why isn't it common to answer questions like "what is our group mission statement" with answers like that? This is what I missed in the TED talk, and what the subsequent discussion with my co-workers brought to light for me. I think Sinek was getting at this, but I think he buried the lede. The "why?" should be something that excites you. Something that you're passionate about. Something that you believe in. He says that's because other people will then believe in it too and will buy it from you. I personally don't care about (or, to be honest, have active antipathy towards) that particular outcome, but that's fine; that's not the point. The point is that a "why?" comes from the heart, from something that actually matters, and it creates a motivating and limiting principle. It defines both what you want to do and what you don't want to do. That gives me a personal answer. My "why?" is that I want to build elegant solutions to problems and do work that I find engaging and can be proud of afterwards. I automate common tasks not because I particularly care about being efficient, but because manually doing common tasks is mind-numbing and boring, and I don't like being bored. I write reliable systems not particularly because that helps clients, but primarily because reliable software is more elegant and beautiful and unreliable software offends me. (Being more usable and frustrating for clients is also good; don't get me wrong. It's just not a motive. It's an outcome.) What does that mean for a group mission statement, a group "why?" Usually these exercises produce some sort of distillation of the collective job responsibilities of the people in the group. Our mission is to maintain core infrastructure to let people do their work and to support authentication and authorization services for the university, yadda yadda yadda... this is all true, in its way, but it's also boring. One can work oneself up to caring about things like that, but it requires a lot of effort. But we all have individual "why?" answers, and I bet they look more like my answer than they do like traditional mission statements. If we're in a place where we have the luxury of worrying about self-actualization questions, what gets us up in the morning, what makes it exciting to go into work, is probably some variation on doing interesting and engaging work. But it's probably a different variation for everyone in the group. For example, as you can see from above, I like building things. My happiest moments are when someone gives me a clearly-defined problem statement that fills a real need and then goes away and leaves me in peace to solve it. One thing I've learned is that I'm not very good at coming up with the problem statements myself; I can do it, but usually I end up solving some problem that isn't very important to other people. I love it when my employer can hand me real problems that will make the world better for people, since often they're a lot more interesting (and meaningful) than the problems I come up with on my own. But that's all highly idiosyncratic and is not going to be shared by everyone in my group. I'm an introvert; the "leave me alone" part of that is important. Other people are extroverts; what gets them up in the morning is, in part, engaging with other people. Some people care passionately about UI design. (I also care passionately about UI design, but the UI designs that I'm passionate about are the ones that are natural for my people, who are apparently aliens from another galaxy, so I'm not the person you want doing UI design for things used by humans.) Others might be particularly interested in researching new technology, or coming up with those problem statements, or in smoothly-running production systems, or in metrics and reporting... I don't really know, but I do know that there's no one answer that fits everyone. Which means that none of our individual "why?" responses should become the group "why?". However, I think that leads to an answer, and it's the answer I'm going to advocate for in the meeting tomorrow. I believe the "why?" of our team should be to use the leeway, trust, and credibility that we have because we're successful to try to create an environment in which every individual member of the team can follow their own "why?" responses. In other words, I think the mission of our group should not be about any specific technology, or about any specific set of services, or outcomes. The way we should use our success is to let every member of our team work in a way that lights their fire. That makes them excited to come into work. That lets each of us have as much fun as I had in the past two days. We should have as our goal to create passionate and empowered employees. Nothing more, but nothing less. This is totally not how group mission statements are done. They're always about blending in to some larger overall technological purpose. But I think that's a mistake, and (despite disliking the presentation), I think that's what this TED talk does actually get at. The purpose is the what, or sometimes the how. It's not the why. And the why isn't static; technology is changing fast, and people are using technology in different ways. Any mission statement around technology today is going to be obsolete in short order, and is going to be too narrow. But I think the flip side is that good technological solutions to the problems of the larger organization are outcomes that fall out of having passionate and inspired employees. If people can work in ways that engage and excite them, they will end up solving problems. We're all adults; we know that we're paid to do a job and that job needs to involve solving real problems for the larger organization. All of that is obvious, and therefore none of that belongs in a mission statement. A mission statement should state the inobvious. And while some visionary people can come up with mission statements around technology or around how people use technology that can be a rallying point for a team or organization, I think that's much rarer than people like to think it is. If you stumble across one like that, great, but I think most teams, and certainly our team, would be better served by having the team mission statement be to enable every individual on the team to be passionate about their work. What should our group work on next? Figure out what the university's problems are, line those needs up with the passions of the members of the team, ask the people most excited about each problem how they want to solve that problem, and write down the answers. There's our roadmap and our strategy, all rolled into one.

I moved to Boston in 2005 at the same time that Aaron Swartz did and we were introduced by a mutual friend. Aaron was one of my first friends in Boston and we became close. When Aaron moved to San Francisco, I moved into his apartment in Somerville where he kept a room for a year or so. Mika and I still live there. His old posters remain on our walls and his old books remain on our shelves. Aaron s brothers Ben and Noah both lived with us and remain close friends. I have spent hours (days?) reading and thinking about Aaron over the last two weeks. It has been disorienting but beautiful to read the descriptions of, and commentaries on, Aaron s life. Although I suspect I may never feel ready, there are several things I want to say about Aaron s death, about Aaron s work, and about what Aaron means to me. 1. Aaron s Death The reaction to Aaron s death has been overwhelming and inspirational. At some point in the near future I plan to join some of the important campaigns already being waged in his name. There are many attempts to understand why Aaron died and many attempts to prevent it from happening to others in the future. Unfortunately, I am familiar with the process of soul-searching and second-guessing that happens when a friend commits suicide. I m sure that every one of his friends has asked themselves, as I have, What could I have done differently? I don t know the answer, but I do know this: Aaron was facing the real risk of losing half his life to prison. But even if one believed that he was only facing the likely loss of ten percent or even one percent of his life I wish that we all, and I wish that I in particular, had reacted with the passion, time, anger, activity, and volume proportional to how we have reacted in the last two weeks when he lost the whole thing. 2. Aaron s Work Of course, Aaron and I worked on related projects and I followed his work. And despite all the incredible things that have been said about Aaron, I feel that Aaron s work was more focused, more ambitious, more transformative, more innovative, and more reckless (in a positive sense) than the outpour online suggests. Although discussion of Aaron has focused his successes, achievements, and victories, the work that inspired me most was not the projects that were most popular or successful. Much of Aaron s work was deeply, and as it turned out overly, ambitious. His best projects were self-conscious attempts to transform knowledge production, organization, and dissemination. Although he moved from project to project, his work was consistently focused on bringing semantic-web concepts and technologies to peer production, to the movement for free culture, and to progressive political activism and on the meta-politics necessary to remove barriers to this work. For example, Aaron created an online collaborative encyclopedia project called the TheInfoNetwork (TIN) several years before Wikipedia was started. I talked to Aaron at length about that project for a research project I am working on. Aaron s work was years ahead of its time; in 2000, TIN embraced more of the Wikimedia Foundation s current goals and principles than Wikipedia did when it was launched. While Wikipedia sought to create a free reference work online, Aaron s effort sought to find out what a reference work online could look like. It turned out to be too ambitious, perhaps, but it taught many, including myself, an enormous amount in that process. When I met Aaron, he was in the process starting a company, Infogami, that was trying to chase many of TIN s goals. Infogami was conceived of as a wiki aware of the structure of data. The model was both simple and profound. Years later, Wikimedia Deutschland s WikiData project is beginning to bring some of these ideas to the mainstream. Infogami merged with Reddit as equal halves of a company with a shared technological foundation based on some of Aaron s other work. But when Reddit took off, Infogami was rarely mentioned, even by Aaron. I think that is too bad. Reddit got traction because it made the most popular stuff more visible; Reddit is popular, fundamentally, because popular things are popular. But popular is not necessary positive. For that reason, Reddit never struck me as either surprising or transformative. But what started as Aaron s half the company, on the other hand, aimed to create a powerful form of democratized information production and dissemination. And although Infogami didn t take off, the ideas and code behind the project found life at the heart of Open Library and will continue to influence and inspire countless other projects. I believe that Infogami s lessons and legacy will undergird a generation of transformative peer production technologies in a way that the Reddit website important as it is will not. 3. What Aaron Means to Me A lot of what has been written about Aaron speaks to his intelligence, his curiosity, his generosity, his ethics and his drive. Although I recognize all these qualities in the Aaron I knew, I ve felt alienated by how abstract some of the discussion of Aaron has been my memories are of particularities.

I remember the time Aaron was hospitalized and I spent two hours on the phone going through my bookshelves arguing with him about the virtues of the books in my library as we tried to decide which books I would bring him. I remember Aaron confronting Peter Singer intellectual founder of the modern animal rights movement at the Boston Vegetarian Food Festival to ask if humans had a moral obligation to stop animals from killing each other. I lurked behind, embarrassed about the question but curious to hear the answer. (Singer sighed and said yes sort of and complemented Aaron on the enormous Marxist commentary he was carrying.) I remember 1-800-INTERNET.com. I remember talking with Aaron about whether being wealthy could be ethical. I argued it could not but Aaron argued uncharacteristically I thought that it could. Aaron told Mika she should slap him if he ever became wealthy. The very next day, it was announced that his company had been acquired and that Aaron was a millionaire. I remember the standing bets I had with Aaron and how he would email me every time news reports favored his claims (but never when they did not). And I remember that I won t hear from him again.

Aaron was a friend and inspiration. I miss him deeply and I am very sad.

I ve been trying to tidy up my Mako templates within my Turbogears 2 project. As part of that I was looking at some of them that are quickstarted including one which is the About page. What was curious was there was all this CSS work all done already for you, including icons. Digging further I found out that one of the many projects Turbogears takes in, is Bootstrap. It s website describes Bootstrap as Sleek, intuitive, and powerful front-end framework for faster and easier web development. but what it means to me is a bunch of guys who understand HTML and CSS way better than me have made it easy for me to build a decent web application. While the framework won t suit everyone s tastes, it makes a lot of the formatting decisions so much easier. The thing is, in all the Turbogears documentation I have read I ve not heard it mentioned. Not sure why, its pretty awesome (not SQLAlchemy awesome but not many things are).

Related articles

• TurboGears2 2.2.1 (pypi.python.org)
• twitter bootstrap CSS mobile (stackoverflow.com)
• 11 Reasons to Use Twitter Bootstrap (sitepoint.com)
• Book Review : Twitter BootStrap Web Development How-To (anujgakhar.com)
• Bootstrap in 2013 (epiphanysearch.co.uk)

I did not realize how much I was missing this sort of heads-down programming time in my life until the last two days. I think the last time that I had this much fun with my job was when I was learning Java, and even that wasn't quite this much fun since it was a lot of experimentation rather than being directly productive in a language I know well. Here's a short list of modern Perl, Perl techniques, and interesting modules that I'd not had a reason to use before today:

• Profiling and Devel::NYTProf. What a lovely piece of software. I'm starting to like this trend towards useful developer tools dumping their output in HTML, particularly when many of them are this pretty. (Devel::Cover by way of Test::Strict also does this, and I've been making heavy use of it.)
• Memoize. I've known it existed for years, but I've never had a reason to use it. Memoizing str2time when doing log parsing cut the time by a quarter. (I'll probably write a hand-rolled date parser for the specific date format eventually, since str2time is really slow since it's so general, but wrapping Memoize around it takes five seconds.)
• Module::Build. I was staying away from this because of all the problems Debian had with embedded code copies, but it appears to not be doing that any more (or at least I can use it in a way that it doesn't). And it really is so much nicer than ExtUtils::MakeMaker. I will probably convert all of my packages over time, although I have to see what it's like for XS modules. ETA 2013-01-24: Gregor pointed out that I was confusing Module::Build with Module::Install. I feel silly now; I've been avoiding Module::Build solely because I've been confusing it with something else entirely!
• HTTP::BrowserDetect. This isn't a general piece of software, of course, but once again it was lovely to discover that CPAN already contained exactly the piece of software that I needed. I'm trying to produce a summary of what browsers our authenticated users use as part of a general software inventory, and this turned the nonsense that browsers send into exactly the sort of management-consumable classifications I needed.
• IO::Compress and IO::Uncompress. Yes, this is much nicer than what I used to have to do with Compress::Zlib. It's like people kept working on Perl while I've been using all the things I learned five years ago!

I still have tomorrow morning to continue focusing on this and will hopefully finish up the work to feed long time periods of logs into my analysis tool. And, even better, I have a log parsing framework that I really like and that I think will make any number of things easier in the long run. (Also, it has a remarkably thorough test suite. I love test-driven development. Although I haven't written comprehensive tests for the very final front-end piece, since generating sanitized log input to trigger all the cases is too much effort right at the moment.)

I have a problem I have to solve for work that involves correlating Apache access and error logs. Part of WebAuth logs successful authentications to the Apache error log, and I want to correlate User-Agent strings with users so that we can figure out what devices our users are using by percentage of users rather than percentage of hits. The problem, as those who have tried to do this prior to Apache 2.4 know, is that Apache doesn't provide any easy way to correlate access and error log entries (made even more complex because two separate components are involved). I could have just hacked something together, but I've written way too many ad hoc log parsers, and, see, I was reading this book.... The book in question is Mark Jason Dominus's Higher Order Perl. I'm not quite done with it, and will post a full review when I am. I have some problems with it, mostly around the author's choice of example problems. But there is one chapter on infinite streams, and the moment I read that chapter on the train, it struck me as the perfect solution to log parsing problems. I'm not much of a functional programming person (which is where Dominus is drawing most of the material for this book), so I don't know if this terminology is standard or somewhat unique to the book. An infinite stream in this context is basically a variation on an interator that lets you look at the next item without consuming it. The power comes from putting this modified iterator in front of a generator and use it to consume one element at a time, and then compose this with transformation and filtering functions. That gives you all the power of the iterator to store state and lets you process one logical element from the stream at a time, without inverting your flow of control. Dominus provides code in the book for a very nice functional implementation of this that's about as close as you're probably going to get to writing Haskell in Perl. Unfortunately, his publisher decided to write their own free software license, so the license is kind of weird and doesn't explicitly permit redistribution of modified code. It's probably fine, but I didn't feel like dealing with it, and I'm more comfortable with writing object-oriented code at the moment (at least in Perl), so I decided to write an object-oriented version of the same code specific for log parsing. That's what I've been doing since shortly after lunch, and I can't remember the last time I've had this much fun writing code. I have a reasonable first cut at a (fully tested and fully test-driven) log parsing framework built on top of a reasonably generic implementation of the core ideas behind infinite streams. I also used this as an opportunity to experiment with Module::Build, and have discovered that the things I most disliked about it have apparently all been fixed. And I'm also using Perl 5.10 features. (I was tempted to start using some things from 5.12, but I do actually need to run this on Debian stable.) It's rather satisfying to write a thoroughly modern Perl module. There are some definite drawbacks to writing this in an object-oriented fashion. There's rather more machinery and glue that has to be set up, it's probably a bit slower, and it tends to accumulate layers of calls. One of the advantages of the method with standalone functions and a very simple, transparent data structure is that it's easier to eliminate unnecessary call nesting. But I suspect the object-oriented version will do what I want without any difficulties, and if I feel very inspired, I can always fiddle with it later. Maybe I'll eventually use this as a project to experiment with Moose as well. I'm surprised that no one else has done this, but I poked around on CPAN a fair bit and couldn't find anything. This will all show up on CPAN (as Log::Stream) as soon as I've finished enough of it to implement my sample application. And then I'll hopefully find some time to rewrite our metrics system using it, which should simplify it considerably....

ITWire ran a story on the 12th of January entitled "Fedora still has problems with secure boot". It ends up discussing two issues with the author's experience with the Fedora installer - that he can't reclaim any free space on existing drives, and that the installer didn't automatically add entries for Windows to the grub menu. These are certainly legitimate issues, and I don't want to suggest that it's reasonable for people to have to manually alter their configuration in order to support dual boot. But they're not issues with Fedora's support for secure boot, despite the enthusiasm with which certain people have jumped on the story. We've received one credible report of a secure boot related problem with Fedora on a couple of Toshiba laptops, which appears (and I want to stress that we're still working on diagnosing it) to be a firmware bug rather than any kind of problem with Fedora.

Mistakes happen in journalism, and sometimes there are differences of opinion. But this story is simply wrong. When asked about it in the comments, the author failed to support his position. When contacted, the editor in chief was willing to add a note saying that I disputed the arguments but was unwilling to remove the incorrect claims. As a result, the internet remains full of links and reposts of an article that unashamedly tells users that the current Linux distribution with the best UEFI hardware support has issues with something it has no issues with.

For reasons that are unclear to me, ITWire seems to have some sort of well regarded status in the Australian technical industry. It seems entirely undeserved.

comments

Yesterday, I asked for testers for my prototype for making Debian better at handling pluggable hardware devices, which I set out to create earlier this month. Several valuable testers showed up, and caused me to really want to to open up the development to more people. But before I did this, I want to come up with a sensible name for this project. Today I finally decided on a new name, and I have renamed the project from hw-support-handler to this new name. In the process, I moved the source to git and made it available as a collab-maint repository in Debian. The new name? It is Isenkram. To fetch and build the latest version of the source, use

git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/isenkram.git
cd isenkram && git-buildpackage -us -uc

I have not yet adjusted all files to use the new name yet. If you want to hack on the source or improve the package, please go ahead. But please talk to me first on IRC or via email before you do major changes, to make sure we do not step on each others toes. :) If you wonder what 'isenkram' is, it is a Norwegian word for iron stuff, typically meaning tools, nails, screws, etc. Typical hardware stuff, in other words. I've been told it is the Norwegian variant of the German word eisenkram, for those that are familiar with that word. Update 2013-01-26: Added -us -us to build instructions, to avoid confusing people with an error from the signing process. Update 2013-01-27: Switch to HTTP URL for the git clone argument to avoid the need for authentication.

Recently I recieved a MyAudio Tablet Series9 as a gift. From the factory it runs some version of Android, but I already got enough Android devices. Instead I wanted to play a bit with a basic Linux install. This tablet is based on the AllWinner A10 System on a Chip. Some of these instructions might work for other systems based on the same chip set: Step 1: Install the rescue system from http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?6,9396 on a SD-card. You can configure network settings in rescue/interfaces and rescue/wpa_supplicant.conf. Step 2: Boot the rescue system. The MyAudio table will boot from the SD-card if it contains a bootable system, so this is quite easy. The first time you boot the rescue system tries to locate a system.bin file from the tablet. this file contains the hardware configuration and is needed for initializing all the hardware. This means that the screen can t be initialized the first time you boot and will just appear off. Unless the system automatically boots again you need to locate the system.bin yourself from the tablet. It is usually located on /dev/nanda and have names like system.bin, script.bin, or evb.bin. To find the file you can use the log the rescue system places in log/deviceinfo.log on the SD-card during boot. You should now have console access to the tablet and using a USB keyboard you should be able to work in the console. Step 3: Setting up the network Having configured rescue/interfaces and rescue/wpa_supplicant.conf the network ought to work. I am experiencing some problems getting it to connect to my Access Point (using WPA2). Patience works, but you might need to monitor the status with wpa_cli(8) and then run udhcp -i wlan0 when it succeeds. Step 4: Install Debian using the installer at http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?6,8906 This just worked fine Step 5: Getting the touch screen to work. The system.bin file can be decoded with the fexc utility either available on the rescue system (compiled for arm) of from https://github.com/linux-sunxi/sunxi-tools. Finding the ctp_para section we can see that this tablet uses a ft5x touch screen. Adding ft5x_ts to /etc/modules on our installed system will make sure that the correct kernel module gets loaded on boot time. But for some reason the kernel driver and the X11 evdev driver will not talk together. So we need to compile our own kernel patched as described on https://www.miniand.com/forums/forums/development/topics/how-do-i-get-the-lcd-display-and-touch-screen-working-on-an-a10-tablet#post-1225. I have made kernel packages for Debian available at http://hacking.dk/files/linux-image-3.0.57-sun4i+_1.0+nomultitouch_armhf.deb or http://hacking.dk/files/linux-image-3.4.24-sun4i+_1.0+nomultitouch_armhf.deb. Install the kernel package you want and run this as root:

# KERNEL_VERSION=3.4.24-sun4i+
# /usr/bin/mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel  -C none -a 0x40008000 -e 0x40008000 -n Linux-$KERNEL_VERSION -d /boot/vmlinuz-$KERNEL_VERSION /boot/uImage
# /usr/bin/mkimage -A arm -O linux -T ramdisk -C gzip -a 0x00000000 -e 0x00000000 -n initramfs-$KERNEL_VERSION -d /boot/initrd.img-$KERNEL_VERSION /boot/uInitrd

After a reboot X11 will respond to the touch screen, but Step 6: Configure the touch screen the pointer does not point where I touch the screen. The transformation between the points are wrong. This is fixed by adding this to your xorg.conf:

Section "InputClass"
    Identifier     "touchscreen"
    MatchProduct   "ft5x_ts"
    Option    "TransformationMatrix" "0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1"
    Option    "Calibration" "0 768 0 1024"
EndSection

or more dynamically by running:

$ xinput set-prop ft5x_ts "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
$ xinput set-prop ft5x_ts "Evdev Axis Calibration" 0 768 0 1024

For more information about the Transformation Matrix, see the X.Org Wiki Step 7: Install a on-screen keyboard. I have not found the perfect keyboard application yet. Currently I am using matchbox-keyboard

Re-implement ikiwiki, or something like it, in go. See how much the language's features and philosophy colour the design. In particular I'm wondering how much the first-class treatment of concurrency might change how you structure things: one thread per page, or hot pages... you'd want to approach it with lots of micro-locks rather than one big lock to rule them all. I can see some future ikiwiki refactoring work being a bit like the Linux Kernel's efforts to get rid of their big kernel lock. See also: Joey's proposed Haskell ikiwiki rewrite. I may be remembering wrong, but I thought he had some beginning code up somewhere. Perhaps I'm conflating it with John Goerzen's one-time OfflineIMAP rewrite, which might also be lost to the sands of time...

In this article, I'm going to explain you how you can extend Swift, the OpenStack Object Storage project, so it performs extra action on files at upload or at download time. We're going to build an anti-virus filter inside Swift. The goal is to refuse uploaded data if they contain a virus. To help us with virus analyses, we'll use ClamAV. WSGI, paste and middleware To do our content analysis, the best place to hook in the Swift architecture is at the beginning of every request, on swift-proxy, before the file is actually stored on the cluster. Swift proxy uses, like many other OpenStack projects, paste to build his HTTP architecture. Paste uses WSGI and provides an architecture based on a pipeline. The pipeline is composed of a succession of middleware, ending with one application. Each middleware has the chance to look at the request or at the response, can modify it, and then pass it to the following middleware. The latest component of the pipeline is the real application, and in this case, the Swift proxy server. If you've already deployed Swift, you encountered a default pipeline in the swift-proxy.conf configuration file:
This is a really basic pipeline with a few middleware. The first one catches error, the second one is in charge to return 200 OK response if you send a GET /healthcheck request on your proxy server. The third one is in charge of caching, the fourth one is used for rate limiting, the fifth for authentication, the sixth one for logging, and the final one is the actual proxy server, in charge of proxying the request to the account, container, or object servers (the others components of Swift). Of course, we could remove or add any of the middleware here at our convenience. Be aware that the order matters: for example, if you put healthcheck after tempauth, you won't be able to access the /healthcheck URL without being authenticated! ClamAV If you don't know ClamAV, it's an antivirus engine designed for detecting trojans, viruses, malware and other malicious threats. Wwe're going to use it to scan every incoming file. To build the middleware, we'll use the Python binding pyclamd. The API is quite simple, see:
Anatomy of a WSGI middleware Your WSGI middleware should consist of a callable object. Usually this is done with a class implementing the __call__ method. Here's a basic boilerplate:
I'm not going to expand more on why this is built this way, but if you want to have more info on this kind of filter middleware, you can read their documentation on Paste. This middleware will just do nothing as it is. It's going to simply pass all requests it receives to the final application, and returns the result. Testing our basic middleware Now is a really good time to add unit tests. I hope you didn't think we were going to write code without some tests, right? It's really easy to test a middleware, as we're going to use WebOb for that.
We create a FakeApp class, that represents a fake WSGI application. You could also use a real application, or write a fake application looking like the one you want to test. It'll require more time, but your tests will be closer to the reality. Here we write the simplest test we can for our middleware. We're just sending a GET / request to it, so it passes the request to the final application and returns the result. It is transparent, it does nothing. Now, with that solid base we'll able to add more features and test these features incrementally. Plugging ClamAV in With our base ready, we can start thinking about how to plug ClamAV in. What we want to check here, is the content of the file when it's uploaded. If we refer to the OpenStack object storage API , a file upload is done via a PUT request, so we're going to limit the check to that kind of requests. Obviously, more checks could be added, but we'll keep things simple here for the sake of comprehensibility. With WSGI, the content of the request is available in env['wsgi.input'] as an object implementing a file interface. We'll scan that stream with ClamAV to check for viruses.
That's it. We only check for PUT requests and if there's a virus in the file, we return a 403 Forbidden error with the name of the detected virus, bypassing entirely the rest of the middleware chain and the application handling. Then, we can simply test it.
The first test test_put_empty simulates an empty PUT request. The second one, test_put_no_virus simulates a regular PUT request but with a simple file containing no virus. Finally, the third and last test simulates the upload of a virus using the EICAR test file. This is a special test file that is recognized as a virus, even if it's not real one. Very handy for testing virus detection software! Configuring Swift proxy Our middleware is ready! We can configure Swift's proxy server to use it. We need to add the following lines to our swift-proxy.conf to teach it how to load the filter:
We'll assume that our Python modules is named swiftclamava here. Now that we've defined our filter and how to load it, we can use it in our pipeline:
Just before reaching the proxy-server, and after the user being authenticated, the content will be scanned for viruses. It's important here to put this after authentication for example, because otherwise we may scan content that will get rejected by the authtemp module, thus scanning for nothing! Beyond scanning And voil , we now have a simple middleware testing uploaded content and refusing infected files. We could enhance it with various other things, like configuration handling, but I'll let that as an exercise for the interested readers. We didn't exploited it here, but note that you can also manipulate request headers and modify them if needed. For example, we could have added a header X-Object-Meta-Scanned-By: ClamAV to indicates that the file has been scanned by ClamAV. You should now be able to build your own middleware doing whatever you want with uploaded data. Happy hacking!

Today in the USA is Martin Luther King, Jr., day. But sometimes these holidays get confusing for a 6-year-old. I asked Jacob the other day if he knew what holiday was coming up. He thought about it for a second, then declared it would be St. Patrick s Day. He was excited because St. Patrick s Day is green. When he realized that it was really MLK Day, he was disappointed. That day isn t green. So I said, Jacob, how about we celebrate pretend St. Patrick s Day on Monday? His face lit up, he got a huge smile, and said, Oh yes! Great idea, dad! Oliver got all excited about it too. I was already planning on us doing some cooking, and thankfully had green food coloring already. So I sort of discarded my plans so each meal could have something green in it. When the boys woke up this morning, I wished each of them Happy Pretend St. Patrick s Day! We all wore green. Jacob put his shirt on backwards so the side with more green would be facing front. For breakfast, our green dish was green crepes with a succotash (based on baby lima beans and corn) filling. The boys were excited to discover that the crepes could be green on one side, and green and a little brown on the other. Jacob was unsure of the succotash idea, but after having a few bites, declared it excellent . After breakfast, we made bread. They loved watching the green food coloring disperse in the water. We checked on how green the dough looked periodically. We watched how it was rising and whether it was staying green. And we checked in on it backing, as the crust turned from green to brown. We discussed green bread over and over. Important questions were asked and answers were attempted. And then, of course, the moment of truth removing the loaf from the pan. The boys jabbered excitedly that there was some green peeking out. While we waited for it to cool, we went out to the creek. The creek is dry this year, so we got to walk in it. Jacob used his stick to make a line behind him. I asked him, Is that a line so we can find our way back? Oh! Uhm. Yes! And then he added arrows so we d know which way to go. Jacob stopped every 20 or so feet to collect pretend train tickets from Oliver and me. Oliver eventually grew tired of this, so Jacob started collecting Oliver s ticket from me. They climbed on some trees, managed to find some mud, drew outlines of train cars in the dirt, and then followed Jacob s line back down the creek bed. They pointed out any green things they saw. Then we went back to the house, took off our warm coats, and cut into the bread. Can you imagine the excitement? I hadn t realized green is a flavor, but it must have been somehow, because those boys absolutely loved this green bread. When we got out the jam, Jacob realized that it was red on the green bread, and that now his bread was Christmas-colored. All sorts of green bread discoveries were made, but the best among them was that if you hold a slice of green bread up to the bright sun, the sun makes it glow green and it looks like a stained-glass window. Sometimes a few drops of food coloring can add a ton of excitement to a day.

when it s a prediction . In the 4th January edition of the Guardian Weekly , the front page story, entitled Meet the world s new boomers ¹ contained this little gem:

Back in 2006, [PricewaterhouseCoopers] made some forecasts about what the global economy might look like in 2050, and it has now updated the predictions in the light of the financial crisis and its aftermath.

Delightful. They made some forecasts about what the global economy might look like. Given that they clearly didn t include any impact of the GFC in their forecasts, it clearly wasn t a particularly accurate forecast. Y know what an inaccurate prediction is called? Guesswork. Let s call a spade a spade here. I see this all the time, and it s starting to shit me. People making predictions and forecasts and projections hither and yon, and they re almost always complete bollocks, and they never get called on it. I read the Greater Fool blog now and then, and that blog is chock full of examples of people making predictions which have very little chance of being in any way accurate. While Dr Ben Goldacre and others are making inroads into requiring full disclosure in clinical trials, I m not aware of anyone taking a similar stand against charlatans making dodgy-as-hell predictions over and over again, with the sole purpose of getting attention, without any responsibility for the accuracy of those predictions. Is anyone aware of anyone doing work in this area, or do I need to register badpredictions.net and start calling out dodginess?