Search Results: "ana"

3 May 2012

Gunnar Wolf: Co-starring: Debian Tour Managua 2012!

As stated in the 2012-04-30 edition of the Debian Project News, this weekend I will be meeting Holger Levsen (who has been there for over a week now) in Managua, Nicaragua, as part of the Debian Tour 2012, a set of talks meant to raise awareness and interest on Debian between the Nicaraguan (+Central American) user groups, university students, companies and government. Not all of the planned activities are present in the Debian Tour webpage. I know I will be giving my talk on Debian in the Free Software projects' universe, this Saturday at Universidad Centro Americana (UCA). Besides this, we will be meeting on Monday with the UCA staff to discuss some DebConf-specific issues. Sunday? Well, I hope^Wfully trust we will have interesting activities as well :)

Rudy Godoy: FLISOL Puno

Past Saturday April 28 I attended to the FLISOL 2012 Puno hosted at the Casa de la Cultura in downtown Puno. It was a great experience to deliver a talk after a while, the second speech since I enrolled into the UCSP s Computer and Engineering Faculty to get my Computer Science BS degree. Puno is really a nice city with a great landscape for those like me who enjoy the sun, lakes, wonderful mountains and, as it s name says, the Andes plane 3860m above sea level. Pretty high and very cold at night indeed but a lovely place. FLISOL is short for Latin American Free Software Installation Festival that just aged 12 this year. In my talk I wanted to describe the motivations behind the Free Software movement origins. I specially remarked the fact that the movement doesn t look for technical excellence, even though this is something we thrive for, rather than preserving a common set of guidelines for protecting assets we do value such software and freedom. Later I discussed about how Debian have become a key actor in the free software ecosystem. Primarily as a huge software library, second as a building block for specialized distributions (such as Ubuntu) and third, but not the last, as a facilitator for new developments and contributions to the ecosystem, and I mentioned here the Debian GNU/Hurd project. Through such topics I explained what we do, why we do it and why they may want to contribute. There was a good reception from the audience and there were many questions on the subjects I elaborated on. I was impressed to see many Debian users, some of them power users , and even tried to help one to configure his obscure Xorg settings on his laptop (didn t succeed because lack of connectivity, will send him testing CDs eventually). I d like to thank to the organization who made a great job. The team, nearly 30 students from Universidad Nacional del Altiplano plus local activists, started working in February collecting funds and managed to gather more than 330 attendees during the almost 10 hours of the event. Also special thanks for the coffee machine that was available!

2 May 2012

Uwe Hermann: sigrok - cross-platform, open-source logic analyzer software with protocol decoder support

sigrok logo I'm happy to finally announce an open-source (GNU GPL), cross-platform (Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Windows, ...) logic analyzer software package myself and Bert Vermeulen have been working on for quite a long time now: sigrok (it groks your signals). History I originally started working on an open-source logic analyzer software named "flosslogic" in 2010, because I grew tired of almost all devices having a proprietary and Windows-only software, often with limited features, limited input/output file formats, limited usability, limited protocol decoder support, and so on. Thus, the goal was to write a portable, GPL'd, software that can talk to many different logic analyzers via modules/plugins, supports many input/output formats, and many different protocol decoders. The advantage being, that every time we add a new driver for another logic analyzer it automatically supports all the input/output formats we already have, you can use all the protocol decoders we already wrote, etc. It also works the other way around: If someone writes a new protocol decoder or file format driver, it can automatically be used with any of the supported logic analyzers out of the box. Turns out Bert Vermeulen had been working on a similar software for a while too (due to exactly the same reasons, crappy Windows software, etc.) so it was only logical that we joined forces and worked on this together. We kept Bert's name for the software package ("sigrok"), set up a SourceForge project, mailing lists, IRC channel, wiki, etc. and started working. Overview, Features You can get the lastest sigrok source code from our main git repository:
  $ git clone git://sigrok.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/sigrok/sigrok
Here's a short overview of sigrok and its features as of today. The software consists of the following components: We're happy to hear about other (maybe special-purpose) frontends you may want to write using libsigrok/libsigrokdecode as helper libs! Firmware Saleae Logic Some logic analyzer devices require firmware to be uploaded before they can be used. As always, firmware is a bit of a pain, but here's what we currently do: For non-free firmware we provide instructions how to extract it from the vendor software or from USB dumps, if possible. For distributable firmware we have a git repo where you can get it (thanks ASIX for allowing us to distribute the ASIX Sigma/Sigma2 firmware files!).
  $ git clone git://sigrok.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/sigrok/sigrok-firmwares
Finally, for all Cypress FX2 based logic analyzers we have an open-source (GNU GPL) firmware named fx2lafw, started by myself, but most work (and finishing the firmware) was then done by Joel Holdsworth, thanks! The support list includes Saleae Logic, CWAV USBee SX, CWAV USBee AX, Robomotic Minilogic/BugLogic3, Braintechnology USB-LPS, and many others. Get the code from the fw2lafw git repository:
  $ git clone git://sigrok.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/sigrok/fx2lafw
Example dumps We collect various captured logic analyzer signals / protocol dumps in the sigrok-dumps git repository:
  $ git clone git://sigrok.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/sigrok/sigrok-dumps
They can be useful for testing the sigrok command-line application, the sigrok GUIs, or the protocol decoders. We're happy to include further contributed example data in our repository, please send us .sr files of any interesting data/protocol you may come across (even if sigrok doesn't yet have a protocol decoder for that protocol). See the Example dumps wiki page for details. Packages, distros, installers sigrok Windows installer I'm currently working on updated Debian packages for sigrok (will be apt-get install sigrok to get everything), and we're happy about further packaging efforts for other distros. We have preliminary Windows installer files (using NSIS), but the Windows code needs some more fixes and portability improvements before it's really usable. On Mac OS X you can use fink/Macports to install as usual, fancier .app installer files are being worked on. Future Apart from support for more logic analyzers, input/output formats, and protocol decoders, we have a number of other plans for the next few releases. This includes support for analog data, i.e. support for (USB) oscilloscopes, multimeters, spectrum analyzers, and such stuff. This will also require additional GUI support (which could take a while). Also, we want to improve/fix the Windows support, and test/port sigrok to other architectures we come across. Performance improvements for the protocol decoding as well as more features there are also planned. Contact Feel free to contact us on the sigrok-devel mailing list, or in the IRC channel #sigrok on Freenode. There's also an identi.ca group for sigrok. We're always happy about feedback, bug reports, suggestions for improving sigrok, and patches of course!

Matthew Garrett: Anatomy of a Fedora 17 ISO image

My spare time has been limited lately, so progress on producing Mac-bootable Fedora install images has been a bit slow. Thankfully it looks like everything's gong to land in time for Fedora 17[1] so hurrah for that - all that's missing right now are the last couple of patches that make sure the boot picker displays useful labels on the drives.

So how is this accomplished? Here's a hex dump of the first few K of the image.
00000000  45 52 08 00 00 00 90 90  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ER.............. 
00000010  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00000020  33 ed fa 8e d5 bc 00 7c  fb fc 66 31 db 66 31 c9   3...... ..f1.f1. 
00000030  66 53 66 51 06 57 8e dd  8e c5 52 be 00 7c bf 00   fSfQ.W....R.. .. 
00000040  06 b9 00 01 f3 a5 ea 4b  06 00 00 52 b4 41 bb aa   .......K...R.A.. 
00000050  55 31 c9 30 f6 f9 cd 13  72 16 81 fb 55 aa 75 10   U1.0....r...U.u. 
00000060  83 e1 01 74 0b 66 c7 06  f1 06 b4 42 eb 15 eb 00   ...t.f.....B.... 
00000070  5a 51 b4 08 cd 13 83 e1  3f 5b 51 0f b6 c6 40 50   ZQ......?[Q...@P 
00000080  f7 e1 53 52 50 bb 00 7c  b9 04 00 66 a1 b0 07 e8   ..SRP.. ...f.... 
00000090  44 00 0f 82 80 00 66 40  80 c7 02 e2 f2 66 81 3e   D.....f@.....f.> 
000000a0  40 7c fb c0 78 70 75 09  fa bc ec 7b ea 44 7c 00   @ ..xpu.... .D . 
000000b0  00 e8 83 00 69 73 6f 6c  69 6e 75 78 2e 62 69 6e   ....isolinux.bin 
000000c0  20 6d 69 73 73 69 6e 67  20 6f 72 20 63 6f 72 72    missing or corr 
000000d0  75 70 74 2e 0d 0a 66 60  66 31 d2 66 03 06 f8 7b   upt...f f1.f... 
000000e0  66 13 16 fc 7b 66 52 66  50 06 53 6a 01 6a 10 89   f... fRfP.Sj.j.. 
000000f0  e6 66 f7 36 e8 7b c0 e4  06 88 e1 88 c5 92 f6 36   .f.6. .........6 
00000100  ee 7b 88 c6 08 e1 41 b8  01 02 8a 16 f2 7b cd 13   . ....A...... .. 
00000110  8d 64 10 66 61 c3 e8 1e  00 4f 70 65 72 61 74 69   .d.fa....Operati 
00000120  6e 67 20 73 79 73 74 65  6d 20 6c 6f 61 64 20 65   ng system load e 
00000130  72 72 6f 72 2e 0d 0a 5e  ac b4 0e 8a 3e 62 04 b3   rror...^....>b.. 
00000140  07 cd 10 3c 0a 75 f1 cd  18 f4 eb fd 00 00 00 00   ...<.u.......... 
00000150  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
This is the boot sector. One of the fun things about ISO9660 is that it doesn't have a boot sector in the usual x86 sense - firmwares are expected to read enough of the filesystem that they can find the bootloader in it and run it directly. x86 isn't really smart enough to manage that, so it uses something called El Torito[2]. In any case, this is usually empty space on an x86 CD. But with an increasing number of systems shipping without optical drives, real CD installs are decreasing in popularity. We use a piece of software called isohybrid that allows the building of ISO9660 images that can be written directly onto a USB stick. Asking a machine to boot off them will execute the boot sector located here, which then loads a real bootloader that's capable of reading ISO and booting the OS. It'll just be ignored when it's on a real CD.

There's one difference here, though. The isohybrid bootsector has been modified so that the first 32 bytes are just noops, and this has been inserted:
00000000  45 52 08 00 00 00 90 90  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ER.............. 
45 52 ("ER") indicates the presence of an Apple partition map. This will become important later. 0800 indicates that it's using 2048-byte sectors. The 9090 is a lie to convince the firmware that it's not a zero-sized disk without representing dangerous code. We need an Apple partition map because some older Macs won't boot off CD unless the CD has one. But it's sitting right at the start of the boot sector, and this code is going to be executed. Thankfully, the entire Apple header decodes to
00000000  45                inc bp
00000001  52                push dx
00000002  0800              or [bx+si],al
00000004  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000006  90                nop
00000007  90                nop
00000008  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000000A  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000000C  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000000E  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000010  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000012  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000014  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000016  0000              add [bx+si],al
00000018  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000001A  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000001C  0000              add [bx+si],al
0000001E  0000              add [bx+si],al
which is completely harmless - we can execute all these instructions without any interesting changes in state. They'll all be undone by the rest of the boot sector.
000001b0  14 05 00 00 00 00 00 00  4c 1e ed 76 00 00 80 00   ........L..v.... 
000001c0  01 00 00 3f a0 89 00 00  00 00 00 50 14 00 00 fe   ...?.......P.... 
000001d0  ff ff ef fe ff ff a4 00  00 00 70 04 00 00 00 fe   ..........p..... 
000001e0  ff ff 00 fe ff ff 44 05  00 00 c0 08 00 00 00 00   ......D......... 
000001f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 55 aa   ..............U. 
This is the MBR partition table. The aim here was to produce media that would boot via BIOS just as well as it does via EFI, and it turns out that there are some systems that refuse to BIOS-boot off GPT media. So we need an MBR partition map. The first entry covers the entire disk and is of type 0. This is important, because some EFI implementations are strict about MBR parsing - if there's an MBR with overlapping partitions, the entire MBR will be ignored. Inconvenient. Fortunately, we've got the source code to this code, and it turns out that partitions of type 0 are ignored when performing this check. So, there's a partition of type 0.

Why does it cover the entire disk? Once we've booted the OS, we need to be able to read the ISO image contained on the USB stick. That means the kernel needs to be able to mount it, which means we need a partition entry that covers the entire disk. Linux is perfectly happy mounting a filesystem from a partition of type 0.

So, the next partition. This is an EFI boot partition that points at the embedded VFAT El-Torito image. Some firmware will decide that we've got an MBR and so will only boot off a partition that exists in it. So, here's an MBR partition to keep them happy.

The final partition covers the embedded HFS+ image. It's there purely for convenience - it means we can access it under Linux in order to update its contents for testing purposes.
00000200  45 46 49 20 50 41 52 54  00 00 01 00 5c 00 00 00   EFI PART....\... 
00000210  09 27 93 7e 00 00 00 00  01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   .'.~............ 
00000220  fe 4f 14 00 00 00 00 00  30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   .O......0....... 
00000230  de 4f 14 00 00 00 00 00  2a 26 0f 37 23 c9 7f 4f   .O......*&.7#..O 
00000240  90 df 5e fe 0a 60 1c b0  10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ..^.. .......... 
00000250  80 00 00 00 80 00 00 00  ec 70 63 c1 00 00 00 00   .........pc..... 
00000260  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
And here we have the GPT header. Nothing complicated here, other than it indicates that the first partition descriptor is at LBA 0x10, ie byte 0x2000 - that's further into the disk than normal. That leaves us enough space to fit the Apple partition entries.

Why have a GPT at all? The EFI spec says that machines should boot fine from an MBR partition. Sadly, not all seem to. It also lets us represent the HFS+ partition in a way that makes the Mac firmware happy.
00000800  50 4d 00 00 00 00 00 03  00 00 00 01 00 00 00 10   PM.............. 
00000810  41 70 70 6c 65 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   Apple........... 
00000820  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00000830  41 70 70 6c 65 5f 70 61  72 74 69 74 69 6f 6e 5f   Apple_partition_ 
00000840  6d 61 70 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   map............. 
00000850  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a  00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00000860  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
2K into the disk, here's an Apple partition map. It's 2K into the disk because we set the sector size to 2K in the partition map header. Why did we do that? Because the default is 512 bytes, and if we'd put the partition map at 512 bytes it would have been on top of the GPT header. Why 2K rather than 1K? A couple of reasons. First, the Apple partition map is only used when we boot off an actual CD, and the CD sector size is genuinely 2K. Secondly, because CDs have a sector size of 2K, 2K is a value that's actually been tested in the real world. It's nice to avoid tempting fate.
00001000  50 4d 00 00 00 00 00 03  00 00 00 29 00 00 04 70   PM.........)...p 
00001010  45 46 49 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   EFI............. 
00001020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00001030  41 70 70 6c 65 5f 48 46  53 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   Apple_HFS....... 
00001040  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00001050  00 00 00 00 00 00 04 70  00 00 00 33 00 00 00 00   .......p...3.... 
00001060  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
*
00001800  50 4d 00 00 00 00 00 03  00 00 01 51 00 00 08 c0   PM.........Q.... 
00001810  45 46 49 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   EFI............. 
00001820  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00001830  41 70 70 6c 65 5f 48 46  53 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   Apple_HFS....... 
00001840  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00001850  00 00 00 00 00 00 08 c0  00 00 00 33 00 00 00 00   ...........3.... 
00001860  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
The Apple partition map entries. One partition covers the entire disk, the other the embedded HFS+ filesystem. Why do this? Because not all Macs understand EFI El Torito, so won't EFI boot a CD unless there's an Apple partition map. Why have an HFS+ partition at all? Because the same Macs won't boot off FAT.
00002000  a2 a0 d0 eb e5 b9 33 44  87 c0 68 b6 b7 26 99 c7   ......3D..h..&.. 
00002010  d0 84 a5 d4 aa 89 e0 40  81 f9 fc e4 04 e9 c2 99   .......@........ 
00002020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  10 4b 14 00 00 00 00 00   .........K...... 
00002030  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  49 53 4f 48 79 62 72 69   ........ISOHybri 
00002040  64 20 49 53 4f 00 49 53  4f 48 79 62 72 69 64 00   d ISO.ISOHybrid. 
00002050  41 70 70 6c 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   Appl............ 
00002060  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
*
00002080  a2 a0 d0 eb e5 b9 33 44  87 c0 68 b6 b7 26 99 c7   ......3D..h..&.. 
00002090  68 d5 e0 27 72 83 c6 4c  a7 ae 92 dd ed 6c 89 71   h..'r..L.....l.q 
000020a0  a4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  13 05 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
000020b0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  49 53 4f 48 79 62 72 69   ........ISOHybri 
000020c0  64 00 41 70 70 6c 65 00  41 70 70 6c 00 00 00 00   d.Apple.Appl.... 
000020d0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
*
00002100  00 53 46 48 00 00 aa 11  aa 11 00 30 65 43 ec ac   .SFH.......0eC.. 
00002110  68 d5 e0 27 72 83 c6 4c  a7 ae 92 dd ed 6c 89 71   h..'r..L.....l.q 
00002120  44 05 00 00 00 00 00 00  03 0e 00 00 00 00 00 00   D............... 
00002130  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  49 53 4f 48 79 62 72 69   ........ISOHybri 
00002140  64 00 41 70 70 6c 65 00  41 70 70 6c 00 00 00 00   d.Apple.Appl.... 
00002150  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
Three GPT entries - one covers the entire CD, one covers the embedded FAT filesystem, one covers the embedded EFI filesystem. That ensures that they're all accessible to the firmware.
00008000  01 43 44 30 30 31 01 00  4c 49 4e 55 58 20 20 20   .CD001..LINUX    
00008010  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20                    
00008020  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  46 65 64 6f 72 61 2d 4c           Fedora-L 
00008030  69 76 65 43 44 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20   iveCD            
00008040  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00           ........ 
00008050  c4 12 05 00 00 05 12 c4  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00008060  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................ 
00008070  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  01 00 00 01 01 00 00 01   ................ 
00008080  00 08 08 00 40 00 00 00  00 00 00 40 15 00 00 00   ....@......@.... 
00008090  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17  00 00 00 00 22 00 1d 00   ............"... 
000080a0  00 00 00 00 00 1d 00 08  00 00 00 00 08 00 70 05   ..............p. 
000080b0  01 09 30 36 f0 02 00 00  01 00 00 01 01 00 20 20   ..06..........   
000080c0  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20                    
The ISO9660 superblock. This is completely standard. From here on there's nothing terribly surprising - the CD filesystem itself is entirely normal. The only slight oddity is that we have three embedded El Torito images. The first of these is a BIOS-bootable disk image. That'll be executed whenever the CD is put in a non-EFI machine. The second is a VFAT EFI boot image. That's used for the majority of EFI systems. The third is an HFS+ EFI boot image. There's no strict requirement for the HFS+ one to be an El Torito image - CD booting on Macs is already handled by the Apple partition map. Storing it as an El Torito is purely for convenience, since it guarantees correct alignment and avoids us having to parse the entire ISO9660 image to find its location when generating the partition maps.

In summary: Three partition maps, three bootable images, support for BIOS, UEFI and Mac platforms, works whether it's burned to a CD or written directly to a USB stick. I'm pretty pleased with that.

[1] Other than an awkward bug where something goes horribly wrong during Radeon graphics init, so Radeon-based Macs aren't working too well at the moment. We're working on it.

[2] The world decided that writing a real ISO9660 driver for BIOS was hard, so came up with El Torito. El Torito is a spec for embedding disk images inside ISO9660. There's a pointer to the disk image in the Cd header, so the BIOS simply reads a few blocks off CD, finds that pointer and then sets up a bunch of disk i/o interrupts to point at the embedded filesystem rather than a real disk. From that point on, the El Torito image simply behaves like a floppy or hard drive. This was a reasonable compromise given how resource limited older BIOS implementations were.

For reasons that aren't entirely clear, UEFI doesn't mandate that implementations support ISO9660. So even though our firmware is now sufficiently capable that the only thing standing between it and emacs is someone being sufficiently bored, we still use El Torito. Fortunately the spec allows multiple El Torito images to be embedded, so we can include one that's bootable by BIOS systems and another that's bootable by UEFI systems.

comment count unavailable comments

30 April 2012

Russ Allbery: Debian private repositories

Earlier this year, I switched Stanford's internal repositories from an old debarchiver setup that didn't do repository signing to something more modern and secure built on top of reprepro. While we're not doing anything particularly exciting at a technical level, I thought it might be interesting for people to see how a large site with heavy Debian usage divides up and manages its internal repositories. I put up a first draft of a writeup at Debian private repositories. This is currently fairly incomplete. One obvious thing that's missing is a pointer to the wrapper script that we use, but I know there's more. I'm happy to prioritize additional documentation based on what people would find interesting. Send me email (or mention on debian-enterprise, to which I'll also send a pointer to this) if there's anything in particular you want to hear about.

Petter Reinholdtsen: Cutting it short - and picking the right tool for the job

I normally cut my hair short, and my tool of choice has been a common hair/beard cutter, bought in a electrical shop here in Norway. But the last ones have not really been up to the task. My last cutter, some model from Braun, could only cut a few of my hairs at the time, and cutting my head took forever. And the one before that did not work very well either. We have looked for something better for a while, but it was not until I ended up visiting a hairdresser that we discovered that there are indeed better tools available. But these are not marketed and sold to "regular consumers". The hair saloons can get them through their suppliers, but their suppliers only sell companies. The models they sell, are very different from the ones available from Elkj p and Lefdal. The main difference is their efficiency. It would cut my hair in 5 minutes, instead of the 30-40 minutes required by my impotent Braun. The hairdresser I visited had a Panasonic ER160, which unfortunately is no longer available from the producer. But I found it had a successor, the Panasonic ER1611. The next step was to find somewhere to buy it. This was not straight forward. The list of suppliers I got from the hairdresser did not want to sell anything to me. But searching for the model on the web we found a supplier in Norway willing to sell it to us for around NOK 4000,-. This was a bit much. We kept searching and finally found a Danish supplier selling it for around NOK 1800,-. We ordered one, and it arrived a few days ago. The instructions said it had to charge for 8 hours when we started to use it, so we left it charging over night. Normally it will only need one hour to charge. The following evening we successfully tested it, and I can warmly recommend it to anyone looking for a real hair cutter. The ones we have used until now have been hair cutter toys.

John Goerzen: Review: Amateur Radio Handhelds (HTs), APRS, and Battery Tuning Tips

There are a lot of opinions about handhelds for amateur radio users (these handhelds are often known as HTs). I ve used three of them, two with APRS capability, and thought it s about time I write about them. First, I ll talk about the units in particular, then I ll get to some broader Yaesu vs. Kenwood generalizations and conclusions. Yaesu VX-7R a rugged first HT without APRS Cost: $350 as of 4/30/2012 This was the first HT I got as a ham, at the suggestion of Mike AE0MW. It truly does make a great first handheld for a ham. Radio-wise, one unique feature is a receive that s wideband enough to cover both broadcast FM and broadcast AM, the various ham bands, and plenty of others besides. The battery life quoted in the manual is 6 hours on 2m and 5.5 hours on 440 (using standard 6s TX / 6s RX / 48s squelched metric), and in my experience it seems it must be even better in some cases. The real piece of news about this unit, though, is just how rugged it is. It says submersible across the front and I absolutely believe it. I have personal experience with its ruggedness. I once was at an event and put the radio on my car roof while helping one of my children into the car. I then started driving home and forgot it there. When we got home, I realized what had happened, and also realized what that mysterious CLUNK along the busy county road was. So I drove 45 minutes back to where I heard the clunk, and found the VX-7R still lying in the roadway, where it had been for 1.5 hours on the 55 MPH road. The thing was really beat up. It had obviously been hit by numerous vehicles. The antenna was ripped off, taking the SMA mount with it. But wouldn t you know it, the darn thing still powered up. I took it to a local amateur radio shop, and about $80 later it was repaired. Incredible. The only real problem was the antenna connector. I took this radio with me on my bicycle many days, mounted on my handlebars. It got bounced around, but still worked great. Some days I listened to FM radio from it while riding my bike, monitoring a local repeater while I rode. Other days, I spent most of my ride (about an hour each way) chatting with people on the repeaters I have a mobile antenna mounted on the bike, fed to the VX-7R, and a headset. It all worked fine never a problem at all. The ruggedness has its downside. All of the connectors on the radio, except for DC in, are screw-down even the speaker/mic connector. This obviously helps keep water out, but means that it can take a lot longer than normal to do a simple thing like plug in a speaker/mic. It doesn t need any tools, but can get a little annoying. The radio physically is small (unless you install the belt clip, which has an odd peg-based mechanism that protrudes unnecessarily far and is surprisingly non-rugged). It can easily fit into a pocket. The other downsides of the VX-7R mostly surround its interface. I m not one of the Yaesu haters that seem to be so common. I find the interface usable if you read the manual; it seems a lot of people that complain about it don t. But it is quirky. The SET mode is one long menu in sort of a ring. You scroll with the knob, and when you get to the end, it repeats to the beginning. There are one or two shortcut keys to a specific setting, but overall either you use the thing so much you know exactly where you re going, or you re twisting the knob for awhile until the option you want rolls around. (I know of nobody that uses it so much they know exactly where they re going.) They do have options grouped into categories, but it doesn t help much because there s no quick way to skip between categories. The dual transceivers work less elegantly than on the TH-D72A or VX-8GR. Instead of being two equal transceivers A and B, they are main and sub . The sub transceiver is not broadband receive like the main receiver is. But there are also other limitations that have no apparent logic. For instance, you can program memory groups into the device putting, say, all the local repeaters into a certain group, or all the public safety frequencies (to use as a scanner). You can go to the special set menu, select group, then activate SCAN, and it will scan only the memories in that group. But you can t select the special group mode on the sub transceiver for no apparent reason. One other complaint is that the AC charger introduces so much noise to a transmission that you cannot really use the VX-7R to transmit while the charger is connected. Yaesu sells a programming cable that plugs into the speaker/mic port on one end, and a DB-9 serial port on the other, and includes programming software. For an incredibly high price. For far less, I found a similar cable on eBay that has a USB port on the other end (with a built-in USB/serial converter), and used VX-7R Commander though now that Chirp is available for Linux, I ll probably switch to it. I would probably continue to recommend this transceiver for a new ham. The ruggedness, plus the broadband RX, are features that should make it appealing. It is an excellent emergency preparedness/response radio due to those properties; having TX and RX on ham bands, plus RX on broadcast and public safety could be quite the asset. However, for someone that has any interest in APRS, one of the other two radios I mention is probably a better choice. At only $10 more, the VX-8GR sacrifices ruggedness and broadband receive for APRS functionality and could make a compelling alternative to the VX-7R at the same price point. The very low-power transmit at 50MHz and 220MHz on the VX-7R strikes me as a gimmick feature at best that has very little actual use. Shipped battery: FNB-80LI, 7.4V, 1400 mAh, lithium-ion Kenwood TH-D72A / D72E The Cadillac HT, with APRS and GPS Cost: $464 as of April 30, 2012 It s hard to use any word but incredible to describe this HT, though it does have its own rough edges. Starting with the basics, it has dual transceivers with full duplex (meaning you can be transmitting on one band while receiving on another). Its stored memory system and memory bank scanning system are both a lot easier and faster to use than Yaesu s, and work the same on both transceivers A and B, though perhaps offer slightly less flexibility than Yaesu s (on the VX-7R, a single memory can be a member of more than one group). The quoted operating time is 6 hours, which is probably accurate with APRS and GPS off, matching (or nearly matching) the VX-7R. The TH-D72A has the usual mic and speaker ports. Unlike Yaesu, Kenwood has used the same jack for years, so it is not necessary to purchase new accessories with each upgrade. The unit also has both serial (Kenwood connector) and standard mini USB ports, and even ships with a USB cable. The USB port is designed to interface to a PC, and the radio presents itself as a serial-over-USB device. Kenwood also includes MCP-4A, the programming software for the unit, free. This is one example of several things that Kenwood includes for free but are costly add-ons with Yaesu. Kenwood s configuration menu system is hierarchical. You can scroll through the four top-level menus (RADIO, GPS, APRS, and SKY), then navigate through sub menus. The result is that it s both faster and easier to find what you want than on the Yaesu menus. Plus, as you navigate, the radio shows you the shortcut key to get to a particular option (each level of menu is numbered starting) so, for instance, Menu-1-1-0 takes me directly to the configuration for RX battery saver interval far faster than I could get there on the VX-7R or VX-8GR. Only the APRS menu gets a bit crowded with this setup. The D72A supports Kenwood s Sky Command II an intriguing way of making it essentially a remote for a Kenwood HF rig such as the TS-2000. It works by engaging a crossband repeater for the audio, and setting up a AX.25 packet link for the control. It works, but as the response time to frequency adjustments is measured in seconds, is klunky for tuning around a HF band. A nifty, though perhaps not supremely useful, feature with some hackable potential that I haven t explored yet. The TH-D72A is one of only two shipping general-purpose amateur radios that have a built-in GPS the other is the Yaesu VX-8GR, which I ll review below. The GPS works well, and can get a fix indoors if desired. It has a system of saving waypoints, which you can then navigate back to later (using distance/bearing indicators). It also has a track log. While the track log can t be viewed on the unit, it can be downloaded with the included MCP-4A software and saved in a variety of formats including Google s KML for later importing into Google Maps or Google Earth. I enjoy this feature on trips to see where I went later on. There is also a GPS-only mode, which disables all of the other radio circuitry on the radio for very low power consumption. The GPS navigation screens all support heading-up or north-up indicators. But where this radio really shines is APRS. The D72 has all the basics you d expect sending and receiving beacons, sending and receiving messages and bulletins, etc. It has built-in support for being a digipeater in many different ways, including new-N UI-Trace. Coupled with an MFJ VHF amplifier, this could make a nice temporary (or even permanent) digi. The message interface permits sending, receiving, and shortcuts for replying to messages. Beacon transmission can be completely manual, at set intervals, or using SmartBeaconing. Outbound beacons also support proportional pathing (meaning adjusting via-path to not have wide coverage with every transmission). Also, if not using SmartBeaconing, a decay algorithm can be used to send beacons less frequently when the station s location isn t changing. An alternative tells the system to transmit a beacon every time PTT is released, subject to rate limiting by interval. So lots of choices there. For incoming beacons, there are various filters by callsign pattern, packet type, etc. that control whether they will be processed at all, and what kind of alert (visual or audible) to present. Beacons are also placed in a received beacon list, sorted with the most recent at the top (duplicates from the same station are always removed, so only the most recent is presented.) A long press of the LIST button shows time received and type of device next to the callsign. Selecting a specific beacon shows status text, comment, device type, bearing/distance (with graphical north-up or heading-up display), telemetry (weather information and the like), and a little bit of info about the via-path. Pretty nice to see weather reports from local weather stations on there. You can sort the list by received time, station call, or distance from your position but it doesn t stay sorted by anything other than received time, and takes several seconds to re-sort. Seems like a bit of an oversight there. The D72A supports QSY information in beacons. This can automatically insert the frequency of the other band on the transceiver into your transmitted beacons for you, or give you a quick way to tune to the frequency mentioned on others beacons. Either way, a nice touch. The D72 also supports query packets, such as packets asking your station to transmit its position right now. The TH-D72A can directly interface with several types of weather stations via serial link to read weather sensor information and transmit it into APRS packets directly, with no need for a PC to be in the picture at all. But if you do hook up a PC to it, there are quite a few more possibilities. You can hook it up to PC APRS software (or a hardware device such as the AVMAP) to see locations of other APRS stations on a map. It can emit APRS packets, plus even GPS sentences, down the USB port to the PC. Moreover, in PACKET mode, it acts as a full TNC, with a fairly robust TNC command set. In short, it can do more than APRS; it can also do regular AX.25 such as DX clusters, BBS, nodes, etc. As far as I know, this is the only HT that can interface with a PC in this manner, and only Kenwood s mobile D710 has the same kind of feature set at that. Kenwood includes a lot of documentation with the TH-D72A. The 51-page printed manual is a summary or introductory guide. The included CD-ROM supplies another 75 pages of detailed reference material, and the 92-page in-depth APRS manual has a level of detail that true geeks like me appreciate. I ve referred to Kenwood s documentation more than once while figuring out things about the VX-8GR (which woefully under-documents things like SmartBeaconing). That said, it appears that at least some of the documentation has been copied from the earlier TH-D7A. Page 4 of the printed book is a good example. It talks about the memory effect of the battery, and warns against unplugging and replugging the charger because the charge cycle will be reset and the battery will be over-charged (I find it hard to believe that a Li-Ion charge controller would be that stupid, and furthermore direct observation suggests that it isn t.) Parts of the in-depth APRS guide appear to have been written for the D710, but that s a really minor nit. Unlike Yaesu, Kenwood issues periodic firmware updates to the D72A, which you can apply over USB. They have fixed bugs and added features to the unit over time. Now onto the things that aren t so good about the D72A. I ll start with the battery system, since we were already discussing it. Despite shipping with a much larger battery than the VX-8GR (1800 mAh vs. 1100 mAh), it only manages roughly equal battery life with APRS and GPS engaged. (It will probably do better as a simple voice unit, however.) This has been confirmed by numerous reports on the Internet. I will discuss this topic more below. There is very little else to fault the D72A on, feature-wise. I have a minor nit in that it is impossible to cause the keylock feature to also lock PTT. It would be nice to be able to see raw APRS packets on beacons and messages. Other than that, I can t think of a feature it really lacks. Compared to the VX-7R and VX-8GR, the TH-D72A is significantly larger physically, in every dimension. It is not uncomfortably large, and still fits in my hand fine. But its size is enough different that it feels like the design is dated and could have been more compact if Kenwood would have bothered. It s a nit, sure, but a nontrivial one. With the single exception of the sturdy metal belt clip, the D72 doesn t feel nearly as rugged as the VX-7R, and not even as rugged as the VX-8GR. The keys have a squishy feel to them, the PTT button works fine but has a cheap plastic design (as opposed to the rubberized versions on Yaesu s HTs). The manual doesn t mention it, but one Kenwood brochure mentions and IP54 weatherproofing. That means it is protected against limited ingress of dust and against water sprayed from all directions limited ingress permitted. Contrast that to the VX-7R, which is rated for 30 minutes of submersion at 3ft and has a magnesium case. It seems to be specced similarly to the VX-8GR, though the VX-8GR certainly feels a lot more solid. I have no proof, as I m not about to sacrifice my HTs for science, but I doubt that the TH-D72A would have survived over an hour on a busy road as well as the VX-7R did, and probably not even as well as the VX-8GR would. The case is plastic a stout plastic, but still plastic. Like the VX-8GR, and unlike the VX-7R, the D72A does not have broadband receive. It can receive some bands adjacent to the ham bands it supports, which includes a lot of bands of interest to people with scanners, but still can t receive broadcast FM signals like the VX-7R. Shipped battery: PB-45L, 1800 mAh, lithium-ion Yaesu VX-8GR: Cheaper APRS & GPS Cost: $360 as of 4/30/2012 One could probably call this Yaesu s closest competitor to the D72A. At about $100 cheaper, it doesn t have a featureset that matches Kenwood s, but it does have a few innovations that the D72A lacks. Starting with the basics, it lacks the VX-7R s broadband receive, with the receive roughly matching the TH-D72A s. The 8GR is a dual-transceiver HT, and it works this effectively (moreso than the VX-7R). Yaesu has a bad habit of changing connectors on radios with regularity, and charging an arm and a leg for accessories to boot. Even within the VX-8 line, the 8GR uses different accessories than the 8DR, and of course has different plugs than the 7R (though it appears that the DC power plug is the same, and with some luck you might be able to use a VX-7R speaker/mic on the 8GR, though not the reverse). The menu system on the 8GR is still similar to the 7R, though Yaesu has done several things to improve it. For one, scrolling through the menu now shows several lines of context on the screen at once, making it faster to scan. Also, there are more ways to jump into the menu at a certain location than before and even a small bit of clumsily-implemented hierarchy (there are several settings on the SmartBeaconing page, for instance). The menu key now toggles between various displays: the default frequency/status display, a GPS display, an APRS staion list, and an APRS message list. Just about everything operationally takes more keypresses than the D72A. On the D72A, it s one or two keys (a physical button or F+button) to do almost everything: toggle GPS state, change TNC/APRS state (turn on or off), etc. All of that is in the scrolling menus on the 8GR. The quickest way there, which is documented in the manual, is to press MENU until a certain screen comes up, then press and hold MENU to bring up the settings (defaulting to a certain APRS-related category), then scroll and change settings. It s a pain to turn APRS on and off, because you have to do this process for both the GPS and the APRS modem. Inexplicably, there is a hotkey to change the APRS beacon method (manual, auto, or SmartBeaconing) but not to turn APRS itself on or off. (The D72A has a hotkey to toggle the beaconing, though not to change its method; though in truth, if you do it frequently, the menu shortcuts will get you there rapidly.) Physically, the VX-8GR is closer to the size of the 7R than the size of the D72A, and notably is significantly smaller than the D72A (at least with the standard battery). As noted in the D72A review, the VX-8GR feels more rugged than the D72A, though whether that is actually true or not is hard to pin down. It is definitely less rugged than the VX-7R. The keys require more pressure than the D72A, and in this they are similar to the 7R, but feel satisfyingly solid. Unlike the other radios here, the 8GR does not have a dedicated volume knob, having only one dial on the top. To adjust volume, you hold the volume button on the left while twisting the knob. In practice, this is probably not usually very annoying, but if the radio is on your belt or otherwise not in your hand, this would be a frustration. (I think it would be particularly annoying if using it with a speaker/mic). Setting 99 will let you change the key so you don t have to hold it in, which could probably go a long way to making the situation more tolerable. One unique feature of the VX-8GR, as far as I know completely unique to it, is a vibrating alert. This would most frequently be used with APRS to provide a nearly-silent alert of incoming messages and the like. The screen of the 8G, while similar in size to both the D72A and the 7R, appears to be higher-resolution (or if not, they make better use of it). More information is packed onto the screen at once, and although the D72A does have a small font, it uses it so rarely that lots of scrolling is needed. The 8GR uses a smaller font than the D72A to show content of messages and the like, which makes a much faster experience since there is a lot less scrolling. Neither radio has a setting to change this behavior, so if your eyesight isn t good, you may prefer the D72A anyhow. The VX-8GR supports a heading-up or a north-up view of the received GPS data, but strangely it does not support this when navigating to a received beacon (north-up is the only option). Unlike the TH-D72A, you can engage keylock on the 8GR while someone s beacon is on the display. Also unlike the TH-D72A, you can lock out the PTT key on the 8GR. However, the keylock feature is just a quick press of the power button, which makes me a bit nervous. And worse, if you tell it to lock the PTT key, then it also won t transmit any automatic APRS beacons! There are a lot of things the D72A supports in the APRS area that the 8GR doesn t. Here s a summary of features missing in the 8GR compared to the D72A: voice alert (can t even do it manually since tone/CTCSS are locked out in APRS mode), quick replying to messages, TNC mode (meaning you can t use it with PC-based APRS programs), full AX.25 packet mode, full PC linking, weather station inputs, built-in digipeater mode, heading-up display, GPS track logs, QSY in beacons, quick tuning to others QSY info, responding to position queries, proportional pathing, automatic decay, beaconing on PTT release, sorting of beacon list, hotkey access to many features, and I m sure the list goes on. On the flipside, the only thing feature-wise that you get on the 8GR s APRS implementation that the D72A lacks is ability to inspect raw APRS packets. The VX-8GR has the lowest-capacity battery of the three radios covered in this post, and this is an oft-cited problem for users of the unit. Yeasu does seem to do a much better job of power management than Kenwood, though, so in full APRS and GPS mode, the battery life is roughly the same, amazingly enough. It is unlikely that the talk time on the 8GR would match either the 7R or the D72A, however. Kenwood and Yaesu both have a battery saver feature which cuts power to the RX circuit except for brief checks for signals. Yaesu completely disables this while the APRS modem is on (and STILL matches Kenwood s battery life, despite the smaller battery!) Kenwood doesn t, though recommends changing the signal-check interval from 0.2s to 0.03s in order to avoid truncating APRS packets. Yaesu offers an 1800 mAh extended-life battery which should significantly exceed Kenwood s battery life. Aftermarket vendors have 2000 mAh batteries as well. Either way, expect APRS to be a drain on batteries. More on that below. Although Yaesu includes 168 pages of documentation with the 8GR, don t expect it to match the quality and detail of Kenwood s 218 pages. There are a lot of gimmicky/useless features on the 8GR (WIRES, for one) that get extensive treatment, and there is a fair bit of repetition. I particularly single out the SmartBeaconing documentation on the 8GR as being, at best, woefully incomplete and probably also inaccurate to boot. Read the D72A manuals to figure out how that feature works on your 8GR. I bought the VX-8GR intending it to be something akin to a more versatile TinyTrak. On that score, it mostly succeeds. It may be my go-to rig for use at bicycle rides, marathons, emergencies, etc., while the D72A will probably be the one that goes with me on trips. Shipped battery: FNB-101LI, 7.4V, 1100 mAh, lithium-ion Not covered: VX-8DR poor value for the dollar Cost: $434 ($550 with GPS and GPS connector) Yaesu s top-of-the-line HT is sometimes considered to be the VX-8DR. It maintains the broadband capability of the 7R, is probably almost as rugged as the 7R, and has APRS built in, like the 8GR. It even has an option to add a Bluetooth board. What is doesn t have built-in is a GPS. You can add one on for $77 for the FGPS-2 plus $39 for the CT-136 connector which connects the GPS to the unit. But then you have a unit a lot less rugged than even the D72A (that s a small connector for the GPS), a lot less small, with the same APRS featureset as the 8GR (meaning a lot less than the D72A), which costs about $100 more than the D72A. Frankly I think this makes for a poor APRS package, and would probably only be reasonable for someone that wants other 8DR features and has a desire for some very occasionaly APRS work. Battery Life and APRS One of my first surprises with APRS HTs was the poor battery life I saw. Doing my research seemed to suggest that, contrary to popular opinion, the transmitted beacons were not the culiprit, but the receive circuits were to blame. Because it is not acceptable to cut off the first 200ms of an AX.25 packet like it is with a repeater, the RX circuit is either engaged much more frequently (Kenwood) or continuously (Yaesu), putting a lot more drain on the battery. (This has also been confirmed by multiple others that have done testing) The GPS receiver also adds drain, and on the D72A, so does the TNC, which is always active when APRS is. If you don t care about received beacons, you can dramatically raise the battery life on the D72A by setting the power saver to 1 second or greater as high as 14 hours by one report. On either unit, raising the squelch should have some effect (though not as much; but in any case, weak packets won t decode anyhow, so there s no sense in letting them in.) On the 8GR, getting the extended life 1800 mAh (or aftermarket version) could produce battery life in nearly that same region, without compromising on the RX side of things. Conclusions If you want a HT capable of APRS, seriously think of the TH-D72A before anything else. It is $100 more expensive than the 8GR, but has more than $100 worth of extra features (and included things, like PC link cable and software, that are extra on the 8GR), so it has a better value. If you re particularly budget-conscious or want the most ruggedness you can find, the 7R and 8GR are solid contenders if you can sacrifice the extra APRS features. Update May 1: Clarified what the lack of TNC mode on the VX-8GR means, and also how the VX-8GR PTT keylock also locks out APRS transmissions.

Pietro Abate: unburden my home dir

Today I installed unburden-home-dir and I'm very please with it. It's a simple script that takes care of your temporary files to move them outside your home directory. The main reason why I installed it is to minimize the number of read/writes of iceweasel. My favorite browser is apparently the culprit of 80% of read / write operations on disk even when it is idle... Moving the cache to tmpfs, I hope to reduce the IO on disk and to extend my battery life. Using a SSD I haven't noticed any remarkable benefits regarding performances, but I hope I'll manage to squeeze a bit more from my battery. Installing and configuring unburden-home-dir is straightforward. It is packaged for debian (experimental at the time of writing), and it is very easy to configure. Remember that if you want to have your cache on tmpfs, you need to ether mount a tmpfs-enabled file system somewhere or enable RAMTMP=yes in /etc/default/rcS (default in wheezy). After installing unburden-home-dir iotop shows a delightful page full of zeros :) ps: if you use duplicity, remember to specify the option --archive-dir to move the duplicity cache somewhere else...

Russell Coker: The Royal Caribbean Official Android app

I ve just played with the official Android app [1] for the Royal Carribean cruise line [2]. The cruise line is apparently great (I ve never been on one of their ships but the reviews are good) but the Android app isn t. Net Access The most obvious and significant problem with this app is that it s entirely useless without net access. All data of note comes from the Internet which means that the program is useless in any location where Internet access is unavailable (or unreasonably expensive). They wrote an app about cruising that can t be used on a cruise ship! Did they even think about what they were doing? The correct thing to do when writing such an application is to have all basic data about all ships included in the app. This means that when they change the deck plan of a ship they need to release a new version of the app and have people download it. Having done a lot of software development I understand that forcing software updates (even updates to included data files) involves some effort and expense. But when they spend $20,000,000 to update a ship (which is about the minimum that is spent for a major ship in dry-dock according to TV documentaries I ve watched) it seems quite reasonable to budget $10,000 to release new software. Also one benefit of updating the software is that it can promote the changes, after spending tens of millions of dollars improving a ship they probably want to promote that to customers and pushing a new app update with adverts for the improved ship seems like a good way of doing that. There is some data that can t reasonably be included in the app due to size constraints with photos of ships being the most notable example. The solution to this is to provide an option for the user to cache the data that interests them. For example if I was meeting some people to discuss the possibility of a group cruise on a RCL ship then I could download all the pictures of that ship on my home Wifi network and then have them all available with no delay or 3G costs. Also the app seems to hang if net access is temporarily interrupted. As phones are expected to have unreliable net access this is also a significant flaw. Maps The maps of the ships are comprised of a series of pictures which each show one deck. In addition to being downloaded (not cached or included in the app) they aren t scalable (they should be SVG or at least allow zooming the high resolution pictures) and they don t allow a 3D view. The paper maps used to promote cruises (including RCI cruises) and which are given to all passengers on Princess cruises (I m not sure about other lines) show a side cutaway view of the ship which is handy for working out which things are near where you are. It seems that an ideal cruise ship mapping program would have some sort of 3D component, maybe X3D. My experience is that a two night cruise isn t long enough to become familiar with one of the smaller cruise ships. Using a map is essential and a smart phone is a good way of managing such a map as typical 2D paper maps just aren t good enough for such a large and complex structure. Photos One of the significant things that is wrong with the app is a lack of care in displaying the photos of ships. They display three pictures of the Allure of the Seas (one of the two newest, biggest, and most luxurious ships in their fleet), but one of those three photos is actually of the Oasis of the Seas. The fact that the two ships are almost identical is no excuse, there is a principle at stake! Also only having three pictures is pretty poor, there is no way that less than 50 pictures could do justice to such a big ship! A Google search for the words cruise and photos turns up many sites with pictures of cruise ships and it s not particularly difficult to find pictures of any particular ship. Photographs by customers are often of high quality as some of the better DSLR cameras are in the same price range as some of the cheaper tickets for cruise ships. Probably the best thing that RCI could do is to run a contest and allow their customers to enter photos and vote towards the winning entries. That would get them photos that aren t as sterile as the official photos and which include the things that are of most interest to customers. Finally in terms of caching, pictures are the most easily cached source of data and as phones get higher resolution they keep getting bigger. The storage space for a modern phone is equivalent to the entire 3G download quota for about a year on an affordable Australian 3G plan. When dealing with photos downloaded from the net the default should be to cache everything. Navigation Navigating a smart-phone app is a lot more difficult than navigating the same data on a desktop system (which would be in a web browser). Users can compensate for some deficiencies with web site organisation by using a large monitor and having several web browser windows with multiple tabs. But with a phone it should be possible to switch between things quickly. The main menu has a View Our Ships option (which allows viewing deck plans and pictures) and a View Our Staterooms option which offers a list of ships and then describes the state rooms available for each one. This means that you can t see all the information about a ship in one place and even worse you can t easily compare ships. As it seems likely that people will want to use this app for selecting a cruise it should be possible to select a few ships that are of interest and then quickly flip between them. For example the Rhapsody of the Seas and the Voyager of the Seas are cruising in my part of the world so it would be nice if I could tell the app to compare those ships and then allow me to view a page about one ship and then flick to the equivalent page about the other ship. Another notable problem is that the ships are listed in alphabetical order. The sensible thing to do is to list them by class going from biggest to smallest. Lessons to be Learned These problems aren t specific to the RCI app, many other Android apps have the same flaws. For example the Google Play market app doesn t cache the icons of the installed apps so every time I want to see a list of installed apps it goes slow and wastes some of my bandwidth. Doing something wrong in the same way as Google isn t necessarily a great mistake, although using the Google Play market on a cruise ship is probably very uncommon. Probably the biggest problem is a lack of testing. They should have sent the developers on a cruise as a live test. Every cruise ship has a sales desk for booking future cruises so it wouldn t be difficult to have a dozen Android phones at the sales desk to see how real customers who really want to book a cruise find it. I presume that even if net access was available then such a test would fail dismally. If a 3D display of a ship combined with all the data management capabilities of a modern smart phone (which is a lot more powerful than the desktop systems I used prior to 2000) can t at least be a useful supplement to a stack of paper brochures then it s probably a failure. I think that the RCI app is an example of how to make an Android app which doesn t fall into the more common failings (such as being a quick and dirty port from iOS) but yet still isn t useful to customers. I recommend that people who develop apps which have an objective of imparting information to users try it out as an example of what not to do. Try a few basic tasks like comparing the three biggest classes of RCI ships in terms of features, after failing to do that with the app you can then use Wikipedia to get the result. But don t use the Wikipedia client apps, use a tabbed browser such as Opera Mini. Related posts:
  1. An Introduction to Android I gave a brief introductory talk about Android at this...
  2. Choosing an Android Phone My phone contract ends in a few months, so I m...
  3. Galaxy S vs Xperia X10 and Android Network Access Galaxy S Review I ve just been given an indefinite loan...

28 April 2012

Russell Coker: Nando s Voucher Interpretation

Every year my parents buy a book of vouchers for various businesses in Victoria. It s one of those deals where businesses (mostly restaurants) pay for advertising space to have their tear-off vouchers in the book (which typically allow a discount of between $5 and $30) and the customers buy the book for something like $40 (I m not really sure as I don t pay). Every year I take my pick of the vouchers that don t suit my parents, the Nando s chain of chicken and chips restaurants that specialises in Peri-Peri spicy sauce [1] is one that doesn t suit my parents (they prefer the traditional English-Australian food). The Nando s vouchers say Enjoy one complimentary 1/4 flame-grilled peri-peri chicken item when another 1/4 flame-grilled peri-peri chicken item is purchased with no explanation of exactly what an item is. Every Nando s store that I ve been to in the past has interpreted item as chicken and chips, usually they include the drink that comes with the quarter chicken meal in the item that is free. I can do without a second soda as it s really cheap from the supermarket and I m not going to drink two at one meal anyway so I m not bothered when someone interprets the voucher as not involving a free drink. But the lack of chips is annoying. At the Nando s store on Swanston St between La Trobe St and Little Lonsdale St they interpret item as being just the 1/4 chicken. I think that most people would regard this as an unusual interpretation. If the intent was to only offer 1/4 chicken then the voucher could have stated that a free 1/4 chicken was offered and removed all doubt. The fact that the voucher says a free 1/4 flame-grilled peri-peri chicken item instead of offering a free Quarter Chicken (which is the description for chicken on it s own on the Nandos menus) seems to be a reasonable indication that more than just the free chicken is offered. I won t be attending the Nandos store on Swanston St again and recommend that others avoid it too. Failing to offer the full value on the voucher is annoying, it decreases the value for money (which is a problem given how expensive Nandos is), and it makes me wonder what other cost-saving measures might be used at that store. I ve got a stack of vouchers (many of which will expire before being used) and the Melbourne CBD has many places to eat. No related posts.

27 April 2012

Ana Beatriz Guerrero Lopez: Debian in the Google Summer of Code 2012

This year our efforts have paid off and despite there being more mentoring organizations than there were in 2011 (175 in 2011 and 180 in 2012), this year in Debian we got 81 submissions versus 43 submissions in 2011.
You can see here the graphs of applications against time from this year: 2012 The result is this year we ll have 15 students in Debian versus 9 students last year! Without further ado, here is the list of projects and student who will be working with us this summer: If you want to know more about these projects, follow the links and ask the students (and mentors)!

Pietro Abate: Learning from the Future of Component Repositories - CBSE 2012

Learning from the Future of Component Repositories ( Pietro Abate, Roberto Di Cosmo, Ralf Treinen and Stefano Zacchiroli ) has been accepted to be presented at CBSE 2012 (26-28 June, Bertinoro, Italy)

Abstract
  An important aspect of the quality assurance of large component repositories
  is the logical coherence of component metadata. We argue that it is possible
  to identify certain classes of such problems by checking relevant properties
  of the possible future repositories into which the current
  repository may evolve. In order to make a complete analysis of all possible
  futures effective however, one needs a way to construct a finite set of
  representatives of this infinite set of potential futures. We define a class
  of properties for which this can be done.
  We illustrate the practical usefulness of the approach with two quality
  assurance applications: (i) establishing the amount of  forced upgrades''
  induced by introducing new versions of existing components in a repository,
  and (ii) identifying outdated components that need to be upgraded in order to
  ever be installable in the future. For both applications we provide
  experience reports obtained on the Debian distribution.
The tools presented in this paper (outdated and challenges) are already in Debian as part of the 'dose-extra' package.

Russell Coker: BTRFS and ZFS as Layering Violations

LWN has an interesting article comparing recent developments in the Linux world to the Unix Wars that essentially killed every proprietary Unix system [1]. The article is really interesting and I recommend reading it, it s probably only available to subscribers at the moment but should be generally available in a week or so (I used my Debian access sponsored by HP to read it). A comment on that article cites my previous post about the reliability of RAID [2] and then goes on to disagree with my conclusion that using the filesystem for everything is the right thing to do. The Benefits of Layers I don t believe as strongly in the BTRFS/ZFS design as the commentator probably thinks. The current way my servers (and a huge number of other Linux systems) work of having RAID to form a reliable array of disks from a set of cheap disks for the purpose of reliability and often capacity or performance is a good thing. I have storage on top of the RAID array and can fix the RAID without bothering about the filesystem(s) and have done so in the past. I can also test the RAID array without involving any filesystem specific code. Then I have LVM running on top of the RAID array in exactly the same way that it runs on top of a single hard drive or SSD in the case of a laptop or netbook. So Linux on a laptop is much the same as Linux on a server in terms of storage once we get past the issue of whether a single disk or a RAID array is used for the LVM PV, among other things this means that the same code paths are used and I m less likely to encounter a bug when I install a new system. LVM provides multiple LVs which can be used for filesystems, swap, or anything else that uses storage. So if a filesystem gets badly corrupted I can umount it, create an LVM snapshot, and then take appropriate measures to try and fix it without interfering with other filesystems. When using layered storage I can easily add or change layers when it s appropriate. For example I have encryption on only some LVs on my laptop and netbook systems (there is no point encrypting the filesystem used for .iso files of Linux distributions) and on some servers I use RAID-0 for cached data. When using a filesystem like BTRFS or ZFS which includes subvolumes (similar in result to LVM in some cases) and internal RAID you can t separate the layers. So if something gets corrupted then you have to deal with all the complexity of BTRFS or ZFS instead of just fixing the one layer that has a problem. Update: One thing I forgot to mention when I first published this is the benefits of layering for some uncommon cases such as network devices. I can run an Ext4 filesystem over a RAID-1 array which has one device on NBD on another system. That s a bit unusual but it is apparently working well for some people. The internal RAID on ZFS and BTRFS doesn t support such things and using software RAID underneath ZFS or BTRFS loses some features. When using DRBD you might have two servers with local RAID arrays, DRBD on top of that, and then an Ext4 filesystem. As any form of RAID other than internal RAID loses reliability features for ZFS and BTRFS that means that no matter how you might implement those filesystems with DRBD it seems that you will lose somehow. It seems that neither BTRFS nor ZFS supports a disconnected RAID mode (like a Linux software RAID with a bitmap so it can resync only the parts that didn t change) so it s not possible to use BTRFS or ZFS RAID-1 with an NBD device. The only viable way of combining ZFS data integrity features with DRBD replication seems to be using a zvol for DRBD and then running Ext4 on top of that. The Benefits of Integration When RAID and the filesystem are separate things (with some added abstraction from LVM) it s difficult to optimise the filesystem for RAID performance at the best of times and impossible in many cases. When the filesystem manages RAID it can optimise it s operation to match the details of the RAID layout. I believe that in some situations ZFS will use mirroring instead of RAID-Z for small writes to reduce the load and that ZFS will combine writes into a single RAID-Z stripe (or set of contiguous RAID-Z stripes) to improve write performance. It would be possible to have a RAID driver that includes checksums for all blocks, it could then read from another device when a checksum fails and give some of the reliability features that ZFS and BTRFS offer. Then to provide all the reliability benefits of ZFS you would at least need a filesystem that stores multiple copies of the data which would of course need checksums (because the filesystem could be used on a less reliable block device) and therefore you would end up with two checksums on the same data. Note that if you want to have a RAID array with checksums on all blocks then ZFS has a volume management feature (which is well described by Mark Round) [3]. Such a zvol could be used for a block device in a virtual machine and in an ideal world it would be possible to use one as swap space. But the zvol is apparently managed with all the regular ZFS mechanisms so it s not a direct list of blocks on disk and thus can t be extracted if there is a problem with ZFS. Snapshots are an essential feature by today s standards. The ability to create lots of snapshots with low overhead is a significant feature of filesystems like BTRFS and ZFS. Now it is possible to run BTRFS or ZFS on top of a volume manager like LVM which does snapshots to cover the case of the filesystem getting corrupted. But again that would end up with two sets of overhead. The way that ZFS supports snapshots which inherit encryption keys is also interesting. Conclusion It s technically possible to implement some of the ZFS features as separate layers, such as a software RAID implementation that put checksums on all blocks. But it appears that there isn t much interest in developing such things. So while people would use it (and people are using ZFS ZVols as block devices for other filesystems as described in a comment on Mark Round s blog) it s probably not going to be implemented. Therefore we have a choice of all the complexity and features of BTRFS or ZFS, or the current RAID+LVM+Ext4 option. While the complexity of BTRFS and ZFS is a concern for me (particularly as BTRFS is new and ZFS is really complex and not well supported on Linux) it seems that there is no other option for certain types of large storage at the moment. ZFS on Linux isn t a great option for me, but for some of my clients it seems to be the only option. ZFS on Solaris would be a better option in some ways, but that s not possible when you have important Linux software that needs fast access to the storage. Related posts:
  1. Starting with BTRFS Based on my investigation of RAID reliability [1] I have...
  2. ZFS vs BTRFS on Cheap Dell Servers I previously wrote about my first experiences with BTRFS [1]....
  3. Reliability of RAID ZDNet has an insightful article by Robin Harris predicting the...

26 April 2012

Sylvain Le Gall: On the importance of memory buffer...

I have been working since a long time on trying to solve random crashes on the OCaml Forge. I have first suspected failing hardware to be the cause of it, but found no evidence about that. In despair of a solution, I have installed cacti to investigate the issue. The good news is that it has allowed me to catch a pretty nice graph of a crash. Load average - Crash Just before the crash the average load was 200... My conclusion was that too many processes were running at the same time. So I start to hunt processes that load the server for nothing. One of them was darcsweb. This process doesn't really create a load, but it calls darcs for various operations and most of them are quite expensive. The most expensive one is darcs diff. I first turn on the caching of darcsweb, which already reduce the number of invocation of darcs. But it doesn't make a real difference (except that the website was faster to load). I continued to investigate. In order to reduce globally the load of the server, I installed various robots.txt to prevent crawler to call diff for all VCS on the forge. Crawler traffic is 10 times the normal traffic and indexing diff in Google is not very interesting. It doesn't make a real difference. Load average - Peaks I installed a script to analyze all the peak load above 2. The peaks happen every hour and are more or less important (from 4 to 10). I discovered that this peak were related to the hourly cronjob of FusionForge that fixed repository permissions. I was pretty surprise because updating permissions should no generate this load. This morning, I had a simple idea. There are a lot of process on the server and one of them (the bzr daemon, loggerhead) eats a big chunk of memory (at least never frees it). I just had a quick at the "buffers" memory... Only 4MB ! I just restarted loggerhead. The improvement made on robots.txt makes it a lot more stable with regard to memory consumption, since we don't run bzr diff anymore. The "buffers" memory is now at 100MB and guess what ! No more peaks... Here is the result: Load average - Restart Conclusion: sometimes the cause of a high load lies in a single number...

Alexander Pashaliyski: Google Summer of Code 2012 Clang support for build services in Debian

This project is about extension of the Debian infrastructure with ability to build packages with clang. The key idea is to have an alternative way to build packages and easily switch between clang and gcc/g++. Clang is faster than gcc, uses less memory, and produces faster code. It is getting better with time. It is available under the BSD license. It is well documented. It can help programmers find and analyze easily their errors, because clang has much more detailed error and warning messages and it allows better diagnostics. It also provides a good alternative for programmers using gcc in the coding and compiling processes. It enforces better code quality. In the compiling process, compiler choice is usually done by setting the environment variable CC. When Makefile is generated, it contains initialization of the CC variable based on the current environment. If CC is not set, the default compiler is gcc. CC is always used by make. I proved this with tests (I set CC=/usr/bin/clang).
There must be an easy way to switch the default compiler between gcc/g++ and clang. One way would be by issuing a command like
dpkg-reconfigure default-compiler . I think that debuild, sbuild can be changed to take optional compiler argument (something like clang gcc). If this argument is not specified, the default compiler is used (according to CC)
Also I think that when the default compiler is set to clang, some special cases should be checked.
Example: There is gcc hard coded in the Makefile. In this case there should be a dialog box that offers several options to choose from:
1. Leave gcc in this line.
2. Change gcc with the CC variable.
3. Edit with the default text editor.
I have seen the 3rd option in many applications, like svn or crontab. When some file modification is required, the default editor is launched to modify the file.
Also, I ll check what are the compiling problems of the current packages that can t compile by just changing gcc with clang. This way I ll see what checks for special cases to implement.

Olly Betts: Xapian GSoC 2012 Projects

At the end of the previous episode, you may remember our gallant heroes had a pile of 30 proposals to review. We soon spotted one more to mark as invalid (just a paste with our ideas list plus a some biographical details), and another got withdrawn by the student without explanation (but was low quality anyway), so that left us with 28. We had six volunteers for mentoring, and in the initial allocation we received five student slots from Google, but we asked nicely if we could have an extra one, and were lucky enough to get it. Last year we had four students, so that's a 50% increase. Here's those 28, broken down by the project idea:
  • 8 - Weighting Schemes
  • 6 - Learning to Rank
  • 3 - Dynamic Snippets
  • 2 - Lucene Backend
  • 2 - QueryParser improvements
  • 1 - Erlang Bindings
  • 1 - Improve C# and Java bindings
  • 1 - Improve PHP Bindings
  • 1 - Improve Python Bindings
  • 1 - Improving Japanese Support
  • 1 - Node.js Bindings
  • 1 - Postlist encodings
I find it interesting that the most popular three ideas have closer connections to Information Retrieval theory than most - probably these appeal to students who have taken IR courses and already have an interest and some knowledge of the project area. I think we should aim to get more ideas like these on the list in future years. It's worth noting that in several cases students had taken an idea in sufficiently different directions that there wasn't much overlap, so we didn't just pick the best proposal for each project idea to narrow things down. Also, the proposal isn't the only factor - we like to see applicants work on patch, and to interact with us on IRC and/or email. But in the end it happens we ended up with proposals which were all from different ideas - here are those we selected:
My congratulations to the lucky six, and my commiserations to those we weren't able to select. It wasn't an easy selection to make, and we truly appreciate the time you spent writing your proposal, working on patches, and on the rest of the application process. We'd encourage you to remain involved with Xapian, and to apply to us again next year if you're still eligible for GSoC.

Paul Wise: What happens when a Debian derivative shuts down?

Over the past months we have seen the end of two Debian derivatives. In January the news came that Junta de Extremadura (Spain) were abandoning the development of LinEx and switching to Debian itself. Early in March the Debian derivatives census scripts noted that the Vanillux apt repository was down. Fabrice Quenneville then confirmed that he had to put a hold on the Vanillux project due to the cost of bandwidth and servers. In addition the future of StormOS is in doubt after Illumian was created. StormOS is a port of Debian to the OpenSolaris kernel and Illumian is similar but uses only apt/dpkg and repackages everything else. The LinEx page in the Debian derivatives census did not reveal much information about the project that would have been useful to Debian, in particular it does not list any apt repositories. As a result it is quite hard to say what has potentially been lost. Two mails from people close to or involved in the project indicate that much of the LinEx distribution was already merged into Debian. It is probably safe to say that everything of value has been merged into Debian, including at least one of the developers involved in LinEx. Vanillux was a small distribution with few developers according to the Google caches of their website. If we look at the patches created by the derivatives census scripts, we can see that the 5 source packages that were possibly derived from Debian source packages were simply imported from Christian Marillat's repository of non-free, patented, legally restricted and multimedia-related packages. The patches indicate that 3 source packages were forked from Debian and that 2 source packages were done from scratch. The forked packages seem to be mainly about enabling support for proprietary and patented codecs in several programs. This is a surprisingly small number of altered/differing packages, so what else could Vanillux folks have been working on? It appears that there were 12 new source packages that were not derived from Debian source packages. These appear to be mainly multimedia-related packages, one font imported from an Ubuntu PPA, some syslinux themes and a metapackage. The multimedia packages are all from Christian Marillat's repository. The Debian multimedia team is working hard on bringing multimedia related software to Debian and welcomes help with that. The font (Cantarell) is now in Debian under a different source package name. The metapackage appears to be very similar to from the ubuntu-meta source package from Ubuntu that uses germinate. So at first glance, the contribution of Vanillux to the world of Linux distributions appears to be in the area of artwork and package selection. The artwork produced is basically Vanillux branding and is thus not usable by Debian, although we would like more artists involved in Debian. The meta-package is not easily useful to Debian since we use a different mechanism for our task packages and our task packages have already been updated for the GNOME 3 transition. Still, the amount of difference between to source packages is relatively small. So, what else? Perusing the diff between the list of source packages exposed by the Packages and Sources files, I noted that a number of binary packages in the Packages files reference source packages not listed in the Sources files. When I saw picasa in that list, it occurred to me that Vanillux might have directly imported some binary packages without their corresponding source packages. Perusing their apt metadata confirms that they have imported some binary packages of non-free software directly from vendors. These include Google Desktop, Opera, Picasa and VirtualBox 3.2. The rest of the packages in the diff appear to be caused by some sort of issue with the import process from Debian and other apt repos. Most of the above could be achieved by adding some external commerical repositories to a normal Debian system or by merging some of those repositories (such as the Opera one) into Debian. The interesting thing about the Debian derivatives census is that it allows us to perform analyses like these and figure out what patches and packages we might like to integrate into Debian. In this way we can salvage some of the value of our derivatives if they abandon ship. If you have any ideas or code for improving the census or are running a Debian derivative, please join us at the Debian derivatives frontdesk.

25 April 2012

Steve Kemp: So I have a new bathroom

The work on my bathroom is complete. The two weeks of noise and mess were well worth it. The old and unpleasant room is now completely different. The only issue I see is that I've managed to fill up the storage already. I'm particularly impressed with the sink, but special mention must go to the step, and the light switch (this is touch-sensitive and apparently incapable of electrocuting me). Rest assured that despite all the changes none of my dinosaurs are missing! Oh well I can always mount a new shelf, or three. ObQuote: - "Tell me of your homeworld, Usul.", Dune.

Vincent Bernat: XBMC Eden on Debian Wheezy

I bought some HTPC a few years ago to run XBMC, a neat media center solution. At the time, to avoid any problems, I installed it on top of a minimal Ubuntu Lucid installation with the official packages from the team XBMC. Recently, XBMC Eden has been released and XBMC has landed into Debian unstable. It was a good occasion to make the switch. Unofficial XBMC logo for Eden TL;DR: Installing XBMC on Debian Wheezy is quite easy: it almost works out of the box. The big difficulty is the configuration of the remote control: either it works as you expect or you will have to scratch your head over the pile of layers needed to work with a remote control. The configuration of my HTPC is as follows:
  • an Antec Micro Fusion 350 housing featuring a SoundGraph iMON IR receiver and LCD screen1,
  • a Zotac ION-ITX-D-E motherboard with an Intel Atom 330 CPU and an nVidia ION chipset,
  • some Onkyo AV receiver connected through HDMI,
  • a Logitech Harmony 555 as remote control.

Installation

Installing Debian Wheezy Installing Debian Wheezy2 is pretty easy. Nowadays, getting a bootable USB key from a netinst image of Debian Installer for Wheezy is simplified:
$ sudo dd if=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso \
>         of=/dev/disk/by-id/usb...
The installation was smooth with the exception of GRUB which was unable to install itself on the disk. This is a known bug when dealing with LVM and it comes with a simple workaround. I hope it will be corrected in time for Wheezy release. While this has little to do with the installation of XBMC, I wanted to test systemd which may become the default init in Debian (at least in Debian GNU/Linux). From README.Debian:
systemd can be installed alongside sysvinit and will not change the behaviour of the system out of the box. This is intentional. To test systemd, add init=/bin/systemd to the kernel command line and then rebooting, or install the systemd-sysv package.
The final system boots in about 15 seconds.

Configuring X Because video decoding in nouveau driver is still a work in progress, the use of the proprietary NVIDIA drivers is mandatory to be able to watch high resolution videos. Therefore, /etc/apt/sources.list should be completed with contrib and non-free repository. Then, you can install the appropriate packages: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia, nvidia-vdpau-driver and xserver-xorg. Here is my /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/nvidia.conf:
Section "Device"
    Identifier     "NVidia ION"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    Option         "HWCursor" "False"
    Option         "NoFlip" "False"
    Option         "FlatPanelProperties" "Scaling = Native"
    Option         "DynamicTwinView" "False"
    Option         "ConnectedMonitor" "DFP-1"
    Option         "CustomEDID" "DFP-1:/etc/X11/edid.bin"
    Option         "NoLogo" "True"
EndSection
Section "Extensions"
    Option "Composite" "false"
EndSection
The CustomEDID option allows the driver to get an appropriate EDID even when the AV receiver is off. You can get yours, free of charge, with get-edid from read-edid package.

Installing XBMC Thanks to the work of Andr s Mej a, XBMC is now available in Debian Wheezy. To install it, just type aptitude install xbmc. I have dropped the following xbmc.service in /etc/systemd/system directory:
[Unit]
Description = XBMC media center
After = syslog.target
[Service]
User = xbmc
Group = xbmc
Type = simple
ExecStart = /usr/bin/xinit /usr/bin/xbmc-standalone -- :0
Restart = on-failure
[Install]
WantedBy = multi-user.target
Enable this service on boot with systemctl enable xbmc.service. You need to allow xbmc user to run X. The simplest way is to run dpkg-reconfigure -plow x11-common and to allow anybody to run X. sudo may be an alternative.

Configuration

Sound While I wanted to use PulseAudio, I want the AV receiver to be able to upmix stereo streams itself. With PulseAudio, it would always receive a 6-channel signal. Therefore, I directly use ALSA. First, unmute the appropriate outputs:
$ amixer scontrols   grep IEC958
Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0
Simple mixer control 'IEC958 Default PCM',0
Simple mixer control 'IEC958',1
$ amixer sset 'IEC958',0 unmute
$ amixer sset 'IEC958 Default PCM',0 unmute
$ amixer sset 'IEC958',1 unmute
$ sudo systemctl stop alsa-utils.service
The order of channels is incorrect. With the following /etc/asound.conf, we declare a new output, hdmi2, with a different mapping:
pcm.hdmi2  
  type asym
  playback.pcm  
    type plug
    slave.pcm "remap-surround51"
   
 
pcm.!remap-surround51  
  type route
  slave.pcm "hdmi"
  ttable  
    0.0= 1
    1.1= 1
    2.4= 1
    3.5= 1
    4.2= 1
    5.3= 1
   
 
In XBMC, this output should be used instead of the default one. hdmi should still be used for passthrough. To check if each speaker is mapped correctly, one can use speaker-test -D hdmi2 -c 6.

LCD display The LCD display integrated into the SoundGraph iMON is supported by the imon kernel module and the lcdproc package. I have only modified a few lines of /etc/LCDd.conf to make it work:
[server]
Driver=imonlcd
ServerScreen=off
[imonlcd]
Protocol=1
OnExit=2
Contrast=400

Remote control This is the most difficult part. I have a Logitech Harmony remote which is a great universal remote. Its support in Linux is acceptable: you can configure through Logitech website and use congruity to push the new configuration.

Remote controls and Linux Before Linux 2.6.36, most remote controls would need LIRC to work:
  • The driver receives the signal from the IR receiver and make it available through /dev/lirc.
  • lircd, with the help of a configuration file describing the protocol used by the remote control, will read the signal and turn it into the appropriate LIRC code.
  • XBMC connects to lircd and receives incoming LIRC codes. It will translate them to an XBMC command. This translation is specified in Lircmap.xml.
  • XBMC maps each command to an action (like Play, Fullscreen, ) using a keymap. This keymap can handle commands received by a remote control, but also by a keyboard, a mouse or a joystick.
Since Linux 2.6.36, remote controls will be mapped as a generic input device (just like a keyboard):
  • The driver receives the signal from the IR receiver.
  • The signal will be handled by a decoder. The configuration of this decoder is done in userland by ir-keytable. The decoder will turn the signal into the appropriate event (usually, some keypress).
  • X will listen to those events and turn them into X key events.
  • XBMC will receive them and use the appropriate keymap to turn them into actions.
And to add more complexity to the mix, in this last case, you can still use LIRC: lircd will listen to events generated by the kernel and turn them into LIRC codes. This can be very confusing. Moreover, the SoundGraph iMON IR receiver accepts two IR protocols: the iMON protocol and the RC-6 one. The Linux driver accepts both of them but uses the first one by default. The RC-6 protocol is the protocol used by many MCE remote controls. I hope you are still with me here.

The easy way To get a reasonable configuration out of the box, here is how to configure each layer:
Logitech Harmony remote
Configure it as a Microsoft branded Media Center PC: Windows Media Center SE.
iMON IR receiver
It must use RC-6 protocol. See below for more details.
LIRC
In /etc/lirc/hardware.conf, put DEVICE=/dev/input/by-id/usb-15c2_0038-event-if00 and DRIVER=devinput. In /etc/lirc/lircd.conf, just put include "/usr/share/lirc/remotes/devinput/lircd.conf.devinput".
XBMC
With the previous bits done, it should just work out of the box.
To switch to RC-6 protocol, install the ir-keytable package and use the following commands:
$ sudo modprobe rc-imon-mce
$ sudo ir-keytable -s rc0 -p rc-6 -c -w /lib/udev/rc_keymaps/imon_mce
Read imon_mce table
Old keytable cleared
Wrote 77 keycode(s) to driver
Protocols changed to RC-6
To make the change permanent, add the rc-imon-mce module to /etc/modules and create /etc/udev/rules.d/90-imon.rules with the following content:
# Override the keytable for iMON
ACTION=="add change", SUBSYSTEM=="rc", DRV_NAME="imon", \
   RUN+="/usr/bin/ir-keytable -s $name -p rc-6 -c -w /lib/udev/rc_keymaps/imon_mce"

The hard way Now, you may want to bind custom actions to some (physical or virtual) buttons. Basically, you are left with two solutions:
  1. Start from the basic configuration with LIRC and add more buttons at each levels (there are five of them!).
  2. Remove LIRC and start with the Logitech Harmony acting as a Microsoft MCE keyboard.
The first option can be quite difficult. You need to find an unused code for the Logitech Harmony. You can try to make it learn a new code if you have some RC-6 remote control. Then, you need to ensure that this code will be present in the keytable used by ir-keytable. If not, you need to add it. That s not easy since you need a to enable some debug stuff in the kernel to find the appropriate scancode. After that, the code needs to be translated in lircd.conf. You will then have to translate it again in Lircmap.xml. At least, you need to add it to a keymap in XBMC. The other way is not ideal but seems less cumbersome. The first step is to configure the Logitech Harmony as a Microsoft MCE keyboard: it has a lot of available keys. Because of the lack of multimedia keys, let s match the keyboard configuration of XBMC:
Button Command Button Command
Channel Down PageDown Stop X
Channel Up PageUp Skip back Comma
Prev Backspace Skip forward .
Up DirectionUp Play P
Down DirectionDown Rewind R
Left DirectionLeft Fast forward F
Right DirectionRight Star Delete
OK Enter Pound W
Menu C Red F1
Exit Esc Green F2
Guide Tab Yellow F3
Info I Blue F4
Unfortunately, the keytables provided with ir-keytable are not complete enough. I have built a more complete table3. With this table and the bindings described above, most functions will work out of the box without LIRC. Additional keys can be configured in a dedicated keymap4. Here is an excerpt of mine:
<keymap>
 <global>
  <keyboard>
    <end>XBMC.ShutDown()</end>
    <f1>XBMC.ActivateWindow(MusicLibrary)</f1>
    <f2>XBMC.ActivateWindow(Videos,TvShowTitles)</f2>
    <f3>XBMC.ActivateWindow(Videos,MovieTitles)</f3>
    <f4>XBMC.ActivateWindow(Weather)</f4>
  </keyboard>
 </global>
 <FullscreenVideo>
  <keyboard>
   <opensquarebracket>SubtitleDelayMinus</opensquarebracket>
   <closesquarebracket>SubtitleDelayPlus</closesquarebracket>
   <f6>xbmc.runscript(script.xbmc.subtitles)</f6>
  </keyboard>
 </FullscreenVideo>
</keymap>

FTP Instead of using SSH, I prefer to drop new files with anonymous FTP. vsftpd fits this purpose. Here is my configuration file:
listen=YES
xferlog_enable=YES
use_localtime=YES
setproctitle_enable=YES
secure_chroot_dir=/var/run/vsftpd/empty
nopriv_user=ftp
ftpd_banner=XBMC
hide_ids=YES
ftp_username=xbmc
anon_umask=022
anon_root=/home/xbmc/media
anonymous_enable=YES
write_enable=YES
anon_upload_enable=YES
anon_world_readable_only=YES
It is currently not compatible with systemd (see bug #670308). I have removed the symlink in /etc/rc2.d and I have used the following unit file:
[Unit]
Description=Vsftpd ftp daemon
After=syslog.target network.target
[Service]
Type=simple
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/vsftpd /etc/vsftpd.conf
ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID
ExecStartPre=-/bin/mkdir -p /var/run/vsftpd/empty
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

Miscellaneous
  1. In /etc/default/grub, reduce TIMEOUT to 0 to shorten the boot time.
  2. Enabling dirty regions can help speed up XBMC.
  3. aptitude install upower pm-utils to be able to shutdown/suspend from XBMC. Since XBMC was configured to be started outside any session, you need to explicitely give the appropriate rights by creating the following /var/lib/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d/xbmc.pkla:
    [Actions for xbmc user]
    Identity=unix-user:xbmc
    Action=org.freedesktop.upower.*;org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.*
    ResultAny=yes
    ResultInactive=yes
    ResultActive=yes
    

  1. The readibility of the LCD screen is very bad. You should look at the VFD version. The IR receiver reception is poor. The provided remote control is a joke.
  2. Debian Wheezy is not yet released. If you are unfamiliar with Debian, it may be cumbersome to maintain it until the freeze happens in a few months.
  3. Some keys are missing from the provided table. For example, there is no exclamation mark. While there is a scan code for such a key in RC-6 protocol, there is no appropriate key code to translate to: on a QWERTY keyboard, the exclamation mark is on the same key as the number 1. It is possible to map it to some other key code, but the mapping would have been difficult to use.
  4. For example, in ~/.xbmc/userdata/keymaps/harmony.xml.

Tanguy Ortolo: Debian: switch to UEFI boot

UEFI logo: a cube with u, e and fi written on each visible face For those interested, here is a way to install Debian and boot it with UEFI if you have an UEFI motherboard. Using UEFI with Debian requires expert knowledge so if you do not feel up to it, keep your BIOS system. 1 Background UEFI is a specification for motherboard's firmwares which is replacing the old BIOS. For now, UEFI motherboards still include a BIOS compatibility layer. The UEFI boot process is quite different from the BIOS one. It involves one specific piece of the motherboard's firmware, the UEFI Boot Manager, which is able to load boot loaders from FAT file systems on specially-typed partitions. It can offer a boot menu (boot: Debian from HDD, Windows from HDD, USB stick, DVD?), which can be configured from a running operating system. So, basically, to boot a system with UEFI, you need two things:
  • to install an UEFI boot loader on a FAT-formated EFI System Partition;
  • to tell the UEFI Boot Manager to create an entry for that boot loader.
2 Installation or preparation If you are installing a new Debian system, read the first part. If you already have a BIOS-bootable Debian system installed, read the second one. In both cases you will have to use Debian testing, because stable's GRUB has problems with UEFI. You can also use Debian stable while taking only GRUB from testing though. 2.1 Installation of a new Debian system There is no installer image for UEFI, so you can either:
  • make your own, by installing an UEFI boot loader to an USB stick, which will load a regular installer kernel and initrd;
  • use a regular BIOS installer image, using the compatibility mode of your motherboard.
The installer does not provide a convenient way to install an UEFI boot loader, so you are going to install a regular BIOS boot loader at first, and switch to UEFI later. Use the expert mode and format your hard drive with a GUID Partition Table (GPT). Create a small partition (1 MiB would be far enough), type it as a BIOS Boot Partition (this is the untitled flag above the bootable one in Partman), do not format it and do not mount it: this will be needed for BIOS booting. Create another small partition (same kind of size), type it as an EFI System Partition (this is the bootable flag), format it as FAT and mount it on /boot/efi: this will be needed for UEFI booting. Finish the installation as usual, installing GRUB for BIOS, and boot your new system. 2.2 Preparation of an existing Debian system for UEFI You need to use a GUID Partition Table on your hard drive. If you used an MBR, you lost; you may try to convert it to GPT using a tool such as gdisk, but that means operating without a net, loosing your current boot loader in the process. If there is no space left on your hard drive, use Debian Live to make some. Create a small partition (1 MiB would be far enough), type it as an EFI System Partition, format it as FAT and mount it (permanently, using the fstab) on /boot/efi (that directory will not exist, so create it first). 3 Switch to GRUB UEFI Install the package grub-efi-amd64. Prepare it by running the command (assuming your hard drive is /dev/sda):
# grub-install /dev/sda
That will do three things:
  1. generate a GRUB image;
  2. install it to the EFI partition at efi/debian/grubx64.efi;
  3. try to configure the UEFI Boot Manager (the motherboard's boot menu) to load it on start-up
That last step will fail. This is expected, because the UEFI Boot Manager can only be configured from an operating system that was started from UEFI. So if you stop here, you get an unbootable system. Now, copy (a symlink would be relevant here, but that cannot be done on a FAT file system!) the GRUB image to that other path on the EFI System Partition: efi/boot/bootx64.efi. This is where the UEFI firmware looks for a boot loader when it has not been configured for a specific path, typically on removable media. Reboot to check that If that trick worked, you are now on UEFI-booted system. Run grub-install again, which should now succeed to configure the UEFI Boot Manager. Reboot to check that you get a debian entry on the motherboard's boot menu, and remove efi/boot/bootx64.efi which is no longer needed.

Next.

Previous.