Search Results: "ema"

4 March 2025

Paul Tagliamonte: Reverse Engineering (another) Restaurant Pager system

Some of you may remember that I recently felt a bit underwhelmed by the last pager I reverse engineered the Retekess TD-158, mostly due to how intuitive their design decions were. It was pretty easy to jump to conclusions because they had made some pretty good decisions on how to do things. I figured I d spin the wheel again and try a new pager system this time I went for a SU-68G-10 pager, since I recognized the form factor as another fairly common unit I ve seen around town. Off to Amazon I went, bought a set, and got to work trying to track down the FCC filings on this model. I eventually found what seemed to be the right make/model, and it, once again, indicated that this system should be operating in the 433 MHz ISM band likely using OOK modulation. So, figured I d start with the center of the band (again) at 433.92 MHz, take a capture, test my luck, and was greeted with a now very familiar sight. Same as the last goarounds, except the premable here is a 0 symbol followed by 6-ish symbol durations of no data, followed by 25 bits of a packet. Careful readers will observe 26 symbols above after the preamble I did too! The last 0 in the screenshot above is not actually a part of the packet rather, it s part of the next packet s preamble. Each packet is packed in pretty tight.

By Hand Demodulation Going off the same premise as last time, I figured i d give it a manual demod and see what shakes out (again). This is now the third time i ve run this play, so check out either of my prior two posts for a better written description of what s going on here I ll skip all the details since i d just be copy-pasting from those posts into here. Long story short, I demodulated a call for pager 1, call for pager 10, and a power off command.
What Bits
Call 1 1101111111100100100000000
Call 101101111111100100010100000
Off 1101111111100111101101110
A few things jump out at me here the first 14 bits are fixed (in my case, 11011111111001), which means some mix of preamble, system id, or other system-wide constant. Additionally, The last 9 bits also look like they are our pager the 1 and 10 pager numbers (LSB bit order) jump right out (100000000 and 010100000, respectively). That just leaves the two remaining bits which look to be the action 00 for a Call , and 11 for a Power off . I don t super love this since command has two bits rather than one, the base station ID seems really long, and a 9-bit Pager ID is just weird. Also, what is up with that power-off pager id? Weird. So, let s go and see what we can do to narrow down and confirm things by hand.

Testing bit flips Rather than call it a day at that, I figure it s worth a bit of diligence to make sure it s all correct so I figured we should try sending packets to my pagers and see how they react to different messages after flipping bits in parts of the packet. I implemented a simple base station for the pagers using my Ettus B210mini, and threw together a simple OOK modulator and transmitter program which allows me to send specifically crafted test packets on frequency. Implementing the base station is pretty straightforward, because of the modulation of the signal (OOK), it s mostly a matter of setting a buffer to 1 and 0 for where the carrier signal is on or off timed to the sample rate, and sending that off to the radio. If you re interested in a more detailed writeup on the steps involved, there s a bit more in my christmas tree post. First off, I d like to check the base id. I want to know if all the bits in what I m calling the base id are truly part of the base station ID, or perhaps they have some other purpose (version, preamble?). I wound up following a three-step process for every base station id:
  • Starting with an unmodified call packet for the pager under test:
    • Flip the Nth bit, and transmit the call. See if the pager reacts.
    • Hold SET , and pair the pager with the new packet.
    • Transmit the call. See if the pager reacts.
    • After re-setting the ID, transmit the call with the physical base station, see if the pager reacts.
  • Starting with an unmodified off packet for the pager system
  • Flip the Nth bit, transmit the off, see if the pager reacts.
What wound up happening is that changing any bit in the first 14 bits meant that the packet no longer worked with any pager until it was re-paired, at which point it begun to work again. This likely means the first 14 bits are part of the base station ID and not static between base stations, or some constant like a version or something. All bits appear to be used. I repeated the same process with the command bits, and found that only 11 and 00 caused the pagers to react for the pager ids i ve tried. I repeated this process one last time with the pager id bits this time, and found the last bit in the packet isn t part of the pager ID, and can be either a 1 or a 0 and still cause the pager to react as if it were a 0. This means that the last bit is unknown but it has no impact on either a power off or call, and all messages sent by my base station always have a 0 set. It s not clear if this is used by anything likely not since setting a bit there doesn t result in any change of behavior I can see yet.

Final Packet Structure After playing around with flipping bits and testing, the final structure I was able to come up with based on behavior I was able to observe from transmitting hand-crafted packets and watching pagers buzz:
base id
command
pager id
???

Commands The command section bit comes in two flavors either a call or an off command.
Type Id (2 bits) Description
Call00Call the pager identified by the id in pager id
Off11Request pagers power off, pager id is always 10110111
As for the actual RF PHY characteristics, here s my best guesses at what s going on with them:
What Description
Center Frequency 433.92 MHz
Modulation OOK
Symbol Duration 1300us
Bits 25
Preamble 325us of carrier, followed by 8800us of no carrier
I m not 100% on the timings, but they appear to be close enough to work reliabily. Same with the center frequency, it s roughly right but there may be a slight difference i m missing.

Lingering Questions This was all generally pretty understandable another system that had some good decisions, and wasn t too bad to reverse engineer. This was a bit more fun to do, since there was a bit more ambiguity here, but still not crazy. At least this one was a bit more ambiguous that needed a bit of followup to confirm things, which made it a bit more fun. I am left with a few questions, though which I m kinda interested in understanding, but I ll likely need a lot more data and/or original source: Why is the command two bits here? This was a bit tough to understand because of the number of bits they have at their disposal given the one last bit at the end of the packet that doesn t seem to do anything, there s no reason this couldn t have been a 16 bit base station id, and an 8 bit pager id along with a single bit command (call or off). When sending an off why is power off that bit pattern? Other pager IDs don t seem to work with off , so it has some meaning, but I m not sure what that is. You press and hold 9 on the physical base station, but the code winds up coming out to 0xED, 237 or maybe -19 if it s signed. I can t quite figure out why it s this value. Are there other codes? Finally what s up with the last bit? Why is it 25 bits and not 24? It must take more work to process something that isn t 8 bit aligned and all for something that s not being used!

3 March 2025

Bits from Debian: Bits from the DPL

Dear Debian community, this is bits from DPL for February. Ftpmaster team is seeking for new team members In December, Scott Kitterman announced his retirement from the project. I personally regret this, as I vividly remember his invaluable support during the Debian Med sprint at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. He even took time off to ensure new packages cleared the queue in under 24 hours. I want to take this opportunity to personally thank Scott for his contributions during that sprint and for all his work in Debian. With one fewer FTP assistant, I am concerned about the increased workload on the remaining team. I encourage anyone in the Debian community who is interested to consider reaching out to the FTP masters about joining their team. If you're wondering about the role of the FTP masters, I'd like to share a fellow developer's perspective:
"My read on the FTP masters is:
  • In truth, they are the heart of the project.
  • They know it.
  • They do a fantastic job."
I fully agree and see it as part of my role as DPL to ensure this remains true for Debian's future. If you're looking for a way to support Debian in a critical role where many developers will deeply appreciate your work, consider reaching out to the team. It's a great opportunity for any Debian Developer to contribute to a key part of the project. Project Status: Six Months of Bug of the Day In my Bits from the DPL talk at DebConf24, I announced the Tiny Tasks effort, which I intended to start with a Bug of the Day project. Another idea was an Autopkgtest of the Day, but this has been postponed due to limited time resources-I cannot run both projects in parallel. The original goal was to provide small, time-bound examples for newcomers. To put it bluntly: in terms of attracting new contributors, it has been a failure so far. My offer to explain individual bug-fixing commits in detail, if needed, received no response, and despite my efforts to encourage questions, none were asked. However, the project has several positive aspects: experienced developers actively exchange ideas, collaborate on fixing bugs, assess whether packages are worth fixing or should be removed, and work together to find technical solutions for non-trivial problems. So far, the project has been engaging and rewarding every day, bringing new discoveries and challenges-not just technical, but also social. Fortunately, in the vast majority of cases, I receive positive responses and appreciation from maintainers. Even in the few instances where help was declined, it was encouraging to see that in two cases, maintainers used the ping as motivation to work on their packages themselves. This reflects the dedication and high standards of maintainers, whose work is essential to the project's success. I once used the metaphor that this project is like wandering through a dark basement with a lone flashlight-exploring aimlessly and discovering a wide variety of things that have accumulated over the years. Among them are true marvels with popcon >10,000, ingenious tools, and delightful games that I only recently learned about. There are also some packages whose time may have come to an end-but each of them reflects the dedication and effort of those who maintained them, and that deserves the utmost respect. Leaving aside the challenge of attracting newcomers, what have we achieved since August 1st last year? With some goodwill, you can see a slight impact on the trends.debian.net graphs (thank you Lucas for the graphs), but I would never claim that this project alone is responsible for the progress. What I have also observed is the steady stream of daily uploads to the delayed queue, demonstrating the continuous efforts of many contributors. This ongoing work often remains unseen by most-including myself, if not for my regular check-ins on this list. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to everyone pushing fixes there, contributing to the overall quality and progress of Debian's QA efforts. If you examine the graphs for "Version Control System" and "VCS Hosting" with the goodwill mentioned above, you might notice a positive trend since mid-last year. The "Package Smells" category has also seen reductions in several areas: "no git", "no DEP5 copyright", "compat <9", and "not salsa". I'd also like to acknowledge the NMUers who have been working hard to address the "format != 3.0" issue. Thanks to all their efforts, this specific issue never surfaced in the Bug of the Day effort, but their contributions deserve recognition here. The experience I gathered in this project taught me a lot and inspired me to some followup we should discuss at a Sprint at DebCamp this year. Finally, if any newcomer finds this information interesting, I'd be happy to slow down and patiently explain individual steps as needed. All it takes is asking questions on the Matrix channel to turn this into a "teaching by example" session. By the way, for newcomers who are interested, I used quite a few abbreviations-all of which are explained in the Debian Glossary. Sneak Peek at Upcoming Conferences I will join two conferences in March-feel free to talk to me if you spot me there.
  1. FOSSASIA Summit 2025 (March 13-15, Bangkok, Thailand) Schedule: https://eventyay.com/e/4c0e0c27/schedule
  2. Chemnitzer Linux-Tage (March 22-23, Chemnitz, Germany) Schedule: https://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2025/de/programm/vortraege
Both events will have a Debian booth-come say hi! Kind regards Andreas.

2 March 2025

Colin Watson: Free software activity in February 2025

Most of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay. OpenSSH OpenSSH upstream released 9.9p2 with fixes for CVE-2025-26465 and CVE-2025-26466. I got a heads-up on this in advance from the Debian security team, and prepared updates for all of testing/unstable, bookworm (Debian 12), bullseye (Debian 11), buster (Debian 10, LTS), and stretch (Debian 9, ELTS). jessie (Debian 8) is also still in ELTS for a few more months, but wasn t affected by either vulnerability. Although I m not particularly active in the Perl team, I fixed a libnet-ssleay-perl build failure because it was blocking openssl from migrating to testing, which in turn was blocking the above openssh fixes. I also sent a minor sshd -T fix upstream, simplified a number of autopkgtests using the newish Restrictions: needs-sudo facility, and prepared for removing the obsolete slogin symlink. PuTTY I upgraded to the new upstream version 0.83. GCC 15 build failures I fixed build failures with GCC 15 in a few packages: Python team A lot of my Python team work is driven by its maintainer dashboard. Now that we ve finished the transition to Python 3.13 as the default version, and inspired by a recent debian-devel thread started by Santiago, I thought it might be worth spending a bit of time on the uscan error section. uscan is typically scraping upstream web sites to figure out whether new versions are available, and so it s easy for its configuration to become outdated or broken. Most of this work is pretty boring, but it can often reveal situations where we didn t even realize that a Debian package was out of date. I fixed these packages: I upgraded these packages to new upstream versions: In bookworm-backports, I updated python-django to 3:4.2.18-1 (issuing BSA-121) and added new backports of python-django-dynamic-fixture and python-django-pgtrigger, all of which are dependencies of debusine. I went through all the build failures related to python-click 8.2.0 (which was confusingly tagged but not fully released upstream and posted an analysis. I fixed or helped to fix various other build/test failures: I dropped support for the old setup.py ftest command from zope.testrunner upstream. I fixed various odds and ends of bugs: Installer team Following up on last month, I merged and uploaded Helmut s /usr-move fix.

1 March 2025

Debian Brasil: Debian Day 30 years in S o Carlos - Brazil

This year's Debian day was a pretty special one, we are celebrating 30 years! Giving the importance of this event, the Brazilian community planned a very special week. Instead of only local gatherings, we had a week of online talks streamed via Debian Brazil's youtube channel (soon the recordings will be uploaded to Debian's peertube instance). Nonetheless the local celebrations happened around the country and I've organized one in S o Carlos with the help of GELOS, the FLOSS group at University of S o Paulo. The event happened on August 19th and went on the whole afternoon. We had some talks about Debian and free software (see table below), a coffee break where we had the chance to talk, and finished with a group photo (check this one and many others below). Actually, it wasn't the end, we carried on the conversation about Debian and free software in a local bar :-) We had around 30 people in the event and reached a greater audience via the announcements across the university's press releases and emails sent to our Brazilian mailing lists. You can check some of them below. Time Author Title ----- -------- ------ 14:10 GELOS Intro to GELOS 14:30 Carlos Melara (Charles) A ~~not so~~ Brief Introdution to the Debian Project 15:15 Guilherme Paix o Debian and the Free Culture 15:45 z Free Software: the paths to a free life 16:15 -- Coffee Break 17:15 Prof. Dr. Francisco Jos Monaco The FOSS Ecosystem and You Here are some photos taken during the event! Preparation for Debian Day Getting things ready for the event. Intro to GELOS Intro to GELOS talk. Debian intro A ~~not so~~ Brief Introdution to the Debian Project talk. Everyone knows Debian Everyone already knew Debian! Free software Debian and the Free Culture talk Auditorium People in the auditorium space. Free software Free Software: the paths to a free life talk Coffee Break Coffee Break. FOSS Ecosystem The FOSS Ecosystem and You talk. Group photo Group photo. Celebration afterwards Celebration goes on in the bar.

28 February 2025

Petter Reinholdtsen: Brushing up on old packages in Xiph and Debian

Since my motivation boost in the beginning of the month caused me to wrap up a new release of liboggz, I have used the same boost to wrap up new editions of libfishsound, liboggplay and libkate too. These have been tagged in upstream git, but not yet published on the Xiph download location. I am waiting for someone with access to have time to move the tarballs there, I hope it will happen in a few days. The same is the case for a minor update of liboggz too. As I was looking at Xiph packages lacking updates, it occurred to me that there are packages in Debian that have not received a new upload in a long time. Looking for a way to identify them, I came across the ltnu script from the devscripts package. It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single maintainer should have a look at. But I wanted a archive wide summary. Based on the UDD SQL query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command: 
#!/bin/sh
env PGPASSWORD=udd-mirror psql --host=udd-mirror.debian.net --user=udd-mirror udd --command="
select source,
       max(version) as ver,
       max(date) as uploaded
from upload_history
where distribution='unstable' and
      source in (select source
                 from sources
                 where release='sid')
group by source
order by max(date) asc
limit 50;"
This will sort all source packages in Debian by upload date, and list the 50 oldest ones. The end result is a list of packages I suspect could use some attention: 
           source                        ver                    uploaded        
-----------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------
 xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev    1.1.2-1                   2011-02-09 22:26:27+00
 dynamite                      0.1.1-2                   2011-04-30 16:47:20+00
 xkbind                        2010.05.20-1              2011-05-02 22:48:05+00
 libspctag                     0.2-1                     2011-09-22 18:47:07+00
 gromit                        20041213-9                2011-11-13 21:02:56+00
 s3switch                      0.1-1                     2011-11-22 15:47:40+00
 cd5                           0.1-3                     2011-12-07 21:19:05+00
 xserver-xorg-video-glide      1.2.0-1                   2011-12-30 16:50:48+00
 blahtexml                     0.9-1.1                   2012-04-25 11:32:11+00
 aggregate                     1.6-7                     2012-05-01 00:47:11+00
 rtfilter                      1.1-4                     2012-05-11 12:50:00+00
 sic                           1.1-5                     2012-05-11 19:10:31+00
 kbdd                          0.6-4                     2012-05-12 07:33:32+00
 logtop                        0.4.3-1                   2012-06-05 23:04:20+00
 gbemol                        0.3.2-2                   2012-06-26 17:03:11+00
 pidgin-mra                    20100304-1                2012-06-29 23:07:41+00
 mumudvb                       1.7.1-1                   2012-06-30 09:12:14+00
 libdr-sundown-perl            0.02-1                    2012-08-18 10:00:07+00
 ztex-bmp                      20120314-2                2012-08-18 19:47:55+00
 display-dhammapada            1.0-0.1                   2012-12-19 12:02:32+00
 eot-utils                     1.1-1                     2013-02-19 17:02:28+00
 multiwatch                    1.0.0-rc1+really1.0.0-1   2013-02-19 17:02:35+00
 pidgin-latex                  1.5.0-1                   2013-04-04 15:03:43+00
 libkeepalive                  0.2-1                     2013-04-08 22:00:07+00
 dfu-programmer                0.6.1-1                   2013-04-23 13:32:32+00
 libb64                        1.2-3                     2013-05-05 21:04:51+00
 i810switch                    0.6.5-7.1                 2013-05-10 13:03:18+00
 premake4                      4.3+repack1-2             2013-05-31 12:48:51+00
 unagi                         0.3.4-1                   2013-06-05 11:19:32+00
 mod-vhost-ldap                2.4.0-1                   2013-07-12 07:19:00+00
 libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir   1.1.19-2.1                2013-07-12 21:22:48+00
 w9wm                          0.4.2-8                   2013-07-18 11:49:10+00
 vish                          0.0.20130812-1            2013-08-12 21:10:37+00
 xfishtank                     2.5-1                     2013-08-20 17:34:06+00
 wap-wml-tools                 0.0.4-7                   2013-08-21 16:19:10+00
 ttysnoop                      0.12d-6                   2013-08-24 17:33:09+00
 libkaz                        1.21-2                    2013-09-02 16:00:10+00
 rarpd                         0.981107-9                2013-09-02 19:48:24+00
 libimager-qrcode-perl         0.033-1.2                 2013-09-04 21:06:31+00
 dov4l                         0.9+repack-1              2013-09-22 19:33:25+00
 textdraw                      0.2+ds-0+nmu1             2013-10-07 21:25:03+00
 gzrt                          0.8-1                     2013-10-08 06:33:13+00
 away                          0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2           2013-10-25 01:18:18+00
 jshon                         20131010-1                2013-11-30 00:00:11+00
 libstar-parser-perl           0.59-4                    2013-12-23 21:50:43+00
 gcal                          3.6.3-3                   2013-12-29 18:33:29+00
 fonts-larabie                 1:20011216-5              2014-01-02 21:20:49+00
 ccd2iso                       0.3-4                     2014-01-28 06:33:35+00
 kerneltop                     0.91-1                    2014-02-04 12:03:30+00
 vera++                        1.2.1-2                   2014-02-04 21:21:37+00
(50 rows)
So there are 8 packages last uploaded to unstable in 2011, 12 packages in 2012 and 26 packages in 2013. I suspect their maintainers need help and we should all offer our assistance. I already contacted two of them and hope the rest of the Debian community will chip in to help too. We should ensure any Debian specific patches are passed upstream if they still exist, that the package is brought up to speed with the latest Debian policy, as well as ensure the source can built with the current compiler set in Debian. As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

24 February 2025

Russ Allbery: Review: A Little Vice

Review: A Little Vice, by Erin E. Elkin
Publisher: Erin Elkin
Copyright: June 2024
ASIN: B0CTHRK61X
Format: Kindle
Pages: 398
A Little Vice is a stand-alone self-published magical girl novel. It is the author's first novel. C is a high school student and frequent near-victim of monster attacks. Due to the nefarious work of Avaritia Wolf and her allies, his high school is constantly attacked by Beasts, who are magical corruptions of some internal desire taken to absurd extremes. Standing in their way are the Angelic Saints: magical girls who transform into Saint Castitas, Saint Diligentia, and Saint Temperantia and fight the monsters. The monsters for some reason seem disposed to pick C as their victim for hostage-taking, mind control, use as a human shield, and other rather traumatic activities. He's always rescued by the Saints before any great harm is done, but in some ways this makes the situation worse. It is obvious to C that the Saints are his three friends Inessa, Ida, and Temperance, even though no one else seems able to figure this out despite the blatant clues. Inessa has been his best friend since childhood when she was awkward and needed his support. Now, she and his other friends have become literal heroes, beautiful and powerful and capable, constantly protecting the school and innocent people, and C is little more than a helpless burden to be rescued. More than anything else, he wishes he could be an Angelic Saint like them, but of course the whole idea is impossible. Boys don't get to be magical girls. (I'm using he/him pronouns for C in this review because C uses them for himself for most of the book.) This is a difficult book to review because it is deeply focused on portraying a specific internal emotional battle in all of its sometimes-ugly complexity, and to some extent it prioritizes that portrayal over conventional story-telling. You have probably already guessed that this is a transgender coming-out story Elkin's choice of the magical girl genre was done with deep understanding of its role in transgender narratives but more than that, it is a transgender coming-out story of a very specific and closely-observed type. C knows who he wishes he was, but he is certain that this transformation is absolutely impossible. He is very deep in a cycle of self-loathing for wanting something so manifestly absurd and insulting to people who have the virtues that C does not. A Little Vice is told in the first person from C's perspective, and most of this book is a relentless observation of C's anxiety and shame spiral and reflexive deflection of any possibility of a way out. This is very well-written: Elkin knows the reader is going to disagree with C's internalized disgust and hopelessness, knows the reader desperately wants C to break out of that mindset, and clearly signals in a myriad of adroit ways that Elkin is on the reader's side and does not agree with C's analysis. C's friends are sympathetic, good-hearted people, and while sometimes oblivious, it is obvious to the reader that they're also on the reader's side and would help C in a heartbeat if they saw an opening. But much of the point of the book is that it's not that easy, that breaking out of the internal anxiety spiral is nearly impossible, and that C is very good at rejecting help, both because he cannot imagine what form it could take but also because he is certain that he does not deserve it. In other words, much of the reading experience of this book involves watching C torture and insult himself. It's all the more effective because it isn't gratuitous. C's internal monologue sounds exactly like how an anxiety spiral feels, complete with the sort of half-effective coping mechanisms, deflections, and emotional suppression one develops to blunt that type of emotional turmoil. I normally hate this kind of book. I am a happy ending and competence porn reader by default. The world is full of enough pain that I don't turn to fiction to read about more pain. It says a lot about how well-constructed this book is that I stuck with it. Elkin is going somewhere with the story, C gets moments of joy and delight along the way to keep the reader from bogging down completely, and the best parts of the book feel like a prolonged musical crescendo with suspended chords. There is a climax coming, but Elkin is going to make you wait for it for far longer than you want to. The main element that protects A Little Vice from being too grim is that it is a genre novel that is very playful about both magical girls and superhero tropes in general. I've already alluded to one of those elements: Elkin plays with the Mask Principle (the inability of people to see through entirely obvious secret identities) in knowing and entertaining ways. But there are also villains, and that leads me to the absolutely delightful Avaritia Wolf, who for me was the best character in this book. The Angelic Saints are not the only possible approach to magical girl powers in this universe. There are villains who can perform a similar transformation, except they embrace a vice rather than a virtue. Avaritia Wolf embraces the vice of greed. They (Avaritia's pronouns change over the course of the book) also have a secret identity, which I suspect will be blindingly obvious to most readers but which I'll avoid mentioning since it's still arguably a spoiler. The primary plot arc of this book is an attempt to recruit C to the side of the villains. The Beasts are drawn to him because he has magical potential, and the villains are less picky about gender. This initially involves some creepy and disturbing mind control, but it also brings C into contact with Avaritia and Avaritia's very specific understanding of greed. As far as Avaritia is concerned, greed means wanting whatever they want, for whatever reason they feel like wanting it, and there is absolutely no reason why that shouldn't include being greedy for their friends to be happy. Or doing whatever they can to make their friends happy, whether or not that looks like villainy. Elkin does two things with this plot that I thought were remarkably skillful. The first is that she directly examines and then undermines the "easy" transgender magical girl ending. In a world of transformation magic, someone who wants to be a girl could simply turn into a girl and thus apparently resolve the conflict in a way that makes everyone happy. I think there is an important place for that story (I am a vigorous defender of escapist fantasy and happy endings), but that is not the story that Elkin is telling. I won't go into the details of why and how the story complicates and undermines this easy ending, but it's a lot of why this book feels both painful and honest to a specific, and very not easy, transgender experience, even though it takes place in an utterly unrealistic world. But the second, which is more happy and joyful, is that Avaritia gleefully uses a wholehearted embrace of every implication of the vice of greed to bulldoze the binary morality of the story and question the classification of human emotions into virtues and vices. They are not a hero, or even all that good; they have some serious flaws and a very anarchic attitude towards society. But Avaritia provides the compelling, infectious thrill of the character who looks at the social construction of morality that is constraining the story and decides that it's all bullshit and refuses to comply. This is almost the exact opposite of C's default emotional position at the start of the book, and watching the two characters play off of each other in a complex friendship is an absolute delight. The ending of this book is complicated, messy, and incomplete. It is the sort of ending that I think could be incredibly powerful if it hits precisely the right chords with the reader, but if you're not that reader, it can also be a little heartbreaking because Elkin refuses to provide an easy resolution. The ending also drops some threads that I wish Elkin hadn't dropped; there are some characters who I thought deserved a resolution that they don't get. But this is one of those books where the author knows exactly what story they're trying to tell and tells it whether or not that fits what the reader wants. Those books are often not easy reading, but I think there's something special about them. This is not the novel for people who want detailed world-building that puts a solid explanation under events. I thought Elkin did a great job playing with the conventions of an episodic anime, including starting the book on Episode 12 to imply C's backstory with monster attacks and hinting at a parallel light anime story by providing TV-trailer-style plot summaries and teasers at the start and end of each chapter. There is a fascinating interplay between the story in which the Angelic Saints are the protagonists, which the reader can partly extrapolate, and the novel about C that one is actually reading. But the details of the world-building are kept at the anime plot level: There's an arch-villain, a World Tree, and a bit of backstory, but none of it makes that much sense or turns into a coherent set of rules. This is a psychological novel; the background and rules exist to support C's story. If you do want that psychological novel... well, I'm not sure whether to recommend this book or not. I admire the construction of this book a great deal, but I don't think appealing to the broadest possible audience was the goal. C's anxiety spiral is very repetitive, because anxiety spirals are very repetitive, and you have to be willing to read for the grace notes on the doom loop if you're going to enjoy this book. The sentence-by-sentence writing quality is fine but nothing remarkable, and is a bit shy of the average traditionally-published novel. The main appeal of A Little Vice is in the deep and unflinching portrayal of a specific emotional journey. I think this book is going to work if you're sufficiently invested in that journey that you are willing to read the brutal and repetitive parts. If you're not, there's a chance you will bounce off this hard. I was invested, and I'm glad I read this, but caveat emptor. You may want to try a sample first. One final note: If you're deep in the book world, you may wonder, like I did, if the title is a reference to Hanya Yanagihara's (in)famous A Little Life. I do not know for certain I have not read that book because I am not interested in being emotionally brutalized but if it is, I don't think there is much similarity. Both books are to some extent about four friends, but I couldn't find any other obvious connections from some Wikipedia reading, and A Little Vice, despite C's emotional turmoil, seems to be considerably more upbeat. Content notes: Emotionally abusive parent, some thoughts of self-harm, mind control, body dysmorphia, and a lot (a lot) of shame and self-loathing. Rating: 7 out of 10

21 February 2025

Jonathan Dowland: haskell streaming libraries

For my PhD, my colleagues/collaborators and I built a distributed stream-processing system using Haskell. There are several other Haskell stream-processing systems. How do they compare? First, let's briefly discuss and define streaming in this context. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs introduces Streams as an analogue of lists, to support delayed evaluation. In brief, the inductive list type (a list is either an empty list or a head element pre-pended to another list) is replaced with a structure with a head element and a promise which, when evaluated, will generate the tail (which in turn may have a head element and a promise to generate another tail, culminating in the equivalent of an empty list.) Later on SICP also covers lazy evaluation. However, the streaming we're talking about originates in the relational community, rather than the functional one, and is subtly different. It's about building a pipeline of processing that receives and emits data but doesn't need to (indeed, cannot) reference the whole stream (which may be infinite) at once. Haskell streaming systems Now let's go over some Haskell streaming systems. conduit (2011-) Conduit is the oldest of the ones I am reviewing here, but I doubt it's the first in the Haskell ecosystem. If I've made any obvious omissions, please let me know! Conduit provides a new set of types to model streaming data, and a completely new set of functions which are analogues of standard Prelude functions, e.g. sumC in place of sum. It provides its own combinator(s) such as . ( aka fuse) which is like composition but reads left-to-right. The motivation for this is to enable (near?) constant memory usage for processing large streams of data -- presumably versus using a list-based approach and to provide some determinism: the README gives the example of "promptly closing file handles". I think this is another way of saying that it uses strict evaluation, or at least avoids lazy evaluation for some things. Conduit offers interleaved effects: which is to say, IO can be performed mid-stream. Conduit supports distributed operation via Data.Conduit.Network in the conduit-extra package. Michael Snoyman, principal Conduit author, wrote up how to use it here: https://www.yesodweb.com/blog/2014/03/network-conduit-async To write a distributed Conduit application, the application programmer must manually determine the boundaries between the clients/servers and write specific code to connect them. pipes (2012-) The Pipes Tutorial contrasts itself with "Conventional Haskell stream programming": whether that means Conduit or something else, I don't know. Paraphrasing their pitch: Effects, Streaming Composability: pick two. That's the situation they describe for stream programming prior to Pipes. They argue Pipes offers all three. Pipes offers it's own combinators (which read left-to-right) and offers interleaved effects. At this point I can't really see what fundamentally distinguishes Pipes from Conduit. Pipes has some support for distributed operation via the sister library pipes-network. It looks like you must send and receive ByteStrings, which means rolling your own serialisation for other types. As with Conduit, to send or receive over a network, the application programmer must divide their program up into the sub-programs for each node, and add the necessary ingress/egress code. io-streams (2013-) io-streams emphasises simple primitives. Reading and writing is done under the IO Monad, thus, in an effectful (but non-pure) context. The presence or absence of further stream data are signalled by using the Maybe type (Just more data or Nothing: the producer has finished.) It provides a library of functions that shadow the standard Prelude, such as S.fromList, S.mapM, etc. It's not clear to me what the motivation for io-streams is, beyond providing a simple interface. There's no declaration of intent that I can find about (e.g.) constant-memory operation. There's no mention of or support (that I can find) for distributed operation. streaming (2015-) Similar to io-streams, Streaming emphasises providing a simple interface that gels well with traditional Haskell methods. Streaming provides effectful streams (via a Monad -- any Monad?) and a collection of functions for manipulating streams which are designed to closely mimic standard Prelude (and Data.List) functions. Streaming doesn't push its own combinators: the examples provided use $ and read right-to-left. The motivation for Streaming seems to be to avoid memory leaks caused by extracting pure lists from IO with traditional functions like mapM, which require all the list constructors to be evaluated, the list to be completely deconstructed, and then a new list constructed. Like io-streams, the focus of the library is providing a low-level streaming abstraction, and there is no support for distributed operation. streamly (2017-) Streamly appears to have the grand goal of providing a unified programming tool as suited for quick-and-dirty programming tasks (normally the domain of scripting languages) and high-performance work (C, Java, Rust, etc.). Their intended audience appears to be everyone, or at least, not just existing Haskell programmers. See their rationale Streamly offers an interface to permit composing concurrent (note: not distributed) programs via combinators. It relies upon fusing a streaming pipeline to remove intermediate list structure allocations and de-allocations (i.e. de-forestation, similar to GHC rewrite rules) The examples I've seen use standard combinators (e.g. Control.Function.&, which reads left-to-right, and Applicative). Streamly provide benchmarks versus Haskell pure lists, Streaming, Pipes and Conduit: these generally show Streamly several orders of magnitude faster. I'm finding it hard to evaluate Streamly. It's big, and it's focus is wide. It provides shadows of Prelude functions, as many of these libraries do. wrap-up It seems almost like it must be a rite-of-passage to write a streaming system in Haskell. Stones and glass houses, I'm guilty of that too. The focus of the surveyed libraries is mostly on providing a streaming abstraction, normally with an analogous interface to standard Haskell lists. They differ on various philosophical points (whether to abstract away the mechanics behind type synonyms, how much to leverage existing Haskell idioms, etc). A few of the libraries have some rudimentary support for distributed operation, but this is limited to connecting separate nodes together: in some cases serialising data remains the application programmer's job, and in all cases the application programmer must manually carve up their processing according to a fixed idea of what nodes they are deploying to. They all define a fixed-function pipeline.

Russell Coker: Links February 2025

Oliver Lindburg wrote an interesting article about Designing for Crisis [1]. Bruce Schneier blogged about how to cryptographically identify other humans in advance of AT technology allowing faking people you know [2]. Anarcat has an interesting review of qalc which is a really good calculator, I ll install it on all my workstations [3]. It even does furlongs per fortnight! This would be good to be called from a LLM system when someone asks about mathematical things. Krebs has an informative article about a criminal employed by Elon s DOGE [4]. Conservatives tend to be criminals. Krebs wrote an interesting article about the security of the iOS (and presumably Android) apps for DeekSeek [5]. Seems that the DeepSeek people did everything wrong. Bruce Schneier and Davi Ottenheimer wrote an insightful article DOGE as a National Cyberattack [6]. Bruce Schneier and Barath Raghavan wrote an insightful article about why and how computer generated voices should sound robotic [7]. Cory Doctorow has an interesting approach to the trade war between the US and Canada, instead of putting tarrifs on imports from the US the Canadian government should make it legal for Canadians to unlock their own property [8]. This youtube video about designing a compressed air engine for a model plane is interesting [9]. Krebs has an interesting article on phishing and mobile phone wallets, Google and Apple need to restrict the number of wallets per phone [10]. The Daily WTF has a good summary of why Elon s DOGE organisation is badly designed and run and a brief mention of how it damages the US [11]. ArsTechnica has an informative article about device code phishing [12]. The increased use of single-sign-on is going to make this more of a problem. Shrivu wrote an insightful and informative article on how to backdoor LLMs [13]. Cory Doctorow wrote an informative post about MLMs and how they are the mirror world version of community organising [14].
Related posts:
  1. Links March 2024 Bruce Schneier wrote an interesting blog post about his workshop...
  2. Links February 2024 In 2018 Charles Stross wrote an insightful blog post Dude...
  3. Links August 2024 Bruce Schneier and Kim C rdova wrote an insightful article about...

20 February 2025

Paul Tagliamonte: boot2kier

I can t remember exactly the joke I was making at the time in my work s slack instance (I m sure it wasn t particularly funny, though; and not even worth re-reading the thread to work out), but it wound up with me writing a UEFI binary for the punchline. Not to spoil the ending but it worked - no pesky kernel, no messing around with userland . I guess the only part of this you really need to know for the setup here is that it was a Severance joke, which is some fantastic TV. If you haven t seen it, this post will seem perhaps weirder than it actually is. I promise I haven t joined any new cults. For those who have seen it, the payoff to my joke is that I wanted my machine to boot directly to an image of Kier Eagan. As for how to do it I figured I d give the uefi crate a shot, and see how it is to use, since this is a low stakes way of trying it out. In general, this isn t the sort of thing I d usually post about except this wound up being easier and way cleaner than I thought it would be. That alone is worth sharing, in the hopes someome comes across this in the future and feels like they, too, can write something fun targeting the UEFI. First thing s first gotta create a rust project (I ll leave that part to you depending on your life choices), and to add the uefi crate to your Cargo.toml. You can either use cargo add or add a line like this by hand: 
uefi =   version = "0.33", features = ["panic_handler", "alloc", "global_allocator"]
We also need to teach cargo about how to go about building for the UEFI target, so we need to create a rust-toolchain.toml with one (or both) of the UEFI targets we re interested in: 
[toolchain]
targets = ["aarch64-unknown-uefi", "x86_64-unknown-uefi"]
Unfortunately, I wasn t able to use the image crate, since it won t build against the uefi target. This looks like it s because rustc had no way to compile the required floating point operations within the image crate without hardware floating point instructions specifically. Rust tends to punt a lot of that to libm usually, so this isnt entirely shocking given we re nostd for a non-hardfloat target. So-called softening requires a software floating point implementation that the compiler can use to polyfill (feels weird to use the term polyfill here, but I guess it s spiritually right?) the lack of hardware floating point operations, which rust hasn t implemented for this target yet. As a result, I changed tactics, and figured I d use ImageMagick to pre-compute the pixels from a jpg, rather than doing it at runtime. A bit of a bummer, since I need to do more out of band pre-processing and hardcoding, and updating the image kinda sucks as a result but it s entirely manageable. 
$ convert -resize 1280x900 kier.jpg kier.full.jpg
$ convert -depth 8 kier.full.jpg rgba:kier.bin
This will take our input file (kier.jpg), resize it to get as close to the desired resolution as possible while maintaining aspect ration, then convert it from a jpg to a flat array of 4 byte RGBA pixels. Critically, it s also important to remember that the size of the kier.full.jpg file may not actually be the requested size it will not change the aspect ratio, so be sure to make a careful note of the resulting size of the kier.full.jpg file. Last step with the image is to compile it into our Rust bianary, since we don t want to struggle with trying to read this off disk, which is thankfully real easy to do. 
const KIER: &[u8] = include_bytes!("../kier.bin");
const KIER_WIDTH: usize = 1280;
const KIER_HEIGHT: usize = 641;
const KIER_PIXEL_SIZE: usize = 4;
Remember to use the width and height from the final kier.full.jpg file as the values for KIER_WIDTH and KIER_HEIGHT. KIER_PIXEL_SIZE is 4, since we have 4 byte wide values for each pixel as a result of our conversion step into RGBA. We ll only use RGB, and if we ever drop the alpha channel, we can drop that down to 3. I don t entirely know why I kept alpha around, but I figured it was fine. My kier.full.jpg image winds up shorter than the requested height (which is also qemu s default resolution for me) which means we ll get a semi-annoying black band under the image when we go to run it but it ll work. Anyway, now that we have our image as bytes, we can get down to work, and write the rest of the code to handle moving bytes around from in-memory as a flat block if pixels, and request that they be displayed using the UEFI GOP. We ll just need to hack up a container for the image pixels and teach it how to blit to the display. 
/// RGB Image to move around. This isn't the same as an
///  image::RgbImage , but we can associate the size of
/// the image along with the flat buffer of pixels.
struct RgbImage  
/// Size of the image as a tuple, as the
 /// (width, height)
 size: (usize, usize),
/// raw pixels we'll send to the display.
 inner: Vec<BltPixel>,
 
impl RgbImage  
/// Create a new  RgbImage .
 fn new(width: usize, height: usize) -> Self  
RgbImage  
size: (width, height),
inner: vec![BltPixel::new(0, 0, 0); width * height],
 
 
/// Take our pixels and request that the UEFI GOP
 /// display them for us.
 fn write(&self, gop: &mut GraphicsOutput) -> Result  
gop.blt(BltOp::BufferToVideo  
buffer: &self.inner,
src: BltRegion::Full,
dest: (0, 0),
dims: self.size,
 )
 
 
impl Index<(usize, usize)> for RgbImage  
type Output = BltPixel;
fn index(&self, idx: (usize, usize)) -> &BltPixel  
let (x, y) = idx;
&self.inner[y * self.size.0 + x]
 
 
impl IndexMut<(usize, usize)> for RgbImage  
fn index_mut(&mut self, idx: (usize, usize)) -> &mut BltPixel  
let (x, y) = idx;
&mut self.inner[y * self.size.0 + x]
We also need to do some basic setup to get a handle to the UEFI GOP via the UEFI crate (using uefi::boot::get_handle_for_protocol and uefi::boot::open_protocol_exclusive for the GraphicsOutput protocol), so that we have the object we need to pass to RgbImage in order for it to write the pixels to the display. The only trick here is that the display on the booted system can really be any resolution so we need to do some capping to ensure that we don t write more pixels than the display can handle. Writing fewer than the display s maximum seems fine, though. 
fn praise() -> Result  
let gop_handle = boot::get_handle_for_protocol::<GraphicsOutput>()?;
let mut gop = boot::open_protocol_exclusive::<GraphicsOutput>(gop_handle)?;
// Get the (width, height) that is the minimum of
 // our image and the display we're using.
 let (width, height) = gop.current_mode_info().resolution();
let (width, height) = (width.min(KIER_WIDTH), height.min(KIER_HEIGHT));
let mut buffer = RgbImage::new(width, height);
for y in 0..height  
for x in 0..width  
let idx_r = ((y * KIER_WIDTH) + x) * KIER_PIXEL_SIZE;
let pixel = &mut buffer[(x, y)];
pixel.red = KIER[idx_r];
pixel.green = KIER[idx_r + 1];
pixel.blue = KIER[idx_r + 2];
 
 
buffer.write(&mut gop)?;
Ok(())
Not so bad! A bit tedious we could solve some of this by turning KIER into an RgbImage at compile-time using some clever Cow and const tricks and implement blitting a sub-image of the image but this will do for now. This is a joke, after all, let s not go nuts. All that s left with our code is for us to write our main function and try and boot the thing! 
#[entry]
fn main() -> Status  
uefi::helpers::init().unwrap();
praise().unwrap();
boot::stall(100_000_000);
Status::SUCCESS
If you re following along at home and so interested, the final source is over at gist.github.com. We can go ahead and build it using cargo (as is our tradition) by targeting the UEFI platform. 
$ cargo build --release --target x86_64-unknown-uefi

Testing the UEFI Blob While I can definitely get my machine to boot these blobs to test, I figured I d save myself some time by using QEMU to test without a full boot. If you ve not done this sort of thing before, we ll need two packages, qemu and ovmf. It s a bit different than most invocations of qemu you may see out there so I figured it d be worth writing this down, too. 
$ doas apt install qemu-system-x86 ovmf
qemu has a nice feature where it ll create us an EFI partition as a drive and attach it to the VM off a local directory so let s construct an EFI partition file structure, and drop our binary into the conventional location. If you haven t done this before, and are only interested in running this in a VM, don t worry too much about it, a lot of it is convention and this layout should work for you. 
$ mkdir -p esp/efi/boot
$ cp target/x86_64-unknown-uefi/release/*.efi \
 esp/efi/boot/bootx64.efi
With all this in place, we can kick off qemu, booting it in UEFI mode using the ovmf firmware, attaching our EFI partition directory as a drive to our VM to boot off of. 
$ qemu-system-x86_64 \
 -enable-kvm \
 -m 2048 \
 -smbios type=0,uefi=on \
 -bios /usr/share/ovmf/OVMF.fd \
 -drive format=raw,file=fat:rw:esp
If all goes well, soon you ll be met with the all knowing gaze of Chosen One, Kier Eagan. The thing that really impressed me about all this is this program worked first try it all went so boringly normal. Truly, kudos to the uefi crate maintainers, it s incredibly well done.

Booting a live system Sure, we could stop here, but anyone can open up an app window and see a picture of Kier Eagan, so I knew I needed to finish the job and boot a real machine up with this. In order to do that, we need to format a USB stick. BE SURE /dev/sda IS CORRECT IF YOU RE COPY AND PASTING. All my drives are NVMe, so BE CAREFUL if you use SATA, it may very well be your hard drive! Please do not destroy your computer over this. 
$ doas fdisk /dev/sda
Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.40.4).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.
Command (m for help): n
Partition type
p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
e extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1):
First sector (2048-4014079, default 2048):
Last sector, +/-sectors or +/-size K,M,G,T,P  (2048-4014079, default 4014079):
Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 1.9 GiB.
Command (m for help): t
Selected partition 1
Hex code or alias (type L to list all): ef
Changed type of partition 'Linux' to 'EFI (FAT-12/16/32)'.
Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered.
Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
Syncing disks.
Once that looks good (depending on your flavor of udev you may or may not need to unplug and replug your USB stick), we can go ahead and format our new EFI partition (BE CAREFUL THAT /dev/sda IS YOUR USB STICK) and write our EFI directory to it. 
$ doas mkfs.fat /dev/sda1
$ doas mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
$ cp -r esp/efi /mnt
$ find /mnt
/mnt
/mnt/efi
/mnt/efi/boot
/mnt/efi/boot/bootx64.efi
Of course, naturally, devotion to Kier shouldn t mean backdooring your system. Disabling Secure Boot runs counter to the Core Principals, such as Probity, and not doing this would surely run counter to Verve, Wit and Vision. This bit does require that you ve taken the step to enroll a MOK and know how to use it, right about now is when we can use sbsign to sign our UEFI binary we want to boot from to continue enforcing Secure Boot. The details for how this command should be run specifically is likely something you ll need to work out depending on how you ve decided to manage your MOK. 
$ doas sbsign \
 --cert /path/to/mok.crt \
 --key /path/to/mok.key \
 target/x86_64-unknown-uefi/release/*.efi \
 --output esp/efi/boot/bootx64.efi
I figured I d leave a signed copy of boot2kier at /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/KIER.efi on my Dell XPS 13, with Secure Boot enabled and enforcing, just took a matter of going into my BIOS to add the right boot option, which was no sweat. I m sure there is a way to do it using efibootmgr, but I wasn t smart enough to do that quickly. I let er rip, and it booted up and worked great! It was a bit hard to get a video of my laptop, though but lucky for me, I have a Minisforum Z83-F sitting around (which, until a few weeks ago was running the annual http server to control my christmas tree ) so I grabbed it out of the christmas bin, wired it up to a video capture card I have sitting around, and figured I d grab a video of me booting a physical device off the boot2kier USB stick.
Attentive readers will notice the image of Kier is smaller then the qemu booted system which just means our real machine has a larger GOP display resolution than qemu, which makes sense! We could write some fancy resize code (sounds annoying), center the image (can t be assed but should be the easy way out here) or resize the original image (pretty hardware specific workaround). Additionally, you can make out the image being written to the display before us (the Minisforum logo) behind Kier, which is really cool stuff. If we were real fancy we could write blank pixels to the display before blitting Kier, but, again, I don t think I care to do that much work.

But now I must away If I wanted to keep this joke going, I d likely try and find a copy of the original video when Helly 100%s her file and boot into that or maybe play a terrible midi PC speaker rendition of Kier, Chosen One, Kier after rendering the image. I, unfortunately, don t have any friends involved with production (yet?), so I reckon all that s out for now. I ll likely stop playing with this the joke was done and I m only writing this post because of how great everything was along the way. All in all, this reminds me so much of building a homebrew kernel to boot a system into but like, good, though, and it s a nice reminder of both how fun this stuff can be, and how far we ve come. UEFI protocols are light-years better than how we did it in the dark ages, and the tooling for this is SO much more mature. Booting a custom UEFI binary is miles ahead of trying to boot your own kernel, and I can t believe how good the uefi crate is specifically. Praise Kier! Kudos, to everyone involved in making this so delightful .

14 February 2025

Freexian Collaborators: Monthly report about Debian Long Term Support, January 2025 (by Roberto C. S nchez)

Like each month, have a look at the work funded by Freexian s Debian LTS offering.

Debian LTS contributors In January, 20 contributors have been paid to work on Debian LTS, their reports are available:
  • Abhijith PA did 8.0h (out of 14.0h assigned), thus carrying over 6.0h to the next month.
  • Adrian Bunk did 36.5h (out of 47.75h assigned and 52.25h from previous period), thus carrying over 63.5h to the next month.
  • Andrej Shadura did 11.0h (out of 11.0h assigned and 4.0h from previous period), thus carrying over 4.0h to the next month.
  • Arturo Borrero Gonzalez did 9.0h (out of 10.0h assigned), thus carrying over 1.0h to the next month.
  • Bastien Roucari s did 22.0h (out of 22.0h assigned).
  • Ben Hutchings did 8.0h (out of 21.0h assigned and 3.0h from previous period), thus carrying over 16.0h to the next month.
  • Chris Lamb did 18.0h (out of 18.0h assigned).
  • Daniel Leidert did 20.0h (out of 23.0h assigned and 3.0h from previous period), thus carrying over 6.0h to the next month.
  • Emilio Pozuelo Monfort did 34.0h (out of 7.0h assigned and 27.75h from previous period), thus carrying over 0.75h to the next month.
  • Guilhem Moulin did 3.25h (out of 20.0h assigned), thus carrying over 16.75h to the next month.
  • Jochen Sprickerhof did 23.0h (out of 15.0h assigned and 8.0h from previous period).
  • Lee Garrett did 15.75h (out of 8.5h assigned and 51.5h from previous period), thus carrying over 44.25h to the next month.
  • Lucas Kanashiro did 8.0h (out of 32.0h assigned and 32.0h from previous period), thus carrying over 56.0h to the next month.
  • Markus Koschany did 40.0h (out of 40.0h assigned).
  • Roberto C. S nchez did 14.75h (out of 13.5h assigned and 10.5h from previous period), thus carrying over 9.25h to the next month.
  • Santiago Ruano Rinc n did 21.75h (out of 18.75h assigned and 6.25h from previous period), thus carrying over 3.25h to the next month.
  • Sean Whitton did 8.5h (out of 8.5h assigned).
  • Sylvain Beucler did 10.5h (out of 0.0h assigned and 49.5h from previous period), thus carrying over 39.0h to the next month.
  • Thorsten Alteholz did 11.0h (out of 11.0h assigned).
  • Tobias Frost did 12.0h (out of 12.0h assigned).

Evolution of the situation In January, we have released 33 DLAs. There were numerous security and non-security updates to Debian 11 (codename bullseye ) during January.
  • Notable security updates:
    • rsync, prepared by Thorsten Alteholz, fixed several CVEs (including information leak and path traversal vulnerabilities)
    • tomcat9, prepared by Markus Koschany, fixed several CVEs (including denial of service and information disclosure vulnerabilities)
    • ruby2.7, prepared by Bastien Roucari s, fixed several CVEs (including denial of service vulnerabilities)
    • tiff, prepared by Adrian Bunk, fixed several CVEs (including NULL ptr, buffer overflow, use-after-free, and segfault vulnerabilities)
  • Notable non-security updates:
    • linux-6.1, prepared by Ben Hutchings, has been packaged for bullseye (this was done specifically to provide a supported upgrade path for systems that currently use kernel packages from the bullseye-backports suite)
    • debian-security-support, prepared by Santiago Ruano Rinc n, which formalized the EOL of intel-mediasdk and node-matrix-js-sdk
In addition to the security and non-security updates targeting bullseye , various LTS contributors have prepared uploads targeting Debian 12 (codename bookworm ) with fixes for a variety of vulnerabilities. Abhijith PA prepared an upload of puma; Bastien Roucari s prepared an upload of node-postcss with fixes for data processing and denial of service vulnerabilities; Daniel Leidert prepared updates for setuptools, python-asyncssh, and python-tornado; Lee Garrett prepared an upload of ansible-core; and Guilhem Moulin prepared updates for python-urllib3, sqlparse, and opensc. Santiago Ruano Rinc n also worked on tracking and filing some issues about packages that need an update in recent releases to avoid regressions on upgrade. This relates to CVEs that were fixed in buster or bullseye, but remain open in bookworm. These updates, along with Santiago s work on identifying and tracking similar issues, underscore the LTS Team s commitment to ensuring that the work we do as part of LTS also benefits the current Debian stable release. LTS contributor Sean Whitton also prepared an upload of jinja2 and Santiago Ruano Rinc n prepared an upload of openjpeg2 for Debian unstable (codename sid ), as part of the LTS Team effort to assist with package uploads to unstable.

Thanks to our sponsors Sponsors that joined recently are in bold.

12 February 2025

Jonathan Dowland: FOSDEM 2025

I'm going to FOSDEM 2025! As usual, I'll be in the Java Devroom for most of that day, which this time around is Saturday. Please recommend me any talks! This is my shortlist so far:

10 February 2025

Petter Reinholdtsen: Some of my 2024 free software activities

It is a while since I posted a summary of the free software and open culture activities and projects I have worked on. Here is a quick summary of the major ones from last year. I guess the biggest project of the year has been migrating orphaned packages in Debian without a version control system to have a git repository on salsa.debian.org. When I started in April around 450 the orphaned packages needed git. I've since migrated around 250 of the packages to a salsa git repository, and around 40 packages were left when I took a break. Not sure who did the around 160 conversions I was not involved in, but I am very glad I got some help on the project. I stopped partly because some of the remaining packages needed more disk space to build than I have available on my development machine, and partly because some had a strange build setup I could not figure out. I had a time budget of 20 minutes per package, if the package proved problematic and likely to take longer, I moved to another package. Might continue later, if I manage to free up some disk space. Another rather big project was the translation to Norwegian Bokm l and publishing of the first book ever published by a S mi woman, the M ter vi liv eller d d? book by Elsa Laula, with a PD0 and CC-BY license. I released it during the summer, and to my surprise it has already sold several copies. As I suck at marketing, I did not expect to sell any. A smaller, but more long term project (for more than 10 years now), and related to orphaned packages in Debian, is my project to ensure a simple way to install hardware related packages in Debian when the relevant hardware is present in a machine. It made a fairly big advance forward last year, partly because I have been poking and begging package maintainers and upstream developers to include AppStream metadata XML in their packages. I've also released a few new versions of the isenkram system with some robustness improvements. Today 127 packages in Debian provide such information, allowing isenkram-lookup to propose them. Will keep pushing until the around 35 package names currently hard coded in the isenkram package are down to zero, so only information provided by individual packages are used for this feature. As part of the work on AppStream, I have sponsored several packages into Debian where the maintainer wanted to fix the issue but lacked direct upload rights. I've also sponsored a few other packages, when approached by the maintainer. I would also like to mention two hardware related packages in particular where I have been involved, the megactl and mfi-util packages. Both work with the hardware RAID systems in several Dell PowerEdge servers, and the first one is already available in Debian (and of course, proposed by isenkram when used on the appropriate Dell server), the other is waiting for NEW processing since this autumn. I manage several such Dell servers and would like the tools needed to monitor and configure these RAID controllers to be available from within Debian out of the box. Vaguely related to hardware support in Debian, I have also been trying to find ways to help out the Debian ROCm team, to improve the support in Debian for my artificial idiocy (AI) compute node. So far only uploaded one package, helped test the initial packaging of llama.cpp and tried to figure out how to get good speech recognition like Whisper into Debian. I am still involved in the LinuxCNC project, and organised a developer gathering in Norway last summer. A new one is planned the summer of 2025. I've also helped evaluate patches and uploaded new versions of LinuxCNC into Debian. After a 10 years long break, we managed to get a new and improved upstream version of lsdvd released just before Christmas. As I use it regularly to maintain my DVD archive, I was very happy to finally get out a version supporting DVDDiscID useful for uniquely identifying DVDs. I am dreaming of a Internet service mapping DVD IDs to IMDB movie IDs, to make life as a DVD collector easier. My involvement in Norwegian archive standardisation and the free software implementation of the vendor neutral Noark 5 API continued for the entire year. I've been pushing patches into both the API and the test code for the API, participated in several editorial meetings regarding the Noark 5 Tjenestegrensesnitt specification, submitted several proposals for improvements for the same. We also organised a small seminar for Noark 5 interested people, and is organising a new seminar in a month. Part of the year was spent working on and coordinating a Norwegian Bokm l translation of the marvellous children's book Ada and Zangemann , which focus on the right to repair and control your own property, and the value of controlling the software on the devices you own. The translation is mostly complete, and is now waiting for a transformation of the project and manuscript to use Docbook XML instead of a home made semi-text based format. Great progress is being made and the new book build process is almost complete. I have also been looking at how to companies in Norway can use free software to report their accounting summaries to the Norwegian government. Several new regulations make it very hard for companies to do use free software for accounting, and I would like to change this. Found a few drafts for opening up the reporting process, and have read up on some of the specifications, but nothing much is working yet. These were just the top of the iceberg, but I guess this blog post is long enough now. If you would like to help with any of these projects, please get in touch, either directly on the project mailing lists and forums, or with me via email, IRC or Signal. :) As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

9 February 2025

Philipp Kern: 20 years

20 years ago, I got my Debian Developer account. I was 18 at the time, it was Shrove Tuesday and - as is customary - I was drunk when I got the email. There was so much that I did not know - which is also why the process took 1.5 years from the time I applied. I mostly only maintained a package or two. I'm still amazed that Christian Perrier and Joerg Jaspert put sufficient trust in me at that time. Nevertheless now feels like a good time for a personal reflection of my involvement in Debian.
During my studies I took on more things. In January 2008 I joined the Release Team as an assistant, which taught me a lot of code review. I have been an Application Manager on the side.
Going to my first Debconf was really a turning point. My first one was Mar del Plata in Argentina in August 2008, when I was 21. That was quite an excitement, traveling that far from Germany for the first time. The personal connections I made there made quite the difference. It was also a big boost for motivation. I attended 8 (Argentina), 9 (Spain), 10 (New York), 11 (Bosnia and Herzegovina), 12 (Nicaragua), 13 (Switzerland), 14 (Portland), 15 (Germany), 16 (South Africa), and hopefully I'll make it to this year's in Brest. At all of them I did not see much of the countries as I prioritized all of my time focused on Debian, even skipping some of the day trips in favor of team meetings. Yet I am very grateful to the project (and to my employer) for shipping me there.I ended up as Stable Release Manager for a while, from August 2008 - when Martin Zobel-Helas moved into DSA - until I got dropped in March 2020. I think my biggest achievements were pushing for the creation of -updates in favor of a separate volatile archive and a change of the update policy to allow for more common sense updates in the main archive vs. the very strict "breakage or security" policy we had previously. I definitely need to call out Adam D. Barratt for being the partner in crime, holding up the fort for even longer.In 2009 I got too annoyed at the existing wanna-build team not being responsive anymore and pushed for the system to be given to a new team. I did not build it and significant contributions were done by other people (like Andreas Barth and Joachim Breitner, and later Aurelien Jarno). I mostly reworked the way the system was triggered, investigated when it broke and was around when people wanted things merged.
In the meantime I worked sys/netadmin jobs while at university, both paid and as a volunteer with the students' council. For a year or two I was the administrator of a System z mainframe IBM donated to my university. We had a mainframe course and I attended two related conferences. That's where my s390(x) interest came from, although credit for the port needs to go to Aurelien Jarno.
Since completing university in 2013 I have been working for a company for almost 12 years. Debian experience was very relevant to the job and I went on maintaining a Linux distro or two at work - before venturing off into security hardening. People in megacorps - in my humble opinion - disappear from the volunteer projects because a) they might previously have been studying and thus had a lot more time on their hands and b) the job is too similar to the volunteer work and thus the same brain cells used for work are exhausted and can't be easily reused for volunteer work. I kept maintaining a couple of things (buildds, some packages) - mostly because of a sense of commitment and responsibility, but otherwise kind of scaled down my involvement. I also felt less connected as I dropped off IRC.Last year I finally made it to Debian events again: MiniDebconf in Berlin, where we discussed the aftermath of the xz incident, and the Debian BSP in Salzburg. I rejoined IRC using the Matrix bridge. That also rekindled my involvement, with me guiding a new DD through NM and ending up in DSA. To be honest, only in the last two or three years I felt like a (more) mature old-timer.
I have a new gig at work lined up to start soon and next to that I have sysadmining for Debian. It is pretty motivating to me that I can just get things done - something that is much harder to achieve at work due to organizational complexities. It balances out some frustration I'd otherwise have. The work is different enough to be enjoyable and the people I work with are great.

The future
I still think the work we do in Debian is important, as much as I see a lack of appreciation in a world full of containers. We are reaping most of the benefits of standing on the shoulders of giants and of great decisions made in the past (e.g. the excellent Debian policy, but also the organizational model) that made Debian what it is today.Given the increase in size and complexity of what Debian ships - and the somewhat dwindling resource of developer time, it would benefit us to have better processes for large-scale changes across all packages. I greatly respect the horizontal effects that are currently being driven and that suck up a lot of energy.A lot of our infrastructure is also aging and not super well maintained. Many take it for granted that the services we have keep existing, but most are only maintained by a person or two, if even. Software stacks are aging and it is even a struggle to have all necessary packages in the next release.Hopefully I can contribute a bit or two to these efforts in the future.

Antoine Beaupr : A slow blogging year

Well, 2024 will be remembered, won't it? I guess 2025 already wants to make its mark too, but let's not worry about that right now, and instead let's talk about me. A little over a year ago, I was gloating over how I had such a great blogging year in 2022, and was considering 2023 to be average, then went on to gather more stats and traffic analysis... Then I said, and I quote:
I hope to write more next year. I've been thinking about a few posts I could write for work, about how things work behind the scenes at Tor, that could be informative for many people. We run a rather old setup, but things hold up pretty well for what we throw at it, and it's worth sharing that with the world...
What a load of bollocks.

A bad year for this blog 2024 was the second worst year ever in my blogging history, tied with 2009 at a measly 6 posts for the year: 
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ curl -sSL https://anarc.at/blog/   grep 'href="\./'   grep -o 20[0-9][0-9]   sort   uniq -c   sort -nr   grep -v 2025   tail -3
      6 2024
      6 2009
      3 2014
I did write about my work though, detailing the migration from Gitolite to GitLab we completed that year. But after August, total radio silence until now.

Loads of drafts It's not that I have nothing to say: I have no less than five drafts in my working tree here, not counting three actual drafts recorded in the Git repository here: 
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ git s blog
## main...origin/main
?? blog/bell-bot.md
?? blog/fish.md
?? blog/kensington.md
?? blog/nixos.md
?? blog/tmux.md
anarcat@angela:anarc.at$ git grep -l '\!tag draft'
blog/mobile-massive-gallery.md
blog/on-dying.mdwn
blog/secrets-recovery.md
I just don't have time to wrap those things up. I think part of me is disgusted by seeing my work stolen by large corporations to build proprietary large language models while my idols have been pushed to suicide for trying to share science with the world. Another part of me wants to make those things just right. The "tagged drafts" above are nothing more than a huge pile of chaotic links, far from being useful for anyone else than me, and even then. The on-dying article, in particular, is becoming my nemesis. I've been wanting to write that article for over 6 years now, I think. It's just too hard.

Writing elsewhere There's also the fact that I write for work already. A lot. Here are the top-10 contributors to our team's wiki: 
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git shortlog --numbered --summary --group="format:%al"   head -10
  4272  anarcat
   423  jerome
   117  zen
   116  lelutin
   104  peter
    58  kez
    45  irl
    43  hiro
    18  gaba
    17  groente
... but that's a bit unfair, since I've been there half a decade. Here's the last year: 
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git shortlog --since=2024-01-01 --numbered --summary --group="format:%al"   head -10
   827  anarcat
   117  zen
   116  lelutin
    91  jerome
    17  groente
    10  gaba
     8  micah
     7  kez
     5  jnewsome
     4  stephen.swift
So I still write the most commits! But to truly get a sense of the amount I wrote in there, we should count actual changes. Here it is by number of lines (from commandlinefu.com): 
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ git ls-files   xargs -n1 git blame --line-porcelain   sed -n 's/^author //p'   sort -f   uniq -ic   sort -nr   head -10
  99046 Antoine Beaupr 
   6900 Zen Fu
   4784 J r me Charaoui
   1446 Gabriel Filion
   1146 Jerome Charaoui
    837 groente
    705 kez
    569 Gaba
    381 Matt Traudt
    237 Stephen Swift
That, of course, is the entire history of the git repo, again. We should take only the last year into account, and probably ignore the tails directory, as sneaky Zen Fu imported the entire docs from another wiki there... 
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ find [d-s]* -type f -mtime -365   xargs -n1 git blame --line-porcelain 2>/dev/null   sed -n 's/^author //p'   sort -f   uniq -ic   sort -nr   head -10
  75037 Antoine Beaupr 
   2932 J r me Charaoui
   1442 Gabriel Filion
   1400 Zen Fu
    929 Jerome Charaoui
    837 groente
    702 kez
    569 Gaba
    381 Matt Traudt
    237 Stephen Swift
Pretty good! 75k lines. But those are the files that were modified in the last year. If we go a little more nuts, we find that: 
anarcat@angela:help.torproject.org$ $ git-count-words-range.py    sort -k6 -nr   head -10
parsing commits for words changes from command: git log '--since=1 year ago' '--format=%H %al'
anarcat 126116 - 36932 = 89184
zen 31774 - 5749 = 26025
groente 9732 - 607 = 9125
lelutin 10768 - 2578 = 8190
jerome 6236 - 2586 = 3650
gaba 3164 - 491 = 2673
stephen.swift 2443 - 673 = 1770
kez 1034 - 74 = 960
micah 772 - 250 = 522
weasel 410 - 0 = 410
I wrote 126,116 words in that wiki, only in the last year. I also deleted 37k words, so the final total is more like 89k words, but still: that's about forty (40!) articles of the average size (~2k) I wrote in 2022. (And yes, I did go nuts and write a new log parser, essentially from scratch, to figure out those word diffs. I did get the courage only after asking GPT-4o for an example first, I must admit.) Let's celebrate that again: I wrote 90 thousand words in that wiki in 2024. According to Wikipedia, a "novella" is 17,500 to 40,000 words, which would mean I wrote about a novella and a novel, in the past year. But interestingly, if I look at the repository analytics. I certainly didn't write that much more in the past year. So that alone cannot explain the lull in my production here.

Arguments Another part of me is just tired of the bickering and arguing on the internet. I have at least two articles in there that I suspect is going to get me a lot of push-back (NixOS and Fish). I know how to deal with this: you need to write well, consider the controversy, spell it out, and defuse things before they happen. But that's hard work and, frankly, I don't really care that much about what people think anymore. I'm not writing here to convince people. I have stop evangelizing a long time ago. Now, I'm more into documenting, and teaching. And, while teaching, there's a two-way interaction: when you give out a speech or workshop, people can ask questions, or respond, and you all learn something. When you document, you quickly get told "where is this? I couldn't find it" or "I don't understand this" or "I tried that and it didn't work" or "wait, really? shouldn't we do X instead", and you learn. Here, it's static. It's my little soapbox where I scream in the void. The only thing people can do is scream back.

Collaboration So. Let's see if we can work together here. If you don't like something I say, disagree, or find something wrong or to be improved, instead of screaming on social media or ignoring me, try contributing back. This site here is backed by a git repository and I promise to read everything you send there, whether it is an issue or a merge request. I will, of course, still read comments sent by email or IRC or social media, but please, be kind. You can also, of course, follow the latest changes on the TPA wiki. If you want to catch up with the last year, some of the "novellas" I wrote include: (Well, no, you can't actually follow changes on a GitLab wiki. But we have a wiki-replica git repository where you can see the latest commits, and subscribe to the RSS feed.) See you there!

Antoine Beaupr : Qalculate hacks

This is going to be a controversial statement because some people are absolute nerds about this, but, I need to say it. Qalculate is the best calculator that has ever been made. I am not going to try to convince you of this, I just wanted to put out my bias out there before writing down those notes. I am a total fan. This page will collect my notes of cool hacks I do with Qalculate. Most examples are copy-pasted from the command-line interface (qalc(1)), but I typically use the graphical interface as it's slightly better at displaying complex formulas. Discoverability is obviously also better for the cornucopia of features this fantastic application ships.

Qalc commandline primer On Debian, Qalculate's CLI interface can be installed with: 
apt install qalc
Then you start it with the qalc command, and end up on a prompt: 
anarcat@angela:~$ qalc
>
Then it's a normal calculator: 
anarcat@angela:~$ qalc
> 1+1
  1 + 1 = 2
> 1/7
  1 / 7   0.1429
> pi
  pi   3.142
>
There's a bunch of variables to control display, approximation, and so on: 
> set precision 6
> 1/7
  1 / 7   0.142857
> set precision 20
> pi
  pi   3.1415926535897932385
When I need more, I typically browse around the menus. One big issue I have with Qalculate is there are a lot of menus and features. I had to fiddle quite a bit to figure out that set precision command above. I might add more examples here as I find them.

Bandwidth estimates I often use the data units to estimate bandwidths. For example, here's what 1 megabit per second is over a month ("about 300 GiB"): 
> 1 megabit/s * 30 day to gibibyte 
  (1 megabit/second)   (30 days)   301.7 GiB
Or, "how long will it take to download X", in this case, 1GiB over a 100 mbps link: 
> 1GiB/(100 megabit/s)
  (1 gibibyte) / (100 megabits/second)   1 min + 25.90 s

Password entropy To calculate how much entropy (in bits) a given password structure, you count the number of possibilities in each entry (say, [a-z] is 26 possibilities, "one word in a 8k dictionary" is 8000), extract the base-2 logarithm, multiplied by the number of entries. For example, an alphabetic 14-character password is: 
> log2(26*2)*14
  log (26   2)   14   79.81
... 80 bits of entropy. To get the equivalent in a Diceware password with a 8000 word dictionary, you would need: 
> log2(8k)*x = 80
  (log (8   000)   x) = 80  
  x   6.170
... about 6 words, which gives you: 
> log2(8k)*6
  log (8   1000)   6   77.79
78 bits of entropy.

Exchange rates You can convert between currencies! 
> 1 EUR to USD
  1 EUR   1.038 USD
Even fake ones! 
> 1 BTC to USD
  1 BTC   96712 USD
This relies on a database pulled form the internet (typically the central european bank rates, see the source). It will prompt you if it's too old: 
It has been 256 days since the exchange rates last were updated.
Do you wish to update the exchange rates now? y
As a reader pointed out, you can set the refresh rate for currencies, as some countries will require way more frequent exchange rates. The graphical version has a little graphical indicator that, when you mouse over, tells you where the rate comes from.

Other conversions Here are other neat conversions extracted from my history 
> teaspoon to ml
  teaspoon = 5 mL
> tablespoon to ml
  tablespoon = 15 mL
> 1 cup to ml 
  1 cup   236.6 mL
> 6 L/100km to mpg
  (6 liters) / (100 kilometers)   39.20 mpg
> 100 kph to mph
  100 kph   62.14 mph
> (108km - 72km) / 110km/h
  ((108 kilometers)   (72 kilometers)) / (110 kilometers/hour)  
  19 min + 38.18 s

Completion time estimates This is a more involved example I often do.

Background Say you have started a long running copy job and you don't have the luxury of having a pipe you can insert pv(1) into to get a nice progress bar. For example, rsync or cp -R can have that problem (but not tar!). (Yes, you can use --info=progress2 in rsync, but that estimate is incremental and therefore inaccurate unless you disable the incremental mode with --no-inc-recursive, but then you pay a huge up-front wait cost while the entire directory gets crawled.)

Extracting a process start time First step is to gather data. Find the process start time. If you were unfortunate enough to forget to run date --iso-8601=seconds before starting, you can get a similar timestamp with stat(1) on the process tree in /proc with: 
$ stat /proc/11232
  File: /proc/11232
  Size: 0               Blocks: 0          IO Block: 1024   directory
Device: 0,21    Inode: 57021       Links: 9
Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2025-02-07 15:50:25.287220819 -0500
Modify: 2025-02-07 15:50:25.287220819 -0500
Change: 2025-02-07 15:50:25.287220819 -0500
 Birth: -
So our start time is 2025-02-07 15:50:25, we shave off the nanoseconds there, they're below our precision noise floor. If you're not dealing with an actual UNIX process, you need to figure out a start time: this can be a SQL query, a network request, whatever, exercise for the reader.

Saving a variable This is optional, but for the sake of demonstration, let's save this as a variable: 
> start="2025-02-07 15:50:25"
  save("2025-02-07T15:50:25"; start; Temporary; ; 1) =
  "2025-02-07T15:50:25"

Estimating data size Next, estimate your data size. That will vary wildly with the job you're running: this can be anything: number of files, documents being processed, rows to be destroyed in a database, whatever. In this case, rsync tells me how many bytes it has transferred so far: 
# rsync -ASHaXx --info=progress2 /srv/ /srv-zfs/
2.968.252.503.968  94%    7,63MB/s    6:04:58  xfr#464440, ir-chk=1000/982266)
Strip off the weird dots in there, because that will confuse qalculate, which will count this as: 
  2.968252503968 bytes   2.968 B
Or, essentially, three bytes. We actually transferred almost 3TB here: 
  2968252503968 bytes   2.968 TB
So let's use that. If you had the misfortune of making rsync silent, but were lucky enough to transfer entire partitions, you can use df (without -h! we want to be more precise here), in my case: 
Filesystem              1K-blocks       Used  Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg_hdd-srv 7512681384 7258298036  179205040  98% /srv
tank/srv               7667173248 2870444032 4796729216  38% /srv-zfs
(Otherwise, of course, you use du -sh $DIRECTORY.)

Digression over bytes Those are 1 K bytes which is actually (and rather unfortunately) Ki, or "kibibytes" (1024 bytes), not "kilobytes" (1000 bytes). Ugh. 
> 2870444032 KiB
  2870444032 kibibytes   2.939 TB

> 2870444032 kB
  2870444032 kilobytes   2.870 TB
At this scale, those details matter quite a bit, we're talking about a 69GB (64GiB) difference here: 
> 2870444032 KiB - 2870444032 kB
  (2870444032 kibibytes)   (2870444032 kilobytes)   68.89 GB
Anyways. Let's take 2968252503968 bytes as our current progress. Our entire dataset is 7258298064 KiB, as seen above.

Solving a cross-multiplication We have 3 out of four variables for our equation here, so we can already solve: 
> (now-start)/x = (2996538438607 bytes)/(7258298064 KiB) to h
  ((actual   start) / x) = ((2996538438607 bytes) / (7258298064
  kibibytes))
  x   59.24 h
The entire transfer will take about 60 hours to complete! Note that's not the time left, that is the total time. To break this down step by step, we could calculate how long it has taken so far: 
> now-start
  now   start   23 h + 53 min + 6.762 s
> now-start to s
  now   start   85987 s
... and do the cross-multiplication manually, it's basically: 
x/(now-start) = (total/current)
so: 
x = (total/current) * (now-start)
or, in Qalc: 
> ((7258298064  kibibytes) / ( 2996538438607 bytes) ) *  85987 s
  ((7258298064 kibibytes) / (2996538438607 bytes))   (85987 secondes)  
  2 d + 11 h + 14 min + 38.81 s
It's interesting it gives us different units here! Not sure why.

Now and built-in variables The now here is actually a built-in variable: 
> now
  now   "2025-02-08T22:25:25"
There is a bewildering list of such variables, for example: 
> uptime
  uptime = 5 d + 6 h + 34 min + 12.11 s
> golden
  golden   1.618
> exact
  golden = ( (5) + 1) / 2

Computing dates In any case, yay! We know the transfer is going to take roughly 60 hours total, and we've already spent around 24h of that, so, we have 36h left. But I did that all in my head, we can ask more of Qalc yet! Let's make another variable, for that total estimated time: 
> total=(now-start)/x = (2996538438607 bytes)/(7258298064 KiB)
  save(((now   start) / x) = ((2996538438607 bytes) / (7258298064
  kibibytes)); total; Temporary; ; 1)  
  2 d + 11 h + 14 min + 38.22 s
And we can plug that into another formula with our start time to figure out when we'll be done! 
> start+total
  start + total   "2025-02-10T03:28:52"
> start+total-now
  start + total   now   1 d + 11 h + 34 min + 48.52 s
> start+total-now to h
  start + total   now   35 h + 34 min + 32.01 s
That transfer has ~1d left, or 35h24m32s, and should complete around 4 in the morning on February 10th. But that's icing on top. I typically only do the cross-multiplication and calculate the remaining time in my head. I mostly did the last bit to show Qalculate could compute dates and time differences, as long as you use ISO timestamps. Although it can also convert to and from UNIX timestamps, it cannot parse arbitrary date strings (yet?).

Other functionality Qalculate can:
  • Plot graphs;
  • Use RPN input;
  • Do all sorts of algebraic, calculus, matrix, statistics, trigonometry functions (and more!);
  • ... and so much more!
I have a hard time finding things it cannot do. When I get there, I typically need to resort to programming code in Python, use a spreadsheet, and others will turn to more complete engines like Maple, Mathematica or R. But for daily use, Qalculate is just fantastic. And it's pink! Use it!

Further reading and installation This is just scratching the surface, the fine manual has more information, including more examples. There is also of course a qalc(1) manual page which also ships an excellent EXAMPLES section. Qalculate is packaged for over 30 Linux distributions, but also ships packages for Windows and MacOS. There are third-party derivatives as well including a web version and an Android app.

Updates Colin Watson liked this blog post and was inspired to write his own hacks, similar to what's here, but with extras, check it out!

Petter Reinholdtsen: New oggz release 1.1.2 after 15 years

A little over a week ago, I noticed the liboggz package on my Debian dashboard had not had a new upstream release for a while. A closer look showed that its last release, version 1.1.1, happened in 2010. A few patches had accumulated in the Debian package, and I even noticed that I had passed on these patches to upstream five years ago. A handful crash bugs had been reported against the Debian package, and looking at the upstream repository I even found a few crash bugs reported there too. To add insult to injury, I discovered that upstream had accumulated several fixes in the years between 2010 and now, and many of them had not made their way into the Debian package. I decided enough was enough, and that a new upstream release was needed fixing these nasty crash bugs. Luckily I am also a member of the Xiph team, aka upstream, and could actually go to work immediately to fix it. I started by adding automatic build testing on the Xiph gitlab oggz instance, to get a better idea of the state of affairs with the code base. This exposed a few build problems, which I had to fix. In parallel to this, I sent an email announcing my wish for a new release to every person who had committed to the upstream code base since 2010, and asked for help doing a new release both on email and on the #xiph IRC channel. Sadly only a fraction of their email providers accepted my email. But Ralph Giles in the Xiph team came to the rescue and provided invaluable help to guide be through the release Xiph process. While this was going on, I spent a few days tracking down the crash bugs with good help from valgrind, and came up with patch proposals to get rid of at least these specific crash bugs. The open issues also had to be checked. Several of them proved to be fixed already, but a few I had to creat patches for. I also checked out the Debian, Arch, Fedora, Suse and Gentoo packages to see if there were patches applied in these Linux distributions that should be passed upstream. The end result was ready yesterday. A new liboggz release, version 1.1.2, was tagged, wrapped up and published on the project page. And today, the new release was uploaded into Debian. You are probably by now curious on what actually changed in the library. I guess the most interesting new feature was support for Opus and VP8. Almost all other changes were stability or documentation fixes. The rest were related to the gitlab continuous integration testing. All in all, this was really a minor update, hence the version bump only from 1.1.1 to to 1.1.2, but it was long overdue and I am very happy that it is out the door. One change proposed upstream was not included this time, as it extended the API and changed some of the existing library methods, and thus require a major SONAME bump and possibly code changes in every program using the library. As I am not that familiar with the code base, I am unsure if I am the right person to evaluate the change. Perhaps later. Since the release was tagged, a few minor fixes has been committed upstream already: automatic testing the cross building to Windows, and documentation updates linking to the correct project page. If a important issue is discovered with this release, I guess a new release might happen soon including the minor fixes. If not, perhaps they can wait fifteen years. :) I would like to send a big thank you to everyone that helped make this release happen, from the people adding fixes upstream over the course of fifteen years, to the ones reporting crash bugs, other bugs and those maintaining the package in various Linux distributions. Thank you very much for your time and interest. As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

6 February 2025

Bits from Debian: Proxmox Platinum Sponsor of DebConf25

proxmox-logo We are pleased to announce that Proxmox has committed to sponsor DebConf25 as a Platinum Sponsor. Proxmox develops powerful, yet easy-to-use Open Source server software. The product portfolio from Proxmox, including server virtualization, backup, and email security, helps companies of any size, sector, or industry to simplify their IT infrastructures. The Proxmox solutions are based on the great Debian platform, and we are happy that we can give back to the community by sponsoring DebConf25. With this commitment as Platinum Sponsor, Proxmox is contributing to the Debian annual Developers' conference, directly supporting the progress of Debian and Free Software. Proxmox contributes to strengthen the community that collaborates on Debian projects from all around the world throughout all of the year. Thank you very much, Proxmox, for your support of DebConf25! Become a sponsor too! DebConf25 will take place from 14 to 20 July 2025 in Brest, France, and will be preceded by DebCamp, from 7 to 13 July 2025. DebConf25 is accepting sponsors! Interested companies and organizations may contact the DebConf team through sponsors@debconf.org, and visit the DebConf25 website at https://debconf25.debconf.org/sponsors /become-a-sponsor/.

5 February 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in January 2025

Welcome to the first report in 2025 from the Reproducible Builds project! Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the world of software supply-chain security when relevant. As usual, though, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. Table of contents:
  1. reproduce.debian.net
  2. Two new academic papers
  3. Distribution work
  4. On our mailing list
  5. Upstream patches
  6. diffoscope
  7. Website updates
  8. Reproducibility testing framework

reproduce.debian.net The last few months saw the introduction of reproduce.debian.net. Announced at the recent Debian MiniDebConf in Toulouse, reproduce.debian.net is an instance of rebuilderd operated by the Reproducible Builds project. Powering that is rebuilderd, our server designed monitor the official package repositories of Linux distributions and attempt to reproduce the observed results there. This month, however, we are pleased to announce that in addition to the existing amd64.reproduce.debian.net and i386.reproduce.debian.net architecture-specific pages, we now build for a three more architectures (for a total of five) arm64 armhf and riscv64.

Two new academic papers Giacomo Benedetti, Oreofe Solarin, Courtney Miller, Greg Tystahl, William Enck, Christian K stner, Alexandros Kapravelos, Alessio Merlo and Luca Verderame published an interesting article recently. Titled An Empirical Study on Reproducible Packaging in Open-Source Ecosystem, the abstract outlines its optimistic findings:
[We] identified that with relatively straightforward infrastructure configuration and patching of build tools, we can achieve very high rates of reproducible builds in all studied ecosystems. We conclude that if the ecosystems adopt our suggestions, the build process of published packages can be independently confirmed for nearly all packages without individual developer actions, and doing so will prevent significant future software supply chain attacks.
The entire PDF is available online to view.
In addition, Julien Malka, Stefano Zacchiroli and Th o Zimmermann of T l com Paris in-house research laboratory, the Information Processing and Communications Laboratory (LTCI) published an article asking the question: Does Functional Package Management Enable Reproducible Builds at Scale?. Answering strongly in the affirmative, the article s abstract reads as follows:
In this work, we perform the first large-scale study of bitwise reproducibility, in the context of the Nix functional package manager, rebuilding 709,816 packages from historical snapshots of the nixpkgs repository[. We] obtain very high bitwise reproducibility rates, between 69 and 91% with an upward trend, and even higher rebuildability rates, over 99%. We investigate unreproducibility causes, showing that about 15% of failures are due to embedded build dates. We release a novel dataset with all build statuses, logs, as well as full diffoscopes: recursive diffs of where unreproducible build artifacts differ.
As above, the entire PDF of the article is available to view online.

Distribution work There as been the usual work in various distributions this month, such as:
  • 10+ reviews of Debian packages were added, 11 were updated and 10 were removed this month adding to our knowledge about identified issues. A number of issue types were updated also.
  • The FreeBSD Foundation announced that a planned project to deliver zero-trust builds has begun in January 2025 . Supported by the Sovereign Tech Agency, this project is centered on the various build processes, and that the primary goal of this work is to enable the entire release process to run without requiring root access, and that build artifacts build reproducibly that is, that a third party can build bit-for-bit identical artifacts. The full announcement can be found online, which includes an estimated schedule and other details.

On our mailing list On our mailing list this month:
  • Following-up to a substantial amount of previous work pertaining the Sphinx documentation generator, James Addison asked a question pertaining to the relationship between SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable and testing that generated a number of replies.
  • Adithya Balakumar of Toshiba asked a question about whether it is possible to make ext4 filesystem images reproducible. Adithya s issue is that even the smallest amount of post-processing of the filesystem results in the modification of the Last mount and Last write timestamps.
  • James Addison also investigated an interesting issue surrounding our disorderfs filesystem. In particular:
    FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace) filesystems such as disorderfs do not delete files from the underlying filesystem when they are deleted from the overlay. This can cause seemingly straightforward tests for example, cases that expect directory contents to be empty after deletion is requested for all files listed within them to fail.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

diffoscope diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 285, 286 and 287 to Debian:
  • Security fixes:
    • Validate the --css command-line argument to prevent a potential Cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. Thanks to Daniel Schmidt from SRLabs for the report. [ ]
    • Prevent XML entity expansion attacks. Thanks to Florian Wilkens from SRLabs for the report.. [ ][ ]
    • Print a warning if we have disabled XML comparisons due to a potentially vulnerable version of pyexpat. [ ]
  • Bug fixes:
    • Correctly identify changes to only the line-endings of files; don t mark them as Ordering differences only. [ ]
    • When passing files on the command line, don t call specialize( ) before we ve checked that the files are identical or not. [ ]
    • Do not exit with a traceback if paths are inaccessible, either directly, via symbolic links or within a directory. [ ]
    • Don t cause a traceback if cbfstool extraction failed.. [ ]
    • Use the surrogateescape mechanism to avoid a UnicodeDecodeError and crash when any decoding zipinfo output that is not UTF-8 compliant. [ ]
  • Testsuite improvements:
    • Don t mangle newlines when opening test fixtures; we want them untouched. [ ]
    • Move to assert_diff in test_text.py. [ ]
  • Misc improvements:
    • Drop unused subprocess imports. [ ][ ]
    • Drop an unused function in iso9600.py. [ ]
    • Inline a call and check of Config().force_details; no need for an additional variable in this particular method. [ ]
    • Remove an unnecessary return value from the Difference.check_for_ordering_differences method. [ ]
    • Remove unused logging facility from a few comparators. [ ]
    • Update copyright years. [ ][ ]
In addition, fridtjof added support for the ASAR .tar-like archive format. [ ][ ][ ][ ] and lastly, Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 285 [ ][ ] and 286 [ ][ ].
strip-nondeterminism is our sister tool to remove specific non-deterministic results from a completed build. This month version 1.14.1-1 was uploaded to Debian unstable by Chris Lamb, making the following the changes:
  • Clarify the --verbose and non --verbose output of bin/strip-nondeterminism so we don t imply we are normalizing files that we are not. [ ]
  • Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0. [ ]

Website updates There were a large number of improvements made to our website this month, including:

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. In January, a number of changes were made by Holger Levsen, including:
  • reproduce.debian.net-related:
    • Add support for rebuilding the armhf architecture. [ ][ ]
    • Add support for rebuilding the arm64 architecture. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Add support for rebuilding the riscv64 architecture. [ ][ ]
    • Move the i386 builder to the osuosl5 node. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Don t run our rebuilders on a public port. [ ][ ]
    • Add database backups on all builders and add links. [ ][ ]
    • Rework and dramatically improve the statistics collection and generation. [ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
    • Add contact info to the main page [ ], thumbnails [ ] as well as the new, missing architectures. [ ]
    • Move the amd64 worker to the osuosl4 and node. [ ]
    • Run the underlying debrebuild script under nice. [ ]
    • Try to use TMPDIR when calling debrebuild. [ ][ ]
  • buildinfos.debian.net-related:
    • Stop creating buildinfo-pool_$ suite _$ arch .list files. [ ]
    • Temporarily disable automatic updates of pool links. [ ]
  • FreeBSD-related:
    • Fix the sudoers to actually permit builds. [ ]
    • Disable debug output for FreeBSD rebuilding jobs. [ ]
    • Upgrade to FreeBSD 14.2 [ ] and document that bmake was installed on the underlying FreeBSD virtual machine image [ ].
  • Misc:
    • Update the real year to 2025. [ ]
    • Don t try to install a Debian bookworm kernel from backports on the infom08 node which is running Debian trixie. [ ]
    • Don t warn about system updates for systems running Debian testing. [ ]
    • Fix a typo in the ZOMBIES definition. [ ][ ]
In addition:
  • Ed Maste modified the FreeBSD build system to the clean the object directory before commencing a build. [ ]
  • Gioele Barabucci updated the rebuilder stats to first add a category for network errors [ ] as well as to categorise failures without a diffoscope log [ ].
  • Jessica Clarke also made some FreeBSD-related changes, including:
    • Ensuring we clean up the object directory for second build as well. [ ][ ]
    • Updating the sudoers for the relevant rm -rf command. [ ]
    • Update the cleanup_tmpdirs method to to match other removals. [ ]
  • Jochen Sprickerhof:
  • Roland Clobus:
    • Update the reproducible_debstrap job to call Debian s debootstrap with the full path [ ] and to use eatmydata as well [ ][ ].
    • Make some changes to deduce the CPU load in the debian_live_build job. [ ]
Lastly, both Holger Levsen [ ] and Vagrant Cascadian [ ] performed some node maintenance.
If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

2 February 2025

Bits from Debian: Bits from the DPL

Dear Debian community, this is bits from DPL for January. Sovereign Tech Agency I was recently pointed to Technologies and Projects supported by the Sovereign Tech Agency which is financed by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. It is a subsidiary of the Federal Agency for Disruptive Innovation, SPRIND GmbH. It is worth sending applications there for distinct projects as that is their preferred method of funding. Distinguished developers can also apply for a fellowship position that pays up to 40hrs / week (32hrs when freelancing) for a year. This is esp. open to maintainers of larger numbers of packages in Debian (or any other Linux distribution). There might be a chance that some of the Debian-related projects submitted to the Google Summer of Code that did not get funded could be retried with those foundations. As per the FAQ of the project: "The Sovereign Tech Agency focuses on securing and strengthening open and foundational digital technologies. These communities working on these are distributed all around the world, so we work with people, companies, and FOSS communities everywhere." Similar funding organizations include the Open Technology Fund and FLOSS/fund. If you have a Debian-related project that fits these funding programs, they might be interesting options. This list is by no means exhaustive just some hints I ve received and wanted to share. More suggestions for such opportunities are welcome. Year of code reviews On the debian-devel mailing list, there was a long thread titled "Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian". It initially suggested something along the lines of: "Let's review MRs in Salsa." The discussion quickly expanded to include patches that have been sitting in the BTS for years, which deserve at least the same attention. One idea I'd like to emphasize is that associating BTS bugs with MRs could be very convenient. It s not only helpful for documentation but also the easiest way to apply patches. I d like to emphasize that no matter what workflow we use BTS, MRs, or a mix it is crucial to uphold Debian s reputation for high quality. However, this reputation is at risk as more and more old issues accumulate. While Debian is known for its technical excellence, long-standing bugs and orphaned packages remain a challenge. If we don t address these, we risk weakening the high standards that Debian is valued for. Revisiting old issues and ensuring that unmaintained packages receive attention is especially important as we prepare for the Trixie release. Debian Publicity Team will no longer post on X/Twitter The Press Team has my full support in its decision to stop posting on X. As per the Publicity delegation: the team once decided to join Twitter, but circumstances have since changed. The current Press delegates have the institutional authority to leave X, just as their predecessors had the authority to join. I appreciate that the team carefully considered the matter, reinforced by the arguments developed on the debian-publicity list, and communicated its reasoning openly. Kind regards, Andreas.

Colin Watson: Free software activity in January 2025

Most of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian. If you appreciate this sort of work and are at a company that uses Debian, have a look to see whether you can pay for any of Freexian s services; as well as the direct benefits, that revenue stream helps to keep Debian development sustainable for me and several other lovely people. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay. Python team We finally made Python 3.13 the default version in testing! I fixed various bugs that got in the way of this: As with last month, I fixed a few more build regressions due to the removal of a deprecated intersphinx_mapping syntax in Sphinx 8.0: I ported a few packages to Django 5.1: I ported python-pypump to IPython 8.0. I fixed python-datamodel-code-generator to handle isort 6, and contributed that upstream. I fixed some packages to tolerate future versions of dh-python that will drop their dependency on python3-setuptools: I removed the old python-celery-common transitional package from celery, since nothing in Debian needs it any more. I fixed or helped to fix various other build/test failures: I upgraded these packages to new upstream versions: Rust team I fixed rust-pyo3-ffi to avoid explicit Python version dependencies that were getting in the way of making Python 3.13 the default version. Security tools packaging team I uploaded libevt to fix a build failure on i386 and to tolerate future versions of dh-python that will drop their dependency on python3-setuptools. Installer team I helped with some testing of a debian-installer-utils patch as part of the /usr move. I need to get around to uploading this, since it looks OK now. Other small things Helmut Grohne reached out for help debugging a multi-arch coinstallability problem (you know it s going to be complicated when even Helmut can t figure it out on his own ) in binutils, and we had a call about that. I reviewed and applied a new Romanian translation of debconf s manual pages. I did my twice-yearly refresh of debmirror s mirror_size documentation, and applied a contribution to improve the example debmirror.conf. I fixed an arguable preprocessor string handling bug in man-db, and applied a fix for out-of-tree builds.

Next.

Previous.