Search Results: "will"

2 May 2016

Russ Allbery: Review: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Review: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, by Stieg Larsson
Translator: Reg Keeland
Series: Millennium #1
Publisher: Vintage Crime
Copyright: 2005, 2008
Printing: June 2009
ISBN: 0-307-47347-3
Format: Mass market
Pages: 644
As The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo opens, Mikael Blomkvist is losing a criminal libel suit in Swedish court. His magazine, Millennium, published his hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism that purported to reveal sketchy arms deals and financial crimes by Hans-Erik Wennerstr m, a major Swedish businessman. But the underlying evidence didn't hold up, and Blomkvist could offer no real defense at trial. The result is a short prison stint for him (postponed several months into this book) and serious economic danger for Millennium. Lisbeth Salander is a (very) freelance investigator for Milton Security. Her specialty is research and background checks: remarkably thorough, dispassionate, and comprehensive. She's almost impossible to talk to, tending to meet nearly all questions with stony silence, but Dragan Armansky, the CEO of Milton Security, has taken her partly under his wing. She, and Milton Security, were hired by a lawyer named Dirch Frode to do a comprehensive background check on Mikael Blomkvist, which she and Dragan present near the start of the book. The reason, as the reader discovers in a few more chapters, is that Frode's employer wants to offer Blomkvist a very strange job. Over forty years ago, Harriet Vanger, scion of one of Sweden's richest industrial families, disappeared. Her uncle, Henrik Vanger, has been obsessed with her disappearance ever since, but in forty years of investigation has never been able to discover what happened to her. There are some possibilities for how her body could have been transported off the island the Vangers (mostly) lived, and live, on, but motive and suspects are still complete unknowns. Vanger wants Blomkvist to try his hand under the cover of writing a book about the Vanger family. Payment is generous, but even more compelling is Henrik Vanger's offer to give Blomkvist documented, defensible evidence against Wennerstr m at the end of the year. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (the original Swedish title is M n som hatar kvinnor, "Men who hate women") is the first of three mystery novels written at the very end of Stieg Larsson's life, all published posthumously. They made quite a splash when they were published: won multiple awards, sold millions of copies, and have resulted in four movies to date. I've had a copy of the book sitting around for a while and finally picked it up when in the mood for something a bit different. A major disclaimer up front: I read very little crime and mystery fiction. Every genre has its own conventions and patterns, and regular genre readers often look for different things than people new to that genre. My review is from a somewhat outside and inexperienced perspective, which may not be useful for regular genre readers. I'm also a US reader, reading the book in translation. It appears to be a very good translation, but it was also quite obvious to me that The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was written from a slightly different set of cultural assumptions than I brought to the book. This is one of the merits of reading books from other cultures in translation. It can be eye-opening, and can carry some of the same thrill as science fiction or fantasy, to hit the parts of the book that question your assumptions. But it can also be hard to tell whether some striking aspect of a book is due to a genre convention I wasn't familiar with, a Swedish cultural assumption that I don't share, or just the personal style of the author. A few things do leap out as cultural differences. Blomkvist has to spend a few months in prison in the middle of this book, and that entire experience is completely foreign to an American understanding of what prison is like. The degradation, violence, and awfulness that are synonymous with prison for an American are almost entirely absent. He even enjoys the experience as quiet time to focus on writing a history of the Vangers (Blomkvist early on decides to take his cover story seriously, since he doubts he'll make any inroads into the mystery of Harriet's disappearance but can at least get a book out of it). It's a minor element in the book, glossed over in a few pages, but it's certainly eye-opening for how minimum security prison could be structured in a civilized country. Similarly, as an American reader, I was struck by how hard Larsson has to work to ruin Salander's life. Although much of the book is written from Blomkvist's perspective (in tight third person), Lisbeth Salander is the titular girl with the dragon tattoo and becomes more and more involved in the story as it develops. The story Larsson wanted to tell requires that she be in a very precarious position legally and socially. In the US, this would be relatively easy, particularly for someone who acts like Salander does. In Sweden, Larsson has to go to monumental efforts to find ways for Salander to credibly fall through Sweden's comprehensive social safety net, and still mostly relies on Salander's complete refusal to assist or comply with any form of authority or support. I've read a lot about differences in policies around social support between the US and Scandinavian countries, but I've rarely read something that drove the point home more clearly than the amount of work a novelist has to go to in order to mess up their protagonist's life in Sweden. The actual plot is slow-moving and as much about the psychology of the characters as it is about the mystery. The reader gets inside the thoughts of the characters occasionally, but Larsson shows far more than tells and leaves it to the reader to draw more general conclusions. Blomkvist's relationship with his long-time partner and Millennium co-founder is an excellent example: so much is left unstated that I would have expected other books to lay down in black and white, and the characters seem surprisingly comfortable with ambiguity. (Some of this may be my genre unfamiliarity; SFF tends to be straightforward to a fault, and more literary fiction is more willing to embrace ambiguous relationships.) While the mystery of Harriet's disappearance forms the backbone of the story, rather more pages are spent on Blomkvist navigating the emotional waters of the near-collapse of his career and business, his principles around investigation and journalism, and the murky waters of the Vanger's deeply dysfunctional family. Harriet's disappearance is something of a locked room mystery. The day she disappeared, a huge crash closed the only bridge from the island to the mainland, both limiting suspects and raising significant questions about why her body was never found on the island. It's also forty years into the past, so Blomkvist has to rely on Henrik Vanger's obsessive archives, old photographs, and old police reports. I found the way it unfolded to be quite satisfying: there are just enough clues to let Blomkvist credibly untangle things with some hard work and research, but they're obscure enough to make it plausible that previous investigators missed them. Through most of this novel, I wasn't sure what I thought of it. I have a personal interest in Blomkvist's journalistic focus wrongdoing by rich financiers but I had trouble warming to Blomkvist himself. He's a very passive, inward character, who spends a lot of the early book reacting to things that are happening to him. Salander is more dynamic and honestly more likable, but she's also deeply messed up, self-destructive, and does some viciously awful things in this book. And the first half of the book is very slow: lots of long conversations, lots of character introduction, and lots of Blomkvist wandering somewhat aimlessly. It's only when Larsson gets the two protagonists together that I thought the book started to click. Salander sees Blomkvist's merits more clearly than the reader can, I think. I also need to give a substantial warning: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a very violent novel, and a lot of that violence is sexual. By mid-book, Blomkvist realizes that Harriet's disappearance is somehow linked with a serial killer whose trademark is horrific, sexualized symbolism drawn from Leviticus. There is a lot of rape here, including revenge rape by a protagonist. If that sort of thing is likely to bother you, you may want to steer way clear. That said, despite the slow pace, the nauseating subject matter, the occasionally very questionable ethics of protagonists, and a twist of the knife at the very end of the novel that I thought was gratuitously nasty on Larsson's part and wasn't the conclusion I wanted, I found myself enjoying this. It has a different pace and a different flavor than what I normally read, the characters are deep and complex enough to play off each other in satisfying ways, and Salander is oddly compelling to read about. Given the length, it's a substantial investment of time, but I don't regret reading it, and I'm quite tempted to read the sequel. I'm not sure this is the sort of book I can recommend (or not recommend) given my lack of familiarity with the genre, but I think US readers might get an additional layer of enjoyment out of seeing how different of a slant the Swedish setting puts on some of the stock elements of a crime novel. Followed by The Girl Who Played with Fire. Rating: 7 out of 10

1 May 2016

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in April 2016

FTP assistant This month I marked 171 packages for accept and rejected 42. I also sent 3 emails to maintainers asking questions. It seems to be that another quiet month is behind us. Nevertheless the flood of strange things in NEW continued this month. Hmm, weird world .. Debian LTS This was my twenty-second month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. This month my all in all workload had been 15.75h. After getting the permission of the security team I changed the temporary-issues to meanwhile assigned CVEs and uploaded fuseiso. This resulted in DSA 3551-1. I also prepared new packages for asterisk and asked for testers on the LTS mailing list. Luckily Gabriel Filion really tried these packages and found a regression with manager connections. Dear reader, the new packages are waiting for your tests now :-) . Further I used the upload of poppler (DLA 446-1) to test the workflow of the new wheezy-security upload. Uploading and building packages worked perfectly. Unfortunately the push to the security mirrors was a bit delayed (it only happened after an upload of the security team). But this seems to be fixed by Ansgar now. Last but not least I had a look at PHP5. I think I will start my regular uploads in May. Other stuff As I had to deal with non-Debian stuff this month, I didn t do lots of other things. I only uploaded node-uml

Ben Hutchings: Debian LTS work, April 2016

This month was still quiet for me in terms of uploads, as "wheezy" was only handed over to the LTS team near the end of the month. I carried over 5.5 hours from March and was assigned another 15 hours of work by Freexian's Debian LTS initiative, but only worked a total of 12.25 hours. I have returned the spare hours to the pool. As last month, I prepared a stable update for Linux 3.2 on kernel.org, which will be released soon as 3.2.80. I also triaged the open security issues and backported a few individual patches to our wheezy-security branch. However I expect to rebase the wheezy-security branch onto Linux 3.2.80 before making the next upload. I also participated in discussion of supporting armel/armhf in wheezy LTS. I don't expect many LTS users to be using the Debian kernel packages, as we only supported a small range of ARM hardware before the introduction of the multiplatform flavours in jessie. However, those architectures rarely require any extra effort to support in linux stable updates so I had no objection to including them.

Russ Allbery: Review: The Oath

Review: The Oath, by Jeffrey Toobin
Publisher: Anchor
Copyright: 2012
Printing: June 2013
ISBN: 0-307-39071-3
Format: Trade paperback
Pages: 298
Jeffrey Toobin is a legal analyst for CNN and The New Yorker and plays a similar role for the intricacies of the legal system as popular science writers play for physics. I'd previously read and reviewed his The Nine, an excellent history of the Rehnquist Supreme Court. The Oath is half sequel and half extension, bringing the same analysis to the first four years of the Obama presidency and the appointments of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Sequels to popular history books that are not explicitly multi-volume works are a tricky publishing niche. People expect them to stand alone; I doubt it would work to tell people "read The Nine before reading this book," and regardless, Toobin did not take that approach. But the court profiled in The Oath only differs by two justices than that in The Nine. There was therefore a fair bit of repetition, since Toobin felt obligated to repeat his profiles of the five members of the court he had already deeply analyzed in the previous book. He even retold the story of Sandra Day O'Conner leaving the court despite it falling outside the focus of this book. I think these 300 pages could have been 150 pages of additional material in The Nine if Toobin had started this project later. That said, if you enjoyed The Nine (and I very much did), this is more of the same. Toobin picks up with Obama's inauguration ceremony and a fascinating bit of legal trivia over the oath of office, and then provides a detailed profile of the Roberts court and the major decisions of the first four years of Obama's presidency. His discussion of the nomination process and Obama's judicial philosophy rang very true following the death of Scalia: Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland is exactly what one would predict from Toobin's discussion. And, as with the previous book, I discovered that I had a lot of misconceptions about both Sotomayor and Kagan that Toobin cleared up. He does a great job showing the complexities of the interplay between law, politics, apparently unlikely friendships (such as Scalia and Ginsburg), and the executive and judicial branch. Worth particular mention is Toobin's discussion of the office of Solicitor General of the United States. I had no idea the role it plays in Supreme Court decisions. If I had given it any thought at all, I would have assumed it was essentially a variation on White House Counsel crossed with the Attorney General's office. But it's quite a bit more than that, as Elena Kagan's profile shows. If you, like I, raised an eyebrow at Obama's nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court from Solicitor General, wondering if that was at all similar to Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers, this section will be very informative. White House Counsel and Solicitor General are very, very different positions. However, The Oath has one major drawback that The Nine didn't: it's partisan. Now, Toobin is a liberal, with a clear preference towards the progressive side of the court. This was also true in The Nine, and I don't think that's a serious problem. Everyone writes from a particular perspective; stating it is more honest than concealing it, and it's the reader's responsibility to weigh multiple sides. But I thought Toobin was largely fair to those he disagreed with in The Nine. Even Thomas received some defense against popular misconceptions. It probably helped that much of that book focuses on conservatives who became liberals as the court shifted, people like Sandra Day O'Conner for whom Toobin has clear respect. I commented in my review of the previous book that it didn't feel quite balanced, but it felt like Toobin was trying hard to be fair. The Oath does not give that same feeling. Toobin hates the direction of the Roberts court, hates most of its 5-4 decisions, and strongly disagrees with the judicial philosophies of both Roberts and Alito. But more than that, he is clearly dubious that they even have coherent judicial philosophies. Maybe that's a legitimate critique, maybe it's not; regardless, I don't think he proves his case. The tone of much of the book is disgusted and angry rather than deliberate and relentless. Where Toobin engages with the thought process of Alito or, particularly, Roberts, the primary focus is to disagree with it rather than explain it. This happens to match my own emotional reaction, but I doubt it will be persuasive to someone who doesn't already agree with Toobin, and it hurts the quality of the history. I suspect this would have been a better book if Toobin had waited ten years before writing it (still covering the same time frame). Some distance from the subject helps provide a more complete and thoughtful history. But, of course, it likely wouldn't have sold as well. That said, one of the themes of this book is how the conservatives on the Roberts court are currently playing the role of radicals from the perspective of the judicial tradition, overturning settled case law and calling into question precedents that have been used to decide numerous cases. The liberals, in contrast, are currently mostly playing the role of conservatives: standing up for the principle of stare decisis, trying to maintain consistency with past decisions, trying to minimize disruptive change. Conservatives will argue (correctly) that this depends on one's time frame and that they're trying to overturn radical past decisions, but those radical decisions, whatever their merits, are now often more than fifty years into the past. I hadn't thought about the current Supreme Court ideological battles from that perspective and found it eye-opening. It also ties in well with Obama's judicial philosophy as Toobin presents it: preferring democracy, laws, and change from the ballot box, and with little appetite for controversial court decisions. Obama is a judicial conservative. He therefore favors the liberal wing as the court is currently constructed, but not because he has much appetite for pushing forward civil rights in the courts. This is not the book The Nine was. It's repetitive if you've read the previous book (which you should, as it's the better book of the two), and I thought Toobin's critical balance was off. But it has a lot of interesting things to say about Obama's approach to the law, how the executive branch interacts with the Supreme Court, and the philosophy and approaches of the newer justices on the court. Recommended, although not as strongly. Rating: 7 out of 10

29 April 2016

Iain R. Learmonth: MiniDebCamp Vienna 2016

I'm currently in Vienna for MiniDebCamp and MiniDebConf at FH Technikum Wien, hosted as a part of Linuxwochen Wien. Today and yesterday have been spent hacking on Debian, and I've produced a few package updates and closed a few bugs.

Scapy The last update to Scapy in Debian was in August 2011. Bug #773554 was filed in 2014 to request a new upstream version be packaged and in a few days this bug should be closed. As this package is maintained by someone else and I'm performing a non-maintainer upload, the upload will sit in the delayed queue for 3 days. There has also been a Python 3 port of Scapy developed, and I've also packaged this (bug #822096). You will be able to install this version as python3-scapy and run it as /usr/bin/scapy3, which means it can fully co-exist with an installation of the original Python 2 version on the same system.

Hamradio Blend
  • Carles Fernandez had produced an updated package for gnss-sdr and this has now been uploaded to unstable.
  • Ana Custura produced an updated package for chirp and this has now been uploaded to unstable.
  • I've made a couple of updates to the hamradio-maintguide and released version 0.2 of that documentation. This was simple changes for secure URIs for the Vcs-* fields and options for updating existing packages to new upstream versions using uscan, by tarball URL or by local tarball.

qtile qtile is a "full-featured, hackable tiling window manager written and configured in Python". I've been a big fan of tiling window managers for a few years now, starting with XMonad in 2013, moving to i3 and now I plan to move to qtile as I think its customisability and complete removal of window decorations will work well for me. I have now packaged qtile (bug #762637), and updated one of its dependencies (xcffib), and it will appear in unstable after passing ftp-master scrutiny.

28 April 2016

Holger Levsen: Voctomix available in Debian sid

Yesterday evening CarlFK prodded me to package Voctomix, which is a live video mixer written by the Chaos Communication Congress' Video Operation Crew. It's written in Python using GStreamer and was started when they realised dvswitch was not suitable anymore for them. The DebConf16 video team plans to test it in Cape Town (for covering the BoF room), so I figured I'd help now with packaging the software. Less than 24h after I started, voctomix made it through NEW and is now available in sid and hopefully will be available in stretch soon too! And by DebConf16 it should also finally be available in jessie-backports. Wheeehooo! Thanks to Stefano Rivera who helped me with some dh_python3 detail and the Debian ftpmasters for letting it though NEW so quickly (and btw, for their general awesome work on NEW processing in the last years too!) - may the winkekatze be with you! ;-)

27 April 2016

Niels Thykier: auto-decrufter in top 5 after 10 months

About 10 months ago, we enabled an auto-decrufter in dak. Then after 3 months it had become the top 11th remover . Today, there are only 3 humans left that have removed more packages than the auto-decrufter impressively enough, one of them is not even an active FTP-master (anymore). The current score board:
 5371 Luca Falavigna
 5121 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
 4401 Ansgar Burchardt
 3928 DAK's auto-decrufter
 3257 Scott Kitterman
 2225 Joerg Jaspert
 1983 James Troup
 1793 Torsten Werner
 1025 Jeroen van Wolffelaar
  763 Ryan Murray
For comparison, here is the number removals by year for the past 6 years:
 5103 2011
 2765 2012
 3342 2013
 3394 2014
 3766 2015  (1842 removed by auto-decrufter)
 2845 2016  (2086 removed by auto-decrufter)
Which tells us that in 2015, the FTP masters and the decrufter performed on average over 10 removals a day. And by the looks of it, 2016 will surpass that. Of course, the auto-decrufter has a tendency to increase the number of removed items since it is an advocate of remove early, remove often! .:) Data is from https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals-full.txt. Scoreboard computed as:
  grep ftpmaster: removals-full.txt   \
   perl -pe 's/.*ftpmaster:\s+//; s/\]$//;'   \
   sort   uniq -c   sort --numeric --reverse   head -n10
Removals by year computed as:
 grep ftpmaster: removals-full.txt   \
   perl -pe 's/.* (\d 4 ) \d 2 :\d 2 :\d 2 .*/$1/'   uniq -c   tail -n6
(yes, both could be done with fewer commands)
Filed under: Debian

Michal Čihař: motranslator 1.0

After two months since it's announcement I think it's good time to release 1.0 version of motranslator. This release doesn't bring any major changes, it's more to indicate that the library is stable :-). The motranslator is a translation library used in current phpMyAdmin master (upcoming 4.7.0) with focus on speed and memory usage. It uses Gettext MO files to load the translations. It also comes with testsuite (100% coverage) and basic documentation. Recommended way to install it is using composer from Packagist repository:
composer require phpmyadmin/motranslator
The Debian package will be available probably at point phpMyAdmin 4.7.0 will be out, but if you see need to have it earlier, just let me know.

Filed under: English phpMyAdmin 0 comments

26 April 2016

Pau Garcia i Quiles: Is KDE the right place for Thunderbird?

For years, Mozilla has been saying they are no longer focused on Thunderbird and its place is outside of Mozilla. Now it seems they are going to act on what they said: Mozilla seeks new home for e-mail client Thunderbird. The candidates they are exploring are the Software Freedom Conservancy, The Document Foundation, and I expect at least the Apache Software Foundation to be a serious candidate, and Gnome to propose. Some voices in KDE say we should also propose the KDE eV as a candidate hosting organization. What follows is my opinion, not the official opinion of the eV or the board s, or the KDE Community s opinion. Take it with a grain (or more) of salt. I am not so sure. I am trying to think what the KDE eV can offer to Mozilla to be appealing to them and if my analysis is correct, we are too far and Thunderbird would pose many risks to the other projects in KDE. (I am blurring the lines between KDE eV , KDE community , KDE Frameworks , etc as it has no relevance for the discussion) Thunderbird is an open source project/product with a lot of commercial users and has (still has?) many paid contributors. IMHO what Mozilla is looking for is an organization with a well-oiled funding machine, able to campaign for money (even if in a tight circle, something like ours Patron program), and accept and process funds in a way that directly benefits Thunderbird. I e. hiring developers to implement X or Y, or work on some area full-time, or at least, half-time. KDE does not work like that. KDE has few commercial users (other than distros, if you want to count them as commercial users). Other than Blue Systems, I don t think we have any developer working for KDE. Also, the eV is not exactly a well-oiled funding machine. We have been talking about that for years. And we do not hire developers directly to work on X or Y (at most, we pay for part of the expenses of sprints). All of that makes me think we are not the right host for Thunderbird. But it does not stop there! Let s say Thunderbird comes to KDE and suddenly we are offered USD 1 M from several organizations who want to be Patrons of Thunderbird , or influence Thunderbird, or whatever. First problem: do we allow funds to go to a specific project rather than the eV deciding how to distribute them? AFAIK we do not allow that and at least one KDE sub-project has had trouble with that in the past. Then there is the thing about Patrons of Thunderbird : no such thing. Either you are a Patron of KDE, including Plasma Mobile, OwnCloud, and whatnot, or you are nothing. You cannot be a Patron of Partial KDE, namely Thunderbird . Influencing, did I say? The eV is by its own rules not an influencer on KDE s direction, just an entity to provide legal and economic support. Quite the opposite from what Mozilla does today for Thunderbird. Even if funders would not mind all that, there is the huge risk this poses for all the other projects. With as little as USD 200K donated towards Thunderbird (and USD 200K is not much for a product with so many commercial users, which means a healthy ecosystem of companies making money on support, development, etc, and thus donating to somehow influence or be perceived as important players), Thunderbird becomes the most important project in KDE. How would we manage this? In any sensible organization, Thunderbird would become the main focus and all the other KDE projects would be relegated. Even if we decide not to, external PR would make that look like it happened. For all those reasons, I think KDE is not the right place for Thunderbird at the moment. It would require a big change in what the eV can do and how it operates. And that change may be for good but it s not there now and it will not be by the time Mozilla has to decide if KDE is the right place. All that, and I have not even talked about technology and what any sensible Thunderbird customer would think today: what is the medium and long-term roadmap? Migrate Thunderbird users to Kontact/KDE PIM? Port Thunderbird to Qt + KF5, maybe including moving to QtWebEngine? Will Windows support be deteriorated by that change? Or maybe the plan is to cancel KMail and Akregator? Those are second-thoughts, unimportant right now. Update If you want to contribute to the discussion, please join the KDE-Community mailing list.

Niels Thykier: Putting Debian packages in labelled boxes

Lintian 2.5.44 was released the other day and (to most) the most significant bug fix was probably that Lintian learned about Policy 3.9.8. I would like to thank Axel Beckert for doing that. Notably it also made me update the test suite so to make future policy releases less painful. For others, it might be the fact that Lintian now accepts (valid) versioned provides (which seemed prudent now that Britney accepts them as well). Newcomers might appreciate that we are giving a much more sensible warning when they have extra spaces in their changelog sign off line (rather than pretending it is an improper NMU). But I digress What I am here to talk about is that Lintian 2.5.44 started classifying packages based on various facts or properties , we can determine. Therefore: Here are some of the labelled boxes your packages will be put into[0]: The tags themselves are (as mentioned) mere classifications and their primary purpose is to classify or measure certain properties. With them any body can download the data set and come with some bold statement about Debian packages (hopefully without relying too much on lies, damned lies and statistics ). Lets try that immediately! In the next release, we will also add tracking of auto-generated snippets from dh_*-tools. Currently unversioned, but I hope to add versioning to that so we can find and rebuild packages that have been built with buggy autoscripts (like #788098) If you want to see the classification tags for your package, please run lintian with like this:
# Add classification tags
$ lintian -L +classification <pkg-or-changes>
# Or if you want only classification tags$ lintian -L =classification <pkg-or-changes>
Please keep in mind that classification tags ( C ) are not issues in themselves. Lintian is simply attempting to add a visible indicator about a given fact or property in the package nothing more, nothing less. Future work help (read: patches) welcome: [0] Mind you, the reporting framework s handling of these tags could certainly be improved. [1] Please note how it distinguishes 1.0 into native and non-native based on whether the package has a diff.gz. Presumably that can be exploited somehow [2] Disclaimer: At the time of writing, only ~80% of the archive have been processed. This is computed as: NS / (NS + WS), where NS and WS are the number of unique packages with the tags no-ctrl-scripts and ctrl-script respectively. [3] or maybe not, but we got two packages classified as using both CDBS and the dh-sequencer. I have not looked at it in detail. For the curious: libmecab-java and ctioga2.
Filed under: Debian, Lintian

Matthias Klumpp: Why are AppStream metainfo files XML data?

This is a question raised quite quite often, the last time in a blogpost by Thomas, so I thought it is a good idea to give a slightly longer explanation (and also create an article to link to ). There are basically three reasons for using XML as the default format for metainfo files: 1. XML is easily forward/backward compatible, while YAML is not This is a matter of extending the AppStream metainfo files with new entries, or adapt existing entries to new needs. Take this example XML line for defining an icon for an application:
<icon type="cached">foobar.png</icon>
and now the equivalent YAML:
Icons:
  cached: foobar.png
Now consider we want to add a width and height property to the icons, because we started to allow more than one icon size. Easy for the XML:
<icon type="cached" width="128" height="128">foobar.png</icon>
This line of XML can be read correctly by both old parsers, which will just see the icon as before without reading the size information, and new parsers, which can make use of the additional information if they want. The change is both forward and backward compatible. This looks differently with the YAML file. The foobar.png is a string-type, and parsers will expect a string as value for the cached key, while we would need a dictionary there to include the additional width/height information:
Icons:
  cached: name: foobar.png
          width: 128
          height: 128
The change shown above will break existing parsers though. Of course, we could add a cached2 key, but that would require people to write two entries, to keep compatibility with older parsers:
Icons:
  cached: foobar.png
  cached2: name: foobar.png
          width: 128
          height: 128
Less than ideal. While there are ways to break compatibility in XML documents too, as well as ways to design YAML documents in a way which minimizes the risk of breaking compatibility later, keeping the format future-proof is far easier with XML compared to YAML (and sometimes simply not possible with YAML documents). This makes XML a good choice for this usecase, since we can not do transitions with thousands of independent upstream projects easily, and need to care about backwards compatibility. 2. Translating YAML is not much fun A property of AppStream metainfo files is that they can be easily translated into multiple languages. For that, tools like intltool and itstool exist to aid with translating XML using Gettext files. This can be done at project build-time, keeping a clean, minimal XML file, or before, storing the translated strings directly in the XML document. Generally, YAML files can be translated too. Take the following example (shamelessly copied from Dolphin):
<summary>File Manager</summary>
<summary xml:lang="bs">Upravitelj datoteka</summary>
<summary xml:lang="cs">Spr vce soubor </summary>
<summary xml:lang="da">Filh ndtering</summary>
This would become something like this in YAML:
Summary:
  C: File Manager
  bs: Upravitelj datoteka
  cs: Spr vce soubor 
  da: Filh ndtering
Looks manageable, right? Now, AppStream also covers long descriptions, where individual paragraphs can be translated by the translators. This looks like this in XML:
<description>
  <p>Dolphin is a lightweight file manager. It has been designed with ease of use and simplicity in mind, while still allowing flexibility and customisation. This means that you can do your file management exactly the way you want to do it.</p>
  <p xml:lang="de">Dolphin ist ein schlankes Programm zur Dateiverwaltung. Es wurde mit dem Ziel entwickelt, einfach in der Anwendung, dabei aber auch flexibel und anpassungsf hig zu sein. Sie k nnen daher Ihre Dateiverwaltungsaufgaben genau nach Ihren Bed rfnissen ausf hren.</p>
  <p>Features:</p>
  <p xml:lang="de">Funktionen:</p>
  <p xml:lang="es">Caracter sticas:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>Navigation (or breadcrumb) bar for URLs, allowing you to quickly navigate through the hierarchy of files and folders.</li>
  <li xml:lang="de">Navigationsleiste f r Adressen (auch editierbar), mit der Sie schnell durch die Hierarchie der Dateien und Ordner navigieren k nnen.</li>
  <li xml:lang="es">barra de navegaci n (o de ruta completa) para URL que permite navegar r pidamente a trav s de la jerarqu a de archivos y carpetas.</li>
  <li>Supports several different kinds of view styles and properties and allows you to configure the view exactly how you want it.</li>
  ....
  </ul>
</description>
Now, how would you represent this in YAML? Since we need to preserve the paragraph and enumeration markup somehow, and creating a large chain of YAML dictionaries is not really a sane option, the only choices would be: In both cases, we would loose the ability to translate individual paragraphs, which also means that as soon as the developer changes the original text in YAML, translators would need to translate the whole bunch again, which is inconvenient. On top of that, there are no tools to translate YAML properly that I am aware of, so we would need to write those too. 3. Allowing XML and YAML makes a confusing story and adds complexity While adding YAML as a format would not be too hard, given that we already support it for DEP-11 distro metadata (Debian uses this), it would make the business of creating metainfo files more confusing. At time, we have a clear story: Write the XML, store it in /usr/share/metainfo, use standard tools to translate the translatable entries. Adding YAML to the mix adds an additional choice that needs to be supported for eternity and also has the problems mentioned above. I wanted to add YAML as format for AppStream, and we discussed this at the hackfest as well, but in the end I think it isn t worth the pain of supporting it for upstream projects (remember, someone needs to maintain the parsers and specification too and keep XML and YAML in sync and updated). Don t get me wrong, I love YAML, but for translated metadata which needs a guarantee on format stability it is not the ideal choice. So yeah, XML isn t fun to write by hand. But for this case, XML is a good choice.

Michal &#268;iha&#345;: Weekly phpMyAdmin contributions 2016-W16

Last week was again focused on bug fixing due to increased amount of received bug reports on 4.6.0 release. Fortunately most of the annoying bugs are already fixed in git and will be soon released as 4.6.1. Another bigger task which was started last week was wiki migration. So far we've been using own wiki running MediaWiki and we're migrating it to GitHub wiki. The wiki on GitHub is way simpler, but it seems as better choice for us. During the migration all user documentation will be merged into our documentation, so that it's all in one place and wiki will be targeted on developers. Handled issues:

Filed under: English phpMyAdmin 2 comments

Reproducible builds folks: Reproducible builds: week 52 in Stretch cycle

What happened in the Reproducible Builds effort between April 17th and April 23rd 2016: Toolchain fixes Thomas Weber uploaded lcms2/2.7-1 which will not write uninitialized memory when writing color names. Original patch by Lunar. The GCC 7 development phase has just begun, so Dhole reworked his patch to make gcc use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH if set which prompted interesting feedback, but it has not been merged yet. Alexis Bienven e submitted a patch for sphinx to strip Python object memory addresses from the generated documentation. Packages fixed The following packages have become reproducible due to changes in their build dependencies: cobertura, commons-pool, easymock, eclipselink, excalibur-logkit, gap-radiroot, gluegen2, jabref, java3d, jcifs, jline, jmock2, josql, jtharness, libfann, libgroboutils-java, libjemmy2-java, libjgoodies-binding-java, libjgrapht0.8-java, libjtds-java, liboptions-java, libpal-java, libzeus-jscl-java, node-transformers, octave-msh, octave-secs2d, openmama, rkward. The following packages have become reproducible after being fixed: Patches submitted that have not made their way to the archive yet: tests.reproducible-builds.org diffoscope development diffoscope 52 was released with changes from Mattia Rizzolo, h01ger, Satyam Zode and Reiner Herrmann, who also did the release. Notable changes included: As usual, diffoscope 52 is available on Debian, Archlinux and PyPI, other distributions will hopefully soon update. Package reviews 28 reviews have been added, 11 have been updated and 94 have been removed in this week. 14 FTBFS bugs were reported by Chris Lamb (one being was a duplicate of a bug filed by Sebastian Ramacher an hour earlier). Misc. This week's edition was written by Lunar, Holger 'h01ger' Levsen and Chris Lamb and reviewed by a bunch of Reproducible builds folks on IRC.

Rhonda D'Vine: Prince

Last week we lost another great musician, song writer, artist. It's painful to realise that more and more of the people you grew up with aren't there anymore. We lost Prince, TAFKAP, Symbol, Prince. He wrote a lot of great music, even some you wouldn't attribute to him, like Sinead O'Connor's Nothing Compares To You, Bangles' Manic Monday or Chaka Khan's I Feel For You. But I actually would like to share some songs that are also performed by himself, so without further ado here are the songs: Rest in peace, Prince. And you, enjoy.

/music permanent link Comments: 0 Flattr this

Steinar H. Gunderson: Full stack

As I'm nearing the point where Nageru, my live video mixer, can produce a stream directly that is actually suitable to streaming directly to clients (without a transcoding layer in the chain), it struck me the other day how much of the chain I've actually had to touch: In my test setup, the signal comes into a Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle. At some point, I found what I believe is a bug in the card's firmware; I couldn't fix it, but a workaround was applied in the Linux kernel. (I also have some of their PCI cards, in which I haven't found any bugs, but I have found bugs in their drivers.) From there, it goes into bmusb, a driver I wrote myself. bmusb uses libusb-1.0 to drive the USB card from userspace but for performance and stability reasons, I patched libusb to use the new usbfs zerocopy support in the Linux kernel. (The patch is still pending review.) Said zerocopy support wasn't written by me, but I did the work to clean up the support and push it upstream (it's in the 4.6-rc* series). Once safely through bmusb, it goes of course into Nageru, which I wrote myself. Nageru uses Movit for pixel processing, which I also wrote myself. Movit in turn uses OpenGL; I've found bugs in all three major driver implementations, and fixed a Nageru-related one in Mesa (and in the process of debugging that, found bugs in apitrace, a most useful OpenGL debugger). Sound goes through zita-resampler to stretch it ever so gently (in case audio and video clocks are out of sync), which I didn't wrote, but patched to get SSE support (patch pending upstream). So now Nageru chews a bit on it, and then encodes the video using x264 (that's the new part in 1.3.0 of course, you need a fast CPU to do that as opposed to using Quick Sync). I didn't write x264, but I had to redo parts of the speedcontrol patch (not part of upstream; awaiting review semi-upstream) because of bugs and outdated timings, but I also found a bug in x264 proper (fixed by upstream, pending inclusion). Muxing is done through ffmpeg, where I actually found multiple bugs in the muxer (some of which are still pending fixes). Once the stream is safely encoded and hopefully reasonably standards-conforming (that took me quite a while), it goes to Cubemap, which I wrote, for reflection to clients. For low-bitrate clients, it takes a detour through VLC to get a re-encode on a faster machine to lower bitrate I've found multiple bugs in VLC's streaming support in the past (and also fixed some of them, plus written the code that interacts with Cubemap). From there it goes to any of several clients, usually a browser. I didn't write any browsers (thank goodness!), but I wrote the client-side JavaScript that picks the closest relay, and the code for sending it to a Chromecast. I also found a bug in Chrome for Android (will be fixed in version 50 or 51, although the fix was just about turning on something that was already in the works), and one in Firefox for Linux (fixed by patching GStreamer's MP4 demuxer, although they've since switched away from that to something less crappy). IE/Edge also broke at some point, but unfortunately I don't have a way to report bugs to Microsoft. There's also at least one VLC bug involved on the client side (it starts decoding frames too late if they come with certain irregular timestamps, which causes them to drop), but I want to verify that they still persist even after the muxer is fixed before I go deep on that. Moral of the story: If anyone wants to write a multimedia application and says I'll just use <framework, language or library XYZ>, and I'll get everything for free; I just need to click things together! , they simply don't know what they're talking about and are in for a rude awakening. Multimedia is hard, an amazing amount of things can go wrong, complex systems have subtle bugs, and there is no silver bullet.

Matthias Klumpp: A GNOME Software Hackfest report

Two weeks ago was the GNOME Software hackfest in London, and I ve been there! And I just now found the time to blog about it, but better do it late than never  . Arriving in London and finding the Red Hat offices After being stuck in trains for the weekend, but fortunately arriving at the airport in time, I finally made it to London with quite some delay due to the slow bus transfer from Stansted Airport. After finding the hotel, the next issue was to get food and a place which accepted my credit card, which was surprisingly hard in defence of London I must say though, that it was a Sunday, 7 p.m. and my card is somewhat special (in Canada, it managed to crash some card readers, so they needed a hard-reset). While searching for food, I also found the Red Hat offices where the hackfest was starting the next day by accident. My hotel, the office and the tower bridge were really close, which was awesome! I have been to London in 2008 the last time, and only for a day, so being that close to the city center was great. The hackfest didn t leave any time to visit the city much, but by being close to the center, one could hardly avoid the London experience  . Cool people working on great stuff towerbridge2016That s basically the summary for the hackfest  . It was awesome to meet with Richard Hughes again, since we haven t seen each other in person since 2011, but work on lots of stuff together. This was especially important, since we managed to solve quite some disagreements we had over stuff Richard even almost managed to make me give in to adding <kudos/> to the AppStream spec, something which I was pretty against supporting (it didn t make it yet, but I am no longer against the idea of having that the remaining issues are solvable). Meeting Iain Lane again (after FOSDEM) was also very nice, and also seeing other people I ve only worked with over IRC or bug reports (e.g. William, Kalev, ) was great. Also lots of new people were there, like guys from Endless, who build their low-budget computer for developing/emerging countries on top of GNOME and Linux technologies. It s pretty cool stuff they do, you should check out their website! (they also build their distribution on top of Debian, which is even more awesome, and something I didn t know before (because many Endless people I met before were associated with GNOME or Fedora, I kind of implicitly assumed the system was based on Fedora  )). The incarnation of GNOME Software used by endless looks pretty different from what the normal GNOME user sees, since it s adjusted for a different audience and input method. But it looks great, and is a good example for how versatile GS already is! And for upstream GNOME, we ve seen some pretty great mockups done by Endless too I hope those will make it into production somehow.
Ironically, a "snapstore" was close to the office ;-)

Ironically, a snapstore was close to the office ;-)

XdgApp and sandboxing of apps was also a big topic, aside from Ubuntu and Endless integration. Fortunately, Alexander Larsson was also there to answer all the sandboxing and XdgApp-questions. I used the time to follow up on a conversation with Alexander we started at FOSDEM this year, about the Limba vs. XdgApp bundling issue. While we are in-line on the sandboxing approach, the way how software is distributed is implemented differently in Limba and XdgApp, and it is bad to have too many bundling systems around (doesn t make for a good story where we can just tell developers ship as this bundling format, and it will be supported everywhere ). Talking with Alex about this was very nice, and I think there is a way out of the too-many-solutions dilemma, at least for Limba and XdgApp I will blog about that separately soon. On the Ubuntu side, a lot of bugs and issues were squashed and changes upstreamed to GNOME, and people were generally doing their best to reduce Richard s bus-factor on the project a little  . I mainly worked on AppStream issues, finishing up the last pieces of appstream-generator and running it against some sample package sets (and later that week against the whole Debian archive). I also started to implement support for showing AppStream issues in the Debian PTS (this work is not finished yet). I also managed to solve a few bugs in the old DEP-11 generator and prepare another release for Ubuntu. We also enjoyed some good Japanese food, and some incredibly great, but also suddenly very expensive Indian food (but that s a different story  ). The most important thing for me though was to get together with people actually using AppStream metadata in software centers and also more specialized places. This yielded some useful findings, e.g. that localized screenshots are not something weird, but actually a wanted feature of Endless for their curated AppStore. So localized screenshots will be part of the next AppStream spec. Also, there seems to be a general need to ship curation information for software centers somehow (which apps are featured? how are they styled? added special banners for some featured apps, app of the day features, etc.). This problem hasn t been solved, since it s highly implementation-specific, and AppStream should be distro-agnostic. But it is something we might be able to address in a generic way sooner or later (I need to talk to people at KDE and Elementary about it). In summary It was a great event! Going to conferences and hackfests always makes me feel like it moves projects leaps ahead, even if you do little coding. Sorting out issues together with people you see in person (rather than communicating with them via text messages or video chat), is IMHO always the most productive way to move forward (yeah, unless you do this every week, but I think you get my point  ). For me, being the only (and youngest ^^) developer at the hackfest who was not employed by any company in the FLOSS business, the hackfest was also motivating to continue to invest spare time into working on these projects. So, the only thing left to do is a huge shout out of THANK YOU to the Ubuntu Community Fund and therefore the Ubuntu community for sponsoring me! You rock! Also huge thanks to Canonical for organizing the sponsoring really quickly, so I didn t get into trouble with paying my flights.
Laney and attente walking on the Millennium Bridge after we walked the distance between Red Hat and Canonical's offices.

Laney and attente on the Millennium Bridge after we walked the distance between Red Hat and Canonical s offices.

To worried KDE people: No, I didn t leave the blue side I just generally work on cross-desktop stuff, and would like all desktops to work as well as possible

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppMgsPack 0.1.0

Over the last few months, I have been working casually on a new package to integrate MessagePack with R. What is MessagePack, you ask? To quote its website, "It's like JSON, but fast and small." Or in more extended terms:
MessagePack is an efficient binary serialization format. It lets you exchange data among multiple languages like JSON. But it's faster and smaller. Small integers are encoded into a single byte, and typical short strings require only one extra byte in addition to the strings themselves.
Now, serialization formats are a dime a dozen: JSON, BSON, Protocol Buffers, CaptnProto, Flatbuffer. The list goes on and on. So why another? In a nutshell: "software ecosystems". I happen to like working with Redis, and within the world of Redis, MessagePack is a first-class citizen supported by things close to the core like the embedded Lua interpreter, as well as fancy external add-ons such as the Redis Desktop Manager GUI. So nothing overly fundamentalist here, but a fairly pragmatic choice based on what happens to fit my needs. Plus, having worked on and off with Protocol Buffers for close to a decade, the chance of working with something not requiring a friggin' schema compiler seemed appealing for a chance. So far, we have been encoding a bunch of data streams at work via MessagePack into Redis (and of course back). It works really well---header-only C++11 libraries for the win. I'll provide an updated RcppRedis which uses this (if present) in due course. For now and the foreseeable future, this RcppMsgPack package will live only on the ghrr drat repository. To make RcppMsgPack work, I currently have to include the MessagePack 1.4.0 headers. A matching package for this version of the headers is in Debian but so far only in experimental. Once this hits the mainline repository I can depend on it, and upload a (lighter, smaller) RcppMsgPack to CRAN. Until then, please just do
## install drat if not present
if (!require(drat)) install.packages("drat")
## use drat to select ghrr repo
drat::addRepo("ghrr")
## install RcppMsgPack
install.packages("RcppMsgPack")
More details, issue tickets etc are at the GitHub repository.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

25 April 2016

Antoine Beaupr : My free software activities, April 2016

Debian Long Term Support (LTS) This is my 5th month working on Debian LTS, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. This is my largest month so far, in which I worked on completing the Xen and NSS packages updates from last month, but also spent a significant amount of time working on phpMyAdmin and libidn.

Updates to NSS and Xen completed This basically consisted on following up on the reviews from other security people. I basically continued building up on Brian's work and tested the package on a test server at Koumbit, which seems to have survived well the upgrade. The details are in this post to the debian-lts mailing list. As for NSS, the package was mostly complete, but I forgot to ship the tests for some reason, so I added them back. I also wrote the release team to see if it was possible to update NSS to the same version in all suites. Unfortunately, this issue is still pending, but I still hope we can find better ways of managing that package in the long term.

IDN and phpMyAdmin Most of my time this month was spent working on IDN and phpMyAdmin. Unfortunately, it turns out that someone else had worked on the libidn package. This is partly my fault: I forgot to check in the dsa-needed.txt file for assignment before working on the package. But considering how in flux the workflow currently is with the switch between the main security team and the LTS team for the wheezy maintenance, I don't feel too bad. Still, I prepared a package which was a bit more painful than it should have been because of GNUlib. I didn't even know about GNUlib before, oddly enough, and after that experience, I feel that it should just not exist at all anymore. I have filed a bug to remove that dependency at the very least, but I do not clearly see how such a tool is necessary on Debian at this point in time. But phpMyAdmin, no one had worked on that. And I understand why: even though it's a very popular package, there were quite a few outstanding issues (8!) in Wheezy, with 10-15 patches to be ported. Plus, it's ... well, PHP. And old PHP at that, with parts of it with modern autoloader classes, and other with mixed HTML and PHP content, require (and not require_once) and all sorts of nasty things you still find in the PHP universe. I nevertheless managed to produce a new Debian package for wheezy and test it on Koumbit's test servers. Hopefully, that can land into Wheezy soon.

Long term software support I am a little worried that we are, both in Jessie and Wheezy sitting in between stable releases for phpMyAdmin, something that is a recurring issue for a lot of packages in Debian stable or LTS. Sometimes, it just happens that the version that happens to be in Debian testing when it is released as stable is just not a supported release upstream. It's the case for phpMyAdmin in Jessie (4.3, whereas 4.0 and 4.4 are supported) and Wheezy (3.4, although it's unclear how long that was supported upstream). But even if the next Debian stable (Stretch), would pick a stable release upstream, there is actually no phpMyAdmin release that has a support window as long as Debian stable (roughly 3 years), let alone as long as Debian LTS (5 years). This is a similar problem with NSS: upstream is simply not supporting their product in the long term, or at least not in the terms we are used to in the Debian community (ie. only security fixes or regressions). This is, in my opinion, a real concern for the reliability and sustainability of the computing infrastructure we are creating. While some developers are of the opinion that software older than 18 months is too old, here we are shipping hardware and software in space or we have Solaris, which is supported for 16 years! Now that is a serious commitment and something we can rely on. 18 months is really, really, a tiny short time in the history of our civilization. I know computer programmers and engineers like to think of themselves in elitist terms, that they are changing the world every other year. But the truth is that things have not changed much in the last 4 decades where computing has existed, both in terms of security or functionality. Two quotes from my little quotes collection come to mind here:
Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster. - Wirth's law The future is already here it's just not very evenly distributed. - William Gibson
Because of course, the response to my claims that computing is not really advancing is "but look! we have supercomputers in our pockets now!" Yes, of course, we do have those fancy phones and they are super-connected, but they are a threat to our fundamental rights and freedom. And those glittering advances always pale in comparison to what could be done if we wouldn't be wasting our time rewriting the same software over and over again on different, often proprietary, platforms, simply because of the megalomaniac fantasies of egoistic programmers. It would be great to build something that lasts, for a while. Software that does not need to be updated every 16 months. You'd think that something as basic as a screensaver release could survive what is basically the range of human infancy. Yet it seems we like to run mindlessly in the minefield of software development, one generation following the other without questioning the underlying assumption of infinite growth that permeates our dying civilization. I have talked about this before of course, but working with the LTS project just unnerves me so bad that I just needed to let out another rant. (For the record, I really have a lot of respect for JWZ and all the work he has done in the free software world. I frequently refer to his "no-bullshit" backup guide and use Xscreensaver daily. But I do think he was wrong in this case: asking Debian to remove Xscreensaver is just too much. The response from the maintainer was exemplary of how to handle such issues in the future. I restarted Xscreensaver after the stable update, and the message is gone, and things are still all fine. Thanks JWZ and Tormod for keeping things rolling.)

Other free software work With that in mind, I obviously didn't stop doing other computing work this month. In fact, I did a lot of work to try to generally fix the internet, that endless and not-quite-gratifying hobby so many of us are destroying our bodies to accomplish.

Build tools I have experimented a bit more with different build tools. I got worried because at some point cowbuilder got orphaned and I figured I could refresh the way I build packages for LTS. I looked into sbuild, but that ended up not bringing much improvements over my current cowbuilder setup (which I really need to document better). I was asked by the new maintainer to open a bug report to make such setups easier by guessing the basepath better, so we'll see how that goes. I did enjoy the simplicity of gitpkg and discovered cowpoke which made it about 2 times faster to build packages because I could use another server to build larger packages. I also found that gitpkg doesn't use -n by default when calling gzip, which makes it harder to reproduce tarballs when they are themselves built reproducibly, which is the case for Github tarballs (really nice of them). So I filed bug #820842 about that. It would be pretty awesome if such buildds would be available for Debian Developers to do their daily tasks. It could simply be a machine that would spin up a chroot with cowbuilder or it could even be a full, temporary VM although that would take way more resources than a simple VM with a cowbuilder setup. In the meantime, I should probably look at whalebuilder as an alternative to cowbuilder. It is a tool that supports building packages within a Docker chroot, which means that packages are built from a clean environment like pbuilder, and using COW optimisations but also without privileges or network access, which is a huge plus especially when you build untrusted packages.

Ikiwiki admonitions I have done some work to implement Moinmoin-like admonitions in Ikiwiki, something I am quite happy about since it's something I was really missing about Moinmoin. Admonitions bring a really nice way to outline certain blocks with varying severity levels and distinct styles. For example:
Admonitions are great!
This was done with a macro, but basically, since Markdown allows more or less arbitrary HTML, this can also be done with the <div> tag. I like that we don't have a new weird markup here. Yet, I still liked the sub-parser feature of MoinMoin, something that can be implemented in Ikiwiki, but it's a little more clunky. Normally, you'd probably do this with the inline macro and subpages, but it's certainly less intuitive that directly inlined content.

Ereader I got a new e-reader! I was hesitant between the Kobo Aura H20 and the Kobo Glo HD, which were the ones available at Bestbuy. So I bought both and figured I would return the other. That was a painful decision! In the end, both machines are pretty nice:
  • Aura H2O
    • Pros:
      • waterproof
      • larger screen (makes it easier to see web pages and better for the eyes)
      • naturally drawn to it
    • Cons:
      • heavier
      • larger (fits in outside pocket though)
      • port cover finicky
      • more expensive (180$) - prices may go down in future
  • Aura Glo HD
    • Pros
      • smaller (fits in inside pocket of both coats)
      • better resolution in theory (can't notice in practice)
      • cheaper (100$)
      • may be less common on the future (larger models more common? just a guess)
    • Cons
      • no SD card
      • smaller screen
      • power button in the middle
... but in the end, I ended up settling down on the Glo, mostly for the price. Heck, I saved around 100$, so for that amount, I could have gotten two machines so that if one breaks I would still have the other. I have ordered a cover for it on Deal Extreme about two weeks ago, and it still hasn't arrived. I suspect it's going to take a few more months to get there, by which point I may have changed e-reader again. Note that both e-readers needed an update to calibre, so I started working on a calibre backport (#818309) which I will complete soon. So anyways, I looked into better ways of transferring articles from the web to the e-reader, something which I do quite a bit to avoid spending too much time on the computer. Since the bookmark manager I use (Bookie) is pretty much dead, I started looking at other alternatives. And partly inspired by Framasoft's choice of Wallabag for their bookmarking service (Framabag), I started to look into that software, especially since my friend who currently runs the Bookie instance is thinking of switching to Wallabag as well. It seems the simplest way to browse articles remotely through a standard protocol is by implementing OPDS support in Wallabag. OPDS is a standard developed in part by the Internet Archive and it allows for browsing book collections and downloading them. Articles and bookmarks would then be presented as individual books that would be accessible from any OPDS-compatible device. Unfortunately, the Kobo e-readers don't support OPDS out of the box: you need to setup some OPDS-compatible reader like Koreader. And that I found nearly impossible to do: I was able to setup KSM (the "start menu", not to be confused with that KSM), but not Koreader in KSM. Besides, I do not want a separate OS running here on the tablet: I just want to start Koreader every once in a while. KSM just starts another system when you reboot the e-reader, something which is not really convenient on the Kobo. Basically, I just want to add Koreader as a tile in the home screen on the e-reader. I found the documentation on that topic to be sparse and hard to follow. It is often dispersed across multiple forum threads and involves uploading random binaries, often proprietary, to the e-reader. It had been a long time since I was asked to "register my software" frenetically, and I hadn't missed that one bit. So I decided to stay away from this until that solution and its documentation matures a bit.

Streaming re-established I have worked a bit on my home radio stream. I simply turned the Liquidsoap stream back online, and did a few tweaks to the documentation that I had built back then. All that experimenting led me to do two NMUs. One was for gmpc-plugins to fix a FTBFS (bug #807735) and to properly kill the shout streamer when completing the playback (bug #820908). The other was to fix the ezstream manpage (bug #573928), a patch that had been sitting there for 5 years! This was to try to find an easy way to stream random audio (say from a microphone) to the Icecast server, something which is surprisingly difficult, consider how basic that functionality is. I was surprised to see that Darkice just completely fails to start (bug #821040) and I had to fallback to the simplest ices2 software to stream the audio. I am still having issues with Liquidsoap: it's really unstable! As a server, I would expect it to keep running for days if not years. Unfortunately, there's always something that makes it crash. I had assertion failed (bug #821112) and I keep seeing it crash after 2-3 days fairly reliably, a bug I reported 3 years ago and that is still not fixed (bug #727307). Switching back the stream to Vorbis (because I was having problems with the commandline mp3 players and ogg123 is much more lightweight) created another set of problems too, this time with the phone. It seems that Android cannot stream Vorbis at all, something that is even worse in Cyanogenmod... I also had to tweak my MPD config to make the Android client be able to load the larger playlists (see dmix buffer is full).

Android apps So I have also done quite a bit of work again on my phone. I finally was told how to access from Termux from adb shell which is pretty cool because now I can start a screen on my phone and then, when I'm tired of tapping to type, I can just reconnect to it when I plug in a USB cable on my laptop. I sent a pull request to fix the documentation regarding that. I also tried to see how my SMS and Signal situation could be improved. Right now, I have two different apps to do SMS on my phone: I use both Signal and the VoIP.ms SMS client, because I do not have a contract or SIM card in my phone. Both work well independently, but it's somewhat annoying to have to switch between the two. (In fact, I feel that Signal itself has an issue with how it depends on the network to send encrypted messages: I often have to "ping" people in clear text (and therefore in the other app) so that they connect to their data plan to fetch my "secure" signal messages...) Anyways, I figured it would be nice if at least there would be a SMS fallback in Signal that would allow me to send regular text messages from signal through Voip.MS. That was dismissed really fast. Moxie even closed the conversation completely, something I had never experienced before, and doesn't feel exactly pleasant. The Voip.MS side was of course not impressed and basically shrugged it off because Signal was not receptive. I also tried to clear up the Libresignal confusion: there are 3 different projects named "Libresignal", and I am not sure I figured out the right thing, even though the issue is now closed and there's a FAQ that is supposed to make all that clear. Nevertheless, I opened two distinct feature requests to try to steer the conversation into a more productive direction: GCM-less calls and GCM support. But I'm not sure neither will go anywhere. In the meantime, I am using the official signal client, which I downloaded using gplaycli and which I keep up to date with Aptoide. Even though the reliability of that site is definitely questionable, it seems that once you have a trusted version, it is safe to upgrade, regardless of the source because there is a trust path between you and the developer. I also filed a few issues with varying levels of success/response from the community:

Random background radiation And then there's of course the monthly background noise of all the projects I happened to not only stumble on, but also file bugs or patches against:

Gunnar Wolf: Passover / Pesaj, a secular viewpoint, a different viewpoint... And slowly becoming history!

As many of you know (where "you" is "people reading this who actually know who I am), I come from a secular Jewish family. Although we have some religious (even very religious) relatives, neither my parents nor my grandparents were religious ever. Not that spirituality wasn't important to them My grandparents both went deep into understanding by and for themselves the different spiritual issues that came to their mind, and that's one of the traits I most remember about them while I was growing up. But formal, organized religion was never much welcome in the family; again, each of us had their own ways to concile our needs and fears with what we thought, read and understood. This week is the Jewish celebration of Passover, or Pesaj as we call it (for which Passover is a direct translation, as Pesaj refers to the act of the angel of death passing over the houses of the sons of Israel during the tenth plague in Egypt; in Spanish, the name would be Pascua, which rather refers to the ritual sacrifice of a lamb that was done in the days of the great temple)... Anyway, I like giving context to what I write, but it always takes me off the main topic I want to share. Back to my family. I am a third-generation member of the Hashomer Hatzair zionist socialist youth movement; my grandmother was among the early Hashomer Hatzair members in Poland in the 1920s, both my parents were active in the Mexico ken in the 1950s-1960s (in fact, they met and first interacted there), and I was a member from 1984 until 1996. It was also thanks to Hashomer that my wife and I met, and if my children get to have any kind of Jewish contact in their lifes, I hope it will be through Hashomer as well. Hashomer is a secular, nationalist movement. A youth movement with over a century of history might seem like a contradiction. Over the years, of course, it has changed many details, but as far as I know, the essence is still there, and I hope it will continue to be so for good: Helping shape integral people, with identification with Judaism as a nation and not as a religion; keeping our cultural traits, but interpreting them liberally, and aligned with a view towards the common good Socialism, no matter how the concept seems pass nowadays. Colectivism. Inclusion. Peaceful coexistence with our neighbours. Acceptance of the different. I could write pages on how I learnt about each of them during my years in Hashomer, how such concepts striked me as completely different as what the broader Jewish community I grew up in understood and related to them... But again, I am steering off the topic I want to pursue. Every year, we used to have a third Seder (that is, a third Passover ceremony) at Hashomer. A third one, because as tradition mandates two ceremonies to be held outside Israel, and a movement comprised of people aged between 7 and 21, having a seder competing with the familiar one would not be too successful, we held a celebration on a following day. But it would never be the same as the "formal" Pesaj: For the Seder, the Jewish tradition mandates following the Hagada The Seder always follows a predetermined order (literally, Seder means order), and the Hagad (which means both legend and a story that is spoken; you can find full Hagadot online if you want to see what rites are followed; I found a seemingly well done, modern, Hebrew and English version, a more traditional one, in Hebrew and Spanish, and Wikipedia has a description including its parts and rites) is, quite understandably, full with religious words, praises for God, and... Well, many things that are not in line with Hashomer's values. How could we be a secular movement and have a big celebration full with praises for God? How could we yearn for life in the kibbutz distance from the true agricultural meaning of the celebration? The members of Hashomer Hatzair repeatedly took on the task (or, as many would see it, the heresy) of adapting the Hagada to follow their worldview, updated it for the twentieth century, had it more palatable for our peculiarities. Yesterday, when we had our Seder, I saw my father still has together with the other, more traditional Hagadot we use two copies of the Hagad he used at Hashomer Hatzair's third Seder. And they are not only beautiful works showing what they, as very young activists thought and made solemn, but over time, they are becoming historic items by themselves (one when my parents were still young janijim, in 1956, and one when they were starting to have responsabilities and were non-formal teachers or path-showers, madrijim, in 1959). He also had a copy of the Hagad we used in the 1980s when I was at Hashomer; this last one was (sadly?) not done by us as members of Hashomer, but prepared by a larger group between Hashomer Hatzair and the Mexican friends of Israeli's associated left wing party, Mapam. This last one, I don't know which year it was prepared and published on, but I remember following it in our ceremony. So, I asked him to borrow me the three little books, almost leaflets, and scanned them to be put online. Of course, there is no formal licensing information in them, much less explicit authorship information, but they are meant to be shared So I took the liberty of uploading them to the Internet Archive, tagging them as CC-0 licensed. And if you are interested in them, flowing over and back between Spanish and Hebrew, with many beautiful texts adapted for them from various sources, illustrated by our own with the usual heroic, socialist-inspired style, and lovingly hand-reproduced using the adequate technology for their day... Here they are: I really enjoyed the time I took scanning and forming them, reading some passages, imagining ourselves and my parents as youngsters, remembering the beautiful work we did at such a great organization. I hope this brings this joy to others like it did to me. , . Once shomer, always shomer.

Norbert Preining: G del and Daemons an excursion into literature

Explaining G del s theorems to students is a pain. Period. How can those poor creatures crank their mind around a Completeness and an Incompleteness Proof I understand that. But then, there are brave souls using G del s theorems to explain the world of demons to writers, in particular to answer the question:
You can control a Demon by knowing its True Name, but why?
goedel-glabrezu Very impressive. Found at worldbuilding.stackexchange.com, pointed to me by a good friend. I dare to full quote author Cort Ammon (nothing more is known), to preserve this masterpiece. Thanks!!!!
Use of their name forces them to be aware of the one truth they can never know. Tl/Dr: If demons seek permanent power but trust no one, they put themselves in a strange position where mathematical truisms paint them into a corner which leaves their soul small and frail holding all the strings. Use of their name suggests you might know how to tug at those strings and unravel them wholesale, from the inside out! Being a demon is tough work. If you think facing down a 4000lb Glabrezu without their name is difficult, try keeping that much muscle in shape in the gym! Never mind how many manicurists you go through keeping the claws in shape! I don t know how creative such demons truly are, but the easy route towards the perfect French tip that can withstand the rigors of going to the gym and benching ten thousand pounds is magic. Such a demon might learn a manicure spell from the nearby resident succubi. However, such spells are often temporary. No demon worth their salt is going to admit in front of a hero that they need a moment to refresh their mani before they can fight. The hero would just laugh at them. No, if a demon is going to do something, they re going to do it right, and permanently. Not just nice french tips with a clear lacquer over the top, but razor sharp claws that resharpen themselves if they are blunted and can extend or retract at will! In fact, come to think of it, why even go to the gym to maintain one s physique? Why not just cast a magic spell which permanently makes you into the glorious Hanz (or Franz) that the trainer keeps telling you is inside you, just waiting to break free. Just get the spell right once, and think of the savings you could have on gym memberships. Demons that wish to become more powerful, permanently, must be careful. If fairy tales have anything to teach is, it s that one of the most dangerous things you can do is wish for something forever, and have it granted. Forever is a very long time, and every spell has its price. The demon is going to have to make sure the price is not greater than the perks. It would be a real waste to have a manicure spell create the perfect claws, only to find that they come with a peculiar perchance to curve towards one s own heart in an attempt to free themselves from the demon that cast them. So we need proofs. We need proofs that each spell is a good idea, before we cast it. Then, once we cast it, we need proof that the spell actually worked intended. Otherwise, who knows if the next spell will layer on top perfectly or not. Mathematics to the rescue! The world of First Order Logic (FOL, or herefter simply logic ) is designed to offer these guarantees. With a few strokes of a pen, pencil, or even brush, it can write down a set of symbols which prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that not only will the spell work as intended, but that the side effects are manageable. How? So long as the demon can prove that they can cast a negation spell to undo their previous spell, the permanency can be reverted by the demon. With a few more fancy symbols, the demon can also prove that nobody else outside of the demon can undo their permanency. It s a simple thing for mathematics really. Mathematics has an amazing spell called reductio ad infinitum which does unbelievable things. However, there is a catch. There is always a catch with magic, even when that magic is being done through mathematics. In 1931, Kurt G del published his Incompleteness Theorems. These are 3 fascinating works of mathematical art which invoke the true names of First Order Logic and Set Theory. G del was able to prove that any system which is powerful enough to prove out all of algebra (1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, 3 * 5 = 15, etc.), could not prove its own validity. The self referential nature of proving itself crossed a line that First Order Logic simply could not return from. He proved that any system which tries must pick up one of these five traits: If the demon wants itself to be able to cancel the spell, his proof is going to have to include his own abilities, creating just the kind of self referential effects needed to invoke G del s incompleteness theorems. After a few thousand years, the demon may realize that this is folly. A fascinating solution the demon might choose is to explore the incomplete solution to G del s challenge. What if the demon permits the spell to change itself slightly, but in an unpredictable way. If the demon was a harddrive, perhaps he lets a single byte get changed by the spell in a way he cannot expect. This is actually enough to sidestep G del s work, by introducing incompleteness. However, now we have to deal with pesky laws of physic and magics. We can t just create something out of nothing, so if we re going to let the spell change a single byte of us, there must be a single byte of information, its dual, that is unleashed into the world. Trying to break such conservation laws opens up a whole can of worms. Better to let that little bit go free into the world. Well, almost. If you repeat this process a whole bunch of times, layering spells like a Matryoska doll, you re eventually left with a soul that is nothing but the leftover bits of your spells that you simply don t know enough about to use. If someone were collecting those bits and pieces, they might have the undoing of your entire self. You can t prove it, of course, but its possible that those pieces that you sent out into the world have the keys to undo your many layers of armor, and then you know they are the bits that can nullify your soul if they get there. So what do you do? You hide them. You cast your spells only on the darkest of nights, deep in a cave where no one can see you. If you need assistants, you make sure to ritualistically slaughter them all, lest one of them know your secret and whisper it to a bundle of reeds, The king has horns, if you are familiar with the old fairy tale. Make it as hard as possible for the secret to escape, and hope that it withers away to nothingness before someone discovers it, leaving you invincible. Now we come back to the name. The demon is going to have a name it uses to describe its whole self, including all of the layers of spellcraft it has acquired. This will be a great name like Abraxis, the Unbegotten Father or Satan, lord of the underworld. However, they also need to keep track of their smaller self, their soul. Failure to keep track of this might leave them open to an attack if they had missed a detail when casting their spells, and someone uncovered something to destroy them. This would be their true name, potentially something less pompous, like Gaylord Focker or Slartybartfarst. They would never use this name in company. Why draw attention to the only part of them that has the potential to be weak. So when the hero calls out for Slartybartfarst, the demon truly must pay attention. If they know the name the demon has given over the remains of their tattered soul, might they know how to undo the demon entirely? Fear would grip their inner self, like a child, having to once again consider that they might be mortal. Surely they would wish to destroy the hero that spoke the name, but any attempt runs the risk of falling into a trap and exposing a weakness (surely their mind is racing, trying to enumerate all possible weaknesses they have). It is surely better for them to play along with you, once you use their true name, until they understand you well enough to confidently destroy you without destroying themselves. So you ask for answers which are plausible. This one needs no magic at all. None of the rules are invalid in our world today. Granted finding a spell of perfect manicures might be difficult (believe me, some women have spent their whole life searching), but the rules are simply those of math. We can see this math in non-demonic parts of society as well. Consider encryption. An AES-256 key is so hard to brute force that it is currently believed it is impossible to break it without consuming 3/4 of the energy in the Milky Way Galaxy (no joke!). However, know the key, and decryption is easy. Worse, early implementations of AES took shortcuts. They actually left the signature of the path they took through the encryption in their accesses to memory. The caches on the CPU were like the reeds from the old fable. Merely observing how long it took to read data was sufficient to gather those reeds, make a flute, and play a song that unveils the encryption key (which is clearly either The king has horns or 1-2-3-4-5 depending on how secure you think your luggage combination is). Observing the true inner self of the AES encryption implementations was enough to completely dismantle them. Of course, not every implementation fell victim to this. You had to know the name of the implementation to determine which vulnerabilities it had, and how to strike at them. Or, more literally, consider the work of Alfred Whitehead, Principia Mathematica. Principia Mathematica was to be a proof that you could prove all of the truths in arithmetic using purely procedural means. In Principia Mathematica, there was no manipulation based on semantics, everything he did was based on syntax manipulating the actual symbols on the paper. G del s Incompleteness Theorem caught Principia Mathematica by the tail, proving that its own rules were sufficient to demonstrate that it could never accomplish its goals. Principia Mathematica went down as the greatest Tower of Babel of modern mathematical history. Whitehead is no longer remembered for his mathematical work. He actually left the field of mathematics shortly afterwards, and became a philosopher and peace advocate, making a new name for himself there. (by Cort Ammon)

Next.

Previous.