A gorgeous day in Chicago for the 37th annual Chicago Marathon. Today was the seventh time I ran this race. I had sat out last fall, and ran a smaller local race (well enough for a BQ). But the last time I ran Chicago I mused that maybe next time I'd train more. I tried, but it didn't quite work with a minor injury dragging on a little. Just like in 2010. And so it continues: it is my home course, and the course I have run the most and know the best. Yet it is the one where I have the greatest difficulty coming in with a time that is good enough for Boston. I knew that today wasn't going to be that day, so I aimed lower to just run even splits (ie running about equal halfs). But even that failed: After 1:44 for the first half I lost a good ten minutes to finish at 3:40:42. Oh well. There is always next year... But it was a simply sunningly fabulous day, and the race was once again very, very well put together. We were worried about extra security: not a real issue. The streets were lined with people and even Lisa and Julia managed to cheer me on at mile 13 (still smiles), mile 19 (grimacing, about to fall apart) and 25 (hanging in). And Anna was working the mile 18 water stop. The worst where miles 20 to 22 when I walked a fair bit. The race results have details; maybe I'll update the chart I made in prior years. One minor FAIL was a wait at the end for gear check. That was pathetic. I guess the folks manning the stand didn't keep bags sorted well enough so lines were long, and slow. Oh well -- the rest was fine, and it remains one of the nicest marathon races. Oh, and the other FAIL was that my Nexus 4 phone couldn't hold a charge til I was done. What's up with that? The running tracker traced me til around mile 20, and then the phone shut down for lack of juice. Disappointing too. But hey, it spares you, dear reader, the look of some bad post-race selfies...

Recently, I've been attending a training course in Moldova about the representation of gender in the media and the influence on society of gender stereotypes.
The course was organized by Inesa Lupu, of Invento and financed by the UE as part of the Youth in Action program. It was the first time, for me, in this kind of international project and it was, in a word, fantastic.
Among the participants, there were people from Azerbaijan, Georgia, Italy, Latvia, Moldova and Slovenia.
That meant a great mix of cultures, languages and experiences.
And that was the key, in my opinion, of the success: coming from different countries and different social and cultural contexts meant that we were able to have a very broad and diverse point of view on the problem of gender stereotypes. So, here's some highlights on what we discussed. The media representation of gender (aka: gender issues are not only women issues) Tough Guise by Jackson Katz is a interesting documentary about the way the modern society - particularly in the US - defines masculinity as intrinsically tied to violence, aggressivity and "toughness" and on the consequences of this on the society as a whole. The author's theory is "that male violence, misogyny, and homophobia are inextricably linked to how we define manhood as a culture. The film gives special attention to how American media have glamorized increasingly regressive and violence masculine ideals in the face of mounting social and economic threats to traditional white male heterosexual authority". It then results clear that we cannot avoid to think about gender issues as women and men issues, because after all is the cultural definition of both femininity and masculinity that heavily influences the behaviour of men and women and their interaction.
In particular, I liked Katz's analysis of media's use of victim blaming speech while reporting of violences against women which tend to shift the focus from the violence perpetrated by men as part of definition of masculinity. Another documentary we watched, more focused on women representation, is MissRepresentation by Jennifer Siebel Newsom.
The film analyses the under representation of women in position of power, and the issue of women and leadership, especially in politics, in the US. Nothing too new, if you are interested in gender issues, as it is a widely discussed and studied topic, but still worth watching. After watching them, we formed little groups of three-four persons from different countries to discuss them, and it was even more interesting to listen the opinion of the guys (we had four male participants). Photography and Phototherapy As a workshop on media representation of gender, photography and advertisement were two of the main argument we spoke about. We focused on it for two days: our trainer, Lietta Granato - photographer and phototherapist - first gave us a lesson on photography, making us experimenting a bit with exposure times and diaphragm's aperture. Then she presented the evolution in the last 50 year or so, of the depiction of women in the ads.
And that, to be honest, was a bit upsetting.
I've already had seen one of the most important and widely known films on this theme, the Killing Us Softly series by Jean Kilbourne, but some of the ads Lietta showed to us were really really horrible. Actually, most of them were horrible. Commenting and deconstructing these ads would take a separate blogpost, probably, and there are many people more competent than me on the topic, so I've decided to simply share some of the worst ads in a collage, without much commenting. These are vintage, from the fifties to the seventies. Do you think we got better? Pff. They go from promoting violence and rape to heavily objectifying women. Special mention for the Compaq ad: as a geek woman I feel particularly insulted by the idea that I'm supposed to use a "pocket pc" as "pocket mirror". Because I wouldn't be able, obviously, to use it as a computer. Lietta also introduced us to photographic therapy and particularly the work of Jo Spence and Rosy Martin. If you browse Jo Spence's site, please be aware that there is a series of pics documenting all the stages of her illness (she died of breast cancer) and they are pretty intense. "In 1984, alongside Rosy Martin, Spence developed Photo-Therapy , adopting techniques from co-counselling. The considerable achievement of Photo-Therapy was to invert the traditional relationship between the photographer and the subject. If historically the subject had little control over their own representation, Photo-Therapy shifts this dynamic. The subject was able to act out personal narratives and claim agency for their own biography." (source: http://www.jospence.org/biography.html)
I love this concept and I really really love Spence's photos. To close on a happier note, I really suggest you to allocate 20 minutes of your time to watch this great talk by Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, about the role of "single story" in shaping stereotypes and misunderstandings.

Back in February, I wanted a new laptop for my work, so I bought a fancy Dell Latitude E6540 laptop. Bad luck, it was giving my sore eyes and horrible headaches, to the point I couldn't work more than a dozen minutes with it. As in my work, we were not allowed to buy PC laptops with any other vendor, my boss convinced me to get a 15'' macbook pro retina (yes that's about as expensive a laptop as you can get). Although quite reluctant at first, I did need a new laptop, so I gave in. Of course, I had to install debian on it. I booted once or twice on macos to leave enough space for Debian and install rEFIt so that I could boot into it. I had to use version 3.9 of linux else it wouldn't boot.After about 8 month, I must say I'm quite pleased with the beast. The retina display is very neat (a 2880x1800 resolution!), and it is pretty fast. There are two annoyances though:

• I never managed to get either the non-free NVIDIA drivers or the integrated intel graphics to work. The NVIDIA driver give blank screen on X startup, while it doesn't even start with the intel drivers (and I've tried all the tricks I could find around). The fine point is that I don't have any hardware 3D acceleration !
• The wireless network is pretty unstable.

Another point is the update of GRUB: Debian's post-install scripts don't play nice with the EFI setup, so here is what I have to do to update to a newer version of grub, (and it's also what I had to do initially to install GRUB):

# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
# grub-install --efi-directory=/mnt

The /dev/sda1 partition is the so-called EFI partition. I think it is created by rEFIt and it is essentially empty.

Seen at $DAYJOB, from a candidate we rejected due to a pretty poor showing in a phone interview:

May I suggest that your company puts in place a more effective way of interviewing potential candidates. Please pass this to comment to your senior management so they may look at improving this process.

I m not sure I ve ever seen such a clear confirmation that our interviewing process is working as intended. While we hire for smart people who don t meekly accept the status quo, we d prefer it if our staff don t mouth off when things don t go their way. Customers tend to frown on such outbursts.

As I mentioned earlier, the information in the documents released by Edward Snowden show a clear pattern of corporate and government abuse of the information networks that are now deeply intertwined with the lives of many people all over the world. Surveillance is a power dynamic where the party doing the spying has power over the party being surveilled. The surveillance state that results when one party has "Global Cryptologic Dominance" is a seriously bad outcome. The old saw goes "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely". In this case, the stated goal of my government appears to be absolute power in this domain, with no constraint on the inevitable corruption. If you are a supporter of any sort of a just social contract (e.g. International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance), the situation should be deeply disturbing. One of the major sub-threads in this discussion is how the NSA and their allies have actively tampered with and weakened the cryptographic infrastructure that everyone relies on for authenticated and confidential communications on the 'net. This kind of malicious work puts everyone's communication at risk, not only those people who the NSA counts among their "targets" (and the NSA's "target" selection methods are themselves fraught with serious problems). The US government is supposed to take pride in the checks and balances that keep absolute power out of any one particular branch. One of the latest attempts to simulate "checks and balances" was the President's creation of a "Review Group" to oversee the current malefactors. The review group then asked for public comment. A group of technologists (including myself) submitted a comment demanding that the review group provide concrete technical details to independent technologists. Without knowing the specifics of how the various surveillance mechanisms operate, the public in general can't make informed assessments about what they should consider to be personally safe. And lack of detailed technical knowledge also makes it much harder to mount an effective political or legal opposition to the global surveillance state (e.g. consider the terrible Clapper v. Amnesty International decision, where plaintiffs were denied standing to sue the Director of National Intelligence because they could not demonstrate that they were being surveilled). It's also worth noting that the advocates for global surveillance do not themselves want to be surveilled, and that (for example) the NSA has tried to obscure as much of their operations as possible, by over-classifying documents, and making spurious claims of "national security". This is where the surveillance power dynamic is most baldly in play, and many parts of the US government intelligence and military apparatus has a long history of acting in bad faith to obscure its activities. The people who have been operating these surveillance systems should be ashamed of their work, and those who have been overseeing the operation of these systems should be ashamed of themselves. We need to better understand the scope of the damage done to our global infrastructure so we can repair it if we have any hope of avoiding a complete surveillance state in the future. Getting the technical details of these compromises in the hands of the public is one step on the path toward a healthier society. PostscriptLest I be accused of optimism, let me make clear that fixing the technical harms is necessary, but not sufficient; even if our technical infrastructure had not been deliberately damaged, or if we manage to repair it and stop people from damaging it again, far too many people still regularly accept ubiquitous private (corporate) surveillance. Private surveillance organizations (like Facebook and Google) are too often in a position where their business interests are at odds with their users' interests, and powerful adversaries can use a surveillance organization as a lever against weaker parties. But helping people to improve their own data sovereignty and to avoid subjecting their friends and allies to private surveillance is a discussion for a separate post, i think.Tags: cryptography, nsa

Announcement After a very long work, over the course of 4 months, I have finished packaging the first RC1 of OpenStack. This comes on time, just 9 days before the official Havana release. Please do try this RC1 before the official 2013.2, code name Havana, is released, and hopefully uploaded to Debian. All of the packages are available from Debian Experimental, keeping Grizzly in Sid. However, there is also some private repositories that I maintain, holding Wheezy backports: deb http://havana.pkgs.enovance.com/debian havana main deb http://archive.gplhost.com/debian havana-backports main The first repository holds the packages maintained within the Alioth group. These are built directly from my Jenkins machine, on each git push. The 2nd repository is holding backports from Sid to Wheezy for the packages that I don t actively maintain (though a lot of them are in the Python module team, in which I do a lot of packaging and updates as well). A few numbers A few numbers about this now. I had to work on 145 source packages: at least backport them to Wheezy, and push them in the GPLHost archive repository above. This generates 360 binary packages. Out of these, I maintain 77 source packages within the Alioth OpenStack group, generating 209 .deb files. That s a lot of stuff to deal with (and I feel sometimes a bit dizzy about it). While OpenStack is a big jigsaw puzzle to solve for the users, it is even more for someone who has to deal with all the (sometimes buried in the the code) Python dependencies. I hope others will come and join me in this packaging effort, since over the time, there s more and more work to be done, as the project grows. Note that most of the work is unfortunately done on packaging (and updating) the Python dependencies, working on the packages themselves is done last, at the end of the cycle. Other things not packaged (yet) Before the release (and the forthcoming Hongkong summit on the 5th of November), I hope to be able to finish packaging TripleO. TripleO is in fact OpenStack on OpenStack, which works with nova-baremetal. I have no idea how to test or install this, though it sounds like a lot of fun. There are 6 source packages that need to be done. Also, pending on the FTP masters NEW queue, is Trove: Database as a Service. I hope this one can get through soon. There is, also, Marconi, which is an incubated project for a new message queuing service, which probably will replace RabbitMQ (I m not sure yet what it does, and I will be happy to hear about it at the summit). Lastly, there s Ironic, which will at some point, replace nova-baremetal. That is, it does cloud computing over bare metal, without virtualization. All of these new projects are still in an incubation stage, and are not part of the official release yet. Though, I have learned over the course of this past year, that with OpenStack, it s never early enough to start the packaging work. Thanks to my sponsor! Please note that all of this wouldn t be possible without eNovance sponsoring my packaging work. A big up to all of them for supporting and loving Debian! You guys rox. Also a special thanks to Mehdi / Sileth, for his work testing everything with the Tempest functional tests and the CI platform.

I wish I had known about that quote from Michael Graves before now. I would have perhaps had an answer to some recent visitors to makespace.

There are regular scheduled visits to makespace where people can come and view our facilities, and perhaps start the process of becoming a member if they decide they like what they see.

However, we sometimes get people who just turn up at the door. If a member feels charitable they may choose to give a short tour rather than just turn the person away. I happened to be in one Friday afternoon recently varnishing a folding chair when two such people rang the doorbell. There were few other members about and because watching varnish dry was dull I decided to be helpful and do a quick tour.

I explained that they really ought to return for a scheduled event for a proper tour, gave the obligatory minimal safety briefing, and showed them the workshops and tools. During the tour it was mentioned they were attending a certain local higher education establishment and were interested in makespace as an inexpensive studio.

Before they left I was asked what I was working on. I explained that I had been creating stools and chairs from plywood. At this point the conversation took a somewhat surreal turn, one of them asked, well more demanded, who my principle influence had been in designing with plywood.

When I said that I had mainly worked from a couple of Google image searches they were aghast and became quite belligerent. They both insisted I must have done proper research and my work was obviously influenced by Charles and Ray Eames and Arne Jacobsen and surely I intended to cite my influences in my design documents.

My admission that I had never even heard the names before and had no design documents seemed to lead to a distinctly condescending tone as they explained that all modern plywood design stemmed from a small number of early 20th century designers and any competent designers research would have revealed that.

At this point in proceedings I was becoming a bit put out that my good deed of showing off the workshop had not gone unpunished. I politely explained that I designed simply by generating a requirement in my head, maybe an internet search to see what others had done, measuring real things to get dimensions and then a great deal of trial and error.

I was then abruptly informed that my "design process was completely invalid and there were well established ways to design furniture correctly and therefore my entire design was invalid" and that I was wasting time and material. I thanked them for their opinion and showed them out, safe and well before anyone gets any ideas.

I put the whole incident out of my mind until I finished writing up the final folding chair post the other day. It struck me that perhaps I had been unknowingly influenced by these designers. It was certainly true I had generated ideas from the hundreds of images my searches had revealed.

I did some research and it turns out that from the 1930s to the 1950s there were a string of designers using plywood in novel ways from the butterfly stool by Sori Yanagi through formed curvy chairs by Alvar Aalto and eero saarinen.

While these designers produced some wonderfully iconic and contemporary furniture I think that after reviewing my initial notes that two more modern designers Christian Desile and Leo Salom probably influenced me more directly. Though I did not reference their designs beyond seeing the images along with hundreds of others, certainly nothing was directly copied.

And there in lies an often repeated observation: no one creates anything without being influenced by their environment. The entire creative process of several billion ape descendants (or Golgafrincham telephone sanitisers if you prefer) is based on the simple process of copying, combining and transforming what is around us.

I must accept that certain individuals at points in history have introduced radical improvements in their field, people like Socrates Galileo Leonardo Newton Einstein. However, even these outstanding examples were enlightened enough to acknowledge those that came before. Newtons quotation "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants" pretty much sums it up.

In my case I am privileged enough to live in a time where my environment has grown to the size of the world thanks to the internet. My influences, and therefore what I create, is that much richer but at the same time it means that my influence on others is similarly diminished.

I have joined the maker community because I want to create. The act of creation teaches me new skills in a physical, practical way and additionally I get to exercise my mind using new techniques or sometimes things I had forgotten I already knew. I view this as an extension of my previous Open Source software work, adding a physical component to a previously purely mental pursuit.

But importantly I like that my creations might provide inspiration for someone else. To improve those chances in the wider world I force myself to follow a few basic rules:

Release

Possibly one of the hardest things for any project. I carefully avoided the word finish here because my experience leads me to the conclusion that I always want to improve my designs.

But it is important to get to a point in a project where you can say "that is good enough to share", this is more common in software but it really applies to any project.

Share

If your aim here is to improve your society with your contribution sharing your designs and information is important. I think there is nothing better than someone else taking one of your designs and using it and perhaps improving on it, remember that is what you probably did in one way or another better to make it less hard for that to happen.

Ensure your design files are appropriately licensed and they are readily accessible. I personally lean towards the more generally accessible open source licences like MIT but the decision is ultimately yours.

Licencing is important, especially in the current copyright happy society. I know it sounds dull and no one takes that seriously, right? Sorry, but yes they do and it is better for you to be clear from the start, especially if there is a software component to your project. Oh one personal plea, use an existing well known licence, the world simply does not need another one!

Write about it

The blog posts about the things I have made sometimes take almost as much time as the creation. The clear recording on my thoughts in written and photographic form often gives me more inspiration for improvements or other projects.

If someone else gets pleasure from the telling then that can only be good. If you do not do this then your voice cannot be heard and you wasted an opportunity to motivate others.

Feedback

If you do manage to get feedback on your creation, read it. You may disagree or not be interested for the current project but the feedback process is important. In software this often manifests as bug reports, in more physical projects this often becomes forum or blog comments.

Just remember that you need a thick skin for this, the most vocal members of any society are the minority with inflammatory opinion, the silent majority are by definition absent but there is still useful feedback out there.

Create again

By this I simply mean that once you are satisfied yourself on a project move on to the next. This may sound a little obvious but once you have some creative momentum it is much easier to keep going project to project than in you leave time between.

Also do not have too many projects ongoing, by all means have a couple so you do not get stuck waiting for materials or workshop time but more than three and four and you will never be able to release any of them.

Those students were perhaps somewhat misguided in how they stated their opinions, but they are correct that in the world in which we find ourselves we are all influenced. Though contrary to received wisdom those influences are more likely to be from the internet and our peers in the global maker society than historical artists.

Despite the fact that I've had very little time to either read or write reviews, I haven't stopped buying a few books here and there. And, of course, Powell's Indiespensable keeps coming. Matt Bell In the House Upon the Dirt Between the Lake and the Woods (mainstream)
Steven Brust Orca (sff)
Steven Brust Dragon (sff)
John W. Campbell Collected Editorials from Analog (non-fiction)
Jane Fletcher The Walls of Westernfort (sff)
Mira Grant How Green This Land, How Blu This Sea (sff)
Tate Hallaway Tall, Dark, & Dead (sff)
Diana Wynne Jones Howl's Moving Castle (sff)
Rebecca Lee Bobcat and Other Stories (mainstream)
Victor Lombardi Why We Fail (non-fiction)
George R.R. Martin & Gardner Dozois (ed.) Songs of Love and Death (sff anthology)
Seanan McGuire In Sea-Salt Tears (sff)
Seanan McGuire Late Eclipses (sff)
Justina Robson Selling Out (sff)
John Scalzi Muse of Fire (sff)
Mark Slouka Brewster (mainstream)
Tor.com (ed.) The Stories (sff anthology)
Carrie Vaughn Kitty and the Midnight Hour (sff) This is a wide variety of random stuff, including some stuff that was free (the Tor.com anthology, which is every piece of short fiction they've published and is about 4000 pages, the Campbell editorials from the Internet Archive) and a lot of stuff that was on sale. As well as another two shipments of Indiespensible. The Brust books I've already read and are already in the family, but I hooked a friend of mine on the Vlad Taltos series, and those were the only two that I both didn't have and that weren't available on Kindle. So I picked them up while he was visiting so that he could read the whole series.

Weblate, a free web-based translation management system, of course also needs to be translated. Now it's right time to complete translation into your language before Weblate 1.7 will be released. The release is currently planned on Monday, to have clean table before hacking on Weblate during Hackweek. There is not much time left so jump in right now and start translating :-).

Filed under: English SUSE Weblate 0 comments Flattr this!

For a while I have been eyeing with the TI eZ430 Chronos watch, a slightly bulky sports watch that not only comes with a built-in thermometer, barometer and accelerometer, but also a freely programmable micro controller (from the TI MSP430 family hence the name). In addition it has a small radio chip included and can communicate wirelessly with the computer, or possibly other devices. All in all, a very geeky toy. A week ago I managed to buy one quite cheaply via eBay (30 including shipping). It took me a while to get an overview of the various resources about the device. Here is what I have learned.

• Hardware: I have the new edition (the included debug board and wireless access point are white). This means that I cannot update the software of the watch via the wireless connection, and it means that most software written for it does not support the new altimeter sensor (yet).
• Development: Debian is a very suitable development platform; the packages mspdebug and gcc-msp430 provide all I need to compile (make config && make) and upload (mspdebug rf2500 "prog ../foo.txt") new software.
• Code: Besides the original software that comes with the device (which supports the new hardware), there are two main lines of community-driven developments: OpenChronos and openchronos-ng. The former is (as the name suggests) older and maintained mostly by forks in various places. The latter is newer, its UI deviates further from the original software and seems to be slightly more active.
• Communication: Both of these have their own mailinglists (openchronos, where I did not get a reply yet, and ti-chronos-development, where my messages are still waiting for moderation). I found only one IRC channel, #openchronos on freenode, with similarly little activity.

After I found that out, I tried to hack a bit on the various software. The first issue I had (and still have) is that I cannot use the buttons of the device while it is attached to the debug board. They do work if forget to take out the battery, but supposedly that is bad for the battery. So my compile-upload-test-cycle becomes a compile-upload-detach-insert-battery-test-remove-battery-attach-cycle. I could not find out how to emulate button presses using mspdebug. Any suggestions are welcome. The other problem was the new altimeter hardware: Neither OpenChronos nor openchronos-ng support that yet. I originally planned to port the driver from the official software to a random OpenChronos fork when I read that Richard Rondu did that to openchronos-ng yet. I found the code in a month-old merge-request. I tried it, it worked, and I started to clean up the code a bit and add a variometer mode to it, e.g. displaying the current rate of climb my ultimate goal is to use this as a surprisingly cheap variometer for paragliding. After a day of hacking and quickly lifting the watch from the room floor to the room ceiling and back I believe that it works okish, although quite a few parameter can benefit from more tweaking: sample rate (currently 20Hz), length of history (currently 2s) and the linear regression method (currently simply the difference between the average of the samples of the current second with the samples of the last second). As always, patches welcome, the code is in my fork on sf.net.
Next to do would be to enable some buzzing noise depending on the rate of change; during flight I don t want to decipher a low-contract LCD screen. But it is questionable whether the buzzer is loud enough we ll see. I was also happy to hear that there are other zE430-hackers in Karlsruhe, one of them for example tries to make the alarm clock sleep-cycle-aware.

Continuing in photo blog posts, here is our last vacation - in the beginning of September we've traveled around Slovenia, mostly for hiking, but we've enjoyed other things as well. Our first short hike was around lake Bled, which is nice lake placed in between mountains: Afternoon we had some time left, so we've walked around Peri nik waterfall, which was close to Mojstrana where we were accommodated (if you will be looking for accommodation there, check River Cottage): Then it came time for some serious hiking and we went up to the mountains, in the end we did not make it to Triglav because of weather, but we've gone on Cmir: After that we had to relax a bit and visited Ljubljana and ended up near kocjan Caves which we've visited on next day: After relaxing evening in Saksida winery, it was time to go back to mountains. We've started visiting Tolmin gorges, which is nice natural area worth short detour: Last days we've spent near Bovec and hiked around a bit, one of the things we've enjoyed most is trip to Krnsko lake: This was definitely not our last trip to Slovenia as there are still some places we want to visit :-).

Filed under: English Photography Travelling 2 comments Flattr this!

Here in the US, the Affordable Care Act is finally going into effect, with accompanying drama. I managed to get signed up today at healthcare.gov. After not having health insurance since 2000, I will finally be covered starting January 1 2014. Since my income is mosty publically known anyway, I thought it might be helpful to blog about some details. I was uninsured for 14 years due to a combination of three factors:

1. Initially, youthful stupidity and/or a perfectly resonable cost/benefit analysis. (Take your pick.)
2. Due to the US health insurance system being obviously broken, and my preference to avoid things that are broken. Especially when the breakage involved insurers refusing to cover me at any sane level due to a minor and easily controlled pre-existing condition.
3. Since I'm not much motivated by income levels, and am very motivated to have time to work on things that are important to me, my income has been on average pretty low, and perhaps more importantly, I have intentionally avoided being a full-time employee of anyone at any point in the past 14 years (have rejected job offers), and so was not eligible for any employee plans which were the only reasonable way to be covered in the US. (See point #2.)

So, if you're stuck waiting in line on healthcare.gov (is this an entirely new online experience brought to us by the US government?), or have seen any of the dozen or so failure modes that I saw just trying to register for a login to the site, yeah, it's massively overloaded right now, and it's also quite broken on a number of technical levels. But you can eventually get though it. Based on some of the bugs I saw, it may help to have an large number of email addresses and use a different one for each application attempt. It also wouldn't hurt to write some programs to automate the attempts, because otherwise you may have to fill out the same form dozens of times. And no, you can't use "you+foo@bar.com" for your email; despite funding the development of RFC-822 in the 80's, the US government is clueless about what consititutes a valid email address. But my "favorite" misfeature of the site is that it refuses to let you enter any accented characters, or characters not in the latin alphabet when signing up. Even if they're, you know, part of your name. (Welcome back to Ellis Island..) I want to check the git repository to see if I can find the backstory for these and other interesting technical decisions, but they have forgotten to push anything to it for over 3 months. The good news is that once you get past the initial signup process, and assuming you get the confirmation mail before the really short expiration period of apparently less than 1 hour (another interesting technical choice, given things like greylisting), the actual exchange is not badly overloaded, and nor is it very buggy (comparatively). I was able to complete an application in about an hour. The irony is that after all that, I was only able to choose from one health insurer covering my area on the so-called "exchange". (Blue Cross/Blue Shield) I also signed up for dental insurance (it was a welcome surprise that the site offers this at all) and had a choice of two insurers for that. The application process was made more uncertian for me since I have no idea what I'll end up doing for money once my current crowdsourced year of work is done. The site wants you to know how much income you'll have in 2014, and my guess is anywhere between $6000 (from a rental property) and about what I made this year (approx $25000 before taxes). Or up, if I say, answered the Google pings. The best choice seemed to be to answer what I made this year, which is also close to what I made last year. So, I'll be paying around $200/month for a combination of not very good health insurance, and not very good dental insurance. There is around $750/year of financial aid to people at my guesstimated 2014 income level, which would drop that to $140/month, but I will let them refund me whatever that turns out to be in a lump sum later instead. For comparison, I am lucky to spend rather less renting a three bedroom house situated in 25 acres of woods.. It's strange to think that all of this is an improvement to the system here in the US, especially given all the better options that could have been passed instead, but it seems that it probably is. Especially when I consider the many people around me who are less fortunate than myself. If you'd like a broader perspective on this, see Tobias Buckell's "American healthcare was already socialized by Reagan, we re just fighting about how to pay for it".

XMir's been delayed from Ubuntu 13.10. The stated reason is that multi-monitor support isn't sufficiently reliable. That's true, but it's far from the only problem that XMir still has:

• It's still broken on some single-monitor systems

Some machines have display corruption. There are writes to freed memory. To be fair, some of the behaviour that's been seen has been down to underlying bugs in the Xorg drivers that were never triggered under normal use but are hit by XMir. Others are down to implicit assumptions made in the drivers that XMir happens to violate. The problem is that there doesn't appear to have been enough room in the schedule to deal with these interactions, presumably because nobody accounted for the inevitable "This thing we thought would be easy turns out to be difficult" part of the project.


• The input driver bug still isn't really fixed

I've mentioned this bug before. It's now marked "Fix released" which is kind of true but not really. Mir now tells XMir that the VT is changing before the VT is changed, but it doesn't wait for that to complete before switching the VTs. Until XMir is scheduled and runs, it's still receiving input events. In most circumstances that window is small, so there's no real risk of triggering it accidentally.

There's one corner case where it might still cause problems. Simply running isn't enough - XMir has to make progress through its event loop. That'll only happen if the X server is processing its wakeup events, and it's possible to effectively stall that by submitting a sufficiently awkward drawing request to the server. The X server will appear to freeze, and if the user then attempts to work out what's going on by switching to a VT and logging in, those input events will still be going to XMir. It's left as an exercise to the reader to construct ways to take advantage of this.

This can't happen in Xorg because the VT switch is blocked until the input devices have been released. Mir could have done the same, but doesn't because of a conscious design decision - in the Ubuntu Phone world, clients stop doing things when they're told to. Ubuntu Desktop is expected to behave the same way.

This is an unfortunate situation to be in. Ubuntu Desktop was told that they were switching to XMir, but Mir development seems to be driven primarily by the needs of Ubuntu Phone. XMir has to do things that no other Mir client will ever cope with, and unless Mir development takes that into account it's inevitably going to suffer breakage like this. Canonical management needs to resolve this if there's any hope of ever shipping XMir as the default desktop environment.


• It's still missing features

XMir doesn't support colour profiles. XRandR properties aren't exposed, so there's no way to control TV output encoding or overscan. There's still no hardware cursor support. Switching to XMir now would reduce functionality without providing any user-visible gain.

It's clear that XMir has turned into a larger project than Canonical had originally anticipated, but that's hardly surprising. There's only one developer with previous X experience working on it full-time, and the announced schedule provided no opportunity to deal with unexpected problems. As if that weren't enough, there's obvious conflict between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Phone when it comes to developer time and required functionality. The one hardware vendor who's willing to take a public stand has demonstrated that they have no interest in supporting XMir, despite Canonical assuring people that they were already engaging in productive negotiations with GPU manufacturers.

Multiple monitor support may be the single most obvious feature where XMir is lacking, but it's not the only one. Technically and politically, this code is a long way from being ready for prime time. Without significant community contribution, Canonical need to focus on prioritising it appropriately rather than expecting a tiny number of developers to perform miracles. Or, alternatively, they could just drop XMir entirely and focus on Unity 8.

comments

Being a bit of a vim-outliner fanatic, but having an inability to remember all of the various key combos, is a sad place to be. Having lived there for far too long, I finally got up the energy to learn enough Inkscape to produce my very own vim-outliner cheatsheet. One more thing I can ,,x

After 1.5 month of work, I am proud to officialy release OUnit 2.0.0. This is a major rewrite of OUnit to include various feature that I think was missing from OUnit1. The very good news is that the port of the OASIS test suite has proven that this new version of OUnit can drastically improve the running time of a test suite. OUnit is a unit test framework for OCaml. It allows one to easily create unit-tests for OCaml code. It is based on HUnit, a unit testing framework for Haskell. It is similar to JUnit, and other XUnit testing frameworks. Download OUnit v2.0.0 Documentation of v2.0.0 Website The basic features:

• better configuration setup
  • environment variable
  • command line options
  • configuration files
• improved output of the tests:
  • allow vim quickfix to jump in the log file where the error has happened
  • output HTML report
  • output JUnit report
  • systematic logging (verbose always on), but output log in a file
• choose how to run your test:
  • run tests in parallel using processes (auto-detect number of CPU and run as many worker processes)
  • run tests concurrently using threads
  • use the old sequential runner
• choose which test to run with a chooser that can do smart selection of tests:
  • simple: just run test in sequence
  • failfirst: run the tests that failed in the last run first and skip the success if they are still failing
• some refactoring:
  • bracket: use a registration in the context but easier to use
  • remove all useless functions in the OUnit2 interface
• non-fatal section: allow to fail inside non-fatal section without quitting immediately the whole test
• allow to use OUnit1 test inside OUnit2 (smooth the transition)
• timer that makes tests fail if they take too long, only when using the processes runner (I was not able to do it cleanly using threads and sequential)
• allow to parametrize filenames so that you can use OUNIT_OUTPUT_FILE=ounit-$(suite_name),log and have $(suite_name) replace by the test suite name
• create locks to avoid accessing the same resources within a single process or the whole application (typically to avoid doing a chdir while another thread is doing a chdir elsewhere)
• create a in_testdata_dir function to locate test data, if any

Migration path OUnit 2.0.0 still provides the OUnit module which is exactly the same as the last OUnit 1.X version. This way, you are not forced to migrate. However, this means that you will gain no advantage of the new release and even some slowdown due to increase complexity of the code. Though, I strongly recommend to upgrade to OUnit2. Here is a checklist to do the migration:

• replace all open OUnit by open OUnit2
• the test function now takes test_ctxt argument, so replace all fun () -> ...) by fun test_ctxt -> ...
• bracket are now inlined so bracket setUp f tearDown is now let x = bracket setUp tearDown test_ctxt in
• make sure that you don't change global process state like chdir or Unix.putenv or that you don't rely on another test setting something for the next test

The OASIS test suite migration In order to check that everything was working correctly, I have migrated the OASIS test suite to OUnit2. This is a big test suite (210 test cases) and it includes quite big sequences of tests (end to end tests from calling oasis setup to compiling and installing the results). This was really time consuming and I wish to see a significant speedup for the tests with OUnit2. You can see the result in term of code of the full migration here. Here are the results on my Intel Core i7 920/SSD:

• Pristine test suite (210 tests):
  • oUnit v1: 52.36s (i.e. latest OUnit v1.x, reference time)
  • oUnit1 over oUnit2: 60.39s (OUnit v2.0.0 using the OUnit v1 layer)
• Migration to OUnit2 (166 tests):
  • processes (8 shards): 10.12s
  • processes (autodect, 4 shards): 12.99s
  • sequential: 58.77s

The migration was quite heavy because this test suite had a big design problem. It uses in-place modification of the test data. I think I pick this design because I thought this was a good idea to decrease the running time. As a matter of fact, this was a huge mistake, that keeps popping failed test cases because one of the previous tests was failing. I have refactored all this and now we start by copying the test data into a temporary directory, which ensure that everything is always starting from pristine test data. During the redesign, I have decided to reduce the number of tests by merging some of them. This should have no big impact on the running time, although this is not as pure 1:1 comparison with OUnit v1. Although it is still testing exactly the same thing. This explain the loss of ~50 tests, which in fact has been merged in other tests. The overall speedup is 4x compared to OUnit v1, when using processes. However there is a 12% increase compared to OUnit v1 for sequential and a 15% increase when using OUnit v1 compatibility layer. While this is not very good score, I hope this is small enough to compensate the huge win of being able to run tests in parallel with processes. And now the magic ! At this point, if you read carefully the numbers, you would have noticed that there is a 4.5x decrease in speed when you compare sequential and 4 processes for OUnit2. Since we are only actively testing in 4 shards, it looks strange. I don't expect a super-linear speedup due to the use of processes. I have checked that every tests was indeed running and found no solutions to this mystery. Right now, I think this is due to the fact that we are running less tests in more processes which should lighten the load of the GC (which may not trigger at all). I am not sure about this explanation and will welcome any bug report which shows a problem in the implementation of either sequential or processes runner. Although, this is great. Help still wanted If you find any bugs with OUnit v2, this is the time to submit a bug. OUnit BTS If you want to try to fix bugs by yourself, please checkout the latest version of OUnit:

 $> darcs get http://forge.ocamlcore.org/anonscm/darcs/ounit/ounit

Patches always welcome.

Matt Palmer wrote an insightful post about the use of the word professional [1]. It s one factor that makes me less inclined to be a member of professional societies. The TED blog has an interesting article about Wikihouse which is a project to create a set of free designs for houses to be cut out of plywood with a CNC milling machine [2]. The article also links to a TED talk by Alastair Parvin of the Wikihouse project which covers many interesting things other than designing houses. An XKCD comic has one of the best explanations of bullying I ve ever seen [3]. If you aren t familiar with XKCD then make sure you hover your mouse over it to read the hidden text. The Fair Phone is a project to develop a smart phone starting with conflict-free resources and with fully free software (not like a typical Android build) [4]. It s an interesting project and the price and specs seem within the normal range so you re not paying a huge premium for a conflict-free phone. Unfortunately they only have one model with a 4.3 display, if they had a competitor for the Galaxy Note then I d be interested. Patrick Stokes wrote an insightful article about why I m entitled to my opinion is a bogus argument [5]. Jim Daly wrote an interesting TED blog post interviewing Rishi Manchanda about Upstream Doctors who look for the root causes of medical problems rather than just treating the symptoms [6]. Brian Krebs wrote an insightful article about the value of a hacked email account [7]. If you are trying to convince your users to use better passwords then this should help. Ron Garrett wrote an insightful series or articles on morality hooked on the premise of whether it s wrong to torture kittens [8]. Part of his conclusion is that people who believe it s wrong to do such things tend to be more capable of working in large groups and forming a productive and efficient society. The TED blog has an interesting post by Karen Eng summarising Andreas Raptopoulos talk about using autonomous drones to deliver parcels in parts of the world that don t have usable roads [9]. Delivering parcels (which would start with medical supplies but would presumably move on to commercial transport) by drone is apparently really cheap. Being cheaper than building roads isn t going to be difficult but it seems that they are going to make it cheaper than paying people to deliver parcels even if the roads were built. The main web site about this project is www.matternet.us, they are hiring electrical engineers. Here is the link for Andreas TED talk [10]. The TOR blog has an interesting article by Emily Asher-Perrin comparing the different houses of Hogwarts [11]. It s an insightful article about personality attributes and gives more information than is available in the movies (I d read the books if I had time).

• [1] http://hezmatt.org/~mpalmer/blog/2013/05/14/a-modest-vocabulary-proposal.html
• [2] http://blog.ted.com/2013/05/23/how-to-print-out-your-own-house/
• [3] http://xkcd.com/1216/
• [4] http://www.fairphone.com/
• [5] http://theconversation.com/no-youre-not-entitled-to-your-opinion-9978
• [6] http://tinyurl.com/n2rvo94
• [7] http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/06/the-value-of-a-hacked-email-account/
• [8] http://tinyurl.com/nczyspd
• [9] http://tinyurl.com/kxu8dxp
• [10] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqcX3AM5oh8
• [11] http://tinyurl.com/o4sbt3l

Enca 1.15 has been just released. It does not bring any new features, just a little of cleanup and officially moves it's code to GitHub. If you don't know Enca, it is an Extremely Naive Charset Analyser. It detects character set and encoding of text files and can also convert them to other encodings using either a built-in converter or external libraries and tools like libiconv, librecode, or cstocs. Full list of changes for 1.15 release:

• Documentation improvement
• Development moved to GitHub
• Do not use deprecated autoconf macros

Still enca is in maintenance mode only and I have no intentions to write new features. However there is no limitation to other contributors :-). You can download from http://cihar.com/software/enca/.

Filed under: Enca English 2 comments Flattr this!

Yesterday, i said a sad goodbye to an old friend at ABC No Rio. Cookiepuss was a steadfast companion in my volunteer shifts at the No Rio computer center, a cranky yet gregarious presence. I met her soon after moving to New York, and have hung out with her nearly every week for years. She had the run of the building at ABC No Rio, and was friends with all sorts of people. She was known and loved by punks and fine artists, by experimental musicians and bike mechanics, computer geeks and librarians, travelers and homebodies, photographers, screenprinters, anarchists, community organizers, zinesters, activists, performers, and weirdos of all stripes. For years, she received postcards from all over the world, including several from people who had never even met her in person. In her younger days, she was a ferocious mouser, and even as she shrank with age and lost some of her teeth she remained excited about food. She was an inveterate complainer; a pants-shredder; a cat remarkably comfortable with dirt; a welcoming presence to newcomers and a friendly old curmudgeon who never seemed to really hold a grudge even when i had to do horrible things like help her trim her nails. After a long life, she died having said her goodbyes, and surrounded by people who loved her. I couldn't have asked for better, but I miss her fiercely.

---

• Mahout k-Means took 51 minutes on average per iteration (The raw numbers are 38:24, 62:29, 46:21, 56:20, 52:15, 45:11, 57:12, 44:58, 52:01, 50:26, so you can see there is a surpisingly high amount of variance there).
• ELKI k-Means on a single CPU core took 4 minutes 25 seconds per iteration, and 45 minutes total, including parsing the input data from an ascii file. Maybe I will try a parallel implementation next.

---

• ELKI is quite well optimized. The Java Hotspot VM does a good job at optimizing this code, and I have seen it to be on par with R's k-means, which is written in C. I'm not sure if Mahout has received a similar amount of optimization yet. (In fact, 15% of the Mahout runtime was garbage collection runtime - indicating that it creates too many objects.)
• ELKI can use the data in a uniform way, similar to a column store database. It's literally crunching the raw double[] arrays. Mahout on the other hand - as far as I can tell - is getting the data from a sequence file, which then is deserialized into a complex object. In addition to the actual data, it might be expecting sparse and dense vectors mixed etc.
• Size: this data set fits well into memory. Once this no longer holds, ELKI will no longer be an option. Then MapReduce/Hadoop/Mahout wins. In particular, such an implementation will by design not keep the whole data set in memory, but need to de-serialize it from disk again on each iteration. This is overhead, but saves memory.
• Design: MapReduce is designed for huge clusters, where you must expect nodes to crash during your computation. Well, chances are that my computer will survive 45 minutes, so I do not need this for this data size. However, when you really have large data, and need multiple hours on 1000 nodes to process it, then this becomes important to survive losing a node. The cost is that all interim results are written to the distributed filesystem. This extra I/O comes, again, at a cost.

---