Search Results: "ana"

27 January 2014

Kees Cook: -fstack-protector-strong

There will be a new option in gcc 4.9 named -fstack-protector-strong , which offers an improved version of -fstack-protector without going all the way to -fstack-protector-all . The stack protector feature itself adds a known canary to the stack during function preamble, and checks it when the function returns. If it changed, there was a stack overflow, and the program aborts. This is fine, but figuring out when to include it is the reason behind the various options. Since traditionally stack overflows happen with string-based manipulations, the default (-fstack-protector), only includes the canary code when a function defines an 8 (--param=ssp-buffer-size=N, N=8 by default) or more byte local character array. This means just a few functions get the checking, but they re probably the most likely to need it, so it s an okay balance. Various distributions ended up lowering their default --param=ssp-buffer-size option down to 4, since there were still cases of functions that should have been protected but the conservative gcc upstream default of 8 wasn t covering them. However, even with the increased function coverage, there are rare cases when a stack overflow happens on other kinds of stack variables. To handle this more paranoid concern, -fstack-protector-all was defined to add the canary to all functions. This results in substantial use of stack space for saving the canary on deep stack users, and measurable (though surprisingly still relatively low) performance hit due to all the saving/checking. For a long time, Chrome OS used this, since we re paranoid. :) In the interest of gaining back some of the lost performance and not hitting our Chrome OS build images with such a giant stack-protector hammer, Han Shen from the Chrome OS compiler team created the new option -fstack-protector-strong, which enables the canary in many more conditions: This meant we were covering all the more paranoid conditions that might lead to a stack overflow. Chrome OS has been using this option instead of -fstack-protector-all for about 10 months now. As a quick demonstration of the options, you can see this example program under various conditions. It tries to show off an example of shoving serialized data into a non-character variable, like might happen in some network address manipulations or streaming data parsing. Since I m using memcpy here for clarity, the builds will need to turn off FORTIFY_SOURCE, which would also notice the overflow.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
struct no_chars  
    unsigned int len;
    unsigned int data;
 ;
int main(int argc, char * argv[])
 
    struct no_chars info =    ;
    if (argc < 3)  
        fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s LENGTH DATA...\n", argv[0]);
        return 1;
     
    info.len = atoi(argv[1]);
    memcpy(&info.data, argv[2], info.len);
    return 0;
 
Built with everything disabled, this faults trying to return to an invalid VMA: Built with FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, we see the expected catch of the overflow in memcpy: So, we ll leave FORTIFY_SOURCE disabled for our comparisons. With pre-4.9 gcc, we can see that -fstack-protector does not get triggered to protect this function: However, using -fstack-protector-all does trigger the protection, as expected: And finally, using the gcc snapshot of 4.9, here is -fstack-protector-strong doing its job: For Linux 3.14, I ve added support for -fstack-protector-strong via the new CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG option. The old CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR will be available as CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_REGULAR. When comparing the results on builds via size and objdump -d analysis, here s what I found with gcc 4.9: A normal x86_64 defconfig build, without stack protector had a kernel text size of 11430641 bytes with 36110 function bodies. Adding CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_REGULAR increased the kernel text size to 11468490 (a +0.33% change), with 1015 of 36110 functions stack-protected (2.81%). Using CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG increased the kernel text size to 11692790 (+2.24%), with 7401 of 36110 functions stack-protected (20.5%). And 20% is a far-cry from 100% if support for -fstack-protector-all was added back to the kernel. The next bit of work will be figuring out the best way to detect the version of gcc in use when doing Debian package builds, and using -fstack-protector-strong instead of -fstack-protector. For Ubuntu, it s much simpler because it ll just be the compiler default.

2014, Kees Cook. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
Creative Commons License

26 January 2014

Niels Thykier: Release architecture meeting 2014-01-26

Today, we held an one-hour IRC-meeting to debate the status of the current architectures in sid. During that one hour, we brought up all 13 architectures. We made a decision on 9 of the architectures. The remaining 4 will be revisited within 2 months. As for the actual results, we will announce these on debian-devel-announce with our next bits mail. I suspect the announcement to happen within a couple of days. I am quite pleased that we managed to keep the meeting to one hour. Especially considering that it was planned less than a week ago. One of the things, that I believe helped us, was that we had summarised the status for each architecture prior to the meeting. In my view, the summary allowed us to finish at least half of the architectures within their allocated 5 minutes. In fact, we had 20 minutes for the last 2 architectures partly because amd64 + i386 combined took about a minute. A second thing that helped us stay on time was cutting debates short. Obviously, with less than 5 minutes per architecture, there was little time for debate and, I admit, that was by design. This meant that we had to defer 4 decisions for later. We are currently waiting for information, which we hope to have soon. More on that in the announcement later.
I would like to thank the attendees for contributing to a productive and short meeting. It was a pleasure and I hope we can repeat the success next time. :)

Neil Williams: Home server rack

The uses of this particular rack I ll cover in future entries this is about how I made the rack itself, with help from friends (Steve McIntyre & Andy Simpkins). A common theme is making allowances for using dev kit boards ready-to-rack ARM servers are not here yet. My aim was to have 4, possibly 6 ARM dev kit boards running services from home, so there was no need for a standard 42U rack, a 9U rack is enough. Hence:
Wall Mounted 9U 450mm deep 19 inch rack enclosure glass door To run various other services around the house (firewall, file server etc.), a microserver was also necessary:
HP 704941-421 ProLiant Micro Server (AMD Turion II Neo N54L 2.2GHz, 2GB RAM, 250GB HDD, 2 Core, 7th Generation) I chose to mount that on a bookcase beneath the wall mounted rack as it kept all the cables at the bottom of the rack itself. The microserver needed a second gigabit network card fitted to cope with being a firewall as well, if you do the same, ensure you find a suitable card with a low profile bracket. Some are described as being low profile but do not package the low profile bracket, only a low profile card and a full height bracket.
Intel EXPI9301CTBLK PRO1000 Network Card note the low profile bracket in the pack. The first of the dev kit requirements is the lack of boards which can be racked, so shelves are going to be needed, leading on to something to stop the boards wandering across the shelf when the cables are adjusted velcro pads in my case. Second requirement is that dev kit boards are notorious for not rebooting cleanly. Nothing to do with the image being run, the board just doesn t cut power or doesn t come back after cutting power. Sometimes this is down to early revisions of the board, sometimes the board pulls enough power through the USB serial converter to remain alive, whatever the cause, it won t reboot without user involvement. So a PDU becomes necessary remotely controllable. New units tend to be expensive and/or only suitable for larger racks, I managed to find an older 8 port APC unit, something like: (Don t be surprised if that becomes a dead link search for APC Smart Slot Master Switch Power Distribution Unit). Talking of power, I m looking to use SATA drives with these boards and the boards themselves come with a variety of wall wart plugs or USB cables, so a number of IEC sockets are needed not the usual plugs:
Power cable IEC C14 plug 13A socket 25 cm or, for devices which genuinely need 2A to boot (use the 1A for attached SATA or leave empty):

Black Universal 3.1A 15W 5V Dual USB Rapid Mains Charger Plug Check the power output rating of the USB plugs used to connect to the mains as well many are 1A or less. Keep the right plug for the right board.
Power is going to also be a problem if, like me, you want to run SATA drives off boards which support SATA. The lack of a standard case means that ATX power is awkward, so check out some cheap SATA enclosures to get a SATA connector with USB power. I am using these enclosures (prices seem to have risen since I obtained them):

Startech 2.5 inch eSATA USB External Hard Drive Enclosure for SATA HDD Along with these:
eSATA to SATA Serial External Shielded Cable 1m because the iMx53 boards have SATA connectors but the enclosure exports eSATA. Whilst this might seem awkward, the merit of having both eSATA and simple USB power on one enclosure is not to be under-estimated. (Avoid the stiffer black cables space will get tight inside the rack.) Naturally, a 2.5 inch SATA drive is going to be needed for each enclosure, I m using HDD but SSD is also an option. Also, consider simple 2 or 3 way fused adaptors so that the board and the SATA drive can be powered from a single PDU port, this makes rebooting much simpler if the board needs a power supply with integrated plug instead of over USB. Now to the networking (2 x 8 port was cheaper than 1 x 16):
Netgear GS108 8-port Gigabit Ethernet Unmanaged Switch Don t forget the cat5 cables too you ll want lots of short cables, 1m or shorter inside the rack and a few longer ones going to the microserver and wall socket. I used 8x1m. Naturally, on the floor below your rack you are going to put a UPS, so the PDU power then needs to be converted to draw from the UPS via IEC plugs instead of standard mains. I decided to use a 6 gang extension 1m cable with an IEC plug it was the only bit of wiring I had to do and even those are available ready-made if you want to do it that way. Depending on the board, you may need your own serial to USB converters, you ll certainly need some powered USB hubs. I m using a wall mounted 9U rack, so I also needed a masonry drill and 4 heavy duty masonry M8 bolts. The rack comes with a mounting plate which needs to be bolted to the wall but nothing else is included. This step is much easier with someone else to take the weight of the rack as it is guided into the brackets on the mounting plate the bracket may need a little persuasion to allow for the bolt heads to not get in the way during mounting. Once mounted, the holes in the back of the rack allow for plenty of room, it s just getting to that point. The rack has side panels which latch out easily, providing easy maintenance. The glass door can be easily reversed to open from the opposite side. However, the key in the glass door is largely useless. The expectation is that the units in the rack are attached at the front but the dev boards on shelves are not going to be protected by a key in the front door. The key therefore ends up being little more than a handle for the glass door. OK. If you ve got this far, it s a case of putting things together:
Economy Cage Nut Tool 19 inch racking for cagenut extraction Yes, you really do want one. Fine, do without the premium one, but the economy one will save you a lot of (physical) pain. At this stage, it becomes clear that the normal 19 inch server rack shelves don t leave a lot of room at the back of the rack for the cables and there are a lot of cables. Each board has power, USB serial connection and network. The SATA has power too. The PDU has a power lead and you ll need network switches too. The network switches need power and an uplink cable. I positioned the supports in the rack as far forward as possible and attached the shelves to give enough room for the PDU on the base of the rack, the network switches resting on top and the extension bar (with the heavier, stiffer cables) at the back. (I need to bring my shelves another 1 or 2 positions further forward as there is barely enough room for one cable between the shelf and the back of the rack and that makes moving boards around harder than it needs to be.) The PDU defaults to enabling all ports at startup, so connect to it over telnet and turn off the ports before connecting things and sorting out the network interface to what the rest of the lab needs. (I m using a 10. range and the PDU was originally set to use 192.168.1.) That s about it as far as the hardware setup is concerned. Just time to label up each board, note down which PDU port does which device, which serial to USB converter is on which device on the microserver and check the power my initial problem with one board was traced to the inability of the board to power SATA off the on-board USB port even when using the provided 2A power supply. That meant adding a standard mains adaptor to feed both the SATA power and the board power off the one PDU port there is little point powering off the board but not the SATA, or vice versa. I haven t totalled up the expenditure but the biggest expenses were the microserver and the wall mounted rack but don t underestimate how much it will cost to buy 6 IEC plugs, various USB serial converters and how much you may spend on peripheral items. There is quite a lot of room on the 2 shelves for more boards, what will limit the deployment in this rack is space for the cables, especially power. The shorter the power cables, the easier it will be to maintain the devices in the rack. It might be worth looking at a 12U rack, if only to give plenty of space for cables. Once I ve got the software working, I ll describe what this rack will be doing it s got something to do with Debian, ARM, Linux and tests but you ve probably already guessed that much

Daniel Pocock: Beyond init systems: other opportunities for simplification

One thing that everybody agrees on in the debate about Debian's init system replacement is that the manifests used by most of the new schemes are far more concise than traditional init scripts. Simplification need not stop there however. Another opportunity for simplification exists in the creation of users at package installation. Every packaging tool has a different approach and all of them involve multiple lines of boilerplate script code duplicated between hundreds of packages that all need exactly the same thing. What is worse, embedding this logic into the postinst scripts on Debian or %post logic of an RPM makes it far more awkard for a system administrator to audit the user account requirements of packages (when installing many of them in a hurry) or to customise the logic for a whole site without rebuilding the whole packages. Potential improvement How to improve this? Well, packages (on any distribution) could be invited to declare the user and group accounts they depend on. A central configuration parameter in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg or /etc/rpm would then control how the package manager behaves, with several possible options:
  • Create users/groups on demand without prompting
  • Abort installation/configuration of any package if the pre-requisite users do not exist on the system
  • Prompt: at the beginning of any package install, ask the administrator to create the users himself before proceeding, with an option to abort and potentially displaying some convenient LDIF fragments and other samples that the administrator can cut and paste.
Running a command like apt-get --simulate would give a system administrator an immediate view of all users/groups required by the packages they propose to install.

25 January 2014

Ben Hutchings: Looking back on my time at Solarflare, part 1

Friday was my last day at Solarflare Communications, which I joined in 2006 (originally as Level 5 Networks). When I started, Level 5 Networks (L5N) had a 2-port gigabit Ethernet controller called EF1 and a user-level network stack called EtherFabric which ran on Linux. It had nearly completed the Falcon project to develop a 10-gigabit controller (also supporing a 2-port gigabit mode) and was porting EtherFabric to Windows. Later that year, however, L5N merged with Solarflare Communications (SF), which was developing a 10GBASE-T PHY (for 10-gigabit Ethernet over twisted-pair cables). The investors and management saw the opportunity to create an integrated 10GBASE-T LAN-on-motherboard chip that would be attractive to OEMs and so had the potential for mass sales. EtherFabric was put on the back-burner, but regular net drivers for Linux, Windows and other operating systems became more important. In a change from my previous jobs, my initial role at L5N was to maintain and extend the in-house test automation software, Runbench, written in Python. I worked with Dickon Reed who had written most of Runbench up to then. One of my first major tasks was to extend it to cover DUTs running Windows. Aside from changing Runbench itself, I wrote a simple SSH server to be installed on DUTs, using the Twisted.Python framework. (Cygwin's port of OpenSSH wasn't suitable for running a lot of native Windows commands.) I rewrote the test-installation script for the Windows driver itself, converting it to Python (with a C extension to get around the WOW64 nonsense). As Windows does not allow loading a driver just once (like insmod in Linux), except by using the kernel debugger, I added a time check in the driver so the test-installation script can make it fail early when reloaded after a reboot, so that a crasher bug in the probe path would usually be recoverable. In 2007 I persuaded management in Cambridge to loan several older servers to DebConf. I took them there and back by car, and they were used to convert video for live streams and recordings. (This was repeated in 2009.) I was also asked to work on other small development tasks, including some cleanup on the Linux net driver (sfc). In mid-2007, when SF decided it was time to get sfc upstream (in-tree), I joined Steve Hodgson and Robert Stonehouse in working on that. Out-of-tree (separately distributed) drivers for Linux normally need a large number of preprocessor conditions for compatibility with Linux's kernel module API across a range of supported versions. They may also implement some features with a driver-specific interface that should be replaced with a standard interface (possibly including the work to define that standard). They may not comply with the kernel coding style or unwritten conventions for kernel code. All of these problems were present and had to be dealt with. As part of this work, I extended unifdef so that it could be used to remove all of the backward-compatibility and not-for-upstream code without introducing extra blank lines. I could then export the out-of-tree driver from CVS(!) into a kernel source tree automatically and turn it into a patch or patch series that would stand a chance of being acceptable upstream. Our first few attempts got little response, but eventually we newbies got the message that the driver was simply too big for a single submission and that putting patches on a web site because they're too big for the list was not a solution. In the next week, I removed about half of the code (on a git branch), resulting in a relatively lean driver that could be sent to the netdev list. And finally the 9th (I think) submission was accepted. Following this, I continued to work on sfc but was also brought into the Siena project. Siena (SFL9021) was the LAN-on-motherboard chip that had been planned following the merger. It combined a dual-port controller based on Falcon with a 10GBASE-T PHY and a management controller (MC) to support Lights-Out Management (LOM). (Since 10GBASE-T has not taken off, it is now mostly sold as the SFC9020 variant in which the PHY is disabled.) I worked on some of the test framework and test cases for validating the controller design in software simulation and FPGA. In the course of this I learned to read and (somewhat) understand the chip design written in Verilog, but only made a single trivial fix to it. In August 2009, the first Siena ASICs came back from the fab. There were a few ASIC-specific bugs but all of them were quickly worked around in firmware, so it would soon be ready for production. But there was much work still to be done on the driver and firmware. The firmware had until then been running in a smaller block of RAM with no peripherals to manage, while sfc had earlier been modified just enough to configure a sim or FPGA for running a userland test application. sfc now had many special cases scattered around it, and would tell the MC firmware to peek and poke registers that were no longer directly accessible from the host. The software and firmware developers had agreed that, in order to support LOM, the MC would be responsible for managing the ports and all peripherals and drivers would send higher-level requests to the MC. As a bonus, this removed the need for the driver to know the details of each new board, so that it would not be necessary to backport sfc into distribution kernels very often. Over the next few months, the firmware team did an excellent job of defining and implementing those operations, including writing the driver-side functions to invoke them. Meanwhile, Steve and I concentrated on refactoring sfc so most of the Falcon/Siena differences could be abstracted through a few structures with function pointers. The refactoring and new code for Siena were completed and submitted upstream in several large patch series in October and November. In fact, there were so many patches that Solarflare appeared in LWN's table of who wrote Linux 2.6.33 (as did I, thanks also to another patch series adding firmware metadata to many drivers). Sadly we had missed Linux 2.6.32 which was a longterm stable branch and used in many distributions, but I was able to get this version backported into all the major distributions over the next year. (To be continued.)

Russell Coker: Links January 2014

Fast Coexist has an interesting article about the art that Simon Beck creates by walking in snow [1]. If you are an artist you can create art in any way, even by walking in patterns in the snow. Russ Altman gave an interesting TED talk about using DNA testing before prescribing drugs [2]. I was surprised by the amount of variation in effects of codeine based on genetics, presumably many other drugs have a similar range. Helen Epstein wrote an interesting article about Dr. Sara Josephine Baker who revolutionised child care and saved the lives of a huge number of children [3]. Her tenacity is inspiring. Also it s interesting to note that the US Republican party was awful even before the Southern Strategy . The part about some doctors opposing child care because it s the will of God for children to die and keep them in employment is chilling. Jonathan Weiler wrote an insightful article about the problems with American journalism in defending the government [4]. He criticises the media for paying more attention to policing decorum than to content. Tobias Buckell wrote an interesting post about the so-called socialised health-care in the US [5]. He suggests that Ronald Reagan socialised health-care by preventing hospitals from dumping dying people on the street. I guess if doing nothing for people until they have a medical emergency counts as socialised health-care then the US has it. Kelvin Thomson MP made some insightful comments about climate change, the recent heat-wave in Australia, and renewable energy [6]. Iwan Baan gave an interesting TED talk about ways that people have built cheap homes in unexpected places [7], lots of good pictures. Racialicious has an interesting article by Arturo R. Garc a about research into the effects of concussion and the way the NFL in the US tried to prevent Dr. Bennet Omalu publicising the results of his research [8]. Stani (Jan Schmidt) wrote an interesting post about how they won a competition to design a commemerative Dutch 5 Euro coin [9]. The coin design is really good (a candidate for the geekiest coin ever), I want one! Seriously if anyone knows how to get one at a reasonable price (IE close to face value for circulated or not unreasonably expensive for uncirculated) then please let me know. When writing about Edward Snowden, Nathan says Imagine how great a country would be if if it were governed entirely by people who Dick Cheney would call Traitor [10]. That s so right, that might make the US a country I d be prepared to live in. Andrew Solomon gave an interesting TED talk Love No Matter What about raising different children [11]. Aditi Shankardass gave an interesting TED talk about using an ECG to analyse people diagnosed wit severe Autism and other developmental disorders [12]. Apparently some severe cases of Autism have a root cause that can be treated with anti-seizure medication. George Monbiot wrote an insightful article about the way that Bono and Bob Geldoff promote G8 government intervention in Africa and steal air-time that might be given to allow Africans to represent themselves in public debates [13]. Daniel Pocock wrote an informative article about racism in Australian politics and how it is bad for job-seekers and the economy (in addition to being horribly wrong) [14]. Aeon Magazine has an interesting article by Anne Buchanan about the difference between scientists and farmers [15]. She has some interesting points about the way that the lack of general knowledge impacts research, but misses the point that in most fields of study there is a huge problem of people not knowing about recent developments in their own field. I don t think it s a pipe dream to be well educated in humanities and science, but I guess that depends on the definition of well educated . Brian Cox gave an interesting TED talk titled Why We Need the Explorers about the benefits of scientific research [16]. Yupu Zhang, Abhishek Rajimwale, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, and Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau from the University of Wisconsin-Madison wrote an interesting paper about ZFS corruption in the face of disk and memory errors [17]. One thing to note is that turning off atime can reduce the probability of a memory error leading to corrupt data being written to disk, run zfs set atime=off tank to fix this. The comedian Solomon Georgio celebrated Martin Luther King day by tweeting I love you to racists [18]. It s an interesting approach and appears to have worked well.

24 January 2014

Erich Schubert: Definition of Data Science

Everything is "big data" now, and everything is "data science". Because these terms lack a proper, falsifiable definition.
A number of attempts to define them exist, but they usually only consist of a number of "nice to haves" strung together. For Big Data, it's the 3+ V's, and for Data Science, this diagram on Wikipedia is a typical example.
This is not surprising: effectively these term are all marketing, not scientific attempts at definiting a research domain.
Actually, my favorite definition is this, except that it should maybe read pink pony in the middle, instead of unicorn.
Data science has been called "the sexiest job" so often, this has recently led to an integer overflow.
The problem with these definitions is that they are open-ended. They name some examples (like "volume") but they essentially leave it open to call anything "big data" or "data science" that you would like to. This is, of course, a marketers dream buzzword. There is nothing saying that "picking my nose" is not big data science.

If we ever want to get to a usable definition and get rid of all the hype, we should consider a more precise definition; even when this means making it more exclusive (funnily enough, some people already called above open-ended definitions "elitist" ...).
Big data:
  • Must involve distributed computation on multiple servers
  • Must intermix computation and data management
  • Must advance over the state-of-the-art of relational databases, data warehousing and cloud computing in 2005
  • Must enable results that were unavailable with earlier approaches, or that would take substantially longer (runtime or latency)
  • Must be disruptively more data-driven
Data science:
  • Must incorporate domain knowledge (e.g. business, geology, etc.).
  • Must take computational aspects into account (scalability etc.).
  • Must involve scientific techniques such as hypothesis testing and result validation.
  • Results must be falsifiable.
  • Should involve more mathematics and statistics than earlier approaches.
  • Should involve more data management than earlier approaches (indexing, sketching&hashing etc.).
  • Should involve machine learning, AI or knowledge discovery algorithms.
  • Should involve visualization and rapid prototyping for software development.
  • Must satisfy at least one of these shoulds in a disruptive level.
But this is all far from a proper definition. Partially because these fields are so much in flux; but largely because they're just too ill-defined.
There is a lot of overlap, that we should try to flesh out. For example, data science is not just statistics. Because it is much more concerned with how data is organized and how the computations can be made efficiently. Yet often, statistics is much better at integrating domain knowledge. People coming from computation, on the other hand, usually care too little about the domain knowledge and falsifiability of their results - they're happy if they can compute anything.
Last but not least, nobody will be in favor of such a rigid definition and requirements. Because most likely, you will have to strip that "data scientist" label off your business card - and why bite the hand that feeds? Most of what I do certainly would not qualify as data science or big data anymore with an "elitist" definition. While this doesn't lessen my scientific results, it makes them less marketable.
Essentially, this is like a global "gentlemans agreement". Buzz these words while they last, then move on to the next similar "trending topic".

Maybe we should just leave these terms to the marketing folks, and let them bubble them till it bursts. Instead, we should just stick to the established and better defined terms...
Thank you.
Of course, sometimes you will have to play Buzzword Bingo. Nobody is going to stop you. But I will understand that you are doing "playing buzzword bingo", unless you get more precise.
Once you then have results that are so massively better, and really disrupted science, then you can still call it "data science" later on.
You have been seeing, I've been picking on the word "disruptive" a lot. As long as you are doing "business as usual", and focusing on off-the-shelf solution, it will not be disruptive. And it then won't be big data science, or a big data approach that yields major gains. It will be just "business as usual" with different labels, and return results as usual.
Let's face it. We don't just want big data or data science. What everybody is looking for is disruptive results, which will require a radical approach, not a slight modification involving slightly more computers of what you have been doing all along.

23 January 2014

John Goerzen: Why and how to run ZFS on Linux

I m writing a bit about ZFS these days, and I thought I d write a bit about why I am using it, why it might or might not be interesting for you, and what you might do about it. ZFS Features and Background ZFS is not just a filesystem in the traditional sense, though you can use it that way. It is an integrated storage stack, which can completely replace the need for LVM, md-raid, and even hardware RAID controllers. This permits quite a bit of flexibility and optimization not present when building a stack involving those components. For instance, if a drive in a RAID fails, it needs only rebuild the parts that have actual data stored on them. Let s look at some of the features of ZFS: Although it is often considered a server filesystem, ZFS has been used in plenty of other situations for some time now, with ports to FreeBSD, Linux, and MacOS. I find it particularly useful: The added level of security in having cheap snapshots available is almost worth it by itself. ZFS drawbacks Compared to other Linux filesystems, there are a few drawbacks of ZFS: Converting to ZFS I have written up an extensive HOWTO on converting an existing system to use ZFS. It covers workarounds for all the boot-time bugs I have encountered as well as documenting all steps needed to make it happen. It works quite well. Additional Hints If setting up zvols to be used by VirtualBox or some such system, you might be interested in managing zvol ownership and permissions with udev.

22 January 2014

Clint Adams: December 2013 debian-keyring analysis

Total keys: 996
Key versions:
    996 4
Primary key pubkey algorithms:
    623 "DSA"
    373 "RSA"
Primary key pubkey sizes:
    624 1024
     27 2048
      2 3072
    340 4096
      2 8192
      1 10240
Total number of UIDs + UAts: 4394
Hash algorithm used for most recent self-sig:
      1 "RIPEMD160"
   3188 "SHA1"
   1041 "SHA256"
      1 "SHA384"
    163 "SHA512"
Judgment on preferred hash algorithms:
   1776 null
   2618 "weak hash with higher preference"
Judgment on expiration times:
     53 "expiration passed"
    111 "expiration too far in future"
   3887 "no expiration set"
    343 null
This was generated with debian-keyring 2013.12.13, hopenpgp-tools 0.4-1, jshon 20131010-3, and the following inefficient script:
#!/bin/zsh
infile=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
tempfile=$(mktemp)
trap 'rm $ tempfile ' EXIT
hokey lint --output-format JSON <$ infile  >$ tempfile 
print -n "Total keys: "
jshon -a -e keyFingerprint <$ tempfile    wc -l
print "Key versions: "
jshon -a -e keyVer -e val <$ tempfile    sort   uniq -c
print "Primary key pubkey algorithms: "
jshon -a -e keyAlgorithmAndSize -e pubkeyalgo -e val <$ tempfile    sort   uniq -c
print "Primary key pubkey sizes: "
jshon -a -e keyAlgorithmAndSize -e pubkeysize -e val <$ tempfile    sort -n   uniq -c
print -n "Total number of UIDs + UAts: "
jshon -a -e keyUIDsAndUAts -k <$ tempfile    wc -l
print "Hash algorithm used for most recent self-sig: "
jshon -a -e keyUIDsAndUAts -a -e uidSelfSigHashAlgorithms -a -e val <$ tempfile    sort   uniq -c
print "Judgment on preferred hash algorithms: "
jshon -a -e keyUIDsAndUAts -a -e uidPreferredHashAlgorithms -a -e explanation <$ tempfile    sort   uniq -c
print "Judgment on expiration times: "
jshon -a -e keyUIDsAndUAts -a -e uidKeyExpirationTimes -a -e explanation <$ tempfile    sort   uniq -c
This represents incorrect handling of revoked UIDs and user attributes, and possibly unknown bugs. "Judgments" are based on this document and are not generalized per key.

Erich Schubert: The init wars

The init wars have recently caught a lot of media attention (e.g. heise, prolinux, phoronix). However, one detail that is often overlooked: Debian is debating over the default, while all of them are already supported to a large extend, actually. Most likely, at least two of them will be made mandatory to support IMHO.
The discussion seems to be quite heated, with lots of people trying to evangelize for their preferred system. This actually only highlights that we need to support more than one, as Debian has always been about choice. This may mean some extra work for the debian-installer developers, because choosing the init system at install time (instead of switching later) will be much easier. More often than not, when switching from one init system to another you will have to perform a hard reset.
If you want to learn about the options, please go to the formal discussion page, which does a good job at presenting the positions in a neutral way.
Here is my subjective view of the init systems:
  • SysV init is the current default, and thus deserves to be mentioned first. It is slow, because it is based on a huge series of shell scripts. It can often be fragile, but at the same time it is very transparent. For a UNIX system administrator, SysV init is probably the preferred choice. You only reboot your servers every year anyway.
  • upstart seems to be a typical Canonical project. It solves a great deal of problems, but apparently isn't good enough at it for everybody, and they fail at including anyone in their efforts. Other examples of these fails include Unity and Mir, where they also announced the project as-is, instead of trying to get other supporters on board early (AFAICT). The key problem to widespread upstart acceptance seems to be the Canonical Contributor License Agreement that many would-be contributors are unwilling to accept. The only alternative would be to fork upstart completely, to make it independent of Canonical. (Note that upstart nevertheless is GPL, which is why it can be used by Debian just fine. The CLA only makes getting patches and enhancements included in the official version hard.)
  • systemd is the rising star in the init world. It probably has the best set of features, and it has started to incorporate/replace a number of existing projects such as ConsoleKit. I.e. it not only manages services, but also user sessions. It can be loosely tied to the GNOME project which has started to rely on it more and more (much to the unhappyness of Canonical, who used to be a key player for GNOME; note that officially, GNOME chose to not depend on systemd, yet I see this as the only reliable combination to get a complete GNOME system running, and since "systemd can eventually replace gnome-session" I foresee this tie to become closer). As the main drawback, systemd as is will (apparently) only work with the Linux kernel, whereas Debian has to also support kFreeBSD, NetBSD, Hurd and the OpenSolaris kernels (some aren't officially supported by Debian, but by separate projects).
So my take: I believe the only reasonable default is systemd. It has the most active development community and widest set of features. But as it cannot support all architectures, we need mandatory support for an alternative init system, probably SysV. Getting both working reliably will be a pain, in particular since more and more projects (e.g. GNOME) tie themselves closely to systemd, and would then become Linux-only or require major patches.
I have tried only systemd on a number of machines, and unfortunately I cannot report it as "prime time ready" yet. You do have the occasional upgrade problems and incompatibilities, as it is quite invasive. From screensavers activating during movies to double suspends, to being unable to shutdown my system when logged in (systemd would treat the login manager as separate session, and not being the sole user it would not allow me to shut down), I have seen quite a lot of annoyances happen. This is an obvious consequence of the active development on systemd. This means that we should make the decision early, because we will need a lot of time to resolve all these bugs for the release.
There are more disruptions coming on the way. Nobody seems to have talked about kDBUS yet, the integration of an IPC mechanism like DBUS into the Linux kernel. It IMHO has a good chance of making it into the Linux kernel rather soon, and I wouldn't be surprised if it became mandatory for systemd soon after. Which then implies that only a recent kernel (say, mid-2014) version might be fully supported by systemd soon.
I would also like to see less GNOME influence in systemd. I have pretty much given up on the GNOME community, which is moving into a UI direction that I hate: they seem to only care about tablet and mobile phones for dumb users, and slowly turn GNOME into an android UI; selling black background as major UI improvements. I feel that the key GNOME development community does not care about developers and desktop users like me anymore (but dream of being the next Android), and therefore I have abandoned GNOME and switched to XFCE.
I don't give upstart much of a chance. Of course there are some Debian developers already involved in its development (employed by Canonical), so this will cause some frustration. But so far, upstart is largely an Ubuntu-only solution. And just like Mir, I don't see much future in it; instead I foresee Ubuntu going systemd within a few years, because it will want to get all the latest GNOME features. Ubuntu relies on GNOME, and apparently GNOME already has chosen systemd over upstart (even though this is "officially" denied).
Sticking with SysV is obviously the easiest choice, but it does not make a lot of sense to me technically. It's okay for servers, but more and more desktop applications will start to rely on systemd. For legacy reasons, I would however like to retain good SysV support for at least 5-10 more years.

But what is the real problem? After all, this is a long overdue decision.
  • There is too much advocacy and evangelism, from either side. The CTTE isn't really left alone to do a technical decision, but instead the main factors have become of political nature, unfortunately. You have all kinds of companies (such as Spotify) weigh in on the debate, too.
  • The tone has become quite aggressive and emotional, unfortunately. I can already foresee some comments on this blog post "you are a liar, because GNOME is now spelled Gnome!!1!".
  • Media attention. This upcoming decision has been picked up by various Linux media already, increasing the pressure on everybody.
  • Last but not least, the impact will be major. Debian is one of the largest distributions, last but not least used by Ubuntu and Steam, amongst others. Debian preferring one over the other will be a slap in somebodys face, unfortunately.
So how to solve it? Let the CTTE do their discussions, and stop flooding them with mails trying to influence them. There has been so much influencing going on, it may even backfire. I'm confident they will find a reasonable decision, or they'll decide to poll all the DDs. If you want to influence the outcome provide patches to anything that doesn't yet fully support your init system of choice! I'm sure there are hundreds of packages which do neither have upstart nor systemd support yet (as is, I currently have 27 init.d scripts launched by systemd, for example). IMHO, nothing is more convincing than have things just work, and of course, contributing code. We are in open source development, and the one thing that gets you sympathy in the community is to contribute code to someone elses project. For example, contribute full integrated power-management support into XFCE, if you include power management functionality.
As is, I have apparently 7 packages installed with upstart support, and 25 with systemd support. So either, everybody is crazy about systemd, or they have the better record of getting their scripts accepted upstream. (Note that this straw poll is biased - with systemd, the benefits of not using "legacy" init.d script may just be larger).

Gunnar Wolf: Finally: A student once again

Formally, today is my first day as a student on a formal, scholarized institution Basically for the first time in almost twenty years! Yes, those that know me know that I aspire to live the life of academia. I have worked at public universities for almost all of my adult life (between 1997 and 1999 I worked at a local ISP and at a private school), and have had a minor academic position ( T cnico Acad mico ) for almost ten years. And not having a proper degree limited me from pursuing anything further. Then, in early 2010 I presented the written exam. By late 2010, the corresponding oral exam. That allowed me to get my formal diploma in December 2010. By the end of 2011, I requested to be a teacher in the Engineering Faculty of UNAM, and started teaching Operating Systems a year ago, in January 2012. So, a good advance in the last few years... But I know that if I just sit here, I won't be able to advance my position towards really entering the Sacred Halls of Academia. And there are some rituals I have to comply with. One of those rituals is... Devoting some long time to studying under the formal structures. Ok, so I'm finally a postgraduate student I have enrolled in Especialidad en Seguridad Inform tica y Tecnolog as de la Informaci n, a short (one year) postgraduate program in ESIME Culhuac n, of Instituto Polit cnico Nacional (a small campus of Mexico's second-largest university). Some friends have asked me, why am I starting with a Specialization and not a Masters degree. Some simple reasons: Just as when I went to Tijuana in 2010 to do my written exam, once I got and started with the paperwork, I didn't want to let it go If I postpone it, I will probably lose the push to do it by May-July, when the Masters admission process starts. Also, this specialization can be linked with the masters degree on the same topic given at the same campus. This program is one year long, and the masters two But having them both takes 2.5 years. So, not such a bad deal after all. And finally, because, after such a long time without being scholarized, I fear not having an easy time getting to grips with the discipline. I can commit to overworking myself for a year If it's too much for me, I'll just stay with that degree and give up. I expect to like it and continue... But it's also a safe bet :-) Now, there has to be a downside to picking up this path: Of course, my free time will be harshly reduced. I have reduced my Debian involvement in the last year, as I devoted a huge chunk of my time to teaching and book-writing... This year... We shall see what happens. I can for now only confirm what I have said publicly but inside our team only: I have requested to my peers and to our DPL to step down as a DebConf chair. I love organizing DebConf, but I don't want to be formally committed to a position I just cannot fulfill as I did when I started with it. As for package maintenance, by far most of my packges are team maintained, and those that are not are relatively easy to keep track of. And of course, I'll keep an eye on my keyring-maint duties as well Will even try to link that work with what I do at school! Anyway, lets see what comes now!

21 January 2014

John Goerzen: Married!

One week before the wedding, to Laura: Mono won t just clear up right away. One week before the wedding, to me: That s going to need stitches. Yes, not long before the wedding, Laura had come down with mononucleosis and I had cut into my finger with a very sharp knife while cutting bread requiring a trip to the emergency room to get stitches. Two days before we got married, instead of moving furniture, I was getting stitches out of my finger. It wasn t the kind of week we had planned. But it was the happiest, most amazing occasion I could have ever imagined. As I wrote last month, I am richly blessed indeed. Our wedding was three days after Christmas. The church was still decorated for Christmas, with the tree in on corner, glittering stars suspended in mid-air on cables from the walls, wreaths and candles in the windows, and it was a joy-filled day. Before the ceremony, we took pictures the only part of the day Jacob and Oliver weren t thrilled with. Nevertheless, we got some fun ones. Laura and I seem to know quite a few pastors between us and not just because Laura is a pastor. My brother officiated with the wedding vows, his wife with scripture and a prayer of blessing, and the church s pastor gave the message. Laura and I wrote in our wedding program, Music has long been a thread running through both our lives. We have enjoyed singing together, playing piano and pennywhistle duets, attending concerts, and even exploring old hymnals. Music is also one of the best ways to have a conversation even a conversation with God. We wrote a page in the program about each of the hymns that were a part of the wedding, and why we picked them. The combined church choirs of my home church and Laura s church sang John Rutter s beautiful arrangement of For the Beauty of the Earth (click here to listen to a different choir). Hearing For the beauty of each hour , For the joy of human love , and Lord of all, to thee we raise this our joyful hymn of praise was perfect for the day. It was with such great happiness that we walked out of the sanctuary, a married couple, to the sound of the congregation singing Joy to the World! Jacob and Oliver were so very excited on our wedding day. They happily explored the church while waiting for things to happen. We had them help us light our unity candle, and they were pleased with that. Jacob loved his suit, which made him look just like me. And they were, of course, delighted with the cake and in the middle of it all. For our honeymoon, we managed to get two weeks of vacation, and spent about half of it at home. We had looked at various options for retreats in the country, but eventually concluded that our house is a retreat in the country, so might as well enjoy it at home. We also went to the Palo Duro Canyon area near Amarillo in the Texas panhandle, staying in a small B&B in Canyon, TX. Palo Duro is the second-largest canyon in North America, and quite colorful year-round. What a beautiful place to go for our honeymoon! By the time we got there, Laura was getting past mono, and we went for hikes in the canyon on two different days hiking a total of 10 miles, including a hike up the side of the canyon. After we got back home, on the last weekday of our honeymoon, we went back to the Flint Hills of Kansas, to some of the same places we had spent our third date. We climbed the windy staircase at the Chase County Courthouse, the oldest courthouse still in use in Kansas. And peered out its famous oval window. We found the last remnant of the old ghost town of Elk, ate at the same restaurant we had that day. It brought back wonderful memories, and it was a good day in itself. Because even though it was a gold, drizzly, overcast day in January, this time, we were married. And this year, Thanksgiving is all year.

20 January 2014

Thorsten Glaser: FOSDEM preparations done.

I ve produced several pin-on buttons to take with me to FOSDEM for giving away (as long as there are any left): Several pin-on buttons I made First row (nice projects), from left to right: MidnightBSD; Glenda, the Plan 9 bunny; Teckids e.V. Second row (The MirOS Project): mksh; the Shilouette D mon; the Triforce (Live+Install CDs for i386 and sparc, with MirGrml); the m (alternative logo, vector) Third row (things originating from tarent): Freedroidz (now a Teckids project); OSIAM (Identity and Access Management); tarent (tarent AG, tarent GmbH), who sponsored production of these buttons Hm jupp needs a button able logo!
FOSDEM meetup

Enrico Zini: terminal-emulators

Quest for a terminal emulator The requirements I need a terminal emulator. This is a checklist of the features that I need: My experience is that getting all of this to work is not being as easy as it seems, so I'm creating this page to track progress. gnome-terminal I've been happily using this for years, and it did everything I needed, until some months ago it started to open new tabs in the terminal's working directory instead of the last tab's working directory. This is a big point of frustration for me. It also started opening https urls with Firefox, although the preferred browser was Chromium. There seemed to be no way to control it: I looked for firefox or iceweasel in all gconf and dconf settings and found nothing. The browser issue was fixed by accident when I used Xfce4's settings application to change the browser from Chromium to Firefox and then back to Chromium. update, thanks to Mathieu Parent, Josh Triplett, Peter De Wachter, Julien Cristau, and Charles Plessy: It is also possible to restore the "new tab opened inside the same directory of the last tab I was in" behaviour, by enabling "run command as a login shell" so that /etc/profile.d/vte.sh is run (thanks Mathieu Parent for the link). That in turn spawned extra cleanup work in my .bashrc/.bash_profile/.profile setup, which has been randomly evolving since even before my first Debian "buzz" system. I found that it was setting PROMPT_COMMAND to something else to set the terminal title, conflicting with what vte.sh wants to do. With regards to loading /etc/profile.d/vte.sh by default, Peter De Watcher sent pointers to relevant bugs: here, here, and here. An alternative strategy is to work using the prompt rather than PROMPT_COMMAND; an example is in Josh Triplett's .bashrc from git://joshtriplett.org/git/home. Josh Triplett also said:
To fix the browser launched for URLs, you either need to use a desktop environment following GNOME's mechanism for setting the default browser, or edit ~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list and make sure x-scheme-handler/http, x-scheme-handler/https, and x-scheme-handler/ftp are set to your preferred browser's desktop file basename under [Added Associations].
All my issues with gnome-terminal are now gone and I'm only too happy to go back to it. rxvt-unicode-256color urxvt took some work. This is where I got with configuration:
URxvt.font: xft:Monospace-10:antialias=true
URxvt.foreground: #aaaaaa
URxvt.background: black
URxvt.scrollBar_right: true
URxvt.cursorBlink: true
URxvt.perl-ext-common: default,matcher,tabbedex
URxvt.url-launcher: /usr/bin/x-www-browser
URxvt.matcher.button: 1
URxvt.perl-lib: /home/enrico/.urxvt/perl
URxvt.color0: black
URxvt.color1: #aa0000
URxvt.color2: #00aa00umask
URxvt.color3: #aa5500
URxvt.color4: #0000aa
URxvt.color5: #aa00aa
URxvt.color6: #00aaaa
URxvt.color7: #aaaaaa
URxvt.color8: #555555
URxvt.color9: #ff5555
URxvt.color10: #55ff55
URxvt.color11: #ffff55
URxvt.color12: #5555ff
URxvt.color13: #ff55ff
URxvt.color14: #55ffff
URxvt.color15: #ffffff
I got all of the tab behaviour that I need by "customizing" the tab script (yuck github :( ). Missing sakura Configuration is in .config/sakura/sakura.conf and these bits help:
colorset1_fore=rgb(170,170,170)
colorset1_back=rgb(0,0,0)
colorset1_opacity=99
colorset2_fore=rgb(0,0,0)
colorset2_back=rgb(254,254,254)
colorset2_opacity=99
font=Monospace 10
show_always_first_tab=No
scrollbar=false
fullscreen_key=F11
palette=linux
Missing lxterminal Configuration is in .config/lxterminal/lxterminal.conf and this is relevant to me:
[general]
fontname=DejaVu Sans Mono 10
fgcolor=#aaaaaaaaaaaa
disallowbold=false
cursorblinks=true
tabpos=top
hidescrollbar=false
hidemenubar=true
hideclosebutton=true
disablef10=true
disablealt=true
Also, to open a url directly you control+click it. Missing terminator Configuration is in .config/terminator/config and this is relevant to me:
[global_config]
  use_custom_url_handler = True
  custom_url_handler = x-www-browser
  inactive_color_offset = 1.0
[keybindings]
  close_term = None
  close_window = None
  copy = None
  cycle_next = None
  cycle_prev = None
  go_down = None
  go_next = None
  go_prev = None
  go_up = None
  group_all = None
  group_tab = None
  hide_window = None
  move_tab_left = None
  move_tab_right = None
  new_tab = None
  new_terminator = None
  new_window = None
  next_tab = None
  paste = None
  prev_tab = None
  reset_clear = None
  reset = None
  resize_down = None
  resize_left = None
  resize_right = None
  resize_up = None
  rotate_ccw = None
  rotate_cw = None
  scaled_zoom = None
  search = None
  split_horiz = None
  split_vert = None
  switch_to_tab_1 = <Alt>F1
  switch_to_tab_2 = <Alt>F2
  switch_to_tab_3 = <Alt>F3
  switch_to_tab_4 = <Alt>F4
  switch_to_tab_5 = <Alt>F5
  switch_to_tab_6 = <Alt>F6
  switch_to_tab_7 = <Alt>F7
  switch_to_tab_8 = <Alt>F8
  switch_to_tab_9 = <Alt>F9
  switch_to_tab_10 = <Alt>F10
  toggle_scrollbar = None
  toggle_zoom = None
  ungroup_all = None
  ungroup_tab = None
[profiles]
  <span class="createlink">default</span>
    palette = "#000000:#aa0000:#00aa00:#aa5500:#0000aa:#aa00aa:#00aaaa:#aaaaaa:#555555:#ff5555:#55ff55:#ffff55:#5555ff:#ff55ff:#55ffff:#ffffff"
    copy_on_selection = True
    icon_bell = False
    background_image = None
    show_titlebar = False
Missing update: Richard Hartmann pointed out that terminator's upstream maintainer now changed after the old one didn't have time any more, and it should have a release with a ton of improvements anytime soon. xfce4-terminal Configuration is in .config/xfce4/terminal, and this is relevant to me: terminalrc:
[Configuration]
FontName=Monospace 10
MiscAlwaysShowTabs=FALSE
MiscBell=FALSE
MiscBordersDefault=TRUE
MiscCursorBlinks=FALSE
MiscCursorShape=TERMINAL_CURSOR_SHAPE_BLOCK
MiscDefaultGeometry=80x24
MiscInheritGeometry=FALSE
MiscMenubarDefault=FALSE
MiscMouseAutohide=FALSE
MiscToolbarDefault=FALSE
MiscConfirmClose=TRUE
MiscCycleTabs=TRUE
MiscTabCloseButtons=TRUE
MiscTabCloseMiddleClick=TRUE
MiscTabPosition=GTK_POS_TOP
MiscHighlightUrls=TRUE
ShortcutsNoMenukey=TRUE
ShortcutsNoMnemonics=TRUE
ColorForeground=#aaaaaaaaaaaa
accels.scm:
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-1" "<Alt>F1")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-2" "<Alt>F2")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-3" "<Alt>F3")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-4" "<Alt>F4")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-5" "<Alt>F5")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-6" "<Alt>F6")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-7" "<Alt>F7")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-8" "<Alt>F8")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-9" "<Alt>F9")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-10" "<Alt>F10")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-11" "<Alt>F11")
(gtk_accel_path "<Actions>/terminal-window/goto-tab-12" "<Alt>F12")
update: Yves-Alexis Perez points out that to disable the F1 for help in the terminal, you need to remove the accelerator. I tried this and this and didn't have success, but I confess I did not dig too much into it. Although xfce4-terminal -e does not work as I expect, xfce4-terminal registers a wrapper for x-terminal-emulator that does the right thing with respect to -e (also thanks Yves-Alexis Perez). Missing roxterm Configuration is in .config/roxterm.sourceforge.net/ split in several files corresponding to profiles. This is a reasonable starting point for me: Profiles/Default:
[roxterm profile]
colour_scheme=Default
disable_menu_access=1
disable_menu_shortcuts=1
disable_tab_menu_shortcuts=0
tab_close_btn=0
hide_menubar=1
always_show_tabs=0
Colours/Default:
[roxterm colour scheme]
0=#000000000000
1=#aaaa00000000
2=#0000aaaa0000
3=#aaaa55550000
4=#00000000aaaa
5=#aaaa0000aaaa
6=#0000aaaaaaaa
7=#aaaaaaaaaaaa
8=#555555555555
9=#ffff55555555
10=#5555ffff5555
11=#ffffffff5555
12=#55555555ffff
13=#ffff5555ffff
14=#5555ffffffff
15=#ffffffffffff
palette_size=16
foreground=#aaaaaaaaaaaa
background=#000000000000
cursor=#cccccccccccc
bold=
dim=
Shortcuts/Default:
[roxterm shortcuts scheme]
File/New Window=
File/New Tab=
File/Close Window=
File/Close Tab=
Tabs/Previous Tab=
Tabs/Next Tab=
Edit/Copy=
Edit/Paste=
View/Zoom In=<Control>plus
View/Zoom Out=<Control>minus
View/Normal Size=<Control>0
View/Full Screen=F11
View/Scroll Up One Line=
View/Scroll Down One Line=
Help/Help=
Edit/Copy & Paste=
Search/Find...=
Search/Find Next=
Search/Find Previous=
File/New Window With Profile/Default=
File/New Tab With Profile/Default=
Tabs/Select_Tab_0=<Alt>F1
Tabs/Select_Tab_1=<Alt>F2
Tabs/Select_Tab_2=<Alt>F3
Tabs/Select_Tab_3=<Alt>F4
Tabs/Select_Tab_4=<Alt>F5
Tabs/Select_Tab_5=<Alt>F6
Tabs/Select_Tab_6=<Alt>F7
Tabs/Select_Tab_7=<Alt>F8
Tabs/Select_Tab_8=<Alt>F9
Tabs/Select_Tab_9=<Alt>F9
Tabs/Select_Tab_10=<Alt>F10
Tabs/Select_Tab_11=<Alt>F11
Tabs/Select_Tab_12=<Alt>F12
Global:
[roxterm options]
edit_shortcuts=0
prefer_dark_theme=1
colour_scheme=Default
warn_close=1
Missing Nothing of my initial requirements seems to be missing, really, so I'm sticking to it for a while to see what happens. The first itch to scratch is that when the menubar is hidden, the popup menu becomes the entire menubar contents, which does not fit the general use case to have a contextual menu with the most common shortcuts. I'll just declare it useless and get myself used to some new hotkey for starting a new terminal. update: after fixing my issues with gnome-terminal I've switched back to gnome-terminal: its interface feels less clunky as I'm already used to it. Other references Guillem Jover made a similar analysis in 2009, it can be found here. Thomas Koch mentioned that termit should be able to do all I need, and is scriptable in Lua. I like the sound of that, and it's definitely one I should look next time I find myself shopping for terminal emulators.

19 January 2014

Daniel Pocock: Debian solving Drupal's third-party library challenge

The tremendously successful Drupal community observes stringent requirements about many things, in particular, licensing and the prohibition of bundling third-party JavaScript. While these policies may seem onerous at first glance, it turns out there is another project with a written guarantee to provide third-party code in a form that meets the expectations of Drupal and does so in a way that completely automates all that tedious effort into one-click oblivion. I'm talking about the Debian GNU/Linux operating system. Drupal's libraries module The libraries module for Drupal appeared as an initial attempt to help track third-party JavaScript. The module has been available in Debian for almost a year and has recently been provided in the wheezy-backports distribution for people running the stable version of Debian. The library provides a standard way for other modules to reference third-party JavaScript but it still leaves the web master with some manual work to go out and download all the necessary JavaScript and copy it into the right place. This is where Debian comes to the rescue. Using the module in practice I've recently uploaded JSCommunicator to Debian and wanted to provide a convenient way for people to get it in Drupal. Therefore, in addition to providing the JSCommunicator packages, I created an extra package, drupal7-mod-jscommunicator. JSCommunicator itself depends on other JavaScript, specifically, the JsSIP library. I repeated the same process for JsSIP. This gives us the following collection of four related packages:
Third-party library Library itself Drupal module, packaged
JSCommunicator libjs-jscommunicator drupal7-mod-jscommunicator
JsSIP libjs-jssip drupal7-mod-jssip
If you explore the package details in Debian's package catalog you will notice that each package depends on the other packages it requires. Debian's package management utility, apt-get, can transitively resolve all the relationships between this set of packages. In fact, on a newly built server, you can simply run the command:
apt-get install drupal7-mod-jscommunicator
and the apt-get utility will install Apache, MySQL, Drupal itself, the libraries module, all the related JavaScript libraries and the final Drupal module of JSCommunicator itself. It really is that easy. Here is an example of the output displayed by the command on a freshly built server:
# apt-get -d install drupal7-mod-jscommunicator
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  apache2 apache2-bin apache2-data curl dbconfig-common drupal7
  drupal7-mod-jssip drupal7-mod-libraries fontconfig-config fonts-dejavu-core
  javascript-common libaio1 libapache2-mod-php5 libapr1 libaprutil1
  libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite3 libaprutil1-ldap libarchive-extract-perl libc6
  libcurl3 libdbd-mysql-perl libdbi-perl libedit2 libfontconfig1 libgcrypt11
  libgd3 libhtml-template-perl libjbig0 libjpeg8 libjs-jssip libjson-c2
  liblocale-gettext-perl liblog-message-simple-perl liblua5.1-0
  libmodule-pluggable-perl libmysqlclient18 libonig2 libperl4-corelibs-perl
  libpng12-0 libpod-latex-perl libqdbm14 librtmp0 libssh2-1 libterm-ui-perl
  libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-soundex-perl libtiff5
  libuuid-perl libvpx1 libxml2 libxpm4 locales mysql-client mysql-client-5.5
  mysql-common mysql-server mysql-server-5.5 mysql-server-core-5.5 perl
  perl-base perl-modules php5 php5-cli php5-common php5-gd php5-json
  php5-mysql php5-readline ssl-cert wwwconfig-common
Suggested packages:
  apache2-doc apache2-suexec-pristine apache2-suexec-custom apache2-utils
  php-pear glibc-doc libclone-perl libmldbm-perl libnet-daemon-perl
  libplrpc-perl libsql-statement-perl rng-tools libgd-tools
  libipc-sharedcache-perl libterm-readkey-perl tinyca perl-doc
  libterm-readline-gnu-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl make libb-lint-perl
  libcpanplus-dist-build-perl libcpanplus-perl libfile-checktree-perl
  liblog-message-perl libobject-accessor-perl php5-user-cache
  openssl-blacklist postgresql-client
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apache2 apache2-bin apache2-data curl dbconfig-common drupal7
  drupal7-mod-jscommunicator drupal7-mod-jssip drupal7-mod-libraries
  fontconfig-config fonts-dejavu-core javascript-common libaio1
  libapache2-mod-php5 libapr1 libaprutil1 libaprutil1-dbd-sqlite3
  libaprutil1-ldap libarchive-extract-perl libcurl3 libdbd-mysql-perl
  libdbi-perl libfontconfig1 libgd3 libhtml-template-perl libjbig0 libjpeg8
  libjs-jssip libjson-c2 liblog-message-simple-perl liblua5.1-0
  libmodule-pluggable-perl libmysqlclient18 libonig2 libperl4-corelibs-perl
  libpng12-0 libpod-latex-perl libqdbm14 librtmp0 libssh2-1 libterm-ui-perl
  libtext-soundex-perl libtiff5 libvpx1 libxpm4 mysql-client mysql-client-5.5
  mysql-common mysql-server mysql-server-5.5 mysql-server-core-5.5 php5
  php5-cli php5-common php5-gd php5-json php5-mysql php5-readline ssl-cert
  wwwconfig-common
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libc6 libedit2 libgcrypt11 liblocale-gettext-perl libtext-charwidth-perl
  libtext-iconv-perl libuuid-perl libxml2 locales perl perl-base perl-modules
12 upgraded, 60 newly installed, 0 to remove and 222 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.2 MB of archives.
After this operation, 152 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Libraries API in Drupal 8 Contrary to an earlier version of this blog, the libraries module is not joining the core in Drupal 8 however its use has been strongly encouraged for any new modules submitted through the Drupal community approval process. This means there will be further opportunity for Drupal users to consolidate on their use of Debian to completely automate the management of all third-party libraries and modules throughout their Drupal system(s).

18 January 2014

Jonathan McDowell: Fixing my parents' ADSL

I was back at my parents' over Christmas, like usual. Before I got back my Dad had mentioned they'd been having ADSL stability issues. Previously I'd noticed some issues with keeping a connection up for more than a couple of days, but it had got so bad he was noticing problems during the day. The eventual resolution isn't going to surprise anyone who's dealt with these things before, but I went through a number of steps to try and improve things. Firstly, I arranged for a new router to be delivered before I got back. My old Netgear DG834G was still in use and while it didn't seem to have been the problem I'd been meaning to get something with 802.11n instead of the 802.11g it supports for a while. I ended up with a TP-Link TD-W8980, which has dual band wifi, ADSL2+, GigE switch and looked to have some basic OpenWRT support in case I want to play with that in the future. Switching over was relatively simple and as part of that procedure I also switched the ADSL microfilter in use (I've seen these fail before with no apparent cause). Once the new router was up I looked at trying to get some line statistics from it. Unfortunately although it supports SNMP I found it didn't provide the ADSL MIB, meaning I ended up doing some web scraping to get the upstream/downstream sync rates/SNR/attenuation details. Examination of these over the first day indicated an excessive amount of noise on the line. The ISP offer the ability in their web interface to change the target SNR for the line. I increased this from 6db to 9db in the hope of some extra stability. This resulted in a 2Mb/s drop in the sync speed for the line, but as this brought it down to 18Mb/s I wasn't too worried about that. Watching the stats for a further few days indicated that there were still regular periods of excessive noise, so I removed the faceplate from the NTE5 master BT socket, removing all extensions from the line. This resulted in regaining the 2Mb/s that had been lost from increasing the SNR target, and after watching the line for a few days confirmed that it had significantly decreased the noise levels. It turned out that the old external ringer that was already present on the line when my parents' moved in was still connected, although it had stopped working some time previously. Also there was an unused and much spliced extension in place. Removed both of these and replacing the NTE5 faceplate led to a line that was still stable. At the time of writing the connection has been up since before the new year, significantly longer than it had managed for some time. As I said at the start I doubt this comes as a surprise to anyone who's dealt with this sort of line issue before. It wasn't particularly surprising to me (other than the level of the noise present), but I went through each of the steps to try and be sure that I had isolated the root cause and could be sure things were actually better. It turned out that doing the screen scraping and graphing the results was a good way to verify this. Observe: adsl-noise.png The blue/red lines indicate the SNR for the upstream and downstream links - the initial lower area is when this was set to a 6db target, then later is a 9db target. Green are the forward error correction errors divided by 100 (to make everything fit better on the same graph). These are correctable, but still indicate issues. Yellow are CRC errors, indicating something that actually caused a problem. They can be clearly seen to correlate with the FEC errors, which makes sense. Notice the huge difference removing the extensions makes to both of these numbers. Also notice just how clear graphing the data makes things - it was easy to show my parents' the graph and indicate how things had been improved and should thus be better.

James Bromberger: Linux.conf.au 2014: LCA TV

The radio silence here on my blog has been not from lack of activity, but the inverse. Linux.conf.au chewed up the few remaining spare cycles I have had recently (after family and work), but not from organising the conference (been there, got the T-Shirt and the bag). So, let s do a run through of what has happened LCA2014 Perth has come and gone in pretty smooth fashion. A remarkable effort from the likes of the Perth crew of Luke, Paul, Euan, Leon, Jason, Michael, and a slew of volunteers who stepped up not to mention our interstate firends of Steve and Erin, Matthew, James I, Tim the Streaming guy and others, and our pro organisers at Manhattan Events. It was a reasonably smooth ride: the UWA campus was beautiful, the leacture theatres were workable, and the Octogon Theatre was at its best when filled with just shy of 500 like minded people and an accomplished person gracing the stage. What was impressive (to me, at least) was the effort of the AV team (which I was on the extreme edges of); videos of keynotes hit the Linux Australia mirror within hours of the event. Recording and live streaming of all keynotes and sessions happend almost flawlessly. Leon had built a reasonably robust video capture management system (eventstreamer on github) to ensure that people fresh to DVswitch had nothing break so bad it didn t automatically fix itself and all of this was monitored from the Operations Room (called the TAVNOC, which would have been the AV NOC, but somehow a loose reference to the UWA Tavern the Tav crept in there). Some 167 videos were made and uploaded most of this was also mirrored on campus before th end of the conference so attendees could load up their laptops with plenty of content for the return trip home. Euan s quick Blender work meant there was a nice intro and outro graphic, and Leon s scripting ensured that Zookeepr, the LCA conference manegment software, was the source of truth in getting all videos processed and tagged correctly. I was scheduled (and did give) a presentation at LCA 2014 about Debian on Amazon Web Services (on Thursday), and attended as many of the sessions as possible, but my good friend Michael Davies (LCA 2004 chair, and chair of the LCA Papers Committee for a good many years) had another role for this year. We wanted to capture some of the hallway track of Linux.conf.au that is missed in all the videos of presentations. And thus was born LCA TV. LCA TV consisted of the video equipment for an additional stream mixer host, cameras, cables and switches, hooking into the same streaming framework as the rest of the sessions. We took over a corner of the registration room (UWA Undercroft), brought in a few stage lights, a couch, coffee table, seat, some extra mics, and aimed to fill the session gaps with informal chats with some of the people at Linux.conf.au speakers, attendees, volunteers alike. And come they did. One or two interviews didn t succeed (this was an experiment), but in the end, we ve got over 20 interviews with some interesting people. These streamed out live to the people watching LCA from afar; those unable to make it to Perth in early January; but they were recorded too and we can start to watch them (see below) I was also lucky enough to mix the video for the three keynotes as well as the opening and closing, with very capable crew around the Octogon Theatre. As the curtain came down, and the 2014 crew took to the stage to be congratulated by the attendees, I couldn t help but feel a little bit proud and a touch nostalgic memories from 11 years earlier when LCA 2003 came to a close in the very same venue. So, before we head into the viewing season for LCA TV, let me thank all the volunteers who organised, the AV volunteers, the Registration volunteers, the UWA team who helped with Octogon, Networking, awesome CB Radios hooked up to the UWA repeated that worked all the way to the airport. Thanks to the Speakers who submitted proposals. The Speakers who were accepted, made the journey and took to the stage. The people who attended. The sponsors who help make this happen. All of the above helps share the knowledge, and ultimately, move the community forward. But my thanks to Luke and Paul for agreeing to stand there in the middle of all this madness and hive of semi structured activity that just worked. Please remember this was experimental; the noise was the buzz of the conference going on around us. There was pretty much only one person on the AV kit my thanks to Andrew Cooks who I ll dub as our sound editor, vision director, floor manager, and anything else. So who did we interview? One or two talks did not work, so appologies to those that are missing. Here s the playlist to start you off! Enjoy.

Colin Watson: Testing wanted: GRUB 2.02~beta2 Debian/Ubuntu packages

This is mostly a repost of my ubuntu-devel mail for a wider audience, but see below for some additions. I'd like to upgrade to GRUB 2.02 for Ubuntu 14.04; it's currently in beta. This represents a year and a half of upstream development, and contains many new features, which you can see in the NEWS file. Obviously I want to be very careful with substantial upgrades to the default boot loader. So, I've put this in trusty-proposed, and filed a blocking bug to ensure that it doesn't reach trusty proper until it's had a reasonable amount of manual testing. If you are already using trusty and have some time to try this out, it would be very helpful to me. I suggest that you only attempt this if you're comfortable driving apt-get directly and recovering from errors at that level, and if you're willing to spend time working with me on narrowing down any problems that arise. Please ensure that you have rescue media to hand before starting testing. The simplest way to upgrade is to enable trusty-proposed, upgrade ONLY packages whose names start with "grub" (e.g. use apt-get dist-upgrade to show the full list, say no to the upgrade, and then pass all the relevant package names to apt-get install), and then (very important!) disable trusty-proposed again. Provided that there were no errors in this process, you should be safe to reboot. If there were errors, you should be able to downgrade back to 2.00-22 (or 1.27+2.00-22 in the case of grub-efi-amd64-signed). Please report your experiences (positive and negative) with this upgrade in the tracking bug. I'm particularly interested in systems that are complex in any way: UEFI Secure Boot, non-trivial disk setups, manual configuration, that kind of thing. If any of the problems you see are also ones you saw with earlier versions of GRUB, please identify those clearly, as I want to prioritise handling regressions over anything else. I've assigned myself to that bug to ensure that messages to it are filtered directly into my inbox. I'll add a couple of things that weren't in my ubuntu-devel mail. Firstly, this is all in Debian experimental as well (I do all the work in Debian and sync it across, so the grub2 source package in Ubuntu is a verbatim copy of the one in Debian these days). There are some configuration differences applied at build time, but a large fraction of test cases will apply equally well to both. I don't have a definite schedule for pushing this into jessie yet - I only just finished getting 2.00 in place there, and the release schedule gives me a bit more time - but I certainly want to ship jessie with 2.02 or newer, and any test feedback would be welcome. It's probably best to just e-mail feedback to me directly for now, or to the pkg-grub-devel list. Secondly, a couple of news sites have picked this up and run it as "Canonical intends to ship Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with a beta version of GRUB". This isn't in fact my intent at all. I'm doing this now because I think GRUB 2.02 will be ready in non-beta form in time for Ubuntu 14.04, and indeed that putting it in our development release will help to stabilise it; I'm an upstream GRUB developer too and I find the exposure of widely-used packages very helpful in that context. It will certainly be much easier to upgrade to a beta now and a final release later than it would be to try to jump from 2.00 to 2.02 in a month or two's time. Even if there's some unforeseen delay and 2.02 isn't released in time, though, I think nearly three months of stabilisation is still plenty to yield a boot loader that I'm comfortable with shipping in an LTS. I've been backporting a lot of changes to 2.00 and even 1.99, and, as ever for an actively-developed codebase, it gets harder and harder over time (in particular, I've spent longer than I'd like hunting down and backporting fixes for non-512-byte sector disks). While I can still manage it, I don't want to be supporting 2.00 for five more years after upstream has moved on; I don't think that would be in anyone's best interests. And I definitely want some of the new features which aren't sensibly backportable, such as several of the new platforms (ARM, ARM64, Xen) and various networking improvements; I can imagine a number of our users being interested in things like optional signature verification of files GRUB reads from disk, improved Mac support, and the TrueCrypt ISO loader, just to name a few. This should be a much stronger base for five-year support.

17 January 2014

Michael Stapelberg: debmirror 6x speed-up, or how to fill a 1 GBps Rackspace link

As explained in more detail in my my last blog post, Rackspace is providing hosting for Debian Code Search. For those of you who don t know, Rackspace is a cloud company that provides (among other services) a public cloud based on OpenStack. That means you can easily (and programmatically, if you want) bring up virtual servers, block storage volumes, configure the network between them, etc. As part of my initial performance experiments, I was running debmirror to clone a full Debian source mirror, and I noticed this took about one hour. Given that the peak network and storage write rates I have observed in my benchmarks are much higher, I wondered why it took so long. About 43 GB (that s how big the Debian sid sources are) in 60 minutes means 12 MB/s download rate, which is a bit more than a sustained 100 MBit/s connection. Luckily, at least the Rackspace servers I looked at are connected with 1 GBit/s to the internet, so more should be possible. Note that these are the old Rackspace servers. There is a new generation of servers, which I have not yet tried, that apparently offer even higher performance. After a brief look at the debmirror source code, I concluded that it can only use a single mirror and downloads files sequentially. There is some obvious potential for improvement here, and the fact that I could come up with a proof of concept written in Go to determine the files to download in a couple of minutes encouraged me to spend my saturday on this problem :-). About 7 hours later, my prototype had gone through various iterations and the code could sustain about 115 MB/s incoming bandwidth for most of the time. Here is a screenshot of dstat measuring the performance: Another 3 hours later, the most obvious bugs were weeded out and the code successfully cloned an entire mirror for the first time. I verified the correctness by running debmirror afterwards, and no files were downloaded that had not actually arrived on the mirror in the meantime. Features
  1. Parallel downloading from multiple mirrors.
    Of course, it is not guaranteed that the mirrors are consistent, but that is a solvable problem: whenever a non-200 HTTP response is encountered, the file is put back into the queue and gets rescheduled onto any mirror. Eventually, it will be rescheduled onto the mirror from which the sources.gz was downloaded, and that mirror has to have it.
  2. HTTP keep-alive and pipelining.
    debmirror also does HTTP keep-alive (I read that in the source, did not verify it), but it downloads files sequentially, i.e. it downloads one file, then sends the request for the next file. This means that after one file was received, no data is being received until another round-trip finished. For a lot of small files (think of .dsc and .debian.tar.gz files or small orig tarballs) that really adds up.
    Therefore, I use HTTP pipelining: I send 99 requests and then just receive all the responses at full speed. The magic number 99 comes from the fact that this is the smallest common denominator that all mirrors I have tested allow. nginx by default allows 100 requests.
  3. Request ordering.
    Instead of sending requests at random, I sort the download queue by size and make sure that the first request on each connection is for a big file. The intention is that TCP will adapt to that quickly and use a bigger window size as soon as possible instead of ramping up slower later on. Note that I have not actually measured the window sizes, so this is just a hunch.
    Another nice side-effect of the ordering is that the amount of data that is being sent through each connection is roughly equal. This means we don t waste TCP connections by sending 99 requests for small files only.
  4. (Goroutines).
    I m a bit hesitant to even write about it, so let s make it quick: Perl (and thus debmirror) is typically single-threaded, whereas Goroutines scale nicely on multi-core systems. I don t think it makes a big difference on the machines I am running this on as they have only two cores and are not maxed out on CPU usage at all. But maybe this will be more important for saturating 10 GBit/s? :-)
  5. (Mirror selection).
    It s not a feature of the code, but certainly relevant: of course I selected mirrors that are connected to the internet with at least a Gigabit link, serve files reasonably fast and have low latency to Rackspace s Chicago presence.
    Interestingly, while I used to think that universities have access to big uplinks and beefy machines, none of the mirrors that I use are located at a university. In fact, every mirror ending in .edu that I tried was really slow most of them providing something like 2-4 MB/s.
Results With the latest iteration of the code, I can clone an entire Debian source mirror with 43 GB of data in about 11.5 minutes, which corresponds to a 63 MB/s download rate:
GOMAXPROCS=20 ./dcs-debmirror -num_workers=20
68,24s user 384,90s system 66% cpu 11:25,97 total
It should be noted that the download rate is very low in the first couple of seconds since the sources.gz file is downloaded from a single mirror, then unpacked and analyzed. The peak download rate is about 115 MB/s (= 920 MBit/s) which is reasonably close at what you can achieve with a Gigabit link, I think. If the entire uplink was available to me at all time, the Rackspace hardware would be able to saturate that easily, both in terms of reading from the network and in terms of writing to block storage. I tested this on an SSD volume, but I see about 113 MB/s throughput with the internal hard disk, so I think that should work, too. There is another dstat screenshot of the final version (writing to disk). Perhaps even more interesting to some readers is the time for an incremental update:
GOMAXPROCS=20 ./dcs-debmirror -tcp_conns=20
2013/10/13 11:09:55 Downloading 307 files (447 MB total)
 
2013/10/13 11:10:04 All 307 files downloaded in 9.105605931s. Download rate is 49.186567 MB/s
4,91s user 3,99s system 67% cpu 13,205 total
The wall clock time is higher than the time reported by the code because the code does not count the time for downloading and parsing the sources.gz file. The entire program is about 400 lines (not SLOC) of Go code. It s part of the Debian Code Search source. If you re interested, you can read dcs-debmirror.go in your browser. Conclusions The outcome of this experiment is that I now know (and have shown!) that there are significantly more efficient ways of cloning a Debian mirror than what debmirror does. Furthermore, I have a good grasp on what kind of performance the Rackspace cloud offers and I am fairly happy with the numbers :-). My code is useful to me in context of Debian Code Search, but unless you need a sid-only source-only mirror, it will not be useful to you directly. Of course you can take the ideas that I implemented and implement them elsewhere personally, I don t plan to do that. If you have hardware, bandwidth and a use-case for 10 GBit/s+ mirroring, I d like to hear about it! :-)

16 January 2014

Iustin Pop: What's in a community?

I haven't been doing Debian work for a while now, due to various reasons. However, I try to keep reading (but not posting to) the mailing list, such as to keep in touch (in a virtual way). What surprises me is how the community evolves: in some ways not at all (was there an init-system flamewar this week already or not?), in some ways a lot (mailing list bans!). Since I don't post to the mailing lists, consider this post as my +1 towards the listmaster's work: yes, we should limit the damage that abusive people do to the project. I'm surprised at how some people call list bans as censorship (it's not, IMHO), and how they treat abuse as something light. Another thing that surprises me is how abuse and arrogance go hand in hand. In the explanations for bans, I've seen not just one example where the abusive person is not only, well, abusive, but also considers themselves superior (morally, technically, etc.). If you're already so much superior, why hit on people? If you already know so much, why the personal attacks? And no, being immature is not the whole or even the only explanation This page has a nice collection of quotes around the same motive: how you treat other people, especially people whom you regard less knowledgeable than you, tells a lot about your character. One quote is nice in how succinct and how applicable it is to the kind of abuse I've seen:
To insult or to abuse those who cannot resist, or dare not resent the injury, is a sure mark of cowardice, [ ].
From 1852 September 30, Farmer s Cabinet, Courtesy to Inferiors, Page 1, Column 2, Volume 51, Number 8, Amherst, New Hampshire. The rest of the quote also contains a somewhat sexist remark, so I've left that part out (but I'm surprised they still talked about swords in the 1850s). And yes, I hope that this spring I'll be able to get back to my Debian work.

Next.

Previous.