Search Results: "tar"

11 September 2016

Niels Thykier: Unseen changes to lintian.d.o

We have been making a lot of minor changes to lintian.d.o and the underlying report framework. Most of them were hardly noticeable to the naked. In fact, I probably would not have spotted any of them, if I had not been involved in writing them. Nonetheless, I felt like sharing them, so here goes. User visible changes: In case you were wondering, the section title is partly a pun as half of these changes were intended to assist visually impaired users. They were triggered by me running into Sam Hartmann at DebConf16, where I asked him about how easy Debian s websites were for blind people. Allegedly, we are generally doing quite good in his opinion (with one exception, for which Sam filed Bug#830213), which was a positive surprise for me. On a related note: Thanks Luke Faraone and Asheesh Laroia for getting helping me started on these changes. Reporting framework / Internal changes: With the last change + the no generate reports option, we were able to schedule lintian more frequently. Originally, lintian only ran once a day. With the no generate reports , we added a second run and with the last changes, we bumped it to 4 times a day. Unsurprisingly, it means that we are now reprocessing the archive a lot faster than previously. All of the above is basically the all the note-worthy changes on the Lintian reporting framework since the Partial rewrite of lintian s reporting setup (~1 years ago).
Filed under: Debian, Lintian

10 September 2016

Dirk Eddelbuettel: New package gettz on CRAN

gettz is now on CRAN in its initial release 0.0.1. It provides a possible fallback in situations where Sys.timezone() fails to determine the system timezone. That can happen when e.g. the file /etc/localtime somehow is not a link into the corresponding file with zoneinfo data in, say, /usr/share/zoneinfo. Duane McCully provided a nice StackOverflow answer with code that offers fallbacks via /etc/timezone (on Debian/Ubuntu) or /etc/sysconfig/clock (on RedHat/CentOS/Fedora, and rumour has it, BSD* systems) or /etc/TIMEZONE (on Solaris). The gettz micro-package essentially encodes that approach so that we have an optional fallback when Sys.timezone() comes up empty. In the previous paragraph, note the stark absense of OS X where there seems nothing to query, and of course Windows. Contributions for either would be welcome. For questions or comments use the issue tracker off the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Sylvain Le Gall: Release of OASIS 0.4.7

I am happy to announce the release of OASIS v0.4.7. Logo OASIS small OASIS is a tool to help OCaml developers to integrate configure, build and install systems in their projects. It should help to create standard entry points in the source code build system, allowing external tools to analyse projects easily. This tool is freely inspired by Cabal which is the same kind of tool for Haskell. You can find the new release here and the changelog here. More information about OASIS in general on the OASIS website. Pull request for inclusion in OPAM is pending. Here is a quick summary of the important changes: Features: This version contains a lot of changes and is the achievement of a huge amount of work. The addition of OMake as a plugin is a huge progress. The overall work has been targeted at making OASIS more library like. This is still a work in progress but we made some clear improvement by getting rid of various side effect (like the requirement of using "chdir" to handle the "-C", which leads to propage ~ctxt everywhere and design OASISFileSystem). I would like to thanks again the contributor for this release: Spiros Eliopoulos, Paul Snively, Jeremie Dimino, Christopher Zimmermann, Christophe Troestler, Max Mouratov, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix, Geoff Shannon, Simon Cruanes, Vladimir Brankov, Gabriel Radanne, Evgenii Lepikhin, Petter Urkedal, Gerd Stolpmann and Anton Bachin.

Enrico Zini: Dreaming of being picked

From "Stop stealing dreams":
Settling for the not-particularly uplifting dream of a boring, steady job isn t helpful. Dreaming of being picked picked to be on TV or picked to play on a team or picked to be lucky isn t helpful either. We waste our time and the time of our students when we set them up with pipe dreams that don t empower them to adapt (or better yet, lead) when the world doesn t work out as they hope. The dreams we need are self-reliant dreams. We need dreams based not on what is but on what might be. We need students who can learn how to learn, who can discover how to push themselves and are generous enough and honest enough to engage with the outside world to make those dreams happen.
This made me think that I know many hero stories based on "the chosen", like Matrix, like most superheros getting powers either from some entity chosing them for it, or from chance. I have a hard time thinking of a superhero who becomes one just by working hard at acquiring and honing their skills: I can only think of Batman and Ironman, and they start off as super rich. If I think of people who start from scratch as commoners and work hard to become exceptional, in the standard superhero narrative, I can only think of supervillains. Scary. It makes me feel culturally biased into thinking that a common person cannot be trusted to act responsibly, and that only the rich, the chosen and the aristocrats can. As a bias it may serve the rich and the aristocrats, but I don't think it serves society as a whole.

8 September 2016

Jamie McClelland: Wait... is that how you are supposed to configure your SSD card?

I bought a laptop with only SSD drives a while ago and based on a limited amount of reading, added the "discard" option to my /etc/fstab file for all partitions and happily went on my way expecting to avoid the performance degradation problems that happen on SSD cards without this setting). Yesterday, after a several month ordeal, I finally installed SSD drives in one of May First/People Link's servers and started doing more research to find the best way to set things up. I was quite surprised to learn that my change in /etc/fstab accomplished nothing. Well, not entirely true, my /boot partition was still getting empty sectors reported to the SSD card. Since my filesystem is on top of LVM and LVM is on top of an encrypted disk, those messages from the files system to the disk were not getting through. I learned that when I tried to run the fstrim command on one of the partitions and received the message that the disk didn't support it. Since my /boot partition is not in LVM or encrypted, it worked on /boot. I then made the necessary changes to /etc/lvm/lvm.conf and /etc/crypttab, restarted and... same result. Then I ran update-initramfs -u and rebooted and now fstrim works. I decided to remove the discard option from /etc/fstab and will set a cron job to run fstrim periodically. Also, I learned of some security implications of using trim on an encrypted disk which don't seem to outweigh the benefits.

7 September 2016

Antonio Terceiro: Debian CI updates for September 2016

debci 1.4 was released just a few days ago. Among general improvements, I would like to highlight: ci.debian.net has been upgraded to debci 1.4 just after that. At the same time I have also upgraded autodep8 and autopkgtest to their latest versions, available in jessie-backports. This means that it is now safe for Debian packages to assume the changes in autopkgtest 4.0 are available, in special the $AUTOPKGTEST_* environment variables. In other news, for several weeks there were had issues with tests not being scheduled when they should have. I was just assuming that the issue was due to the existing test scheduler, debci-batch, being broken. Today I was working on a new implementation that is going to be a lot faster, I started to hit a similar issue on my local tests, and finally realized what was wrong. The fact is that debci-batch stores the timestamp of the last time a package has been scheduled to run, and it there are no test result after that timestamp, it assumes the package is still in the queue to be tested, and does not schedule it again. It turns out that a few weeks ago, during maintainance work, I had cleared the queue, discarding all jobs that were there, but forgot to reset those timestamps, so when debci-batch came around again, it checked the timestamp of the last request and did not make new requests because there was no test result after that timestamp! I cleared all those timestamps, and the system should now go back to normal. That is it for now. I you want to contribute to the Debian CI project and want to get in touch, you can pop up on the #debci channel on the OFTC IRC network, or mail the autopkgtest-devel mailing list.

Reproducible builds folks: Reproducible Builds: week 71 in Stretch cycle

What happened in the Reproducible Builds effort between Sunday August 28 and Saturday September 3 2016: Media coverage Antonio Terceiro blogged about testing build reprodubility with debrepro . GSoC and Outreachy updates The next round is being planned now: see their page with a timeline and participating organizations listing. Maybe you want to participate this time? Then please reach out to us as soon as possible! Packages reviewed and fixed, and bugs filed The following packages have addressed reproducibility issues in other packages: The following updated packages have become reproducible in our current test setup after being fixed: The following updated packages appear to be reproducible now, for reasons we were not able to figure out yet. (Relevant changelogs did not mention reproducible builds.) The following 4 packages were not changed, but have become reproducible due to changes in their build-dependencies: Some uploads have addressed some reproducibility issues, but not all of them: Patches submitted that have not made their way to the archive yet: Reviews of unreproducible packages 706 package reviews have been added, 22 have been updated and 16 have been removed in this week, adding to our knowledge about identified issues. 5 issue types have been added: 1 issue type has been updated: Weekly QA work FTBFS bugs have been reported by: diffoscope development diffoscope development on the next version (60) continued in git, taking in contributions from: strip-nondeterminism development Mattia Rizzolo uploaded strip-nondeterminism 0.023-2~bpo8+1 to jessie-backports. A new version of strip-nondeterminism 0.024-1 was uploaded to unstable by Chris Lamb. It included contributions from: Holger added jobs on jenkins.debian.net to run testsuites on every commit. There is one job for the master branch and one for the other branches. disorderfs development Holger added jobs on jenkins.debian.net to run testsuites on every commit. There is one job for the master branch and one for the other branches. tests.reproducible-builds.org Debian: We now vary the GECOS records of the two build users. Thanks to Paul Wise for providing the patch. Misc. This week's edition was written by Ximin Luo, Holger Levsen & Chris Lamb and reviewed by a bunch of Reproducible Builds folks on IRC.

6 September 2016

Markus Koschany: My Free Software Activities in August 2016

Welcome to gambaru.de. Here is my monthly report that covers what I have been doing for Debian. If you re interested in Android, Java, Games and LTS topics, this might be interesting for you. Debian Android Debian Games Debian Java Debian LTS This was my seventh month as a paid contributor and I have been paid to work 14,75 hours on Debian LTS, a project started by Rapha l Hertzog. In that time I did the following: Non-maintainer uploads QA

Norbert Preining: Yukio Mishima: Patriotism ( )

A masterpiece by Yukio Mishima Patriotism the story of love and dead. A short story about the double suicide of a Lieutenant and his wife following the Ni Ni Roku Incident where some parts of the military tried to overthrow government and military leaders. Although Lieutenant Takeyama wasn t involved into the coup, because his friends wanted to safeguard him and his new wife, he found himself facing a fight and execution of his friends. Not being able to cope with this situation he commits suicide, followed by his wife.
mishima-patriotism Written in 1960 by one of the most interesting writers of Japanese modern history, Yukio Mishima, this book and the movie made by Mishima himself, are very disturbing images of the relation between human and state. Although the English title says Patriotism, the Japanese one is (Yukoku) which is closer to Concern for one s own country. This concern, and the feeling of devotion to the Imperial system and the country that leads the two into their deed. We are guided through the whole book and movie by a large scroll with (shisei, devotion) written on it. But indeed, Patriotism is a good title I think one of the most dangerous concepts mankind has brought forth. If Patriotism would be only the love for one s own country, all would be fine. But reality shows that patriotism unfailingly brings along xenophobia and the feeling of superiority. For someone coming from a small and unimportant country, I never had even the slightest allure to be patriotic in the bad sense. And looking at the world and people around me, I often have the feeling that mainly big countries produce the biggest and worst style of patriotism. This is obvious in countries like China, but having recently learned that all US pupils have to recite (obviously without understanding) the Pledge of Allegiance, the shock of how bad patriotism can start washing the brains of even the smallest kids in a seemingly free country is still present. But back to the book: Here the patriotism is exhibited by the presence of the Imperial images and shrine in the entrance, in front of which the two pray the last time before executing themselves. patriotism1 Not only the book is a masterpiece by itself, also the movie is a special piece of art: Filmed in silent movie style with text inserts, the whole story takes place on a Noh stage. This is in particular interesting as Mishima was one of the few, if not the only, modern Noh play writer. He has written several Noh plays. Another very impressive scene for me was when, after her husbands suicide, Reiko returns from putting up her final make-up into the central room. Her kimono is already blood soaked and the trailing kimono leaves traces on the Noh stage resembling the strokes of a calligraphy, as if her movement is guided, too, by . The final scene of the movie shows the two of them in a Zen stone garden, forming the stone, the unreachable island of happiness. patriotism2 Very impressive, both the book as well as the movie.

5 September 2016

Joachim Breitner: The new CIS-194

The Haskell minicourse at the University of Pennsylvania, also known as CIS-194, has always had a reach beyond the students of Penn. At least since Brent Yorgey gave the course in 2013, who wrote extensive lecture notes and eventually put the material on Github. This year, it is my turn to give the course. I could not resist making some changes, at least to the first few weeks: Instead of starting with a locally installed compiler, doing execises that revolve mostly around arithmetic and lists, I send my students to CodeWorld, which is a web programming environment created by Chris Smith1. This greatly lowers the initial hurlde of having to set up the local toolchain, and is inclusive towards those who have had little expose to the command line before. Not that I do not expect my students to handle that, but it does not hurt to move that towards later in the course. But more importantly: CodeWorld comes with a nicely designed simple API to create vector graphics, to animate these graphics and even create interactive programs. This means that instead of having to come up with yet another set of exercieses revolving around lists and numbers, I can have the students create Haskell programs that are visual. I believe that this is more motivating and stimulating, and will nudge the students to spend more time programming and thus practicing. In fact, the goal is that in their third homework assignemnt, the students will implement a fully functional, interactive Sokoban game. And all that before talking about the built-in lists or tuples, just with higher order functions and custom datatypes. (Click on the picture above, which is part of the second weeks s homework. You can use the arrow keys to move the figure around and press the escape key to reset the game. Boxes cannot be moved yet -- that will be part of homework 3.) If this sounds interesting to you, and you always wanted to learn Haskell from scratch, feel free to tag along. The lecture notes should be elaborate enough to learn from that, and with the homework problems, you should be able to tell whether you have solved it yourself. Just do not publish your solutions before the due date. Let me know if you have any comments about the course so far. Eventually, I will move to local compilation, use of the interpreter and text-based IO and then start using more of the material of previous iterations of the course, which were held by Richard Eisenberg in 2014 and by Noam Zilberstein in 2015.

  1. Chris has been very helpful in making sure CodeWorld works in a way that suits my course, thanks for that!

Chris Lamb: How to write your first Lintian check

Lintian's humble description of "Debian package checker" belies its importance within the Debian GNU/Linux project. An extensive static analysis tool, it's not only used by the vast majority of developers, falling foul of some of its checks even cause uploads to be automatically rejected by the archive maintenance software. As you may have read in my recent monthly report, I've recently been hacking on Lintian itself. In particular:

However, this rest of this post will go through the steps needed to start contributing yourself. To demonstrate this I will be walking through submitting a patch for bug #831864 which warns about Python packages that ship .coverage files generated by Coverage.py.
Getting started First, let's obtain the Lintian sources and create a branch for our work:
$ git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git
[ ]
$ cd lintian
$ git checkout -b warn-about-dotcoverage-files
Switched to a new branch 'warn-about-dotcoverage-files'
The most interesting files are under checks/*:
$ ls -l checks/   head -n 9
total 1356
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby  6393 Jul 29 14:19 apache2.desc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby  8619 Jul 29 14:19 apache2.pm
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby  1956 Jul 29 14:19 application-not-library.desc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby  3285 Jul 29 14:19 application-not-library.pm
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby   544 Jul 29 14:19 automake.desc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby  1354 Jul 29 14:19 automake.pm
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby 19506 Jul 29 14:19 binaries.desc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby 25204 Jul 29 14:19 binaries.pm
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby 15641 Aug 24 21:42 changelog-file.desc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lamby lamby 19606 Jul 29 14:19 changelog-file.pm
Note that the files are in pairs; a foo.desc file that contains description of the tags and a sibling foo.pm Perl module that actually performs the checks.

Let's add our new tag before we go any further. After poking around, it looks like files. pm,desc would be most appropriate, so we'll add our new tag definition to files.desc:
Tag: package-contains-python-coverage-file
Severity: normal
Certainty: certain
Info: The package contains a file that looks like output from the Python
 coverage.py tool.  These are generated by python ,3 -coverage during a test
 run, noting which parts of the code have been executed.  They can then be
 subsequently analyzed to identify code that could have been executed but was
 not.
 .
 As they are are unlikely to be of utility to end-users, these files should
 be removed from the package.
The Severity and Certainty fields are documented in the manual. Note the convention of using double spaces after full stops in the Info section.

Extending the testsuite Lintian has many moving parts based on regular expressions and other subtle logic, so it's especially important to provide tests in order to handle edge cases and to catch any regressions in the future. We create tests by combining a tiny Debian package that will deliberately violate our check, along with some metadata and the expected output of running Lintian against this package. The tests themselves are stored under t/tests. There may be an existing test that it would be more appropriate to extend, but I've gone with creating a new directory called files-python-coverage:
$ mkdir -p t/tests/files-python-coverage
$ cd t/tests/files-python-coverage
First, we create a simple package, installing dummy file to trigger the check:
$ mkdir -p debian/debian
$ touch debian/.coverage
$ echo ".coverage /usr/share/files-python-coverage" > debian/debian/install
Note that we do not need a debian/rules file as long as we do not deviate from a "skeleton" debhelper style. We then add the aforementioned metadata to t/tests/files-python-coverage/desc:
Testname: files-python-coverage
Sequence: 6000
Version: 1.0
Description: Check for Python .coverage files
Test-For:
 package-contains-python-coverage-file
and the expected warning to t/tests/files-python-coverage/tags:
$ echo "W: files-python-coverage: package-contains-python-coverage-file" \
      "usr/share/files-python-coverage/.coverage" > tags

When we run the testsuite, it should fail because we don't emit the check yet:
$ cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
$ debian/rules runtests onlyrun=tag:package-contains-python-coverage-file
[ ]
--- t/tests/files-python-coverage/tags
+++ debian/test-out/tests/files-python-coverage/tags.files-python-coverage
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-W: files-python-coverage: package-contains-python-coverage-file usr/share/files-python-coverage/.coverage
fail tests::files-python-coverage: output differs!
Failed tests (1)
    tests::files-python-coverage
debian/rules:48: recipe for target 'runtests' failed
make: *** [runtests] Error 1
$ echo $?
1
Specifying onlyrun= means we only run the tests that are designed to trigger this tag rather than the whole testsuite. This is controlled by the Test-For key in our desc file, not by scanning the tags files. This recipe for creating a testcase could be used when submitting a regular bug against Lintian providing a failing testcase not only clarifies misunderstandings resulting from the use of natural language, it also makes it easier, quicker and safer to correct the offending code itself.

Emitting the tag Now, let's actually implement the check:
             tag 'package-installs-python-egg', $file;
          
+        # ---------------- .coverage (coverage.py output)
+        if ($file->basename eq ".coverage")  
+            tag 'package-contains-python-coverage-file', $file;
+         
         # ---------------- /usr/lib/site-python
Our testsuite now passes:
$ debian/rules runtests onlyrun=tag:package-contains-python-coverage-file
private/generate-profiles.pl
.... running tests ....
mkdir -p "debian/test-out"
t/runtests -k -j 9 t "debian/test-out" tag:package-contains-python-coverage-file
ENV[PATH]=[..]
pass tests::files-python-coverage
if [ "tag:package-contains-python-coverage-file" = "" ]; then touch runtests; fi
$ echo $?
0

Submitting the patch Lastly, we create a patch for submission to the bug tracking system:
$ git commit -a -m "c/files: Warn about Python packages which ship" \
      "coverage.py information. (Closes: #831864)"
$ git format-patch HEAD~
0001-c-files-Warn-about-Python-packages-which-ship-covera.patch
and we finally attach it to the existing bug:
To: 831864@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 831864-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Bcc: control@bugs.debian.org
tags 831864 + patch
thanks
Patch attached.
/lamby

Summary I hope this post will encourage at some extra contributions towards this important tool. (Be aware that I'm not a Lintian maintainer, so not only should you not treat anything here as gospel and expect this post may be edited over time if clarifications arise.)

Bits from Debian: DebConf17 organization started

DebConf17 will take place in Montreal, Canada from August 6 to August 12, 2017. It will be preceded by DebCamp, July 31 to August 4, and Debian Day, August 5. We invite everyone to join us in organizing DebConf17. There are different areas where your help could be very valuable, and we are always looking forward to your ideas. The DebConf content team is open to suggestions for invited speakers. If you'd like to propose somebody who is not a regular DebConf attendee follow the details in the call for speaker proposals blog post. We are also beginning to contact potential sponsors from all around the globe. If you know any organization that could be interested, please consider handing them the sponsorship brochure or contact the fundraising team with any leads. The DebConf team is holding IRC meetings every two weeks. Have a look at the DebConf17 website and wiki page, and engage in the IRC channels and the mailing list. Let s work together, as every year, on making the best DebConf ever!

Paul Tagliamonte: go-haversine

In the spirit of blogging about some of the code i ve written in the past year or two, I wrote a small utility library called go-haversine, which uses the Haversine Forumla to compute the distance between two points. This is super helpful when working with GPS data - but remember, this assumes everything s squarely on the face of the planet.

4 September 2016

Carl Chenet: Retweet 0.9: Automatically retweet & like

Retweet 0.9, a self-hosted Python app to automatically retweet and like tweets from another user-defined Twitter account, was released this September, 2nd. Retweet 0.9 is already in production for Le Journal du hacker, a French-speaking Hacker News-like website, LinuxJobs.fr, a French-speaking job board and this very blog. fiesta What s the purpose of Retweet? Let s face it, it s more and more difficult to communicate about our projects. Even writing an awesome app is not enough any more. If you don t appear on a regular basis on social networks, everybody thinks you quit or that the project is stalled. But what if you already have built an audience on Twitter for, let s say, your personal account. Now you want to automatically retweet and like all tweets from the account of your new project, to push it forward. Sure, you can do it manually, like in the old good 90 s or you can use Retweet! Twitter Out Of The Browser Have a look at my Github account for my other Twitter automation tools: What about you? Do you use tools to automate the management of your Twitter account? Feel free to give me feedback in the comments below.

Iustin Pop: Usefulness of real-time data during cycling

Wow, a mouthful of a title, for a much simpler post. Up until earlier this year, I had only one sport GPS device, and that was a watch. Made sense, as my "main" sport was running (not that I did it very consistently). Upgraded over a few generations of Garmins, I mainly used it to record my track and statistics (pace, heart rate, etc.) The newest generation of watch and heart rate monitor even give more statistics (left-right leg balance, ground contact time, so on). Most of this data can be looked at while running, but only as an exception; after all, it's very hard to run with one hand up in front of your face. The other useful features guided workouts and alerts during normal runs I've used, but not consistently. So when I started biking a bit more seriously, I wondered whether it would make sense to buy a bike computer. The feature intersection between watch and bike GPS is quite large, so clearly this is a "want" not a "need" by far. Reading forum posts showed the same question repeated multiple times What convinced me to nevertheless buy such a bike GPS were the mapping/routing features. A bike GPS with good routing features, or even just maps on which tracks can be overlayed, can certainly ease the discovery of new routes. After a few months of use, my most useful feature is one that I didn't expect. While the mapping is useful and I do use it, the one that actually is significantly better than my watch is the large display with data fields that I can trivially check almost continuously on road biking, and during technically easy climbing sections for mountain biking. My setup looks like this: It's a 9-field setup; the Edge 1000 can go to 10, but I like "headline" field. The watch can only go to four, and is basically not usable during rides, unless one would use a quick-release kit for mounting on the handle bar. This setup allowed me to learn much better my physical capabilities, why I sometimes run out of energy, and how the terrain affects me. Random things that I learned: Seeing all this data only after the ride is less useful since you don't remember exactly how you felt during specific points in the ride. But as real-time data, one can easily see/feel the correlation between how the body feels and what data says. One thing that would be also useful would be real-time power data (3 sec average, not instantaneous) to correlate even better with the body state. I now use heart rate and cadence as a proxy for that, but being able to see actual power numbers would increase the usefulness of the data even more. Unfortunately, none of these makes the climbs easier. But at least it allows me to understand why one climb feels hard and another easy (relatively speaking). I wonder if, and how this could be applied to running; maybe with smart glasses? Conclusion: yes, I do recommend a bike computer with a large display (to be able to see many fields at once). Just in case one has disposable income at hand and doesn't know which hobby to spend it on ;-)

Steinar H. Gunderson: Multitrack audio in Nageru 1.4.0

Even though the Chess Olympiad takes some attention right now, development on Nageru (my live video mixer) has continued steadily throughout since the 1.3.0 release. I wanted to take a little time to talk about the upcoming 1.4.0 release, and why things are as they are; writing down things often make them a bit clearer. Every major release of Nageru has had a specific primary focus: 1.0.0 was about just getting everything to work, 1.1.0 was about NVIDIA support for more oomph, 1.2.0 was about stabilization and polish (and added support for Blackmagic's PCI cards as a nice little bonus), and 1.3.0 was about x264 integration. For 1.4.0, I wanted to work on multitrack audio and mixing. Audio has always been a clear focus for Nageru, and for good reason; video is 90% about audio, and it's sorely neglected in most amateur productions (not to mention that processing tools are nearly non-existant in most free or cheap software video mixers). Right from the get-go, it's had a chain with proper leveling, compressors and most importantly visual monitoring, so that you know when things are not as they should be. However, it was also written with an assumption that there would be a single audio input source (one of the cameras), and that's going to change. Single-input is less of a showstopper than one'd think at first; you can work around it by buying a mixer, plug everything into that and then feed that signal into the computer. However, there are a few downsides: If you want camera audio, you'll need to pull more cable from each camera (or have SDI de-embedders). Your mixer is likely to require an extra power supply, and that means yet more cable (any decent USB video card can power over USB, so why shouldn't your audio?). You'll need to buy and transport yet another device. And so on. (If you already have a PA mixer, of course you can use it, but just reusing the PA mix as a stream mix rarely gives the best results, and mixing on an aux bus gives very little flexibility.) So for 1.4.0, I wanted something to get essentially the processing equivalent of a mid-range mixer. But even though my education is in DSP, my experience with mixers is rather limited, so I did the only reasonable thing and went over to a friend who's also an (award-winning) audio engineer. (It turns out that everything on a mixer is the way it is for a pretty good reason, tuned through 50+ years of collective audio experience. If you just try to make up something on your own without understanding what's going on, you have a 0.001% chance of stumbling upon some genius new way of doing things by accident, and a significantly larger chance than that of messing things up.) After some back and forth, we figured out a reasonable set of basic tools that would be useful in the right hands, and not too confusing for a beginner. So let's have a look at the new controls you get: Nageru expanded audio control view There's one set of these controls for each bus. (This is the expanded view; there's also a compact view that has only the meters and the fader, which is what you'll typically want to use during the run itself the expanded view is for setup and tweaking.) A bus in Nageru is a pair of channels (left/right), sourced from a video capture or ALSA card. The channel mapping is flexible; my USB sound card has 18 channels, for instance, and you can use that to make several buses. Each bus has a name (here I named it very creatively Main , but in a real setting you might want something like Blue microphone or Speaker PC ), which is just for convenience; it doesn't mean much. The most important parts of the mix are given the most screen estate, so even though the way through the signal chain is left-to-right top-to-bottom, I'll go over it in the opposite direction. By far the most important part is the audio level, so the fader naturally is very prominent. (Note that the scale is nonlinear; you want more resolution in the most important area.) Changing a fader with the mouse or keyboard is possible, and probably most people will be doing that, but Nageru will also support USB faders. These usually speak MIDI, for historical reasons, and there are some UI challenges when they're all so different, but you can get really small ones if you want to get that tactile feel without blowing up your budget or getting a bigger backpack. Then there's the meter to the left of that. Nageru already has R128 level meters in the mastering section (not shown here, but generally unchanged from 1.3.0), and those are kept as-is, but for each bus, you don't want to know loudness; you want to know recording levels, so you want a peak meter, not a loudness meter. In particular, you don't want the bus to send clipped data to the master (which would happen if you set it too high); Nageru can handle this situation pretty well (unlike most digital mixers, it mixes in full 32-bit floating-point so there's no internal clipping, and there's a limiter on the master by default), but it's still not a good place to be in, so you can see that being marked in red in this example. The meter doubles as an input peak check during setup; if you turn off all the effects and set the fader to neutral, you can see if the input hits peak or not, and then adjust it down. (Also, you can see here that I only have audio in the left channel; I'd better check my connections, or perhaps just use mono, by setting the right channel on the bus mapping to the same input as the left one.) The compressor (now moved from the mastering section to each bus) should be well-known for those using 1.3.0, but in this view, it also has a reduction meter, so that you can see whether it kicks in or not. Most casual users would want to just leave the gain staging and compressor settings alone, but a skilled audio engineer will know how to adjust these to each speaker's antics (some speak at a pretty even volume and thus can get a bit of headroom, while some are much more variable and need tighter settings). Finally (or, well, first), there's the EQ section. The lo-cut is again well-known from 1.3.0 (the cutoff frequency is the same across all buses), but there's now also a simple three-band EQ per bus. Simply ask the speaker to talk normally for a bit, and tweak the controls until it sounds good. People have different voices and different ways of holding the microphone, and if you have a reasonable ear, you can use the EQ to your advantage to make them sound a little more even on the stream. Either that, or just put it in neutral, and the entire EQ code will be bypassed. The code is making pretty good progress; all the DSP stuff is done (save for some optimizations I want to do in zita-resampler, now that the discussion flow is started again), and in theory, one could use it already as-is. However, there's a fair amount of gnarly support code that still needs to be written: In particular, I need to do some refactoring to support ALSA hotplug (you don't want your entire stream to go down just because an USB soundcard dropped out for a split second), and similarly some serialization of saving/loading bus mappings. It's not exactly rocket science, but all the code still needs to be written, and there are a number of corner cases to think of. If you want to peek, the code is in the multichannel_audio branch, but beware; I rebase/squash it pretty frequently, so if you pull from it, expect frequent git breakage.

3 September 2016

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in August 2016

FTP assistant This month I marked 257 packages for accept and rejected only 26. Seems to be that I mostly choosed the high quality packages this month. I also sent 12 emails to maintainers asking questions. Debian LTS This was my twenty-sixth month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. This month my all in all workload has been 14.75h. Again, most of the time I choosed packages, where at the end the vulnerable code of the corresponding CVE was not present in the Wheezy version. So I could mark several CVEs for lshell and wget as not-affected, without doing an upload. Unfortunately I had to give up working on chicken. My scheme abilities appear to be rather rusty. Further, I uploaded a test version for php5 that takes care of 17 CVEs and as requested by the LTS users, two additional bugs. After all tests are passed, I will do a real upload with DLA. This month I also had another term of frontdesk work. Other stuff For the Alljoyn framework I fixed a compile issue with gcc 6 and could close RC-bugs
#831127, #831091, and #831198.
My patch was also accepted by upstream. Unfortunately a bug in gtest resulted in #833636. As gcc 6 is the default compiler now in testing, I could also close RC bug #831106.

Iustin Pop: Nationalpark Bike Marathon 2016

Nationalpark Bike Marathon 2016 report: gravity rules! "Marathon" is a bit of a misnomer, since I did the short route, not the medium nor the long one. But hey, it's the official name! Setup This race has four possible lengths: "Valader" which is full round-trip Scuol-Scuol (137km/4'026m), "Jauer" (Fuldera-Scuol, 103km/2'934m), "Livignasco" (Livigno-Scuol, 66km/1'871m) and "Put r" (S-chanf to Scuol, 47Km/1'051m). After many debates, I settled on the Livignasco route, as that was what I was reasonably confident to be able to do. The only problem was that this route (and all the longer ones, of course) were going over Pass Chaschauna, which is a quite hard climb. My bike shop person, who did the full length a number of times, just said when hearing the route I was planning: "Chaschauna is a bitch " Bad language, proper characterisation. The route choice also impacts the logistics: except for the full route, the question is where to sleep the night before? One can sleep either at the start place, or sleep in Scuol itself and take the official shuttle to the start place, but this means waking up much earlier. I decided to sleep in Livigno, as with a 7:45 start this would allow me to sleep until ~6:30, have a quick breakfast and be in time for the race. Problem #1 So on Friday (26th) I drove to Scuol, picked up my start number, and then drove over to Livigno and checked in to the hotel. Speaking of picking up the start number, I saw this at the start area: While picking up my start number: the race is so fast that an STI is needed as pacer?? An STI needed as pacer? How fast are these people, I wondered? Day of the race My plan to have a relaxing sleep until relatively late failed. I went to sleep with difficulties: late dinner due to my late arrival in Livigno, and then I was stressed enough about not missing the race that at 05:05 I already woke up, and was checking the clock every five minutes. Finally at 05:30 I gave up and got out of bed, with only about 6 hours of sleep. Problem #2. The other problem was that I na vely thought the hotel will have breakfast from 07:00 or even 07:30. Hah, as if this was Switzerland. The hotel had breakfast from 08:00, no reason to hurry, right? So I had a poor man's breakfast in the room, some energy bars and an ice tea. Problem #3. At least I had time to grab this picture from the hotel room: Good morning Livigno! Not bad. On to the race! But before that, remember to fill my hydration pack with 3L of water, and put it in my not-so-light backpack. Of course I had tools and some spare parts with me, what if something happens? Problem #4, over-planning. The race The setup at the start was pretty easy. Wait near the start until 07:45, then go. For me, not too in front, of course: Ready for the start! Pass Chaschauna About 3 kilometres of easy/flat road, and then it starts. Pass Chaschauna, killing your legs softly Already climbing  on foot! But not everybody. But at least the pictures were nice! The climb is hard, but the view is worth it! Still climbing So high already! Good legs :) Looking back: it's been a loong way up I can see the top!  and the remaining steep meters to climb :( The climb is difficult. It was around 22% for most of the time, and very few people were able to bike up. Not only the absolute meters were the problem, but also the fact that the ground was quite loose, and pushing the bike, or rather climbing up while pushing the bike, was difficult to do in bike shoes with cleats. Proper hiking shoes would have been much more adequate. Maybe this is why despite the effort, some people biked as much as possible? I was careful not to over-exert myself and walked almost all the way up. Hence the pictures But at last, reached the top of the pass, and was very happy to be done with it. The GPX file from my Garmin says it took only 4 minutes (1.2km) after the race start to actually start climbing (it was not obvious we were climbing so early), and then 1h:20m/8Km to get from 1'817m altitude to the highest point at 2'658m. 8Km in 1h:20m, faster than walking pace but quite slower than running pace (on flat terrain, of course). At the top of the pass I was quite happy: Finally at the top! Clipping in and Go! Smilling and happy! And then the descent started: I wonder how steep it will be going down This was an easy section :/ All the way leading to the race I kept thinking only about climbing Chaschauna, and not about going down on it. It was quite an experience, which I won't forget soon. The trail was already well travelled, which means that besides the loose ground in form of large clumps of dried earth, there was a layer of fine, somewhat moist earth, about 3-5 centimetres deep, which made the downhill "interesting". Coupled with what was a much steeper trail than going up I saw most of the time ~33% it's no surprise that many, or even most, of the people were walking their bikes down. The GPX track says that the trail goes 319m down in 1Km (so a 31.9% over one entire kilometre), then another 130m over the next 1.4Km (9.28%), and then (not sure if this is the pass per se or after) another longer segment of ~260m over 3Km (8.56%). The first steep segment needs lots of skill and concentration, the others are normal gradients. But at least things go fast. What took uphill took ~40 minutes for the last 450m up, downhill it took only 15 minutes! Falling I was able, thanks to recent training, to bike down the trail, or at least I thought so. So on the steep segment I was struggling to bike down and keep control of my bike, putting one leg down on some sections but in general being "on the bike", being hit by the dirt I was throwing in the air despite the mud-guards, being careful but at the same time enjoying this difficult section. That is, right up to the point where I got, I think, too comfortable. After the second-to-last curve, the rear wheel slides, I lose balance and fall in the (thankfully soft) dirt a bit more forcefully than I should have, the bike also sliding along in the dirt. No damage to myself, just some trivial scratches; the bike seems a bit shaken (fork was turned 180 , full of dirt, etc.). I get again on the bike and I continue down; however, something seems off: the rear brake level doesn't have a return anymore, I have to push it to go back. Still usable, but strange. So I continue the other two segment of this descent, and over these ~4-5Km I feel the brake issue going worse and worse: it's actually hard to push the brake lever back, and even pressing it doesn't seem to have much effect. And then the realisation dawns on my: I have hydraulic brakes, and the worsening thing leads me to think my brake hose has been punctured (by what? I fell in loose dirt) and I'm losing the brake fluid with every press. Now, on flat road, biking with only the front brake is tricky but doable. On an MTB course, having only one brake is not a smart thing . Not easy, not smart, and definitely dangerous. It also felt very strange to not have both brakes, and then I realised how much I work with the brakes in unison. I knew that there are repair posts in the race, but I didn't know if they can fix such things (and doing a brake fluid refill how complicated is it, how much time does it take?). Anyway, I resolved to try and continue if the terrain allows until I reach the first repair post, and stop if it gets too steep. It would be pretty sad to have to abort the race after only 10Km, right? The terrain did cooperate: up and down, so I was able to bleed speed easily, and even though through forest, the visibility was good enough that I could plan ahead. It was strangely lonely at this time: I was going slowly and thus not reaching from behind anyone, but also not being reached by riders from behind. I did enjoy it a bit, the quietness of the forest, just interrupted by the squeaking of my front brake And then I finally see the sign for "Repair: 1Km". Yaaay! maybe I don't have to quit the race. And then, about 100m further on, another sign: "Danger! Steep descent". Uh-oh tantalisingly close Let's go slow. And yes, here I was overtaken by 3-4 other cyclists. This was the single moment in the race where I did have a moment of real fear: at one point, I was going down with the remaining brake as pressed as I could without compromising stability, and I was still gaining speed. Not smart, and as I was debating how to fall to stop my descent, the terrain started to get less steep, and I finally reached the repair station, at kilometre 21. Difficult repairs There was another person being serviced for a flat rear tire, so I wait in line and discuss with him my problem. Upon hearing I only had the front brake, he said: "Wow, how did you manage to descend this last segment?" "Well, slowly ". My turn came up, I explain my problem and my theory, and the repair guy gives me one look, the bike one look, but doesn't look at the brake hose. Instead, he looks once at the brake lever, sees that another cable guide on my handle bar was bent during the fall and actually was mechanically interfering with the brake lever, unbends that thing, and says "here you go". I was stunned. 15 seconds of looking at the problem without stress, and the problem was solved. I could have done this myself if I took the time to look and think, and not hurry. And I could have enjoyed all the downhill on the pass, with two functioning brakes. Some lessons have to be learned the hard way, and this was one. I got off easy though, as I didn't have a real accident while biking with only one brake. And they say you get wiser as you get older Anyway, brake repaired, I stopped at the Sanit r tent to have my scratches disinfected, and onwards. The following few kilometres until S-chanf I enjoyed very much. S-chanf And then, 2 hours 10 minutes into the race, I exit the forest trail, reach S-chanf, and start climbing and descending and climbing and descending. In the sun, which now (after 10 AM) is not that light anymore. The initial climb at S-chanf, while not much, took away my remaining short-term reserves. The route is 50m ascent, then down and then another 50m ascent, and after a bit of flat another 75m ascent I was getting tired, despite eating energy bars and drinking water (and juice at stops). This goes one for an entire hour, during which I cover about 23Km, so not a bad speed everything considered. But getting more and more tired. There were also some very nice segments, along the river, in the shade of the forest. Some fast downhill, some fast flat. I got overtaken by quite a few real racers, that were going so fast I couldn't keep up with them as in I didn't dare ride that fast even when I had the energy. Clearly they were from the longer segments, and boy were they fast! A number of couples (or pairs?) one woman one man, a number of bigger groups, all going as if they had E-bikes or super-powers, not just biking along tired like me Last climb And then, the last big climb: half an hour of going about 300m up (absolute values, so cumulative number would probably be higher), in the sun, over about 6Km, so only 5% average gradient. But I was tired and even resorted to walking on some portions At least I could take some pictures again: Much later, climbing again. Or have pictures taken: A bit of a smile left. Yes, that's a smile, not a grimace! Nice views: Look, nice castle! Stopping for a picture, and not because I was *dead tired* :) At one point, in a bit of a shade, I stop to catch my breath. Somebody else stopped as well and, seeing as I was checking my GPS, asks: I got overtaken by a lot of cyclists here, although many of them were from S-chanf route (based on the number colour). Sad The thing is, besides the climbing and the sun, this and the previous part was a very nice route: through small towns, high above the valley, beautiful landscapes, etc. Just enjoying it was hard, since I wasn't a) trained well enough and b) prepared well enough. Last segment, last downhill In any case, after that hard half hour, it's flat (or rather said, average gradient zero): Flat route, good pavement. Can catch my breath, and take a another picture. Good road, good views, but I'm on the last virtual bar of my battery, so the remaining 15Km I do in 40 minutes, also "eating" the last ascent meters still about 300 left, I think, but up/down/up/down, so you could reuse kinetic energy to gain potential one. The only question I had now was, the route was at this moment about 400m higher (in absolute altitude) than the finish point, so when do we lose that altitude? The answer was a very very nice answer: in the last 5Km, for an average gradient of 8%, just perfect. I was tired however, so I couldn't really enjoy or go fast here, but it was a good feeling. Finish! And then, entering Scuol, not really believing I'm near the finish, that I will be able to actually stop and relax. My finish picture doesn't do justice to how happy I was at that moment: At the finish, happy happy happy! However, after passing the finish line, it was a bit weird. I just stop now? What next? So weird to just walk, not push pedals, and not go up. Or down. The funny thing here was that I thought I didn't use much of my water (hydration pack) during the race. But soon after finishing, I drank the equivalent of about two glasses (let's say 0.5L) and it was over. So I did manage to drink 2.5L during the race, plus the sport drinks at the stops. Time for stats: my Garmin says 67.07Km, 4h:29m, average speed 15.0kph (hah), 1'615m elevation gain. Official numbers say 66Km, 1'871m elevation, and thus 14.22kph. Ranking-wise: Sigh, could have done better. I was aiming for somewhere around last 33%, not last 25% :-P First classed was ~66% faster than me Going to the train station was hard as in difficult to move my legs. Took one nice picture of Scuol though, so was able to think a bit: After the race: Scuol is not so bad And then the long way back to Livigno. Took me 4 h to bike to Scuol, and about 3 hours to go back via public transport. At least I ate a sandwich in the meantime. Then reached Livigno, which was also looking nice: Took me almost as long by public transport as by bike, but finally back in Livigno. Also nice! Then got on my bike, which at this point was magically light and easy to ride (it seems I was at least partially recovered), rode to the hotel, packed my stuff, and drove home. On the highway I had my first real meal for that day, but I was quite tired so didn't feel like the achievement it should have been Lessons The biggest takeaway from this race was the huge learning experience I got. The race was itself awesome, but the learning even more so. First, for this particular race, it's much better to sleep in Scuol and (if not doing the whole route) take the shuttle to the actual start. Yes, one has to wake up earlier, but you have assured breakfast via the organisers (++++!), and after the race you don't have to get even more tired by taking the train and the bus and Second, I need better logistics: I don't need to carry that heavy load (spare tube, pump, tools, jacket in case it's cold) when the race is well organised. The water in the hydration pack was useful, but carrying it up Chaschauna was a pain. Not sure what I'll do next; it's possible to survive only on water/drinks from the food posts (basically 2.5-2.8L is equivalent to only 4 750ml bottles, and there were I think about 6 stops?), but the hydration pack is so easy to use Keeping one's head cool and not stress about things also would help: had I looked at my brake lever in peace, I could have solved it myself, and not ride ~10Km with only one brake. Also, losing some weight (as in losing fat, not having a lighter bike) would definitely help. I could stand to lose 5Kg easily, probably 10Kg, and that would bring me more in line with other people in the race (at least looking at the pictures). And hey, my Watts/Kg would improve magically! And last but most important, I need better training. Training on how to use my energy, training longer rides so that my body gets used to it and doesn't bonk after 3 hours, training training training. Which I like, but the problem is time to do it Also, in case anybody wonders: yes, I do recommend this race! It was definitely fun, and the route itself is very nice, nicer than the pictures here show. Closing words: gravity rules. Up or down, it's hard and punishing. Still: Ride on!

2 September 2016

Julian Andres Klode: apt 1.3 RC4 Tweaking apt update

Did that ever happen to you: You run apt update, it fetches a Release file, then starts fetching DEP-11 metadata, then any pdiff index stuff, and then applies them; all after another? Or this: You don t see any update progress until very near the end? Worry no more: I tweaked things a bit in 1.3~rc4 (git commit). Prior to 1.3~rc4, acquiring the files for an update worked like this: We create some object for the Release file, once a release file is done we queue any next object (DEP-11 icons, .diff/Index files, etc). There is no prioritizing, so usually we fetch the 5MB+ DEP-11 icons and components files first, and only then start working on other indices which might use Pdiff. In 1.3~rc4 I changed the queues to be priority queues: Release files and .diff/Index files have the highest priority (once we have them all, we know how much to fetch). The second level of priority goes to the .pdiff files which are later on passed to the rred process to patch an existing Packages, Sources, or Contents file. The third priority level is taken by all other index targets. Actually, I implemented the priority queues back in Jun. There was just one tiny problem: Pipelining. We might be inserting elements into our fetching queues in order of priority, but with pipelining enabled, stuff of lower priority might already have their HTTP request sent before we even get to queue the higher priority stuff. Today I had an epiphany: We fill the pipeline up to a number of items (the depth, currently 10). So, let s just fill the pipeline with items that have the same (or higher) priority than the maximum priority of the already-queued ones; and pretend it is full when we only have lower priority items. And that works fine: First the Release and .diff/Index stuff is fetched, which means we can start showing accurate progress info from there one. Next, the pdiff files are fetched, meaning that we can apply them in parallel to any targets downloading later in parallel (think DEP-11 icon tarballs). This has a great effect on performance: For the 01 Sep 2016 03:35:23 UTC -> 02 Sep 2016 09:25:37 update of Debian unstable and testing with Contents and appstream for amd64 and i386, update time reduced from 37 seconds to 24-28 seconds. In other news I recently cleaned up the apt packaging which renamed /usr/share/bug/apt/script to /usr/share/bug/apt. That broke on overlayfs, because dpkg could not rename the old apt directory to a backup name during unpack (only directories purely on the upper layer can be renamed). I reverted that now, so all future updates should be fine. David re-added the Breaks against apt-utils I recently removed by accident during the cleanup, so no more errors about overriding dump solvers. He also added support for fingerprints in gpgv s GOODSIG output, which apparently might come at some point. I Also fixed a few CMake issues, fixed the test suite for gpgv 2.1.15, allow building with a system-wide gtest library (we really ought to add back a pre-built one in Debian), and modified debian/rules to pass -O to make. I wish debhelper would do the latter automatically (there s a bug for that). Finally, we fixed some uninitialized variables in the base256 code, out-of-bound reads in the Sources file parser, off-by-one errors in the tagfile comment stripping code[1], and some memcpy() with length 0. Most of these will be cherry-picked into the 1.2 (xenial) and 1.0.9.8 (jessie) branches (releases 1.2.15 and 1.0.9.8.4). If you forked off your version of apt at another point, you might want to do the same. [1] those were actually causing the failures and segfaults in the unit tests on hurd-i386 buildds. I always thought it was a hurd-specific issue PS. Building for Fedora on OBS has a weird socket fd #3 that does not get closed during the test suite despite us setting CLOEXEC on it. Join us in #debian-apt on oftc if you have ideas.
Filed under: Debian, Ubuntu

1 September 2016

Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo: GNU libc and Linux

Some time ago, I built a static program that I wanted to run on an Android tablet. What was my surprise when I saw a message saying "FATAL: kernel too old". After some investigation, it turns out that GNU libc may assume some Linux features are present during build time. This means that given a minimum Linux version, that built libc might only work on that version or newer. Since 2014, GNU libc itself requires 2.6.32 as the minimum. Previously, it was 2.6.16, changed in 2012. Debian, as of 2015, builds it with a required minimum Linux version of 3.2. To give an idea about the history of these kernel releases, we have: So, at least for GNU libc upstream, it would appear that not many devices would stop being supported, though the situation would not be as good for binary versions of Debian. However, I have a small list of devices that might show otherwise. Many Android devices have been shipped with Linux 3.4, but I encountered at least one using Linux 3.0. So, even though many new devices ship with newer versions of Linux, it's still possible to find some new and older devices using versions older than 3.2, and even versions older than 2.6.32 may be found. Another interesting note is that, without a few patches, it's not possible to build Linux 2.6.32 with GCC 5 and newer. For that and many other reasons, it's important that we update. For bug fixes, and so we can make progress and use better software are some of the other reasons. So, it's imperative that we have devices support upstream. Otherwise, the task of doing updates with forward porting becomes daunting. And that's the current state for many devices, which is why I have been trying to use new software with older versions of Linux. But as time passes, I realize how hard a task this is, as most new software these days, even a building block like GNU libc, requires ever new versions of Linux. For now, most gadgets I have support Linux 3.4 or newer. But not long ahead, that support will be dropped as well. And that means there will be no more updates for those devices. It's a consequence of both targeting time-to-market and programmed obsolescence as business practices. Upstream support is no priority, and maintenance is only that required until the next model is available on the stores. This is one more reason why we need to have more operating systems available for those devices. Systems that are designed to last more than a couple of years. As I said, upstream support is imperative, but as a step forward, I still believe we can provide the GNU experience to lots of devices out there.

Next.

Previous.