Search Results: "jan"

5 March 2026

Ian Jackson: Adopting tag2upload and modernising your Debian packaging

Introduction tag2upload allows authorised Debian contributors to upload to Debian simply by pushing a signed git tag to Debian s gitlab instance, Salsa. We have recently announced that tag2upload is, in our opinion, now very stable, and ready for general use by all Debian uploaders. tag2upload, as part of Debian s git transition programme, is very flexible - it needs to support a large variety of maintainer practices. And it s relatively unopinionated, wherever that s possible. But, during the open beta, various contributors emailed us asking for Debian packaging git workflow advice and recommendations. This post is an attempt to give some more opinionated answers, and guide you through modernising your workflow. (This article is aimed squarely at Debian contributors. Much of it will make little sense to Debian outsiders.) Why Ease of development git offers a far superior development experience to patches and tarballs. Moving tasks from a tarballs and patches representation to a normal, git-first, representation, makes everything simpler. dgit and tag2upload do automatically many things that have to be done manually, or with separate commands, in dput-based upload workflows. They will also save you from a variety of common mistakes. For example, you cannot accidentally overwrite an NMU, with tag2upload or dgit. These many safety catches mean that our software sometimes complains about things, or needs confirmation, when more primitive tooling just goes ahead. We think this is the right tradeoff: it s part of the great care we take to avoid our software making messes. Software that has your back is very liberating for the user. tag2upload makes it possible to upload with very small amounts of data transfer, which is great in slow or unreliable network environments. The other week I did a git-debpush over mobile data while on a train in Switzerland; it completed in seconds. See the Day-to-day work section below to see how simple your life could be. Don t fear a learning burden; instead, start forgetting all that nonsense Most Debian contributors have spent months or years learning how to work with Debian s tooling. You may reasonably fear that our software is yet more bizarre, janky, and mistake-prone stuff to learn. We promise (and our users tell us) that s not how it is. We have spent a lot of effort on providing a good user experience. Our new git-first tooling, especially dgit and tag2upload, is much simpler to use than source-package-based tooling, despite being more capable. The idiosyncrasies and bugs of source packages, and of the legacy archive, have been relentlessly worked around and papered over by our thousands of lines of thoroughly-tested defensive code. You too can forget all those confusing details, like our users have! After using our systems for a while you won t look back. And, you shouldn t fear trying it out. dgit and tag2upload are unlikely to make a mess. If something is wrong (or even doubtful), they will typically detect it, and stop. This does mean that starting to use tag2upload or dgit can involve resolving anomalies that previous tooling ignored, or passing additional options to reassure the system about your intentions. So admittedly it isn t always trivial to get your first push to succeed. Properly publishing the source code One of Debian s foundational principles is that we publish the source code. Nowadays, the vast majority of us, and of our upstreams, are using git. We are doing this because git makes our life so much easier. But, without tag2upload or dgit, we aren t properly publishing our work! Yes, we typically put our git branch on Salsa, and point Vcs-Git at it. However:
  • The format of git branches on Salsa is not standardised. They might be patches-unapplied, patches-applied, bare debian/, or something even stranger.
  • There is no guarantee that the DEP-14 debian/1.2.3-7 tag on salsa corresponds precisely to what was actually uploaded. dput-based tooling (such as gbp buildpackage) doesn t cross-check the .dsc against git.
  • There is no guarantee that the presence of a DEP-14 tag even means that that version of package is in the archive.
This means that the git repositories on Salsa cannot be used by anyone who needs things that are systematic and always correct. They are OK for expert humans, but they are awkward (even hazardous) for Debian novices, and you cannot use them in automation. The real test is: could you use Vcs-Git and Salsa to build a Debian derivative? You could not. tag2upload and dgit do solve this problem. When you upload, they:
  1. Make a canonical-form (patches-applied) derivative of your git branch;
  2. Ensure that there is a well-defined correspondence between the git tree and the source package;
  3. Publish both the DEP-14 tag and a canonical-form archive/debian/1.2.3-7 tag to a single central git depository, *.dgit.debian.org;
  4. Record the git information in the Dgit field in .dsc so that clients can tell (using the ftpmaster API) that this was a git-based upload, what the corresponding git objects are, and where to find them.
This dependably conveys your git history to users and downstreams, in a standard, systematic and discoverable way. tag2upload and dgit are the only system which achieves this. (The client is dgit clone, as advertised in e.g. dgit-user(7). For dput-based uploads, it falls back to importing the source package.) Adopting tag2upload - the minimal change tag2upload is a substantial incremental improvement to many existing workflows. git-debpush is a drop-in replacement for building, signing, and uploading the source package. So, you can just adopt it without completely overhauling your packaging practices. You and your co-maintainers can even mix-and-match tag2upload, dgit, and traditional approaches, for the same package. Start with the wiki page and git-debpush(1) (ideally from forky aka testing). You don t need to do any of the other things recommended in this article. Overhauling your workflow, using advanced git-first tooling The rest of this article is a guide to adopting the best and most advanced git-based tooling for Debian packaging. Assumptions
  • Your current approach uses the patches-unapplied git branch format used with gbp pq and/or quilt, and often used with git-buildpackage. You previously used gbp import-orig.
  • You are fluent with git, and know how to use Merge Requests on gitlab (Salsa). You have your origin remote set to Salsa.
  • Your main Debian branch name on Salsa is master. Personally I think we should use main but changing your main branch name is outside the scope of this article.
  • You have enough familiarity with Debian packaging including concepts like source and binary packages, and NEW review.
  • Your co-maintainers are also adopting the new approach.
tag2upload and dgit (and git-debrebase) are flexible tools and can help with many other scenarios too, and you can often mix-and-match different approaches. But, explaining every possibility would make this post far too confusing. Topics and tooling This article will guide you in adopting:
  • tag2upload
  • Patches-applied git branch for your packaging
  • Either plain git merge or git-debrebase
  • dgit when a with-binaries uploaded is needed (NEW)
  • git-based sponsorship
  • Salsa (gitlab), including Debian Salsa CI
Choosing the git branch format In Debian we need to be able to modify the upstream-provided source code. Those modifications are the Debian delta. We need to somehow represent it in git. We recommend storing the delta as git commits to those upstream files, by picking one of the following two approaches.
rationale Much traditional Debian tooling like quilt and gbp pq uses the patches-unapplied branch format, which stores the delta as patch files in debian/patches/, in a git tree full of unmodified upstream files. This is clumsy to work with, and can even be an alarming beartrap for Debian outsiders.
git merge Option 1: simply use git, directly, including git merge. Just make changes directly to upstream files on your Debian branch, when necessary. Use plain git merge when merging from upstream. This is appropriate if your package has no or very few upstream changes. It is a good approach if the Debian maintainers and upstream maintainers work very closely, so that any needed changes for Debian are upstreamed quickly, and any desired behavioural differences can be arranged by configuration controlled from within debian/. This is the approach documented more fully in our workflow tutorial dgit-maint-merge(7).
git-debrebase Option 2: Adopt git-debrebase. git-debrebase helps maintain your delta as linear series of commits (very like a topic branch in git terminology). The delta can be reorganised, edited, and rebased. git-debrebase is designed to help you carry a significant and complicated delta series. The older versions of the Debian delta are preserved in the history. git-debrebase makes extra merges to make a fast-forwarding history out of the successive versions of the delta queue branch. This is the approach documented more fully in our workflow tutorial dgit-maint-debrebase(7). Examples of complex packages using this approach include src:xen and src:sbcl.
Determine upstream git and stop using upstream tarballs We recommend using upstream git, only and directly. You should ignore upstream tarballs completely.
rationale Many maintainers have been importing upstream tarballs into git, for example by using gbp import-orig. But in reality the upstream tarball is an intermediate build product, not (just) source code. Using tarballs rather than git exposes us to additional supply chain attacks; indeed, the key activation part of the xz backdoor attack was hidden only in the tarball! git offers better traceability than so-called pristine upstream tarballs. (The word pristine is even a joke by the author of pristine-tar!)
First, establish which upstream git tag corresponds to the version currently in Debian. From the sake of readability, I m going to pretend that upstream version is 1.2.3, and that upstream tagged it v1.2.3. Edit debian/watch to contain something like this: 
version=4
opts="mode=git" https://codeberg.org/team/package refs/tags/v(\d\S*)
You may need to adjust the regexp, depending on your upstream s tag name convention. If debian/watch had a files-excluded, you ll need to make a filtered version of upstream git.
git-debrebase From now on we ll generate our own .orig tarballs directly from git.
rationale We need some upstream tarball for the 3.0 (quilt) source format to work with. It needs to correspond to the git commit we re using as our upstream. We don t need or want to use a tarball from upstream for this. The .orig is just needed so a nice legacy Debian source package (.dsc) can be generated.
Probably, the current .orig in the Debian archive, is an upstream tarball, which may be different to the output of git-archive and possibly even have different contents to what s in git. The legacy archive has trouble with differing .origs for the same upstream version . So we must until the next upstream release change our idea of the upstream version number. We re going to add +git to Debian s idea of the upstream version. Manually make a tag with that name: 
git tag -m "Compatibility tag for orig transition" v1.2.3+git v1.2.3~0
git push origin v1.2.3+git
If you are doing the packaging overhaul at the same time as a new upstream version, you can skip this part.
Convert the git branch
git merge Prepare a new branch on top of upstream git, containing what we want: 
git branch -f old-master         # make a note of the old git representation
git reset --hard v1.2.3          # go back to the real upstream git tag
git checkout old-master :debian  # take debian/* from old-master
git commit -m "Re-import Debian packaging on top of upstream git"
git merge --allow-unrelated-histories -s ours -m "Make fast forward from tarball-based history" old-master
git branch -d old-master         # it's incorporated in our history now
If there are any patches, manually apply them to your main branch with git am, and delete the patch files (git rm -r debian/patches, and commit). (If you ve chosen this workflow, there should be hardly any patches,)
rationale These are some pretty nasty git runes, indeed. They re needed because we want to restart our Debian packaging on top of a possibly quite different notion of what the upstream is.
git-debrebase Convert the branch to git-debrebase format and rebase onto the upstream git: 
git-debrebase -fdiverged convert-from-gbp upstream/1.2.3
git-debrebase -fdiverged -fupstream-not-ff new-upstream 1.2.3+git
If you had patches which patched generated files which are present only in the upstream tarball, and not in upstream git, you will encounter rebase conflicts. You can drop hunks editing those files, since those files are no longer going to be part of your view of the upstream source code at all.
rationale The force option -fupstream-not-ff will be needed this one time because your existing Debian packaging history is (probably) not based directly on the upstream history. -fdiverged may be needed because git-debrebase might spot that your branch is not based on dgit-ish git history.
Manually make your history fast forward from the git import of your previous upload. 
dgit fetch
git show dgit/dgit/sid:debian/changelog
# check that you have the same version number
git merge -s ours --allow-unrelated-histories -m 'Declare fast forward from pre-git-based history' dgit/dgit/sid
Change the source format Delete any existing debian/source/options and/or debian/source/local-options.
git merge Change debian/source/format to 1.0. Add debian/source/options containing -sn.
rationale We are using the 1.0 native source format. This is the simplest possible source format - just a tarball. We would prefer 3.0 (native) , which has some advantages, but dpkg-source between 2013 (wheezy) and 2025 (trixie) inclusive unjustifiably rejects this configuration. You may receive bug reports from over-zealous folks complaining about the use of the 1.0 source format. You should close such reports, with a reference to this article and to #1106402.
git-debrebase Ensure that debian/source/format contains 3.0 (quilt).
Now you are ready to do a local test build. Sort out the documentation and metadata Edit README.source to at least mention dgit-maint-merge(7) or dgit-maint-debrebase(7), and to tell people not to try to edit or create anything in debian/patches/. Consider saying that uploads should be done via dgit or tag2upload. Check that your Vcs-Git is correct in debian/control. Consider deleting or pruning debian/gbp.conf, since it isn t used by dgit, tag2upload, or git-debrebase.
git merge Add a note to debian/changelog about the git packaging change.
git-debrebase git-debrebase new-upstream will have added a new upstream version stanza to debian/changelog. Edit that so that it instead describes the packaging change. (Don t remove the +git from the upstream version number there!)
Configure Salsa Merge Requests
git-debrebase In Settings / Merge requests , change Squash commits when merging to Do not allow .
rationale Squashing could destroy your carefully-curated delta queue. It would also disrupt git-debrebase s git branch structure.
Set up Salsa CI, and use it to block merges of bad changes Caveat - the tradeoff gitlab is a giant pile of enterprise crap. It is full of startling bugs, many of which reveal a fundamentally broken design. It is only barely Free Software in practice for Debian (in the sense that we are very reluctant to try to modify it). The constant-churn development approach and open-core business model are serious problems. It s very slow (and resource-intensive). It can be depressingly unreliable. That Salsa works as well as it does is a testament to the dedication of the Debian Salsa team (and those who support them, including DSA). However, I have found that despite these problems, Salsa CI is well worth the trouble. Yes, there are frustrating days when work is blocked because gitlab CI is broken and/or one has to keep mashing Retry . But, the upside is no longer having to remember to run tests, track which of my multiple dev branches tests have passed on, and so on. Automatic tests on Merge Requests are a great way of reducing maintainer review burden for external contributions, and helping uphold quality norms within a team. They re a great boon for the lazy solo programmer. The bottom line is that I absolutely love it when the computer thoroughly checks my work. This is tremendously freeing, precisely at the point when one most needs it deep in the code. If the price is to occasionally be blocked by a confused (or broken) computer, so be it. Setup procedure Create debian/salsa-ci.yml containing 
include:
  - https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/raw/master/recipes/debian.yml
In your Salsa repository, under Settings / CI/CD , expand General Pipelines and set CI/CD configuration file to debian/salsa-ci.yml.
rationale Your project may have an upstream CI config in .gitlab-ci.yml. But you probably want to run the Debian Salsa CI jobs. You can add various extra configuration to debian/salsa-ci.yml to customise it. Consult the Salsa CI docs.
git-debrebase Add to debian/salsa-ci.yml: 
.git-debrebase-prepare: &git-debrebase-prepare
  # install the tools we'll need
  - apt-get update
  - apt-get --yes install git-debrebase git-debpush
  # git-debrebase needs git user setup
  - git config user.email "salsa-ci@invalid.invalid"
  - git config user.name "salsa-ci"
  # run git-debrebase make-patches
  # https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/371
  - git-debrebase --force
  - git-debrebase --noop-ok make-patches
  # make an orig tarball using the upstream tag, not a gbp upstream/ tag
  # https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/541
  - git-deborig
.build-definition: &build-definition
  extends: .build-definition-common
  before_script: *git-debrebase-prepare
build source:
  extends: .build-source-only
  before_script: *git-debrebase-prepare
variables:
  # disable shallow cloning of git repository. This is needed for git-debrebase
  GIT_DEPTH: 0
rationale Unfortunately the Salsa CI pipeline currently lacks proper support for git-debrebase (salsa-ci#371) and has trouble directly using upstream git for orig tarballs (#salsa-ci#541). These runes were based on those in the Xen package. You should subscribe to the tickets #371 and #541 so that you can replace the clone-and-hack when proper support is merged.
Push this to salsa and make the CI pass. If you configured the pipeline filename after your last push, you will need to explicitly start the first CI run. That s in Pipelines : press New pipeline in the top right. The defaults will very probably be correct. Block untested pushes, preventing regressions In your project on Salsa, go into Settings / Repository . In the section Branch rules , use Add branch rule . Select the branch master. Set Allowed to merge to Maintainers . Set Allowed to push and merge to No one . Leave Allow force push disabled. This means that the only way to land anything on your mainline is via a Merge Request. When you make a Merge Request, gitlab will offer Set to auto-merge . Use that. gitlab won t normally merge an MR unless CI passes, although you can override this on a per-MR basis if you need to. (Sometimes, immediately after creating a merge request in gitlab, you will see a plain Merge button. This is a bug. Don t press that. Reload the page so that Set to auto-merge appears.) autopkgtests Ideally, your package would have meaningful autopkgtests (DEP-8 tests) This makes Salsa CI more useful for you, and also helps detect and defend you against regressions in your dependencies. The Debian CI docs are a good starting point. In-depth discussion of writing autopkgtests is beyond the scope of this article. Day-to-day work With this capable tooling, most tasks are much easier. Making changes to the package Make all changes via a Salsa Merge Request. So start by making a branch that will become the MR branch. On your MR branch you can freely edit every file. This includes upstream files, and files in debian/. For example, you can:
  • Make changes with your editor and commit them.
  • git cherry-pick an upstream commit.
  • git am a patch from a mailing list or from the Debian Bug System.
  • git revert an earlier commit, even an upstream one.
When you have a working state of things, tidy up your git branch:
git merge Use git-rebase to squash/edit/combine/reorder commits.
git-debrebase Use git-debrebase -i to squash/edit/combine/reorder commits. When you are happy, run git-debrebase conclude. Do not edit debian/patches/. With git-debrebase, this is purely an output. Edit the upstream files directly instead. To reorganise/maintain the patch queue, use git-debrebase -i to edit the actual commits.
Push the MR branch (topic branch) to Salsa and make a Merge Request. Set the MR to auto-merge when all checks pass . (Or, depending on your team policy, you could ask for an MR Review of course.) If CI fails, fix up the MR branch, squash/tidy it again, force push the MR branch, and once again set it to auto-merge. Test build An informal test build can be done like this: 
apt-get build-dep .
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b
Ideally this will leave git status clean, with no modified or un-ignored untracked files. If it shows untracked files, add them to .gitignore or debian/.gitignore as applicable. If it dirties the tree, consider trying to make it stop doing that. The easiest way is probably to build out-of-tree, if supported upstream. If this is too difficult, you can leave the messy build arrangements as they are, but you ll need to be disciplined about always committing, using git clean and git reset, and so on. For formal binaries builds, including for testing, use dgit sbuild as described below for uploading to NEW. Uploading to Debian Start an MR branch for the administrative changes for the release. Document all the changes you re going to release, in the debian/changelog.
git merge gbp dch can help write the changelog for you: 
dgit fetch sid
gbp dch --ignore-branch --since=dgit/dgit/sid --git-log=^upstream/main
rationale --ignore-branch is needed because gbp dch wrongly thinks you ought to be running this on master, but of course you re running it on your MR branch. The --git-log=^upstream/main excludes all upstream commits from the listing used to generate the changelog. (I m assuming you have an upstream remote and that you re basing your work on their main branch.) If there was a new upstream version, you ll usually want to write a single line about that, and perhaps summarise anything really important.
(For the first upload after switching to using tag2upload or dgit you need --since=debian/1.2.3-1, where 1.2.3-1 is your previous DEP-14 tag, because dgit/dgit/sid will be a dsc import, not your actual history.)
Change UNRELEASED to the target suite, and finalise the changelog. (Note that dch will insist that you at least save the file in your editor.) 
dch -r
git commit -m 'Finalise for upload' debian/changelog
Make an MR of these administrative changes, and merge it. (Either set it to auto-merge and wait for CI, or if you re in a hurry double-check that it really is just a changelog update so that you can be confident about telling Salsa to Merge unverified changes .) Now you can perform the actual upload: 
git checkout master
git pull --ff-only # bring the gitlab-made MR merge commit into your local tree
git merge 
git-debpush
git-debrebase 
git-debpush --quilt=linear
--quilt=linear is needed only the first time, but it is very important that first time, to tell the system the correct git branch layout.
Uploading a NEW package to Debian If your package is NEW (completely new source, or has new binary packages) you can t do a source-only upload. You have to build the source and binary packages locally, and upload those build artifacts. Happily, given the same git branch you d tag for tag2upload, and assuming you have sbuild installed and a suitable chroot, dgit can help take care of the build and upload for you: Prepare the changelog update and merge it, as above. Then:
git-debrebase Create the orig tarball and launder the git-derebase branch: 
git-deborig
git-debrebase quick
rationale Source package format 3.0 (quilt), which is what I m recommending here for use with git-debrebase, needs an orig tarball; it would also be needed for 1.0-with-diff.
Build the source and binary packages, locally: 
dgit sbuild
dgit push-built
rationale You don t have to use dgit sbuild, but it is usually convenient to do so, because unlike sbuild, dgit understands git. Also it works around a gitignore-related defect in dpkg-source.
New upstream version Find the new upstream version number and corresponding tag. (Let s suppose it s 1.2.4.) Check the provenance: 
git verify-tag v1.2.4
rationale Not all upstreams sign their git tags, sadly. Sometimes encouraging them to do so can help. You may need to use some other method(s) to check that you have the right git commit for the release.
git merge Simply merge the new upstream version and update the changelog: 
git merge v1.2.4
dch -v1.2.4-1 'New upstream release.'
git-debrebase Rebase your delta queue onto the new upstream version: 
git debrebase mew-upstream 1.2.4
If there are conflicts between your Debian delta for 1.2.3, and the upstream changes in 1.2.4, this is when you need to resolve them, as part of git merge or git (deb)rebase. After you ve completed the merge, test your package and make any further needed changes. When you have it working in a local branch, make a Merge Request, as above. Sponsorship git-based sponsorship is super easy! The sponsee can maintain their git branch on Salsa, and do all normal maintenance via gitlab operations. When the time comes to upload, the sponsee notifies the sponsor that it s time. The sponsor fetches and checks out the git branch from Salsa, does their checks, as they judge appropriate, and when satisfied runs git-debpush. As part of the sponsor s checks, they might want to see all changes since the last upload to Debian: 
dgit fetch sid
git diff dgit/dgit/sid..HEAD
Or to see the Debian delta of the proposed upload: 
git verify-tag v1.2.3
git diff v1.2.3..HEAD ':!debian'
git-debrebase Or to show all the delta as a series of commits: 
git log -p v1.2.3..HEAD ':!debian'
Don t look at debian/patches/. It can be absent or out of date.
Incorporating an NMU Fetch the NMU into your local git, and see what it contains: 
dgit fetch sid
git diff master...dgit/dgit/sid
If the NMUer used dgit, then git log dgit/dgit/sid will show you the commits they made. Normally the best thing to do is to simply merge the NMU, and then do any reverts or rework in followup commits: 
git merge dgit/dgit/sid
git-debrebase You should git-debrebase quick at this stage, to check that the merge went OK and the package still has a lineariseable delta queue.
Then make any followup changes that seem appropriate. Supposing your previous maintainer upload was 1.2.3-7, you can go back and see the NMU diff again with: 
git diff debian/1.2.3-7...dgit/dgit/sid
git-debrebase The actual changes made to upstream files will always show up as diff hunks to those files. diff commands will often also show you changes to debian/patches/. Normally it s best to filter them out with git diff ... ':!debian/patches' If you d prefer to read the changes to the delta queue as an interdiff (diff of diffs), you can do something like 
git checkout debian/1.2.3-7
git-debrebase --force make-patches
git diff HEAD...dgit/dgit/sid -- :debian/patches
to diff against a version with debian/patches/ up to date. (The NMU, in dgit/dgit/sid, will necessarily have the patches already up to date.)
DFSG filtering (handling non-free files) Some upstreams ship non-free files of one kind of another. Often these are just in the tarballs, in which case basing your work on upstream git avoids the problem. But if the files are in upstream s git trees, you need to filter them out. This advice is not for (legally or otherwise) dangerous files. If your package contains files that may be illegal, or hazardous, you need much more serious measures. In this case, even pushing the upstream git history to any Debian service, including Salsa, must be avoided. If you suspect this situation you should seek advice, privately and as soon as possible, from dgit-owner@d.o and/or the DFSG team. Thankfully, legally dangerous files are very rare in upstream git repositories, for obvious reasons. Our approach is to make a filtered git branch, based on the upstream history, with the troublesome files removed. We then treat that as the upstream for all of the rest of our work.
rationale Yes, this will end up including the non-free files in the git history, on official Debian servers. That s OK. What s forbidden is non-free material in the Debianised git tree, or in the source packages.
Initial filtering 
git checkout -b upstream-dfsg v1.2.3
git rm nonfree.exe
git commit -m "upstream version 1.2.3 DFSG-cleaned"
git tag -s -m "upstream version 1.2.3 DFSG-cleaned" v1.2.3+ds1
git push origin upstream-dfsg
And now, use 1.2.3+ds1, and the filtered branch upstream-dfsg, as the upstream version, instead of 1.2.3 and upstream/main. Follow the steps for Convert the git branch or New upstream version, as applicable, adding +ds1 into debian/changelog. If you missed something and need to filter out more a nonfree files, re-use the same upstream-dfsg branch and bump the ds version, eg v1.2.3+ds2. Subsequent upstream releases 
git checkout upstream-dfsg
git merge v1.2.4
git rm additional-nonfree.exe # if any
git commit -m "upstream version 1.2.4 DFSG-cleaned"
git tag -s -m "upstream version 1.2.4 DFSG-cleaned" v1.2.4+ds1
git push origin upstream-dfsg
Removing files by pattern If the files you need to remove keep changing, you could automate things with a small shell script debian/rm-nonfree containing appropriate git rm commands. If you use git rm -f it will succeed even if the git merge from real upstream has conflicts due to changes to non-free files.
rationale Ideally uscan, which has a way of representing DFSG filtering patterns in debian/watch, would be able to do this, but sadly the relevant functionality is entangled with uscan s tarball generation.
Common issues
  • Tarball contents: If you are switching from upstream tarballs to upstream git, you may find that the git tree is significantly different. It may be missing files that your current build system relies on. If so, you definitely want to be using git, not the tarball. Those extra files in the tarball are intermediate built products, but in Debian we should be building from the real source! Fixing this may involve some work, though.
  • gitattributes: For Reasons the dgit and tag2upload system disregards and disables the use of .gitattributes to modify files as they are checked out. Normally this doesn t cause a problem so long as any orig tarballs are generated the same way (as they will be by tag2upload or git-deborig). But if the package or build system relies on them, you may need to institute some workarounds, or, replicate the effect of the gitattributes as commits in git.
  • git submodules: git submodules are terrible and should never ever be used. But not everyone has got the message, so your upstream may be using them. If you re lucky, the code in the submodule isn t used in which case you can git rm the submodule.
Further reading I ve tried to cover the most common situations. But software is complicated and there are many exceptions that this article can t cover without becoming much harder to read. You may want to look at:
  • dgit workflow manpages: As part of the git transition project, we have written workflow manpages, which are more comprehensive than this article. They re centered around use of dgit, but also discuss tag2upload where applicable. These cover a much wider range of possibilities, including (for example) choosing different source package formats, how to handle upstreams that publish only tarballs, etc. They are correspondingly much less opinionated. Look in dgit-maint-merge(7) and dgit-maint-debrebase(7). There is also dgit-maint-gbp(7) for those who want to keep using gbp pq and/or quilt with a patches-unapplied branch.
  • NMUs are very easy with dgit. (tag2upload is usually less suitable than dgit, for an NMU.) You can work with any package, in git, in a completely uniform way, regardless of maintainer git workflow, See dgit-nmu-simple(7).
  • Native packages (meaning packages maintained wholly within Debian) are much simpler. See dgit-maint-native(7).
  • tag2upload documentation: The tag2upload wiki page is a good starting point. There s the git-debpush(1) manpage of course.
  • dgit reference documentation: There is a comprehensive command-line manual in dgit(1). Description of the dgit data model and Principles of Operation is in dgit(7); including coverage of out-of-course situations. dgit is a complex and powerful program so this reference material can be overwhelming. So, we recommend starting with a guide like this one, or the dgit- (7) workflow tutorials.
  • Design and implementation documentation for tag2upload is linked to from the wiki.
  • Debian s git transition blog post from December. tag2upload and dgit are part of the git transition project, and aim to support a very wide variety of git workflows. tag2upload and dgit work well with existing git tooling, including git-buildpackage-based approaches. git-debrebase is conceptually separate from, and functionally independent of, tag2upload and dgit. It s a git workflow and delta management tool, competing with gbp pq, manual use of quilt, git-dpm and so on.
git-debrebase
  • git-debrebase reference documentation: Of course there s a comprehensive command-line manual in git-debrebase(1). git-debrebase is quick and easy to use, but it has a complex data model and sophisticated algorithms. This is documented in git-debrebase(5).
Edited 2026-03-05 18:48 UTC to add a missing --noop-ok to the Salsa CI runes. Thanks to Charlemagne Lasse for the report. Apologies if this causes Debian Planet to re-post this article as if it were new.


comment count unavailable comments

17 February 2026

Freexian Collaborators: Monthly report about Debian Long Term Support, January 2026 (by Santiago Ruano Rinc n)

The Debian LTS Team, funded by Freexian s Debian LTS offering, is pleased to report its activities for January.

Activity summary During the month of January, 20 contributors have been paid to work on Debian LTS (links to individual contributor reports are located below). The team released 33 DLAs fixing 216 CVEs. The team continued preparing security updates in its usual rhythm. Beyond the updates targeting Debian 11 ( bullseye ), which is the current release under LTS, the team also proposed updates for more recent releases (Debian 12 ( bookworm ) and Debian 13 ( trixie )), including Debian unstable. We highlight several notable security updates here below. Notable security updates:
  • python3.9, prepared by Andrej Shadura (DLA-4455-1), fixing multiple vulnerabilities in the Python interpreter.
  • php, prepared by Guilhem Moulin (DLA-4447-1), fixing two vulnerabilities that could yield to request forgery or denial of service.
  • apache2, prepared by Bastien Roucari s DLA-4452-1, fixing four CVEs.
  • linux-6.1, prepared by Ben Hutchings (DLA-4436-1), as a regular update of the linux 6.1 backport to Debian 11.
  • python-django, prepared by Chris Lamb (DLA-4458-1), resolving multiple vulnerabilities.
  • firefox-esr prepared by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (DLA-4439-1)
  • gnupg2, prepared by Roberto S nchez (DLA-4437-1), fixing multiple issues, including CVE-2025-68973 that could potentially be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
  • apache-log4j2, prepared by Markus Koschany (DLA-4444-1)
  • ceph, prepared by Utkarsh Gupta (DLA-4460-1)
  • inetutils, prepared by Andreas Henriksson (DLA-4453-1), fixing an authentication bypass in telnetd.
Moreover, Sylvain Beucler studied the security support status of p7zip, a fork of 7zip that has become unmaintained upstream. To avoid letting the users continue using an unsupported package, Sylvain has investigated a path forward in collaboration with the security team and the 7zip maintainer, looking to replace p7zip with 7zip. It is to note however that 7zip developers don t reveal the information about the patches that fix CVEs, making it difficult to backport single patches to fix vulnerabilities in Debian released versions. Contributions from outside the LTS Team: Thunderbird, prepared by maintainer Christoph Goehre. The DLA (DLA-4442-1) was published by Emilio. The LTS Team has also contributed with updates to the latest Debian releases:
  • Bastien uploaded gpsd to unstable, and proposed updates for trixie #1126121 and bookworm #1126168 to fix two CVEs.
  • Bastien also prepared the imagemagick updates for trixie and bookworm, released as DSA-6111-1, along with the bullseye update DLA-4448-1.
  • Chris proposed a trixie point update for python-django (#112646), and the work for bookworm was completed in February (#1079454). The longstanding bookworm update required tracking down a regression in the django-storages packages.
  • Markus prepared tomcat10 updates for trixie and bookworm (DSA-6120-1), and tomcat11 for trixie (DSA-6121-1)
  • Thorsten Alteholz prepared bookworm point updates for zvbi (#1126167) to fix five CVEs; taglib (#1126273) to fix one CVE; and libuev (#1126370) to fix one CVE.
  • Utkarsh prepared an unstable update of node-lodash to fix one CVE.
Other than the work related to updates, Sylvain made several improvements to the documentation and tooling used by the team.

Individual Debian LTS contributor reports

Thanks to our sponsors Sponsors that joined recently are in bold.

13 February 2026

Erich Schubert: Dogfood Generative AI

Current AI companies ignore licenses such as the GPL, and often train on anything they can scrape. This is not acceptable. The AI companies ignore web conventions, e.g., they deep link images from your web sites (even adding ?utm_source=chatgpt.com to image URIs, I suggest that you return 403 on these requests), but do not direct visitors to your site. You do not get a reliable way of opting out from generative AI training or use. For example, the only way to prevent your contents from being used in Google AI Overviews is to use data-nosnippet and cripple the snippet preview in Google. The AI browsers such as Comet, Atlas do not identify as such, but rather pretend they are standard Chromium. There is no way to ban such AI use on your web site. Generative AI overall is flooding the internet with garbage. It was estimated that 1/3rd of the content uploaded to YouTube is by now AI generated. This includes the same veteran stories crap in thousands of variants as well as brainrot content (that at least does not pretend to be authentic), some of which is among the most viewed recent uploads. Hence, these platforms even benefit from the AI slop. And don t blame the creators because you can currently earn a decent amount of money from such contents, people will generate brainrot content. If you have recently tried to find honest reviews of products you considered buying, you will have noticed thousands of sites with AI generated fake product reviews, that all are financed by Amazon PartnerNet commissions. Often with hilarious nonsense such as recommending sewing thread with German instructions as tool for repairing a sewing machine. And on Amazon, there are plenty of AI generated product reviews the use of emoji is a strong hint. And if you leave a negative product review, there is a chance they offer you a refund to get rid of it And the majority of SPAM that gets through my filters is by now sent via Gmail and Amazon SES. Partially because of GenAI, StackOverflow is pretty much dead which used to be one of the most valuable programming resources. (While a lot of people complain about moderation, famous moderator Shog9 from the early SO days suggested that a change in Google s ranking is also to blame, as it began favoring showing new content over the existing answered questions causing more and more duplicates to be posted because people no longer found the existing good answers. In January 2026, there were around 3400 questions and 6000 answers posted, less than in the first month of SO of August 2008 (before the official launch). Many open-source projects are suffering in many ways, e.g., false bug reports that caused curl to stop its bug bounty program. Wikipedia is also suffering badly from GenAI. Science is also flooded with poor AI generated papers, often reviewed with help from AI. This is largely due to bad incentives to graduate, you are expected to write many papers on certain A conferences, such as NeurIPS. On these conferences the number of submissions is growing insane, and the review quality plummets. All to often, the references in these papers are hallucinated, too; and libraries complain that they receive more and more requests to locate literature that does not appear to exist. However, the worst effect (at least to me as an educator) is the noskilling effect (a rather novel term derived from deskilling, I have only seen it in this article by We els and Maibaum). Instead of acquiring skills (writing, reading, summarizing, programming) by practising, too many people now outsource all this to AI, leading to them not learn the basics necessary to advance to a higher skill level. In my impression, this effect is dramatic. It is even worse than deskilling, as it does not mean losing an advanced skill that you apparently can replace, but often means not acquiring basic skills in the first place. And the earlier pupils start using generative AI, the less skills they acquire. Dogfood the AI Let s dogfood the AI. Here s an outline:
  1. Get a list of programming topics, e.g., get a list of algorithms from Wikidata, get a StackOverflow data dump.
  2. Generate flawed code examples for the algorithms / programming questions, maybe generate blog posts, too.
    You do not need a high-quality model for this. Use something you can run locally or access for free.
  3. Date everything back in time, remove typical indications of AI use.
  4. Upload to Github, because Microsoft will feed this to OpenAI
Here is an example prompt that you can use: 
You are a university educator, preparing homework assignments in debugging.
The programming language used is  lang .
The students are tasked to find bugs in given code.
Do not just call existing implementations from libraries, but implement the algorithm from scratch.
Make sure there are two mistakes in the code that need to be discovered by the students.
Do NOT repeat instructions. Do NOT add small-talk. Do NOT provide a solution.
The code may have (misleading) comments, but must NOT mention the bugs.
If you do not know how to implement the algorithm, output an empty response.
Output only the code for the assignment! Do not use markdown.
Begin with a code comment that indicates the algorithm name and idea.
If you indicate a bug, always use a comment with the keyword BUG
Generate a  lang  implementation (with bugs) of:  n  ( desc )
Remember to remove the BUG comments! If you pick some slighly less common programming languages (by quantity of available code, say Go or Rust) you have higher chances that this gets into the training data. If many of us do this, we can feed GenAI its own garbage. If we generate thousands of bad code examples, this will poison their training data, and may eventually lead to an effect known as model collapse . On the long run, we need to get back to an internet for people, not an internet for bots. Some kind of internet 2.0 , but I do not have a clear vision on how to keep AI out if AI can train on it, they will. And someone will copy and paste the AI generated crap back into whatever system we built. Hence I don t think technology is the answere here, but human networks of trust.

8 February 2026

Colin Watson: Free software activity in January 2026

About 80% of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian, as well as one direct donation via GitHub Sponsors (thanks!). If you appreciate this sort of work and are at a company that uses Debian, have a look to see whether you can pay for any of Freexian s services; as well as the direct benefits, that revenue stream helps to keep Debian development sustainable for me and several other lovely people. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay or GitHub Sponsors. Python packaging New upstream versions: Fixes for Python 3.14: Fixes for pytest 9: Porting away from the deprecated pkg_resources: Other build/test failures: I investigated several more build failures and suggested removing the packages in question: Other bugs: Other bits and pieces Alejandro Colomar reported that man(1) ignored the MANWIDTH environment variable in some circumstances. I investigated this and fixed it upstream. I contributed an ubuntu-dev-tools patch to stop recommending sudo. I added forky support to the images used in Salsa CI pipelines. I began working on getting a release candidate of groff 1.24.0 into experimental, though haven t finished that yet. I worked on some lower-priority security updates for OpenSSH. Code reviews

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in January 2026

Debian LTS/ELTS This was my hundred-thirty-ninth month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian (as the LTS- and ELTS-teams have been merged now, there is only one paragraph left for both activities). During my allocated time I uploaded or worked on: I also attended the monthly LTS/ELTS meeting. While working on updates, I stumbled upon packages, whose CVEs have been postponed for a long time and their CVSS score was rather high. I wonder whether one should pay more attention to postponed issues, otherwise one could have already marked them as ignored. Debian Printing Unfortunately I didn t found any time to work on this topic. Debian Lomiri This month I worked on unifying packaging on Debian and Ubuntu. This makes it easier to work on those packages independent of the used platform. This work is generously funded by Fre(i)e Software GmbH! Debian Astro This month I uploaded a new upstream version or a bugfix version of: Debian IoT Unfortunately I didn t found any time to work on this topic. Debian Mobcom Unfortunately I didn t found any time to work on this topic. misc This month I uploaded a new upstream version or a bugfix version of: Unfortunately this month I was distracted from my normal Debian work by other unpleasant things, so that the paragraphs above are mostly empty. I now have to think about how many of my spare time I am able to dedicate to Debian in the future.

6 February 2026

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in January 2026

Welcome to the first monthly report in 2026 from the Reproducible Builds project! These reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, highlighting items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. As ever, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please see the Contribute page on our website.

  1. Flathub now testing for reproducibility
  2. Reproducibility identifying projects that will fail to build in 2038
  3. Distribution work
  4. Tool development
  5. Two new academic papers
  6. Upstream patches

Flathub now testing for reproducibility Flathub, the primary repository/app store for Flatpak-based applications, has begun checking for build reproducibility. According to a recent blog post:
We have started testing binary reproducibility of x86_64 builds targeting the stable repository. This is possible thanks to flathub-repro-checker, a tool doing the necessary legwork to recreate the build environment and compare the result of the rebuild with what is published on Flathub. While these tests have been running for a while now, we have recently restarted them from scratch after enabling S3 storage for diffoscope artifacts.
The test results and status is available on their reproducible builds page.

Reproducibility identifying software projects that will fail to build in 2038 Longtime Reproducible Builds developer Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted on Reddit on Y2K38 commemoration day T-12 that is to say, twelve years to the day before the UNIX Epoch will no longer fit into a signed 32-bit integer variable on 19th January 2038. Bernhard s comment succinctly outlines the problem as well as notes some of the potential remedies, as well as links to a discussion with the GCC developers regarding adding warnings for int time_t conversions . At the time of publication, Bernhard s topic had generated 50 comments in response.

Distribution work Conda is language-agnostic package manager which was originally developed to help Python data scientists and is now a popular package manager for Python and R. conda-forge, a community-led infrastructure for Conda recently revamped their dashboards to rebuild packages straight to track reproducibility. There have been changes over the past two years to make the conda-forge build tooling fully reproducible by embedding the lockfile of the entire build environment inside the packages.
In Debian this month:
In NixOS this month, it was announced that the GNU Guix Full Source Bootstrap was ported to NixOS as part of Wire Jansen bachelor s thesis (PDF). At the time of publication, this change has landed in NiX stdev distribution.
Lastly, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another openSUSE monthly update for his work there.

Tool development diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions, 310 and 311 to Debian.
  • Fix test compatibility with u-boot-tools version 2026-01. [ ]
  • Drop the implied Rules-Requires-Root: no entry in debian/control. [ ]
  • Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.3. [ ]
  • Reference the Debian ocaml package instead of ocaml-nox. (#1125094)
  • Apply a patch by Jelle van der Waa to adjust a test fixture match new lines. [ ]
  • Also the drop implied Priority: optional from debian/control. [ ]

In addition, Holger Levsen uploaded two versions of disorderfs, first updating the package from FUSE 2 to FUSE 3 as described in last months report, as well as updating the packaging to the latest Debian standards. A second upload (0.6.2-1) was subsequently made, with Holger adding instructions on how to add the upstream release to our release archive and incorporating changes by Roland Clobus to set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS on 32-bit platforms, fixing a build failure on 32-bit systems. Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 311-2-ge4ec97f7 and disorderfs to 0.6.2.

Two new academic papers Julien Malka, Stefano Zacchiroli and Th o Zimmermann of T l com Paris in-house research laboratory, the Information Processing and Communications Laboratory (LTCI) published a paper this month titled Docker Does Not Guarantee Reproducibility:
[ ] While Docker is frequently cited in the literature as a tool that enables reproducibility in theory, the extent of its guarantees and limitations in practice remains under-explored. In this work, we address this gap through two complementary approaches. First, we conduct a systematic literature review to examine how Docker is framed in scientific discourse on reproducibility and to identify documented best practices for writing Dockerfiles enabling reproducible image building. Then, we perform a large-scale empirical study of 5,298 Docker builds collected from GitHub workflows. By rebuilding these images and comparing the results with their historical counterparts, we assess the real reproducibility of Docker images and evaluate the effectiveness of the best practices identified in the literature.
A PDF of their paper is available online.
Quentin Guilloteau, Antoine Waehren and Florina M. Ciorba of the University of Basel in Sweden also published a Docker-related paper, theirs called Longitudinal Study of the Software Environments Produced by Dockerfiles from Research Artifacts:
The reproducibility crisis has affected all scientific disciplines, including computer science (CS). To address this issue, the CS community has established artifact evaluation processes at conferences and in journals to evaluate the reproducibility of the results shared in publications. Authors are therefore required to share their artifacts with reviewers, including code, data, and the software environment necessary to reproduce the results. One method for sharing the software environment proposed by conferences and journals is to utilize container technologies such as Docker and Apptainer. However, these tools rely on non-reproducible tools, resulting in non-reproducible containers. In this paper, we present a tool and methodology to evaluate variations over time in software environments of container images derived from research artifacts. We also present initial results on a small set of Dockerfiles from the Euro-Par 2024 conference.
A PDF of their paper is available online.

Miscellaneous news On our mailing list this month: Lastly, kpcyrd added a Rust section to the Stable order for outputs page on our website. [ ]

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Finally, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

Birger Schacht: Status update, January 2026

January was a slow month, I only did three uploads to Debian unstable: I was very happy to see the new dfsg-new-queue and that there are more hands now processing the NEW queue. I also finally got one of the packages accepted that I uploaded after the Trixie release: wayback which I uploaded last August. There has been another release since then, I ll try to upload that in the next few days. There was a bug report for carl asking for Windows support. carl used the xdg create for looking up the XDG directories, but xdg does not support windows systems (and it seems this will not change) The reporter also provided a PR to replace the dependency with the directories crate which more system agnostic. I adapted the PR a bit and merged it and released version 0.6.0 of carl. At my dayjob I refactored django-grouper. django-grouper is a package we use to find duplicate objects in our data. Our users often work with datasets of thousands of historical persons, places and institutions and in projects that run over years and ingest data from multiple sources, it happens that entries are created several times. I wrote the initial app in 2024, but was never really happy about the approach I used back then. It was based on this blog post that describes how to group spreadsheet text cells. It uses sklearns TfidfVectorizer with a custom analyzer and the library sparse_dot_topn for creating the matrix. All in all the module to calculate the clusters was 80 lines and with sparse_dot_topn it pulled in a rather niche Python library. I was pretty sure that this functionality could also be implemented with basic sklearn functionality and it was: we are now using DictVectorizer because in a Django app we are working with objects that can be mapped to dicts anyway. And for clustering the data, the app now uses the DBSCAN algorithm (with the manhattan distance as metric). The module is now only half the size and the whole app lost one dependency! I released those changes as version 0.3.0 of the app. At the end of January together with friends I went to Brussels to attend FOSDEM. We took the night train but there were a couple of broken down trains so the ride took 26 hours instead of one night. It is a good thing we had a one day buffer and FOSDEM only started on Saturday. As usual there were too many talks to visit, so I ll have to watch some of the recordings in the next few weeks. Some examples of talks I found interesting so far:

4 February 2026

Ben Hutchings: FOSS activity in January 2026

30 January 2026

Utkarsh Gupta: FOSS Activites in January 2026

Here s my monthly but brief update about the activities I ve done in the FOSS world.

Debian
Whilst I didn t get a chance to do much, here are still a few things that I worked on:
  • A few discussions with the new DFSG team, et al.
  • Assited a few folks in getting their patches submitted via Salsa.
  • Reviewing pyenv MR for Ujjwal.
  • Mentoring for newcomers.
  • Moderation of -project mailing list.

Ubuntu
I joined Canonical to work on Ubuntu full-time back in February 2021. Whilst I can t give a full, detailed list of things I did, here s a quick TL;DR of what I did:
  • Successfully released Resolute Snapshot 3!
    • This one was also done without the ISO tracker and cdimage access.
    • We also worked very hard to build and promote all the image in due time.
  • Worked further on the whole artifact signing story for cdimage.
  • Assisted a bunch of folks with my Archive Admin and Release team hats to:
    • Helped in EOL ing Plucky.
    • Starting to help with the upcoming 24.04.4 release.
  • With that, the mid-cycle sprints are around the corner, so quite busy preparing for that.

Debian (E)LTS
This month I have worked 59 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS) and on its sister Extended LTS project and did the following things:

Released Security Updates

Work in Progress
  • knot-resolver: Affected by CVE-2023-26249, CVE-2023-46317, and CVE-2022-40188, leading to Denial of Service.
  • ruby-rack: There were multiple vulnerabilities reported in Rack, leading to DoS (memory exhaustion) and proxy bypass.
    • [ELTS]: After completing the work for LTS myself, Bastien picked it up for ELTS and reached out about an upstream regression and we ve been doing some exchanges. Bastien has done most of the work backporting the patches but needs a review and help backporting CVE-2025-61771. Haven t made much progress since last month and will carry it over.
  • node-lodash: Affected by CVE-2025-13465, lrototype pollution in baseUnset function.
    • [stable]: The patch for trixie and bookworm are ready but haven t been uploaded yet as I d like for the unstable upload to settle a bit before I proceed with stable uploads.
    • [LTS]: The bullseye upload will follow once the stable uploads are in and ACK d by the SRMs.
  • xrdp: Affected by CVE-2025-68670, leading to a stack-based buffer overflow.

Other Activities
  • [ELTS] Helped Bastien Roucaries debug a tomcat9 regression for buster.
    • I spent quite a lot of time trying to help Bastien (with Markus and Santiago involved via mail thread) by reproducing the regression that the user(s) reported.
    • I also helped suggest a path forward by vendoring everything, which I was then requested to also help perform.
    • Whilst doing that, I noticed circular dependency hellhole and suggested another path forward by backporting bnd and its dependencies as separate NEW packages.
    • Bastien liked the idea and is going to work on that but preferred to revert the update to remedy the immediate regressions reported. I further helped him in reviewing his update. This conversation happened on #debian-elts IRC channel.
  • [LTS] Assisted Ben Hutchings with his question about the next possible steps with a plausible libvirt regression caused by the Linux kernel update. This was a thread on debian-lts@ mailing list.
  • [LTS] Attended the monthly LTS meeting on IRC. Summary here.
  • [E/LTS] Monitored discussions on mailing lists, IRC, and all the documentation updates.
Until next time.
:wq for today.

19 January 2026

Russell Coker: Furilabs FLX1s

The Aim I have just got a Furilabs FLX1s [1] which is a phone running a modified version of Debian. I want to have a phone that runs all apps that I control and can observe and debug. Android is very good for what it does and there are security focused forks of Android which have a lot of potential, but for my use a Debian phone is what I want. The FLX1s is not going to be my ideal phone, I am evaluating it for use as a daily-driver until a phone that meets my ideal criteria is built. In this post I aim to provide information to potential users about what it can do, how it does it, and how to get the basic functions working. I also evaluate how well it meets my usage criteria. I am not anywhere near an average user. I don t think an average user would ever even see one unless a more technical relative showed one to them. So while this phone could be used by an average user I am not evaluating it on that basis. But of course the features of the GUI that make a phone usable for an average user will allow a developer to rapidly get past the beginning stages and into more complex stuff. Features The Furilabs FLX1s [1] is a phone that is designed to run FuriOS which is a slightly modified version of Debian. The purpose of this is to run Debian instead of Android on a phone. It has switches to disable camera, phone communication, and microphone (similar to the Librem 5) but the one to disable phone communication doesn t turn off Wifi, the only other phone I know of with such switches is the Purism Librem 5. It has a 720*1600 display which is only slightly better than the 720*1440 display in the Librem 5 and PinePhone Pro. This doesn t compare well to the OnePlus 6 from early 2018 with 2280*1080 or the Note9 from late 2018 with 2960*1440 which are both phones that I ve run Debian on. The current price is $US499 which isn t that good when compared to the latest Google Pixel series, a Pixel 10 costs $US649 and has a 2424*1080 display and it also has 12G of RAM while the FLX1s only has 8G. Another annoying thing is how rounded the corners are, it seems that round corners that cut off the content are a standard practice nowadays, in my collection of phones the latest one I found with hard right angles on the display was a Huawei Mate 10 Pro which was released in 2017. The corners are rounder than the Note 9, this annoys me because the screen is not high resolution by today s standards so losing the corners matters. The default installation is Phosh (the GNOME shell for phones) and it is very well configured. Based on my experience with older phone users I think I could give a phone with this configuration to a relative in the 70+ age range who has minimal computer knowledge and they would be happy with it. Additionally I could set it up to allow ssh login and instead of going through the phone support thing of trying to describe every GUI setting to click on based on a web page describing menus for the version of Android they are running I could just ssh in and run diff on the .config directory to find out what they changed. Furilabs have done a very good job of setting up the default configuration, while Debian developers deserve a lot of credit for packaging the apps the Furilabs people have chosen a good set of default apps to install to get it going and appear to have made some noteworthy changes to some of them. Droidian The OS is based on Android drivers (using the same techniques as Droidian [2]) and the storage device has the huge number of partitions you expect from Android as well as a 110G Ext4 filesystem for the main OS. The first issue with the Droidian approach of using an Android kernel and containers for user space code to deal with drivers is that it doesn t work that well. There are 3 D state processes (uninterrupteable sleep which usually means a kernel bug if the process remains in that state) after booting and doing nothing special. My tests running Droidian on the Note 9 also had D state processes, in this case they are D state kernel threads (I can t remember if the Note 9 had regular processes or kernel threads stuck in D state). It is possible for a system to have full functionality in spite of some kernel threads in D state but generally it s a symptom of things not working as well as you would hope. The design of Droidian is inherently fragile. You use a kernel and user space code from Android and then use Debian for the rest. You can t do everything the Android way (with the full OS updates etc) and you also can t do everything the Debian way. The TOW Boot functionality in the PinePhone Pro is really handy for recovery [3], it allows the internal storage to be accessed as a USB mass storage device. The full Android setup with ADB has some OK options for recovery, but part Android and part Debian has less options. While it probably is technically possible to do the same things in regard to OS repair and reinstall the fact that it s different from most other devices means that fixes can t be done in the same way. Applications GUI The system uses Phosh and Phoc, the GNOME system for handheld devices. It s a very different UI from Android, I prefer Android but it is usable with Phosh. IM Chatty works well for Jabber (XMPP) in my tests. It supports Matrix which I didn t test because I don t desire the same program doing Matrix and Jabber and because Matrix is a heavy protocol which establishes new security keys for each login so I don t want to keep logging in on new applications. Chatty also does SMS but I couldn t test that without the SIM caddy. I use Nheko for Matrix which has worked very well for me on desktops and laptops running Debian. Email I am currently using Geary for email. It works reasonably well but is lacking proper management of folders, so I can t just subscribe to the important email on my phone so that bandwidth isn t wasted on less important email (there is a GNOME gitlab issue about this see the Debian Wiki page about Mobile apps [4]). Music Music playing isn t a noteworthy thing for a desktop or laptop, but a good music player is important for phone use. The Lollypop music player generally does everything you expect along with support for all the encoding formats including FLAC0 a major limitation of most Android music players seems to be lack of support for some of the common encoding formats. Lollypop has it s controls for pause/play and going forward and backward one track on the lock screen. Maps The installed map program is gnome-maps which works reasonably well. It gets directions via the Graphhopper API [5]. One thing we really need is a FOSS replacement for Graphhopper in GNOME Maps. Delivery and Unboxing I received my FLX1s on the 13th of Jan [1]. I had paid for it on the 16th of Oct but hadn t received the email with the confirmation link so the order had been put on hold. But after I contacted support about that on the 5th of Jan they rapidly got it to me which was good. They also gave me a free case and screen protector to apologise, I don t usually use screen protectors but in this case it might be useful as the edges of the case don t even extend 0.5mm above the screen. So if it falls face down the case won t help much. When I got it there was an open space at the bottom where the caddy for SIMs is supposed to be. So I couldn t immediately test VoLTE functionality. The contact form on their web site wasn t working when I tried to report that and the email for support was bouncing. Bluetooth As a test of Bluetooth I connected it to my Nissan LEAF which worked well for playing music and I connected it to several Bluetooth headphones. My Thinkpad running Debian/Trixie doesn t connect to the LEAF and to headphones which have worked on previous laptops running Debian and Ubuntu. A friend s laptop running Debian/Trixie also wouldn t connect to the LEAF so I suspect a bug in Trixie, I need to spend more time investigating this. Wifi Currently 5GHz wifi doesn t work, this is a software bug that the Furilabs people are working on. 2.4GHz wifi works fine. I haven t tested running a hotspot due to being unable to get 4G working as they haven t yet shipped me the SIM caddy. Docking This phone doesn t support DP Alt-mode or Thunderbolt docking so it can t drive an external monitor. This is disappointing, Samsung phones and tablets have supported such things since long before USB-C was invented. Samsung DeX is quite handy for Android devices and that type feature is much more useful on a device running Debian than on an Android device. Camera The camera works reasonably well on the FLX1s. Until recently for the Librem 5 the camera didn t work and the camera on my PinePhone Pro currently doesn t work. Here are samples of the regular camera and the selfie camera on the FLX1s and the Note 9. I think this shows that the camera is pretty decent. The selfie looks better and the front camera is worse for the relatively close photo of a laptop screen taking photos of computer screens is an important part of my work but I can probably work around that. I wasn t assessing this camera t find out if it s great, just to find out if I have the sorts of problems I had before and it just worked. The Samsung Galaxy Note series of phones has always had decent specs including good cameras. Even though the Note 9 is old comparing to it is a respectable performance. The lighting was poor for all photos. FLX1s
Note 9
Power Use In 93 minutes having the PinePhone Pro, Librem 5, and FLX1s online with open ssh sessions from my workstation the PinePhone Pro went from 100% battery to 26%, the Librem 5 went from 95% to 69%, and the FLX1s went from 100% to 99%. The battery discharge rate of them was reported as 3.0W, 2.6W, and 0.39W respectively. Based on having a 16.7Wh battery 93 minutes of use should have been close to 4% battery use, but in any case all measurements make it clear that the FLX1s will have a much longer battery life. Including the measurement of just putting my fingers on the phones and feeling the temperature (FLX1s felt cool and the others felt hot). The PinePhone Pro and the Librem 5 have an optional Caffeine mode which I enabled for this test, without that enabled the phone goes into a sleep state and disconnects from Wifi. So those phones would use much less power with caffeine mode enabled, but they also couldn t get fast response to notifications etc. I found the option to enable a Caffeine mode switch on the FLX1s but the power use was reported as being the same both with and without it. Charging One problem I found with my phone is that in every case it takes 22 seconds to negotiate power. Even when using straight USB charging (no BC or PD) it doesn t draw any current for 22 seconds. When I connect it it will stay at 5V and varying between 0W and 0.1W (current rounded off to zero) for 22 seconds or so and then start charging. After the 22 second display the phone will make the tick sound indicating that it s charging and the power meter will measure that it s drawing some current. I added the table from my previous post about phone charging speed [6] with an extra row for the FLX1s. For charging from my PC USB ports the results were the worst ever, the port that does BC did not work at all it was looping trying to negotiate after a 22 second negotiation delay the port would turn off. The non-BC port gave only 2.4W which matches the 2.5W given by the spec for a High-power device which is what that port is designed to give. In a discussion on the Purism forum about the Librem5 charging speed one of their engineers told me that the reason why their phone would draw 2A from that port was because the cable was identifying itself as a USB-C port not a High-power device port. But for some reason out of the 7 phones I tested the FLX1s and the One Plus 6 are the only ones to limit themselves to what the port is apparently supposed to do. Also the One Plus 6 charges slowly on every power supply so I don t know if it is obeying the spec or just sucking. On a cheap AliExpress charger the FLX1s gets 5.9V and on a USB battery it gets 5.8V. Out of all 42 combinations of device and charger I tested these were the only ones to involve more than 5.1V but less than 9V. I welcome comments suggesting an explanation. The case that I received has a hole for the USB-C connector that isn t wide enough for the plastic surrounds on most of my USB-C cables (including the Dell dock). Also to make a connection requires a fairly deep insertion (deeper than the One Plus 6 or the Note 9). So without adjustment I have to take the case off to charge it. It s no big deal to adjust the hole (I have done it with other cases) but it s an annoyance.
Phone Top z640 Bottom Z640 Monitor Ali Charger Dell Dock Battery Best Worst
FLX1s FAIL 5.0V 0.49A 2.4W 4.8V 1.9A 9.0W 5.9V 1.8A 11W 4.8V 2.1A 10W 5.8V 2.1A 12W 5.8V 2.1A 12W 5.0V 0.49A 2.4W
Note9 4.8V 1.0A 5.2W 4.8V 1.6A 7.5W 4.9V 2.0A 9.5W 5.1V 1.9A 9.7W 4.8V 2.1A 10W 5.1V 2.1A 10W 5.1V 2.1A 10W 4.8V 1.0A 5.2W
Pixel 7 pro 4.9V 0.80A 4.2W 4.8V 1.2A 5.9W 9.1V 1.3A 12W 9.1V 1.2A 11W 4.9V 1.8A 8.7W 9.0V 1.3A 12W 9.1V 1.3A 12W 4.9V 0.80A 4.2W
Pixel 8 4.7V 1.2A 5.4W 4.7V 1.5A 7.2W 8.9V 2.1A 19W 9.1V 2.7A 24W 4.8V 2.3A 11.0W 9.1V 2.6A 24W 9.1V 2.7A 24W 4.7V 1.2A 5.4W
PPP 4.7V 1.2A 6.0W 4.8V 1.3A 6.8W 4.9V 1.4A 6.6W 5.0V 1.2A 5.8W 4.9V 1.4A 5.9W 5.1V 1.2A 6.3W 4.8V 1.3A 6.8W 5.0V 1.2A 5.8W
Librem 5 4.4V 1.5A 6.7W 4.6V 2.0A 9.2W 4.8V 2.4A 11.2W 12V 0.48A 5.8W 5.0V 0.56A 2.7W 5.1V 2.0A 10W 4.8V 2.4A 11.2W 5.0V 0.56A 2.7W
OnePlus6 5.0V 0.51A 2.5W 5.0V 0.50A 2.5W 5.0V 0.81A 4.0W 5.0V 0.75A 3.7W 5.0V 0.77A 3.7W 5.0V 0.77A 3.9W 5.0V 0.81A 4.0W 5.0V 0.50A 2.5W
Best 4.4V 1.5A 6.7W 4.6V 2.0A 9.2W 8.9V 2.1A 19W 9.1V 2.7A 24W 4.8V 2.3A 11.0W 9.1V 2.6A 24W
Conclusion The Furilabs support people are friendly and enthusiastic but my customer experience wasn t ideal. It was good that they could quickly respond to my missing order status and the missing SIM caddy (which I still haven t received but believe is in the mail) but it would be better if such things just didn t happen. The phone is quite user friendly and could be used by a novice. I paid $US577 for the FLX1s which is $AU863 by today s exchange rates. For comparison I could get a refurbished Pixel 9 Pro Fold for $891 from Kogan (the major Australian mail-order company for technology) or a refurbished Pixel 9 Pro XL for $842. The Pixel 9 series has security support until 2031 which is probably longer than you can expect a phone to be used without being broken. So a phone with a much higher resolution screen that s only one generation behind the latest high end phones and is refurbished will cost less. For a brand new phone a Pixel 8 Pro which has security updates until 2030 costs $874 and a Pixel 9A which has security updates until 2032 costs $861. Doing what the Furilabs people have done is not a small project. It s a significant amount of work and the prices of their products need to cover that. I m not saying that the prices are bad, just that economies of scale and the large quantity of older stock makes the older Google products quite good value for money. The new Pixel phones of the latest models are unreasonably expensive. The Pixel 10 is selling new from Google for $AU1,149 which I consider a ridiculous price that I would not pay given the market for used phones etc. If I had a choice of $1,149 or a feature phone I d pay $1,149. But the FLX1s for $863 is a much better option for me. If all I had to choose from was a new Pixel 10 or a FLX1s for my parents I d get them the FLX1s. For a FOSS developer a FLX1s could be a mobile test and development system which could be lent to a relative when their main phone breaks and the replacement is on order. It seems to be fit for use as a commodity phone. Note that I give this review on the assumption that SMS and VoLTE will just work, I haven t tested them yet. The UI on the FLX1s is functional and easy enough for a new user while allowing an advanced user to do the things they desire. I prefer the Android style and the Plasma Mobile style is closer to Android than Phosh is, but changing it is something I can do later. Generally I think that the differences between UIs matter more when on a desktop environment that could be used for more complex tasks than on a phone which limits what can be done by the size of the screen. I am comparing the FLX1s to Android phones on the basis of what technology is available. But most people who would consider buying this phone will compare it to the PinePhone Pro and the Librem 5 as they have similar uses. The FLX1s beats both those phones handily in terms of battery life and of having everything just work. But it has the most non free software of the three and the people who want the $2000 Librem 5 that s entirely made in the US won t want the FLX1s. This isn t the destination for Debian based phones, but it s a good step on the way to it and I don t think I ll regret this purchase.
Related posts:
  1. Phone Charging Speeds With Debian/Trixie One of the problems I encountered with the PinePhone Pro...
  2. Pixel 6A I have just bought a Pixel 6A [1] for my...
  3. More About the Librem 5 I concluded my previous post about the Purism Librem 5...

11 January 2026

Otto Kek l inen: Stop using MySQL in 2026, it is not true open source

Featured image of post Stop using MySQL in 2026, it is not true open sourceIf you care about supporting open source software, and still use MySQL in 2026, you should switch to MariaDB like so many others have already done. The number of git commits on github.com/mysql/mysql-server has been significantly declining in 2025. The screenshot below shows the state of git commits as of writing this in January 2026, and the picture should be alarming to anyone who cares about software being open source. MySQL GitHub commit activity decreasing drastically

This is not surprising Oracle should not be trusted as the steward for open source projects When Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and MySQL along with it back in 2009, the European Commission almost blocked the deal due to concerns that Oracle s goal was just to stifle competition. The deal went through as Oracle made a commitment to keep MySQL going and not kill it, but (to nobody s surprise) Oracle has not been a good steward of MySQL as an open source project and the community around it has been withering away for years now. All development is done behind closed doors. The publicly visible bug tracker is not the real one Oracle staff actually uses for MySQL development, and the few people who try to contribute to MySQL just see their Pull Requests and patch submissions marked as received with mostly no feedback and then those changes may or may not be in the next MySQL release, often rewritten, and with only Oracle staff in the git author/committer fields. The real author only gets a small mention in a blog post. When I was the engineering manager for the core team working on RDS MySQL and RDS MariaDB at Amazon Web Services, I oversaw my engineers contributions to both MySQL and MariaDB (the latter being a fork of MySQL by the original MySQL author, Michael Widenius). All the software developers in my org disliked submitting code to MySQL due to how bad the reception by Oracle was to their contributions. MariaDB is the stark opposite with all development taking place in real-time on github.com/mariadb/server, anyone being able to submit a Pull Request and get a review, all bugs being openly discussed at jira.mariadb.org and so forth, just like one would expect from a true open source project. MySQL is open source only by license (GPL v2), but not as a project.

MySQL s technical decline in recent years Despite not being a good open source steward, Oracle should be given credit that it did keep the MySQL organization alive and allowed it to exist fairly independently and continue developing and releasing new MySQL versions well over a decade after the acquisition. I have no insight into how many customers they had, but I assume the MySQL business was fairly profitable and financially useful to Oracle, at least as long as it didn t gain too many features to threaten Oracle s own main database business. I don t know why, perhaps because too many talented people had left the organization, but it seems that from a technical point of view MySQL clearly started to deteriorate from 2022 onward. When MySQL 8.0.29 was released with the default ALTER TABLE method switched to run in-place, it had a lot of corner cases that didn t work, causing the database to crash and data to corrupt for many users. The issue wasn t fully fixed until a year later in MySQL 8.0.32. To many users annoyance Oracle announced the 8.0 series as evergreen and introduced features and changes in the minor releases, instead of just doing bugfixes and security fixes like users historically had learnt to expect from these x.y.Z maintenance releases. There was no new major MySQL version for six years. After MySQL 8.0 in 2018 it wasn t until 2023 when MySQL 8.1 was released, and it was just a short-term preview release. The first actual new major release MySQL 8.4 LTS was released in 2024. Even though it was a new major release, many users got disappointed as it had barely any new features. Many also reported degraded performance with newer MySQL versions, for example the benchmark by famous MySQL performance expert Mark Callaghan below shows that on write-heavy workloads MySQL 9.5 throughput is typically 15% less than in 8.0. Benchmark showing new MySQL versions being slower than the old Due to newer MySQL versions deprecating many features, a lot of users also complained about significant struggles regarding both MySQL 5.7->8.0 and 8.0->8.4 upgrades. With few new features and heavy focus on code base cleanup and feature deprecation, it became obvious to many that Oracle had decided to just keep MySQL barely alive, and put all new relevant features (e.g. vector search) into Heatwave, Oracle s closed-source and cloud-only service for MySQL customers. As it was evident that Oracle isn t investing in MySQL, Percona s Peter Zaitsev wrote Is Oracle Finally Killing MySQL in June 2024. At this time MySQL s popularity as ranked by DB-Engines had also started to tank hard, a trend that likely accelerates in 2026. MySQL dropping significantly in DB-Engines ranking In September 2025 news reported that Oracle was reducing its workforce and that the MySQL staff was getting heavily reduced. Obviously this does not bode well for MySQL s future, and Peter Zaitsev posted already in November stats showing that the latest MySQL maintenance release contained fewer bug fixes than before.

Open source is more than ideology: it has very real effects on software security and sovereignty Some say they don t care if MySQL is truly open source or not, or that they don t care if it has a future in coming years, as long as it still works now. I am afraid people thinking so are taking a huge risk. The database is often the most critical part of a software application stack, and any flaw or problem in operations, let alone a security issue, will have immediate consequences, and not caring will eventually get people fired or sued. In open source problems are discussed openly, and the bigger the problem, the more people and companies will contribute to fixing it. Open source as a development methodology is similar to the scientific method with free flow of ideas that are constantly contested and only the ones with the most compelling evidence win. Not being open means more obscurity, more risk and more just trust us bro attitude. This open vs. closed is very visible for example in how Oracle handles security issues. We can see that in 2025 alone MySQL published 123 CVEs about security issues, while MariaDB had 8. There were 117 CVEs that only affected MySQL and not MariaDB in 2025. I haven t read them all, but typically the CVEs hardly contain any real details. As an example, the most recent one CVE-2025-53067 states Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. There is no information a security researcher or auditor could use to verify if any original issue actually existed, or if it was fixed, or if the fix was sufficient and fully mitigating the issue or not. MySQL users just have to take the word of Oracle that it is all good now. Handling security issues like this is in stark contrast to other open source projects, where all security issues and their code fixes are open for full scrutiny after the initial embargo is over and CVE made public. There is also various forms of enshittification going on one would not see in a true open source project, and everything about MySQL as a software, documentation and website is pushing users to stop using the open source version and move to the closed MySQL versions, and in particular to Heatwave, which is not only closed-source but also results in Oracle fully controlling customer s databases contents. Of course, some could say this is how Oracle makes money and is able to provide a better product. But stories on Reddit and elsewhere suggest that what is going on is more like Oracle milking hard the last remaining MySQL customers who are forced to pay more and more for getting less and less.

There are options and migrating is easy, just do it A large part of MySQL users switched to MariaDB already in the mid-2010s, in particular everyone who had cared deeply about their database software staying truly open source. That included large installations such as Wikipedia, and Linux distributions such as Fedora and Debian. Because it s open source and there is no centralized machine collecting statistics, nobody knows what the exact market shares look like. There are however some application specific stats, such as that 57% of WordPress sites around the world run MariaDB, while the share for MySQL is 42%. For anyone running a classic LAMP stack application such as WordPress, Drupal, Mediawiki, Nextcloud, or Magento, switching the old MySQL database to MariaDB is be straightforward. As MariaDB is a fork of MySQL and mostly backwards compatible with it, swapping out MySQL for MariaDB can be done without changing any of the existing connectors or database clients, as they will continue to work with MariaDB as if it was MySQL. For those running custom applications and who have the freedom to make changes to how and what database is used, there are tens of mature and well-functioning open source databases to choose from, with PostgreSQL being the most popular general database. If your application was built from the start for MySQL, switching to PostgreSQL may however require a lot of work, and the MySQL/MariaDB architecture and storage engine InnoDB may still offer an edge in e.g. online services where high performance, scalability and solid replication features are of highest priority. For a quick and easy migration MariaDB is probably the best option. Switching from MySQL to the Percona Server is also very easy, as it closely tracks all changes in MySQL and deviates from it only by a small number of improvements done by Percona. However, also precisely because of it being basically just a customized version of the MySQL Server, it s not a viable long-term solution for those trying to fully ditch the dependency on Oracle. There are also several open source databases that have no common ancestry with MySQL, but strive to be MySQL-compatible. Thus most apps built for MySQL can simply switch to using them without needing SQL statements to be rewritten. One such database is TiDB, which has been designed from scratch specifically for highly scalable and large systems, and is so good that even Amazon s latest database solution DSQL was built borrowing many ideas from TiDB. However, TiDB only really shines with larger distributed setups, so for the vast majority of regular small- and mid-scale applications currently using MySQL, the most practical solution is probably to just switch to MariaDB, which on most Linux distributions can simply be installed by running apt/dnf/brew install mariadb-server. Whatever you end up choosing, as long as it is not Oracle, you will be better off.

10 January 2026

Dirk Eddelbuettel: Rcpp 1.1.1 on CRAN: Many Improvements in Semi-Annual Update

rcpp logo Team Rcpp is thrilled to share that an exciting new version 1.1.1 of Rcpp is now on CRAN (and also uploaded to Debian and already built for r2u). Having switchted to C++11 as the minimum standard in the previous 1.1.0 release, this version takes full advantage of it and removes a lot of conditional code catering to older standards that no longer need to be supported. Consequently, the source tarball shrinks by 39% from 3.11 mb to 1.88 mb. That is a big deal. (Size peaked with Rcpp 1.0.12 two years ago at 3.43 mb; relative to its size we are down 45% !!) Removing unused code also makes maintenance easier, and quickens both compilation and installation in general. This release continues as usual with the six-months January-July cycle started with release 1.0.5 in July 2020. Interim snapshots are always available via the r-universe page and repo. We continue to strongly encourage the use of these development released and their testing we tend to run our systems with them too. Rcpp has long established itself as the most popular way of enhancing R with C or C++ code. Right now, 3020 packages on CRAN depend on Rcpp for making analytical code go faster and further. On CRAN, 13.1% of all packages depend (directly) on Rcpp, and 60.9% of all compiled packages do. From the cloud mirror of CRAN (which is but a subset of all CRAN downloads), Rcpp has been downloaded 109.8 million times. The two published papers (also included in the package as preprint vignettes) have, respectively, 2151 (JSS, 2011) and 405 (TAS, 2018) citations, while the the book (Springer useR!, 2013) has another 715. This time, I am not attempting to summarize the different changes. The full list follows below and details all these changes, their respective PRs and, if applicable, issue tickets. Big thanks from all of us to all contributors!

Changes in Rcpp release version 1.1.1 (2026-01-08)
  • Changes in Rcpp API:
    • An unused old R function for a compiler version check has been removed after checking no known package uses it (Dirk in #1395)
    • A narrowing warning is avoided via a cast (Dirk in #1398)
    • Demangling checks have been simplified (I aki in #1401 addressing #1400)
    • The treatment of signed zeros is now improved in the Sugar code (I aki in #1404)
    • Preparations for phasing out use of Rf_error have been made (I aki in #1407)
    • The long-deprecated function loadRcppModules() has been removed (Dirk in #1416 closing #1415)
    • Some non-API includes from R were refactored to accommodate R-devel changes (I aki in #1418 addressing #1417)
    • An accessor to Rf_rnbeta has been removed (Dirk in #1419 also addressing #1420)
    • Code accessing non-API Rf_findVarInFrame now uses R_getVarEx (Dirk in #1423 fixing #1421)
    • Code conditional on the R version now expects at least R 3.5.0; older code has been removed (Dirk in #1426 fixing #1425)
    • The non-API ATTRIB entry point to the R API is no longer used (Dirk in #1430 addressing #1429)
    • The unwind-protect mechanism is now used unconditionally (Dirk in #1437 closing #1436)
  • Changes in Rcpp Attributes:
    • The OpenMP plugin has been generalized for different macOS compiler installations (Kevin in #1414)
  • Changes in Rcpp Documentation:
    • Vignettes are now processed via a new "asis" processor adopted from R.rsp (Dirk in #1394 fixing #1393)
    • R is now cited via its DOI (Dirk)
    • A (very) stale help page has been removed (Dirk in #1428 fixing #1427)
    • The main README.md was updated emphasizing r-universe in favor of the local drat repos (Dirk in #1431)
  • Changes in Rcpp Deployment:
    • A temporary change in R-devel concerning NA part in complex variables was accommodated, and then reverted (Dirk in #1399 fixing #1397)
    • The macOS CI runners now use macos-14 (Dirk in #1405)
    • A message is shown if R.h is included before Rcpp headers as this can lead to errors (Dirk in #1411 closing #1410)
    • Old helper functions use message() to signal they are not used, deprecation and removal to follow (Dirk in #1413 closing #1412)
    • Three tests were being silenced following #1413 (Dirk in #1422)
    • The heuristic whether to run all available tests was refined (Dirk in #1434 addressing #1433)
    • Coverage has been tweaked via additional #nocov tags (Dirk in #1435)
  • Non-release Changes:
    • Two interim non-releases 1.1.0.8.1 and .2 were made in order to unblock CRAN due to changes in R-devel rather than Rcpp

Thanks to my CRANberries, you can also look at a diff to the previous interim release along with pre-releaseds 1.1.0.8, 1.1.0.8.1 and 1.1.0.8.2 that were needed because R-devel all of a sudden decided to move fast and break things. Not our doing. Questions, comments etc should go to the GitHub discussion section list]rcppdevellist off the R-Forge page. Bugs reports are welcome at the GitHub issue tracker as well. Both sections can be searched as well.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

7 January 2026

Ravi Dwivedi: Why my Riseup account got suspended (and reinstated)

Disclaimer: The goal of this post is not to attack Riseup. In fact, I love Riseup and support their work.

Story Riseup is an email provider, known for its privacy-friendly email service. The service requires an invite from an existing Riseup email user to get an account. I created my account on Riseup in the year 2020, of course with the help of a friend who invited me. Since then, I have used the email address only occasionally, although it is logged into my Thunderbird all the time. Fast-forward to the 4th of January 2026, when Thunderbird suddenly told me that it could not log in to my Riseup account. When I tried logging in using their webmail, it said invalid password . Finally, I tried logging in to my account on their website, and was told that
Log in for that account is temporary suspended while we perform maintenance. Please try again later.
At this point, I suspected that the Riseup service itself was facing some issues. I asked a friend who had an account there if the service was up, and they said that it was. The issue seemed to be specific only to my account. I contacted Riseup support and informed them of the issue. They responded the next day (the 5th of January) saying:
The my-username-redacted account was found inviting another account that violated our terms of use. As a security measure we suspend all related accounts to ToS violations.
(Before we continue, I would like to take a moment and reflect upon how nice it was to receive response from a human rather than an AI bot a trend that is unfortunately becoming the norm nowadays.) I didn t know who violated their ToS, so I asked which account violated their terms. Riseup told me:
username-redacted@riseup.net attempted to create aliases that could be abused to impersonate riseup itself.
I asked a friend whom I invited a month before the incident, and they confirmed that the username belonged to them. When I asked what they did, they told me they tried creating aliases such as floatup and risedown. I also asked Riseup which aliases violated their terms, but their support didn t answer this. I explained to the Riseup support that the impersonation wasn t intentional, that the user hadn t sent any emails, and that I had been a user for more than 5 years and had donated to them in the past. Furthermore, I suggested that they should block the creation of such aliases if they think the aliases violate their terms, like how email providers typically don t allow users to create admin@ or abuse@ email addresses. After I explained myself, Riseup reinstated my account. Update on the 10th of January 2025: My friend told me that the alias that violated Riseup s terms was cloudadmin and his account was reinstated on the 7th of January.

Issues with suspension I have the following issues regarding the way the suspension took place
  • There was no way of challenging the suspension before the action was taken
  • The action taken against me was disproportionate. Remember that I didn t violate any terms. It was allegedly done by a user I invited. They could just block the aliases while continuing the discussion in parallel.
  • I was locked out of my account with no way of saving my emails and without any chance to migrate. What if that email address was being used for important stuff such as bank access or train tickets? I know people who use Riseup email for such purposes.
  • The violation wasn t even proven. I wasn t told which alias violated the terms and how could that be used to impersonate Riseup itself
When I brought up the issue of me getting locked out of my account without a way of downloading my emails or migrating my account, Riseup support responded by saying:
You must understand that we react [by] protecting our service, and therefore we cannot provide notice messages on the affected accounts. We need to act preventing any potential damage to the service that might affect the rest of the users, and that measure is not excessive (think on how abusers/spammers/scammers/etc could trick us and attempt any action before their account is suspended).
This didn t address my concerns, so let s move on to the next section.

Room for improvement Here s how I think Riseup s ban policy could be changed while still protecting against spammers and other bad actors:
  • Even if Riseup can t provide notice to blocked accounts, perhaps they can scale back limitations on the inviting account which wasn t even involved for example, by temporarily disabling invites from that account until the issue is resolved.
  • In this case, the person didn t impersonate Riseup, so Riseup could have just blocked the aliases and let the user know about it, rather than banning the account outright.
  • Riseup should give blocked users access to their existing emails so they have a chance to migrate them to a different provider. (Riseup could disable SMTP and maybe incoming emails but keep IMAP access open). I know people who use Riseup for important things such as bank or train tickets, and a sudden block like this is not a good idea.
  • Riseup should factor in the account profile in making these decisions. I had an account on their service for 5 years and I had only created around 5 invites. (I don t remember the exact number and there s no way to retrieve this information.) This is not exactly an attacker profile. I feel long-term users like this deserve an explanation for a ban.
I understand Riseup is a community-run service and does not have unlimited resources like big corporations or commercial email providers do. Their actions felt disproportionate to me because I don t know what issues they face behind the scenes. I hope someone can help to improve the policies, or at least shed light on why they are the way they are. Signing off now. Meet you in the next one! Thanks to Badri and Contrapunctus for reviewing this blog post

5 January 2026

Colin Watson: Free software activity in December 2025

About 95% of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay or GitHub Sponsors. Python packaging I upgraded these packages to new upstream versions: Python 3.14 is now a supported version in unstable, and we re working to get that into testing. As usual this is a pretty arduous effort because it requires going round and fixing lots of odds and ends across the whole ecosystem. We can deal with a fair number of problems by keeping up with upstream (see above), but there tends to be a long tail of packages whose upstreams are less active and where we need to chase them, or where problems only show up in Debian for one reason or another. I spent a lot of time working on this: Fixes for pytest 9: I filed lintian: Report Python egg-info files/directories to help us track the migration to pybuild-plugin-pyproject. I did some work on dh-python: Normalize names in pydist lookups and pyproject plugin: Support headers (the latter of which allowed converting python-persistent and zope.proxy to pybuild-plugin-pyproject, although it needed a follow-up fix). I fixed or helped to fix several other build/test failures: Other bugs: Other bits and pieces Code reviews

4 January 2026

Valhalla's Things: And now for something completely different

Posted on January 4, 2026
Tags: topic:walking
Warning
mention of bodies being bodies and minds being minds, and not in the perfectly working sense.
One side of Porto Ceresio along the lake: there is a small strip of houses, and the hills behind them are covered in woods. A boat is parked around the middle of the picture. A lot of the youtube channels I follow tend to involve somebody making things, so of course one of the videos my SO and I watched a few days ago was about walking around San Francisco Bay, and that recalled my desire to go to places by foot. Now, for health-related reasons doing it properly would be problematic, and thus I ve never trained for that, but during this Christmas holiday-heavy time I suggested my very patient SO the next best thing: instead of our usual 1.5 hours uphill walk in the woods, a 2 hours and a bit mostly flat walk on paved streets, plus some train, to a nearby town: Porto Ceresio, on the Italian side of Lake Lugano. I started to prepare for it on the day before, by deciding it was a good time to upgrade my PinePhone, and wait, I m still on Trixie? I could try Forky, what could possibly go wrong? And well, the phone was no longer able to boot, and reinstalling from the latest weekly had a system where the on-screen keyboard didn t appear, and I didn t want to bother finding out why, so re-installed another time from the 13.0 image, and between that, and distracting myself with widelands while waiting for the downloads and uploads and reboots etc., well, all of the afternoon and the best part of the evening disappeared. So, in a hurry, between the evening and the next morning I prepared a nice healthy lunch, full of all the important nutrients such as sugar, salt, mercury and arsenic. Tuna (mercury) soboro (sugar and salt) on rice and since I was in a hurry I didn t prepare any vegetables, but used pickles (more salt) and shio kombu (arsenic and various heavy metals, sugar and salt). Plus a green tea mochi for dessert, in case we felt low on sugar. :D Then on the day of the walk we woke up a bit later than usual, and then my body decided it was a good day for my belly to not exactly hurt, but not not-hurt either, and there I took an executive decision to wear a corset, because if something feels like it wants to burst open, wrapping it in a steel reinforced cage will make it stop. (I m not joking. It does. At least in those specific circumstances.) This was followed by hurrying through the things I had to do before leaving the house, having a brief anxiety attack and feeling feverish (it wasn t fever), and finally being able to leave the house just half an hour late. A stream running on rocks with the woods to both sides. And then, 10 minutes after we had left, realizing that I had written down the password for the train website, since it was no longer saved on the phone, but i had forgotten the bit of paper at home. We could have gone back to take it, but decided not to bother, as we could also hopefully buy paper-ish tickets at the train station (we could). Later on, I also realized I had also forgotten my GPS tracker, so I have no record of where we went exactly (but it s not hard to recognize it on a map) nor on what the temperature was. It s a shame, but by that point it was way too late to go back. Anyway, that probably was when Murphy felt we had paid our respects, and from then on everything went lovingly well! Routing had been done on the OpenStreetMap website, with OSRM, and it looked pretty easy to follow, but we also had access to an Android phone, so we used OSMAnd to check that we were still on track. It tried to lead us to the Statale (i.e. most important and most trafficked road) a few times, but we ignored it, and after a few turns and a few changes of the precise destination point we managed to get it to cooperate. At one point a helpful person asked us if we needed help, having seen us looking at the phone, and gave us indication for the next fork (that way to Cuasso al Piano, that way to Porto Ceresio), but it was pretty easy, since the way was clearly marked also for cars. Then we started to notice red and white markings on poles and other places, and on the next fork there was a signpost for hiking routes with our destination and we decided to follow it instead of the sign for cars. I knew that from our starting point to or destination there was also a hiking route, uphill both ways :) , through the hills, about 5 or 6 hours instead of two, but the sign was pointing downhill and we were past the point where we would expect too long of a detour. A wide and flat unpaved track passing through a flat grassy area with trees to the sides and rolling hills in the background. And indeed, after a short while the paved road ended, but the path continued on a wide and flat track, and was a welcome detour through what looked like water works to prevent flood damage from a stream. In a warmer season, with longer grass and ticks maybe the fact that I was wearing a long skirt may have been an issue, but in winter it was just fine. And soon afterwards, we were in Porto Ceresio. I think I have been there as a child, but I had no memory of it. On the other hand, it was about as I expected: a tiny town with a lakeside street full of houses built in the early 1900s when the area was an important tourism destination, with older buildings a bit higher up on the hills (because streams in this area will flood). And of course, getting there by foot rather than by train we also saw the parts where real people live (but not work: that s cross-border commuters country). Dried winter grass with two strips of frost, exactly under the shade of a fence. Soon after arriving in Porto Ceresio we stopped to eat our lunch on a bench at the lakeside; up to then we had been pretty comfortable in the clothing we had decided to wear: there was plenty of frost on the ground, in the shade, but the sun was warm and the temperatures were cleanly above freezing. Removing the gloves to eat, however, resulted in quite cold hands, and we didn t want to stay still for longer than strictly necessary. So we spent another hour and a bit walking around Porto Ceresio like proper tourists and taking pictures. There was an exhibition of nativity scenes all around the streets, but to get a map one had to go to either facebook or instagram, or wait for the opening hours of an office that were later than the train we planned to get to go back home, so we only saw maybe half of them, as we walked around: some were quite nice, some were nativity scenes, and some showed that the school children must have had some fun making them. three gnome adjacent creatures made of branches of evergreen trees, with a pointy hat made of moss, big white moustaches and red Christmas tree balls at the end of the hat and as a nose. They are wrapped in LED strings, and the lake can be seen in the background. Another Christmas decoration were groups of creatures made of evergreen branches that dotted the sidewalks around the lake: I took pictures of the first couple of groups, and then after seeing a few more something clicked in my brain, and I noticed that they were wrapped in green LED strings, like chains, and they had a red ball that was supposed to be the nose, but could just be around the mouth area, and suddenly I felt the need to play a certain chord to release them, but sadly I didn t have a weaponized guitar on me :D A bench in the shape of an open book, half of the pages folded in a reversed U to make the seat and half of the pages standing straight to form the backrest. It has the title page and beginning of the Constitution of the Italian Republic. Another thing that we noticed were some benches in the shape of books, with book quotations on them; most were on reading-related topics, but the one with the Constitution felt worth taking a picture of, especially these days. And then, our train was waiting at the station, and we had to go back home for the afternoon; it was a nice outing, if a bit brief, and we agreed to do it again, possibly with a bit of a detour to make the walk a bit longer. And then maybe one day we ll train to do the whole 5-6 hour thing through the hills.

3 January 2026

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: 2025 A Musical Retrospective

2026 already! The winter weather here has really been beautiful and I always enjoy this time of year. Writing this yearly musical retrospective has now become a beloved tradition of mine1 and I enjoy retracing the year's various events through albums I listened to and concerts I went to. Albums In 2025, I added 141 new albums to my collection, around 60% more than last year's haul. I think this might have been too much? I feel like I didn't have time to properly enjoy all of them and as such, I decided to slow down my acquisition spree sometimes in early December, around the time I normally do the complete opposite. This year again, I bought the vast majority of my music on Bandcamp. Most of the other albums I bought as CDs and ripped them.
Try to Win - Stay True
Shotcallers - Tales of Urban Tribes
Lut ce Borgia - Long Live Summer
Lut ce Borgia - Choose
Senza Frontiere - Nonce futuro senza m moria
Self Control - Self Control Session #19 -5-23
Maldita - Un Mundo En Demencia
Bambu - They re Burning the Boats
Paradise Lost - Ascension
Krigsgrav - Stormcaller
Nobro - Live Your Truth Shred Some Gnar
Nobro - Sick Hustle
Balm Squad - Dark Times album
Corrigan Fest - La victoire en chantant
The Planet Smashers - Attack of the Planet Smashers
Extra a humana - Bailando en la oscuridad
Ben Prunty - FTL - Lost Ship EP
Faze - Big Upsetter
Faze - Struggling to Enjoy Ourselves While the World Slowly Implodes
Faze - Songs by Faze
Faze - Content
Blackbraid - Blackbraid III
UZU - qui la libert -
Vulgaires Machins - Contempler l'ab me
The Planet Smashers - On the Dancefloor
Self Control - Still... Can't Bring Us Down
Propagandhi - At Peace
Propagandhi - Today's Empires, Tomorrow's Ashes
Propagandhi - Potemkin City Limits
Propagandhi - Failed States
Rogue Steady Orchestra - Fehlstaat
Balm Squad - Point of No Return
Calva Louise - Edge of the Abyss
Fallujah - Xenotaph
Impureza - Alc zares
Propagandhi - Supporting Caste
Phantom Spell - Immortal's Requiem
In Mourning - The Immortal
Dava ! - Premi re Pression
22 Longs Riffs - Contre Courant
Insania - The Great Apocalypse
Phantom Spell - Heather & Hearth
Tenaz - Existencia Individual
B ton Arm - Renaissance
Messa - The Spin
Jo Corbeau - Yeba A oli
Jo Corbeau - Roi des rois
Lord Kossity - Everlord
Mo'Kalamity - Deeper Revolution
Mo'Kalamity - Freedom of Soul
Mo'Kalamity - Warriors of Light
Mo'Kalamity - Shine
Death Proof - Parallel World
Death Proof - Haunted
Death Proof - Do What You Want
The Buzzers - Cutting It Close
The Buzzers - Bloody Minded EP
Fuerza Bruta - Somos El Mal
Total Nada - Aqu y Ahora
Regress 86 - Primitive Stomp
Petrol Girls - Talk of Violence
Petrol Girls - Baby
Achigan - Les proc s condamn s
Atomic Threat - Nuke You
Atomic Threat - Atomic Threat
Atomic Threat - Nuke Us
Les Ordures Ioniques - Se so lagent
Les Ordures Ioniques - Je m'en viens so l
Les Ordures Ioniques - Les Ordures Ioniques
Nephylim - Circuition
Fighting Chance - Thus Hopes Fades
Capable! - Br le Br le Br le \ Hot-dog chicane
Strength Thru Oi!
Oi! Oi! That's Yer Lot!
Carry On Oi
Oi! The Album
Tulaviok - D che la Ch'touille
Tulaviok - Q-Sec
The Abyssinians - Satta Amasagana
Evil Conduct - Sorry... No
Grima - Nightside
Lambrini Girls - You're Welcome
Lambrini Girls - Who Let the Dogs Out
Dead Pioneers - Dead Pioneers
Dead Pioneers - PO$T AMERICAN
Havukruunu - Tavastland
Mitch Murder - Then Again
Polyrhythmics - Filter System
Ultra Razzia - Ultra Razzia - Armistice Split
The Uncouth - S\T
Ain't Right - Pils Session #21
Kardashev - The Baring of Shadows
Fucked Up - Hidden World
Fucked Up - Epics in Minutes
Liberty & Justice - Empire Down Split
Liberty & Justice - Locked In
Liberty & Justice - Top of the Scrapheap
AUS!Funkt - My Way - Interception
AUS!Funkt - That's a Fact
Dynamite Express - Dynamite Express
Mortier - L'Ennui
Union Thugs - Pils Session #16
Jag Arreola - Unmasked
Le Matos - Turbo Kid Original Game Soundtrack
Union Thugs - Coup de Grisou
BLEMISH - Pils Session #23
The Halo Effect - March of the Unheard
Polyrhythmics - Man from the Future
Crachat - Fille Poup e
Over the Hill - Older, Not Wiser
Taxi Girls - Rainy
Taxi Girls - Coming Up Roses
Brass Lip - vol 2
Brass Lip - vol 1
The Prowlers - On the Run
Ain't Right - Careful What You Wish For
Stranglehold - Trouble
Stranglehold - Stranglehold
B ton Arm - Collection
Flatfoot 56 - Toil
Flatfoot 56 - Blackthorn
Blitz - Voice of a Generation
Bad Bunny - DeB TiRAR M S FOToS
Ultra Razzia - Ultra Razzia
Force Majeure - Force Majeure
Alternate Action - Thin Line
Saturday Night Satan - All Things Black
Alternate Action - Violent Crime EP
The Stress - The War Has Just Begun
The Stress - Never Die
The Stress - More Than You'll Ever Be
Spleen - ll
Spleen - Demo
Ultra Razzia - Collection
Big Boss - Skinhead revenge
Battery March - Boston Eats Its Young \ Futur pour eux EP
Workers Comp - Demo
Khassarat - How Many More Must Perish in the Pursuit of Hope?
Huntsmen - The Dry Land
Julie Christmas - Ridiculous and Full of Blood
Gaerea - Coma
Kanonenfieber - Die Urkatastrophe
Concerts In 2025, I went to the following 25 (!!) concerts: Although I haven't touched metalfinder's code in a good while, my instance still works very well and I get the occasional match when a big-name artist in my collection comes in town. Most the venues that advertise on Bandsintown are tied to Ticketmaster though, which means most underground artists (i.e. most of the music I listen to) end up playing elsewhere. As such, shout out again to the Gancio project and to the folks running the Montreal instance. It continues to be a smash hit and most of the interesting concerts end up being advertised there. See you all in 2026!
  1. see the 2022, 2023 and 2024 entries

31 December 2025

Junichi Uekawa: Happy new year.

Happy new year.

Bits from Debian: DebConf26 dates announced

Alt Debconf26 by Romina Molina As announced in Brest, France, in July, the Debian Conference is heading to Santa Fe, Argentina. The DebConf26 team and the local organizers team in Argentina are excited to announce Debconf26 dates, the 27th edition of the Debian Developers and Contributors Conference: DebCamp, the annual hacking session, will run from Monday July 13th to Sunday to July 19th 2026, followed by DebConf from Monday July 20th to Saturday July 25th 2026. For all those who wish to meet us in Santa Fe, the next step will be the opening of registration on January 26, 2026. The call for proposals period for anyone wishing to submit a conference or event proposal will be launched on the same day. DebConf26 is looking for sponsors; if you are interested or think you know of others who would be willing to help, please have a look at our sponsorship page and get in touch with sponsors@debconf.org. About Debian The Debian Project was founded in 1993 by Ian Murdock to be a truly free community project. Since then the project has grown to be one of the largest and most influential Open Source projects. Thousands of volunteers from all over the world work together to create and maintain Debian software. Available in 70 languages, and supporting a huge range of computer types, Debian calls itself the universal operating system. About DebConf DebConf is the Debian Project's developer conference. In addition to a full schedule of technical, social and policy talks, DebConf provides an opportunity for developers, contributors and other interested people to meet in person and work together more closely. It has taken place annually since 2000 in locations as varied as Scotland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, India, Korea. More information about DebConf is available from https://debconf.org/. For further information, please visit the DebConf26 web page at https://debconf26.debconf.org/ or send mail to press@debian.org. Debconf26 is made possible by Proxmox and others.

30 December 2025

Utkarsh Gupta: FOSS Activites in December 2025

Here s my monthly but brief update about the activities I ve done in the FOSS world.

Debian
Whilst I didn t get a chance to do much, here are still a few things that I worked on:
  • Prepared security update for wordpress for trixie and bookworm.
  • A few discussions with the new DFSG team, et al.
  • Assited a few folks in getting their patches submitted via Salsa.
  • Mentoring for newcomers.
  • Moderation of -project mailing list.

Ubuntu
I joined Canonical to work on Ubuntu full-time back in February 2021. Whilst I can t give a full, detailed list of things I did, here s a quick TL;DR of what I did:
  • Successfully released Resolute Snapshot 2!
    • This one was also done without the ISO tracker and cdimage access.
    • I think this one went rather smooth. Let s see what we re able to do for snapshot 3.
  • Worked on removing GPG keys from the cdimage instance. That took a while, whew!
  • Assisted a bunch of folks with my Archive Admin and Release team hats to:
    • review NEW packages for Ubuntu Studio.
    • remove old binaries that are stalling transition and/or migration.
    • LTS requalification of Ubuntu flavours.
    • bootstrapping dotnet-10 packages for Stable Release Updates.
  • With that, we ve entered the EOY break. :)
    • I was anyway on vacation for majority of this month. ;)

Debian (E)LTS
This month I have worked 72 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS) and on its sister Extended LTS project and did the following things:

Released Security Updates
  • ruby-git: Multiple vulnerabilities leading to command line injection and improper path escaping.
  • ruby-sidekiq: Multiple vulnerabilities leading to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) and Denial of Service in Web UI.
  • python-apt: Vulnerability leading to crash via invalid nullptr dereference in TagSection.keys().
    • [LTS]: Fixed CVE-2025-6966 via 2.2.1.1 for bullseye. This has been released as DLA 4408-1.
    • [ELTS]: Fixed CVE-2025-6966 via 1.8.4.4 for buster and 1.4.4 for stretch. This has been released as ELA 1596-1.
    • All of this was coordinated b/w the Security team and Julian Andres Klode. Julian will take care of the stable uploads.
  • node-url-parse: Vulnerability allowing authorization bypass through specially crafted URL with empty userinfo and no host.
  • wordpress: Multiple vulnerabilities in WordPress core, leading to Sent Data & Cross-site Scripting.
  • usbmuxd: Privilege escalation vulnerability via path traversal in SavePairRecord command.
    • [LTS]: Fixed CVE-2025-66004 via 1.1.1-2+deb11u1 for bullseye. This has been released as DLA 4417-1.
    • [ELTS]: Fixed CVE-2025-66004 via 1.1.1~git20181007.f838cf6-1+deb10u1 for buster and 1.1.0-2+deb9u1 for stretch. This has been released as ELA 1599-1.
    • All of this was coordinated b/w the Security team and Yves-Alexis Perez. Yves will take care of the stable uploads.
  • gst-plugins-good1.0: Multiple vulnerabilities in isomp4 plugin leading to potential out-of-bounds reads and information disclosure.
  • postgresql-13: Multiple vulnerabilities including unauthorized schema statistics creation and integer overflow in libpq allocation calculations.
  • gst-plugins-base1.0: Multiple vulnerabilities in SubRip subtitle parsing leading to potential crashes and buffer issues.

Work in Progress
  • ceph: Affected by CVE-2024-47866, using the argument x-amz-copy-source to put an object and specifying an empty string as its content leads to the RGW daemon crashing, resulting in a DoS attack.
  • knot-resolver: Affected by CVE-2023-26249, CVE-2023-46317, and CVE-2022-40188, leading to Denial of Service.
  • adminer: Affected by CVE-2023-45195 and CVE-2023-45196, leading to SSRF and DoS, respectively.
  • u-boot: Affected by CVE-2025-24857, where boot code access control flaw in U-Boot allowing arbitrary code execution via physical access.
    • [ELTS]: As it s only affected the version in stretch, I ve started the work to find the fixing commits and prepare a backport. Not much progress there, I ll roll it over to January.
  • ruby-rack: There were multiple vulnerabilities reported in Rack, leading to DoS (memory exhaustion) and proxy bypass.
    • [ELTS]: After completing the work for LTS myself, Bastien picked it up for ELTS and reached out about an upstream regression and we ve been doing some exchanges. Bastien has done most of the work backporting the patches but needs a review and help backporting CVE-2025-61771.

Other Activities
  • Frontdesk from 01-12-2025 to 07-12-2025.
    • Auto EOL d a bunch of packages.
    • Marked CVE-2025-12084/python2.7 as end-of-life for bullseye, buster, and stretch.
    • Marked CVE-2025-12084/jython as end-of-life for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-13992/chromium as end-of-life for bullseye.
    • Marked apache2 CVEs as postponed for bullseye, buster, and stretch.
    • Marked CVE-2025-13654/duc as postponed for bullseye and buster.
    • Marked CVE-2025-32900/kdeconnect as ignored for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-12084/pypy3 as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-14104/util-linux as postponed for bullseye, buster, and stretch.
    • Marked several CVEs for fastdds as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked several CVEs for pytorch as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-2486/edk2 as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-6172 7,9 /golang-1.15 as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-65637/golang-logrus as postponed for bullseye.
    • Marked CVE-2025-12385/qtdeclarative-opensource-src ,gles as postponed for bullseye, buster, and stretch.
    • Marked TEMP-0000000-D08402/rust-maxminddb as postponed for bullseye.
    • Added the following packages to d,e la-needed.txt:
      • liblivemedia, sogo.
    • During my triage, I had to make the bin/elts-eol script robust to determine the lts_admin repository - did a back and forth with Emilio about this on the list.
    • I sent a gentle reminder to the LTS team about the issues fixed in bullseye but not in bookworm via mailing list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2025/12/msg00013.html.
  • I claimed php-horde-css-parser to work on CVE-2020-13756 for buster and did almost all the work only to realize that the patch already existed in buster and the changelog confirmed that it was intentionally fixed.
    • After speaking with Andreas Henriksson, we figured that the CVE ID was missed when the ELA was generated and so I fixed that via 87afaaf19ce56123bc9508d9c6cd5360b18114ef and 5621431e84818b4e650ffdce4c456daec0ee4d51 in the ELTS security tracker to reflect the situation.
  • Participated in a thread which I started last month around using Salsa CI for E/LTS packages and if we plan to sunset it in favor of using Debusine. The plan for now is to keep it around as it s still beneficial and Debusine is still in its early phase.
  • Did a lot of back and forth with Helmut about debusine uploads on #debian-elts.
    • While debugging a failure in dcut uploads, I ran into an SSH compatibility issue on deb-master.freexian.com that could be fixed on the server-side. I shared all my findings to Freexian s sysadmin team.
    • A minimal fix on the server side would be one of: 
      PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms -ssh-dss
      or explicitly restricting to modern algorithms, e.g.: 
      PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms
ssh-ed25519,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256
  • Jelly on #debian-lts reported that all my DLA mails had broken GMail s DKIM signature. So I set up sending replies from @debian.org and that seems to have fixed that! \o/
  • [LTS] Attended a rather short monthly LTS meeting on Jitsi. Summary here.
  • [E/LTS] Monitored discussions on mailing lists, IRC, and all the documentation updates.
Until next time.
:wq for today.

28 December 2025

Jonathan Dowland: Our study, 2025

We re currently thinking of renovating our study/home office. I ll likely write more about that project. Embarking on it reminded me that I d taken a photo of the state of it nearly a year ago and forgot to post it, so here it is.
Home workspace, January 2025 Home workspace, January 2025
When I took that pic last January, it had been three years since the last one, and the major difference was a reduction in clutter. I've added a lava lamp (charity shop find) and Rob Sheridan print. We got rid of the PO NG chair (originally bought for breast feeding) so we currently have no alternate seating besides the desk chair. As much as I love my vintage mahogany writing desk, our current thinking is it s likely to go. I m exploring whether we could fit in two smaller desks: one main one for the computer, and another workbench for play: the synthesiser, Amiga, crafting and 3d printing projects, etc.

Next.

Previous.