Search Results: "ron"

7 August 2015

Christoph Egger: Systemd pitfalls

logind hangs If you just updated systemd and ssh to that host seems to hang, that's just a known Bug (Debian Bug). Don't panic. Wait for the logind timeout and restart logind. restart and stop;start One thing that confused me several times and still confuses people is systemctl restart doing more than systemctl stop ; systemctl start. You will notice the difference once you have a failed service. A restart will try to start the service again. Both stop and start however will just ignore it. Rumors have it this has changed post jessie however. sysvinit-wrapped services and stop While there are certainly bugs with sysvinit services in general (I found myself several times without a local resolver as unbound failed to be started, haven't managed to debug further), the stop behavior of wrapped services is just broken. systemctl stop will block until the sysv initscript finished. It will even note the result of the action in its state. However systemctl will return with exitcode 0 and not output anything on stdout/stderr. This has been reported as Debian Bug. zsh helper I found the following zshrc snipped quite helpful in dealing with non-reported systemctl failures. On root shells it will display a list of failed services as part of the prompt. This will give proper feedback whether your systemctl stop failed, it will give feedback if you still have type=simple services and if the sysv-init script or wrapper is broken.
precmd ()  
    if [[ $UID == 0 && $+commands[systemctl] != 0 ]]
    then
      use_systemd=true
      systemd_failed=" systemctl --state=failed   grep failed   cut -d \  -f 2   tr '\n' ' ' "
    fi
 
if [[ $UID == 0 && $+commands[systemctl] != 0 ]]
then
  PROMPT=$'% $fg[red]>>  $systemd_failed$reset_color% \n'
else
  PROMPT=""
fi
PROMPT+=whateveryourpromptis
zsh completion Speaking of zsh, there's one problem that bothers me a lot and I don't have any solution for. Tab-completing the service name for service is blazing fast. Tab-completing the service name for systemctl restart takes ages. People traced down to truckloads of dbus communication for the completion but no further fix is known (to me). type=simple services As described in length by Lucas Nussbaum type=simple services are actively harmful. Proper type=forking daemons are strictly superior (they provide feedback of finished initialization and success thereof) and type=notify services are so simple there's no excuse for not using them even for private one-off hacks. Even if you're language doesn't provide libsystemd-daemon bindings:
(defun sd-notify (event-string)
  (let ((socket (make-instance 'sb-bsd-sockets:local-socket :type :datagram))
        (name (posix-getenv "NOTIFY_SOCKET"))
        (bufferlen (length event-string)))
    (when name
      (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-connect socket name)
      (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-send socket event-string bufferlen))))
This is a stable API guaranteed to not break in the future and implemented in less than ten lines of code with just basic socket functions. And if your language has support it becomes actually trivial:
    try:
        import systemd
        systemd.daemon.notify("READY=1")
    except ImportError:
        pass
Note that in both cases there is no drawback at all on systemd-free setups. It has the overhead of checking the process' environment for NOTIFY_SOCKET or for the systemd package and behaves like a simple service otherwise. Actually the idea of separating the technical aspect (daemonizing) from the semantic aspect of signalizing "initialization finished, everything's fine" is a pretty good idea and hopefully has the potential to reduce the number of services signalizing the "everything's fine" too early. It could even be ported to non-systemd init systems easily given the API.

Christoph Egger: Systemd pitfalls

logind hangs If you just updated systemd and ssh to that host seems to hang, that's just a known Bug (Debian Bug #770135). Don't panic. Wait for the logind timeout and restart logind. restart and stop;start One thing that confused me several times and still confuses people is systemctl restart doing more than systemctl stop ; systemctl start. You will notice the difference once you have a failed service. A restart will try to start the service again. Both stop and start however will just ignore it. Rumors have it this has changed post jessie however. sysvinit-wrapped services and stop While there are certainly bugs with sysvinit services in general (I found myself several times without a local resolver as unbound failed to be started, haven't managed to debug further), the stop behavior of wrapped services is just broken. systemctl stop will block until the sysv initscript finished. It will even note the result of the action in its state. However systemctl will return with exitcode 0 and not output anything on stdout/stderr. This has been reported as Debian Bug #792045. zsh helper I found the following zshrc snipped quite helpful in dealing with non-reported systemctl failures. On root shells it will display a list of failed services as part of the prompt. This will give proper feedback whether your systemctl stop failed, it will give feedback if you still have type=simple services and if the sysv-init script or wrapper is broken.
precmd ()  
    if [[ $UID == 0 && $+commands[systemctl] != 0 ]]
    then
      use_systemd=true
      systemd_failed=" systemctl --state=failed   grep failed   cut -d \  -f 2   tr '\n' ' ' "
    fi
 
if [[ $UID == 0 && $+commands[systemctl] != 0 ]]
then
  PROMPT=$'% $fg[red]>>  $systemd_failed$reset_color% \n'
else
  PROMPT=""
fi
PROMPT+=whateveryourpromptis
zsh completion Speaking of zsh, there's one problem that bothers me a lot and I don't have any solution for. Tab-completing the service name for service is blazing fast. Tab-completing the service name for systemctl restart takes ages. People traced down to truckloads of dbus communication for the completion but no further fix is known (to me). type=simple services As described in length by Lucas Nussbaum type=simple services are actively harmful. Proper type=forking daemons are strictly superior (they provide feedback of finished initialization and success thereof) and type=notify services are so simple there's no excuse for not using them even for private one-off hacks. Even if you're language doesn't provide libsystemd-daemon bindings:
(defun sd-notify (event-string)
  (let ((socket (make-instance 'sb-bsd-sockets:local-socket :type :datagram))
        (name (posix-getenv "NOTIFY_SOCKET"))
        (bufferlen (length event-string)))
    (when name
      (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-connect socket name)
      (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-send socket event-string bufferlen))))
This is a stable API guaranteed to not break in the future and implemented in less than ten lines of code with just basic socket functions. And if your language has support it becomes actually trivial:
    try:
        import systemd
        systemd.daemon.notify("READY=1")
    except ImportError:
        pass
Note that in both cases there is no drawback at all on systemd-free setups. It has the overhead of checking the process' environment for NOTIFY_SOCKET or for the systemd package and behaves like a simple service otherwise. Actually the idea of separating the technical aspect (daemonizing) from the semantic aspect of signalizing "initialization finished, everything's fine" is a pretty good idea and hopefully has the potential to reduce the number of services signalizing the "everything's fine" too early. It could even be ported to non-systemd init systems easily given the API.

Mike Gabriel: My FLOSS activities in July 2015

July 2015 has been mainly dedicated to these five fields of endeavour: Debian Edu rollout at a grammar school (Gymnasium) in L beck, Germany In spring 2015, we got contacted by the IT coordinator of a grammar school (Gymnasium) in L beck, Germany. He asked for some consultancy on the existing school network based on Debian and Linux Mint. The school has been running on Linux all-over for the past 5 years (at least, IIRC). After several phone calls and a personal meeting, the decision was reached to switch over the educational segment of their school IT completely to Debian Edu / Skolelinux. GOsa and Debian Edu testing and fixing This new customer gave us the opportunity of intensively testing Debian Edu jessie. Diverting from previous rollouts, we dropped LibVirt as virtualization technology and switched over to Ganeti. The Debian Edu machines all run in KVM virtual machines. Our Diskless Workstations and diskfull workstations have been running on Debian Edu jessie plus MATE desktop environment for a while already. But the main servers at other customers' are still on Debian Edu squeeze. read more

Ben Hutchings: Debian LTS work, July 2015

This was my eighth month working on Debian LTS. I was assigned 14.75 hours of work by Freexian's Debian LTS initiative. linux-2.6 I didn't upload any new version of the kernel this month, but I did send all the recent security fixes to Willy Tarreau who maintains the 2.6.32.y branch at kernel.org. I also spent more time working on a fix for bug #770492 aka CVE-2015-1350, which is not yet fixed upstream. I now have a candidate patch for 2.6.32.y/squeeze, and automated tests covering many of the affected filesystems. Front desk The LTS 'front desk' role is now assigned on a rota, and I was my first turn in the third week of July. I investigated which new CVEs affected LTS-supported packages in squeeze, recorded this in the secure-testing repository, and mailed the package maintainers to give them a chance to handle the updates. groovy Groovy had a single issue (CVE-2015-3253) with a simple fix that I could apply to the version in squeeze. Unfortunately the previous version in squeeze had not been properly updated during the squeeze release cycle and could no longer be built from source. I eventually worked out what the build-dependencies should be, uploaded the fix and issued DLA-274-1. ruby1.9.1 Ruby 1.9.1 also had a single issue (CVE-2014-6438), though the fixes were more complicated and hard to find. (The original bug report for this is still not public in the upstream bug tracker.) I also had to find an earlier upstream change that they depended on. As I've mentioned before, Ruby has an extensive test suite so I could be quite confident in my backported changes. I uploaded and issued DLA-275-1. libidn The GNU library for Internationalized Domain Names, libidn, required applications to pass only valid UTF-8 strings as domain names. The Jabber instant messaging server turned out not to be validating untrusted domain names, leading to a security issue there (CVE-2015-2059). As there are likely to be other applications with similar bugs, this was resolved by adding UTF-8 validation to libidn. The fix for this involved importing additional functions from the GNU portability library, gnulib, and there my difficulties began. Confusingly, libidn has two separate sets of functions imported from gnulib, and due to interdependencies it turned out that I would have to update both of these wholesale rather than just importing the new functions that were wanted. This resulted in a 35,000 line patch. Following that I needed to autoreconf the package (and debug that process when it failed), ending up with another 26,000 line patch. Finally, it turned out that the new gnulib code needed gperf to build a header file for Solaris (when building for Linux? huh?). I ended up adding that with another patch instead. libidn has a decent test suite, so I could at least be confident in the result of my changes. I uploaded and issued DLA-277-1. Dear upstream developers, please use sane libraries instead of gnulib.

John Goerzen: Detailed Smart Card Cryptographic Token Security Guide

After my first post about smartcards under Linux, I thought I would share some information I ve been gathering. This post is already huge, so I am not going to dive into much specific commands, but I am linking to many sources with detailed instructions. I ve reviewed several types of cards. For this review, I will focus on the OpenPGP card and the Yubikey NEO, since the Cardomatic Smartcard-HSM is not supported by the gpg version in Jessie. Both cards are produced by people with strong support for the Free Software ecosystem and have strong cross-platform support with source code. OpenPGP card: Basics with GnuPG The OpenPGP card is well-known as one of the first smart cards to work well on Linux. It is a single-application card focused on use with GPG. Generally speaking, by the way, you want GPG2 for use with smartcards. Basically, this card contains three slots: decryption, signing, and authentication slots. The concept is that the private key portions of the keys used for these items are stored only on the card, can never be extracted from the card, and the cryptographic operations are performed on the card. There is more information in my original post. In a fairly rare move for smartcards, this card supports 4096-byte RSA keys; most are restricted to 2048-byte keys. The FSF Europe hands these out to people and has a lot of good information about them online, including some HOWTOs. The official GnuPG smart card howto is 10 years old, and although it has some good background, I d suggest using the FSFE instructions instead. As you ll see in a bit, most of this information also pertains to the OpenPGP mode of the Yubikey Neo. OpenPGP card: Other uses Of course, this is already pretty great to enhance your GPG security, but there s a lot more that you can do with this card to add two-factor authentication (2FA) to a lot of other areas. Here are some pointers: OpenPGP card: remote authentication with ssh You can store the private part of your ssh key on the card. Traditionally, this was only done by using the ssh agent emulation mode of gnupg-agent. This is still possible, of course. Now, however, the OpenSC project now supports the OpenPGP card as a PKCS#11 and PKCS#15 card, which means it works natively with ssh-agent as well. Try just ssh-add -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so if you ve put a key in the auth slot with GPG. ssh-add -L will list its fingerprint for insertion into authorized_keys. Very simple! As an aside: Comments that you need scute for PKCS#11 support are now outdated. I do not recommend scute. It is quite buggy. OpenPGP card: local authentication with PAM You can authenticate logins to a local machine by using the card with libpam-poldi here are some instructions. Between the use with ssh and the use with PAM, we have now covered 2FA for both local and remote use in Unix environments. OpenPGP card: use on Windows Let s move on to Windows environments. The standard suggestion here seems to be the mysmartlogon OpenPGP mini-driver. It works with some sort of Windows CA system, or the local accounts using EIDAuthenticate. I have not yet tried this. OpenPGP card: Use with X.509 or Windows Active Directory You can use the card in X.509 mode via these gpgsm instructions, which apparently also work with Windows Active Directory in some fashion. You can also use it with web browsers to present a certificate from a client for client authentication. For example, here are OpenSC instructions for Firefox. OpenPGP card: Use with OpenVPN Via the PKCS#11 mode, this card should be usable to authenticate a client to OpenVPN. See the official OpenVPN HOWTO or these other instructions for more. OpenPGP card: a note on PKCS#11 and PKCS#15 support You ll want to install the opensc-pkcs11 package, and then give the path /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so whenever something needs the PKCS#11 library. There seem to be some locking/contention issues between GPG2 and OpenSC, however. Usually killing pcscd and scdaemon will resolve this. I would recommend doing manipulation operations (setting PINs, generating or uploading keys, etc.) via GPG2 only. Use the PKCS#11 tools only to access. OpenPGP card: further reading Kernel Concepts also has some nice readers; you can get this card in a small USB form-factor by getting the mini-card and the Gemalto reader. Yubikey Neo Introduction The Yubikey Neo is a fascinating device. It is a small USB and NFC device, a little smaller than your average USB drive. It is a multi-application device that actually has six distinct modes: There is a ton to digest with this device. Yubikey Neo Basics By default, the Yubikey Neo is locked to only a subset of its features. Using the yubikey-personalization tool (you ll need the version in stretch; jessie is too old), you can use ykpersonalize -m86 to unlock the full possibilities of the card. Run that command, then unplug and replug the device. It will present itself as a USB keyboard as well as a PC/SC-compatible card reader. It has a capacitive button, which is used to have it generate keystrokes to input validation information for HOTP or HMAC validation. It has two slots that can be configured with HMAC and HOTP; a short button press selects the default slot #1 and a long press selects slot #2. But before we get into that, let s step back at some basics. opensc-tool list-algorithms claims this card supports RSA with 1024, 2048, and 3072 sizes, and EC with 256 and 384-bit sizes. I haven t personally verified anything other than RSA-2048 though. Yubikey Neo: OpenPGP support In this mode, the card is mostly compatible with the physical OpenPGP card. I say mostly because there are a few protocol differences I ll get into later. It is also limited to 2048-byte keys. Support for this is built into GnuPG and the GnuPG features described above all work fine. In this mode, it uses firmware from the Yubico fork of the JavaCard OpenPGP Card applet. There are Yubico-specific tutorials available, but again, most of the general GPG stuff applies. You can use gnupg-agent to use the card with SSH as before. However, due to some incompatibilities, the OpenPGP applet on this card cannot be used as a PKCS#11 card with either scute or OpenSC. That is not exactly a huge problem, however, as the card has another applet (PIV) that is compatible with OpenSC and so this still provides an avenue for SSH, OpenVPN, Mozilla, etc. It should be noted that the OpenPGP applet on this card can also be used with NFC on Android with the OpenKeychain app. Together with pass (or its Windows, Mac, or phone ports), this makes a nicely secure system for storing passwords. Yubikey Neo: PKCS#11 with the PIV applet There is also support for the PIV standard on the Yubikey Neo. This is supported by default on Linux (via OpenSC) and Windows and provides a PKCS#11-compabible store. It should, therefore, be compatible with ssh-agent, OpenVPN, Active Directory, and all the other OpenPGP card features described above. The only difference is that it uses storage separate from the OpenPGP applet. You will need one of the Yubico PIV tools to configure the key for it; in Debian, the yubico-piv-tool from stretch does this. Here are some instructions on using the Yubikey Neo in PIV mode: A final note: for security, it s important to change the management key and PINs before deploying the PIV mode. I couldn t get this to work with Firefox, but it worked pretty much everywhere else. Yubikey Neo: HOTP authentication This is the default mode for your Yubikey; all other modes require enabling with ykpersonalize. In this mode, a 128-bit AES key stored on the Yubikey is used to generate one-time passwords (OTP). (This key was shared in advance with the authentication server.) A typical pattern would be for three prompts: username, password, and Yubikey HOTP. The user clicks in the Yubikey HOTP field, touches the Yubikey, and their one-time token is pasted in. In the background, the service being authenticated to contacts an authentication server. This authentication server can be either your own (there are several open source implementations in Debian) or the free Yubicloud. Either way, the server decrypts the encrypted part of the OTP, performs validity checks (making sure that the counter is larger than any counter it s seen before, etc) and returns success or failure back to the service demanding authentication. The first few characters of the posted auth contain the unencrypted key ID, and thus it can also be used to provide username if desired. Yubico has provided quite a few integrations and libraries for this mode. A few highlights: You can also find some details on the OTP mode. Here s another writeup. This mode is simple to implement, but it has a few downsides. One is that it is specific to the Yubico line of products, and thus has a vendor lock-in factor. Another is the dependence on the authentication server; this creates a potential single point of failure and can be undesireable in some circumtances. Yubikey Neo: OATH and HOTP and TOTP First, a quick note: OATH and OAuth are not the same. OATH is an authentication protocol, and OAuth is an authorization protocol. Now then Like Yubikey HOTP, OATH (both HOTP and TOTP) modes rely on a pre-shared key. (See details in the Yubico article.) Let s talk about TOTP first. With TOTP, there is a pre-shared secret with each service. Each time you authenticate to that service, your TOTP generator combines the timestamp with the shared secret using a HMAC algorithm and produces a OTP that changes every 30 seconds. Google Authenticator is a common example of this protocol, and this is a drop-in replacement for it. Gandi has a nice description of it that includes links to software-only solutions on various platforms as well. With the Yubikey, the shared secrets are stored on the card and processed within it. You cannot extract the shared secret from the Yubikey. Of course, if someone obtains physical access to your Yubikey they could use the shared secret stored on it, but there is no way they can steal the shared secret via software, even by compromising your PC or phone. Since the Yubikey does not have a built-in clock, TOTP operations cannot be completed solely on the card. You can use a PC-based app or the Android application (Play store link) with NFC to store secrets on the device and generate your TOTP codes. Command-line users can also use the yubikey-totp tool in the python-yubico package. OATH can also use HOTP. With HOTP, an authentication counter is used instead of a clock. This means that HOTP passwords can be generated entirely within the Yubikey. You can use ykpersonalize to configure either slot 1 or 2 for this mode, but one downside is that it can really only be used with one service per slot. OATH support is all over the place; for instance, there s libpam-oath from the OATH toolkit for Linux platforms. (Some more instructions on this exist.) Note: There is another tool from Yubico (not in Debian) that can apparently store multiple TOTP and HOTP codes in the Yubikey, although ykpersonalize and other documentation cannot. It is therefore unclear to me if multiple HOTP codes are supported, and how.. Yubikey Neo: Challenge-Response Mode This can be useful for doing offline authentication, and is similar to OATH-HOTP in a sense. There is a shared secret to start with, and the service trying to authenticate sends a challenge to the token, which must supply an appropriate response. This makes it only suitable for local authentication, but means it can be done fairly automatically and optionally does not even require a button press. To muddy the waters a bit, it supports both Yubikey OTP and HMAC-SHA1 challenge-response modes. I do not really know the difference. However, it is worth noting that libpam-yubico works with HMAC-SHA1 mode. This makes it suitable, for instance, for logon passwords. Yubikey Neo: U2F U2F is a new protocol for web-based apps. Yubico has some information, but since it is only supported in Chrome, it is not of interest to me right now. Yubikey Neo: Further resources Yubico has a lot of documentation, and in particular a technical manual that is actually fairly detailed. Closing comments Do not think a hardware security token is a panacea. It is best used as part of a multi-factor authentication system; you don t want a lost token itself to lead to a breach, just as you don t want a compromised password due to a keylogger to lead to a breach. These things won t prevent someone that has compromised your PC from abusing your existing ssh session (or even from establishing new ssh sessions from your PC, once you ve unlocked the token with the passphrase). What it will do is prevent them from stealing your ssh private key and using it on a different PC. It won t prevent someone from obtaining a copy of things you decrypt on a PC using the Yubikey, but it will prevent them from decrypting other things that used that private key. Hopefully that makes sense. One also has to consider the security of the hardware. On that point, I am pretty well satisfied with the Yubikey; large parts of it are open source, and they have put a lot of effort into hardening the hardware. It seems pretty much impervious to non-government actors, which is about the best guarantee a person can get about anything these days. I hope this guide has been helpful.

6 August 2015

Eduard Sanou: Reproducible builds on Debian for GSoC 2015, 1st update

This is the second blog post I m writing about my experiences contributing to Debian for Google Summer of Code 2015 (check my first post)

Status update

First month It s been two months and a few days since the GSoC started. During the first month I worked on fixing specific packages, mainly concerning issues with timestamps, which is a very common source of unreproducibility. In many cases, during the build process files are compressed into gzip or zip archives, which store the creation time of files in the metadata. This can lead to unreproducible results when there is timezone variation between builds (easily fixed setting the timezone to UTC before the compression happens). In some cases the compressed files are generated during the build, and thus add build times in the metadata of compressed files (in this case the creation date of the files needs to be normalized somehow). As explained in my application, I finished exams on the end of June, that s why I chose to work on small fixes first, so that I could make the most out of my time between studying and finishing university projects and reports. I m happy with my first month, as I have worked as originally planned. Actually, my estimation of the number of bugs I could submit every week was surpassed in reality!

Second month Once the university was over, I started dedicating myself fully to the project. This allowed me to start working on toolchain fixes, following my original plan on working with timestamp related issues. In particular I have been working a lot in implementing a proposal for deterministic timestamps that appeared in the reproducible builds project. The idea is to define an environment variable called SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH that contains a known timestamp in Unix epoch format. With this variable exported, tools that would embed the localtime in their generated or processed files, can use this externally supplied date. This would happen only if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is exported, so the behaviour of the tool wouldn t change if the variable is not set. The first package I patched to implement this behaviour was gcc. The reason behind this is that there are about 420 unreproducible packages due to using the __DATE__, __TIME__ and __TIMESTAMP__ C macros. My patch changes the behavior of the macros __DATE__ and __TIME__ if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is exported. I submitted this patch to the gcc-patches list. Even though there was some interesting discussions in the list, the patch has not been accepted yet. Seeing how the reproducible builds idea is gaining momentum and becoming widespread, I m positive that at some point the gcc people will be more receptive for such patch. The second work with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was in debhelper; I patched this building tool to export the variable with the latest debian/changelog entry timestamp. With this patch, all the tools that run under dh will be able to use it to embed deterministic timestamps. Unfortunately some parts of the build process of some packages don t happen under debhelper, so the variable needs to be exported in a different way. Having submitted the debhelper patch allowed many packages to become reproducible after the tools that embedded timestamps were patched to honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. As of today, the toolchain packages I have patched to do that are: gcc, libxslt, gettext, ghostscript and qt4-x11 (qhelpgenerator). I have also continued working on fixing individual packages affected by timestamps, random orderings (such as the ones from listing hash keys) and locale depending orderings; I have tagged packages in our infrastructure to note what kind of issue makes them unreproducible; I have updated some parts of the Reproducible Builds Wiki.

Impressions about reproducible builds The work I did during the first month felt a bit tedious sometimes: it didn t require much creativity or thinking as most of the fixes where quite mechanical, following a recipe. After I became free from university duties, I started looking into less trivial issues, which require more deep investigation and feel more rewarding once they are fixed. I also worked on toolchain fixes, which need more work and need more care. Fixing toolchain packages feels particularly rewarding because they can cause many packages to become reproducible at once. There is a very active community in the reproducible builds project! It s great to see so many people contributing to this project spending so many hours and putting so much effort. I ve felt very welcome from the beginning and I have gotten kind replies and helpful answers to all the questions and doubts I ve had, both from my mentor and from the other people in the project. I want to add that I m still amazed by the awesome infrastructure set up for the reproducible builds project. The team is using a Jenkins machine to continuously build packages to check for reproducibility, with irc notifications for changes, and also with a really useful web interface to list all the packages organized by issues that allows exploring them individually with all the available information. Also not only the infrastructure is used to build Debian amd64 packages, but also FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenWRT, coreboot and lately Debian armhf with the help of a few new arm nodes.

Impressions about working on a free software project This was my first time working on a community driven free software project and I ve learned so many things. Something I learned during the first days, which is even more present in such wide project like the reproducible builds, is that contributing is not just writing patches for the features you want; you also need to convince the maintainer of the package to accept the patch! I was a bit surprised at the beginning because even if this is a Debian project, that aims to make changes to the whole distribution, decisions are not absolute for the whole Debian project. After taking decisions within the reproducible builds teams on how to approach things, we need to convince the rest of the Debian developers (mainly maintainers) to follow them, as they are allowed to disagree. So it is required to work together for solutions that makes everyone comfortable, usually with discussions on mailing lists or irc. There is another fact that I wasn t expecting before getting involved in this project. The kind of teamwork I have done previously involves having a leader who decides how stuff is done, who takes decisions when needed and oversees the whole project. There seems to be a different philosophy in Debian. Instead of having a leader, everyone tries their best, trying to convince the others that their solution is good, often by showing an implementation of the solution and providing proof that it works, rather than trying to get the solution accepted before coding it. Also, solutions and ideas are valued for their quality rather than by the position of the person submitting them, and there is no hierarchy within the group: all comments and advices are taken equally, valuing their usefulness regardless of who gives them. Usually there are no votes when deciding things. Members try their best on their approaches, trying to convince others as best as they can. And even if someone disagrees they may end up accepting the solution if they don t manage to convince the original proposer of doing things differently. The idea is to spend more time working and coding than arguing and deciding on the way to do things. So far I ve seen this approach to be very efficient :) I ve been told by my mentor that for difficult cases there exist a Debian committee that helps mediate on disagreements, but that is only used as a last option, probably when the discussion gets heated up.

Personal experience Overall I m very happy to finally having set my foot in the free software community, where I m able to contribute to the kind of software I have been using for years. The sense of community in Debian is really big, and everyone is invited to participate. I think that Google is doing an awesome job with the Google Summer of Code, not only because it gives a lot to free software but because it helps students to join the free software world as contributors (which is something that may be difficult to get into when you don t know how to begin, as it happened to myself for some time). I plan to continue contributing to the free software world, and I d encourage anyone to find projects to get involved and contribute as well! Happy hacking to everyone!

5 August 2015

Don Armstrong: Introducing dqsub

I've been using qsub for a while now on the cluster here at the IGB at UofI. qsub is a command line program which is used to submit jobs to a scheduler to eventually be run on one (or more) nodes of a cluster. Unfortunately, qsub's interface is horrible. It requires that you write a shell script for every single little thing you run, and doesn't do simple things like providing defaults or running multiple jobs at once with slightly different arguments. I've dealt with this for a while using some rudimentary shell scripting, but I finally had enough. So instead, I wrote a wrapper around qsub called dqsub. What used to require a complicated invocation like:
echo -e '#!/bin/bash\nmake foo'  \
 qsub -q default -S /bin/bash -d $(pwd) \
  -l mem=8G,nodes=1:ppn=4 -;
can now be run with
dqsub --mem 8G --ppn 4 make foo;
Want to run some command in every single directory which starts with SRX? That's easy:
ls -1 SRX* dqsub --mem 8G --ppn 4 --array chdir make bar;
Want instead to behave like xargs but do the same thing?
ls -1 SRX* dqsub --mem 8G --ppn 4 --array xargs make bar -C;
Now, this wrapper isn't complete yet, but it's already more than enough to do what I require, and has saved me quite a bit of time already. You can steal dqsub for yourself Feel free to request specific features, too.

4 August 2015

Matthew Garrett: Reverse this

The TODO group is an industry body that appears to be trying to define community best practices or something. I don't really know what their backstory is and whether they're trying to do meaningful work or just provide a fig leaf of respectability to organisations that dislike being criticised for doing nothing to improve the state of online communities but don't want to have to actually do anything, and their initial work on codes of conduct was, perhaps, suboptimal. But they do appear to be trying to improve things - this commit added a set of inappropriate behaviours, and also clarified that reverseisms were not actionable behaviour.

At which point Reddit lost its shit, because Reddit is garbage. And now the repository is a mess of white men attempting to explain how any policy that could allow them to be criticised is the real racism.

Fuck that shit.

Being a cis white man who's a native English speaker from a fairly well-off background, I'm pretty familiar with privilege. Spending my teenage years as an atheist of Irish Catholic upbringing in a Protestant school in a region of Northern Ireland that made parts of the bible belt look socially progressive, I'm also pretty familiar with the idea that that said privilege doesn't shield me from everything bad in life. Having privilege isn't a guarantee that my life will be better, in the same way that avoiding smoking doesn't mean I won't die of lung cancer. But there's an association in both cases, one that's strong enough to alter the statistical likelihood in meaningful ways.

And that inherently affects discussions about race or gender or sexuality. The probability that I've been subject to systematic discrimination because of these traits is vanishingly small. In the communities this policy is intended to cover, I'm the default. It's very difficult for any minority to exercise power over me. "You're white, you wouldn't understand" isn't fundamentally about my colour, it's about the fact that my colour means I haven't been subject to society trying to make my life more difficult at every opportunity. A community that considers saying that to be racist is a community that will never change the default, a community that will never be able to empower people who didn't grow up with that privilege. A code of conduct that makes it clear that "reverse racism" isn't grounds for complaint makes it clear that certain conversations are legitimate and helps ensure we have the framework we need to gradually change that default, and as such is better than one that doesn't.

(comments disabled because I don't trust any of you)

comment count unavailable comments

Julien Danjou: Ceilometer, Gnocchi & Aodh: Liberty progress

It's been a while since I talked about Ceilometer and its companions, so I thought I'd go ahead and write a bit about what's going on this side of OpenStack. I'm not going to cover new features and fancy stuff today, but rather a shallow overview of the new project processes we initiated. Ceilometer growing Ceilometer has grown a lot since that time when we started it 3 years ago. It has evolved from a system designed to fetch and store measurements, to a more complex system, with agents, alarms, events, databases, APIs, etc. All those features were needed and asked for by users and operators, but let's be honest, some of them should never have ended up in the Ceilometer code repository, especially not all at the same time. The reality is we picked a pragmatic approach due to the rigidity of the OpenStack Technical Committee in regards to new projects to become OpenStack integrated and, therefore, blessed projects. Ceilometer was actually the first project to be incubated and then integrated. We had to go through the very first issues of that process. Fortunately, now that time has passed, and all those constraints have been relaxed. To me, the OpenStack Foundation is turning into something that looks like the Apache Foundation, and there's, therefore, no need to tie technical solutions to political issues. Indeed, the Big Tent now allows much more flexibility to all of that. Back a year ago, we were afraid to bring Gnocchi into Ceilometer. Was the Technical Committee going to review the project? Was the project going to be in the scope of Ceilometer for the Technical Committee? Now we don't have to ask ourselves those questions, now that we have that freedom, it empowers us to actually do what we think is good in term of technical design without worrying too much about political issues.
Ceilometer development activity
Acknowledging Gnocchi The first step in this new process was to continue working on Gnocchi (a timeserie database and resource indexer designed to overcome historical Ceilometer storage issue) and to decide that it was not the right call to merge it into Ceilometer as some REST API v3, but that it was better to keep it standalone. We managed to get traction to Gnocchi, getting a few contributors and users. We're even seeing talks proposed to the next Tokyo Summit where people leverage Gnocchi, such as "Service of predictive analytics on cost and performance in OpenStack", "Suveil" and "Cutting Edge NFV On OpenStack: Healing and Scaling Distributed Applications". We are also doing some progress on pushing Gnocchi outside of the OpenStack community, as it can be a self-sufficient timeserie and resource database that can be used without any OpenStack interaction. Branching Aodh Rather than continuing to grow Ceilometer, during the last summit we all decided that it was time to reorganize and split Ceilometer into the different components it is made of, leveraging a more service-oriented architecture. The alarm subsystem of Ceilometer being mostly untied to the rest of Ceilometer, we decided it was the first and perfect candidate to do that. I personally engaged into doing the work and created a new repository with only the alarm code from Ceilometer, named Aodh.
Aodh is an Irish word meaning fire. A word picked so it also had some relation to Heat, and because we have some Irish influence around the project .
This made sense for a lot of reason. First because Aodh can now work completely standalone, using either Ceilometer or Gnocchi as a backend or any new plugin you'd write. I love the idea that OpenStack projects can work standalone like Swift does for example without implying any other OpenStack component. I think it's a proof of good design. Secondly, because it allows us to resonate on a smaller chunk of software a reason really under-estimated today in OpenStack. I believe that the size of your software should match a certain ratio to the size of your team. Aodh is, therefore, a new project under the OpenStack Telemetry program (or what remains of OpenStack programs now), alongside Ceilometer and Gnocchi, forked from the original Ceilometer alarm feature. We'll deprecate the latter with the Liberty release, and we'll remove it in the Mitaka release. Lessons learned Actually, moving that code out of Ceilometer (in the case of Aodh), or not merging it in (in the case of Gnocchi) had a few side effects that I admit I think we probably under-estimated back then. Indeed, the code size of Gnocchi or Aodh ended up being much smaller than the entire Ceilometer project Gnocchi is 7 smaller and Aodh 5x smaller than Ceilometer and therefore much more easy to manipulate and to hack on. That allowed us to merge dozens of patches in a few weeks, cleaning-up and enhancing a lot of small things in the code. Those tasks are very much harder in Ceilometer, due to the bigger size of the code base and the small size of our team. By having our small team working on smaller chunks of changes even when it meant actually doing more reviews greatly improved our general velocity and the number of bugs fixed and features implemented. On the more sociological side, I think it gave the team the sensation of finally owning the project. Ceilometer was huge, and it was impossible for people to know every side of it. Now, it's getting possible for people inside a team to cover a much larger portion of those smaller project, which gives them a greater sense of ownership and caring. Which ends up being good for the project quality overall. That also means that we technically decided to have different core teams by project (Ceilometer, Gnocchi, and Aodh) as they all serve different purposes and can all be used standalone or with each others. Meaning we could have contributors completely ignoring other projects. All of that reminds me some discussion I heard about projects such as Glance, trying to fit new features in - some that are really orthogonal to the original purpose. It's now clear to me that having different small components interacting together that can be completely owned and taken care of by a (small) team of contributors is the way to go. People that can therefore trust each others and easily bring new people in, makes a project really incredibly more powerful. Having a project covering a too wide set of features make things more difficult if you don't have enough manpower. This is clearly an issue that big projects inside OpenStack are facing now, such as Neutron or Nova.

3 August 2015

Jamie McClelland: Docker: evil spawn or useful tool

There are plenty of criticisms of docker, the system for building a container-based virtual machine running just a single application. I've read many of them have have consistently been either in agreement or at least amused. The most relevant criticism is about the basic approach of building single-application virtual machines. To understand this criticism, let's remember - in traditional application deployment there are at least three distinct jobs: These three groups have lived in happy tension for years. Now we have containers. The problem with containers is that suddenly the system administrators are out entirely and the distribution developers' role may have been dramatically minimized or circumvented altogether. Meanwhile, the application developer is both liberated from any constraints imposed by either the system administrator or the distribution developers (hooray!) but is also sadled with the enormous responsibilities of these two roles - which may not be apparent to the application developer at first. I have practically no distribution developer experience and have considerable experience as a system administrator and an application developer. And, it took me months to sort through how to properly develop and deploy an application using docker in a way that I thought was responsible and secure. I started by learning about how docker wants you to deploy images - by downloading them from their shared regisry. As I mentioned, I have very little experience in the realm of distribution development, but I at least know enough about Debian to know that a lot of time and thought has gone into cryptographically verifying packages that I install, which apparently is not done at all with Docker images. Is that obvious to everyone using Docker?? Fortunately, you can work around this problem by creating your own base image which is trivially easy. So, now I build all images, from scratch, locally. That helps put Debian developers back into the mix. Next, I started looking at Docker Files that I could use to construct my images and discovered something else troubling. Take, for example, the official nginx Docker image. It is based on Debian Jessie (hooray - our distribution developers are in the mix!). However, it then proceeds to install nginx from the nginx repository, not the debian repository. Well, I guess if you are nginx you want to have full control, but still, the Debian developers version of nginx has been vetted to ensure it works with Debian Jessie, so you are really losing something here. So... my next break from Docker convention is to use all Debian packages in my Docker files. Once my images were built and my application was tested and running, I was done, right? Wrong. Well, I would have been done if I didn't care about upgrading my systems, backing up my data or running cron jobs. Remember those things? Those are things that distribution developers and system administrators have been perfecting for decades. And, they are not trivial. I then built a series of scripts to help alert me when a image I am using has updates (you can't just use cron-apt any more since cron isn't running in your container) and help me update the image and deploy it to all my applications (which involves restarting the application). Backing up data is a whole different can of worms - sometimes involving interacting with your container (if it's a database container, you have to launch a database dump) or simply copying files from the host, assuming you got the right Docker volume strategy (which took me days to fully understand). Lastly, I had to run a cron job from the host that then runs whatever commands are needed on each of my containers. This was complicated. In the end, was it worth it? Yes, I think so. However, not because it was simple, which seems to be the Docker mantra. I think it's worth it because I can run 100 instances of my application using significantly less resources than when I was using full virtualization and because I can more easily and flexibly adjust the resource allocation. However, check in with me in a year and I'll probably have a different opinion.

Matthew Palmer: How not to report abuse

This is the entire complaint that was received:
We are an IT security company from Spain. We have detected sensitive information belonging to Banesco Banco Universal, C.A. clientes. As authorized representative in the resolution of IT security incidents affecting Banesco Banco Universal, C.A., we demand the deletion of the content related to Banesco Banco Universal, C.A, clients. This content violates the law about electronic crime in Venezuela (see Ley Especial sobre Delitos Inform ticos de Venezuela , Chapter III, Articles 20 y 23).
Note the complete lack of any information regarding what URLs, or even which site(s), they consider to be problematic. Nope, just delete all our stuff! and a wave of the against the law somewhere! stick.

1 August 2015

Francois Marier: Setting the wifi regulatory domain on Linux and OpenWRT

The list of available wifi channels is slightly different from country to country. To ensure access to the right channels and transmit power settings, one needs to set the right regulatory domain in the wifi stack.

Linux For most Linux-based computers, you can look and change the current regulatory domain using these commands:
iw reg get
iw reg set CA
where CA is the two-letter country code when the device is located. On Debian and Ubuntu, you can make this setting permanent by putting the country code in /etc/default/crda. Finally, to see the list of channels that are available in the current config, use:
iwlist wlan0 frequency

OpenWRT On OpenWRT-based routers (including derivatives like Gargoyle), looking and setting the regulatory domain temporarily works the same way (i.e. the iw commands above). In order to persist your changes though, you need to use the uci command:
uci set wireless.radio0.country=CA
uci set wireless.radio1.country=CA
uci commit wireless
where wireless.radio0 and wireless.radio1 are the wireless devices specific to your router. You can look them up using:
uci show wireless
To test that it worked, simply reboot the router and then look at the selected regulatory domain:
iw reg get

Scanning the local wifi environment Once your devices are set to the right country, you should scan the local environment to pick the least congested wifi channel. You can use the Kismet spectools (free software) if you have the hardware, otherwise WifiAnalyzer (proprietary) is a good choice on Android (remember to manually set the available channels in the settings).

Lars Wirzenius: Obnam 1.13 released (backup software)

I have just released version 1.13 of Obnam, my backup program. See the website at http://obnam.org for details on what it does. The new version is available from git (see http://git.liw.fi) and as Debian packages from http://code.liw.fi/debian, and uploaded to Debian, and soon in unstable. The NEWS file extract below gives the highlights of what's new in this version. Version 1.13, released 2015-08-01 Bug fixes: Improvements:

Russ Allbery: Review: The Pyramid Waltz

Review: The Pyramid Waltz, by Barbara Ann Wright
Series: Katya and Starbride #1
Publisher: Bold Strokes
Copyright: September 2012
ISBN: 1-60282-792-3
Format: Kindle
Pages: 264
Princess Katya Nar Umbriel is publicly a bored, womanizing, and difficult daughter to the rulers of Farraday. It's all an act, though, with the full knowledge of her parents. As the second child, she's the leader of the Order of Vestra: the equivalent of the Secret Service, devoted to protecting the royal family and, by extension, the kingdom, particularly against magical attacks. Starbride is new to court and entirely out of place. From a northern neighboring country, and far more comfortable in practical clothing than the frilled court dresses that her mother wants her to wear, she has been sent to court to make contacts. Her people are getting the bad side of various trade contracts and desperately need some political maneuvering space of their own. Starbride's best hope for this is to study law in the palace library when she can manage to avoid the other courtiers. But then she and Katya stumble across each other, outside of the roles they're playing, and might have an opportunity for a deeper connection. One that neither of them want to entangle in their personal worries. This is the last of a set of books I picked up while looking for lesbian romance with fantasy or science fiction elements. On the romance front, it's one of the better entries in that set. Both Katya and Starbride are likeable, in large part due to their mutual exasperation with the trappings of the court. (Making the protagonists more serious, thoughtful, and intelligent than the surrounding characters is an old trick, but it works.) Wright has a good ear for banter, particularly the kind when two people of good will are carefully feeling each other out. And despite Katya's need to keep a deep secret from Starbride for some of the book, The Pyramid Waltz mostly avoids irritating communication failures as a plot driver. The fantasy portion and the plot drivers, alas, are weaker. The world building is not exactly bad, but it's just not that interesting. There are a couple of moderately good ideas, in the form of pyramid magic and secret (and dangerous) magical powers that run in the royal family, but they're not well-developed. Pyramid magic turns out to look much like any other generic fantasy magic system, with training scenes that could have come from a Valdemar or Wheel of Time novel (and without as much dramatic tension). And the royal family's secret, while better-developed and integral to the plot, still felt rather generic and one-sided. Maybe that's something Wright develops better in future novels in this series, but that was another problem: the ending of The Pyramid Waltz was rather weak. Partly, I think, this is because the cast is too large and not well-developed. I cared about Katya and Starbird, and to a lesser extent their servants and one of the Order members. (Wright has a moderately interesting bit of worldbuilding about how servants work in Starbride's culture, which I wish we'd seen more of.) But there are a bunch of other Order of Vesta members, Katya's family, and various other bits of history and hinted world views, none of which seemed to get much depth. The ending climax involved a lot of revelations and twists that primarily concerned characters I didn't care about. It lost something in the process. This book is clearly set up for a sequel. There is an ending, but it's not entirely satisfying. Unfortunately, despite liking Katya and Starbird a lot, the rest of the story wasn't compelling enough to make me want to buy it, particularly since the series apparently goes through another three books before reaching a real ending. I enjoyed parts of this book, particularly Katya and Starbird feeling each other out and discovering similarities in their outlook. Katya teasing Starbird, and Starbird teasing herself, over her mother's choice of her clothing was probably the best part. It's not bad for what it's trying to do, but I think it's a bit too generic and not satisfying enough to really recommend. Followed by For Want of a Fiend. Rating: 6 out of 10

31 July 2015

Raphaël Hertzog: My Free Software Activities in July 2015

My monthly report covers a large part of what I have been doing in the free software world. I write it for my donators (thanks to them!) but also for the wider Debian community because it can give ideas to newcomers and it s one of the best ways to find volunteers to work with me on projects that matter to me. Debian LTS This month I have been paid to work 15 hours on Debian LTS. In that time I did the following: Kali Linux / Debian Stretch work kaliKali Linux wants to experiment something close to Debian Constantly Usable Testing: we have a kali-rolling release that is based on Debian Testing and we want to take a new snapshot every 4 months (in order to have 3 releases per year). More specifically we have a kali-dev repository which is exactly Debian Stretch + our own Kali packages (the kali package take precedence) updated 4 times a day, just like testing is. And we have a britney2 setup that generates kali-rolling out of kali-dev (without any requirement in terms of delay/RC bugs, it just ensures that dependencies are not broken), also 4 times a day. We have jenkins job that ensures that our metapackages are installable in kali-dev (and kali-rolling) and that we can build our ISO images. When things break, I have to fix them and I try to fix them on the Debian side first. So here are some examples of stuff I did in response to various failures: If you analyze this list, you will see that a large part of the issues we had come down to package getting removed from testing due to RC bugs. We should be able to anticipate those issues and monitor the packages that have an impact on Kali. We will probably add new jenkins job that installs all the metapackages and then run how-can-i-help -s testing-autorm --old I just submitted #794238 as a wishlist against how-can-i-help. At the same time, there are bugs that make it into testing and that I fix / work around on the Kali side. But those fixes / work around might be more useful if they were pushed to testing via testing-proposed-updates. I tried to see whether other derivatives had similar needs to see if derivatives could join their efforts at this level but it does not look like so for now. Last but not least, bugs reported on the Kali side also resulted in Debian improvements: Other Debian work Sponsorship. I sponsored multiple packages for Daniel Stender who is packaging prospector, a software that I requested earlier (through RFP bug). So I reviewed and uploaded python-requirements-detector, python-setoptconf, pylint-celery and pylint-common. During a review I also discovered a nice bug in dh-python (#793609a comment in the middle of a Build-Depends could break a package). I also sponsored an upload of notmuch-addrlookup (new package requested by a Freexian customer). Packaging. I uploaded python-django 1.7.9 in unstable and 1.8.3 in experimental to fix security issues. I uploaded a new upstream release of ditaa through a non-maintainer uploaded (again at the request of a Freexian customer). Distro Tracker. Beside the work to integrate detailed security status, I fixed the code to be compatible with Django 1.8 and modified the tox configuration to ensure that the test suite is regularly run against Django 1.8. I also merged multiple patches of Christophe Siraut (cf #784151 and #754413). Thanks See you next month for a new summary of my activities.

2 comments Liked this article? Click here. My blog is Flattr-enabled.

30 July 2015

DebConf team: DebConf15 Schedule Published and Additional Featured Speakers Announced (Posted by DebConf Content Team)

DebConf15 Schedule The DebConf content team is pleased to announce the schedule of DebConf15, the forthcoming Debian Developers Conference. From a total of nearly 100 talk submissions, the team selected 75 talks. Due to the high number of submissions, several talks had to be shortened to 20 minute slots, of which a total of 30 talks have made it to the schedule. In addition, around 50 meetings and discussions (BoFs) have been submitted so far, as well as several other events like lightning talk sessions, live demos, a movie screening, a poetry night or stand-up comedy. The Schedule is available online at the DebConf15 conference site. Further changes to the schedule can and will be made, but today s announcement represents the first stable version. Featured Speakers In addition to the previously announced invited speakers, the content team also announces the following list of additional featured speakers: The full list of invited and featured speakers, including the invited speakers profiles and the titles of their talks is available here.

Steve Kemp: The differences in Finland start at home.

So we're in Finland, and the differences start out immediately. We're renting a flat, in building ten, on a street. You'd think "10 Streetname" was a single building, but no. It is a pair of buildings: 10A, and 10B. Both of the buildings have 12 flats in them, with 10A having 1-12, and 10B having 13-24. There's a keypad at the main entrance, which I assumed was to let you press a button and talk to the people inside "Hello I'm the postmaster", but no. There is no intercom system, instead you type in a magic number and the door opens. The magic number? Sounds like you want to keep that secret, since it lets people into the common-area? No. Everybody has it. The postman, the cleaners, the DHL delivery man, and all the ex-tenants. We invited somebody over recently and gave it out in advance so that they could knock on our flat-door. Talking of cleaners: In the UK I lived in a flat and once a fortnight somebody would come and sweep the stair-well, since we didn't ever agree to do it ourselves. Here somebody turns up every day, be it to cut the grass, polish the hand-rail, clean the glass on the front-door, or mop the floors of the common area. Sounds awesome. But they cut the grass, right outside our window, at 7:30AM. On the dot. (Or use a leaf-blower, or something equally noisy.) All this communal-care is paid for by the building-association, of which all flat-owners own shares. Sounds like something we see in England, or even like Americas idea of a Home-Owners-Association. (In Scotland you own your own flat, you don't own shares of an entity which owns the complete building. I guess there are pros and cons to both approaches.) Moving onwards other things are often the same, but the differences when you spot them are odd. I'm struggling to think of them right now, somebody woke me up by cutting our grass for the second time this week (!) Anyway I'm registered now with the Finnish government, and have a citizen-number, which will be useful, I've got an appointment booked to register with the police - which is something I had to do as a foreigner within the first three months - and today I've got an appointment with a local bank so that I can have a euro-bank-account. Happily I did find a gym to join, the owner came over one Sunday to give me a tiny-tour, and then gave me a list of other gyms to try if his wasn't good enough - which was a nice touch - I joined a couple of days later, his gym is awesome. (I'm getting paid in UK-pounds, to a UK-bank, so right now I'm getting local money by transferring to my wifes account here, but I want to do that to my own, and open a shared account for paying for rent, electricity, internet, water, & etc). My flat back home is still not rented, because the nice property management company lost my keys. Yeah you can't make that up can you? With a bit of luck the second set of keys I mailed them will arrive soon and the damn thing can be occupied, while I'm not relying on that income I do wish to have it.

28 July 2015

Norbert Preining: ePub editor Sigil landed in Debian

Long long time ago I wanted to have Sigil, an epub editor, to appear in Debian. There was a packaging wishlist bug from back in 2010 with intermittent activities. But thanks to concerted effort, especially by Mattia Rizzolo and Don Armstrong, packaging progressed to a state that I could sponsor the upload to experimental about 4 months ago. And yesterday, after long waiting, finally Sigil passed the watchful eyes of the Debian ftp-masters and has entered Debian/experimental. sigil-debian I have already updated the packaging for the latest version 0.8.7, which will be included in Debian/sid rather soon. Thanks again especially Mattia for his great work.
Email this to someonePrint this pageShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInFlattr the author

27 July 2015

Andrew Cater: Bye SPARC - for now

So it looks as if it's the end for the Debian SPARC port that is primarily 32 bit, for now at least. Too little available modern hardware, too few porters and an upstream hardware provider emotionally tied to significant licensing and support agreements.

If 64 bit SPARC hardware were more available, I'd be interested again. SPARC has given me two of my favourite moments in Debian. I helped a colleague to duplicate existing software and move architecture from Intel to SPARC mainly by copying across the list of packages.

It also allowed me in ?? 1999 / 2000 ?? to take a SPARC 20 to London Olympia to a Linux Expo where one of the principal sponsors was Sun. They laughed on their stand when I set up older hardware with minimal memory but were not so amused when I demonstrated Debian, full X Window environment and KDE successfully.

Michael Stapelberg: dh-make-golang: creating Debian packages from Go packages

Recently, the pkg-go team has been quite busy, uploading dozens of Go library packages in order to be able to package gcsfuse (a user-space file system for interacting with Google Cloud Storage) and InfluxDB (an open-source distributed time series database). Packaging Go library packages (!) is a fairly repetitive process, so before starting my work on the dependencies for gcsfuse, I started writing a tool called dh-make-golang. Just like dh-make itself, the goal is to automatically create (almost) an entire Debian package. As I worked my way through the dependencies of gcsfuse, I refined how the tool works, and now I believe it s good enough for a first release. To demonstrate how the tool works, let s assume we want to package the Go library github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit:
midna /tmp $ dh-make-golang github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit
2015/07/25 18:25:39 Downloading "github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit/..."
2015/07/25 18:25:53 Determining upstream version number
2015/07/25 18:25:53 Package version is "0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c"
2015/07/25 18:25:53 Determining dependencies
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 Packaging successfully created in /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 Resolve all TODOs in itp-golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.txt, then email it out:
2015/07/25 18:25:55     sendmail -t -f < itp-golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.txt
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 Resolve all the TODOs in debian/, find them using:
2015/07/25 18:25:55     grep -r TODO debian
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 To build the package, commit the packaging and use gbp buildpackage:
2015/07/25 18:25:55     git add debian && git commit -a -m 'Initial packaging'
2015/07/25 18:25:55     gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 To create the packaging git repository on alioth, use:
2015/07/25 18:25:55     ssh git.debian.org "/git/pkg-go/setup-repository golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit 'Packaging for golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit'"
2015/07/25 18:25:55 
2015/07/25 18:25:55 Once you are happy with your packaging, push it to alioth using:
2015/07/25 18:25:55     git push git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git --tags master pristine-tar upstream
The ITP is often the most labor-intensive part of the packaging process, because any number of auto-detected values might be wrong: the repository owner might not be the Upstream Author , the repository might not have a short description, the long description might need some adjustments or the license might not be auto-detected.
midna /tmp $ cat itp-golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.txt
From: "Michael Stapelberg" <stapelberg AT debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit -- Go package for rate limiting
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg AT debian.org>
* Package name    : golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit
  Version         : 0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1
  Upstream Author : Aaron Jacobs
* URL             : https://github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit
* License         : Apache-2.0
  Programming Lang: Go
  Description     : Go package for rate limiting
 GoDoc (https://godoc.org/github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit)
 .
 This package contains code for dealing with rate limiting. See the
 reference (http://godoc.org/github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit) for more info.
TODO: perhaps reasoning
midna /tmp $
After filling in all the TODOs in the file, let s mail it out and get a sense of what else still needs to be done:
midna /tmp $ sendmail -t -f < itp-golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.txt
midna /tmp $ cd golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ grep -r TODO debian
debian/changelog:  * Initial release (Closes: TODO) 
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $
After filling in these TODOs as well, let s have a final look at what we re about to build:
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ head -100 debian/**/*
==> debian/changelog <==                            
golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit (0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1) unstable; urgency=medium
  * Initial release (Closes: #793646)
 -- Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>  Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:26:34 +0200
==> debian/compat <==
9
==> debian/control <==
Source: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit
Section: devel
Priority: extra
Maintainer: pkg-go <pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
               dh-golang,
               golang-go,
               golang-github-jacobsa-gcloud-dev,
               golang-github-jacobsa-oglematchers-dev,
               golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest-dev,
               golang-github-jacobsa-syncutil-dev,
               golang-golang-x-net-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.6
Homepage: https://github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git;a=summary
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git
Package: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit-dev
Architecture: all
Depends: $ shlibs:Depends ,
         $ misc:Depends ,
         golang-go,
         golang-github-jacobsa-gcloud-dev,
         golang-github-jacobsa-oglematchers-dev,
         golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest-dev,
         golang-github-jacobsa-syncutil-dev,
         golang-golang-x-net-dev
Built-Using: $ misc:Built-Using 
Description: Go package for rate limiting
 This package contains code for dealing with rate limiting. See the
 reference (http://godoc.org/github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit) for more info.
==> debian/copyright <==
Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: ratelimit
Source: https://github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit
Files: *
Copyright: 2015 Aaron Jacobs
License: Apache-2.0
Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2015 Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>
License: Apache-2.0
Comment: Debian packaging is licensed under the same terms as upstream
License: Apache-2.0
 Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 You may obtain a copy of the License at
 .
 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 .
 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 limitations under the License.
 .
 On Debian systems, the complete text of the Apache version 2.0 license
 can be found in "/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0".
==> debian/gbp.conf <==
[DEFAULT]
pristine-tar = True
==> debian/rules <==
#!/usr/bin/make -f
export DH_GOPKG := github.com/jacobsa/ratelimit
%:
	dh $@ --buildsystem=golang --with=golang
==> debian/source <==
head: error reading  debian/source : Is a directory
==> debian/source/format <==
3.0 (quilt)
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $
Okay, then. Let s give it a shot and see if it builds:
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ git add debian && git commit -a -m 'Initial packaging'
[master 48f4c25] Initial packaging                                                      
 7 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 debian/changelog
 create mode 100644 debian/compat
 create mode 100644 debian/control
 create mode 100644 debian/copyright
 create mode 100644 debian/gbp.conf
 create mode 100755 debian/rules
 create mode 100644 debian/source/format
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder
[ ]
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ lintian ../golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0\~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1_amd64.changes
I: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
P: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit-dev: no-upstream-changelog
I: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $
This package just built (as it should!), but occasionally one might need to disable a test and file an upstream bug about it. So, let s push this package to pkg-go and upload it:
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ ssh git.debian.org "/git/pkg-go/setup-repository golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit 'Packaging for golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit'"
Initialized empty shared Git repository in /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git/
HEAD is now at ea6b1c5 add mrconfig for dh-make-golang
[master c5be5a1] add mrconfig for golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
To /git/pkg-go/meta.git
   ea6b1c5..c5be5a1  master -> master
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ git push git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git --tags master pristine-tar upstream
Counting objects: 31, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (25/25), done.
Writing objects: 100% (31/31), 18.38 KiB   0 bytes/s, done.
Total 31 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0)
To git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git
 * [new branch]      master -> master
 * [new branch]      pristine-tar -> pristine-tar
 * [new branch]      upstream -> upstream
 * [new tag]         upstream/0.0_git20150723.0.2ca5e0c -> upstream/0.0_git20150723.0.2ca5e0c
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ cd ..
midna /tmp $ debsign golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0\~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1_amd64.changes
[ ]
midna /tmp $ dput golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0\~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1_amd64.changes   
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/)
[ ]
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1.dsc
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c.orig.tar.bz2
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1.debian.tar.xz
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit-dev_0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1_all.deb
Uploading golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit_0.0~git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1_amd64.changes
midna /tmp $ cd golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit 
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ git tag debian/0.0_git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $ git push git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git --tags master pristine-tar upstream
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit.git
 * [new tag]         debian/0.0_git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1 -> debian/0.0_git20150723.0.2ca5e0c-1
midna /tmp/golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit master $
Thanks for reading this far, and I hope dh-make-golang makes your life a tiny bit easier. As dh-make-golang just entered Debian unstable, you can install it using apt-get install dh-make-golang. If you have any feedback, I m eager to hear it.

Next.

Previous.