Search Results: "tar"

3 May 2017

Reproducible builds folks: Reproducing R packages

In the past couple of weeks, Ximin Luo worked on making R generate reproducible output. This is now mostly complete, and we're waiting on feedback from upstream about our patch. In the meantime, there are a few packages that remain unreproducible, but the issue probably lies in those specific packages rather than the R toolchain. Perhaps you can help out with them, after reading this!
R packages compile into a .rdb database format that contains the package's definitions, plus a .rdx index file for easy lookup in the .rdb file. Usually, there is a main rdb with the package contents, plus another rdb that stores the help data. There is also a paths.rds (same format as .rdx) that contains some more stuff. One can actually read these files by hand using Rscript, see the diffoscope code in rdata.py. If you run that, you can see that path.rds contains some obvious paths, but the other files contain less obvious stuff, and in fact these scripts give identical output for the .rdb files, even though they are bitwise different. To get to the bottom of this, we'll have to use the R debugger. Attached to this post is a script that smooths this process. I ran this against Debian's R packages, but it probably also works with other distros' R packages - try it and see. You run it like ./r-mini-repro-test.sh $pkgdir $builddir and it will output some hashes for you; make sure to install the build dependencies first. You should manually vary both $pkgdir and $builddir to introduce the build-path variations; $builddir can be an arbitrary string but $pkgdir should point to the actual R package's source directory, so I just copy that to two locations and point the script at each of them in turn. Now, we can begin debugging. Before I did this, we had 478 unreproducible R packages so the biggest problem was likely with R itself. I downloaded the source code of both R and a small example package (r-cran-tensor), then figured out how the R packages were actually being built. This resulted in me writing the script above, to speed up debugging. You can read about R's debugger here (no HTTPS), it's a bit primitive but it supports the basic stuff (step, continue, where, print/eval) and that was adequate for me. Debugging R core So let's take a small example with Debian R 3.4.0-1:
$ ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 123
[..]
* installing *source* package  tensor  ...
** package  tensor  successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
** R
** preparing package for lazy loading
** help
*** installing help indices
** building package indices
** testing if installed package can be loaded
* DONE (tensor)
[..]
c71a766429151a13e46039f3c37a14edc704004f410c34f8f37a2f098506421d  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdx
736b5b4a885db71fb3fe2a538faeefe43c500c4080dbf2c75b97135b98401acd  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
8a3f9616de7ee78a83b07395dd6ec43c5259d3f1b1b653d397808fc9fc5d96c2  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdx
d1ac634987b24606a5da627ec073f45edce2bddf071391dd17c246a0a01eba63  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
80796cc1a2cfcac40c394153f67617d575e103a405430b8483c2261a903db046  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/paths.rds
$ ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 1234
[..]
5f081f4d6f9da1fbe06e374067e6636d926de4cdf09886058b15c5928c636c0d  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdx
7145669891e1b766ca0d8d89fa9c317af716e61a62650abe3a11a848240f1d57  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
8a3f9616de7ee78a83b07395dd6ec43c5259d3f1b1b653d397808fc9fc5d96c2  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdx
d1ac634987b24606a5da627ec073f45edce2bddf071391dd17c246a0a01eba63  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
80796cc1a2cfcac40c394153f67617d575e103a405430b8483c2261a903db046  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/paths.rds
The files are created by the ** preparing package for lazy loading and ** help steps. In retrospect this seems somewhat obvious from the output, but I had never done R before so I spent a while using strace to be sure; one can see that those files are indeed written to after those strings are printed. Then we can grep the R source code for these strings.
r-base-3.4.0$ grep -Ri "preparing package for lazy loading" src
src/library/tools/R/install.R:                starsmsg(stars, "preparing package for lazy loading")
Reading the file, we see that this happens in the tools:::.install_packages function, and reading it further we see that it calls makeLazyLoading then code2LazyLoadDB then makeLazyLoadDB. Seems promising, let's confirm it before chasing potential wild geese. Important: In the rest of these command-line outputs I'll prepend what I input with >>> but this doesn't actually get printed by Rscript. So don't be surprised that you don't see these, when you're trying to recreate my steps. Also I am a total R noob so possibly there are more elegant ways to do what I'm about to show you; this is what I came up with after 2-3 hours of research.
$ DEBUG=1 ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 123
enter (some or all of) the following into R:
[.. helpful commands ..]
+ R_DEFAULT_PACKAGES= LC_COLLATE=C /usr/lib/R/bin/R --no-restore --slave --args nextArg-lnextArgdebian/123/usr/lib/R/site-librarynextArg-dnextArg.nextArg--built-timestamp="Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000"
>>> debug(tools:::makeLazyLoadDB)
>>> tools:::.install_packages()
processing  . 
[..]
** preparing package for lazy loading
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB, not yet run ..]
 
OK so we just entered the function and it's paused, in a separate shell let's check what it's doing:
$ find r-cran-tensor-1.5 -name '*.rdb'
[ no output ]
So, no files have been written yet, which means none of the parent functions did anything, we are in the right function (or it's in a child). If we continue the function, we get:
>>> c
exiting from: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
** help
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(db, file.path(manOutDir, basename(outDir)))
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB, not yet run ..]
 
$ find r-cran-tensor-1.5 -name '*.rdb'
r-cran-tensor-1.5/debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
Then continuing again:
>>> c
exiting from: makeLazyLoadDB(db, file.path(manOutDir, basename(outDir)))
*** installing help indices
** building package indices
** testing if installed package can be loaded
* DONE (tensor)
$ find r-cran-tensor-1.5 -name '*.rdb'
r-cran-tensor-1.5/debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
r-cran-tensor-1.5/debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
So it seems likely this function is the correct one. After reading the source code of makeLazyLoadDB, even though I don't understand the whole thing, it looks like possibly this part is the one that does the actual writing:
    for (i in seq_along(vars))  
        key <- if (is.null(from)   is.environment(from))
            lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile,
                                     ascii, compress,  envhook)
        else lazyLoadDBinsertListElement(from, i, datafile, ascii,
                                         compress, envhook)
        assign(vars[i], key, envir = varenv)
     
So let's step through it and see if the data contains any paths.
$ DEBUG=1 ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 123
[..]
>>> debug(tools:::makeLazyLoadDB)
>>> tools:::.install_packages()
processing  . 
[..]
** preparing package for lazy loading
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB, not yet run ..]
 
>>>                                                                             # pressing <Enter> just means "step"
debug: ascii <- as.logical(ascii)                                               # this is the first line of the function
>>>                                                                             # keep stepping
[..]
>>>
debug: for (i in seq_along(vars))  
[.. source code of the inside of the block, not yet run ..]
 
>>>
debug: key <- if (is.null(from)   is.environment(from)) lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i],
    from, datafile, ascii, compress, envhook) else lazyLoadDBinsertListElement(from,
    i, datafile, ascii, compress, envhook)
>>>
debug: lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile, ascii, compress,
    envhook)                                                                    # not yet run
If we look at the source code we see that it will try to insert the value of .Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]] into the file, so let's evaluate it:
>>> .Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]]
function (x, y)
tensor(x, y, 2, 2)
<environment: namespace:tensor>
>>> typeof(.Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]])
[1] "closure"
>>> environment(.Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]])        # get the environment of a closure
<environment: namespace:tensor>
>>> envlist(environment(.Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]])) # environment as an envlist, more detailed output
$ %*t% 
function (x, y)
tensor(x, y, 2, 2)
<environment: namespace:tensor>
$ %t*% 
function (x, y)
tensor(x, y, 1, 1)
<environment: namespace:tensor>
$ %t*t% 
function (x, y)
tensor(x, y, 1, 2)
<environment: namespace:tensor>
$.__NAMESPACE__.
<environment: 0x55eb55d00be0>
$.__S3MethodsTable__.
<environment: 0x55eb55d166e8>
$.packageName
[1] "tensor"
$tensor
function (A, B, alongA = integer(0), alongB = integer(0))
 
[.. function definition ..]
 
<environment: namespace:tensor>
Nothing obviously containing paths so far, let's keep stepping and dumping the objects
>>>
debug: assign(vars[i], key, envir = varenv)
>>>                                                                             # next iteration now
debug: key <- if (is.null(from)   is.environment(from)) lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i],
    from, datafile, ascii, compress, envhook) else lazyLoadDBinsertListElement(from,
    i, datafile, ascii, compress, envhook)
>>>
debug: lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile, ascii, compress,
    envhook)
>>> .Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]]
function (x, y)
tensor(x, y, 1, 1)
<environment: namespace:tensor>
>>>
[.. more stepping ..]
debug: lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile, ascii, compress,
    envhook)
>>> .Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]]
<environment: 0x55eb55d00be0>
>>> envlist(.Internal(getVarsFromFrame(vars[i], from, FALSE))[[1L]])
$S3methods
     [,1] [,2] [,3]
$dynlibs
NULL
$exports
<environment: 0x55eb55d0a4f8>
$imports
$imports$base
[1] TRUE
$lazydata
<environment: 0x55eb55d0a178>
attr(,"name")
[1] "lazydata:tensor"
$path
[1] "/mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-tensor-1.5/debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor"
$spec
    name  version
"tensor"    "1.5"
Oh, here we go. (In fact we could have got this earlier, it was part of the .__NAMESPACE__. key of the first environment that we examined.) Naturally, you'll sometimes miss stuff, and sometimes go down dead ends when doing something like this, perseverence is important. The names are also a hint, after grepping the R source code for names like "S3methods" and "lazydata" we see that src/library/base/R/namespace.R is the only one that contains all of them, then reading that code in more depth reveals this. After patching it, rebuilding r-base, installing this patched version, then running our tests again, we see that we've eliminated differences in the main rdb file but not the help rdb file. :( In fact, after some more time stepping through the loop repeatedly and printing out all the objects, nothing obvious shows up. Time to re-read the source code of makeLazyLoadDB. We notice that all the lazyLoadDBinsert* functions have a hook parameter that we haven't been stepping through because it's in a separate function. So let's do that. Since it's an inner function, one has to call debug() inside makeLazyLoadDB:
$ DEBUG=1 ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 123
[..]
>>> debug(tools:::makeLazyLoadDB)
>>> tools:::.install_packages()
processing  . 
[..]
** preparing package for lazy loading
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB, not yet run ..]
 
>>> c
exiting from: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
** help
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(db, file.path(manOutDir, basename(outDir)))
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB, not yet run ..]
 
[.. stepping through the function ..]
debug: envhook <- function(e)  
[.. function definition ..]
 
>>>                                                                             # step next, to define that function
[.. next statement, we don't care about it ..]
>>> debug(envhook)
[.. then keep stepping through makeLazyLoadDB ..]
>>>
debug: lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile, ascii, compress,
    envhook)
[.. then keep stepping through makeLazyLoadDB ..]
debug: lazyLoadDBinsertVariable(vars[i], from, datafile, ascii, compress,
    envhook)
[.. hook wasn't run for these previous iterations for some reason, but keep stepping ..]
[.. eventually we get ..]
debugging in: (function (e)
 
[.. function definition ..]
 )(<environment>)                                                               # "(..)(<environment>)" is R's name for that function (actually a closure)
debug:  
[.. source code, not yet run ..]
 
>>> e
/mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-tensor-1.5/man/tensor.Rd
>>> typeof(e)
[1] "environment"
>>> envlist(e)
$Enc
[1] "UTF-8"
$encoding
[1] ""
$filename
[1] "/mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-tensor-1.5/man/tensor.Rd"
$timestamp
[1] "2002-01-16 11:51:14 CET"
$wd
[1] "/mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-tensor-1.5"
After doing the same thing as before, i.e. grepping the R source code for "Enc" "timestamp" etc, we spot a few different places that are setting the wd field. Then after some experimenting, we find that overwriting this in a different file (src/library/tools/R/parseRd.R) seems to work to get rid of this irreproducibility. (This may not be the best; our exact strategy is still being discussed with upstream, but at least we know which areas of the code are responsible.) Exercise for the reader to figure out how to get rid of the paths.rds difference. After doing the previous two, this one is fairly easy. These three issues allowed us to write a preliminary patch that enabled us to reproduce r-cran-tensor.
$ ./r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 123
[..]
bca9de1351ab265475cf6f1af3f6aff49bde1d209e8fafb33954caa8d90f3462  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdx
ac7fffeb751ffc2d13c5317704b19787a7078446d97d1c6f259c93f282e04cef  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
d989603340d1e8f14c35551ef379956653bf3b6e7b1868b4bf9a66d85820998e  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdx
30e543cda9f97c202dc9c0291933940dfe71b94d352f66d8ed6c035c1a722b41  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
e9f78ba2cca39a6face1ed88fce4bb718d911d567d01db49bc00a3011720ac50  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/paths.rds
$ ./r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor-1.5 1234
[..]
bca9de1351ab265475cf6f1af3f6aff49bde1d209e8fafb33954caa8d90f3462  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdx
ac7fffeb751ffc2d13c5317704b19787a7078446d97d1c6f259c93f282e04cef  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
d989603340d1e8f14c35551ef379956653bf3b6e7b1868b4bf9a66d85820998e  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdx
30e543cda9f97c202dc9c0291933940dfe71b94d352f66d8ed6c035c1a722b41  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
e9f78ba2cca39a6face1ed88fce4bb718d911d567d01db49bc00a3011720ac50  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/paths.rds
$ ./r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-tensor 1234
[..]
bca9de1351ab265475cf6f1af3f6aff49bde1d209e8fafb33954caa8d90f3462  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdx
ac7fffeb751ffc2d13c5317704b19787a7078446d97d1c6f259c93f282e04cef  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/R/tensor.rdb
d989603340d1e8f14c35551ef379956653bf3b6e7b1868b4bf9a66d85820998e  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdx
30e543cda9f97c202dc9c0291933940dfe71b94d352f66d8ed6c035c1a722b41  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/tensor.rdb
e9f78ba2cca39a6face1ed88fce4bb718d911d567d01db49bc00a3011720ac50  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/tensor/help/paths.rds
Testing the patch Of course r-cran-tensor is just 1 package, so then we tested this patch on all 478 tagged R packages. Before the patch, all of these were unreproducible. Now 463/478 are reproducible, hurray! The first version of the patch made 2 packages FTBFS ("fail to build from source"), r-bioc-biobase and r-cran-shinybs; this was fixed in a subsequent version of the patch. (Some other packages, r-cran-randomfields r-cran-randomfieldsutils, FTBFS even with an unpatched r-base, due to differences between 3.3.3 and 3.4.0 (#861333), and not because of our patch.) Given the overwhelming proportion of packages that did reproduce, the other 14 packages that are still unreproducible, are quite probably due to issues in those specific packages. Only 2 of these are certainly due to build-path differences: r-cran-runit r-cran-rinside. This is because, we currently see they are reproducible in Debian testing but not Debian unstable. This is slightly misleading, the real reason is not testing vs unstable directly; rather the fact that we (at the time of writing) use the same build path when trying to reproduce Debian testing packages, and different paths for unstable. The other 12 are unreproducible in both testing and unstable, so it either suffers from a non-build-path issue as well as a build-path issue, or only a non-build-path issue. So, further investigation of each package is needed. This is where you can help. :) Debugging R packages To investigate why (for example) r-cran-runit doesn't reproduce despite our patches, we just do the above process again:
$ DEBUG=1 ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-runit
[..]
>>> debug(tools:::makeLazyLoadDB)
>>> tools:::.install_packages()
processing  . 
a directory
* build_help_types=
* DBG: 'R CMD INSTALL' now doing do_install()
* created lock directory  /mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-runit/debian/r-cran-runit/usr/lib/R/site-library/00LOCK-r-cran-runit 
* installing *source* package  RUnit  ...
** package  RUnit  successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
** backing up earlier installation
** R
** inst
** preparing package for lazy loading
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB ..]
 
We know our irreproducibility is with the help files and not the main package, so c to skip this part:
>>> c
exiting from: makeLazyLoadDB(ns, dbbase, compress = compress)
** help
debugging in: makeLazyLoadDB(db, file.path(manOutDir, basename(outDir)))
debug:  
[.. source code of makeLazyLoadDB ..]
 
Examine the "from" object, grep the output for our builddir
>>> from
$ RUnit-internal 
[..]
$ RUnit-intro 
[..]
[.. etc ..]
[..]
$checkFuncs
\title RUnit check [..]
[..]
  For a simple example see the provided test cases in
  /mystupidbuildpath/r-tests/r-cran-runit/debian/r-cran-runit/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/examples/runitVirtualClassTest.r.
[..]
Found it, now we quit, patch the source code, and try again.
>>> Q
[..]
exit code 1
[.. hack hack hack ..]
$ ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-runit-0.4.31/ 123
[..]
01347305351a45bb88dab909c56942498e97f5edbe583cf6ab1327138914e315  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/R/RUnit.rdx
ecde40bdfac5b070acc30a0d5889d9d7f65418844d14312aceff6af5b9d0bf7a  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/R/RUnit.rdb
182d38ac5adc160eb9edd40d5bd7e27b95b756b8f14cee7d912ba4745ae81bdc  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/RUnit.rdx
f8a9f22acc9f937cb47a92f3979d619e83a791ad734796c2fcd9d0a34e1f11ca  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/RUnit.rdb
5c37672fdc1f325b8a3846f4eafd2624b246ec70ce01d197134fa1b97a9ee849  ./debian/123/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/paths.rds
$ ../r-mini-repro-test.sh r-cran-runit-0.4.31/ 1234
[..]
01347305351a45bb88dab909c56942498e97f5edbe583cf6ab1327138914e315  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/R/RUnit.rdx
ecde40bdfac5b070acc30a0d5889d9d7f65418844d14312aceff6af5b9d0bf7a  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/R/RUnit.rdb
182d38ac5adc160eb9edd40d5bd7e27b95b756b8f14cee7d912ba4745ae81bdc  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/RUnit.rdx
f8a9f22acc9f937cb47a92f3979d619e83a791ad734796c2fcd9d0a34e1f11ca  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/RUnit.rdb
5c37672fdc1f325b8a3846f4eafd2624b246ec70ce01d197134fa1b97a9ee849  ./debian/1234/usr/lib/R/site-library/RUnit/help/paths.rds
Works! All finished. :) If yours doesn't, just repeat the above loop; hopefully eventually you'll get there.

Axel Beckert: Upcoming Hacker/FLOSS Events in Switzerland: Debian BSP, LPD, Hackerfunk 10th Anniversary, ZeTeCo

There are quite some events and dates ahead for hackers, makers, debianers and hackerfunk listeners: Crowdfunding for ZeTeCo Camp in July Ends in Two Days! You might have heard of the ZeTeCo Camp near Schaffhausen in July. If you want ot come or at least support that event, please contribute to their crowdfunding campaign. They have more than 90% of their goal funded and there s less only about two days left to reach their funding goal. If it doesn t get funded in time, the event may be be on a knife edge. Debian Bug Squashing Party in Zurich this Weekend One week before the More-than-a-BSP at the Mozilla office in Paris there will also be a Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Z rich at the CCCZH Hackerspace R schtibach . We ll start on Friday, the 5th of May 2017 in the late afternoon, probably around 4pm or 5pm, and will end on Sunday, the 7th of May 2017 also in the late afternoon. Please add yourself to the according section on the BSP s wiki page if you want to join us to squash the hopefully not that many left over bugs in testing. Unfortunately we didn t notice two date clashes when we set the date for the BSP during the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Debian.ch Association earlier this year: Linux Presentation Day this Saturday, 6th of May 2017 On the one hand there will be the Swiss Edition of the Linux Presentation Day (LPD) on Saturday, the 6th of May 2017 including the LPD in Z rich. The latter will take place in the same building as the BSP, just on a different floor: The BSP will be at floor B3 in the CCCZH Hackerspace and the LPD will be on the ground floor at Revamp-IT in the former ZKB foyer. 10 Years Hackerfunk: Show on 6th, Party on 13th of May 2017 And on the other hand, Venty s and my (German dialect) radio show and podcast Hackerfunk will have it s 10th anniversary show also on that Saturday. So I ll vanish from BSP for a few hours on Saturday evening for broadcasting this very special Hackerfunk episode on Radio Radius. But since Venty and me didn t want to make yet another big event at R schtibach on the same weekend, we ll do the Hackerfunk 10th Anniversary Party one weekend later on Saturday the 13th of May 2017 also at the CCCZH Hackerspace R schtibach . A separate announcement on https://www.hackerfunk.ch/ (also in the RSS feed there) will follow.

Rapha&#235;l Hertzog: My Free Software Activities in April 2017

My monthly report covers a large part of what I have been doing in the free software world. I write it for my donors (thanks to them!) but also for the wider Debian community because it can give ideas to newcomers and it s one of the best ways to find volunteers to work with me on projects that matter to me. Debian LTS I was allocated 10 hours to work on security updates for Debian 7 Wheezy and had 1.5 hours remaining from March. During this time I did the following: Kali and pkg-security I updated the britney instance that we are using in Kali and spotted two small documentation mistakes that I fixed. We had a long-standing bug in Kali where extensions would stay visible on the lock screen. It was hard to reproduce and this month we finally managed to nail down the conditions required to reproduce it. It turns out that EasyScreenCast was the culprit. We paid Emilio Pozuelo Monfort to work on a patch and he fixed the problem in EasyScreenCast and also in gnome-shell, as a buggy extension should not have resulted in this behavior. I responded to multiple queries of new contributors in the pkg-security team. The team is rather active and it would be great if we could have a few more Debian developers to help review and sponsor the work our enthusiastic new members. Thanks See you next month for a new summary of my activities. Hopefully, I will be more active again between kids vacations, French elections and Zelda Breadth of the Wild, I got very much distracted from Debian last month.

One comment Liked this article? Click here. My blog is Flattr-enabled.

2 May 2017

Shirish Agarwal: Advice for people registering for debconf

Let me start by sharing the nice offer I got from Qatar airways today Qatar airways discount offer Unfortunately it doesn t work for me as the offer ends way before the conference will happen. I am guessing this is slack time for Qatar airways hence they are introduced this offer. I would have gladly taken this up if it was there in July end, August mid-week but guess that s when international tourist season might start :(. Now onto other business, while I m glad of the response generated by my blog post about Debconf which was published about a week back I am in much the same boat as everybody else so connecting with me wouldn t be beneficial at all. While I know the rough criteria that is used to evaluate applications, everybody has a fair chance. While I have shared some advice/insight for new people making proposals and a somewhat longer version in a mail the best way IMO is to take lots of care during the registration process. Think of the registration process as making a GSOC application, rework and reiterate the application as many times as possible till you yourself are not satisfied with the application although May 10th is the cut-off date for bursary applications. Having shared that, Debconf and Debian likes to have varied crowd, hence both fresh people who may be curious and have shown a slant of contributing towards free software has as much as a chance as seasoned Debian Developers. From the numbers shared, it seems something like 109 odd bursary requests till about 2 days back and while around 28-30 odd bursary requests would be fulfilled. So it s a pretty unenvious position for the people who are going to be making the choices. That does not mean one should lose hope as some people cancel their bursaries, the easiest being if the visa is denied then obviously the person whose visa is denied can t travel, other reasons might be work/business plans changing, death in the family etc. everything and anything that life can throw on you. Usually then the bursary moves on the next person on the list. Even if you are not selected this year, don t lose heart and try again next year. The beautiful thing about Debconf is each time the circumstances differ, for e.g. next year in Taiwan the accommodation is free from the University so it s possible that more people would be there in Debconf18. One contribution that people can easily do/make and doesn t need a lot of Unix skills is the Debian SSO documentation , you could do in the Debian wiki or if mediawiki is your tea then the Debconf wiki is also welcoming which uses mediawiki. The current documentation is text-based, it would be an improvement if we have the same thing with help of pictures showing how you get the certificate and add it to your favourite browser. Let somebody who is new try it, if nobody steps up say in a week, then will do that documentation myself. So best of luck on your applications and hopefully we will all meet either in Debconf17 or Debconf18. Till later.
Filed under: Miscellenous Tagged: #Advice, #applicaiton, #Bursary requests, #contribution, #debconf17, #Debconf18, #planet-debian, #QatarAirways, #variety, Documentation

Markus Koschany: My Free Software Activities in April 2017

Welcome to gambaru.de. Here is my monthly report that covers what I have been doing for Debian. If you re interested in Java, Games and LTS topics, this might be interesting for you. Debian Games Debian Java Debian LTS This was my fourteenth month as a paid contributor and I have been paid to work 23,75 hours on Debian LTS, a project started by Rapha l Hertzog. In that time I did the following: Misc Thanks for reading and see you next time.

Ben Hutchings: Debian LTS work, April 2017

I was assigned 15 hours of work by Freexian's Debian LTS initiative and worked 13.25 12 hours. I prepared a security update for the Linux kernel and issued DLA-922-1. I also continued catching up with the backlog of fixes for the Linux 3.2 longterm stable branch. I released stable update 3.2.88 at the start of the month and am now preparing the next stable update.

Urvika Gola: Debian goes to Hackathon!

Recently I had the opportunity to be a part of Ultrahack as a mentor which was held in Helsinki, Finland.
Ultrahack is a combination of hackathon and startup accelerators.
As a mentor, my role was to ensure that each team have best possible chances of fulfilling the evaluation criteria for the contest. I also helped teams with the development and pitching. It was a very exciting place to brainstorm life changing ideas and convert those ideas into working model. I met so many amazing developers who were building cool stuff. There were a few open source developers and student open source developers like me!
Being a Debian contributor, I spread the what Debian is all about. What makes it the best linux distribution. I talked to students about various programmes like GSoC and Outreachy, Debian participates as a mentoring organisation. I also described my role as a GSoC student under Debian and the free-RTC project I worked under. Many female developers were interested in the Outreachy programme, I described the projects that Debian has currently under the Outreachy programme. During the hackathon period, I talked to people about the upcoming annual DebConf which takes place. I informed them that they can still apply as a speaker or for diversity bursaries and about the logo-making competition. Thank you Debian for always supporting me!

Russ Allbery: Review: Ninefox Gambit

Review: Ninefox Gambit, by Yoon Ha Lee
Series: The Machineries of Empire #1
Publisher: Solaris
Copyright: 2016
ISBN: 1-84997-992-8
Format: Kindle
Pages: 384
Charis is a Kel, which means that she's a soldier of the Hexarchate. A captain, to be precise: Captain Kel Charis of Heron Company, commanding infantry forces to stamp out heresy. The heresy she's stamping out at the start of the book are the Eels, or the Society of the Flourish as they call themselves, and they're strong enough that they can also command heretical technology. Charis manages to win through, but only because she has enough flexibility and quick thinking to adjust to the presence of a heresy and reach beyond the Lexicon Primary, improvising formations on the spot to adjust for the affects of the rebel calendar. Military victory is prized among the Kel, but stepping outside the bounds of Doctrine to achieve it is not. Charis is not particularly surprised when her company is disbanded for re-education after the battle. She is very surprised when she personally is tapped to offer a solution to a far greater attack on the Hexarchate. I first encountered Yoon Ha Lee's fiction in the short story "The Unstrung Zither", was blown away by the creativity and delightfully weird twist on science fiction war, and have been following his writing ever since. Most of it is short fiction, though, and I'm not much of a short fiction reader, so there haven't been many reviews. Ninefox Gambit is his first, and much-anticipated, full-length novel. It's probably not too surprising for someone from the generation that grew up with Star Wars, but I have a soft spot in my heart for magitech. Hard science fiction has its merits, as does the softer sort that takes standard, if impossible, genre tropes for granted. But something about a far-future, space-faring society based on magic that straddles the rules of technology, physics, affinities, and beliefs calls to that part of me that spent hours thinking about the nature of the Force. It has to be good magitech, though: something odd and different but well-thought-out, full of implications and twisty consequences that reshape society and that inspire a whole new type of engineering and science. Magic that's not physics as we know it, but that's knowable, researchable, and something that a society can reshape itself around. This is the good magitech. In the world of the Hexarchate, calendrical systems are more than just a mutual agreement for conveying time. They order and structure the laws of the universe as much as they structure society. What technological devices, and what weapons, are possible is influenced by the calendar in observance, which in turn is based on what calendar people believe in and follow. Close adherence to a calendrical regime enables exotics: weapons with incredibly powerful and often horrific effects, such as the threshold winnower that plays a repeated, nightmarish role in this story. Invariant weapons, ones that will work in any calendar system, are much weaker. The Hexarchate is called that because it is a society formed by six factions, who divide the work of ruling its scattered planets according to the expertise and tendencies of each faction. Together, they impose the high calendar, and maintain it against heresies with an iron fist lest their power be undermined or transformed and their exotics fail to function. The Kel is their military faction, a key component of that fist, and their specialty is formations: specific arrangements of humans or ships that channel the power of the calendar to defend against or attack with exotics. Formations have to be held exactly to hold their power and yet have to be flexible enough to change based on fast-changing battlefield conditions. To assist in this, Kel are programmed with formation instinct: psychological conditioning that helps them obediently take and hold formations. And, not coincidentally, offer nearly absolute obedience to their chain of command. I just finished reading another book that attempted to use math as a key component of its world-building. I think Lee was far more successful. The math here is realistic for its purpose, obviously necessary given the formation structures built into the world's physics, and a lovely nod to the importance of calendars. A single calendar might involve only simple arithmetic, but the formation and technological implications of a calendar, let alone the fuzzy boundaries between two calendars each partially in force, would naturally require tricky advanced mathematics to work out. For someone in Charis's position, mathematical training is a rare but vitally important tactical advantage. As you might have guessed from the amount that I'm talking about combat, Ninefox Gambit is military SF. Charis is a military officer, and a comfortable majority of this book is combat of one kind or another. That's not normally my thing, and I did wish there was a bit more non-military social development. But my normal problem with military SF is that I lack the interest in battlefield tactics and strategy to stay fully engaged by description of battle after battle. Ninefox Gambit is the story of Charis attempting to retake a stronghold of the Hexarchate that's fallen to heretical forces, but Lee adds an important twist that does keep me engaged: Jedao. General Shuos Jedao was the greatest general the Hexarchate had ever seen. He never lost a battle. The only catch is that, in the middle of a highly successful campaign against heretics, he went mad, slaughtering both the heretics and his own troops with a horrific weapon while simultaneously murdering all of his command staff. He's much too dangerous and insane to leave alive, but he was also much too valuable and skillful to lose as a weapon, so for the subsequent centuries he's been kept in a threshold state, an undead ghost. A ghost that the Hexarchate can put into Charis's head, a constant advisor as she's placed in charge of the swarm sent to retake the Fortress of Scattered Needles. A brilliant tactician, sociopath, and mass murderer whose advice can never be trusted. The heart of Ninefox Gambit isn't the combat. It's the interplay of power, analysis, and guesswork under the combat, as Charis attempts to use Jedao's brilliance while not losing her own sense of identity or letting him mess too badly with her head. At the start, she's way out of her depth. But she's thoughtful, careful, has a strong internal sense of identity, and learns fast. And the story of Jedao's past is accurate, but incomplete. For those who are familiar with the often-ornate language and prose style of Yoon Ha Lee's short fiction and who are worried it wouldn't hold up at longer length, note that his style here is much different. There are a few touches of ornate description, but most of the book is written in a straightforward and easily-understandable narrative style. Thankfully, because the layers of tactical thrust and counter-thrust are complicated enough that I would have lost them entirely beneath too-complex prose. There's a lot of brutal death in this book. I got a bit tired of both that and the tactical maneuvering, although that's less the fault of the book and more my own mild antipathy towards military SF. But the unique universe background held my interest long enough to become intrigued by Charis's slow but determined probing at Jedao's secrets and the politics of the Hexarchate. I still would have preferred the story to have a somewhat lower body count, but as long as one can read past some gore, there's plenty here to appeal to someone who normally gives military SF a pass. I think its biggest drawback is that, although it has a narrative arc that comes to a clear conclusion, Ninefox Gambit raises a lot of important questions about its world and mostly doesn't answer them. There are more books coming, and I hope they contain more definitive answers. Followed by Raven Stratagem. Rating: 7 out of 10

1 May 2017

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in April 2017

FTP assistant This month I marked 72 packages for accept and sent one email to a maintainer asking questions. The number of rejections went down to 15. I would name that a good level again. Debian LTS This was my thirty-fourth month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. As others reduced their workload for this month, my all in all workload has been 23.75h. During that time I did uploads of In addition I had one week of frontdesk duties. I also started to work on icu and bind9. The patches for icu applied fine but the corresponding test did not work but stopped somewhere in the middle!? I am open for any suggestions why this could happen. Other stuff This has been a busy LTS month, so I only created node-tunein and adopted smstools as DOPOM.

Russ Allbery: Review: Survival

Review: Survival, by Julie E. Czerneda
Series: Species Imperative #1
Publisher: DAW
Copyright: May 2004
ISBN: 0-7564-0180-1
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 401
Dr. Mackenzie Connor, Mac to everyone she works with, is a biodiversity researcher specializing in salmon. In her future United States, humanity seems to have caught on to the importance of preserving wild places and learning about them, and is willing to invest in good equipment and a semi-permanent research installation. This comes with some occasional drawbacks, since she has to fight to get access to the salmon runs inside a nature preserve, but she wouldn't have it any other way. She wins enough of those fights, won the latest, and is now in position to monitor a run in a way that she's never been able to before. She was not expecting an alien to go diving in the middle of her salmon run. She was certainly not expecting that alien to be accompanied by a bureaucrat insisting that this alien's curiosity is more important than her research (hah). But the accompanying letter she receives is scarily persuasive, if maddeningly unhelpful. Much like the apparently jovial, earnest, eager, and very odd alien. Mac's continued hopes that she can quickly put this bizarre intrusion to rest and go back to her salmon are dashed by an impossible power outage, an alien visitor, and a violent kidnapping. Now her best friend and colleague is missing, the bureaucrat is not who he appears to be, and Mac is getting caught up in something that feels way over her head. SF novels feature a lot of science, but not a lot of scientific research. The research that does appear is often impulsive, wildly compressed, or far too focused on the breakthroughs of single people. The SF novel that everyone points to for accurate portrayal of real scientific research is Benford's Timescape, which I found deeply unexciting. Now I have a new novel to point to for a better treatment, although (somewhat disappointingly) Mac's research gets sidelined relatively early in the story and left behind for the conclusion. Czerneda gives us not just a few scientists and an imaginary research project, but an entire operational field station with a history. The Norcoast Salmon Research Facility is located just off-shore in carefully-designed domes to provide easy access to the sea with minimal intrusion into the local ecology. It's a bustling mix of research scientists, engineers, and the ever-present seasonal grad students, who come and go in all their immature enthusiasm and are viewed with a motherly bemusement that I immediately recognized from years of working at a university. Mac splits administrative duties with another scientist in an arrangement that will be familiar to academics everywhere, and the book opens with a mutually suspicious but mostly scripted turf fight with the guardian of the neighboring wildlife trust, the same fight they've been having every six months for years. I know Czerneda is herself a biologist by training; I'm not sure what her other academic background is, but if she hasn't spent years around academics and field studies, she's at least done some excellent research. A lot of novels have a quotidian background that's interrupted by the arrival of the plot. At the start of the story, the characters often care more about their day-to-day lives than the plot, and are dragged into it reluctantly. But one sign of an excellent writer is their ability to get the reader to care about that quotidian background alongside the character, and to sympathize with the character's reluctance to get pulled into the promised (and generally more exciting) novel plot. Czerneda succeeds in this about as well as any writer I've read since Robin McKinley's Sunshine, and that's high praise. I cared about Mac's salmon, I was nearly as irritated as she was when her research was interrupted, and I still want to go back and see more of the experiments and studies she was hoping to run. Interstellar drama and threats to multiple species are all well and good, but the salmon are running! The actual plot is a mysterious threat that turns into a combination of a biological and cultural puzzle and a sort of first-contact story. Mac is not truly the first human to encounter the Dhryn, but she's certainly the first person they've explained anything to, and the first human to go where she goes. Sadly, it also shares some of the characteristics that sour me a bit on biological SF for personal reasons: a bit too much description of food, eating habits, squishy body parts, digestive processes, and biological discomfort. This is mostly a personal gripe, and won't bother other people as much as it does me, but I could have done without bits like the descriptions of Mac's attempts to figure out how to survive on alien cuisine. I'm also dubious of some of the biology of the Dhryn; given the startling bizarreness of Earth biology, maybe I shouldn't be, but I still think there are a few problems with the square-cube law here. But Mac's irrepressible grumpy curiosity makes this story, even in the bits that made me squeamish. I think I'd read any book in which she's the main character. I will warn that the ending is surprisingly dark and wasn't what I was expecting, and Survival doesn't resolve its central mysteries. This is clearly the first book of a trilogy and should be read with that expectation. But I thoroughly enjoyed it, and hopefully the next book will have more salmon. Followed by Migration. Rating: 8 out of 10

30 April 2017

Paul Wise: FLOSS Activities April 2017

Changes

Issues

Review

Administration
  • Debian systems: quiet a logrotate warning, investigate issue with DNSSEC and alioth, deploy fix on our first stretch buildd, restore alioth git repo after history rewrite, investigate iptables segfaults on buildd and investigate time issues on a NAS
  • Debian derivatives census: delete patches over 5 MiB, re-enable the service
  • Debian wiki: investigate some 403 errors, fix alioth KGB config, deploy theme changes, close a bogus bug report, ping 1 user with bouncing email, whitelist 9 email addresses and whitelist 2 domains
  • Debian QA: deploy my changes
  • Debian mentors: security upgrades and service restarts
  • Openmoko: debug mailing list issue, security upgrades and reboots

Communication
  • Invite Wazo to the Debian derivatives census
  • Welcome ubilinux, Wazo and Roopa Prabhu (of Cumulus Linux) to the Debian derivatives census
  • Discuss HP/ProLiant wiki page with HPE folks
  • Inform git history rewriter about the git mailmap feature

Sponsors The libconfig-crontab-perl backports and pyvmomi issue were sponsored by my employer. All other work was done on a volunteer basis.

Chris Lamb: Free software activities in April 2017

Here is my monthly update covering what I have been doing in the free software world (previous month):
Reproducible builds

Whilst anyone can inspect the source code of free software for malicious flaws, most software is distributed pre-compiled to end users. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to permit verification that no flaws have been introduced either maliciously or accidentally during this compilation process by promising identical results are always generated from a given source, thus allowing multiple third-parties to come to a consensus on whether a build was compromised. I have generously been awarded a grant from the Core Infrastructure Initiative to fund my work in this area. This month I:
I also made the following changes to diffoscope, our recursive and content-aware diff utility used to locate and diagnose reproducibility issues:
  • New features:
    • Add support for comparing Ogg Vorbis files. (0436f9b)
  • Bug fixes:
    • Prevent a traceback when using --new-file with containers. (#861286)
    • Don't crash on invalid archives; print a useful error instead. (#833697).
    • Don't print error output from bzip2 call. (21180c4)
  • Cleanups:
    • Prevent abstraction-level violations by defining visual diff support on Presenter classes. (7b68309)
    • Show Debian packages installed in test output. (c86a9e1)


Debian
Debian LTS

This month I have been paid to work 18 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS). In that time I did the following:
  • "Frontdesk" duties, triaging CVEs, etc.
  • Issued DLA 882-1 for the tryton-server general application platform to fix a path suffix injection attack.
  • Issued DLA 883-1 for curl preventing a buffer read overrun vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 884-1 for collectd (a statistics collection daemon) to close a potential infinite loop vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 885-1 for the python-django web development framework patching two open redirect & XSS attack issues.
  • Issued DLA 890-1 for ming, a library to create Flash files, closing multiple heap-based buffer overflows.
  • Issued DLA 892-1 and DLA 891-1 for the libnl3/libnl Netlink protocol libraries, fixing integer overflow issues which could have allowed arbitrary code execution.

Uploads
  • redis (4:4.0-rc3-1) New upstream RC release.
  • adminer:
    • 4.3.0-2 Fix debian/watch file.
    • 4.3.1-1 New upstream release.
  • bfs:
    • 1.0-1 Initial release.
    • 1.0-2 Drop fstype tests as they rely on /etc/mtab being available. (#861471)
  • python-django:
    • 1:1.10.7-1 New upstream security release.
    • 1:1.11-1 New upstream stable release to experimental.

I sponsored the following uploads: I also performed the following QA uploads:
  • gtkglext (1.2.0-7) Correct installation location of gdkglext-config.h after "Multi-Archification" in 1.2.0-5. (#860007)
Finally, I made the following non-maintainer uploads (NMUs):
  • python-formencode (1.3.0-2) Don't ship files in /usr/lib/python 2.7,3 /dist-packages/docs. (#860146)
  • django-assets (0.12-2) Patch pytest plugin to check whether we are running in a Django context, otherwise we can break unrelated testsuites. (#859916)


FTP Team

As a Debian FTP assistant I ACCEPTed 155 packages: aiohttp-cors, bear, colorize, erlang-p1-xmpp, fenrir, firejail, fizmo-console, flask-ldapconn, flask-socketio, fontmanager.app, fonts-blankenburg, fortune-zh, fw4spl, fzy, gajim-antispam, gdal, getdns, gfal2, gmime, golang-github-go-macaron-captcha, golang-github-go-macaron-i18n, golang-github-gogits-chardet, golang-github-gopherjs-gopherjs, golang-github-jroimartin-gocui, golang-github-lunny-nodb, golang-github-markbates-goth, golang-github-neowaylabs-wabbit, golang-github-pkg-xattr, golang-github-siddontang-goredis, golang-github-unknwon-cae, golang-github-unknwon-i18n, golang-github-unknwon-paginater, grpc, grr-client-templates, gst-omx, hddemux, highwayhash, icedove, indexed-gzip, jawn, khal, kytos-utils, libbloom, libdrilbo, libhtml-gumbo-perl, libmonospaceif, libpsortb, libundead, llvm-toolchain-4.0, minetest-mod-homedecor, mini-buildd, mrboom, mumps, nnn, node-anymatch, node-asn1.js, node-assert-plus, node-binary-extensions, node-bn.js, node-boom, node-brfs, node-browser-resolve, node-browserify-des, node-browserify-zlib, node-cipher-base, node-console-browserify, node-constants-browserify, node-delegates, node-diffie-hellman, node-errno, node-falafel, node-hash-base, node-hash-test-vectors, node-hash.js, node-hmac-drbg, node-https-browserify, node-jsbn, node-json-loader, node-json-schema, node-loader-runner, node-miller-rabin, node-minimalistic-crypto-utils, node-p-limit, node-prr, node-sha.js, node-sntp, node-static-module, node-tapable, node-tough-cookie, node-tunein, node-umd, open-infrastructure-storage-tools, opensvc, openvas, pgaudit, php-cassandra, protracker, pygame, pypng, python-ase, python-bip32utils, python-ltfatpy, python-pyqrcode, python-rpaths, python-statistics, python-xarray, qtcharts-opensource-src, r-cran-cellranger, r-cran-lexrankr, r-cran-pwt9, r-cran-rematch, r-cran-shinyjs, r-cran-snowballc, ruby-ddplugin, ruby-google-protobuf, ruby-rack-proxy, ruby-rails-assets-underscore, rustc, sbt, sbt-launcher-interface, sbt-serialization, sbt-template-resolver, scopt, seqsero, shim-signed, sniproxy, sortedcollections, starjava-array, starjava-connect, starjava-datanode, starjava-fits, starjava-registry, starjava-table, starjava-task, starjava-topcat, starjava-ttools, starjava-util, starjava-vo, starjava-votable, switcheroo-control, systemd, tilix, tslib, tt-rss-notifier-chrome, u-boot, unittest++, vc, vim-ledger, vis, wesnoth-1.13, wolfssl, wuzz, xandikos, xtensor-python & xwallpaper. I additionally filed 14 RC bugs against packages that had incomplete debian/copyright files against getdns, gfal2, grpc, mrboom, mumps, opensvc, python-ase, sniproxy, starjava-topcat, starjava-ttools, unittest++, wolfssl, xandikos & xtensor-python.

Russ Allbery: Review: Periodic Tales

Review: Periodic Tales, by Hugh Aldersey-Williams
Publisher: HarperCollins
Copyright: February 2011
ISBN: 0-06-207881-X
Format: Kindle
Pages: 451
Perhaps my favorite chapter in Randall Munroe's What If? is his examination of what would happen if you assembled a periodic table from square blocks of each element. As with most What If? questions, the answer is "everyone in the vicinity dies," but it's all about the journey. The periodic table is full of so many elements that we rarely hear about but which have fascinating properties. It was partly in the memory of that chapter that I bought Periodic Tales on impulse after seeing a mention of it somewhere on the Internet (I now forget where). Hugh Aldersey-Williams is a journalist and author, but with a background in natural sciences. He also has a life-long hobby of collecting samples of the elements and attempting to complete his own private copy of the periodic table, albeit with considerably more precautions and sample containment than Munroe's thought experiment. Periodic Tales is inspired by that collection. It's a tour and cultural history of many of the elements, discussing their discovery, their role in commerce and industry, their appearance, and often some personal anecdotes. This is not exactly a chemistry book, although there's certainly some chemistry here, nor is it a history, although Aldersey-Williams usually includes some historical notes about each element he discusses. The best term might be an anthropology of the elements: a discussion of how they've influenced culture and an examination of the cultural assumptions and connections we've constructed around them. But primarily it's an idiosyncratic and personal tour of the things Aldersey-Williams found interesting about each one. Periodic Tales is not comprehensive. The completionist in me found that a bit disappointing, and there are a few elements that I think would have fit the overall thrust of the book but are missing. (Lithium and its connection to mental health and now computer batteries comes to mind.) It's also not organized in the obvious way, either horizontally or vertically along the periodic table. Instead, Aldersey-Williams has divided the elements he talks about into five major but fairly artificial divisions: power (primarily in the economic sense), fire (focused on burning and light), craft (the materials from which we make things), beauty, and earth. Obviously, these are fuzzy; silver appears in craft, but could easily be in power with gold. I'm not sure how defensible this division was. But it does, for good or for ill, break the reader's mind away from a purely chemical and analytical treatment and towards broader cultural associations. This cultural focus, along with Aldersey-Williams's clear and conversational style, are what pull this book firmly away from being a beautified recitation of facts that could be gleamed from Wikipedia. It also leads to some unexpected choices of focus. For example, the cultural touchstone he chooses for sodium is not salt (which is a broad enough topic for an entire book) but sodium street lights, the ubiquitous and color-distorting light of modern city nights, thus placing salt in the "fire" category of the book. Discussion of cobalt is focused on pigments: the brilliant colors of paint made possible by its many brightly-colored compounds. Arsenic is, of course, a poison, but it's also a source of green, widely used in wallpaper (and Aldersey-Williams discusses the connection with the controversial death of Napoleon). And the discussion of aluminum starts with a sculpture, and includes a fascinating discussion of "banalization" as we become used to use of a new metal, which the author continues when looking a titanium and its currently-occurring cultural transition between the simply new and modern and a well-established metal with its own unique cultural associations. One drawback of the somewhat scattered organization is that, while Periodic Tales provides fascinating glimmers of the history of chemistry and the search to isolate elements, those glimmers are disjointed and presented in no particular order. Recently-discovered metals are discussed alongside ancient ones, and the huge surge in elemental isolation in the 1800s is all jumbled together. Wikipedia has a very useful timeline that helps sort out one's sense of history, but there was a part of me left wanting a more structured presentation. I read books like this primarily for the fascinating trivia. Mercury: known in ancient times, but nearly useless, so used primarily for ritual and decoration (making the modern reader cringe). Relative abundancies of different elements, which often aren't at all what one might think. Rare earths (not actually that rare): isolated through careful, tedious work by Swedish mining chemists whom most people have never heard of, unlike the discoverers of many other elements. And the discovery of the noble gases, which is a fascinating bit of disruptive science made possible by new technology (the spectroscope), forcing a rethinking of the periodic table (which had no column for noble gases). I read a lot of this while on vacation and told interesting tidbits to my parents over breakfast or dinner. It's that sort of book. This is definitely in the popular science and popular writing category, for all the pluses and minuses that brings. It's not a detailed look at either chemistry or history. But it's very fun to read, it provides a lot of conversational material, and it takes a cultural approach that would not have previously occurred to me. Recommended if you like this sort of thing. Rating: 7 out of 10

29 April 2017

Shirish Agarwal: India and the Agricultural Economy

Indian farmer ploughing a field in traditional style - Wikimedia commons I was in two minds when I read Ritesh s blog post about the Indian Economy. I was angry with Ritesh as he seemed to selectively take facts and present it rather than taking it whole. Even if he had searched even a little bit, he would have got much more better material and everybody would have been the gainer. I have to also admit, I feel very much like a hypocrite as I have never slaved in a farm so my understanding and conclusions are a mix of media and limited interaction with farmers some years ago. There is also lots of local customs and politics that come into the picture and it s not as straight-forward as Ritesh thinks. What he has failed to share/account for is the far worse bad and stressed debts for the industry so just saying farm loan waivers are bad without sharing any of the context makes it seem much more worse. This is when our Current Chief Economic Adviser states about loan waivers to corporates You need to be able to forgive those debts because this is how capitalism works. People make mistakes, those have to be forgiven to some extent Let me start though with words from a book I read sometime back On a peasant uprising erupted in . The farmers were angry with high interest rates, high taxes, high inflation and low-government prices for their crops. The system had let them into debt, and debt had meant foreclosure and loss of their fields to the land barons. I intentionally have made a fill in the blanks as both the dates and places was true in India 100 years back and even today, the only difference between the two is the absence of taxes. Many people would think I m talking about Champaran whose tale while well-known in India is sadly a stub-class article in wikipedia  with quite a few citation needed tags as well  but is also true today as will be seen below. Interestingly, there is/was a remark by some unknown person who said gora sahab gays, bhura sahab aaya meaning the white officer has gone, in his place the brown officer has come. The evidence of this is very much in the Telegraph Act and the story about its usage and its place in Indian politics Surprisingly, sadly and coincidentally, the quote minus the dates and place didn t happen in India but also in Cambodia. The above quote has been taken from for the sake of all living things by John M. Del Vecchio. The quote itself appears in the first 10 odd pages (historical summation) of the somewhat 1200 odd pages book. I actually got an old edition which tops out at 900 pages so probably some more updated input/news isn t available but it still packs a powerful wallop. I want to dedicate a separate blog post for the book itself so will not say more on that book and what it shares. Sadly and coincidentally, there were news reports yesterday itself of farmers agitating for better prices just yesterday. Some of the interesting work if you want to understand the farmer s indebtedness is to study the Income, Expenditure, Productive Assets and Indebtedness of Agricultural Households in India done by NSSO. Again, one does not need to read the whole report, there were some of the analysis shared by the Hindu here and here. This was also echoed by Logical Indian It really boggles the mind to know than an average farming household earns around INR 200 per day. Even if you take a family of four people that comes to INR 50/- per person. Most rural joint families at the very least have 3-4 kids at the very least. Sadly Agricultural incomes do not keep sync even with the inflation index as there is no fair minimum age and wage for the Indian farmer, the concept does not exist for her(im)  . Just me and mum going onto a restaurant and having one dish each easily can run anywhere between INR 200~250 easily . Cooking in the house is the same if you add/input the labor (which is usually not calculated) used to make lunch/dinner. There was the idea that contract farming might be a solution but even that was corrupted by Multi-national companies such as Pepsi and others that the Government is showing movement to have a model contracting law . There are loads of stories on downtoearth magazine which deals with the above and all sorts of issues the farmer faces. I should talk about Maharashtra and even here there was/has been an irrigation scam with figures given from 35k to 70k crores or 350 to 700 billion INR . The latest finding by the PAC has been shared here. I will cut the blog post short as I find the whole thing personally very depressing. As far as local customs go this was from one of the farmers interaction some years ago where me and some other friends had gone across a village and came to know that all of them grew the same crop with some minor variances. When asked why is it so, while many said its fate, one of the elderly gentleman shared an experience where a farmer had planted some other thing. The gentleman prospered while the other villagers were suffering from glut of whatever they produced. Knowing he prospered, the other villagers damaged his crops and all sorts of unlucky things started happening for the farmer. In the end he realized his best bet is to follow the ways of the other villagers, at least they would be in peace. What I have shared isn t either unique or even unknown, even Toronto Star of Canada reported on the issue some years ago. At the end of it all, the story is one of no education and limited skill-set and I don t see it changing any time soon. There are some who are earning big figures, but majority of the farmers will always be in the red
Filed under: Miscellenous Tagged: #Agricultal Economy, #Champaran, #Contract farming, #Corruption, #farmer suicide, #irrigation scam, #Loan waivers, #planet-debian, poverty

Antoine Beaupr : My free software activities, April 2017

Debian Long Term Support (LTS) This is my monthly Debian LTS report. My time this month was spent working on various hairy security issues, most notably XBMC (now known as Kodi) and yaml-cpp.

Kodi directory transversal I started by looking in CVE-2017-5982, a "directory traversal" vulnerability in XBMC (now known as Kodi) which is a technical term for "allow attackers to read any world-readable file on your computer from the network". It's a serious vulnerability which has no known fix. When you enable the "remote control" interface in Kodi, it allows anyone with the password (which is disabled by default) to download any files Kodi has read access to on the machine it's running. Considering Kodi is often connected to multiple services, this may mean elevated compromise and more nasty stuff. I furthered the investigation done with my own analysis which showed the problem is difficult to solve: Kodi internally uses the facility to show thumbnails and media to the user, and there are no clear way of restricting which paths Kodi should have access to. Indeed, Kodi is designed to access mounted file systems and paths in arbitrary locations. In Debian bug #855225, I further confirmed confirmed wheezy and jessie-backports as vulnerable and therefore showed with good certainty that stretch and sid are vulnerable as well. I also suggested possible workaround, but at this point, it's in upstream's hands, as the changes will be intrusive. The file transfer mechanism need to be revamped all over Kodi, or authentication (with a proper password policy), need to be enforced.

Squirrelmail Next I looked at that old webmail software, Squirrelmail, which suffers from a remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2017-7692) when sending mails with sendmail on the commandline. This is arguably an edge case, but considering the patch was simple, I figured I would provide an update to the LTS community. I tried to get a coordinated release for jessie, since the code is the same, but this wasn't completed at the time of writing. A patch is available and will hopefully be picked up by another LTS worker soon.

Fop and Batik Those issues (CVE-2017-5661 and CVE-2017-5662) were more difficult. The patches weren't clearly documented and there were no upstream references other than security advisories for the first release in years (in the case of batik) or months (in the case of fop), which made it hard to track down the issues. Fortunately, I was able to track down the upstream issues (FOP-2668 and BATIK-1139) where I got confirmation on what the proper fixes were. I could then release DLA-927-1 and DLA-926-1 with the backported patches. I do not use fop or batik. In fact, even after reading the homepage of both products, I couldn't quite figure out what use people could possibly have for that thing. Before uploading the packages, I therefore made packages available for testing for fop and batik.

libsndfile Next up was libsndfile which a bunch of overflows when parsing various audio files. I backported a patch for CVE-2017-7585 CVE-2017-7586 and CVE-2017-7741 which all seemed to be fixed by a single patch usptream. CVE-2017-7742 was also fixed, although with a separate patch. In all of those, i could only test CVE-2017-7741 and CVE-2017-7742, as the others were missing test cases. I provided a test package for a few days then I also figured it would be best to incorporate the security fixes done in stable, which brought in fixes for CVE-2015-7805, CVE-2014-9756 and CVE-2014-9496. So in the end, I ported patches from wheezy to jessie and uploaded the jessie version (reverting certain build changes) into wheezy and uploaded DLA-928-1 with the results.

yaml-cpp I then turned to yaml-cpp, a C++ parser for YAML. This one didn't have a known upstream fix, but I figured I would give it a shot anyways. I ended up writing my first C++ code in years which is still pending review and merge upstream. It's not an easy problem to fix: this is basically an excessive recursion problem that can be used to smash the stack. I figured I could introduce a recursion limit, but as the discussion showed, this is a limited approach: stack size varies on different platforms and it's not easy to find the right limit. The real solution is to rewrite the code to avoid recursion but that's a major code refactoring I didn't feel belong in a LTS update. Besides, this could be better handled by upstream, so I will leave things at that for now. It does make you wonder how much code out there is recursing on untrusted data structures...

kedpm Finally, a friend over at Koumbit.org reported Debian bug #860817, as information leak in kedpm, a password manager I previously maintained. I requested and got assigned CVE-2017-8296 and provided a fix for wheezy and jessie. For unstable and the coming stretch release, I have requested kedpm to be completely removed from Debian (Debian bug #860817) which involved a release notes update (Debian bug #861277). It's unfortunate to see software go, but kedpm wasn't maintained. I wasn't the original author: I just gave a few patches and ended up maintaining that software and not using it. It's a bad situation to be in, as you don't really know what's working and not with the tools you are supposed to be responsible for. There are more modern alternatives available now and I encourage everyone to switch.

Triage Looking for more work, I peeked a bit in the secretary tasks to triage some pending issues. I found that trafficserver could be crashed with simple requests (CVE-2017-5659) so I looked into that issue. My analysis showed that the patch is long and complex and could be difficult to backport to the old version available in wheezy. I also couldn't reproduce the issue in wheezy, so it may be a bug introduced only later, although I couldn't confirm that directly. I also triaged wireshark, where I just noted the maintainer expressed concern that we were taking up issues too fast and will probably take care of this one. I also postponed various issues in GnuTLS (marked "no-dsa") as they affect only a (unfortunately) rarely used part of GnuTLS that has been removed in later version: OpenPGP support.

Other free software work

Debiman I finally got around contributing to the debiman project. I worked on ensuring that there is a dman compatibility in debiman, by shipping dman in the debian-goodies package (Debian bug #860920). I also submitted a pull request to fix the fix about page title, document the custom assets repository, fix a stray bracket and link to the link to venerable man7.org project After a discussion on IRC, I also filed a few more issues: I'm happy to be able to contribute to this important service and I hope the new FAQ I created will be online soon!

XMonad and Emacs I started using writeroom-mode again as part of my work on LWN. As it turns out, my setup was not exactly working: I had to port my config to the new version and windows weren't "sticky" as they should be, a known issue with Xmonad. Indeed, Xmonad doesn't obey the "static" or "all desktops" standard directives. Writeroom is a "distraction-free writing" mode for Emacs, so the irony of working on such a deep distraction in establishing a distraction free environment is not lost on me. Needing to scratch that particular itch, and with the help of clever people from the IRC channel, I was able to make Emacs tell Xmonad to show its window (or "frame" as Emacs likes to call it) on all desktops. This involved creating a new function which I think could be useful in the CopyWindow library:
--   Toggle between "copyToAll" or "killAllOtherCopies". Copies to all
-- workspaces, or remove from all other workspaces, depending on
-- previous state (checked with "wsContainingCopies").
copyToAllToggle :: X ()
copyToAllToggle = do
    -- check which workspaces have copies
    copies <- wsContainingCopies
    if null copies
      then windows copyToAll -- no workspaces, make sticky
      else killAllOtherCopies -- already other workspaces, unstick
There are probably better ways of implementing this directly in the CopyWindow code - wsContainingCopies, in particular, is probably overkill. But it's all I can use directly from my xmonad.hs, so that's what I did. The other bit I needed was something to trigger that function from the outside. I rejected the ServerMode hook because it looked a bit too complicated and there is a built-in facility within X that works without this, which, from Emacs' point of view, is the x-send-client-message function. So I made up a new message identifier and wrote a event hook handler to process it:
--   handle X client messages that tell Xmonad to make a window appear
-- on all workspaces
--
-- this should really be using _NET_WM_STATE and
-- _NET_WM_STATE_STICKY. but that's more complicated: then we'd need
-- to inspect a window and figure out the current state and act
-- accordingly. I am not good enough with Xmonad to figure out that
-- part yet.
--
-- Instead, just check for the relevant message and check if the
-- focused window is already on all workspaces and toggle based on
-- that.
--
-- this is designed to interoperate with Emacs's writeroom-mode module
-- and called be called from elisp with:
--
-- (x-send-client-message nil 0 nil "XMONAD_COPY_ALL_SELF" 8 '(0))
myClientMessageEventHook :: Event -> X All
myClientMessageEventHook (ClientMessageEvent  ev_message_type = mt, ev_data = dt ) = do
  dpy <- asks display
  -- the client message we're expecting
  copyAllMsg <- io $ internAtom dpy "XMONAD_COPY_ALL_SELF" False
  -- if the event matches the message we expect, toggle sticky state
  when (mt == copyAllMsg && dt /= []) $ do
    copyToAllToggle
  -- we processed the event completely
  return $ All True
All that was left was to hook that into Emacs, and I was done! Whoohoo! Full screen total domination, distraction free work! :) I would love to hear from others what they think of that approach, if they have improvements or if the above copyToAllToggle function could be merged in. Ideally, Xmonad would just parse the STICKY client messages and do the right thing - maybe even directly in CopyWindow - but I have found this enough Haskell for one day. You can see the diff on my home directory to see exactly the changes involved to make this configuration work.

Emacs packaging Speaking of Emacs, after complaining in the noisy #emacs IRC channel about the poor TLS configuration of marmelade.org -- and filing a bug (Debian bug #861106) regarding the use of SHA-1 in certificate pinning -- I was told we shouldn't expect trust from third-party ELPA repositories. Marmelade seems to be dead, as the maintainer is "behind the great firewall of China" and MELPA still hasn't figured out how to sign packages. In the end, it seems like there are tons of elpa packages in Debian and that if your favorite one is missing, that's a bug that can be filed and fixed. I first discovered that 6 of the packages I used were already packaged: And so I went ahead and filed a ton more bugs for the packages I am using but that aren't in Debian just yet: Of those, I can't recommend multiple-cursors (MC) enough: I used it at least 4 times just writing this text. It's just awesome. The other ones are also all great in their own right of course, but I feel they are more specific to my workflow whereas MC is just amazing.

ikiwiki I did some more work on ikiwiki the software driving this blog. I created a new plugin to, at least, fix anchors in the table of contents to be human readable. This is something I had done on the MoinMoin wiki almost a decade ago -- which I called then NicerHeadingIds and that I have always found frustrating with Ikiwiki. It turns out the problem was both easier and hairier than I thought. Right from the start, something weird was happening: something was already adding nice headings, but they were somewhat broken. It turns out that multimarkdown already inserts those headers, but I wasn't satisfied with the way they were generated. But even worse, I had the headinganchors plugin enabled, but that plugin wasn't taking effect, because of multimarkdown. And even if it would take effect, it doesn't behave well with non-ASCII characters, which gets turned in their numeric presentation. So I also wrote the i18nheadinganchors plugin that creates better headings and patched the toc plugin so that it can reuse existing anchors if they exist, while keeping backwards compatibility. I hope this gets merged in a future ikiwiki release so I do not have to carry this patch locally too long... In other news, I have upgraded the ikiwiki-hosting package to the latest version and sent a patch upstream to provide HSTS support.

Other stuff I have migrated all my public repos hosted on my home server to either Gitlab.com or Github. I also have repositories on 0xacab and it seemed ludicrous to have 4 different, canonical, places where my code was hosted. I have now about 40 different projects on Gitlab and about 60 on Github, although most of the latter are forks of existing projects. I also made a manpage for stressant and moved the documentation to RTFD which makes it neatly accessible. I also made small incremental improvements (like --directory support). I installed Rainloop on this server to give a nice, mobile-friendly webmail. Instructions to replicate this setup are in mail. In the constant git-annex documentation effort, I tried to draft a user guide that could be a basis for restructuring the documentation to be more easily accessible. I also helped a friend put his documentation on the wiki in splitting a repository. Finally, I also looked into Android stuff a little more. I wrote a usability review of the F-Droid privileged extension that will bring good changes, I hope. I also opened the discussion regarding reproducible builds to try and clarify exactly how those worked to help the Wallabag people ship consistently signed alphas. So far, it seems that it will remain a standard practice on F-Droid to ship packages that are not signed by the official upstream signature, unfortunately, unless upstream provides a reproducible build that is publicly available... Switching to such build is also a hairy issue, as, obviously, the signature changes, which raises the alarm we are trying to avoid in the first place.

John Goerzen: Is there any way to truly secure Docker container contents?

There is much to like about Docker. Much has been written about it, and about how secure the containerization is. This post isn t about that. This is about keeping what s inside each container secure. I believe we have a fundamental problem here. Earlier this month, a study on security vulnerabilities on Docker Hub came out, and the picture isn t pretty. One key finding:
Over 80% of the :latest versions of official images contained at least on high severity vulnerability!
And it s not the only one raising questions. Let s dive in and see how we got here. It s hard to be secure, but Debian makes it easier Let s say you want to run a PHP application like WordPress under Apache. Here are the things you need to keep secure: On Debian (and most of its best-known derivatives), we are extremely lucky to have a wonderful security support system. If you run a Debian system, the combination of unattended-updates, needrestart, debsecan, and debian-security-support will help one keep a Debian system secure and verify it is. When the latest OpenSSL bug comes out, generally speaking by the time I wake up, unattended-updates has already patched it, needrestart has already restarted any server that uses it, and I m protected. Debian s security team generally backports fixes rather than just say here s the new version , making it very safe to automatically apply patches. As long as I use what s in Debian stable, all layers mentioned above will be protected using this scheme. This picture is much nicer than what we see in Docker. Problems We have a lot of problems in the Docker ecosystem:
  1. No built-in way to know when a base needs to be updated, or to automatically update it
  2. Diverse and complicated vendor security picture
  3. No way to detect when intermediate libraries need to be updated
  4. Complicated final application security picture
Let s look at them individually. Problem #1: No built-in way to know when a base needs to be updated, or to automatically update it First of all, there is nothing in Docker like unattended-updates. Although a few people have suggested ways to run unattended-updates inside containers, there are many reasons that approach doesn t work well. The standard advice is to update/rebuild containers. So how do you know when to do that? It is not all that obvious. Theoretically, official OS base images will be updated when needed, and then other Docker hub images will detect the base update and be rebuilt. So, if a bug in a base image is found, and if the vendors work properly, and if you are somehow watching, then you could be protected. There is work in this area; tools such as watchtower help here. But this can lead to a false sense of security, because: Problem #2: Diverse and complicated vendor security picture Different images can use different operating system bases. Consider just these official images, and the bases they use: (tracking latest tag on each) And how about a few unofficial images? The good news is that Debian jessie seems to be pretty popular here. The bad news is that you see everything from Oracle Linux, to Ubuntu, to Debian testing, to Debian oldstable in just this list. Go a little further, and you ll see Alpine Linux, CentOS, and many more represented. Here s the question: what do you know about the security practices of each of these organizations? How well updated are their base images? Even if it s Debian, how well updated is, for instance, the oldstable or the testing image? The attack surface here is a lot larger than if you were just using a single OS. But wait, it gets worse: Problem #3: No way to detect when intermediate libraries need to be updated Let s say your Docker image is using a base that is updated immediately when a security problem is found. Let s further assume that your software package (WordPress, MySQL, whatever) is also being updated. What about the intermediate dependencies? Let s look at the build process for nginx. The Dockerfile for it begins with Debian:stretch-slim. But then it does a natural thing: it runs an apt-get install, pulling in packages from both Debian and an nginx repo. I ran the docker build across this. Of course, the apt-get command brings in not just the specified packages, but also their dependencies. Here are the ones nginx brought in: fontconfig-config fonts-dejavu-core gettext-base libbsd0 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgd3 libgeoip1 libicu57 libjbig0 libjpeg62-turbo libpng16-16 libssl1.1 libtiff5 libwebp6 libx11-6 libx11-data libxau6 libxcb1 libxdmcp6 libxml2 libxpm4 libxslt1.1 nginx nginx-module-geoip nginx-module-image-filter nginx-module-njs nginx-module-xslt ucf Now, what is going to trigger a rebuild if there s a security fix to libssl1.1 or libicu57? (Both of these have a history of security holes.) The answer, for the vast majority of Docker images, seems to be: nothing automatic. Problem #4: Complicated final application security picture And that brings us to the last problem: Let s say you want to run an application in Docker. exim, PostgreSQL, Drupal, or maybe something more obscure. Who is watching for security holes in it? If you re using Debian packages, the Debian security team is. If you re using a Docker image, well, maybe it s the random person that contributed it, maybe it s the vendor, maybe it s Docker, maybe it s nobody. You have to take this burden on yourself, to validate the security support picture for each image you use. Conclusion All this adds up to a lot of work, which is not taken care of for you by default in Docker. It is no surprise that many Docker images are insecure, given this picture. The unfortunate reality is that many Docker containers are running with known vulnerabilities that have known fixes, but just aren t, and that s sad. I wonder if there are any practices people are using that can mitigate this better than what the current best-practice recommendations seem to be?

Russ Allbery: Review: Neverness

Review: Neverness, by David Zindell
Publisher: Bantam Spectra
Copyright: May 1988
Printing: July 1989
ISBN: 0-553-27903-3
Format: Mass market
Pages: 552
Mallory Ringess is a Pilot, one of the people who can guide a lightship through interstellar space from inside the dark cocoon and biotech interface that allows visualization of the mathematics of interstellar travel. At the start of the book, he's young, arrogant, impulsive, and has a deeply unhealthy relationship with Leopold Soli, the Lord Pilot and supposedly his uncle by marriage (although they share a remarkable physical resemblance). An encounter with his uncle in a bar provokes a rash promise, and Ringess finds himself promising to attempt to map the Solid State Entity in search of the Elder Eddas, a secret of life from the mythical Ieldra that might lead to mankind's immortality. The opening of Neverness is Ringess's initial voyage and brash search, in which he proves to be a capable mathematician who can navigate a region of space twisted and deformed by becoming part of a transcendent machine intelligence. The knowledge he comes away with, though, is scarcely more coherent than the hints Soli relates at the start of the story: the secret of mankind is somehow hidden in its deepest past. That, in turn, provokes a deeply bizarre trip into the ice surrounding his home city of Neverness to attempt to steal biological material from people who have recreated themselves as Neanderthals. Beyond that point, I would say that things get even weirder, but weird still implies some emotional connection with the story. I think a more accurate description is that the book gets more incoherently mystical, more hopelessly pretentious, and more depressingly enthralled by childish drama. It's the sort of thing that one writes if one is convinced that the Oedipal complex is the height of subtle characterization. I loathed this book. I started loathing this book partway through Ringess's trip through the Solid State Entity, when Zindell's prose reached for transcendent complexity, tripped over its own shoelaces, and fell headlong into overwrought babbling. I continued reading every page because there's a perverse pleasure in hate-reading a book one dislikes this intensely, and because I wanted to write a review on the firm foundation of having endured the entire experience. The paperback edition I have has a pull quote from Orson Scott Card on the cover, which includes the phrase "excellent hard science fiction." I'm not sure what book Card read, because if this is hard science fiction, Lord of the Rings is paranormal romance. Even putting aside the idea that one travels through interstellar space by proving mathematical theorems in artificially dilated time (I don't think Zindell really understands what a proof is or why you write one), there's the whole business with stopping time with one's mind, reading other people's minds, and remembering one's own DNA. The technology, such as it is, makes considerably less sense than Star Wars. The hard SF requirement to keep technology consistent with extrapolated science is nowhere to be found here. The back-cover quote from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch is a bit more on-target: "Reminiscent of Gene Wolfe's New Sun novels... really comes to life among the intrigues of Neverness." This is indeed reminiscent of Gene Wolfe, in that it wouldn't surprise me at all if Zindell fell in love with the sense of antiquity, strangeness, and hints of understood technology that Wolfe successfully creates and attempted to emulate Wolfe in his first novel. Sadly, Zindell isn't Wolfe. Almost no one is, which is why attempting to emulate the extremely difficult feat Wolfe pulls off in the Book of the New Sun in your first novel is not a good idea. The results aren't pretty. There is something to be said for resplendent descriptions, rich with detail and ornamental prose. That something is "please use sparingly and with an eye to the emotional swings of the novel." Wolfe does not try to write most of a novel that way, which is what makes those moments of description so effective. Wolfe is also much better at making his mysteries and allusions subtle and unobtrusive, rather than having the first-person protagonist beat the reader over the head with them for pages at a time. This is a case where showing is probably better than telling. Let me quote a bit of description from the start of the book:
She shimmers, my city, she shimmers. She is said to be the most beautiful of all the cities of the Civilized Worlds, more beautiful even than Parpallaix or the cathedral cities of Vesper. To the west, pushing into the green sea like a huge, jewel-studded sleeve of city, the fragile obsidian cloisters and hospices of the Farsider's Quarter gleamed like black glass mirrors. Straight ahead as we skated, I saw the frothy churn of the Sound and their whitecaps of breakers crashing against the cliffs of North Beach and above the entire city, veined with purple and glazed with snow and ice, Waaskel and Attakel rose up like vast pyramids against the sky. Beneath the half-ring of extinct volcanoes (Urkel, I should mention, is the southernmost peak, and though less magnificent than the others, it has a conical symmetry that some find pleasing) the towers and spires of the Academy scattered the dazzling false winter light so that the whole of the Old City sparkled.
That's less than half of that paragraph, and the entire book is written like that, even in the middle of conversations. Endless, constant words piled on words about absolutely everything, whether important or not, whether emotionally significant or not. And much of it isn't even description, but philosophical ponderings that are desperately trying to seem profound. Here's another bit:
Although I knew I had never seen her before, I felt as if I had known her all my life. I was instantly in love with her, not, of course, as one loves another human being, but as a wanderer might love a new ocean or a gorgeous snowy peak he has glimpsed for the first time. I was practically struck dumb by her calmness and her beauty, so I said the first stupid thing which came to mind. "Welcome to Neverness," I told her.
Now, I should be fair: some people like this kind of description, or at least have more tolerance for it than I do. But that brings me to the second problem: there isn't a single truly likable character in this entire novel. Ringess, the person telling us this whole story, is a spoiled man-child, the sort of deeply immature and insecure person who attempts to compensate through bluster, impetuousness, and refusing to ever admit that he made a mistake or needed to learn something. He spends a good portion of the book, particularly the deeply bizarre and off-putting sections with the fake Neanderthals, attempting to act out some sort of stereotyped toxic masculinity and wallowing in negative emotions. Soli is an arrogant, abusive asshole from start to finish. Katherine, Ringess's love interest, is a seer who has had her eyes removed to see the future (I cannot express how disturbing I found Zindell's descriptions of this), has bizarre and weirdly sexualized reactions to the future she never explains, and leaves off the ends of all of her sentences, which might be be the most pointlessly irritating dialogue quirk I've seen in a novel. And Ringess's mother is a man-hating feminist from a separatist culture who turns into a master manipulator (I'm starting to see why Card liked this book). I at least really wanted to like Bardo, Ringess's closest friend, who has a sort of crude loyalty and unwillingness to get pulled too deep into the philosophical quicksand lurking underneath everything in this novel. Alas, Zindell insists on constantly describing Bardo's odious eating, belching, and sexual habits every time he's on the page, thus reducing him to the disgusting buffoon who gets drunk a lot and has irritating verbal ticks. About the only person I could stand by the end of the book was Justine, who at least seems vaguely sensible (and who leaves the person who abuses her), but she's too much of a non-entity to carry sustained interest. (There is potential here for a deeply scathing and vicious retelling of this story from Justine's point of view, focusing on the ways she was belittled, abused, and ignored, but I think Zindell was entirely unaware of why that would be so effective.) Oh, and there's lots of gore and horrific injury and lovingly-described torture, because of course there is. And that brings me back to the second half of that St. Louis Post-Dispatch review quote: "... really comes to life among the intrigues of Neverness." I would love to know what was hiding behind the ellipses in this pull quote, because this half-sentence is not wrong. Insofar as Neverness has any real appeal, it's in the intrigues of the city of Neverness and in the political structure that rules it. What this quote omits is that these intrigues start around page 317, more than halfway through the novel. That's about the point where faux-Wolfe starts mixing with late-career Frank Herbert and we get poet-assassins, some revelations about the leader of the Pilot culture, and some more concrete explanations of what this mess of a book is about. Unfortunately, you have to read through the huge and essentially meaningless Neanderthal scenes to get there, scenes that have essentially nothing to do with the interesting content of this book. (Everything that motivates them turns out to be completely irrelevant to the plot and useless for the characters.) The last 40% of the book is almost passable, and characters I cared about might have even made it enjoyable. Still, a couple of remaining problems detract heavily, chief among them the lack of connection of the great revelation of the story to, well, anything in the story. We learn at the very start of the novel that the stars of the Vild are mysteriously exploding, and much of the novel is driven by uncovering an explanation and solution. The characters do find an explanation, but not through any investigation. Ringess is simply told what is happening, in a wad of exposition, as a reward for something else entirely. It's weirdly disconnected from and irrelevant to everything else in the story. (There are some faint connections to the odd technological rules that the Pilot society lives under, but Zindell doesn't even draw attention to those.) The political intrigue in Neverness is similar: it appears out of nowhere more than halfway through the book, with no dramatic foundation for the motives of the person who has been keeping most of the secrets. And the final climax of the political machinations involves a bunch of mystical nonsense masquerading as science, and more of the Neanderthal bullshit that ruins the first half of the book. This is a thoroughly bad book: poorly plotted, poorly written, clotted and pretentious in style, and full of sociopaths and emotionally stunted children. I read the whole thing because I'm immensely stubborn and make poor life choices, but I was saying the eight deadly words ("I don't care what happens to these people") by a hundred pages in. Don't emulate my bad decisions. (Somehow, this novel was shortlisted for the Arthur C. Clarke award in 1990. What on earth could they possibly have been thinking?) Neverness is a stand-alone novel, but the ending sets up a subsequent trilogy that I have no intention of reading. Followed by The Broken God. Rating: 2 out of 10

28 April 2017

Russ Allbery: Review: Small Gods

Review: Small Gods, by Terry Pratchett
Series: Discworld #13
Publisher: Harper
Copyright: February 1994
Printing: March 2008
ISBN: 0-06-109217-7
Format: Mass market
Pages: 357
Small Gods is the thirteenth Discworld novel, but it features new characters and is unrelated to any of the previous books. Some reading order guides show it as following Pyramids in an "ancient civilizations" track, but its only relationship with that book is some minor thematic similarities. You could start here with Discworld if you wanted to. Brutha is a novice in the hierarchy of the church of the Great God Om, and his elders are convinced he'll probably die a novice. He's just not particularly bright, you see. But he is very obedient, and he doesn't mind doing hard work, and there's nothing exactly wrong with him, except that he looks at people with startling intensity when they're talking to him. Almost as if he's listening. All that seems about to change, however, when the Great God Om himself approaches Brutha and starts talking to him. Not that Brutha is at all convinced at first that this is happening, particularly given that Om appears in the form of a small, battered, one-eyed tortoise who was dropped into the church garden by an eagle attempting to break his shell. Small Gods is, as you might have guessed, a parody of religion, at least large, organized religion with fixed hierarchies, organizations called the Quisition that like to torture people, and terrifyingly devout deacons who are certain of themselves in ways that no human ever should be. It's also an interesting bit of Discworld metaphysics: gods gain power from worship (a very old idea in fantasy), and when they don't get enough worship, they end up much diminished and even adrift in the desert. Or trapped in the form of a small tortoise. One might wonder how Om ended up in his present condition given the vast and extremely authoritarian church devoted to his worship, but that's the heart of Pratchett's rather pointed parody: large religious organizations end up being about themselves, rather than about the god they supposedly worship, to such an extent that they don't provide any worship at all. Brutha is not thinking of things like this. Once he's finally convinced that Om is who he claims to be, he provides worship and belief of a very practical but wholehearted and unshakable sort, just as he does everything else in life. That makes him the eighth prophet of Om as prophecy foretold, but it's far from clear how that will be of any practical use. Or how Om will come back into power. And meanwhile, Brutha has come to the attention of Vorbis, the head of the Exquisitors, who does not know about the tortoise (and wouldn't believe if he did), but who has a use for Brutha's other talent: his eidetic memory. In typical Pratchett fashion, the story expands to include a variety of other memorable characters from the neighboring city of Ephebe, a country full of gods and philosophers. Vorbis's aims here are unclear at the start of the book, but Vorbis being who he is, they can't be good. Brutha is drawn along in his wake. Meanwhile, Om is constantly watching for an opportunity to regain his lost power and worshipful following, and also to avoid being eaten. Despite the humorous components, Small Gods is rather serious about religion and about its villain. It's also a touch repetitive; Om's lack of power and constant fretting about it, Brutha's earnest but naive loyalty, and Vorbis's malevolent determination are repeatedly stressed and get a little old. Some bits in Ephebe are quite fun, but the action is a bit disjointed, partly because the protagonist is rarely the motive force in the plot. There are also some extended scenes of trudging through the desert that I thought dragged a bit. But Pratchett hits some powerful notes in his critique of religion, and there are a few bits with Death at the end of the book that I thought were among the better pieces of Discworld philosophy. And when Brutha gets a chance to use his one talent of memory, I greatly enjoyed the resulting scenes. He hits just the right combination of modesty, capability, and earnestness. I know a lot of Pratchett readers really like Small Gods. I'm not one of those; I thought it was about average for the Discworld series (at least among the books I've read so far). But average for Discworld is still pretty good, and its new setting makes it a plausible place to start (or to take a break from the other Discworld plot threads). Followed, in publication order, by Lords and Ladies. I don't believe it has a direct plot sequel. Rating: 7 out of 10

27 April 2017

Joey Hess: Exede Surfbeam 2

My new satellite internet connection is from Exede, connecting to the ViaSat 1 bird in geosync orbit. A few technical details that I've observed follow. antagonistic by design The "Surfbeam 2 wifi modem" is a closed proprietary system. That is important because it's part of Exede's bandwidth management system. The Surfbeam tracks data use and sends it periodically to Exede. When a user has gone over their monthly priority data, Exede then throttles the bandwidth in various ways -- this throttling seems to be implemented, at least partially on the Surfbeam itself. (Perhaps by setting QoS flags?) So, if a user could hack their Surfbeam, they could probably bypass the bandwidth caps, or at least some of them. Perhaps Exede would notice eventually. Of course, doing so would surely violate the Exede TOS. If you're renting the modem, like I am, hacking a device you don't own might also subject you to criminal penalties. Needless to say, I don't plan to hack the SurfBeam. But it's been hacked before. So, this is a device that lives in people's homes and is antagonistic to them by design. weird data throttling The way the Surfbeam reports data use back to Exede periodically and gets throttling configured has some odd effects sometimes. For example, the Surfbeam can be in throttled state left-over from the previous billing month. When a new billing month begins, it can remain throttled for some time (up to multiple hours) until it sends an update to Exede and they un-throttle it. Data downloaded at that time might still be counted as priority data even though it was throttled. I've seen some good indications of that happening, but am not sure yet. But, I've decided that the throttling doesn't matter for me. Why? ViaSat 1 has many spot beams, and the working-class beam I'm in (most of it is in eastern Kentucky) does not seem to get a lot of use between 7 am and 4:30 pm weekdays. Even when throttled, I often get 300 kb/s - 1 mb/s speeds during the day, which is not a lot worse than the ~2.5 mb/s peak when unthrottled. And that's the time when I want to use broadband -- when the sun is shining and I'm at home at work/play. I'm probably going to switch to a cheaper plan with less priority data, because the priority data is not buying me much. This is a big change from the old FAP which rendered the satellite no faster than dialup. a whole network in there Looking at the ports open on the Surfbeam, some very strange things turned up. First, there are not one, not two, but three separate IPs used by the device, and there are at least two and perhaps three distinct computers involved. There are a lot of flickering LEDs inside the box; a whole network in there. 192.168.100.1 is the satellite controller. It's a Linux box, fingerprinted as kernel 3.10 or so (so full of security holes presumably), and it's running thttpd/2.25b (doesn't seem to have any known holes). It seems to have ssh and snmp, but with some port filtering that prevents access. (Note that the above exploit video confirms that snmp is running.) Some machine parsable data is exposed at http://192.168.100.1/index.cgi?page=modemStatusData and http://192.168.100.1/index.cgi?page=triaStatusData. (See (SurfStat program) 192.168.1.1 is the wifi router. It has a dns server, an icslap proxy, and nmap thinks it's Linux 3.x with Synology DiskStation Manager (probably the latter is a false positive?) It has its own separate web server for configuration, which is not thttpd. I'm fairly sure this is a separate processor from the other IP address. 192.168.100.2 responds to ICMP, but has no open ports at all. However, it seems to have filtered ssh, telnet, msrpc, microsoft-ds, and port 8090 (probably http), so perhaps it's running all that stuff. This one is definitely a separate processor, located in the Satellite dish's TRIA (transmit receive integrated assembly). Verified by disconnecting the dish's coax cable and being unable to ping it. lack of source code for GPLed software Exede did not provide anything to me about the GPL licensed source code on the Surfbeam 2. I'm not sure if they're legally required to do so in my case, since they're renting it to me? But, they do let you buy the device too, so it's interesting that nothing mentions the licenses of its software and where to get the source code. I'll try to buy it and ask for the source code eventually. power use The Surfbeam pulls as much power as two beefy laptops, but it is beaming signals thousands of miles into space, so I give it a bit of a pass. I want to find a way to power it from DC power, but have not had any success with that so far, so am wasting more power to run it on an inverter. Its power supply is rated at 30v and 2.5 amps. Interestingly, I've seen a photo of another Surfbeam power supply that only pulls 1.5 amps. This and a different case with fewer (external) LEDs makes me think perhaps the installer stuck me with an old and less efficient version. Maybe they integrated some of those processors into a single board in a new version and perhaps made it waste less power as heat. Mine gets pretty warm. I'm currently only able to run it approximately one hour per hour of sun collected by the house. Still on dialup the rest of the time. With the ability to get on broadband when dialup is being painful, being on dialup the rest of the time is perfectly ok. Of course it helps that with tools like git-annex, I'm very well tuned to popping up onto broadband briefly and making it count.

Russ Allbery: Review: Necessity

Review: Necessity, by Jo Walton
Series: Thessaly #3
Publisher: Tor
Copyright: July 2016
ISBN: 0-7653-7902-3
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 331
Athena's experiment with a city (now civilization) modeled after Plato's Republic continues, but in a form that she would not have anticipated, and in a place rather far removed from its origins. But despite new awareness of the place and role of gods, a rather dramatic relocation, and unanticipated science-fiction complications, it continues in much the same style as in The Just City: thoughtful, questioning debate, a legal and social system that works surprisingly well, and a surprising lack of drama. At least, that is, until the displaced cities are contacted by the mainstream of humanity, and Athena goes unexpectedly missing. The latter event turns out to have much more to do with the story than the former, and I regret that. Analyzing mainline human civilization and negotiating the parameters of a very odd first contact would have, at least in my opinion, lined up a bit better with the strengths of this series. Instead, the focus is primarily on metaphysics, and the key climactic moment in those metaphysics is rather mushy and incoherent compared to the sharp-edged analysis Walton's civilization is normally capable of. Not particularly unexpected, as metaphysics of this sort are notoriously tricky to approach via dialectical logic, but it was a bit of a letdown. Much of this book deals with Athena's disappearance and its consequences (including the title), and it wasn't bad, but it wanders a bit into philosophical musings on the nature of gods. Necessity is a rather odd book, and I think anyone who started here would be baffled, but it does make a surprising amount of sense in the context of the series. Skipping ahead to here seems like a truly bad idea, but reading the entire series (relatively closely together) does show a coherent philosophical, moral, and social arc. The Just City opens with Apollo confronted by the idea of individual significance: what does it mean to treat other people as one's equals in an ethical sense, even if they aren't on measures of raw power? The Thessaly series holds to that theme throughout and follows its implications. Many of the bizarre things that happen in this series seem like matter-of-fact outcomes once you're engrossed in the premises and circumstances at the time. Necessity adds a surprising amount of more typical science fiction trappings, but they turn out to be ancillary to the story. What matters is considered action, trying to be your best self, and the earnest efforts of a society to put those principles first. And that's the strength of the whole series, including Necessity: I like these people, I like how they think, and I enjoy spending time with them, almost no matter what they're doing. As with the previous books, we get interwoven chapters from different viewpoints, this time from three primary characters plus some important "guest" chapters. As with the previous books, the viewpoint characters are different again, mostly a generation younger, and I had to overcome my initial disappointment at not hearing the same voices. But Walton is excellent at characterization. I really like this earnest, thoughtful, oddly-structured society that always teeters on the edge of being hopelessly naive and trusting but is self-aware enough to never fall in. By the end of the book, I liked this round of characters nearly as much as I liked the previous rounds (although I've still never liked a character in these books as well as I liked Simmea). I think one incomplete but important way to sum up the entire Thessaly series is that it's a trilogy of philosophical society-building on top of the premise of a universal love for and earnest, probing, thoughtful analysis of philosophy. Walton's initial cheat is to use an deus ex machina to jumpstart such a society from a complex human world that would be unlikely to provide enough time or space for it to build its own separate culture and tradition. I think the science-fiction trick is required to make this work real-world societies that try this end up having to spend so much of their energy fighting intrusion from the outside and diffusion into the surrounding culture that they don't have the same room to avoid conformity and test and argue against their own visions. Necessity is not at all the conclusion of that experiment I would expect, but it won me over, and I think it worked, even if a few bits of it felt indulgent. Most importantly for that overall project, this series is generational, and Necessity shows how it would feel to grow up deep inside it, seeing evolution on top of a base structure that is ubiquitous and ignored. Even the generation in The Philosopher Kings wasn't far enough removed to support that; Necessity is, and in a way this book shows how distinctly different and even alien human culture can become when it has space to evolve on top of different premises. I enjoyed the moments of small surprise, where characters didn't react the way that I'd expect for reasons now buried generations-deep in their philosophical foundations. This book will not win you over if you didn't already like the series, and I suspect it will lose a few people who read the previous two books. The plot structure is a little strange, the metaphysics are a touch strained, and the ending is, well, not quite the payoff that I was hoping for, although it's thematically appropriate and grew on me after a few days of thinking it over. But I got more Socrates, finally, who is as delightful as always and sorely needed to add some irreverence and contrariness to the the mix. And I got to read more about practical, thoughtful people who are trying hard to do their best, to be their best selves, and to analyze and understand the world. There's something calming, delightful, and beautifully optimistic about their approach, and I'm rather sad to not have more of it to read. Rating: 7 out of 10

Next.

Previous.