Search Results: "reg"

1 September 2025

Birger Schacht: Status update, August 2025

Due to the freeze I did not do that many uploads in the last few months, so there were various new releases I packaged once Trixie was released. Regarding the release of Debian 13, Trixie, I wrote a small summary of the changes in my packages. I uploaded an unreleased version of cage to experimental, to prepare for the transition to wlroots-0.19. Both sway and labwc already had packages in experimental that depended on the new wlroots version. When the transition happened, I uploaded the cage version to unstable, as well as labwc 0.9.1 and sway 1.11. I updated Most of the packages I uploaded using git-debpush, some of them could not be uploaded this way due to upstream using git submodules (this is 1107219). I also created 1112040 - git-debpush: should also say which tag it created and 1111504 - git-debpush: pristine-tar check warns about pristine-tar data thats not present (which is already fixed). I uploaded wayback 0.2 to NEW, where it is waiting for review, (ITP). In my dayjob I added extended the place lookup form of apis-core-rdf to allow searching places and selecting them on a map using leaflet and the nominatim API. Another issue I worked on was about highlighting those inputs of our generic list filter that are used to filter the results. I released a couple of bugfix releases for the v0.50 release, then v0.51 and two bugfix releases and then v0.52 and another couple of bugfix releases. v0.53 will land in a couple of days. I also released v0.6.2 of apis-highlighter-ng, which is sort of a plugin for apis-core-rdf, that allows to highlight parts of a text and link them to whatever Django object (in our case relations).

Russ Allbery: Review: Regenesis

Review: Regenesis, by C.J. Cherryh
Series: Cyteen #2
Publisher: DAW
Copyright: January 2009
ISBN: 0-7564-0592-0
Format: Mass market
Pages: 682
The main text below is an edited version of my original review of Regensis written on 2012-12-21. Additional comments from my re-read are after the original review. Regenesis is a direct sequel to Cyteen, picking up very shortly after the end of that book and featuring all of the same characters. It would be absolutely pointless to read this book without first reading Cyteen; all of the emotional resonance and world-building that make Regensis work are done there, and you will almost certainly know whether you want to read it after reading the first book. Besides, Cyteen is one of the best SF novels ever written and not the novel to skip. Because this is such a direct sequel, it's impossible to provide a good description of Regenesis without spoiling at least characters and general plot developments from Cyteen. So stop reading here if you've not yet read the previous book. I've had this book for a while, and re-read Cyteen in anticipation of reading it, but I've been nervous about it. One of the best parts of Cyteen is that Cherryh didn't belabor the ending, and I wasn't sure what part of the plot could be reasonably extended. Making me more nervous was the back-cover text that framed the novel as an investigation of who actually killed the first Ari, a question that was fairly firmly in the past by the end of Cyteen and that neither I nor the characters had much interest in answering. Cyteen was also a magical blend of sympathetic characters, taut tension, complex plotting, and wonderful catharsis, the sort of lightning in a bottle that can rarely be caught twice. I need not have worried. If someone had told me that Regenesis was another 700 pages of my favorite section of Cyteen, I would have been dubious. But that's exactly what it is. And the characters only care about Ari's murderer because it comes up, fairly late in the novel, as a clue in another problem. Ari and Justin are back in the safe laboratory environment of Reseune, safe now that politics are not trying to kill or control them. Yanni has taken over administration. There is a general truce, and even some deeper agreement. Everyone can take a breath and relax, albeit with the presence of Justin's father Jordan as an ongoing irritant. But broader Union politics are not stable: there is an election in progress for the Defense councilor that may break the tenuous majority in favor of Reseune and the Science Directorate, and Yanni is working out a compromise to gain more support by turning a terraforming project loose on a remote world. As the election and the politics heat up, interpersonal relationships abruptly deteriorate, tensions with Jordan sharply worsen, and there may be moles in Reseune's iron-clad security. Navigating the crisis while keeping her chosen family safe will once again tax all of Ari's abilities. The third section of Cyteen, where Ari finally has the tools to take fate into her own hands and starts playing everyone off against each other, is one of my favorite sections of any book. If it was yours as well, Regenesis is another 700 pages of exactly that. As an extension and revisiting, it does lose a bit of immediacy and surprise from the original. Regenesis is also less concerned with the larger questions of azi society, the nature of thought and personality, loyalty and authority, and the best model for the development of human civilization. It's more of a political thriller. But it's a political thriller that recaptures much of the drama and tension of Cyteen and is full of exceptionally smart and paranoid people thinking through all angles of a problem, working fast on their feet, and successfully navigating tricky and treacherous political landscapes. And, like Cyteen but unlike others of Cherryh's novels I've read, it's a novel about empowerment, about seizing control of one's surroundings and effectively using all of the capability and leverage at one's fingertips. That gives it a catharsis that's almost as good as Cyteen. It's also, like its predecessor, a surprisingly authoritarian novel. I think it's in that, more than anything else in these books, that one sees the impact of the azi. Regenesis makes it clear that the story is set, not in a typical society, but inside a sort of corporation, with an essentially hierarchical governance structure. There are other SF novels set within corporations (Solitaire comes to mind), but normally they follow peons or at best mid-level personnel or field agents, or otherwise take the viewpoint of the employees or the exploited. When they follow the corporate leaders, the focus usually isn't down inside the organization, but out into the world, with the corporation as silent resources on which the protagonist can draw. Regenesis is instead about the leadership. It's about decisions about the future of humanity that characters feel they can make undemocratically (in part because they or their predecessors have effectively engineered the opinions of the democratic population), but it's also about how one manages and secures a top-down organization. Reseune is, as in the previous novel, a paranoid's suspicions come true; everyone is out to get everyone else, or at least might be, and the level of omnipresent security and threat forces a close parsing of alliances and motivations that elevates loyalty to the greatest virtue. In Cyteen, we had long enough with Ari to see the basic shape of her personality and her slight divergences from her predecessor, but her actions are mostly driven by necessity. Regenesis gives us more of a picture of what she's like when her actions aren't forced, and here I think Cherryh manages a masterpiece of subtle characterization. Ari has diverged substantially from her predecessor without always realizing, and those divergences are firmly grounded in the differences she found or created between her life and the first Ari's. She has friends, confidents, and a community, which combined with past trauma has made her fiercely, powerfully protective. It's that protective instinct that weaves the plot together. So many of the events of Cyteen and Regenesis are driven by people's varying reactions to trauma. If you, like me, loved the last third of Cyteen, read this, because Regenesis is more of exactly that. Cherryh finds new politics, new challenges, and a new and original plot within the same world and with the same characters, but it has the same feel of maneuvering, analysis, and decisive action. You will, as with Cyteen have to be comfortable with pages of internal monologue from people thinking through all sides of a problem. If you didn't like that in the previous book, avoid this one; if you loved it, here's the sequel you didn't know you were waiting for. Original rating: 9 out of 10

Some additional thoughts after re-reading Regenesis in 2025: Cyteen mostly held up to a re-reading and I had fond memories of Regenesis and hoped that it would as well. Unfortunately, it did not. I think I can see the shape of what I enjoyed the first time I read it, but I apparently was in precisely the right mood for this specific type of political power fantasy. I did at least say that you have to be comfortable with pages of internal monologue, but on re-reading, there was considerably more of that than I remembered and it was quite repetitive. Ari spends most of the book chasing her tail, going over and around and beside the same theories that she'd already considered and worrying over the nuances of every position. The last time around, I clearly enjoyed that; this time, I found it exhausting and not very well-written. The political maneuvering is not that deep; Ari just shows every minutia of her analysis. Regenesis also has more about the big questions of how to design a society and the role of the azi than I had remembered, but I'm not sure those discussions reach any satisfying conclusions. The book puts a great deal of effort into trying to convince the reader that Ari is capable of designing sociological structures that will shape Union society for generations to come through, mostly, manipulation of azi programming (deep sets is the term used in the book). I didn't find this entirely convincing the first time around, and I was even less convinced in this re-read. Human societies are a wicked problem, and I don't find Cherryh's computer projections any more convincing than Asimov's psychohistory. Related, I am surprised, in retrospect, that the authoritarian underpinnings of this book didn't bother me more on my first read. They were blatantly obvious on the second read. This felt like something Cherryh put into these books intentionally, and I think it's left intentionally ambiguous whether the reader is supposed to agree with Ari's goals and decisions, but I was much less in the mood on this re-read to read about Ari making blatantly authoritarian decisions about the future of society simply because she's smart and thinks she, unlike others, is acting ethically. I say this even though I like Ari and mostly enjoyed spending time in her head. But there is a deep fantasy of being able to reprogram society at play here that looks a lot nastier from the perspective of 2025 than apparently it did to me in 2012. Florian and Catlin are still my favorite characters in the series, though. I find it oddly satisfying to read about truly competent bodyguards, although like all of the azi they sit in an (I think intentionally) disturbing space of ambiguity between androids and human slaves. The somewhat too frank sexuality from Cyteen is still present in Regenesis, but I found it a bit less off-putting, mostly because everyone is older. The authoritarian bent is stronger, since Regenesis is the story of Ari consolidating power rather than the underdog power struggle of Cyteen, and I had less tolerance for it on this re-read. The main problem with this book on re-read was that I bogged down about halfway through and found excuses to do other things rather than finish it. On the first read, I was apparently in precisely the right mood to read about Ari building a fortified home for all of her friends; this time, it felt like endless logistics and musings on interior decorating that didn't advance the plot. Similarly, Justin and Grant's slow absorption into Ari's orbit felt like a satisfying slow burn friendship in my previous reading and this time felt touchy and repetitive. I was one of the few avid defenders of Regenesis the first time I read it, and sadly I've joined the general reaction on a re-read: This is not a very good book. It's too long, chases its own tail a bit too much, introduces a lot more authoritarianism and doesn't question it as directly as I wanted, and gets even deeper into Cherryh's invented pseudo-psychology than Cyteen. I have a high tolerance for the endless discussions of azi deep sets and human flux thinking, and even I got bored this time through. On re-read, this book was nowhere near as good as I thought it was originally, and I would only recommend it to people who loved Cyteen and who really wanted a continuation of Ari's story, even if it is flabby and not as well-written. I have normally been keeping the rating of my first read of books, but I went back and lowered this one by two points to ensure it didn't show as high on my list of recommendations.

Re-read rating: 6 out of 10

31 August 2025

Otto Kek l inen: Managing procrastination and distractions

Featured image of post Managing procrastination and distractionsI ve noticed that procrastination and inability to be consistently productive at work has become quite common in recent years. This is clearly visible in younger people who have grown up with an endless stream of entertainment literally at their fingertips, on their mobile phone. It is however a trap one can escape from with a little bit of help. Procrastination is natural they say humans are lazy by nature after all. Probably all of us have had moments when we choose to postpone a task we know we should be working on, and instead spent our time doing secondary tasks (valorisation). Classic example is cleaning your apartment when you should be preparing for an exam. Some may procrastinate by not doing any work at all, and just watching YouTube videos or the like. To some people, typically those who are in their 20s and early in their career, procrastination can be a big challenge and finding the discipline to stick to planned work may need intentional extra effort, and perhaps even external help. During my 20+ year career in software development I ve been blessed to work with engineers of various backgrounds and each with their unique set of strengths. I have also helped many grow in various areas and overcome challenges, such as lack of intrinsic motivation and managing procrastination, and some might be able to get it in check with some simple advice.

Distance yourself from the digital distractions The key to avoiding distractions and procrastination is to make it inconvenient enough that you rarely do it. If continuing to do work is easier than switching to procrastination, work is more likely to continue. Tips to minimize digital distractions, listed in order of importance:
  1. Put your phone away. Just like when you go to a movie and turn off your phone for two hours, you can put the phone away completely when starting to work. Put the phone in a different room to ensure there is enough physical distance between you and the distraction, so it is impossible for you to just take a quick peek .
  2. Turn off notifications from apps. Don t let the apps call you like sirens luring Odysseus. You don t need to have all the notifications. You will see what the apps have when you eventually open them at a time you choose to use them.
  3. Remove or disable social media apps, games and the like from your phone and your computer. You can install them back when you have vacation. You can probably live without them for some time. If you can t remove them, explore your phone s screen time restriction features to limit your own access to apps that most often waste your time. These features are sometimes listed in the phone settings under digital health .
  4. Have a separate work computer and work phone. Having dedicated ones just for work that are void of all unnecessary temptations helps keep distance from the devices that could derail your focus.
  5. Listen to music. If you feel your brain needs a dose of dopamine to get you going, listening to music helps satisfy your brain s cravings while still being able to simultaneously keep working.
Doing a full digital detox is probably not practical, or not sustainable for an extended time. One needs apps to stay in touch with friends and family, and staying current in software development probably requires spending some time reading news online and such. However the tips above can help contain the distractions and minimize the spontaneous attention the distractions get. Some of the distractions may ironically be from the work itself, for example Slack notifications or new email notifications. I recommend turning them off for a couple of hours every day to have some distraction free time. It should be enough to check work mail a couple times a day. Checking them every hour probably does not add much overall value for the company unless your work is in sales or support where the main task itself is responding to emails.

Distraction free work environment Following the same principle of distancing yourself from distractions, try to use a dedicated physical space for working. If you don t have a spare room to dedicate to work, use a neighborhood caf or sign up for a local co-working space or start commuting to the company office to find a space to be focused on work in.

Break down tasks into smaller steps Sometimes people postpone tasks because they feel intimidated by the size or complexity of a task. In particular in software engineering problems may be vague and appear large until one reaches the breakthrough that brings the vision of how to tackle it. Breaking down problems into smaller more manageable pieces has many advantages in software engineering. Not only can it help with task-avoidance, but it can also make the problem easier to analyze, suggest solutions and test them and build a solid foundation to expand upon to ultimately later reach a full solution on the entire larger problem. Working on big problems as a chain of smaller tasks may also offer more opportunities to celebrate success on completing each subtask and help getting in a suitable cadence of solving a single thing, taking a break and then tackling the next issue. Breaking down a task into concrete steps may also help with getting more realistic time estimations. Sometimes procrastination isn t real someone could just be overly ambitious and feel bad about themselves for not doing an unrealistic amount of work.

Intrinsic motivation Of course, you should follow your passion when possible. Strive to pick a career that you enjoy, and thus maximize the intrinsic motivation you experience. However, even a dream job is still a job. Nobody is ever paid to do whatever they want. Any work will include at least some tasks that feel like a chore or otherwise like something you would not do unless paid to. Some would say that the definition of work itself is having to do things one would otherwise not do. You can only fully do whatever you want while on vacation or when you choose to not have a job at all. But if you have a job, you simply need to find the intrinsic motivation to do it. Simply put, some tasks are just unpleasant or boring. Our natural inclination is to avoid them in favor of more enjoyable activities. For these situations we just have to find the discipline to force ourselves to do the tasks and figuratively speaking whip ourselves into being motivated to complete the tasks.

Extrinsic motivation As the name implies, this is something people external to you need to provide, such as your employer or manager. If you have challenges in managing yourself and delivering results on a regular basis, somebody else needs to set goals and deadlines and keep you accountable for them. At the end of the day this means that eventually you will stop receiving salary or other payments unless you did your job. Forcing people to do something isn t nice, but eventually it needs to be done. It would not be fair for an employer to pay those who did their work the same salary as those who procrastinated and fell short on their tasks. If you work solo, you can also simulate the extrinsic motivation by publicly announcing milestones and deadlines to build up pressure for yourself to meet them and avoid publicly humiliation. It is a well-studied and scientifically proven phenomenon that most university students procrastinate at the start of assignments, and truly start working on them only once the deadline is imminent.

External help for addictions If procrastination is mainly due to a single distraction that is always on your mind, it may be a sign of an addiction. For example, constantly thinking about a computer game or staying up late playing a computer game, to the extent that it seriously affects your ability to work, may be a symptom of an addiction, and getting out of it may be easier with external help.

Discipline and structure Most of the time procrastination is not due to an addiction, but simply due to lack of self-discipline and structure. The good thing is that those things can be learned. It is mostly a matter of getting into new habits, which most young software engineers pick up more or less automatically while working along the more senior ones. Hopefully these tips can help you stay on track and ensure you do everything you are expected to do with clear focus, and on time!

29 August 2025

Ravi Dwivedi: Installing Debian With Btrfs and Encryption

Motivation On the 8th of August 2025 (a day before the Debian Trixie release), I was upgrading my personal laptop from Debian Bookworm to Trixie. It was a major update. However, the update didn t go smoothly, and I ran into some errors. From the Debian support IRC channel, I got to know that it would be best if I removed the texlive packages. However, it was not so easy to just remove texlive with a simple apt remove command. I had to remove the texlive packages from /usr/bin. Then I ran into other errors. Hours after I started the upgrade, I realized I preferred having my system as it was before, as I had to travel to Noida the next day. Needless to say, I wanted to go to sleep rather than fix my broken system. Only if I had a way to go back to my system before I started upgrading, it would have saved a lot of trouble for me. I ended up installing Trixie from scratch. It turns out that there was a way to recover to the state before the upgrade - using Timeshift to roll back the system to a state (in our example, it is the state before the upgrade process started) in the past. However, it needs the Btrfs filesystem with appropriate subvolumes, not provided by Debian installer in their guided partitioning menu. I have set it up after a few weeks of the above-mentioned incident. Let me demonstrate how it works.
Check the screenshot above. It shows a list of snapshots made by Timeshift. Some of them were made by me manually. Others were made by Timeshift automatically as per the routine - I have set up hourly backups and weekly backups etc. In the above-mentioned major update, I could have just taken a snapshot using Timeshift before performing the upgrade and could have rolled back to that snapshot when I found that I cannot spend more time on fixing my installation errors. Then I could just perform the upgrade later.

Installation In this tutorial, I will cover how I installed Debian with Btrfs and disk encryption, along with creating subvolumes @ for root and @home for /home so that I can use Timeshift to create snapshots. These snapshots are kept on the same disk where Debian is installed, and the use-case is to roll back to a working system in case I mess up something or to recover an accidentally deleted file. I went through countless tutorials on the Internet, but I didn t find a single tutorial covering both the disk encryption and the above-mentioned subvolumes (on Debian). Debian doesn t create the desired subvolumes by default, therefore the process requires some manual steps, which beginners may not be comfortable performing. Beginners can try distros such as Fedora and Linux Mint, as their installation includes Btrfs with the required subvolumes. Furthermore, it is pertinent to note that I used Debian Trixie s DVD iso on a real laptop (not a virtual machine) for my installation. Debian Trixie is the codename for the current stable version of Debian. Then I took screenshots in a virtual machine by repeating the process. Moreover, a couple of screenshots are from the installation I did on the real laptop. Let s start the tutorial by booting up the Debian installer.
The above screenshot shows the first screen we see on the installer. Since we want to choose Expert Install, we select Advanced Options in the screenshot above.
Let s select the Expert Install option in the above screenshot. It is because we want to create subvolumes after the installer is done with the partition, and only then proceed to installing the base system. Non-expert install modes proceed directly to installing the system right after creating partitions without pausing for us to create the subvolumes.
After selecting the Expert Install option, you will get the screen above. I will skip to partitioning from here and leave the intermediate steps such as choosing language, region, connecting to Wi-Fi, etc. For your reference, I did create the root user.
Let s jump right to the partitioning step. Select the Partition disks option from the menu as shown above.
Choose Manual.
Select your disk where you would like to install Debian.
Select Yes when asked for creating a new partition.
I chose the msdos option as I am not using UEFI. If you are using UEFI, then you need to choose the gpt option. Also, your steps will (slightly) differ from mine if you are using UEFI. In that case, you can watch this video by the YouTube channel EF Linux in which he creates an EFI partition. As he doesn t cover disk encryption, you can continue reading this post after following the steps corresponding to EFI.
Select the free space option as shown above.
Choose Create a new partition.
I chose the partition size to be 1 GB.
Choose Primary.
Choose Beginning.
Now, I got to this screen.
I changed mount point to /boot and turned on the bootable flag and then selected Done setting up the partition.
Now select free space.
Choose the Create a new partition option.
I made the partition size equal to the remaining space on my disk. I do not intend to create a swap partition, so I do not need more space.
Select Primary.
Select the Use as option to change its value.
Select physical volume for encryption.
Select Done setting up the partition.
Now select Configure encrypted volumes.
Select Yes.
Select Finish.
Selecting Yes will take a lot of time to erase the data. Therefore, I would say if you have hours for this step (in case your SSD is like 1 TB), then I would recommend selecting Yes. Otherwise, you could select No and compromise on the quality of encryption. After this, you will be asked to enter a passphrase for disk encryption and confirm it. Please do so. I forgot to take the screenshot for that step.
Now select that encrypted volume as shown in the screenshot above.
Here we will change a couple of options which will be shown in the next screenshot.
In the Use as menu, select btrfs journaling file system.
Now, click on the mount point option.
Change it to / - the root file system.
Select Done setting up the partition.
This is a preview of the paritioning after performing the above-mentioned steps.
If everything is okay, proceed with the Finish partitioning and write changes to disk option.
The installer is reminding us to create a swap partition. I proceeded without it as I planned to add swap after the installation.
If everything looks fine, choose yes for writing the changes to disks.
Now we are done with partitioning and we are shown the screen in the screenshot above. If we had not selected the Expert Install option, the installer would have proceeded to install the base system without asking us. However, we want to create subvolumes before proceeding to install the base system. This is the reason we chose Expert Install. Now press Ctrl + F2.
You will see the screen as in the above screenshot. It says Please press Enter to activate this console. So, let s press Enter.
After pressing Enter, we see the above screen.
The screenshot above shows the steps I performed in the console. I followed the already mentioned video by EF Linux for this part and adapted it to my situation (he doesn t encrypt the disk in his tutorial). First we run df -h to have a look at how our disk is partitioned. In my case, the output was:
# df -h
Filesystem              Size  Used  Avail   Use% Mounted on
tmpfs                   1.6G  344.0K  1.6G    0% /run
devtmpfs                7.7G       0  7.7G   0% /dev
/dev/sdb1               3.7G    3.7G    0   100% /cdrom
/dev/mapper/sda2_crypt  952.9G  5.8G  950.9G  0% /target
/dev/sda1               919.7M  260.0K  855.8M  0% /target/boot
df -h shows us that /dev/mapper/sda2_crypt and /dev/sda1 are mounted on /target and /target/boot respectively. Let s unmount them. For that, we run:
# umount /target
# umount /target/boot
Next, let s mount our root filesystem to /mnt.
# mount /dev/mapper/sda2_crypt /mnt
Let s go into the /mnt directory.
# cd /mnt
Upon listing the contents of this directory, we get:
/mnt # ls
@rootfs
Debian installer has created a subvolume @rootfs automatically. However, we need the subvolumes to be @ and @home. Therefore, let s rename the @rootfs subvolume to @.
/mnt # mv @rootfs @
Listing the contents of the directory again, we get:
/mnt # ls
@
We only one subvolume right now. Therefore, let us go ahead and create another subvolume @home.
/mnt # btrfs subvolume create @home
Create subvolume './@home'
If we perform ls now, we will see there are two subvolumes:
/mnt # ls
@ @home
Let us mount /dev/mapper/sda2_crypt to /target
/mnt # mount -o noatime,space_cache=v2,compress=zstd,ssd,discard=async,subvol=@ /dev/mapper/sda2_crypt /target/
Now we need to create a directory for /home.
/mnt # mkdir /target/home/
Now we mount the /home directory with subvol=@home option.
/mnt # mount -o noatime,space_cache=v2,compress=zstd,ssd,discard=async,subvol=@home /dev/mapper/sda2_crypt /target/home/
Now mount /dev/sda1 to /target/boot.
/mnt # mount /dev/sda1 /target/boot/
Now we need to add these options to the fstab file, which is located at /target/etc/fstab. Unfortunately, vim is not installed in this console. The only way to edit is Nano.
nano /target/etc/fstab
Edit your fstab file to look similar to the one in the screenshot above. I am pasting the fstab file contents below for easy reference.
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# systemd generates mount units based on this file, see systemd.mount(5).
# Please run 'systemctl daemon-reload' after making changes here.
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
/dev/mapper/sda2_crypt /        btrfs   noatime,compress=zstd,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvol=@ 0       0
/dev/mapper/sda2_crypt /home    btrfs   noatime,compress=zstd,ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvol=@home 0       0
# /boot was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=12842b16-d3b3-44b4-878a-beb1e6362fbc /boot           ext4    defaults        0       2
/dev/sr0        /media/cdrom0   udf,iso9660 user,noauto     0       0
Please double check the fstab file before saving it. In Nano, you can press Ctrl+O followed by pressing Enter to save the file. Then press Ctrl+X to quit Nano. Now, preview the fstab file by running
cat /target/etc/fstab
and verify that the entries are correct, otherwise you will booted to an unusable and broken system after the installation is complete. Next, press Ctrl + Alt + F1 to go back to the installer.
Proceed to Install the base system.
Screenshot of Debian installer installing the base system. Screenshot of Debian installer installing the base system.
I chose the default option here - linux-image-amd64. After this, the installer will ask you a few more questions. For desktop environment, I chose KDE Plasma. You can choose the desktop environment as per your liking. I will not cover the rest of the installation process and assume that you were able to install from here.

Post installation Let s jump to our freshly installed Debian system. Since I created a root user, I added the user ravi to the suoders file (/etc/sudoers) so that ravi can run commands with sudo. Follow this if you would like to do the same. Now we set up zram as swap. First, install zram-tools.
sudo apt install zram-tools
Now edit the file /etc/default/zramswap and make sure to have the following lines are uncommented:
ALGO=lz4
PERCENT=50
Now, run
sudo systemctl restart zramswap
If you run lsblk now, you should see the below-mentioned entry in the output:
zram0          253:0    0   7.8G  0 disk  [SWAP]
This shows us that zram has been activated as swap. Now we install timeshift, which can be done by running
sudo apt install timeshift
After the installation is complete, run Timeshift and schedule snapshots as you please. We are done now. Hope the tutorial was helpful. See you in the next post and let me know if you have any suggestions and questions on this tutorial.

Raju Devidas: Fixing Auto-Rotate screen orientation on PostmarketOS devices running MATE DE

Fixing Auto-Rotate screen orientation on PostmarketOS devices running MATE DEI have been using my Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2015) with PostmarketOS on and off since last year. It serves as a really good e-book reader with KOReader installed on it. Have tried phosh and plasma-mobile on it, works nicely but slows the device down heavily (2 GB RAM and old processor) so I use MATE Desktop environment on it.Lately I have started using this tablet along with my laptop as a second screen for work. And it has been working super nicely for that. The only issue being that I have to manually rotate the screen to landscape every time I reboot the device. It resets the screen orientation to portrait after a reboot. So I went through the pmOS wiki and a neat nice hack documented there worked very well for me. First we will test if the auto-rotate sensor works and if we can read values from it. So we install some basic necessary packages
$ sudo apk add xrandr xinput inotify-tools iio-sensor-proxy
Enable the service for iio-sensor-proxy
sudo rc-update add iio-sensor-proxy
Reboot the device. Now in the device terminal start the sensor monitor-sensor
user@samsung-gt58 ~> monitor-sensor
    Waiting for iio-sensor-proxy to appear
+++ iio-sensor-proxy appeared
=== Has accelerometer (orientation: normal, tilt: vertical)
=== Has ambient light sensor (value: 5.000000, unit: lux)
=== No proximity sensor
=== No compass
    Light changed: 14.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: left-up
    Tilt changed: tilted-down
    Light changed: 12.000000 (lux)
    Tilt changed: vertical
    Light changed: 13.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 11.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 13.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: normal
    Light changed: 5.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 6.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 5.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: right-up
    Light changed: 3.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 4.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 5.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 12.000000 (lux)
    Tilt changed: tilted-down
    Light changed: 19.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: bottom-up
    Tilt changed: vertical
    Light changed: 1.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 2.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 4.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: right-up
    Tilt changed: tilted-down
    Light changed: 11.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: normal
    Tilt changed: vertical
    Tilt changed: tilted-down
    Light changed: 18.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 21.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 22.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 19.000000 (lux)
    Accelerometer orientation changed: left-up
    Light changed: 17.000000 (lux)
    Tilt changed: vertical
    Light changed: 14.000000 (lux)
    Tilt changed: tilted-down
    Light changed: 16.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 18.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 17.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 18.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 17.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 18.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 17.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 18.000000 (lux)
    Light changed: 17.000000 (lux)
As you can see we can read the rotation values from the sensor as I am rotating the tablet in different orientations. Now we just need to use a script which changes the screen orientation using xrandr according to the sensor value.
#!/bin/sh
killall monitor-sensor
monitor-sensor > /dev/shm/sensor.log 2>&1 &
while inotifywait -e modify /dev/shm/sensor.log; do
  ORIENTATION=$(tail /dev/shm/sensor.log   grep &aposorientation&apos   tail -1   grep -oE &apos[^ ]+$&apos)
  case "$ORIENTATION" in
    normal)
      xrandr -o normal
      xinput set-prop "Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen" "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
      ;;
    left-up)
      xrandr -o left
      xinput set-prop "Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen" "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" 0 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
      ;;
    bottom-up)
      xrandr -o inverted
      xinput set-prop "Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen" "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" -1 0 1 0 -1 1 0 0 1
      ;;
    right-up)
      xrandr -o right
      xinput set-prop "Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen" "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 1
      ;;
  esac
done

auto-rotate-screen.sh

You need to replace the name of your touch input device in the script, you can get the name by using xinput --list , make sure to type this on the device terminal.
user@samsung-gt58 ~> xinput --list
* Virtual core pointer                    	id=2	[master pointer  (3)]
*   * Virtual core XTEST pointer              	id=4	[slave  pointer  (2)]
*   * Zinitix Capacitive TouchScreen          	id=10	[slave  pointer  (2)]
*   * Toad One Plus                           	id=12	[slave  pointer  (2)]
* Virtual core keyboard                   	id=3	[master keyboard (2)]
    * Virtual core XTEST keyboard             	id=5	[slave  keyboard (3)]
    * GPIO Buttons                            	id=6	[slave  keyboard (3)]
    * pm8941_pwrkey                           	id=7	[slave  keyboard (3)]
    * pm8941_resin                            	id=8	[slave  keyboard (3)]
    * Zinitix Capacitive TouchScreen          	id=11	[slave  keyboard (3)]
    * samsung-a2015 Headset Jack              	id=9	[slave  keyboard (3)]
In our script here we are using a Zinitix capacitive screen, it will be different for yours.Once your script is ready with the correct touchscreen name. Save and make the script executable. chmod +x auto-rotate-screen.sh Then test your script in your terminal ./auto-rotate.sh , stop the script using Ctrl + CNow we need add this script to auto-start. On MATE DE you can go to System > Control Center > Startup Applications, then click on Custom Add button, browse the script location, give it a name and then click on Add button. Now reboot the tablet/device, login and see the auto rotation working.
0:00
/0:09

  1. Auto-Rotation wiki article on PostmarketOS Wiki https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Auto-rotation

25 August 2025

Gunnar Wolf: The comedy of computation, or, how I learned to stop worrying and love obsolescence

This post is a review for Computing Reviews for The comedy of computation, or, how I learned to stop worrying and love obsolescence , a book published in Stanford University Press
The Comedy of Computation is not an easy book to review. It is a much enjoyable book that analyzes several examples of how being computational has been approached across literary genres in the last century how authors of stories, novels, theatrical plays and movies, focusing on comedic genres, have understood the role of the computer in defining human relations, reactions and even self-image. Mangrum structures his work in six thematic chapters, where he presents different angles on human society: How have racial stereotypes advanced in human imagination and perception about a future where we interact with mechanical or computational partners (from mechanical tools performing jobs that were identified with racial profiles to intelligent robots that threaten to control society); the genericity of computers and people can be seen as generic, interchangeable characters, often fueled by the tendency people exhibit to confer anthropomorphic qualities to inanimate objects; people s desire to be seen as truly authentic , regardless of what it ultimately means; romantic involvement and romance-led stories (with the computer seen as a facilitator for human-to-human romances, distractor away from them, or being itself a part of the couple); and the absurdity in antropomorphization, in comparing fundamentally different aspects such as intelligence and speed at solving mathematical operations, as well as the absurdity presented blatantly as such by several techno-utopian visions. But presenting this as a linear set of concepts that are presented does not do justice to the book. Throughout the sections of each chapter, a different work serves as the axis Novels and stories, Hollywood movies, Broadway plays, some covers for the Time magazine, a couple of presenting the would-be future, even a romantic comedy entirely written by bots . And for each of them, Benjamin Mangrum presents a very thorough analysis, drawing relations and comparing with contemporary works, but also with Shakespeare, classical Greek myths, and a very long etc tera. This book is hard to review because of the depth of work the author did: Reading it repeatedly made me look for other works, or at least longer references for them. Still, despite being a work with such erudition, Mangrum s text is easy and pleasant to read, without feeling heavy or written in an overly academic style. I very much enjoyed reading this book. It is certainly not a technical book about computers and society in any way; it is an exploration of human creativity and our understanding of the aspects the author has found as central to understanding the impact of computing on humankind. However, there is one point I must mention before closing: I believe the editorial decision to present the work as a running text, with all the material conceptualized as footnotes presented as a separate, over 50 page long final chapter, detracts from the final result. Personally, I enjoy reading the footnotes because they reveal the author s thought processes, even if they stray from the central line of thought. Even more, given my review copy was a PDF, I could not even keep said chapter open with one finger, bouncing back and forth. For all purposes, I missed out on the notes; now that I finished reading and stumbled upon that chapter, I know I missed an important part of the enjoyment.

20 August 2025

Antoine Beaupr : Encrypting a Debian install with UKI

I originally setup a machine without any full disk encryption, then somehow regretted it quickly after. My original reasoning was that this was a "play" machine so I wanted as few restrictions on accessing the machine as possible, which meant removing passwords, mostly. I actually ended up having a user password, but disabled the lock screen. Then I started using the device to manage my photo collection, and suddenly there was a lot of "confidential" information on the device that I didn't want to store in clear text anymore.

Pre-requisites So, how does one convert an existing install from plain text to full disk encryption? One way is to backup to an external drive, re-partition everything and copy things back, but that's slow and boring. Besides, cryptsetup has a cryptsetup-reencrypt command, surely we can do this in place? Having not set aside enough room for /boot, I briefly considered a "encrypted /boot" configuration and conversion (e.g. with this guide) but remembered grub's support for this is flaky, at best, so I figured I would try something else. Here, I'm going to guide you through how I first converted from grub to systemd-boot then to UKI kernel, then re-encrypt my main partition. Note that secureboot is disabled here, see further discussion below.

systemd-boot and Unified Kernel Image conversion systemd folks have been developing UKI ("unified kernel image") to ship kernels. The way this works is the kernel and initrd (and UEFI boot stub) in a single portable executable that lives in the EFI partition, as opposed to /boot. This neatly solves my problem, because I already have such a clear-text partition and won't need to re-partition my disk to convert. Debian has started some preliminary support for this. It's not default, but I found this guide from Vasudeva Kamath which was pretty complete. Since the guide assumes some previous configuration, I had to adapt it to my case. Here's how I did the conversion to both systemd-boot and UKI, all at once. I could have perhaps done it one at a time, but doing both at once works fine. Before your start, make sure secureboot is disabled, see the discussion below.
  1. install systemd tools:
    apt install systemd-ukify systemd-boot
    
  2. Configure systemd-ukify, in /etc/kernel/install.conf:
    layout=uki
    initrd_generator=dracut
    uki_generator=ukify
    
    TODO: it doesn't look like this generates a initrd with dracut, do we care?
  3. Configure the kernel boot arguments with the following in /etc/kernel/uki.conf:
    [UKI]
    Cmdline=@/etc/kernel/cmdline
    
    The /etc/kernel/cmdline file doesn't actually exist here, and that's fine. Defaults are okay, as the image gets generated from your current /proc/cmdline. Check your /etc/default/grub and /proc/cmdline if you are unsure. You'll see the generated arguments in bootctl list below.
  4. Build the image:
    dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-$(uname -r)
    
  5. Check the boot options:
    bootctl list
    
    Look for a Type #2 (.efi) entry for the kernel.
  6. Reboot:
    reboot
    
You can tell you have booted with systemd-boot because (a) you won't see grub and (b) the /proc/cmdline will reflect the configuration listed in bootctl list. In my case, a systemd.machine_id variable is set there, and not in grub (compare with /boot/grub/grub.cfg). By default, the systemd-boot loader just boots, without a menu. You can force the menu to show up by un-commenting the timeout line in /boot/efit/loader/loader.conf, by hitting keys during boot (e.g. hitting "space" repeatedly), or by calling:
systemctl reboot --boot-loader-menu=0
See the systemd-boot(7) manual for details on that. I did not go through the secureboot process, presumably I had already disabled secureboot. This is trickier: because one needs a "special key" to sign the UKI image, one would need the collaboration of debian.org to get this working out of the box with the keys shipped onboard most computers. In other words, if you want to make this work with secureboot enabled on your computer, you'll need to figure out how to sign the generated images before rebooting here, because otherwise you will break your computer. Otherwise, follow the following guides:

Re-encrypting root filesystem Now that we have a way to boot an encrypted filesystem, we can switch to LUKS for our filesystem. Note that you can probably follow this guide if, somehow, you managed to make grub work with your LUKS setup, although as this guide shows, you'd need to downgrade the cryptographic algorithms, which seems like a bad tradeoff. We're using cryptsetup-reencrypt for this which, amazingly, supports re-encrypting devices on the fly. The trick is it needs free space at the end of the partition for the LUKS header (which, I guess, makes it a footer), so we need to resize the filesystem to leave room for that, which is the trickiest bit. This is a possibly destructive behavior. Be sure your backups are up to date, or be ready to lose all data on the device. We assume 512 byte sectors here. Check your sector size with fdisk -l and adjust accordingly.
  1. Before you perform the procedure, make sure requirements are installed:
    apt install cryptsetup systemd-cryptsetup cryptsetup-initramfs
    
    Note that this requires network access, of course.
  2. Reboot in a live image, I like GRML but any Debian live image will work, possibly including the installer
  3. First, calculate how many sectors to free up for the LUKS header
    qalc> 32Mibyte / ( 512 byte )
      (32 mebibytes) / (512 bytes) = 65536
    
  4. Find the sector sizes of the Linux partitions:
    fdisk  -l /dev/nvme0n1   awk '/filesystem/   print $1 " " $4  '  
    
    For example, here's an example with a /boot and / filesystem:
    $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1   awk '/filesystem/   print $1 " " $4  '
    /dev/nvme0n1p2 999424
    /dev/nvme0n1p3 3904979087
    
  5. Substract 1 from 2:
    qalc> set precision 100
    qalc> 3904979087 - 65536
    
    Or, last step and this one, in one line:
    fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1   awk '/filesystem/   print $1 " " $4 - 65536  '
    
  6. Recheck filesystem:
    e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p2
    
  7. Resize filesystem:
    resize2fs /dev/nvme0n1p2 $(fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1   awk '/nvme0n1p2/   print $4 - 65536  ')s
    
    Notice the trailing s here: it makes resize2fs interpret the number as a 512 byte sector size, as opposed to the default (4k blocks).
  8. Re-encrypt filesystem:
    cryptsetup reencrypt --encrypt /dev/nvme0n1p2 --resize-device-size=32M
    
    This is it! This is the most important step! Make sure your laptop is plugged in and try not to interrupt it. This can, apparently, be resumed without problem, but I'd hate to show you how. This will show progress information like:
    Progress:   2.4% ETA 23m45s,      53GiB written, speed   1.3 GiB/s
    
    Wait until the ETA has passed.
  9. Open and mount the encrypted filesystem and mount the EFI system partition (ESP):
    cryptsetup open /dev/nvme0n1p2 crypt
    mount /dev/mapper/crypt /mnt
    mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 /mnt/boot/efi
    
    If this fails, now is the time to consider restoring from backups.
  10. Enter the chroot
    for fs in proc sys dev ; do
      mount --bind /$fs /mnt/$fs
    done
    chroot /mnt
    
    Pro tip: this can be done in one step in GRML with:
    grml-chroot /mnt bash
    
  11. Generate a crypttab:
    echo crypt_dev_nvme0n1p2 UUID=$(blkid -o value -s UUID /dev/nvme0n1p2) none luks,discard >> /etc/crypttab
    
  12. Adjust root filesystem in /etc/fstab, make sure you have a line like this:
    /dev/mapper/crypt_dev-nvme0n1p2 /               ext4    errors=remount-ro 0       1
    
    If you were already using a UUID entry for this, there's nothing to change!
  13. Configure the root filesystem in the initrd:
    echo root=/dev/mapper/crypt_dev_nvme0n1p2 > /etc/kernel/cmdline
    
  14. Regenerate UKI:
    dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-$(uname -r)
    
    Be careful here! systemd-boot inherits the command line from the system where it is generated, so this will possibly feature some unsupported commands from your boot environment. In my case GRML had a couple of those, which broke the boot. It's still possible to workaround this issue by tweaking the arguments at boot time, that said.
  15. Exit chroot and reboot
    exit
    reboot
    
Some of the ideas in this section were taken from this guide but was mostly rewritten to simplify the work. My guide also avoids the grub hacks or a specific initrd system (as the guide uses initramfs-tools and grub, while I, above, switched to dracut and systemd-boot). RHEL also has a similar guide, perhaps even better. Somehow I have made this system without LVM at all, which simplifies things a bit (as I don't need to also resize the physical volume/volume groups), but if you have LVM, you need to tweak this to also resize the LVM bits. The RHEL guide has some information about this.

Sven Hoexter: Istio: Connect via a VirtualService to External IP Addresses

Rant - I've a theory about istio: It feels like a software designed by people who hate the IT industry and wanted revenge. So they wrote a software with so many odd points of traffic interception (e.g. SNI based traffic re-routing) that's completely impossible to debug. If you roll that out into an average company you completely halt the IT operations for something like a year. On topic: I've two endpoints (IP addresses serving HTTPS on a none standard port) outside of kubernetes, and I need some rudimentary balancing of traffic. Since istio is already here one can levarage that, combining the resource kinds ServiceEntry, DestinationRule and VirtualService to publish a service name within the istio mesh. Since we do not have host names and DNS for those endpoint IP addresses we need to rely on istio itself to intercept the DNS traffic and deliver a virtual IP address to access the service. The sample given here leverages the exportTo configuration to make the service name only available in the same namespace. If you need broader access remove or adjust that. As usual in kubernetes you can resolve the name also as FQDN, e.g. acme-service.mynamespace.svc.cluster.local.
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: ServiceEntry
metadata:
  name: acme-service
spec:
  hosts:
    - acme-service
  ports:
    - number: 12345
      name: acmeglue
      protocol: HTTPS
  resolution: STATIC
  location: MESH_EXTERNAL
  # limit the availability to the namespace this resource is applied to
  # if you need cross namespace access remove all the  exportTo s in here
  exportTo:
    - "."
  # use  endpoints:  in this setup,  addreses:  did not work
  endpoints:
    # region1
    - address: 192.168.0.1
      ports:
        acmeglue: 12345
    # region2
     - address: 10.60.48.50
       ports:
        acmeglue: 12345
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: DestinationRule
metadata:
  name: acme-service
spec:
  host: acme-service
  # limit the availability to the namespace this resource is applied to
  exportTo:
    - "."
  trafficPolicy:
    loadBalancer:
      simple: LEAST_REQUEST
    connectionPool:
      tcp:
        tcpKeepalive:
          # We have GCP service attachments involved with a 20m idle timeout
          # https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/about-vpc-hosted-services#nat-subnets-other
          time: 600s
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
  name: acme-service
spec:
  hosts:
    - acme-service
  # limit the availability to the namespace this resource is applied to
  exportTo:
    - "."
  http:
  - route:
    - destination:
        host: acme-service
    retries:
      attempts: 2
      perTryTimeout: 2s
      retryOn: connect-failure,5xx
---
# Demo Deployment, istio configuration is the important part
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: foobar
  labels:
    app: foobar
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: foobar
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: foobar
        # enable istio sidecar
        sidecar.istio.io/inject: "true"
      annotations:
        # Enable DNS capture and interception, IP resolved will be in 240.240/16
        # If you use network policies you've to allow egress to this range.
        proxy.istio.io/config:  
          proxyMetadata:
            ISTIO_META_DNS_CAPTURE: "true"
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: nginx
        image: nginx:latest
        ports:
        - containerPort: 80
Now we can exec into the deployed pod, do something like curl -vk https://acme-service:12345, and it will talk to one of the endpoints defined in the ServiceEntry via an IP address out of the 240.240/16 Class E network. Documentation
https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/
https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/service-entry/#ServiceEntry-Resolution
https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/#LoadBalancerSettings-SimpleLB
https://istio.io/latest/docs/ops/configuration/traffic-management/dns-proxy/#sidecar-mode

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppArmadillo 14.6.3-1 on CRAN: Minor Upstream Bug Fixes

armadillo image Armadillo is a powerful and expressive C++ template library for linear algebra and scientific computing. It aims towards a good balance between speed and ease of use, has a syntax deliberately close to Matlab, and is useful for algorithm development directly in C++, or quick conversion of research code into production environments. RcppArmadillo integrates this library with the R environment and language and is widely used by (currently) 1268 other packages on CRAN, downloaded 41 million times (per the partial logs from the cloud mirrors of CRAN), and the CSDA paper (preprint / vignette) by Conrad and myself has been cited 642 times according to Google Scholar. Conrad made three minor bug fix releases since the 4.6.0 release last month. We need to pace releases at CRAN so we do not immediately upload there on each upstream release and then CRAN also had the usual (and well-deserved) summer rest leading to a slight delay relative to the last upstream. The minor changes in the three releases are summarized below. All our releases are always available via the GitHub repo and hence also via r-universe, and still rigorously tested via our own reverse-dependency checks. We also note that the package once again passed with flying colours and no human intervention which remains impressive given the over 1200 reverse dependencies.

Changes in RcppArmadillo version 14.6.3-1 (2025-08-14)
  • Upgraded to Armadillo release 14.6.3 (Caffe Mocha)
    • Fix OpenMP related crashes in Cube::slice() on Arm64 CPUs

Changes in RcppArmadillo version 14.6.2-1 (2025-08-08) (GitHub Only)
  • Upgraded to Armadillo release 14.6.2 (Caffe Mocha)
    • Fix for corner-case speed regression in sum()
    • Better handling of OpenMP in omit_nan() and omit_nonfinite()

Changes in RcppArmadillo version 14.6.1-1 (2025-07-21) (GitHub Only)
  • Upgraded to Armadillo release 14.6.1 (Caffe Mocha)
    • Fix for speed regression in mean()
    • Fix for detection of compiler configuration
    • Use of pow optimization now optional

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is a diffstat report relative to previous release. More detailed information is on the RcppArmadillo page. Questions, comments etc should go to the rcpp-devel mailing list off the Rcpp R-Forge page.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds summit 2025 to take place in Vienna

We are extremely pleased to announce the upcoming Reproducible Builds summit, which will take place from October 28th 30th 2025 in the historic city of Vienna, Austria. This year, we are thrilled to host the eighth edition of this exciting event, following the success of previous summits in various iconic locations around the world, including Hamburg (2023 2024), Venice (2022), Marrakesh (2019), Paris (2018), Berlin (2017), Berlin (2016) and Athens (2015). If you re excited about joining us this year, please make sure to read the event page which has more details about the event and location. As in previous years, we will be sending invitations to all those who attended our previous summit events or expressed interest to do so. However, even if you do not receive a personal invitation, please do email the organizers and we will find a way to accommodate you.

About the event The Reproducible Builds Summit is a unique gathering that brings together attendees from diverse projects, united by a shared vision of advancing the Reproducible Builds effort. During this enriching event, participants will have the opportunity to engage in discussions, establish connections and exchange ideas to drive progress in this vital field. Our aim is to create an inclusive space that fosters collaboration, innovation and problem-solving. With your help, we will bring this (and several other areas) into life:
The main seminar room.

Schedule Although the exact content of the meeting will be shaped by the participants, the main goals will include:
  • Update & exchange about the status of reproducible builds in various projects.
  • Improve collaboration both between and inside projects.
  • Expand the scope and reach of reproducible builds to more projects.
  • Work together and hack on solutions.
  • Establish space for more strategic and long-term thinking than is possible in virtual channels.
  • Brainstorm designs on tools enabling users to get the most benefits from reproducible builds.
  • Discuss how reproducible builds will be usable and meaningful to users and developers alike.
Logs and minutes will be published after the meeting.

Location & date

Registration instructions Please reach out if you d like to participate in hopefully interesting, inspiring and intense technical sessions about reproducible builds and beyond! We look forward to what we anticipate to be yet another extraordinary event!

18 August 2025

Jonathan Dowland: Amiga redux

Matthew blogged about his Amiga CDTV project, a truly unique Amiga hack which also manages to be a novel Doom project (no mean feat: it's a crowded space) This re-awakened my dormant wish to muck around with my childhood Amiga some more. When I last wrote about it (four years ago ) I'd upgraded the disk drive emulator with an OLED display and rotary encoder. I'd forgotten to mention I'd also sourced a modern trapdoor RAM expansion which adds 2MiB of RAM. The Amiga can only see 1.5MiB1 of it at the moment, I need perform a mainboard modification to access the final 512kiB2, which means some soldering.
[Amiga Test Kit](https://github.com/keirf/Amiga-Stuff) showing 2MiB RAM Amiga Test Kit showing 2MiB RAM
What I had planned to do back then: replace the switch in the left button of the original mouse, which was misbehaving; perform the aformentioned mainboard mod; upgrade the floppy emulator wiring to a ribbon cable with plug-and-socket, for easier removal; fit an RTC chip to the RAM expansion board to get clock support in the OS. However much of that might be might be moot, because of two other mods I am considering, PiStorm I've re-considered the PiStorm accelerator mentioned in Matt's blog. Four years ago, I'd passed over it, because it required you to run Linux on a Raspberry Pi, and then an m68k emulator as a user-space process under Linux. I didn't want to administer another Linux system, and I'm generally uncomfortable about using a regular Linux distribution on SD storage over the long term. However in the intervening years Emu68, a bare-metal m68k emulator has risen to prominence. You boot the Pi straight into Emu68 without Linux in the middle. For some reason that's a lot more compelling to me. The PiStorm enormously expands the RAM visible to the Amiga. There would be no point in doing the mainboard mod to add 512k (and I don't know how that would interact with the PiStorm). It also can provide virtual hard disk devices to the Amiga (backed by files on the SD card), meaning the floppy emulator would be superfluous. Denise Mainboard I've just learned about a truly incredible project: the Denise Mini-ITX Amiga mainboard. It fitss into a Mini-ITX case (I have a suitable one spare already). Some assembly required. You move the chips from the original Amiga over to the Denise mainboard. It's compatible with the PiStorm (or vice-versa). It supports PC-style PS/2 keyboards (I have a Model M in the loft, thanks again Simon) and has a bunch of other modern conveniences: onboard RTC; mini-ITX power (I'll need something like a picoPSU too) It wouldn't support my trapdoor RAM card but it takes a 72-pin DIMM which can supply 2MiB of Chip RAM, and the PiStorm can do the rest (they're compatible3). No stock at the moment but if I could get my hands on this, I could build something that could permanently live on my desk.

  1. the Boobip board's 1.5MiB is "chip" RAM: accessible to the other chips on the mainboard, with access mediated by the AGNUS chip.
  2. the final 512kiB is "Fast" RAM: only accessible to the CPU, not mediated via Agnus.
  3. confirmation

Otto Kek l inen: Best Practices for Submitting and Reviewing Merge Requests in Debian

Featured image of post Best Practices for Submitting and Reviewing Merge Requests in DebianHistorically the primary way to contribute to Debian has been to email the Debian bug tracker with a code patch. Now that 92% of all Debian source packages are hosted at salsa.debian.org the GitLab instance of Debian more and more developers are using Merge Requests, but not necessarily in the optimal way. In this post I share what I ve found the best practice to be, presented in the natural workflow from forking to merging.

Why use Merge Requests? Compared to sending patches back and forth in email, using a git forge to review code contributions brings several benefits:
  • Contributors can see the latest version of the code immediately when the maintainer pushes it to git, without having to wait for an upload to Debian archives.
  • Contributors can fork the development version and easily base their patches on the correct version and help test that the software continues to function correctly at that specific version.
  • Both maintainer and other contributors can easily see what was already submitted and avoid doing duplicate work.
  • It is easy for anyone to comment on a Merge Request and participate in the review.
  • Integrating CI testing is easy in Merge Requests by activating Salsa CI.
  • Tracking the state of a Merge Request is much easier than browsing Debian bug reports tagged patch , and the cycle of submit review re-submit re-review is much easier to manage in the dedicated Merge Request view compared to participants setting up their own email plugins for code reviews.
  • Merge Requests can have extra metadata, such as Approved , and the metadata often updates automatically, such as a Merge Request being closed automatically when the Git commit ID from it is pushed to the target branch.
Keeping these benefits in mind will help ensure that the best practices make sense and are aligned with maximizing these benefits.

Finding the Debian packaging source repository and preparing to make a contribution Before sinking any effort into a package, start by checking its overall status at the excellent Debian Package Tracker. This provides a clear overview of the package s general health in Debian, when it was last uploaded and by whom, and if there is anything special affecting the package right now. This page also has quick links to the Debian bug tracker of the package, the build status overview and more. Most importantly, in the General section, the VCS row links to the version control repository the package advertises. Before opening that page, note the version most recently uploaded to Debian. This is relevant because nothing in Debian currently enforces that the package in version control is actually the same as the latest uploaded to Debian. Packaging source code repository links at tracker.debian.org Following the Browse link opens the Debian package source repository, which is usually a project page on Salsa. To contribute, start by clicking the Fork button, select your own personal namespace and, under Branches to include, pick Only the default branch to avoid including unnecessary temporary development branches. View after pressing Fork Once forking is complete, clone it with git-buildpackage. For this example repository, the exact command would be gbp clone --verbose git@salsa.debian.org:otto/glow.git. Next, add the original repository as a new remote and pull from it to make sure you have all relevant branches. Using the same fork as an example, the commands would be:
git remote add go-team https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/glow.git
gbp pull --verbose --track-missing go-team
The gbp pull command can be repeated whenever you want to make sure the main branches are in sync with the original repository. Finally, run gitk --all & to visually browse the Git history and note the various branches and their states in the two remotes. Note the style in comments and repository structure the project has and make sure your contributions follow the same conventions to maximize the chances of the maintainer accepting your contribution. It may also be good to build the source package to establish a baseline of the current state and what kind of binaries and .deb packages it produces. If using Debcraft, one can simply run debcraft build in the Git repository.

Submitting a Merge Request for a Debian packaging improvement Always start by making a development branch by running git checkout -b <branch name> to clearly separate your work from the main branch. When making changes, remember to follow the conventions you already see in the package. It is also important to be aware of general guidelines on how to make good Git commits. If you are not able to immediately finish coding, it may be useful to publish the Merge Request as a draft so that the maintainer and others can see that you started working on something and what general direction your change is heading in. If you don t finish the Merge Request in one sitting and return to it another day, you should remember to pull the Debian branch from the original Debian repository in case it has received new commits. This can be done easily with these commands (assuming the same remote and branch names as in the example above):
git fetch go-team
git rebase -i go-team/debian/latest
Frequent rebasing is a great habit to help keep the Git history linear, and restructuring and rewording your commits will make the Git history easier to follow and understand why the changes were made. When pushing improved versions of your branch, use git push --force. While GitLab does allow squashing, I recommend against it. It is better that the submitter makes sure the final version is a neat and clean set of commits that the receiver can easily merge without having to do any rebasing or squashing themselves. When ready, remove the draft status of the Merge Request and wait patiently for review. If the maintainer does not respond in several days, try sending an email to <source package name>@packages.debian.org, which is the official way to contact maintainers. You could also post a comment on the MR and tag the last few committers in the same repository so that a notification email is triggered. As a last resort, submit a bug report to the Debian bug tracker to announce that a Merge Request is pending review. This leaves a permanent record for posterity (or the Debian QA team) of your contribution. However, most of the time simply posting the Merge Request in Salsa is enough; excessive communication might be perceived as spammy, and someone needs to remember to check that the bug report is closed.

Respect the review feedback, respond quickly and avoid Merge Requests getting stale Once you get feedback, try to respond as quickly as possible. When people participating have everything fresh in their minds, it is much easier for the submitter to rework it and for the reviewer to re-review. If the Merge Request becomes stale, it can be challenging to revive it. Also, if it looks like the MR is only waiting for re-review but nothing happens, re-read the previous feedback and make sure you actually address everything. After that, post a friendly comment where you explicitly say you have addressed all feedback and are only waiting for re-review.

Reviewing Merge Requests This section about reviewing is not exclusive to Debian package maintainers anyone can contribute to Debian by reviewing open Merge Requests. Typically, the larger an open source project gets, the more help is needed in reviewing and testing changes to avoid regressions, and all diligently done work is welcome. As the famous Linus quote goes, given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow . On salsa.debian.org, you can browse open Merge Requests per project or for a whole group, just like on any GitLab instance. Reviewing Merge Requests is, however, most fun when they are fresh and the submitter is active. Thus, the best strategy is to ensure you have subscribed to email notifications in the repositories you care about so you get an email for any new Merge Request (or Issue) immediately when posted. Change notification settings from Global to Watch to get an email on new Merge Requests When you see a new Merge Request, try to review it within a couple of days. If you cannot review in a reasonable time, posting a small note that you intend to review it later will feel better to the submitter compared to not getting any response. Personally, I have a habit of assigning myself as a reviewer so that I can keep track of my whole review queue at https://salsa.debian.org/dashboard/merge_requests?reviewer_username=otto, and I recommend the same to others. Seeing the review assignment happen is also a good way to signal to the submitter that their submission was noted.

Reviewing commit-by-commit in the web interface Reviewing using the web interface works well in general, but I find that the way GitLab designed it is not ideal. In my ideal review workflow, I first read the Git commit message to understand what the submitter tried to do and why; only then do I look at the code changes in the commit. In GitLab, to do this one must first open the Commits tab and then click on the last commit in the list, as it is sorted in reverse chronological order with the first commit at the bottom. Only after that do I see the commit message and contents. Getting to the next commit is easy by simply clicking Next. Example review to demonstrate location of buttons and functionality When adding the first comment, I choose Start review and for the following remarks Add to review. Finally, I click Finish review and Submit review, which will trigger one single email to the submitter with all my feedback. I try to avoid using the Add comment now option, as each such comment triggers a separate notification email to the submitter.

Reviewing and testing on your own computer locally For the most thorough review, I pull the code to my laptop for local review with git pull <remote url> <branch name>. There is no need to run git remote add as pulling using a URL directly works too and saves from needing to clean up old remotes later. Pulling the Merge Request contents locally allows me to build, run and inspect the code deeply and review the commits with full metadata in gitk or equivalent.

Investing enough time in writing feedback, but not too much See my other post for more in-depth advice on how to structure your code review feedback. In Debian, I would emphasize patience, to allow the submitter time to rework their submission. Debian packaging is notoriously complex, and even experienced developers often need more feedback and time to get everything right. Avoid the temptation to rush the fix in yourself. In open source, Git credits are often the only salary the submitter gets. If you take the idea from the submission and implement it yourself, you rob the submitter of the opportunity to get feedback, try to improve and finally feel accomplished. Sure, it takes extra effort to give feedback, but the contributor is likely to feel ownership of their work and later return to further improve it. If a submission looks hopelessly low quality and you feel that giving feedback is a waste of time, you can simply respond with something along the lines of: Thanks for your contribution and interest in helping Debian. Unfortunately, looking at the commits, I see several shortcomings, and it is unlikely a normal review process is enough to help you finalize this. Please reach out to Debian Mentors to get a mentor who can give you more personalized feedback. There might also be contributors who just dump the code , ignore your feedback and never return to finalize their submission. If a contributor does not return to finalize their submission in 3-6 months, I will in my own projects simply finalize it myself and thank the contributor in the commit message (but not mark them as the author). Despite best practices, you will occasionally still end up doing some things in vain, but that is how volunteer collaboration works. We all just need to accept that some communication will inevitably feel like wasted effort, but it should be viewed as a necessary investment in order to get the benefits from the times when the communication led to real and valuable collaboration. Please just do not treat all contributors as if they are unlikely to ever contribute again; otherwise, your behavior will cause them not to contribute again. If you want to grow a tree, you need to plant several seeds.

Approving and merging Assuming review goes well and you are ready to approve, and if you are the only maintainer, you can proceed to merge right away. If there are multiple maintainers, or if you otherwise think that someone else might want to chime in before it is merged, use the Approve button to show that you approve the change but leave it unmerged. The person who approved does not necessarily have to be the person who merges. The point of the Merge Request review is not separation of duties in committing and merging the main purpose of a code review is to have a different set of eyeballs looking at the change before it is committed into the main development branch for all eternity. In some packages, the submitter might actually merge themselves once they see another developer has approved. In some rare Debian projects, there might even be separate people taking the roles of submitting, approving and merging, but most of the time these three roles are filled by two people either as submitter and approver+merger or submitter+merger and approver. If you are not a maintainer at all and do not have permissions to click Approve, simply post a comment summarizing your review and that you approve it and support merging it. This can help the maintainers review and merge faster.

Making a Merge Request for a new upstream version import Unlike many other Linux distributions, in Debian each source package has its own version control repository. The Debian sources consist of the upstream sources with an additional debian/ subdirectory that contains the actual Debian packaging. For the same reason, a typical Debian packaging Git repository has a debian/latest branch that has changes only in the debian/ subdirectory while the surrounding upstream files are the actual upstream files and have the actual upstream Git history. For details, see my post explaining Debian source packages in Git. Because of this Git branch structure, importing a new upstream version will typically modify three branches: debian/latest, upstream/latest and pristine-tar. When doing a Merge Request for a new upstream import, only submit one Merge Request for one branch: which means merging your new changes to the debian/latest branch. There is no need to submit the upstream/latest branch or the pristine-tar branch. Their contents are fixed and mechanically imported into Debian. There are no changes that the reviewer in Debian can request the submitter to do on these branches, so asking for feedback and comments on them is useless. All review, comments and re-reviews concern the content of the debian/latest branch only. It is not even necessary to use the debian/latest branch for a new upstream version. Personally, I always execute the new version import (with gbp import-orig --verbose --uscan) and prepare and test everything on debian/latest, but when it is time to submit it for review, I run git checkout -b import/$(dpkg-parsechangelog -SVersion) to get a branch named e.g. import/1.0.1 and then push that for review.

Reviewing a Merge Request for a new upstream version import Reviewing and testing a new upstream version import is a bit tricky currently, but possible. The key is to use gbp pull to automate fetching all branches from the submitter s fork. Assume you are reviewing a submission targeting the Glow package repository and there is a Merge Request from user otto s fork. As the maintainer, you would run the commands:
git remote add otto https://salsa.debian.org/otto/glow.git
gbp pull --verbose otto
If there was feedback in the first round and you later need to pull a new version for re-review, running gbp pull --force will not suffice, and this trick of manually fetching each branch and resetting them to the submitter s version is needed:
for BRANCH in pristine-tar upstream debian/latest
do
git checkout $BRANCH
git reset --hard origin/$BRANCH
git pull --force https://salsa.debian.org/otto/glow.git $BRANCH
done
Once review is done, either click Approve and let the submitter push everything, or alternatively, push all the branches you pulled locally yourself. In GitLab and other forges, the Merge Request will automatically be marked as Merged once the commit ID that was the head of the Merge Request is pushed to the target branch.

Please allow enough time for everyone to participate When working on Debian, keep in mind that it is a community of volunteers. It is common for people to do Debian stuff only on weekends, so you should patiently wait for at least a week so that enough workdays and weekend days have passed for the people you interact with to have had time to respond on their own Debian time. Having to wait may feel annoying and disruptive, but try to look at the upside: you do not need to do extra work simply while waiting for others. In some cases, that waiting can be useful thanks to the sleep on it phenomenon: when you yourself look at your own submission some days later with fresh eyes, you might notice something you overlooked earlier and improve your code change even without other people s feedback!

Contribute reviews! The last but not least suggestion is to make a habit of contributing reviews to packages you do not maintain. As we already see in large open source projects, such as the Linux kernel, they have far more code submissions than they can handle. The bottleneck for progress and maintaining quality becomes the reviews themselves. For Debian, as an organization and as a community, to be able to renew and grow new contributors, we need more of the senior contributors to shift focus from merely maintaining their packages and writing code to also intentionally interact with new contributors and guide them through the process of creating great open source software. Reviewing code is an effective way to both get tangible progress on individual development items and to transfer culture to a new generation of developers.

Why aren t 100% of all Debian source packages hosted on Salsa? As seen at trends.debian.net, more and more packages are using Salsa. Debian does not, however, have any policy about it. In fact, the Debian Policy Manual does not even mention the word Salsa anywhere. Adoption of Salsa has so far been purely organic, as in Debian each package maintainer has full freedom to choose whatever preferences they have regarding version control. I hope the trend to use Salsa will continue and more shared workflows emerge so that collaboration gets easier. To drive the culture of using Merge Requests and more, I drafted the Debian proposal DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request based Collaboration for Debian packages. If you are active in Debian and you think DEP-18 is beneficial for Debian, please give a thumbs up at dep-team/deps!21.

17 August 2025

C.J. Collier: The Very Model of a Patriot Online

It appears that the fragile masculinity tech evangelists have identified Debian as a community with boundaries which exclude them from abusing its members and they re so angry about it! In response to posts such as this, and inspired by Dr. Conway s piece, I ve composed a poem which, hopefully, correctly addresses the feelings of that crowd.
The Very Model of a Patriot Online
I am the very model of a modern patriot online,
My keyboard is my rifle and my noble cause is so divine.
I didn't learn my knowledge in a dusty college lecture hall,
But from the chans where bitter anonymity enthralls us all.
I spend a dozen hours every day upon my sacred quest,
To put the globo-homo narrative completely to the test.
My arguments are peer-reviewed by fellas in the comments section,
Which proves my every thesis is the model of complete perfection.
I m steeped in righteous anger that the libs call 'white fragility,'
For mocking their new pronouns and their lack of masculinity.
I m master of the epic troll, the comeback, and the searing snark,
A digital guerrilla who is fighting battles in the dark.
I know the secret symbols and the dog-whistles historical,
From Pepe the Frog to  Let s Go Brandon,  in order categorical;
In short, for fighting culture wars with rhetoric rhetorical,
I am the very model of a patriot polemical.
***
I stand for true expression, for the comics and the edgy clown,
Whose satire is too based for all the fragile folks in town.
They say my speech is 'violence' while my spirit they are trampling,
The way they try to silence me is really quite a startling sampling
Of 1984, which I've not read but thoroughly understand,
Is all about the tyranny that's gripping this once-blessed land.
My humor is a weapon, it s a razor-bladed, sharp critique,
(Though sensitive elites will call my masterpiece a form of  hate speech ).
They cannot comprehend my need for freedom from all consequence,
They call it 'hate,' I call it 'jokes,' they just don't have a lick of sense.
So when they call me  bigot  for the spicy memes I post pro bono,
I tell them their the ones who're cancelled, I'm the victim here, you know!
Then I can write a screed against the globalist cabal, you see,
And tell you every detail of their vile conspiracy.
In short, when I use logic that is flexible and personal,
I am the very model of a patriot controversial.
***
I'm very well acquainted with the scientific method, too,
It's watching lengthy YouTube vids until my face is turning blue.
I trust the heartfelt testimony of a tearful, blonde ex-nurse,
But what a paid fact-checker says has no effect and is perverse.
A PhD is proof that you've been brainwashed by the leftist mob,
While my own research on a meme is how I really do my job.
I know that masks will suffocate and vaccines are a devil's brew,
I learned it from a podcast host who used to sell brain-boosting goo.
He scorns the lamestream media, the CNNs and all the rest,
Whose biased reporting I've put fully to a rigorous test
By only reading headlines and confirming what I already knew,
Then posting my analysis for other patriots to view.
With every "study" that they cite from sources I can't stand to hear,
My own profound conclusions become ever more precisely clear.
In short, when I've debunked the experts with a confident "Says who?!",
I am the very model of a researcher who sees right through you.
***
But all these culture wars are just a sleight-of-hand, a clever feint,
To hide the stolen ballots and to cover up the moral taint
Of D.C. pizza parlors and of shipping crates from Wayfair, it s true,
It's all connected in a plot against the likes of me and you!
I've analyzed the satellite photography and watermarks,
I understand the secret drops, the cryptic Qs, the coded sparks.
The  habbening  is coming, friends, just give it two more weeks or three,
When all the traitors face the trials for their wicked treachery.
They say that nothing happened and the dates have all gone past, you see,
But that's just disinformation from the globalist enemy!
Their moving goalposts constantly, a tactic that is plain to see,
To wear us down and make us doubt the coming, final victory!
My mind can see the patterns that a simple sheep could never find,
The hidden puppet-masters who are poisoning our heart and mind.
In short, when I link drag queens to the price of gas and child-trafficking,
I am the very model of a patriot whose brain is quickening!
***
My pickup truck's a testament to everything that I hold dear,
With vinyl decals saying things the liberals all hate and fear.
The Gadsden flag is waving next to one that's blue and starkly thin,
To show my deep respect for law, except the feds who're steeped in sin.
There's Punisher and Molon Labe, so that everybody knows
I'm not someone to trifle with when push to final shoving goes.
I've got my tactical assault gear sitting ready in the den,
Awaiting for the signal to restore our land with my fellow men.
I practice clearing rooms at home when my mom goes out to the store,
A modern Minuteman who's ready for a civil war.
The neighbors give me funny looks, I see them whisper and take note,
They'll see what's what when I'm the one who's guarding checkpoints by their throat.
I am a peaceful man, of course, but I am also pre-prepared,
To neutralize the threats of which the average citizen's unscared.
In short, when my whole identity's a brand of tactical accessory,
You'll say a better warrior has never graced a Cabela's registry.
***
They say I have to tolerate a man who thinks he is a dame,
While feminists and immigrants are putting out my vital flame!
There taking all the jobs from us and giving them to folks who kneel,
And "woke HR" says my best jokes are things I'm not allowed to feel!
An Alpha Male is what I am, a lion, though I'm in this cubicle,
My life's frustrations can be traced to policies Talmudical.
They lecture me on privilege, I, who have to pay my bills and rent!
While they give handouts to the lazy, worthless, and incompetent!
My grandad fought the Nazis! Now I have to press a key for  one 
To get a call-rep I can't understand beneath the blazing sun
Of global, corporate tyranny that's crushing out the very soul
Of men like me, who've lost their rightful, natural, and just control!
So yes, I am resentful! And I'm angry! And I'm right to be!
They've stolen all my heritage and my masculinity!
In short, when my own failures are somebody else's evil plot,
I am the very model of the truest patriot we've got!
***
There putting chips inside of you! Their spraying things up in the sky!
They want to make you EAT THE BUGS and watch your very spirit die!
The towers for the 5G are a mind-control delivery tool!
To keep you docile while the children suffer in a grooming school!
The WEF, and Gates, and Soros have a plan they call the 'Great Reset,'
You'll own no property and you'll be happy, or you'll be in debt
To social credit overlords who'll track your every single deed!
There sterilizing you with plastics that they've hidden in the feed!
The world is flat! The moon is fake! The dinosaurs were just a lie!
And every major tragedy's a hoax with actors paid to cry!
I'M NOT INSANE! I SEE THE TRUTH! MY EYES ARE OPEN! CAN'T YOU SEE?!
YOU'RE ALL ASLEEP! YOU'RE COWARDS! YOU'RE AFRAID OF BEING TRULY FREE!
My heart is beating faster now, my breath is short, my vision's blurred,
From all the shocking truth that's in each single, solitary word!
I've sacrificed my life and friends to bring this message to the light, so...
You'd better listen to me now with all your concentrated might, ho!
***
For my heroic struggle, though it's cosmic and it's biblical,
Is waged inside the comments of a post that's algorithm-ical.
And still for all my knowledge that's both tactical and practical,
My mom just wants the rent I owe and says I'm being dramatical.

16 August 2025

Birger Schacht: Updates and additions in Debian 13 Trixie

Last week Debian 13 (Trixie) was released and there have been some updates and additions in the packages that I maintain, that I wanted to write about. I think they are not worth of being added to the release notes, but I still wanted to list some of the changes and some of the new packages.

sway Sway, the tiling Wayland compositor was version 1.7 in Bookworm. It was updated to version 1.10 (and 1.11 is already in experimental and waiting for an upload to unstable). This new version of sway brings, among a lot of other features, updated support for touchpad gestures and support for the ext-session-lock-v1 protocol, which allows for more robust and secure screen locking. The configuration snippet that activates the default sway background is now shipped in the sway-backgrounds package instead of being part of the sway package itself. The default menu application was changed from dmenu to wmenu. wmenu is a Wayland native alternative to dmenu which I packaged and it is now recommended by sway. There are some small helper tools for sway that were updated: swaybg was bumped from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1, swaylock was bumped from 1.7.2 to 1.8.2. The grimshot script, which is a script for making screenshots, was part of the sway s contrib folder for a long time (but was shipped as a separate binary package). It was removed from sway and is now part of the sway-contrib project. There are some other useful utilities in this source package that I might package in the future. slurp, which is used by grimshot to select a region, was updated from version 1.4 to version 1.5.

labwc I uploaded the first labwc package two years ago and I m happy it is now part of a stable Debian release. Labwc is also based on wlroots, like sway. It is a window-stacking compositor and is inspired by openbox. I used openbox for a long time back in the day before I moved to i3 and I m very happy to see that there is a Wayland alternative.

foot Foot is a minimalistic and fast Wayland terminal emulator. It is mostly keyboard driven. foot was updated from version 1.13.1 to 1.21.0. The probably most important change for users updating might be the fact that:
  • Control+Shift+u is now bound to unicode-input instead of show- urls-launch, to follow the convention established in GTK and Qt
  • show-urls-launch now bound to Control+Shift+o

et cetera The Wayland kiosk cage was updated from 0.1.4 to 0.2.0. The waybar bar for wlroots compositors was updated from 0.9.17 to 0.12.0. swayimg was updated from 1.10 to 3.8 and now brings support for custom key bindings, support for additional image types (PNM, EXR, DICOM, Farbfeld, sixel) and a gallery mode. tofi, another dmenu replacement was updated from 0.8.1 to 0.9.1, wf-recorder a tool for screen recording in wlroots-based compositors, was updated from version 0.3 to version 0.5.0. wlogout was updated from version 1.1.1 to 1.2.2. The application launcher wofi was updated from 1.3 to 1.4.1. The lightweight status panel yambar was updated from version 1.9 to 1.11. kanshi, the tool for managing and automatically switching your output profiles, was updated from version 1.3.1 to version 1.5.1. usbguard was updated from version 1.1.2 to 1.1.3.

added
  • fnott - a lightweight notification daemon for wlroots based compositors
  • fyi - a utility to send notifications to a notification daemon, similar to notify-send
  • pipectl - a tool to create and manage short-lived named pipes, this is a dependency of wl-present. wl-present is a script around wl-mirror which implements output mirroring for wlroots-based compositors
  • poweralertd - a small daemon that notifies you about the power status of your battery powered devices
  • wlopm - control power management of outputs
  • wlrctl - command line utility for miscellaneous wlroots Wayland extensions
  • wmenu - already mentioned, the new default launcher of sway
  • wshowkeys - shows keypresses in wayland sessions, nice for debugging
  • libsfdo - libraries implementing some freedesktop.org specs, used by labwc

15 August 2025

Freexian Collaborators: Monthly report about Debian Long Term Support, July 2025 (by Roberto C. S nchez)

Like each month, have a look at the work funded by Freexian s Debian LTS offering.

Debian LTS contributors In July, 17 contributors have been paid to work on Debian LTS, their reports are available:
  • Adrian Bunk did 19.0h (out of 19.0h assigned).
  • Andrej Shadura did 5.0h (out of 0.0h assigned and 8.0h from previous period), thus carrying over 3.0h to the next month.
  • Bastien Roucari s did 18.5h (out of 18.75h assigned), thus carrying over 0.25h to the next month.
  • Ben Hutchings did 12.5h (out of 3.25h assigned and 15.5h from previous period), thus carrying over 6.25h to the next month.
  • Carlos Henrique Lima Melara did 10.0h (out of 10.0h assigned).
  • Chris Lamb did 18.0h (out of 18.0h assigned).
  • Daniel Leidert did 18.75h (out of 17.25h assigned and 1.5h from previous period).
  • Emilio Pozuelo Monfort did 18.75h (out of 18.75h assigned).
  • Guilhem Moulin did 15.0h (out of 14.0h assigned and 1.0h from previous period).
  • Jochen Sprickerhof did 2.0h (out of 16.5h assigned and 2.25h from previous period), thus carrying over 16.75h to the next month.
  • Lee Garrett did 7.0h (out of 0.0h assigned and 23.25h from previous period), thus carrying over 16.25h to the next month.
  • Markus Koschany did 9.0h (out of 18.75h assigned), thus carrying over 9.75h to the next month.
  • Roberto C. S nchez did 10.25h (out of 18.5h assigned and 2.75h from previous period), thus carrying over 11.0h to the next month.
  • Santiago Ruano Rinc n did 7.25h (out of 12.75h assigned and 2.25h from previous period), thus carrying over 7.75h to the next month.
  • Sylvain Beucler did 18.75h (out of 18.75h assigned).
  • Thorsten Alteholz did 15.0h (out of 15.0h assigned).
  • Utkarsh Gupta did 15.0h (out of 1.0h assigned and 14.0h from previous period).

Evolution of the situation In July, we released 24 DLAs.
  • Notable security updates:
    • angular.js, prepared by Bastien Roucari s, fixes multiple vulnerabilities including input sanitization and potential regular expression denial of service (ReDoS)
    • tomcat9, prepared by Markus Koschany, fixes an assortment of vulnerabilities
    • mediawiki, prepared by Guilhem Moulin, fixes several information disclosure and privilege escalation vulnerabilities
    • php7.4, prepared by Guilhem Moulin, fixes several server side request forgery and denial of service vulnerabilities
This month s contributions from outside the regular team include an update to thunderbird, prepared by Christoph Goehre (the package maintainer). LTS Team members also contributed updates of the following packages:
  • commons-beanutils (to stable and unstable), prepared by Adrian Bunk
  • djvulibre (to oldstable, stable, and unstable), prepared by Adrian Bunk
  • git (to stable), prepared by Adrian Bunk
  • redis (to oldstable), prepared by Chris Lamb
  • libxml2 (to oldstable), prepared by Guilhem Moulin
  • commons-vfs (to oldstable), prepared by Daniel Leidert
Additionally, LTS Team member Santiago Ruano Rinc n proposed and implemented an improvement to the debian-security-support package. This package is available so that interested users can quickly determine if any installed packages are subject to limited security support or are excluded entirely from security support. However, there was not previously a way to identify explicitly supported packages, which has become necessary to note exceptions to broad exclusion policies (e.g., those which apply to substantial package groups, like modules belonging to the Go and Rust language ecosystems). Santiago s work has enabled the notation of exceptions to these exclusions, thus ensuring that users of debian-security-support have accurate status information concerning installed packages.

DebCamp 25 Security Tracker Sprint The previously announced security tracker sprint took place at DebCamp from 7-13 July. Participants included 8 members of the standing LTS Team, 2 active Debian Developers with an interest in LTS, 3 community members, and 1 member of the Debian Security Team (who provided guidance and reviews on proposed changes to the security tracker); participation was a mix of in person at the venue in Brest, France and remote. During the days of the sprint, the team tackled a wide range of bugs and improvements, mostly targeting the security tracker. The sprint participants worked on the following items: As can be seen from the above list, only a small number of changes were brought to completion during the sprint week itself. Given the very compressed timeframe involved, the broad scope of tasks which were under consideration, and the highly sensitive data managed by the security tracker, this is not entirely unexpected and in no way diminishes the great work done by the sprint participants. The LTS Team would especially like to thank Salvatore Bonaccorso of the Debian Security Team for making himself available throughout the sprint to answer questions, for providing guidance on the work, and for helping the work by reviewing and merging the MRs which were able to merged during the sprint itself. In the weeks that follow the sprint, the team will continue working towards completing the in progress items.

Thanks to our sponsors Sponsors that joined recently are in bold.

12 August 2025

Sergio Cipriano: Running Docker (OCI) Images in Incus

Running Docker (OCI) Images in Incus Incus 6.15 released with a lot of cool features, my favorite so far is the authentication support for OCI registries. Here's an example:
$ incus remote add docker https://docker.io --protocol=oci
$ incus launch docker:debian:sid sid
$ incus shell sid
root@sid:~# apt update && apt upgrade -y
root@sid:~# cat /etc/os-release 
PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux forky/sid"
NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
VERSION_CODENAME=forky
ID=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.debian.org/"
This has been really useful for creating containers to test packages, much better than launching the official Debian stable Incus images and then manually changing the sources list.

Freexian Collaborators: Debian Contributions: DebConf 25, OpenSSH upgrades, Cross compilation collaboration and more! (by Anupa Ann Joseph)

Debian Contributions: 2025-07 Contributing to Debian is part of Freexian s mission. This article covers the latest achievements of Freexian and their collaborators. All of this is made possible by organizations subscribing to our Long Term Support contracts and consulting services.

DebConf 25, by Stefano Rivera and Santiago Ruano Rinc n In July, DebConf 25 was held in Brest, France. Freexian was a gold sponsor and most of the Freexian team attended the event. Many fruitful discussions were had amongst our team and within the Debian community. DebConf itself was organized by a local team in Brest, that included Santiago (who now lives in Uruguay). Stefano was also deeply involved in the organization, as a DebConf committee member, core video team, and the lead developer for the conference website. Running the conference took an enormous amount of work, consuming all of Stefano and Santiago s time for most of July. Lucas Kanashiro was active in the DebConf content team, reviewing talks and scheduling them. There were many last-minute changes to make during the event. Anupa Ann Joseph was part of the Debian publicity team doing live coverage of DebConf 25 and was part of the DebConf 25 content team reviewing the talks. She also assisted the local team to procure the lanyards. Recorded sessions presented by Freexian collaborators, often alongside other friends in Debian, included:

OpenSSH upgrades, by Colin Watson Towards the end of a release cycle, people tend to do more upgrade testing, and this sometimes results in interesting problems. Manfred Stock reported No new SSH connections possible during large part of upgrade to Debian Trixie , which would have affected many people upgrading from Debian 12 (bookworm), with potentially severe consequences for people upgrading remote systems. In fact, there were two independent problems that each led to much the same symptom:
  • As part of hardening the OpenSSH server, OpenSSH 9.8 split the monolithic sshd listener process into two pieces: a minimal network listener (still called sshd), and an sshd-session process dealing with each individual session. Before this change, when sshd received an incoming connection, it forked and re-executed itself with some special parameters to deal with it; after this change, it forks and executes sshd-session instead, and sshd no longer accepts the parameters it used to accept for this.

    Debian package upgrades happen (roughly) in two phases: first we unpack the new files onto disk, and then we run some configuration steps which usually include things like restarting services. Normally this is fine, because the old service keeps on working until it s restarted. In this case, unpacking the new files onto disk immediately stopped new SSH connections from working: the old sshd received the connection and tried to hand it off to a freshly-executed copy of the new sshd binary on disk, which no longer supports this. This wasn t much of a problem when upgrading OpenSSH on its own or with a small number of other packages, but in release upgrades it left a large gap when you can t SSH to the system any more, and if anything fails in that interval then you could be in trouble.

    After trying a couple of other approaches, Colin landed on the idea of having the openssh-server package divert /usr/sbin/sshd to /usr/sbin/sshd.session-split before the unpack step of an upgrade from before 9.8, then removing the diversion and moving the new file into place once it s ready to restart the service. This reduces the period when new connections fail to a minimum.
  • Most OpenSSH processes, including sshd, check for a compatible version of the OpenSSL library when they start up. This check used to be very picky, among other things requiring both the major and minor part of the version number to match. OpenSSL 3 has a better versioning policy, and so OpenSSH 9.4p1 relaxed this check.

    Unfortunately, bookworm shipped with OpenSSH 9.2p1, so as soon as you unpacked the new OpenSSL library during an upgrade, sshd stopped working. This couldn t be fixed by a change in trixie; we needed to change bookworm in advance of the upgrade so that it would tolerate newer versions of OpenSSL, and time was tight if we wanted this to be available before the release of Debian 13.

    Fortunately, there s a stable-updates mechanism for exactly this sort of thing, and the stable release managers kindly accepted Colin s proposal to fix this there.
The net result is that if you apply updates to bookworm (including stable-updates / bookworm-updates, which is enabled by default) before starting the upgrade to trixie, everything should be fine.

Cross compilation collaboration, by Helmut Grohne Supporting cross building in Debian packages touches lots of areas of the archive and quite some of these matters reside in shared responsibility between different teams. Hence, DebConf was an ideal opportunity to settle long-standing issues. The cross building bof sparked lively discussions as a significant fraction of developers employ cross builds to get their work done. In the trixie release, about two thirds of the packages can satisfy their cross Build-Depends and about half of the packages actually can be cross built.

Miscellaneous contributions
  • Rapha l Hertzog updated tracker.debian.org to remove references to Debian 10 which was moved to archive.debian.org, and had many fruitful discussions related to Debusine during DebConf 25.
  • Carles Pina prepared some data, questions and information for the DebConf 25 l10n and i18n BoF.
  • Carles Pina demoed and discussed possible next steps for po-debconf-manager with different teams in DebConf 25. He also reviewed Catalan translations and sent them to the packages.
  • Carles Pina started investigating a django-compressor bug: reproduced the bug consistently and prepared a PR for django-compressor upstream (likely more details next month). Looked at packaging frictionless-py.
  • Stefano Rivera triaged Python CVEs against pypy3.
  • Stefano prepared an upload of a new upstream release of pypy3 to Debian experimental (due to the freeze).
  • Stefano uploaded python3.14 RC1 to Debian experimental.
  • Thorsten Alteholz uploaded a new upstream version of sane-airscan to experimental. He also started to work on a new upstream version of hplip.
  • Colin backported fixes for CVE-2025-50181 and CVE-2025-50182 in python-urllib3, and fixed several other release-critical or important bugs in Python team packages.
  • Lucas uploaded ruby3.4 to experimental as a starting point for the ruby-defaults transition that will happen after Trixie release.
  • Lucas coordinated with the Release team the fix of the remaining RC bugs involving ruby packages, and got them all fixed.
  • Lucas, as part of the Debian Ruby team, kicked off discussions to improve internal process/tooling.
  • Lucas, as part of the Debian Outreach team, engaged in multiple discussions around internship programs we run and also what else we could do to improve outreach in the Debian project.
  • Lucas joined the Local groups BoF during DebConf 25 and shared all the good experiences from the Brazilian community and committed to help to document everything to try to support other groups.
  • Helmut spent significant time with Samuel Thibault on improving architecture cross bootstrap for hurd-any mostly reviewing Samuel s patches. He proposed a patch for improving bash s detection of its pipesize and a change to dpkg-shlibdeps to improve behavior for building cross toolchains.
  • Helmut reiterated the multiarch policy proposal with a lot of help from Nattie Mayer-Hutchings, Rhonda D Vine and Stuart Prescott.
  • Helmut finished his work on the process based unschroot prototype that was the main feature of his talk (see above).
  • Helmut analyzed a multiarch-related glibc upgrade failure induced by a /usr-move mitigation of systemd and sent a patch and regression fix both of which reached trixie in time. Thanks to Aurelien Jarno and the release team for their timely cooperation.
  • Helmut resurrected an earlier discussion about changing the semantics of Architecture: all packages in a multiarch context in order to improve the long-standing interpreter problem. With help from Tollef Fog Heen better semantics were discovered and agreement was reached with Guillem Jover and Julian Andres Klode to consider this change. The idea is to record a concrete architecture for every Architecture: all package in the dpkg database and enable choosing it as non-native.
  • Helmut implemented type hints for piuparts.
  • Helmut reviewed and improved a patch set of Jochen Sprickerhof for debvm.
  • Anupa was involved in discussions with the Debian Women team during DebConf 25.
  • Anupa started working for the trixie release coverage and started coordinating release parties.
  • Emilio helped coordinate the release of Debian 13 trixie.

6 August 2025

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in July 2025

Welcome to the seventh report from the Reproducible Builds project in 2025. Our monthly reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, and highlight items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please see the Contribute page on our website. In this report:
  1. Reproducible Builds Summit 2025
  2. Reproducible Builds an official goal for SUSE Enterprise Linux
  3. Reproducible Builds at FOSSY 2025
  4. New OSS Rebuild project from Google
  5. New extension of Python setuptools to support reproducible builds
  6. diffoscope
  7. New library to patch system functions for reproducibility
  8. Independently Reproducible Git Bundles
  9. Website updates
  10. Distribution work
  11. Reproducibility testing framework
  12. Upstream patches

Reproducible Builds Summit 2025 We are extremely pleased to announce the upcoming Reproducible Builds Summit, set to take place from October 28th 30th 2025 in Vienna, Austria! We are thrilled to host the eighth edition of this exciting event, following the success of previous summits in various iconic locations around the world, including Venice, Marrakesh, Paris, Berlin, Hamburg and Athens. Our summits are a unique gathering that brings together attendees from diverse projects, united by a shared vision of advancing the Reproducible Builds effort. During this enriching event, participants will have the opportunity to engage in discussions, establish connections and exchange ideas to drive progress in this vital field. Our aim is to create an inclusive space that fosters collaboration, innovation and problem-solving. If you re interesting in joining us this year, please make sure to read the event page which has more details about the event and location. Registration is open until 20th September 2025, and we are very much looking forward to seeing many readers of these reports there!

Reproducible Builds an official goal for SUSE Enterprise Linux On our mailing list this month, Bernhard M. Wiedemann revealed the big news that reproducibility is now an official goal for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 16:
[Everything] changed earlier this year when reproducible-builds for SLES-16 became an official goal for the product. More people are talking about digital sovereignty and supply-chain security now. [ ] Today, only 9 of 3319 (source) packages have significant problems left (plus 7 with pending fixes), so 99.5% of packages have reproducible builds.

Reproducible Builds at FOSSY 2025 On Saturday 2nd August, Vagrant Cascadian and Chris Lamb presented at this year s FOSSY 2025. Their talk, titled Never Mind the Checkboxes, Here s Reproducible Builds!, was introduced as follows:
There are numerous policy compliance and regulatory processes being developed that target software development but do they solve actual problems? Does it improve the quality of software? Do Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) actually give you the information necessary to verify how a given software artifact was built? What is the goal of all these compliance checklists anyways or more importantly, what should the goals be? If a software object is signed, who should be trusted to sign it, and can they be trusted forever?
Hosted by the Software Freedom Conservancy and taking place in Portland, Oregon, USA, FOSSY aims to be a community-focused event: Whether you are a long time contributing member of a free software project, a recent graduate of a coding bootcamp or university, or just have an interest in the possibilities that free and open source software bring, FOSSY will have something for you . More information on the event is available on the FOSSY 2025 website, including the full programme schedule. Vagrant and Chris also staffed a table, where they will be available to answer any questions about Reproducible Builds and discuss collaborations with other projects.

New OSS Rebuild project from Google The Google Open Source Security Team (GOSST) published an article this month announcing OSS Rebuild, a new project to strengthen trust in open source package ecosystems by reproducing upstream artifacts. As the post itself documents, the new project comprises four facets:
  • Automation to derive declarative build definitions for existing PyPI (Python), npm (JS/TS), and Crates.io (Rust) packages.
  • SLSA Provenance for thousands of packages across our supported ecosystems, meeting SLSA Build Level 3 requirements with no publisher intervention.
  • Build observability and verification tools that security teams can integrate into their existing vulnerability management workflows.
  • Infrastructure definitions to allow organizations to easily run their own instances of OSS Rebuild to rebuild, generate, sign, and distribute provenance.
One difference with most projects that aim for bit-for-bit reproducibility, OSS Rebuild aims for a kind of semantic reproducibility:
Through automation and heuristics, we determine a prospective build definition for a target package and rebuild it. We semantically compare the result with the existing upstream artifact, normalizing each one to remove instabilities that cause bit-for-bit comparisons to fail (e.g. archive compression).
The extensive post includes examples about how to access OSS Rebuild attestations using the Go-based command-line interface.

New extension of Python setuptools to support reproducible builds Wim Jeantine-Glenn has written a PEP 517 Build backend in order to enable reproducible builds when building Python projects that use setuptools. Called setuptools-reproducible, the project s README file contains the following:
Setuptools can create reproducible wheel archives (.whl) by setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH at build time, but setting the env var is insufficient for creating reproducible sdists (.tar.gz). setuptools-reproducible [therefore] wraps the hooks build_sdist build_wheel with some modifications to make reproducible builds by default.

diffoscope diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions 301, 302 and 303 to Debian:
  • Improvements:
    • Use Difference.from_operation in an attempt to pipeline the output of the extract-vmlinux script, potentially avoiding it all in memory. [ ]
    • Memoize a number of calls to --version, saving a very large number of external subprocess calls.
  • Bug fixes:
    • Don t check for PyPDF version 3 specifically, check for versions greater than 3. [ ]
    • Ensure that Java class files are named .class on the filesystem before passing them to javap(1). [ ]
    • Mask stderr from extract-vmlinux script. [ ][ ]
    • Avoid spurious differences in h5dump output caused by exposure of absolute internal extraction paths. (#1108690)
  • Misc:
    • Use our_check_output in the ODT comparator. [ ]
    • Update copyright years. [ ]
In addition: Lastly, Chris Lamb added a tmpfs to try.diffoscope.org so that diffoscope has a non-trivial temporary area to unpack archives, etc. [ ] Elsewhere in our tooling, however, reprotest is our tool for building the same source code twice in different environments and then checking the binaries produced by each build for any differences. This month, reprotest version 0.7.30 was uploaded to Debian unstable by Holger Levsen, chiefly including a change by Rebecca N. Palmer to not call sudo with the -h flag in order to fix Debian bug #1108550. [ ]

New library to patch system functions for reproducibility Nicolas Graves has written and published libfate, a simple collection of tiny libraries to patch system functions deterministically using LD_PRELOAD. According to the project s README:
libfate provides deterministic replacements for common non-deterministic system functions that can break reproducible builds. Instead of relying on complex build systems or apps or extensive patching, libfate uses the LD_PRELOAD trick to intercept system calls and return fixed, predictable values.
Describing why he wrote it, Nicolas writes:
I originally used the OpenSUSE dettrace approach to make Emacs reproducible in Guix. But when Guix switch to GCC@14, dettrace stopped working as expected. dettrace is a complex piece of software, my need was much less heavy: I don t need to systematically patch all sources of nondetermism, just the ones that make a process/binary unreproducible in a container/chroot.

Independently Reproducible Git Bundles Simon Josefsson has published another interesting article this month. Titled Independently Reproducible Git Bundles, the blog post describes the advantages of why you might a reproducible bundle, and the pitfalls that can arise when trying to create them:
One desirable property is that someone else should be able to reproduce the same git bundle, and not only that a single individual is able to reproduce things on one machine. It surprised me to see that when I ran the same set of commands on a different machine (started from a fresh git clone), I got a different checksum. The different checksums occurred even when nothing had been committed on the server side between the two runs.

Website updates Once again, there were a number of improvements made to our website this month including:

Distribution work In Debian this month:
Debian contributors have made significant progress toward ensuring package builds produce byte-for-byte reproducible results. You can check the status for packages installed on your system using the new package debian-repro-status, or visit reproduce.debian.net for Debian s overall statistics for trixie and later. You can contribute to these efforts by joining #debian-reproducible on IRC to discuss fixes, or verify the statistics by installing the new rebuilderd package and setting up your own instance.

The IzzyOnDroid Android APK repository made further progress in July, crossing the 50% reproducibility threshold congratulations. Furthermore, a new release of the Neo Store was released, which exposes the reproducible status directly next to the version of each app.
In GNU Guix, a series of patches intended to fix the reproducibility for the Mono programming language was merged, fixing reproducibility in Mono versions 1.9 [ ], 2.4 [ ] and 2.6 [ ].
Lastly, in addition to the news that openSUSE Enterprise Linux now [has an official goal of reproducibility]((https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2025-July/003846.html), Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another monthly update for their work there.

Reproducibility testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operates a comprehensive testing framework running primarily at tests.reproducible-builds.org in order to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. In July, however, a number of changes were made by Holger Levsen, including:
  • Switch the URL for the Tails package set. [ ]
  • Make the dsa-check-packages output more useful. [ ]
  • Setup the ppc64el architecture again, has it has returned this time with a 2.7 GiB database instead of 72 GiB. [ ]
In addition, Jochen Sprickerhof improved the reproducibility statistics generation:
  • Enable caching of statistics. [ ][ ][ ]
  • Add some common non-reproducible patterns. [ ]
  • Change output to directory. [ ]
  • Add a page sorted by diffoscope size. [ ][ ]
  • Switch to Python s argparse module and separate output(). [ ]
Holger also submitted a number of Debian bugs against rebuilderd and rebuilderd-worker:
  • Config files and scripts for a simple one machine setup. [ ][ ]
  • Create a rebuilderd user. [ ]
  • Create rebuilderd-worker user with sbuild. [ ]
Lastly, Mattia Rizzolo added a scheduled job to renew some SSL certificates [ ] and Vagrant Cascadian performed some node maintenance [ ][ ].

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including: There were a number of other patches from openSUSE developers:

Finally, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

Colin Watson: Free software activity in July 2025

About 90% of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay or GitHub Sponsors. DebConf I attended DebConf for the first time in 11 years (my last one was DebConf 14 in Portland). It was great! For once I had a conference where I had a fairly light load of things I absolutely had to do, so I was able to spend time catching up with old friends, making some new friends, and doing some volunteering - a bit of Front Desk, and quite a lot of video team work where I got to play with sound desks and such. Apparently one of the BoFs ( birds of a feather , i.e. relatively open discussion sessions) where I was talkmeister managed to break the automatic video cutting system by starting and ending precisely on time, to the second, which I m told has never happened before. I ll take that. I gave a talk about Debusine, along with helping Enrico run a Debusine BoF. We still need to process some of the feedback from this, but are generally pretty thrilled about the reception. My personal highlight was getting a shout-out in a talk from CERN (in the slide starting at 32:55). Other highlights for me included a Python team BoF, Ian s tag2upload talk and some very useful follow-up discussions, a session on archive-wide testing, a somewhat brain-melting whiteboard session about the multiarch interpreter problem , several useful discussions about salsa.debian.org, Matthew s talk on how Wikimedia automates their Debian package builds, and many others. I hope I can start attending regularly again! OpenSSH Towards the end of a release cycle, people tend to do more upgrade testing, and this sometimes results in interesting problems. Manfred Stock reported No new SSH connections possible during large part of upgrade to Debian Trixie , and after a little testing in a container I confirmed that this was a reproducible problem that would have affected many people upgrading from Debian 12 (bookworm), with potentially severe consequences for people upgrading remote systems. In fact, there were two independent problems that each led to much the same symptom: The net result is that if you apply updates to bookworm (including stable-updates / bookworm-updates, which is enabled by default) before starting the upgrade to trixie, everything should be fine. Many thanks to Manfred for reporting this with just enough time to spare that we were able to fix it before Debian 13 is released in a few days! debmirror I did my twice-yearly refresh of debmirror s mirror_size documentation, and applied a patch from Christoph Goehre to improve mirroring of installer files. madison-lite I proposed renaming this project along with the rmadison tool in devscripts, although I m not yet sure what a good replacement name would be. Python team I upgraded python-expandvars, python-typing-extensions (in experimental), and webtest to new upstream versions. I backported fixes for some security vulnerabilities to unstable: I fixed or helped to fix a number of release-critical bugs: I fixed some other bugs, mostly Severity: important: I reinstated python3-mastodon s build-dependency on and recommendation of python3-blurhash, now that the latter has been fixed to use the correct upstream source.

5 August 2025

Ravi Dwivedi: Tricked by a website while applying for Vietnam visa

In December 2024, Badri and I went to Vietnam. In this post, I ll document our experiences with the visa process of Vietnam. Vietnam requires an e-visa to enter the country. The official online portal for the e-visa application is evisa.xuatnhapcanh.gov.vn/. However, I submitted my visa application on the website vietnamvisa.govt.vn. It was only after submitting my application and making the payment that I realized that it s not the official e-visa website. The realization came from the tagline mentioned in the top left corner of the website - the best way to obtain a Vietnam visa. I was a bit upset that I got tricked by that website. I should have checked the top level domains of Vietnam s government websites. Anyways, it is pretty easy to confuse govt.vn with gov.vn. I also paid double the amount of the official visa fee. However, I wasn t asked to provide a flight reservation or hotel bookings - documents which are usually asked for most of the visas. But they did ask me for a photo. I was not even sure whether the website was legit or not. Badri learnt from my experience and applied through the official Vietnam government website. During the process, he had to provide a hotel booking as well as enter the hotel address into the submission form. Additionally, the official website asked to provide the exact points of entry to and exit from the country, which the non-official website did not ask for. On the other hand, he had to pay only 25 USD versus my 54 USD. It turned out that the website I registered on was also legit, as they informed me a week later that my visa has been approved, along with a copy of my visa. Further, I was not barred from entering and found to be holding a fake visa. It appears that the main scam is not about the visa being fake, but rather that you will be charged more than if you apply through the official website. I would still recommend you (the readers) to submit your visa application only through the official website and not on any of the other such websites. Our visa was valid for a month (my visa was valid from the 4th of December 2024 to the 4th of January 2025). We also had a nice time in Vietnam. Stay tuned for my Vietnam travel posts! Credits to Badri for proofreading and writing his part of the experience.

Next.

Previous.