Review:
The Raven Scholar, by Antonia Hodgson
| Series: |
Eternal Path Trilogy #1 |
| Publisher: |
Orbit |
| Copyright: |
April 2025 |
| ISBN: |
0-316-57723-5 |
| Format: |
Kindle |
| Pages: |
651 |
The Raven Scholar is an epic fantasy and the first book of a
projected trilogy. It is Antonia Hodgson's first published fantasy novel;
her previous published novels are historical mystery. I would classify
this as adult fantasy the main character is thirty-four with a stable
court position but it has strong YA vibes because of the generational
turnover feel of the main plot.
Eight years before the start of this book, Andren Valit attempted to
assassinate the emperor and failed. Since then, his widow and three
children twins Yana and Ruko and infant Nisthala have been living in
disgrace in a cramped apartment, subject to constant inspections and
suspicion. As the story opens, they have been summoned to appear before
the emperor, escorted by a young and earnest Hound (essentially the state
security services) named Shal Worthy. The resulting interrogation is full
of dangerous traps. Not all of them will be avoided.
The formalization of the consequences of that imperial summons falls to an
unpopular Junior Archivist (Third Class) whose one notable skill is her
penmanship. A meeting that was disasterous for the Valits becomes
unexpectedly fortunate for the archivist, albeit with a poisonous core.
Eight years later, Neema Kraa is High Scholar, and Emperor Bersun's
twenty-four years of permitted reign is coming to an end. The Festival is
about to begin. One representative from each of the empire's eight anats
(religious schools) will compete in seven days of Trials, save for the
Dragons who do not want the throne and will send a proxy. The victor
according to the Trials scoring system will become emperor and reign
unquestioned for twenty-four years or until resignation. This is the
system that put an end to the era of chaos and has been in place for over
a thousand years.
On the eve of the Trials, the Raven contender is found murdered. Neema is
immediately a suspect; she even has reasons to suspect herself. She
volunteers to lead the investigation because she has to know what
happened. She is also volunteered to be the replacement Raven contender.
There is no chance that she will become emperor; she doesn't even know how
to fight. But agnostic Neema has a rather unexpected ally.
As the last chime fades we drop neatly on to the balcony's rusting
hand rail, folding our wings with a soft shuffle. Noon, on the ninth
day of the eighth month, 1531. Neema Kraa's lodgings. We are here,
exactly where we should be, at exactly the right moment, because we
are the Raven, and we are magnificent.
The Raven Scholar is a rather good epic fantasy, with some caveats
that I'll get to in a moment, but I found it even more fascinating as a
genre artifact.
I've read my share of epic fantasy over the years, although most of my
familiarity of the current wave of new adult fairy epics comes from
reviews rather than personal experience.
The Raven Scholar is epic
fantasy, through and through. There is court intrigue, a main character
who is a court functionary unexpectedly thrown into the middle of some
problem, civilization-wide stakes, dramatic political alliances, detailed
magic and mythological systems, and gods. There were moments that reminded
me of a Guy Gavriel Kay novel, although Hodgson's characters tend more
towards disarming moments of humanization instead of Kay's operatic scenes
of emotional intensity.
But
The Raven Scholar is also a murder mystery, complete with a
crime scene, clues, suspects, evidence, an investigation, a possibly
compromised detective, and a morass of possible motives and red herrings.
I'm not much of a mystery reader, but this didn't feel like sort of
ancillary mystery that might crop up in the course of a typical epic
fantasy. It felt like a full-fledged investigation with an amateur
detective; one can tell that Hodgson's previous four books were historical
mysteries.
And then there's the Trials, which are the centerpiece of the book.
This book helped me notice that people (okay, me, I'm the people) have
been sleeping on the influence of
The
Hunger Games,
Battle Royale, and reality TV (specifically
Survivor) on genre fiction, possibly because the more obvious riffs
on the idea (
Powerless,
The Selection) have been young adult
or new adult. Once I started looking, I realized this idea is everywhere
now:
Throne of Glass,
Fourth Wing, even
The Night
Circus to some extent. Competitions with consequences are having a
moment.
I suspect having a competition to decide the next emperor is going to
strike some traditional fantasy readers as sufficiently absurd and
unbelievable that it will kick them out of the book. I had a moment of
"okay, this is weird, why would anyone stick with this system for so long"
myself. But I would encourage such readers to interrogate whether that's
only a response from unfamiliarity; after all, strange women lying in
ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government either.
This is hardly the most unrealistic epic fantasy trope, and it has the
advantage of being a hell of a plot generator when handled well.
Hodgson handles it well. Society in this novel is structured around the
anats and the eight Guardians, gods who, according to myth, had returned
seven times previously to save the world, but who will destroy the world
when they return again. Each Guardian represents a group of
characteristics and useful societal functions: the Ox is trustworthy,
competent and hard-working; the Fox is a trickster and a rule-bender; the
Raven is shrewd and careful and is the Guardian of scholars and lawyers.
Each Trial is organized by one of the anats and tests the contenders for
the skills most valued by that Guardian, often in subtle and rather
ingenious ways. There are flaws here that you could poke at if you wanted
to, but I was charmed and thoroughly entertained by how well Hodgson
weaves the story around the Trials and uses the conflicting values to
create character conflict, unexpected alliances, and engrossing plot.
Most importantly for a book of this sort, I liked Neema. She has a
charming combination of competence, quirks (she is almost physically
unable to not correct people's factual errors), insecurity, imposter
syndrome, and determination. She is way out of her depth and knows it, but
she has an ethical core and an insatiable curiosity that won't let her
leave the central mysteries of the book alone. And the character dynamics
are great; there are a lot of characters, including the competition
problem of having to juggle eight contenders and give them all sufficient
characterization to be meaningful, but this book uses its length to give
each character some room to breathe. This is a long book, well over 600
pages, but it felt packed with events and plot twists. After every chapter
I had to fight the urge to read just one more.
The biggest drawback of this book is that it is very much the first book
of a trilogy, none of the other volumes are out yet, and the ending is
rather nasty. This is the sort of trilogy that opens with a whole lot of
bad things happening, and while I am thoroughly hooked and will purchase
the next volume as soon as it's available, I wish Hodgson had found a way
to end the book on a somewhat more positive or hopeful note. The middle of
the book was great; the end was a bit of an emotional slog, alas. The
writing is good enough here that I'm fairly sure the depression will be
worth it, but if you need your endings to be triumphant (and who could
blame you in this moment in history), you may want to wait on this one
until more volumes are out.
Apart from that, though, this was a lot of fun. The Guardians felt like
they came from a different strand of fantasy than you usually see in epic,
more of a traditional folk tale vibe, which adds an intriguing twist to
the epic fantasy setting. The characters all work, and Hodgson even pulls
off some
Game of Thrones style twists that make you sympathetic to
characters you previously hated. The magic system apart from the Guardians
felt underbaked, but the politics had more depth than a lot of fantasy
novels. If you want the truly complex and twisty politics you would get
from one of Guy Gavriel Kay's historical rewrites, you will come away
disappointed, but it was good enough for me. And I did enjoy the Raven.
Respect, that's all we demand. Recognition of our magnificence.
Offerings. Love. Fear. Trembling awe. Worship. Shiny things. Blood
sacrifice, some of us very much enjoy blood sacrifice. Truly, we ask
for so little.
Followed by an as-yet untitled sequel that I hope will materialize.
Rating: 7 out of 10
Another (again somewhat minor) maintenance release of the 
We at 
The discovery of a backdoor in XZ Utils in the spring of 2024 shocked the open source community, raising critical questions about software supply chain security. This post explores whether better Debian packaging practices could have detected this threat, offering a guide to auditing packages and suggesting future improvements.
The XZ backdoor in versions 5.6.0/5.6.1 made its way briefly into many major Linux distributions such as Debian and Fedora, but luckily didn t reach that many actual users, as the backdoored releases were quickly removed thanks to the heroic diligence of 
If the changes are extensive, and you want to use a LLM to help spot potential security issues, generate the report of both the upstream and Debian packaging differences in Markdown with:
To compare changes across the new and old upstream tarball, one would need to compare commits afba662b New upstream version 5.8.0 and fa1e8796 New upstream version 5.8.1 by running 
With all the above tips you can now go and try to audit your own favorite package in Debian and see if it is identical with upstream, and if not, how it differs.
There is only one tiny thing that maybe a very experienced Autotools user could potentially have noticed: the 
