Search Results: "xam"

6 March 2015

Eddy Petrișor: Occasional Rsnapshot v1.3.1

I was writing in the previous post about Occasional Rsnapshot and how I ended up writing it.

Just before releasing v1.2.1 I realized it would make sense Semantic Versioning which, in just a few words means:
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:
MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and
PATCH version when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes.
I just released Occasional Rsnapshot v1.3.1 which mainly fixed issue 4:
When deciding to do a backup for interval INT, there should be a check that the oldest snapshot in INT-1 interval is older than the threshold for the INT interval. Otherwise the INT interval will be populated with backups more frequent than desired and it is possible older backups in INT interval to completely lost.
The condition should be:
ts(oldest(INT-1)) - ts(newest(INT)) >= threshold(INT)
For example:
  • if weekly.0 is from 15th of February and daily.6 is from 17th of February, weekly should not be triggered, but
  • if weekly.0 is from 15th of February and daily.6 is from 23rd of February, weekly shall be triggered
This extra check should probably added in can_backup_interval.
It was a small bug, but it might have lead to losing important older backups because newer and more frequent backups would be pushed from hourly, interval by interval up to the yearly interval, in spite of the fact that the distance between backups wouldn't have been respecting the upper interval minimum distance in time.

There was also a small syntax bugfix, but functionally nothing has changed because bash was doing the right thing even with that small error.

If you have started using Occasional Rsnapshot, you definitely want now Occasional Rsnapshot v1.3.1. If you haven't started and you don't have backups, please start doing backups, and while you're at it, you might want to try Occasional Rsnapshot (with Rsnapshot).

Richard Hartmann: Release Critical Bug report for Week 10

The UDD bugs interface currently knows about the following release critical bugs: How do we compare to the Squeeze and Wheezy release cycles?
Week Squeeze Wheezy Jessie
43 284 (213+71) 468 (332+136) 319 (240+79)
44 261 (201+60) 408 (265+143) 274 (224+50)
45 261 (205+56) 425 (291+134) 295 (229+66)
46 271 (200+71) 401 (258+143) 427 (313+114)
47 283 (209+74) 366 (221+145) 342 (260+82)
48 256 (177+79) 378 (230+148) 274 (189+85)
49 256 (180+76) 360 (216+155) 226 (147+79)
50 204 (148+56) 339 (195+144) ???
51 178 (124+54) 323 (190+133) 189 (134+55)
52 115 (78+37) 289 (190+99) 147 (112+35)
1 93 (60+33) 287 (171+116) 140 (104+36)
2 82 (46+36) 271 (162+109) 157 (124+33)
3 25 (15+10) 249 (165+84) 172 (128+44)
4 14 (8+6) 244 (176+68) 187 (132+55)
5 2 (0+2) 224 (132+92) 175 (124+51)
6 release! 212 (129+83) 161 (109+52)
7 release+1 194 (128+66) 147 (106+41)
8 release+2 206 (144+62) 147 (96+51)
9 release+3 174 (105+69) 152 (101+51)
10 release+4 120 (72+48) 112 (82+30)
11 release+5 115 (74+41)
12 release+6 93 (47+46)
13 release+7 50 (24+26)
14 release+8 51 (32+19)
15 release+9 39 (32+7)
16 release+10 20 (12+8)
17 release+11 24 (19+5)
18 release+12 2 (2+0)
Graphical overview of bug stats thanks to azhag:

5 March 2015

EvolvisForge blog: I have to give you that one

After seeing what the Wildfly (formerly JBoss AS) and Liferay combo does to /tmp, and somewhat attempting to fix it, I saw JVM_TMP in the Debian tomcat7 init script and thought, oh no, not another one. Is that even safe, what they do here, or is that a possibility to instantly pwn? The net is full of literature for how to obtain temporary files and directories, but there is nothing about how to reliably obtain paths under /tmp or, more generally, directories not just writable for one single user (think the g+w thing that got FusionForge CVE-2013-1423). The scenario here is: I am root, and I want to start something as another user, and pass it a stable path, such as /tmp/liferay. So I can just mkdir /tmp/liferay die; chown thatuser /tmp/liferay and, in the stop process, rm -rf /tmp/liferay, right? (Of course not. Also, bad example, as the liferay thing can also be started as thatuser, and our devs regularily need to do that, the init script is there just for the admin convenience and reboot-safety. But I still am interested if there is a secure way to achieve this.) The tomcat7 scenario is trivial : on That Other Init System , it would just get its private /tmp declared in the .service file, and good is, no more hassle. That s one I have to give you. (No idea if this is actually shipped in jessie. Our production systems run wheezy anyway, so there is not even the slightest bit of temptation. Plus, it would not solve the liferay issue, see above. Still, a point for going into the right direction.) The idea here is the same. It creates a directory on start and tears it down on stop. If there was nothing to do on start, the init script could just use mktemp -d. Heck, maybe it still should, but it would need to note down, and communicate to the stop instance, the actual name used. What a drag This is something I see popping up from time to time. I want to use stable paths for SSH session multiplexing control sockets in my ssh_config(5) file, but have them on tmpfs (Linux) or mfs (BSD) so they get properly removed on reboot. No Unix traditionally has per-user temporary directories that are clean and created after reboot. (Adjusting the paths is trivial once you have them.) Android has it worse, what with not having a world-writable tmp directory, which the shell needs e.g. for here documents; there are two components here, to have a directory the current user can write to, and to know its location. Some fail at the first, some at the second, some at both, and the classic /tmp is not the cure, as we have seen. (But if you ever see mksh erroring out due to lack of write permissions somewhere (including /sqlite_stmt_journals which used to be it) as non-root on Android, or even as root, set TMPDIR to something writable; it s tracked, so the change gets active immediately.)

4 March 2015

Simon Josefsson: EdDSA and Ed25519 goes to IETF

After meeting Niels M ller at FOSDEM and learning about his Ed25519 implementation in GNU Nettle, I started working on a simple-to-implement description of Ed25519. The goal is to help implementers of various IETF (and non-IETF) protocols add support for Ed25519. As many are aware, OpenSSH and GnuPG has support for Ed25519 in recent versions, and OpenBSD since the v5.5 May 2014 release are signed with Ed25519. The paper describing EdDSA and Ed25519 is not aimed towards implementers, and does not include test vectors. I felt there were room for improvement to get wider and more accepted adoption. Our work is published in the IETF as draft-josefsson-eddsa-ed25519 and we are soliciting feedback from implementers and others. Please help us iron out the mistakes in the document, and point out what is missing. For example, what could be done to help implementers avoid side-channel leakage? I don t think the draft is the place for optimized and side-channel free implementations, and it is also not the place for a comprehensive tutorial on side-channel free programming. But maybe there is a middle ground where we can say something more than what we can do today. Ideas welcome!

Zlatan Todori : Interviews with FLOSS developers: Paul Wise

After starting with Joey Hess, we continue with Paul Wise. What makes his star to shine are many things such as being a DSA (Debian System Administrator), a helpful hand on mailings list, encouraging people to join Debian teams but most of all - he has encyclopedia knowledge on Debian as a whole which he gladly shares with anyone who asks (very fast response on IRC channels). It is almost impossible for any single person to count all Debian teams, work and places - to know most of those things, you can image the vast knowledge which Paul has. The legend says that his brain has better and faster search engine algorithm on Debian related queries than all other engines combined. So lets see what he has to share with world. me: Who are you? pabs: Paul Wise (pabs) and I have to say that I'm no-where near as knowledgeable as your intro suggests. me: How did you start programming? pabs: Messing around with fractals and graphics things in MS BASIC. me: How would you now advise others to start programming? pabs: Pick an issue in a tool you use, investigate how the tool works and how you can change it, fix that and contribute the change back to the project that created that tool. In the process you will learn skills, interact with the community and contribute to the project. me: Setup of your development machine? pabs: Lenovo Thinkpad with external monitor, Debian testing and some tweaks me What is your preferable language (for hacking)? Why? How do you compare it to other languages? pabs: I currently prefer Python for its readability. It still has some rough edges though the documentation covers them fairly well. I generally pick up new languages when working on projects written in them. Haskell is next on the horizon due to Nikki and the Robots. me: Describe your current most memorable situation as software developer/hacker? pabs: I had a great time creating fractals in BASIC, learning about the Mandelbrot set, L-systems and more. My days and nights of hacking on frhed (a GPLed hex editor for Windows) to help me cheat at Civilisation were pretty memorable. frhed led to my work on reverse engineering the CHM file format (a documentation format for Windows programs). A stand-out moment during my time with Debian was hacking on the derivates census patch generation code during the Debian UK BBQ weekend, surrounded by geeks playing Portal, cooking things, hacking on Debian and generally having a good time (thanks Steve!). me: Some memorable moments from Debian conferences? pabs: There are so many; meeting Debian folks, playing Mao once and then never again, late night games of werewolf, both delectably delicious and hideously disgusting cheeses, fried insects, day trips to beautiful landscapes, inspiring keynotes, exciting BoFs, secret IRC channels for planning surprise birthday parties, blue hair, wet air, blocks of fried cheese, a vast quantity of icecream, pants, geeks in the surf, volcanoes, hiking, a wonderful view, a uni-cycling stormtrooper & more. me: How do you see future of Debian development? pabs: I hope we will continue to exist and uphold our principles for the foreseeable future. I don't have any crystal balls though. me: You recently became member of Debian DSA - what is that like, what roles do you have and what tasks are in front of DSA? pabs: We wrote a bit of text about that for DPN recently. me: You have large knowledge on Debian and you share it with anyone who wants to know more. What motivates you to do so? pabs: I want the operating system I personally rely on to exist into the future, helping folks work on and join Debian can help with that. me: Why should developers and users join Debian community? What makes Debian a great and happy place? pabs: Every Debian contributor has different reasons for joining the community. Personally the Social Contract, the DFSG and the spirit and culture behind them are the main reason to be involved. I also like our many efforts towards technical excellence and correctness. Of course I've made a number of good friends over the years, especially as a result of attending DebConf every year since 2007. me: You are member of Debian publicity team which writes Debian news - do you need more people to join that team and how can they start? pabs: Since there is an infinite amount of work to do, pretty much every part of Debian always needs help, that includes the publicity team. We published a post about ways to help here. me: If someone wants to contribute to Debian in terms of packaging, can they do it anonymously (for example over Tor network, does Debian have .onion address)? pabs: Due to Debian's penchant for transparency it is harder but there are definitely package maintainers who have built up a reputation for good work under a pseudonym over the years and become Debian contributors as a result. I'm not aware of completely anonymous package maintainers but there are definitely people who file bugs using one-off pseudonyms, which is almost the same thing as anonymously. There are definitely Debian contributors and members who use Tor while contributing to Debian. In fact, as Debian is very highly dependent on OpenPGP and the best practices for OpenPGP include refreshing your keyring slowly over Tor, so probably quite a number of Debian contributors use Tor. As far as I know Debian itself does not run any Tor relays or onion services. me: What are places that non-packaging developers and people could join and help spread Debian even more? pabs: There are many ways to help Debian, including non-technical ones. Unfortunately our web page about helping Debian isn't quite up-to-date with all of them but a few more are to volunteer at DebConf, helo with artwork requests, speak about Debian at events or even come up with ideas for projects. Whatever skills you have, Debian can probably make use of them. If you aren't sure where to start, jump on the debian-mentors mailing list or IRC channel and we can probably guide you to the right place within Debian. Don't worry about not being skilled enough, everyone starts somewhere. me: How do you see Debian will manage webapps? pabs: Personally I prefer locally installed software, standard data formats and standard data transfer protocols to the wild webapps world but I understand they are becoming very popular to produce and use due to the ubiquity of the web browser platform. Antonio Terceiro is mentoring a project for this year's newcomer mentorship programs (outreachy/gsoc) that aims to improve support for installing web apps on Debian installations. I hope it succeeds as it could help make Debian more popular on servers and home servers in particular. me: How would you advise Debian (and other FLOSS users) to setup their machine in terms of security and anonymity? pabs: All technology has upsides and downsides. I would advise anyone to analyse their situation and protect themselves accordingly. For example if you have a bad memory, full disk encryption, which is based on pass-phrases might lead to data loss and physical security might be a better choice for protecting your data. The right choices around technology are very much a personal thing. me: Is it better to setup xmonad (because it is Haskell based WM) with small dependency chain or GNOME (because it is getting sandboxed apps) in term of security and privacy implications? pabs: Again, the right choices around technology are very much a personal thing. Due to the design of X11, both of these are approximately equivalent from a window-manager security properties point of view, that is to say, pretty bad. Wayland is one of the possible X11 successors and offers much better security properties. GNOME folks are working on switching to Wayland. Ultimately though it comes down to how each person uses their window manager and which software they run under it. me: Should Debian join Tor project as distro that installs Tor relays by default - should it offer that as option in installer in Debian 9? pabs: Running a Tor relay requires a reasonably fast and reliable Internet connection and should be a conscious decision on behalf of the sysadmin for a computer so Debian probably shouldn't install them by default. If tasksel gets support for installing tasks from Debian Pure Blends, then we could add a Tor relay task to the Debian Sanctuary Pure Blend. me: Have you ever considered joining initiatives such as FreedomBox? pabs: I was quite moved by Eben Moglen's talk at DebConf10 in New York and the resulting BoF. It seemed like a very ambitious project but I didn't really have the knowledge, skills or time to contribute yet. me: Are you a gamer? Valve Steam games are offered for free to Debian Developers - do you use steam and play Valve games? Your thoughts on Steam and non-free Linux gaming? pabs: I play computer games occasionally, all from Debian main or ones that I'm packaging. 0ad is my current go-to for a bit of gaming. I don't have any experience with Steam or non-free games on Linux. me: Is there something you would change in FLOSS ecosystem? pabs: Various folks have highlighted new and ongoing challenges for the FLOSS ecosystem in various places in recent years. Something that I would like to highlight that does not get talked about enough is the choices we make around our digital artefacts. This is the discussion around "preferred form for modification" or "source". The "source" for a particular digital artefact is a deliberate choice on behalf of the authors. Often generated files are distributed alongside the "source" without any instructions for reproducing the generated files from the "source". It sometimes happens that FLOSS contributors forget to distriute what they have chosen as "source", instead just distributing the generated files. This is a fairly well known issue but still happens. What isn't thought about quite as much is that the choice of "source" has consequences for future development possibilities of that "source". Some forms of "source" are more expressive than others, can be modified in a wider variety of ways and are better choices in general. Sometimes the consequences of choosing less expressive forms are mild and other times they are quite important. I hope more people will start to think about these choices. Some examples where, in my opinion, various people could have made better choices are listed in the mail I sent to the games team list last year. Another thing I would like to highlight is the work that organisations like Software Freedom Conservancy and Software in the Public Interest do to protect, defend, promote and support FLOSS projects. It is very important work that needs our interest and support. me: Can FLOSS world create great alternatives to Viber, Dropbox, WhatsUp, Facebook, Skype and other non-free services? pabs: I think that the FLOSS world has already created alternatives to all of those. The success of non-free services doesn't take these alternatives away but it does mean some of them are less useful because some of them are the kind of tools that become more useful with a larger amount of people using them. I don't know what it would take for the FLOSS alternatives to achieve similar success as network effects are hard to overcome. Hopefully mako is right and the network effects are overrated. me: Your thoughts and compare Cloud, IaaS, PaaS, SaaSS? To what should the FLOSS world pay more attention and energy? pabs: Initially I dismissed these as buzzwords and a threat to Free Software. These days I view them as potential opportunities for Free Software. Cloud-related technologies such as OpenStack and virtual machines can make private compute farm hardware more flexible and useful to their owners. IaaS providers can be used to run Debian more simply and cheaply and therefore bring Debian to more people than possible with hardware. PaaS providers can be used to run Free Software services. SaaSS can be based entirely on Free Software and respect users. Of course, just like running Free Software on hardware (proprietary or libre), cloud technology, IaaS, PaaS and SaaSS all come with downsides. The FLOSS world should aim to inform users of our software of these downsides. For example, the Debian installer could note that it is running on Intel CPUs with a proprietary BIOS and various proprietary software running, that it is running on a mobile phone with a locked bootloader, that it is running in a Xen VM on machines owned by Amazon. Free Software services could note they are running on Google App Engine etc. Free Software web browsers, chat clients etc could note when they are connecting to proprietary network services. All these notes could inform users about the downsides present in the particular situation encountered. There is also much work to be done making it easier to run Free Software on top of or use Free Software to connect to all manner of platforms from lowRISC to UEFI to VMware to Google App Engine to GitHub to Facebook. The more places Free Software can reach, the more people will be exposed to the philosophy behind it and the more potential there is for folks to join the community. While co-option of the FLOSS world is a dangerous certainty, co-option of proprietary platforms might be able to expand the reach of the philosophy behind Free Software. me: Your thoughts on Purism (the open hardware laptop initiative that got recently funded on CrowdSupply)? pabs: I don't know enough about that to comment but personally I am more interested in a laptop based on a libre CPU architecture. The RISC-V ISA and the lowRISC project seems to be one of the more promising possibilities at this point in time. me: Did you watch Citizenfour - comments on it? pabs: I've seen the trailer and look forward to watching it at some point, I read there might be a screening at DebConf15.

2 March 2015

Carl Chenet: Backup Checker 1.2 : verify remote backups

Follow me on Identi.ca or Twitter or Diaspora*diaspora-banner Backup Checker is a command line software developed in Python 3.4, allowing users to verify the integrity of archives (tar,gz,bz2,lzma,zip,tree of files) and the state of the files inside an archive in order to find corruptions or intentional of accidental changes of states or removal of files inside an archive. The major feature of this new version is the ability of Backup Checker to use Unix streams. Using classic Unix tools like OpenSSH or wget, Backup Check is able to verify a remote tar. gz,bz2,xz archive. The following example verifies a tar.gz archive located on remote server through SSH: $ ssh -q server "cat /tmp/backup.tar.gz" ./backupchecker.py -c . -
 Another short example with the FTP protocol, to verify a tar.bz2 archive located on a remote server through FTP: 
$ wget --quiet -O - ftp://user:pass@server/backup.tar.gz   ./backupchecker.py -c . -
Moreover in this release, a new option configuration-name allows the user to define a custome name for the files generated by Backup Checker (default is defined from the name of the archive using the -g or -G options). It is a major step for Backup Checker. It is indeed easier and easier to use Backup Checker in your own scripts, allowing to fully automate your backup controls. Several companies now use Backup Checker to secure their backups. Let us know if we can help you. As usual, any feedback is welcome, through bug reports, emails of the author or comments on this blog.

Gergely Nagy: Distributed Version Control from another angle

I've been using distributed version control systems for a good while, started with TLA back in 2001, when it was still a bunch of shell scripts and was simply called "Arch". I jumped the Git bandwagon quite early too, sometime around May 2005, I believe, though it was only something to test and play with on the side: I didn't migrate my projects over yet. There are many reasons why I preferred these over the systems I used in the past (RCS and CVS; never considered Subversion an option), most of those reasons have been discussed at length over the years, and there's no reason to do so again.The reason for this post, is because I read a blog post about why Git and the other DVCSes fall short. There are a number of things in that article that I find... well, lets just say misinformed. I'll try to explain why.But here's the rub
I have wanted to have the full history while offline a grand total of maybe about six times. And this is merely going down over time as bandwidth gets ever more readily available. If you work as a field tech, or on a space station, or in a submarine or something, then okay, sure, this is a huge feature for you. But for the rest of us, I am going to assert that this is not the use case you need to optimize for when choosing a VCS.
I'm neither a field tech, nor do I work on a space station or a submarine. Yet, having the full history available locally has been crucial for my work for at least the past six years. Initially, I worked offline primarily, because my internet connection was incredibly limited (slow, expensive and unreliable), yet, I had a habit of committing small changes often. I needed a full clone to work effectively, and conveniently. Throw-away branches and all that - I needed them local, I didn't have the resources to push them online every time I wanted a merge.But now that I have fast and reliable internet, why do I need the full history on my own computer? I do, because I do much more research than I do development. The vast majority of my work between 2010 and 2012 involved reading histories, cherry picking and so on. About six hours a day, I was reading the past. Having the full history locally is a terrific aid when your job involves digging through it.Between 2013 and 2014, the amount of history reading dropped significantly, but I still worked with long-lived branches a lot, branches where history matters, where having easy and fast access to them is indispensable. I still had to find changes based on content (not commit message, branch, date or anything - content) on a daily basis. Hitting the network for each and every search would have wasted not only tremendous bandwidth and processing power on the server, but also a significant amount of time.If you do more maintenance and research, or follow a good number of branches (or forks), with the intent to merge and cherry-pick actively from them, having all the histories available locally is a huge improvement. I'm happy to pay the price of "wasting" disk space to have this available. I couldn't work otherwise. Without full, local history, the things I did for syslog-ng would not have been possible. No maintenance, none of the features I implemented, none of the fixes I found. Why? Because I rely on the project's history to aid me in learning the whys, not just the hows.Thank you, but - perhaps unlike others - I like to learn from the past, and prefer doing it efficiently.Say goodbye to blobs (or your sanity (and sometimes both))
You know what kind of external binary asset management system works really well? Subversion. Turns out it works tolerably for source control, too. Maybe you should take a look at it.
Sure, some systems are better at managing binary assets. Git - and usually DVCSes - are terrible at it. There's nothing stopping anyone from using two systems: one for source, another for data. Mind you, I am extremely happy with git-annex. I disagree with Subversion being tolerable for source control. I'd turn this assertion around instead: You know what kind of system works really well for source code? Git. Turns out it works tolerably as an external binary assest management system, too. Maybe you should take a look at it.But then, I rarely need to work with blobs, so I'm likely not the best person to disagree here.Say goodbye to sane version synchronizationOkay, so this part of the article is ill-titled, I believe. Large repositories and version synchronisation are two different, not necessarily related topic. Granted DVCSes may not be the best fit for large repositories, but neither are centralised version control systems, based on my past experience. I had the misfortune of working with a roughly 3-4Gb (checked out) project, with extensive history, managed with a centralised version control system, without local history. It was terrible (and blame was so slow and expensive that we were told never to use it, because it crashed the server). While the system allowed us to have a reasonable overview over the whole project, but it utterly failed at allowing us to work at the component level. How do I see which version of component X we had in project release A? Or the version of component Y we had two weeks ago? Or what if we have component M, made up from components J and K, and belonging to component Z? Good luck managing that in a single repository.With TLA, we had configs, which were a bit cumbersome to use, but captured most of the essential parts of managing component bundling and hierarchical versioning far better than any other solution I've seen so far. I've yet to find an acceptable solution, but I'm convinced it will not have anything to do with centralised systems. You can't capture the delicate relations there.Say what again, I dare you, I double dare you
All of the above might be almost tolerable if DVCSes were easier to use than traditional SCMs, but they aren t.
I'm sorry, but have you tried managing a decently sized project, with a large history, built from multiple components with a traditional SCM? Because that is a colossal pain in the backside.Does Git's UI suck? Yes. But so did CVS's and Subversion's. If you rely on the command-line tools, you're going to feel the pain. That is why you use the IDE integration you surely have, which makes the most common tasks a breeze. That may sound like a git-apology, but remember, we did the same with every other version control system, because smart people prefer integration, and want the computer to work for them.
And yet, when someone dares to say that Git is harder than other SCMs, they inevitably get yelled at, in what I can only assume is a combination of Stockholm syndrome and groupthink run amok by overdosing on five-hour energy buckets.
If you feel the need to understand the innards of Git - then yes, it is harder than traditional SCMs. It is distributed, and different than what you're used to. If you do not have prior knowledge though, the difference in learning the internal working of Git and - say - Subversion all that different. And if you do not care how it works down below (and I dare say, a lot of developers should not, and do not care), then there is nothing to learn, apart from your IDE integration, which ain't different from a traditional SCM's.Mind you, I found it both interesting, and beneficial to learn Git's inner workings. Not only because it allowed me to make better use of my VCS, but because it taught me a bunch of things I could make use of elsewhere. I learned nothing from traditional SCMs.Do you hear the people sing, singing the song of angry men
There is one last major argument that I hear all the time about why DVCSes are superior, which is that they somehow enable more democratic code development.
The reason Git and other tools make code contribution easier is not GitHub pull requests (although, for drive-by contributions those are pretty useful too). The reason they make contribution easier is because you have your own copy of the full history. You can create your own branches easily, you can work with it as if you were the owner. For one-off contributions, that is no real advantage, I'll give you that. It takes more effort to fork & do a PR on GitHub, than to send a patch, I'll also agree with that.But once you start working with a project for more than a few patches, when you want to work with its history too, once you have long-lived branches, the local copy quickly becomes a great asset. Once you want to submit more than a few changes, you won't have to repeat a all steps. And not only that: since you have the full history, merging upstream changes (or just cherry picking from them), rebasing your work, and many other tasks become simpler.That is what it buys you, that is why it makes contribution easier. GitHub pull requests are an icing over the cake at best (and there are a good number of cases where the icing is completely unnecessary, because it doesn't go well with the cake).In closingIn closing, I'd like to highlight that different projects have different requirements. For example, I understand why Facebook, Google and a number of others use a single, huge repository. I happen to hate that setup, and would find working in such an environment horrible. But luckily, I don't work for those companies, and they don't listen to me, either, so everyone's happy. That does not mean I would go out and tell them they're wrong to use such a centralised, single-repository setup. For their use, in their situation, for their requirements, that may be the better option. For mine, not so much.In the end, what we need to realise is that there is no single tool that will fit all needs. There are tasks where Git is a terrible choice, but that does not make it terrible for all cases. Similarly, there are cases where Subversion is superior (I assume - I didn't have the misfortune of meeting with such a case).Instead of bashing the DVCS world, and assuming the Big Company use cases are all that matter, and that everyone uses the tools the same way, accept that some use it to achieve things you didn't think of, jobs you didn't consider.

28 February 2015

Zlatan Todori : Interviews with FLOSS developers: Joey Hess

Edit: Now translated to Chinese. Thanks zhang wei! There is really hardly a better way to open a series of interviewing with developers behind Free Libre Open Source Software project, then with incredible mind such as Joey Hess. To write his contributions to Free software ecosystem, especially in Debian, would be a book by itself. His impact exceeds even his projects - people literally follow his blog posts to see what he is doing and how is he living. A hacker from cabin. If you really need to have a picture of true hacker, then Joey is the one. As this isn't a book I will just mention few projects that he has been behind - git-annex, ikiwiki, etckeeper, debian installer, parts of dpkg, debhelper, devscripts, taskel. So without further waiting here it is. Picture of Joey Hess me: Who are you? joeyh: I'm Joey -- https://joeyh.name/ me: How did you start programming? joeyh: Atari 130XE which came with BASIC and a boring word processor and not much else. No other friends had one, so the only way to get software was to type in demo programs from manual and then begin to change and write my own. So, the easy way to learn. Also some Logo in school. me: How would you now advise others to start programming? joeyh: Difficult question, it seems much harder to get an intimate understanding of things than when I started, and much harder to be motivated to program when there's so much stuff easily available. Maybe simple bare-metal systems like Arduino coupled with real-world interaction are the answer. I've recently been mentoring my nephew who is learning python and Python the Hard Way has gotten him far impressively fast. me: Setup of your development machine? joeyh: Lenovo laptop de-spywared with Debian unstable, xmonad, xfce, vim. me: Your thoughts on Purism (the open hardware laptop initiative that got recently funded on CrowdSupply)? joeyh: I don't know much about that one, but it seems that consumer level hardware has gotten so low quality, and so closed and untrustworthy that it makes sense to either build alternatives that are open, or pick out, as a community, the stuff we can adapt to our needs and concentrate on it. Several projects are trying, I hope they succeed. me: How do you see future of Debian development? joeyh: Well, I've mostly stopped worrying about it. If you look back at my presentations at the past 2 or 3 DebConfs, you'll find my best thoughts on the matter. me: You retired as Debian developer - do you intend sometime soon to come back and/or do you plan to join some other communities? joeyh: It would be glorious to come back, wouldn't it? But I don't think I will. Can't step in the same river twice, and all. Instead, Debian will probably have to put up with me as an annoying upstream author who doesn't ship tarballs, but does ship debian/ directories, and as a bug reporter who enjoys reporting amusing bugs like -0 NaN. I seem to have more time to spend in other online communities since I left Debian, but in a more diffuse way. Maybe that's just what it's like, to be involved in Free Software but not in the embrace of a big project like Debian. me: Some memorable moments from Debian conferences? joeyh: There are so many! Picnicing on berries and tamales at the Portland farmer's market right outside the venue; rainbows and bonfire in Switzerland after crazy busy days; impromptu pipe organ repair in a weird night venue in Edinburgh; walking through Porto Alegre at night with Ian Murdock and how humble he was about what he'd started; hacking all night in Spain; failing to sleep through midnight sun and incessent partying Finland; hanging out in the hotel lobby in Atlanta where we designed Build-Depends. me: Are you a gamer? Valve Steam games are offered for free to Debian Developers - do you use steam and play Valve games? joeyh: I've played through Half Life and Portal, but nethack has claimed more of my time. I mostly enjoy short, indie games, or games that tell us something new about the medium of games, A recent favorite was A Dark Room. But really, I have more pure fun playing real world Tabletop games with friends, like Carcassanne Discovery and Hive. In March, I am going to try to write a roguelike game in one week, in Haskell, for the Seven Day Roguelike Challenge and I'll be blogging about my progress daily. me: You are nowdays a Haskell hacker (git-annex) - what would you like to say about this language and how does it compare to Python, C, JavaScript, Ruby and Perl? joeyh: Not just git-annex; all my current projects are written in Haskell. I think it's amazing how much we expect programmers to keep in their heads while writing code. Is that buffer going to overflow? Is changing the value of that global variable going to break some other part of the code? Is that input sanitized yet? Did that interface change? Haskell solves some of these outright, but more, it makes you start noticing this kind of pervasive issue, and it provides ways to completely eliminate a class of problems from your code. For example http://joeyh.name/blog/entry/making_propellor_safer_with_GADTs_and_type_families/. The class of bugs I avoided there had never affected my code even once, but it was still worth preventing that whole class of bugs, so I don't have to worry about them ever again. me: Would you suggest Haskell as first language to learn especially for those that have an itch for mathematics? joeyh: I think that can work well. Or it can go other the way -- I had an affinity to mathematics when I was young, but it got knocked out of me in the way that happens to many people, and languages like perl and C don't do much to make you want to learn more about higher-order math. I've been picking up a bit more here and there via Haskell. me: How do you compare your productivity in Haskell compared to your Perl days? joeyh: It's very different; I'm a very different programmer now. I probably would bang out quick hacks more quickly when I was writing Perl. But, they tended to stay quick hacks. Now, I might take a little longer to get there, but the code seems a lot more solid, while also being more malleable to turn into larger or different programs. I'm also a lot more drawn toward writing software libraries. me: Can you describe your philosophy of life (you live in cabin, in forest, using a lot of solar power - many people are intrigued (including myself) what drives you towards that kind of life and how does it impact your overall quality of life and happiness. Looking the todays modern predator capitalistic society, in which you could easily earn more then $10.000 a month, you seem to be an anarchist and very humble human)? joeyh: I want to build worthwhile things that might last. Which is super hard in the world of software, both because it's hard to think far ahead at all, and because most jobs don't emphasize that kind of real value. I've been lucky and bootstrapped up to a point where I've been able to work full time on free software for years, and I'm willing to forgo a lot to continue that. Living in the woods without modern conveniences is great, because it's quiet and you can think as much as you like; the internet is just as close as it is anywhere else (maybe a bit slower); and when you've spent too much time quietly thinking you'll need to go chop wood, or haul water, or jump in the river to cool off, depending on the season. (Humble? Like most programmers, I am internally a flaming tower of ego...)
Vote on Hacker News

27 February 2015

Richard Hartmann: Release Critical Bug report for Week 09

The UDD bugs interface currently knows about the following release critical bugs: How do we compare to the Squeeze and Wheezy release cycles?
Week Squeeze Wheezy Jessie
43 284 (213+71) 468 (332+136) 319 (240+79)
44 261 (201+60) 408 (265+143) 274 (224+50)
45 261 (205+56) 425 (291+134) 295 (229+66)
46 271 (200+71) 401 (258+143) 427 (313+114)
47 283 (209+74) 366 (221+145) 342 (260+82)
48 256 (177+79) 378 (230+148) 274 (189+85)
49 256 (180+76) 360 (216+155) 226 (147+79)
50 204 (148+56) 339 (195+144) ???
51 178 (124+54) 323 (190+133) 189 (134+55)
52 115 (78+37) 289 (190+99) 147 (112+35)
1 93 (60+33) 287 (171+116) 140 (104+36)
2 82 (46+36) 271 (162+109) 157 (124+33)
3 25 (15+10) 249 (165+84) 172 (128+44)
4 14 (8+6) 244 (176+68) 187 (132+55)
5 2 (0+2) 224 (132+92) 175 (124+51)
6 release! 212 (129+83) 161 (109+52)
7 release+1 194 (128+66) 147 (106+41)
8 release+2 206 (144+62) 147 (96+51)
9 release+3 174 (105+69) 152 (101+51)
10 release+4 120 (72+48)
11 release+5 115 (74+41)
12 release+6 93 (47+46)
13 release+7 50 (24+26)
14 release+8 51 (32+19)
15 release+9 39 (32+7)
16 release+10 20 (12+8)
17 release+11 24 (19+5)
18 release+12 2 (2+0)
Graphical overview of bug stats thanks to azhag:

26 February 2015

EvolvisForge blog: tomcat7 init script is asynchronous

TIL: the init script of tomcat7 in Debian is asynchronous. For some piece of software, our rollout (install and upgrade) process works like this: The first tomcat7 start here is just to unzip the *.war files. For some reason, people like to let tomcat7 do that. This failed today; there were two webapps. Manually unzipping it also did not work for some reason. Re-doing it, inserting a sleep 30 after the here , made it work. In a perfect world, initscripts only return when the service is running, so that the next one started in a nice sequential (not parallel!) init or manual start sequence can do what it needs to, assuming the previous command has fully finished. In this perfect world, those who do wish for faster startup times use a different init system, one that starts things in parallel, for example. Even there, dependencies will wish for the depended-on service to be fully running when they are started; even more so, since the delays between starting things seem to be less for that other init system. So, this is not about the init system, but about the init script; a change that would be a win-win for users of both init schemes. Update: Someone already contacted me with feedback: they suggested to wait until the shutdown port is listened on by tomcat7. We ll look at this later. In the meantime, we re trying to also get rid of the config (and logs) in webapps/ part
PS: If someone is interested in an init script (Debian/LSB sysvinit, I made the effort to finally learn that some months before the other system came) that starts Wildfly (formerly known as JBoss AS) synchronously, waiting until all *.?ar files are fully deployed before returning (though with a timeout in case it won t ever finish), just ask (maybe it will become a dialogue, in which we can improve it together). (We have two versions of it, the more actively maintained one is in a secret internal project though, so I d have to merge it and ready it for publication though, plus the older one is AGPLv3, the newer one was relicenced to a BSDish licence.)

25 February 2015

Zlatan Todori : Net neutrality for average Joe

If you are still unsure what it means, here is perfectly simple example.

23 February 2015

Enrico Zini: akonadi-client-example

Akonadi client example After many failed attemps I have managed to build a C++ akonadi client. It has felt like one of the most frustrating programming experiences of my whole life, so I'm sharing the results hoping to spare others from all the suffering. First thing first, akonadi client libraries are not in libakonadi-dev but in kdepimlibs5-dev, even if kdepimlibs5-dev does not show in apt-cache search akonadi. Then, kdepimlibs is built with Qt4. If your application uses Qt5 (mine was) you need to port it back to Qt4 if you want to talk to Akonadi. Then, kdepimlibs does not seem to support qmake and does not ship pkg-config .pc files, and if you want to use kdepimlibs your build system needs to be cmake. I ported by code from qmake to cmake, and now qtcreator wants me to run cmake by hand every time I change the CMakeLists.txt file, and it stopped allowing to add, rename or delete sources. Finally, most of the code / build system snippets found on the internet seem flawed in a way or another, because the build toolchain of Qt/KDE applications has undergone several redesignins during time, and the network is littered with examples from different eras. The way to obtain template code to start a Qt/KDE project is to use kapptemplate. I have found no getting started tutorial on the internet that said "do not just copy the snippets from here, run kapptemplate instead so you get them up to date". kapptemplate supports building an "Akonadi Resource" and an "Akonadi Serializer", but it does not support generating template code for an akonadi client. That left me with the feeling that I was dealing with some software that wants to be developed but does not want to be used. Anyway, now an example of how to interrogate Akonadi exists as is on the internet. I hope that all the tears of blood that I cried this morning have not been cried in vain.

Enrico Zini: akonadi-build-hth

The wonders of missing documentation Update: I have managed to build an example Akonadi client application. I'm new here, I want to make a simple C++ GUI app that pops up a QCalendarWidget which my local Akonadi has appointments. I open qtcreator, create a new app, hack away for a while, then of course I get undefined references for all Akonadi symbols, since I didn't tell the build system that I'm building with akonadi. Ok. How do I tell the build system that I'm building with akonadi? After 20 minutes of frantic looking around the internet, I still have no idea. There is a package called libakonadi-dev which does not seem to have anything to do with this. That page mentions everything about making applications with Akonadi except how to build them. There is a package called kdepimlibs5-dev which looks promising: it has no .a files but it does have haders and cmake files. However, qtcreator is only integrated with qmake, and I would really like the handholding of an IDE at this stage. I put something together naively doing just what looked right, and I managed to get an application that segfaults before main() is even called: 
/*
 * Copyright   2015 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
 *
 * This work is free. You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
 * terms of the Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2,
 * as published by Sam Hocevar. See the COPYING file for more details.
 */
#include <QDebug>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
    qDebug() << "BEGIN";
    return 0;
 

QT       += core gui widgets
CONFIG += c++11
TARGET = wtf
TEMPLATE = app
LIBS += -lkdecore -lakonadi-kde
SOURCES += wtf.cpp
I didn't achieve what I wanted, but I feel like I achieved something magical and beautiful after all. I shall now perform some haruspicy on those oscure cmake files to see if I can figure something out. But seriously, people?

Dirk Eddelbuettel: drat Tutorial: Publishing a package

Introduction The drat package was released earlier this month, and described in a first blog post. I received some helpful feedback about what works and what doesn't. For example, Jenny Bryan pointed out that I was not making a clear enough distinction between the role of using drat to publish code, and using drat to receive/install code. Very fair point, and somewhat tricky as R aims to blur the line between being a user and developer of statistical analyses, and hence packages. Many of us are both. Both the main point is well taken, and this note aims to clarify this issue a little by focusing on the former. Another point make by Jenny concerns the double use of repository. And indeed, I conflated repository (in the sense of a GitHub code repository) with repository for a package store used by a package manager. The former, a GitHub repository, is something we use to implement a personal drat with: A GitHub repository happens to be uniquely identifiable just by its account name, and given an (optional) gh-pages branch also offers a stable and performant webserver we use to deliver packages for R. A (personal) code repository on the other hand is something we implement somewhere---possibly via drat which supports local directories, possibly on a network share, as well as anywhere web-accessible, e.g. via a GitHub repository. It is a little confusing, but I will aim to make the distinction clearer.

Just once: Setting up a drat repository So let us for the remainder of this post assume the role of a code publisher. Assume you have a package you would like to make available, which may not be on CRAN and for which you would like to make installation by others easier via drat. The example below will use an interim version of drat which I pushed out yesterday (after fixing a bug noticed when pushing the very new RcppAPT package). For the following, all we assume (apart from having a package to publish) is that you have a drat directory setup within your git / GitHub repository. This is not an onerous restriction. First off, you don't have to use git or GitHub to publish via drat: local file stores and other web servers work just as well (and are documented). GitHub simply makes it easiest. Second, bootstrapping one is trivial: just fork my drat GitHub repository and then create a local clone of the fork. There is one additional requirement: you need a gh-pages branch. Using the fork-and-clone approach ensures this. Otherwise, if you know your way around git you already know how to create a gh-pages branch. Enough of the prerequisities. And on towards real fun. Let's ensure we are in the gh-pages branch: 
edd@max:~/git/drat(master)$ git checkout gh-pages
Switched to branch 'gh-pages'
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/gh-pages'.
edd@max:~/git/drat(gh-pages)$

Publish: Run one drat command to insert a package Now, let us assume you have a package to publish. In my case this was version 0.0.1.2 of drat itself as it contains a fix for the very command I am showing here. So if you want to run this, ensure you have this version of drat as the CRAN version is currently behind at release 0.0.1 (though I plan to correct that in the next few days). To publish an R package into a code repository created via drat running on a drat GitHub repository, just run insertPackage(packagefile) which we show here with the optional commit=TRUE. The path to the package can be absolute are relative; the easists is often to go up one directory from the sources to where R CMD build ... has created the package file. 
edd@max:~/git$ Rscript -e 'library(drat); insertPackage("drat_0.0.1.2.tar.gz", commit=TRUE)'
[gh-pages 0d2093a] adding drat_0.0.1.2.tar.gz to drat
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 src/contrib/drat_0.0.1.2.tar.gz
Counting objects: 7, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done.
Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 7.37 KiB   0 bytes/s, done.
Total 7 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
To git@github.com:eddelbuettel/drat.git
   206d2fa..0d2093a  gh-pages -> gh-pages
edd@max:~/git$
You can equally well run this as insertPackage("drat_0.0.1.2.tar.gz"), then inspect the repo and only then run the git commands add, commit and push. Also note that future versions of drat will most likely support git operations directly by relying on the very promising git2r package. But this just affect package internals, the user-facing call of e.g. insertPackage("drat_0.0.1.2.tar.gz", commit=TRUE) will remain unchanged. And in a nutshell that really is all there is to it. With the newly drat-ed package pushed to your GitHub repository with a single function call), it is available via the automatically-provided gh-pages webserver access to anyone in the world. All they need to do is to point R's package management code (which is built into R itself and used for e.g._ CRAN and BioConductor R package repositories) to the new repo---and that is also just a single drat command. We showed this in the first blog post and may expand on it again in a follow-up. So in summary, that really is all there is to it. After a one-time setup / ensuring you are on the gh-pages branch, all it takes is a single function call from the drat package to publish your package to your drat GitHub repository.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

21 February 2015

Dominique Dumont: Performance improvement for cme check dpkg

Hello Thanks to Devel::NYTProf, I ve realized that Module::CoreList was used in a not optimal way (to say the least) in Config::Model::Dpkg::Dependency when checking the dependency between Perl packages. (Note that only Perl packages with many dependencies were affected by this lack of performance) After a rework, the performance are much better. Here s an example comparing check time before and after the modification of libconfig-model-dpkg-perl. With libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 2.059:
$ time cme check dpkg
Using Dpkg
loading data
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
checking data
check done real 0m10.235s
user 0m10.136s
sys 0m0.088s With libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 2.060:
$ time cme check dpkg
Using Dpkg
loading data
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
checking data
check done real 0m1.565s
user 0m1.468s
sys 0m0.092s All in all, a 8x performance improvement on the dependency check. Note that, due to the freeze, the new version of libconfig-model-dpkg-perl is available only in experimental. All the best
Tagged: Config::Model, debian, dpkg, package

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppAPT 0.0.1

Over the last few days I put together a new package RcppAPT which interfaces the C++ library behind the awesome apt, apt-get, apt-cache, ... commands and their GUI-based brethren. The package currently implements two functions which permit search for package information via a regular expression, as well as a (vectorised) package name-based check. More to come, and contributions would be very welcome. A few examples just to illustrate follow. 
R> hasPackages(c("r-cran-rcpp", "r-cran-rcppapt"))
   r-cran-rcpp r-cran-rcppapt 
          TRUE          FALSE
This shows that Rcpp is (of course) available as a binary, but this (very new) package is (unsurprisingly) not yet available pre-built. We can search by regular expression: 
R> library(RcppAPT)
R> getPackages("^r-base-c.")
          Package      Installed       Section
1 r-base-core-dbg 3.1.2-1utopic0 universe/math
2 r-base-core-dbg           <NA> universe/math
3     r-base-core 3.1.2-1utopic0 universe/math
4     r-base-core           <NA> universe/math
R>
With the (default) expression catching everything, we see a lot of packages: 
R> dim(getPackages())
[1] 104431      3
R>
A bit more information is on the package page here as well as as the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

20 February 2015

Richard Hartmann: Release Critical Bug report for Week 08

The UDD bugs interface currently knows about the following release critical bugs: How do we compare to the Squeeze and Wheezy release cycles?
Week Squeeze Wheezy Jessie
43 284 (213+71) 468 (332+136) 319 (240+79)
44 261 (201+60) 408 (265+143) 274 (224+50)
45 261 (205+56) 425 (291+134) 295 (229+66)
46 271 (200+71) 401 (258+143) 427 (313+114)
47 283 (209+74) 366 (221+145) 342 (260+82)
48 256 (177+79) 378 (230+148) 274 (189+85)
49 256 (180+76) 360 (216+155) 226 (147+79)
50 204 (148+56) 339 (195+144) ???
51 178 (124+54) 323 (190+133) 189 (134+55)
52 115 (78+37) 289 (190+99) 147 (112+35)
1 93 (60+33) 287 (171+116) 140 (104+36)
2 82 (46+36) 271 (162+109) 157 (124+33)
3 25 (15+10) 249 (165+84) 172 (128+44)
4 14 (8+6) 244 (176+68) 187 (132+55)
5 2 (0+2) 224 (132+92) 175 (124+51)
6 release! 212 (129+83) 161 (109+52)
7 release+1 194 (128+66) 147 (106+41)
8 release+2 206 (144+62) 147 (96+51)
9 release+3 174 (105+69)
10 release+4 120 (72+48)
11 release+5 115 (74+41)
12 release+6 93 (47+46)
13 release+7 50 (24+26)
14 release+8 51 (32+19)
15 release+9 39 (32+7)
16 release+10 20 (12+8)
17 release+11 24 (19+5)
18 release+12 2 (2+0)
Graphical overview of bug stats thanks to azhag:

Rhonda D'Vine: Queer-Positive Songs

Just recently I stumbled upon one of these songs again and thought to myself: Are there more out there? With these songs I mean songs that could from its lyrics be considered queer-positive. Lyrics that cointain parts that speak about queer topics. To get you an idea of what I mean here are three songs as examples: Do you have further examples for me? I know that I already mentioned another one in my blog entry about Garbage for a start. I am aware that there probably are dedicated bands that out of their own history do a lot songs in that direction, but I also want to hear about songs in which it is only mentioned in a side note and not made the central topic of the whole song, making it an absolutely normal random by-note. Like always, enjoy and I'm looking forward to your suggestions!

/music permanent link Comments: 17 Flattr this

19 February 2015

Matthew Garrett: It has been 0 days since the last significant security failure. It always will be.

So blah blah Superfish blah blah trivial MITM everything's broken.

Lenovo deserve criticism. The level of incompetence involved here is so staggering that it wouldn't be a gross injustice for the company to go under as a result[1]. But let's not pretend that this is some sort of isolated incident. As an industry, we don't care about user security. We will gladly ship products with known security failings and no plans to update them. We will produce devices that are locked down such that it's impossible for anybody else to fix our failures. We will hide behind vague denials, we will obfuscate the impact of flaws and we will deflect criticisms with announcements of new and shinier products that will make everything better.

It'd be wonderful to say that this is limited to the proprietary software industry. I would love to be able to argue that we respect users more in the free software world. But there are too many cases that demonstrate otherwise, even where we should have the opportunity to prove the benefits of open development. An obvious example is the smartphone market. Hardware vendors will frequently fail to provide timely security updates, and will cease to update devices entirely after a very short period of time. Fortunately there's a huge community of people willing to produce updated firmware. Phone manufacturer is never going to fix the latest OpenSSL flaw? As long as your phone can be unlocked, there's a reasonable chance that there's an updated version on the internet.

But this is let down by a kind of callous disregard for any deeper level of security. Almost every single third-party Android image is either unsigned or signed with the "test keys", a set of keys distributed with the Android source code. These keys are publicly available, and as such anybody can sign anything with them. If you configure your phone to allow you to install these images, anybody with physical access to your phone can replace your operating system. You've gained some level of security at the application level by giving up any real ability to trust your operating system.

This is symptomatic of our entire ecosystem. We're happy to tell people to disable security features in order to install third-party software. We're happy to tell people to download and build source code without providing any meaningful way to verify that it hasn't been tampered with. Install methods for popular utilities often still start "curl sudo bash". This isn't good enough.

We can laugh at proprietary vendors engaging in dreadful security practices. We can feel smug about giving users the tools to choose their own level of security. But until we're actually making it straightforward for users to choose freedom without giving up security, we're not providing something meaningfully better - we're just providing the same shit sandwich on different bread.

[1] I don't see any way that they will, but it wouldn't upset me

comment count unavailable comments

17 February 2015

Lucas Nussbaum: Some email organization tips and tricks

I d like to share a few tips that were useful to strengthen my personal email organization. Most of what follows is probably not very new nor special, but hey, let s document it anyway. Many people have an inbox folder that just grow over time. It s actually similar to a twitter or RSS feed (except they probably agree that they are supposed to read more of their email feed ). When I send an email to them, it sometimes happen that they don t notice it, if the email arrives at a bad time. Of course, as long as they don t receive too many emails, and there aren t too many people relying on them, it might just work. But from time to time, it s super-painful for those interacting with them, when they miss an email and they need to be pinged again. So let s try not to be like them. :-) Tip #1: do Inbox Zero (or your own variant of it) Inbox Zero is an email management methodology inspired from David Allen s Getting Things Done book. It s best described in this video. The idea is to turn one s Inbox into an area that is only temporary storage, where every email will get processed at some point. Processing can mean deleting an email, archiving it, doing the action described in the email (and replying to it), etc. Put differently, it basically means implementing the Getting Things Done workflow on one s email. Tip #1.1: archive everything One of the time-consuming decisions in the original GTD workflow is to decide whether something should be eliminated (deleted) or stored for reference. Given that disk space is quite cheap, it s much easier to never decide about that, and just archive everything (by duplicating the email to an archive folder when it is received). To retrieve archived emails when needed, I then use notmuch within mutt to easily search through recent (< 2 year) archives. I use archivemail to archive older email in compressed mboxes from time to time, and grepmail to search through those mboxes when needed. I don t archive most Debian mailing lists though, as they are easy to fetch from master.d.o with the following script: 
#!/bin/sh
rsync -vP master.debian.org:~debian/*/*$1/*$1.$ 2:-$(date +%Y%m) * .
Then I can fetch a specific list archive with getlist devel 201502, or a set of archives with e.g. getlist devel 2014, or the current month with e.g. getlist devel. Note that to use grepmail on XZ-compressed archives, you need libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl version 1.5002-3 (only in unstable I was using a locally-patched version for ages, but finally made a patch last week, which Gregor kindly uploaded). Tip #1.2: split your inbox (Yes, this one looks obvious but I m always surprised at how many people don t do that.) Like me, you probably receive various kinds of emails: Splitting those into separate folders has several advantages: I ve seen some people splitting their inbox into too many folders. There s not much point in having a per-sender folder organization (unless there s really a recurring flow of emails from a specific person), as it increases the risk of missing an email. I use procmail to organize my email into folders. I know that there are several more modern alternatives, but I haven t looked at them since procmail does the job for me. Resulting organization I use one folder for my day-job email, one for my DPL email, one for all other email directed or Cced to me. Then, I have a few folders for automated notifications of stuff. My Debian mailing list folders are auto-managed by procmail s $MATCH: 
:0:
 * ^X-Mailing-List: <.*@lists\.debian\.org>
 * ^X-Mailing-List: <debian-\/[^@]*
 .ml.debian.$MATCH/
Some other mailing lists are in they separate folders, and there s a catch-all folder for the remaining ones. Ah, and since I use feed2imap, I have folders for the RSS/Atom feeds I follow. I have two different commands to start mutt. One only shows a restricted number of (important) folders. The other one shows the full list of (non-empty) folders. This is a good trick to avoid spending time reading email when I am supposed to do something more important. :) As for many people probably, my own organization is loosely based on GTD and Inbox Zero. It sometimes happen that some emails stay in my Inbox for several days or weeks, but I very rarely have more than 20 or 30 emails in one of my main inbox folders. I also do reviews of the whole content of my main inbox folders once or twice a week, to ensure that I did not miss an email that could be acted on quickly. A last trick is that I have a special folder replies, where procmail copies emails that are replies to a mail I sent, but which do not Cc me. That s useful to work-around Debian s no Cc on reply to mailing list posts policy. I receive email using offlineimap (over SSH to my mail server), and send it using nullmailer (through a SSH tunnel). The main advantage of offlineimap over using IMAP directly in mutt is that using IMAP to a remote server feels much more sluggish. Another advantage is that I only need SSH access to get my full email setup to work. Tip #2: tracking sent emails Two recurring needs I had was: I developed a short script to address that. It scans the content of my Sent maildir and my archive maildirs, and, for each email address I use, displays (see example output in README) the list of emails sent with this address (one email per line). It also detects if an email was replied to ( R column after the date), and abbreviates common parts in email addresses (debian-project@lists.debian.org becomes d-project@l.d.o). It also generates a temporary maildir with symlinks to all emails, so that I can just open the maildir if needed.

Next.

Previous.