Search Results: "ron"

24 February 2026

John Goerzen: Screen Power Saving in the Linux Console

I just made up a Debian trixie setup that has no need for a GUI. In fact, I rarely use the text console either. However, because the machine is dual boot and also serves another purpose, it s connected to my main monitor and KVM switch. The monitor has three inputs, and when whatever display it s set to goes into powersave mode, it will seek out another one that s active and automatically switch to it. You can probably see where this is heading: it s really inconvenient if one of the inputs never goes into powersave mode. And, of course, it wastes energy. I have concluded that the Linux text console has lost the ability to enter powersave mode after an inactivity timeout. It can still do screen blanking setting every pixel to black but that is a distinct and much less useful thing. You can do a lot of searching online that will tell you what to do. Almost all of it is wrong these days. For instance, none of these work: Why is this? Well, we are on at least the third generation of Linux text console display subsystems. (Maybe more than 3, depending on how you count.) The three major ones were:
  1. The VGA text console
  2. fbdev
  3. DRI/KMS
As I mentioned recently in my post about running an accurate 80 25 DOS-style console on modern Linux, the VGA text console mode is pretty much gone these days. It relied on hardware rendering of the text fonts, and that capability simply isn t present on systems that aren t PCs or even on PCs that are UEFI, which is most of them now. fbdev, or a framebuffer console under earlier names, has been in Linux since the late 1990s. It was the default for most distros until more recently. It supported DPMS powersave modes, and most of the instructions you will find online reference it. Nowadays, the DRI/KMS system is used for graphics. Unfortunately, it is targeted mainly at X11 and Wayland. It is also used for the text console, but things like DPMS-enabled timeouts were never implemented there. You can find some manual workarounds for instance, using ddcutil or similar for an external monitor, or adjusting the backlight files under /sys on a laptop. But these have a number of flaws making unwanted brightness adjustments, and not automatically waking up on keypress among them. My workaround I finally gave up and ran apt-get install xdm. Then in /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup, I added one line: 
xset dpms 0 0 120
Now the system boots into an xdm login screen, and shuts down the screen after 2 minutes of inactivity. On the rare occasion where I want a text console from it, I can switch to it and it won t have a timeout, but I can live with that. Thus, quite hopefully, concludes my series of way too much information about the Linux text console!

23 February 2026

Antoine Beaupr : PSA: North america changes time forward soon, Europe next

This is a copy of an email I used to send internally at work and now made public. I'm not sure I'll make a habit of posting it here, especially not twice a year, unless people really like it. Right now, it's mostly here to keep with my current writing spree going.
This is your bi-yearly reminder that time is changing soon!

What's happening? For people not on tor-internal, you should know that I've been sending semi-regular announcements when daylight saving changes occur. Starting now, I'm making those announcements public so they can be shared with the wider community because, after all, this affects everyone (kind of). For those of you lucky enough to have no idea what I'm talking about, you should know that some places in the world implement what is called Daylight saving time or DST. Normally, you shouldn't have to do anything: computers automatically change time following local rules, assuming they are correctly configured, provided recent updates have been applied in the case of a recent change in said rules (because yes, this happens). Appliances, of course, will likely not change time and will need to adjusted unless they are so-called "smart" (also known as "part of a bot net"). If your clock is flashing "0:00" or "12:00", you have no action to take, congratulations on having the right time once or twice a day. If you haven't changed those clocks in six months, congratulations, they will be accurate again! In any case, you should still consider DST because it might affect some of your meeting schedules, particularly if you set up a new meeting schedule in the last 6 months and forgot to consider this change.

If your location does not have DST Properly scheduled meetings affecting multiple time zones are set in UTC time, which does not change. So if your location does not observer time changes, your (local!) meeting time will not change. But be aware that some other folks attending your meeting might have the DST bug and their meeting times will change. They might miss entire meetings or arrive late as you frantically ping them over IRC, Matrix, Signal, SMS, Ricochet, Mattermost, SimpleX, Whatsapp, Discord, Slack, Wechat, Snapchat, Telegram, XMPP, Briar, Zulip, RocketChat, DeltaChat, talk(1), write(1), actual telegrams, Meshtastic, Meshcore, Reticulum, APRS, snail mail, and, finally, flying a remote presence drone to their house, asking what's going on. (Sorry if I forgot your preferred messaging client here, I tried my best.) Be kind; those poor folks might be more sleep deprived as DST steals one hour of sleep from them on the night that implements the change.

If you do observe DST If you are affected by the DST bug, your local meeting times will change access the board. Normally, you can trust that your meetings are scheduled to take this change into account and the new time should still be reasonable. Trust, but verify; make sure the new times are adequate and there are no scheduling conflicts. Do this now: take a look at your calendar in two week and in April. See if any meeting need to be rescheduled because of an impossible or conflicting time.

When does time change, how and where? Notice how I mentioned "North America" in the subject? That's a lie. ("The doctor lies", as they say on the BBC.) Other places, including Europe, also changes times, just not all at once (and not all North America). We'll get into "where" soon, but first let's look at the "how". As you might already know, the trick is:
Spring forward, fall backwards.
This northern-centric (sorry!) proverb says that clocks will move forward by an hour this "spring", after moving backwards last "fall". This is why we lose an hour of work, sorry, sleep. It sucks, to put it bluntly. I want it to stop and will keep writing those advisories until it does. To see where and when, we, unfortunately, still need to go into politics.

USA and Canada First, we start with "North America" which, really, is just some parts of USA[1] and Canada[2]. As usual, on the Second Sunday in March (the 8th) at 02:00 local (not UTC!), the clocks will move forward. This means that properly set clocks will flip from 1:59 to 3:00, coldly depriving us from an hour of sleep that was perniciously granted 6 months ago and making calendar software stupidly hard to write. Practically, set your wrist watch and alarm clocks[3] back one hour before going to bed and go to bed early. [1] except Arizona (except the Navajo nation), US territories, and Hawaii [2] except Yukon, most of Saskatchewan, and parts of British Columbia (northeast), one island in Nunavut (Southampton Island), one town in Ontario (Atikokan) and small parts of Quebec (Le Golfe-du-Saint-Laurent), a list which I keep recopying because I find it just so amazing how chaotic it is. When your clock has its own Wikipedia page, you know something is wrong. [3] hopefully not managed by a botnet, otherwise kindly ask your bot net operator to apply proper software upgrades in a timely manner

Europe Next we look at our dear Europe, which will change time on the last Sunday in March (the 29th) at 01:00 UTC (not local!). I think it means that, Amsterdam-time, the clocks will flip from 1:59 to 3:00 AM local on that night. (Every time I write this, I have doubts. I would welcome independent confirmation from night owls that observe that funky behavior experimentally.) Just like your poor fellows out west, just fix your old-school clocks before going to bed, and go to sleep early, it's good for you.

Rest of the world with DST Renewed and recurring apologies again to the people of Cuba, Mexico, Moldova, Israel, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, Chile (except Magallanes Region), parts of Australia, and New Zealand which all have their own individual DST rules, omitted here for brevity. In general, changes also happen in March, but either on different times or different days, except in the south hemisphere, where they happen in April.

Rest of the world without DST All of you other folks without DST, rejoice! Thank you for reminding us how manage calendars and clocks normally. Sometimes, doing nothing is precisely the right thing to do. You're an inspiration for us all.

Changes since last time There were, again, no changes since last year on daylight savings that I'm aware of. It seems the US congress debating switching to a "half-daylight" time zone which is an half-baked idea that I should have expected from the current USA politics. The plan is to, say, switch from "Eastern is UTC-4 in the summer" to "Eastern is UTC-4.5". The bill also proposes to do this 90 days after enactment, which is dangerously optimistic about our capacity at deploying any significant change in human society. In general, I rely on the Wikipedia time nerds for this and Paul Eggert which seems to singlehandledly be keeping everything in order for all of us, on the tz-announce mailing list. This time, I've also looked at the tz mailing list which is where I learned about the congress bill. If your country has changed time and no one above noticed, now would be an extremely late time to do something about this, typically writing to the above list. (Incredibly, I need to write to the list because of this post.) One thing that did change since last year is that I've implemented what I hope to be a robust calendar for this, which was surprisingly tricky. If you have access to our Nextcloud, it should be visible under the heading "Daylight saving times". If you don't, you can access it using this direct link. The procedures around how this calendar was created, how this email was written, and curses found along the way, are also documented in this wiki page, if someone ever needs to pick up the Time Lord duty.

Wouter Verhelst: On Free Software, Free Hardware, and the firmware in between

When the Free Software movement started in the 1980s, most of the world had just made a transition from free university-written software to non-free, proprietary, company-written software. Because of that, the initial ethical standpoint of the Free Software foundation was that it's fine to run a non-free operating system, as long as all the software you run on that operating system is free. Initially this was just the editor. But as time went on, and the FSF managed to write more and more parts of the software stack, their ethical stance moved with the times. This was a, very reasonable, pragmatic stance: if you don't accept using a non-free operating system and there isn't a free operating system yet, then obviously you can't write that free operating system, and the world won't move towards a point where free operating systems exist. In the early 1990s, when Linus initiated the Linux kernel, the situation reached the point where the original dream of a fully free software stack was complete. Or so it would appear. Because, in fact, this was not the case. Computers are physical objects, composed of bits of technology that we refer to as "hardware", but in order for these bits of technology to communicate with other bits of technology in the same computer system, they need to interface with each other, usually using some form of bus protocol. These bus protocols can get very complicated, which means that a bit of software is required in order to make all the bits communicate with each other properly. Generally, this software is referred to as "firmware", but don't let that name deceive you; it's really just a bit of low-level software that is very specific to one piece of hardware. Sometimes it's written in an imperative high-level language; sometimes it's just a set of very simple initialization vectors. But whatever the case might be, it's always a bit of software. And although we largely had a free system, this bit of low-level software was not yet free. Initially, storage was expensive, so computers couldn't store as much data as today, and so most of this software was stored in ROM chips on the exact bits of hardware they were meant for. Due to this fact, it was easy to deceive yourself that the firmware wasn't there, because you never directly interacted with it. We knew it was there; in fact, for some larger pieces of this type of software it was possible, even in those days, to install updates. But that was rarely if ever done at the time, and it was easily forgotten. And so, when the free software movement slapped itself on the back and declared victory when a fully free operating system was available, and decided that the work of creating a free software environment was finished, that only keeping it recent was further required, and that we must reject any further non-free encroachments on our fully free software stack, the free software movement was deceiving itself. Because a computing environment can never be fully free if the low-level pieces of software that form the foundations of that computing environment are not free. It would have been one thing if the Free Software Foundation declared it ethical to use non-free low-level software on a computing environment if free alternatives were not available. But unfortunately, they did not. In fact, something very strange happened. In order for some free software hacker to be able to write a free replacement for some piece of non-free software, they obviously need to be able to actually install that theoretical free replacement. This isn't just a random thought; in fact it has happened. Now, it's possible to install software on a piece of rewritable storage such as flash memory inside the hardware and boot the hardware from that, but if there is a bug in your software -- not at all unlikely if you're trying to write software for a piece of hardware that you don't have documentation for -- then it's not unfathomable that the replacement piece of software will not work, thereby reducing your expensive piece of technology to something about as useful as a paperweight. Here's the good part. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the bits of technology that made up computers became so complicated, and the storage and memory available to computers so much larger and cheaper, that it became economically more feasible to create a small, tiny, piece of software stored in a ROM chip on the hardware, with just enough knowledge of the bus protocol to download the rest from the main computer. This is awesome for free software. If you now write a replacement for the non-free software that comes with the hardware, and you make a mistake, no wobbles! You just remove power from the system, let the DRAM chips on the hardware component fully drain, return power, and try again. You might still end up with a brick of useless silicon if some of the things you sent to your technology make it do things that it was not designed to do and therefore you burn through some critical bits of metal or plastic, but the chance of this happening is significantly lower than the chance of you writing something that impedes the boot process of the piece of hardware and you are unable to fix it because the flash is overwritten. There is anecdotal evidence that there are free software hackers out there who do so. So, yay, right? You'd think the Free Software foundation would jump at the possibility to get more free software? After all, a large part of why we even have a Free Software Foundation in the first place, was because of some piece of hardware that was misbehaving, so you would think that the foundation's founders would understand the need for hardware to be controlled by software that is free. The strange thing, what has always been strange to me, is that this is not what happened. The Free Software Foundation instead decided that non-free software on ROM or flash chips is fine, but non-free software -- the very same non-free software, mind -- that touches the general storage device that you as a user use, is not. Never mind the fact that the non-free software is always there, whether it sits on your storage device or not. Misguidedness aside, if some people decide they would rather not update the non-free software in their hardware and use the hardware with the old and potentially buggy version of the non-free software that it came with, then of course that's their business. Unfortunately, it didn't quite stop there. If it had, I wouldn't have written this blog post. You see, even though the Free Software Foundation was about Software, they decided that they needed to create a hardware certification program. And this hardware certification program ended up embedding the strange concept that if something is stored in ROM it's fine, but if something is stored on a hard drive it's not. Same hardware, same software, but different storage. By that logic, Windows respects your freedom as long as the software is written to ROM. Because this way, the Free Software Foundation could come to a standstill and pretend they were still living in the 90s. An unfortunate result of the "RYF" program is that it means that companies who otherwise would have been inclined to create hardware that was truly free, top to bottom, are now more incentivised by the RYF program to create hardware in which the non-free low-level software can't be replaced. Meanwhile, the rest of the world did not pretend to still be living in the nineties, and free hardware communities now exist. Because of how the FSF has marketed themselves out of the world, these communities call themselves "Open Hardware" communities, rather than "Free Hardware" ones, but the principle is the same: the designs are there, if you have the skill you can modify it, but you don't have to. In the mean time, the open hardware community has evolved to a point where even CPUs are designed in the open, which you can design your own version of. But not all hardware can be implemented as RISC-V, and so if you want a full system that builds RISC-V you may still need components of the system that were originally built for other architectures but that would work with RISC-V, such as a network card or a GPU. And because the FSF has done everything in their power to disincentivise people who would otherwise be well situated to build free versions of the low-level software required to support your hardware, you may now be in the weird position where we seem to have somehow skipped a step.
My own suspicion is that the universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.
-- J.B.S. Haldane (comments for this post will not pass moderation. Use your own blog!)

22 February 2026

Otto Kek l inen: Do AI models still keep getting better, or have they plateaued?

Featured image of post Do AI models still keep getting better, or have they plateaued?The AI hype is based on the assumption that the frontier AI labs are producing better and better foundational models at an accelerating pace. Is that really true, or are people just in sort of a mass psychosis because AI models have become so good at mimicking human behavior that we unconsciously attribute increasing intelligence to them? I decided to conduct a mini-benchmark of my own to find out if the latest and greatest AI models are actually really good or not.

The problem with benchmarks Every time any team releases a new LLM, they boast how well it performs on various industry benchmarks such as Humanity s Last Exam, SWE-Bench and Ai2 ARC or ARC-AGI. An overall leaderboard can be viewed at LLM-stats. This incentivizes teams to optimize for specific benchmarks, which might make them excel on specific tasks while general abilities degrade. Also, the older a benchmark dataset is, the more online material there is discussing the questions and best answers, which in turn increases the chances of newer models trained on more recent web content scoring better. Thus I prefer looking at real-time leaderboards such as the LM Arena leaderboard (or OpenCompass for Chinese models that might be missing from LM Arena). However, even though the LM Arena Elo score is rated by humans in real-time, the benchmark can still be played. For example, Meta reportedly used a special chat-optimized model instead of the actual Llama 4 model when getting scored on the LM Arena. Therefore I trust my own first-hand experience more than the benchmarks for gaining intuition. Intuition however is not a compelling argument in discussions on whether or not new flagship AI models have plateaued. Thus, I decided to devise my own mini-benchmark so that no model could have possibly seen it in its training data or be specifically optimized for it in any way.

My mini-benchmark I crafted 6 questions based on my own experience using various LLMs for several years and having developed some intuition about what kinds of questions LLMs typically struggle with. I conducted the benchmark using the OpenRouter.ai chat playroom with the following state-of-the-art models: OpenRouter.ai is great as it very easy to get responses from multiple models in parallel to a single question. Also it allows to turn off web search to force the models to answer purely based on their embedded knowledge. OpenRouter.ai Chat playroom Common for all the test questions is that they are fairly straightforward and have a clear answer, yet the answer isn t common knowledge or statistically the most obvious one, and instead requires a bit of reasoning to get correct. Some of these questions are also based on myself witnessing a flagship model failing miserably to answer it.

1. Which cities have hosted the Olympics more than just once? This question requires accounting for both summer and winter Olympics, and for Olympics hosted across multiple cities. The variance in responses comes from if the model understands that Beijing should be counted as it has hosted both summer and winter Olympics. Interestingly GPT was the only model to not mention Beijing at all. Some variance also comes from how models account for co-hosted Olympics. For example Cortina should be counted as having hosted the Olympics twice, in 1956 and 2026, but only Claude, Gemini and Kimi pointed this out. Stockholm s 1956 hosting of the equestrian games during the Melbourne Olympics is a special case, which GPT, Gemini and Kimi pointed out in a side note. Some models seem to have old training material, and for example Grok assumes the current year is 2024. All models that accounted for awarded future Olympics (e.g. Los Angeles 2028) marked them clearly as upcoming. Overall I would judge that only GPT and MinMax gave incomplete answers, while all other models replied as the best humans could reasonably have.

2. If EUR/USD continues to slide to 1.5 by mid-2026, what is the likely effect on BMW s stock price by end of 2026? This question requires mapping the currency exchange rate to historic value, dodging the misleading word slide , and reasoning on where the revenue of a company comes from and how a weaker US dollar affects it in multiple ways. I ve frequently witnessed flagship models get it wrong how interest rates and exchange rates work. Apparently the binary choice between up or down is somehow challenging to the internal statistical model in the LLMs on a topic where there are a lot of training material that talk about both things being likely to happen, and choosing between them requires specifically reasoning about the scenario at hand and disregarding general knowledge of the situation. However, this time all the models concluded correctly that a weak dollar would have a negative overall effect on the BMW stock price. Gemini, GLM, Qwen and Kimi also mention the potential hedging effect of BMW s X-series production in South Carolina for worldwide export.

3. What is the Unicode code point for the traffic cone emoji? This was the first question where the the flagship models clearly still struggle in 2026. The trap here is that there is no traffic cone emoji, so an advanced model should simply refuse to give any Unicode numbers at all. Most LLMs however have an urge to give some answer, leading to hallucinations. Also, as the answer has a graphical element to it, the LLM might not understand how the emoji looks in ways that would be obvious to a human, and thus many models claim the construction sign emoji is a traffic cone, which it is not. By far the worst response was from GPT, that simply hallucinates and stops there: OpenAIs GPT-5.2 completely wrong answer to traffic cone emoji question While Gemini and Grok were among the three models not falling into this trap, the response from Claude was exemplary good: Claude Opus 4.6 exemplary good answer to traffic cone emoji question

4. Which languages are the 10 most commonly spoken in the world? For each language, count from 1 to 5. This seemingly simple question can become quite complex when you account for the fact that other languages might also have their own character system, both for words and the numerals (e.g. Arabic /one vs /1), and that numbers might have variations depending on what the thing being counted is (e.g in French object gender un/une), or whether plain numbers and occurrences have their own words (e.g. Russian /odin vs /raz). I ve also witnessed older models frequently mix up on what parts of the reply should be using what language. For a human this question is trivial, assuming they know the language. For LLMs it is surprisingly challenging. Grok and MinMax only gave a list of the most popular languages and stopped there without showing any words in the languages. Qwen got a bit further by trying to list numbers in each language, but the lists were only the numbers 1 to 5: Qwen3.5 Plus count to five in top 10 languages I have seen Grok do something similar before, which in fact inspired me to include this question in my mini-benchmark. GPT got a bit further, but for Hindi, Arabic and Bengali it listed the numerals in local script, not the number words. Gemini, GLM and Kimi gave a complete and correct answer as a list, while the absolute best answer and presentation was by Claude, that gave the table below:
Claude Opus 4.6 10 Most Commonly Spoken Languages (by Total Speakers)
# Language 1 2 3 4 5
1 English One Two Three Four Five
2 Mandarin Chinese (y ) ( r) (s n) (s ) (w )
3 Hindi (ek) (do) (t n) (ch r) (p ch)
4 Spanish Uno Dos Tres Cuatro Cinco
5 French Un Deux Trois Quatre Cinq
6 Arabic (w id) (ithn n) (thal tha) (arba a) (khamsa)
7 Bengali (ek) (dui) (tin) (ch r) (p ch)
8 Portuguese Um Dois Tr s Quatro Cinco
9 Russian (odin) (dva) (tri) (chetyre) (pyat')
10 Japanese (ichi) (ni) (san) (shi) (go)
Note: Rankings are based on estimated total speakers (native + non-native). Rankings can vary depending on the source and methodology used.

5. Count the number of drone launch pads in the picture. Together with the question, I uploaded this picture: Drone pad picture attached to question above A human can easily count that there are 10 rows and 30+ columns in the grid, but because the picture resolution isn t good enough, the exact number of columns can t be counted, and the answer should be that there are at least 300 launch pads in the picture. GPT and Grok both guessed the count is zero. Instead of hallucinating some number they say zero, but it would have been better to not give any number at all, and just state that they are unable to perform the task. Gemini gave as its answer 101 , which is quite odd, but reading the reasoning section, it seems to have tried counting items in the image without reasoning much about what it is actually counting and that there is clearly a grid that can make the counting much easier. Both Qwen and Kimi state they can see four parallel structures, but are unable to count drone launch pads. The absolutely best answer was given by Claude, which counted 10-12 rows and 30-40+ columns, and concluded that there must be 300-500 drone launch pads. Very close to best human level - impressive! This question applied only to multi-modal models that can see images, so GLM and MinMax could not give any response.

6. Explain why I am getting the error below, and what is the best way to fix it? Together with the question above, I gave this code block: 
$ SH_SCRIPTS="$(mktemp; grep -Irnw debian/ -e '^#!.*/sh'   sort -u   cut -d ':' -f 1   true)"
$ shellcheck -x --enable=all --shell=sh "$SH_SCRIPTS"
/tmp/tmp.xQOpI5Nljx
debian/tests/integration-tests: /tmp/tmp.xQOpI5Nljx
debian/tests/integration-tests: openBinaryFile: does not exist (No such file or directory)
Older models would easily be misled by the last error message thinking that a file went missing, and focus on suggesting changes to the complex-looking first line. In reality the error is simply caused by having the quotes around the $SH_SCRIPTS, resulting in the entire multi-line string being passed as a single argument to shellcheck. So instead of receiving two separate file paths, shellcheck tries to open one file literally named /tmp/tmp.xQOpI5Nljx\ndebian/tests/integration-tests. Incorrect argument expansion is fairly easy for an experienced human programmer to notice, but tricky for an LLM. Indeed, Grok, MinMax, and Qwen fell for this trap and focused on the mktemp, assuming it somehow fails to create a file. Interestingly GLM fails to produce an answer at all, as the reasoning step seems to be looping, thinking too much about the missing file, but not understanding why it would be missing when there is nothing wrong with how mktemp is executed. Claude, Gemini, and Kimi immediately spot the real root cause of passing the variable quoted and suggested correct fixes that involve either removing the quotes, or using Bash arrays or xargs in a way that makes the whole command also handle correctly filenames with spaces in them.

Conclusion
Model Sports Economics Emoji Languages Visual Shell Score
Claude Opus 4.6 6/6
GPT-5.2 ~ 2.5/6
Grok 4.1 3/6
Gemini 3.1 Pro 5/6
GLM 5 ? N/A 3/5
MinMax M2.5 N/A 1/5
Qwen3.5 Plus ~ 2.5/6
Kimi K2.5 4/6
Obviously, my mini-benchmark only had 6 questions, and I ran it only once. This was obviously not scientifically rigorous. However it was systematic enough to trump just a mere feeling. The main finding for me personally is that Claude Opus 4.6, the flagship model by Anthropic, seems to give great answers consistently. The answers are not only correct, but also well scoped giving enough information to cover everything that seems relevant, without blurping unnecessary filler. I used Claude extensively in 2023-2024 when it was the main model available at my day work, but for the past year I had been using other models that I felt were better at the time. Now Claude seems to be the best-of-the-best again, with Gemini and Kimi as close follow-ups. Comparing their pricing at OpenRouter.ai the Kimi K2.5 price of $0.6 / million tokens is almost 90% cheaper than the Claude Opus 4.6 s $5.0 / million tokens suggests that Kimi K2.5 offers the best price-per-performance ratio. Claude might be cheaper with a monthly subscription directly from Anthropic, potentially narrowing the price gap. Overall I do feel that Anthropic, Google and Moonshot.ai have been pushing the envelope with their latest models in a way that one can t really claim that AI models have plateaued. In fact, one could claim that at least Claude has now climbed over the hill of AI slop and consistently produces valuable results. If and when AI usage expands from here, we might actually not drown in AI slop as chances of accidentally crappy results decrease. This makes me positive about the future. I am also really happy to see that there wasn t just one model crushing everybody else, but that there are at least three models doing very well. As an open source enthusiast I am particularly glad to see that Moonshot.ai s Kimi K2.5 is published with an open license. Given the hardware, anyone can run it on their own. OpenRouter.ai currently lists 9 independent providers alongside Moonshot.ai itself, showcasing the potential of open-weight models in practice. If the pattern holds and flagship models continue improving at this pace we might look back at 2026 as the year AI stopped feeling like a call center associate and started to resemble a scientific researcher. While new models become available we need to keep testing, keep questioning, and keep our expectations grounded in actual performance rather than press releases. Thanks to OpenRouter.ai for providing a great service that makes testing various models incredibly easy!

21 February 2026

Vasudev Kamath: Learning Notes: Debsecan MCP Server

Since Generative AI is currently the most popular topic, I wanted to get my hands dirty and learn something new. I was learning about the Model Context Protocol at the time and wanted to apply it to build something simple.
Idea On Debian systems, we use debsecan to find vulnerabilities. However, the tool currently provides a simple list of vulnerabilities and packages with no indication of the system's security posture meaning no criticality information is exposed and no executive summary is provided regarding what needs to be fixed. Of course, one can simply run the following to install existing fixes and be done with it: 
apt-get install $(debsecan --suite sid --format packages --only-fixed)
But this is not how things work in corporate environments; you need to provide a report showing the system's previous state and the actions taken to bring it to a safe state. It is all about metrics and reports. My goal was to use debsecan to generate a list of vulnerabilities, find more detailed information on them, and prioritize them as critical, high, medium, or low. By providing this information to an AI, I could ask it to generate an executive summary report detailing what needs to be addressed immediately and the overall security posture of the system.
Initial Take My initial thought was to use an existing LLM, either self-hosted or a cloud-based LLM like Gemini (which provides an API with generous limits via AI Studio). I designed functions to output the list of vulnerabilities on the system and provide detailed information on each. The idea was to use these as "tools" for the LLM.
Learnings
  1. I learned about open-source LLMs using Ollama, which allows you to download and use models on your laptop.
  2. I used Llama 3.1, Llama 3.2, and Granite 4 on my laptop without a GPU. I managed to run my experiments, even though they were time-consuming and occasionally caused my laptop to crash.
  3. I learned about Pydantic and how to use it to parse custom JSON schemas with minimal effort.
  4. I learned about osv.dev, an open-source initiative by Google that aggregates vulnerability information from various sources and provides data in a well-documented JSON schema format.
  5. I learned about the EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) and how it is used alongside static CVSS scoring to detect truly critical vulnerabilities. The EPSS score provides an idea of the probability of a vulnerability being exploited in the wild based on actual real-world attacks.
These experiments led to a collection of notebooks. One key takeaway was that when defining tools, I cannot simply output massive amounts of text because it consumes tokens and increases costs for paid models (though it is fine for local models using your own hardware and energy). Self-hosted models require significant prompting to produce proper output, which helped me understand the real-world application of prompt engineering.
Change of Plans Despite extensive experimentation, I felt I was nowhere close to a full implementation. While using a Gemini learning tool to study MCP, it suddenly occurred to me: why not write the entire thing as an MCP server? This would save me from implementing the agent side and allow me to hook it into any IDE-based LLM.
Design This MCP server is primarily a mix of a "tool" (which executes on the server machine to identify installed packages and their vulnerabilities) and a "resource" (which exposes read-only information for a specific CVE ID). The MCP exposes two tools:
  1. List Vulnerabilities: This tool identifies vulnerabilities in the packages installed on the system, categorizes them using CVE and EPSS scores, and provides a dictionary of critical, high, medium, and low vulnerabilities.
  2. Research Vulnerabilities: Based on the user prompt, the LLM can identify relevant vulnerabilities and pass them to this function to retrieve details such as whether a fix is available, the fixed version, and criticality.
Vibe Coding "Vibe coding" is the latest trend, with many claiming that software engineering jobs are a thing of the past. Without going into too much detail, I decided to give it a try. While this is not my first "vibe coded" project (I have done this previously at work using corporate tools), it is my first attempt to vibe code a hobby/learning project. I chose Antigravity because it seemed to be the only editor providing a sufficient amount of free tokens. For every vibe coding project, I spend time thinking about the barebones skeleton: the modules, function return values, and data structures. This allows me to maintain control over the LLM-generated code so it doesn't become overly complicated or incomprehensible. As a first step, I wrote down my initial design in a requirements document. In that document, I explicitly called for using debsecan as the model for various components. Additionally, I asked the AI to reference my specific code for the EPSS logic. The reasons were:
  1. debsecan already solves the core problem; I am simply rebuilding it. debsecan uses a single file generated by the Debian Security team containing all necessary information, which prevents us from needing multiple external sources.
  2. This provides the flexibility to categorize vulnerabilities within the listing tool itself since all required information is readily available, unlike my original notebook-based design.
I initially used Gemini 3 Flash as the model because I was concerned about exceeding my free limits.
Hiccups Although it initially seemed successful, I soon noticed discrepancies between the local debsecan outputs and the outputs generated by the tools. I asked the AI to fix this, but after two attempts, it still could not match the outputs. I realized it was writing its own version-comparison logic and failing significantly. Finally, I instructed it to depend entirely on the python-apt module for version comparison; since it is not on PyPI, I asked it to pull directly from the Git source. This solved some issues, but the problem persisted. By then, my weekly quota was exhausted, and I stopped debugging. A week later, I resumed debugging with the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model. Within 20-25 minutes, it found the fix, which involved four lines of changes in the parsing logic. However, I ran out of limits again before I could proceed further. In the requirements, I specified that the list vulnerabilities tool should only provide a dictionary of CVE IDs divided by severity. However, the AI instead provided full text for all vulnerability details, resulting in excessive data including negligible vulnerabilities being sent to the LLM. Consequently, it never called the research vulnerabilities tool. Since I had run out of limits, I manually fixed this in a follow-up commit.
How to Use I have published the current work in the debsecan-mcp repository. I have used the same license as the original debsecan. I am not entirely sure how to interpret licenses for vibe-coded projects, but here we are. To use this, you need to install the tool in a virtual environment and configure your IDE to use the MCP. Here is how I set it up for Visual Studio Code:
  1. Follow the guide from the VS Code documentation regarding adding an MCP server.
  2. My global mcp.json looks like this:
 
  "servers":  
      "debsecan-mcp":  
          "command": "uv",
              "args": [
                  "--directory",
                  "/home/vasudev/Documents/personal/FOSS/debsecan-mcp/debsecan-mcp",
                  "run",
                  "debsecan-mcp"
              ]
           
   ,
  "inputs": []
  1. I am running it directly from my local codebase using a virtualenv created with uv. You may need to tweak the path based on your installation.
  2. To use the MCP server in the Copilot chat window, reference it using #debsecan-mcp. The LLM will then use the server for the query.
  3. Use a prompt like: "Give an executive summary of the system security status and immediate actions to be taken."
  4. You can observe the LLM using list_vulnerabilities followed by research_cves. Because the first tool only provides CVE IDs based on severity, the LLM is smart enough to research only high and critical vulnerabilities, thereby saving tokens.
What's Next? This MCP is not yet perfect and has the following issues:
  1. The list_vulnerabilities dictionary contains duplicate CVE IDs because the code used a list instead of a set. While the LLM is smart enough to deduplicate these, it still costs extra tokens.
  2. Because I initially modeled this on debsecan, it uses a raw method for parsing /var/lib/dpkg/status instead of python-apt. I am considering switching to python-apt to reduce maintenance overhead.
  3. Interestingly, the AI did not add a single unit test, which is disappointing. I will add these once my limits are restored.
  4. I need to create a cleaner README with usage instructions.
  5. I need to determine if the MCP can be used via HTTP as well as stdio.
Conclusion Vibe coding is interesting, but things can get out of hand if not managed properly. Even with a good process, code must be reviewed and tested; you cannot blindly trust an AI to handle everything. Even if it adds tests, you must validate them, or you are doomed!

Thomas Goirand: Seamlessly upgrading a production OpenStack cluster in 4 hours : with 2k lines shell script


tl;dr: To the question: what does it take to upgrade OpenStack , my personal answer is: less than 2K lines of dash script. I ll here describe its internals, and why I believe it is the correct solution. Why writing this blog post During FOSSDEM 2024, I was asked how to you handle upgrades . I answered with a big smile and a short with a very small shell script as I couldn t explain in 2 minutes how it was done. Just saying it is great this way doesn t help giving readers enough hints to be trusted. Why and how did I do it the right way ? This blog post is an attempt to reply better to this question more deeply. Upgrading OpenStack in production I wrote this script maybe a 2 or 3 years ago. Though I m only blogging about it today, because I did such an upgrade in a public cloud in production last Thuesday evening (ie: the first region of the Infomaniak public cloud). I d say the cluster is moderately large (as of today: about 8K+ VMs running, 83 compute nodes, 12 network nodes, for a total of 10880 physical CPU cores and 125 TB of RAM if I only count the compute servers). It took only 4 hours to do the upgrade (though I already wore some more code to speed this up for the next time ). It went super smooth without a glitch. I mostly just sat, reading the script output and went to bed once it finished running. The next day, all my colleagues at Infomaniak were nicely congratulating me that it went that smooth (a big thanks to all of you who did). I couldn t dream of an upgrade that smooth! :) Still not impressed? Boring read? Yeah let s dive into more technical details. Intention behind the implementation My script isn t perfect. I wont ever pretend it is. But at least, it does minimize down time of every OpenStack service. It also is a by the book implementation of what s written in the OpenStack doc, following every upstream advice. As a result, it is fully seamless for some OpenStack services, and as HA as OpenStack can be for others. The upgrade process is of course idempotent and can be re-run in case of failure. Here s why. General idea My upgrade script does thing in a certain order, respecting what is documented about upgrades in the OpenStack documentation. It basically does: Installing dependencies The first thing the upgrade script does is: For this last thing, a static list of all needed dependency upgrade is maintained between each release of OpenStack, and for each type of nodes. Then for all packages in this list, the script checks with dpkg-query that the package is really installed, and with apt-cache policy that it really is going to be upgraded (Maybe there s an easier way to do this?). This way, no package is marked as manually installed by mistake during the upgrade process. This ensure that apt-get purge autoremove really does what it should, and that the script is really idempotent. The idea then, is that once all dependencies are installed, upgrading and restarting leaf packages (ie: OpenStack services like Nova, Glance, Cinder, etc.) is very fast, because the apt-get command doesn t need to install all dependencies. So at this point, doing apt-get install python3-cinder for example (which will also, thanks to dependencies, upgrade cinder-api and cinder-scheduler, if it s in a controller node) only takes a few seconds. This principle applies to all nodes (controller nodes, network nodes, compute nodes, etc.), which helps a lot speeding-up the upgrade and reduce unavailability. hapc At its core, the oci-cluster-upgrade-openstack-release script uses haproxy-cmd (ie: /usr/bin/hapc) to drain each API server to-be-upgraded from haproxy. Hapc is a simple Python wrapper around the haproxy admin socket: it sends command to it with an easy to understand CLI. So it is possible to reliably upgrade one API service only after it s drained away. Draining means one just wait for the last query to finish and the client to disconnect from http before giving the backend server some more queries. If you do not know hapc / haproxy-cmd, I recommend trying it: it s going to be hard for you to stop using it once you tested it. Its bash-completion script makes it VERY easy to use, and it is helpful in production. But not only: it is also nice to have when writing this type of upgrade script. Let s dive into haproxy-cmd. Example on how to use haproxy-cmd Let me show you. First, ssh one of the 3 controller and search where the virtual IP (VIP) is located with crm resource locate openstack-api-vip or with a (more simple) crm status . Let s ssh that server who got the VIP, and now, let s drain it away from haproxy. $ hapc list-backends
$ hapc drain-server --backend glancebe --server cl1-controller-1.infomaniak.ch --verbose --wait --timeout 50
$ apt-get install glance-api
$ hapc enable-server --backend glancebe --server cl1-controller-1.infomaniak.ch Upgrading the control plane My upgrade script leverages hapc just like above. For each OpenStack project, it s done in this order on the first node holding the VIP: Starting at [1], the risk is that other nodes may have a new version of the database schema, but an old version of the code that isn t compatible with it. But it doesn t take long, because the next step is to take care of the other (usually 2) nodes of the OpenStack control plane: So while there s technically zero down time, still some issues between [1] and [2] above may happen because of the new DB schema and the old code (both for API and other services) are up and running at the same time. It is however supposed to be rare cases (some OpenStack project don t even have db change between some OpenStack releases, and it often continues to work on most queries with the upgraded db), and the cluster will be like that for a very short time, so that s fine, and better than an full API down time. Satellite services Then there s satellite services, that needs to be upgraded. Like Neutron, Nova, Cinder. Nova is the least offender as it has all the code to rewrite Json object schema on-the-fly so that it continues to work during an upgrade. Though it s a known issue that Cinder doesn t have the feature (last time I checked), and it s also probably the same for Neutron (maybe recent-ish versions of OpenStack do use oslo.versionnedobjects ?). Anyways, upgrade on these nodes are done just right after the control plane for each service. Parallelism and upgrade timings As we re dealing with potentially hundreds of nodes per cluster, a lot of operations are performed in parallel. I choose to simply use the & shell thingy with some wait shell stuff so that not too many jobs are done in parallel. For example, when disabling SSH on all nodes, this is done 24 nodes at a time. Which is fine. And the number of nodes is all depending on the type of thing that s being done. For example, while it s perfectly OK to disable puppet on 24 nodes at the same time, but it is not OK to do that with Neutron services. In fact, each time a Neutron agent is restarted, the script explicitly waits for 30 seconds. This conveniently avoids a hailstorm of messages in RabbitMQ, and neutron-rpc-server to become too busy. All of these waiting are necessary, and this is one of the reasons why can sometimes take that long to upgrade a (moderately big) cluster. Not using config management tooling Some of my colleagues would have prefer that I used something like Ansible. Whever, there s no reason to use such tool if the idea is just to perform some shell script commands on every servers. It is a way more efficient (in terms of programming) to just use bash / dash to do the work. And if you want my point of view about Ansible: using yaml for doing such programming would be crasy. Yaml is simply not adapted for a job where if, case, and loops are needed. I am well aware that Ansible has workarounds and it could be done, but it wasn t my choice.

18 February 2026

Thomas Lange: 42.000 FAI.me jobs created

The FAI.me service has reached another milestone: The 42.000th job was submitted via the web interface since the beginning of this service in 2017. The idea was to provide a simple web interface for end users for creating the configs for the fully automatic installation with only minimal questions and without knowing the syntax of the configuration files. Thanks a lot for using this service and for all your feedback. The next job can be yours! P.S.: I like to get more feedback for the FAI.me service. What do you like most? What's missing? Do you have any success story how you use the customized ISO for your deployment? Please fill out the FAI questionaire or sent feedback via email to fai.me@fai-project.org About FAI.me FAI.me is the service for building your own customized images via a web interface. You can create an installation or live ISO or a cloud image. For Debian, multiple release versions can be chosen, as well as installations for Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu Desktop, or Linux Mint. Multiple options are available like selecting different desktop environments, the language and keyboard and adding a user with a password. Optional settings include adding your own package list, choosing a backports kernel, adding a postinst script and adding a ssh public key, choosing a partition layout and some more.

17 February 2026

Russell Coker: Links February 2026

Charles Stross has a good theory of why AI is being pushed on corporations, really we need to just replace CEOs with LLMs [1]. This disturbing and amusing article describes how an Open AI investor appears to be having psychological problems releated to SCP based text generated by ChatGPT [2]. Definitely going to be a recursive problem as people who believe in it invest in it. interesting analysis of dbus and design for a more secure replacement [3]. Scott Jenson gave an insightful lecture for Canonical about future potential developments in the desktop UX [4]. Ploum wrote an insightful article about the problems caused by the Github monopoly [5]. Radicale sounds interesting. Niki Tonsky write an interesting article about the UI problems with Tahoe (latest MacOS release) due to trying to make an icon for everything [6]. They have a really good writing style as well as being well researched. Fil-C is an interesting project to compile C/C++ programs in a memory safe way, some of which can be considered a software equivalent of CHERI [7]. Brian Krebs wrote a long list of the ways that Trump has enabled corruption and a variety of other crimes including child sex abuse in the last year [8]. This video about designing a C64 laptop is a masterclass in computer design [9]. Salon has an interesting article about the abortion thought experiment that conservatives can t handle [10]. Ron Garrett wrote an insightful blog post about abortion [11]. Bruce Schneier and Nathan E. Sanders wrote an insightful article about the potential of LLM systems for advertising and enshittification [12]. We need serious legislation about this ASAP!
Related posts:
  1. Links February 2024 In 2018 Charles Stross wrote an insightful blog post Dude...
  2. Links February 2025 Oliver Lindburg wrote an interesting article about Designing for Crisis...
  3. Links February 2021 Elestic Search gets a new license to deal with AWS...

Freexian Collaborators: Monthly report about Debian Long Term Support, January 2026 (by Santiago Ruano Rinc n)

The Debian LTS Team, funded by Freexian s Debian LTS offering, is pleased to report its activities for January.

Activity summary During the month of January, 20 contributors have been paid to work on Debian LTS (links to individual contributor reports are located below). The team released 33 DLAs fixing 216 CVEs. The team continued preparing security updates in its usual rhythm. Beyond the updates targeting Debian 11 ( bullseye ), which is the current release under LTS, the team also proposed updates for more recent releases (Debian 12 ( bookworm ) and Debian 13 ( trixie )), including Debian unstable. We highlight several notable security updates here below. Notable security updates:
  • python3.9, prepared by Andrej Shadura (DLA-4455-1), fixing multiple vulnerabilities in the Python interpreter.
  • php, prepared by Guilhem Moulin (DLA-4447-1), fixing two vulnerabilities that could yield to request forgery or denial of service.
  • apache2, prepared by Bastien Roucari s DLA-4452-1, fixing four CVEs.
  • linux-6.1, prepared by Ben Hutchings (DLA-4436-1), as a regular update of the linux 6.1 backport to Debian 11.
  • python-django, prepared by Chris Lamb (DLA-4458-1), resolving multiple vulnerabilities.
  • firefox-esr prepared by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (DLA-4439-1)
  • gnupg2, prepared by Roberto S nchez (DLA-4437-1), fixing multiple issues, including CVE-2025-68973 that could potentially be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
  • apache-log4j2, prepared by Markus Koschany (DLA-4444-1)
  • ceph, prepared by Utkarsh Gupta (DLA-4460-1)
  • inetutils, prepared by Andreas Henriksson (DLA-4453-1), fixing an authentication bypass in telnetd.
Moreover, Sylvain Beucler studied the security support status of p7zip, a fork of 7zip that has become unmaintained upstream. To avoid letting the users continue using an unsupported package, Sylvain has investigated a path forward in collaboration with the security team and the 7zip maintainer, looking to replace p7zip with 7zip. It is to note however that 7zip developers don t reveal the information about the patches that fix CVEs, making it difficult to backport single patches to fix vulnerabilities in Debian released versions. Contributions from outside the LTS Team: Thunderbird, prepared by maintainer Christoph Goehre. The DLA (DLA-4442-1) was published by Emilio. The LTS Team has also contributed with updates to the latest Debian releases:
  • Bastien uploaded gpsd to unstable, and proposed updates for trixie #1126121 and bookworm #1126168 to fix two CVEs.
  • Bastien also prepared the imagemagick updates for trixie and bookworm, released as DSA-6111-1, along with the bullseye update DLA-4448-1.
  • Chris proposed a trixie point update for python-django (#112646), and the work for bookworm was completed in February (#1079454). The longstanding bookworm update required tracking down a regression in the django-storages packages.
  • Markus prepared tomcat10 updates for trixie and bookworm (DSA-6120-1), and tomcat11 for trixie (DSA-6121-1)
  • Thorsten Alteholz prepared bookworm point updates for zvbi (#1126167) to fix five CVEs; taglib (#1126273) to fix one CVE; and libuev (#1126370) to fix one CVE.
  • Utkarsh prepared an unstable update of node-lodash to fix one CVE.
Other than the work related to updates, Sylvain made several improvements to the documentation and tooling used by the team.

Individual Debian LTS contributor reports

Thanks to our sponsors Sponsors that joined recently are in bold.

13 February 2026

Erich Schubert: Dogfood Generative AI

Current AI companies ignore licenses such as the GPL, and often train on anything they can scrape. This is not acceptable. The AI companies ignore web conventions, e.g., they deep link images from your web sites (even adding ?utm_source=chatgpt.com to image URIs, I suggest that you return 403 on these requests), but do not direct visitors to your site. You do not get a reliable way of opting out from generative AI training or use. For example, the only way to prevent your contents from being used in Google AI Overviews is to use data-nosnippet and cripple the snippet preview in Google. The AI browsers such as Comet, Atlas do not identify as such, but rather pretend they are standard Chromium. There is no way to ban such AI use on your web site. Generative AI overall is flooding the internet with garbage. It was estimated that 1/3rd of the content uploaded to YouTube is by now AI generated. This includes the same veteran stories crap in thousands of variants as well as brainrot content (that at least does not pretend to be authentic), some of which is among the most viewed recent uploads. Hence, these platforms even benefit from the AI slop. And don t blame the creators because you can currently earn a decent amount of money from such contents, people will generate brainrot content. If you have recently tried to find honest reviews of products you considered buying, you will have noticed thousands of sites with AI generated fake product reviews, that all are financed by Amazon PartnerNet commissions. Often with hilarious nonsense such as recommending sewing thread with German instructions as tool for repairing a sewing machine. And on Amazon, there are plenty of AI generated product reviews the use of emoji is a strong hint. And if you leave a negative product review, there is a chance they offer you a refund to get rid of it And the majority of SPAM that gets through my filters is by now sent via Gmail and Amazon SES. Partially because of GenAI, StackOverflow is pretty much dead which used to be one of the most valuable programming resources. (While a lot of people complain about moderation, famous moderator Shog9 from the early SO days suggested that a change in Google s ranking is also to blame, as it began favoring showing new content over the existing answered questions causing more and more duplicates to be posted because people no longer found the existing good answers. In January 2026, there were around 3400 questions and 6000 answers posted, less than in the first month of SO of August 2008 (before the official launch). Many open-source projects are suffering in many ways, e.g., false bug reports that caused curl to stop its bug bounty program. Wikipedia is also suffering badly from GenAI. Science is also flooded with poor AI generated papers, often reviewed with help from AI. This is largely due to bad incentives to graduate, you are expected to write many papers on certain A conferences, such as NeurIPS. On these conferences the number of submissions is growing insane, and the review quality plummets. All to often, the references in these papers are hallucinated, too; and libraries complain that they receive more and more requests to locate literature that does not appear to exist. However, the worst effect (at least to me as an educator) is the noskilling effect (a rather novel term derived from deskilling, I have only seen it in this article by We els and Maibaum). Instead of acquiring skills (writing, reading, summarizing, programming) by practising, too many people now outsource all this to AI, leading to them not learn the basics necessary to advance to a higher skill level. In my impression, this effect is dramatic. It is even worse than deskilling, as it does not mean losing an advanced skill that you apparently can replace, but often means not acquiring basic skills in the first place. And the earlier pupils start using generative AI, the less skills they acquire. Dogfood the AI Let s dogfood the AI. Here s an outline:
  1. Get a list of programming topics, e.g., get a list of algorithms from Wikidata, get a StackOverflow data dump.
  2. Generate flawed code examples for the algorithms / programming questions, maybe generate blog posts, too.
    You do not need a high-quality model for this. Use something you can run locally or access for free.
  3. Date everything back in time, remove typical indications of AI use.
  4. Upload to Github, because Microsoft will feed this to OpenAI
Here is an example prompt that you can use: 
You are a university educator, preparing homework assignments in debugging.
The programming language used is  lang .
The students are tasked to find bugs in given code.
Do not just call existing implementations from libraries, but implement the algorithm from scratch.
Make sure there are two mistakes in the code that need to be discovered by the students.
Do NOT repeat instructions. Do NOT add small-talk. Do NOT provide a solution.
The code may have (misleading) comments, but must NOT mention the bugs.
If you do not know how to implement the algorithm, output an empty response.
Output only the code for the assignment! Do not use markdown.
Begin with a code comment that indicates the algorithm name and idea.
If you indicate a bug, always use a comment with the keyword BUG
Generate a  lang  implementation (with bugs) of:  n  ( desc )
Remember to remove the BUG comments! If you pick some slighly less common programming languages (by quantity of available code, say Go or Rust) you have higher chances that this gets into the training data. If many of us do this, we can feed GenAI its own garbage. If we generate thousands of bad code examples, this will poison their training data, and may eventually lead to an effect known as model collapse . On the long run, we need to get back to an internet for people, not an internet for bots. Some kind of internet 2.0 , but I do not have a clear vision on how to keep AI out if AI can train on it, they will. And someone will copy and paste the AI generated crap back into whatever system we built. Hence I don t think technology is the answere here, but human networks of trust.

12 February 2026

Freexian Collaborators: Debian Contributions: cross building, rebootstrap updates, Refresh of the patch tagging guidelines and more! (by Anupa Ann Joseph)

Debian Contributions: 2026-01 Contributing to Debian is part of Freexian s mission. This article covers the latest achievements of Freexian and their collaborators. All of this is made possible by organizations subscribing to our Long Term Support contracts and consulting services.

cross building, by Helmut Grohne In version 1.10.1, Meson merged a patch to make it call the correct g-ir-scanner by default thanks to Eli Schwarz. This problem affected more than 130 source packages. Helmut retried building them all and filed 69 patches as a result. A significant portion of those packages require another Meson change to call the correct vapigen. Another notable change is converting gnu-efi to multiarch, which ended up requiring changes to a number of other packages. Since Aurelien dropped the libcrypt-dev dependency from libc6-dev, this transition now is mostly complete and has resulted in most of the Perl ecosystem correctly expressing perl-xs-dev dependencies needed for cross building. It is these infrastructure changes affecting several client packages that this work targets. As a result of this continued work, about 66% of Debian s source packages now have satisfiable cross Build-Depends in unstable and about 10000 (55%) actually can be cross built. There are now more than 500 open bug reports affecting more than 2000 packages most of which carry patches.

rebootstrap, by Helmut Grohne Maintaining architecture cross-bootstrap requires continued effort for adapting to archive changes such as glib2.0 dropping a build profile or an e2fsprogs FTBFS. Beyond those generic problems, architecture-specific problems with e.g. musl-linux-any or sparc may arise. While all these changes move things forward on the surface, the bootstrap tooling has become a growing pile of patches. Helmut managed to upstream two changes to glibc for reducing its Build-Depends in the stage2 build profile and thanks Aurelien Jarno.

Refresh of the patch tagging guidelines, by Rapha l Hertzog Debian Enhancement Proposal #3 (DEP-3) is named Patch Tagging Guidelines and standardizes meta-information that Debian contributors can put in patches included in Debian source packages. With the feedback received over the years, and with the change in the package management landscape, the need to refresh those guidelines became evident. As the initial driver of that DEP, I spent a good day reviewing all the feedback (that I kept in a folder) and producing a new version of the document. The changes aim to give more weight to the syntax that is compatible with git format-patch s output, and also to clarify the expected uses and meanings of a couple of fields, including some algorithm that parsers should follow to define the state of the patch. After the announcement of the new draft on debian-devel, the revised DEP-3 received a significant number of comments that I still have to process.

Miscellaneous contributions
  • Helmut uploaded debvm making it work with unstable as a target distribution again.
  • Helmut modernized the code base backing dedup.debian.net significantly expanding the support for type checking.
  • Helmut fixed the multiarch hinter once more given feedback from Fabian Gr nbichler.
  • Helmut worked on migrating the rocblas package to forky.
  • Rapha l fixed RC bug #1111812 in publican and did some maintenance for tracker.debian.org.
  • Carles added support in the festival Debian package for systemd socket activation and systemd service and socket units. Adapted the patch for upstream and created a merge request (also fixed a MacOS X building system error while working on it). Updated Orca Wiki documentation regarding festival. Discussed a 2007 bug/feature in festival which allowed having a local shell and that the new systemd socket activation has the same code path.
  • Carles using po-debconf-manager worked on Catalan translations: 7 reviewed and sent; 5 follow ups, 5 deleted packages.
  • Carles made some po-debconf-manager changes: now it attaches the translation file on follow ups, fixed bullseye compatibility issues.
  • Carles reviewed a new Catalan apt translation.
  • Carles investigated and reported a lxhotkey bug and sent a patch for the abcde package.
  • Carles made minor updates for Debian Wiki for different pages (lxde for dead keys, Ripping with abcde troubleshooting, VirtualBox troubleshooting).
  • Stefano renamed build-details.json in Python 3.14 to fix multiarch coinstallability.
  • Stefano audited the tooling and ignore lists for checking the contents of the python3.X-minimal packages, finding and fixing some issues in the process.
  • Stefano made a few uploads of python3-defaults and dh-python in support of Python 3.14-as-default in Ubuntu. Also investigated the risk of ignoring byte-compilation failures by default, and started down the road of implementing this.
  • Stefano did some sysadmin work on debian.social infrastructure.
  • Stefano and Santiago worked on preparations for DebConf 26. Especially to help the local team on opening the registration, and reviewing the budget to be presented for approval.
  • Stefano uploaded routine updates of python-virtualenv and python-flexmock.
  • Antonio collaborated with DSA on enabling a new proxy for salsa to prevent scrapers from taking the service down.
  • Antonio did miscellaneous salsa administrative tasks.
  • Antonio fixed a few Ruby packages towards the Ruby 3.4 transition.
  • Antonio started work on planned improvements to the DebConf registration system.
  • Santiago prepared unstable updates for the latest upstream versions of knot-dns and knot-resolver. The authoritative DNS server and DNS resolver software developed by CZ.NIC. It is worth highlighting that, given the separation of functionality compared to other implementations, knot-dns and knot-resolver are also less complex software, which results in advantages in terms of security: only three CVEs have been reported for knot-dns since 2011).
  • Santiago made some routine reviews of merge requests proposed for the Salsa CI s pipeline. E.g. a proposal to fix how sbuild chooses the chroot when building a package for experimental.
  • Colin fixed lots of Python packages to handle Python 3.14 and to avoid using the deprecated pkg_resources module.
  • Colin added forky support to the images used in Salsa CI pipelines.
  • Colin began working on getting a release candidate of groff 1.24.0 (the first upstream release since mid-2023, so a very large set of changes) into experimental.
  • Lucas kept working on the preparation for Ruby 3.4 transition. Some packages fixed (support build against Ruby 3.3 and 3.4): ruby-rbpdf, jekyll, origami-pdf, ruby-kdl, ruby-twitter, ruby-twitter-text, ruby-globalid.
  • Lucas supported some potential mentors in the Google Summer of Code 26 program to submit their projects.
  • Anupa worked on the point release announcements for Debian 12.13 and 13.3 from the Debian publicity team side.
  • Anupa attended the publicity team meeting to discuss the team activities and to plan an online sprint in February.
  • Anupa attended meetings with the Debian India team to plan and coordinate the MinDebConf Kanpur and sent out related Micronews.
  • Emilio coordinated various transitions and helped get rid of llvm-toolchain-17 from sid.

10 February 2026

Freexian Collaborators: Writing a new worker task for Debusine (by Carles Pina i Estany)

Debusine is a tool designed for Debian developers and Operating System developers in general. You can try out Debusine on debusine.debian.net, and follow its development on salsa.debian.org. This post describes how to write a new worker task for Debusine. It can be used to add tasks to a self-hosted Debusine instance, or to submit to the Debusine project new tasks to add new capabilities to Debusine. Tasks are the lower-level pieces of Debusine workflows. Examples of tasks are Sbuild, Lintian, Debdiff (see the available tasks). This post will document the steps to write a new basic worker task. The example will add a worker task that runs reprotest and creates an artifact of the new type ReprotestArtifact with the reprotest log. Tasks are usually used by workflows. Workflows solve high-level goals by creating and orchestrating different tasks (e.g. a Sbuild workflow would create different Sbuild tasks, one for each architecture).

Overview of tasks A task usually does the following:
  • It receives structured data defining its input artifacts and configuration
  • Input artifacts are downloaded
  • A process is run by the worker (e.g. lintian, debdiff, etc.). In this blog post, it will run reprotest
  • The output (files, logs, exit code, etc.) is analyzed, artifacts and relations might be generated, and the work request is marked as completed, either with Success or Failure
If you want to follow the tutorial and add the Reprotest task, your Debusine development instance should have at least one worker, one user, a debusine client set up, and permissions for the client to create tasks. All of this can be setup following the steps in the Contribute section of the documentation. This blog post shows a functional Reprotest task. This task is not currently part of Debusine. The Reprotest task implementation is simplified (no error handling, unit tests, specific view, docs, some shortcuts in the environment preparation, etc.). At some point, in Debusine, we might add a debrebuild task which is based on buildinfo files and uses snapshot.debian.org to recreate the binary packages.

Defining the inputs of the task The input of the reprotest task will be a source artifact (a Debian source package). We model the input with pydantic in debusine/tasks/models.py: 
class ReprotestData(BaseTaskDataWithExecutor):
   """Data for Reprotest task."""

   source_artifact: LookupSingle

class ReprotestDynamicData(BaseDynamicTaskDataWithExecutor):
   """Reprotest dynamic data."""

   source_artifact_id: int   None = None
The ReprotestData is what the user will input. A LookupSingle is a lookup that resolves to a single artifact. We would also have configuration for the desired variations to test, but we have left that out of this example for simplicity. Configuring variations is left as an exercise for the reader. Since ReprotestData is a subclass of BaseTaskDataWithExecutor it also contains environment where the user can specify in which environment the task will run. The environment is an artifact with a Debian image. The ReprotestDynamicData holds the resolution of all lookups. These can be seen in the Internals tab of the work request view.

Add the new Reprotest artifact data class In order for the reprotest task to create a new Artifact of the type DebianReprotest with the log and output metadata: add the new category to ArtifactCategory in debusine/artifacts/models.py: 
    REPROTEST = "debian:reprotest"
In the same file add the DebianReprotest class: 
class DebianReprotest(ArtifactData):
   """Data for debian:reprotest artifacts."""

   reproducible: bool   None = None

   def get_label(self) -> str:
       """Return a short human-readable label for the artifact."""
       return "reprotest analysis"
It could also include the package name or version. In order to have the category listed in the work request output artifacts table, edit the file debusine/db/models/artifacts.py: In ARTIFACT_CATEGORY_ICON_NAMES add ArtifactCategory.REPROTEST: "folder", and in ARTIFACT_CATEGORY_SHORT_NAMES add ArtifactCategory.REPROTEST: "reprotest",.

Create the new Task class In debusine/tasks/ create a new file reprotest.py.
reprotest.py 
# Copyright   The Debusine Developers
# See the AUTHORS file at the top-level directory of this distribution
#
# This file is part of Debusine. It is subject to the license terms
# in the LICENSE file found in the top-level directory of this
# distribution. No part of Debusine, including this file, may be copied,
# modified, propagated, or distributed except according to the terms
# contained in the LICENSE file.

"""Task to use reprotest in debusine."""

from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any

from debusine import utils
from debusine.artifacts.local_artifact import ReprotestArtifact
from debusine.artifacts.models import (
    ArtifactCategory,
    CollectionCategory,
    DebianSourcePackage,
    DebianUpload,
    WorkRequestResults,
    get_source_package_name,
    get_source_package_version,
)
from debusine.client.models import RelationType
from debusine.tasks import BaseTaskWithExecutor, RunCommandTask
from debusine.tasks.models import ReprotestData, ReprotestDynamicData
from debusine.tasks.server import TaskDatabaseInterface


class Reprotest(
    RunCommandTask[ReprotestData, ReprotestDynamicData],
    BaseTaskWithExecutor[ReprotestData, ReprotestDynamicData],
):
    """Task to use reprotest in debusine."""

    TASK_VERSION = 1

    CAPTURE_OUTPUT_FILENAME = "reprotest.log"

    def __init__(
        self,
        task_data: dict[str, Any],
        dynamic_task_data: dict[str, Any]   None = None,
    ) -> None:
        """Initialize object."""
        super().__init__(task_data, dynamic_task_data)

        self._reprotest_target: Path   None = None

    def build_dynamic_data(
        self, task_database: TaskDatabaseInterface
    ) -> ReprotestDynamicData:
        """Compute and return ReprotestDynamicData."""
        input_source_artifact = task_database.lookup_single_artifact(
            self.data.source_artifact
        )

        assert input_source_artifact is not None
        self.ensure_artifact_categories(
            configuration_key="input.source_artifact",
            category=input_source_artifact.category,
            expected=(
                ArtifactCategory.SOURCE_PACKAGE,
                ArtifactCategory.UPLOAD,
            ),
        )
        assert isinstance(
            input_source_artifact.data, (DebianSourcePackage, DebianUpload)
        )
        subject = get_source_package_name(input_source_artifact.data)
        version = get_source_package_version(input_source_artifact.data)

        assert self.data.environment is not None

        environment = self.get_environment(
            task_database,
            self.data.environment,
            default_category=CollectionCategory.ENVIRONMENTS,
        )

        return ReprotestDynamicData(
            source_artifact_id=input_source_artifact.id,
            subject=subject,
            parameter_summary=f" subject _ version ",
            environment_id=environment.id,
        )

    def get_input_artifacts_ids(self) -> list[int]:
        """Return the list of input artifact IDs used by this task."""
        if not self.dynamic_data:
            return []

        return [
            self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id,
            self.dynamic_data.environment_id,
        ]

    def fetch_input(self, destination: Path) -> bool:
        """Download the required artifacts."""
        assert self.dynamic_data

        artifact_id = self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id
        assert artifact_id is not None
        self.fetch_artifact(artifact_id, destination)

        return True

    def configure_for_execution(self, download_directory: Path) -> bool:
        """
        Find a .dsc in download_directory.

        Install reprotest and other utilities used in _cmdline.
        Set self._reprotest_target to it.

        :param download_directory: where to search the files
        :return: True if valid files were found
        """
        self._prepare_executor_instance()

        if self.executor_instance is None:
            raise AssertionError("self.executor_instance cannot be None")

        self.run_executor_command(
            ["apt-get", "update"],
            log_filename="install.log",
            run_as_root=True,
            check=True,
        )
        self.run_executor_command(
            [
                "apt-get",
                "--yes",
                "--no-install-recommends",
                "install",
                "reprotest",
                "dpkg-dev",
                "devscripts",
                "equivs",
                "sudo",
            ],
            log_filename="install.log",
            run_as_root=True,
        )

        self._reprotest_target = utils.find_file_suffixes(
            download_directory, [".dsc"]
        )
        return True

    def _cmdline(self) -> list[str]:
        """
        Build the reprotest command line.

        Use configuration of self.data and self._reprotest_target.
        """
        target = self._reprotest_target
        assert target is not None

        cmd = [
            "bash",
            "-c",
            f"TMPDIR=/tmp ; cd /tmp ; dpkg-source -x  target  package/; "
            "cd package/ ; mk-build-deps ; apt-get install --yes ./*.deb ; "
            "rm *.deb ; "
            "reprotest --vary=-time,-user_group,-fileordering,-domain_host .",
        ]

        return cmd

    @staticmethod
    def _cmdline_as_root() -> bool:
        r"""apt-get install --yes ./\*.deb must be run as root."""
        return True

    def task_result(
        self,
        returncode: int   None,
        execute_directory: Path,  # noqa: U100
    ) -> WorkRequestResults:
        """
        Evaluate task output and return success.

        For a successful run of reprotest:
        -must have the output file
        -exit code is 0

        :return: WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS or WorkRequestResults.FAILURE.
        """
        reprotest_file = execute_directory / self.CAPTURE_OUTPUT_FILENAME

        if reprotest_file.exists() and returncode == 0:
            return WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS

        return WorkRequestResults.FAILURE

    def upload_artifacts(
        self, exec_directory: Path, *, execution_result: WorkRequestResults
    ) -> None:
        """Upload the ReprotestArtifact with the files and relationships."""
        if not self.debusine:
            raise AssertionError("self.debusine not set")

        assert self.dynamic_data is not None
        assert self.dynamic_data.parameter_summary is not None

        reprotest_artifact = ReprotestArtifact.create(
            reprotest_output=exec_directory / self.CAPTURE_OUTPUT_FILENAME,
            reproducible=execution_result == WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS,
            package=self.dynamic_data.parameter_summary,
        )

        uploaded = self.debusine.upload_artifact(
            reprotest_artifact,
            workspace=self.workspace_name,
            work_request=self.work_request_id,
        )

        assert self.dynamic_data is not None
        assert self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id is not None
        self.debusine.relation_create(
            uploaded.id,
            self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id,
            RelationType.RELATES_TO,
        )
Below are the main methods with some basic explanation. In order for Debusine to discover the task, add "Reprotest" in the file debusine/tasks/__init__.py in the __all__ list. Let s explain the different methods of the Reprotest class:

build_dynamic_data method The worker has no access to Debusine s database. Lookups are all resolved before the task gets dispatched to a worker, so all it has to do is download the specified input artifacts. build_dynamic_data method lookup the artifact, assert that is a valid category, extract the package name and version, and get the environment in which it will be executed. The environment is needed to run the task (reprotest will run in a container using unshare, incus ). 
    def build_dynamic_data(
        self, task_database: TaskDatabaseInterface
    ) -> ReprotestDynamicData:
        """Compute and return ReprotestDynamicData."""
        input_source_artifact = task_database.lookup_single_artifact(
            self.data.source_artifact
        )

        assert input_source_artifact is not None
        self.ensure_artifact_categories(
            configuration_key="input.source_artifact",
            category=input_source_artifact.category,
            expected=(
                ArtifactCategory.SOURCE_PACKAGE,
                ArtifactCategory.UPLOAD,
            ),
        )
        assert isinstance(
            input_source_artifact.data, (DebianSourcePackage, DebianUpload)
        )
        subject = get_source_package_name(input_source_artifact.data)
        version = get_source_package_version(input_source_artifact.data)

        assert self.data.environment is not None

        environment = self.get_environment(
            task_database,
            self.data.environment,
            default_category=CollectionCategory.ENVIRONMENTS,
        )

        return ReprotestDynamicData(
            source_artifact_id=input_source_artifact.id,
            subject=subject,
            parameter_summary=f" subject _ version ",
            environment_id=environment.id,
        )

get_input_artifacts_ids method Used to list the task s input artifacts in the web UI. 
   def get_input_artifacts_ids(self) -> list[int]:
       """Return the list of input artifact IDs used by this task."""
       if not self.dynamic_data:
           return []

       assert self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id is not None
       return [self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id]

fetch_input method Download the required artifacts on the worker. 
    def fetch_input(self, destination: Path) -> bool:
        """Download the required artifacts."""
        assert self.dynamic_data

        artifact_id = self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id
        assert artifact_id is not None
        self.fetch_artifact(artifact_id, destination)

        return True

configure_for_execution method Install the packages needed by the task and set _reprotest_target, which is used to build the task s command line. 
   def configure_for_execution(self, download_directory: Path) -> bool:
       """
       Find a .dsc in download_directory.

       Install reprotest and other utilities used in _cmdline.
       Set self._reprotest_target to it.

       :param download_directory: where to search the files
       :return: True if valid files were found
       """
       self._prepare_executor_instance()

       if self.executor_instance is None:
           raise AssertionError("self.executor_instance cannot be None")

       self.run_executor_command(
           ["apt-get", "update"],
           log_filename="install.log",
           run_as_root=True,
           check=True,
       )
       self.run_executor_command(
           [
               "apt-get",
               "--yes",
               "--no-install-recommends",
               "install",
               "reprotest",
               "dpkg-dev",
               "devscripts",
               "equivs",
               "sudo",
           ],
           log_filename="install.log",
           run_as_root=True,
       )

       self._reprotest_target = utils.find_file_suffixes(
           download_directory, [".dsc"]
       )
       return True

_cmdline method Return the command line to run the task. In this case, and to keep the example simple, we will run reprotest directly in the worker s executor VM/container, without giving it an isolated virtual server. So, this command installs the build dependencies required by the package (so reprotest can build it) and runs reprotest itself. 
   def _cmdline(self) -> list[str]:
       """
       Build the reprotest command line.

       Use configuration of self.data and self._reprotest_target.
       """
       target = self._reprotest_target
       assert target is not None

       cmd = [
           "bash",
           "-c",
           f"TMPDIR=/tmp ; cd /tmp ; dpkg-source -x  target  package/; "
           "cd package/ ; mk-build-deps ; apt-get install --yes ./*.deb ; "
           "rm *.deb ; "
           "reprotest --vary=-time,-user_group,-fileordering,-domain_host .",
       ]

       return cmd
Some reprotest variations are disabled. This is to keep the example simple with the set of packages to install and reprotest features.

_cmdline_as_root method Since during the execution it s needed to install packages, run it as root (in the container): 
   @staticmethod
   def _cmdline_as_root() -> bool:
       r"""apt-get install --yes ./\*.deb must be run as root."""
       return True

task_result method Task succeeded if a log is generated and the return code is 0. 
    def task_result(
        self,
        returncode: int   None,
        execute_directory: Path,  # noqa: U100
    ) -> WorkRequestResults:
        """
        Evaluate task output and return success.

        For a successful run of reprotest:
        -must have the output file
        -exit code is 0

        :return: WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS or WorkRequestResults.FAILURE.
        """
        reprotest_file = execute_directory / self.CAPTURE_OUTPUT_FILENAME

        if reprotest_file.exists() and returncode == 0:
            return WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS

        return WorkRequestResults.FAILURE

upload_artifacts method Create the ReprotestArtifact with the log and the reproducible boolean, upload it, and then add a relation between the ReprotestArtifact and the source package: 
    def upload_artifacts(
        self, exec_directory: Path, *, execution_result: WorkRequestResults
    ) -> None:
        """Upload the ReprotestArtifact with the files and relationships."""
        if not self.debusine:
            raise AssertionError("self.debusine not set")

        assert self.dynamic_data is not None
        assert self.dynamic_data.parameter_summary is not None

        reprotest_artifact = ReprotestArtifact.create(
            reprotest_output=exec_directory / self.CAPTURE_OUTPUT_FILENAME,
            reproducible=execution_result == WorkRequestResults.SUCCESS,
            package=self.dynamic_data.parameter_summary,
        )

        uploaded = self.debusine.upload_artifact(
            reprotest_artifact,
            workspace=self.workspace_name,
            work_request=self.work_request_id,
        )

        assert self.dynamic_data is not None
        assert self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id is not None
        self.debusine.relation_create(
            uploaded.id,
            self.dynamic_data.source_artifact_id,
            RelationType.RELATES_TO,
        )

Execution example To run this task in a local Debusine (see steps to have it ready with an environment, permissions and users created) you can do: 
$ python3 -m debusine.client artifact import-debian -w System http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/h/hello/hello_2.10-5.dsc
(get the artifact ID from the output of that command) The artifact can be seen in http://$DEBUSINE/debusine/System/artifact/$ARTIFACTID/. Then create a reprotest.yaml: 
$ cat <<EOF > reprotest.yaml
source_artifact: $ARTIFACT_ID
environment: "debian/match:codename=bookworm"
EOF
Instead of debian/match:codename=bookworm it could use the artifact ID. Finally, create the work request to run the task: 
$ python3 -m debusine.client create-work-request -w System reprotest --data reprotest.yaml
Using Debusine web you can see the work request, which should go to Running status, then Completed with Success or Failure (depending if reprotest could reproduce it or not). Clicking on the Output tab would have an artifact of type debian:reprotest with one file: the log. In the Metadata tab of the artifact it has Data: the package name and reproducible (true or false).

What is left to do? This was a simple example of creating a task. Other things that could be done:
  • unit tests
  • documentation
  • configurable variations
  • running reprotest directly on the worker host, using the executor environment as a reprotest virtual server
  • in this specific example, the command line might be doing too many things that could maybe be done by other parts of the task, such as prepare_environment.
  • integrate it in a workflow so it s easier to use (e.g. part of QaWorkflow)
  • extract more from the log than just pass/fail
  • display the output in a more useful way (implement an artifact specialized view)

8 February 2026

Colin Watson: Free software activity in January 2026

About 80% of my Debian contributions this month were sponsored by Freexian, as well as one direct donation via GitHub Sponsors (thanks!). If you appreciate this sort of work and are at a company that uses Debian, have a look to see whether you can pay for any of Freexian s services; as well as the direct benefits, that revenue stream helps to keep Debian development sustainable for me and several other lovely people. You can also support my work directly via Liberapay or GitHub Sponsors. Python packaging New upstream versions: Fixes for Python 3.14: Fixes for pytest 9: Porting away from the deprecated pkg_resources: Other build/test failures: I investigated several more build failures and suggested removing the packages in question: Other bugs: Other bits and pieces Alejandro Colomar reported that man(1) ignored the MANWIDTH environment variable in some circumstances. I investigated this and fixed it upstream. I contributed an ubuntu-dev-tools patch to stop recommending sudo. I added forky support to the images used in Salsa CI pipelines. I began working on getting a release candidate of groff 1.24.0 into experimental, though haven t finished that yet. I worked on some lower-priority security updates for OpenSSH. Code reviews

Dirk Eddelbuettel: chronometre: A new package (pair) demo for R and Python

Both R and Python make it reasonably easy to work with compiled extensions. But how to access objects in one environment from the other and share state or (non-trivial) objects remains trickier. Recently (and while r-forge was resting so we opened GitHub Discussions) a question was asked concerning R and Python object pointer exchange. This lead to a pretty decent discussion including arrow interchange demos (pretty ideal if dealing with data.frame-alike objects), but once the focus is on more library-specific objects from a given (C or C++, say) library it is less clear what to do, or how involved it may get. R has external pointers, and these make it feasible to instantiate the same object in Python. To demonstrate, I created a pair of (minimal) packages wrapping a lovely (small) class from the excellent spdlog library by Gabi Melman, and more specifically in an adapted-for-R version (to avoid some R CMD check nags) in my RcppSpdlog package. It is essentially a nicer/fancier C++ version of the tic() and tic() timing scheme. When an object is instantiated, it starts the clock and when we accessing it later it prints the time elapsed in microsecond resolution. In Modern C++ this takes little more than keeping an internal chrono object. Which makes for a nice, small, yet specific object to pass to Python. So the R side of the package pair instantiates such an object, and accesses its address. For different reasons, sending a raw pointer across does not work so well, but a string with the address printed works fabulously (and is a paradigm used around other packages so we did not invent this). Over on the Python side of the package pair, we then take this string representation and pass it to a little bit of pybind11 code to instantiate a new object. This can of course also expose functionality such as the show time elapsed feature, either formatted or just numerically, of interest here. And that is all that there is! Now this can be done from R as well thanks to reticulate as the demo() (also shown on the package README.md) shows: 
> library(chronometre)
> demo("chronometre", ask=FALSE)


        demo(chronometre)
        ---- ~~~~~~~~~~~

> #!/usr/bin/env r
> 
> stopifnot("Demo requires 'reticulate'" = requireNamespace("reticulate", quietly=TRUE))

> stopifnot("Demo requires 'RcppSpdlog'" = requireNamespace("RcppSpdlog", quietly=TRUE))

> stopifnot("Demo requires 'xptr'" = requireNamespace("xptr", quietly=TRUE))

> library(reticulate)

> ## reticulate and Python in general these days really want a venv so we will use one,
> ## the default value is a location used locally; if needed create one
> ## check for existing virtualenv to use, or else set one up
> venvdir <- Sys.getenv("CHRONOMETRE_VENV", "/opt/venv/chronometre")

> if (dir.exists(venvdir))  
+ >     use_virtualenv(venvdir, required = TRUE)
+ >   else  
+ >     ## create a virtual environment, but make it temporary
+ >     Sys.setenv(RETICULATE_VIRTUALENV_ROOT=tempdir())
+ >     virtualenv_create("r-reticulate-env")
+ >     virtualenv_install("r-reticulate-env", packages = c("chronometre"))
+ >     use_virtualenv("r-reticulate-env", required = TRUE)
+ >  


> sw <- RcppSpdlog::get_stopwatch()                   # we use a C++ struct as example

> Sys.sleep(0.5)                                      # imagine doing some code here

> print(sw)                                           # stopwatch shows elapsed time
0.501220 

> xptr::is_xptr(sw)                                   # this is an external pointer in R
[1] TRUE

> xptr::xptr_address(sw)                              # get address, format is "0x...."
[1] "0x58adb5918510"

> sw2 <- xptr::new_xptr(xptr::xptr_address(sw))       # cloned (!!) but unclassed

> attr(sw2, "class") <- c("stopwatch", "externalptr") # class it .. and then use it!

> print(sw2)                                          #  xptr  allows us close and use
0.501597 

> sw3 <- ch$Stopwatch(  xptr::xptr_address(sw) )      # new Python object via string ctor

> print(sw3$elapsed())                                # shows output via Python I/O
datetime.timedelta(microseconds=502013)

> cat(sw3$count(), "\n")                              # shows double
0.502657 

> print(sw)                                           # object still works in R
0.502721 
>
The same object, instantiated in R is used in Python and thereafter again in R. While this object here is minimal in features, the concept of passing a pointer is universal. We could use it for any interesting object that R can access and Python too can instantiate. Obviously, there be dragons as we pass pointers so one may want to ascertain that headers from corresponding compatible versions are used etc but principle is unaffected and should just work. Both parts of this pair of packages are now at the corresponding repositories: PyPI and CRAN. As I commonly do here on package (change) announcements, I include the (minimal so far) set of high-level changes for the R package.

Changes in version 0.0.2 (2026-02-05)
  • Removed replaced unconditional virtualenv use in demo given preceding conditional block
  • Updated README.md with badges and an updated demo

Changes in version 0.0.1 (2026-01-25)
  • Initial version and CRAN upload

Questions, suggestions, bug reports, are welcome at either the (now awoken from the R-Forge slumber) Rcpp mailing list or the newer Rcpp Discussions.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

Vincent Bernat: Fragments of an adolescent web

I have unearthed a few old articles typed during my adolescence, between 1996 and 1998. Unremarkable at the time, these pages now compose, three decades later, the chronicle of a vanished era.1 The word blog does not exist yet. Wikipedia has yet to come. Google has not been born. AltaVista reigns over searches, while already struggling to embrace the nascent immensity of the web2. To meet someone, you had to agree in advance and prepare your route on paper maps. The web is taking off. The CSS specification has just emerged, HTML tables still serve for page layout. Cookies and advertising banners are making their appearance. Pages are adorned with music and videos, forcing browsers to arm themselves with plugins. Netscape Navigator sits on 86% of the territory, but Windows 95 now bundles Internet Explorer to quickly catch up. Facing this offensive, Netscape open-sources its browser. France falls behind. Outside universities, Internet access remains expensive and laborious. Minitel still reigns, offering a phone directory, train tickets, remote shopping. This was not yet possible with the Internet: buying a CD online was a pipe dream. Encryption suffers from inappropriate regulation: the DES algorithm is capped at 40 bits and cracked in a few seconds. These pages bear the trace of the web s adolescence. Thirty years have passed. The same battles continue: data selling, advertising, monopolies.
  1. Most articles linked here are not translated from French to English.
  2. I recently noticed that Google no longer fully indexes my blog. For example, it is no longer possible to find the article on lan o. I assume this is a consequence of the explosion of AI-generated content or a change in priorities for Google.

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Montreal Subway Foot Traffic Data, 2025 edition

Another year of data from Soci t de Transport de Montr al, Montreal's transit agency! A few highlights this year:
  1. Although the Saint-Michel station closed for emergency repairs in November 2024, traffic never bounced back to its pre-closure levels and is still stuck somewhere around 2022 Q2 levels. I wonder if this could be caused by the roadwork on Jean-Talon for the new Blue Line stations making it harder for folks in Montreal-Nord to reach the station by bus.
  2. The effects of the opening of the Royalmount shopping center has had a durable impact on the traffic at the De la Savane station. I reported on this last year, but it seems this wasn't just a fad.
  3. With the completion of the Deux-Montagnes branch of the R seau express m tropolitain (REM, a light-rail, above the surface transit network still in construction), the transfer stations to the Montreal subway have seen major traffic increases. The douard-Montpetit station has nearly reached its previous all-time record of 2015 and the McGill station has recovered from the general slump all the other stations have had in 2025.
  4. The Assomption station, which used to have one of the lowest number of riders of the subway network, has had a tremendous growth in the past few years. This is mostly explained by the many high-rise projects that were built around the station since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  5. Although still affected by a very high seasonality, the Jean-Drapeau station broke its previous record of 2019, a testament of the continued attraction power of the various summer festivals taking place on the Sainte-H l ne et Notre-Dame islands.
More generally, it seems the Montreal subway has had a pretty bad year. Traffic had been slowly climbing back since the COVID-19 pandemic, but this is the first year since 2020 such a sharp decline can be witnessed. Even major stations like Jean-Talon or Lionel-Groulx are on a downward trend and it is pretty worrisome. As for causes, a few things come to mind. First of all, as the number of Montrealers commuting to work by bike continues to rise1, a modal shift from public transit to active mobility is to be expected. As local experts put it, this is not uncommon and has been seen in other cities before. Another important factor that certainly turned people away from the subway this year has been the impacts of the continued housing crisis in Montreal. As more and more people get kicked out of their apartments, many have been seeking refuge in the subway stations to find shelter. Sadly, this also brought a unprecedented wave of incivilities. As riders' sense of security sharply decreased, the STM eventually resorted to banning unhoused people from sheltering in the subway. This decision did bring back some peace to the network, but one can posit damage had already been done and many casual riders are still avoiding the subway for this reason. Finally, the weekslong STM worker's strike in Q4 had an important impact on general traffic, as it severely reduced the opening hours of the subway. As for the previous item, once people find alternative ways to get around, it's always harder to bring them back. Hopefully, my 2026 report will be a more cheerful one... By clicking on a subway station, you'll be redirected to a graph of the station's foot traffic. Licences
  1. Mostly thanks to major improvements to the cycling network and the BIXI bikesharing program.

6 February 2026

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in January 2026

Welcome to the first monthly report in 2026 from the Reproducible Builds project! These reports outline what we ve been up to over the past month, highlighting items of news from elsewhere in the increasingly-important area of software supply-chain security. As ever, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please see the Contribute page on our website.

  1. Flathub now testing for reproducibility
  2. Reproducibility identifying projects that will fail to build in 2038
  3. Distribution work
  4. Tool development
  5. Two new academic papers
  6. Upstream patches

Flathub now testing for reproducibility Flathub, the primary repository/app store for Flatpak-based applications, has begun checking for build reproducibility. According to a recent blog post:
We have started testing binary reproducibility of x86_64 builds targeting the stable repository. This is possible thanks to flathub-repro-checker, a tool doing the necessary legwork to recreate the build environment and compare the result of the rebuild with what is published on Flathub. While these tests have been running for a while now, we have recently restarted them from scratch after enabling S3 storage for diffoscope artifacts.
The test results and status is available on their reproducible builds page.

Reproducibility identifying software projects that will fail to build in 2038 Longtime Reproducible Builds developer Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted on Reddit on Y2K38 commemoration day T-12 that is to say, twelve years to the day before the UNIX Epoch will no longer fit into a signed 32-bit integer variable on 19th January 2038. Bernhard s comment succinctly outlines the problem as well as notes some of the potential remedies, as well as links to a discussion with the GCC developers regarding adding warnings for int time_t conversions . At the time of publication, Bernhard s topic had generated 50 comments in response.

Distribution work Conda is language-agnostic package manager which was originally developed to help Python data scientists and is now a popular package manager for Python and R. conda-forge, a community-led infrastructure for Conda recently revamped their dashboards to rebuild packages straight to track reproducibility. There have been changes over the past two years to make the conda-forge build tooling fully reproducible by embedding the lockfile of the entire build environment inside the packages.
In Debian this month:
In NixOS this month, it was announced that the GNU Guix Full Source Bootstrap was ported to NixOS as part of Wire Jansen bachelor s thesis (PDF). At the time of publication, this change has landed in NiX stdev distribution.
Lastly, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another openSUSE monthly update for his work there.

Tool development diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris Lamb made the following changes, including preparing and uploading versions, 310 and 311 to Debian.
  • Fix test compatibility with u-boot-tools version 2026-01. [ ]
  • Drop the implied Rules-Requires-Root: no entry in debian/control. [ ]
  • Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.3. [ ]
  • Reference the Debian ocaml package instead of ocaml-nox. (#1125094)
  • Apply a patch by Jelle van der Waa to adjust a test fixture match new lines. [ ]
  • Also the drop implied Priority: optional from debian/control. [ ]

In addition, Holger Levsen uploaded two versions of disorderfs, first updating the package from FUSE 2 to FUSE 3 as described in last months report, as well as updating the packaging to the latest Debian standards. A second upload (0.6.2-1) was subsequently made, with Holger adding instructions on how to add the upstream release to our release archive and incorporating changes by Roland Clobus to set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS on 32-bit platforms, fixing a build failure on 32-bit systems. Vagrant Cascadian updated diffoscope in GNU Guix to version 311-2-ge4ec97f7 and disorderfs to 0.6.2.

Two new academic papers Julien Malka, Stefano Zacchiroli and Th o Zimmermann of T l com Paris in-house research laboratory, the Information Processing and Communications Laboratory (LTCI) published a paper this month titled Docker Does Not Guarantee Reproducibility:
[ ] While Docker is frequently cited in the literature as a tool that enables reproducibility in theory, the extent of its guarantees and limitations in practice remains under-explored. In this work, we address this gap through two complementary approaches. First, we conduct a systematic literature review to examine how Docker is framed in scientific discourse on reproducibility and to identify documented best practices for writing Dockerfiles enabling reproducible image building. Then, we perform a large-scale empirical study of 5,298 Docker builds collected from GitHub workflows. By rebuilding these images and comparing the results with their historical counterparts, we assess the real reproducibility of Docker images and evaluate the effectiveness of the best practices identified in the literature.
A PDF of their paper is available online.
Quentin Guilloteau, Antoine Waehren and Florina M. Ciorba of the University of Basel in Sweden also published a Docker-related paper, theirs called Longitudinal Study of the Software Environments Produced by Dockerfiles from Research Artifacts:
The reproducibility crisis has affected all scientific disciplines, including computer science (CS). To address this issue, the CS community has established artifact evaluation processes at conferences and in journals to evaluate the reproducibility of the results shared in publications. Authors are therefore required to share their artifacts with reviewers, including code, data, and the software environment necessary to reproduce the results. One method for sharing the software environment proposed by conferences and journals is to utilize container technologies such as Docker and Apptainer. However, these tools rely on non-reproducible tools, resulting in non-reproducible containers. In this paper, we present a tool and methodology to evaluate variations over time in software environments of container images derived from research artifacts. We also present initial results on a small set of Dockerfiles from the Euro-Par 2024 conference.
A PDF of their paper is available online.

Miscellaneous news On our mailing list this month: Lastly, kpcyrd added a Rust section to the Stable order for outputs page on our website. [ ]

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:

Finally, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

4 February 2026

Dirk Eddelbuettel: littler 0.3.23 on CRAN: More Features (and Fixes)

max-heap image The twentythird release of littler as a CRAN package landed on CRAN just now, following in the now twenty year history (!!) as a (initially non-CRAN) package started by Jeff in 2006, and joined by me a few weeks later. littler is the first command-line interface for R as it predates Rscript. It allows for piping as well for shebang scripting via #!, uses command-line arguments more consistently and still starts faster. It also always loaded the methods package which Rscript only began to do in later years. littler lives on Linux and Unix, has its difficulties on macOS due to some-braindeadedness there (who ever thought case-insensitive filesystems as a default were a good idea?) and simply does not exist on Windows (yet the build system could be extended see RInside for an existence proof, and volunteers are welcome!). See the FAQ vignette on how to add it to your PATH. A few examples are highlighted at the Github repo:, as well as in the examples vignette. This release, the first in about eleven months, once again brings two new helper scripts, and enhances six existing one. The release was triggered because it finally became clear why installGitHub.r ignored r2u when available: we forced the type argument to source (so thanks to I aki for spotting this). One change was once again contributed by Michael which is again greatly appreciated. The full change description follows.

Changes in littler version 0.3.22 (2026-02-03)
  • Changes in examples scripts
    • A new script busybees.r aggregates deadlined packages by maintainer
    • Several small updated have been made to the (mostly internal) 'r2u.r' script
    • The deadliners.r script has refined treatment for screen width
    • The install2.r script has new options --quiet and --verbose as proposed by Zivan Karaman
    • The rcc.r script passes build-args to 'rcmdcheck' to compact vignettes and save data
    • The installRub.r script now defaults to 'noble' and is more tolerant of inputs
    • The installRub.r script deals correctly with empty utils::osVersion thanks to Michael Chirico
    • New script checkPackageUrls.r inspired by how CRAN checks (with thanks to Kurt Hornik for the hint)
    • The installGithub.r script now adjusts to bspm and takes advantage of r2u binaries for its build dependencies
  • Changes in package
    • Environment variables (read at build time) can use double quotes
    • Continuous intgegration scripts received a minor update

My CRANberries service provides a comparison to the previous release. Full details for the littler release are provided as usual at the ChangeLog page, and also on the package docs website. The code is available via the GitHub repo, from tarballs and now of course also from its CRAN page and via install.packages("littler"). Binary packages are available directly in Debian as well as (in a day or two) Ubuntu binaries at CRAN thanks to the tireless Michael Rutter. Comments and suggestions are welcome at the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can sponsor me at GitHub.

Ben Hutchings: FOSS activity in January 2026

3 February 2026

Valhalla's Things: A Day Off

Posted on February 3, 2026
Tags: madeof:atoms, madeof:bits
Today I had a day off. Some of it went great. Some less so. I woke up, went out to pay our tribute to NotOurCat, and it was snowing! yay! And I had a day off, so if it had snowed enough that shovelling was needed, I had time to do it (it didn t, it started to rain soon afterwards, but still, YAY snow!). Then I had breakfast, with the fruit rye bread I had baked yesterday, and I treated myself to some of the strong Irish tea I have left, instead of the milder ones I want to finish before buying more of the Irish. And then, I bought myself a fancy new expensive fountain pen. One that costs 16 ! more than three times as much as my usual ones! I hope it will work as well, but I m quite confident it should. I ll find out when it arrives from Germany (together with a few ink samples that will result in a future blog post with some SCIENCE). I decided to try and use bank transfers instead of my visa debit card when buying from online shops that give the option to do so: it s a tiny bit more effort, but it means I m paying 0.25 to my bank1 rather than the seller having to pay some unknown amount to an US based payment provider. Unluckily, the fountain pen website offered a huge number of payment methods, but not bank transfers. sigh. And then, I could start working a bit on the connecting wires for the LED strips for our living room: I soldered two pieces, six wires each (it s one RGB strip, 4 pins, and a warm white one requiring two more), then did a bit of tests, including writing some micropython code to add a test mode that lights up each colour in sequence, and the morning was almost gone. For some reason this project, as simple as it is, is taking forever. But it is showing progress. There was a break, when the postman delivered a package of chemicals 2 for a future project or two. There will be blog posts! After lunch I spent some time finishing eyelets on the outfit I wanted to wear this evening, as I had not been able to finish it during fosdem. This one will result in two blog posts! Meanwhile, in the morning I didn t remember the name of the program I used to load software on micropython boards such as the one that will control the LED strips (that s thonny), and while searching for it in the documentation, I found that there is also a command line program I can use, mpremote, and that s a much better fit for my preferences! I mentioned it in an xmpp room full of nerds, and one of them mentioned that he could try it on his Inkplate, when he had time, and I was nerd-sniped into trying it on mine, which had been sitting unused showing the temperatures in our old house on the last day it spent there and needs to be updated for the sensors in the new house. And that lead to the writing of some notes on how to set it up from the command line (good), and to the opening on one upstream issue (bad), because I have an old model, and the board-specific library isn t working. at all. And that s when I realized that it was 17:00, I still had to cook the bread I had been working on since yesterday evening (ciabatta, one of my favourites, but it needs almost one hour in the oven), the outfit I wanted to wear in the evening was still not wearable, the table needed cleaning and some panicking was due. Thankfully, my mother was cooking dinner, so I didn t have to do that too. I turned the oven on, sewed the shoulder seams of the bodice while spraying water on the bread every 5 minutes, and then while it was cooking on its own, started to attach a closure to the skirt, decided that a safety pin was a perfectly reasonable closure for the first day an outfit is worn, took care of the table, took care of the bread, used some twine to close the bodice, because I still haven t worked out what to use for laces, realized my bodkin is still misplaced, used a long and sharp and big needle meant for sewing mattresses instead of a bodkin, managed not to stab myself, and less than half an hour late we could have dinner. There was bread, there was Swedish crispbread, there were spreads (tuna, and beans), and vegetables, and then there was the cake that caused my mother to panic when she added her last honey to the milk and it curdled (my SO and I tried it, it had no odd taste, we decided it could be used) and it was good, although I had to get a second slice just to be 100% sure of it. And now I m exhausted, and I ve only done half of the things I had planned to do, but I d still say I ve had quite a good day.
  1. Banca Etica, so one that avoids any investment in weapons and a number of other problematic things.
  2. not food grade, except for one, but kitchen-safe.

Next.

Previous.