Search Results: "reg"

11 April 2017

Matthew Garrett: Disabling SSL validation in binary apps

Reverse engineering protocols is a great deal easier when they're not encrypted. Thankfully most apps I've dealt with have been doing something convenient like using AES with a key embedded in the app, but others use remote protocols over HTTPS and that makes things much less straightforward. MITMProxy will solve this, as long as you're able to get the app to trust its certificate, but if there's a built-in pinned certificate that's going to be a pain. So, given an app written in C running on an embedded device, and without an easy way to inject new certificates into that device, what do you do?

First: The app is probably using libcurl, because it's free, works and is under a license that allows you to link it into proprietary apps. This is also bad news, because libcurl defaults to having sensible security settings. In the worst case we've got a statically linked binary with all the symbols stripped out, so we're left with the problem of (a) finding the relevant code and (b) replacing it with modified code. Fortuntely, this is much less difficult than you might imagine.

First, let's find where curl sets up its defaults. Curl_init_userdefined() in curl/lib/url.c has the following code:
set->ssl.primary.verifypeer = TRUE;
set->ssl.primary.verifyhost = TRUE;
#ifdef USE_TLS_SRP
set->ssl.authtype = CURL_TLSAUTH_NONE;
#endif
set->ssh_auth_types = CURLSSH_AUTH_DEFAULT; /* defaults to any auth
type */
set->general_ssl.sessionid = TRUE; /* session ID caching enabled by
default */
set->proxy_ssl = set->ssl;

set->new_file_perms = 0644; /* Default permissions */
set->new_directory_perms = 0755; /* Default permissions */

TRUE is defined as 1, so we want to change the code that currently sets verifypeer and verifyhost to 1 to instead set them to 0. How to find it? Look further down - new_file_perms is set to 0644 and new_directory_perms is set to 0755. The leading 0 indicates octal, so these correspond to decimal 420 and 493. Passing the file to objdump -d (assuming a build of objdump that supports this architecture) will give us a disassembled version of the code, so time to fix our problems with grep:
objdump -d target grep --after=20 ,420 grep ,493

This gives us the disassembly of target, searches for any occurrence of ",420" (indicating that 420 is being used as an argument in an instruction), prints the following 20 lines and then searches for a reference to 493. It spits out a single hit:
43e864: 240301ed li v1,493
Which is promising. Looking at the surrounding code gives:
43e820: 24030001 li v1,1
43e824: a0430138 sb v1,312(v0)
43e828: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e82c: 24030001 li v1,1
43e830: a0430139 sb v1,313(v0)
43e834: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e838: ac400170 sw zero,368(v0)
43e83c: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e840: 2403ffff li v1,-1
43e844: ac4301dc sw v1,476(v0)
43e848: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e84c: 24030001 li v1,1
43e850: a0430164 sb v1,356(v0)
43e854: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e858: 240301a4 li v1,420
43e85c: ac4301e4 sw v1,484(v0)
43e860: 8fc20018 lw v0,24(s8)
43e864: 240301ed li v1,493
43e868: ac4301e8 sw v1,488(v0)

Towards the end we can see 493 being loaded into v1, and v1 then being copied into an offset from v0. This looks like a structure member being set to 493, which is what we expected. Above that we see the same thing being done to 420. Further up we have some more stuff being set, including a -1 - that corresponds to CURLSSH_AUTH_DEFAULT, so we seem to be in the right place. There's a zero above that, which corresponds to CURL_TLSAUTH_NONE. That means that the two 1 operations above the -1 are the code we want, and simply changing 43e820 and 43e82c to 24030000 instead of 24030001 means that our targets will be set to 0 (ie, FALSE) rather than 1 (ie, TRUE). Copy the modified binary back to the device, run it and now it happily talks to MITMProxy. Huge success.

(If the app calls Curl_setopt() to reconfigure the state of these values, you'll need to stub those out as well - thankfully, recent versions of curl include a convenient string "CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST no longer supports 1 as value!" in this function, so if the code in question is using semi-recent curl it's easy to find. Then it's just a matter of looking for the constants that CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER are set to, following the jumps and hacking the code to always set them to 0 regardless of the argument)

comment count unavailable comments

Antoine Beaupr : A report from Netconf: Day 1

As is becoming traditional, two times a year the kernel networking community meets in a two-stage conference: an invite-only, informal, two-day plenary session called Netconf, held in Toronto this year, and a more conventional one-track conference open to the public called Netdev. I was invited to cover both conferences this year, given that Netdev was in Montreal (my hometown), and was happy to meet the crew of developers that maintain the network stack of the Linux kernel. This article covers the first day of the conference which consisted of around 25 Linux developers meeting under the direction of David Miller, the kernel's networking subsystem maintainer. Netconf has no formal sessions; although some people presented slides, interruptions are frequent (indeed, encouraged) and the focus is on hashing out issues that are blocked on the mailing list and getting suggestions, ideas, solutions, and feedback from their peers.

Removing ndo_select_queue() One of the first discussions that elicited a significant debate was the ndo_select_queue() function, a key component of the Linux polling system that determines when and how to send packets on a network interface (see netdev_pick_tx and friends). The general question was whether the use of ndo_select_queue() in drivers is a good idea. Alexander Duyck explained that Intel people were considering using ndo_select_queue() for receive/transmit queue matching. Intel drivers do not currently use the hook provided by the Linux kernel and it turns out no one is happy with ndo_select_queue(): the heuristics it uses don't really please anyone. The consensus (including from Duyck himself) seemed to be that it should just not be used anymore, or at least not used for that specific purpose. The discussion turned toward the wireless network stack, which uses it extensively, but for other purposes. Johannes Berg explained that the wireless stack uses ndo_select_queue() for traffic classification, for example to get voice traffic through even if the best-effort queue is backed up. The wireless stack could stop using it by doing flow control completely inside the wireless stack, which already uses the fq_codel flow-control mechanism for other purposes, so porting away from ndo_select_queue() seems possible there. The problem then becomes how to update all the drivers to change that behavior, which would be a lot of work. Still, it seems people are moving away from a generic ndo_select_queue() interface to stack-specific or even driver-specific (in the case of Intel) queue management interfaces.

refcount_t followup There was a followup discussion on the integration of the refcount_t type into the network stack, which we covered recently. This type is meant to be an in-kernel defense against exploits based on overflowing or underflowing an object's reference count. The consensus seems to be that having refcount_t used for debugging is acceptable, but it cannot be enabled by default. An issue that was identified is that the networking developers are fairly sure that introducing refcount_t would have a severe impact on performance, but they do not have benchmarks to prove it, something Miller identified as a problem that needs to be worked on. Miller then expressed some openness to the idea of having it as a kernel configuration option. A similar discussion happened, on the second day, regarding the KASan memory error detector which was covered when it was introduced in 2014. Eric Dumazet warned that there could be a lot of issues that cannot be detected by KASan because of the way the network stack often bypasses regular memory-allocation routines for performance reasons. He also noted that this can sometimes mean the stack may go over the regular 10% memory limit (the tcp_mem parameter, described in the tcp(7) man page) for certain operations, especially when rebuilding out of order packets with lots of parallel TCP connections. Therefore it was proposed that these special memory recycling tricks could be optionally disabled, at run or compile-time, to instrument proper memory tracking. Dumazet argued this was a situation similar to refcount_t in that we need a way to disable high performance to make the network stack easier to debug with KAsan. The problem with optional parameters is that they are often disabled in production or even by default, which, in turn, means that critical bugs cannot actually be found because the code paths are not tested. When I asked Dumazet about this, he explained that Google performs integration testing of new kernels before putting them in production, and those toggles could be enabled there to find and fix those bugs. But he agreed that certain code paths are then not tested until the code gets deployed in production. So it seems the status quo remains: security folks wants to improve the reliability of the kernel, but the network folks can't afford the performance cost. Yet it was clear in the discussions that the team cares about security issues and wants those issues to be fixed; the impact of some of the solutions is just too big.

Lightweight wireless management packet access Berg explained that some users need to have high-performance access to certain management frames in the wireless stack and wondered how to best expose those to user space. The wireless stack already allows users to clone a network interface in "monitor" mode, but this has a big performance cost, as the radiotap header needs to be constructed from scratch and the packet header needs to be copied. As wireless improves and the bandwidth rises to gigabit levels, this can become significant bottleneck for packet sniffers or reporting software that need to know precisely what's going on over the air outside of the regular access point client operation. It seems the proper way to do this is with an eBPF program. As Miller summarized, just add another API call that allows loading a BPF program into the kernel and then those users can use a BPF filtering point to get the statistics they need. This will require an extra hook in the wireless stack, but it seems like this is the way that will be taken to implement this feature.

VLAN 0 inconsistencies Hannes Frederic Sowa brought up the seemingly innocuous question of "how do we handle VLAN 0?" In theory, VLAN 0 means "no VLAN". But the Linux kernel currently handles this differently depending on whether the VLAN module is loaded and whether a VLAN 0 interface was created. Sometimes the VLAN tag is stripped, sometimes not. It turns out the semantics of this were accidentally changed last time there was a change here and this was originally working but is now broken. Sowa therefore got the go-ahead to fix this to make the behavior consistent again.

Loopy fun Then it came the turn of Jamal Hadi Salim, the maintainer of the kernel's traffic-control (tc) subsystem. The first issue he brought up is a problem in the tc REDIRECT action that can create infinite loops within the kernel. The problem can be easily alleviated when loops are created on the same interface: checks can be added that just drop packets coming from the same device and rate-limit logging to avoid a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. The more serious problem occurs when a packet is forwarded from (say) interface eth0 to eth1 which then promptly redirects it from eth1 back to eth0. Obviously, this kind of problem can only be created by a user with root access so, at first glance, those issues don't seem that serious: admins can shoot themselves in the foot, so what? But things become a little more serious when you consider the container case, where an untrusted user has root access inside a container and should have constrained resource limitations. Such a loop could allow this user to deploy an effective DoS attack against a whole group of containers running on the same machine. Even worse, this endless loop could possibly turn into a deadlock in certain scenarios, as the kernel could try to transmit the packet on the same device it originated from and block, progressively filling the queues and eventually completely breaking network access. Florian Westphal argued that a container can already create DoS conditions, for example by doing a ping flood. According to Salim, this whole problem was created when two bits used for tracking such packets were reclaimed from the skb structure used to represent packets in the kernel. Those bits were a simple TTL (time to live) field that was incremented on each loop and dropped after a pre-determined limit was reached, breaking infinite loops. Salim asked everyone if this should be fixed or if we should just forget about this issue and move on. Miller proposed to keep a one-behind state for the packet, fixing the simplest case (two interfaces). The general case, however, would requite a bitmap of all the interfaces to be scanned, which would impose a large overhead. Miller said an attempt to fix this should somehow be made. The root of the problem is that the network maintainers are trying to reduce the size of the skb structure, because it's used in many critical paths of the network stack. Salim's position is that, without the TTL fields, there is no way to fix the general case here, and this constitutes a security issue. So either the bits need to be brought back, or we need to live with the inherent DoS threat.

Dumping large statistics sets Another issue Salim brought up was the question of how to export large statistics sets from the kernel. It turns out that some use cases may end up dumping a lot of data. Salim mentioned a real-world tc use case that calls for reading six-million entries. The current netlink-based API provides a way to get only 20 entries at a time, which means it takes forever to dump the state of all those policy actions. Salim has a patch that changes the dump size be eight times the NLMSG_GOOD_SIZE, which improves performance by an order of magnitude already, although there are issues with checking the user-space buffer size there. But a more complete solution is needed. What Salim proposed was a way to ask only for the states that changed since the last dump was requested. He has a patch to add a last_access field to the netlink_callback structure used by netlink_dump() to output data; that raised the question of how to actually use that field. Since Salim fetches that data every five seconds, he figured he could just tell the kernel to return all the nodes that changed in that period. But then if the dump takes more than five seconds to complete, the next dump may be missing states that changed during the extra delay. An alternative mechanism would be for the user-space utility to keep the time stamp it requested and use that as a delta for the next dump. It turns out this is a larger problem than just tc. Dumazet mentioned this was an issue with fq_codel classes: he would even like to be able to dump those statistics faster than every five seconds. Roopa Prabhu mentioned that Cumulus also has similar problems dumping stats from bridges, so clearly a more generic solution is needed here. There is, however, a fundamental problem with dumping large statistics sets from the kernel: those statistics are constantly changing while the dump is created and unless versioning or locking mechanisms are used which would slow things down the data returned is bound to be only an approximation of reality. Salim promised to send a set of RFC patches to further discussions regarding this issue, but during the following Netdev conference, Berg published a patch to fix this ten-year-old issue, which brought cheers from the audience.
The author would like to thank the Netconf and Netdev organizers for travel to, and hosting assistance in, Toronto. Many thanks to Berg, Dumazet, Salim, and Sowa for their time taken for a technical review of this article. Note: this article first appeared in the Linux Weekly News.

Antoine Beaupr : A report from Netconf: Day 2

This article covers the second day of the informal Netconf discussions, held on on April 4, 2017. Topics discussed this day included the binding of sockets in VRF, identification of eBPF programs, inconsistencies between IPv4 and IPv6, changes to data-center hardware, and more. (See this article for coverage from the first day of discussions).

How to bind to specific sockets in VRF One of the first presentations was from David Ahern of Cumulus, who presented a few interesting questions for the audience. His first was the problem of binding sockets to a given interface. Right now, there are four different ways this can be done:
  • the old SO_BINDTODEVICE generic socket option (see socket(7))
  • the IP_PKTINFO, IP-specific socket option (see ip(7)), introduced in Linux 2.2
  • the IP_UNICAST_IF flag, introduced in Linux 3.3 for WINE
  • the IPv6 scope ID suffix, part of the IPv6 addressing standard
So there's a problem of having too many ways of doing the same thing, something that cannot really be fixed without breaking ABI compatibility. But even worse, conflicts between those options are not reported by the kernel so it's possible for a user to set up socket flags in a way that certain flags override others and there are no checks made or errors reported. It was agreed that the user should get some notification of conflicting changes here, at least. Furthermore, binding sockets to a specific VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) device is not currently possible, so Ahern asked what the best way to do this would be, considering the many options available. A use case example is a UDP multicast socket that could be bound to a specific interface within a VRF. This is an old problem: Tom Herbert explained that there were previous discussions about making the bind() system call more programmable so that, for example, you could bind() a UDP socket to a discrete list of IP addresses or a subnet. So he identified this issue as a broader problem that should be addressed by making the interfaces more generic. Ahern explained that it is currently possible to bind sockets to the slave device of a VRF even though that should not be allowed. He also raised the question of how the kernel should tell which socket should be selected for incoming packets. Right now, there is a scoring mechanism for UDP sockets, but that cannot be used directly in this more general case. David Miller said that there are already different ways of specifying scope: there is the VRF layer and the namespace ("netns") layer. A long time ago, Miller reluctantly accepted the addition of netns keys everywhere, swallowing the performance cost to gain flexibility. He argued that a new key should not be added and instead existing infrastructure should be reused. Herbert argued this was exactly the reason why this should be simplified: "if we don't answer the question, people will keep on trying this". For example, one can use a VRF to limit listening addresses, but it gets complicated if we need a device for every address. It seems the consensus evolved towards using, IP_UNICAST_IF, added back in 2012, which is accessible for non-root users. It is currently limited to UDP and RAW sockets, but it could be extended for TCP.

XDP and eBPF program identification Ahern then turned to the problem of extracting BPF programs from the kernel. He gave the example of a simple cBPF (classic BPF) filter that checks for ARP packets. If the filter is read back from the kernel, the user gets a blob of binary data, which is hard to interpret. There is an kernel verifier that can show C-like output, but that is also difficult to interpret. Ahern then added annotations to his slide that showed what the original program actually does, which was a good demonstration of why such a feature is needed. Ahern explained that, at least for cBPF, it should be possible to recover the original plaintext, or at least something close to the original program. A first step would be to replace known constants (like 0x806 for ARP). Even with eBPF, it should be possible to improve the output. Alexei Starovoitov, the BPF maintainer, explained that it might make sense to start by returning information about the maps used by an eBPF program. Then more complex data structures could be inspected once we know their type. The first priority is to get simple debugging tools working but, in the long term, the goal is a full decompiler that can reconstruct instructions into a human-readable program. The question that remains is how to return this data. Ahern explained that right now the bpf() system call copies the data to a different file descriptor, but it could just fill in a buffer. Starovoitov argued for a file descriptor; that would allow the kernel to stream everything through the same descriptor instead of having many attach points. Netlink cannot be used for this because of its asynchronous nature. A similar issue regarding the way we identify express data path (XDP) programs (which are also written in BPF) was raised by Daniel Borkmann from Covalent. Miller explained that users will want ways to figure out which XDP program was installed, so XDP needs an introspection mechanism. We currently have SHA-1 identifiers that can be internally used to tell which binary is currently loaded but those are not exposed to user space. Starovoitov mentioned it is now just a boolean that shows if a program is loaded or not. A use case for this, on top of just trying to figure out which BPF program is loaded, is to actually fetch the source code of a BPF program that was deployed in the field for which the source was lost. It is still uncertain that it will be possible to extract an exact copy that could then be recompiled into the same program. Starovoitov added that he needed this in production to do proper reporting.

IPv4/IPv6 equivalency The last issue or set of issues that Ahern brought up was the question of inconsistencies between IPv4 and IPv6. It turns out that, because both protocols were (naturally) implemented separately, there are inconsistencies in how they are handled in the Linux kernel, which affect, among other things, the VRF framework. The first example he gave was the fact that IPv6 addresses added on the loopback interface generate unreachable routes in the main routing table, yet this doesn't happen with IPv4 addresses. Hannes Frederic Sowa explained this was part of the IPv6 specification: there are stronger restrictions on loopback interfaces in IPv6 than IPv4. Ahern explained that VRF loopback interfaces do not implement these restrictions and wanted to know if this was a problem. Another issue is that anycast routes are added to the wrong interface. This is apparently not specific to VRF: this was done "just because Java", and has been there from day one. It seems that the Java Virtual Machine builds its own routing table and assumes this behavior, so changing this would break every JVM out there, which is obviously not acceptable. Finally, Martin Kafai Lau asked if work should be done to merge the IPv4 and IPv6 FIB (forwarding information base) trees. The FIB tree is the data structure that represents routing tables in the Linux kernel. Miller explained that the two trees are not semantically equivalent: while IPv6 does source-address lookup and routing, IPv4 does not. We can't remove the source lookups from IPv6, because "people probably use that". According to Alexander Duyck, adding source tables to IPv4 would degrade performance to the level of IPv6 performance, which was jokingly referred to as an incentive to switch to IPv6. More seriously, Sowa argued that using the same compressed tree IPv4 uses in IPv6 could make sense. People may want to have source routing in IPv4 as well. Miller argued that the kernel is optimized for 32-bit addresses in IPv4, and conceded that it could be scaled to 64-bit subnets, but 128-bit addresses would be much harder. Sowa suggested that they could be limited to 64 bits, as global routes that are announced over BGP usually have such a limit, and more specific routes are usually at discrete prefixes like /65, /127 (for interconnect links) or /128 for (for point-to-point links). He expressed concerns over the reliability of such an implementation so, at this point, it is unlikely that the data structures could be merged. What is more likely is that the code path could be merged and simplified, while keeping the data structures separate.

Modules options substitutions The next issue that was raised was from Ji P rko, who asked how to pass configuration options to a driver before the driver is initialized. Some chips require that some settings be sent before the firmware is loaded, which leads to a weird situation where there is a need to address a device before it's actually recognized by the kernel. The question then can be summarized as to how to pass information to a device that doesn't exist yet. The answer seems to be that devlink could do this, as it has access to the full device tree and, therefore, to devices that can be addressed by (say) PCI identifiers. Then a possible devlink command could look something like:
    devlink dev pci/0000:03:00.0 option set foo bar
This idea raised a bunch of extra questions: some devices don't have a one-to-one mapping with the PCI bridge identifiers, for example, meaning that those identifiers cannot be used to access such devices. Another issue is that you may want to send multiple settings in a single transaction, which doesn't fit well in the devlink model. Miller then proposed to let the driver initialize itself to some state and wait for configuration to be sent when necessary. Another way would be to unregister the driver and re-register with the given configuration. Shrijeet Mukherjee explained that right now, Cumulus is doing this using horrible startup script magic by retrying and re-registering, but it would be nice to have a more standard way to do this.

Control over UAPI patches Another issue that came up was the problem of changes in the user-space API (UAPI) which break backward compatibility. P rko said that "we have to be more careful about those changes". The problem is that reviewers are not always available to make detailed reviews of such changes and may not notice API-breaking changes. P rko proposed creating a bot to check if a given patch introduces UAPI changes, changes in structs, or in netlink enums. Miller said he could block merges until discussions happen and that patchwork, which Miller uses to process patches from the mailing list, does some of this. He also pointed out there aren't enough test cases in the first place. Starovoitov argued UAPI isn't special, there are other ways of breaking backward compatibility. He expressed concerns that such a bot could create a false sense that everything is fine while a patch could break compatibility and not be detected. Miller countered that UAPI is special in that "we're stuck with it forever". He then went on to propose that, since there's a maintainer (or more) for each module, he can make sure that each maintainer explicitly approves changes to those modules.

Data-center hardware changes Starovoitov brought up the issue of a new type of hardware that is currently being deployed in data centers called a "multi-host NIC" (network interface card). It's a single NIC that is connected to multiple servers. Facebook, for example, uses this in its Yosemite platform that shoves twelve servers into a 2U rack mount, in three modules. Each module is made of four servers connected to the traditional switch fabric with a single NIC through PCI-Express. Mellanox and and Broadcom also have similar devices. One question is how to manage those devices. Since they are connected through a PCI-Express bus, Linux will see them as a NIC, yet they are also a little like switches, in that they interconnect multiple servers. Furthermore, the kernel security model assumes that a NIC is trusted, and gladly opens its own memory to NICs through DMA; this can become a huge security issue when the NIC is under the control of another server. This can especially become problematic if we consider that there could be TLS hardware offloading in the future with the introduction of in-kernel TLS stacks. The other problem is the question of reliability: since those devices are currently "dumb", they need to be managed just like a regular NIC. If the host managing the card crashes, it could disable a whole set of servers that rely on the same NIC. There could be an election process among the servers, but that complicates significantly what used to be a simple PCI connection. Mukherjee pointed out that the model Cisco uses for this is that the "smart NIC" is a "slave" of the main switch fabric. It's a daughter card, which makes it easier to manage from a network perspective. It is clear that Linux will need a way to represent those devices, probably through the newly introduced switchdev or DSA (distributed switch architecture), but it will be something to keep an eye on as density increases in the data center. There were many more discussions during Netconf, too many to cover here, but in the end, Miller thanked everyone for all the interesting topics as the participants dispersed for a day off to travel to Montreal to attend the following Netdev conference.
The author would like to thank the Netconf and Netdev organizers for travel to, and hosting assistance in, Toronto. Many thanks to Alexei Starovoitov for his time taken for a technical review of this article. Note: this article first appeared in the Linux Weekly News.

10 April 2017

Daniel Pocock: If Alan Turing was born today, would he be a Muslim?

Alan Turing's name and his work are well known to anybody with a theoretical grounding in computer science. Turing developed his theories well before anybody invented file sharing, overclocking or mass surveillance. In fact, Turing was largely working in the absence of any computers at all: the transistor was only invented in 1947 and the microchip, the critical innovation that has made computing both affordable and portable, only came in 1960, four years after Turing's death. To this day, the Turing Test remains a well known challenge in the field of Artificial Intelligence. The most prestigious prize in computing, the A.M. Turing Award from the ACM, equivalent to the Nobel Prize in other fields of endeavour, is named in Turing's honour. (This year's award is another British scientist, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web).
Potentially far more people know of Alan Turing for his groundbreaking work at Bletchley Park and the impact it had on cracking the Nazi's Enigma machines during World War 2, giving the allies an advantage against Hitler. While in his lifetime, Turing exposed the secret communications of the Nazis, in his death, he exposed something manifestly repugnant about his own society. Turing's challenges with his sexuality (or Britain's challenge with it) are just as well documented as his greatest scientific achievements. The 2014 movie The Imitation Game tells Turing's story, bringing together the themes from his professional and personal life. Had Turing chosen to flee British persecution by going abroad, he would be a refugee in the same sense as any person who crossed the seas to reach Europe today to avoid persecution elsewhere. Please prove me wrong In March, I blogged about the problem of racism that plagues Britain today. While some may have felt the tone of the blog was quite strong, I was in no way pleased to find my position affirmed by the events that occurred in the two days after the blog appeared. Two days and two more human beings (both immigrants and both refugees) subjected to abhorrent and unnecessary acts of abuse in Great Britain. Both cases appear to be fuelled directly by the evil that has been oozing out of number 10 Downing Street since they decided to have a referendum on "Brexit". What stands out about these latest crimes is not that they occurred (this type of thing has been going on for months now) but certain contrasts between their circumstances and to a lesser extent, the fact they occurred immediately after Theresa May formalized Britain's departure from the EU. One of the victims was almost beaten to death by a street gang, while the other was abused by men wearing uniforms. One was only a child, while the other is a mature adult who has been in the UK almost three decades, completely assimilated into British life, working and paying taxes. Both were doing nothing out of the ordinary at the time the abuse occurred: one had engaged in a conversation at a bus stop, the other was on a routine visit to a Government office. There is no evidence that either of them had done anything to provoke or invite the abhorrent treatment meted out to them by the followers of Theresa May and Nigel Farage. The first victim, on 30 March, was Stojan Jankovic, a refugee from Yugoslavia who has been in the UK for 26 years. He had a routine meeting at an immigration department office where he was ambushed, thrown in the back of a van and sent to rot in a prison cell by Theresa May's gestapo. On Friday, 31 March, it was Reker Ahmed, a 17 year old Kurdish-Iranian beaten to the brink of death by a crowd in south London. One of the more remarkable facts to emerge about these two cases is that while Stojan Jankovic was basically locked up for no reason at all, the street thugs who the police apprehended for the assault on Ahmed were kept in a cell for less than 48 hours and released again on bail. While the harmless and innocent Jankovic was eventually released after a massive public outcry, he spent more time locked up than that gang of violent criminals who beat Reker Ahmed. In other words, Theresa May and Nigel Farage's Britain has more concern for the liberty of violent criminals than somebody like Jankovic who has been working and paying taxes in the UK since before any of those street thugs were born. A deeper insight into Turing's fate With gay marriage having been legal in the UK for a number of years now, the rainbow flag flying at the Tate and Sir Elton John achieving a knighthood, it becomes difficult for people to relate to the world in which Turing and many other victims were collectively classified by their sexuality, systematically persecuted by the state and ultimately died far sooner than they should have. (Turing was only 41 when he died). In fact, the cruel and brutal forces that ripped Turing apart (and countless other victims too) haven't dissipated at all, they have simply shifted their target. The slanderous comments insinuating that immigrants "steal" jobs or that Islam is about terrorism are eerily reminiscent of suggestions that gay men abduct young boys or work as Soviet spies. None of these lies has any basis in fact, but repeat them often enough in certain types of newspaper and these ideas spread like weeds. In an ironic twist, Turing's groundbreaking work at Bletchley Park was founded on the contributions of Polish mathematicians, their own country having been the first casualty to Hitler, they were also both immigrants and refugees in Britain. Today, under the Theresa May/Nigel Farage leadership, Polish citizens have been subjected to regular vilification by the media and some have even been killed in the street. It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words. When you compare these two pieces of propaganda: a 1963 article in the Sunday Mirror advising people "How to spot a possible homo" and a UK Government billboard encouraging people to be on the lookout for people who look different, could you imagine the same type of small-minded and power-hungry tyrants crafting them, singling out a minority so as to keep the public's attention in the wrong place?
Many people have noticed that these latest UK Government posters portray foreigners, Muslims and basically anybody who is not white using a range of characteristics found in anti-semetic propaganda from the Third Reich: Do the people who create such propaganda appear to have any concern whatsoever for the people they hurt? How would Alan Turing have felt when he encountered propaganda like that from the Sunday Mirror? Do posters like these encourage us to judge people by their gifts in science, the arts or sporting prowess or do they encourage us to lump them all together based on their physical appearance? It is a basic expectation of scientific methodology that when you repeat the same experiment, you should get the same result. What type of experiment are Theresa May and Nigel Farage conducting and what type of result would you expect? Playing ping-pong with children If anybody has any doubt that this evil comes from the top, take a moment to contemplate the 3,000 children who were baited with the promise of resettlement from the Calais "jungle" camp into the UK under the Dubs amendment. When French authorities closed the "jungle" in 2016, the children were lured out of the camp and left with nowhere to go as Theresa May and French authorities played ping-pong with them. Given that the UK parliament had already agreed they should be accepted, was there any reason for Theresa May to dig her heels in and make these children suffer? Or was she just trying to prove her credentials as somebody who can bastardize migrants just the way Nigel Farage would do it? How do British politicians really view migrants? Parliamentarian Keith Vaz, former chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee (responsible for security, crime, prostitution and similar things) was exposed with young men from eastern Europe, encouraging them to take drugs before he ordered them "Take your shirt off. I'm going to attack you.". How many British MP's see foreigners this way? Next time you are groped at an airport security checkpoint, remember it was people like Keith Vaz and his committee who oversee those abuses, writing among other things that "The wider introduction of full-body scanners is a welcome development". No need to "take your shirt off" when these machines can look through it as easily as they can look through your children's underwear. According to the World Health Organization, HIV/AIDS kills as many people as the September 11 attacks every single day. Keith Vaz apparently had no concern for the possibility he might spread this disease any further: the media reported he doesn't use any protection in his extra-marital relationships. While Britain's new management continue to round up foreigners like Stojan Jankovic who have done nothing wrong, they chose not to prosecute Keith Vaz for his antics with drugs and prostitution. Who is Britain's next Alan Turing? Britain's next Alan Turing may not be a homosexual. He or she may have been a child turned away by Theresa May's spat with the French at Calais, a migrant bundled into a deportation van by the gestapo (who are just following orders) or perhaps somebody of Muslim appearance who is set upon by thugs in the street who have been energized by Nigel Farage. If you still have any uncertainty about what Brexit really means, this is it. A country that denies itself the opportunity to be great by subjecting itself to be ruled under the "divide and conquer" mantra of the colonial era. Throughout the centuries, Britain has produced some of the most brilliant scientists of their time. Newton, Darwin and Hawking are just some of those who are even more prominent than Turing, household names around the world. One can only wonder what the history books will have to say about Theresa May and Nigel Farage however. Next time you see a British policeman accosting a Muslim, whether it is at an airport, in a shopping centre, keeping Manchester United souvenirs or simply taking a photograph, spare a thought for Alan Turing and the era when homosexuals were their target of choice.

9 April 2017

Antoine Beaupr : Contribute your skills to Debian in Montreal, April 14 2017

Join us in Montreal, on April 14 2017, and we will find a way in which you can help Debian with your current set of skills! You might even learn one or two things in passing (but you don't have to). Debian is a free operating system for your computer. An operating system is the set of basic programs and utilities that make your computer run. Debian comes with dozens of thousands of packages, precompiled software bundled up for easy installation on your machine. A number of other operating systems, such as Ubuntu and Tails, are based on Debian. The upcoming version of Debian, called Stretch, will be released later this year. We need you to help us make it awesome :) Whether you're a computer user, a graphics designer, or a bug triager, there are many ways you can contribute to this effort. We also welcome experience in consensus decision-making, anti-harassment teams, and package maintenance. No effort is too small and whatever you bring to this community will be appreciated. Here's what we will be doing:

Goals and principles This is a work in progress, and a statement of intent. Not everything is organized and confirmed yet. We want to bring together a heterogeneous group of people. This goal will guide our handling of sponsorship requests, and will help us make decisions if more people want to attend than we can welcome properly. In other words: if you're part of a group that is currently under-represented in computer communities, we would like you to be able to attend. We are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming environment for all, regardless of level of experience, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, age, religion, nationality, or other similar personal characteristic. Attending this event requires reading and respecting the Debian Code of Conduct, that sets the standards in terms of behaviour for the whole event, including communication (public and private) before, while and after. The space where this event will take place is unfortunately not accessible to wheelchairs. Food (including vegetarian options) should be provided for lunch. If you have any specific needs regarding food, please let us know when registering, and we will do our best.

What we will be doing This will be an informal session to confirm and fix bugs in Debian. If you have never worked with Debian packages, this is a good opportunity to learn about packaging and bugtracker usage. Bugs flagged as Release Critical are blocking the release of the upcoming version of Debian. To fix them, it helps to make sure the bug report documents the up-to-date status of the bug, and of its resolution. One does not need to be a programmer to do this work! For example, you can try and reproduce bugs in software you use... or in software you will discover. This helps package maintainers better focus their work. We will also try to actually fix bugs by testing patches and uploading fixes into Debian itself. Antoine Beaupr , a seasoned Debian developer, will be available to sponsor uploads and teach people about basic Debian packaging skills.

Where? When? How to register? See https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2017/04/ca/Montreal for the exact address and time.

8 April 2017

Dirk Eddelbuettel: #4: Simpler shoulders()

Welcome to the fourth post in the repulsively random R ramblings series, or R4 for short. My twitter feed was buzzing about a nice (and as yet unpublished, ie not-on-CRAN) package thankr by Dirk Schumacher which compiles a list of packages (ordered by maintainer count) for your current session (or installation or ...) with a view towards saying thank you to those whose packages we rely upon. Very nice indeed. I had a quick look and run it twice ... and had a reaction of ewwww, really? as running it twice gave different results as on the second instance a boatload of tibblyverse packages appeared. Because apparently kids these day can only slice data that has been tidied or something. So I had another quick look ... and put together an alternative version using just base R (as there was only one subfunction that needed reworking):
source(file="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dirkschumacher/thankr/master/R/shoulders.R")
format_pkg_df <- function(df)   # non-tibblyverse variant
    tb <- table(df[,2])
    od <- order(tb, decreasing=TRUE)
    ndf <- data.frame(maint=names(tb)[od], npkgs=as.integer(tb[od]))
    colpkgs <- function(m, df)   paste(df[ df$maintainer == m, "pkg_name"], collapse=",")  
    ndf[, "pkg"] <- sapply(ndf$maint, colpkgs, df)
    ndf
 
A nice side benefit is that the function is now free of external dependencies (besides, of course, base R). Running this in the ESS session I had open gives:
R> shoulders()  ## by Dirk Schumacher, with small modifications
                               maint npkgs                                                                 pkg
1 R Core Team <R-core@r-project.org>     9 compiler,graphics,tools,utils,grDevices,stats,datasets,methods,base
2 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>     4                                  RcppTOML,Rcpp,RApiDatetime,anytime
3  Matt Dowle <mattjdowle@gmail.com>     1                                                          data.table
R> 
and for good measure a screenshot is below:
I think we need a catchy moniker for R work using good old base R. SoberVerse? GrumbyOldFolksR? PlainOldR? Better suggestions welcome. Edit on 2017-04-09: And by now Dirk Schumacher fixed that little bug in thankr which was at the start of this. His shoulders() function is now free of side effects, and thankr is now a clean micropackage free of external depends from any verse, be it tiddly or grumpy. I look forward to seeing it on CRAN soon!

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

7 April 2017

Dirk Eddelbuettel: #3: Follow R-devel

Welcome to the third post in the rarely relevant R recommendation series, or R4 for short. Today will be brief, but of some importance. In order to know where R is going next, few places provide a better vantage point than the actual ongoing development. A few years ago, I mentioned to Duncan Murdoch how straightforward the setup of my CRANberries feed (and site) was. After all, static blog compilers converting textual input to html, rss feed and whatnot have been around for fifteen years (though they keep getting reinvented). He took this to heart and built the (not too pretty) R-devel daily site (which also uses a fancy diff tool as it shows changes in NEWS) as well as a more general description of all available sub-feeds. I follow this mostly through blog aggregations -- Google Reader in its day, now Feedly. A screenshot is below just to show that it doesn't have to be ugly just because it is on them intertubes:
This shows a particularly useful day when R-devel folded into the new branch for what will be the R 3.4.0 release come April 21. The list of upcoming changes is truly impressive and quite comprehensive -- and the package registration helper, focus of posts #1 and #2 here, is but one of these many changes. One function I learned about that day is tools::CRAN_package_db(), a helper to get a single (large) data.frame with all package DESCRIPTION information. Very handy. Others may have noticed that CRAN repos now have a new top-level file PACKAGES.rds and this function does indeed just fetch it--which you could do with a similar one-liner in R-release as well. Still very handy. But do read about changes in R-devel and hence upcoming changes in R 3.4.0. Lots of good things coming our way.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

6 April 2017

Reproducible builds folks: Reproducible Builds: week 101 in Stretch cycle

Here's what happened in the Reproducible Builds effort between Sunday March 26 and Saturday April 1 2017: Media coverage Sylvain Beucler wrote a follow-up post Practical basics of reproducible builds 2, which like last weeks article is about his experiences making software build reproducibly. Reproducible work in other projects Colin Watson started writing a patch to make launchpad store .buildinfo files. (It's not yet deployed.) Toolchain development and fixes Ximin Luo continued to work on BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP patches for GCC 6 and dpkg. Packages reviewed and fixed, and bugs filed Chris Lamb: Mattia Rizzolo: Reviews of unreproducible packages 49 package reviews have been added, 25 have been updated and 42 have been removed in this week, adding to our knowledge about identified issues. 1 issue type has been updated: Weekly QA work During our reproducibility testing, FTBFS bugs have been detected and reported by: diffoscope development diffoscope 81 was uploaded to experimental by Chris Lamb. It included contributions from: reprotest development reprotest development continued in git, including contributions from: buildinfo.debian.net development buildinfo.debian.net development continued in git, including contributions from: reproducible-website development Holger switched reproducible-builds.org and www.reproducible-builds.org to letsencrypt certificates. Misc. This week's edition was written by Ximin Luo and Holger Levsen & reviewed by a bunch of Reproducible Builds folks on IRC & the mailing lists.

4 April 2017

Matthias Klumpp: On Tanglu

It s time for a long-overdue blogpost about the status of Tanglu. Tanglu is a Debian derivative, started in early 2013 when the systemd debate at Debian was still hot. It was formed by a few people wanting to create a Debian derivative for workstations with a time-based release schedule using and showcasing new technologies (which include systemd, but also bundling systems and other things) and built in the open with a community using the similar infrastructure to Debian. Tanglu is designed explicitly to complement Debian and not to compete with it on all devices. Tanglu has achieved a lot of great things. We were the first Debian derivative to adopt systemd and with the help of our contributors we could kill a few nasty issues affecting it and Debian before it ended up becoming default in Debian Jessie. We also started to use the Calamares installer relatively early, bringing a modern installation experience additionally to the traditional debian-installer. We performed the usrmerge early, uncovering a few more issues which were fed back into Debian to be resolved (while workarounds were added to Tanglu). We also briefly explored switching from initramfs-tools to Dracut, but this release goal was dropped due to issues (but might be revived later). A lot of other less-impactful changes happened as well, borrowing a lot of useful ideas and code from Ubuntu (kudos to them!). On the infrastructure side, we set up the Debian Archive Kit (dak), managing to find a couple of issues (mostly hardcoded assumptions about Debian) and reporting them back to make using dak for distributions which aren t Debian easier. We explored using fedmsg for our infrastructure, went through a long and painful iteration of build systems (buildbot -> Jenkins -> Debile) before finally ending up with Debile, and added a set of own custom tools to collect archive QA information and present it to our developers in an easy to digest way. Except for wanna-build, Tanglu is hosting an almost-complete clone of basic Debian archive management tools. During the past year however, the project s progress slowed down significantly. For this, mostly I am to blame. One of the biggest challenges for a young project is to attract new developers and members and keep them engaged. A lot of the people coming to Tanglu and being interested in contributing were unfortunately no packagers and sometimes no developers, and we didn t have the manpower to individually mentor these people and teach them the necessary skills. People asking for tasks were usually asked where their interests were and what they would like to do to give them a useful task. This sounds great in principle, but in practice it is actually not very helpful. A curated list of junior jobs is a much better starting point. We also invested almost zero time in making our project known and create the necessary buzz and excitement that s actually needed to sustain a project like this. Doing more in the advertisement domain and help newcomers area is a high priority issue in the Tanglu bugtracker, which to the day is still open. Doing good alone isn t enough, talking about it is of crucial importance and that is something I knew about, but didn t realize the impact of for quite a while. As strange as it sounds, investing in the tech only isn t enough, community building is of equal importance. Regardless of that, Tanglu has members working on the project, but way too few to manage a project of this magnitude (getting package transitions migrated alone is a large task requiring quite some time while at the same time being incredibly boring :P). A lot of our current developers can only invest small amounts of time into the project because they have a lot of other projects as well. The other issue why Tanglu has problems is too much stuff being centralized on myself. That is a problem I wanted to rectify for a long time, but as soon as a task wasn t done in Tanglu because no people were available to do it, I completed it. This essentially increased the project s dependency on me as single person, giving it a really low bus factor. It not only centralizes power in one person (which actually isn t a problem as long as that person is available enough to perform tasks if asked for), it also centralizes knowledge on how to run services and how to do things. And if you want to give up power, people will need the knowledge on how to perform the specific task first (which they will never gain if there s always that one guy doing it). I still haven t found a great way to solve this it s a problem that essentially kills itself as soon as the project is big enough, but until then the only way to counter it slightly is to write lots of documentation. Last year I had way less time to work on Tanglu than the project deserves. I also started to work for Purism on their PureOS Debian derivative (which is heavily influenced by some of the choices we made for Tanglu, but with different focus that s probably something for another blogpost). A lot of the stuff I do for Purism duplicates the work I do on Tanglu, and also takes away time I have for the project. Additionally I need to invest a lot more time into other projects such as AppStream and a lot of random other stuff that just needs continuous maintenance and discussion (especially AppStream eats up a lot of time since it became really popular in a lot of places). There is also my MSc thesis in neuroscience that requires attention (and is actually in focus most of the time). All in all, I can t split myself and KDE s cloning machine remains broken, so I can t even use that ;-). In terms of projects there is also a personal hard limit of how much stuff I can handle, and exceeding it long-term is not very healthy, as in these cases I try to satisfy all projects and in the end do not focus enough on any of them, which makes me end up with a lot of half-baked stuff (which helps nobody, and most importantly makes me loose the fun, energy and interest to work on it). Good news everyone! (sort of) So, this sounded overly negative, so where does this leave Tanglu? Fact is, I can not commit the crazy amounts of time for it as I did in 2013. But, I love the project and I actually do have some time I can put into it. My work on Purism has an overlap with Tanglu, so Tanglu can actually benefit from the software I develop for them, maybe creating a synergy effect between PureOS and Tanglu. Tanglu is also important to me as a testing environment for future ideas (be it in infrastructure or in the make bundling nice! department). So, what actually is the way forward? First, maybe I have the chance to find a few people willing to work on tasks in Tanglu. It s a fun project, and I learned a lot while working on it. Tanglu also possesses some unique properties few other Debian derivatives have, like being built from source completely (allowing us things like swapping core components or compiling with more hardening flags, switching to newer KDE Plasma and GNOME faster, etc.). Second, if we do not have enough manpower, I think converting Tanglu into a rolling-release distribution might be the only viable way to keep the project running. A rolling release scheme creates much less effort for us than making releases (especially time-based ones!). That way, users will have a constantly updated and secure Tanglu system with machines doing most of the background work. If it turns out that absolutely nothing works and we can t attract new people to help with Tanglu, it would mean that there generally isn t much interest from the developer or user side in a project like this, so shutting it down or scaling it down dramatically would be the only option. But I do not think that this is the case, and I believe that having Tanglu around is important. I also have some interesting plans for it which will be fun to implement for testing  The only thing that had to stop is leaving our users in the dark on what is happening. Sorry for the long post, but there are some subjects which are worth writing more than 140 characters about  If you are interested in contributing to Tanglu, get in touch with us! We have an IRC channel #tanglu-devel on Freenode (go there for quicker responses!), forums and mailinglists, It looks like I will be at Debconf this year as well, so you can also catch me there! I might even talk about PureOS/Tanglu infrastructure at the conference.

3 April 2017

Jonas Meurer: debian lts report 2017.03

Debian LTS report for March 2017 March 2017 was my seventh month as a Debian LTS team member. I was allocated 14,75 hours and spent 11,25 of them on the following tasks:

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RApiDatetime 0.0.3

A brown bag bug fix release 0.0.3 of RApiDatetime is now on CRAN. RApiDatetime provides six entry points for C-level functions of the R API for Date and Datetime calculations. The functions asPOSIXlt and asPOSIXct convert between long and compact datetime representation, formatPOSIXlt and Rstrptime convert to and from character strings, and POSIXlt2D and D2POSIXlt convert between Date and POSIXlt datetime. These six functions are all fairly essential and useful, but not one of them was previously exported by R. I left two undefined variables in calls in the exported header file; this only become an issue once I actually tried accessing the API from another package as I am now doing in anytime.

Changes in RApiDatetime version 0.0.3 (2017-04-02)
  • Correct two simple copy-and-paste errors in RApiDatetime.h
  • Also enable registration in useDynLib, and explicitly export known and documented R access functions provided for testing

Courtesy of CRANberries, there is a comparison to the previous release. More information is on the rapidatetime page. For questions or comments please use the issue tracker off the GitHub repo.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

1 April 2017

Mike Hommey: git-cinnabar experimental features

Since version 0.4.0, git-cinnabar has a few hidden experimental features. Two of them are available in 0.4.0, and a third was recently added on the master branch. The basic mechanism to enable experimental features is to set a preference in the git configuration with a comma-separated list of features to enable, or all, for all of them. That preference is cinnabar.experiments. Any means to set a git configuration can be used. You can: But what features are there? wire In order to talk to Mercurial repositories, git-cinnabar normally uses mercurial python modules. This experimental feature allows to access Mercurial repositories without using the mercurial python modules. It then relies on git-cinnabar-helper to connect to the repository through the mercurial wire protocol. As of version 0.4.0, the feature is automatically enabled when Mercurial is not installed. merge Git-cinnabar currently doesn t allow to push merge commits. The main reason for this is that generating the correct mercurial data for those merges is tricky, and needs to be gotten right. In version 0.4.0, enabling this feature allows to push merge commits as long as the parent commits are available on the mercurial repository. If they aren t, you need to first push them independently, and then push the merge. On current master, that limitation doesn t exist anymore ; you can just push everything in one go. The main caveat with this experimental support for pushing merges is that it currently doesn t handle the case where a file was moved on one of the branches the same way mercurial would (i.e. the information would be lost to mercurial users). clonebundles As of mercurial 3.6, Mercurial servers can opt-in to providing pre-generated bundles, which, when clients support it, takes CPU load off the server when a clone is performed. Good for servers, and usually good for clients too when they have a fast network connection, because downloading a pre-generated bundle is usually faster than waiting for the server to generate one. As of a few days ago, the master branch of git-cinnabar supports cloning using those pre-generated bundles, provided the server advertizes them (mozilla-central does).

Antoine Beaupr : My free software activities, February and March 2017

Looking into self-financing Before I begin, I should mention that I started tracking my time working on free software more systematically. I spend a lot of time on the computer, as regular readers of this blog might remember so I wanted to know exactly how much time was paid vs free work. I was already using org-mode's time clock system to keep track of my work hours, so I just extended this to my regular free software contributions, which also helps in writing those reports. It turns out that over 60% of my computer time is spent working on free software. That's huge! I was expecting something more along the range of 20 to 40% of my time. So I started thinking about ways of financing this work. I created a Patreon page but I'm hesitant into launching such a campaign: the only thing worse than "no patreon page" is "a patreon page with failed goals and no one financing it". So before starting such an effort, I'd like to get a feeling of what other people's experience with it are. I know that joeyh is close to achieving his goals, but I can't compare with the guy that invented git-annex or debhelper, so I'm concerned I wouldn't be able to raise the same level of funding. So any advice you have, feel free to contact me in private or in the comments. If you would be ready to fund my work, I'd love to know about it, obviously, but I guess I wouldn't get real numbers until I actually open up such a page... Now, onto the regular report.

Wallabako I spent a good chunk of time completing most of the things I had in mind for Wallabako, which I mentioned quickly in the previous report. Wallabako is now much easier to installed, with clearer instructions, an easier to use configuration file, more reliable synchronization and read status propagation. As usual the Wallabako README file has all the details. I've also looked at better integration with Koreader, the free software e-reader that forms the basis of the okreader free software distribution which has been able to port Debian to the Kobo e-readers, a project I am really excited about. This project has the potential of supporting Kobo readers beyond the lifetime that upstream grants it and removes a lot of proprietary software and spyware that ships with the Kobo readers. So I have made a few contributions to okreader and also on koreader, the ebook reader okreader is based on.

Stressant I rewrote stressant, my simple burn-in and stress-testing tool. After struggling in turn with Debirf, live-build, vmdebootstrap and even FAI, I just figured maybe it wasn't the best idea to try and reinvent that particular wheel: instead of reinventing how to build yet another Debian system build tool, maybe I should just reuse what's already there. It turns out there's a well known, succesful and fairly complete recovery system called Grml. It is a Debian Derivative, so all I needed to do was to stop procrastinating and actually write the actual stressant tool instead of just creating a distribution with a bunch of random tools shipped in. This allowed me to focus on which tools were the best to stress test different components. This selection ended up being: fio can also be used to overwrite disk drives with the proper options (--overwrite and --size=100%), although grml also ships with nwipe for wiping old spinning disks and hdparm to do a secure erase of SSD disks (whatever that's worth). Stressant still needs to be shipped with grml for this transition to be complete. In the meantime, I was able to configure the excellent public Gitlab CI service to provide ISO images with Stressant built-in as a stopgap measure. I also need to figure out a way to automate starting stressant from a boot menu to automate deployments on a larger scale, although because I have little need for the feature at this moment in time, this will likely wait for a sponsor to show up for this to be implemented. Still, stressant has useful features like the capability of sending logs by email using a fresh new implementation of the Python SMTPHandler (BufferedSMTPHandler) which waits for logging to complete before sending a single email. Another interesting piece of code in there is the NegateAction argparse handler that enables the use of "toggle flags" (e.g. --flag / --no-flag). I'm so happy with the code that I figure I could just share it here directly:
class NegateAction(argparse.Action):
    '''add a toggle flag to argparse

    this is similar to 'store_true' or 'store_false', but allows
    arguments prefixed with --no to disable the default. the default
    is set depending on the first argument - if it starts with the
    negative form (define by default as '--no'), the default is False,
    otherwise True.
    '''
    negative = '--no'
    def __init__(self, option_strings, *args, **kwargs):
        '''set default depending on the first argument'''
        default = not option_strings[0].startswith(self.negative)
        super(NegateAction, self).__init__(option_strings, *args,
                                           default=default, nargs=0, **kwargs)
    def __call__(self, parser, ns, values, option):
        '''set the truth value depending on whether
        it starts with the negative form'''
        setattr(ns, self.dest, not option.startswith(self.negative))
Short and sweet. I wonder why stuff like this is not in the standard library yet - maybe just because no one bothered yet? It'd be great to get feedback of more experienced Pythonistas on this one. I hope that my work on Stressant is complete. I get zero funding for this work, and have little use for it myself: I manage only a few machines and such a tool really shines when you regularly put new hardware online, which is (fortunately?) not my case anymore. I'd be happy, of course, to accompany organisations and people that wish to further develop and use such a tool. A short demo of stressant as well as detailed description of how it works is of course available in its README file.

Standard third party repositories After looking at improvements for the grml repository instructions, I realized there was no real "best practices" document on how to configure an Apt repository. Sure, there are tools like reprepro and others, but those hardly qualify as policy: they are very flexible and there are lots of ways to create insecure repositories or curl sh style instructions, which we of course generally want to avoid. While the larger problem of Unstrusted Debian packages remain generally unsolved (e.g. when you install any .deb file, it can get root on your system), it seemed to me one critical part of this problem was how to add a random third-party repository to your machine while limiting, as much as possible, what possible attackers could do with such a repository. In other words, to solve the more general problem of insecure .deb files, we also need to solve the distribution problem, otherwise fixing the .deb files themselves will be useless. This lead to the creation of standardized repository instructions that define:
  1. how to distribute the repository's public signing key (ie. over HTTPS)
  2. how to name suites and components (e.g. use stable and main unless you have a good reason, and explain yourself)
  3. recommend a healthy does of apt preferences pinning
  4. how to distribute keys (e.g. with a derive-archive-keyring package)
I've seen so many third party repositories get this wrong. For example, a lot of repositories recommend this type of command to intialize the OpenPGP trust path:
curl http://example.com/key.asc   apt-key add -
This has the following problems:
  • the key is transfered in plaintext and can easily be manipulated by an active attacker (e.g. a router on your path to the server or a neighbor in a Wifi cafe)
  • the key is added to the main trust root, which allows the key to authentify as the real Debian archive, therefore giving it all rights over all packages
  • since it's part of the global archive, it's difficult for a package to remove/add the key when a key rollover is necessary (and repositories generally don't provide a deriv-archive-keyring to do that process anyways)
An example of this are the Docker install instructions that, at least, manage to do this over HTTPS. Some other repositories don't even bother teaching people about the proper way of adding those keys. We settled for:
wget -O /usr/share/keyrings/deriv-archive-keyring.gpg https://deriv.example.net/debian/deriv-archive-keyring.gpg
That location was explicitly chosen to be out of the main trust directory, so that it needs to be explicitly added to the sources.list as well:
deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/deriv-archive-keyring.gpg] https://deriv.example.net/debian/ stable main
Similarly, we highly recommend users setup "apt pinning" to restrict what a given repository can do. Since pinning is so confusing, most people don't actually bother even configuring it and I have yet to see a single repo advise its users to configure those preferences, which are essential to limit what a repository can do. To keep configuration simple, we recommend this:
Package: *
Pin: origin deriv.example.net
Pin-Priority: 100
Obviously, for a single-package repository, the actual package name should be listed, e.g.:
Package: foo
Pin: origin deriv.example.net
Pin-Priority: 100
And the priority should probably be set to 1 unless you want to allow automatic upgrades. It is my hope that this design will get more traction in the years to come and become a de-facto standard that will be a key part in safely adding third party repositories. There is obviously much more work to be done to improve security when installing untrusted .deb files, and I encourage Debian developers to consider contributing to the UntrustedDebs discussions and particularly to the Teams/Dpkg/Spec/DeclarativePackaging work.

Signal R&D I spent a significant amount of time this month struggling with the Signal project on my phone. I'm still ambivalent on Signal: it's a centralized designed, too dependent on phone numbers, but I must admit they get a lot of things right and it's the only free-software platform that allows for easy-to-use, multi-platform videoconferencing that my family can use. I've been following Signal for a while: up until now, I had been using the LibreSignal rebuild of the official client, as it is distributed on a F-Droid repository. Because I try to avoid Google (proprietary) software on my phone, it's basically the only way I could even install Signal. Unfortunately, the repository is out of date and introduces another point of trust in the distribution model: now you not only need to trust the Signal authors to do the right thing, you also need to trust that F-Droid repo not to inject nasty code on your phone. I've therefore started a discussion about how Signal could be distributed outside of the Google Play Store. I'd like to think it's one of the things that led the Signal people to distribute an official copy of Signal outside of the playstore. After much struggling, I was able to upgrade to this official client and will be able to upgrade easily by just downloading the APK. (Do note that I ended up reinstalling and re-registering Signal, which unfortunately changed my secret keys.) I do hope Signal enters F-Droid one day, but it could take a while because it still doesn't work without Google services and barely works with MicroG, the free software alternative to the Google services clients. Moxie also set a list of requirements like crash reporting and statistics that need to be implemented on F-Droid's side before he agrees to the deployment, so this could take a while. I've also participated in the, ahem, discussion on the JWZ blog regarding a supposed vulnerability in Signal where it would leak previously unknown phone numbers to third parties. I reviewed the way the phone number is uploaded and, while it's possible to create a rainbow table of phone numbers (which are hashed with a truncated SHA-1 checksum), I couldn't verify the claims of other participants in the thread. For me, Signal still does the right thing with contacts, although I do question the way "read status" notifications get transmitted, but that belong in another bug report / blog post.

Debian Long Term Support (LTS) It's been more than a year working on Debian LTS, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. I didn't work much in February so I had a lot of hours to catchup with, and was unfortunately unable to do so, partly because I was busy with other projects, and partly because my colleagues are doing a great job at resolving the most important issues. So one my concerns this month was finding work. It seemed that all the hard packages were either taken (e.g. my usual favorites, tiff and imagemagick, we done by others) or just too challenging (e.g. I don't feel quite comfortable tackling the LTS branch of the Linux kernel yet). I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out what was wrong with pcre3, only to realise the "32" in the report was not about the architecture, but about the character width. Because of thise, I marked 4 CVEs (CVE-2017-7186, CVE-2017-7244, CVE-2017-7245, CVE-2017-7246) as "not-affected", since the 32-bith character support wasn't enabled in wheezy (or jessie, for that matter). I still spent some time trying to reproduce the issues, which require a compiler with an AddressSanitizer, something that was introduced in both Clang and GCC after Wheezy was released, which makes reproducing this fairly complicated... This allowed me to experiment more with Vagrant, however, and I have provided the Debian cloud team with a 32-bit Vagrant box that was merged in shortly after, although it doesn't show up yet in the official list of Debian images. Then I looked at the apparmor situation (CVE-2017-6507), Debian bug #858768). That was one tricky bug as well, since it's not a security issue in apparmor per se, but more an issue with things that assume a certain behavior from apparmor. I have concluded that Wheezy was not affected because there are no assumptions of proper isolation there - which are provided only starting from LXC 1.0 - and Docker is not in Wheezy. I also couldn't reproduce the issue on Jessie, but, as it turns out, the issue was sysvinit-specific, which is why I couldn't reproduce it under the default systemd configuration shipped with Jessie. I also looked at the various binutils security issues: as I reported on the mailing list, I didn't see anything serious enough in there to warrant a a security release and followed the lead of both the stable and Red Hat security teams by marking this "no-dsa". I similiarly reviewed the mp3splt security issues (specifically CVE-2017-5666) and was fairly puzzled by that issue, which seems to be triggered only the same address sanitization extensions than PCRE, although there was some pretty wild interplay with debugging flags in there. All in all, it seems we can't reproduce that issue in wheezy, but I do not feel confident enough in the results to push that issue aside for now. I finally uploaded the pending graphicsmagick issue (DLA-547-2), a regression update to fix a crash that was introduced in the previous release (DLA-547-1, mistakenly named DLA-574-1). Hopefully that release should clear up some of the confusion and fix the regression. I also released DLA-879-1 for the CVE-2017-6369 in firebird2.5 which was an interesting experiment: I couldn't reproduce the issue in a local VM. After following the Ubuntu setup tutorial, as I wasn't too familiar with the Firebird database until now (hint: the default username and password is sysdba/masterkey), I ended up assuming we were vulnerable and just backporting the patch after seeing the jessie folks push out a release just in case. I also looked at updating the ca-certificates package to deal with the pending WoSign/Startcom removal: I made an explicit list of the CAs that need to be removed after reviewing the Mozilla list. I also sent a patch for an unrelated issue where ca-certificates is writing to /usr/local (!!) in Debian bug #843722. I have also done some "meta" work in starting a discussion about fixing the missing DLA links in the tracker, as you will notice all of the above links lead to nowhere. Thanks to pabs, there are now some links but unfortunately there are about 500 DLAs missing from the website. We also discussed ways to Debian bug #859123, something which is currently a manual process. This is now in the hands of the excellent webmaster team. I have also filed a few missing security bugs (Debian bug #859135, Debian bug #859136), partly because I wanted to help the security team. But it turned out that I felt the script needed some improvements, so I submitted a patch to improve the script so it is easier to run.

Other projects As usual, there's the usual mixed bags of chaos: More stuff on Github...

Thorsten Alteholz: My Debian Activities in March 2017

FTP assistant This month I marked 111 packages for accept and sent four emails to maintainers asking questions. The bad number of the month are the 41 packages I had to reject. This rejection rate was the worst of all my NEW-months. May I ask everybody to pay a bit more attention before uploading/sponsoring a package? Debian LTS This was my thirty-third month that I did some work for the Debian LTS initiative, started by Raphael Hertzog at Freexian. This month my all in all workload has been 14.75h. During that time I did uploads of I also took care of radare and marked all CVEs as not-affected in Wheezy. My next package on the list will be qbittorrent. Other stuff I uploaded a new version of entropybroker to fix a bug with the handling of return codes of ppoll. This version will also make it to Stretch. The same happens with a bug in alljoyn-services-1509. I don t know why everybody talks about unblock-bugs that need to be filed!? The release team was always faster in granting the unblock than me in filing the corresponding bug. As my DOPOM for this month I adopted httperf, took care of some bugs and sent patches upstream. I also created a new project on Alioth that is called debian-mobcom (Alioth page), which shall be a place for all packages concerning mobile communication on the network part. I only uploaded libosmocore to experimental yet, so the package list is rather short.

David Kalnischkies: Winning the Google Open Source Lottery

I don't know about you, but I frequently get mails announcing that I was picked as the lucky winner of a lottery, compensation program or simply as "business associate". Obvious Spam of course, that never happens in reality. Just like my personal "favorite" at the moment: Mails notifying me of inheritance from a previously (more or less) unknown relative. Its just that this is what has happend basically a few weeks ago in reality to me (over the phone through) and I am still dealing with the bureaucracy required of teaching the legal system that I have absolutely no intention of becoming the legal successor of someone I haven't seen in 20 years, regardless of how close the family relation is on paper but that might be the topic of another day. On the 1st March a mail titled "Google Open Source Peer Bonus Program" looked at first as if it would fall into this lottery spam class. It didn't exactly help that the mail was multipart HTML and text, but the text really only the text, not mentioning the embedded links used in the HTML part. It even included a prominent and obvious red flag: "Please fill out the form". 20% Bayes score didn't come from nothing. Still, for better or worse the words "Open Source" made it unlikely to be spam similar to how the word PGP indicates authenticity. So it happened, another spam message became true for me. I wonder which one will be next You have probably figured out by now that I didn't know that program before. Kinda embarrassing for a previous Google Summer of Code student (GSoC is run by the same office), but the idea behind it is simple: Google employees can nominate contributors to open source stuff for a small monetary "thank you!" gift card. Earlier this week winners for this round were announced 52 contributors including yours truly. You might be surprised, but the rational given behind my name is APT (I got a private mail with the full rational from my "patron", just in case you wonder if at least I would know more). It is funny how a guy who was taken aback by the prospect of needing a package manager like YaST to use Linux contributed just months later the first patch to apt and has roughly 8 years later amassed more than 2400 commits. It's birthday season in my family with e.g. mine just a few days ago, so its seems natural that apt has its own birthday today just as if it would be part of my family: 19th years this little bundle of bugs joy is now! In more sober moments I wonder sometimes how apt and I would have turned out if we hadn't meet. Would apt have met someone else? Would I? Given that I am still the newest team member and only recently joined Debian as DD at all APT has some strange ways of showing that it loves you: It e.g. helps users compose mails which end in a dilemma to give a recent example. Perhaps you need to be a special kind of crazy1 to consider this good, but as I see it apt has a big enough userbase that regardless of what your patch is doing, someone will like it. That drastically increases the chances that someone will also like it enough to say so in public offsetting complains from all those who don't like the (effects of the) patch which are omnipresent. And twice in a blue moon some of those will even step forward and thank you explicitly. Not that it would be necessary, but it is nice anyhow. So, thanks for the love supercow, Google & apt users! Or in other words: APT might very well be one of the most friendly (package manager related) project to contribute to as the language-specific managers have smaller userbases and hence a smaller chance of having someone liking your work (in public) so contribute a patch or two and be loved, too! Disclaimer: I get no bonus for posting this nor are any other strings attached. Birthdays are just a good time to reflect. In terms of what I do with my new found riches (in case I really receive them I haven't yet so that could still be an elaborate scam ): APT is a very humble program, but even it is thinking about moving away from a dev-box with less than 4 GB of RAM and no SSD, so it is happily accepting the gift and expects me to upgrade sooner now. What kind of precedence this sets for the two decades milestone next year? If APT isn't obsolete by then We will see.

  1. which even ended up topping Hacker News around New Year's Eve who would have thought that apt and reproducibility bugs are top news ;)

Francois Marier: Manually expanding a RAID1 array on Ubuntu

Here are the notes I took while manually expanding an non-LVM encrypted RAID1 array on an Ubuntu machine. My original setup consisted of a 1 TB drive along with a 2 TB drive, which meant that the RAID1 array was 1 TB in size and the second drive had 1 TB of unused capacity. This is how I replaced the old 1 TB drive with a new 3 TB drive and expanded the RAID1 array to 2 TB (leaving 1 TB unused on the new 3 TB drive).

Partition the new drive In order to partition the new 3 TB drive, I started by creating a temporary partition on the old 2 TB drive (/dev/sdc) to use up all of the capacity on that drive:
$ parted /dev/sdc
unit s
print
mkpart
print
Then I initialized the partition table and creating the EFI partition partition on the new drive (/dev/sdd):
$ parted /dev/sdd
unit s
mktable gpt
mkpart
Since I want to have the RAID1 array be as large as the smaller of the two drives, I made sure that the second partition (/home) on the new 3 TB drive had:
  • the same start position as the second partition on the old drive
  • the end position of the third partition (the temporary one I just created) on the old drive
I created the partition and flagged it as a RAID one:
mkpart
toggle 2 raid
and then deleted the temporary partition on the old 2 TB drive:
$ parted /dev/sdc
print
rm 3
print

Create a temporary RAID1 array on the new drive With the new drive properly partitioned, I created a new RAID array for it:
mdadm /dev/md10 --create --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdd1 missing
and added it to /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf:
mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
which required manual editing of that file to remove duplicate entries.

Create the encrypted partition With the new RAID device in place, I created the encrypted LUKS partition:
cryptsetup -h sha256 -c aes-xts-plain64 -s 512 luksFormat /dev/md10
cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/md10 chome2
I took the UUID for the temporary RAID partition:
blkid /dev/md10
and put it in /etc/crypttab as chome2. Then, I formatted the new LUKS partition and mounted it:
mkfs.ext4 -m 0 /dev/mapper/chome2
mkdir /home2
mount /dev/mapper/chome2 /home2

Copy the data from the old drive With the home paritions of both drives mounted, I copied the files over to the new drive:
eatmydata nice ionice -c3 rsync -axHAX --progress /home/* /home2/
making use of wrappers that preserve system reponsiveness during I/O-intensive operations.

Switch over to the new drive After the copy, I switched over to the new drive in a step-by-step way:
  1. Changed the UUID of chome in /etc/crypttab.
  2. Changed the UUID and name of /dev/md1 in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf.
  3. Rebooted with both drives.
  4. Checked that the new drive was the one used in the encrypted /home mount using: df -h.

Add the old drive to the new RAID array With all of this working, it was time to clear the mdadm superblock from the old drive:
mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdc1
and then change the second partition of the old drive to make it the same size as the one on the new drive:
$ parted /dev/sdc
rm 2
mkpart
toggle 2 raid
print
before adding it to the new array:
mdadm /dev/md1 -a /dev/sdc1

Rename the new array To change the name of the new RAID array back to what it was on the old drive, I first had to stop both the old and the new RAID arrays:
umount /home
cryptsetup luksClose chome
mdadm --stop /dev/md10
mdadm --stop /dev/md1
before running this command:
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --name=mymachinename:1 --update=name /dev/sdd2
and updating the name in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf. The last step was to regenerate the initramfs:
update-initramfs -u
before rebooting into something that looks exactly like the original RAID1 array but with twice the size.

Paul Wise: FLOSS Activities March 2017

Changes

Issues

Review

Administration
  • Debian systems: apply a patch to userdir-ldap, ask a local admin to reset a dead powerpc buildd, remove dead SH4 porterboxen from LDAP, fix perms on www.d.o OC static mirror, report false positives in an an automated abuse report, redirect 1 student to FAQs/support/DebianEdu, redirect 1 event organiser to partners/trademark/merchandise/DPL, redirect 1 guest account seeker to NM, redirect 1 @debian.org desirer to NM, redirect 1 email bounce to a changes@db.d.o user, redirect 2 people to the listmasters, redirect 1 person to Debian Pure Blends, redirect 1 user to a service admin and redirect 2 users to support
  • Debian packages site: deploy my ports/cruft changes
  • Debian wiki: poke at HP page history and advise a contributor, whitelist 13 email address, whitelist 1 domain, check out history of a banned IP, direct 1 hoster to DebConf17 sponsors team, direct 1 user to OpenStack packaging, direct 1 user to InstallingDebianOn and h-node.org, direct 2 users to different ways to help Debian and direct 1 emeritus DD on repository wiki page reorganisation
  • Debian QA: fix an issue with the PTS news, remove some debugging cruft I left behind, fix the usertags on a QA bug and deploy some code fixes
  • Debian mentors: security upgrades and service restarts
  • Openmoko: security upgrades and reboots

Communication

Sponsors The valgrind backport, samba and libthrift-perl bug reports were sponsored by my employer. All other work was done on a volunteer basis.

Keith Packard: DRM-lease-2

DRM leasing part deux (kernel side) I've stabilized the kernel lease implementation so that leases now work reliably, and don't require a reboot before running the demo app a second time. Here's whats changed:
  1. Reference counting is hard. I'm creating a new drm_master, which means creating a new file. There were a bunch of reference counting errors in my first pass; I've cleaned those up while also reducing the changes needed to the rest of the DRM code.
  2. Added a 'mask_lease' value to the leases -- this controls whether resources in the lease are hidden from the lessor, allowing the lessor to continue to do operations on the leased resources if it likes.
  3. Hacked the mutex locking assertions to not crash in normal circumstances. I'm now doing: BUG_ON(__mutex_owner(&master->dev->mode_config.idr_mutex) != current); to make sure the mutex is held by the current thread, instead of just making sure some thread holds the mutex. I have this memory of a better way to do this, but now I can't dig it up. Suggestions welcome, of course.
I'm reasonably pleased with the current state of the code, although I want to squash the patches together so that only the final state of the design is represented, rather than the series of hacks present now. Comments on #dri-devel I spent a bit of time on the #dri-devel IRC channel answering questions about the DRM-lease design and the changes above reflect that. One concern was about mode setting from two masters at the same time. Mode setting depends on a number of shared 'hidden' resources; things like memory fifos and the like. If either lessee or lessor wants to change the displayed modes, they may fail due to conflicts over these resources and not be able to recover easily. A related concern was that the current TEST/render/commit mechanism used by compositors may no longer be reliable as another master could change hidden resource usage between the TEST and commit operations. Daniel Vetter suggested allowing the lessor to 'exclude' lessee mode sets during this operation. One solution would be to have the lessor set the mode on the leased resources before ceding control of the objects, and once set, the lessee shouldn't perform additional mode setting operations. This would limit the flexibility in the lessee quite a bit as it wouldn't be able to pop up overlay planes or change resolution. Questions Let's review the questions from my last post, DRM-lease: Remaining Kernel Work The code is running, and appears stable. However, it's not quite done yet. Here's a list of remaining items that I know about:
  1. Changing leases should update sub-leases. When you reduce the resources in one lease, the kernel should walk any sub-leases and clear out resources which the lessor no longer has access to.
  2. Sending events when leases are created/destroyed. When a lease is created, if the mask_lease value is set, then the lessor should get regular events describing the effective change. Similarly, both lessor and lessee should get events when a lease is changed.
  3. Refactoring the patch series to squash intermediate versions of the new code.
Remaining Other Work Outside of the kernel, I'll be adding X support for this operation. Here's my current thinking: With that, I think this phase of the project will be wrapped up and it will be time to move on to actually hooking up a real HMD and hacking the VR code to use this new stuff. Seeing the code For those interested in seeing the state of the code so far, there's kernel, drm and kmscube repositories here:

31 March 2017

Chris Lamb: Free software activities in March 2017

Here is my monthly update covering what I have been doing in the free software world (previous month):
Reproducible builds

Whilst anyone can inspect the source code of free software for malicious flaws, most software is distributed pre-compiled to end users. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to permit verification that no flaws have been introduced either maliciously or accidentally during this compilation process by promising identical results are always generated from a given source, thus allowing multiple third-parties to come to a consensus on whether a build was compromised. I have generously been awarded a grant from the Core Infrastructure Initiative to fund my work in this area. This month I:
I also made the following changes to our tooling:
diffoscope

diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues.

  • New features/optimisations:
    • Extract squashfs archive in one go rather than per-file, speeding up ISO comparison by ~10x.
    • Add support for .docx and .odt files via docx2txt & odt2txt. (#859056).
    • Add support for PGP files via pgpdump. (#859034).
    • Add support for comparing Pcap files. (#858867).
    • Compare GIF images using gifbuild. (#857610).
  • Bug fixes:
    • Ensure that we really are using ImageMagick and not the GraphicsMagick compatibility layer. (#857940).
    • Fix and add test for meaningless 1234-content metadata when introspecting archives. (#858223).
    • Fix detection of ISO9660 images processed with isohybrid.
    • Skip icc tests if the Debian-specific patch is not present. (#856447).
    • Support newer versions of cbfstool to avoid test failures. (#856446).
    • Update the progress bar prior to working to ensure filename is in sync.
  • Cleanups:
    • Use /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk over manual calls to dpkg-parsechangelog in debian/rules.
    • Ensure tests and the runtime environment can locate binaries in /usr/sbin (eg. tcpdump).

strip-nondeterminism

strip-nondeterminism is our tool to remove specific non-deterministic results from a completed build.

  • Fix a possible endless loop while stripping .ar files due to trusting the file's own file size data. (#857975).
  • Add support for testing files we should reject and include the filename when evaluating fixtures.

buildinfo.debian.net

buildinfo.debian.net is my experiment into how to process, store and distribute .buildinfo files after the Debian archive software has processed them.

  • Add support for Format: 1.0. (#20).
  • Don't parse Format: header as the source package version. (#21).
  • Show the reproducible status of packages.


Debian


I submitted my platform for the 2017 Debian Project Leader Elections. This was subsequently covered on LWN and I have been participating in the discussions on the debian-vote mailing list since then.


Debian LTS

This month I have been paid to work 14.75 hours on Debian Long Term Support (LTS). In that time I did the following:
  • "Frontdesk" duties, triaging CVEs, etc.
  • Issued DLA 848-1 for the freetype font library fixing a denial of service vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 851-1 for wget preventing a header injection attack.
  • Issued DLA 863-1 for the deluge BitTorrent client correcting a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 864-1 for jhead (an EXIF metadata tool) patching an arbitrary code execution vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 865-1 for the suricata intrusion detection system, fixing an IP protocol matching error.
  • Issued DLA 871-1 for python3.2 fixing a TLS stripping vulnerability in the smptlib library.
  • Issued DLA 873-1 for apt-cacher preventing a HTTP response splitting vulnerability.
  • Issued DLA 876-1 for eject to prevent an issue regarding the checking of setuid(2) and setgid(2) return values.

Uploads
  • python-django:
    • 1:1.10.6-1 New upstream bugfix release.
    • 1:1.11~rc1-1 New upstream release candidate.
  • redis:
    • 3:3.2.8-2 Avoid conflict between RuntimeDirectory and tmpfiles.d(5) both attempting to create /run/redis with differing permissions. (#856116)
    • 3:3.2.8-3 Revert the creation of a /usr/bin/redis-check-rdb to /usr/bin/redis-server symlink to avoid a dangling symlink if only the redis-tools package is installed. (#858519)
  • gunicorn 19.7.0-1 & 19.7.1-1 New upstream releases.
  • adminer 4.3.0-1 New upstream release.

Finally, I also made the following non-maintainer uploads (NMUs):


FTP Team

As a Debian FTP assistant I ACCEPTed 121 packages: 4pane, adql, android-platform-system-core, android-sdk-helper, braillegraph, deepnano, dh-runit, django-auth-ldap, django-dirtyfields, drf-extensions, gammaray, gcc-7, gnome-keysign, golang-code.gitea-sdk, golang-github-bluebreezecf-opentsdb-goclient, golang-github-bsm-redeo, golang-github-cupcake-rdb, golang-github-denisenkom-go-mssqldb, golang-github-exponent-io-jsonpath, golang-github-facebookgo-ensure, golang-github-facebookgo-freeport, golang-github-facebookgo-grace, golang-github-facebookgo-httpdown, golang-github-facebookgo-stack, golang-github-facebookgo-subset, golang-github-go-openapi-loads, golang-github-go-openapi-runtime, golang-github-go-openapi-strfmt, golang-github-go-openapi-validate, golang-github-golang-geo, golang-github-gorilla-pat, golang-github-gorilla-securecookie, golang-github-issue9-assert, golang-github-issue9-identicon, golang-github-jaytaylor-html2text, golang-github-joho-godotenv, golang-github-juju-errors, golang-github-kisielk-gotool, golang-github-kubernetes-gengo, golang-github-lpabon-godbc, golang-github-lunny-log, golang-github-makenowjust-heredoc, golang-github-mrjones-oauth, golang-github-nbutton23-zxcvbn-go, golang-github-neelance-sourcemap, golang-github-ngaut-deadline, golang-github-ngaut-go-zookeeper, golang-github-ngaut-log, golang-github-ngaut-pools, golang-github-ngaut-sync2, golang-github-optiopay-kafka, golang-github-quobyte-api, golang-github-renstrom-dedent, golang-github-sergi-go-diff, golang-github-siddontang-go, golang-github-smartystreets-go-aws-auth, golang-github-xanzy-go-cloudstack, golang-github-xtaci-kcp, golang-github-yohcop-openid-go, graywolf, haskell-raaz, hfst-ospell, hikaricp, iptraf-ng, kanboard-cli, kcptun, kreport, libbluray, libcatmandu-store-elasticsearch-perl, libcsfml, libnet-prometheus-perl, libosmocore, libpandoc-wrapper-perl, libseqlib, matrix-synapse, mockldap, nfs-ganesha, node-buffer, node-pako, nose-el, nvptx-tools, nx-libs, open-ath9k-htc-firmware, pagein, paleomix, pgsql-ogr-fdw, profanity, pyosmium, python-biotools, python-django-extra-views, python-django-otp, python-django-push-notifications, python-dnslib, python-gmpy, python-gmpy2, python-holidays, python-kanboard, python-line-profiler, python-pgpy, python-pweave, python-raven, python-xapian-haystack, python-xopen, r-cran-v8, repetier-host, ruby-jar-dependencies, ruby-maven-libs, ruby-psych, ruby-retriable, seafile-client, spyder-unittest, stressant, systray-mdstat, telegram-desktop, thawab, tigris, tnseq-transit, typesafe-config, vibe.d, x2goserver & xmlrpc-c. I additionally filed 14 RC bugs against packages that had incomplete debian/copyright files against: golang-github-cupcake-rdb, golang-github-sergi-go-diff, graywolf, hfst-ospell, libbluray, pgsql-ogr-fdw, python-gmpy, python-gmpy2, python-pgpy, python-xapian-haystack, repetier-host, telegram-desktop, tigris & xmlrpc-c.

Dirk Eddelbuettel: #2: Even Easier Package Registration

Welcome to the second post in rambling random R recommendation series, or R4 for short. Two days ago I posted the initial (actual) post. It provided context for why we need package registration entries (tl;dr: because R CMD check now tests for it, and because it The Right Thing to do, see documentation in the posts). I also showed how generating such a file src/init.c was essentially free as all it took was single call to a new helper function added to R-devel by Brian Ripley and Kurt Hornik. Now, to actually use R-devel you obviously need to have it accessible. There are a myriad of ways to achieve that: just compile it locally as I have done for years, use a Docker image as I showed in the post -- or be creative with eg Travis or win-builder both of which give you access to R-devel if you're clever about it. But as no good deed goes unpunished, I was of course told off today for showing a Docker example as Docker was not "Easy". I think the formal answer to that is baloney. But we leave that aside, and promise to discuss setting up Docker at another time. R is after all ... just R. So below please find a script you can save as, say, ~/bin/pnrrs.r. And calling it---even with R-release---will generate the same code snippet as I showed via Docker. Call it a one-off backport of the new helper function -- with a half-life of a few weeks at best as we will have R 3.4.0 as default in just a few weeks. The script will then reduce to just the final line as the code will be present with R 3.4.0.
#!/usr/bin/r
library(tools)
.find_calls_in_package_code <- tools:::.find_calls_in_package_code
.read_description <- tools:::.read_description
## all what follows is from R-devel aka R 3.4.0 to be
package_ff_call_db <- function(dir)  
    ## A few packages such as CDM use base::.Call
    ff_call_names <- c(".C", ".Call", ".Fortran", ".External",
                       "base::.C", "base::.Call",
                       "base::.Fortran", "base::.External")
    predicate <- function(e)  
        (length(e) > 1L) &&
            !is.na(match(deparse(e[[1L]]), ff_call_names))
     
    calls <- .find_calls_in_package_code(dir,
                                         predicate = predicate,
                                         recursive = TRUE)
    calls <- unlist(Filter(length, calls))
    if(!length(calls)) return(NULL)
    attr(calls, "dir") <- dir
    calls
 
native_routine_registration_db_from_ff_call_db <- function(calls, dir = NULL, character_only = TRUE)  
    if(!length(calls)) return(NULL)
    ff_call_names <- c(".C", ".Call", ".Fortran", ".External")
    ff_call_args <- lapply(ff_call_names,
                           function(e) args(get(e, baseenv())))
    names(ff_call_args) <- ff_call_names
    ff_call_args_names <-
        lapply(lapply(ff_call_args,
                      function(e) names(formals(e))), setdiff,
               "...")
    if(is.null(dir))
        dir <- attr(calls, "dir")
    package <- # drop name
        as.vector(.read_description(file.path(dir, "DESCRIPTION"))["Package"])
    symbols <- character()
    nrdb <-
        lapply(calls,
               function(e)  
                   if (startsWith(deparse(e[[1L]]), "base::"))
                       e[[1L]] <- e[[1L]][3L]
                   ## First figure out whether ff calls had '...'.
                   pos <- which(unlist(Map(identical,
                                           lapply(e, as.character),
                                           "...")))
                   ## Then match the call with '...' dropped.
                   ## Note that only .NAME could be given by name or
                   ## positionally (the other ff interface named
                   ## arguments come after '...').
                   if(length(pos)) e <- e[-pos]
                   ## drop calls with only ...
                   if(length(e) < 2L) return(NULL)
                   cname <- as.character(e[[1L]])
                   ## The help says
                   ##
                   ## '.NAME' is always matched to the first argument
                   ## supplied (which should not be named).
                   ##
                   ## But some people do (Geneland ...).
                   nm <- names(e); nm[2L] <- ""; names(e) <- nm
                   e <- match.call(ff_call_args[[cname]], e)
                   ## Only keep ff calls where .NAME is character
                   ## or (optionally) a name.
                   s <- e[[".NAME"]]
                   if(is.name(s))  
                       s <- deparse(s)[1L]
                       if(character_only)  
                           symbols <<- c(symbols, s)
                           return(NULL)
                        
                     else if(is.character(s))  
                       s <- s[1L]
                     else   ## expressions
                       symbols <<- c(symbols, deparse(s))
                       return(NULL)
                    
                   ## Drop the ones where PACKAGE gives a different
                   ## package. Ignore those which are not char strings.
                   if(!is.null(p <- e[["PACKAGE"]]) &&
                      is.character(p) && !identical(p, package))
                       return(NULL)
                   n <- if(length(pos))  
                            ## Cannot determine the number of args: use
                            ## -1 which might be ok for .External().
                            -1L
                          else  
                            sum(is.na(match(names(e),
                                            ff_call_args_names[[cname]]))) - 1L
                         
                   ## Could perhaps also record whether 's' was a symbol
                   ## or a character string ...
                   cbind(cname, s, n)
                )
    nrdb <- do.call(rbind, nrdb)
    nrdb <- as.data.frame(unique(nrdb), stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
    if(NROW(nrdb) == 0L   length(nrdb) != 3L)
        stop("no native symbols were extracted")
    nrdb[, 3L] <- as.numeric(nrdb[, 3L])
    nrdb <- nrdb[order(nrdb[, 1L], nrdb[, 2L], nrdb[, 3L]), ]
    nms <- nrdb[, "s"]
    dups <- unique(nms[duplicated(nms)])
    ## Now get the namespace info for the package.
    info <- parseNamespaceFile(basename(dir), dirname(dir))
    ## Could have ff calls with symbols imported from other packages:
    ## try dropping these eventually.
    imports <- info$imports
    imports <- imports[lengths(imports) == 2L]
    imports <- unlist(lapply(imports,  [[ , 2L))
    info <- info$nativeRoutines[[package]]
    ## Adjust native routine names for explicit remapping or
    ## namespace .fixes.
    if(length(symnames <- info$symbolNames))  
        ind <- match(nrdb[, 2L], names(symnames), nomatch = 0L)
        nrdb[ind > 0L, 2L] <- symnames[ind]
      else if(!character_only &&
              any((fixes <- info$registrationFixes) != ""))  
        ## There are packages which have not used the fixes, e.g. utf8latex
        ## fixes[1L] is a prefix, fixes[2L] is an undocumented suffix
        nrdb[, 2L] <- sub(paste0("^", fixes[1L]), "", nrdb[, 2L])
        if(nzchar(fixes[2L]))
            nrdb[, 2L] <- sub(paste0(fixes[2L]), "$", "", nrdb[, 2L])
     
    ## See above.
    if(any(ind <- !is.na(match(nrdb[, 2L], imports))))
        nrdb <- nrdb[!ind, , drop = FALSE]
    ## Fortran entry points are mapped to l/case
    dotF <- nrdb$cname == ".Fortran"
    nrdb[dotF, "s"] <- tolower(nrdb[dotF, "s"])
    attr(nrdb, "package") <- package
    attr(nrdb, "duplicates") <- dups
    attr(nrdb, "symbols") <- unique(symbols)
    nrdb
 
format_native_routine_registration_db_for_skeleton <- function(nrdb, align = TRUE, include_declarations = FALSE)  
    if(!length(nrdb))
        return(character())
    fmt1 <- function(x, n)  
        c(if(align)  
              paste(format(sprintf("     \"%s\",", x[, 1L])),
                    format(sprintf(if(n == "Fortran")
                                       "(DL_FUNC) &F77_NAME(%s),"
                                   else
                                       "(DL_FUNC) &%s,",
                                   x[, 1L])),
                    format(sprintf("%d ,", x[, 2L]),
                           justify = "right"))
            else  
              sprintf(if(n == "Fortran")
                          "     \"%s\", (DL_FUNC) &F77_NAME(%s), %d ,"
                      else
                          "     \"%s\", (DL_FUNC) &%s, %d ,",
                      x[, 1L],
                      x[, 1L],
                      x[, 2L])
           ,
          "     NULL, NULL, 0 ")
     
    package <- attr(nrdb, "package")
    dups <- attr(nrdb, "duplicates")
    symbols <- attr(nrdb, "symbols")
    nrdb <- split(nrdb[, -1L, drop = FALSE],
                  factor(nrdb[, 1L],
                         levels =
                             c(".C", ".Call", ".Fortran", ".External")))
    has <- vapply(nrdb, NROW, 0L) > 0L
    nms <- names(nrdb)
    entries <- substring(nms, 2L)
    blocks <- Map(function(x, n)  
                      c(sprintf("static const R_%sMethodDef %sEntries[] =  ",
                                n, n),
                        fmt1(x, n),
                        " ;",
                        "")
                   ,
                  nrdb[has],
                  entries[has])
    decls <- c(
        "/* FIXME: ",
        "   Add declarations for the native routines registered below.",
        "*/")
    if(include_declarations)  
        decls <- c(
            "/* FIXME: ",
            "   Check these declarations against the C/Fortran source code.",
            "*/",
            if(NROW(y <- nrdb$.C))  
                 args <- sapply(y$n, function(n) if(n >= 0)
                                paste(rep("void *", n), collapse=", ")
                                else "/* FIXME */")
                c("", "/* .C calls */",
                  paste0("extern void ", y$s, "(", args, ");"))
            ,
            if(NROW(y <- nrdb$.Call))  
                args <- sapply(y$n, function(n) if(n >= 0)
                               paste(rep("SEXP", n), collapse=", ")
                               else "/* FIXME */")
               c("", "/* .Call calls */",
                  paste0("extern SEXP ", y$s, "(", args, ");"))
             ,
            if(NROW(y <- nrdb$.Fortran))  
                 args <- sapply(y$n, function(n) if(n >= 0)
                                paste(rep("void *", n), collapse=", ")
                                else "/* FIXME */")
                c("", "/* .Fortran calls */",
                  paste0("extern void F77_NAME(", y$s, ")(", args, ");"))
             ,
            if(NROW(y <- nrdb$.External))
                c("", "/* .External calls */",
                  paste0("extern SEXP ", y$s, "(SEXP);"))
            )
     
    headers <- if(NROW(nrdb$.Call)   NROW(nrdb$.External))
        c("#include <R.h>", "#include <Rinternals.h>")
    else if(NROW(nrdb$.Fortran)) "#include <R_ext/RS.h>"
    else character()
    c(headers,
      "#include <stdlib.h> // for NULL",
      "#include <R_ext/Rdynload.h>",
      "",
      if(length(symbols))  
          c("/*",
            "  The following symbols/expresssions for .NAME have been omitted",
            "", strwrap(symbols, indent = 4, exdent = 4), "",
            "  Most likely possible values need to be added below.",
            "*/", "")
       ,
      if(length(dups))  
          c("/*",
            "  The following name(s) appear with different usages",
            "  e.g., with different numbers of arguments:",
            "", strwrap(dups, indent = 4, exdent = 4), "",
            "  This needs to be resolved in the tables and any declarations.",
            "*/", "")
       ,
      decls,
      "",
      unlist(blocks, use.names = FALSE),
      ## We cannot use names with '.' in: WRE mentions replacing with "_"
      sprintf("void R_init_%s(DllInfo *dll)",
              gsub(".", "_", package, fixed = TRUE)),
      " ",
      sprintf("    R_registerRoutines(dll, %s);",
              paste0(ifelse(has,
                            paste0(entries, "Entries"),
                            "NULL"),
                     collapse = ", ")),
      "    R_useDynamicSymbols(dll, FALSE);",
      " ")
 
package_native_routine_registration_db <- function(dir, character_only = TRUE)  
    calls <- package_ff_call_db(dir)
    native_routine_registration_db_from_ff_call_db(calls, dir, character_only)
 
package_native_routine_registration_db <- function(dir, character_only = TRUE)  
    calls <- package_ff_call_db(dir)
    native_routine_registration_db_from_ff_call_db(calls, dir, character_only)
 
package_native_routine_registration_skeleton <- function(dir, con = stdout(), align = TRUE,
                                                         character_only = TRUE, include_declarations = TRUE)  
    nrdb <- package_native_routine_registration_db(dir, character_only)
    writeLines(format_native_routine_registration_db_for_skeleton(nrdb,
                align, include_declarations),
               con)
 
package_native_routine_registration_skeleton(".")  ## when R 3.4.0 is out you only need this line
Here I use /usr/bin/r as I happen to like littler a lot, but you can use Rscript the same way. Easy enough now?

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Next.

Previous.