Search Results: "xam"

27 October 2015

Mart n Ferrari: Tales from the SRE trenches: Dev vs Ops

This is the second part in a series of articles about SRE, based on the talk I gave in the Romanian Association for Better Software. On the first part, I introduced briefly what is SRE. Today, I present some concrete ways in which SRE tried to make things better, by stopping the war between developers and SysAdmins.

Dev vs Ops: the eternal battle So, it starts at looking at the problem: how to increase the reliability of the service? It turns out that some of the biggest sources of outages are new launches: a new feature that seemed innocuous somehow managed to bring the whole site down. Devs want to launch, and Ops want to have a quiet weekend, and this is were the struggle begins. When launches are problematic, bureaucracy is put in place to minimise the risks: launch reviews, checklists, long-lived canaries. This is followed by development teams finding ways of side-stepping those hurdles. Nobody is happy. One of the key aspects of SRE is to avoid this conflict completely, by changing the incentives, so these pressures between development and operations disappear. At Google, they achieve this with a few different strategies:

Have an SLA for your service Before any service can be supported by SRE, it has to be determined what is the level of availability that it must achieve to make the users and the company happy: this is called the Service Level Agreement (SLA). The SLA will define how availability is measured (for example, percentage of queries handled successfully in less than 50ms during the last quarter), and what is the minimum acceptable value for it (the Service Level Objective, or SLO). Note that this is a product decision, not a technical one. This number is very important for an SRE team and its relationship with the developers. It is not taken lightly, and it should be measured and enforced rigorously (more on that later). Only a few things on earth really require 100% availability (pacemakers, for example), and achieving really high availability is very costly. Most of us are dealing with more mundane affairs, and in the case of websites, there are many other things that fail pretty often: network glitches, OS freezes, browsers being slow, etc. So an SLO of 100% is almost never a good idea, and in most cases it is impossible to reach. In places like Google an SLO of "five nines" (99.999%) is not uncommon, and this means that the service can't fail completely for more than 5 minutes across a whole year!

Measure and report performance against SLA/SLO Once you have a defined SLA and SLO, it is very important that these are monitored accurately and reported constantly. If you wait for the end of the quarter to produce a hand-made report, the SLA is useless, as you only know you broke it when it is too late. You need automated and accurate monitoring of your service level, and this means that the SLA has to be concrete and actionable. Fuzzy requirements that can't be measured are just a waste of time. This is a very important tool for SRE, as it allows to see the progression of the service over time, detect capacity issues before they become outages, and at the same time show how much downtime can be taken without breaking the SLA. Which brings us to one core aspect of SRE:

Use error budgets and gate launches on them If SLO is the minimum rate of availability, then the result of calculating 1 - SLO is what fraction of the time a service can fail without failing out of the SLA. This is called an error budget, and you get to use it the way you want it. If the service is flaky (e.g. it fails consistently 1 of every 10000 requests), most of that budget is just wasted and you won't have any margin for launching riskier changes. On the other hand, a stable service that does not eat the budget away gives you the chance to bet part of it on releasing more often, and getting your new features quicker to the user. The moment the error budget is spent, no more launches are allowed until the average goes back out of the red. Once everyone can see how the service is performing against this agreed contract, many of the traditional sources of conflict between development and operations just disappear. If the service is working as intended, then SRE does not need to interfere on new feature launches: SRE trusts the developers' judgement. Instead of stopping a launch because it seems risky or under-tested, there are hard numbers that take the decisions for you. Traditionally, Devs get frustrated when they want to release, but Ops won't accept it. Ops thinks there will be problems, but it is difficult to back this feeling with hard data. This fuels resentment and distrust, and management is never pleased. Using error budgets based on already established SLAs means there is nobody to get upset at: SRE does not need to play bad cop, and SWE is free to innovate as much as they want, as long as things don't break. At the same time, this provides a strong incentive for developers to avoid risking their budget in poorly-prepared launches, to perform staged deployments, and to make sure the error budget is not wasted by recurrent issues.
That's all for today. The next article will continue delving into how traditional tensions between Devs and Ops are played in the SRE world. Comment

Chris Lamb: ImportError: cannot import name add_to_builtins under Django 1.9

Whilst upgrading various projects to Django 1.9, I found myself repeatedly searching for the following code snippet so I offer it below as a more permanent note for myself and to aid others. If you used django.template.base.add_to_builtins to avoid tedious and unsightly % load module % blocks in your template files, under Django 1.9 you will get the following traceback:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "django/core/management/__init__.py", line 324, in execute
    django.setup()
  File "django/__init__.py", line 18, in setup
    apps.populate(settings.INSTALLED_APPS)
  File "django/apps/registry.py", line 108, in populate
    app_config.import_models(all_models)
  File "django/apps/config.py", line 202, in import_models
    self.models_module = import_module(models_module_name)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/importlib/__init__.py", line 37, in import_module
    __import__(name)
  File "myproject/myproject/utils/models.py", line 1, in <module>
    from django.template.base import add_to_builtins
ImportError: cannot import name add_to_builtins
The solution is to move to defining settings.TEMPLATES instead of calling add_to_builtins. This replaces a number of your existing settings, including TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS, TEMPLATE_DIRS, TEMPLATE_LOADERS, etc. For example:
TEMPLATES = [ 
    'BACKEND': 'django.template.backends.django.DjangoTemplates',
    'DIRS': [
        os.path.join(BASE_DIR, 'templates'),
    ],
    'APP_DIRS': True,
    'OPTIONS':  
        'context_processors': [
            'django.template.context_processors.debug',
            'django.template.context_processors.request',
            'django.contrib.auth.context_processors.auth',
            'django.contrib.messages.context_processors.messages',
            'myproject.utils.context_processors.settings_context',
        ],
        'builtins': [
            'django.contrib.staticfiles.templatetags.staticfiles',
        ],
     ,
 ]
Simply add the modules you previously loaded with add_to_builtins to the builtins key under OPTIONS. (You can read more in the release notes for Django 1.9, as well as read about settings.TEMPLATES generally.)

26 October 2015

Simon Josefsson: Combining Dnsmasq and Unbound

For my home office network I have been using Dnsmasq for some time. Dnsmasq provides me with DNS, DHCP, DHCPv6, and IPv6 Router Advertisement. I run dnsmasq on a Debian Jessie server, but it works similar with OpenWRT if you want to use a smaller device. My entire /etc/dnsmasq.d/local configuration used to look like this:
dhcp-authoritative
interface=eth1
read-ethers
dhcp-range=192.168.1.100,192.168.1.150,12h
dhcp-range=2001:9b0:104:42::100,2001:9b0:104:42::1500
dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::]
enable-ra
Here dhcp-authoritative enable DHCP. interface=eth1 says to listen on eth1 only, which is my internal (IPv4 NAT) network. I try to keep track of the MAC address of all my devices in a /etc/ethers file, so I use read-ethers to have dnsmasq give stable IP addresses for them. The dhcp-range is used to enable DHCP and DHCPv6 on my internal network. The dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::] statement is needed to inform the DHCP clients of the DNS resolver s IPv6 address, otherwise they would only get the IPv4 DNS server address. The enable-ra parameter enables IPv6 router advertisement on the internal network, thereby removing the need to run radvd too useful since I prefer to use copyleft software. Recently I had a desire to use DNSSEC, and enabled it in Dnsmasq using the following statements:
dnssec
trust-anchor=.,19036,8,2,49AAC11D7B6F6446702E54A1607371607A1A41855200FD2CE1CDDE32F24E8FB5
dnssec-check-unsigned
The dnssec keyword enable DNSSEC validation in dnsmasq, using the indicated trust-anchor (get the root-anchors from IANA). The dnssec-check-unsigned deserves some more discussion. The dnsmasq manpage describes it as follows:
As a default, dnsmasq does not check that unsigned DNS replies are legitimate: they are assumed to be valid and passed on (without the authentic data bit set, of course). This does not protect against an attacker forging unsigned replies for signed DNS zones, but it is fast. If this flag is set, dnsmasq will check the zones of unsigned replies, to ensure that unsigned replies are allowed in those zones. The cost of this is more upstream queries and slower performance.
For example, this means that dnsmasq s DNSSEC functionality is not secure against active man-in-the-middle attacks between dnsmasq and the DNS server it is using. Even if example.org used DNSSEC properly, an attacker could fake that it was unsigned to dnsmasq, and I would get potentially incorrect values in return. We all know that the Internet is not a secure place, and your threat model should include active attackers. I believe this mode should be the default in dnsmasq, and users should have to configure dnsmasq to not be in that mode if they really want to (with the obvious security warning). Running with this enabled for a couple of days resulted in frustration about not being able to reach a couple of domains. The behaviour was that my clients would hang indefinitely or get a SERVFAIL, both resulting in lack of service. You can enable query logging in dnsmasq with log-queries and enabling this I noticed three distinct form of error patterns:
jow13gw dnsmasq 460 - -  forwarded www.fritidsresor.se to 213.80.101.3
jow13gw dnsmasq 460 - -  validation result is BOGUS
jow13gw dnsmasq 547 - -  reply cloudflare-dnssec.net is BOGUS DNSKEY
jow13gw dnsmasq 547 - -  validation result is BOGUS
jow13gw dnsmasq 547 - -  reply linux.conf.au is BOGUS DS
jow13gw dnsmasq 547 - -  validation result is BOGUS
The first only happened intermittently, the second did not cause any noticeable problem, and the final one was reproducible. To be fair, I only found the last example after starting to search for problem reports (see post confirming bug). At this point, I had a confirmed bug in dnsmasq that affect my use-case. I want to use official packages from Debian on this machine, so installing newer versions manually is not an option. So I started to look into alternatives for DNS resolving, and quickly found Unbound. Installing it was easy:
apt-get install unbound
unbound-control-setup 
I created a local configuration file in /etc/unbound/unbound.conf.d/local.conf as follows:
server:
	interface: 127.0.0.1
	interface: ::1
	interface: 192.168.1.2
	interface: 2001:9b0:104:42::2
	access-control: 127.0.0.1 allow
	access-control: ::1 allow
	access-control: 192.168.1.2/24 allow
	access-control: 2001:9b0:104:42::2/64 allow
	outgoing-interface: 155.4.17.2
	outgoing-interface: 2001:9b0:1:1a04::2
#	log-queries: yes
#	verbosity: 2
The interface keyword determine which IP addresses to listen on, here I used the loopback interface and the local address of the physical network interface for my internal network. The access-control allows recursive DNS resolving from those networks. And outgoing-interface specify my external Internet-connected interface. log-queries and/or verbosity are useful for debugging. To make things work, dnsmasq has to stop providing DNS services. This can be achieved with the port=0 keyword, however that will also disable informing DHCP clients about the DNS server to use. So this has to be added in manually. I ended up adding the two following lines to /etc/dnsmasq.d/local:
port=0
dhcp-option=option:dns-server,192.168.1.2
Restarting unbound and dnsmasq now leads to working (and secure) internal DNSSEC-aware name resolution over both IPv4 and IPv6. I can verify that resolution works, and that Unbound verify signatures and reject bad domains properly with dig as below, or use online DNSSEC resolver test page although I m not sure how confident you can be in the result from that page.
$ host linux.conf.au
linux.conf.au has address 192.55.98.190
linux.conf.au mail is handled by 1 linux.org.au.
$ host sigfail.verteiltesysteme.net
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
$ 
I use Munin to monitor my services, and I was happy to find a nice Unbound Munin plugin. I installed the file in /usr/share/munin/plugins/ and created a Munin plugin configuration file /etc/munin/plugin-conf.d/unbound as follows:
[unbound*]
user root
env.statefile /var/lib/munin-node/plugin-state/root/unbound.state
env.unbound_conf /etc/unbound/unbound.conf
env.unbound_control /usr/sbin/unbound-control
env.spoof_warn 1000
env.spoof_crit 100000
I run munin-node-configure --shell sh to enable it. To work unbound has to be configured as well, so I create a /etc/unbound/unbound.conf.d/munin.conf as follows.
server:
	extended-statistics: yes
	statistics-cumulative: no
	statistics-interval: 0
remote-control:
	control-enable: yes
The graphs may be viewed at my munin instance.

Craig Small: ps standards and locales

I looked at two interesting issues today around the ps program in the procps project. One had a solution and the other I m puzzled about. ps User-defined Format Issue #9 was quite the puzzle. The output of ps changed depending if a different option had a hyphen before it or not. First, the expected output
$ ps p $$ -o pid=pid,comm=comm
 pid comm
31612 bash
Next, the unusual output.
$ ps -p $$ -o pid=pid,comm=comm
pid,comm=comm
 31612
The difference being the second we have -p not p. The second unexpected thing about this is, it was designed that way. Unix98 standard apparently permits this sort of craziness. To me it is a useless feature that will more likely than not confuse people. Within ps, depending on what sort of flags you start with, you use a sysv parser or a bsd parser. One of them triggered the Unix98 compatibility option while the other did not, hence the change in behavior. The next version of procps will ship with a ps that has the user-defined output format of the first example. I had a look at the latest standard, IEEE 1003.1-2013, doesn t seem to have anything like that in it. Short Month Length This one has got me stuck. A user has reported in issue #5 that when they use their locale columns such as start time get mis-aligned because their short month is longer than 3 characters. They also mention some other columns for memory etc are not long enough but that s a generic problem that is impossible to fix sensibly. OK, for the month problem the fix would be to know what the month length is and set the column width for those columns to that plus a bit more for the other fixed components, simple really. Except; how do you know for a specific locale what their short month length is? I always assumed it was three! I haven t found anything that has this information. Note, I m not looking for strlen() but some function that has the maximum length for short month names (e.g. Jan, Feb, Mar etc). This also got me thinking how safe some of those date to string functions are if you have a static buffer as the destination. It s not safe to assume they will be DD MMM YYYY because there might be more Ms. So if you know how to work out the short month name length, let me know!

25 October 2015

Johannes Schauer: unshare without superuser privileges

TLDR: With the help of Helmut Grohne I finally figured out most of the bits necessary to unshare everything without becoming root (though one might say that this is still cheated because the suid root tools newuidmap and newgidmap are used). I wrote a Perl script which documents how this is done in practice. This script is nearly equivalent to using the existing commands lxc-usernsexec [opts] -- unshare [opts] -- COMMAND except that these two together cannot be used to mount a new proc. Apart from this problem, this Perl script might also be useful by itself because it is architecture independent and easily inspectable for the curious mind without resorting to sources.debian.net (it is heavily documented at nearly 2 lines of comments per line of code on average). It can be retrieved here at https://gitlab.mister-muffin.de/josch/user-unshare/blob/master/user-unshare Long story: Nearly two years after my last last rant about everything needing superuser privileges in Linux, I'm still interested in techniques that let me do more things without becoming root. Helmut Grohne had told me for a while about unshare(), or user namespaces as the right way to have things like chroot without root. There are also reports of LXC containers working without root privileges but they are hard to come by. A couple of days ago I had some time again, so Helmut helped me to get through the major blockers that were so far stopping me from using unshare in a meaningful way without executing everything with sudo. My main motivation at that point was to let dpkg-buildpackage when executed by sbuild be run with an unshared network namespace and thus without network access (except for the loopback interface) because like pbuilder I wanted sbuild to enforce the rule not to access any remote resources during the build. After several evenings of investigating and doctoring at the Perl script I mentioned initially, I came to the conclusion that the only place that can unshare the network namespace without disrupting anything is schroot itself. This is because unsharing inside the chroot will fail because dpkg-buildpackage is run with non-root privileges and thus the user namespace has to be unshared. But this then will destroy all ownership information. But even if that wasn't the case, the chroot itself is unlikely to have (and also should not) tools like ip or newuidmap and newgidmap installed. Unsharing the schroot call itself also will not work. Again we first need to unshare the user namespace and then schroot will complain about wrong ownership of its configuration file /etc/schroot/schroot.conf. Luckily, when contacting Roger Leigh about this wishlist feature in bug#802849 I was told that this was already implemented in its git master \o/. So this particular problem seems to be taken care of and once the next schroot release happens, sbuild will make use of it and have unshare --net capabilities just like pbuilder already had since last year. With the sbuild case taken care of, the rest of this post will introduce the Perl script I wrote. The name user-unshare is really arbitrary. I just needed some identifier for the git repository and a filename. The most important discovery I made was, that Debian disables unprivileged user namespaces by default with the patch add-sysctl-to-disallow-unprivileged-CLONE_NEWUSER-by-default.patch to the Linux kernel. To enable it, one has to first either do
echo 1   sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_userns_clone > /dev/null
or
sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1
The tool tries to be like unshare(1) but with the power of lxc-usernsexec(1) to map more than one id into the new user namespace by using the programs newgidmap and newuidmap. Or in other words: This tool tries to be like lxc-usernsexec(1) but with the power of unshare(1) to unshare more than just the user and mount namespaces. It is nearly equal to calling:
lxc-usernsexec [opts] -- unshare [opts] -- COMMAND
Its main reason of existence are: I hoped that systemd-nspawn could do what I wanted but it seems that its requirement for being run as root will not change any time soon Another tool in Debian that offers to do chroot without superuser privileges is linux-user-chroot but that one cheats by being suid root. Had I found lxc-usernsexec earlier I would've probably not written this. But after I found it I happily used it to get an even better understanding of the matter and further improve the comments in my code. I started writing my own tool in Perl because that's the language sbuild was written in and as mentioned initially, I intended to use this script with sbuild. Now that the sbuild problem is taken care of, this is not so important anymore but I like if I can read the code of simple programs I run directly from /usr/bin without having to retrieve the source code first or use sources.debian.net. The only thing I wasn't able to figure out is how to properly mount proc into my new mount namespace. I found a workaround that works by first mounting a new proc to /proc and then bind-mounting /proc to whatever new location for proc is requested. I didn't figure out how to do this without mounting to /proc first partly also because this doesn't work at all when using lxc-usernsexec and unshare together. In this respect, this perl script is a bit more powerful than those two tools together. I suppose that the reason is that unshare wasn't written with having being called without superuser privileges in mind. If you have an idea what could be wrong, the code has a big FIXME about this issue. Finally, here a demonstration of what my script can do. Because of the /proc bug, lxc-usernsexec and unshare together are not able to do this but it might also be that I'm just not using these tools in the right way. The following will give you an interactive shell in an environment created from one of my sbuild chroot tarballs:
$ mkdir -p /tmp/buildroot/proc
$ ./user-unshare --mount-proc=/tmp/buildroot/proc --ipc --pid --net \
    --uts --mount --fork -- sh -c 'ip link set lo up && ip addr && \
    hostname hoothoot-chroot && \
    tar -C /tmp/buildroot -xf /srv/chroot/unstable-amd64.tar.gz; \
    /usr/sbin/chroot /tmp/buildroot /sbin/runuser -s /bin/bash - josch && \
    umount /tmp/buildroot/proc && rm -rf /tmp/buildroot'
(unstable-amd64-sbuild)josch@hoothoot-chroot:/$ whoami
josch
(unstable-amd64-sbuild)josch@hoothoot-chroot:/$ hostname
hoothoot-chroot
(unstable-amd64-sbuild)josch@hoothoot-chroot:/$ ls -lha /proc   head
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 218 nobody nogroup    0 Oct 25 19:06 .
drwxr-xr-x  22 root   root     440 Oct  1 08:42 ..
dr-xr-xr-x   9 root   root       0 Oct 25 19:06 1
dr-xr-xr-x   9 josch  josch      0 Oct 25 19:06 15
dr-xr-xr-x   9 josch  josch      0 Oct 25 19:06 16
dr-xr-xr-x   9 root   root       0 Oct 25 19:06 7
dr-xr-xr-x   9 josch  josch      0 Oct 25 19:06 8
dr-xr-xr-x   4 nobody nogroup    0 Oct 25 19:06 acpi
dr-xr-xr-x   6 nobody nogroup    0 Oct 25 19:06 asound
Of course instead of running this long command we can also instead write a small shell script and execute that instead. The following does the same things as the long command above but adds some comments for further explanation:
#!/bin/sh

set -exu

# I'm using /tmp because I have it mounted as a tmpfs
rootdir="/tmp/buildroot"

# bring the loopback interface up
ip link set lo up

# show that the loopback interface is really up
ip addr

# make use of the UTS namespace being unshared
hostname hoothoot-chroot

# extract the chroot tarball. This must be done inside the user namespace for
# the file permissions to be correct.
#
# tar will fail to call mknod and to change the permissions of /proc but we are
# ignoring that
tar -C "$rootdir" -xf /srv/chroot/unstable-amd64.tar.gz true

# run chroot and inside, immediately drop permissions to the user "josch" and
# start an interactive shell
/usr/sbin/chroot "$rootdir" /sbin/runuser -s /bin/bash - josch

# unmount /proc and remove the temporary directory
umount "$rootdir/proc"
rm -rf "$rootdir"
and then:
$ mkdir -p /tmp/buildroot/proc
$ ./user-unshare --mount-proc=/tmp/buildroot/proc --ipc --pid --net --uts --mount --fork -- ./chroot.sh
As mentioned in the beginning, the tool is nearly equivalent to calling lxc-usernsexec [opts] -- unshare [opts] -- COMMAND but because of the problem with mounting proc (mentioned earlier), lxc-usernsexec and unshare cannot be used with above example. If one tries anyways one will only get:
$ lxc-usernsexec -m b:0:1000:1 -m b:1:558752:1 -- unshare --mount-proc=/tmp/buildroot/proc --ipc --pid --net --uts --mount --fork -- ./chroot.sh
unshare: mount /tmp/buildroot/proc failed: Invalid argument
I'd be interested in finding out why that is and how to fix it.

24 October 2015

Russ Allbery: Review: Oathbreakers

Review: Oathbreakers, by Mercedes Lackey
Series: Vows and Honor #2
Publisher: DAW
Copyright: January 1989
ISBN: 0-88677-454-3
Format: Mass market
Pages: 318
The Tarma and Kethry stories tend to be stand-alone and are readable out of order, and this isn't an exception. But if you want their background, consider reading Oathblood or (less recommended) The Oathbound before reading this book. (Reading Oathblood first may require a bit of finesse, since some of the stories in that book come after this novel. Unfortunately, there is no good ordering or collection of these stories that maintains internal chronological order.) This is more like it. This is the Tarma and Kethry story that I remembered when calling them my favorite characters in the Valdemar universe. Following the short stories merged into The Oathbound fixup novel, Tarma and Kethry are still trying to gather the resources required to start a school and to rebuild Tarma's clan. That's led to them signing with a highly-respected mercenary company: Idra's Sunhawks. Idra renounced her claims to the Rethwellen line of royal succession to lead the Sunhawks, creating a mercenary band that's legendary for their quality and battlefield capabilities. The story opens with a campaign in Jkatha, on one side of a civil war, which is mostly an opportunity to get to know the Sunhawks and to see Tarma and Kethry show their competence. The real story starts later, when Idra is called back to Rethwellen for family business and something goes very wrong. I think Lackey is best at two types of stories: misunderstood young people who grow into themselves and their place in the world, and competent people displaying their competence. The Tarma and Kethry stories, and particularly Oathbreakers, are of the latter type. This is clearly wish fulfillment: Lackey's stories often lack nuance, there's rarely any doubt as to who the good and bad guys are, and, although very bad things can happen, you're probably going to get some sort of happy ending. But if you're in the mood for that sort of story, it's so satisfying. The Tarma and Kethry we see here are a mature, experienced fighter and mage team (plus Warrl, who provides vitally important magical and combat assistance, as well as some pointed advice). They know what they're doing, they care deeply for each other, and both their relationship patterns and their capabilities are well-understood. Both do a bit of growing over the course of this novel, but that's not really the point. The point is seeing them take on unfamiliar challenges and tricky investigations while being very good at what they do. In other words, this isn't bildungsroman or high fantasy; it's sword and sorcery, and an excellent example of the genre. Reading these books as part of the overall Valdemar series provides some enjoyable moments with the first explicit contact between Valdemar and its Heralds and Tarma and Kethry's world. The maps here firmly establish their home regions as well to the south of Valdemar and multiple kingdoms away, but Rethwellen (as previously established in earlier Herald-focused trilogies) is on Valdemar's southern border. Seeing Lackey's very separate magic and divinity systems cross and meet, with a bit of initial mutual suspicion, is a rather fun moment (if, at least, you're in the mood for a story in which the world has a vested interest in making sure all the good people like each other). Although I'm wondering why Kethry didn't get extremely uncomfortable when she crossed the border into Valdemar due to the trick that Vanyel pulled in his trilogy. (I seem to recall this is explained away at some point.) Be warned that this novel does contain other elements typical of early Lackey. There is, for example, the inevitable rape, although thankfully off-camera and not quite as central to the plot. (Although in a way that makes it worse since it felt gratuitous. I'm unconvinced that the rape was at all necessary to the story that Lackey was telling.) Revenge and eye-for-an-eye justice are hotly defended by the protagonists. This isn't a series to look to for subtle and complex solutions to political problems; instead, everything gets better if you just kill all the evil people. There isn't anything quite as egregious as the actions of the supposed good guys in The Oathbound, but you still have to read past a certain bloodthirstiness in the stated good side of a very black-and-white morality. That means this isn't a novel for all people or all moods. But within those genre conventions, which aren't that unusual for sword and sorcery, Oathbreakers is a lot of fun. It's one of the few Valdemar novels I've read during this re-read that lived up to my memory of it. Recommended if you like this sort of thing. Rating: 8 out of 10

23 October 2015

Clint Adams: Beware of typhoons or tsunamis

The 12 member nations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership pact have agreed to prohibit demands that companies reveal software source code*, a step that appears aimed at curbing efforts by China to gain access to this sensitive information, The Yomiuri Shimbun has learned. Source code is the confidential information for software and is a blueprint embedded in many commonly used products, such as vehicles, mobile phones and home appliances. Source code is usually tightly guarded because it conatins commands that make using the software easier. China requires foreign companies operating there to hand over source code, a move that has sparked sharp criticism from many countries. Observers believe the decision by TPP participants to ban demands to reveal this code is intended to restrain China's move. The TPP's electronic commerce chapter in principle prohibits the 12 member nations from demanding access to source code for mass-produced software. According to the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry, the Japan-Mongolia economic partnership agreement signed in February contains a stipulation banning demands for such information, but there are very few other examples around the world. Japan, the United States and other nations that are home to many information technology companies want to make the stipulation effectively a global standard, and they are considering whether to incorporate such a condition in economic partnership agreements that will be inked in the future. Source code is an important corporate secret for development firms. *Source code A software program written in a language a computer understands. As well as containing expert details about the unique functions of the product, the software is essential for fixing glitches and making improvements. Hackers have attempted to access source code because gaining this information would make it easier to create viruses that could exploit any software defects. In the software business, it is rarely made public, as it is considered a corporate secret.

Joey Hess: propelling disk images

Following up on Then and Now ... In quiet moments at ICFP last August, I finished teaching Propellor to generate disk images. With an emphasis on doing a whole lot with very little new code and extreme amount of code reuse. For example, let's make a disk image with nethack on it. First, we need to define a chroot. Disk image creation reuses propellor's chroot support, described back in propelling containers. Any propellor properties can be assigned to the chroot, so it's easy to describe the system we want.
 nethackChroot :: FilePath -> Chroot
    nethackChroot d = Chroot.debootstrapped (System (Debian Stable) "amd64") mempty d
        & Apt.installed ["linux-image-amd64"]
        & Apt.installed ["nethack-console"]
        & accountFor gamer
        & gamer  hasInsecurePassword  "hello"
        & gamer  hasLoginShell  "/usr/games/nethack"
      where gamer = User "gamer"
Now to make an image from that chroot, we just have to tell propellor where to put the image file, some partitioning information, and to make it boot using grub.
 nethackImage :: RevertableProperty
    nethackImage = imageBuilt "/srv/images/nethack.img" nethackChroot
        MSDOS (grubBooted PC)
        [ partition EXT2  mountedAt  "/boot"
             setFlag  BootFlag
        , partition EXT4  mountedAt  "/"
             addFreeSpace  MegaBytes 100
        , swapPartition (MegaBytes 256)
        ]
The disk image partitions default to being sized to fit exactly the files from the chroot that go into each partition, so, the disk image is as small as possible by default. There's a little DSL to configure the partitions. To give control over the partition size, it has some functions, like addFreeSpace and setSize. Other functions like setFlag and extended can further adjust the partitions. I think that worked out rather well; the partition specification is compact and avoids unecessary hardcoded sizes, while providing plenty of control. By the end of ICFP, I had Propellor building complete disk images, but no boot loader installed on them.
Fast forward to today. After stuggling with some strange grub behavior, I found a working method to install grub onto a disk image. The whole disk image feature weighs in at: 203 lines to interface with parted
88 lines to format and mount partitions
90 lines for the partition table specification DSL and partition sizing
196 lines to generate disk images
75 lines to install grub on a disk image
652 lines of code total Which is about half the size of vmdebootstrap 1/4th the size of partman-base (probably 1/100th the size of total partman), and 1/13th the size of live-build. All of which do similar things, in ways that seem to me to be much less flexible than Propellor.
One thing I'm considering doing is extending this so Propellor can use qemu-user-static to create disk images for eg, arm. Add some u-boot setup, and this could create bootable images for arm boards. A library of configs for various arm boards could then be included in Propellor. This would be a lot easier than running the Debian Installer on an arm board. Oh! I only just now realized that if you have a propellor host configured, like this example for my dialup gateway, leech --
 leech = host "leech.kitenet.net"
        & os (System (Debian (Stable "jessie")) "armel")
        & Apt.installed ["linux-image-kirkwood", "ppp", "screen", "iftop"]
        & privContent "/etc/ppp/peers/provider"
        & privContent "/etc/ppp/pap-secrets"
        & Ppp.onBoot
        & hasPassword (User "root")
        & Ssh.installed
-- The host's properties can be extracted from it, using eg hostProperties leech and reused to create a disk image with the same properties as the host! So, when my dialup gateway gets struck by lightning again, I could use this to build a disk image for its replacement:
 import qualified Propellor.Property.Hardware.SheevaPlug as SheevaPlug
    laptop = host "darkstar.kitenet.net"
        & SheevaPlug.diskImage "/srv/images/leech.img" (MegaBytes 2000)
            (& propertyList "has all of leech's properties"
                (hostProperties leech))
This also means you can start with a manually built system, write down the properties it has, and iteratively run Propellor against it until you think you have a full specification of it, and then use that to generate a new, clean disk image. Nice way to transition from sysadmin days of yore to a clean declaratively specified system.

22 October 2015

Pau Garcia i Quiles: FOSDEM Desktops DevRoom 2016

It is now official: KDE will be present again at FOSDEM in the 2016 edition, on the 30th and 31st of January, 2016. Talks will take place at the Desktops DevRoom, on Sunday the 31st, but not exclusively: in past years, there were Qt and KDE-related talks at the mobile devroom, lightning talks, distributions, open document editors and more. KDE will be sharing the room with other desktop environments, as usual: Gnome, Unity, Enlightenment, Razor, etc. Representatives from those communities will be helping me in managing and organizing the devroom: Christophe Fergeau, Michael Zanetti, Philippe Caseiro and J rome Leclanche. I would like to extend the invitation to any other free/open source desktop environment and/or related stuff. Check last year s schedule for an example. Closed-source shops (Microsoft, Apple, Oracle, etc) are ALSO invited, provided that you will talk about something related to open source. We will publish the Call for Talks for the Desktops DevRoom 2016 soon. Stay tuned. In the meanwhile, you can subscribe to the Desktops DevRoom mailing list to be informed of important and useful information, and talk about FOSDEM and specific issues of the Desktops DevRoom.

Joey Hess: propellor orchestration

With the disclamer that I don't really know much about orchestration, I have added support for something resembling it to Propellor. Until now, when using propellor to manage a bunch of hosts, you updated them one at a time by running propellor --spin $somehost, or maybe you set up a central git repository, and a cron job to run propellor on each host, pulling changes from git. I like both of these ways to use propellor, but they only go so far... All those scenarios are supported by propellor now! Well, I haven't actually implemented concurrently yet, but the point is that the conducts property can be used with any of propellor's property combinators, like before etc, to express all kinds of scenarios. The conducts property works in combination with an orchestrate function to set up all the necessary stuff to let one host ssh into another and run propellor there.
main = defaultMain (orchestrate hosts)
hosts = 
    [ master
    , webservers 
    , ...
    ]
The orchestrate function does a bunch of stuff: I've very pleased that I was able to add the Propellor.Property.Conductor module implementing this with only a tiny change to the rest of propellor. Almost everything needed to implement it was there in propellor's infrastructure already. Also kind of cool that it only needed 13 lines of imperative code, the other several hundred lines of the implementation being all pure code.

20 October 2015

Ritesh Raj Sarraf: Controlling ill behaving applications with Linux Cgroups

For some time, I have been wanting to read more on Linux Cgroups to explore possibilities of using it to control Ill behaving applications. At this time, while I'm stuck in travel, it has given me some time to look into it. In our Free Software world, most of the things are do-o-cracy, i.e. when your use case is not the common one, it is typically you who has to explore possible solutions. It could be Bugs, Feature Requests or as is in my case, performance issues. But that is not to assume that we do not have better quality software in Free Software world. Infact, in my opinion, some of the tools available are far much more better than the competition in terms of features, and to add a sweetener (or nutritional facts) to it is the fact that Free Software liberates the user. One of my favorite tool, for photo management, is Digikam. Digikam is a big project, very featureful, and has some functionalities that may not be available in the competition. But as is with most Free Software projects, Digikam is a tool which underneath consumes many more subprojects from the Free Software ecosystem. For anyone who has used Digikam, may know some of the bugs that surface on it. Not necessarily a bug in Digikam, but maybe in one of the underneath libraries/tools that it consumes (Exiv, libkface, marble, OpenCV, libPGF etc). But the bottom line is that the overall Digikam experience (and if I may say: the overall GNU/Linux experience) takes a hit. Digikam has pretty powerful features for annotation, tagging, facial recognition. These features, together with Digikam, make it a compelling product. But the problem is that many of these projects are independent. Thus tight integration is a challenge. And at times, bugs can be hard to find, root cause and fix. Let's take a real example here. If you were to use Digikam today (version 4.13.0) with annotation, tagging and facial recognition as some of the core features for your use case, you may run into frustrating overall experience. Not just that, the bugs would also effect your overall GNU/Linux experience. The facial recognition feature, if triggered, will eat up all your memory. Thus leading you to uncover Linux's long old memory bug. The tagging feature, if triggered, again will lead to frequent I/O. Thus again leading to a stalled Linux system because of blocked CPU cycled, for nothing. So one of the items on my TODO list was to explore Linux Cgroups, and see if it was cleanly possible to tame a process to a confinement, so that even if it was ill behaving (for whatever reasons), your machine does not take the beating. And now that the cgroups consumer dust has kinda settled down, systemd was my first obvious choice to look at. systemd provides a helper utility, systemd-run, for similar tasks. With systemd-run, you could apply all the resource controller logic to the given process, typically cpu, memory and blkio. And restrict it to a certain set. You can also define what user to run the service as.
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ systemd-run -p BlockIOWeight=10 find /
Running as unit run-23805.service.
2015-10-20 / 21:37:44         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ systemctl status -l run-23805.service
  run-23805.service - /usr/bin/find /
   Loaded: loaded
  Drop-In: /run/systemd/system/run-23805.service.d
            50-BlockIOWeight.conf, 50-Description.conf, 50-ExecStart.conf
   Active: active (running) since Tue 2015-10-20 21:37:44 CEST; 6s ago
 Main PID: 23814 (find)
   Memory: 12.2M
      CPU: 502ms
   CGroup: /system.slice/run-23805.service
            23814 /usr/bin/find /
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/raw6
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/snmp
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat/rt_cache
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat/arp_cache
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat/ndisc_cache
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat/ip_conntrack
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/stat/nf_conntrack
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/tcp6
Oct 20 21:37:45 learner find[23814]: /proc/3/net/udp6
2015-10-20 / 21:37:51         
But, out of the box, graphical applications do not work. I haven't looked, but it should be doable by giving it the correct environment details.
Underneath, systemd is using the same Linux Control Groups to limit resources for individual applications. So, in cases where you have a requirement and do not have systemd, or you directly want to make use of cgroups, it could be easily done with basic cgroups tools like cgroup-tools.
With cgroup-tools, I now have a simple cgroups hierarchy set for my current use case, i.e. Digikam
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ ls /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/rrs_customCG/
cgroup.clone_children           memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes      memory.numa_stat
cgroup.event_control            memory.kmem.tcp.max_usage_in_bytes  memory.oom_control
cgroup.procs                    memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes      memory.pressure_level
digikam/                        memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes          memory.soft_limit_in_bytes
memory.failcnt                  memory.limit_in_bytes               memory.stat
memory.force_empty              memory.max_usage_in_bytes           memory.swappiness
memory.kmem.failcnt             memory.memsw.failcnt                memory.usage_in_bytes
memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes      memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes         memory.use_hierarchy
memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes  memory.memsw.max_usage_in_bytes     notify_on_release
memory.kmem.slabinfo            memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes         tasks
memory.kmem.tcp.failcnt         memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
2015-10-20 / 21:45:38         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ ls /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/rrs_customCG/digikam/
cgroup.clone_children           memory.kmem.tcp.max_usage_in_bytes  memory.oom_control
cgroup.event_control            memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes      memory.pressure_level
cgroup.procs                    memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes          memory.soft_limit_in_bytes
memory.failcnt                  memory.limit_in_bytes               memory.stat
memory.force_empty              memory.max_usage_in_bytes           memory.swappiness
memory.kmem.failcnt             memory.memsw.failcnt                memory.usage_in_bytes
memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes      memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes         memory.use_hierarchy
memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes  memory.memsw.max_usage_in_bytes     notify_on_release
memory.kmem.slabinfo            memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes         tasks
memory.kmem.tcp.failcnt         memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes  memory.numa_stat
2015-10-20 / 21:45:53         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/rrs_customCG/cpu.shares 
1024
2015-10-20 / 21:48:44         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/rrs_customCG/digikam/cpu.shares 
512
2015-10-20 / 21:49:05         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/rrs_customCG/memory.limit_in_bytes 
9223372036854771712
2015-10-20 / 22:20:14         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/rrs_customCG/digikam/memory.limit_in_bytes 
2764369920
2015-10-20 / 22:20:27         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio/rrs_customCG/blkio.weight
500
2015-10-20 / 21:51:43         
rrs@learner:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/Result$ cat /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio/rrs_customCG/digikam/blkio.weight
10
2015-10-20 / 21:51:50         
The base group, $USER_customCG needs super admin privileges. Which once set appropriately, allows the user to further self-define sub-groups. And users can then also define separate limits per sub-group.
With the resource limitations set in place, my overall experience on very recent hardware (Intel Haswell Core i7, 8 GiB RAM, 500 GB SSHD, 128 GB SSD) has improved considerably. It still is not perfect, but it definitely is a huge improvement over what I had to go through ealire: A stalled machine for hours.
top - 21:54:38 up 1 day,  6:46,  1 user,  load average: 7.22, 7.51, 7.37
Tasks: 299 total,   1 running, 298 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu0  :  7.1 us,  3.0 sy,  1.0 ni, 11.1 id, 77.8 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu1  :  6.0 us,  4.0 sy,  2.0 ni, 49.0 id, 39.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu2  :  5.0 us,  2.0 sy,  0.0 ni, 24.8 id, 68.3 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu3  :  5.9 us,  5.0 sy,  0.0 ni, 21.8 id, 67.3 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
MiB Mem : 7908.926 total,   96.449 free, 4634.922 used, 3177.555 buff/cache
MiB Swap: 8579.996 total, 3454.746 free, 5125.250 used. 2753.324 avail Mem 
PID to signal/kill [default pid = 8879] 
  PID  PPID nTH USER        PR  NI S %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND                           UID 
 8879  8868  18 rrs         20   0 S  8.2 31.2  37:44.64 digikam                          1000 
10255  9960   4 rrs         39  19 S  1.0  0.8  19:47.73 tracker-miner-f                  1000 
10157  9960   7 rrs         20   0 S  0.5  3.0  32:29.76 gnome-shell                      1000 
    7     2   1 root        20   0 S  0.2        0:53.48 rcu_sched                           0 
  401     1   1 root        20   0 S  0.2  1.3   0:54.93 systemd-journal                     0 
10269  9937   4 rrs         20   0 S  0.2  0.4   2:34.50 gnome-terminal-                  1000 
15316     1  14 rrs         20   0 S  0.2  3.7  30:05.96 evolution                        1000 
23777     2   1 root        20   0 S  0.2        0:05.73 kworker/u16:0                       0 
23814     1   1 root        20   0 D  0.2  0.0   0:02.00 find                                0 
24049     2   1 root        20   0 S  0.2        0:01.29 kworker/u16:3                       0 
24052     2   1 root        20   0 S  0.2        0:02.94 kworker/u16:4                       0 
    1     0   1 root        20   0 S       0.1   0:18.24 systemd                             0 
The reporting tools may not be correct here. Because from what is being reported above, I should be having a machine stalled, and heavily paging, while the kernel scanning its list of processes to find the best process to kill. From this approach of jailing processes, the major side effect I can see is that the process (Digikam) is now starved of resources and will take much much much more time than what it would have been usually. But in the usual cases, it takes up all, and ends up starving (and getting killed) for consuming all available resources. So I guess it is better to be on a balanced resource diet. :-)

Categories:

Keywords:

Like:

17 October 2015

Joey Hess: it's a bird, it's a plane, it's a super monoid for propellor

I've been doing a little bit of dynamically typed programming in Haskell, to improve Propellor's Info type. The result is kind of interesting in a scary way. Info started out as a big record type, containing all the different sorts of metadata that Propellor needed to keep track of. Host IP addresses, DNS entries, ssh public keys, docker image configuration parameters... This got quite out of hand. Info needed to have its hands in everything, even types that should have been private to their module. To fix that, recent versions of Propellor let a single Info contain many different types of values. Look at it one way and it contains DNS entries; look at it another way and it contains ssh public keys, etc. As an migr from lands where you can never know what type of value is in a $foo until you look, this was a scary prospect at first, but I found it's possible to have the benefits of dynamic types and the safety of static types too. The key to doing it is Data.Dynamic. Thanks to Joachim Breitner for suggesting I could use it here. What I arrived at is this type (slightly simplified):
newtype Info = Info [Dynamic]
    deriving (Monoid)
So Info is a monoid, and it holds of a bunch of dynamic values, which could each be of any type at all. Eep! So far, this is utterly scary to me. To tame it, the Info constructor is not exported, and so the only way to create an Info is to start with mempty and use this function:
addInfo :: (IsInfo v, Monoid v) => Info -> v -> Info
addInfo (Info l) v = Info (toDyn v : l)
The important part of that is that only allows adding values that are in the IsInfo type class. That prevents the foot shooting associated with dynamic types, by only allowing use of types that make sense as Info. Otherwise arbitrary Strings etc could be passed to addInfo by accident, and all get concated together, and that would be a total dynamic programming mess. Anything you can add into an Info, you can get back out:
getInfo :: (IsInfo v, Monoid v) => Info -> v
getInfo (Info l) = mconcat (mapMaybe fromDynamic (reverse l))
Only monoids can be stored in Info, so if you ask for a type that an Info doesn't contain, you'll get back mempty. Crucially, IsInfo is an open type class. Any module in Propellor can make a new data type and make it an instance of IsInfo, and then that new data type can be stored in the Info of a Property, and any Host that uses the Property will have that added to its Info, available for later introspection.
For example, this weekend I'm extending Propellor to have controllers: Hosts that are responsible for running Propellor on some other hosts. Useful if you want to run propellor once and have it update the configuration of an entire network of hosts. There can be whole chains of controllers controlling other controllers etc. The problem is, what if host foo has the property controllerFor bar and host bar has the property controllerFor foo? I want to avoid a loop of foo running Propellor on bar, running Propellor on foo, ... To detect such loops, each Host's Info should contain a list of the Hosts it's controlling. Which is not hard to accomplish:
newtype Controlling = Controlled [Host]
    deriving (Typeable, Monoid)
isControlledBy :: Host -> Controlling -> Bool
h  isControlledBy  (Controlled hs) = any (== hostName h) (map hostName hs)
instance IsInfo Controlling where
    propigateInfo _ = True
mkControllingInfo :: Host -> Info
mkControllingInfo controlled = addInfo mempty (Controlled [controlled])
getControlledBy :: Host -> Controlling
getControlledBy = getInfo . hostInfo
isControllerLoop :: Host -> Host -> Bool
isControllerLoop controller controlled = go S.empty controlled
  where
    go checked h
          controller  isControlledBy  c = True
        -- avoid checking loops that have been checked before
          hostName h  S.member  checked = False
          otherwise = any (go (S.insert (hostName h) checked)) l
      where
        c@(Controlled l) = getControlledBy h
This is all internal to the module that needs it; the rest of propellor doesn't need to know that the Info is using used for this. And yet, the necessary information about Hosts is gathered as propellor runs.
So, that's a useful technique. I do wonder if I could somehow make addInfo combine together values in the list that have the same type; as it is the list can get long. And, to show Info, the best I could do was this:
 instance Show Info where
            show (Info l) = "Info " ++ show (map dynTypeRep l)
The resulting long list of the types of vales stored in a host's info is not a useful as it could be. Of course, getInfo can be used to get any particular type of value:
*Main> hostInfo kite
Info [InfoVal System,PrivInfo,PrivInfo,Controlling,DnsInfo,DnsInfo,DnsInfo,AliasesInfo, ...
*Main> getInfo (hostInfo kite) :: AliasesInfo
AliasesInfo (fromList ["downloads.kitenet.net","git.joeyh.name","imap.kitenet.net","nntp.olduse.net" ...
And finally, I keep trying to think of a better name than "Info".

Iustin Pop: Server upgrades and monitoring

Undecided whether the title should be "exercises in Yak shaving" or "paying back technical debt" or "too much complexity for personal systems". Anyway I started hosting my personal website and some other small stuff on a dedicated box (rented from a provider) in early 2008. Even for a relatively cheap box, it worked without issues for a good number of years. A surprising number of years, actually; the only issue was a power supply failure that was solved by the provider automatically and then nothing for many years. Even the harddrive (mechanical) had no issues at all for 7 years (Power_On_Hours: 64380; I probably got it after it had a few months of uptime). I believe it was the longest running harddrive I've ever used (for the record: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10, ST3250310AS). The reason I delayed upgrade for a long time was twofold: first, at the same provider I couldn't get a similar SLA for the same amount of money. I could get better hardware, but with worse SLA and options. This is easily solvable, of course, by just finding a different provider. The other issue was that I never bothered to setup proper configuration management for the host; after all, it was only supposed to run Apache with ikiwiki and some other trivial small other things. The truth was that over time it started pilling up more and more "small things" so actually changing the host is expensive. As the age of the server neared 7 years, I thought to combine upgrade from Wheezy to Jessie with a HW upgrade. Managed to find a different provider that had my desired SLA and HW configuration, got the server and the only thing left was to do the migration. Previous OS upgrades were simple as they were on the same host; i.e. rely on Debian's reliable upgrade and nothing else to, eventually adjust slightly some configs. With a cross-host upgrade (I couldn't just copy the old OS since it was also a 32-to-64 bit change) it's much worse: since there's no previous installation, I had to manually check and port the old configuration for each individual service. This got very tedious, and I realised I have to make it somehow better. "Proper" configuration management aside, I thought that I need proper monitoring first. I already had (for a long while actually) graphing via Munin, but no actual monitoring. Since the host only had few services, this was again supposed to be easy - same mistake again. The problem is that once you have any monitoring system setup, it's very easy to actually add "just one more" host or service to it. First it was only the external box, then it was my firewall, then it was the rest of my home network. Then it was the cloud services that I use for example, checking whether my domain registrar's nameservers still are authoritative for my domain or whether the expiration date it still far in the future. And so on In the end, what was in previous iterations (e.g. Squeeze to Wheezy upgrade) a half-weekend job only, spread out over many weekends (interleaved with other activities, not fully working on it). I had to keep the old machine running for a month more in order to make sure everything was up and running, and I ended up with 80 services monitored across multiple systems; the migrated machine itself has almost half of these. Some of these are light items (e.g. a checking that a single vhost responds) other are aggregates. I still need to add some more checks though, especially more complex (end-to-end) ones. The lesson I learned in all this is that, with or without configuration management in place, having monitoring makes it much easier do to host or service moves, as you know much better when everything is done whether it's "done-done" or just "almost done". The question that remains though: with 80 services for a home network plus external systems (personal use); I'm not sure if I'm doing things right (monitor the stuff I need) or wrong (do I really need these many things)?

Russell Coker: Mail Server Training

Today I ran a hands-on training session on configuring a MTA with Postfix and Dovecot for LUV. I gave each student a virtual machine running Debian/Jessie with full Internet access and instructions on how to configure it as a basic mail server. Here is a slightly modified set of instructions that anyone can do on their own system. Today I learned that documentation that includes passwords on a command-line should have quotes around the password, one student used a semi-colon character in his password which caused some confusion (it s the command separator character in BASH). I also discovered that trying to just tell users which virtual server to login to is prone to errors, in future I ll print out a list of user-names and passwords for virtual servers and tear off one for each student so there s no possibility of 2 users logging in to the same system. I gave each student a sub-domain of unixapropos.com (a zone that I use for various random sysadmin type things). I have changed the instructions to use example.com which is the official address for testing things (or you could use any zone that you use). The test VMs that I setup had a user named auser , the documentation assumes this account name. You could change auser to something else if you wish. Below are all the instructions for anyone who wants to try it at home or setup virtual machines and run their own training session. Basic MTA Configuration
  1. Run apt-get install postfix to install Postfix, select Internet Site for the type of mail configuration and enter the domain name you selected for the mail name.
  2. The main Postfix configuration file is /etc/postfix/main.cf. Change the myhostname setting to the fully qualified name of the system, something like mta.example.com.
    You can edit /etc/postfix/main.cf with vi (or any other editor) or use the postconf command to change it, eg postconf -e myhostname=mta.example.com .
  3. Add home_mailbox=Maildir/ to the Postfix configuration to make it deliver to a Maildir spool in the user s home directory.
  4. Restart Postfix to apply the changes.
  5. Run apt-get install swaks libnet-ssleay-perl to install swaks (a SMTP test tool).
  6. Test delivery by running the command swaks -f auser@example.com -t auser@example.com -s localhost . Note that swaks displays the SMTP data so you can see exactly what happens and if something goes wrong you will see everything about the error.
  7. Inspect /var/log/mail.log to see the messages about the delivery. View the message which is in ~auser/Maildir/new.
  8. When other students get to this stage run the same swaks command but with the -t changed to the address in their domain, check the mail.log to see that the messages were transferred and view the mail with less to see the received lines. If you do this on your own specify a recipient address that s a regular email address of yours (EG a Gmail account).
Basic Pop/IMAP Configuration
  1. Run apt-get install dovecot-pop3d dovecot-imapd to install Dovecot POP and IMAP servers.
    Run netstat -tln to see the ports that have daemons listening on them, observe that ports 110 and 143 are in use.
  2. Edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf and change mail_location to maildir:~/Maildir . Then restart Dovecot.
  3. Run the command nc localhost 110 to connect to POP, then run the following commands to get capabilities, login, and retrieve mail:
    user auser
    pass WHATEVERYOUMADEIT
    capa
    list
    retr 1
    quit
  4. Run the command nc localhost 143 to connect to IMAP, then run the following commands to list capabilities, login, and logout:
    a capability
    b login auser WHATEVERYOUMADEIT
    c logout
  5. For the above commands make note of the capabilities, we will refer to that later.
Now you have a basically functional mail server on the Internet! POP/IMAP Over SSL To avoid password sniffing we need to use SSL. To do it properly requires obtaining a signed key for a DNS address but we can do the technical work with the snakeoil certificate that is generated by Debian.
  1. Edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf and change ssl = no to ssl = required . Then add the following 2 lines:
    ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem
    ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
    1. Run netstat -tln and note that ports 993 and 995 are not in use.
    2. Edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf and uncomment the following lines:
      port = 993
      ssl = yes
      port = 995
      ssl = yes
    3. Restart Dovecot, run netstat -tln and note that ports 993 and 995 are in use.
  2. Run nc localhost 110 and nc localhost 143 as before, note that the capabilities have changed to include STLS/STARTTLS respectively.
  3. Run gnutls-cli --tofu 127.0.0.1 -p 993 to connect to the server via IMAPS and gnutls-cli --tofu 127.0.0.1 -p 995 to connect via POP3S. The --tofu option means to Trust On First Use , it stores the public key in ~/.gnutls and checks it the next time you connect. This allows you to safely use a snakeoil certificate if all apps can securely get a copy of the key.
Postfix SSL
  1. Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf and add the following 4 lines:
    smtpd_tls_received_header = yes
    smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1
    smtp_tls_loglevel = 1
    smtp_tls_security_level = may
    Then restart Postfix. This makes Postfix log TLS summary messages to syslog and in the Received header. It also permits Postfix to send with TLS.
  2. Run nc localhost 25 to connect to your SMTP port and then enter the following commands:
    ehlo test
    quit
    Note that the response to the EHLO command includes 250-STARTTLS, this is because Postfix was configured with the Snakeoil certificate by default.
  3. Run gnutls-cli --tofu 127.0.0.1 -p 25 -s and enter the following commands:
    ehlo test
    starttls
    ^D
    After the CTRL-D gnutls-cli will establish a SSL connection.
  4. Run swaks -tls -f auser@example.com -t auser@example.com -s localhost to send a message with SSL encryption. Note that swaks doesn t verify the key.
  5. Try using swaks to send messages to other servers with SSL encryption. Gmail is one example of a mail server that supports SSL which can be used, run swaks -tls -f auser@example.com -t YOURADDRESS@gmail.com to send TLS (encapsulated SSL) mail to Gmail via swaks. Also run swaks -tls -f auser@example.com -t YOURADDRESS@gmail.com -s localhost to send via your new mail server (which should log that it was a TLS connection from swaks and a TLS connection to Gmail).
SASL SASL is the system of SMTP authentication for mail relaying. It is needed to permit devices without fixed IP addresses to send mail through a server. The easiest way of configuring Postfix SASL is to have Dovecot provide it s authentication data to Postfix. Among other things if you change Dovecot to authenticate in another way you won t need to make any matching changes to Postfix.
  1. Run mkdir -p /var/spool/postfix/var/spool and ln -s ../.. /var/spool/postfix/var/spool/postfix , this allows parts of Postfix to work with the same configuration regardless of whether they are running in a chroot.
  2. Add the following to /etc/postfix/main.cf and restart Postfix:
    smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
    smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
    smtpd_sasl_path = /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
    broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
    smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
  3. Edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf, uncomment the following lines, and then restart Dovecot:
    unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
    mode = 0666
  4. Edit /etc/postfix/master.cf, uncomment the line for the submission service, and restart Postfix. This makes Postfix listen on port 587 which is allowed through most firewalls.
  5. From another system (IE not the virtual machine you are working on) run swaks -tls -f auser@example.com -t YOURADDRESS@gmail.com -s YOURSERVER and note that the message is rejected with Relay access denied .
  6. Now run swaks -tls --auth-user auser --auth-password WHATEVER -f auser@example.com -t YOURREALADDRESS -s YOURSERVER and observe that the mail is delivered (subject to anti-spam measures at the recipient).
  7. Configuring a MUA If every part of the previous 3 sections is complete then you should be able to setup your favourite MUA. Use auser as the user-name for SMTP and IMAP, mail.example.com for the SMTP/IMAP server and it should just work! Of course you need to use the same DNS server for your MUA to have this just work. But another possibility for testing is to have the MUA talk to the server by IP address not by name.

Steve Kemp: Robbing Peter to pay Paul, or location spoofing via DNS

I rarely watched TV online when I was located in the UK, but now I've moved to Finland with appalling local TV choices it has become more common. The biggest problem with trying to watch BBC's iPlayer, and similar services, is the location restrictions. Not a huge problem though: The next part is the harder one - making your traffic pass over the VPN. If you were simple you'd just say "Send everything over the VPN". But that would slow down local traffic, so instead you have to use trickery. My approach was just to run a series of routing additions, similar to this (except I did it in the openvpn configuration, via pushed-routes):
ip -4 route add .... dev tun0
This works, but it is a pain as you have to add more and more routes. The simpler solution which I switched to after a while was just configuring mitmproxy on the remote OpenVPN end-point, and then configuring that in the browser. With that in use all your traffic goes over the VPN link, if you enable the proxy in your browser, but nothing else will. I've got a network device on-order, which will let me watch netflix, etc, from my TV, and I'm lead to believe this won't let you setup proxies, or similar, to avoid region-bypass. It occurs to me that I can configure my router to give out bogus DNS responses - if the device asks for "iplayer.bbc.com" it can return 10.10.10.10 - which is the remote host running the proxy. I imagine this will be nice and simple, and thought I was being clever: Because I can handle DNS-magic on the router I can essentially spoof my location for all the devices on the internal LAN, which is a good thing. Anyway I was reasonably pleased with the idea of using DNS to route traffic over the VPN, in combination with a transparent proxy. I was even going to blog about it, and say "Hey! This is a cool idea I've never heard of before". Instead I did a quick google(.fi) and discovered that there are companies offering this as a service. They don't mention the proxying bit, but it's clearly what they're doing - for example OverPlay's SmartDNS. So in conclusion I can keep my current setup, or I can use the income I receive from DNS hosting to pay for SmartDNS, or other DNS-based location-fakers. Regardless. DNS. VPN. Good combination. Try it if you get bored.

Francois Marier: Introducing reboot-notifier for jessie and stretch

One of the packages that got lost in the transition from Debian wheezy to jessie was the update-notifier-common package which could be used to receive notifications when a reboot is needed (for example, after installing a kernel update). I decided to wrap this piece of functionality along with a simple cron job and create a new package: reboot-notifier. Because it uses the same file (/var/run/reboot-required) to indicate that a reboot is needed, it should work fine with any custom scripts that admins might have written prior to jessie. If you're running sid or strech, all you need to do is:
apt install reboot-notifier
On jessie, you'll need to add the backports repository to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main

16 October 2015

Vincent Sanders: Raspberries are not the only fruit

I have worked with ARM based systems for longer than I care to admit to myself. From the Acorn Archimedes 305 in 1987 through to modern 64bit systems I have seen many many changes in the ARM community. One big change has been the rise of the inexpensive single board computer (SBC).

Arguably the Raspberry Pi (RPi) was responsible for starting this trend. Before RPi there were small development boards available, I was even involved in producing some of them, none of these really became a big thing and were principally vehicles for silicon vendors to showcase their SoC in an accessible way. When I say accessible I mean for silicon vendors who were previously used to charging many thousands of pounds for their development boards now only charging hundreds.

Raspberry Pi 2 B+ in my case
In my opinion the RPi was a complete disruption to the SBC market. In early 2012 a complete ARM computer system could now be purchased for $35 ( 25) which was substantially cheaper than the best contemporary competitor the Beaglebone $89 ( 60)

To be clear, the reason the RPi succeeded (millions sold, household name) was not on price alone but also the large amount of good supporting software and how easy it was made for teachers and makers to use.

There were several areas that the RPi managed to change perceived issues into opportunities for using what was already available or third parties to provide. There were also several issues raised about the original RPi:
Some of these have been addressed since release as the foundation now sells cases, hardware revisions with much more powerful processors, pre-configured storage, cameras and displays. The important thing to note here though is the RPi has made the bare SBC a much more widely accepted product where all the non critical parts are considered "extras" and a lot is forgiven because of the price.

With that acceptance there have been many, many new SBC coming to market with better peripherals and increasingly competitive pricing. These are technically not clones as none of them use the Broadcom processor of the RPi but they often share many features and possibly even a compatible expansion header.

Banana pi in my case with a 2.5inch drive bay
The Banana Pi was one of these copycats which I acquired for a similar price as an RPi in 2014. The main processor of this system was a 1Ghz dual core Allwinner A20 processor (a considerable advance on the 700MHz single core of the original RPi) coupled to a gigabyte of memory. Additionally the board benefited from having SATA and gigabit Ethernet MAC which made for a much more versatile system. Various third parties filled in the missing peripherals including my own attempt at a case.

I acquired a cubietruck for the NetSurf project to use as a build node in their CI system this is again based on the A20 but with more memory and somewhat better peripheral support but at a substantial cost over the Banana Pi.

The most recent addition to this form factor is the introduction by Xunlong Software of the Orange Pi PC. This little board is the same footprint as the RPi2 B+ design but with differing connector placement. The processor is a quad core 1.6GHz Allwinner H3 with a gigabyte of memory and has has Ethernet and USB but no SATA.

Pile of Orange Pi PC in my cases
The big news about this board though is the price, at $15 ( 10) it resets the price expectations just as the RPi did before it. I was initially sceptical of the quality of the product (or if it would arrive at all) but I have acquired five of these boards and every one of them came well packaged, boxed and in a static bag, just like the RPi does, and they all worked.

I created a case design based on my RPi slimline case so they would be protected when piled up with all the other boards. The use of a DC barrel jack instead of micro USB for power is better in that the connector is more robust and intended for higher current draws but does mean additional leads are needed. There are, however, two flies in the ointment, neither are showstoppers but make the board a little more difficult to use.

Orange Pi in my case with heatsinkOne is a simple necessity of a substantial heatsink on the H3 processor. Initially I used a small 20 x 20mm copper heatsink (around 800mm square surface area) but this was insufficient under full load. I did not want to have to use a fan so I milled some slots into copper round bar, then cut off sections and faced them on a lathe. The completed design had more than 2200 square mm surface area and cost around $2.5 ( 1.5) in material (and a couple of hours in the workshop but that was fun and I made something)

The second issue and arguably much more serious is that of software. Let me be honest, it is dreadful, I mean very bad indeed. The images provided from the Orange Pi website are some of the worst examples of "do something quick" I have experienced.

Fortunately a user on the forums named loboris decided to create scripts that generate a Debian (and Ubuntu and Fedora) distribution images that can be installed from SD card. He relies on a somewhat patched 3.4 kernel full of Allwinner vendor changes and the inevitable binary blobs for the Marli GPU but the result does work.

I have had a few units acting as distcc compiler slaves for two weeks now at 100% CPU loading and they are still running. The processor does not get overly warm with the heatsink installed and Debian behaves just fine. The main caveat being that it is definitely not going to work if you try and update the kernel through packaging.

My ARM build farm as a pile of SBC
The state of software support and Xunlong Software relying on a forum user to complete their product does tarnish an otherwise impressive and possibly market changing SBC.

Perhaps I expect too much for fifteen bucks? I guess when the cost of the case, heatsink, cables and memory storage card is similar to the rest of the computer there is simply no margin left for anything else.

In conclusion hopefully this brief overview has provided some insight into what is available in this market and that the Raspberry Pi is indeed not the only option.

I finish with an image is of my ARM build farm consisting of every SBC I mention here (including a couple of RPi)

15 October 2015

Laura Arjona: Long summer story, Welcome team, and I am a Debian Developer now

Note: 2015/10/16: I need to add some links but I won t delay this more, posting now, will edit later. Summer ended long time ago, but believe me, I m still catching up with all the things that I began in June/July, all the things I left in August when I went holidays, and more things that appeared in August and September. This is a long overdue post, I hope you bear with me for waiting so long, and writing (now) so long too! June In June, I was 100% sure that I would not attend DebConf15 (well, I was 98% sure until then), and when the new Outreach Sponsorship grants were announced, I decided to write some mails to several Debian contributors, so they consider applying for the grant and attend DebConf (and maybe trigger some i18n/l10n meeting ). They kindly declined, and I understood their reasons, but also wondered what would have happened if the proposal would have come from somebody more official instead of a random contributor that they don t know. I also hoped that lots of other Debianites also write to newbies or not-yet-DD-contributors or non-packaging contributors to invite them to DebConf, and I hoped that they had better luck than me in convincing them :) July In July I usually work hard preparing the computer labs for next academic year at my workplace in the University, but I also have more free time in the long afternoons and evenings, since I don t sleep much, and there is not much to do outside with the summer hot. So I used that month to go on contributing to DebConf publicity and think a bit more about Debian and the other free software communities. I didn t put much time in advancing my selfhosting (no SSL yet in *.larjona.net! booooo!) but I decided to deep my toe in Sandstorm.io, and try to selfhost an instance ( http://lacaja.larjona.net ) and try Etherpad inside Sandstorm (since I failed in deploying Etherpad by myself in my jessie+nginx+postgres box). Sandstorm worked, and Etherpad was packaged in Sandstorm so it worked too; and I have my free-software-base pads now for writing and share. So I joined #sandstorm IRC channel since then, and there I learnt that Asheesh Laroia (who works in Sandstorm.io and is also a Debian Developer and was going to give a talk about Sandstorm.io in DebConf15) was offering mentorship for people wanting to learn Sandstorm packaging, and his proposal was to begin packaging Framadate. I also failed in selfhosting Dudle (prepared for Apache + FastCGI, couldn t make it work in my Nginx), so Asheesh s proposal looked suitable for me. We talked and decided to invest the rest of July and first days of August in learning to package Framadate. I learned a lot, but couldn t finish the task. I encountered many issues (setting my dev environment, and later trying to package), and we solved some of them but my time ran out. I posted my work in the list, and I hope that my feedback on the documentation and the issues I encountered helped Asheesh and the Sandstorm community. Framadate is packaged in Sandstorm.io now, Drew Fisher packaged it, not sure if my stuff was useful or not (it s been useful for me, for learning, at least). I ll talk more about Sandstorm.io in a future blog post updating on my selfhosting adventures. What I liked most was the kind of proposal of mentoring that Asheesh made. It was very detailed in every aspect: the task, the things you need to accomplish it, details about his availability for mentorship I try to be welcoming in the teams in which I participate, but the fact is that I fail in actually mentor, maybe because of not making specific proposals to people (until now, I was like Hi, newcomer! Go read this, this and this, and try for yourself any task you feel you like it, and come back if you have issues , la Debian ). This, plus the thoughts about my mails in June for diversity outreach in DebConf, made me feel the need of having a team where people willing to welcome newcomers share tricks and procedures, write together more specific proposals, and follow up the newcomers experiences in a regular way. I talked with Enrico Zini and we wrote down some notes for a Welcome Team in Debian; he said he would spread the word during DebCamp/DebConf and we would see what people thinks about it. August August came, and the day before going on holidays I was really tired: too much luggage to prepare, too many hours in front of the computer, and the usual stress of traveling; and I took the bad decision of signing some GPG keys of several Debianites that I met in July. I say bad decision because the lack of sleep showed its black magic and I accidentally deleted my secring.gpg file. I knew I had a backup but I didn t have too much time to invest and I didn t want to mess it with the backup too, and my laptop was going to stay at home, powered off, during the whole month, so I just went on holidays and left the GPG issue for later. The day after, meanwhile I was waiting in the airport for my boarding time, I received a mail accepting me as Debian Developer. Wow!! Really, I was not expecting that the process was already finished, I had interchanged several mails with my Application Manager (who happens to be the current DPL!) and I thought that his summer could be quite packed of Debian/DebConf work and my process could wait a bit. So it was a very happy news and very motivating after one month (July) full of free software work. On the other side, I was a bit scared: what type of Debian Developer are you, larjona, not capable to sign some GPG keys without breaking your setup?! but I answered myself well, I m the type of Debian Developer that has backups :) and then, with that mixed feelings of excitement and impostor syndrome, I took my plane and went on holidays, not expecting to touch any computer until the end of the month. August is probably the month in the year when I have more free time (holidays), but less time to dedicate to free software. I devote most of the month to visit family and stay with them, with no internet connection available or no free time to look at the mailbox or social networks or IRC But DebCamp and DebConf15 were happening during my holidays. And this DebConf15 was the first one in which I participated in the organization, and the first one in which I felt more than being a consumer of Debian videos . I could not follow the streamings, my only internet-capable device was my Android 2.x phone, but when I had wifi I fetched the mail, and during the nights, while everybody else was sleeping and I was laying on the terrace, below the sky full of stars, I could read batches of hundred of mails from debconf-discuss mailing list. And I could get some feeling from DebConf life, because I learned about the ad-hoc BoFs and discussions, the morning bike rides and swimming proposals, and the dancing classes, the i18m/l10n meeting, and many other things. I could answer some mail from time to time, and I also knew that a fellow Debianite from Madrid was going to bring me some stickers, maybe a t-shirt, and shake hands in my name to some persons. September and October September was about finishing reading all the mails and try to answer the pending ones, and preparing my computer to use my new Debian identity (and stop using larjona-guest). I still have some things to do, pending technical work, and some mails that I should have answered and I ve forgotten, for sure (if you sent me a mail that needs answer or would be fine that I answer (even if it was months ago!), please resend or ping me). I recovered my secring.gpg but and just now I added larjona@debian.org to the ID in my GPG key, but didn t signed the pending keys again (sorry dkg and holger! will catch up there soon). My subkeys expired and I m trying to find out how to proceed (they are in my FSFE SmartCard) :/ About the Debian teams, I ve resumed my work in publicity team (this year I ll try to be more involved, in Debian Project News in particular), partially in the website team, and recently I ve finished catching up with the Spanish translation of the website. I ve also joined the DebConf team again (for DebConf16, no matter I probably won t attend) and documented the Publicity task for DebConf, and I try to engage the mailing list and the IRC meetings. I finally could have time to watch some DebConf15 videos and Andreas Tille s talk ( Creating a more inviting environment for newcomers New experiences from MoM, SoB, Teammetrics ) helped me to step ahead in welcoming people with more useful stuff than Hi, newcomer! Go read this (general URLs), try for yourself whatever you like . I have made specific proposals for two people. In mid September I accepted an interview about Debian for a podcast with quite a lot audience (in Spanish), in which I explained the idea of the Welcome Team and offered myself as first-contact. Since then, two more people have contacted me and I have offered specific tasks I think are suitable for them. I also try to be more available in the IRC and offer some time spans for new contributors to DebConf to explain the git setup, the wiki, and all this stuff that looks more complicated than what it is. And I think that s all. My Debianite friend kindly brought me some stickers and a DebConf t-shirt, plus the organization t-shirt that the team gave me as present for my contributions in DebConf15. Neil McGovern kindly sent me a certificate of my new Debian Developer status (thanks!!), and it s posted in my wall at work. Here you are a photo! larjona_dd.JPG (Note: my wall is full of stickers and pieces of papers with things I need, things I like and things I use to explain my work (sometimes sarcastically/ironically ). Maybe some day I ll make a blog post about that!) I feel very proud and happy. Still, a lot of things to learn and work to do, but my intentions are: to keep on progressing (sometimes fast, sometimes slowly), never give up, and enjoy the multiple flowers I find in my way :) Thanks everybody! October and future Some other ideas/plans for the future (the ones I didn t say yet): Comments? If you want to comment you can use this pump.io thread.
Filed under: My experiences and opinion, News Tagged: Communities, Contributing to libre software, Debian, Developer motivations, encryption, English, Free Software, gpg, libre software

14 October 2015

Norbert Preining: On Lars Wirzenius, Mart n Ferrari, and Debian

Now that the tsunami that followed my recent blog post has passed, I can read through all the nice comments and blogs of other people. I didn t expect that just writing up some links to posts on LKML, plus adding my personal opinion on what has happened and about my interpretation concerning Debian could gather so much attention. Anyway, let us look at the blog posts written in the aftermath. debian-newspeak-coc In particular do I want to answer to two blogs: Lars Wirzenius blog and Mart n Ferrari s blog, both of which are excellent examples of insults. I also want to mention that although the previous two are bad examples, there are fortunately also those who are able to resist primitive insults, in particular Gunnar Wolf (direct link to the blog does not work), and Miriam Ruiz blog, which contradict my blog and propose a different view, without pulling the knife. Lars Wirzenius Let us start with Lars (ah sorry, I have to call him Wirzenius here, strange custom has suddenly popped up in Debian!):
I think Preining mis-characterises what happens on the Linux kernel mailing list, and in Debian, in free software development in general, and what Sarah Sharp has said and done. I continue to think he is wrong about everything on this topic.
I am very surprised that Lars^WWirzenius is in possession of a crystal ball that allows him to see and evaluate my attitude towards all these items, considering that I have presented links to posts on the LKML, and yes, my interpretation of the matter. Mind that the whole text amounts to about 130 lines on my screen, while my personal opinion was stated in two paragraphs of total 9 lines plus some interspersed comments. And in these maybe 20 lines I didn t make general statements about open source, kernel development etc etc. Lars, I know you have closed your blog for comments so I couldn t ask you but please, can you send me one of your crystal balls if you have more of them? At least he has managed to keep a bit of proper writing and disagreed with my statement on Debian (whether there is fun or not in Debian). He is of course free to do that, but please, don t rob me the right to state that I think Debian has changed. All this dispute centers around people not being capable to distinguish two things: One, being against the Code of Conduct due to the inclusion of administrative actions without clear definitions, and Two, being pro offensive behavior and and insults. Now, dear Lars^WWirzenius, please listen: I never advocated abusive behavior or insults, nor do I defend it. (Did you hear that!) I simply opposed the Code of Conduct as ruling instrument. And what kind of emails I got due to my opposition was far outside the Code of Conduct you are so strongly defending. So please, stay at the facts, and stop insulting me. Thanks. Mart n Ferrari Concerning Mart n I don t have much to say but please, stop spreading lies. You stated:
Once again, he s complaining about how the fun from Debian has been lost because making sexist jokes, or treating other people like shit is not allowed any more.
Could you please come up with a reference to this? Or are you just interpreting? I am very disappointed about this level of discussion between Debian Developers. You not even cared to answer my comment on your blog. Should I say something clear here you should be happy that this has not been written on a Debian mailing list, otherwise I hope the Code of Conduct hammer would hit you.
So yes, it seems that at least these two blogs underline exactly what my opinion is: Communication culture in Debian has changed to be more company-like. Probably due to the ever increasing amount of developers that are paid for their work on Debian (Ubuntu), the pressure to follow US company codes has taken a firm grip, so firm that even stating my diverging opinion is already enough to get branded. Good Future!

Lunar: Reproducible builds: week 24 in Stretch cycle

What happened in the reproducible builds effort this week: Toolchain fixes Scott Kitterman fixed an issue with non-deterministic Depends generated by dh-python identified by Santiago Vila and Chris Lamb. Lunar updated the patch against dpkg which makes the order of files in control.tar.gz deterministic using the new --sort=name option available in GNU Tar 1.28. josch released sbuild version 0.66.0-1 with several fixes and improvements. The most notable one for reproducible builds is the new --build-path option and $build_path configuration variable added by akira which allows to explicitly chose a given build path. Reiner Herrmann wrote a new patch for dh-systemd to sort the list of unit files in the generated maintainer scripts. Packages fixed The following packages became reproducible due to changes in their build dependencies: aoeui, apron, camlmix, cudf, findlib, glpk-java, hawtjni, haxe, java-atk-wrapper, llvm-py, misery, mtasc, ocamldsort, optcomp, spamoracle. The following packages became reproducible after getting fixed: Some uploads fixed some reproducibility issues but not all of them: Untested Patches submitted which have not made their way to the archive yet: reproducible.debian.net ProfitBricks once again increased their support for reproducible builds in Debian and in other free software projects by adding 58 new cores and 138 GiB of RAM to the already existing setup. Two new amd64 build nodes and 16 new amd64 build jobs have been added which doubles the build capacity per day and allows us to spot many kind of problems earlier. The size of the tmpfs where builds are performed has also been increased from 70 to 200 GiB on all amd64 build nodes. Huge thanks! When examining a package, a link now points to a table listing all previous recorded tests for the same package. (Mattia) The menu on the package pages has also been improved. (h01ger) Packages in the depwait state are now rescheduled automatically after five days. (h01ger) Links to documentation and other projects being tested have been made more visible on the landing page. (h01ger) To reduce noise on the team IRC channel five different types of notifications have been turned into mail notifications. The remaining ones have been shortened and the status changes have been limited to unstable and experimental. (h01ger) Maintainer notifications about status changes in a package will only be sent out once per day, and not on each status change. (h01ger) diffoscope development Some more experiments of concurrent processing have been made. None were good and reliable enough to be shared, though. Package reviews 48 reviews have been removed, 189 added and 23 updated this week. 9 FTBFS bugs were reported by Chris Lamb. Misc. h01ger met with Levente Polyak to discuss testing Arch Linux on Debian continuous test system with an easily extensible framework. The idea is to also allow testing of other distributions, and provide a nice package based view like the one for Debian.

Next.

Previous.