Daniel Pocock: When conspiracy theories come true
In a blog attempting to join the dots between Australia's intelligence services and the US PRISM program, I speculated that Australia has had extensive access to data harvested by PRISM.
My hunch has just been exposed rather dramatically today: Top secret data center under construction to house all our secrets.
"There has been no discussion of the project in Senate estimates committee hearings, and the public reports of Parliament's joint committee on intelligence and security make no reference to it."
The news story also suggests that the relationship is bi-directional, with data harvested from Australian ISPs cross referenced against US databases from Facebook and Google.
From a human rights perspective, the implications of this data sharing are much more dramatic than the NSA just snooping on US citizens within the US. While Australia often tries to portray the image that it is a safe and happy country, it has a dark side. Police are kept busy investigating politicians and Government officials: Prime Minister and her associates connected to a union slush fund, the central bank's banknote printing agency's chief executive and 8 colleagues on conspiracy charges and even a senator on good old fashioned shoplifting and assault charges
Exporting PRISM data to a human rights backwater
As an Australian, my own rights and those of my family are more heavily protected and respected living in Europe than if I lived in my country of birth. Australia does not have a bill of rights like the US (where PRISM data is harvested) or the European Convention of Human Rights. Once US data is exported to Australia, it can be used to support sinister programs like the indefinite detention of coloured people in sinister desert camps. Just this week, the Government left over 50 bodies of poor refugees for the sharks to eat. For someone with such a lack of a conscience, can you imagine them thinking twice about using PRISM data for unscrupulous purposes?
Is US PRISM data at greater risk?
Despite the stench of corruption and lip service to human rights, is there any hard evidence that PRISM data will be at greater risk if allowed into the hands of Australians?
Death by SMS
One former Australian official (having dual-citizenship with Sri Lanka) is accused of facilitating war crimes in the Sri Lankan civil war. At present he is Sri Lanka's ambassador at the UN, giving him the benefit of diplomatic immunity. When he was working for Australia, how much data did he have access to? Isn't it ludicrous that in the name of stopping terrorism, data may have been collected and handed to war criminals on a silver platter?
Behind enemy lines
Like James Bond in reverse, an Australian official was exposed unofficially engaging in a relationship with a Vietnamese spy colonel. In addition to the $20 million in bribery to win a bank note printing contract, is data being used as a tool to leverage trade negotiations, officially or otherwise? If an Australian official with top-secret clearance ends up under the control of a foreign agent, what is the risk that they would be exploited to obtain PRISM data?
Defence minister resignation in Chinese spy scandal
In 2009 Australia's defence minister was identified having close links to a Chinese-Australian business woman including all the usual little luxuries: first class flights, apartment rental and joint business deals with family members. He subsequently resigned. Little details were made public. How much PRISM data was directly available to political officials like the defence minister?
Disappearing Prime Ministers
The disappearance of a serving Prime Minister, Harold Holt, during the cold war remains an unsolved mystery to this day. People continue to ask was he swept out to sea or voluntarily whisked away in a Chinese or Soviet nuclear submarine. While Australia has traditionally had strong ties to Britain and the US, there have been exceptions to the rule. Fortunately this all happened before PRISM and Harold Holt red submarine rumours are no more well-founded than the UFO theories of his abduction.
Where did all the data go?
As the music industry has found out the hard way, digital data can be copied at will with the originator having no control.
The revelations that Britain and Australia are in on the PRISM shenanigans only confirms that this data is seen as a new form of currency for exchange in geo-political posturing. While used weapons take decades to work their way down the chain, data can spread at the speed of light.
My hunch has just been exposed rather dramatically today: Top secret data center under construction to house all our secrets.
"There has been no discussion of the project in Senate estimates committee hearings, and the public reports of Parliament's joint committee on intelligence and security make no reference to it."
The news story also suggests that the relationship is bi-directional, with data harvested from Australian ISPs cross referenced against US databases from Facebook and Google.
From a human rights perspective, the implications of this data sharing are much more dramatic than the NSA just snooping on US citizens within the US. While Australia often tries to portray the image that it is a safe and happy country, it has a dark side. Police are kept busy investigating politicians and Government officials: Prime Minister and her associates connected to a union slush fund, the central bank's banknote printing agency's chief executive and 8 colleagues on conspiracy charges and even a senator on good old fashioned shoplifting and assault charges
Exporting PRISM data to a human rights backwater
As an Australian, my own rights and those of my family are more heavily protected and respected living in Europe than if I lived in my country of birth. Australia does not have a bill of rights like the US (where PRISM data is harvested) or the European Convention of Human Rights. Once US data is exported to Australia, it can be used to support sinister programs like the indefinite detention of coloured people in sinister desert camps. Just this week, the Government left over 50 bodies of poor refugees for the sharks to eat. For someone with such a lack of a conscience, can you imagine them thinking twice about using PRISM data for unscrupulous purposes?
Is US PRISM data at greater risk?
Despite the stench of corruption and lip service to human rights, is there any hard evidence that PRISM data will be at greater risk if allowed into the hands of Australians?
Death by SMS
One former Australian official (having dual-citizenship with Sri Lanka) is accused of facilitating war crimes in the Sri Lankan civil war. At present he is Sri Lanka's ambassador at the UN, giving him the benefit of diplomatic immunity. When he was working for Australia, how much data did he have access to? Isn't it ludicrous that in the name of stopping terrorism, data may have been collected and handed to war criminals on a silver platter?
Behind enemy lines
Like James Bond in reverse, an Australian official was exposed unofficially engaging in a relationship with a Vietnamese spy colonel. In addition to the $20 million in bribery to win a bank note printing contract, is data being used as a tool to leverage trade negotiations, officially or otherwise? If an Australian official with top-secret clearance ends up under the control of a foreign agent, what is the risk that they would be exploited to obtain PRISM data?
Defence minister resignation in Chinese spy scandal
In 2009 Australia's defence minister was identified having close links to a Chinese-Australian business woman including all the usual little luxuries: first class flights, apartment rental and joint business deals with family members. He subsequently resigned. Little details were made public. How much PRISM data was directly available to political officials like the defence minister?
Disappearing Prime Ministers
The disappearance of a serving Prime Minister, Harold Holt, during the cold war remains an unsolved mystery to this day. People continue to ask was he swept out to sea or voluntarily whisked away in a Chinese or Soviet nuclear submarine. While Australia has traditionally had strong ties to Britain and the US, there have been exceptions to the rule. Fortunately this all happened before PRISM and Harold Holt red submarine rumours are no more well-founded than the UFO theories of his abduction.
Where did all the data go?
As the music industry has found out the hard way, digital data can be copied at will with the originator having no control.
The revelations that Britain and Australia are in on the PRISM shenanigans only confirms that this data is seen as a new form of currency for exchange in geo-political posturing. While used weapons take decades to work their way down the chain, data can spread at the speed of light.
With wheezy released, the floodgates are opened on a lot of debhelper
changes that have been piling up. Most of these should be pretty minor, but
I released one yesterday that will affect all users of
A few weeks ago, a new version of
If you would like more information about lldpd, please have a look
at
(This is something I did a few months ago, and I really should have noted down all the details then so I covered everything. However hopefully these notes will remind me enough next time.)
When I first wanted to reverse engineer a USB device that only had Windows drivers the "easy" option was to take a Windows machine, install
FD passing for DRI.Next
Using the DMA-BUF interfaces to pass DRI objects between the client
and server, as discussed in my previous blog posting on
Today I'm in bed, because I have le sniffles, and a painful headache. I'm using epiphany to write this post, via VNC to my main desktop, but I'm hating it as I've somehow evolved into a state where the following crashes my browser:
I'm on my way back from the Anti ACTA demo in London, at which I was asked to speak. I was good to see a number of people attend. I bumped into the wonderful Bridget Fox too!
Here's my speech:
My spare time has been limited lately, so progress on producing Mac-bootable Fedora install images has been a bit slow. Thankfully it looks like everything's gong to land in time for Fedora 17[1] so hurrah for that - all that's missing right now are the last couple of patches that make sure the boot picker displays useful labels on the drives.
The bug report
Simon McVittie reported in Debian bug
* This post is almost translation of my
The crowd of thousands gathered here to attend PreventaConf 2011 were abuzz over the unveiling of the culmination of 3 years of aimless arsing about^ww^w concentrated development which has led to the porting of dpkg to the
Women fainted, men wept openly, medical personnel were kept busy dealing with the many instances of heart seizure, multisensory hallucination and spontaneous combustion which accompanied this momentous event.
Much remains to be done.
I've been doing a bit of work recently on the
I recently added a
I decided to upgrade my notebook to SSD disk. The disk replacement went easy, installed fresh Debian on it and now comes the tricky part how to properly tune system to use as much as SSD can provide.
The first obvious thing for me is changing IO scheduler. But which one to choose? Most of howtos seem to suggest noop or deadline, without stating benefits of each. For now I've chosen deadline, without string coninfidence, that I'm doing the right thing.
The next major part of tips includes removing filesystem journalling. Well I think journalling exists for good reason and disabling it won't help me much (no, I really don't want to wait for fsck after each crash).
The last tweak seems to be using tmpfs for any temporary data (/tmp) or even for logs. For /tmp it might make sense, on cost of loosing available memory (or swapping it out, what really does not help the SSD anyway). However I definitely don't want to loose my logs on every reboot.
Maybe I'm missing some bit, but the only important thing seems to be the IO scheduler.

