My post yesterday on how Google gains financial benefit from vendor GPL violations contained an assertion that some people have questioned - namely, "unscrupulous hardware vendors save money by ignoring their GPL obligations". And, to be fair, as written it's true but not entirely convincing. So instead, let's consider "unscrupulous hardware vendors have economic incentives to ignore their GPL obligations".

The direct act of compliance costs money
Complying with the GPL means having the source code that built the binaries you ship. This is easy if your workflow involves putting source in at one end and getting binaries out at the other, but getting to that workflow means having a certain degree of engineering rigour. If your current build process involves mixing a bunch of known good binaries you got from somewhere but you can't remember where with a hacked up source tree that exists on someone's hard drive and then pushing all of these into a tool that only runs on Windows ME, before taking the resulting image and replacing chunks of it by hand, compliance is effectively impossible.

We all know that this is against all kinds of best practices and probably causes so many problems that it's more expensive in the long term, but retooling and hiring someone to oversee all of this takes time and money, and given the margins on many of these devices that's probably enough to make you uncompetitive for a couple of product cycles. Maybe you'll be in a better position afterwards, but you don't know that there'll be an afterwards.

Suppliers who don't provide you with the source code may be cheaper than those who do
You can't be in compliance if you don't have the source code in the first place. The same arguments that apply to the hardware vendors also apply to the people selling you your chips, so there's also an economic incentive for them to avoid complying. And there's an obvious incentive for you to choose the cheaper chipset, even if they don't comply.

Getting the source may cost money
Buying a chipset doesn't necessarily get you the software that makes it work - several silicon vendors will charge you for the SDK. But many of these devices are effectively reference platforms, so are basically identical from a hardware perspective. So if one of your competitors paid for the SDK, you can just dump the binaries off their machine, flash them onto your own boards and save yourself a decent amount of money. You obviously don't get the source, and nor do you have the standing to insist that the vendor whose binaries you misappropriated give you the source.

In the absence of enforcement, GPL compliance only works if it's the norm
Let's imagine two companies, A and B. Both build a tablet device, and buy the full SDK including source code. Both find a bunch of bugs in the vendor SDK and fix a different subset of them. They ship. A provides source code. B doesn't. B can now take A's bugfixes and incorporate them, resulting in a more compelling product without any significant extra cost. You now have two products that can sell for the same price, but B's is better. A would need to prove that B copied their bugfixes rather than simply fixing them themselves , which probably isn't going to happen.

In a larger market, if B is the only vendor who does this then their advantage isn't large - some of A's work is misappropriated by B, but A does benefit from the engineering work contributed by C, D, E, F and G. A combination of social pressure and legal threats may bring B into compliance. But if infringement is the norm, A has no incentive at all to release the source - by doing so they'll be helping not only B, but also C, D, E, F and G. Everyone undercuts A and they go out of business quite quickly.

Moral: In the absence of enforcement, if everyone else is infringing, a single company who complies is at a disadvantage.

If compliance cost nothing then everyone would do it
You can argue that cheap tablets from China are infringing simply because nobody knows better. But what's HTC's excuse? They've clearly decided that there's a benefit in holding back their source code releases[1], balancing this against the risk of being sued. They know full well what they're doing. If compliance was free they'd ship the source at the same time as they shipped the binaries. Other significant vendors are also fully aware of their obligations but choose to ignore them anyway.

Summary
There are economic incentives to infringe the GPL, and therefore (all else being equal) an infringing device can be sold for less money. All else being equal, a cheaper device will sell more units. More sales means more devices selling adverts for Google. Google makes more money because Android vendors infringe the GPL.

Edited to add:

But don't just take my word for it - Jean-Baptiste Queru says the same here (search for "scrubbing" - is there any way to link directly to a Google plus comment?)

[1] The usual argument is "We will release the source code within 120 days", implying that it's a process that takes time and we should just be patient. Every single time I've started making threatening noises, the source has appeared within a week.

comments

Do you believe that there will come a major inflation in the next months or years? If not, you can stop reading this article. Otherwise lets think what would be the right thing to do now.

Even though some three months have passed since DebConf11 has successfully ended, I still wanted to give you just a glimpse on how some parts were played through the eyes of a lunatic (read: organizer). Of course, blog post can t come close near of explaining anything but at least it should give some insight and hopefully some pointers to the future DebConf organizers. If you don t feel like reading this much text you can listen to last episode of This Week In Debian podcast and after it just head to Beginning of the end part. DebConf11 First of all I d like to apologize if I offended or hurt anyone in this whole process as it wasn t my intention and during DebConf organization this is nothing irregular, for you to get hurt or you hurting somebody else. One thing that got stuck with me this whole time is when Mart n Ferrari approached me after I did bid proposal of Bosnia/Herzegovina for DebConf11 back on DebConf9 and told me you have no idea what you just got yourself into I played cool and said something along the line of coure I do and boy did I lie. During DebConf organization you re bound to make some of your decisions instantaneously in which you ll lose something, the most you can do is assess what s the thing you can cut the cord on, even though if that thing or a person for that matter might have meant something to you. You ll lose things, relationships, friendships, contacts at the times sense of humor and maybe even common logic. Some of it comes back to you, some the very next day and for some it may take longer. Some of it was lost irreversibly, but even in that case it wasn t lost and could even be traced to some other cause. One thing that I m thankful for is that I didn t lose, not lose but even get distanced from those close to me, and that I didn t lose guy who was with me in this from very first day, my right hand, my partner in crime Velimir ( aroundthfur ). It s not even losing I m talking about here, because even by losing you re gaining something and this is part of your everyday life, it s just that your life frame kinda gets stuck on fast forward button. So once the ride s over you may feel bit dizzy asking yourself what just happened. During this time I was also contacted by Google recruiter regrading software engineer internship but to make a long story short I didn t make it due to my heavy involvement and my lack of time (read: fail). But I don t find this as losing either, first time I was contacted by them, next time they ll be contacted by me maybe even for different position this time (project manager? . Even this DebConf wasn t our first bid we lost DebConf7 bid to Edinburgh, but it is perseverance that got us here. The moral I m trying to tell here is if you have a goal never back down from it. What I found to be our biggest problem and what I personally found as most painstaking in all of this was having and reporting to so many different sides and different groups while trying to keep them in same communication channel. Even my right hand (Velimir) was apart from me (Vienna), then place where two of us are coming from is not the place where DebConf is getting organized in. As in the end we ended up having all the parties separated and pulling to their own side, from Government of Republika Srpska to NGO to Debian to local team and to those who remained as undeclared . Option of cutting the cord in this case was missing as these were the components that DebCon11 was made of. Of course this meant you ll be missing workforce and there were days you d wake up driving >= 200 km/h (literally) with one hand on the wheel, other on the phone and your other right hand (Velimir) holding your RedBull. But you wouldn t do this just because you had to and there was no one else to do it, you d do it because you re responsible for the sake of the project and won t be just sitting there because by some unwritten hierarchy rules you re supposed to sit and supervise things. I d advise you do the same thing when you see there s no one else to do something, even if it means making coffee for one of the teams. I m not trying to scare you away from organizing your own DebConf, on the contrary after all I ve been through in past two years if someone asked me would I do it if I knew it was like this, without a doubt my answer would still be fsck yea . All the previous DebConf organizers told me about all of this, but why didn t I give up? For the same reason you won t give up and for the same reason why we believe in the same goal. If anything this is one of the stories you ll want to tell your kids about so When I was your age I used to sleep naked in the snow would turn to When I was your age I organized DebConf11 in Maybe this blog post wasn t even necessary and some things weren t supposed to be said, I guess sometimes I just can t shut up For those who were on DebConf11 I hope you enjoyed and had a great time, otherwise I m saying all of this in vein. As organizer all you see is problems and you miss most of the confrence, but by what I know there are 11 candidate bids for DebConf13 and for me hearing that tells me the results of our efforts. DebConf11 after effects I could write a whole novel about this, but to keep it as short as possible, for last two years as a side project I was working on an idea of Government or some of its institutions migrating to Linux. At first I was somewhat loud about it, then after Microsoft heard about it and after they tried stopping the idea by trying to scare me by trying to interfere with my private life; as that didn t work its lobbyist came even near of obstructing the whole conference within the Government. For the sake of the conference, I convinced the Government that by supporting DebConf it doesn t mean they need to move to Linux and publicly stopped talking about it. I also convinced them that our only goal was to have successful conference and promote alternative options and open ideas. I wasn t lying as I saw this as new opportunity of them concluding on their own why they should or shouldn t not move, the better conference was the more chances of success we had. That s why I tried pushing as many representatives from various companies as in this case we would use reverse psychology where basically no one or few know what Linux or Debian for that matter is, but everybody knows who Google is, so if you have participants from i.e: Google or Austrian E-Health care system talking about how they are using your technology is better way to explain what s it all about really. Eventually Microsoft even had their first ever conference in Bosnia/Herzegovina and you wanna take a wild guess where it was held? In the end we had a great conference, after the conference we were the ones that were approached by some big local companies interested in future co-operation and in the end a meeting with Mark Shuttleworth and President along with the core of Government was scheduled. Topic? Migration to Linux. For me personally this meeting went better then I could possibly even picture it, many topics were discussed and basically it was up to us/me to make a draft of the project plan and submit request for proposal to the Government. There was still some lobbying but it seemed as it all disappeared, runway was clear and open for the lift off. Necessary contacts with potential future partners were made and before any meetings were scheduled I announced I ll be taking a short break. I missed this years vacation, for matter of a fact I missed going to a vacation for last two years. I decided going to Dubrovnik for few days, just to recollect my thoughts, recompile my kernel and switch to lower gear as I was stuck in 6th gear for way too long. Beginning of the end Being on this vacation , even if it was only for few days this gave me an opportunity to look at it all from a different prospective, different angle and that s when it came to me. I realized that even before I was finished with one project without even realizing I was already involved with another one, one that would take much more time and one that might leave me wondering ~5 years later with question what if? After all if get involved with something I m not going to back out, it s either failure is not an option or I won t start doing it at all. Even if it brought me everything I wanted, how would you know if that s what you wanted if you haven t thought about it first? Having DebConf for the first time in this region already showed some (positive) results, but for seeing the actual results it may take a bit longer. We sowed the seeds now the best thing we can do is leave them as it is and see if anything grows out. Of course I could lean over them and protect them from any natural or any other type of hazards, this would also mean when I m not around it wouldn t know how to protect itself on its own. Besides all, interfering with natures way of doing things is rarely a good option. I consider myself to still be relatively young and threatening my well being over safe keeping some seeds and watching over if they grow into something or not doesn t really seem that attractive to me. Maybe one day I ll decide to leave the land, maybe I won t even get to see if anything grows out after all. Maybe some day someone will find this fruit, recognize its worth and claim it as it s own, maybe over time everybody forgets everything and even that this land once was a fertile ground. Maybe, maybe not. I m still a student, I was supposed to graduate last year but I took less classes last year so I wouldn t snap under all the pressure. That s why this year I have less classes and am supposed to graduate in May, that s less then a year until then and I just want to devote some time to myself, figure out what I want with me life, learn the things I want to learn, do the things I want to do. I want to turn back to working on Eclipse, I have some good plans for Eclipse and Android developers, lately I ve been slacking off way too much but I think I have a good excuse In the end, all I know is that I still want to change the world, whether it s doing that inside of Google or in my own company, or some third place; or I ll just be laughing at this statement only time will show. I m hoping that now with all of this out of me I can finally finish the DebConf11 chapter of my life.

A continuation of my intermittent series on Emdebian and prompted by a query from Paul Wise, I thought I'd cover some of the uses to which a device running Emdebian can be put. It is a bit long this one...

So, yes, there are general purpose computers which could run Emdebian but there are common features amongst general purpose computers:

1. Lots of different tasks must be supported - lots of different packages installed, each user could quite easily use a distinct set of packages from another user.


2. Multi-user support - even if any one machine is only used by one person, a general purpose computer must have support for adding another user - not just a system user, a real user with a login, shell, possibly bookmarks and browser history etc.


3. Connectivity - general purpose computers (and that includes mobile phones) must connect to a variety of other computers to be at all useful.


4. Multi-modal data input - there needs to be support for a mouse and a keyboard or touchscreen and just as likely, software support for accessibility interfaces like an on screen keyboard and switch inputs.


5. Storage for user data - the system admin can't know how much data users are going to add and if it is general purpose, it's probably going to support media players, image viewers, even office software. The data files managed and written by such software tend to be large and tend to accumulate into large collections. This means that a general purpose machine cannot anticipate the full storage requirements, so has to allow plenty of room for user data storage. If there's so much storage space available, why use an OS which is primarily designed to take up less space? Just use the full version, Debian.

Now compare with the common features of special purpose or single-purpose computers:

1. Single task only - a splash screen (without support for removal) covers all the boot information, the single task starts as a daemon and if the user quits the task, the task initiates a shutdown, not quit. Every effort is made to prevent the task from exposing the underlying OS, including auto-restarts if it does crash.


2. Single-user support - indeed, user is not the typical user. user in this case is a non-login user without a shell, created by the postinst of the task package purely to support running the task without root privileges (because if the task doesn't need privileges, it shouldn't retain privileges).


3. Single mode input - don't expect these machines to support 105 key keyboards. You'll be lucky to have 5 keys which are really just buttons. The button won't just enter 'J' into the machine, it will fire off a command to charge your bank or start a drill or shutdown a malfunctioning service. (Each button will often be multi-functional as well, depending on context). Some devices will replace the mouse with a touchscreen but many are fitted in places where touchscreens simply won't survive, where keys have to be able to withstand being submerged in water (or oil) for hours. Many machines simply won't have mouse support at all. Many will not have any typical external connectors. Indeed, units which go into dirty or wet environments certainly won't have standard external connectors of any kind. Think boats and factories. Internal battery packs with custom hot-fit replacements, buttons encased in 4mm of clear plastic, screens viewable only through protective mesh / filters.


4. Restricted connectivity - if the task doesn't need networking, no networking hardware is fitted. If the task doesn't need USB, no USB hardware is fitted. If the task doesn't need serial connections, there will probably be an internal serial connector but also a Warranty void if removed sticker. Don't expect an RS232 inside the case either, this will be a flat cable connector which you'll need to attach to a breakout board which correctly connects the cable wires to the RS232 port pins. That mapping is not standardised (why would it? only service engineers are approved to use it.)


5. Constrained user data - the task is in complete control and determines what the user can view, store and access. Storage can be expensive and a power drain, so if the task doesn't need Gb of storage, don't fit the machine with Gb of storage. Profit.

So what are these mysterious single-use computers running Emdebian? It's hard to tell because the task has no particular reason to tell the user anything about the OS. Perhaps a different way to phrase the same question would be: Why use a general purpose OS for a special purpose computer?.

• Single task does not mean single process - doing one thing can involve doing a couple of different things behind the scenes, so a multi-tasking kernel and userspace is extremely useful in providing a responsive machine without wasting money on unnecessarily powerful hardware. Multithreading support is also valuable.


• Software reuse makes good business sense - why write a single-usage operating system when the device needs a multi-tasking OS anyway and suitable ones already exist?


• Minimal software - no point packaging Xorg or GNOME when the user interface is a tiny QVGA framebuffer and the device only has 128Mb of RAM. By all means get the core system (cairo, pango, Qt, gettext, dpkg) from Emdebian but the actual code which performs the task of the device will generally be bespoke and, yes, that generally means proprietary, closed source, utterly non-free. This is where GNU/Linux wins over iOS and Windows - the graphical software is trivially separated from the core software and tested as such. If your device has only monochrome text output (and plenty of those still exist), what possible reason is there to use a graphical toolkit? Use the multi-tasking support of the OS to handle inter-process communication and understand the licensing - job done. Again, these devices have deliberately limited storage capacity, the smaller the OS, the lower the cost of the device, within certain constraints.


• Debugging compatibility - this is the big one. It's hard debugging the task software on device with the differences in architecture and connectivity. Why not use the same packages on the same OS on the development machines as on the devices? All the power and all the screen resources to properly investigate bugs, simple way to provide an emulator for translation support and other activities (like user interface training). There will always be bugs which have to be debugged on device - timing issues, hardware issues - but why not make at least a proportion of the likely bugs easier to fix by using binary compatible libraries on both the big desktop machines and the small devices?

This is why Emdebian Grip is popular for these machines - because Emdebian Grip is binary compatible with the equivalent Debian suite and when a bug appears in the high level user interface, it is much easier to debug that on the desktop than on device. Debian stable is a fantastic OS for commercial development - the stability of the OS makes detection of interface bugs much easier. It is rare that developers have to investigate whether bugs in their UI come down to a bug in the underlying OS. That saves time.

The machines themselves? I'm sure others can come up with other examples but these are some which come to my mind (no particular order):

• Control interfaces - solar power controllers, robot controllers - anywhere that a low power board can monitor responses from other machines and do something intelligent about reported errors. Temperature limit responses, pressure limit responses, encoding all of those in assembly or VHDL is hard, so use a system which provides for more creative result handling.


• Electric car charging points - very simple user interface, single task which doesn't complicate things by expecting the user to tap on something to start the main application - just process the card details, charge the customer and provide power.


• Similarlyelectronic point of sale devices - EPOS. The staff on the shop floor don't want to be waiting for an X server to start up and then using a menu. The device starts up and runs one task (checking barcodes, printing labels, counting stock), if the task is shutdown, the machine shuts down.


• Communication aids - my area, a machine which presents a simple UI on non-standard framebuffer hardware, lots of audio output but little other connectivity. Resilience is very important, so solid state is vital but why provide more solid state storage than the device can actually needs?

Anywhere where the device simply needs to DoTheRightThing in a variety of unpredictable circumstances, you're going to need a general purpose OS to gather the data and produce the right result. Anywhere where the device has only a single task, you're going to want to not provide access to the rest of the system. There's no point providing "general purpose access" when the device doesn't have "general purpose hardware". There's no point fitting general purpose hardware if the device does not use it. That is a waste of money, a waste of resources and causes unnecessary delays if one component or other becomes unobtainable or changes behaviour. Limit your exposure to hardware bugs and get the product out to the user more quickly and more reliably, everyone is happy. Fit non-standard hardware and you can fit custom hardware which better matches the profile of the device usage - why use standard speakers capable of CD quality across a vast frequency range when the device only makes very very loud alert noises which can be done at lower sample rates and with narrow range, high amplitude, speakers.

There are all sorts of estimates for the number of computers now in the average Western home. It's worth noting that the vast majority of those computers are not PCs or laptops or even game consoles and routers - all instances of general purpose machines with general purpose access / connectivity. A lot of the computers in your home are embedded in machines like white goods, media controllers (set top boxes and the like). Some of these will still use low level firmware written entirely in assembly or COBOL. More complex ones already have a general purpose OS inside yet constrain that OS with a simple, user-friendly interface which is tailored to the hardware actually fitted. It might be cool to connect to your set top box over Bluetooth but really, is that actually going to sell more units? Only if there are other high-end services written for the device which the average customer won't want to see pushing up the price of the base unit. Some machines (particularly in automotive uses) will need to be using Real Time operating systems and Safety Critical operating systems but even some of those are based on general purpose systems - just old versions which have been thoroughly tested.

Finally, consider that for a lot of these devices, the customer is not you. The customer is another business who then put the device into something else which is installed into a factory production line which produces something which goes into creating a consumer product you find in Tesco or on Amazon or bundled in with another service like your TV/broadband contract. There is absolutely no reason for these devices to provide general purpose computing to you, even if the device itself is part of something else which can provide such services.

Today, German politicians decided, that Germany be liable for up to 211 billion Euros for the debts of other EU countries. Or, put differently: the politicians put the money of the current and future generations on the line for a country that lived way above its capabilities for too many years. When the EU was founded, it was explicitly stated that no country needs ever be liable for any other. I understand that politics is hard, and letting Greece (and others) fall down might carry heavy, unforeseen consequences. Also, I understand that the Greek people are mostly innocent in all this and that the fault lies with their politicians and other corrupt entities in the nation. However, what s happening these days is beyond the comprehensible. If I were in a non-Germany EU country, I d rejoice and continue making debts. It is likely that this won t be the last time that our politicians cave in to pressure by other nations who have a lesser understanding of budgeting and saving. Since I am German, I can only shake my head, look to Berlin and ask myself whether this is the final straw that broke the camel s back. How the heck do the people over there ever want to regain the trust of their people? Politics has become the game of pleasing each other, who cares about the people? And the German politicians are (once again, remember credit default swaps?) at the forefront of this stupidity. To me, there is only one solution to Greece s debts: make sure that what happened can never happen again, and then cut the debts, or slice them in half. Let the banks carry the weight, for it was them who gave out the loans too liberally. And if this forces a bank or two to default, let it happen, for fuck s sake. The consequences might be dire, but they ll subside. And that s surely better than trying to pretend that we can keep juggling this heavily inflated financial system. Instead, the executives, elected to carry the trust of the people, are setting precedents for other countries to follow Greece, for it is likely that they wil be bailed out. By us. That is not the way to teach anyone the basics of economy: you can only spend as much as you earn, without exceptions. Debts will only come around to hurt you. I could puke. NP: Godspeed You Black Emperor!: F# A#

A couple of weeks ago my old laptop decided to rest forever, and I was forced to impose some economic pressure onto the consumption of the planet resources by acquiring a new one. Fortunately this happened while I am still here in Canada, where it is reasonably cheaper to get a decent laptop than it is in Brazil. Although I did not have the budget I wanted for buying a really kick ass laptop, I was able to buy a decent one, an HP Pavilion G6 1B74CA. I went on 4 different shops with a USB stick loaded with Debian Live to check whether all the hardware would work ok. I always asked one of the salesman before rebooting the laptops, but it was funny to see the reactions of the different employees who came by to check what I was doing: some of them barely noticed that GNOME was not Windows XYZ, and and some asked whether I was hacking the laptops. Unfortunately, I wasn t able to find a single laptop in which the wireless worked out of the box with the Squeeze kernel, which sucks. I searched over the internet a lot, and it seems that even the vendors recommended by the FSF do not provide laptops with wireless cards that work without non-free blobs. Other issue I had was with the Intel graphics. After the kernel enables the modesetting, the backlight goes to the minimum and it looks like you have no video. There are a couple of workarounds in the internet, and the one in which you add acpi_osi=Linux acpi_backlight=vendor to the kernel parameters makes the laptop turn on by itself in the morning. This is probably caused by broken ACPI handling in the BIOS, who almost always is written by people on crack. The other issues I had were related to the keyboard. First, the BIOS came by default with Access keys mode enabled, which means that by default pressing F2-F12 actually activated the multimedia keys instead of the real function keys. It was disapointing to hit F12 and have my wireless turned off. After disabling this in the BIOS setup, it was OK. Well, not quite: for some reason, Fn+F4 did not generate the expected keycodes. After some research on the internet, I found a interesting Ubuntu bug . It seems that the latest and greatest version of Windows starts its video setup application via the Meta+P shortcut ( Meta is the actual name of what Windows people call the Windows key ). Guess what the morons writing the HP BIOS did yes, they made the keys Fn+F4 (where F4 has video setup as its multimedia key ) generate the keycodes for Meta+P! It would be a lot easier for everyone in the world if the people at Microsoft just make their stuff listen to both Meta+P and the video setup keycode, which is generated by every laptop out there, to activate the Windows screen setup thing. This way the very smart dudes writing BIOS at HP wouldn t need to make Fn+F4 generate the keycodes for Meta+P and break every single desktop that is not procuced at Redmond.

As I wrote in part 1, my family and I were in Mexico recently. Today I ll write about the places we stayed. We spent most of the time in a room we rented in a private home in Guadalajara. My friend Jonathan had found it for us, and it was not too far from his home. The owner was a grandmother, and across the courtyard was more family, including a granddaughter close in age to our boys. They enjoyed playing together. It was really a perfect arrangement for us. There s no better way to be a part of local life when traveling than to stay in someone s house. Here s our bedroom: Notice the glass slats in the window it s a nifty, though not airtight, alternative to our regular windows. More on that later. More of the inside: We had a bit of a language barrier while in Mexico, though never anything significant. My Spanish vocabulary started with almost nothing and I reached maybe a few dozen words by the time we left. Terah knew some Spanish from high school and college, and my friend was fluent. Our hostess also knew a little English. But we all communicated well enough. Terah or Jonathan would help translate when needed. As I d seen before, the children would say things to each other, but never seemed to be bothered that their playmates didn t understand what was being said. They just had a great time anyhow. On Sunday afternoon, when we came back from our activities, there was a buzz of activity. Children everywhere outside, running and playing. Adults too, chatting. We didn t know exactly what was happening, but sent Jacob and Oliver out to play anyhow (which they were eager to do). The yard was enclosed by a wall, so children could pretty much run around without lots of supervision. Eventually they were invited to have some birthday cake (ah ha!) it was one of the children s birthday. Jacob and Oliver actually were served the first two pieces of cake (as the amigos ). Everyone seemed so friendly, warm, and welcoming. Each morning started with breakfast at the house, followed by a scene like this: That s Jacob and Oliver, looking to see if Jonathan had arrived for the day yet. I often noticed in Mexico that I was unsure if I was inside or outside. Here in Kansas, we can have a string of summer days that each exceed 110F (44C) or a few weeks in winter that never get above 15F (-9C), even in daytime. And then we have some pleasant days like right now, too or rain blowing sideways at 60MPH. In general, we spend a lot of effort keeping the outside, well, out. It is quite clear that this isn t a problem in the Guadalajara area. Some restaurants could have been described as buildings with large, open windows so you feel a lot of breeze while inside. Or perhaps as a simple shade roof with a few supports on the edges, so you re never really inside at all (sort of like going under a small shade tent outdoors). To the extent that windows could close, many of them couldn t be made airtight. It was clear that in that area, people spend more energy finding ways to invite the outdoors in rather than to keep it out, thanks to the year-round moderate climate. Perhaps the best example of this surprised me one evening. We were arriving in Guanajuato, an old silver mining town in the mountains, and were going to spend the night at Hotel Socav n, which had been recommended to us by a local friend of Jonathan s. From the street, the hotel looked tiny. But walk in, and you get in this old-looking (and feeling) entry tunnel: That s the front desk, apparently cut out of it there on the right. We asked to see some of the rooms before buying apparently a normal request around there. The innkeeper agreed, and gave us keys and directions to find them on the third floor. It included going up 2 flights of stairs, passing through a courtyard, and going up another flight. It was after dark, and the hotel was dimly lit something I was fine with. I thought we were stepping out into a beautiful atrium with some potted plants in the center of the building something fairly common in some nicer hotels. Until I felt rain on my head. Then I realized that the courtyard, which began two floors up from the street, was open to the sky. Beautiful! Here was the view from out room door: And down the hall : After getting home, a Google happened to turn up some reviews of this hotel. I was so annoyed at what some people wrote! One person gave them only 3 stars because they didn t have air conditioning, had poor water pressure, and lots of steps . Someone else complained of the dark entry tunnel something I couldn t help but smiling about the moment I entered. My review, which should hopefully get posted soon, is certainly different. I gave them 5 stars, because if I wanted a Super 8 with generic fluorescent lighting and the same layout as thousands of other hotels, I would have gone to Nebraska instead of Mexico. Most homes and local hotels in the region don t have air conditioning because they don t need it, and that s just how water pressure is in Mexico (due to needing to pump it from municipal supplies to private storage tanks overhead). And who doesn t appreciate entering a hotel through a brick tunnel? Ah, sigh This should give you some idea of the kind of travel we like: part of the point of traveling is enjoying the differences from home, and I think it is a huge mistake to be annoyed at everything that is different. Enjoy the differences! Finally, here s a photo of the staircase in the home we stayed in, which I thought was fascinating:

This was the second most rainy day of the year, so far. 28 hours of solid rain and counting. Good time to take stock of the water situation here at the cabin after a year's experience. The springs were as seasonal as I'd feared. After running strongly all Spring, the main spring ebbed and died in the Summer months. By mid-July there was no remaining source of potable water. If I had not been away so much over the summer it would have been worse. As it was, I needed only twenty gallons of water hauled from neighbor Lee's well. The large cistern was filled in a single night during the most rainy period this Spring, and provided wash water for two months of the summer, and that only lowered it by a quarter. So I could have been less sparing with it, and not relied so much on rain water catchment for supplimental wash water. Today I replaced the pump, so I can use the pressure tank and have running water in the house. I could have done this earlier, but what can I say; I enjoy hauling buckets of water, when it doesn't involve breaking ice. In the winter when there's firewood to haul instead, I'll enjoy the indoor plumbing. Also today, I may have finally fixed the pipe to the large cistern properly, so it won't only fill at the heaviest rain times. Along with the ability to cross-pump water from the small to the large cistern, it should be easier to keep it filled, and I might be able to reduce the turbidity enough that it's potable eventually. Will see. I don't live in a dry region, but this is a relatively dry place for the area. It's been interesting to get a taste of what it'd be like to live somewhere where water is actually scarce.

Amazon has recently renewed a voucher for their AWS cloud services. It is enough to keep 4 machines up 24/7 for two years ... or to experiment with this and that with some confidence not to be surprised at the month's end. Thank you, Amazon. And you all, if there is something you want to experiment with, tell me to start it ... or inform me / pressure me to finally find out how I can delegate my credentials.

Something I would like you all to play with is to start shopping through the many links to your right, where most of you should find an Amazon store close to you. Tell me what country is missing. There is sadly no earnings for what I buy personally, but for everything I get someone else to buy through those links, there is up to 5%. This shall pay someone's travel to the next sprint, so I hoped. But so far it is only the tons of canned dog food my wife bought through Amazon (which is great, she did not need to carry it and it was a free delivery), that contributed to it all with 6 Euros. I do not see who bought what or what is bought in a single order (well, there are not too many orders), but I see what was bought ... not that it matters much, but you should know.

Just recently I discovered the Amazon personal Shops, so I created a Debian Med Shop. This allows to mention various products easily. And we can use it to point each other to some good stuff that has crossed our ways. I put a pointer to "The Cell" there, which may be obvious to many of you, but it is not for the typical IT guy approaching bioinformatics outside the UK/US bookmarket. And Kensington stopped my RSI problems ten years back, together with Microsoft, admittedly. What is missing? We should possibly have more of such shops, but give me feedback on how easy it is to switch to one's home Amazon. An I should then check if indeed one gets any earnings assigned when the Amazon is changed - would be positively surprised if so.

All this Amazon partnering has the gigantic disadvantage that it is personal to me. So you need to trust me that I indeed forward the money. I can of course just paste the summary Amazon gives me, but you still need to trust me. And you need to send me the items you wish to see in the shop and ... annoying. Please comment with better ideas ... and if in need of something consider doing that shopping through the links to the right ... it might accumulate to something and help the one or other patch / new package during the next Debian Med Sprint on Bioinformatics.

I got a call from Mum today to inform me that my grandmother had passed away last night, Brisbane time, at 94 years of age. If you want to get all genealogically correct, she's technically my step-maternal grandmother, but she's the grandmother I spent the most time with, growing up, so I'm not going to split hairs. It's come as a bit of a shock, because despite having had progressively worse dementia for probably over a decade, she's been in incredibly good physical condition. I think it was in her 70's that she had a heart valve replaced, and I for one had been expecting that to be the thing to wear out and take her down slowly. I last saw her in the flesh in January, when the above photo was taken, and more recently a few weeks ago on Skype. She was recently moved from an aged-care hostel in Toowoomba to a nursing home in Brisbane, as her dementia had progressed beyond the point that she could be cared for in the previous facility. Mum had visited her earlier in the day yesterday, and she was fine, but apparently the staff found her unconscious at around 5pm when they went to get her for dinner. She was taken to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital where it was determined she had suffered from a stroke, and she passed away later that evening at around 11:30pm. So all in all, she had a very good innings, and of all the ways to leave this world, this was one of the quicker and more painless ways to do it. That's the problem with a quick exit - it's usually completely unexpected. It's looking like the funeral will be on Friday, and I've got a flight tentatively booked to leave on Wednesday and get in on Friday morning and return again on Monday. At the time I arranged this, I'd completely forgotten that I was flying to Calgary on Monday night to babysit the son of friends, while they go to the US Consulate for a visa appointment. Fortunately this travel doesn't conflict with that travel, it just means I'll be away from work for longer, and spending a lot of time inside pressurized tubes. I'm fairly confident with all of the short international trips, I'm going to look like a drug mule or something, and someone's going to thoroughly cavity search me.

Yesterday, as I was trying to charge my N900, something bad happened. I must have applied slightly too much pressure when I tried to enter the battery charger into the micro-USB port, and I heard something crack. Next thing I know, I see the micro-USB port is not where it's supposed to be anymore, and it won't charge anymore, at all. This isn't something that's unfixable, but it's not something that's in my skillset to fix. So I'll need to send it in for repairs, or some such. Since the battery was almost flat, and the red traffic light behind which I'd been waiting at the time switched to green, I just switched it off to save battery life, and moved on. When I got home, I tried switching it on again so that I could take a backup of the device before sending it in for repair and/or finding someone to fix it, but the battery was apparently already quite dead at the time -- I could boot it, I could start the backup application, but around the time I pushed on the 'new backup' button, the phone decided that the battery level was just too low and powered itself down. D'oh. So, here's a silly question: Does anyone have the necessary skills required to help me solder the micro-USB connector back on? Alternatively, does anyone have a (charged) Nokia BL-5J battery that I can borrow for a few minutes so I can create a backup and store it on the micro-sd card? Your help is very much appreciated. Mean time, I'll be off buying a temporary replacement phone now.

Much of my academic research involves statistics and crunching through big datasets. To do this, I use computer clusters like Amazon's EC2 and a cluster at the Harvard MIT Data Center. I will frequently kick of a job to run overnight on the full HMDC cluster of ~100 computers. Some of my friends do so nearly every night on similar clusters. Like many researchers and engineers, it costs me nothing to kick off a big job. That said, computers consume a lot of energy so I did a little back-of-the-envelope calculation to figure out what the cost in terms of resources might add up to. An overnight job that uses a 100 computer cluster might use 800 computer-hours. Although power efficiency varies hugely between computers, most statistical analysis is CPU intensive and should come close to maximizing power consumption. According to a few sources [e.g., 1 2 3], 200 watts might be a conservative estimate of much a modern multi-CPU server will draw under high load and won't include other costs like cooling. Using this estimate, the overnight job on 100 machines would easily use 160 kilowatt hours (kWh) of energy. In Massachusetts, most of our power comes from coal. This page suggests that an efficient coal plant will generate 2,460 kWh for each ton of coal. That means that one overnight job would use 59 kg (130 lbs) of coal. In the process, you would also create 153 kg (338 lb) of CO2 and a bit under half a kilogram (about 1 lb) of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide each. It's a very rough estimate but it certainly generates some pressure to make sure the research counts! Of course, I've written some free software that runs on many thousands of computers and servers. How many tons of coal are burnt to support laziness or a lack of optimization in my software? What is the coal cost of choosing to write a program in a less efficient, but easier to write, higher-level programming languages like Python or Ruby instead of writing a more efficient version in C?

• Privacy: as far as I can tell, Plus design had started with privacy in mind, whereas for Facebook it is still an unloved child, a spare tire. Facebook keeps on getting bad reviews here; people don't get their UI and mis-share things. I read somewhere that FB is actually losing users in the US: kids who leave Facebook because their parents are getting on, and they don't want them to see what they shared with their friends.
• UI: the Circles UI is very easy to use. The same functionality on Facebook is awful to manage. And the notifications UI in Plus also are a lot better than the tiny indicator in Facebook.
• New stuff: Hangout and group chats are pretty interesting (well, actually I don't like Video at all ...). This puts pressure on Facebook to move, and it looks like they might present some Skype integration soon. But they need to make this really good to keep up with hangout. Just adding "Call me" buttons for all users that have specified a Skype account in their profile won't do the trick.
• Future integration: Wave already had many of these things, but the wrong way. You would put a map into a chat; the Plus way will probably be to share a map session with a circle and add chat and collaborative editing there. Google "Office" is another place where it is trivial but very useful to add Plus.

---

It s Co-operatives Fortnight until 9 July and our co-op is supporting many events:

• This afternoon (Wednesday 29 June), we ll be at Co-operative lending and ethical investment in Bristol;
• Tomorrow, we ll be at a Co-operative Business Breakfast in Glastonbury;
• Next Friday, we re hosting a Co-operative Business Breakfast in Weston-super-Mare;
• and we ll post more events to our co-op s news page as we find out about them.

As you may know, we ve already done two events: First, last Friday, Michael attended the Co-operatives UK Annual Meeting on our behalf. Co-operatives UK is our national co-ordinating co-op and the figurehead for the movement in this country. I didn t see the meeting (the live video link didn t work for me, as before), but Michael reports:

The AGM seemed well organized; it was good to hear about the work they re doing and the concerns regarding the co-operative situation in Poland. I think it s important to exercise one s ability to vote, but would have liked more opportunity to speak with people.

We couldn t send anyone to the Mary Portas session on Friday evening, but Paul Dale Smith summarised the session and RuthRosselson described it as Mary Portas tells Co-op Congress how it is . Then on Saturday, I was in Manchester for The Power of Co-operation, thanks to support from software.coop and The Co-operative Bank. The first session I attended, on mutualisting the Post Office was interesting and pretty full, but I found some later sessions rather frustrating. As well as my usual concerns about surrendering to uncritical use of private-sector software, I got quite annoyed by two sessions on member engagement where the presenters seemed to talk for almost the full time without letting the audience engage! Not good for my blood pressure, that, especially when I feel they re missing something! But the real value of the day was in the fascinating discussions I had with many people in the short breaks in the plenary, or while wandering around the exhibition and the marketplace. For example, it was great to see Revolver still selling the T-shirts I mentioned here in 2009 as well as giving out free samples of their brilliant fairtrade coffee. What comes from the various discussions will probably decide whether we attend similar events in future. Were you in Birmingham? How was it for you? Are you supporting Co-operatives Fortnight? How, where, when and why?

Guys, we have a problem. The name of that problem is NVidia and their Optimus technology. The idea of that tech is quite neat take a laptop, put two video cards in it, use the powerful card when you need 3D power, use the weak card when you need to conserve battery. The problem is that any laptop with this technology is currently an expensive paperweight on Linux (or rather it was so until a couple weeks ago, see below). And NVidia has no plans for fixing that. Let me explain the technicalities. In all modern laptops (such as the new and sexy Dell XPS 15z and many, many others) NVidia Optimus is implemented as follows there is an NVidia card and an Intel card, all display outputs are connected to the Intel card, when the user wants more 3D power, the NVidia card is powered on and it renders an image into a framebuffer in the video memory of the Intel card which is the responsible for actually outputing that framebuffer to a display. Currently in Linux if you are using NVidia drivers the Intel card is left uninitialised, your session starts up fine on the NVidia card, it outputs the resulting picture onto the video memory of the Intel card, but the Intel card is not configured in any way and so it does not do anything further with this picture and the display stays black. The alternative is to use Intel video card driver and then the NVidia card stays there in your laptop as dead weight. It does not even power down (out of the box) so you have all the power consumption and none of the functionality. There is some support from NVidia to using that card for CUDA computing purposes in such situation, but nothing else. After years of neglect and statements from NVidia that Optimus support in Linux is impossible and thus not even planned, one individual stepped up and made it work. Yes, the solution is hacky, yes it is a hassle to set up and make it work, but this is the first glimmer of hope for actually working Optimus on Linux. Over the last couple years the share of laptops with Optimus has greatly increased almost all laptops that have NVidia video cards have Optimus now. This Bumblebee project is currently our only real hope on making Linux work on these laptops. This project needs our support in a multitude of ways:
1) help test the actual project on different hardware;
2) look at the code and help improve on it, both the core code and system integration, simplify it so that everyone can install and use this;
3) figure out how we can integrate that support into distributions, so that it becomes possible to have working Linux out-of-the-box on Optimus hardware;
4) pressure NVidia more to provide official Optimus support on Linux (at least in always-on-NVidia mode, without breaking Bumblebee along the way). Martin has already showed the superiority of open source by implementing something that NVidia considered to be too hard to do, let s show the power of our community to push such solutions to production quality.

Since my latest announcement of the Lua workshop, I received a couple of emails asking why I discourage the use of Lua. Actually, I already wrote out many of the things I dislike about Lua. I won't come back on this technical issues here, but since Lua 5.2 is not yet released (it's still at alpha stage), they are still relevant nowadays. Stack based API is harder

The ease of integration of Lua into a C program is one of the point of Lua. They claim it's very easy to integrate Lua into your C application, because it does not use pointer, nor reference counting, nor anything that requires a minimum amount of skills to be used. It uses a virtual stack based approach. You push or pop things on a stack, and refers to them using a relative or absolute index. In order to people who never wrote Lua code to understand, here's a quick example on how this work. The L pointer is a Lua environment.

/* Create a table on the stack: index 1 */
lua_newtable(L);
/* Push a string on the stack: index 2 */
lua_pushstring(L, "hello");
/* Push a number on the stack: index 3 */
lua_pushnumber(L, 123);
/* Set newtable["hello"] = 123 */
lua_settable(L, -3);

You first push a table (in Lua, a table is almost equivalent to what you'd call a hash table in other language), then push the key, the value, and do the assignment operation. In the settable, we use -3 as index, meaning the "3rd item on the stack counting from top". We could also have written lua_settable(L, 1), since the table is also the first item on the stack from the bottom. So far, so good. Problems arise when you do more complicated stuff. My previous example is what you would typically find in a tutorial, but of course, real life is different, and usually more complex. If you cut the things in different parts, it can start to be more complicated. Let's take a look at the following:

/* Create a table on the stack: index 1 */
lua_newtable(L);
/* Push a string on the stack: index 2 */
lua_pushstring(L, "hello");
/* Push a number on the stack: index 3 */
lua_pushnumbe(L, mycomputingfunction());
/* Set newtable["hello"] = 123 */
lua_settable(L, -3);

Here, we do exactly the same thing, but we do not push 123 directly: we compute it. And here's the trick: if your computing function is also using the Lua stack, things can become very messy. As long as your computing function use the stack cleanly by pushing and poping all its item, and returning the stack in the same state it was before, you're safe. The problem is that in a complex program, you also write bugs. You do not chose to, but you do. And sometimes, you forget to pop one of the item you fetched from a table. Imagine that mycomputingfunction is:

int
mycomputingfunctiong(void)
 
  /* Just push the table we want to fetch
     the number from on the stack */
  pushatableonstack(L);
  lua_pushstring(L, "mykey");
  lua_gettable(L, -2);
  return lua_tonumber(L, -1);
 

This function works perfectly. It pushes a table, then a key ("mykey"), then fetches mytable["mykey"] and pops the key (lua_gettable does push value/pop key itself), and then returns the numeric value of the last item (the fetched one) of the stack. However, this function has a bug: it does not pop the table! This does not prevent the function to work. It does not raise a segmentation fault. It does not show any problem under gdb. It does not show any leak under Valgrind. It does now show any problem under any standard C debugging tool. But when you'll start using it, your program will start to do weird things, and you'll have to spend a huge amount of time debugging it manually, dumping the stack content at each step of your program to watch out what's wrong. Another bad thing, that can happen, is some code poping accidentally an item from the stack, or worst, from an empty stack. This does not raise any error on the Lua side, but will break your program in very unfunny way. Even if I've been very meticulous writing awesome, but we hit that problem regularly. The easiest workaround is to use lua_settop(L, 0) to reset the stack to 0 element. Doing this regularly (like after each program event or treatment) can remove left-over items and avoid the never ending stack grow you may experience if your left-over items continue to pile up. Did I tell you I dislike work-around? You could also use lua_call(), which would avoid such an error, but this would require a huge amount of indirection, and would make write more (useless) code. This kind of problem does not exists with pointer based API. If you screw things up, the problem will cause a segmentation fault or leak memory, or cause things you can (easily) debug with standard tools like gdb or Valgrind. No reference counting is a pain in the ass

Userdata objects are variable Lua size objects embedding a C struct you define. It's the equivalent of an object in object oriented language. Lua does not provide any reference counting for the userdata objects. That means you can push this objects on the stack, use them, but they cannot directly reference each others. If you have a "car" userdata and a "wheel" one, the car cannot hold directly a reference to the wheel. This is not possible because userdata are allocated and garbage collected by Lua, and there's no way to increase the reference counting yourself. So the common hack is to store the wheel into a table as a value, and store the table index as an integer into the car data structure. This obviously makes memory leaks tracking harder, add huge level of reference indirection in usage (still more code), and does not make the whole process less error prone (at least in my opinion). No paradigm makes you lose time

Lua is proud to come with no paradigm and to provide metatables. I already showed 3 years ago that it has big flaws. To me, this ain't no good. Lua is not functional, nor it is object oriented. Most people, including me, want one of this paradigm, or any else. Plain old imperative is not enough. So you'll start to build more, or to use something like LOOP, which implements an object model. You'll implement your paradigm. I say life is too short to (re)write a paradigm. In awesome we wanted to have an object oriented approach (this is kind of typical in such a graphical application context), so we tried to build one. To me, this started to be a show stopper when I realized that I've ended writing Python object model into Lua while developing awesome (which aims to be a window manager, not a language). This is one of the reason I stopped hacking on Lua things. I liked Python object model and wanted to have it in Lua, and spending time rewriting Python is just not worth it. I probably should have chose Python, not Lua. YMMV. Embedding may not be a good choice

This is not Lua related, but I want to mention it. Googling for "embedding vs extending" will probably tell you more about why you should double check that you really need to embed Lua rather than to extend it. Being small is not an excuse

One common argument to choose Lua is that it has a small footprint. Yeah, that's true, but that's useless. Bummer! When I program, I don't have any resource usage pressure. People who have such pressure are either paranoids or playing in the world of embedded computers. This is also a no more existing conception since quad core processors equiped phones are coming into the market. I'm rather confident that what we used to call embedded devices are just dead and are now plain computers. But as usual, YMMV. So start to forget about it, run in your underpants and yelling "yay we killed that shit!", and then use real computers stuff. :-) Even if benchmarks show how Lua is damn fast, remember what a benchmark proves: that you can do useless things very fast. Too few extension modules

This is not directly Lua's fault, but there's too few extension modules for Lua. The community is quite small compared to other big languages' ones. So think twice

before you choose Lua (or any other language). My recommendations these days would be not to embed, but to extend. If you really have no choice and need to embed a language into your application, GNU Guile is probably worth considering, because it's a Scheme and therefore a functional language :-), and because it can provides also different languages. Including Lua.

So we're just over 2 weeks away from our next set of local elections in the UK (May 5th), and alongside those elections we're also being asked about switching to a new voting system for future elections. For a long time we've used the simple First Past The Post (FPTP) system here, but now we have the possbility of moving to Alternative Vote (AV) instead. First Past The Post FPTP is simple to understand - the person who receives more votes than any single other person wins. But that simplicity is the only good thing, and there are many problems with it. It's unfair: in an election with 10 candidate, it's possible for a winner to have just 11% of the vote, even in the case where the other 89% of voters would consider them to be the worst option. It's also very susceptible to tactical voting, leading to nasty tactics in parties' election literature like claiming "party foo cannot win here, so don't waste your vote on them - vote for us instead!". See this Wikipedia article for more background. Alternative Vote AV is slightly more complicated. Instead of just placing a mark against their single preferred candidate, voters are able to rank as many of the candidates as they like. In the case that there is not a clear winner with more than 50% of the votes from the initial count, the lowest-ranked candidate is eliminated and second-choice votes from their supporters are counted and re-distributed for the other candidates. Iterate this process until one candidate gets more than 50% of the total votes. By re-calculating the votes this way, supporters of less popular candidates / parties should no longer feel the pressure to vote tactically and a more accurate picture of voter intention should emerge. The downsides? AV will tend to lead to slower, more expensive counting due to the potential for several rounds. It's still not real proportional voting, but it's better than FPTP in this regard. Again, Wikipedia has a good article about this subject. Other options? I'd be much happier to see discussion / trials of other voting systems. For example, Debian uses a variation on Condorcet called Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping which is an excellent system for fair voting, but it's very difficult to explain and counting votes is comparatively very expensive. It's bad enough getting ostensibly-intelligent Debian developers to understand this system; extending this to a national election would be impossible in my opinion. It's also not an option on the ballot here... :-) Politicians spreading lies I know this won't come as a major shock for a nationwide referendum, but there's a lot of campaigning going on. And, in the best traditions of political campaigning, there's a huge amount of bullshit being spread. The worst is coming from the "No to AV" campaign, as far as I can see. Without many positive things to claim, various members of the Conservative party (current government, with most to fear from a change of voting system, of course) are spouting outright lies and sowing FUD in all directions:

1. Claiming that AV will cost 250 million, most of which would be for the cost of electronic voting machines. Except... there's no evidence that these would be needed, nor are there any plans to use them.
2. Continuing on, highlighting the alleged "extra costs" of AV: campaign poster FUD saying that we need to choose between cardiac facilities for babies and AV, or between equipment for our soldiers and AV. Except... there's no evidence that costs will be that high, nor that we have to make such binary choices.
3. Claims from senior Conservative figures that changing to AV would mean more votes and legitimacy for extremists like the British National Party. Except... there is no evidence that AV will boost minority extremist parties. The BNP themselves are urging their supporters to vote against AV. Finally, if these parties have a high enough proportion of votes that they should be getting seats in parliament then they should have those seats - this is one of the tenets of democracy. Why should we be choosing a voting system to deliberately disenfranchise people?
4. Finally, even David Cameron is at it: "too much of the debate about the alternative vote (AV) had so far been dominated by 'scientific' evaluation of the two systems' merits. But for me, politics shouldn't be some mind-bending exercise. It's about what you feel in your gut - about the values you hold dear and the beliefs you instinctively have. And I just feel it, in my gut, that AV is wrong." Well, it's nice that our Prime Minister wants to ignore all the scientific evidence and go with his gut feeling. After all, why would we want to think about choices like this?

Don't swallow the bullshit If you're eligible to vote in the UK, please ignore the bollocks. Make up your own mind how to vote in this referendum, by looking at the facts. I've done that and I'll be voting in favour of switching to AV.

Madeleines / Magdalenas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_%28cake%29), home made, and Jolly Roger themed!
And Flan: 4 minutes, pressure cooker made, Cr me caramel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cr%C3%A8me_caramel)
I adapted the recipes to make them healthier (fructose instead of sugar, whole brown flour instead of white, refined one).

Sam Varghese has written an article that is very skeptical of the educational value of the OLPC project [1].Are Laptops Any Good for Schools?Sam cites an article in the New York Times by Winnie Hu about schools removing laptop programs due to a lack of success [2]. Winnie s article gives an example of a school shutting a program because of getting new teachers who lacked computer skills and some examples of schools which had issues with the repair cost. The solution to that would be computers that are more robust and easier to use by all accounts the OLPC systems are solidly constructed and easy to use!It is claimed that using laptops doesn t increase test scores. Using only test scores to compare educational methods is a way to lose, probably any school which does nothing other than try to increase test scores is worth avoiding. One example from Winnie s article is a report by Mr. Warschauer of students at a middle school in Yarmouth, Me., who used their laptops to create a Spanish book for poor children in Guatemala and debate Supreme Court cases found online . What value can you place on having students develop books for poor children in other countries and debate Supreme Court cases? If this sort of program became popular then it would lead to the countries which do it becoming better places to live in future decades!Mr. Warschauer also claims that If the goal is to get kids up to basic standard levels, then maybe laptops are not the tool. But if the goal is to create the George Lucas and Steve Jobs of the future, then laptops are extremely useful . I would go further than that, I think that providing the educational environment that involves international charity work and analysis of important court cases would lead to students having the skills to become good engineers, designers, and artists who work for people like George Lucas and Steve Jobs. No matter what you might do the vast majority of children will not grow up to be like George Lucas and Steve Jobs, there is a very limited number of positions for such people. But those people employ a huge number of creative people who do interesting and enjoyable work for good pay.I don t think that Winnie s article supports criticism of the OLPC project. I don t think that Winnie s article even contains sufficient evidence to match the headline.Playing GamesSam also cites an article about the misuse of school computers for playing games [3]. Of course there are ways of limiting access to games based on time etc. For a Linux system you could have a root cron job that runs chmod on /usr/games at various times, and preventing users from easily running programs that they install isn t difficult.Not that games are all bad, the flash-based games on www.physicsgames.net do teach kids some things about physics although I admit that much of that could be learned by playing with balls, skate-boards, etc.The Problem with the OLPC ProjectI think that the policy change to make OLPC systems only available to disadvantaged children was a mistake. The give one get one program was a great idea, maybe not the most effective way of getting funding but good for getting developers. While the new Sugar on a Stick project to put the OLPC GUI on a bootable USB device [4] it doesn t compare well to having dedicated hardware IMHO.Minimal Use of ComputersI have previously written about the weight of school bags and how laptops can alleviate the risk of health problems related to carrying heavy text books [5]. Since that time ebook readers and tablets have become incredibly cheap. Ebook readers are really light and the recent tablets are also very light (particularly the smaller ones). It seems to me that every school should at least be moving towards every student having an ebook reader and to use ebooks for all books that are part of the curriculum.At the moment there are a bunch of tablets on sale for about $150, that includes tablets that can access the Internet via Wifi or via 3G and a cheap 3G plan costs less than $150 per annum. If tablets were used for some of the computer tasks related to schools then a lot of the difficulty of repairing hardware would be removed. Tablets don t offer as many options for messing up the software configuration and if the hardware breaks it s easy to transfer the data onto a new tablet from the cloud with a maximum cost of $150 to replace the hardware.Also a cloud-based computing model could permit students to access all the same data from school and home while using desktop computers at both locations.Current SuccessNatalie Craig wrote an interesting article for The Age about The Lab a drop-in computer center for kids on the Autism Spectrum run by Dale Linegar and Stefan Schutt [6]. The fact that kids who have communication difficulties can find it easier to communicate electronically should be fairly obvious to everyone in the free software community, but the creation of an organisation to support such kids is noteworthy I think that such centers should be funded by the government and run in every city.Salman Khan gave an interesting TED talk about his project the Khan Academy [7] which is an online video-based teaching system that evolved from some Youtube videos he produced to tutor his cousins. Salman pointed out that his cousins said that they would rather watch his videos than have him teach them in person, it seems that they liked being able to pause and rewind the talk as well as avoiding the pressure of human interaction. The Khan Academy has videos in Adobe flash format, but conveniently they have download links so those of us who don t have the Flash plugin can still view the content [8].One of the interesting things about the Khan Academy is that in school use the videos are being assigned to kids as homework and the class time is used for teaching children to do worked examples what has traditionally been homework.So it seems that there are real examples of special-needs kids and average kids benefiting from different types of electronic learning.ConclusionI think that almost everything about the education system is broken. I also think that in many ways the education system has reached a local maximum, so there is no small way of improving things, and adding computers without making any of the significant changes needed to fix the big problems probably can t do a lot of good. In spite of this computers can provide some real benefits and I expect that those benefits can be better than the benefits of other potential ways of spending the money (IE it s worth the opportunity cost). I also have no doubt that almost anything can give a negative result if done badly enough, so I don t interpret examples of computer use failing in a school as anything other than evidence of a failing school.While the Khan Academy has some results that seem very positive I think that s only the first step of what needs to be done. It also seems to be based around users who have good Internet access which often isn t the case in places where the OLPC is being deployed. This implies that we need to get systems like the Khan Academy designed to operate in a disconnected manner, maybe with a remote server that s not connected to the Internet. This should be possible if funding is available.Sam suggested that there needs to be a scientific study of the effectiveness of the OLPC. I think that every project which involves significant amounts of public funding should be researched to ensure that it s an effective use of resources. 400,000 laptops is going to cost something more than $40,000,000 so it seems reasonable to devote a few person-years of research to determine how effective they are and which of the possible ways of using an OLPC will give the best results.I am confident that a good study of the effectiveness of the OLPC would demonstrate that it provides real educational benefits when correctly incorporated into an educational program. I also expect that such a study would show some significant differences in the effectiveness of various ways of using them. But we shouldn t be relying on confidence, we need some test results.

• [1] http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-analysis/open-sauce/44673-lca-2011-is-the-olpc-about-technology-or-education
• [2] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/04/education/04laptop.html
• [3] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/11digi.html?adxnnl=1
• [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
• [5] http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/05/24/school-bag-weight/
• [6] http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/autistic-kids-learn-to-fly-in-cyberspace-20110219-1b0fj.html
• [7] http://www.ted.com/talks/salman_khan_let_s_use_video_to_reinvent_education.html
• [8] http://www.khanacademy.org/