Debian Contributions: 2025-06 Contributing to Debian is part of Freexian s mission. This article covers the latest achievements of Freexian and their collaborators. All of this is made possible by organizations subscribing to our Long Term Support contracts and consulting services.

unschroot, by Helmut Grohne Quite a while back, the sbuild maintainers added the unshare backend to enable better isolation of builds, but in doing so sbuild now effectively bundles a container runtime. unschroot is an attempt to separate containment from sbuild by implementing the same features and more in a schroot-compatible way. Last year, vague feature parity was achieved, but going beyond required changing the model from keeping state in the filesystem to keeping Linux namespaces as session state. A proof of concept is now available. While it still has sharp corners, it enables building packages on a squashfs with an overlayfs or id-mapped bind mounting of your ccache neither of which is possible with sbuild s unshare backend. There shall be a DebConf25 presentation about this work.

DebConf 25, by Stefano Rivera, Santiago Ruano Rinc n and Lucas Kanashiro DebConf 25 is now under way in Brest, France. Santiago is part of the local team running the event, and Stefano Rivera is part of the DebConf committee, supporting the event, as well as the video team. Both have spent considerable time in the last month, getting things ready for DebConf. Lucas Kanashiro built the schedule for DebConf 25. Also followed-up on multiple requests from speakers and stakeholders.

Miscellaneous contributions

• Carles did general maintenance on simplemonitor, qnetload and qdacco packages; provided simplemonitor upstream feedback on new feature.
• Carles s updates about po-debconf-manager: prepared for DebCamp/DebConf, used it for reviewing and merging different packages. Also fixed multispeech po-debconf templates.
• Colin Watson found a crash in pterm (PuTTY s terminal emulator) when running in a Wayland session, and backported the resulting upstream fix to trixie.
• Colin responded to an upstream groff bug report about URLs being dropped from PDF output in some cases on Debian, and backported the fix to trixie.
• Helmut dealt with issues related to /usr-move. Most prominently Christian Hofstaedler reported an upgrade failure. /usr-move is a contributing factor here as that s what caused systemd to upgrade a number of Breaks and Replaces to Conflicts. dumat needed some help with dropping mips64el from testing and Theodore Ts o forwarded a fuse2fs upgrade failure.
• Helmut sent patches for 25 cross build failures.
• Helmut debugged rebootstrap failures and worked around build failures related to gcc-15 when they had patches and sent ones otherwise.
• Thorsten Alteholz uploaded cups to fix a FTBFS-bug. This bug was introduced by a change in systemd, which bumped the maximum number of open files. This resulted in a longer test duration that triggered a timeout so that the build failed. Thorsten also uploaded mtink and lprng, which got new translation files.
• Lucas Kanashiro followed-up on multiple unblock requests for ruby packages due to reproducible builds fixes. All of them were accepted into trixie.
• Lucas Kanashiro discussed license issues with upstream involving Redis 8 new license and the possibility of backporting patches to old versions with a different license. Outcome is that upstream is adding a new paragraph to their license to allow the backport for security fixes.
• Lucas Kanashiro fixed multiple CVEs reported against valkey in unstable and trixie.
• Lucas Kanashiro gave a Debian packaging course of 8 hours for students at a free software development course at the University of Sao Paulo.
• Lucas Kanashiro fixed a couple of cross building issues in the ruby ecosystem with Helmut s help.
• Lucas Kanashiro is working on a debci fix for #1107645 (ongoing).
• Stefano Rivera updated python-mitogen to the latest beta releases with upstream support for Ansible 12.
• Stefano Rivera spent some time winding up DebConf 24 books.
• Stefano Rivera fixed packages that were blocking cPython 3.13.5 from migrating to trixie, and filed an unblock request.
• Stefano Rivera investigated a regression in cPython 3.13 that was breaking OpenStack Nova. There is a patch in progress for cPython, but it is not ready for use, yet.
• Santiago reviewed different MRs in Salsa CI. For example, the MR !605 proposed by Aquila that aims to introduce a new debdiff job, as well as the autopkgtest MR !33 to extend the support to architectures other than amd64. Also reviewed MR !611 by Aayush Raj that fixes the autopkgtest images cleanup. And the MR !614, prepared by Charles, to change the suffix name used to bump the version used in the pipeline.
• Anupa procured supplies needed for the DebConf ID tag for the DebConf registration team and co-ordinated its transport to the venue.
• Anupa joined Nattie to complete the registration team tasks.

Hello everyone! I am Kurva Prashanth, Interested in the lower level working of system software, CPUs/SoCs and Hardware design. I was introduced to Open Hardware and Embedded Linux while studying electronics and embedded systems as part of robotics coursework. Initially, I did not pay much attention to it and quickly moved on. However, a short talk on Liberating SBCs using Debian by Yuvraj at MiniDebConf India, 2021 caught my interest. The talk focused on Open Hardware platforms such as Olimex and BeagleBone Black, as well as the Debian distributions tailored for these ARM-based single-board computers has intrigued me to delve deeper into the realm of Open Hardware and Embedded Linux. These days I m trying to improve my abilities to contribute to Debian and Linux Kernel development. Before finding out about the Google Summer of Code project, I had already started my journey with Debian. I extensively used Debian system build tools(debootstrap, sbuild, deb-build-pkg, qemu-debootstrap) for Building Debian Image for Bela Cape a real-time OS for music making to achieve extremely fast audio and sensor processing times. In 2023, I had the opportunity to attend DebConf23 in Kochi, India - thanks to Nilesh Patra (@nilesh) and I met Hector Oron (@zumbi) over dinner at DebConf23 and It was nice talking about his contributions/work at Debian on armhf port and Debian System Administration that conversation got me interested in knowing more about Debian ARM, Installer and I found it fascinating that EmDebian was once a external project bringing Debian to embedded systems and now, Debian itself can be run on many embedded systems. And, also during DebCamp I got Introduced to PGP/GPG keys and the web of trust by Carlos Henrique Lima Melara (@charles) I learned how to use and generate GPG keys. After DebConf23 I tried debian packaging and I miserably failed to get sponsorship for a python library I packaged. I came across the Debian project for this year s Google Summer of Code and found the project titled Make Debian for Raspberry Pi Build Again quite interesting to me and applied. Gladly, on May 8th, I received an acceptance e-mail from GSoC. I got excited that I ll spend the summer working on something that I like doing. I am thrilled to be part of this project and I am super excited for the summer of 25. I m looking forward to work on what I most like, new connections and learning opportunities. So, let me talk a bit more about my project. I will be working on to Make Debian for Raspberry Pi SBC s under the guidance of Gunnar Wolf (@gwolf). In this post, I will describe the project I will be working on.

Why make Debian for Raspberry Pi build again? There is an available set of images for running Debian in Raspberry Pi computers (all models below the 5 series)! However, the maintainer severely lacking time to take care for them; called for help for somebody to adopt them, but have not been successful. The image generation scripts might have bitrotted a bit, but it is mostly all done. And there is a lot of interest and use still in having the images freshly generated and decently tested! This GSoC project is about getting the [https://raspi.debian.net/ Raspberry Pi Debian images] site working reliably, daily-built images become automatic again and ideally making it easily deployable to be run in project machines and migrating exsisting hosting infrastructure to Debian.

How much it differ from Debian build process? While the goal is to stay as close as possible to the Debian build process, Raspberry Pi boards require some necessary platform-specific changes primarily in the early boot sequence and firmware handling. Unlike typical Debian systems, Raspberry Pi boards depend on a non-standard bootloader and use non-free firmware (raspi-firmware), Introducing some hardware-specific differences in the initialization process. These differences are largely confined to the early boot and hardware initialization stages. Once the system boots, the userspace remains closely aligned with a typical Debian install, using Debian packages. The current modifications are required due to non-free firmware. However, several areas merit review: but there are a few parts that might be worth changing.

1. Boot flow: Transitioning to a U-Boot based boot process (as used in Debian installer images for many other SBCs) would reduce divergence and better align with Debian Installer.
2. Current scripts/workarounds: Some existing hacks may now be redundant with recent upstream support and could be removed.
3. Board-specific images: Shift to architecture-specific base images with runtime detection could simplify builds and reduce duplication.

Debian already already building SD card images for a wide range of SBCs (e.g., BeagleBone, BananaPi, OLinuXino, Cubieboard, etc.) installer-arm64/images/u-boot and installer-armhf/images/u-boot, a similar approach for Raspberry Pi could improve maintainability and consistency with Debian s broader SBC support.

Quoted from Mail Discussion Thread with Mentor (Gunnar Wolf)

"One direction we wanted to explore was whether we should still be building one image per family, or whether we could instead switch to one image per architecture (armel, armhf, arm64). There were some details to iron out as RPi3 and RPi4 were quite different, but I think it will be similar to the differences between the RPi 0 and 1, which are handled at first-boot time. To understand what differs between families, take a look at Cyril Brulebois generate-recipe (in the repo), which is a great improvement over the ugly mess I had before he contributed it"

In this project, I intend to to build one image per architecture (armel, armhf, arm64) rather than continuing with the current model of building one image per board. This change simplifies image management, reduces redundancy, and leverages dynamic configuration at boot time to support all supported boards within each architecture. By using U-Boot and flash-kernel, we can detect the board type and configure kernel parameters, DTBs, and firmware during the first boot, reducing duplication across images and simplifying the maintenance burden and we can also generalize image creation while still supporting board-specific behavior at runtime. This method aligns with existing practices in the DebianInstaller team and aligns with Debian s long-term maintainability goals and better leverages upstream capabilities, ensuring a consistent and scalable boot experience. To streamline and standardize the process of building bootable Debian images for Raspberry Pi devices, I proposed a new workflow that leverages U-Boot and flash-kernel Debian packages. This provides a clean, maintainable, and reproducible way to generate images for armel, armhf and arm64 boards. The workflow is vmdb2, a lightweight, declarative tool designed to automate the creation of disk images. A typical vmdb2 recipe defines the disk layout, base system installation (via debootstrap), architecture-specific packages, and any custom post-install hooks and the image should includes U-Boot (the u-boot-rpi package), flash-kernel, and a suitable Debian kernel package like linux-image-arm64 or linux-image-armmp. U-Boot serves as the platform s bootloader and is responsible for loading the kernel and initramfs. Unlike Raspberry Pi s non-free firmware/proprietary bootloader, U-Boot provides an open and scriptable interface, allowing us to follow a more standard Debian boot process. It can be configured to boot using either an extlinux.conf or a boot.scr script generated automatically by flash-kernel. The role of flash-kernel is to bridge Debian s kernel installation system with the specifics of embedded bootloaders like U-Boot. When installed, it automatically copies the kernel image, initrd, and device tree blobs (DTBs) to the /boot partition. It also generates the necessary boot.scr script if the board configuration demands it. To work correctly, flash-kernel requires that the target machine be identified via /etc/flash-kernel/machine, which must correspond to an entry in its internal machine database.\ Once the vmdb2 build is complete, the resulting image will contain a fully configured bootable system with all necessary boot components correctly installed. The image can be flashed to an SD card and used to boot on the intended device without additional manual configuration. Because all key packages (U-Boot, kernel, flash-kernel) are managed through Debian s package system, kernel updates and boot script regeneration are handled automatically during system upgrades.

Current Workflow: Builds one Image per family The current vmdb2 recipe uses the Raspberry Pi GPU bootloader provided via the raspi-firmware package. This is the traditional boot process followed by Raspberry Pi OS, and it s tightly coupled with firmware files like bootcode.bin, start.elf, and fixup.dat. These files are installed to /boot/firmware, which is mounted from a FAT32 partition labeled RASPIFIRM. The device tree files (*.dtb) are manually copied from /usr/lib/linux-image-*-arm64/broadcom/ into this partition. The kernel is installed via the linux-image-arm64 package, and the boot arguments are injected by modifying /boot/firmware/cmdline.txt using sed commands. Booting depends on the root partition being labeled RASPIROOT, referenced through that file. There is no bootloader like UEFI-based or U-Boot involved the Raspberry Pi firmware directly loads the kernel, which is standard for Raspberry Pi boards.

- apt: install
  packages:
    ...
    - raspi-firmware  

The boot partition contents and kernel boot setup are tightly controlled via scripting in the recipe. Limitations of Current Workflow: While this setup works, it is

1. Proprietary and Raspberry Pi specific It relies on the closed-source GPU bootloader the raspi-firmware package, which is tightly coupled to specific Raspberry Pi models.
2. Manual DTB handling Device tree files are manually copied and hardcoded, making upgrades or board-specific changes error-prone.
3. Not easily extendable to future Raspberry Pi boards Any change in bootloader behavior (as seen in the Raspberry Pi 5, which introduces a more flexible firmware boot process) would require significant rework.
4. No UEFI-based/U-Boot The current method bypasses the standard bootloader layers, making it inconsistent with other Debian ARM platforms and harder to maintain long-term.

As Raspberry Pi firmware and boot processes evolve, especially with the introduction of Pi 5 and potentially Pi 6, maintaining compatibility will require more flexibility - something best delivered by adopting U-Boot and flash-kernel.

New Workflow: Building Architecture-Specific Images with vmdb2, U-Boot, flash-kernel, and Debian Kernel This workflow outlines an improved approach to generating bootable Debian images architecture specific, using vmdb2, U-Boot, flash-kernel, and Debian kernels and also to move away from Raspberry Pi s proprietary bootloader to a fully open-source boot process which improves maintainability, consistency, and cross-board support.

New Method: Shift to U-Boot + flash-kernel U-Boot (via Debian su-boot-rpi package) and flash-kernel bring the image building process closer to how Debian officially boots ARM devices. flash-kernel integrates with the system s initramfs and kernel packages to install bootloaders, prepare boot.scr or extlinux.conf, and copy kernel/initrd/DTBs to /boot in a format that U-Boot expects. U-Boot will be used as a second-stage bootloader, loaded by the Raspberry Pi s built-in firmware. Once U-Boot is in place, it will read standard boot scripts ( boot.scr) generated by flash-kernel, providing a Debian-compatible and board-flexible solution. Extending YAML spec for vmdb2 build with U-Boot and flash-kernel To improve an existing vmdb2 YAML spec(https://salsa.debian.org/raspi-team/image-specs/raspi_master.yaml), to integrate U-Boot, flash-kernel, and the architecture-specific Debian kernel into the image build process. By incorporating u-boot-rpi and flash-kernel from Debian packages, alongside the standard initramfs-tools, we align the image closer to Debian best practices while supporting both armhf and arm64 architectures. Below are key additions and adjustments needed in a vmdb2 YAML spec to support the workflow: Install U-Boot, flash-kernel, initramfs-tools and the architecture-specific Debian kernel.

- apt: install
  packages:
    - u-boot-rpi
    - flash-kernel
    - initramfs-tools
    - linux-image-arm64 # or linux-image-armmp for armhf 
  tag: tag-root

Replace linux-image-arm64 with the correct kernel package for specific target architecture. These packages should be added under the tag-root section in YAML spec for vmdb2 build recipe. This ensures that the necessary bootloader, kernel, and initramfs tools are included and properly configured in the image. Configure Raspberry Pi firmware to Load U-Boot Install the U-Boot binary as kernel.img in /boot/firmware we can also download and build U-Boot from source, but Debian provides tested binaries.

- shell:  
    cp /usr/lib/u-boot/rpi_4/u-boot.bin $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/kernel.img
    echo "enable_uart=1" >> $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/config.txt
  root-fs: tag-root

This makes the RPi firmware load u-boot.bin instead of the Linux kernel directly. Set Up flash-kernel for Debian-style Boot flash-kernel integrates with initramfs-tools and writes boot config suitable for U-Boot. We need to make sure /etc/flash-kernel/db contains an entry for board (most Raspberry Pi boards already supported in Bookworm). Set up /etc/flash-kernel.conf with:

- create-file: /etc/flash-kernel.conf
  contents:  
    MACHINE="Raspberry Pi 4"
    BOOTPART="/dev/disk/by-label/RASPIFIRM"
    ROOTPART="/dev/disk/by-label/RASPIROOT"
  unless: rootfs_unpacked

This allows flash-kernel to write an extlinux.conf or boot.scr into /boot/firmware. Clean up Proprietary/Non-Free Firmware Bootflow Remove the direct kernel loading flow:

- shell:  
    rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/vmlinuz*
    rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/initrd.img*
    rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/cmdline.txt
  root-fs: tag-root

Let U-Boot and flash-kernel manage kernel/initrd and boot parameters instead. Boot Flow After This Change

[SoC ROM] -> [start.elf] -> [U-Boot] -> [boot.scr] -> [Linux Kernel]

1. This still depends on the Raspberry Pi firmware to start, but it only loads U-Boot, not Linux kernel.
2. U-Boot gives you more flexibility (e.g., networking, boot menus, signed boot).
3. Using flash-kernel ensures kernel updates are handled the Debian Installer way.
4. Test with a serial console (enable_uart=1) in case HDMI doesn t show early boot logs.

Advantage of New Workflow

1. Replaces the proprietary Raspberry Pi bootloader with upstream U-Boot.
2. Debian-native tooling Uses flash-kernel and initramfs-tools to manage boot configuration.
3. Consistent across boards Works for both armhf and arm64, unifying the image build process.
4. Easier to support new boards Like the Raspberry Pi 5 and future models.

This transition will standardize a bit image-building process, making it aligned with upstream Debian Installer workflows.

vmdb2 configuration for arm64 using u-boot and flash-kernel NOTE: This is a baseline example and may require tuning.

# Raspberry Pi arm64 image using U-Boot and flash-kernel
steps:
  # ... (existing mkimg, partitions, mount, debootstrap, etc.) ...
  # Install U-Boot, flash-kernel, initramfs-tools and architecture specific kernel
  - apt: install
    packages:
      - u-boot-rpi
      - flash-kernel
      - initramfs-tools
      - linux - image - arm64 # or linux - image - armmp for armhf
    tag: tag-root
  # Install U-Boot binary as kernel.img in firmware partition
  - shell:  
      cp /usr/lib/u-boot/rpi_arm64 /u-boot.bin $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/kernel.img
      echo "enable_uart=1" >> $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/config.txt
    root-fs: tag-root
  # Configure flash-kernel for Raspberry Pi
  - create-file: /etc/flash-kernel.conf
    contents:  
      MACHINE="Generic Raspberry Pi ARM64"
      BOOTPART="/dev/disk/by-label/RASPIFIRM"
      ROOTPART="/dev/disk/by-label/RASPIROOT"
    unless: rootfs_unpacked
  # Remove direct kernel boot files from Raspberry Pi firmware
  - shell:  
      rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/vmlinuz*
      rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/initrd.img*
      rm -f $ ROOT? /boot/firmware/cmdline.txt
    root-fs: tag-root
  # flash-kernel will manage boot scripts and extlinux.conf
  # Rest of image build continues...

Required Changes to Support Raspberry Pi Boards in Debian (flash-kernel + U-Boot)

Overview of Required Changes

Component	Required Task
Debian U-Boot Package	Add build target for rpi_arm64 in u-boot-rpi. Optionally deprecate legacy 32-bit targets.
Debian flash-kernel Package	Add or verify entries in db/all.db for Pi 4, Pi 5, Zero 2W, CM4. Ensure boot script generation works via bootscr.uboot-generic.
Debian Kernel	Ensure DTBs are installed at /usr/lib/linux-image-<version>/ and available for flash-kernel to reference.

flash-kernel

Already Supported Boards in flash-kernel Debian Package https://sources.debian.org/src/flash-kernel/3.109/db/all.db/#L1700

Model	Arch	DTB-Id
Raspberry Pi 1 A/B/B+, Rev2	armel	bcm2835-*
Raspberry Pi CM1	armel	bcm2835-rpi-cm1-io1.dtb
Raspberry Pi Zero/Zero W	armel	bcm2835-rpi-zero*.dtb
Raspberry Pi 2B	armhf	bcm2836-rpi-2-b.dtb
Raspberry Pi 3B/3B+	arm64	bcm2837-*
Raspberry Pi CM3	arm64	bcm2837-rpi-cm3-io3.dtb
Raspberry Pi 400	arm64	bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb

uboot

Already Supported Boards in Debian U-Boot Package https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/flash-kernel/-/blob/master/db/all.db

arm64 Model Arch Upstream Defconfig Debian Target - - - Raspberry Pi 3B arm64 rpi_3_defconfig rpi_3 Raspberry Pi 4B arm64 rpi_4_defconfig rpi_4 Raspberry Pi 3B/3B+/CM3/CM3+/4B/CM4/400/5B/Zero 2W arm64 rpi_arm64_defconfig rpi_arm64

armhf Model Arch Upstream Defconfig Debian Target - - - Raspberry Pi 2 armhf rpi_2_defconfig rpi_2 Raspberry Pi 3B (32-bit) armhf rpi_3_32b_defconfig rpi_3_32b Raspberry Pi 4B (32-bit) armhf rpi_4_32b_defconfig rpi_4_32b

armel Model Arch Upstream Defconfig Debian Target - - - Raspberry Pi armel rpi_defconfig rpi Raspberry Pi 1/Zero armel rpi_0_w rpi_0_w These boards are already defined in debian/rules under the u-boot-rpi source package and generates usable U-Boot binaries for corresponding Raspberry Pi models.

To-Do: Add Missing Board Support to U-Boot and flash-kernel in Debian Several Raspberry Pi models are missing from the Debian U-Boot and flash-kernel packages, even though upstream support and DTBs exist in the Debian kernel but are missing entries in the flash-kernel database to enable support for bootloader installation and initrd handling.

Boards Not Yet Supported in flash-kernel Debian Package

Model	Arch	DTB-Id
Raspberry Pi 3A+ (32 & 64 bit)	armhf, arm64	bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb
Raspberry Pi 4B (32 & 64 bit)	armhf, arm64	bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb
Raspberry Pi CM4	arm64	bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb
Raspberry Pi CM 4S	arm64	-
Raspberry Zero 2 W	arm64	bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dtb
Raspberry Pi 5	arm64	bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb
Raspberry Pi CM5	arm64	-
Raspberry Pi 500	arm64	-

Boards Not Yet Supported in Debian U-Boot Package

Model	Arch	Upstream defconfig(s)
Raspberry Pi 3A+/3B+	arm64	-, rpi_3_b_plus_defconfig
Raspberry Pi CM 4S	arm64	-
Raspberry Pi 5	arm64	-
Raspberry Pi CM5	arm64	-
Raspberry Pi 500	arm64	-

So, what next? During the Community Bonding Period, I got hands-on with workflow improvements, set up test environments, and began reviewing Raspberry Pi support in Debian s U-Boot and flash-kernel and these are the logs of the project, where I provide weekly reports on the work done. You can check here: Community Bonding Period logs. My next steps include submitting patches to the u-boot and flash-kernel packages to ensure all missing Raspberry Pi entries are built and shipped. And, also to confirm the kernel DTB installation paths and make sure the necessary files are included for all Raspberry Pi variants. Finally, plan to validate changes with test builds on Raspberry Pi hardware. In parallel, I m organizing my tasks and setting up my environment to contribute more effectively. It s been exciting to explore how things work under the hood and to prepare for a summer of learning and contributing to this great community.

Helpful links

• https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2025/ApprovedProjects/MakeDebianForRaspberryBuildAgain
• https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/board/broadcom/raspberrypi.html
• https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/flash-kernel/flash-kernel.8.en.html
• Progress Tracker: https://krvprashanth.in/gsoc2025/docs/weeklyprogress/
• Building Debian system images with vmdb2

I ve been part of the Debian Project since 2019, when I attended DebConf held in Curitiba, Brazil. That event sparked my interest in the community, packaging, and how Debian works as a distribution. In the early years of my involvement, I contributed to various teams such as the Python, Golang and Cloud teams, packaging dependencies and maintaining various tools. However, I soon felt the need to focus on packaging software I truly enjoyed, tools I was passionate about using and maintaining. That s when I turned my attention to Kubernetes within Debian.

---

A Broken Ecosystem The Kubernetes packaging situation in Debian had been problematic for some time. Given its large codebase and complex dependency tree, the initial packaging approach involved vendorizing all dependencies. While this allowed a somewhat functional package to be published, it introduced several long-term issues, especially security concerns. Vendorized packages bundle third-party dependencies directly into the source tarball. When vulnerabilities arise in those dependencies, it becomes difficult for Debian s security team to patch and rebuild affected packages system-wide. This approach broke Debian s best practices, and it eventually led to the abandonment of the Kubernetes source package, which had stalled at version 1.20.5. Due to this abandonment, critical bugs emerged and the package was removed from Debian s testing channel, as we can see in the package tracker.

---

New Debian Kubernetes Team Around this time, I became a Debian Maintainer (DM), with permissions to upload certain packages. I saw an opportunity to both contribute more deeply to Debian and to fix Kubernetes packaging. In early 2024, just before DebConf Busan in South Korea, I founded the Debian Kubernetes Team. The mission of the team was to repackage Kubernetes in a maintainable, security-conscious, and Debian-compliant way. At DebConf, I shared our progress with the broader community and received great feedback and more visibility, along with people interested in contributing to the team. Our first tasks was to migrate existing Kubernetes-related tools such as kubectx, kubernetes-split-yaml and kubetail into a dedicated namespace on Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance. Many of these tools were stored across different teams (like the Go team), and consolidating them helped us organize development and focus our efforts.

---

De-vendorizing Kubernetes Our main goal was to un-vendorize Kubernetes and bring it up-to-date with upstream releases. This meant:

• Removing the vendor directory and all embedded third-party code.
• Trimming the build scope to focus solely on building kubectl, Kubernetes CLI.
• Using Files-Excluded in debian/copyright to cleanly drop unneeded files during source imports.
• Rebuilding the dependency tree, ensuring all Go modules were separately packaged in Debian.

We used uscan, a standard Debian packaging tool that fetches upstream tarballs and prepares them accordingly. The Files-Excluded directive in our debian/copyright file instructed uscan to automatically remove unnecessary files during the repackaging process:

$ uscan
Newest version of kubernetes on remote site is 1.32.3, specified download version is 1.32.3
Successfully repacked ../v1.32.3 as ../kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz, deleting 30616 files from it.

The results were dramatic. By comparing the original upstream tarball with our repackaged version, we can see that our approach reduced the tarball size by over 75%:

$ du -h upstream-v1.32.3.tar.gz kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz
14M	upstream-v1.32.3.tar.gz
3.2M	kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz

This significant reduction wasn t just about saving space. By removing over 30,000 files, we simplified the package, making it more maintainable. Each dependency could now be properly tracked, updated, and patched independently, resolving the security concerns that had plagued the previous packaging approach.

---

Dependency Graph To give you an idea of the complexity involved in packaging Kubernetes for Debian, the image below is a dependency graph generated with debtree, visualizing all the Go modules and other dependencies required to build the kubectl binary. This web of nodes and edges represents every module and its relationship during the compilation process of kubectl. Each box is a Debian package, and the lines connecting them show how deeply intertwined the ecosystem is. What might look like a mess of blue spaghetti is actually a clear demonstration of the vast and interconnected upstream world that tools like kubectl rely on. But more importantly, this graph is a testament to the effort that went into making kubectl build entirely using Debian-packaged dependencies only, no vendoring, no downloading from the internet, no proprietary blobs.

---

Upstream Version 1.32.3 and Beyond After nearly two years of work, we successfully uploaded version 1.32.3+ds of kubectl to Debian unstable. kubernetes/-/merge_requests/1

• Closed over a dozen long-standing bugs, including:
  • Outdated version requests
  • Missing shell completions
  • VCS (version control system) metadata issues
  • (#1055411, #990793, #1009356, #1016441, #1086756, #1047881, #832706, #976428, #994438)

The new package also includes:

• Zsh, Fish, and Bash completions installed automatically
• Man pages and metadata for improved discoverability
• Full integration with kind and docker for testing purposes

---

Integration Testing with Autopkgtest To ensure the reliability of kubectl in real-world scenarios, we developed a new autopkgtest suite that runs integration tests using real Kubernetes clusters created via Kind. Autopkgtest is a Debian tool used to run automated tests on binary packages. These tests are executed after the package is built but before it s accepted into the Debian archive, helping catch regressions and integration issues early in the packaging pipeline. Our test workflow validates kubectl by performing the following steps:

• Installing Kind and Docker as test dependencies.
• Spinning up two local Kubernetes clusters.
• Switching between cluster contexts to ensure multi-cluster support.
• Deploying and scaling a sample nginx application using kubectl.
• Cleaning up the entire test environment to avoid side effects.
• debian/tests/kubectl.sh

---

Popcon: Measuring Adoption To measure real-world usage, we rely on data from Debian s popularity contest (popcon), which gives insight into how many users have each binary installed. Here s what the data tells us:

• kubectl (new binary): Already installed on 2,124 systems.
• golang-k8s-kubectl-dev: This is the Go development package (a library), useful for other packages and developers who want to interact with Kubernetes programmatically.
• kubernetes-client: The legacy package that kubectl is replacing. We expect this number to decrease in future releases as more systems transition to the new package.

Although the popcon data shows activity for kubectl before the official Debian upload date, it s important to note that those numbers represent users who had it installed from upstream source-lists, not from the Debian repositories. This distinction underscores a demand that existed even before the package was available in Debian proper, and it validates the importance of bringing it into the archive.

Also worth mentioning: this number is not the real total number of installations, since users can choose not to participate in the popularity contest. So the actual adoption is likely higher than what popcon reflects.

---

Community and Documentation The team also maintains a dedicated wiki page which documents:

• Maintained tools and packages
• Contribution guidelines
• Our roadmap for the upcoming Debian releases

https://debian-kubernetes.org

---

Looking Ahead to Debian 13 (Trixie) The next stable release of Debian will ship with kubectl version 1.32.3, built from a clean, de-vendorized source. This version includes nearly all the latest upstream features, and will be the first time in years that Debian users can rely on an up-to-date, policy-compliant kubectl directly from the archive. By comparing with upstream, our Debian package even delivers more out of the box, including shell completions, which the upstream still requires users to generate manually. In 2025, the Debian Kubernetes team will continue expanding our packaging efforts for the Kubernetes ecosystem. Our roadmap includes:

• kubelet: The primary node agent that runs on each node. This will enable Debian users to create fully functional Kubernetes nodes without relying on external packages.
• kubeadm: A tool for creating Kubernetes clusters. With kubeadm in Debian, users will then be able to bootstrap minimum viable clusters directly from the official repositories.
• helm: The package manager for Kubernetes that helps manage applications through Kubernetes YAML files defined as charts.
• kompose: A conversion tool that helps users familiar with docker-compose move to Kubernetes by translating Docker Compose files into Kubernetes resources.

---

Final Thoughts This journey was only possible thanks to the amazing support of the debian-devel-br community and the collective effort of contributors who stepped up to package missing dependencies, fix bugs, and test new versions. Special thanks to:

• Carlos Henrique Melara (@charles)
• Guilherme Puida (@puida)
• Jo o Pedro Nobrega (@jnpf)
• Lucas Kanashiro (@kanashiro)
• Matheus Polkorny (@polkorny)
• Samuel Henrique (@samueloph)
• Sergio Cipriano (@cipriano)
• Sergio Durigan Junior (@sergiodj)

I look forward to continuing this work, bringing more Kubernetes tools into Debian and improving the developer experience for everyone.

I ve been part of the Debian Project since 2019, when I attended DebConf held in Curitiba, Brazil. That event sparked my interest in the community, packaging, and how Debian works as a distribution. In the early years of my involvement, I contributed to various teams such as the Python, Golang and Cloud teams, packaging dependencies and maintaining various tools. However, I soon felt the need to focus on packaging software I truly enjoyed, tools I was passionate about using and maintaining. That s when I turned my attention to Kubernetes within Debian.

---

A Broken Ecosystem The Kubernetes packaging situation in Debian had been problematic for some time. Given its large codebase and complex dependency tree, the initial packaging approach involved vendorizing all dependencies. While this allowed a somewhat functional package to be published, it introduced several long-term issues, especially security concerns. Vendorized packages bundle third-party dependencies directly into the source tarball. When vulnerabilities arise in those dependencies, it becomes difficult for Debian s security team to patch and rebuild affected packages system-wide. This approach broke Debian s best practices, and it eventually led to the abandonment of the Kubernetes source package, which had stalled at version 1.20.5. Due to this abandonment, critical bugs emerged and the package was removed from Debian s testing channel, as we can see in the package tracker.

---

New Debian Kubernetes Team Around this time, I became a Debian Maintainer (DM), with permissions to upload certain packages. I saw an opportunity to both contribute more deeply to Debian and to fix Kubernetes packaging. In early 2024, just before DebConf Busan in South Korea, I founded the Debian Kubernetes Team. The mission of the team was to repackage Kubernetes in a maintainable, security-conscious, and Debian-compliant way. At DebConf, I shared our progress with the broader community and received great feedback and more visibility, along with people interested in contributing to the team. Our first tasks was to migrate existing Kubernetes-related tools such as kubectx, kubernetes-split-yaml and kubetail into a dedicated namespace on Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance. Many of these tools were stored across different teams (like the Go team), and consolidating them helped us organize development and focus our efforts.

---

De-vendorizing Kubernetes Our main goal was to un-vendorize Kubernetes and bring it up-to-date with upstream releases. This meant:

• Removing the vendor directory and all embedded third-party code.
• Trimming the build scope to focus solely on building kubectl, Kubernetes CLI.
• Using Files-Excluded in debian/copyright to cleanly drop unneeded files during source imports.
• Rebuilding the dependency tree, ensuring all Go modules were separately packaged in Debian.

We used uscan, a standard Debian packaging tool that fetches upstream tarballs and prepares them accordingly. The Files-Excluded directive in our debian/copyright file instructed uscan to automatically remove unnecessary files during the repackaging process:

$ uscan
Newest version of kubernetes on remote site is 1.32.3, specified download version is 1.32.3
Successfully repacked ../v1.32.3 as ../kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz, deleting 30616 files from it.

The results were dramatic. By comparing the original upstream tarball with our repackaged version, we can see that our approach reduced the tarball size by over 75%:

$ du -h upstream-v1.32.3.tar.gz kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz
14M	upstream-v1.32.3.tar.gz
3.2M	kubernetes_1.32.3+ds.orig.tar.gz

This significant reduction wasn t just about saving space. By removing over 30,000 files, we simplified the package, making it more maintainable. Each dependency could now be properly tracked, updated, and patched independently, resolving the security concerns that had plagued the previous packaging approach.

---

Dependency Graph To give you an idea of the complexity involved in packaging Kubernetes for Debian, the image below is a dependency graph generated with debtree, visualizing all the Go modules and other dependencies required to build the kubectl binary. This web of nodes and edges represents every module and its relationship during the compilation process of kubectl. Each box is a Debian package, and the lines connecting them show how deeply intertwined the ecosystem is. What might look like a mess of blue spaghetti is actually a clear demonstration of the vast and interconnected upstream world that tools like kubectl rely on. But more importantly, this graph is a testament to the effort that went into making kubectl build entirely using Debian-packaged dependencies only, no vendoring, no downloading from the internet, no proprietary blobs.

---

Upstream Version 1.32.3 and Beyond After nearly two years of work, we successfully uploaded version 1.32.3+ds of kubectl to Debian unstable. kubernetes/-/merge_requests/1

• Closed over a dozen long-standing bugs, including:
  • Outdated version requests
  • Missing shell completions
  • VCS (version control system) metadata issues
  • (#1055411, #990793, #1009356, #1016441, #1086756, #1047881, #832706, #976428, #994438)

The new package also includes:

• Zsh, Fish, and Bash completions installed automatically
• Man pages and metadata for improved discoverability
• Full integration with kind and docker for testing purposes

---

Integration Testing with Autopkgtest To ensure the reliability of kubectl in real-world scenarios, we developed a new autopkgtest suite that runs integration tests using real Kubernetes clusters created via Kind. Autopkgtest is a Debian tool used to run automated tests on binary packages. These tests are executed after the package is built but before it s accepted into the Debian archive, helping catch regressions and integration issues early in the packaging pipeline. Our test workflow validates kubectl by performing the following steps:

• Installing Kind and Docker as test dependencies.
• Spinning up two local Kubernetes clusters.
• Switching between cluster contexts to ensure multi-cluster support.
• Deploying and scaling a sample nginx application using kubectl.
• Cleaning up the entire test environment to avoid side effects.
• debian/tests/kubectl.sh

---

Popcon: Measuring Adoption To measure real-world usage, we rely on data from Debian s popularity contest (popcon), which gives insight into how many users have each binary installed. Here s what the data tells us:

• kubectl (new binary): Already installed on 2,124 systems.
• golang-k8s-kubectl-dev: This is the Go development package (a library), useful for other packages and developers who want to interact with Kubernetes programmatically.
• kubernetes-client: The legacy package that kubectl is replacing. We expect this number to decrease in future releases as more systems transition to the new package.

Although the popcon data shows activity for kubectl before the official Debian upload date, it s important to note that those numbers represent users who had it installed from upstream source-lists, not from the Debian repositories. This distinction underscores a demand that existed even before the package was available in Debian proper, and it validates the importance of bringing it into the archive.

Also worth mentioning: this number is not the real total number of installations, since users can choose not to participate in the popularity contest. So the actual adoption is likely higher than what popcon reflects.

---

Community and Documentation The team also maintains a dedicated wiki page which documents:

• Maintained tools and packages
• Contribution guidelines
• Our roadmap for the upcoming Debian releases

https://debian-kubernetes.org

---

Looking Ahead to Debian 13 (Trixie) The next stable release of Debian will ship with kubectl version 1.32.3, built from a clean, de-vendorized source. This version includes nearly all the latest upstream features, and will be the first time in years that Debian users can rely on an up-to-date, policy-compliant kubectl directly from the archive. By comparing with upstream, our Debian package even delivers more out of the box, including shell completions, which the upstream still requires users to generate manually. In 2025, the Debian Kubernetes team will continue expanding our packaging efforts for the Kubernetes ecosystem. Our roadmap includes:

• kubelet: The primary node agent that runs on each node. This will enable Debian users to create fully functional Kubernetes nodes without relying on external packages.
• kubeadm: A tool for creating Kubernetes clusters. With kubeadm in Debian, users will then be able to bootstrap minimum viable clusters directly from the official repositories.
• helm: The package manager for Kubernetes that helps manage applications through Kubernetes YAML files defined as charts.
• kompose: A conversion tool that helps users familiar with docker-compose move to Kubernetes by translating Docker Compose files into Kubernetes resources.

---

Final Thoughts This journey was only possible thanks to the amazing support of the debian-devel-br community and the collective effort of contributors who stepped up to package missing dependencies, fix bugs, and test new versions. Special thanks to:

• Carlos Henrique Melara (@charles)
• Guilherme Puida (@puida)
• Jo o Pedro Nobrega (@jnpf)
• Lucas Kanashiro (@kanashiro)
• Matheus Polkorny (@polkorny)
• Samuel Henrique (@samueloph)
• Sergio Cipriano (@cipriano)
• Sergio Durigan Junior (@sergiodj)

I look forward to continuing this work, bringing more Kubernetes tools into Debian and improving the developer experience for everyone.

This year I was at FOSDEM 2025, and it was the fifth edition in a row that I participated in person (before it was in 2019, 2020, 2023 and 2024). The event took place on February 1st and 2nd, as always at the ULB campus in Brussels. We arrived on Friday at lunchtime and went straight to the hotel to drop off our bags. This time we stayed at Ibis in the city center, very close to the hustle and bustle. The price was good and the location was really good for us to be able to go out in the city center and come back late at night. We found a Japanese restaurant near the hotel and it was definitely worth having lunch there because of the all-you-can-eat price. After taking a nap, we went out for a walk. Since January 31st is the last day of the winter sales in the city, the streets in the city center were crowded, there were lots of people in the stores, and the prices were discounted. We concluded that if we have the opportunity to go to Brussels again at this time, it would be better wait to buy clothes for cold weather there.

Unlike in 2023 and 2024, the FOSDEM organization did not approve my request for the Translations DevRoom,so my goal was to participate in the event and collaborate at the Debian booth. And also as I always do, I volunteered to operate the broadcast camera in the main auditorium on both days, for two hours each. The Debian booth:

Me in the auditorium helping with the broadcast:

2 weeks before the event, the organization put out a call for interested people to request a room for their community s BoF (Birds of a Feather), and I requested a room for Debian and it was approved :-) It was great to see that people were really interested in participating at the BoF and the room was packed! As the host of the discussions, I tried to leave the space open for anyone who wanted to talk about any subject related to Debian. We started with a talk from MiniDebConf25 organizers, that will be taking place this year in France. Then other topics followed with people talking, asking and answering questions, etc. It was worth organizing this BoF. Who knows, the idea will remain in 2026.

Carlos (a.k.a Charles), Athos, Ma ra and Melissa talked at Fosdem, and Kanashiro was one for organizers of Distributions DevRoom

During the two days of the event, it didn t rain or get too cold. The days were sunny (and people celebrated the weather in Brussels). But I have to admit that it would have been nice to see snow like I did in 2019. Unlike last year, this time I felt more motivated to stay at the event the whole time. Deixo meu agradecimento especial para o Andreas Tille, atual L der do Debian que aprovou o meu pedido de passagens para que eu pudesse participar dos FOSDEM 2025. Como sempre, essa ajuda foi essencial para viabilizar a minha viagem para Bruxelas. I would like to give my special thanks to Andreas Tille, the current Debian Leader, who approved my request for flight tickets so that I could join FOSDEM 2025. As always, this help was essential in making my trip to Brussels possible. And once again Jandira was with me on this adventure. On Monday we went for a walk around Brussels and we also traveled to visit Bruges again. The visit to this city is really worth it because walking through the historic streets is like going back in time. This time we even took a boat trip through the canals, which was really cool.

This year's Debian day was a pretty special one, we are celebrating 30 years! Giving the importance of this event, the Brazilian community planned a very special week. Instead of only local gatherings, we had a week of online talks streamed via Debian Brazil's youtube channel (soon the recordings will be uploaded to Debian's peertube instance). Nonetheless the local celebrations happened around the country and I've organized one in S o Carlos with the help of GELOS, the FLOSS group at University of S o Paulo. The event happened on August 19th and went on the whole afternoon. We had some talks about Debian and free software (see table below), a coffee break where we had the chance to talk, and finished with a group photo (check this one and many others below). Actually, it wasn't the end, we carried on the conversation about Debian and free software in a local bar :-) We had around 30 people in the event and reached a greater audience via the announcements across the university's press releases and emails sent to our Brazilian mailing lists. You can check some of them below.

• Local campus press release - Computing institute press release - Engineering institute press release - Federal institute press release - Debian-br-eventos email Below you can check the list of talks.

Time Author Title ----- -------- ------ 14:10 GELOS Intro to GELOS 14:30 Carlos Melara (Charles) A ~~not so~~ Brief Introdution to the Debian Project 15:15 Guilherme Paix o Debian and the Free Culture 15:45 z Free Software: the paths to a free life 16:15 -- Coffee Break 17:15 Prof. Dr. Francisco Jos Monaco The FOSS Ecosystem and You Here are some photos taken during the event! Getting things ready for the event. Intro to GELOS talk. A ~~not so~~ Brief Introdution to the Debian Project talk. Everyone already knew Debian! Debian and the Free Culture talk People in the auditorium space. Free Software: the paths to a free life talk Coffee Break. The FOSS Ecosystem and You talk. Group photo. Celebration goes on in the bar.

---

title: Debian Day 30 years online in Brazil description: by Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana (phls) published: true date: 2025-03-01T17:39:03.284Z tags: blog, english editor: markdown dateCreated: 2023-08-25T16:00:00.000Z In 2023 the traditional Debian Day is being celebrated in a special way, after all on August 16th Debian turned 30 years old! To celebrate this special milestone in the Debian's life, the Debian Brasil community organized a week with talks online from August 14th to 18th. The event was named Debian 30 years. Two talks were held per night, from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm, streamed on the Debian Brasil channel on YouTube totaling 10 talks. The recordings are also available on the Debian Brazil channel on Peertube. We had the participation of 9 DDs, 1 DM, 3 contributors in 10 activities. The live audience varied a lot, and the peak was on the preseed talk with Eriberto Mota when we had 47 people watching. Thank you to all participants for the contribution you made to the success of our event.

• Antonio Terceiro
• Aquila Macedo
• Charles Melara
• Daniel Lenharo de Souza
• David Polverari
• Eriberto Mota
• Giovani Ferreira
• Jefferson Maier
• Lucas Kanashiro
• Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
• Sergio Durigan Junior
• Thais Araujo
• Thiago Andrade

Veja abaixo as fotos de cada atividade: Nova gera o: uma entrevista com iniciantes no projeto Debian Instala o personalizada e automatizada do Debian com preseed Manipulando patches com git-buildpackage debian.social: Socializando Debian do jeito Debian Proxy reverso com WireGuard Celebra o dos 30 anos do Debian! Instalando o Debian em disco criptografado com LUKS O que a equipe de localiza o j conquistou nesses 30 anos Debian - Projeto e Comunidade! Design Gr fico e Software livre, o que fazer e por onde come ar

Oliver Lindburg wrote an interesting article about Designing for Crisis [1]. Bruce Schneier blogged about how to cryptographically identify other humans in advance of AT technology allowing faking people you know [2]. Anarcat has an interesting review of qalc which is a really good calculator, I ll install it on all my workstations [3]. It even does furlongs per fortnight! This would be good to be called from a LLM system when someone asks about mathematical things. Krebs has an informative article about a criminal employed by Elon s DOGE [4]. Conservatives tend to be criminals. Krebs wrote an interesting article about the security of the iOS (and presumably Android) apps for DeekSeek [5]. Seems that the DeepSeek people did everything wrong. Bruce Schneier and Davi Ottenheimer wrote an insightful article DOGE as a National Cyberattack [6]. Bruce Schneier and Barath Raghavan wrote an insightful article about why and how computer generated voices should sound robotic [7]. Cory Doctorow has an interesting approach to the trade war between the US and Canada, instead of putting tarrifs on imports from the US the Canadian government should make it legal for Canadians to unlock their own property [8]. This youtube video about designing a compressed air engine for a model plane is interesting [9]. Krebs has an interesting article on phishing and mobile phone wallets, Google and Apple need to restrict the number of wallets per phone [10]. The Daily WTF has a good summary of why Elon s DOGE organisation is badly designed and run and a brief mention of how it damages the US [11]. ArsTechnica has an informative article about device code phishing [12]. The increased use of single-sign-on is going to make this more of a problem. Shrivu wrote an insightful and informative article on how to backdoor LLMs [13]. Cory Doctorow wrote an informative post about MLMs and how they are the mirror world version of community organising [14].

• [1] https://tinyurl.com/2cmk6g6a
• [2] https://tinyurl.com/2d6ynkp4
• [3] https://anarc.at/blog/2025-02-08-qalculate-hacks/
• [4] https://tinyurl.com/2yo9gp6b
• [5] https://tinyurl.com/249swu8d
• [6] https://tinyurl.com/23soj7ya
• [7] https://tinyurl.com/22eq6gee
• [8] https://tinyurl.com/2xueute7
• [9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udI2dWmwMUE
• [10] https://tinyurl.com/24tbqdjm
• [11] https://thedailywtf.com/articles/walking-the-doge
• [12] https://tinyurl.com/27zf3yjt
• [13] https://tinyurl.com/26tpcu7f
• [14] https://tinyurl.com/2bwqq4xp

Or how it took more than a year for me to set up this website - As the computer science tradition demands, we must start with a Hello World. Though I have to say this hello world took quite a long time to reach the internet. I ve been thinking about setting up this website for way over a year, but there are always too many things to decide - what Static Site Generator will I use? Where should I get a domain from? Which registrar would be better now? What if I want to set up a mail server, is it good enough? Oh, and what about the theme, which one to choose? Can I get one simple enough to not fetch javascript or css from external sources? This was taking so long that even my friends were saying Please, just share your screen and let s do it now! . Well, rejoice friends, now it s done!

Dear Debian community, this are my bits from DPL for September. New lintian maintainer I'm pleased to welcome Louis-Philippe V ronneau as a new Lintian maintainer. He humorously acknowledged his new role, stating, "Apparently I'm a Lintian maintainer now". I remain confident that we can, and should, continue modernizing our policy checker, and I see this as one important step toward that goal. SPDX name / license tools There was a discussion about deprecating the unique names for DEP-5 and migrating to fully compliant SPDX names. Simon McVittie wrote: "Perhaps our Debian-specific names are better, but the relevant question is whether they are sufficiently better to outweigh the benefit of sharing effort and specifications with the rest of the world (and I don't think they are)." Also Charles Plessy sees the value of deprecating the Debian ones and align on SPDX. The thread on debian-devel list contains several practical hints for writing debian/copyright files. proposal: Hybrid network stack for Trixie There was a very long discussion on debian-devel list about the network stack on Trixie that started in July and was continued in end of August / beginning of September. The discussion was also covered on LWN. It continued in a "proposal: Hybrid network stack for Trixie" by Lukas M rdian. Contacting teams I continued reaching out to teams in September. One common pattern I've noticed is that most teams lack a clear strategy for attracting new contributors. Here's an example snippet from one of my outreach emails, which is representative of the typical approach: Q: Do you have some strategy to gather new contributors for your team? A: No. Q: Can I do anything for you? A: Everything that can help to have more than 3 guys :-D Well, only the first answer, "No," is typical. To help the JavaScript team, I'd like to invite anyone with JavaScript experience to join the team's mailing list and offer to learn and contribute. While I've only built a JavaScript package once, I know this team has developed excellent tools that are widely adopted by others. It's an active and efficient team, making it a great starting point for those looking to get involved in Debian. You might also want to check out the "Little tutorial for JS-Team beginners". Given the lack of a strategy to actively recruit new contributors--a common theme in the responses I've received--I recommend reviewing my talk from DebConf23 about teams. The Debian Med team would have struggled significantly in my absence (I've paused almost all work with the team since becoming DPL) if I hadn't consistently focused on bringing in new members. I'm genuinely proud of how the team has managed to keep up with the workload (thank you, Debian Med team!). Of course, onboarding newcomers takes time, and there's no guarantee of long-term success, but if you don't make the effort, you'll never find out. OS underpaid The Register, in its article titled "Open Source Maintainers Underpaid, Swamped by Security, Going Gray", summarizes the 2024 State of the Open Source Maintainer Report. I find this to be an interesting read, both in general and in connection with the challenges mentioned in the previous paragraph about finding new team members. Kind regards Andreas.

The following contributors got their Debian Developer accounts in the last two months:

• Carlos Henrique Lima Melara (charles)
• Joenio Marques da Costa (joenio)
• Blair Noctis (ncts)

The following contributors were added as Debian Maintainers in the last two months:

• Taihsiang Ho

Congratulations!

tl;dr DebConf24 was fun! A playlist of all of my talks, with subtitles (en, pt-br) and chapters is available on YouTube.

Overview DebConf24 was held in Busan, South Korea, between Sunday July 28th to Sunday August 4th 2024. As usual for DebConfs, I had a great time meeting my friends, but also met new people and got to learn a bit about the interesting things they're working on. I ended up getting too excited during the talk submission stage of the conference and as a result I presented 5 different activities (3 talks, 1 BoF and 1 lightning talk). Since I was too busy with the presentations, I did not have a lot of time to actually hang out with folks, or even to go out in the city, I guess I've learned my lesson for next time. The main purpose of this post is to write about all of the things I presented at the conference. I did want to list some of the interesting talks I've watched, but that I would not be able to be fair as I'm sure I would miss some. You can get the schedule and the recordings of any talks from the conference's website: https://debconf24.debconf.org/schedule/

wcurl Lightning Talk The most fun of my presentations, during the second-to-last day of the conference, I've asked for help from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj> to setup an URL containing a whitespace and redirecting that to wcurl's manpage. I then did a little demo to showcase why me (and a lot others) struggle with downloading things with curl, and how wcurl solves that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM8M5qa4pPM

Fixing CVEs on Debian: Everything you probably know already I've always felt like DebConf was missing security-related talks, so I decided to do something about it and presented a few of the things I've learned when fixing CVEs for Debian. This is an area where we don't get a lot of new contributors, I'm trying to change that, and this talk can be used to introduce newcomers to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzNVVILVyUM

The secret sauce of Debian Debian is not very vocal about all of the nice things it has regarding quality-assurance, testing, or CI, even though it's at the state-of-the-art for a lot of things. This talk is an initial step towards making people aware of the cool things happening behind the scenes. Ideally we should have it well-documented somewhere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_X2IBnpjic

"I use Debian BTW": fzf, tmux, zoxide and friends One of my earliest good memories of Debian was when it started coming with a colored PS1 by default, I still remember the feeling of relief whenever I jumped into a Debian server and didn't have to deal with a black and white PS1. There's still a lot of room for Debian to ship better defaults, and I think some of them can actually happen. This talk is a bit of a silly one where I'm just making people aware of the existence of a few Golang/Rust CLI tools, and also some dotfiles configurations that should probably be the default. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfto3Seokn4

curl The curl project does such a great job with their security advisories that it will likely never receive the amount of praise it deserves, but I did my best at mentioning it throughout my CVEs talk. Maybe I will write more extensively about this someday, but in case I don't:

---

There's no other project which always consistently mentions the exact range of commits that are affected by a given CVE. Forget about whether the versions are EOL, curl doesn't have LTS releases, yet they do such a great job at clearly documenting their CVEs that I would take that over having LTS releases anytime (that's for curl at least, I acknowledge some types of projects have a different need for LTS releases). Not only that, but they are also always careful about explaining alternative mitigations such as configuration changes, build flags that defuse the exploitation, or parameters that you should not use.

---

Just like we tend to do every time we meet, me and the other Debian curl maintainers spent the first 2 or 3 days of the conference talking about how we wanted to eventually meet up to discuss the package. It was going to be informal, maybe during the Cheese and Wine party, but then I've realized we should make it part of the official schedule, which would also give us the recordings for later. And so the "curl maintainers BoF" happened, where we spoke about HTTP3, GnutTLS, wcurl and other things. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL7hSypUTdM

wcurl Right after that BoF, Daniel Stenberg asked if we were interested in having wcurl adopted into curl, which we definitely were, so wcurl is now part of the curl project. Daniel was also kind enough to design a logo for the project, which makes me especially happy because I can stop with my own approach at a logo (which I had to redo every few days): And here is the new logo: Much better, I would say :)

curl Swag DebConf24 was my chance at forwarding some curl swag items to the other curl maintainers, so both Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj> and Carlos Henrique Lima Melara <charles> got the curl-up t-shirt and the very cool curl PCB coaster, both gifted by Daniel Stenberg. Unfortunately I didn't have any of that for DebConf attendees, but I did drop loads of curl stickers at the stickers table, they were gone very quickly.

For the future I used to think the most humbling experience you could have as someone who presented a talk was to have to watch it yourself, you notice a lot of mistakes and you instantly think about things that should be done differently. It turns out the most humbling thing to do is actually to write subtitles for your talks, I noticed every single mistake, often multiple times. So after spending more than 30 hours writing the subtitles for both English and Brazilian Portuguese for my talks, I feel like it's going to be much easier to avoid committing the same mistakes again. After some time you stop feeling shame about those mistakes and you're just left with feelings of annoyance, and at that point it becomes easier to consciously avoid them. I am collecting a list of things I wish I had done differently on all of those talks, so if I end up presenting any one of them again, it will be an improved version.

Dear Debian community, this are my bits from DPL for August. Happy Birthday Debian On 16th of August Debian celebrated its 31th birthday. Since I'm unable to write a better text than our great publicity team I'm simply linking to their article for those who might have missed it: https://bits.debian.org/2024/08/debian-turns-31.html Removing more packages from unstable Helmut Grohne argued for more aggressive package removal and sought consensus on a way forward. He provided six examples of processes where packages that are candidates for removal are consuming valuable person-power. I d like to add that the Bug of the Day initiative (see below) also frequently encounters long-unmaintained packages with popcon votes sometimes as low as zero, and often fewer than ten. Helmut's email included a list of packages that would meet the suggested removal criteria. There was some discussion about whether a popcon vote should be included in these criteria, with arguments both for and against it. Although I support including popcon, I acknowledge that Helmut has a valid point in suggesting it be left out. While I ve read several emails in agreement, Scott Kitterman made a valid point "I don't think we need more process. We just need someone to do the work of finding the packages and filing the bugs." I agree that this is crucial to ensure an automated process doesn t lead to unwanted removals. However, I don t see "someone" stepping up to file RM bugs against other maintainers' packages. As long as we have strict ownership of packages, many people are hesitant to touch a package, even for fixing it. Asking for its removal might be even less well-received. Therefore, if an automated procedure were to create RM bugs based on defined criteria, it could help reduce some of the social pressure. In this aspect the opinion of Niels Thykier is interesting: "As much as I want automation, I do not mind the prototype starting as a semi-automatic process if that is what it takes to get started." The urgency of the problem to remove packages was put by CharlesPlessy into the words: "So as of today, it is much less work to keep a package rotting than removing it." My observation when trying to fix the Bug of the Day exactly fits this statement. I would love for this discussion to lead to more aggressive removals that we can agree upon, whether they are automated, semi-automated, or managed by a person processing an automatically generated list (supported by an objective procedure). To use an analogy: I ve found that every image collection improves with aggressive pruning. Similarly, I m convinced that Debian will improve if we remove packages that no longer serve our users well. DEP14 / DEP18 There are two DEPs that affect our workflow for maintaining packages particularly for those who agree on using Git for Debian packages. DEP-14 recommends a standardized layout for Git packaging repositories, which benefits maintainers working across teams and makes it easier for newcomers to learn a consistent repository structure. DEP-14 stalled for various reasons. Sam Hartman suspected it might be because 'it doesn't bring sufficient value.' However, the assumption that git-buildpackage is incompatible with DEP-14 is incorrect, as confirmed by its author, Guido G nther. As one of the two key tools for Debian Git repositories (besides dgit) fully supports DEP-14, though the migration from the previous default is somewhat complex. Some investigation into mass-converting older formats to DEP-14 was conducted by the Perl team, as Gregor Hermann pointed out.. The discussion about DEP-14 resurfaced with the suggestion of DEP-18. Guido G nther proposed the title Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request-Based Collaboration for Debian Packages , which more accurately reflects the DEP's technical intent. Otto Kek l inen, who initiated DEP-18 (thank you, Otto), provided a good summary of the current status. He also assembled a very helpful overview of Git and GitLab usage in other Linux distros. More Salsa CI As a result of the DEP-18 discussion, Otto Kek l inen suggested implementing Salsa CI for our top popcon packages. I believe it would be a good idea to enable CI by default across Salsa whenever a new repository is created. Progress in Salsa migration In my campaign, I stated that I aim to reduce the number of packages maintained outside Salsa to below 2,000. As of March 28, 2024, the count was 2,368. Today, it stands at 2,187 (UDD query: SELECT DISTINCT count(*) FROM sources WHERE release = 'sid' and vcs_url not like '%salsa%' ;). After a third of my DPL term (OMG), we've made significant progress, reducing the amount in question (369 packages) by nearly half. I'm pleased with the support from the DDs who moved their packages to Salsa. Some packages were transferred as part of the Bug of the Day initiative (see below). Bug of the Day As announced in my 'Bits from the DPL' talk at DebConf, I started an initiative called Bug of the Day. The goal is to train newcomers in bug triaging by enabling them to tackle small, self-contained QA tasks. We have consistently identified target packages and resolved at least one bug per day, often addressing multiple bugs in a single package. In several cases, we followed the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference. Most instances were either welcomed by the maintainer or did not elicit a response. Unfortunately, there was one exception where the recipient of the Package Salvage bug expressed significant dissatisfaction. The takeaway is to balance formal procedures with consideration for the recipient s perspective. I'm pleased to confirm that the Matrix channel has seen an increase in active contributors. This aligns with my hope that our efforts would attract individuals interested in QA work. I m particularly pleased that, within just one month, we have had help with both fixing bugs and improving the code that aids in bug selection. As I aim to introduce newcomers to various teams within Debian, I also take the opportunity to learn about each team's specific policies myself. I rely on team members' assistance to adapt to these policies. I find that gaining this practical insight into team dynamics is an effective way to understand the different teams within Debian as DPL. Another finding from this initiative, which aligns with my goal as DPL, is that many of the packages we addressed are already on Salsa but have not been uploaded, meaning their VCS fields are not published. This suggests that maintainers are generally open to managing their packages on Salsa. For packages that were not yet on Salsa, the move was generally welcomed. Publicity team wants you The publicity team has decided to resume regular meetings to coordinate their efforts. Given my high regard for their work, I plan to attend their meetings as frequently as possible, which I began doing with the first IRC meeting. During discussions with some team members, I learned that the team could use additional help. If anyone interested in supporting Debian with non-packaging tasks reads this, please consider introducing yourself to debian-publicity@lists.debian.org. Note that this is a publicly archived mailing list, so it's not the best place for sharing private information. Kind regards Andreas.

Interesting Scientific American article about the way that language shapes thought processes and how it was demonstrated in eye tracking experiments with people who have Aboriginal languages as their first language [1]. David Brin wrote an interesting article Do We Really Want Immortality [2]. I disagree with his conclusions about the politics though. Better manufacturing technology should allow decreasing the retirement age while funding schools well. Scientific American has a surprising article about the differences between Chimp and Bonobo parenting [3]. I d never have expected Chimp moms to be protective. Sam Varghese wrote an insightful and informative article about the corruption in Indian politics and the attempts to silence Australian journalist Avani Dias [4]. WorksInProgress has an insightful article about the world s first around the world solo yacht race [5]. It has some interesting ideas about engineering. Htwo has an interesting video about adverts for fake games [6]. It s surprising how they apparently make money from advertising games that don t exist. Elena Hashman wrote an insightful blog post about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [7]. I hope they make some progress on curing it soon. The fact that it seems similar to long Covid which is quite common suggests that a lot of research will be applied to that sort of thing. Bruce Schneier wrote an insightful blog post about the risks of MS Copilot [8]. Krebs has an interesting article about how Apple does Wifi AP based geo-location and how that can be abused for tracking APs in warzones etc. Bad Apple! [9]. Bruce Schneier wrote an insightful blog post on How AI Will Change Democracy [10]. Charles Stross wrote an amusing and insightful post about MS Recall titled Is Microsoft Trying to Commit Suicide [11]. Bruce Schneier wrote an insightful blog post about seeing the world as a data structure [12]. Luke Miani has an informative YouTube video about eBay scammers selling overprices MacBooks [13]. The Yorkshire Ranter has an insightful article about Ronald Coase and the problems with outsourcing big development contracts as an array of contracts without any overall control [14].

• [1] https://tinyurl.com/ytwvpary
• [2] https://www.davidbrin.com/nonfiction/immortality.html
• [3] https://tinyurl.com/26czjpjl
• [4] https://sams-blog.com/?p=5615
• [5] https://worksinprogress.co/issue/the-maintenance-race/
• [6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhajAqI66nU
• [7] https://hashman.ca/me-cfs/
• [8] https://tinyurl.com/29b4h5oz
• [9] https://tinyurl.com/24sz7lwa
• [10] https://tinyurl.com/2c6dx8d4
• [11] https://tinyurl.com/26e3xxmn
• [12] https://tinyurl.com/26ykzgn4
• [13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5V6Pez_Dbzs
• [14] https://tinyurl.com/27h5urv9

tl;dr Starting with curl 8.0.0-2, you can now use HTTP3.

curl --http3-only https://example.com

Or, if you would like to try it out in a container:

podman run debian:unstable apt install --update -y curl && curl --http3-only https://example.com

(in case you haven't noticed, apt now has the --update option for the upgrade and install commands, although not available on stable yet)

Availability

• Debian unstable - Since 2024-07-02
• Debian testing - Since 2024-07-18
• Debian 12/bookworm backports - Expected by the end of August 2024.
• Debian 12/bookworm - Due to the mechanisms we have in place to make sure Debian stable is in fact stable, we will never be able to ship this in the regular repository. Users can make use of the backports repositories instead.
• Debian derivatives - Rolling releases will get it by the time it's on Debian testing (e.g.: Kali Linux). Stable derivatives only in their next major release.

The challenge HTTP3 is fresh new, well... not really, but at least fresh enough that I'm not aware of any other Linux distribution supporting it on curl, the reason is likely two-fold:

1. OpenSSL is not there yet OpenSSL still doesn't have proper HTTP3 support, and given that OpenSSL is so widely used, almost every curl distributor/packager will build curl with it and thus changing the TLS backend to something else is risky. Unfortunately, proper support for the OpenSSL libcurl is unlikely to come anytime before the end of this year, the OpenSSL performance is not good enough yet as of version 3.3. Daniel Stenberg has written about the state of this multiple times, most recently at HTTP/3 in curl mid 2024, if you're interested, I suggest reading through his other posts as well. Some might have noticed that nginx does support HTTP3 through OpenSSL, although when you look closely, it's not exactly perfect:

   An SSL library that provides QUIC support is recommended to build nginx, such as BoringSSL, LibreSSL, or QuicTLS. Otherwise, the OpenSSL compatibility layer will be used that does not support early data.

   As you can see, they don't recommend using OpenSSL, and when doing so, you don't get complete support.

2. HTTP3 support for GnuTLS/nghttp3/ngtcp2 is recent The non-experimental support arrived back in October 2023, and so that's when I started seriously planning for this. curl has been working on HTTP3 support for years, and so it did support other TLS backends before that, but out of them, the one most feasible for a distribution to ship would be GnuTLS, which gets HTTP3 support through ngctp2 and nghttp3.

How it was done The Debian curl package has historically shipped at least two variants of libcurl, an OpenSSL and a GnuTLS one. The OpenSSL libcurl can't support HTTP3 for the reasons explained above, but the GnuTLS libcurl can (with ngtcp2 and nghtp3). Debian packages can choose which version of libcurl to link against (without having to modify any upstream source code). Debian's "git" package being a famous example of a package that links against the GnuTLS libcurl. Enabling HTTP3 on curl was done in three steps:

1. Make sure all required dependencies fulfill the minimum requirements.
2. Enable HTTP3 for GnuTLS libcurl.
3. Change the libcurl used by the curl CLI, from OpenSSL to GnuTLS.

curl's HTTP3 support requires a somewhat recent version of nghttp3 and updating that required a transition (due to the SONAME bump), while we've also had months of freeze for transitions due to the time_t transition. After the dependencies were in place, enabling HTTP3 for the GnuTLS libcurl was straightforward. Then, for the last part, we had to switch the TLS backend used by the curl CLI. Doing the swap is also quite easy on the packaging level, but we have to consider the chances of this change breaking our users' environments.

Ensuring there are no breakages The first thing to consider regarding breakages is that this change is not going to be pushed directly to the current Debian stable releases, it will be present in the next stable release (13/trixie) but the current one will stick to the version that's already shipped. Secondly, we have to consider the risk of losing the ability to use certain parameters from the curl CLI which could be limited to the OpenSSL backend. During curl-up 2024, the curl developers pointed out the existence of a page that lists the TLS related options and the backends they work with. Analysing that page, ignoring all of the options that are suffixed with "BLOB" (only pertinent to the library, not the CLI), the only one left which is attention worthy is CURLOPT_ECH.

This experimental feature requires a special build of OpenSSL, as ECH is not yet supported in OpenSSL releases. In contrast ECH is supported by the latest BoringSSL and wolfSSL releases.

As it turns out, Encrypted Client Hello is experimental and it's not supported by the vanilla OpenSSL. This was enough of an investigation for me to go ahead with the change. Noting that even in the worst case scenario (we find a horrible regression), we can rollback without having affected a single stable release. Now that the package is on Debian unstable, the CI tests (autopkgtest) of every package that depends on curl is currently running, the results are compared against the migration-reference (in this case, the curl CLI with OpenSSL, before the change). If everything goes right, curl with HTTP3 support will migrate to Debian testing in around 5 days. If we spot any issues, we'll have to solve them first and it's going to be hard to predict how long it takes, although it's fair to expect less than a month.

Feedback Feel free to join the Matrix room for the Debian curl maintainers:
https://matrix.to/#/#debian-curl-maintainers:matrix.org

Acknowledgements It took us a bit longer than expected to be able to enable HTTP3, nonetheless it's still early enough to be excited about. A lot of people were crucial to make this happen. I should recognize in the first place, obviously, the curl developers and the developers of the supporting libraries: GnuTLS, nghttp3, ngtcp2. Participating in the curl-up 2024 conference helped me get motivated to push this through, besides becoming aware of the right documentation to research for impact. On the Debian side, Sakirnth Nagarasa <sakirnth> was responsible for updating and taking care of the transition for nghttp3 and ngtcp2. Also on the Debian side, I've got loads of help and support from the co-maintainers of the curl package: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj> and Carlos Henrique Lima Melara <charles>.

Changes since publication

2024-07-18

• Update date of availability for Debian testing and expected date for bookworm backports.
• We have historically spoken Portuguese in the room but we'll switch to English in case anyone joins.

tl;dr Whenever you need to download files through the terminal and don't feel like using wget:

wcurl example.com/filename.txt

Manpage:
https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/curl/wcurl.1.en.html

Availability (comes installed with the curl package):

• Debian unstable - Since 2024-07-02
• Debian testing - Since 2024-07-18
• Debian 12/bookworm backports - Expected by the end of August 2024.
• Debian 12/bookworm - Depends on whether Debian's release team will approve it, it could be available in the next point release.
• Debian derivatives - Rolling releases will get it by the time it's on Debian testing (e.g.: Kali Linux). Stable derivatives only in their next major release.

If you don't want to wait for the package update to arrive, you can always copy the script and place it in your /usr/bin, the code is here:
https://github.com/Debian/wcurl/blob/main/wcurl
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wcurl/-/blob/main/wcurl?ref_type=heads

Smoother CLI experience Starting with curl version 8.8.0-2, the Debian's curl package now ships a wcurl executable. wcurl is the solution for those who just need to download files without having to remember curl's parameters for things like automatically naming the files. Some people, myself included, would fall back to using wget whenever there was a need to download a file. Sometimes even installing wget just for that usecase. After all, it's easier to remember "apt install wget" rather than "curl -L -O -C - ...". wcurl consists of a simple shell script that provides sane defaults for the curl invocation, for when the use case is to just download files. By default, wcurl will:

• Encode whitespaces in URLs;
• Download multiple URLs in parallel if the installed curl's version is >= 7.66.0;
• Follow redirects;
• Automatically choose a filename as output;
• Avoid overwriting files if the installed curl's version is >= 7.83.0 (--no-clobber);
• Perform retries;
• Set the downloaded file timestamp to the value provided by the server, if available;
• Default to the protocol used as https if the URL doesn't contain any;
• Disable curl's URL globbing parser so and [] characters in URLs are not treated specially.

Example to download a single file:

wcurl example.com/filename.txt

If you ever need to set a custom flag, you can make use of the --curl-options wcurl option, anything set there will be passed to the curl invocation. Just beware that if you need to set any custom flags, it's likely you will be better served by calling curl directly. The --curl-options option is there to allow for some flexibility in unforeseen circumstances.

The need for wcurl I've always felt a bit ashamed of not remembering curl's parameters for downloading a file and automatically naming it, having resorted to wget most of the times this was needed (even installing wget when it wasn't there, just for this). I've spoken to a few other experienced people I know and confirmed what could be obvious to others: a lot of people struggle with this. Recently, the curl project released the results of 2024's curl survey, which also showed this is as a much needed feature, just look at some of the answers:

Q: Which curl command line option do you think needs improvement and how?

-O, I really want wget like functionality where I don't have to specify the name

Downloading a file (like wget) could be improved - with automatic naming of the file

downloading files - wget is much cleaner

I wish the default behaviour when GETting a binary was to drop it on disk. That's the only reason 'wget foo.tgz" is still ingrained in my muscle memory .

Maybe have a way to download without specifying something in -o (the only reason i used wget still)

--remote-time should be default

--remote-name-all could really use a short flag

Q: If you miss support for something, tell us what!

"Write the data to the file named in the URL (or in redirects if I'm feeling daring), and timestamp the file to the last-modified-date". This is the main reason I'm still using wget.

I can finally feel less bad about falling back to wget due to not remembering the parameters I want.

Idealization vs. reality I don't believe curl will ever change its default behavior in such a way that would accommodate this need, as that would have a side-effect of breaking things which expect the current behavior (the blast radius is literally the solar system). This means a new executable needs to be shipped side-by-side with curl, an opportunity to start fresh and work with a more focused use case (to download files). Ideally, this new executable would be maintained by the curl project, make use of libcurl under-the-hood, and be available everywhere. Nobody wants to worry if their systems have the tool or not, it should always be there. Given I'm just a Debian Developer, with not as much free time as I wish, I've decided to write a simple shell script wrapper calling the curl CLI under-the-hood. wcurl will come installed with the curl package from now on, and I will check with the release team about shipping it on the current Debian stable as well. Shipping wcurl in other distros will be up to them (Debian-derivatives should pick it up automatically, though). We've tried to make it easy for anyone to ship this by using the curl license, keeping the script POSIX-compliant, and shipping a manpage. Maybe if there's enough interest across distributions, someone might sign up for implementing this in upstream curl and increase its reach. I would be happy with the curl project reusing the wcurl name when that happens. It's unlikely that wcurl would be shipped by curl upstream as it is, assuming they would prefer a solution that uses libcurl direclty (more similar to curl the CLI, to maintain). In the worst case, wcurl becomes a Debian-specific tool that only a few people are aware of, in the best case, it becomes the new go-to CLI tool for simply downloading files. I would be happy if at least someone other than me finds it useful.

Naming is hard When I started working on it, I was calling the new executable "curld" (stands for "curl download"), but then when discussing this in one of our weekly calls in the Debian Bras lia community, it was mentioned that this could be confused for a daemon. We then settled for the name "wcurl", suggested by Carlos Henrique Lima Melara <charles>. It doesn't really stand for anything, but it's very easy to remember. You know... "it's that wget alternative for when you want to use curl instead" :)

Feedback I'm hosting the code on Github and Debian's GitLab instance, feel free to open an issue to provide feedback.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wcurl
https://github.com/Debian/wcurl We also have a Matrix room for the Debian curl maintainers:
https://matrix.to/#/#debian-curl-maintainers:matrix.org

Acknowledgments The idea for wcurl came a few days before the curl-up conference 2024. I've been thinking a lot about developer productivity in the terminal lately, different tools and better defaults. Before curl-up, I was also thinking about packaging improvements for the curl package. I don't remember what exactly happened, but I likely had to download something and felt a bit ashamed of maintaining curl and not remembering the parameters to download files the way I wanted. I first discussed this idea in the conference, where I asked the participants about it and there were no concerns raised, and some people said I should give it a go. Participating in curl-up was a really great experience and I'm thankful for the interactions I've had there. On the Debian side, I've got reviews of the code and manpage by Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj>, Guilherme Puida Moreira <puida> and Carlos Henrique Lima Melara <charles>. Sergio ended up rewriting the tool to be POSIX-compliant (my version was written in bash), so he takes all the credit for the portability.

Changes since publication

2024-07-18

• Update date of availability for Debian testing and expected date for bookworm backports.
• Mention charles as the person who suggested "wcurl" as a name.
• Update wcurl's -o/--opts options, it's now just --curl-options.
• Remove mention of language spoken in the Matrix room, we are using English now.
• Update list of features of wcurl.

Modos Labs have released the design of an e-ink display connected by USB-C [1]. They have provided a lot of background information on e-ink displays which isn t available elsewhere. Excellent work! Informative article about a company giving renters insecure locks while facilitating collusion to raise rents [2]. Insightful video by JimmyTheGiant about the destruction of housing estates in the UK [3]. I wonder how much of this was deliberate by the Tories. Insightful video by Modern Vintage Gamer about the way Nintendo is destroying history by preventing people playing old games [4]. Interesting video by Louis Rossmann about the low quality of products and reviews on Amazon [5]. We all know about Enshittification, but it seems that Amazon is getting to the stage of being unusable for some products. Amusing video by Folding Ideas about Decentraland an attampt at a blockchain based second life type thing which failed as you expect blockchain things to fail [6]. The top comment is a transcription of the actions of the speaker s pet cat. ;)

• [1] https://github.com/Modos-Labs/Glider?tab=readme-ov-file
• [2] https://tinyurl.com/2yosvptu
• [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxCgueTf0W0
• [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2KV8MHRJlQ
• [5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83BS_mK9GE
• [6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiZhdpLXZ8Q

The following contributors got their Debian Developer accounts in the last two months:

• Patrick Winnertz (winnie)
• Fabian Gruenbichler (fabiang)

The following contributors were added as Debian Maintainers in the last two months:

• Juri Grabowski
• Tobias Heider
• Jean Charles Del pine
• Guilherme Puida Moreira
• Antoine Le Gonidec
• Arthur Barbosa Diniz

Congratulations!

Bruce Schneier wrote an interesting blog post about his workshop on reimagining democracy and the unusual way he structured it [1]. It would be fun to have a security conference run like that! Matthias write an informative blog post about Wayland Wayland really breaks things Just for now which links to a blog debate about the utility of Wayland [2]. Wayland seems pretty good to me. Cory Doctorow wrote an insightful article about the AI bubble comparing it to previous bubbles [3]. Charles Stross wrote an insightful analysis of the implications if the UK brought back military conscription [4]. Looks like the era of large armies is over. Charles Stross wrote an informative blog post about the Worldcon in China, covering issues of vote rigging for location, government censorship vs awards, and business opportunities [5]. The Paris Review has an interesting article about speaking to the CIA s Creative Writing Group [6]. It doesn t explain why they have a creative writing group that has some sort of semi-official sanction. LongNow has an insightful article about the threats to biodiversity in food crops and the threat that poses to humans [7]. Bruce Schneier and Albert Fox Cahn wrote an interesting article about the impacts of chatbots on human discourse [8]. If it makes people speak more precisely then that would be great for all Autistic people!

• [1] https://tinyurl.com/yppnule7
• [2] https://tinyurl.com/ytcxrvug
• [3] https://tinyurl.com/23ds5phd
• [4] https://tinyurl.com/2268krpg
• [5] https://tinyurl.com/26kr4tb7
• [6] https://tinyurl.com/yr75h7uk
• [7] https://longnow.org/ideas/to-save-it-eat-it/
• [8] https://tinyurl.com/ywwhshor

In 2018 Charles Stross wrote an insightful blog post Dude You Broke the Future [1]. It covers AI in both fiction and fact and corporations (the real AIs) and the horrifying things they can do right now. LongNow has an interesting article about the concept of the Magnum Opus [2]. As an aside I ve been working on SE Linux for 22 years. Cory Doctorow wrote an insightful article about the incentives for enshittification of the Internet and how economic issues and regulations shape that [3]. CCC has a lot of great talks, and this talk from the latest CCC about the Triangulation talk on an attak on Kaspersky iPhones is particularly epic [4]. GoodCar is an online sales site for electric cars in Australia [5]. Ulrike wrote an insightful blog post about how the reliance on volunteer work in the FOSS community hurts diversity [6]. Cory Doctorow wrote an insightful article about The Internet s Original Sin which is misuse of copyright law [7]. He advocates for using copyright strictly for it s intended purpose and creating other laws for privacy, labor rights, etc. David Brin wrote an interesting article on neoteny and sexual selection in humans [8]. 37C3 has an interesting lecture about software licensing for a circular economy which includes environmental savings from better code [9]. Now they track efficiency in KDE bug reports!

• [1] http://tinyurl.com/2estdwk6
• [2] https://longnow.org/ideas/magnum-opus/
• [3] http://tinyurl.com/ymngs25y
• [4] http://tinyurl.com/yum44rag
• [5] https://marketplace.goodcar.co/cars
• [6] https://the.curlybracket.net/2023/12/21/unpaid-work.html
• [7] http://tinyurl.com/2ye7hl4g
• [8] https://www.davidbrin.com/nonfiction/neoteny1.html
• [9] http://tinyurl.com/2c7mjw2z