Search Results: "reg"

23 September 2020

Russell Coker: Qemu (KVM) and 9P (Virtfs) Mounts

I ve tried setting up the Qemu (in this case KVM as it uses the Qemu code in question) 9P/Virtfs filesystem for sharing files to a VM. Here is the Qemu documentation for it [1].
VIRTFS="-virtfs local,path=/vmstore/virtfs,security_model=mapped-xattr,id=zz,writeout=immediate,fmode=0600,dmode=0700,mount_tag=zz"
VIRTFS="-virtfs local,path=/vmstore/virtfs,security_model=passthrough,id=zz,writeout=immediate,mount_tag=zz"
Above are the 2 configuration snippets I tried on the server side. The first uses mapped xattrs (which means that all files will have the same UID/GID and on the host XATTRs will be used for storing the Unix permissions) and the second uses passthrough which requires KVM to run as root and gives the same permissions on the host as on the VM. The advantages of passthrough are better performance through writing less metadata and having the same permissions in host and VM. The advantages of mapped XATTRs are running KVM/Qemu as non-root and not having a SUID file in the VM imply a SUID file in the host. Here is the link to Bonnie++ output comparing Ext3 on a KVM block device (stored on a regular file in a BTRFS RAID-1 filesystem on 2 SSDs on the host), a NFS share from the host from the same BTRFS filesystem, and virtfs shares of the same filesystem. The only tests that Ext3 doesn t win are some of the latency tests, latency is based on the worst-case not the average. I expected Ext3 to win most tests, but didn t expect it to lose any latency tests. Here is a link to Bonnie++ output comparing just NFS and Virtfs. It s obvious that Virtfs compares poorly, giving about half the performance on many tests. Surprisingly the only tests where Virtfs compared well to NFS were the file creation tests which I expected Virtfs with mapped XATTRs to do poorly due to the extra metadata. Here is a link to Bonnie++ output comparing only Virtfs. The options are mapped XATTRs with default msize, mapped XATTRs with 512k msize (I don t know if this made a difference, the results are within the range of random differences), and passthrough. There s an obvious performance benefit in passthrough for the small file tests due to the less metadata overhead, but as creating small files isn t a bottleneck on most systems a 20% to 30% improvement in that area probably doesn t matter much. The result from the random seeks test in passthrough is unusual, I ll have to do more testing on that. SE Linux On Virtfs the XATTR used for SE Linux labels is passed through to the host. So every label used in a VM has to be valid on the host and accessible to the context of the KVM/Qemu process. That s not really an option so you have to use the context mount option. Having the mapped XATTR mode work for SE Linux labels is a necessary feature. Conclusion The msize mount option in the VM doesn t appear to do anything and it doesn t appear in /proc/mounts, I don t know if it s even supported in the kernel I m using. The passthrough and mapped XATTR modes give near enough performance that there doesn t seem to be a benefit of one over the other. NFS gives significant performance benefits over Virtfs while also using less CPU time in the VM. It has the issue of files named .nfs* hanging around if the VM crashes while programs were using deleted files. It s also more well known, ask for help with an NFS problem and you are more likely to get advice than when asking for help with a virtfs problem. Virtfs might be a better option for accessing databases than NFS due to it s internal operation probably being a better map to Unix filesystem semantics, but running database servers on the host is probably a better choice anyway. Virtfs generally doesn t seem to be worth using. I had hoped for performance that was better than NFS but the only benefit I seemed to get was avoiding the .nfs* file issue. The best options for storage for a KVM/Qemu VM seem to be Ext3 for files that are only used on one VM and for which the size won t change suddenly or unexpectedly (particularly the root filesystem) and NFS for everything else.

21 September 2020

Kees Cook: security things in Linux v5.7

Previously: v5.6 Linux v5.7 was released at the end of May. Here s my summary of various security things that caught my attention: arm64 kernel pointer authentication
While the ARMv8.3 CPU Pointer Authentication (PAC) feature landed for userspace already, Kristina Martsenko has now landed PAC support in kernel mode. The current implementation uses PACIASP which protects the saved stack pointer, similar to the existing CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR feature, only faster. This also paves the way to sign and check pointers stored in the heap, as a way to defeat function pointer overwrites in those memory regions too. Since the behavior is different from the traditional stack protector, Amit Daniel Kachhap added an LKDTM test for PAC as well. BPF LSM
The kernel s Linux Security Module (LSM) API provide a way to write security modules that have traditionally implemented various Mandatory Access Control (MAC) systems like SELinux, AppArmor, etc. The LSM hooks are numerous and no one LSM uses them all, as some hooks are much more specialized (like those used by IMA, Yama, LoadPin, etc). There was not, however, any way to externally attach to these hooks (not even through a regular loadable kernel module) nor build fully dynamic security policy, until KP Singh landed the API for building LSM policy using BPF. With this, it is possible (for a privileged process) to write kernel LSM hooks in BPF, allowing for totally custom security policy (and reporting). execve() deadlock refactoring
There have been a number of long-standing races in the kernel s process launching code where ptrace could deadlock. Fixing these has been attempted several times over the last many years, but Eric W. Biederman and Ernd Edlinger decided to dive in, and successfully landed the a series of refactorings, splitting up the problematic locking and refactoring their uses to remove the deadlocks. While he was at it, Eric also extended the exec_id counter to 64 bits to avoid the possibility of the counter wrapping and allowing an attacker to send arbitrary signals to processes they normally shouldn t be able to. slub freelist obfuscation improvements
After Silvio Cesare observed some weaknesses in the implementation of CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED s freelist pointer content obfuscation, I improved their bit diffusion, which makes attacks require significantly more memory content exposures to defeat the obfuscation. As part of the conversation, Vitaly Nikolenko pointed out that the freelist pointer s location made it relatively easy to target too (for either disclosures or overwrites), so I moved it away from the edge of the slab, making it harder to reach through small-sized overflows (which usually target the freelist pointer). As it turns out, there were a few assumptions in the kernel about the location of the freelist pointer, which had to also get cleaned up. RISCV page table dumping
Following v5.6 s generic page table dumping work, Zong Li landed the RISCV page dumping code. This means it s much easier to examine the kernel s page table layout when running a debug kernel (built with PTDUMP_DEBUGFS), visible in /sys/kernel/debug/kernel_page_tables. array index bounds checking
This is a pretty large area of work that touches a lot of overlapping elements (and history) in the Linux kernel. The short version is: C is bad at noticing when it uses an array index beyond the bounds of the declared array, and we need to fix that. For example, don t do this:
int foo[5];
...
foo[8] = bar;
The long version gets complicated by the evolution of flexible array structure members, so we ll pause for a moment and skim the surface of this topic. While things like CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE try to catch these kinds of cases in the memcpy() and strcpy() family of functions, it doesn t catch it in open-coded array indexing, as seen in the code above. GCC has a warning (-Warray-bounds) for these cases, but it was disabled by Linus because of all the false positives seen due to fake flexible array members. Before flexible arrays were standardized, GNU C supported zero sized array members. And before that, C code would use a 1-element array. These were all designed so that some structure could be the header in front of some data blob that could be addressable through the last structure member:
/* 1-element array */
struct foo  
    ...
    char contents[1];
 ;
/* GNU C extension: 0-element array */
struct foo  
    ...
    char contents[0];
 ;
/* C standard: flexible array */
struct foo  
    ...
    char contents[];
 ;
instance = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo) + content_size);
Converting all the zero- and one-element array members to flexible arrays is one of Gustavo A. R. Silva s goals, and hundreds of these changes started landing. Once fixed, -Warray-bounds can be re-enabled. Much more detail can be found in the kernel s deprecation docs. However, that will only catch the visible at compile time cases. For runtime checking, the Undefined Behavior Sanitizer has an option for adding runtime array bounds checking for catching things like this where the compiler cannot perform a static analysis of the index values:
int foo[5];
...
for (i = 0; i < some_argument; i++)  
    ...
    foo[i] = bar;
    ...
 
It was, however, not separate (via kernel Kconfig) until Elena Petrova and I split it out into CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS, which is fast enough for production kernel use. With this enabled, it's now possible to instrument the kernel to catch these conditions, which seem to come up with some regularity in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth drivers for some reason. Since UBSAN (and the other Sanitizers) only WARN() by default, system owners need to set panic_on_warn=1 too if they want to defend against attacks targeting these kinds of flaws. Because of this, and to avoid bloating the kernel image with all the warning messages, I introduced CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP which effectively turns these conditions into a BUG() without needing additional sysctl settings. Fixing "additive" snprintf() usage
A common idiom in C for building up strings is to use sprintf()'s return value to increment a pointer into a string, and build a string with more sprintf() calls:
/* safe if strlen(foo) + 1 < sizeof(string) */
wrote  = sprintf(string, "Foo: %s\n", foo);
/* overflows if strlen(foo) + strlen(bar) > sizeof(string) */
wrote += sprintf(string + wrote, "Bar: %s\n", bar);
/* writing way beyond the end of "string" now ... */
wrote += sprintf(string + wrote, "Baz: %s\n", baz);
The risk is that if these calls eventually walk off the end of the string buffer, it will start writing into other memory and create some bad situations. Switching these to snprintf() does not, however, make anything safer, since snprintf() returns how much it would have written:
/* safe, assuming available <= sizeof(string), and for this example
 * assume strlen(foo) < sizeof(string) */
wrote  = snprintf(string, available, "Foo: %s\n", foo);
/* if (strlen(bar) > available - wrote), this is still safe since the
 * write into "string" will be truncated, but now "wrote" has been
 * incremented by how much snprintf() *would* have written, so "wrote"
 * is now larger than "available". */
wrote += snprintf(string + wrote, available - wrote, "Bar: %s\n", bar);
/* string + wrote is beyond the end of string, and availabe - wrote wraps
 * around to a giant positive value, making the write effectively 
 * unbounded. */
wrote += snprintf(string + wrote, available - wrote, "Baz: %s\n", baz);
So while the first overflowing call would be safe, the next one would be targeting beyond the end of the array and the size calculation will have wrapped around to a giant limit. Replacing this idiom with scnprintf() solves the issue because it only reports what was actually written. To this end, Takashi Iwai has been landing a bunch scnprintf() fixes. That's it for now! Let me know if there is anything else you think I should mention here. Next up: Linux v5.8.

2020, Kees Cook. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
CC BY-SA 4.0

Antoine Beaupr : PSA: Mailman used to harrass people

It seems that Mailman instances are being abused to harrass people with subscribe spam. If some random people complain to you that they "never wanted to subscribe to your mailing list", you may be a victim to that attack, even if you run the latest Mailman 2.

TL;DR: IKR! HOW DO I FIX THIS!? Make sure you have SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET set in your mailman configuration:
SECRET=$(tr -dc 'A-Za-z0-9' < /dev/urandom   head -c 30)'
echo "SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET = '$SECRET'" >> /etc/mailman/mm.cfg
This will add a magic token to all forms in the Mailman web forms that will force the attacker to at least get a token before asking for registration. There are, of course, other ways of performing the attack then, but it's more expensive than a single request for the attacker and keeps most of the junk out.

Other solutions I originally deployed a different fix, using referrer checks and an IP block list:
RewriteMap hosts-deny  txt:/etc/apache2/blocklist.txt
RewriteCond $ hosts-deny:% REMOTE_ADDR NOT-FOUND  !=NOT-FOUND [OR]
RewriteCond $ hosts-deny:% REMOTE_HOST NOT-FOUND  !=NOT-FOUND [OR]
RewriteCond % HTTP_REFERER  !^https://lists.torproject.org/$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^/cgi-bin/mailman/subscribe/ - [F]
# see also https://www.w3.org/TR/referrer-policy/#referrer-policy-origin
Header always set Referrer-Policy "origin"
I kept those restrictions in place because it keeps the spammers from even hitting the Mailman CGI, which is useful to preserve our server resources. But if "they" escalate with smarter crawlers, the block list will still be useful. You can use this query to extract the top 10 IP addresses used for subscription attempts:
awk '  print $NF  ' /var/log/mailman/subscribe   sort   uniq -c   sort -n   tail -10    awk '  print $2 " " $1  '
Note that this might include email-based registration, but in our logs those are extremely rare: only two in three weeks, out of over 73,000 requests. I also use this to keep an eye on the logs:
tail -f  /var/log/mailman/subscribe /var/log/apache2/lists.torproject.org-access.log   grep -v 'GET /pipermail/'
The server-side mitigations might also be useful if you happen to run an extremely old version of Mailman, that is pre-2.1.18, but it's now over 6 years old and part of every supported Debian release out there (all the way back to Debian 8 jessie).

Why does that attack work? Because Mailman 2 doesn't have CSRF tokens in its forms by default, anyone can send a POST request to /mailman/subscribe/LISTNAME to have Mailman send an email to the user. In the old "Internet is for nice people" universe, that wasn't a problem: all it does is ask the victim if they want to subscribe to LISTNAME. Innocuous, right? But in the brave, new, post-Eternal-September, "Internet is for stupid" universe, some assholes think it's a good idea to make a form that collects hundreds of mailing list URLs and spam them through an iframe. To see what that looks like, you can look at the rendered source code behind samedyfreeday.co.uk (not linking to avoid promoting it). That site does what is basically a distributed cross-site scripting attack against Mailman servers. Obviously, CSRF protection should be enabled by default in Mailman, but there you go. Hopefully this will help some folks... (The latest Mailman 3 release doesn't suffer from such idiotic defaults and ships with proper CSRF protection out of the box.)

20 September 2020

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppSpdlog 0.0.2: New upstream, awesome new stopwatch

Following up on the initial RcppSpdlog 0.0.1 release earlier this week, we are pumped to announce release 0.0.2. It contains upstream version 1.8.0 for spdlog which utilizes (among other things) a new feature in the embedded fmt library, namely completely automated formatting of high resolution time stamps which allows for gems like this (taken from this file in the package and edited down for brevity):
    spdlog::stopwatch sw;                                   // instantiate a stop watch

    // some other code

    sp->info("Elapsed time:  ", sw);
What we see is all there is: One instantiates a stopwatch object, and simply references it. The rest, as they say, is magic. And we get tic / toc alike behaviour in modern C++ at essentially no cost us (as code authors). So nice. Output from the (included in the package) function exampleRsink() (again edited down just a little):
R> RcppSpdlog::exampleRsink()
[13:03:23.845114] [fromR] [I] [thread 793264] Welcome to spdlog!
[...]
[13:03:23.845205] [fromR] [I] [thread 793264] Elapsed time: 0.000103611
[...]
[13:03:23.845281] [fromR] [I] [thread 793264] Elapsed time: 0.00018203
R> 
We see that the two simple logging instances come 10 and 18 microseconds into the call. RcppSpdlog bundles spdlog, a wonderful header-only C++ logging library with all the bells and whistles you would want that was written by Gabi Melman, and also includes fmt by Victor Zverovic. The NEWS entry for this release follows.

Changes in RcppSpdlog version 0.0.2 (2020-09-17)
  • Upgraded to upstream release 1.8.0
  • Switched Travis CI to using BSPM, also test on macOS
  • Added 'stopwatch' use to main R sink example

Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is a diffstat report relative to previous release. More detailed information is on the RcppSpdlog page. The only sour grapes, again, are once more over the CRAN processing. And just how 0.0.1 was delayed for no good reason for three weeks, 0.0.2 was delayed by three days just because well that is how CRAN rules sometimes. I d be even more mad if I had an alternative but I don t. We remain grateful for all they do but they really could have let this one through even at one-day update delta. Ah well, now we re three days wiser and of course nothing changed in the package. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub. For the first year, GitHub will match your contributions.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

19 September 2020

Vincent Bernat: Syncing NetBox with a custom Ansible module

The netbox.netbox collection from Ansible Galaxy provides several modules to update NetBox objects:
- name: create a device in NetBox
  netbox_device:
    netbox_url: http://netbox.local
    netbox_token: s3cret
    data:
      name: to3-p14.sfo1.example.com
      device_type: QFX5110-48S
      device_role: Compute Switch
      site: SFO1
However, if NetBox is not your source of truth, you may want to ensure it stays in sync with your configuration management database1 by removing outdated devices or IP addresses. While it should be possible to glue together a playbook with a query, a loop and some filtering to delete unwanted elements, it feels clunky, inefficient and an abuse of YAML as a programming language. A specific Ansible module solves this issue and is likely more flexible.

Notice I recommend that you read Writing a custom Ansible module as an introduction, as well as Syncing MySQL tables for a first simpler example.

Code The module has the following signature and it syncs NetBox with the content of the provided YAML file:
netbox_sync:
  source: netbox.yaml
  api: https://netbox.example.com
  token: s3cret
The synchronized objects are:
  • sites,
  • manufacturers,
  • device types,
  • device roles,
  • devices, and
  • IP addresses.
In our environment, the YAML file is generated from our configuration management database and contains a set of devices and a list of IP addresses:
devices:
  ad2-p6.sfo1.example.com:
     datacenter: sfo1
     manufacturer: Cisco
     model: Catalyst 2960G-48TC-L
     role: net_tor_oob_switch
  to1-p6.sfo1.example.com:
     datacenter: sfo1
     manufacturer: Juniper
     model: QFX5110-48S
     role: net_tor_gpu_switch
# [ ]
ips:
  - device: ad2-p6.example.com
    ip: 172.31.115.18/21
    interface: oob
  - device: to1-p6.example.com
    ip: 172.31.115.33/21
    interface: oob
  - device: to1-p6.example.com
    ip: 172.31.254.33/32
    interface: lo0.0
# [ ]
The network team is not the sole tenant in NetBox. While adding new objects or modifying existing ones should be relatively safe, deleting unwanted objects can be risky. The module only deletes objects it did create or modify. To identify them, it marks them with a specific tag, cmdb. Most objects in NetBox accept tags.

Module definition Starting from the skeleton described in the previous article, we define the module:
module_args = dict(
    source=dict(type='path', required=True),
    api=dict(type='str', required=True),
    token=dict(type='str', required=True, no_log=True),
    max_workers=dict(type='int', required=False, default=10)
)
result = dict(
    changed=False
)
module = AnsibleModule(
    argument_spec=module_args,
    supports_check_mode=True
)
It contains an additional optional arguments defining the number of workers to talk to NetBox and query the existing objects in parallel to speedup the execution.

Abstracting synchronization We need to synchronize different object types, but once we have a list of objects we want in NetBox, the grunt work is always the same:
  • check if the objects already exist,
  • retrieve them and put them in a form suitable for comparison,
  • retrieve the extra objects we don t want anymore,
  • compare the two sets, and
  • add missing objects, update existing ones, delete extra ones.
We code these behaviours into a Synchronizer abstract class. For each kind of object, a concrete class is built with the appropriate class attributes to tune its behaviour and a wanted() method to provide the objects we want. I am not explaining the abstract class code here. Have a look at the source if you want.

Synchronizing tags and tenants As a starter, here is how we define the class synchronizing the tags:
class SyncTags(Synchronizer):
    app = "extras"
    table = "tags"
    key = "name"
    def wanted(self):
        return  "cmdb": dict(
            slug="cmdb",
            color="8bc34a",
            description="synced by network CMDB") 
The app and table attributes defines the NetBox objects we want to manipulate. The key attribute is used to determine how to lookup for existing objects. In this example, we want to lookup tags using their names. The wanted() method is expected to return a dictionary mapping object keys to the list of wanted attributes. Here, the keys are tag names and we create only one tag, cmdb, with the provided slug, color and description. This is the tag we will use to mark the objects we create or modify. If the tag does not exist, it is created. If it exists, the provided attributes are updated. Other attributes are left untouched. We also want to create a specific tenant for objects accepting such an attribute (devices and IP addresses):
class SyncTenants(Synchronizer):
    app = "tenancy"
    table = "tenants"
    key = "name"
    def wanted(self):
        return  "Network": dict(slug="network",
                                description="Network team") 

Synchronizing sites We also need to synchronize the list of sites. This time, the wanted() method uses the information provided in the YAML file: it walks the devices and builds a set of datacenter names.
class SyncSites(Synchronizer):
    app = "dcim"
    table = "sites"
    key = "name"
    only_on_create = ("status", "slug")
    def wanted(self):
        result = set(details["datacenter"]
                     for details in self.source['devices'].values()
                     if "datacenter" in details)
        return  k: dict(slug=k,
                        status="planned")
                for k in result 
Thanks to the use of the only_on_create attribute, the specified attributes are not updated if they are different. The goal of this synchronizer is mostly to collect the references to the different sites for other objects.
>>> pprint(SyncSites(**sync_args).wanted())
 'sfo1':  'slug': 'sfo1', 'status': 'planned' ,
 'chi1':  'slug': 'chi1', 'status': 'planned' ,
 'nyc1':  'slug': 'nyc1', 'status': 'planned' 

Synchronizing manufacturers, device types and device roles The synchronization of manufacturers is pretty similar, except we do not use the only_on_create attribute:
class SyncManufacturers(Synchronizer):
    app = "dcim"
    table = "manufacturers"
    key = "name"
    def wanted(self):
        result = set(details["manufacturer"]
                     for details in self.source['devices'].values()
                     if "manufacturer" in details)
        return  k:  "slug": slugify(k) 
                for k in result 
Regarding the device types, we use the foreign attribute linking a NetBox attribute to the synchronizer handling it.
class SyncDeviceTypes(Synchronizer):
    app = "dcim"
    table = "device_types"
    key = "model"
    foreign =  "manufacturer": SyncManufacturers 
    def wanted(self):
        result = set((details["manufacturer"], details["model"])
                     for details in self.source['devices'].values()
                     if "model" in details)
        return  k[1]: dict(manufacturer=k[0],
                           slug=slugify(k[1]))
                for k in result 
The wanted() method refers to the manufacturer using its key attribute. In this case, this is the manufacturer name.
>>> pprint(SyncManufacturers(**sync_args).wanted())
 'Cisco':  'slug': 'cisco' ,
 'Dell':  'slug': 'dell' ,
 'Juniper':  'slug': 'juniper' 
>>> pprint(SyncDeviceTypes(**sync_args).wanted())
 'ASR 9001':  'manufacturer': 'Cisco', 'slug': 'asr-9001' ,
 'Catalyst 2960G-48TC-L':  'manufacturer': 'Cisco',
                           'slug': 'catalyst-2960g-48tc-l' ,
 'MX10003':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'mx10003' ,
 'QFX10002-36Q':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'qfx10002-36q' ,
 'QFX10002-72Q':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'qfx10002-72q' ,
 'QFX5110-32Q':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'qfx5110-32q' ,
 'QFX5110-48S':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'qfx5110-48s' ,
 'QFX5200-32C':  'manufacturer': 'Juniper', 'slug': 'qfx5200-32c' ,
 'S4048-ON':  'manufacturer': 'Dell', 'slug': 's4048-on' ,
 'S6010-ON':  'manufacturer': 'Dell', 'slug': 's6010-on' 
The device roles are defined like this:
class SyncDeviceRoles(Synchronizer):
    app = "dcim"
    table = "device_roles"
    key = "name"
    def wanted(self):
        result = set(details["role"]
                     for details in self.source['devices'].values()
                     if "role" in details)
        return  k: dict(slug=slugify(k),
                        color="8bc34a")
                for k in result 

Synchronizing devices A device is mostly a name with references to a role, a model, a datacenter and a tenant. These references are declared as foreign keys using the synchronizers defined previously.
class SyncDevices(Synchronizer):
    app = "dcim"
    table = "devices"
    key = "name"
    foreign =  "device_role": SyncDeviceRoles,
               "device_type": SyncDeviceTypes,
               "site": SyncSites,
               "tenant": SyncTenants 
    remove_unused = 10
    def wanted(self):
        return  name: dict(device_role=details["role"],
                           device_type=details["model"],
                           site=details["datacenter"],
                           tenant="Network")
                for name, details in self.source['devices'].items()
                if  "datacenter", "model", "role"  <= set(details.keys()) 
The remove_unused attribute is a safety implemented to fail if we have to delete more than 10 devices: this may be the indication there is a bug somewhere, unless one of your datacenter suddenly caught fire.
>>> pprint(SyncDevices(**sync_args).wanted())
 'ad2-p6.sfo1.example.com':  'device_role': 'net_tor_oob_switch',
                             'device_type': 'Catalyst 2960G-48TC-L',
                             'site': 'sfo1',
                             'tenant': 'Network' ,
 'to1-p6.sfo1.example.com':  'device_role': 'net_tor_gpu_switch',
                             'device_type': 'QFX5110-48S',
                             'site': 'sfo1',
                             'tenant': 'Network' ,
[ ]

Synchronizing IP addresses The last step is to synchronize IP addresses. We do not attach them to a device.2 Instead, we specify the device names in the description of the IP address:
class SyncIPs(Synchronizer):
    app = "ipam"
    table = "ip-addresses"
    key = "address"
    foreign =  "tenant": SyncTenants 
    remove_unused = 1000
    def wanted(self):
        wanted =  
        for details in self.source['ips']:
            if details['ip'] in wanted:
                wanted[details['ip']]['description'] = \
                    f" details['device']  (and others)"
            else:
                wanted[details['ip']] = dict(
                    tenant="Network",
                    status="active",
                    dns_name="",        # information is present in DNS
                    description=f" details['device'] :  details['interface'] ",
                    role=None,
                    vrf=None)
        return wanted
There is a slight difficulty: NetBox allows duplicate IP addresses, so a simple lookup is not enough. In case of multiple matches, we choose the best by preferring those tagged with cmdb, then those already attached to an interface:
def get(self, key):
    """Grab IP address from NetBox."""
    # There may be duplicate. We need to grab the "best".
    results = super(Synchronizer, self).get(key)
    if len(results) == 0:
        return None
    if len(results) == 1:
        return results[0]
    scores = [0]*len(results)
    for idx, result in enumerate(results):
        if "cmdb" in result.tags:
            scores[idx] += 10
        if result.interface is not None:
            scores[idx] += 5
    return sorted(zip(scores, results),
                  reverse=True, key=lambda k: k[0])[0][1]

Getting the current and wanted states Each synchronizer is initialized with a reference to the Ansible module, a reference to a pynetbox s API object, the data contained in the provided YAML file and two empty dictionaries for the current and expected states:
source = yaml.safe_load(open(module.params['source']))
netbox = pynetbox.api(module.params['api'],
                      token=module.params['token'])
sync_args = dict(
    module=module,
    netbox=netbox,
    source=source,
    before= ,
    after= 
)
synchronizers = [synchronizer(**sync_args) for synchronizer in [
    SyncTags,
    SyncTenants,
    SyncSites,
    SyncManufacturers,
    SyncDeviceTypes,
    SyncDeviceRoles,
    SyncDevices,
    SyncIPs
]]
Each synchronizer has a prepare() method whose goal is to compute the current and wanted states. It returns True in case of a difference:
# Check what needs to be synchronized
try:
    for synchronizer in synchronizers:
        result['changed']  = synchronizer.prepare()
except AnsibleError as e:
    result['msg'] = e.message
    module.fail_json(**result)

Applying changes Back to the skeleton described in the previous article, the last step is to apply the changes if there is a difference between these states. Each synchronizer registers the current and wanted states in sync_args["before"][table] and sync_args["after"][table] where table is the name of the table for a given NetBox object type. The diff object is a bit elaborate as it is built table by table. This enables Ansible to display the name of each table before the diff representation:
# Compute the diff
if module._diff and result['changed']:
    result['diff'] = [
        dict(
            before_header=table,
            after_header=table,
            before=yaml.safe_dump(sync_args["before"][table]),
            after=yaml.safe_dump(sync_args["after"][table]))
        for table in sync_args["after"]
        if sync_args["before"][table] != sync_args["after"][table]
    ]
# Stop here if check mode is enabled or if no change
if module.check_mode or not result['changed']:
    module.exit_json(**result)
Each synchronizer also exposes a synchronize() method to apply changes and a cleanup() method to delete unwanted objects. Order is important due to the relation between the objects.
# Synchronize
for synchronizer in synchronizers:
    synchronizer.synchronize()
for synchronizer in synchronizers[::-1]:
    synchronizer.cleanup()
module.exit_json(**result)

The complete code is available on GitHub. Compared to using netbox.netbox collection, the logic is written in Python instead of trying to glue Ansible tasks together. I believe this is both more flexible and easier to read, notably when trying to delete outdated objects. While I did not test it, it should also be faster. An alternative would have been to reuse code from the netbox.netbox collection, as it contains similar primitives. Unfortunately, I didn t think of it until now.

  1. In my opinion, a good option for a source of truth is to use YAML files in a Git repository. You get versioning for free and people can get started with a text editor.
  2. This limitation is mostly due to laziness: we do not really care about this information. Our main motivation for putting IP addresses in NetBox is to keep track of the used IP addresses. However, if an IP address is already attached to an interface, we leave this association untouched.

18 September 2020

Daniel Lange: Getting rid of the Google cookie consent popup

If you clear your browser cookies regularly (as you should do), Google will annoy you with a full screen cookie consent overlay these days. And - of course - there is no "no tracking consent, technically required cookies only" button. You may log in to Google to set your preference. Yeah, I'm sure this is totally following the intent of the EU Directive 2009/136/EC (the "cookie law"). Google cookie consent pop-up Unfortunately none of the big "anti-annoyances" filter lists seem to have picked that one up yet but the friendly folks from the Computerbase Forum [German] to the rescue. User "Sepp Depp" has created the following filter set that WFM: Add this to your uBlock Origin "My filters" tab:
! Google - remove cookie-consent-popup and restore scroll functionality
google.*##.wwYr3.aID8W.bErdLd
google.*##.aID8W.m114nf.t7xA6
google.*##div[jsname][jsaction^="dg_close"]
google.*##html:style(overflow: visible !important;)
google.*##.widget-consent-fullscreen.widget-consent

17 September 2020

Dirk Eddelbuettel: RcppSpdlog 0.0.1: New and Exciting Logging Package

Very thrilled to announce a new package RcppSpdlog which is now on CRAN in its first release 0.0.1. We had tweeted once about the earliest version which had already caught the eyes of Gabi upstream. RcppSpdlog bundles spdlog, a wonderful header-only C++ logging library with all the bells and whistles you would want that was written by Gabi Melman, and also includes fmt by Victor Zverovic. I had meant to package this for a few years now but didn t find an (easy, elegant) way to completely lift stdout / stderr and related uses which R wants us to remove for smoother operations from R itself including synchronized input/output. It was only a few weeks ago that I realized I should subclass a logger (or, more concretely, a sink for a logger) which could then use R input/output. With the right idea the implementaton was easy, and [Gabi]((https://github.com/gabime) was most helpful in making sure R CMD check would not see one or two remaining C++ i/o operations (which we currently do by not activating a default logger, and substituing REprintf() in one call). So this is now clean and sween and a simple use is included in an example in the package we can show here too (in slightly shorter form minus the documentation header):
// this portmanteau include also defines the r_sink we use below, and which
// diverts all logging to R via the Rcpp::Rcout replacement for std::cout
#include <RcppSpdlog>

// [[Rcpp::export]]
void exampleRsink()  

    std::string logname = "fromR";                          // fix a name for this logger
    auto sp = spdlog::get(logname);                         // retrieve existing one
    if (sp == nullptr) sp = spdlog::r_sink_mt(logname);     // or create new one if needed

    // change log pattern (changed from [%H:%M:%S %z] [%n] [%^---%L---%$] )
    sp->set_pattern("[%H:%M:%S.%f] [%n] [%^%L%$] [thread %t] %v");

    sp->info("Welcome to spdlog!");
    sp->error("Some error message with arg:  ", 1);

    sp->warn("Easy padding in numbers like  :08d ", 12);
    sp->critical("Support for int:  0:d ;  hex:  0:x ;  oct:  0:o ; bin:  0:b ", 42);
    sp->info("Support for floats  :03.2f ", 1.23456);
    sp->info("Positional args are  1   0 ..", "too", "supported");
    sp->info(" :<30 ", "left aligned");

 
The NEWS entry for the first release follows.

Changes in RcppSpdlog version 0.0.1 (2020-09-08)
  • Initial release with added R/Rcpp logging sink example

The only sour grapes, if any, are over the CRAN processing. This was originally uploaded three weeks ago. As a new package, it got extra attention and some truly idiosyncratic attention to two details that were already supplied in the first uploaded version. Yet it needed two rounds of going back and forth for really no great net gain, yet wasting a week each time. I am not all that impressed by this, and not particularly pleased either, but I presume is the tax we all pay in order to enjoy the unsurpassed richness of the CRAN repository system which continues to work just flawlessly. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub. For the first year, GitHub will match your contributions.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

16 September 2020

Bits from Debian: Debian Local Groups at DebConf20 and beyond

There are a number of large and very successful Debian Local Groups (Debian France, Debian Brazil and Debian Taiwan, just to name a few), but what can we do to help support upcoming local groups or help spark interest in more parts of the world? There has been a session about Debian Local Teams at Debconf20 and it generated quite a bit of constructive discussion in the live stream (recording available at https://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2020/DebConf20/), in the session's Etherpad and in the IRC channel (#debian-localgroups). This article is an attempt at summarizing the key points that were raised during that discussion, as well as the plans for the future actions to support new or existent Debian Local Groups and the possibility of setting up a local group support team. Pandemic situation During a pandemic it may seem strange to discuss offline meetings, but this is a good time to be planning things for the future. At the same time, the current situation makes it more important than before to encourage local interaction. Reasoning for local groups Debian can seem scary for those outside. Already having a connection to Debian - especially to people directly involved in it - seems to be the way through which most contributors arrive. But if one doesn't have a connection, it is not that easy; Local Groups facilitate that by improving networking. Local groups are incredibly important to the success of Debian since they often help with translations, making us more diverse, support, setting up local bug squashing sprints, establishing a local DebConf team along with miniDebConfs, getting sponsors for the project and much more. Existence of a Local Groups would also facilitate access to "swag" like stickers and mugs, since people not always have the time to deal with the process of finding a supplier to actually get those made. The activity of local groups might facilitate that by organizing related logistics. How to deal with local groups, how to define a local group Debian gathers the information about Local Groups in its Local Groups wiki page (and subpages). Other organisations also have their own schemes, some of them featuring a map, blogs, or clear rules about what constitutes a local group. In the case of Debian there is not a predefined set of "rules", even about the group name. That is perfectly fine, we assume that certain local groups may be very small, or temporary (created around a certain time when they plan several activities, and then become silent). However, the way the groups are named and how they are listed on the wiki page sets expectations with regards to what kinds of activities they involve. For this reason, we encourage all the Debian Local Groups to review their entries in the Debian wiki, keep it current (e.g. add a line "Status: Active (2020)), and we encourage informal groups of Debian contributors that somehow "meet", to create a new entry in the wiki page, too. What can Debian do to support Local Groups Having a centralized database of groups is good (if up-to-date), but not enough. We'll explore other ways of propagation and increasing visibility, like organising the logistics of printing/sending swag and facilitate access to funding for Debian-related events. Continuation of efforts Efforts shall continue regarding Local Groups. Regular meetings are happening every two or three weeks; interested people are encouraged to explore some other relevant DebConf20 talks (Introducing Debian Brasil, Debian Academy: Another way to share knowledge about Debian, An Experience creating a local community on a small town), websites like Debian flyers (including other printed material as cube, stickers), visit the events section of the Debian website and the Debian Locations wiki page, and participate in the IRC channel #debian-localgroups at OFTC.

15 September 2020

Molly de Blanc: Actions, Inactions, and Consequences: Doctrine of Doing and Allowing W. Quinn

There are a lot of interesting and valid things to say about the philosophy and actual arguments of the Actions, Inactions, and Consequences: Doctrine of Doing and Allowing by Warren Quinn. Unfortunately for me, none of them are things I feel particularly inspired by. I m much more attracted to the many things implied in this paper. Among them are the role of social responsibility in making moral decisions. At various points in the text, Quinn makes brief comments about how we have roles that we need to fulfill for the sake of society. These roles carry with them responsibilities that may supersede our regular moral responsibilities. Examples Quinn makes include being a private life guard (and being responsible for the life of one particular person) and being a trolley driver (and your responsibility is to make sure the train doesn t kill anyone). This is part of what has led to me brushing Quinn off as another classist. Still, I am interested in the question of whether social responsibilities are more important than moral ones or whether there are times when this might occur. One of the things I maintain is that we cannot be the best versions of ourselves because we are not living in societies that value our best selves. We survive capitalism. We negotiate climate change. We make decisions to trade the ideal for the functional. For me, this frequently means I click through terms of service, agree to surveillance, and partake in the use and proliferation of oppressive technology. I also buy an iced coffee that comes in a single use plastic cup; I shop at the store with questionable labor practices; I use Facebook. But also, I don t give money to panhandlers. I see suffering and I let it pass. I do not get involved or take action in many situations because I have a pass to not. These things make society work as it is, and it makes me work within society. This is a self-perpetuating, mutually-abusive, co-dependent relationship. I must tell myself stories about how it is okay that I am preferring the status quo, that I am buying into the system, because I need to do it to survive within it and that people are relying on the system as it stands to survive, because that is how they know to survive. Among other things, I am worried about the psychic damage this causes us. When we view ourselves as social actors rather than moral actors, we tell ourselves it is okay to take non-moral actions (or in-actions); however, we carry within ourselves intuitions and feelings about what is right, just, and moral. We ignore these in order to act in our social roles. From the perspective of the individual, we re hurting ourselves and suffering for the sake of benefiting and perpetuating an caustic society. From the perspective of society, we are perpetuating something that is not just less than ideal, but actually not good because it is based on allowing suffering.[1] [1] This is for the sake of this text. I don t know if I actually feel that this is correct. My goal was to make this only 500 words, so I am going to stop here.

Rapha&#235;l Hertzog: Freexian s report about Debian Long Term Support, August 2020

A Debian LTS logo Like each month, here comes a report about the work of paid contributors to Debian LTS. Individual reports In August, 237.25 work hours have been dispatched among 14 paid contributors. Their reports are available: Evolution of the situation August was a regular LTS month once again, even though it was only our 2nd month with Stretch LTS.
At the end of August some of us participated in DebConf 20 online where we held our monthly team meeting. A video is available.
As of now this video is also the only public resource about the LTS survey we held in July, though a written summary is expected to be released soon. The security tracker currently lists 56 packages with a known CVE and the dla-needed.txt file has 55 packages needing an update. Thanks to our sponsors Sponsors that recently joined are in bold.

No comment Liked this article? Click here. My blog is Flattr-enabled.

Russell Coker: More About the PowerEdge R710

I ve got the R710 (mentioned in my previous post [1]) online. When testing the R710 at home I noticed that sometimes the VGA monitor I was using would start flickering when in some parts of the BIOS setup, it seemed that the horizonal sync wasn t working properly. It didn t seem to be a big deal at the time. When I deployed it the KVM display that I had planned to use with it mostly didn t display anything. When the display was working the KVM keyboard wouldn t work (and would prevent a regular USB keyboard from working if they were both connected at the same time). The VGA output of the R710 also wouldn t work with my VGA->HDMI device so I couldn t get it working with my portable monitor. Fortunately the Dell front panel has a display and tiny buttons that allow configuring the IDRAC IP address, so I was able to get IDRAC going. One thing Dell really should do is allow the down button to change 0 to 9 when entering numbers, that would make it easier to enter 8.8.8.8 for the DNS server. Another thing Dell should do is make the default gateway have a default value according to the IP address and netmask of the server. When I got IDRAC going it was easy to setup a serial console, boot from a rescue USB device, create a new initrd with the driver for the MegaRAID controller, and then reboot into the server image. When I transferred the SSDs from the old server to the newer Dell server the problem I had was that the Dell drive caddies had no holes in suitable places for attaching SSDs. I ended up just pushing the SSDs in so they are hanging in mid air attached only by the SATA/SAS connectors. Plugging them in took the space from the above drive, so instead of having 2*3.5 disks I have 1*2.5 SSD and need the extra space to get my hand in. The R710 is designed for 6*3.5 disks and I m going to have trouble if I ever want to have more than 3*2.5 SSDs. Fortunately I don t think I ll need more SSDs. After booting the system I started getting alerts about a fault in one SSD, with no detail on what the fault might be. My guess is that the SSD in question is M.2 and it s in a M.2 to regular SATA adaptor which might have some problems. The data seems fine though, a BTRFS scrub found no checksum errors. I guess I ll have to buy a replacement SSD soon. I configured the system to use the nosmt kernel command line option to disable hyper-threading (which won t provide much performance benefit but which makes certain types of security attacks much easier). I ve configured BOINC to run on 6/8 CPU cores and surprisingly that didn t cause the fans to be louder than when the system was idle. It seems that a system that is designed for 6 SAS disks doesn t need a lot of cooling when run with SSDs. Update: It s a R710 not a T710. I mostly deal with Dell Tower servers and typed the wrong letter out of habit.

14 September 2020

Emmanuel Kasper: Using Debian and RHEL troubleshootings containers on Kubernetes & OpenShift

You can connect to a running pod with oc/kubectl rsh pod_name, or start a copy of a running pod with oc debug pod_name, but as best practises recommend unprivileged, slim container images, where do you get sosreport, kdump, dig and nmap for troubleshooting ? Fortunately you can start either a transient Debian troubleshooting container with:oc run troubleshooting-pod --stdin --tty --rm --image=docker.io/library/debian:busteror a Red Hat Entreprise Linux:
oc run troubleshooting-pod --stdin --tty --rm --image=registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/rhel-tools

Russ Allbery: Review: Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?

Review: Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?, edited by Maya Schenwar, et al.
Editor: Maya Schenwar
Editor: Joe Macar
Editor: Alana Yu-lan Price
Publisher: Haymarket Books
Copyright: June 2016
ISBN: 1-60846-684-1
Format: Kindle
Pages: 250
Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? is an anthology of essays about policing in the United States. It's divided into two sections: one that enumerates ways that police are failing to serve or protect communities, and one that describes how communities are building resistance and alternatives. Haymarket Books (a progressive press in Chicago) has made it available for free in the aftermath of the George Floyd killing and resulting protests in the United States. I'm going to be a bit unfair to this book, so let me start by admitting that the mismatch between it and the book I was looking for is not entirely its fault. My primary goal was to orient myself in the discussion on the left about alternatives to policing. I also wanted to sample something from Haymarket Books; a free book was a good way to do that. I was hoping for a collection of short introductions to current lines of thinking that I could selectively follow in longer writing, and an essay collection seemed ideal for that. What I had not realized (which was my fault for not doing simple research) is that this is a compilation of articles previously published by Truthout, a non-profit progressive journalism site, in 2014 and 2015. The essays are a mix of reporting and opinion but lean towards reporting. The earliest pieces in this book date from shortly after the police killing of Michael Brown, when racist police violence was (again) reaching national white attention. The first half of the book is therefore devoted to providing evidence of police abuse and violence. This is important to do, but it's sadly no longer as revelatory in 2020, when most of us have seen similar things on video, as it was to white America in 2014. If you live in the United States today, while you may not be aware of the specific events described here, you're unlikely to be surprised that Detroit police paid off jailhouse informants to provide false testimony ("Ring of Snitches" by Aaron Miguel Cant ), or that Chicago police routinely use excessive deadly force with no consequences ("Amid Shootings, Chicago Police Department Upholds Culture of Impunity" by Sarah Macaraeg and Alison Flowers), or that there is a long history of police abuse and degradation of pregnant women ("Your Pregnancy May Subject You to Even More Law Enforcement Violence" by Victoria Law). There are about eight essays along those lines. Unfortunately, the people who excuse or disbelieve these stories are rarely willing to seek out new evidence, let alone read a book like this. That raises the question of intended audience for the catalog of horrors part of this book. The answer to that question may also be the publication date; in 2014, the base of evidence and example for discussion had not been fully constructed. This sort of reporting is also obviously relevant in the original publication context of web-based journalism, where people may encounter these accounts individually through social media or other news coverage. In 2020, they offer reinforcement and rhetorical evidence, but I'm dubious that the people who would benefit from this knowledge will ever see it in this form. Those of us who will are already sickened, angry, and depressed. My primary interest was therefore in the second half of the book: the section on how communities are building resistance and alternatives. This is where I'm going to be somewhat unfair because the state of that conversation may have been different in 2015 than it is now in 2020. But these essays were lacking the depth of analysis that I was looking for. There is a human tendency, when one becomes aware of an obvious wrong, to simply publicize the horrible thing that is happening and expect someone to do something about it. It's obviously and egregiously wrong, so if more people knew about it, certainly it would be stopped! That has happened repeatedly with racial violence in the United States. It's also part of the common (and school-taught) understanding of the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s: activists succeeded in getting the violence on the cover of newspapers and on television, people were shocked and appalled, and the backlash against the violence created political change. Putting aside the fact that this is too simplistic of a picture of the Civil Rights era, it's abundantly clear at this point in 2020 that publicizing racist and violent policing isn't going to stop it. We're going to have to do something more than draw attention to the problem. Deciding what to do requires political and social analysis, not just of the better world that we want to see but of how our current world can become that world. There is very little in that direction in this book. Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? does not answer the question of its title beyond "not us" and "white supremacy." While those answers are not exactly wrong, they're also not pushing the analysis in the direction that I wanted to read. For example (and this is a long-standing pet peeve of mine in US political writing), it would be hard to tell from most of the essays in this book that any country besides the United States exists. One essay ("Killing Africa" by William C. Anderson) talks about colonialism and draws comparisons between police violence in the United States and international treatment of African and other majority-Black countries. One essay talks about US military behavior oversees ("Beyond Homan Square" by Adam Hudson). That's about it for international perspective. Notably, there is no analysis here of what other countries might be doing better. Police violence against out-groups is not unique to the United States. No one has entirely solved this problem, but versions of this problem have been handled with far more success than here. The US has a comparatively appalling record; many countries in the world, particularly among comparable liberal democracies in Europe, are doing far better on metrics of racial oppression by agents of the government and of law enforcement violence. And yet it's common to approach these problems as if we have to develop a solution de novo, rather than ask what other countries are doing differently and if we could do some of those things. The US has some unique challenges, both historical and with the nature of endemic violence in the country, so perhaps such an analysis would turn up too many US-specific factors to copy other people's solutions. But we need to do the analysis, not give up before we start. Novel solutions can lead to novel new problems; other countries have tested, working improvements that could provide a starting framework and some map of potential pitfalls. More fundamentally, only the last two essays of this book propose solutions more complex than "stop." The authors are very clear about what the police are doing, seem less interested in why, and are nearly silent on how to change it. I suspect I am largely in political agreement with most of the authors, but obviously a substantial portion of the country (let alone its power structures) is not, and therefore nothing is changing. Part of the project of ending police violence is understanding why the violence exists, picking apart the motives and potential fracture lines in the political forces supporting the status quo, and building a strategy to change the politics. That isn't even attempted here. For example, the "who do you serve?" question of the book's title is more interesting than the essays give it credit. Police are not a monolith. Why do Black people become police officers? What are their experiences? Are there police forces in the United States that are doing better than others? What makes them different? Why do police act with violence in the moment? What set of cultural expectations, training experiences, anxieties, and fears lead to that outcome? How do we change those factors? Or, to take another tack, why are police not held accountable even when there is substantial public outrage? What political coalition supports that immunity from consequences, what are its fault lines and internal frictions, and what portions of that coalition could be broken off, pealed away, or removed from power? To whom, institutionally, are police forces accountable? What public offices can aspiring candidates run for that would give them oversight capability? This varies wildly throughout the United States; political approaches that work in large cities may not work in small towns, or with county sheriffs, or with the FBI, or with prison guards. To treat these organizations as a monolith and their motives as uniform is bad political tactics. It gives up points of leverage. I thought the best essays of this collection were the last two. "Community Groups Work to Provide Emergency Medical Alternatives, Separate from Police," by Candice Bernd, is a profile of several local emergency response systems that divert emergency calls from the police to paramedics, mental health experts, or social workers. This is an idea that's now relatively mainstream, and it seems to be finding modest success where it has been tried. It's more of a harm mitigation strategy than an attempt to deal with the root problem, but we're going to need both. The last essay, "Building Community Safety" by Ejeris Dixon, is the only essay in this book that is pushing in the direction that I was hoping to read. Dixon describes building an alternative system that can intervene in violent situations without using the police. This is fascinating and I'm glad that I read it. It's also frustrating in context because Dixon's essay should be part of a discussion. Dixon describes spending years learning de-escalation techniques, doing hard work of community discussion and collective decision-making, and making deep investment in the skills required to handle violence without calling in a dangerous outside force. I greatly admire this approach (also common in parts of the anarchist community) and the people who are willing to commit to it. But it's an immense amount of work, and as Dixon points out, that work often falls on the people who are least able to afford it. Marginalized communities, for whom the police are often dangerous, are also likely to lack both time and energy to invest in this type of skill training. And many people simply will not do this work even if they do have the resources to do it. More fundamentally, this approach conflicts somewhat with division of labor. De-escalation and social work are both professional skills that require significant time and practice to hone, and as much as I too would love to live in a world where everyone knows how to do some amount of this work, I find it hard to imagine scaling this approach without trained professionals. The point of paying someone to do this work as their job is that the money frees up their time to focus on learning those skills at a level that is difficult to do in one's free time. But once you have an organized group of professionals who do this work, you have to find a way to keep them from falling prey to the problems that plague the police, which requires understanding the origins of those problems. And that's putting aside the question of how large the residual of dangerous crime that cannot be addressed through any form of de-escalation might be, and what organization we should use to address it. Dixon's essay is great; I wouldn't change anything about it. But I wanted to see the next essay engaging with Dixon's perspective and looking for weaknesses and scaling concerns, and then the next essay that attempts to shore up those weaknesses, and yet another essay that grapples with the challenging philosophical question of a government monopoly on force and how that can and should come into play in violent crime. And then essays on grass-roots organizing in the context of police reform or abolition, and on restorative justice, and on the experience of attempting police reform from the inside, and on how to support public defenders, and on the merits and weaknesses of focusing on electing reform-minded district attorneys. Unfortunately, none of those are here. Overall, Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? was a disappointment. It was free, so I suppose I got what I paid for, and I may have had a different reaction if I read it in 2015. But if you're looking for a deep discussion on the trade-offs and challenges of stopping police violence in 2020, I don't think this is the place to start. Rating: 3 out of 10

12 September 2020

Markus Koschany: My Free Software Activities in August 2020

Welcome to gambaru.de. Here is my monthly report (+ the first week in September) that covers what I have been doing for Debian. If you re interested in Java, Games and LTS topics, this might be interesting for you. Debian Games
teeworlds
Debian Java Misc Debian LTS This was my 54. month as a paid contributor and I have been paid to work 20 hours on Debian LTS, a project started by Rapha l Hertzog. In that time I did the following: ELTS Extended Long Term Support (ELTS) is a project led by Freexian to further extend the lifetime of Debian releases. It is not an official Debian project but all Debian users benefit from it without cost. The current ELTS release is Debian 8 Jessie . This was my 27. month and I have been paid to work 14,25 hours on ELTS. Thanks for reading and see you next time.

11 September 2020

Louis-Philippe V ronneau: Hire me!

I'm happy to announce I handed out my Master's Thesis last Monday. I'm not publishing the final copy just yet1, as it still needs to go through the approval committee. If everything goes well, I should have my Master of Economics diploma before Christmas! It sure hasn't been easy, and although I regret nothing, I'm also happy to be done with university. Looking for a job What an odd time to be looking for a job, right? Turns out for the first time in 12 years, I don't have an employer. It's oddly freeing, but also a little scary. I'm certainly not bitter about it though and it's nice to have some time on my hands to work on various projects and read things other than academic papers. Look out for my next blog posts on using the NeTV2 as an OSHW HDMI capture card, on hacking at security tokens and much more! I'm not looking for anything long term (I'm hoping to teach Economics again next Winter), but for the next few months, my calendar is wide open. For the last 6 years, I worked as Linux system administrator, mostly using a LAMP stack in conjunction with Puppet, Shell and Python. Although I'm most comfortable with Puppet, I also have decent experience with Ansible, thanks to my work in the DebConf Videoteam. I'm not the most seasoned Debian Developer, but I have some experience packaging Python applications and libraries. Although I'm no expert at it, lately I've also been working on Clojure packages, as I'm trying to get Puppet 6 in Debian in time for the Bullseye freeze. At the rate it's going though, I doubt we're going to make it... If your company depends on Puppet and cares about having a version in Debian 11 that is maintained (Puppet 5 is EOL in November 2020), I'm your guy! Oh, and I guess I'm a soon-to-be Master of Economics specialising in Free and Open Source Software business models and incentives theory. Not sure I'll ever get paid putting that in application, but hey, who knows. If any of that resonates with you, contact me and let's have a chat! I promise I don't bite :)

  1. The title of the thesis is What are the incentive structures of Free Software? An economic analysis of Free Software's specific development model. Once the final copy is approved, I'll be sure to write a longer blog post about my findings here.

9 September 2020

Reproducible Builds: Reproducible Builds in August 2020

Welcome to the August 2020 report from the Reproducible Builds project. In our monthly reports, we summarise the things that we have been up to over the past month. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to ensure no flaws have been introduced from the original free software source code to the pre-compiled binaries we install on our systems. If you re interested in contributing to the project, please visit our main website.


This month, Jennifer Helsby launched a new reproduciblewheels.com website to address the lack of reproducibility of Python wheels. To quote Jennifer s accompanying explanatory blog post:
One hiccup we ve encountered in SecureDrop development is that not all Python wheels can be built reproducibly. We ship multiple (Python) projects in Debian packages, with Python dependencies included in those packages as wheels. In order for our Debian packages to be reproducible, we need that wheel build process to also be reproducible
Parallel to this, transparencylog.com was also launched, a service that verifies the contents of URLs against a publicly recorded cryptographic log. It keeps an append-only log of the cryptographic digests of all URLs it has seen. (GitHub repo) On 18th September, Bernhard M. Wiedemann will give a presentation in German, titled Wie reproducible builds Software sicherer machen ( How reproducible builds make software more secure ) at the Internet Security Digital Days 2020 conference.

Reproducible builds at DebConf20 There were a number of talks at the recent online-only DebConf20 conference on the topic of reproducible builds. Holger gave a talk titled Reproducing Bullseye in practice , focusing on independently verifying that the binaries distributed from ftp.debian.org are made from their claimed sources. It also served as a general update on the status of reproducible builds within Debian. The video (145 MB) and slides are available. There were also a number of other talks that involved Reproducible Builds too. For example, the Malayalam language mini-conference had a talk titled , ? ( I want to join Debian, what should I do? ) presented by Praveen Arimbrathodiyil, the Clojure Packaging Team BoF session led by Elana Hashman, as well as Where is Salsa CI right now? that was on the topic of Salsa, the collaborative development server that Debian uses to provide the necessary tools for package maintainers, packaging teams and so on. Jonathan Bustillos (Jathan) also gave a talk in Spanish titled Un camino verificable desde el origen hasta el binario ( A verifiable path from source to binary ). (Video, 88MB)

Development work After many years of development work, the compiler for the Rust programming language now generates reproducible binary code. This generated some general discussion on Reddit on the topic of reproducibility in general. Paul Spooren posted a request for comments to OpenWrt s openwrt-devel mailing list asking for clarification on when to raise the PKG_RELEASE identifier of a package. This is needed in order to successfully perform rebuilds in a reproducible builds context. In openSUSE, Bernhard M. Wiedemann published his monthly Reproducible Builds status update. Chris Lamb provided some comments and pointers on an upstream issue regarding the reproducibility of a Snap / SquashFS archive file. [ ]

Debian Holger Levsen identified that a large number of Debian .buildinfo build certificates have been tainted on the official Debian build servers, as these environments have files underneath the /usr/local/sbin directory [ ]. He also filed against bug for debrebuild after spotting that it can fail to download packages from snapshot.debian.org [ ]. This month, several issues were uncovered (or assisted) due to the efforts of reproducible builds. For instance, Debian bug #968710 was filed by Simon McVittie, which describes a problem with detached debug symbol files (required to generate a traceback) that is unlikely to have been discovered without reproducible builds. In addition, Jelmer Vernooij called attention that the new Debian Janitor tool is using the property of reproducibility (as well as diffoscope when applying archive-wide changes to Debian:
New merge proposals also include a link to the diffoscope diff between a vanilla build and the build with changes. Unfortunately these can be a bit noisy for packages that are not reproducible yet, due to the difference in build environment between the two builds. [ ]
56 reviews of Debian packages were added, 38 were updated and 24 were removed this month adding to our knowledge about identified issues. Specifically, Chris Lamb added and categorised the nondeterministic_version_generated_by_python_param and the lessc_nondeterministic_keys toolchain issues. [ ][ ] Holger Levsen sponsored Lukas Puehringer s upload of the python-securesystemslib pacage, which is a dependency of in-toto, a framework to secure the integrity of software supply chains. [ ] Lastly, Chris Lamb further refined his merge request against the debian-installer component to allow all arguments from sources.list files (such as [check-valid-until=no]) in order that we can test the reproducibility of the installer images on the Reproducible Builds own testing infrastructure and sent a ping to the team that maintains that code.

Upstream patches The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of these patches, including:

diffoscope diffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that can not only locate and diagnose reproducibility issues, it provides human-readable diffs of all kinds. In August, Chris Lamb made the following changes to diffoscope, including preparing and uploading versions 155, 156, 157 and 158 to Debian:
  • New features:
    • Support extracting data of PGP signed data. (#214)
    • Try files named .pgp against pgpdump(1) to determine whether they are Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) files. (#211)
    • Support multiple options for all file extension matching. [ ]
  • Bug fixes:
    • Don t raise an exception when we encounter XML files with <!ENTITY> declarations inside the Document Type Definition (DTD), or when a DTD or entity references an external resource. (#212)
    • pgpdump(1) can successfully parse some binary files, so check that the parsed output contains something sensible before accepting it. [ ]
    • Temporarily drop gnumeric from the Debian build-dependencies as it has been removed from the testing distribution. (#968742)
    • Correctly use fallback_recognises to prevent matching .xsb binary XML files.
    • Correct identify signed PGP files as file(1) returns data . (#211)
  • Logging improvements:
    • Emit a message when ppudump version does not match our file header. [ ]
    • Don t use Python s repr(object) output in Calling external command messages. [ ]
    • Include the filename in the not identified by any comparator message. [ ]
  • Codebase improvements:
    • Bump Python requirement from 3.6 to 3.7. Most distributions are either shipping with Python 3.5 or 3.7, so supporting 3.6 is not only somewhat unnecessary but also cumbersome to test locally. [ ]
    • Drop some unused imports [ ], drop an unnecessary dictionary comprehensions [ ] and some unnecessary control flow [ ].
    • Correct typo of output in a comment. [ ]
  • Release process:
    • Move generation of debian/tests/control to an external script. [ ]
    • Add some URLs for the site that will appear on PyPI.org. [ ]
    • Update author and author email in setup.py for PyPI.org and similar. [ ]
  • Testsuite improvements:
    • Update PPU tests for compatibility with Free Pascal versions 3.2.0 or greater. (#968124)
    • Mark that our identification test for .ppu files requires ppudump version 3.2.0 or higher. [ ]
    • Add an assert_diff helper that loads and compares a fixture output. [ ][ ][ ][ ]
  • Misc:
In addition, Mattia Rizzolo documented in setup.py that diffoscope works with Python version 3.8 [ ] and Frazer Clews applied some Pylint suggestions [ ] and removed some deprecated methods [ ].

Website This month, Chris Lamb updated the main Reproducible Builds website and documentation to:
  • Clarify & fix a few entries on the who page [ ][ ] and ensure that images do not get to large on some viewports [ ].
  • Clarify use of a pronoun re. Conservancy. [ ]
  • Use View all our monthly reports over View all monthly reports . [ ]
  • Move a is a suffix out of the link target on the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH age. [ ]
In addition, Javier Jard n added the freedesktop-sdk project [ ] and Kushal Das added SecureDrop project [ ] to our projects page. Lastly, Michael P hn added internationalisation and translation support with help from Hans-Christoph Steiner [ ].

Testing framework The Reproducible Builds project operate a Jenkins-based testing framework to power tests.reproducible-builds.org. This month, Holger Levsen made the following changes:
  • System health checks:
    • Improve explanation how the status and scores are calculated. [ ][ ]
    • Update and condense view of detected issues. [ ][ ]
    • Query the canonical configuration file to determine whether a job is disabled instead of duplicating/hardcoding this. [ ]
    • Detect several problems when updating the status of reporting-oriented metapackage sets. [ ]
    • Detect when diffoscope is not installable [ ] and failures in DNS resolution [ ].
  • Debian:
    • Update the URL to the Debian security team bug tracker s Git repository. [ ]
    • Reschedule the unstable and bullseye distributions often for the arm64 architecture. [ ]
    • Schedule buster less often for armhf. [ ][ ][ ]
    • Force the build of certain packages in the work-in-progress package rebuilder. [ ][ ]
    • Only update the stretch and buster base build images when necessary. [ ]
  • Other distributions:
    • For F-Droid, trigger jobs by commits, not by a timer. [ ]
    • Disable the Archlinux HTML page generation job as it has never worked. [ ]
    • Disable the alternative OpenWrt rebuilder jobs. [ ]
  • Misc;
Many other changes were made too, including:
  • Chris Lamb:
    • Use <pre> HTML tags when dumping fixed-width debugging data in the self-serve package scheduler. [ ]
  • Mattia Rizzolo:
  • Vagrant Cascadian:
    • Mark that the u-boot Universal Boot Loader should not build architecture independent packages on the arm64 architecture anymore. [ ]
Finally, build node maintenance was performed by Holger Levsen [ ], Mattia Rizzolo [ ][ ] and Vagrant Cascadian [ ][ ][ ][ ]

Mailing list On our mailing list this month, Leo Wandersleb sent a message to the list after he was wondering how to expand his WalletScrutiny.com project (which aims to improve the security of Bitcoin wallets) from Android wallets to also monitor Linux wallets as well:
If you think you know how to spread the word about reproducibility in the context of Bitcoin wallets through WalletScrutiny, your contributions are highly welcome on this PR [ ]
Julien Lepiller posted to the list linking to a blog post by Tavis Ormandy titled You don t need reproducible builds. Morten Linderud (foxboron) responded with a clear rebuttal that Tavis was only considering the narrow use-case of proprietary vendors and closed-source software. He additionally noted that the criticism that reproducible builds cannot prevent against backdoors being deliberately introduced into the upstream source ( bugdoors ) are decidedly (and deliberately) outside the scope of reproducible builds to begin with. Chris Lamb included the Reproducible Builds mailing list in a wider discussion regarding a tentative proposal to include .buildinfo files in .deb packages, adding his remarks regarding requiring a custom tool in order to determine whether generated build artifacts are identical in a reproducible context. [ ] Jonathan Bustillos (Jathan) posted a quick email to the list requesting whether there was a list of To do tasks in Reproducible Builds. Lastly, Chris Lamb responded at length to a query regarding the status of reproducible builds for Debian ISO or installation images. He noted that most of the technical work has been performed but there are at least four issues until they can be generally advertised as such . He pointed that the privacy-oriented Tails operation system, which is based directly on Debian, has had reproducible builds for a number of years now. [ ]

If you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit our Contribute page on our website. However, you can get in touch with us via:

7 September 2020

Arturo Borrero Gonz lez: Debconf 2020 online, summary

Debconf2020 logo Debconf2020 took place when I was on personal vacations time. But anyway I m lucky enough that my company, the Wikimedia Foundation, paid the conference registration fee for me and allowed me to take the time (after my vacations) to watch recordings from the conference. This is my first time attending (or watching) a full-online conference, and I was curious to see first hand how it would develop. I was greatly surprised to see it worked pretty nicely, so kudos to the organization, video team, volunteers, etc! What follows is my summary of the conference, from the different sessions and talks I watched (again, none of them live but recordings). The first thing I saw was the Welcome to Debconf 2020 opening session. It is obvious the video was made with lots of love, I found it entertaining and useful. I love it :-) Then I watched the BoF Can Free Software improve social equality. It was introduced and moderated by Hong Phuc Dang. Several participants, about 10 people, shared their visions on the interaction between open source projects and communities. I m pretty much aware of the interesting social advancement that FLOSS can enable in communities, but sometimes is not so easy, it may also present challenges and barriers. The BoF was joined by many people from the Asia Pacific region, and for me, it has been very interesting to take a step back from the usual western vision of this topic. Anyway, about the session itself, I have the feeling the participants may have spent too much time on presentations, sharing their local stories (which are interesting, don t get me wrong), perhaps leaving little room for actual proposal discussions or the like. Next I watched the Bits from the DPL talk. In the session, Jonathan Carter goes over several topics affecting the project, both internally and externally. It was interesting to know more about the status of the project from a high level perspective, as an organization, including subjects such as money, common project problems, future issues we are anticipating, the social aspect of the project, etc. The Lightning Talks session grabbed my attention. It is usually very funny to watch and not as dense as other talks. I m glad I watched this as it includes some interesting talks, ranging from HAM radios (I love them!), to personal projects to help in certain tasks, and even some general reflections about life. Just when I m writing this very sentence, the video for the Come and meet your Debian Publicity team! talk has been uploaded. This team does an incredible work in keeping project information flowing, and social networks up-to-date and alive. Mind that the work of this team is mostly non-engineering, but still, is a vital part of the project. The folks in session explain what the team does, and they also discuss how new people can contribute, the different challenges related to language barriers, etc. I have to admit I also started watching a couple other sessions that turned out to don t be interesting to me (and therefore I didn t finish the video). Also, I tried to watch a couple more sessions that didn t publish their video recording just yet, for example the When We Virtualize the Whole Internet talk by Sam Hartman. Will check again in a couple of days. It is a real pleasure the video recordings from the conference are made available online. One can join the conference anytime (like I m doing!) and watch the sessions at any pace at any time. The video archive is big, I won t be able to go over all of it. I won t lie, I still have some pending videos to watch from last year Debconf2019 :-)

6 September 2020

Jonathan Carter: DebConf 20 Online

This week, last week, Last month, I attended DebConf 20 Online. It was the first DebConf to be held entirely online, but it s the 7th DebConf I ve attended from home. My first one was DebConf7. Initially I mostly started watching the videos because I wanted to learn more about packaging. I had just figured out how to create binary packages by hand, and have read through the new maintainers guide, but a lot of it was still a mystery. By the end of DebConf7 my grasp of source packages was still a bit thin, but other than that, I ended up learning a lot more about Debian during DebConf7 than I had hoped for, and over the years, the quality of online participation for each DebConf has varied a lot. I think having a completely online DebConf, where everyone was remote, helped raise awareness about how important it is to make the remote experience work well, and I hope that it will make people who run sessions at physical events in the future consider those who are following remotely a bit more. During some BoF sessions, it was clear that some teams haven t talked to each other face to face in a while, and I heard at least 3 teams who said This was nice, we should do more regular video calls! . Our usual communication methods of e-mail lists and IRC serve us quite well, for the most part, but sometimes having an actual conversation with the whole team present at the same time can do wonders for dealing with many kind of issues that is just always hard to deal with in text based mediums. There were three main languages used in this DebConf. We ve had more than one language at a DebConf before, but as far as I know it s the first time that we had multiple talks over 3 languages (English, Malayalam and Spanish). It was also impressive how the DebConf team managed to send out DebConf t-shirts all around the world and in time before the conference! To my knowledge only 2 people didn t get theirs in time due to customs. I already posted about the new loop that we worked on for this DebConf. It was an unintended effect that we ended up having lots of shout-outs which ended up giving this online DebConf a much more warmer, personal feel to it than if we didn t have it. I m definitely planning to keep on improving on that for the future, for online and in-person events. There were also some other new stuff from the video team during this DebConf, we ll try to co-ordinate a blog post about that once the dust settled. Thanks to everyone for making this DebConf special, even though it was virtual!

Dirk Eddelbuettel: inline 0.3.16: Now with system2()

A new minor release of the inline package just arrived on CRAN. inline facilitates writing code in-line in simple string expressions or short files. The package is mature and stable, and can be considered to be in maintenance mode: Rcpp used it extensively in the vrey early days before Rcpp Attributes provided an even better alternative. Seveal other package still rely on inline. One of these package is rstan, and Ben Goodrich updated our use of system() to system2() allowing for better error diagnostics. We also did a bit of standard maintenance to Travis CI and the README.md file. See below for a detailed list of changes extracted from the NEWS file.

Changes in inline version 0.3.16 (2020-09-06)
  • Maintenance updates to README.md standardizing badges (Dirk).
  • Maintenance update to Travis CI setup (Dirk).
  • Switch to using system2() for better error diagnostics (Ben Goodrich in #12).

Courtesy of CRANberries, there is a comparison to the previous release. If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub. For the first year, GitHub will match your contributions.

This post by Dirk Eddelbuettel originated on his Thinking inside the box blog. Please report excessive re-aggregation in third-party for-profit settings.

Ben Armstrong: Dronefly relicensed under copyleft licenses

To ensure Dronefly always remains free, the Dronefly project has been relicensed under two copyleft licenses. Read the license change and learn more about copyleft at these links. I was prompted to make this change after a recent incident in the Red DiscordBot development community that made me reconsider my prior position that the liberal MIT license was best for our project. While on the face of it, making your license as liberal as possible might seem like the most generous and hassle-free way to license any project, I was shocked into the realization that its liberality was also its fatal flaw: all is well and good so long as everyone is being cooperative, but it does not afford any protection to developers or users should things suddenly go sideways in how a project is run. A copyleft license is the best way to avoid such issues. In this incident a sad story of conflict between developers I respect on both sides of the rift, and owe a debt to for what they ve taught me three cogs we had come to depend on suddenly stopped being viable for us to use due to changes to the license & the code. Effectively, those cogs became unsupported and unsupportable. To avoid any such future disaster with the Dronefly project, I started shopping for a new license that would protect developers and users alike from similarly losing support, or losing control of their contributions. I owe thanks to Dale Floer, a team member who early on advised me the AGPL might be a better fit, and later was helpful in selecting the doc license and encouraging me to follow through. We ran the new licenses by each contributor and arrived at this consensus: the AGPL is best suited for our server-based code, and CC-BY-SA is best suited for our documentation. The relicensing was made official this morning. On Discord platform alternatives You might well question what I, a Debian developer steeped in free software culture and otherwise in agreement with its principles, am doing encouraging a community to grow on the proprietary Discord platform! I have no satisfying answer to that. I explained when I introduced my project here some of the backstory, but that s more of an account of its beginnings than justification for it to continue on this platform. Honestly, all I can offer is a rather dissatisfying it seemed like the right thing to do at the time. Time will tell whether we could successfully move off of it to a freedom-respecting and privacy-respecting alternative chat platform that is both socially and technically viable to migrate to. That platform would ideally: I m intrigued by Matrix and wonder if it provides some or all of the above in its current form. Are you a developer writing bots for this platform? If so, I especially want to hear from you in the comments about your experience. Or in any case, if you ve been there before if you ve faced the same issue with your community and have a success story to share, I would love to hear from you.

Next.

Previous.