Search Results: "will"

1 May 2007

Simon Law: Party on for Net Freedom


CFP 2007
Originally uploaded by sfllaw.
Tonight, I'm going to be attending an open panel discussion at Computers, Freedom, and Privacy 2007. It's completely open to the public and will be a discussion on freedom on the Internet. There are going to be a number of famous people there, including Whit Diffie, Peter Neumann, Anita Allen, Bruce Schneier, and Ed Viltz. I'm not sure exactly what they're going to be talking about, but I bet it'll be thought-provoking. At around 20:30, I'll be down at the CFP Welcome Party, which is basically a big fundraiser for Creative Commons and EPIC. You've probably heard me mention Creative Commons a few times, because they're a big proponent of having a healthy body of creative work that artists can draw from. Almost all of the art I produce is available under a Creative Commons license, which I've chosen so that you can share, copy, and modify it. So I'm more than happy to socialize with interesting people and to support a good cause. Sounds interesting? You bet! How do you get there? Well, the panel is at Hotel Bonaventure, and starts at 18:30. Details here. Then the welcome party is at 20:30, at Austin's place. Details here. For directions to Austin's house, send me an e-mail. Austin's address is on this flyer. If you're leaving from the Hilton, try these directions. Hope to see you there!

Russell Coker: more about Heartbeat

In a comment on my blog post “a Heartbeat developer comments on my blog post” Alan Robertson writes:


I got in a hurry on my math because of the emergency. So, there are even more assumptions (errors?) than I documented. In particular, the probability model I gave was for a particular node to fail. So the probability of either of two failing would be double that, and either of three failing would be triple that. Note that the probability of multiple simultaneous failures goes up as a power, but the probability of either of only goes up linearly. I really need to sit down and do the math carefully - but the idea of the simultaneous failures going up as a power is true. And the “any of” probability goes up linearly. That’s also true. This is why people can actually use larger HA clusters ;-). The 5 years figure is the industry standard quoted figure for an average Intel-based server to fail. The four hours to repair is a common high-quality of service response time from a hardware vendor. I admit that’s not the same as actual repair time, but if some “repairs” are just reboots, then it’s not a horrible number to start with - if your vendor has cached some spares nearby. I suppose I should sit down and do the math right, and make a spreadsheet of it. (I wonder if I remember that much math?) I assume disk failures are taken care of by hot swap disks, RAID, etc. and so in effect they “never fail” (at least not totally) so that these failures don’t have to be accounted for by the overall availability model. Here’s an intuitive way of thinking about it “from your gut”… If I took your whole data center and made a cluster out of it, what’s the chance that at least half of your servers would fail at once? Pretty darn small, is the short answer ;-). If it’s not pretty darn small, you need to buy better servers, and IBM has just the servers for you ;-). Or maybe they need to hire a better SysAdmin ;-) If you ask yourself “when is the last time at least half my machines in my data center couldn’t communicate with the other half”, then hopefully that’s also a “pretty darn small” chance too. If not, there are well-known methods for making networks highly reliable too. [I’m still ignoring “catastrophes” that you haven’t accounted for in your HA architecture]. I’m not saying this is free, and it can be pricey. One of my other favorite sayings is “Paranoia is an expensive hobby”. How much do you want to spend? You tell me how much you want to spend, and you can figure out how to spend it. I’ll make a separate comment on quorum models later. It’s getting late here.

My only comment in response to that is to say that I still believe the calculations of probability to be correct in my original post and I am interested to see someone prove otherwise. Another comment by Alan:


Data corruption, no doubt, is almost always much worse than loss of availability. And some kinds of data corruption are worse than others. For example, mounting a non-clustered shared disk filesystem twice simultaneously is usually much worse, than updating two replicas of the data simultaneously. In the first case, you have to restore to your previous backups and lose all data since then. In the second case, you only lose updates that were made to one of the sides, and you instantly have a working copy of the data which is nearly always much newer than your last backup (with the possibility of recovering them by significant effort). Typically you would only lose a few minutes of updates at worst - and depending on the kind of networking failure, you might not lose anything. Heartbeats certainly aren’t enough. You need to monitor the health of your servers and the health of your applications. Heartbeat monitors applications and can easily be informed of and act on the health of your servers (with release 2 style Linux-HA Heartbeat configurations).


Followed by:


Since data corruption is so serious, this is why cluster designers worry so much about split-brain, which is managed using the ideas of quorum and it’s sibling fencing. This is all about keeping bad things from happening. This post is really about quorum, since Russ had expressed interest in it. Quorum is the idea that you can uniquely choose a subcluster to represent the whole cluster in those cases where communication failure has caused the cluster to split into separate sub-clusters which cannot properly communicate with each other. In this way, only one of the subclusters continues on, and the others will sit on their hands and do nothing waiting for a person to fix things. Some of the kinds of quorum mentioned below are better than others. But, most importantly, they can be used in combination as described later. The most common kind of quorum is that Russ mentioned in his earlier post - the majority quorum. In this method, for a cluster of n nodes, you grant quorum to a sub-cluster which has more than INT(n/2) members. This means that if you have a 3-node cluster, you have to have two nodes to continue. If you have 4 nodes, you have to have 3 nodes to continue. For 5 nodes, you have to have 3 nodes, and so on. Other basic methods include disk reserve, so that you have reserve a disk to have quorum. In this case, if only one node survives and it can reserve the disk, it continues to run. However, the disk becomes a single point of failure. This may not be a problem if this single disk is required to run any of the cluster services, since they would fail without it anyway. [Heartbeat does not support this method]. An analagous method is to implement a software resource which grants quorum to one subcluster in a fashion analagous to the disk reserve method. This has the advantage of not requiring disk reserves, or a shared disk, but it has the same SPOF disadvantage as the disk reserve method. Heartbeat does support this method using the quorum daemon. It’s incredibly useful for those cases (like split-site clusters) where you cannot use fencing. Another method is to grant quorum to any subcluster which can ping a certain set of nodes, and not grant it to any which can’t access those nodes. This isn’t a wonderful method, and has obvious disadvantages with respect to uniqueness, and single points of failure. (Heartbeat doesn’t yet implement this one). Another method is to grant quorum to any node which is a member of a 2-node cluster. This is better than losing quorum and stopping when one node stops, but obviously completely ignores the uniqueness requirement of quorum. Another method is to ask a human being if you have quorum. This is hardly an ideal circumstance, but useful in some contexts as described below. (Heartbeat doesn’t yet implement this one). Perhaps you say, really the only one of these that’s really good is the first one - the majority vote method. And, I would generally agree with you. But, Heartbeat has the ability to use these in combination which makes some of those methods that seem flaky to be much more reasonable. Heartbeat has the ability to have multiple quorum modules declared, and they’re used in this way: Any module can return HAVEQUORUM, NOQUORUM, or TIE. If they return HAVEQUORUM or NOQUORUM, then no further quorum modules are consulted. However, if they return TIE, then the next quorum module is consulted for its opinion. If the last quorum module returns TIE, it is treated the same as NOQUORUM. This enables you to use one quorum module to break the tie declared by a previous quorum module. You could then use the quorumd to break the tie created by a voting module. Or you could use the quorumd instead of the “two-node” module. Or you could use the “pingable” module instead of the “two-node” module. Or you could at the end always tack on a “human” module, in case all else returns TIE. This is kind of cool, actually. My favorites for next implementation are the pingable and consult human modules. And, of course, if your cluster loses quorum due to real server failures failures, there are always ways to work around it, with a little human intervention. One method is to tell Heartbeat to ignore quorum. Another is to tell Heartbeat to remove certain nodes from the cluster, after you verify that they’re really dead. And, I’m sure that in a pinch, some new methods will be invented. And some of them might actually work ;-).


Regarding the quorumd, it seems that this is an extra server that will generally run on another machine separate from the rest of the cluster. So if we had a two-node cluster with a quorumd then it would effectively be a three-node cluster where one node is not configured to run any resources. It seems that the simpler approach in many cases would be to merely have a three-node cluster with resources not configured to run on one of the nodes. For example if I was running a mail server cluster for an ISP I might configure a three node cluster of the two mail server back-end machines and one other machine that is lightly loaded (EG a DNS server) and have it configured not to run MTA resoures on the DNS machine.

30 April 2007

Mark Brown: One step forward

It depresses me to see people thinking that the way to get changes affecting many packages done in Debian might be via general resolution or that a number of people seem to feel that getting something accepted into policy is a first step in getting anything big done. Debian may be big and prone to arguments but it’s a shame to see people in Debian who think we’re that dependent on process to get things done. This makes me all the more happy to see something like the Smith review project ticking away. It’s all being done on the basis of “Hey, this seems like a good idea - anyone object or want to help?” and by the time it’s done it will have touched every package in Debian which is getting on for as ambitious as it’s possible to be. So far it seems to be getting positive responses from maintainers - I’m sure there will be problems somewhere along the line but I’d be surprised if they were anything other than a tiny minority.

Gustavo Franco: debian monkeys for a better website

I'm here to tell you that I'm releasing debian monkeys 0.3 right now (greasemonkey user script), after the huge amount of feedback about my last post. In other words, you can do more than provide feedback based on a screenshot. You can test it on Fire^W Iceweasel and Epiphany over all the Debian's website content.

I'm writing debian monkeys in a way that it will be trivial merge the changes back to the Debian's website if the webmasters agree and extend it to work over more *.debian.org sites. Actually, the changes applied over www.debian.org are: mentors.debian.net CSS with minor changes based on user feedback, navbar removal, new and persistent sidebar.

How to see www.debian.org like the screenshot above ?
Send your comments, but please read before the known issues below. Patches to the user script source code are also appreciated, keep in mind that I can reject javascript black magic for a while due to the possibility of merge back my changes to the Debian official website.

Known Issues:
More information, issue tracking and wiki at: debian monkeys official website.

Eddy Petrișor: I assume that you are subscribed.

How hard would it be not to have to write this in a message to a ML?

Just add X-Maybe-CC and put the name in there, send to the list and the mailing list software will CC the person in question no matter if the person is listed or not. Obviously, if that address is listed, the mail will be sent only once.

Would that be that hard to implement?

29 April 2007

MJ Ray: Daddy or Chips? (Presenter comments)

I boggled at getting used as a throwaway line in LugRadio and then: Jono Bacon's PA (is this for real?) commented:
"I will get Jono to schedule a call with you sometime to discuss these problems if thats fine with you. He can probably fit you in before Bill Clinton at 2pm on Tuesday."
It also appeared (with a few comments from me) on as days pass by: Die Broadcom (and yes, Die Broadcom!)

Matthew Garrett

If you are running a low-resource or slow system, then more running processes
will consume more RAM and more CPU time. This will result in a slower
system. One option is to lower the number of PIDs. This will reduce
the number of running processes. Fewer running processes reduces the
number CPU and RAM requirements.


If you have published a book by someone who believes this, you may already have lost.

Cord Beermann: Blog established.

I sometimes find myself in a state that needs to write out what i feel or mean to a topic. So i decided to establish an own blog. And here it is.

I read for some time the Blogs of my friends and cow-orkers corona and wusel and both decided to use this nice Blogsoftware called Simple PHP Blog. It is very featureful, but the deciding thing is, that it doesn't need a Database running in the Background.

As this package isn't available from Debian yet, i made a package of it, and applied as Maintainer (see Debian-BTS #421513).

I will wait some days and will then upload the package. For now you can find it at http://debian.cord.de. The package is currently useable for stable, testing and unstable.

28 April 2007

Eddy Petrișor: moto frenzy

GREAT!

This is the word that can describe what I felt today at the moto exhibition that takes place here, in Bucharest (until the 1st of May).

Hondas, Yamahas, Aprilias, Harleys, Suzukis, BMWs... all kinds of bikes, speeders, choppers, cruisers, naked...

Of course, I couldn't resist and I touched, sat on, admired and analysed them all that I could (the Honda and the Ducatti people were the most uptight about this subject).

I was with a friend and he made pictures, but I will have them only on Monday...


And all of these after I met my father this morning before he left for a ride up to Vama Veche (a known rebels' meeting point at the Black Sea). I met him and gave him a pair of chaps for the ride with the beautiful Virago he bought a month ago!


I just need to pass over the formalities, take the driving license exam for A category (motorcycles are in that category, here in Romania; I already have a B category, for cars) and get on with riding myself... on the driver's seat...


Today I felt alive...



P.S.: I would be really cool to go to DebConf7 with the bike and meet some people, but I don't think that is legal for me to drive outside my country in the first year after taking the driving license (although I don't know yet if that would apply to me, having already a B driving license). More than that, the long ride alone I would have to make until I meet with others seems a little risky (you never know what the trip has to offer).

Annabelle Tully: ipw2200

Why oh why does my X40 wifi card suck so much..
It will randomly drop while I’m doing something, so I have to reload the module again.
Sometimes it has a hard time associating properly. It gets IP, but can’t ping the gateway or anything. (The other devices are taken down) so I have to reload module again. It also generally gets very low signal strength.
And also, dmesg gives me strange output
eth1: NETDEV_TX_BUSY returned; driver should report queue full via ieee_device->is_queue_full. eth1: no IPv6 routers present eth1: no IPv6 routers present Update:
A friend of mine had a similiar problem, and he found that the wifi card at the bottom was slightly loose, so he opened the casing and pushed it a bit, and since then its been stable with no issues. Will try the same to see if it works once I can find it in my heart to turn the machine off. Shall update again if this seems to work.

Adam Rosi-Kessel: Four Cheers for Geoffrey s!

Just recently, Rachele complained about a drop in quality at our neighborhood restaurant, Salute. No sooner did she complain than the restaurant changed name, ownership, and chef. Witness the power of the blogosphere! Geoffrey’s (link, anyone?) just opened this week is the old Roslindale location of Salute, having taken a three year hiatus from its last location in the Back Bay, and the South End before that. Back when I worked in the South End in the late 1990’s, it was one of my favorite lunch/brunch places, so I was delighted to discover they’ve reopened in Roslindale. We were the new restaurant’s first brunch customers ever. They open at 8am, and with a natural alarm clock that wakes us up at 6am (our daughter), we were prompt for the opening. The brunch was great. We shared a “DonutMuffin” as an appetizer. There was enough pleasure in that pastry to equal at least half a dozen commercial-grade donuts. I had a tomato, basil, and fancy-cheese-of-some-sort quiche with a side of fresh cantaloupe. It was a very generous serving with a thick tasty crust (no toast necessary!). I was particularly impressed with the volume of fresh basil, and the juiciness of the cantaloupe. Rachele has vegetarian eggs benedict (also delicious) and Esther had a side of heart-shaped waffles, which was just right for her. The coffee was definitely on the high end for restaurant coffee (which, somehow, seems to go on a different scale from coffee-shop coffee.) Next time I’ll try a cappuccino. All this for only $35 (including tip). The meal was comparable to (but slightly cheaper and more filling than) our other favorite brunch place, Bon Savor in Jamaica Plain. The owner/chef explained that they had moved out of the South End when the rent tripled. He’s keeping prices in the 1997-range, since the rent he is paying in Roslindale is comparable to what he paid in the South End in that era. (Although actually I’m sure other costs have gone up significantly). The Chowhound and Universal Hub folks are also pleased. Roslindale is certainly in need of a good brunch place — although I am fond of the Blue Star Diner conceptually, in practice the service has been poor and the food irregular. We will certainly be making fewer trips to JP for brunch now. The dinner menu also looks excellent, with several good vegetarian options. The chef also assured me the couscous dish is vegan. We were the only people in the restaurant in the opening hour. I predict in a month the place will be packed. If so, it will be proof of this blog’s influence!

Russell Coker: new blog

I am starting to move my blog to my own Wordpress server. Here is the new URL for my main blog (feed), and here is the new URL for my Source-Dump blog (feed) which is now named just "dump".

Wordpress gives me the power to change all aspects of my blog's operation (including adding plug-ins). It also allows me to correctly display greater-than and less-than characters (the Perl script I use for converting them is at this post - it's short now but will probably grow).

Hopefully the new blog will also solve the date problems that some Planet readers have been complaining about.

I will briefly put the same content on both the old and new blogs, when I'm fully confident in the new blog I'll stop updating the old one and try to get all Planet installations changed. Anyone who wants to convert their Planet installation to my new blog now is welcome to do so.

27 April 2007

Russell Coker: new blog

I am starting to move my blog to my own Wordpress server. Here is the new URL for my main blog (feed), and here is the new URL for my Source-Dump blog (feed) which is now named just “dump”. Wordpress gives me the power to change all aspects of my blog’s operation (including adding plug-ins). It also allows me to correctly display greater-than and less-than characters (the Perl script I use for converting them is at this post - it’s short now but will probably grow). Hopefully the new blog will also solve the date problems that some Planet readers have been complaining about. I will briefly put the same content on both the old and new blogs, when I’m fully confident in the new blog I’ll stop updating the old one and try to get all Planet installations changed. Anyone who wants to convert their Planet installation to my new blog now is welcome to do so.

Gustavo Franco: Debian.org website meets mentors layout

UPDATE: Thanks for your feedback, for those commenting about the 'grey-on-white' thing. I don't really know if that's bad or not for a11y. I've keratoconus (right eye) and it's ok for me. The point is that we can easily change the colors and implement the new CSS and "migrate" the index was trivial. Take a look at Christoph Haas GPLed CSS (mentors.debian.net) and give your shot on the colors, please.

I was thinking about the two threads going on debian-www mailing list, one about our website look&feel and other about the navigational structure. I've decided to take a break reading and arguing and do a mockup based on mentors.debian.net (and also now live.debian.net).

Pros:
Took me less than an hour to move the entire index content and then decided what to keep and what remove.
Looks cleaner, IMHO.

Cons:
Need to get rid of the swirl and debian.org text adding the official logo there on top

Notes:
Well, I don't think that debian-www will take my mockup seriously, but it's actually the easier to implement over our current infrastructure (again, jmo).

If somebody wants to mirror cvs.d.o:webwml (cvssuck didn't work for me), run tailor over that migrating for svn and experiment with new web site layouts over all the pages we've, let me know!

John Goerzen: Online Internet Bank Review

Back in mid-2000, I set up my first Internet bank account. I have been using the same bank ever since. The whole notion of Internet banks has changed a lot since then, since virtually every bank offers varying degrees of online access these days. Lately I checked on banks to see if I was still using the best one. Here are my reviews of the two banks.

Internet Banks

Let's first talk about what makes a bank an "Internet bank" or "online bank". So many banks let you manage your account online now, that the distinction is blurry. But generally, I would say that unique features of Internet banks are:



There are a few to highlight.

Real-time transaction posting is a great thing to have. If you go to the website and transfer money from your savings to your checking account, you can go to the ATM *now* and withdraw it, and when you get back to your desk, the ATM transaction shows up. There are none of these confusing "business day" rules with cutoff times that traditional banks seem to love. And none of this annoying "process all withdrawals first" business that large traditional banks (hello, Bank of America) love to do in order to screw with customers.

High interest rates. Don't even bother with an online bank if the savings interest rate is less than 3% (or checking less than 1%, in my opinion). It is almost impossible to find a traditional bank with these rates.

Note: if you're reading this after April, 2007, these guidelines may no longer apply due to interest rate changes.

Electronic transfers from other banks. Another great feature. A number of banks let you set up, and then initiate, electronic transfers to and from your accounts at other banks. This is usually free if you are using the feature to transfer money into your account, and with a flat per-transaction fee (usually about the same as a foreign ATM fee) for transferring money out.

Ability to do all business without visiting a branch. Not only should this be possible, but routine business (such as making deposits) should be easy to do without visiting a branch. You should be able to order new checks online.

Now let's look at the individual banks.

First Internet Bank of Indiana

FirstIB (they provide nationwide service, despite the name) is the bank I signed up with in 2000. I had found a bank in Dallas that I really liked, but when I moved to Indianapolis, I tried two and liked neither. They all seemed to have really poor interest rates, offer few useful services, and fees for so many conditions that it was hard to avoid them. (More on that in the traditional banks section below)

I looked at the online banking scene at the time, and wound up opening a checking and savings account with FirstIB. FirstIB started as an online-only bank, but recently acquired a bricks-and-mortar bank as well.

I found FirstIB's customer service at the time to be top-notch; I would dial their toll-free number, select *one* option from a menu, and a rep would answer *immediately*. (Take that, Bank of America, with your 45-minute hold times...) Since FirstIB was based in Indianapolis, I actually visited their offices a couple of times. They had a locked lobby. You picked up a phone, pressed 0, and went into the same queue that callers to the 800 number did, then just asked them to come to the lobby and transact your business. (They would not give out cash there, but could take new account paperwork and deposits and the like)

Their interest rates have consistently outperformed traditional banks, and they offer all the online banking amenities listed above. They did not offer online statements at first, but these days online statements are the norm (there is a fee if you want paper statements). Check ordering is accomplished using a linking with the Deluxe check printers. The web interface uses Digital Insight, and the ACH transfer interface uses CashEdge.

FirstIB will actually reimburse you, at the end of the month, for ATM fees that other banks charge you, up to $6/mo. They also provide an unlimited supply of free postage-paid deposit envelopes, and have a PDF of deposit slips that you can print out should you run out.

FirstIB's customer service has slipped in recent times. I know of some people that have been impacted by some errors that FirstIB has made (simply not processing paperwork that they should have processed). Wait times have gone up for the phone line, and a lot of the great "small bank" feel (where they actually knew their customers, and you might actually know the reps) is gone.

Presidential Bank, FSB

Presidential Bank is the bank I'm looking at now. I was initially drawn to them by their extraordinarly high interest rates (5.25% for savings!), but some other things have convinced me to use them.

Initially, I was suspicious. Presidential is a bricks-and-mortar operation that has been around for awhile, and was one of the very first Internet banks. Their website says that they started offering Internet accounts in 1995, and very much looks like it hasn't been updated since. (Thankfully, the account management interface is more modern). I almost thought the site was a fraud up front, a "too good to be true" deal with the high interest rates and bad-looking website. But after doing some research, realized that it is quite real.

Before setting up accounts with them, I had a few questions (such as whether or not transactions post in real time). Presidential has a simple email address for people that want to send in questions (unlike FirstIB's obvious queue system). I sent an email, and got a response an hour or two later, from a real person with a first and last name, and a personal e-mail address I could use to follow up. Nice. I also had occasion to talk to people on the phone. They were polite, speedy, and helpful.

So I set up my accounts with them. I activated the online access, bill payment, and money transfer features. All worked as expected. I did have a couple more occasions to call them after the account was set up (a more crucial test than the pre-account calls), and they remained helpful. Strangely, this bank, which seems to be a much larger operation than FirstIB, had a more small bank feel. Several times, as I started talking to a rep, he or she would say something like "Oh, I remember processing the setup paperwork on this account last week" or "I think I talked to you about this before?"

Customer service is one of those things you rarely need after the first month or so of an account. But with your bank, it is vital that the reps know what they are doing and are willing to help you when you call -- which Presidential is doing better than FirstIB these days.

Presidential does not rebate ATM fees like FirstIB does. They do provide a few deposit envelopes with your initial account setup packet, but they are not postage paid or unlimited. However, because Presidential's interest rates are so much better than FirstIB's, it doesn't take much in your account to more than balance out that difference. Plus, with so many retail stores offering "cash back" when you use an ATM or debit card, it isn't too bad to get cash for free with Presidential. (And, most employers offer direct deposit, so we rarely use deposit-by-mail) One other trick is to find some local bank and open a no-minimum free checking account with them. You can deposit checks there and withdraw cash from their ATM, and use Presidential's free incoming ACH to electronically transfer the funds to Presidential when you get too much in the local account. (Chances are that these local accounts will not pay any interest)

Presidential offers a few features FirstIB does not. First, they scan all your deposits (not just your canceled checks) and offer to let you view them online. Secondly, they automatically send you an email when they've received a bank-by-mail deposit (you can opt out of that, of course). Third, they let you view *all* of your old statements online (FirstIB only lets you view the last 6 months worth, though both have the complete history available in the web interface).

Like FirstIB, Presidential uses DigitalInsight for the web interface and CashEdge for the ACH feature.

Internet Bank Comparison Both banks offer two primary checking and two primary savings accounts. This table compares all four accounts.

FeatureCheckingSavings
FirstIBPresidentialFirstIBPresidential
AccountInterestFreeInternet PlusInternetMoney MktRegPremierInternet
APY1.26%0%4.50%1.25%3.90%2.75%5.25%1.50-2.50%
Min Balance$500$0$1000$500$4000$1000$0$100
Min MethodAvg DailyDailyAvg DailyDaily
Min to Open$100$25$1500$500$100$100$5000$100
Online Bill Pay$0$4.95/mo$0$5.95/mo (up to 10 payments)Not available
ATM surchage rebate$6$0$0$0
Online Canceled Check ImagesFreeN/A
Online Deposit ImagesNoFreeNoFree
Email Deposit NotificationsNoFreeNoFree
Email Balance AlertsFree
ACH policyFree when initiated at other end; free for deposits when initiated at the bank's website; small fee for withdrawals when initiated at bank's website




Online options at traditional banks

As I mentioned, Presidential is a traditional bank that has offered Internet accounts for some time now. Some other traditional banks do that as well, but look carefully at them, especially if they're a big nationwide bank.

I looked at options from Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC USA, ETrade Bank, and some other large national banks. In general, these were just regular bank accounts with a web interface (HSBC and ETrade being somewhat of exceptions). Read the fine print and you'll find poor interest rates and traditional banking hassles (lack of immediacy in transactions, predatory posting practices, fees for just about everything).

Plus I can tell from personal experience that Bank of America customer service is downright awful. One example: they used to pressure me to open a credit card with them every time I visited a branch. I declined every time, and had to be forceful about it sometimes. Then one day, not long after a visit with a particularly annoying employee, I got a Bank of America credit card -- which I had specifically refused -- in the mail. Hmmmmmm.

They also, unlike any other bank I've ever used, charged a fee to receive wire transfers. Which they had not disclosed. Then, of course, they apply withdrawals before deposits, and caused an overdraft from the undisclosed fee, even though the wire transfer was a *deposit* that would have very easily covered it. That was the last straw for me. After nearly an hour on the phone with them, I got them to agree to reverse both the fee and the overdraft charge. THEN I said I wanted to close my account.

When traditional banks are better

There are a few situations where Internet banks don't work out so well:

Living paycheck to paycheck. If you are constantly running out of money, and it is vital that any deposits get posted *NOW*, you probably don't want an Internet bank (and wouldn't benefit from their higher interest anyway). When you mail in a check, it can take some time before you have access to the money; the postal service has to deliver it, and then most of your checks will be subject to the "non-local" availability policy and held for about a week (though interest will start to accrue immediately).

Not being able to meet minimum balances. Internet banks do tend to offer a variety of accounts, but if you aren't able to regularly maintain $500 to $1000 in your checking account or $2000 to $5000 in your savings, you will likely fall into a category with lower interest and fewer free benefits. These accounts may not have many benefits over traditional banks, and may in fact be worse in some ways. The interest rate gap won't make that much of a difference either. There are several online banks that offer savings accounts only, with high interest rates and low minimums, that you may want to investigate -- though you will have availability into your checking account measured in days, not seconds. Presidential's savings has no minimum, but requires $5000 to open. (They do have lower-interest savings accounts without that requirement) Watch out for FirstIB's accounts; you can open an account with less than the monthly minimum balance, and will run into fees unless you deposit enough to meet the minimums.

MJ Ray: British Library Blogs

After noticing the Library of Congress Blog (thanks for the anonymous link correction) via librarian.net, I asked the British Library and they told me they had a blog for the London in Maps exhibition and will soon launch a new content blog called Sacred. Which other libraries are blogging?

26 April 2007

Miriam Ruiz: Debian packages for Gnash

As it’s quite predictable that we’ll have a newer version of Gnash in one or two months, I’ve created a newer experimental set of packages from the CVS, so that everything is ready when the release comes out. There is really much more to do before they’re in a decent state, mainly making them work out-of-the box for Konqueror, and decide how to handle the shared objects that are being built right now. The plugin for iceweasel works out-of-the-box for me. Do not expect a stable program for the moment anyway, it’s still under heavy development. I’ve been reported some more bugs about these packages anyway, so be careful with them. Chipi has built the packages for amd64 for me, so if you want them, they’re available online. According to one of the developers: “gnash should not have shared objects, they have been enabled again recently to allow builds on Darwin, altought I think we should disable them again”, so I think that matter about shared objects is likely to be solved soon. As it is right now, I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t be compliant with The Policy. As there’s no API for gnash yet, it doesn’t really make sense to create a -dev package for the moment, even though there seem to be some demand for it. Somewhere in the future we will likely have one. For those who want to experiment with later versions, I’m using SVN for handling the packaging, so it’s quite easy to create some really extreme latest version of the packages: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-flash/packages/gnash/trunk/ latest-gnash
cd latest-gnash
fakeroot debian/rules get-orig-source
cd gnash-0.7.2+cvs*.????
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot

Steve Kemp: He was in a bind 'cos he was way behind

My girlfriend who was returned from hospital on Friday learnt a couple of days later that she'd managed to suffer a fractured skull. Apart from that shocking news I've been doing little. Lots of travelling, lots of tidying up ~/bin, little else. One new toy is release which will allow me to easily release projects. The idea is you run "~/bin/release" inside a project directory and it will: Very simple, almost trivially so, but it has a lot nicer than having to do all the bits manually. (sample .release file.) I had a piece of code for triggering new freshmeat announcements working a while back - but it was a little too fragile when it came to reading the ChangeLog files I use so I've killed it for the moment. (Probably "$EDITOR fresmeat.tmp &" would be a better idea anyway!) Connectivity is bad right now, since I'm in the middle of changing home ISP, but hopefully that will be resolved in the next week or two. (Switching from Telewest/Virgin -> Sky for people in the UK who might care.)

25 April 2007

Axel Beckert: The days of my last running Woody are numbered...

As many of the Planet Debian readers know, I bemoan Galeon 1.2 and therefore Woody. For a long time I haven’t found an appropriate browser replacement for Galeon 1.2 in Sarge, so I never switched my home workstation called “gsa” (Pentium II, 400 MHz, 572 MB RAM) to Sarge, since Woody was rockstable and just worked. Though, after a few Galeon 1.3/2.0 rants, someone pointed me to Kazehakase, which indeed is a fine Galeon 1.2 replacement. But I noticed that Kazehakase in Sarge was in an early stage and the Kazehakase from testing (now Etch) were already much more matured. So in comparison to Sarge with Etch I won’t have the problem of not having a mature and sage web browser in main. And due to security support for Woody ceased a few months ago and Etch is now declared stable, it’s time to reinstall my last Woody box with Etch. For that, a repartioning of it’s two hard disks (8 GB and 40 GB) sounds like a good idea and so I had look, what’s on all those partitions where I once had a shot on quite a few Linux distributions and other unix-like operating systems. (Although I was already a big fan of Debian at that time, I wanted to look over my own nose and ordered a few CDs of free operating system at LinISO.de.) So here’s what I found, never really used and will throw away quite soon: That should give enough space for an Etch installation without touching the Woody installation first. Thanks to Venty, I’ve got a DVD drive for that box, so I can install from DVD. And for toying around with all those other neat and free operating systems nowadays, I’ve got my MicroClient Jr. named “c2”.

Julien Blache: pommed v1.3: enhancements and fixes

This is mainly an enhancement release as far as pommed itself is concerned: This last item is probably the most important one for quite a few pommed users; hope it’ll behave better after suspend and will no longer get “stuck”. Gpomme has got 2 new themes, the elegant-bright and elegant-dark themes, along with a configuration GUI which will let you set the theme and the timeout. Enjoy!

Next.

Previous.