Due to the midterm evaluation, this report will cover a span of 4 weeks. As a result, it will be quite a bit longer than my previous reports.
One of the first things I did after my last report was create a FAQ for the project. At first, the FAQ was a plain text file living only in the git repository. Then, it moved to being maintained on the Debian wiki with a cronjob pulling it into my local repository for me to commit and push. Finally, the cronjob moved to wagner. The FAQ is not actually committed to the git repository, but it is available in the
dextools instance running on wagner or on the
wiki. There is also now a basic README file that is part of the git repository that simply points people to the FAQ on the wiki (so people who branch the repository can easily find the documentation).
For those of you who have been reading my other reports and/or testing the dashboard, you have probably noticed the problems I was having getting the text boxes sized properly. After spending countless hours researching and testing different solutions, we finally decided to give up on this for the time being. Therefore, all of the size attributes have been removed from the text inputs, and the background color has been reset to its default value. This means that we will no longer experience the issue of very wide text boxes and a horizontally stretched table. However, it also means that long strings will get cut-off when displayed in a text input.
Since my initial mockup design at the start of the summer, I have had the rows of the table zebra-striped. Based on some feedback from Paul Wise (pabs), I changed this so that the row colors are based on the status of the task. Open tasks are red, closed tasks are green, and in progress tasks are yellow. This makes it much easier to quickly see the progress of the project and find tasks you are interested in.
My original dashboard consisted of one main dex.html file. This file used some javascript to pull in each project s task list. We felt that a much more common use case would involve a user only interested in one particular project. As a result, they would not be likely to use the select boxes to change projects. This ultimately led to me creating standalone dex.html dashboards for each project. These per-project dashboards were identical to the original dex.html, except they did not include the select boxes at the top for changing projects. Eventually, I decided to completely get rid of the original dex.html dashboard. That file now consists of a simple list of links to all of the projects sorted by distribution. Another advantage of this change is that it is much easier to link to a specific project. For example, you might now link to /projects/dex-ubuntu-ancient-patches/dex.html (you can get the URL by simply copying it from the address bar). Another advantage is that you can now link directly to a specific project s graphs (just append #graph).
Another feature that I am still working on is per-project documentation. From the start, we wanted to make it easy for new contributors to get involved in DEX. One way we can do this is by having clear documentation about what the project is and how to deal with tasks. I decided that the easiest approach would be to have this documentation live on the wiki. This allows users to use the familiar wiki markup language to format their text, and it gives us all of the other benefits a wiki provides. Documentation will live at /DEX/<distribution>/
<project>. The dashboard will then take care of pulling in this documentation and displaying it at the top of the proper page. For a while, I was thinking that it would be necessary to filter the HTML produced by the wiki to prevent malicious code from ending up on the dashboard. However, after playing around for a bit, I think that it should be pretty safe to just use the HTML as-is (if someone spams the wiki, we can always revert the change). I am currently finishing up some of the code to handle this, and it should be live sometime this week (a partially working version is live on wagner).
There are also two new checkboxes at the top of each dashboard. These allow users to add completed tasks and/or tasks with completed bugs. This is useful for projects that are close to being complete, as it allows users to quickly view the few remaining tasks. This feature was requested by several people, and I am glad to finally be able to implement it for them.
There is also a second graph on each page. This graph is a bar graph that shows the number of tasks each person has completed. It gets the people from the assignee column for the project, and it only counts tasks with a status of Complete . The graph is updated whenever the getbugs.py script runs to update the task listing (currently every 10 minutes). The bars are sorted from tallest to shortest. The idea behind this graph is to recognize the people working on a project.
The form processing script has not worked on wagner. This was mainly due to a permission issue. Thanks to a hint from Rapha l Hertzog, I was able to use setfacl to fix this. The form can now be submitted, and it should successfully save all changes made via the web form. This involved some updates to support the per-project dex.html files. The form processing script will also ignore any status that is not complete , in progress , or incomplete , which prevents people from messing up the dashboard by submitting invalid information. Finally, the script will now try to use the HTTP_REFERER header to send the user back to the correct page. If this header is not set, the user will be sent back to the main dex.html index page.
Sorting the table has been partially broken since I started including text inputs. I finally got this issue resolved, and I should now be able to sort by text inputs, select boxes, or anything else I might end up including in the table. You can test this by clicking on any header in the table. I will probably add a tiny image to make it more clear which header is being used to sort the table. By default, it is sorted based on the status and then the task name.
The status column now has a select box for setting the status. Since the row coloring is done via javascript, the minute you change the status in the select box, the row color will change to reflect the new status. Keep in mind, for the time being, any change you make via the web form will be lost if you do not hit the Submit button at the top of the form.
That covers most of the dashboard changes that have taken place since my last report. However, there were also some other changes that are worth noting.
Matt Zimmerman, my original mentor, settled down from his traveling and resumed serving as my mentor for the project. I would like to thank Stefano Zacchiroli for all of his help this summer. I look forward to working with him more in the future.
I have also started using the
issue tracker feature on alioth for dextools. Right now, it is mainly being used to help me keep track of bugs and features that I need to deal with. I am hoping that as dextools starts to be used by more people that they will also help report issues on the tracker. This issue tracker is a good source of information for people interested in knowing what I will be working on in the future. I will briefly talk about some of the more important features that I will be working on.
The first issue is one that I have already touched upon in this report. I want to sort out the per-project documentation. This is rather important, as it will most likely be utilized by all projects using the dashboard. It is also essential if we are to get new contributors involved in DEX projects.
Second, I want to setup some method for backing up the projects/ directory on wagner. This directory is not maintained in the git repository, and it contains all of the information submitted via the web form and generated by the scripts. My current plan is to have this directory maintained in its own VCS. Every time getbugs.py runs or the form is submitted, a new commit will be made. This will allow us to easily revert any changes (spam) made to the dashboard. Since we do not foresee the dashboard being the target of much abuse, any user will be able to modify data via the web form.
I also want to add the ability for users to create new projects and task via the web. I envision this as a separate form where they enter the distribution name, project name, a list of BTS bug numbers, and a list of any additional tasks. The script will then take care of applying the necessary usertag to the bugs and/or creating a tasks file in the projects directory for the non-bts tasks. Doing this will make starting a new project trivial, and will eliminate the need for VCS access to create projects that do not utilize BTS bugs.
Finally, I want to eliminate the need for the user to hit the Submit button to save their changes. Any change the user makes should be submitted and saved instantly using AJAX. This will also help eliminate some confusion that was caused by the row color instantly changing when the status is changed. Some users thought that the color change meant that the change was saved when it really was not.
Matt asked me the other day what features I think need to get added before the dashboard is really ready for public use. While the features and issues I mentioned above will help make the dashboard easier to use, the dashboard is still perfectly usable without them. There are only a few more weeks left in the Google Summer of Code 2011. By that time, all of these features and bugs should be sorted out, and we should be able to properly announce the dashboard and make it available for use on all DEX projects. That does not mean that the dashboard will be done . Instead, it will probably result in many new bugs and feature requests being submitted. However, at that point, I will make a very strong effort to keep the dashboard stable and to prevent data loss.
I am looking forward to the finally finishing up this project and seeing it used by the DEX team. As always, if you are interested in helping out with DEX or dextools, my code is available in a
git repository on alioth. There is also the new
issue tracker where you can report bugs and request new features. Finally, you can join the debian-derivatives mailing list, join #debian-derivatives on OFTC, or contact me directly via email or on IRC (nhandler).</project></distribution>
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD was first released with Squeeze in last february. The technology preview label indicated, among other things, that it had a number of limitations when compared with what users would expect: missing features, incomplete functionality, etc.
But it has seen many noteworthy improvements since then. Here are some that I would like to mention:
On July 30th, 2001, I received a mail from James Troup stating that I
was a Debian developer, this 10 days after my Application Manager,
namely Martin Michlmayr, 
So, the fifth Debconf I ve had the chance to attend is clearly over now. It was great, and all organizers (and sponsors) really deserve huge thank you for making this event so successful. I m already looking forward to next year s edition.
Debconf has been very productive for me. I chaired 4 sessions:
As 
