Search Results: "rul"

Otto Kek l inen: Creating Debian packages from upstream Git

Featured image of post Creating Debian packages from upstream Git

In this post, I demonstrate the optimal workflow for creating new Debian packages in 2025, preserving the upstream git history. The motivation for this is to lower the barrier for sharing improvements to and from upstream, and to improve software provenance and supply-chain security by making it easy to inspect every change at any level using standard git tooling. Key elements of this workflow include:

Using a Git fork/clone of the upstream repository as the starting point for creating Debian packaging repositories.
Consistent use of the same git-buildpackage commands, with all package-specific options in gbp.conf.
DEP-14 tag and branch names for an optimal Git packaging repository structure.
Pristine-tar and upstream signatures for supply-chain security.
Use of Files-Excluded in the debian/copyright file to filter out unwanted files in Debian.
Patch queues to easily rebase and cherry-pick changes across Debian and upstream branches.
Efficient use of Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance, for both automated feedback from CI systems and human feedback from peer reviews.

To make the instructions so concrete that anyone can repeat all the steps themselves on a real package, I demonstrate the steps by packaging the command-line tool Entr. It is written in C, has very few dependencies, and its final Debian source package structure is simple, yet exemplifies all the important parts that go into a complete Debian package:

Creating a new packaging repository and publishing it under your personal namespace on salsa.debian.org.
Using dh_make to create the initial Debian packaging.
Posting the first draft of the Debian packaging as a Merge Request (MR) and using Salsa CI to verify Debian packaging quality.
Running local builds efficiently and iterating on the packaging process.

Create new Debian packaging repository from the existing upstream project git repository First, create a new empty directory, then clone the upstream Git repository inside it:

shell

mkdir debian-entr
cd debian-entr
git clone --origin upstreamvcs --branch master \
 --single-branch https://github.com/eradman/entr.git

Using a clean directory makes it easier to inspect the build artifacts of a Debian package, which will be output in the parent directory of the Debian source directory. The extra parameters given to git clone lay the foundation for the Debian packaging git repository structure where the upstream git remote name is upstreamvcs. Only the upstream main branch is tracked to avoid cluttering git history with upstream development branches that are irrelevant for packaging in Debian. Next, enter the git repository directory and list the git tags. Pick the latest upstream release tag as the commit to start the branch upstream/latest. This latest refers to the upstream release, not the upstream development branch. Immediately after, branch off the debian/latest branch, which will have the actual Debian packaging files in the debian/ subdirectory.

shell

cd entr
git tag # shows the latest upstream release tag was '5.6'
git checkout -b upstream/latest 5.6
git checkout -b debian/latest

%% init:   'gitGraph':   'mainBranchName': 'master'      %%
gitGraph:
checkout master
commit id: "Upstream 5.6 release" tag: "5.6"
branch upstream/latest
checkout upstream/latest
commit id: "New upstream version 5.6" tag: "upstream/5.6"
branch debian/latest
checkout debian/latest
commit id: "Initial Debian packaging"
commit id: "Additional change 1"
commit id: "Additional change 2"
commit id: "Additional change 3"

At this point, the repository is structured according to DEP-14 conventions, ensuring a clear separation between upstream and Debian packaging changes, but there are no Debian changes yet. Next, add the Salsa repository as a new remote which called origin, the same as the default remote name in git.

shell

git remote add origin git@salsa.debian.org:otto/entr-demo.git
git push --set-upstream origin debian/latest

This is an important preparation step to later be able to create a Merge Request on Salsa that targets the debian/latest branch, which does not yet have any debian/ directory.

Launch a Debian Sid (unstable) container to run builds in To ensure that all packaging tools are of the latest versions, run everything inside a fresh Sid container. This has two benefits: you are guaranteed to have the most up-to-date toolchain, and your host system stays clean without getting polluted by various extra packages. Additionally, this approach works even if your host system is not Debian/Ubuntu.

shell

cd ..
podman run --interactive --tty --rm --shm-size=1G --cap-add SYS_PTRACE \
 --env='DEB*' --volume=$PWD:/tmp/test --workdir=/tmp/test debian:sid bash

Note that the container should be started from the parent directory of the git repository, not inside it. The --volume parameter will loop-mount the current directory inside the container. Thus all files created and modified are on the host system, and will persist after the container shuts down. Once inside the container, install the basic dependencies:

shell

apt update -q && apt install -q --yes git-buildpackage dpkg-dev dh-make

Automate creating the debian/ files with dh-make To create the files needed for the actual Debian packaging, use dh_make:

shell

# dh_make --packagename entr_5.6 --single --createorig
Maintainer Name : Otto Kek l inen
Email-Address : otto@debian.org
Date : Sat, 15 Feb 2025 01:17:51 +0000
Package Name : entr
Version : 5.6
License : blank
Package Type : single
Are the details correct? [Y/n/q]

Done. Please edit the files in the debian/ subdirectory now.

Due to how dh_make works, the package name and version need to be written as a single underscore separated string. In this case, you should choose --single to specify that the package type is a single binary package. Other options would be --library for library packages (see libgda5 sources as an example) or --indep (see dns-root-data sources as an example). The --createorig will create a mock upstream release tarball (entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz) from the current release directory, which is necessary due to historical reasons and how dh_make worked before git repositories became common and Debian source packages were based off upstream release tarballs (e.g. *.tar.gz). At this stage, a debian/ directory has been created with template files, and you can start modifying the files and iterating towards actual working packaging.

shell

git add debian/
git commit -a -m "Initial Debian packaging"

Review the files The full list of files after the above steps with dh_make would be:

 -- entr
   -- LICENSE
   -- Makefile.bsd
   -- Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.linux-compat
   -- Makefile.macos
   -- NEWS
   -- README.md
   -- configure
   -- data.h
   -- debian
     -- README.Debian
     -- README.source
     -- changelog
     -- control
     -- copyright
     -- gbp.conf
     -- entr-docs.docs
     -- entr.cron.d.ex
     -- entr.doc-base.ex
     -- manpage.1.ex
     -- manpage.md.ex
     -- manpage.sgml.ex
     -- manpage.xml.ex
     -- postinst.ex
     -- postrm.ex
     -- preinst.ex
     -- prerm.ex
     -- rules
     -- salsa-ci.yml.ex
     -- source
       -- format
     -- upstream
       -- metadata.ex
     -- watch.ex
   -- entr.1
   -- entr.c
   -- missing
     -- compat.h
     -- kqueue_inotify.c
     -- strlcpy.c
     -- sys
     -- event.h
   -- status.c
   -- status.h
   -- system_test.sh
 -- entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz

You can browse these files in the demo repository. The mandatory files in the debian/ directory are:

changelog,
control,
copyright,
and rules.

All the other files have been created for convenience so the packager has template files to work from. The files with the suffix .ex are example files that won t have any effect until their content is adjusted and the suffix removed. For detailed explanations of the purpose of each file in the debian/ subdirectory, see the following resources:

The Debian Policy Manual: Describes the structure of the operating system, the package archive and requirements for packages to be included in the Debian archive.
The Developer s Reference: A collection of best practices and process descriptions Debian packagers are expected to follow while interacting with one another.
Debhelper man pages: Detailed information of how the Debian package build system works, and how the contents of the various files in debian/ affect the end result.

As Entr, the package used in this example, is a real package that already exists in the Debian archive, you may want to browse the actual Debian packaging source at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/entr/-/tree/debian/latest/debian for reference. Most of these files have standardized formatting conventions to make collaboration easier. To automatically format the files following the most popular conventions, simply run wrap-and-sort -vast or debputy reformat --style=black.

Identify build dependencies The most common reason for builds to fail is missing dependencies. The easiest way to identify which Debian package ships the required dependency is using apt-file. If, for example, a build fails complaining that pcre2posix.h cannot be found or that libcre2-posix.so is missing, you can use these commands:

shell

$ apt install -q --yes apt-file && apt-file update
$ apt-file search pcre2posix.h
libpcre2-dev: /usr/include/pcre2posix.h
$ apt-file search libpcre2-posix.so
libpcre2-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so
libpcre2-posix3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so.3
libpcre2-posix3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so.3.0.6

The output above implies that the debian/control should be extended to define a Build-Depends: libpcre2-dev relationship. There is also dpkg-depcheck that uses strace to trace the files the build process tries to access, and lists what Debian packages those files belong to. Example usage:

shell

dpkg-depcheck -b debian/rules build

Build the Debian sources to generate the .deb package After the first pass of refining the contents of the files in debian/, test the build by running dpkg-buildpackage inside the container:

shell

dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -b

The options -uc -us will skip signing the resulting Debian source package and other build artifacts. The -b option will skip creating a source package and only build the (binary) *.deb packages. The output is very verbose and gives a large amount of context about what is happening during the build to make debugging build failures easier. In the build log of entr you will see for example the line dh binary --buildsystem=makefile. This and other dh commands can also be run manually if there is a need to quickly repeat only a part of the build while debugging build failures. To see what files were generated or modified by the build simply run git status --ignored:

shell

$ git status --ignored
On branch debian/latest

Untracked files:
 (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
 debian/debhelper-build-stamp
 debian/entr.debhelper.log
 debian/entr.substvars
 debian/files

Ignored files:
 (use "git add -f <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
 Makefile
 compat.c
 compat.o
 debian/.debhelper/
 debian/entr/
 entr
 entr.o
 status.o

Re-running dpkg-buildpackage will include running the command dh clean, which assuming it is configured correctly in the debian/rules file will reset the source directory to the original pristine state. The same can of course also be done with regular git commands git reset --hard; git clean -fdx. To avoid accidentally committing unnecessary build artifacts in git, a debian/.gitignore can be useful and it would typically include all four files listed as untracked above. After a successful build you would have the following files:

shell

 -- entr
   -- LICENSE
   -- Makefile -> Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.bsd
   -- Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.linux-compat
   -- Makefile.macos
   -- NEWS
   -- README.md
   -- compat.c
   -- compat.o
   -- configure
   -- data.h
   -- debian
     -- README.source.md
     -- changelog
     -- control
     -- copyright
     -- debhelper-build-stamp
     -- docs
     -- entr
       -- DEBIAN
         -- control
         -- md5sums
       -- usr
       -- bin
         -- entr
       -- share
       -- doc
         -- entr
         -- NEWS.gz
         -- README.md
         -- changelog.Debian.gz
         -- copyright
       -- man
       -- man1
       -- entr.1.gz
     -- entr.debhelper.log
     -- entr.substvars
     -- files
     -- gbp.conf
     -- patches
       -- PR149-expand-aliases-in-system-test-script.patch
       -- series
       -- system-test-skip-no-tty.patch
       -- system-test-with-system-binary.patch
     -- rules
     -- salsa-ci.yml
     -- source
       -- format
     -- tests
       -- control
     -- upstream
       -- metadata
       -- signing-key.asc
     -- watch
   -- entr
   -- entr.1
   -- entr.c
   -- entr.o
   -- missing
     -- compat.h
     -- kqueue_inotify.c
     -- strlcpy.c
     -- sys
     -- event.h
   -- status.c
   -- status.h
   -- status.o
   -- system_test.sh
 -- entr-dbgsym_5.6-1_amd64.deb
 -- entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
 -- entr_5.6-1.dsc
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.changes
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb
 -- entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz

The contents of debian/entr are essentially what goes into the resulting entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb package. Familiarizing yourself with the majority of the files in the original upstream source as well as all the resulting build artifacts is time consuming, but it is a necessary investment to get high-quality Debian packages. There are also tools such as Debcraft that automate generating the build artifacts in separate output directories for each build, thus making it easy to compare the changes to correlate what change in the Debian packaging led to what change in the resulting build artifacts.

Re-run the initial import with git-buildpackage When upstreams publish releases as tarballs, they should also be imported for optimal software supply-chain security, in particular if upstream also publishes cryptographic signatures that can be used to verify the authenticity of the tarballs. To achieve this, the files debian/watch, debian/upstream/signing-key.asc, and debian/gbp.conf need to be present with the correct options. In the gbp.conf file, ensure you have the correct options based on:

Does upstream release tarballs? If so, enforce pristine-tar = True.
Does upstream sign the tarballs? If so, configure explicit signature checking with upstream-signatures = on.
Does upstream have a git repository, and does it have release git tags? If so, configure the release git tag format, e.g. upstream-vcs-tag = %(version%~%.)s.

To validate that the above files are working correctly, run gbp import-orig with the current version explicitly defined:

shell

$ gbp import-orig --uscan --upstream-version 5.6
gbp:info: Launching uscan...
gpgv: Signature made 7. Aug 2024 07.43.27 PDT
gpgv: using RSA key 519151D83E83D40A232B4D615C418B8631BC7C26
gpgv: Good signature from "Eric Radman <ericshane@eradman.com>"
gbp:info: Using uscan downloaded tarball ../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
gbp:info: Importing '../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz' to branch 'upstream/latest'...
gbp:info: Source package is entr
gbp:info: Upstream version is 5.6
gbp:info: Replacing upstream source on 'debian/latest'
gbp:info: Running Postimport hook
gbp:info: Successfully imported version 5.6 of ../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz

As the original packaging was done based on the upstream release git tag, the above command will fetch the tarball release, create the pristine-tar branch, and store the tarball delta on it. This command will also attempt to create the tag upstream/5.6 on the upstream/latest branch.

Import new upstream versions in the future Forking the upstream git repository, creating the initial packaging, and creating the DEP-14 branch structure are all one-off work needed only when creating the initial packaging. Going forward, to import new upstream releases, one would simply run `git fetch upstreamvcs; gbp import-orig --uscan`, which fetches the upstream git tags, checks for new upstream tarballs, and automatically downloads, verifies, and imports the new version. See the `galera-4-demo` example in the Debian source packages in git explained post as a demo you can try running yourself and examine in detail. You can also try running `gbp import-orig --uscan` without specifying a version. It would fetch it, as it will notice there is now Entr version 5.7 available, and import it.

Build using git-buildpackage From this stage onwards you should build the package using gbp buildpackage, which will do a more comprehensive build.

shell

gbp buildpackage -uc -us

The git-buildpackage build also includes running Lintian to find potential Debian policy violations in the sources or in the resulting .deb binary packages. Many Debian Developers run lintian -EviIL +pedantic after every build to check that there are no new nags, and to validate that changes intended to previous Lintian nags were correct.

Open a Merge Request on Salsa for Debian packaging review Getting everything perfectly right takes a lot of effort, and may require reaching out to an experienced Debian Developers for review and guidance. Thus, you should aim to publish your initial packaging work on Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance, for review and feedback as early as possible. For somebody to be able to easily see what you have done, you should rename your `debian/latest` branch to another name, for example `next/debian/latest`, and open a Merge Request that targets the `debian/latest` branch on your Salsa fork, which still has only the unmodified upstream files. If you have followed the workflow in this post so far, you can simply run:

`git checkout -b next/debian/latest`

`git push --set-upstream origin next/debian/latest`

Open in a browser the URL visible in the git remote response

Write the Merge Request description in case the default text from your commit is not enough

Mark the MR as Draft using the checkbox

Publish the MR and request feedback

Once a Merge Request exists, discussion regarding what additional changes are needed can be conducted as MR comments. With an MR, you can easily iterate on the contents of `next/debian/latest`, rebase, force push, and request re-review as many times as you want. While at it, make sure the Settings > CI/CD page has under CI/CD configuration file the value `debian/salsa-ci.yml` so that the CI can run and give you immediate automated feedback. For an example of an initial packaging Merge Request, see https://salsa.debian.org/otto/entr-demo/-/merge_requests/1.

Open a Merge Request / Pull Request to fix upstream code Due to the high quality requirements in Debian, it is fairly common that while doing the initial Debian packaging of an open source project, issues are found that stem from the upstream source code. While it is possible to carry extra patches in Debian, it is not good practice to deviate too much from upstream code with custom Debian patches. Instead, the Debian packager should try to get the fixes applied directly upstream. Using git-buildpackage patch queues is the most convenient way to make modifications to the upstream source code so that they automatically convert into Debian patches (stored at debian/patches), and can also easily be submitted upstream as any regular git commit (and rebased and resubmitted many times over). First, decide if you want to work out of the upstream development branch and later cherry-pick to the Debian packaging branch, or work out of the Debian packaging branch and cherry-pick to an upstream branch. The example below starts from the upstream development branch and then cherry-picks the commit into the git-buildpackage patch queue:

shell

git checkout -b bugfix-branch master
nano entr.c
make
./entr # verify change works as expected
git commit -a -m "Commit title" -m "Commit body"
git push # submit upstream
gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
git cherry-pick <commit id>
git commit --amend # extend commit message with DEP-3 metadata
gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b
./entr # verify change works as expected
gbp pq export --drop --commit
git commit --amend # Write commit message along lines "Add patch to .."

The example below starts by making the fix on a git-buildpackage patch queue branch, and then cherry-picking it onto the upstream development branch:

shell

gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
nano entr.c
git commit -a -m "Commit title" -m "Commit body"
gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b
./entr # verify change works as expected
gbp pq export --drop --commit
git commit --amend # Write commit message along lines "Add patch to .."
git checkout -b bugfix-branch master
git cherry-pick <commit id>
git commit --amend # prepare commit message for upstream submission
git push # submit upstream

The key git-buildpackage commands to enter and exit the patch-queue mode are:

shell

gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
gbp pq export --drop --commit

%% init:   'gitGraph':   'mainBranchName': 'debian/latest'      %%
gitGraph
checkout debian/latest
commit id: "Initial packaging"
branch patch-queue/debian/latest
checkout patch-queue/debian/latest
commit id: "Delete debian/patches/..."
commit id: "Patch 1 title"
commit id: "Patch 2 title"
commit id: "Patch 3 title"

These can be run at any time, regardless if any debian/patches existed prior, or if existing patches applied cleanly or not, or if there were old patch queue branches around. Note that the extra -b in gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b instructs to build only binary packages, avoiding any nags from dpkg-source that there are modifications in the upstream sources while building in the patches-applied mode.

Programming-language specific dh-make alternatives As each programming language has its specific way of building the source code, and many other conventions regarding the file layout and more, Debian has multiple custom tools to create new Debian source packages for specific programming languages.

Go: dh-make-golang

Haskell: cabal-debian

Java: jh_makepkg

JavaScript/Node.js: npm2deb

Lua: dh-lua

OCaml: dh-ocaml

Perl: dh-make-perl

PHP: pkg-php-tools

Ruby: gem2deb

Notably, Python does not have its own tool, but there is an `dh_make --python` option for Python support directly in dh_make itself. The list is not complete and many more tools exist. For some languages, there are even competing options, such as for Go there is in addition to `dh-make-golang` also Gophian. When learning Debian packaging, there is no need to learn these tools upfront. Being aware that they exist is enough, and one can learn them only if and when one starts to package a project in a new programming language.

The difference between source git repository vs source packages vs binary packages As seen in earlier example, running gbp buildpackage on the Entr packaging repository above will result in several files:

entr_5.6-1_amd64.changes
entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb
entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
entr_5.6-1.dsc
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz.asc

The entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb is the binary package, which can be installed on a Debian/Ubuntu system. The rest of the files constitute the source package. To do a source-only build, run gbp buildpackage -S and note the files produced:

entr_5.6-1_source.changes
entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
entr_5.6-1.dsc
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz.asc

The source package files can be used to build the binary .deb for amd64, or any architecture that the package supports. It is important to grasp that the Debian source package is the preferred form to be able to build the binary packages on various Debian build systems, and the Debian source package is not the same thing as the Debian packaging git repository contents.

flowchart LR
git[Git repository<br>branch debian/latest] --> gbp buildpackage -S  src[Source Package<br>.dsc + .tar.xz]
src --> dpkg-buildpackage  bin[Binary Packages<br>.deb]

If the package is large and complex, the build could result in multiple binary packages. One set of package definition files in debian/ will however only ever result in a single source package.

Option to repackage source packages with Files-Excluded lists in the debian/copyright file Some upstream projects may include binary files in their release, or other undesirable content that needs to be omitted from the source package in Debian. The easiest way to filter them out is by adding to the debian/copyright file a Files-Excluded field listing the undesired files. The debian/copyright file is read by uscan, which will repackage the upstream sources on-the-fly when importing new upstream releases. For a real-life example, see the debian/copyright files in the Godot package that lists:

debian

Files-Excluded: platform/android/java/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar

The resulting repackaged upstream source tarball, as well as the upstream version component, will have an extra +ds to signify that it is not the true original upstream source but has been modified by Debian:

godot_4.3+ds.orig.tar.xz
godot_4.3+ds-1_amd64.deb

Creating one Debian source package from multiple upstream source packages also possible In some rare cases the upstream project may be split across multiple git repositories or the upstream release may consist of multiple components each in their own separate tarball. Usually these are very large projects that get some benefits from releasing components separately. If in Debian these are deemed to go into a single source package, it is technically possible using the component system in git-buildpackage and uscan. For an example see the gbp.conf and watch files in the node-cacache package. Using this type of structure should be a last resort, as it creates complexity and inter-dependencies that are bound to cause issues later on. It is usually better to work with upstream and champion universal best practices with clear releases and version schemes.

When not to start the Debian packaging repository as a fork of the upstream one Not all upstreams use Git for version control. It is by far the most popular, but there are still some that use e.g. Subversion or Mercurial. Who knows maybe in the future some new version control systems will start to compete with Git. There are also projects that use Git in massive monorepos and with complex submodule setups that invalidate the basic assumptions required to map an upstream Git repository into a Debian packaging repository. In those cases one can t use a `debian/latest` branch on a clone of the upstream git repository as the starting point for the Debian packaging, but one must revert the traditional way of starting from an upstream release tarball with `gbp import-orig package-1.0.tar.gz`.

Conclusion Created in August 1993, Debian is one of the oldest Linux distributions. In the 32 years since inception, the `.deb` packaging format and the tooling to work with it have evolved several generations. In the past 10 years, more and more Debian Developers have converged on certain core practices evidenced by https://trends.debian.net/, but there is still a lot of variance in workflows even for identical tasks. Hopefully, you find this post useful in giving practical guidance on how exactly to do the most common things when packaging software for Debian. Happy packaging!

Otto Kek l inen: New Debian package creation from upstream git repository

Featured image of post New Debian package creation from upstream git repository

In this post, I demonstrate the optimal workflow for creating new Debian packages in 2025, preserving the upstream git history. The motivation for this is to lower the barrier for sharing improvements to and from upstream, and to improve software provenance and supply-chain security by making it easy to inspect every change at any level using standard git tooling. Key elements of this workflow include:

Using a Git fork/clone of the upstream repository as the starting point for creating Debian packaging repositories.
Consistent use of the same git-buildpackage commands, with all package-specific options in gbp.conf.
DEP-14 tag and branch names for an optimal Git packaging repository structure.
Pristine-tar and upstream signatures for supply-chain security.
Use of Files-Excluded in the debian/copyright file to filter out unwanted files in Debian.
Patch queues to easily rebase and cherry-pick changes across Debian and upstream branches.
Efficient use of Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance, for both automated feedback from CI systems and human feedback from peer reviews.

To make the instructions so concrete that anyone can repeat all the steps themselves on a real package, I demonstrate the steps by packaging the command-line tool Entr. It is written in C, has very few dependencies, and its final Debian source package structure is simple, yet exemplifies all the important parts that go into a complete Debian package:

Creating a new packaging repository and publishing it under your personal namespace on salsa.debian.org.
Using dh_make to create the initial Debian packaging.
Posting the first draft of the Debian packaging as a Merge Request (MR) and using Salsa CI to verify Debian packaging quality.
Running local builds efficiently and iterating on the packaging process.

Create new Debian packaging repository from the existing upstream project git repository First, create a new empty directory, then clone the upstream Git repository inside it:

shell

mkdir debian-entr
cd debian-entr
git clone --origin upstreamvcs --branch master \
 --single-branch https://github.com/eradman/entr.git

Using a clean directory makes it easier to inspect the build artifacts of a Debian package, which will be output in the parent directory of the Debian source directory. The extra parameters given to git clone lay the foundation for the Debian packaging git repository structure where the upstream git remote name is upstreamvcs. Only the upstream main branch is tracked to avoid cluttering git history with upstream development branches that are irrelevant for packaging in Debian. Next, enter the git repository directory and list the git tags. Pick the latest upstream release tag as the commit to start the branch upstream/latest. This latest refers to the upstream release, not the upstream development branch. Immediately after, branch off the debian/latest branch, which will have the actual Debian packaging files in the debian/ subdirectory.

shell

cd entr
git tag # shows the latest upstream release tag was '5.6'
git checkout -b upstream/latest 5.6
git checkout -b debian/latest

%% init:   'gitGraph':   'mainBranchName': 'master'      %%
gitGraph:
checkout master
commit id: "Upstream 5.6 release" tag: "5.6"
branch upstream/latest
checkout upstream/latest
commit id: "New upstream version 5.6" tag: "upstream/5.6"
branch debian/latest
checkout debian/latest
commit id: "Initial Debian packaging"
commit id: "Additional change 1"
commit id: "Additional change 2"
commit id: "Additional change 3"

At this point, the repository is structured according to DEP-14 conventions, ensuring a clear separation between upstream and Debian packaging changes, but there are no Debian changes yet. Next, add the Salsa repository as a new remote which called origin, the same as the default remote name in git.

shell

git remote add origin git@salsa.debian.org:otto/entr-demo.git
git push --set-upstream origin debian/latest

This is an important preparation step to later be able to create a Merge Request on Salsa that targets the debian/latest branch, which does not yet have any debian/ directory.

Launch a Debian Sid (unstable) container to run builds in To ensure that all packaging tools are of the latest versions, run everything inside a fresh Sid container. This has two benefits: you are guaranteed to have the most up-to-date toolchain, and your host system stays clean without getting polluted by various extra packages. Additionally, this approach works even if your host system is not Debian/Ubuntu.

shell

cd ..
podman run --interactive --tty --rm --shm-size=1G --cap-add SYS_PTRACE \
 --env='DEB*' --volume=$PWD:/tmp/test --workdir=/tmp/test debian:sid bash

Note that the container should be started from the parent directory of the git repository, not inside it. The --volume parameter will loop-mount the current directory inside the container. Thus all files created and modified are on the host system, and will persist after the container shuts down. Once inside the container, install the basic dependencies:

shell

apt update -q && apt install -q --yes git-buildpackage dpkg-dev dh-make

Automate creating the debian/ files with dh-make To create the files needed for the actual Debian packaging, use dh_make:

shell

# dh_make --packagename entr_5.6 --single --createorig
Maintainer Name : Otto Kek l inen
Email-Address : otto@debian.org
Date : Sat, 15 Feb 2025 01:17:51 +0000
Package Name : entr
Version : 5.6
License : blank
Package Type : single
Are the details correct? [Y/n/q]

Done. Please edit the files in the debian/ subdirectory now.

Due to how dh_make works, the package name and version need to be written as a single underscore separated string. In this case, you should choose --single to specify that the package type is a single binary package. Other options would be --library for library packages (see libgda5 sources as an example) or --indep (see dns-root-data sources as an example). The --createorig will create a mock upstream release tarball (entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz) from the current release directory, which is necessary due to historical reasons and how dh_make worked before git repositories became common and Debian source packages were based off upstream release tarballs (e.g. *.tar.gz). At this stage, a debian/ directory has been created with template files, and you can start modifying the files and iterating towards actual working packaging.

shell

git add debian/
git commit -a -m "Initial Debian packaging"

Review the files The full list of files after the above steps with dh_make would be:

 -- entr
   -- LICENSE
   -- Makefile.bsd
   -- Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.linux-compat
   -- Makefile.macos
   -- NEWS
   -- README.md
   -- configure
   -- data.h
   -- debian
     -- README.Debian
     -- README.source
     -- changelog
     -- control
     -- copyright
     -- gbp.conf
     -- entr-docs.docs
     -- entr.cron.d.ex
     -- entr.doc-base.ex
     -- manpage.1.ex
     -- manpage.md.ex
     -- manpage.sgml.ex
     -- manpage.xml.ex
     -- postinst.ex
     -- postrm.ex
     -- preinst.ex
     -- prerm.ex
     -- rules
     -- salsa-ci.yml.ex
     -- source
       -- format
     -- upstream
       -- metadata.ex
     -- watch.ex
   -- entr.1
   -- entr.c
   -- missing
     -- compat.h
     -- kqueue_inotify.c
     -- strlcpy.c
     -- sys
     -- event.h
   -- status.c
   -- status.h
   -- system_test.sh
 -- entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz

You can browse these files in the demo repository. The mandatory files in the debian/ directory are:

changelog,
control,
copyright,
and rules.

All the other files have been created for convenience so the packager has template files to work from. The files with the suffix .ex are example files that won t have any effect until their content is adjusted and the suffix removed. For detailed explanations of the purpose of each file in the debian/ subdirectory, see the following resources:

The Debian Policy Manual: Describes the structure of the operating system, the package archive and requirements for packages to be included in the Debian archive.
The Developer s Reference: A collection of best practices and process descriptions Debian packagers are expected to follow while interacting with one another.
Debhelper man pages: Detailed information of how the Debian package build system works, and how the contents of the various files in debian/ affect the end result.

As Entr, the package used in this example, is a real package that already exists in the Debian archive, you may want to browse the actual Debian packaging source at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/entr/-/tree/debian/latest/debian for reference. Most of these files have standardized formatting conventions to make collaboration easier. To automatically format the files following the most popular conventions, simply run wrap-and-sort -vast or debputy reformat --style=black.

Identify build dependencies The most common reason for builds to fail is missing dependencies. The easiest way to identify which Debian package ships the required dependency is using apt-file. If, for example, a build fails complaining that pcre2posix.h cannot be found or that libcre2-posix.so is missing, you can use these commands:

shell

$ apt install -q --yes apt-file && apt-file update
$ apt-file search pcre2posix.h
libpcre2-dev: /usr/include/pcre2posix.h
$ apt-file search libpcre2-posix.so
libpcre2-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so
libpcre2-posix3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so.3
libpcre2-posix3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre2-posix.so.3.0.6

The output above implies that the debian/control should be extended to define a Build-Depends: libpcre2-dev relationship. There is also dpkg-depcheck that uses strace to trace the files the build process tries to access, and lists what Debian packages those files belong to. Example usage:

shell

dpkg-depcheck -b debian/rules build

Build the Debian sources to generate the .deb package After the first pass of refining the contents of the files in debian/, test the build by running dpkg-buildpackage inside the container:

shell

dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -b

The options -uc -us will skip signing the resulting Debian source package and other build artifacts. The -b option will skip creating a source package and only build the (binary) *.deb packages. The output is very verbose and gives a large amount of context about what is happening during the build to make debugging build failures easier. In the build log of entr you will see for example the line dh binary --buildsystem=makefile. This and other dh commands can also be run manually if there is a need to quickly repeat only a part of the build while debugging build failures. To see what files were generated or modified by the build simply run git status --ignored:

shell

$ git status --ignored
On branch debian/latest

Untracked files:
 (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
 debian/debhelper-build-stamp
 debian/entr.debhelper.log
 debian/entr.substvars
 debian/files

Ignored files:
 (use "git add -f <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
 Makefile
 compat.c
 compat.o
 debian/.debhelper/
 debian/entr/
 entr
 entr.o
 status.o

Re-running dpkg-buildpackage will include running the command dh clean, which assuming it is configured correctly in the debian/rules file will reset the source directory to the original pristine state. The same can of course also be done with regular git commands git reset --hard; git clean -fdx. To avoid accidentally committing unnecessary build artifacts in git, a debian/.gitignore can be useful and it would typically include all four files listed as untracked above. After a successful build you would have the following files:

shell

 -- entr
   -- LICENSE
   -- Makefile -> Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.bsd
   -- Makefile.linux
   -- Makefile.linux-compat
   -- Makefile.macos
   -- NEWS
   -- README.md
   -- compat.c
   -- compat.o
   -- configure
   -- data.h
   -- debian
     -- README.source.md
     -- changelog
     -- control
     -- copyright
     -- debhelper-build-stamp
     -- docs
     -- entr
       -- DEBIAN
         -- control
         -- md5sums
       -- usr
       -- bin
         -- entr
       -- share
       -- doc
         -- entr
         -- NEWS.gz
         -- README.md
         -- changelog.Debian.gz
         -- copyright
       -- man
       -- man1
       -- entr.1.gz
     -- entr.debhelper.log
     -- entr.substvars
     -- files
     -- gbp.conf
     -- patches
       -- PR149-expand-aliases-in-system-test-script.patch
       -- series
       -- system-test-skip-no-tty.patch
       -- system-test-with-system-binary.patch
     -- rules
     -- salsa-ci.yml
     -- source
       -- format
     -- tests
       -- control
     -- upstream
       -- metadata
       -- signing-key.asc
     -- watch
   -- entr
   -- entr.1
   -- entr.c
   -- entr.o
   -- missing
     -- compat.h
     -- kqueue_inotify.c
     -- strlcpy.c
     -- sys
     -- event.h
   -- status.c
   -- status.h
   -- status.o
   -- system_test.sh
 -- entr-dbgsym_5.6-1_amd64.deb
 -- entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
 -- entr_5.6-1.dsc
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.changes
 -- entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb
 -- entr_5.6.orig.tar.xz

The contents of debian/entr are essentially what goes into the resulting entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb package. Familiarizing yourself with the majority of the files in the original upstream source as well as all the resulting build artifacts is time consuming, but it is a necessary investment to get high-quality Debian packages. There are also tools such as Debcraft that automate generating the build artifacts in separate output directories for each build, thus making it easy to compare the changes to correlate what change in the Debian packaging led to what change in the resulting build artifacts.

Re-run the initial import with git-buildpackage When upstreams publish releases as tarballs, they should also be imported for optimal software supply-chain security, in particular if upstream also publishes cryptographic signatures that can be used to verify the authenticity of the tarballs. To achieve this, the files debian/watch, debian/upstream/signing-key.asc, and debian/gbp.conf need to be present with the correct options. In the gbp.conf file, ensure you have the correct options based on:

Does upstream release tarballs? If so, enforce pristine-tar = True.
Does upstream sign the tarballs? If so, configure explicit signature checking with upstream-signatures = on.
Does upstream have a git repository, and does it have release git tags? If so, configure the release git tag format, e.g. upstream-vcs-tag = %(version%~%.)s.

To validate that the above files are working correctly, run gbp import-orig with the current version explicitly defined:

shell

$ gbp import-orig --uscan --upstream-version 5.6
gbp:info: Launching uscan...
gpgv: Signature made 7. Aug 2024 07.43.27 PDT
gpgv: using RSA key 519151D83E83D40A232B4D615C418B8631BC7C26
gpgv: Good signature from "Eric Radman <ericshane@eradman.com>"
gbp:info: Using uscan downloaded tarball ../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
gbp:info: Importing '../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz' to branch 'upstream/latest'...
gbp:info: Source package is entr
gbp:info: Upstream version is 5.6
gbp:info: Replacing upstream source on 'debian/latest'
gbp:info: Running Postimport hook
gbp:info: Successfully imported version 5.6 of ../entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz

As the original packaging was done based on the upstream release git tag, the above command will fetch the tarball release, create the pristine-tar branch, and store the tarball delta on it. This command will also attempt to create the tag upstream/5.6 on the upstream/latest branch.

Import new upstream versions in the future Forking the upstream git repository, creating the initial packaging, and creating the DEP-14 branch structure are all one-off work needed only when creating the initial packaging. Going forward, to import new upstream releases, one would simply run `git fetch upstreamvcs; gbp import-orig --uscan`, which fetches the upstream git tags, checks for new upstream tarballs, and automatically downloads, verifies, and imports the new version. See the `galera-4-demo` example in the Debian source packages in git explained post as a demo you can try running yourself and examine in detail. You can also try running `gbp import-orig --uscan` without specifying a version. It would fetch it, as it will notice there is now Entr version 5.7 available, and import it.

Build using git-buildpackage From this stage onwards you should build the package using gbp buildpackage, which will do a more comprehensive build.

shell

gbp buildpackage -uc -us

The git-buildpackage build also includes running Lintian to find potential Debian policy violations in the sources or in the resulting .deb binary packages. Many Debian Developers run lintian -EviIL +pedantic after every build to check that there are no new nags, and to validate that changes intended to previous Lintian nags were correct.

Open a Merge Request on Salsa for Debian packaging review Getting everything perfectly right takes a lot of effort, and may require reaching out to an experienced Debian Developers for review and guidance. Thus, you should aim to publish your initial packaging work on Salsa, Debian s GitLab instance, for review and feedback as early as possible. For somebody to be able to easily see what you have done, you should rename your `debian/latest` branch to another name, for example `next/debian/latest`, and open a Merge Request that targets the `debian/latest` branch on your Salsa fork, which still has only the unmodified upstream files. If you have followed the workflow in this post so far, you can simply run:

`git checkout -b next/debian/latest`

`git push --set-upstream origin next/debian/latest`

Open in a browser the URL visible in the git remote response

Write the Merge Request description in case the default text from your commit is not enough

Mark the MR as Draft using the checkbox

Publish the MR and request feedback

Once a Merge Request exists, discussion regarding what additional changes are needed can be conducted as MR comments. With an MR, you can easily iterate on the contents of `next/debian/latest`, rebase, force push, and request re-review as many times as you want. While at it, make sure the Settings > CI/CD page has under CI/CD configuration file the value `debian/salsa-ci.yml` so that the CI can run and give you immediate automated feedback. For an example of an initial packaging Merge Request, see https://salsa.debian.org/otto/entr-demo/-/merge_requests/1.

Open a Merge Request / Pull Request to fix upstream code Due to the high quality requirements in Debian, it is fairly common that while doing the initial Debian packaging of an open source project, issues are found that stem from the upstream source code. While it is possible to carry extra patches in Debian, it is not good practice to deviate too much from upstream code with custom Debian patches. Instead, the Debian packager should try to get the fixes applied directly upstream. Using git-buildpackage patch queues is the most convenient way to make modifications to the upstream source code so that they automatically convert into Debian patches (stored at debian/patches), and can also easily be submitted upstream as any regular git commit (and rebased and resubmitted many times over). First, decide if you want to work out of the upstream development branch and later cherry-pick to the Debian packaging branch, or work out of the Debian packaging branch and cherry-pick to an upstream branch. The example below starts from the upstream development branch and then cherry-picks the commit into the git-buildpackage patch queue:

shell

git checkout -b bugfix-branch master
nano entr.c
make
./entr # verify change works as expected
git commit -a -m "Commit title" -m "Commit body"
git push # submit upstream
gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
git cherry-pick <commit id>
git commit --amend # extend commit message with DEP-3 metadata
gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b
./entr # verify change works as expected
gbp pq export --drop --commit
git commit --amend # Write commit message along lines "Add patch to .."

The example below starts by making the fix on a git-buildpackage patch queue branch, and then cherry-picking it onto the upstream development branch:

shell

gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
nano entr.c
git commit -a -m "Commit title" -m "Commit body"
gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b
./entr # verify change works as expected
gbp pq export --drop --commit
git commit --amend # Write commit message along lines "Add patch to .."
git checkout -b bugfix-branch master
git cherry-pick <commit id>
git commit --amend # prepare commit message for upstream submission
git push # submit upstream

The key git-buildpackage commands to enter and exit the patch-queue mode are:

shell

gbp pq import --force --time-machine=10
gbp pq export --drop --commit

%% init:   'gitGraph':   'mainBranchName': 'debian/latest'      %%
gitGraph
checkout debian/latest
commit id: "Initial packaging"
branch patch-queue/debian/latest
checkout patch-queue/debian/latest
commit id: "Delete debian/patches/..."
commit id: "Patch 1 title"
commit id: "Patch 2 title"
commit id: "Patch 3 title"

These can be run at any time, regardless if any debian/patches existed prior, or if existing patches applied cleanly or not, or if there were old patch queue branches around. Note that the extra -b in gbp buildpackage -uc -us -b instructs to build only binary packages, avoiding any nags from dpkg-source that there are modifications in the upstream sources while building in the patches-applied mode.

Programming-language specific dh-make alternatives As each programming language has its specific way of building the source code, and many other conventions regarding the file layout and more, Debian has multiple custom tools to create new Debian source packages for specific programming languages.

Go: dh-make-golang

Haskell: cabal-debian

Java: jh_makepkg

JavaScript/Node.js: npm2deb

Lua: dh-lua

OCaml: dh-ocaml

Perl: dh-make-perl

PHP: pkg-php-tools

Ruby: gem2deb

Notably, Python does not have its own tool, but there is an `dh_make --python` option for Python support directly in dh_make itself. The list is not complete and many more tools exist. For some languages, there are even competing options, such as for Go there is in addition to `dh-make-golang` also Gophian. When learning Debian packaging, there is no need to learn these tools upfront. Being aware that they exist is enough, and one can learn them only if and when one starts to package a project in a new programming language.

The difference between source git repository vs source packages vs binary packages As seen in earlier example, running gbp buildpackage on the Entr packaging repository above will result in several files:

entr_5.6-1_amd64.changes
entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb
entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
entr_5.6-1.dsc
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz.asc

The entr_5.6-1_amd64.deb is the binary package, which can be installed on a Debian/Ubuntu system. The rest of the files constitute the source package. To do a source-only build, run gbp buildpackage -S and note the files produced:

entr_5.6-1_source.changes
entr_5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
entr_5.6-1.dsc
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz
entr_5.6.orig.tar.gz.asc

The source package files can be used to build the binary .deb for amd64, or any architecture that the package supports. It is important to grasp that the Debian source package is the preferred form to be able to build the binary packages on various Debian build systems, and the Debian source package is not the same thing as the Debian packaging git repository contents.

flowchart LR
git[Git repository<br>branch debian/latest] --> gbp buildpackage -S  src[Source Package<br>.dsc + .tar.xz]
src --> dpkg-buildpackage  bin[Binary Packages<br>.deb]

If the package is large and complex, the build could result in multiple binary packages. One set of package definition files in debian/ will however only ever result in a single source package.

Option to repackage source packages with Files-Excluded lists in the debian/copyright file Some upstream projects may include binary files in their release, or other undesirable content that needs to be omitted from the source package in Debian. The easiest way to filter them out is by adding to the debian/copyright file a Files-Excluded field listing the undesired files. The debian/copyright file is read by uscan, which will repackage the upstream sources on-the-fly when importing new upstream releases. For a real-life example, see the debian/copyright files in the Godot package that lists:

debian

Files-Excluded: platform/android/java/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar

The resulting repackaged upstream source tarball, as well as the upstream version component, will have an extra +ds to signify that it is not the true original upstream source but has been modified by Debian:

godot_4.3+ds.orig.tar.xz
godot_4.3+ds-1_amd64.deb

Creating one Debian source package from multiple upstream source packages also possible In some rare cases the upstream project may be split across multiple git repositories or the upstream release may consist of multiple components each in their own separate tarball. Usually these are very large projects that get some benefits from releasing components separately. If in Debian these are deemed to go into a single source package, it is technically possible using the component system in git-buildpackage and uscan. For an example see the gbp.conf and watch files in the node-cacache package. Using this type of structure should be a last resort, as it creates complexity and inter-dependencies that are bound to cause issues later on. It is usually better to work with upstream and champion universal best practices with clear releases and version schemes.

When not to start the Debian packaging repository as a fork of the upstream one Not all upstreams use Git for version control. It is by far the most popular, but there are still some that use e.g. Subversion or Mercurial. Who knows maybe in the future some new version control systems will start to compete with Git. There are also projects that use Git in massive monorepos and with complex submodule setups that invalidate the basic assumptions required to map an upstream Git repository into a Debian packaging repository. In those cases one can t use a `debian/latest` branch on a clone of the upstream git repository as the starting point for the Debian packaging, but one must revert the traditional way of starting from an upstream release tarball with `gbp import-orig package-1.0.tar.gz`.

Conclusion Created in August 1993, Debian is one of the oldest Linux distributions. In the 32 years since inception, the `.deb` packaging format and the tooling to work with it have evolved several generations. In the past 10 years, more and more Debian Developers have converged on certain core practices evidenced by https://trends.debian.net/, but there is still a lot of variance in workflows even for identical tasks. Hopefully, you find this post useful in giving practical guidance on how exactly to do the most common things when packaging software for Debian. Happy packaging!

Gunnar Wolf: No further discussion -- I am staying with a Thinkpad keyboard.

I have been a very happy user of my two SK-8845 keyboards (one at my office, one at home) since I bought them, in 2018 and 2021 respectively. What are they, mind you?

) The beautiful keyboard every Thinkpad owner knows and loves. And although I no longer use my X230 laptop that was my workhorse for several years, my fingers are spoiled. So, both shift keys of my home keyboard have been getting flaky, and I am basically sure it s a failure in the controller, as it does not feel to be physical. It s time to revisit that seven year old post where I found the SK-8845. This time, I decided to try my luck with something different. As a Emacs user, everybody knows we ought to be happy with more and more keys. In fact, I suppose many international people are now familiar with El Eternauta, true? we Emacs users would be the natural ambassadors to deal with the hand species: Emacs users from outer space!

So it kind-of sort-of made sense, when I saw a Toshiba-IBM keyboard being sold for quite cheap (MX$400, just over US$20) to try my luck with it: A truly POS keyboard

This is quite an odd piece of hardware, built in 2013 according to its label. At first I was unsure whether to buy it because of the weird interface it had, but the vendor replied they would ship a (very long!) USB cable with it, so A weird port inside the keyboard

As expected, connecting it to Linux led to a swift, errorless recognition: Nothing too odd here

Within minutes of receiving the hardware, I had it hooked up and started looking at the events it generated However the romance soon started to wane. Some of the reasons:

We cannot forget it is a ~~Piece of Shit~~ Point Of Sale keyboard. It is not intended to be a creative interface. So, the keys are ~75% the size of regular keys. My fingers have a hard time getting used to it, I keep hitting wrong keys. I know I am holding it wrong and my muscle memory can be retrained (and I was very happy when I had the tiny 9 Acer Aspire One) but still, it is not pleasant.
I exclusively use keyboards with a trackpad (as those found in most laptops) because I found that constantly moving my hand to the mouse and back produced me back ache. Within an hour of typing in this keyboard, the old back ache I was happy not to ever have again came back to me.
The pointer device has a left and a right button, but neither middle nor scroll buttons. I could generate middle clicks by setting middle emulation enabled, but the buttons are separated it requires clicking with both thumbs, which is unelegant, to say the least. I remapped some of the spare keys to be mouse buttons 1 5, and it worked for middle click, but not for scroll events. Maybe I could tweak it a bit more but I didn t in the end.

Anyway I m returning it I found an SK-8845 for sale in China for just MX$1814 (~US$90), and jumped for it They are getting scarce! Nowadays it s getting more common (and cheaper) to find the newer style Thinkpad keyboards, but without a trackpad I don t think I should stockpile on keyboards, but no, I m not doing that Anyway, so I m sticking to a Thinkpad keyboard, third in a row.

Scarlett Gately Moore: KDE Application Snaps 25.04.1 with Major Bug Fix!,Life ( Good news finally!)

Snaps!

I actually released last week

I haven t had time to blog, but today is my birthday and taking some time to myself!This release came with a major bugfix. As it turns out our applications were very crashy on non-KDE platforms including Ubuntu proper. Unfortunately, for years, and I didn t know. Developers were closing the bug reports as invalid because users couldn t provide a stacktrace. I have now convinced most developers to assign snap bugs to the Snap platform so I at least get a chance to try and fix them. So with that said, if you tried our snaps in the past and gave up in frustration, please do try them again! I also spent some time cleaning up our snaps to only have current releases in the store, as rumor has it snapcrafters will be responsible for any security issues. With 200+ snaps I maintain, that is a lot of responsibility. We ll see if I can pull it off.

Life!

My last surgery was a success! I am finally healing and out of a sling for the first time in almost a year. I have also lined up a good amount of web work for next month and hopefully beyond. I have decided to drop the piece work for donations and will only accept per project proposals for open source work. I will continue to maintain KDE snaps for as long as time allows. A big thank you to everyone that has donated over the last year to fund my survival during this broken arm fiasco. I truly appreciate it!

With that said, if you want to drop me a donation for my work, birthday or well-being until I get paid for the aforementioned web work please do so here:

Simon Quigley: Toolboxes and Hammers Be You

Toolboxes and Hammers Be YouEveryone has a story. We all started from somewhere, and we re all going somewhere.Ten years ago this summer, I first heard of Ubuntu. It took me time to learn how to properly pronounce the word, although I m glad I learned that early on. I was less fortunate when it came to the pronunciation of the acronym for the Ubuntu Code of Conduct. I had spent time and time again breaking my computer, and I d wanted to start fresh.I ve actually talked about this in an interview before, which you can find here (skip to 5:02 6:12 for my short explanation, I m in orange):https://medium.com/media/ad59becdbd06d230b875fb1512df1921/hrefI ve also done a few interviews over the years, here are some of the more recent ones:https://medium.com/media/83bda448d5f2a979f848e17f04376aa6/href Ask Noah Show 377Lastly, I did a few talks at SCaLE 21x (which the Ubuntu community donation funds helped me attend, thank you for that!):https://medium.com/media/0fbde7ef0ed83c2272a8653a5ea38b67/href https://medium.com/media/4d18f1770dc7eed6c7a9d711ff6a6e89/hrefMy story is fairly simple to summarize, if you don t have the time to go through all the clips.I started in the Ubuntu project at 13 years old, as a middle school student living in Green Bay, WI. I m now 23 years old, still living in Green Bay, but I became an Ubuntu Core Developer, Lubuntu s Release Manager, and worked up to a very great and comfortable spot.So, Simon, what advice would you give to someone at 13 who wants to do the same thing? Here are a few tips * Don t be afraid to be yourself. If you put on a mask, it hinders your growth, and you ll end up paying for it later anyway.
* Find a mentor. Someone who is okay working with someone your age, and ideally someone who works well with people your age (quick shoutout to Aaron Prisk and Walter Lapchynski for always being awesome to me and other folks starting out at high school.) This is probably the most important part.
* Ask questions. Tons of them. Ask questions until you re blue in the face. Ask questions until you get a headache so bad that your weekend needs to come early. Okay, maybe don t go that far, but at the very least, always stay curious.
* Own up to your mistakes. Even the most experienced people you know have made tons of mistakes. It s not about the mistake itself, it s about how you handle it and grow as a person.Now, after ten years, I ve seen many people come and go in Ubuntu. I was around for the transition from upstart to systemd. I was around for the transition from Unity to GNOME. I watched Kubuntu as a flavor recover from the arguments only a few years before I first started, only to jump in and help years later when the project started to trend downwards again.I have deep love, respect, and admiration for Ubuntu and its community. I also have deep love, respect, and admiration for Canonical as a company. It s all valuable work. That being said, I need to recognize where my own limits are, and it s not what you d think. This isn t some big burnout rant.Some of you may have heard rumors about an argument between me and the Ubuntu Community Council. I refuse to go into the private details of that, but what I ll tell you is this in retrospect, it was in good faith. The entire thing, from both my end and theirs, was to try to either help me as a person, or the entire community. If you think any part of this was bad faith from either side, you re fooling yourself. Plus, tons of great work and stories actually came out of this.The Ubuntu Community Council really does care. And so does Mark Shuttleworth.Now, I won t go into many specifics. If you want specifics, I d direct you to the Ubuntu Community Council who would be more than happy to answer any questions (actually they d probably stay silent. Nevermind.) That being said, I can t really talk about any of this without mentioning how great Mark has become.Remember, I was around for a few different major changes within the project. I ve heard and seen stories about Mark that actually match what Reddit says about him. But in 2025, out of the bottom of my heart, I m here to tell you that you re all wrong now.See, Mark didn t just side with somebody and be done with it. He actually listened, and I could tell, he cares very very deeply. I really enjoyed reading ogra s recent blog post, you should seriously check it out. Of course, I m only 23 years old, but I have to say, my experiences with Mark match that too.Now, as for what happens from here. I m taking a year off from Ubuntu. I talked this over with a wide variety of people, and I think it s the right decision. People who know me personally know that I m not one to make a major decision like this without a very good reason to. Well, I d like to share my reasons with you, because I think they d help.People who contribute time to open source find it to be very rewarding. Sometimes so rewarding, in fact, that no matter how many economics and finance books they read, they still haven t figured out how to balance that with a job that pays money. I m sure everyone deeply involved in this space has had the urge to quit their job at least once or twice to pursue their passions.Here s the other element too I ve had a handful of romantic relationships before, and they ve never really panned out. I found the woman that I truly believe I m going to marry. Is it going to be a rough road ahead of us? Absolutely, and to be totally honest, there is still a (small, at this point) chance it doesn t work out.That being said I remain optimistic. I m not taking a year off because I m in some kind of trouble. I haven t burned any bridge here except for one.You know who you are. You need help. I d be happy to reconnect with you once you realize that it s not okay to do what you did. An apology letter is all I want. I don t want Mutually Assured Destruction, I don t want to sit and battle on this for years on end. Seriously dude, just back off. Please.I hate having to take out the large hammer. But sometimes, you just have to do it. I ve quite enjoyed Louis Rossmann s (very not-safe-for-work) videos on BwE.https://medium.com/media/ab64411c41e65317f271058f56bb2aba/hrefI genuinely enjoy being nice to people. I want to see everyone be successful and happy, in that order (but with both being very important). I m not perfect, I m a 23-year-old who just happened to stumble into this space at the right time.To this specific person only, I tell you, please, let me go take my year off in peace. I don t wish you harm, and I won t make anything public, including your name, if you just back off.Whew. Okay. Time to be happy again.Again, I want to see people succeed. That goes for anyone in Ubuntu, Lubuntu, Kubuntu, Canonical, you name it. I m going to remain detached from Ubuntu for at least a year. If circumstances change, or if I feel the timing just isn t right, I ll wait longer. My point is, I ll be back, the when of it will just never be public before it happens.In the meantime, you re welcome to reach out to me. It ll take me some time to bootstrap things, more than I originally thought, but I m hoping it ll be quick. After all, I ve had practice.I m also going to continue writing. About what? I don t know yet.But, I ll just keep writing. I want to share all of the useful tips I ve learned over the years. If you actually liked this post, or if you ve enjoyed my work in the Ubuntu project, please do subscribe to my personal blog, which will be here on Medium (unless someone can give me an open source alternative with a funding model). This being said, while I d absolutely take any donations people would like to provide, at the end of the day, I don t do this for the money. I do this for the people just like me, out of love.So you, just like me, can make your dreams happen.Don t give up, it ll come. Just be patient with yourself.As for me, I have business to attend to. What business is that, exactly? Read Walden, and you ll find out.I wish you all well, even the person I called out. I sincerely hope you find what you re looking for in life. It takes time. Sometimes you have to listen to some music to pass the time, so I created a conceptual mixtape if you want to listen to some of the same music as me.I ll do another blog post soon, don t worry.Be well. Much, much more to come.

Daniel Lange: Polkitd (Policy Kit Daemon) in Trixie ... getting rid of "Authentication is required to create a color profile"

On the way to Trixie, polkitd (Policy Kit Daemon) has lost the functionality to evaluate its .pkla (Polkit Local Authority) files.

$ zcat /usr/share/doc/polkitd/NEWS.Debian.gz 
policykit-1 (121+compat0.1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
  This version of polkit changes the syntax used for local policy rules:
  it is now the same JavaScript-based format used by the upstream polkit
  project and by other Linux distributions.
  System administrators can override the default security policy by
  installing local policy overrides into /etc/polkit-1/rules.d/*.rules,
  which can either make the policy more restrictive or more
  permissive. Some sample policy rules can be found in the
  /usr/share/doc/polkitd/examples directory. Please see polkit(8) for
  more details.
  Some Debian packages include security policy overrides, typically to
  allow members of the sudo group to carry out limited administrative
  actions without re-authenticating. These packages should install their
  rules as /usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d/*.rules. Typical examples can be
  found in packages like flatpak, network-manager and systemd.
  Older Debian releases used the "local authority" rules format from
  upstream version 0.105 (.pkla files with an .desktop-like syntax,
  installed into subdirectories of /etc/polkit-1/localauthority
  or /var/lib/polkit-1/localauthority). The polkitd-pkla package
  provides compatibility with these files: if it is installed, they
  will be processed at a higher priority than most .rules files. If the
  polkitd-pkla package is removed, .pkla files will no longer be used.
 -- Simon McVittie   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 21:33:22 +0100

This applies now to the polkitd version 126-2 destined for Trixie. The most prominent issue is that you will get an error message: "Authentication is required to create a color profile" asking for the root(!) password every time you remotely log into a Debian Trixie system via RDP, x2go or the like. This used to be mendable with a .pkla file dropped into /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d/ ... but these .pkla files are void now and need to be replace with a Javascript "rules" file. The background to his is quite a fascinating read ... 13 years later:
https://davidz25.blogspot.com/2012/06/authorization-rules-in-polkit.html The solution has been listed in DevAnswers as other distros (Fedora, ArchLinux, OpenSuse) have been faster to depreciate the .pkla files and require .rules files. I amended the solution given there with checking for root to be automatically authenticated, too. So, create a 50-color-manager.rules file in /etc/polkit-1/rules.d/:

polkit.addRule(function(action, subject)
if (action.id.startsWith("org.freedesktop.color-manager.") && (subject.isInGroup("users") (subject.user == "root")))
return polkit.Result.YES;

);

and run systemctl restart polkit. You should be good until polkit is rewritten in Rust.

Ben Hutchings: Report for Debian BSP near Leuven in April 2025

On 26th and 27th April we held a Debian bug-squashing party near Leuven, Belgium. Several longstanding and new Debian contributors gathered to work through some of the highest priority bugs affecting the upcoming release of Debian 13 trixie . We were hosted by the Familia community centre in Tildonk. As this venue currently does not have an Internet connection, we brought a mobile hotspot and a local Debian mirror. In attendance were:

Debian Developers: Ben Hutchings, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings, Kurt Roeckx, and Geert Stappers
New contributors: Y ce K r m, Louis Renuart, Arnout Vandecappelle

The new contributors were variously using Arch, Fedora, and Ubuntu, and the DDs spent some some time setting them up with Debian dvelopment environments. The bugs we worked on included:

#994510: libunwind8 abuses setcontext() causing SIGSEGV on i386 with glibc >= 2.32: Kurt added a patch, though it seems that a different change is needed.
#1016936: dwz: Unknown debugging section .debug_addr causes some builds to fail: Ben reduced the severity.
#1063664: gcc-13-cross: file conflicts between gnat-13-<triplet> and gnat- 9,10 -<triplet>: Kurt looked at this and questioned the explanation for reopening this bug.
#1060960: libslf4j-java: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25: Ben identified that there have been 2 separate test regressions, and added a patch for the first of them.
#1064003: src:cross-toolchain-base: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: linux-source-6.5 (>= 6.5.8): Ben closed this as already fixed.
#1072167: grub-pc-dbg: newly-added symbol file does not provide any symbols: Ben reproduced this and added a patch.
#1076350: Segfault with shared libuv on x86 (CVE-2025-47153): Kurt asked the maintainer for clarification of the status.
#1078608: apt update silently leaves old index data: Ben reproduced this (again), and identified that it may be triggered by PackageKit.
#1089192: golang-golang-x-net: FTBFS: FAIL: TestNumICANNRules: Y ce looked at this and wrote a patch. However, the maintainers took a different approach to fix this.
#1089432: shim: Supporting rootless builds by default: Kurt asked the maintainer for a status update.
#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root: Louis and Kurt looked at this. Kurt asked the maintainer for clarification of the status.
#1084066: amdgcn-tools: Please upgrade build-dep to llvm/clang 18 or 19 and #1092643: llvm-toolchain-19: readd gcn targets: Kurt and Arnout looked at these. Arnout added information about the build failure, the relevant upstream changes, and an upstream bug report.
#1095376: refpolicy: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Rules.modular:230: validate] Segmentation fault: Arnout looked at this and was not able to reproduce it, but noted that it may actually be caused by a bug in swig.
#1093160: rsync: failed verification update discarded: Ben reduced the severity.
#1099013: emacs-gtk: hangs compositor when used under Wayland: Louis did a lot of work to reproduce this, but the bug was not reproducible.
#1104169: wish: adduser _radvd on new installs and #1104229: wish: add systemd unit: Geert worked on and committed fixes for these bugs.
#1100699: screen: hardcopy and screen-exchange are insecure by default: Y ce and Ben looked at this. Ben started a discussion of what changes would be appropriate to fix it.
#1100981: libmlir-19 fails to coinstall: Arnout and Kurt looked at this, and pointed out an existing MR that should fix it and some other packages that are similarly affected.

Sergio Talens-Oliag: Playing with vCluster

After my previous posts related to Argo CD (one about argocd-autopilot and another with some usage examples) I started to look into Kluctl (I also plan to review Flux, but I m more interested on the kluctl approach right now). While reading an entry on the project blog about Cluster API somehow I ended up on the vCluster site and decided to give it a try, as it can be a valid way of providing developers with on demand clusters for debugging or run CI/CD tests before deploying things on common clusters or even to have multiple debugging virtual clusters on a local machine with only one of them running at any given time. On this post I will deploy a vcluster using the k3d_argocd kubernetes cluster (the one we created on the posts about argocd) as the host and will show how to:

use its ingress (in our case traefik) to access the API of the virtual one (removes the need of having to use the vcluster connect command to access it with kubectl),
publish the ingress objects deployed on the virtual cluster on the host ingress, and
use the sealed-secrets of the host cluster to manage the virtual cluster secrets.

Creating the virtual cluster

Installing the vcluster applicationTo create the virtual clusters we need the vcluster command, we can install it with arkade:

  arkade get vcluster

The vcluster.yaml fileTo create the cluster we are going to use the following vcluster.yaml file (you can find the documentation about all its options here):

controlPlane:
  proxy:
    # Extra hostnames to sign the vCluster proxy certificate for
    extraSANs:
    - my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net
exportKubeConfig:
  context: my-vcluster_k3d-argocd
  server: https://my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443
  secret:
    name: my-vcluster-kubeconfig
sync:
  toHost:
    ingresses:
      enabled: true
    serviceAccounts:
      enabled: true
  fromHost:
    ingressClasses:
      enabled: true
    nodes:
      enabled: true
      clearImageStatus: true
    secrets:
      enabled: true
      mappings:
        byName:
          # sync all Secrets from the 'my-vcluster-default' namespace to the
          # virtual "default" namespace.
          "my-vcluster-default/*": "default/*"
          # We could add other namespace mappings if needed, i.e.:
          # "my-vcluster-kube-system/*": "kube-system/*"

On the controlPlane section we ve added the proxy.extraSANs entry to add an extra host name to make sure it is added to the cluster certificates if we use it from an ingress. The exportKubeConfig section creates a kubeconfig secret on the virtual cluster namespace using the provided host name; the secret can be used by GitOps tools or we can dump it to a file to connect from our machine. On the sync section we enable the synchronization of Ingress objects and ServiceAccounts from the virtual to the host cluster:

We copy the ingress definitions to use the ingress server that runs on the host to make them work from the outside world.
The service account synchronization is not really needed, but we enable it because if we test this configuration with EKS it would be useful if we use IAM roles for the service accounts.

On the opposite direction (from the host to the virtual cluster) we synchronize:

The IngressClass objects, to be able to use the host ingress server(s).
The Nodes (we are not using the info right now, but it could be interesting if we want to have the real information of the nodes running pods of the virtual cluster).
The Secrets from the my-vcluster-default host namespace to the default of the virtual cluster; that synchronization allows us to deploy SealedSecrets on the host that generate secrets that are copied automatically to the virtual one. Initially we only copy secrets for one namespace but if the virtual cluster needs others we can add namespaces on the host and their mappings to the virtual one on the vcluster.yaml file.

Creating the virtual clusterTo create the virtual cluster we run the following command:

vcluster create my-vcluster --namespace my-vcluster --upgrade --connect=false \
  --values vcluster.yaml

It creates the virtual cluster on the my-vcluster namespace using the vcluster.yaml file shown before without connecting to the cluster from our local machine (if we don t pass that option the command adds an entry on our kubeconfig and launches a proxy to connect to the virtual cluster that we don t plan to use).

Adding an ingress TCP route to connect to the vcluster apiAs explained before, we need to create an IngressTcpRoute object to be able to connect to the vcluster API, we use the following definition:

apiVersion: traefik.containo.us/v1alpha1
kind: IngressRouteTCP
metadata:
  name: my-vcluster-api
  namespace: my-vcluster
spec:
  entryPoints:
    - websecure
  routes:
    - match: HostSNI( my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net )
      services:
        - name: my-vcluster
          port: 443
  tls:
    passthrough: true

Once we apply those changes the cluster API will be available on the https://my-cluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443 URL using its own self signed certificate (we have enabled TLS passthrough) that includes the hostname we use (we adjusted it on the vcluster.yaml file, as explained before).

Getting the kubeconfig for the vclusterOnce the vcluster is running we will have its kubeconfig available on the my-vcluster-kubeconfig secret on its namespace on the host cluster. To dump it to the ~/.kube/my-vcluster-config we can do the following:

  kubectl get -n my-vcluster secret/my-vcluster-kubeconfig \
    --template=" .data.config "   base64 -d > ~/.kube/my-vcluster-config

Once available we can define the vkubectl alias to adjust the KUBECONFIG variable to access it:

alias vkubectl="KUBECONFIG=~/.kube/my-vcluster-config kubectl"

Or we can merge the configuration with the one on the KUBECONFIG variable and use kubectx or a similar tool to change the context (for our vcluster the context will be my-vcluster_k3d-argocd). If the KUBECONFIG variable is defined and only has the PATH to a single file the merge can be done running the following:

KUBECONFIG="$KUBECONFIG:~/.kube/my-vcluster-config" kubectl config view \
  --flatten >"$KUBECONFIG.new"
mv "$KUBECONFIG.new" "$KUBECONFIG"

On the rest of this post we will use the vkubectl alias when connecting to the virtual cluster, i.e. to check that it works we can run the cluster-info subcommand:

  vkubectl cluster-info
Kubernetes control plane is running at https://my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443
CoreDNS is running at https://my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/services/kube-dns:dns/proxy
To further debug and diagnose cluster problems, use 'kubectl cluster-info dump'.

Installing the dummyhttpd applicationTo test the virtual cluster we are going to install the dummyhttpd application using the following kustomization.yaml file:

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
  - https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd-applications.git//dummyhttp/?ref=dummyhttp-v1.0.0
# Add the config map
configMapGenerator:
  - name: dummyhttp-configmap
    literals:
      - CM_VAR="Vcluster Test Value"
    behavior: create
    options:
      disableNameSuffixHash: true
patches:
  # Change the ingress host name
  - target:
      kind: Ingress
      name: dummyhttp
    patch:  -
      - op: replace
        path: /spec/rules/0/host
        value: vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net
  # Add reloader annotations -- it will only work if we install reloader on the
  # virtual cluster, as the one on the host cluster doesn't see the vcluster
  # deployment objects
  - target:
      kind: Deployment
      name: dummyhttp
    patch:  -
      - op: add
        path: /metadata/annotations
        value:
          reloader.stakater.com/auto: "true"
          reloader.stakater.com/rollout-strategy: "restart"

It is quite similar to the one we used on the Argo CD examples but uses a different DNS entry; to deploy it we run kustomize and vkubectl:

  kustomize build .   vkubectl apply -f -
configmap/dummyhttp-configmap created
service/dummyhttp created
deployment.apps/dummyhttp created
ingress.networking.k8s.io/dummyhttp created

We can check that everything worked using curl:

  curl -s https://vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/   jq -cM .
 "c": "Vcluster Test Value","s": ""

The objects available on the vcluster now are:

  vkubectl get all,configmap,ingress
NAME                             READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
pod/dummyhttp-55569589bc-9zl7t   1/1     Running   0          24s
NAME                 TYPE        CLUSTER-IP     EXTERNAL-IP   PORT(S)   AGE
service/dummyhttp    ClusterIP   10.43.51.39    <none>        80/TCP    24s
service/kubernetes   ClusterIP   10.43.153.12   <none>        443/TCP   14m

NAME                        READY   UP-TO-DATE   AVAILABLE   AGE
deployment.apps/dummyhttp   1/1     1            1           24s
NAME                                   DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AGE
replicaset.apps/dummyhttp-55569589bc   1         1         1       24s
NAME                            DATA   AGE
configmap/dummyhttp-configmap   1      24s
configmap/kube-root-ca.crt      1      14m
NAME                                CLASS   HOSTS                             ADDRESS                          PORTS AGE
ingress.networking.k8s.io/dummyhttp traefik vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net 172.20.0.2,172.20.0.3,172.20.0.4 80    24s

While we have the following ones on the my-vcluster namespace of the host cluster:

  kubectl get all,configmap,ingress -n my-vcluster
NAME                                                      READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
pod/coredns-bbb5b66cc-snwpn-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster   1/1     Running   0          18m
pod/dummyhttp-55569589bc-9zl7t-x-default-x-my-vcluster    1/1     Running   0          45s
pod/my-vcluster-0                                         1/1     Running   0          19m
NAME                                           TYPE        CLUSTER-IP      EXTERNAL-IP   PORT(S)                  AGE
service/dummyhttp-x-default-x-my-vcluster      ClusterIP   10.43.51.39     <none>        80/TCP                   45s
service/kube-dns-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster   ClusterIP   10.43.91.198    <none>        53/UDP,53/TCP,9153/TCP   18m
service/my-vcluster                            ClusterIP   10.43.153.12    <none>        443/TCP,10250/TCP        19m
service/my-vcluster-headless                   ClusterIP   None            <none>        443/TCP                  19m
service/my-vcluster-node-k3d-argocd-agent-1    ClusterIP   10.43.189.188   <none>        10250/TCP                18m

NAME                           READY   AGE
statefulset.apps/my-vcluster   1/1     19m
NAME                                                     DATA   AGE
configmap/coredns-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster            2      18m
configmap/dummyhttp-configmap-x-default-x-my-vcluster    1      45s
configmap/kube-root-ca.crt                               1      19m
configmap/kube-root-ca.crt-x-default-x-my-vcluster       1      11m
configmap/kube-root-ca.crt-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster   1      18m
configmap/vc-coredns-my-vcluster                         1      19m
NAME                                                        CLASS   HOSTS                             ADDRESS                          PORTS AGE
ingress.networking.k8s.io/dummyhttp-x-default-x-my-vcluster traefik vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net 172.20.0.2,172.20.0.3,172.20.0.4 80    45s

As shown, we have copies of the Service, Pod, Configmap and Ingress objects, but there is no copy of the Deployment or ReplicaSet.

Creating a sealed secret for dummyhttpdTo use the hosts sealed secrets controller with the virtual cluster we will create the my-vcluster-default namespace and add there the sealed secrets we want to have available as secrets on the default namespace of the virtual cluster:

  kubectl create namespace my-vcluster-default
  echo -n "Vcluster Boo"   kubectl create secret generic "dummyhttp-secret" \
    --namespace "my-vcluster-default" --dry-run=client \
    --from-file=SECRET_VAR=/dev/stdin -o yaml >dummyhttp-secret.yaml
  kubeseal -f dummyhttp-secret.yaml -w dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
  kubectl apply -f dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
  rm -f dummyhttp-secret.yaml dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml

After running the previous commands we have the following objects available on the host cluster:

  kubectl get sealedsecrets.bitnami.com,secrets -n my-vcluster-default
NAME                                        STATUS   SYNCED   AGE
sealedsecret.bitnami.com/dummyhttp-secret            True     34s
NAME                      TYPE     DATA   AGE
secret/dummyhttp-secret   Opaque   1      34s

And we can see that the secret is also available on the virtual cluster with the content we expected:

  vkubectl get secrets
NAME               TYPE     DATA   AGE
dummyhttp-secret   Opaque   1      34s
  vkubectl get secret/dummyhttp-secret --template=" .data.SECRET_VAR " \
    base64 -d
Vcluster Boo

But the output of the curl command has not changed because, although we have the reloader controller deployed on the host cluster, it does not see the Deployment object of the virtual one and the pods are not touched:

  curl -s https://vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/   jq -cM .
 "c": "Vcluster Test Value","s": ""

Installing the reloader applicationTo make reloader work on the virtual cluster we just need to install it as we did on the host using the following kustomization.yaml file:

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
namespace: kube-system
resources:
- github.com/stakater/Reloader/deployments/kubernetes/?ref=v1.4.2
patches:
# Add flags to reload workloads when ConfigMaps or Secrets are created or deleted
- target:
    kind: Deployment
    name: reloader-reloader
  patch:  -
    - op: add
      path: /spec/template/spec/containers/0/args
      value:
        - '--reload-on-create=true'
        - '--reload-on-delete=true'
        - '--reload-strategy=annotations'

We deploy it with kustomize and vkubectl:

  kustomize build .   vkubectl apply -f -
serviceaccount/reloader-reloader created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/reloader-reloader-role created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/reloader-reloader-role-binding created
deployment.apps/reloader-reloader created

As the controller was not available when the secret was created the pods linked to the Deployment are not updated, but we can force things removing the secret on the host system; after we do that the secret is re-created from the sealed version and copied to the virtual cluster where the reloader controller updates the pod and the curl command shows the new output:

  kubectl delete -n my-vcluster-default secrets dummyhttp-secret
secret "dummyhttp-secret" deleted
  sleep 2
  vkubectl get pods
NAME                         READY   STATUS        RESTARTS   AGE
dummyhttp-78bf5fb885-fmsvs   1/1     Terminating   0          6m33s
dummyhttp-c68684bbf-nx8f9    1/1     Running       0          6s
  curl -s https://vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/   jq -cM .
 "c":"Vcluster Test Value","s":"Vcluster Boo"

If we change the secret on the host systems things get updated pretty quickly now:

  echo -n "New secret"   kubectl create secret generic "dummyhttp-secret" \
    --namespace "my-vcluster-default" --dry-run=client \
    --from-file=SECRET_VAR=/dev/stdin -o yaml >dummyhttp-secret.yaml
  kubeseal -f dummyhttp-secret.yaml -w dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
  kubectl apply -f dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
  rm -f dummyhttp-secret.yaml dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
  curl -s https://vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/   jq -cM .
 "c":"Vcluster Test Value","s":"New secret"

Pause and restore the vclusterThe status of pods and statefulsets while the virtual cluster is active can be seen using kubectl:

  kubectl get pods,statefulsets -n my-vcluster
NAME                                                                 READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
pod/coredns-bbb5b66cc-snwpn-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster              1/1     Running   0          127m
pod/dummyhttp-587c7855d7-pt9b8-x-default-x-my-vcluster               1/1     Running   0          4m39s
pod/my-vcluster-0                                                    1/1     Running   0          128m
pod/reloader-reloader-7f56c54d75-544gd-x-kube-system-x-my-vcluster   1/1     Running   0          60m
NAME                           READY   AGE
statefulset.apps/my-vcluster   1/1     128m

Pausing the vclusterIf we don t need to use the virtual cluster we can pause it and after a small amount of time all Pods are gone because the statefulSet is scaled down to 0 (note that other resources like volumes are not removed, but all the objects that have to be scheduled and consume CPU cycles are not running, which can translate in a lot of savings when running on clusters from cloud platforms or, in a local cluster like the one we are using, frees resources like CPU and memory that now can be used for other things):

  vcluster pause my-vcluster
11:20:47 info Scale down statefulSet my-vcluster/my-vcluster...
11:20:48 done Successfully paused vcluster my-vcluster/my-vcluster
  kubectl get pods,statefulsets -n my-vcluster
NAME                           READY   AGE
statefulset.apps/my-vcluster   0/0     130m

Now the curl command fails:

  curl -s https://vcluster-dummyhttp.localhost.mixinet.net:8443
404 page not found

Although the ingress is still available (it returns a 404 because there is no pod behind the service):

  kubectl get ingress -n my-vcluster
NAME                                CLASS     HOSTS                               ADDRESS                            PORTS   AGE
dummyhttp-x-default-x-my-vcluster   traefik   vcluster-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net   172.20.0.2,172.20.0.3,172.20.0.4   80      120m

In fact, the same problem happens when we try to connect to the vcluster API; the error shown by kubectl is related to the TLS certificate because the 404 page uses the wildcard certificate instead of the self signed one:

  vkubectl get pods
Unable to connect to the server: tls: failed to verify certificate: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority
  curl -s https://my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443/api/v1/
404 page not found
  curl -v -s https://my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net:8443/api/v1/ 2>&1   grep subject
*  subject: CN=lo.mixinet.net
*  subjectAltName: host "my-vcluster-api.lo.mixinet.net" matched cert's "*.lo.mixinet.net"

Resuming the vclusterWhen we want to use the virtual cluster again we just need to use the resume command:

  vcluster resume my-vcluster
12:03:14 done Successfully resumed vcluster my-vcluster in namespace my-vcluster

Once all the pods are running the virtual cluster goes back to its previous state, although all of them were started, of course.

Cleaning upThe virtual cluster can be removed using the delete command:

  vcluster delete my-vcluster
12:09:18 info Delete vcluster my-vcluster...
12:09:18 done Successfully deleted virtual cluster my-vcluster in namespace my-vcluster
12:09:18 done Successfully deleted virtual cluster namespace my-vcluster
12:09:18 info Waiting for virtual cluster to be deleted...
12:09:50 done Virtual Cluster is deleted

That removes everything we used on this post except the sealed secrets and secrets that we put on the my-vcluster-default namespace because it was created by us. If we delete the namespace all the secrets and sealed secrets on it are also removed:

  kubectl delete namespace my-vcluster-default
namespace "my-vcluster-default" deleted

ConclusionsI believe that the use of virtual clusters can be a good option for two of the proposed use cases that I ve encountered in real projects in the past:
need of short lived clusters for developers or teams,
execution of integration tests from CI pipelines that require a complete cluster (the tests can be run on virtual clusters that are created on demand or paused and resumed when needed).
For both cases things can be set up using the Apache licensed product, although maybe evaluating the vCluster Platform offering could be interesting. In any case when everything is not done inside kubernetes we will also have to check how to manage the external services (i.e. if we use databases or message buses as SaaS instead of deploying them inside our clusters we need to have a way of creating, deleting or pause and resume those services).

Sergio Durigan Junior: Debian Bug Squashing Party Brazil 2025

With the trixie release approaching, I had the idea back in April to organize a bug squashing party with the Debian Brasil community. I believe the outcome was very positive, and we were able to tackle and fix quite a number of release-critical bugs. This is a brief report of what we did.

A remote BSP It s not the first time I organize a BSP: back in 2019, I helped throw another similar party in Toronto. The difference this time is that, because Brazil is a big country and (perhaps most importantly) because I m not currently living there, the BSP had to be done online. I m a fan of social interactions (especially with the Brazilian community), and in my experience we usually can achieve much more when we get together in a physical place, but hey, you gotta do what you gotta do Most (if not all) of the folks interested in participating had busy weekdays, so it was decided that we would meet during the weekends and try to work on a few bugs over Jitsi. Nothing stopped people from working on bugs during the week as well, of course.

A tag to rule them all We used the `bsp-2025-04-brazil` usertag to mark those bugs that were touched by us. You can see the full list of bugs here, although the current list (as of 2025-05-11) is smaller than the one we had by the end of April. I don t know what happened; maybe it s some glitch with the BTS, or maybe someone removed the usertag by mistake.

Stats In total, we had:

7 participants

37 bugs handled. Of those,

35 bugs fixed

The BSP officially started on 04 April 2025, and ended on 30 April 2025. I was able to attend meetings during two weekends; other people participated more sporadically.

Outcome As I said above, the Debian Brasil community is great and very engaged in the project. Speaking more specifically about the Debian Brasil Devel group, I can say that We have contributors with strong technical skills, and I really love that we have this inclusive, extremely technical culture where debugging and understanding things is really core to pretty much all our discussions. We already meet weekly on Thursdays to talk shop and help newcomers, so having a remote BSP with this group seemed like a logical thing to do. I m really glad to see our results and even happier to hear positive feedback from the community during the last MiniDebConf in Macei . There s some interest in organizing another BSP, this time face-to-face and during the next DebConf. I m all for it, as I love fixing bugs and having a great time with friends. If you re interested in attending, let me know. Thanks, and until next time.

Bits from Debian: Bits from the DPL

Dear Debian community, This is bits from the DPL for April. End of 10 I am sure I was speaking in the interest of the whole project when joining the "End of 10" campaign. Here is what I wrote to the initiators:

Hi Joseph and all drivers of the "End of 10" campaign, On behalf of the entire Debian project, I would like to say that we proudly join your great campaign. We stand with you in promoting Free Software, defending users' freedoms, and protecting our planet by avoiding unnecessary hardware waste. Thank you for leading this important initiative.
Andreas Tille Debian Project Leader

I have some goals I would like to share with you for my second term. Ftpmaster delegation This splits up into tasks that can be done before and after Trixie release. Before Trixie: 1. Reducing Barriers to DFSG Compliance Checks Back in 2002, Debian established a way to distribute cryptographic software in the main archive, whereas such software had previously been restricted to the non-US archive. One result of this arrangement which influences our workflow is that all packages uploaded to the NEW queue must remain on the server that hosts it. This requirement means that members of the ftpmaster team must log in to that specific machine, where they are limited to a restricted set of tools for reviewing uploaded code. This setup may act as a barrier to participation--particularly for contributors who might otherwise assist with reviewing packages for DFSG compliance. I believe it is time to reassess this limitation and work toward removing such hurdles. In October last year, we had some initial contact with SPI's legal counsel, who noted that US regulations around cryptography have been relaxed somewhat in recent years (as of 2021). This suggests it may now be possible to revisit and potentially revise the conditions under which we manage cryptographic software in the NEW queue. I plan to investigate this further. If you have expertise in software or export control law and are interested in helping with this topic, please get in touch with me. The ultimate goal is to make it easier for more people to contribute to ensuring that code in the NEW queue complies with the DFSG. 2. Discussing Alternatives My chances to reach out to other distributions remained limited. However, regarding the processing of new software, I learned that OpenSUSE uses a Git-based workflow that requires five "LGTM" approvals from a group of trusted developers. As far as I know, Fedora follows a similar approach. Inspired by this, a recent community initiative--the Gateway to NEW project--enables peer review of new packages for DFSG compliance before they enter the NEW queue. This effort allows anyone to contribute by reviewing packages and flagging potential issues in advance via Git. I particularly appreciate that the DFSG review is coupled with CI, allowing for both license and technical evaluation. While this process currently results in some duplication of work--since final reviews are still performed by the ftpmaster team--it offers a valuable opportunity to catch issues early and improve the overall quality of uploads. If the community sees long-term value in this approach, it could serve as a basis for evolving our workflows. Integrating it more closely into DAK could streamline the process, and we've recently seen that merge requests reflecting community suggestions can be accepted promptly. For now, I would like to gather opinions about how such initiatives could best complement the current NEW processing, and whether greater consensus on trusted peer review could help reduce the burden on the team doing DFSG compliance checks. Submitting packages for review and automated testing before uploading can improve quality and encourage broader participation in safeguarding Debian's Free Software principles. My explicit thanks go out to the Gateway to NEW team for their valuable and forward-looking contribution to Debian. 3. Documenting Critical Workflows Past ftpmaster trainees have told me that understanding the full set of ftpmaster workflows can be quite difficult. While there is some useful documentation thanks in particular to Sean Whitton for his work on documenting NEW processing rules many other important tasks carried out by the ftpmaster team remain undocumented or only partially so. Comprehensive and accessible documentation would greatly benefit current and future team members, especially those onboarding or assisting in specific workflows. It would also help ensure continuity and transparency in how critical parts of the archive are managed. If such documentation already exists and I have simply overlooked it, I would be happy to be corrected. Otherwise, I believe this is an area where we need to improve significantly. Volunteers with a talent for writing technical documentation are warmly invited to contact me--I'd be happy to help establish connections with ftpmaster team members who are willing to share their knowledge so that it can be written down and preserved. Once Trixie is released (hopefully before DebConf): 4. Split of the Ftpmaster Team into DFSG and Archive Teams As discussed during the "Meet the ftpteam" BoF at DebConf24, I would like to propose a structural refinement of the current Ftpmaster team by introducing two different delegated teams:

DFSG Team
Archive Team (responsible for DAK maintenance and process tooling, including releases)

(Alternative name suggestions are, of course, welcome.) The primary task of the DFSG team would be the processing of the NEW queue and ensuring that packages comply with the DFSG. The Archive team would focus on maintaining DAK and handling the technical aspects of archive management. I am aware that, in the recent past, the ftpmaster team has decided not to actively seek new members. While I respect the autonomy of each team, the resulting lack of a recruitment pipeline has led to some friction and concern within the wider community, including myself. As Debian Project Leader, it is my responsibility to ensure the long-term sustainability and resilience of our project, which includes fostering an environment where new contributors can join and existing teams remain effective and well-supported. Therefore, even if the current team does not prioritize recruitment, I will actively seek and encourage new contributors for both teams, with the aim of supporting openness and collaboration. This proposal is not intended as criticism of the current team's dedication or achievements--on the contrary, I am grateful for the hard work and commitment shown, often under challenging circumstances. My intention is to help address the structural issues that have made onboarding and specialization difficult and to ensure that both teams are well-supported for the future. I also believe that both teams should regularly inform the Debian community about the policies and procedures they apply. I welcome any suggestions for a more detailed description of the tasks involved, as well as feedback on how best to implement this change in a way that supports collaboration and transparency. My intention with this proposal is to foster a more open and effective working environment, and I am committed to working with all involved to ensure that any changes are made collaboratively and with respect for the important work already being done. I'm aware that the ideas outlined above touch on core parts of how Debian operates and involve responsibilities across multiple teams. These are not small changes, and implementing them will require thoughtful discussion and collaboration. To move this forward, I've registered a dedicated BoF for DebConf. To make the most of that opportunity, I'm looking for volunteers who feel committed to improving our workflows and processes. With your help, we can prepare concrete and sensible proposals in advance--so the limited time of the BoF can be used effectively for decision-making and consensus-building. In short: I need your help to bring these changes to life. From my experience in my last term, I know that when it truly matters, the Debian community comes together--and I trust that spirit will guide us again. Please also note: we had a "Call for volunteers" five years ago, and much of what was written there still holds true today. I've been told that the response back then was overwhelming--but that training such a large number of volunteers didn't scale well. This time, I hope we can find a more sustainable approach: training a few dedicated people first, and then enabling them to pass on their knowledge. This will also be a topic at the DebCamp sprint. Dealing with Dormant Packages Debian was founded on the principle that each piece of software should be maintained by someone with expertise in it--typically a single, responsible maintainer. This model formed the historical foundation of Debian's packaging system and helped establish high standards of quality and accountability. However, as the project has grown and the number of packages has expanded, this model no longer scales well in all areas. Team maintenance has since emerged as a practical complement, allowing multiple contributors to share responsibility and reduce bottlenecks--depending on each team's internal policy. While working on the Bug of the Day initiative, I observed a significant number of packages that have not been updated in a long time. In the case of team-maintained packages, addressing this is often straightforward: team uploads can be made, or the team can be asked whether the package should be removed. We've also identified many packages that would fit well under the umbrella of active teams, such as language teams like Debian Perl and Debian Python, or blends like Debian Games and Debian Multimedia. Often, no one has taken action--not because of disagreement, but simply due to inattention or a lack of initiative. In addition, we've found several packages that probably should be removed entirely. In those cases, we've filed bugs with pre-removal warnings, which can later be escalated to removal requests. When a package is still formally maintained by an individual, but shows signs of neglect (e.g., no uploads for years, unfixed RC bugs, failing autopkgtests), we currently have three main tools:

The MIA process, which handles inactive or unreachable maintainers.
Package Salvaging, which allows contributors to take over maintenance if conditions are met.
Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMUs), which are limited to specific, well-defined fixes (which do not include things like migration to Salsa).

These mechanisms are important and valuable, but they don't always allow us to react swiftly or comprehensively enough. Our tools for identifying packages that are effectively unmaintained are relatively weak, and the thresholds for taking action are often high. The Package Salvage team is currently trialing a process we've provisionally called "Intend to NMU" (ITN). The name is admittedly questionable--some have suggested alternatives like "Intent to Orphan"--and discussion about this is ongoing on debian-devel. The mechanism is intended for situations where packages appear inactive but aren't yet formally orphaned, introducing a clear 21-day notice period before NMUs, similar in spirit to the existing ITS process. The discussion has sparked suggestions for expanding NMU rules. While it is crucial not to undermine the autonomy of maintainers who remain actively involved, we also must not allow a strict interpretation of this autonomy to block needed improvements to obviously neglected packages. To be clear: I do not propose to change the rights of maintainers who are clearly active and invested in their packages. That model has served us well. However, we must also be honest that, in some cases, maintainers stop contributing--quietly and without transition plans. In those situations, we need more agile and scalable procedures to uphold Debian's high standards. To that end, I've registered a BoF session for DebConf25 to discuss potential improvements in how we handle dormant packages. These discussions will be prepared during a sprint at DebCamp, where I hope to work with others on concrete ideas. Among the topics I want to revisit is my proposal from last November on debian-devel, titled "Barriers between packages and other people". While the thread prompted substantial discussion, it understandably didn't lead to consensus. I intend to ensure the various viewpoints are fairly summarised--ideally by someone with a more neutral stance than myself--and, if possible, work toward a formal proposal during the DebCamp sprint to present at the DebConf BoF. My hope is that we can agree on mechanisms that allow us to act more effectively in situations where formerly very active volunteers have, for whatever reason, moved on. That way, we can protect both Debian's quality and its collaborative spirit. Building Sustainable Funding for Debian Debian incurs ongoing expenses to support its infrastructure--particularly hardware maintenance and upgrades--as well as to fund in-person meetings like sprints and mini-DebConfs. These investments are essential to our continued success: they enable productive collaboration and ensure the robustness of the operating system we provide to users and derivative distributions around the world. While DebConf benefits from generous sponsorship, and we regularly receive donated hardware, there is still considerable room to grow our financial base--especially to support less visible but equally critical activities. One key goal is to establish a more constant and predictable stream of income, helping Debian plan ahead and respond more flexibly to emerging needs. This presents an excellent opportunity for contributors who may not be involved in packaging or technical development. Many of us in Debian are engineers first--and fundraising is not something we've been trained to do. But just like technical work, building sustainable funding requires expertise and long-term engagement. If you're someone who's passionate about Free Software and has experience with fundraising, donor outreach, sponsorship acquisition, or nonprofit development strategy, we would deeply value your help. Supporting Debian doesn't have to mean writing code. Helping us build a steady and reliable financial foundation is just as important--and could make a lasting impact. Kind regards Andreas. PS: In April I also planted my 5000th tree and while this is off-topic here I'm proud to share this information with my fellow Debian friends.

Jonathan Dowland: procmail versus exim filters

I ve been using Procmail to filter mail for a long time. Reading Antoine s blog post procmail considered harmful, I felt motivated (and shamed) into migrating to something else. Luckily, Enrico's shared a detailed roadmap for moving to Sieve, in particular Dovecot's Sieve implementation (which provides "pipe" and "filter" extensions). My MTA is Exim, and for my first foray into this, I didn't want to change that¹. Exim provides two filtering languages for users: an implementation of Sieve, and its own filter language. Requirements A good first step is to look at what I'm using Procmail for:

I invoke external mail filters: processes which read the mail and emit a possibly altered mail (headers added, etc.). In particular, crm114 (which has worked remarkably well for me) to classify mail as spam or not, and dsafilter, to mark up Debian Security Advisories
I file messages into different folders depending on the outcome of the above filters
I drop mail ("killfile") some sender addresses (persistent pests on mailing lists); and mails containing certain hosts in the References header (as an imperfect way of dropping mailing list threads which are replies to someone I've killfiled); and mail encoded in a character set for a language I can't read (Russian, Korean, etc.), and several other simple static rules
I move mailing list mail into folders, semi-automatically (see list filtering)
I strip "tagged" subjects for some mailing lists: i.e., incoming mail has subjects like "[cs-historic-committee] help moving several tons of IBM360", and I don't want the "[cs-historic-committee]" bit.
I file a copy of some messages, the name of which is partly derived from the current calendar year

Exim Filters I want to continue to do (1), which rules out Exim's implementation of Sieve, which does not support invoking external programs. Exim's own filter language has a pipe function that might do what I need, so let's look at how to achieve the above with Exim Filters. autolists Here's an autolist recipe for Debian's mailing lists, in Exim filter language. Contrast with the Procmail in list filtering:

if $header_list-id matches "(debian.*)\.lists\.debian\.org"
then
  save Maildir/l/$1/
  finish
endif

Hands down, the exim filter is nicer (although some of the rules on escape characters in exim filters, not demonstrated here, are byzantine). killfile An ideal chunk of configuration for kill-filing a list of addresses is light on boiler plate, and easy to add more addresses to in the future. This is the best I could come up with:

if foranyaddress "someone@example.org,\
                  another@example.net,\
                  especially-bad.example.com,\
                 "
   ($reply_address contains $thisaddress
    or $header_references contains $thisaddress)
then finish endif

I won't bother sharing the equivalent Procmail but it's pretty comparable: the exim filter is no great improvement. It would be lovely if the list of addresses could be stored elsewhere, such as a simple text file, one line per address, or even a database. Exim's own configuration language (distinct from this filter language) has some nice mechanisms for reading lists of things like addresses from files or databases. Sadly it seems the filter language lacks anything similar. external filters With Procmail, I pass the mail to an external program, and then read the output of that program back, as the new content of the mail, which continues to be filtered: subsequent filter rules inspect the headers to see what the outcome of the filter was (is it spam?) and to decide what to do accordingly. Crucially, we also check the return status of the filter, to handle the case when it fails. With Exim filters, we can use pipe to invoke an external program:

pipe "$home/mail/mailreaver.crm -u $home/mail/"

However, this is not a filter: the mail is sent to the external program, and the exim filter's job is complete. We can't write further filter rules to continue to process the mail: the external program would have to do that; and we have no way of handling errors. Here's Exim's documentation on what happens when the external command fails:

Most non-zero codes are treated by Exim as indicating a failure of the pipe. This is treated as a delivery failure, causing the message to be returned to its sender.

That is definitely not what I want: if the filter broke (even temporarily), Exim would seemingly generate a bounce to the sender address, which could be anything, and I wouldn't have a copy of the message. The documentation goes on to say that some shell return codes (defaulting to 73 and 75) cause Exim to treat it as a temporary error, spool the mail and retry later on. That's a much better behaviour for my use-case. Having said that, on the rare occasions I've broken the filter, the thing which made me notice most quickly was spam hitting my inbox, which my Procmail recipe achieves. removing subject tagging Here, Exim's filter language gets unstuck. There is no way to add or alter headers for a message in a user filter. Exim uses the same filter language for system-wide message filtering, and in that context, it has some extra functions: headers add <string>, headers remove <string>, but (for reasons I don't know) these are not available for user filters. copy mail to archive folder I can't see a way to derive a folder name from the calendar year. next steps Exim Sieve implementation and its filter language are ruled out as Procmail replacements because they can't do at least two of the things I need to do. However, based on Enrico's write-up, it looks like Dovecot's Sieve implementation probably can. I was also recommended maildrop, which I might look at if Dovecot Sieve doesn't pan out.

I should revisit this requirement because I could probably reconfigure exim to run my spam classifier at the system level, obviating the need to do it in a user filter, and also raising the opportunity to do smtp-time rejection based on the outcome

Sergio Talens-Oliag: Argo CD Usage Examples

As a followup of my post about the use of argocd-autopilot I m going to deploy various applications to the cluster using Argo CD from the same repository we used on the previous post. For our examples we are going to test a solution to the problem we had when we updated a ConfigMap used by the argocd-server (the resource was updated but the application Pod was not because there was no change on the argocd-server deployment); our original fix was to kill the pod manually, but the manual operation is something we want to avoid. The proposed solution to this kind of issues on the helm documentation is to add annotations to the Deployments with values that are a hash of the ConfigMaps or Secrets used by them, this way if a file is updated the annotation is also updated and when the Deployment changes are applied a roll out of the pods is triggered. On this post we will install a couple of controllers and an application to show how we can handle Secrets with argocd and solve the issue with updates on ConfigMaps and Secrets, to do it we will execute the following tasks:

Deploy the Reloader controller to our cluster. It is a tool that watches changes in ConfigMaps and Secrets and does rolling upgrades on the Pods that use them from Deployment, StatefulSet, DaemonSet or DeploymentConfig objects when they are updated (by default we have to add some annotations to the objects to make things work).
Deploy a simple application that can use ConfigMaps and Secrets and test that the Reloader controller does its job when we add or update a ConfigMap.
Install the Sealed Secrets controller to manage secrets inside our cluster, use it to add a secret to our sample application and see that the application is reloaded automatically.

Creating the test project for argocd-autopilotAs we did our installation using argocd-autopilot we will use its structure to manage the applications.

Note: For all examples we are going to assume that the GIT_REPO and GIT_TOKEN variables are defined:

export GIT_REPO="https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git";
export GIT_TOKEN="$(pass mixinet.net/argocd@forgejo/repository-write)";

And the PATH includes the arkade installation directory:

case ":$ PATH :" in
  *:"$ HOME /.arkade/bin":*) ;;
  *) export PATH="$ PATH :$ HOME /.arkade/bin" ;;
esac

The first thing to do is to create a project (we will name it test) as follows:

  argocd-autopilot project create test
INFO cloning git repository: https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
Enumerating objects: 18, done.
Counting objects: 100% (18/18), done.
Compressing objects: 100% (16/16), done.
Total 18 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
INFO using revision: "", installation path: "/"
INFO pushing new project manifest to repo
INFO project created: 'test'

Now that the test project is available we will use it on our argocd-autopilot invocations when creating applications.

Installing the reloader controllerTo add the reloader application to the test project as a kustomize application and deploy it on the tools namespace with argocd-autopilot we do the following:

  argocd-autopilot app create reloader \
    --app 'github.com/stakater/Reloader/deployments/kubernetes/?ref=v1.4.2' \
    --project test --type kustomize --dest-namespace tools
INFO cloning git repository: https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
Enumerating objects: 19, done.
Counting objects: 100% (19/19), done.
Compressing objects: 100% (18/18), done.
Total 19 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
INFO using revision: "", installation path: "/"
INFO created 'application namespace' file at '/bootstrap/cluster-resources/in-cluster/tools-ns.yaml'
INFO committing changes to gitops repo...
INFO installed application: reloader

That command creates four files on the argocd repository:

One to create the tools namespace:

bootstrap/cluster-resources/in-cluster/tools-ns.yaml

apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  annotations:
    argocd.argoproj.io/sync-options: Prune=false
  creationTimestamp: null
  name: tools
spec:  
status:

Another to include the reloader base application from the upstream repository:

apps/reloader/base/kustomization.yaml

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
- github.com/stakater/Reloader/deployments/kubernetes/?ref=v1.4.2

The kustomization.yaml file for the test project (by default it includes the same configuration used on the base definition, but we could make other changes if needed):
apps/reloader/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
```
apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
namespace: tools
resources:
- ../../base
```
The config.json file used to define the application on argocd for the test project (it points to the folder that includes the previous kustomization.yaml file):
apps/reloader/overlays/test/config.json
```
 
  "appName": "reloader",
  "userGivenName": "reloader",
  "destNamespace": "tools",
  "destServer": "https://kubernetes.default.svc",
  "srcPath": "apps/reloader/overlays/test",
  "srcRepoURL": "https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git",
  "srcTargetRevision": "",
  "labels": null,
  "annotations": null
 
```
Note: The config.json file is used to build the Argo CD Application from the ApplicationSet defined for the project (the definition for the test project can be reviewed here), the idea is that we use the config.json or the config_dir.json file to adjust the application parameters to generate the CRD, which is a lot shorter and easier that providing the YAML version directly.

We can check that the application is working using the argocd command line application:

  argocd app get argocd/test-reloader -o tree
Name:               argocd/test-reloader
Project:            test
Server:             https://kubernetes.default.svc
Namespace:          tools
URL:                https://argocd.lo.mixinet.net:8443/applications/test-reloader
Source:
- Repo:             https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
  Target:
  Path:             apps/reloader/overlays/test
SyncWindow:         Sync Allowed
Sync Policy:        Automated (Prune)
Sync Status:        Synced to  (2893b56)
Health Status:      Healthy
KIND/NAME                                          STATUS  HEALTH   MESSAGE
ClusterRole/reloader-reloader-role                 Synced
ClusterRoleBinding/reloader-reloader-role-binding  Synced
ServiceAccount/reloader-reloader                   Synced           serviceaccount/reloader-reloader created
Deployment/reloader-reloader                       Synced  Healthy  deployment.apps/reloader-reloader created
 ReplicaSet/reloader-reloader-5b6dcc7b6f                  Healthy
   Pod/reloader-reloader-5b6dcc7b6f-vwjcx                 Healthy

Adding flags to the reloader serverThe runtime configuration flags for the reloader server are described on the project README.md file, in our case we want to adjust three values:

We want to enable the option to reload a workload when a ConfigMap or Secret is created,
We want to enable the option to reload a workload when a ConfigMap or Secret is deleted,
We want to use the annotations strategy for reloads, as it is the recommended mode of operation when using argocd.

To pass them we edit the apps/reloader/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml file to patch the pod container template, the text added is the following:

patches:
# Add flags to reload workloads when ConfigMaps or Secrets are created or deleted
- target:
    kind: Deployment
    name: reloader-reloader
  patch:  -
    - op: add
      path: /spec/template/spec/containers/0/args
      value:
        - '--reload-on-create=true'
        - '--reload-on-delete=true'
        - '--reload-strategy=annotations'

After committing and pushing the updated file the system launches the application with the new options.

The dummyhttp applicationTo do a quick test we are going to deploy the dummyhttp web server using an image generated using the following Dockerfile:

# Image to run the dummyhttp application <https://github.com/svenstaro/dummyhttp>
# This arg could be passed by the container build command (used with mirrors)
ARG OCI_REGISTRY_PREFIX
# Latest tested version of alpine
FROM $ OCI_REGISTRY_PREFIX alpine:3.21.3
# Tool versions
ARG DUMMYHTTP_VERS=1.1.1
# Download binary
RUN ARCH="$(apk --print-arch)" && \
  VERS="$DUMMYHTTP_VERS" && \
  URL="https://github.com/svenstaro/dummyhttp/releases/download/v$VERS/dummyhttp-$VERS-$ARCH-unknown-linux-musl" && \
  wget "$URL" -O "/tmp/dummyhttp" && \
  install /tmp/dummyhttp /usr/local/bin && \
  rm -f /tmp/dummyhttp
# Set the entrypoint to /usr/local/bin/dummyhttp
ENTRYPOINT [ "/usr/local/bin/dummyhttp" ]

The kustomize base application is available on a monorepo that contains the following files:

A Deployment definition that uses the previous image but uses /bin/sh -c as its entrypoint (command in the k8s Pod terminology) and passes as its argument a string that runs the eval command to be able to expand environment variables passed to the pod (the definition includes two optional variables, one taken from a ConfigMap and another one from a Secret):

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: dummyhttp
  labels:
    app: dummyhttp
spec:
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: dummyhttp
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: dummyhttp
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: dummyhttp
        image: forgejo.mixinet.net/oci/dummyhttp:1.0.0
        command: [ "/bin/sh", "-c" ]
        args:
        - 'eval dummyhttp -b \" \\\"c\\\": \\\"$CM_VAR\\\", \\\"s\\\": \\\"$SECRET_VAR\\\" \"'
        ports:
        - containerPort: 8080
        env:
        - name: CM_VAR
          valueFrom:
            configMapKeyRef:
              name: dummyhttp-configmap
              key: CM_VAR
              optional: true
        - name: SECRET_VAR
          valueFrom:
            secretKeyRef:
              name: dummyhttp-secret
              key: SECRET_VAR
              optional: true

A Service that publishes the previous Deployment (the only relevant thing to mention is that the web server uses the port 8080 by default):

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: dummyhttp
spec:
  selector:
    app: dummyhttp
  ports:
  - name: http
    port: 80
    targetPort: 8080

An Ingress definition to allow access to the application from the outside:

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: dummyhttp
  annotations:
    traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/router.tls: "true"
spec:
  rules:
    - host: dummyhttp.localhost.mixinet.net
      http:
        paths:
          - path: /
            pathType: Prefix
            backend:
              service:
                name: dummyhttp
                port:
                  number: 80

And the kustomization.yaml file that includes the previous files:

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
- deployment.yaml
- service.yaml
- ingress.yaml

Deploying the dummyhttp application from argocdWe could create the dummyhttp application using the argocd-autopilot command as we ve done on the reloader case, but we are going to do it manually to show how simple it is. First we ve created the apps/dummyhttp/base/kustomization.yaml file to include the application from the previous repository:

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
  - https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd-applications.git//dummyhttp/?ref=dummyhttp-v1.0.0

As a second step we create the apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml file to include the previous file:

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
- ../../base

And finally we add the apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/config.json file to configure the application as the ApplicationSet defined by argocd-autopilot expects:

 
  "appName": "dummyhttp",
  "userGivenName": "dummyhttp",
  "destNamespace": "default",
  "destServer": "https://kubernetes.default.svc",
  "srcPath": "apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test",
  "srcRepoURL": "https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git",
  "srcTargetRevision": "",
  "labels": null,
  "annotations": null

Once we have the three files we commit and push the changes and argocd deploys the application; we can check that things are working using curl:

  curl -s https://dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/   jq -M .
 
  "c": "",
  "s": ""

Patching the applicationNow we will add patches to the apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml file:

One to add annotations for reloader (one to enable it and another one to set the roll out strategy to restart to avoid touching the deployments, as that can generate issues with argocd).
Another to change the ingress hostname (not really needed, but something quite reasonable for a specific project).

The file diff is as follows:

--- a/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
@@ -2,3 +2,22 @@ apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
 kind: Kustomization
 resources:
 - ../../base
+patches:
+# Add reloader annotations
+- target:
+    kind: Deployment
+    name: dummyhttp
+  patch:  -
+    - op: add
+      path: /metadata/annotations
+      value:
+        reloader.stakater.com/auto: "true"
+        reloader.stakater.com/rollout-strategy: "restart"
+# Change the ingress host name
+- target:
+    kind: Ingress
+    name: dummyhttp
+  patch:  -
+    - op: replace
+      path: /spec/rules/0/host
+      value: test-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net

After committing and pushing the changes we can use the argocd cli to check the status of the application:

  argocd app get argocd/test-dummyhttp -o tree
Name:               argocd/test-dummyhttp
Project:            test
Server:             https://kubernetes.default.svc
Namespace:          default
URL:                https://argocd.lo.mixinet.net:8443/applications/test-dummyhttp
Source:
- Repo:             https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
  Target:
  Path:             apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test
SyncWindow:         Sync Allowed
Sync Policy:        Automated (Prune)
Sync Status:        Synced to  (fbc6031)
Health Status:      Healthy
KIND/NAME                           STATUS  HEALTH   MESSAGE
Deployment/dummyhttp                Synced  Healthy  deployment.apps/dummyhttp configured
 ReplicaSet/dummyhttp-55569589bc           Healthy
   Pod/dummyhttp-55569589bc-qhnfk          Healthy
Ingress/dummyhttp                   Synced  Healthy  ingress.networking.k8s.io/dummyhttp configured
Service/dummyhttp                   Synced  Healthy  service/dummyhttp unchanged
 Endpoints/dummyhttp
 EndpointSlice/dummyhttp-x57bl

As we can see, the Deployment and Ingress where updated, but the Service is unchanged. To validate that the ingress is using the new hostname we can use curl:

  curl -s https://dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/
404 page not found
  curl -s https://test-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443/
 "c": "", "s": ""

Adding a ConfigMapNow that the system is adjusted to reload the application when the ConfigMap or Secret is created, deleted or updated we are ready to add one file and see how the system reacts. We modify the apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml file to create the ConfigMap using the configMapGenerator as follows:

--- a/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
@@ -2,6 +2,14 @@ apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
 kind: Kustomization
 resources:
 - ../../base
+# Add the config map
+configMapGenerator:
+- name: dummyhttp-configmap
+  literals:
+  - CM_VAR="Default Test Value"
+  behavior: create
+  options:
+    disableNameSuffixHash: true
 patches:
 # Add reloader annotations
 - target:

After committing and pushing the changes we can see that the ConfigMap is available, the pod has been deleted and started again and the curl output includes the new value:

  kubectl get configmaps,pods
NAME                             READY   STATUS        RESTARTS   AGE
configmap/dummyhttp-configmap   1      11s
configmap/kube-root-ca.crt      1      4d7h
NAME                            DATA   AGE
pod/dummyhttp-779c96c44b-pjq4d   1/1     Running       0          11s
pod/dummyhttp-fc964557f-jvpkx    1/1     Terminating   0          2m42s
  curl -s https://test-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443   jq -M .
 
  "c": "Default Test Value",
  "s": ""

Using helm with argocd-autopilotRight now there is no direct support in argocd-autopilot to manage applications using helm (see the issue #38 on the project), but we want to use a chart in our next example. There are multiple ways to add the support, but the simplest one that allows us to keep using argocd-autopilot is to use kustomize applications that call helm as described here. The only thing needed before being able to use the approach is to add the kustomize.buildOptions flag to the argocd-cm on the bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml file, its contents now are follows:

bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
configMapGenerator:
- behavior: merge
  literals:
  # Enable helm usage from kustomize (see https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/2789#issuecomment-960271294)
  - kustomize.buildOptions="--enable-helm"
  -  
    repository.credentials=- passwordSecret:
        key: git_token
        name: autopilot-secret
      url: https://forgejo.mixinet.net/
      usernameSecret:
        key: git_username
        name: autopilot-secret
  name: argocd-cm
  # Disable TLS for the Argo Server (see https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/ingress/#traefik-v30)
- behavior: merge
  literals:
  - "server.insecure=true"
  name: argocd-cmd-params-cm
kind: Kustomization
namespace: argocd
resources:
- github.com/argoproj-labs/argocd-autopilot/manifests/base?ref=v0.4.19
- ingress_route.yaml

On the following section we will explain how the application is defined to make things work.

Installing the sealed-secrets controllerTo manage secrets in our cluster we are going to use the sealed-secrets controller and to install it we are going to use its chart. As we mentioned on the previous section, the idea is to create a kustomize application and use that to deploy the chart, but we are going to create the files manually, as we are not going import the base kustomization files from a remote repository. As there is no clear way to override helm Chart values using overlays we are going to use a generator to create the helm configuration from an external resource and include it from our overlays (the idea has been taken from this repository, which was referenced from a comment on the kustomize issue #38 mentioned earlier).

The sealed-secrets applicationWe have created the following files and folders manually:

apps/sealed-secrets/
  helm
    chart.yaml
    kustomization.yaml
  overlays
      test
          config.json
          kustomization.yaml
          values.yaml

The helm folder contains the generator template that will be included from our overlays. The kustomization.yaml includes the chart.yaml as a resource:

apps/sealed-secrets/helm/kustomization.yaml

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
resources:
- chart.yaml

And the chart.yaml file defines the HelmChartInflationGenerator:

apps/sealed-secrets/helm/chart.yaml

apiVersion: builtin
kind: HelmChartInflationGenerator
metadata:
  name: sealed-secrets
releaseName: sealed-secrets
name: sealed-secrets
namespace: kube-system
repo: https://bitnami-labs.github.io/sealed-secrets
version: 2.17.2
includeCRDs: true
# Add common values to all argo-cd projects inline
valuesInline:
  fullnameOverride: sealed-secrets-controller
# Load a values.yaml file from the same directory that uses this generator
valuesFile: values.yaml

For this chart the template adjusts the namespace to kube-system and adds the fullnameOverride on the valuesInline key because we want to use those settings on all the projects (they are the values expected by the kubeseal command line application, so we adjust them to avoid the need to add additional parameters to it). We adjust global values as inline to be able to use a the valuesFile from our overlays; as we are using a generator the path is relative to the folder that contains the kustomization.yaml file that calls it, in our case we will need to have a values.yaml file on each overlay folder (if we don t want to overwrite any values for a project we can create an empty file, but it has to exist). Finally, our overlay folder contains three files, a kustomization.yaml file that includes the generator from the helm folder, the values.yaml file needed by the chart and the config.json file used by argocd-autopilot to install the application. The kustomization.yaml file contents are:

apps/sealed-secrets/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml

apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
# Uncomment if you want to add additional resources using kustomize
#resources:
#- ../../base
generators:
- ../../helm

The values.yaml file enables the ingress for the application and adjusts its hostname:

apps/sealed-secrets/overlays/test/values.yaml

ingress:
  enabled: true
  hostname: test-sealed-secrets.lo.mixinet.net

And the config.json file is similar to the ones used with the other applications we have installed:

apps/sealed-secrets/overlays/test/config.json

 
  "appName": "sealed-secrets",
  "userGivenName": "sealed-secrets",
  "destNamespace": "kube-system",
  "destServer": "https://kubernetes.default.svc",
  "srcPath": "apps/sealed-secrets/overlays/test",
  "srcRepoURL": "https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git",
  "srcTargetRevision": "",
  "labels": null,
  "annotations": null

Once we commit and push the files the sealed-secrets application is installed in our cluster, we can check it using curl to get the public certificate used by it:

  curl -s https://test-sealed-secrets.lo.mixinet.net:8443/v1/cert.pem
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
[...]
-----END CERTIFICATE-----

The dummyhttp-secretTo create sealed secrets we need to install the kubeseal tool:

  arkade get kubeseal

Now we create a local version of the dummyhttp-secret that contains some value on the SECRET_VAR key (the easiest way for doing it is to use kubectl):

  echo -n "Boo"   kubectl create secret generic dummyhttp-secret \
    --dry-run=client --from-file=SECRET_VAR=/dev/stdin -o yaml \
    >/tmp/dummyhttp-secret.yaml

The secret definition in yaml format is:

apiVersion: v1
data:
  SECRET_VAR: Qm9v
kind: Secret
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: null
  name: dummyhttp-secret

To create a sealed version using the kubeseal tool we can do the following:

  kubeseal -f /tmp/dummyhttp-secret.yaml -w /tmp/dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml

That invocation needs to have access to the cluster to do its job and in our case it works because we modified the chart to use the kube-system namespace and set the controller name to sealed-secrets-controller as the tool expects. If we need to create the secrets without credentials we can connect to the ingress address we added to retrieve the public key:

  kubeseal -f /tmp/dummyhttp-secret.yaml -w /tmp/dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml \
    --cert https://test-sealed-secrets.lo.mixinet.net:8443/v1/cert.pem

Or, if we don t have access to the ingress address, we can save the certificate on a file and use it instead of the URL. The sealed version of the secret looks like this:

apiVersion: bitnami.com/v1alpha1
kind: SealedSecret
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: null
  name: dummyhttp-secret
  namespace: default
spec:
  encryptedData:
    SECRET_VAR: [...]
  template:
    metadata:
      creationTimestamp: null
      name: dummyhttp-secret
      namespace: default

This file can be deployed to the cluster to create the secret (in our case we will add it to the argocd application), but before doing that we are going to check the output of our dummyhttp service and get the list of Secrets and SealedSecrets in the default namespace:

  curl -s https://test-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443   jq -M .
 
  "c": "Default Test Value",
  "s": ""
 
  kubectl get sealedsecrets,secrets
No resources found in default namespace.

Now we add the SealedSecret to the dummyapp copying the file and adding it to the kustomization.yaml file:

--- a/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/apps/dummyhttp/overlays/test/kustomization.yaml
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
 kind: Kustomization
 resources:
 - ../../base
+- dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
 # Create the config map value
 configMapGenerator:
 - name: dummyhttp-configmap

Once we commit and push the files Argo CD creates the SealedSecret and the controller generates the Secret:

  kubectl apply -f /tmp/dummyhttp-sealed-secret.yaml
sealedsecret.bitnami.com/dummyhttp-secret created
  kubectl get sealedsecrets,secrets
NAME                                        STATUS   SYNCED   AGE
sealedsecret.bitnami.com/dummyhttp-secret            True     3s
NAME                      TYPE     DATA   AGE
secret/dummyhttp-secret   Opaque   1      3s

If we check the command output we can see the new value of the secret:

  curl -s https://test-dummyhttp.lo.mixinet.net:8443   jq -M .
 
  "c": "Default Test Value",
  "s": "Boo"

Using `sealed-secrets` in production clustersIf you plan to use `sealed-secrets` look into its documentation to understand how it manages the private keys, how to backup things and keep in mind that, as the documentation explains, you can rotate your sealed version of the secrets, but that doesn t change the actual secrets. If you want to rotate your secrets you have to update them and commit the sealed version of the updates (as the controller also rotates the encryption keys your new sealed version will also be using a newer key, so you will be doing both things at the same time).

Final remarksOn this post we have seen how to deploy applications using the `argocd-autopilot` model, including the use of `helm` charts inside `kustomize` applications and how to install and use the `sealed-secrets` controller. It has been interesting and I ve learnt a lot about `argocd` in the process, but I believe that if I ever want to use it in production I will also review the native `helm` support in `argocd` using a separate repository to manage the applications, at least to be able to compare it to the model explained here.

Ben Hutchings: FOSS activity in April 2025

Debian packages:
- dillo:
  - Bugs:
    - opened #1102988: 10 year old browser is unsafe to use on the web
- firmware-free:
  - Merge requests:
    - opened and merged !9: Fix AppStream metadata issues
  - Uploads:
    - uploaded version 20241210-2 to unstable
- firmware-nonfree:
  - Bugs:
  - Merge requests:
    - merged !118: Update to 20250211
    - reviewed and closed !119: intel-misc: add ish firmware due to the license issue (#1102999)
    - opened and merged !120: Update file patterns included and excluded
    - opened and merged !121: Update to 20250311
    - opened and merged !122: Update to 20250410
    - opened and merged !123: Fix AppStream metadata issues
    - opened and merged !124: Update upstream URLs to point to repository on gitlab.com
    - opened and merged !125: Revert rtw89: 8852c: update fw to v0.27.125.0 (Closes: #1103959)
  - Uploads:
    - uploaded version 20250109-1 to unstable
    - uploaded version 20250211-1 to unstable
    - uploaded version 20250311-1 to unstable
    - uploaded version 20250410-1 to unstable
    - uploaded version 20250410-2 to unstable
- initramfs-tools:
  - Bugs:
    - closed #1099461: initramfs-tools: _call_dracut_install breaks set -e hooks without /sys as already fixed
  - Merge requests:
    - opened and merged !168: unmkinitramfs: Rewrite in C to make it acceptably fast
    - opened !169: Draft: unmkinitramfs: Stop splitting into early and main subdirectories
  - Uploads:
    - uploaded version 0.142+deb12u2 to bookworm
    - uploaded version 0.142+deb12u3 to bookworm
- kernel-handbook:
  - Merge requests:
    - reviewed !9: Clarifications about usage of the test-patches script
- kmod:
  - Bugs:
    - replied to #1099655: initramfs-tools 146 generates incorrect initramfs : does not boot, does not find root fs, reassigning it from initramfs-tools to kmod and merging it with another report
- linux:
  - Bugs:
    - closed #751721: Figure out how to deal with ABI changes as already fixed
    - replied to #946791: Please enable CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y with my findings and a request to the reporter for clarification
    - closed #1066976: linux-source-6.6: make localmodconfig does not configure USB storage, nor cdrom filesystem as not a bug
    - replied to #1086638: linux-image-6.11.5: usbguard-daemon invalid opcode: 0000, usb s not usable
    - replied to and closed #1101203: linux-image-6.12.19-amd64: Kernel 6.12.19-amd64 fails to connect display to X server as not a bug in Debian
    - replied to #1103397: linux-image-amd64: Kernel Panic: copy_fpstate_to_sigfrane crashes. with a diagnosis, and forwarded it upstream
  - Merge requests:
  - Uploads:
    - uploaded version 6.12.22-1~bpo12+1 to bookworm-backports
  - (LTS) Updated the bullseye-security branch to upstream version 5.10.236, but did not yet upload it
- (LTS) linux-6.1:
  - Prepared a backport of version 6.1.135-1 to bullseye-security, but did not yet upload it
- wireless-regdb:
  - Uploads:
    - (LTS) uploaded version 2025.02.20-1~deb12u1 to bookworm
Debian non-package bugs:
- release.debian.org:
  - opened and replied to #1104052: bookworm-pu: package initramfs-tools/0.142+deb12u2
  - opened #1104452: bookworm-pu: package wireless-regdb/2025.02.20-1~deb12u1
Debian non-package projects:
- kernel-team:
  - Merge requests:
    - opened and merged !8: Improvements to find-recent-urgent for meeting agenda
Mailing lists:
- debian-events-eu:
  - posted Debian BSP near Leuven, 26-27 April
- debian-kernel:
- linux-firmware:
  - posted and replied to ish firmware is undistributable

I also co-organised a Debian BSP (Bug-Squashing Party) last weekend, for which I will post a separate report later.

Russ Allbery: Review: Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City

Review: Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City, by K.J. Parker

Series:	Siege #1
Publisher:	Orbit
Copyright:	April 2019
ISBN:	0-316-27080-6
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	349

Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City is... hm, honestly, I'm not sure what the genre of this novel is. It is a story about medieval engineering and siege weapons in a Rome-inspired secondary world that so far as I can tell is not meant to match ours. There is not a hint of magic. It's not technically a fantasy, but it's marketed like a fantasy, and it's not historical fiction nor is it attempting to be alternate history. The most common description is a fantasy of logistics, so I guess I'll go with that, as long as you understand that the fantasy here is of the non-magical sort. K.J. Parker is a pen name for Tom Holt. Orhan is Colonel-in-Chief of the Engineers for the Robur empire, even though he's a milkface, not a blueskin like a proper Robur. (Both of those racial terms are quite offensive.) He started out as a slave, learned a trade, joined the navy as a shipwright, and worked his way up the ranks through luck and enemy action. He's canny, practical, highly respected by his men, happy to cheat and steal to get material for his projects and wages for his people, and just wants to build literal bridges. Nice, sturdy bridges that let people get from one place to another the short way. When this book opens, Orhan is in Classis trying to requisition some rope. He is saved from discovery of his forged paperwork by pirates burning down the warehouse that held all of the rope, and then saved from the pirates by the sorts of coincidences that seem to happen to Orhan all the time. A few subsequent discoveries about what the pirates were after, and news of another unexpected attack on the empire, make Orhan nervous enough that he takes his men to do a job as far away from the City at the heart of the empire as possible. It's just his luck to return in time to find slaughtered troops and to have to sneak his men into a City already under siege. Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City is told in the first person by Orhan, with an internal justification that the reader only discovers at the end of the book. That means your enjoyment of this book is going to depend a lot on how much you like Orhan's voice. This mostly worked for me; his voice is an odd combination of chatty, self-deprecating, and brusque, and it took a bit for me to get used to it, but I came around. This book is clearly competence porn nearly all the fun of this book is seeing what desperate plan Orhan will come up with next so it helps that Orhan does indeed come across as competent. The part that did not work for me was the morality. You would think from the title that would be straightforward: The City is under siege, people want to capture it and kill everyone, Orhan is on the inside, and his job is to keep them out. That would have been the morality of simplistic military fiction, but most of the appeal was in watching the problem-solving anyway. That's how the story starts, but then Parker started dropping hints of more complexity. Orhan is a disfavored minority and the Robur who run the empire are racist assholes, even though Orhan mostly gets along with the ones who work with him closely. Orhan says a few things that make the reader wonder whether the City warrants defending, and it becomes less clear whether Orhan's loyalties were as solid as they appeared to be. Parker then offers a few moral dilemmas and has Orhan not follow them in the expected directions, making me wonder where Parker was going with the morality of this story. And then we find out that the answer is nowhere. Parker is going nowhere. None of that setup has a payoff, and the ending is deeply unsatisfying and arguably pointless. I am not sure this is an objective analysis. This is one of those books where I would not be surprised to see someone else praise its realism. Orhan is in some ways a more likely figure than the typical hero of a book. He likes accomplishing things, he's a cheat and a liar when that serves his purposes, he's loyal to the people he considers friends in a way that often doesn't involve consulting them about what they want, and he makes decisions mostly on vibes and stubbornness. Both his cynicism and his idealism are different types of masks; beneath both, he's an incoherent muddle. You could argue that we're all that sort of muddle, deep down, and the consistent idealists are the unrealistic (and frightening) ones, and I think Parker may be attempting exactly that argument. I know some readers like this sort of fallibly human incoherence. But wow did I ever loathe this ending because I was not reading this book for a realistic psychological profile of an average guy. I was here for the competence porn, for the fantasy of logistics, for the experience of watching someone have a plan and get shit done. Apparently that extends to needing him to be competent at morality as well, or at least think about it as hard as he thinks about siege weapons. One of the reasons why I am primarily a genre reader is that I don't read books for depressing psychological profiles. There are enough of those in the news. I read books to spend some time in a world better than mine, where things work out the way that they are supposed to, or at least in a way that's satisfying. The other place where this book interfered with my vibes is that it's about a war, and a lot of Orhan's projects are finding more efficient ways to kill people. Parker takes a "war is hell" perspective, and Orhan gets deeply upset at the graphic sights of mangled human bodies that are the frequent results of his plans. I feel weird complaining about this because yes, it's good to be aware of the horrific things that we do to other people in wars, but man, I just wanted to watch some effective project management. I want to enjoy unexpected lateral thinking, appreciate the friendly psychological manipulation involved in getting a project to deliver on deadline, and watch someone solve logistical problems. Battlefields provide an endless supply of interesting challenges, but then Parker feels compelled to linger on the brutal consequences of Orhan's ideas and now I'm depressed and sickened rather than enjoying myself. I really wanted to like this book, and for a lot of the book I did, but that ending was a bottomless pit that sucked away all my enjoyment and retroactively made the rest of the book feel worse. I so wanted Parker to be going somewhere clever and surprising, and the disappointment when none of that happened was intense. This is probably an excessively negative reaction, and I will not be surprised when other people get along with this book better than I did, but not only will I not be recommending it, I'm now rather dubious about reading any more Parker. Followed by How to Rule an Empire and Get Away With It. Rating: 5 out of 10

Ian Jackson: Free Software, internal politics, and governance

There is a thread of opinion in some Free Software communities, that we shouldn t be doing politics , and instead should just focus on technology. But that s impossible. This approach is naive, harmful, and, ultimately, self-defeating, even on its own narrow terms.

Today I m talking about small-p politics In this article I m using politics in the very wide sense: us humans managing our disagreements with each other. I m not going to talk about culture wars, woke, racism, trans rights, and so on. I am not going to talk about how Free Software has always had explicitly political goals; or how it s impossible to be neutral because choosing not to take a stand is itself to take a stand. Those issues are all are important and Free Software definitely must engage with them. Many of the points I make are applicable there too. But those are not my focus today. Today I m talking in more general terms about politics, power, and governance. Many people working together always entails politics Computers are incredibly complicated nowadays. Making software is a joint enterprise. Even if an individual program has only a single maintainer, it fits into an ecosystem of other software, maintained by countless other developers. Larger projects can have thousands of maintainers and hundreds of thousands of contributors. Humans don t always agree about everything. This is natural. Indeed, it s healthy: to write the best code, we need a wide range of knowledge and experience. When we can t come to agreement, we need a way to deal with that: a way that lets us still make progress, but also leaves us able to work together afterwards. A way that feels OK for everyone. Providing a framework for disagreement is the job of a governance system. The rules say which people make which decisions, who must be consulted, how the decisions are made, and, how, if any, they can be reviewed. This is all politics. Consensus is great but always requiring it is harmful Ideally a discussion will converge to a synthesis that satisfies everyone, or at least a consensus. When consensus can t be achieved, we can hope for compromise: something everyone can live with. Compromise is achieved through negotiation. If every decision requires consensus, then the proponents of any wide-ranging improvement have an almost insurmountable hurdle: those who are favoured by the status quo and find it convenient can always object. So there will never be consensus for change. If there is any objection at all, no matter how ill-founded, the status quo will always win. This is where governance comes in. Governance is like backups: we need to practice it Governance processes are the backstop for when discussions, and then negotiations, fail, and people still don t see eye to eye. In a healthy community, everyone needs to know how the governance works and what the rules are. The participants need to accept the system s legitimacy. Everyone, including the losing side, must be prepared to accept and implement (or, at least not obstruct) whatever the decision is, and hopefully live with it and stay around. That means we need to practice our governance processes. We can t just leave them for the day we have a huge and controversial decision to make. If we do that, then when it comes to the crunch we ll have toxic rows where no-one can agree the rules; where determined people bend the rules to fit their outcome; and where afterwards people feel like the whole thing was horrible and unfair. So our decisionmaking bodies and roles need to be making decisions, as a matter of routine, and we need to get used to that. First-line decisionmaking bodies should be making decisions frequently. Last-line appeal mechanisms (large-scale votes, for example) are naturally going to be exercised more rarely, but they must happen, be seen as legitimate, and their outcomes must be implemented in full. Governance should usually be routine and boring When governance is working well it s quite boring. People offer their input, and are heard. Angles are debated, and concerns are addressed. If agreement still isn t reached, the committee, or elected leader, makes a decision. Hopefully everyone thinks the leadership is legitimate, and that it properly considered and heard their arguments, and made the decision for good reasons. Hopefully the losing side can still get their work done (and make their own computer work the way they want); so while they will be disappointed, they can live with the outcome. Many human institutions manage this most of the time. It does take some knowledge about principles of governance, and ideally some experience. Governance means deciding, not just mediating By making decisions I mean exercising their authority to rule on an actual disagreement: one that wasn t resolved by debate or negotiation. Governance processes by definition involve deciding, not just mediating. It s not governance if we re advising or cajoling: in that case, we re back to demanding consensus. Governance is necessary precisely when consensus is not achieved. If the governance systems are to mean anything, they must be able to (over)rule; that means (over)ruling must be normal and accepted. Otherwise, when the we need to overrule, we ll find that we can t, because we lack the collective practice. To be legitimate (and seen as legitimate) decisions must usually be made based on the merits, not on participants status, and not only on process questions. On the autonomy of the programmer Many programmers seem to find the very concept of governance, and binding decisionmaking, deeply uncomfortable. Ultimately, it means sometimes overruling someone s technical decision. As programmers and maintainers we naturally see how this erodes our autonomy. But we have all seen projects where the maintainers are unpleasant, obstinate, or destructive. We have all found this frustrating. Software is all interconnected, and one programmer s bad decisions can cause problems for many of the rest of us. We exasperate, why won t they just do the right thing . This is futile. People have never just ed and they re not going to start just ing now. So often the boot is on the other foot. More broadly, as software developers, we have a responsibility to our users, and a duty to write code that does good rather than ill in the world. We ought to be accountable. (And not just to capitalist bosses!) Governance mechanisms are the answer. (No, forking anything but the smallest project is very rarely a practical answer.) Mitigate the consequences of decisions retain flexibility In software, it is often possible to soften the bad social effects of a controversial decision, by retaining flexibility. With a bit of extra work, we can often provide hooks, non-default configuration options, or plugin arrangements. If we can convert the question from how will the software always behave into merely what should the default be , we can often save ourselves a lot of drama. So it is often worth keeping even suboptimal or untidy features or options, if people want to use them and are willing to maintain them. There is a tradeoff here, of course. But Free Software projects often significantly under-value the social benefits of keeping everyone happy. Wrestling software even crusty or buggy software is a lot more fun than having unpleasant arguments. But don t do decisionmaking like a corporation Many programmers experience of formal decisionmaking is from their boss at work. But corporations are often a very bad example. They typically don t have as much trouble actually making decisions, but the actual decisions are often terrible, and not just because corporations goals are often bad. You get to be a decisionmaker in a corporation by spouting plausible nonsense, sounding confident, buttering up the even-more-vacuous people further up the chain, and sometimes by sabotaging your rivals. Corporate senior managers are hardly ever held accountable typically the effects of their tenure are only properly felt well after they ve left to mess up somewhere else. We should select our leaders more wisely, and base decisions on substance. If you won t do politics, politics will do you As a participant in a project, or a society, you can of course opt out of getting involved in politics. You can opt out of learning how to do politics generally, and opt out of understanding your project s governance structures. You can opt out of making judgements about disputed questions, and tell yourself there s merit on both sides . You can hate politicians indiscriminately, and criticise anyone you see doing politics. If you do this, then you are abdicating your decisionmaking authority, to those who are the most effective manipulators, or the most committed to getting their way. You re tacitly supporting the existing power bases. You re ceding power to the best liars, to those with the least scruples, and to the people who are most motivated by dominance. This is precisely the opposite of what you wanted. If enough people won t do politics, and hate anyone who does, your discussion spaces will be reduced to a battleground of only the hardiest and the most toxic. If you don t see the politics, it s still happening If your governance systems don t work, then there is no effective redress against bad or even malicious decisions. Your roleholders and subteams are unaccountable power centres. Power radically distorts every human relationship, and it takes great strength of character for an unaccountable power centre not to eventually become an unaccountable toxic cabal. So if you have a reasonable sized community, but don t see your formal governance systems working people debating things, votes, leadership making explicit decisions that doesn t mean everything is fine, and all the decisions are great, and there s no politics happening. It just means that most of your community have given up on the official process. It also probably means that some parts of your project have formed toxic and unaccountable cabals. Those who won t put up with that will leave. The same is true if the only governance actions that ever happen are massive drama. That means that only the most determined victim of a bad decision, will even consider using such a process. Conclusions

Respect and support the people who are trying to fix things with politics.
Be informed, and, where appropriate, involved.
If you are in a position of authority, be willing to exercise that authority. Do more than just mediating to try to get consensus.

comments

Russ Allbery: Review: Beyond Pain

Review: Beyond Pain, by Kit Rocha

Series:	Beyond #3
Publisher:	Kit Rocha
Copyright:	December 2013
ASIN:	B00GIA4GN8
Format:	Kindle
Pages:	328

Beyond Pain is a science fiction dystopian erotic romance novel and a direct sequel to Beyond Control. Following the romance series convention, each book features new protagonists who were supporting characters in the previous book. You could probably start here if you wanted, but there are significant spoilers here for earlier books in the series. I read this book as part of the Beyond Series Bundle (Books 1-3), which is what the sidebar information is for. Six has had a brutally hard life. She was rescued from an awful situation in a previous book and is now lurking around the edges of the Sector Four gang, oddly fascinated (as are we all) with their constant sexuality and trying to decide if she wants to, and can, be part of their world. Bren is one of the few people she lets get close: a huge bruiser who likes cage fights and pain but treats Six with a protective, careful respect that she finds comforting. This book is the story of Six and Bren getting to the bottom of each other's psychological hangups while the O'Kanes start taking over Six's former sector. Yes, as threatened, I read another entry in the dystopian erotica series because I keep wondering how these people will fuck their way into a revolution. This is not happening very quickly, but it seems obvious that is the direction the series is going. It's been a while since I've reviewed one of these, so here's another variation of the massive disclaimer: I think erotica is harder to review than any other genre because what people like is so intensely personal and individual. This is not even an attempt at an erotica review. I'm both wholly unqualified and also less interested in that part of the book, which should lead you to question my reading choices since that's a good half of the book. Rather, I'm reading these somewhat for the plot and mostly for the vibes. This is not the most competent collection of individuals, and to the extent that they are, it's mostly because the men (who are, as a rule, charismatic but rather dim) are willing to listen to the women. What they are good at is communication, or rather, they're good about banging their heads (and other parts) against communication barriers until they figure out a way around them. Part of this is an obsession with consent that goes quite a bit deeper than the normal simplistic treatment. When you spend this much time trying to understand what other people want, you have to spend a lot of time communicating about sex, and in these books that means spending a lot of time communicating about everything else as well. They are also obsessively loyal and understand the merits of both collective action and in making space for people to do the things that they are the best at, while still insisting that people contribute when they can. On the surface, the O'Kanes are a dictatorship, but they're run more like a high-functioning collaboration. Dallas leads because Dallas is good at playing the role of leader (and listening to Lex), which is refreshingly contrary to how things work in the real world right now. I want to be clear that not only is this erotica, this is not the sort of erotica where there's a stand-alone plot that is periodically interrupted by vaguely-motivated sex scenes that you can skim past. These people use sex to communicate, and therefore most of the important exchanges in the book are in the middle of a sex scene. This is going to make this novel, and this series, very much not to the taste of a lot of people, and I cannot be emphatic enough about that warning. But, also, this is such a fascinating inversion. It's common in media for the surface plot of the story to be full of sexual tension, sometimes to the extent that the story is just a metaphor for the sex that the characters want to have. This is the exact opposite of that: The sex is a metaphor for everything else that's going on in the story. These people quite literally fuck their way out of their communication problems, and not in an obvious or cringy way. It's weirdly fascinating? It's also possible that my reaction to this series is so unusual as to not be shared by a single other reader. Anyway, the setup in this story is that Six has major trust issues and Bren is slowly and carefully trying to win her trust. It's a classic hurt/comfort setup, and if that had played out in the way that this story often does, Bren would have taken the role of the gentle hero and Six the role of the person he rescued. That is not at all where this story goes. Six doesn't need comfort; Six needs self-confidence and the ability to demand what she wants, and although the way Beyond Pain gets her there is a little ham-handed, it mostly worked for me. As with Beyond Shame, I felt like the moral of the story is that the O'Kane men are just bright enough to stop doing stupid things at the last possible moment. I think Beyond Pain worked a bit better than the previous book because Bren is not quite as dim as Dallas, so the reader doesn't have to suffer through quite as many stupid decisions. The erotica continues to mostly (although not entirely) follow traditional gender roles, with dangerous men and women who like attention. Presumably most people are reading these books for the sex, which I am wholly unqualified to review. For whatever it's worth, the physical descriptions are too mechanical for me, too obsessed with the precise structural assemblage of parts in novel configurations. I am not recommending (or disrecommending) these books, for a whole host of reasons. But I think the authors deserve to be rewarded for understanding that sex can be communication and that good communication about difficult topics is inherently interesting in a way that (at least for me) transcends the erotica. I bet I'm going to pick up another one of these about a year from now because I'm still thinking about these people and am still curious about how they are going to succeed. Followed by Beyond Temptation, an interstitial novella. The next novel is Beyond Jealousy. Rating: 6 out of 10

Petter Reinholdtsen: OpenSnitch 1.6.8 is now in Trixie

After some days of effort, I am happy to report that the great interactive application firewall OpenSnitch got a new version in Trixie, now with the Linux kernel based ebpf sniffer included for better accuracy. This new version made it possible for me to finally track down the rule required to avoid a deadlock when using it on a machine with the user home directory on NFS. The problematic connection originated from the Linux kernel itself, causing the /proc based version in Debian 12 to fail to properly attribute the connection and cause the OpenSnitch daemon to block while waiting for the Python GUI, which was unable to continue because the home directory was blocked waiting for the OpenSnitch daemon. A classic deadlock reported upstream for a more permanent solution. I really love the control over all the programs and web pages calling home that OpenSnitch give me. Just today I discovered a strange connection to sb-ssl.google.com when I pulled up a PDF passed on to me via a Mattermost installation. It is some times hard to know which connections to block and which to go through, but after running it for a few months, the default rule set start to handle most regular network traffic and I only have to have a look at the more unusual connections. If you would like to know more about what your machines programs are doing, install OpenSnitch today. It is only a apt install opensnitch away. :) I hope to get the 1.6.9 version in experimental into Trixie before the archive enter hard freeze. This new version should have no relevant changes not already in the 1.6.8-11 edition, as it mostly contain Debian patches, but will give it a few days testing to see if there are any surprises. :) As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address 15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b.

Sergio Talens-Oliag: ArgoCD Autopilot

For a long time I ve been wanting to try GitOps tools, but I haven t had the chance to try them for real on the projects I was working on. As now I have some spare time I ve decided I m going to play a little with Argo CD, Flux and Kluctl to test them and be able to use one of them in a real project in the future if it looks appropriate. On this post I will use Argo-CD Autopilot to install argocd on a k3d local cluster installed using OpenTofu to test the autopilot approach of managing argocd and test the tool (as it manages argocd using a git repository it can be used to test argocd as well).

Installing tools locally with arkadeRecently I ve been using the arkade tool to install kubernetes related applications on Linux servers and containers, I usually get the applications with it and install them on the /usr/local/bin folder. For this post I ve created a simple script that checks if the tools I ll be using are available and installs them on the $HOME/.arkade/bin folder if missing (I m assuming that docker is already available, as it is not installable with arkade):

#!/bin/sh
# TOOLS LIST
ARKADE_APPS="argocd argocd-autopilot k3d kubectl sops tofu"
# Add the arkade binary directory to the path if missing
case ":$ PATH :" in
  *:"$ HOME /.arkade/bin":*) ;;
  *) export PATH="$ PATH :$ HOME /.arkade/bin" ;;
esac
# Install or update arkade
if command -v arkade >/dev/null; then
  echo "Trying to update the arkade application"
  sudo arkade update
else
  echo "Installing the arkade application"
  curl -sLS https://get.arkade.dev   sudo sh
fi
echo ""
echo "Installing tools with arkade"
echo ""
for app in $ARKADE_APPS; do
  app_path="$(command -v $app)"   true
  if [ "$app_path" ]; then
    echo "The application '$app' already available on '$app_path'"
  else
    arkade get "$app"
  fi
done
cat <<EOF
Add the ~/.arkade/bin directory to your PATH if tools have been installed there
EOF

The rest of scripts will add the binary directory to the PATH if missing to make sure things work if something was installed there.

Creating a k3d cluster with opentofuAlthough using k3d directly will be a good choice for the creation of the cluster, I m using tofu to do it because that will probably be the tool used to do it if we were working with Cloud Platforms like AWS or Google. The main.tf file is as follows:

terraform  
  required_providers  
    k3d =  
      source  = "moio/k3d"
      version = "0.0.12"
     
    sops =  
      source = "carlpett/sops"
      version = "1.2.0"
     
   
 
data "sops_file" "secrets"  
    source_file = "secrets.yaml"
 
resource "k3d_cluster" "argocd_cluster"  
  name    = "argocd"
  servers = 1
  agents  = 2
  image   = "rancher/k3s:v1.31.5-k3s1"
  network = "argocd"
  token   = data.sops_file.secrets.data["token"]
  port  
    host_port      = 8443
    container_port = 443
    node_filters = [
      "loadbalancer",
    ]
   
  k3d  
    disable_load_balancer     = false
    disable_image_volume      = false
   
  kubeconfig  
    update_default_kubeconfig = true
    switch_current_context    = true
   
  runtime  
    gpu_request = "all"

The k3d configuration is quite simple, as I plan to use the default traefik ingress controller with TLS I publish the 443 port on the hosts 8443 port, I ll explain how I add a valid certificate on the next step. I ve prepared the following script to initialize and apply the changes:

#!/bin/sh
set -e
# VARIABLES
# Default token for the argocd cluster
K3D_CLUSTER_TOKEN="argocdToken"
# Relative PATH to install the k3d cluster using terr-iaform
K3D_TF_RELPATH="k3d-tf"
# Secrets yaml file
SECRETS_YAML="secrets.yaml"
# Relative PATH to the workdir from the script directory
WORK_DIR_RELPATH=".."
# Compute WORKDIR
SCRIPT="$(readlink -f "$0")"
SCRIPT_DIR="$(dirname "$SCRIPT")"
WORK_DIR="$(readlink -f "$SCRIPT_DIR/$WORK_DIR_RELPATH")"
# Update the PATH to add the arkade bin directory
# Add the arkade binary directory to the path if missing
case ":$ PATH :" in
  *:"$ HOME /.arkade/bin":*) ;;
  *) export PATH="$ PATH :$ HOME /.arkade/bin" ;;
esac
# Go to the k3d-tf dir
cd "$WORK_DIR/$K3D_TF_RELPATH"   exit 1
# Create secrets.yaml file and encode it with sops if missing
if [ ! -f "$SECRETS_YAML" ]; then
  echo "token: $K3D_CLUSTER_TOKEN" >"$SECRETS_YAML"
  sops encrypt -i "$SECRETS_YAML"
fi
# Initialize terraform
tofu init
# Apply the configuration
tofu apply

Adding a wildcard certificate to the k3d ingressAs an optional step, after creating the k3d cluster I m going to add a default wildcard certificate for the traefik ingress server to be able to use everything with HTTPS without certificate issues. As I manage my own DNS domain I ve created the lo.mixinet.net and *.lo.mixinet.net DNS entries on my public and private DNS servers (both return 127.0.0.1 and ::1) and I ve created a TLS certificate for both entries using Let s Encrypt with Certbot. The certificate is updated automatically on one of my servers and when I need it I copy the contents of the fullchain.pem and privkey.pem files from the /etc/letsencrypt/live/lo.mixinet.net server directory to the local files lo.mixinet.net.crt and lo.mixinet.net.key. After copying the files I run the following file to install or update the certificate and configure it as the default for traefik:

#!/bin/sh
# Script to update the
secret="lo-mixinet-net-ingress-cert"
cert="$ 1:-lo.mixinet.net.crt "
key="$ 2:-lo.mixinet.net.key "
if [ -f "$cert" ] && [ -f "$key" ]; then
  kubectl -n kube-system create secret tls $secret \
    --key=$key \
    --cert=$cert \
    --dry-run=client --save-config -o yaml    kubectl apply -f -
  kubectl apply -f - << EOF
apiVersion: traefik.containo.us/v1alpha1
kind: TLSStore
metadata:
  name: default
  namespace: kube-system
spec:
  defaultCertificate:
    secretName: $secret
EOF
else
  cat <<EOF
To add or update the traefik TLS certificate the following files are needed:
- cert: '$cert'
- key: '$key'
Note: you can pass the paths as arguments to this script.
EOF
fi

Once it is installed if I connect to https://foo.lo.mixinet.net:8443/ I get a 404 but the certificate is valid.

Installing argocd with argocd-autopilot

Creating a repository and a token for `autopilot`I ll be using a project on my forgejo instance to manage `argocd`, the repository I ve created is on the URL https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd and I ve created a private user named `argocd` that only has write access to that repository. Logging as the `argocd` user on forgejo I ve created a token with permission to read and write repositories that I ve saved on my pass password store on the `mixinet.net/argocd@forgejo/repository-write` entry.

Bootstrapping the installationTo bootstrap the installation I ve used the following script (it uses the previous GIT_REPO and GIT_TOKEN values):

#!/bin/sh
set -e
# VARIABLES
# Relative PATH to the workdir from the script directory
WORK_DIR_RELPATH=".."
# Compute WORKDIR
SCRIPT="$(readlink -f "$0")"
SCRIPT_DIR="$(dirname "$SCRIPT")"
WORK_DIR="$(readlink -f "$SCRIPT_DIR/$WORK_DIR_RELPATH")"
# Update the PATH to add the arkade bin directory
# Add the arkade binary directory to the path if missing
case ":$ PATH :" in
  *:"$ HOME /.arkade/bin":*) ;;
  *) export PATH="$ PATH :$ HOME /.arkade/bin" ;;
esac
# Go to the working directory
cd "$WORK_DIR"   exit 1
# Set GIT variables
if [ -z "$GIT_REPO" ]; then
  export GIT_REPO="https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git"
fi
if [ -z "$GIT_TOKEN" ]; then
  GIT_TOKEN="$(pass mixinet.net/argocd@forgejo/repository-write)"
  export GIT_TOKEN
fi
argocd-autopilot repo bootstrap --provider gitea

The output of the execution is as follows:

  bin/argocd-bootstrap.sh
INFO cloning repo: https://forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
INFO empty repository, initializing a new one with specified remote
INFO using revision: "", installation path: ""
INFO using context: "k3d-argocd", namespace: "argocd"
INFO applying bootstrap manifests to cluster...
namespace/argocd created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/applications.argoproj.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/applicationsets.argoproj.io created
customresourcedefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io/appprojects.argoproj.io created
serviceaccount/argocd-application-controller created
serviceaccount/argocd-applicationset-controller created
serviceaccount/argocd-dex-server created
serviceaccount/argocd-notifications-controller created
serviceaccount/argocd-redis created
serviceaccount/argocd-repo-server created
serviceaccount/argocd-server created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-application-controller created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-applicationset-controller created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-dex-server created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-notifications-controller created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-redis created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-server created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-application-controller created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-applicationset-controller created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-server created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-application-controller created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-applicationset-controller created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-dex-server created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-notifications-controller created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-redis created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-server created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-application-controller created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-applicationset-controller created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/argocd-server created
configmap/argocd-cm created
configmap/argocd-cmd-params-cm created
configmap/argocd-gpg-keys-cm created
configmap/argocd-notifications-cm created
configmap/argocd-rbac-cm created
configmap/argocd-ssh-known-hosts-cm created
configmap/argocd-tls-certs-cm created
secret/argocd-notifications-secret created
secret/argocd-secret created
service/argocd-applicationset-controller created
service/argocd-dex-server created
service/argocd-metrics created
service/argocd-notifications-controller-metrics created
service/argocd-redis created
service/argocd-repo-server created
service/argocd-server created
service/argocd-server-metrics created
deployment.apps/argocd-applicationset-controller created
deployment.apps/argocd-dex-server created
deployment.apps/argocd-notifications-controller created
deployment.apps/argocd-redis created
deployment.apps/argocd-repo-server created
deployment.apps/argocd-server created
statefulset.apps/argocd-application-controller created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-application-controller-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-applicationset-controller-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-dex-server-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-notifications-controller-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-redis-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-repo-server-network-policy created
networkpolicy.networking.k8s.io/argocd-server-network-policy created
secret/autopilot-secret created
INFO pushing bootstrap manifests to repo
INFO applying argo-cd bootstrap application
INFO pushing bootstrap manifests to repo
INFO applying argo-cd bootstrap application
application.argoproj.io/autopilot-bootstrap created
INFO running argocd login to initialize argocd config
Context 'autopilot' updated
INFO argocd initialized. password: XXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX
INFO run:
    kubectl port-forward -n argocd svc/argocd-server 8080:80

Now we have the argocd installed and running, it can be checked using the port-forward and connecting to https://localhost:8080/ (the certificate will be wrong, we are going to fix that in the next step).

Updating the argocd installation in gitNow that we have the application deployed we can clone the argocd repository and edit the deployment to disable TLS for the argocd server (we are going to use TLS termination with traefik and that needs the server running as insecure, see the Argo CD documentation)

  ssh clone ssh://git@forgejo.mixinet.net/blogops/argocd.git
  cd argocd
  edit bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml
  git commit -m 'Disable TLS for the argocd-server'

The changes made to the kustomization.yaml file are the following:

--- a/bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ configMapGenerator:
         key: git_username
         name: autopilot-secret
   name: argocd-cm
+  # Disable TLS for the Argo Server (see https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/operator-manual/ingress/#traefik-v30)
+- behavior: merge
+  literals:
+  - "server.insecure=true"
+  name: argocd-cmd-params-cm
 kind: Kustomization
 namespace: argocd
 resources:

Once the changes are pushed we sync the argo-cd application manually to make sure they are applied:

As a test we can download the argocd-cmd-params-cm ConfigMap to make sure everything is OK:

apiVersion: v1
data:
  server.insecure: "true"
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  annotations:
    kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration:  
       "apiVersion":"v1","data": "server.insecure":"true" ,"kind":"ConfigMap","metadata": "annotations": ,"labels": "app.kubernetes.io/instance":"argo-cd","app.kubernetes.io/name":"argocd-cmd-params-cm","app.kubernetes.io/part-of":"argocd" ,"name":"argocd-cmd-params-cm","namespace":"argocd" 
  creationTimestamp: "2025-04-27T17:31:54Z"
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/instance: argo-cd
    app.kubernetes.io/name: argocd-cmd-params-cm
    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: argocd
  name: argocd-cmd-params-cm
  namespace: argocd
  resourceVersion: "16731"
  uid: a460638f-1d82-47f6-982c-3017699d5f14

As this simply changes the ConfigMap we have to restart the argocd-server to read it again, to do it we delete the server pods so they are re-created using the updated resource:

  kubectl delete pods -n argocd -l app.kubernetes.io/name=argocd-server

After doing this the port-forward command is killed automatically, if we run it again the connection to get to the argocd-server has to be done using HTTP instead of HTTPS. Instead of testing that we are going to add an ingress definition to be able to connect to the server using HTTPS and GRPC against the address argocd.lo.mixinet.net using the wildcard TLS certificate we installed earlier. To do it we to edit the bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml file to add the ingress_route.yaml file to the deployment:

--- a/bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml
+++ b/bootstrap/argo-cd/kustomization.yaml
@@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ kind: Kustomization
 namespace: argocd
 resources:
 - github.com/argoproj-labs/argocd-autopilot/manifests/base?ref=v0.4.19
+- ingress_route.yaml

The ingress_route.yaml file contents are the following:

apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1
kind: IngressRoute
metadata:
  name: argocd-server
  namespace: argocd
spec:
  entryPoints:
    - websecure
  routes:
    - kind: Rule
      match: Host( argocd.lo.mixinet.net )
      priority: 10
      services:
        - name: argocd-server
          port: 80
    - kind: Rule
      match: Host( argocd.lo.mixinet.net ) && Header( Content-Type ,  application/grpc )
      priority: 11
      services:
        - name: argocd-server
          port: 80
          scheme: h2c
  tls:
    certResolver: default

After pushing the changes and waiting a little bit the change is applied and we can access the server using HTTPS and GRPC, the first way can be tested from a browser and the GRPC using the command line interface:

  argocd --grpc-web login argocd.lo.mixinet.net:8443
Username: admin
Password:
'admin:login' logged in successfully
Context 'argocd.lo.mixinet.net:8443' updated
  argocd app list -o name
argocd/argo-cd
argocd/autopilot-bootstrap
argocd/cluster-resources-in-cluster
argocd/root

So things are working fine and that is all on this post, folks!

Arturo Borrero Gonz lez: My experience in the Debian LTS and ELTS projects

Last year, I decided to start participating in the Debian LTS and ELTS projects. It was a great opportunity to engage in something new within the Debian community. I had been following these projects for many years, observing their evolution and how they gained traction both within the ecosystem and across the industry. I was curious to explore how contributors were working internally especially how they managed security patching and remediation for older software. I ve always felt this was a particularly challenging area, and I was fortunate to experience it firsthand. As of April 2025, the Debian LTS project was primarily focused on providing security maintenance for Debian 11 Bullseye. Meanwhile, the Debian ELTS project was targeting Debian 8 Jessie, Debian 9 Stretch, and Debian 10 Buster. During my time with the projects, I worked on a variety of packages and CVEs. Some of the most notable ones include:

There are several technical highlights I d like to share things I learned or had to apply while participating:

CI/CD pipelines: We used CI/CD pipelines on salsa.debian.org all the times to automate tasks such as building, linting, and testing packages. For any package I worked on that lacked CI/CD integration, setting it up became my first step.
autopkgtest: There s a strong emphasis on autopkgtest as the mechanism for running functional tests and ensuring that security patches don t introduce regressions. I contributed by both extending existing test suites and writing new ones from scratch.
Toolchain complexity for older releases: Working with older Debian versions like Jessie brought some unique challenges. Getting a development environment up and running often meant troubleshooting issues with sbuild chroots, qemu images, and other tools that don t just work like they tend to on Debian stable.
Community collaboration: The people involved in LTS and ELTS are extremely helpful and collaborative. Requests for help, code reviews, and general feedback were usually answered quickly.
Shared ownership: This collaborative culture also meant that contributors would regularly pick up work left by others or hand off their own tasks when needed. That mutual support made a big difference.
Backporting security fixes: This is probably the most intense and most rewarding activity. It involves manually adapting patches to work on older codebases when upstream patches don t apply cleanly. This requires deep code understanding and thorough testing.
Upstream collaboration: Reaching out to upstream developers was a key part of my workflow. I often asked if they could provide patches for older versions or at least review my backports. Sometimes they were available, but most of the time, the responsibility remained on us.
Diverse tech stack: The work exposed me to a wide range of programming languages and frameworks Python, Java, C, Perl, and more. Unsurprisingly, some modern languages (like Go) are less prevalent in older releases like Jessie.
Security team interaction: I had frequent contact with the core Debian Security Team the folks responsible for security in Debian stable. This gave me a broader perspective on how Debian handles security holistically.

In March 2025, I decided to scale back my involvement in the projects due to some changes in my personal life. Still, this experience has been one of the highlights of my career, and I would definitely recommend it to others. I m very grateful for the warm welcome I received from the LTS/ELTS community, and I don t rule out the possibility of rejoining the LTS/ELTS efforts in the future. The Debian LTS/ELTS projects are currently coordinated by folks at Freexian. Many thanks to Freexian and sponsors for providing this opportunity!

Otto Kek l inen: Going Full-Time as an Open Source Developer

Featured image of post Going Full-Time as an Open Source Developer

After careful consideration, I ve decided to embark on a new chapter in my professional journey. I ve left my position at AWS to dedicate at least the next six months to developing open source software and strengthening digital ecosystems. My focus will be on contributing to Linux distributions (primarily Debian) and other critical infrastructure components that our modern society depends on, but which may not receive adequate attention or resources.

The Evolution of Open Source Open source won. Over the 25+ years I ve been involved in the open source movement, I ve witnessed its remarkable evolution. Today, Linux powers billions of devices from tiny embedded systems and Android smartphones to massive cloud datacenters and even space stations. Examine any modern large-scale digital system, and you ll discover it s built upon thousands of open source projects. I feel the priority for the open source movement should no longer be increasing adoption, but rather solving how to best maintain the vast ecosystem of software. This requires building robust institutions and processes to secure proper resourcing and ensure the collaborative development process remains efficient and leads to ever-increasing quality of software.

What is Special About Debian? Debian, established in 1993 by Ian Murdock, stands as one of these institutions that has demonstrated exceptional resilience. There is no single authority, but instead a complex web of various stakeholders, each with their own goals and sources of funding. Every idea needs to be championed at length to a wide audience and implemented through a process of organic evolution. Thanks to this approach, Debian has been consistently delivering production-quality, universally useful software for over three decades. Having been a Debian Developer for more than ten years, I m well-positioned to contribute meaningfully to this community. If your organization relies on Debian or its derivatives such as Ubuntu, and you re interested in funding cyber infrastructure maintenance by sponsoring Debian work, please don t hesitate to reach out. This could include package maintenance and version currency, improving automated upgrade testing, general quality assurance and supply chain security enhancements.
Best way to reach me is by e-mail otto at debian.org. You can also book a 15-minute chat with me for a quick introduction.

Grow or Die My four-year tenure as a Software Development Manager at Amazon Web Services was very interesting. I m grateful for my time at AWS and proud of my team s accomplishments, particularly for creating an open source contribution process that got Amazon from zero to the largest external contributor to the MariaDB open source database. During this time, I got to experience and witness a plethora of interesting things. I will surely share some of my key learnings in future blog posts. Unfortunately, the rate of progress in this mammoth 1.5 million employee organization was slowing down, and I didn t feel I learned much new in the last years. This realization, combined with the opportunity cost of not spending enough time on new cutting-edge technology, motivated me to take this leap. Being a full-time open source developer may not be financially the most lucrative idea, but I think it is an excellent way to force myself to truly assess what is important on a global scale and what areas I want to contribute to. Working fully on open source presents a fascinating duality: you re not bound by any external resource or schedule limitations, and can the progress you make is directly proportional to how much energy you decide to invest. Yet, you also depend on collaboration with people you might never meet and who are not financially incentivized to collaborate. This will undoubtedly expose me to all kinds of challenges. But what would be better in fostering holistic personal growth? I know that deep down in my DNA, I am not made to stay cozy or to do easy things. I need momentum. OK, let s get going