A comment on Facebook yesterday got me thinking what American "traditional values" are all about. We hear it a lot, and I suspect it means something different to different people.

Here's what it means to me.

It starts with an ethic fundamentally informed by the central tenets of Christianity -- which are also excellent standards of decency by secular standards. We are called to have a relentless drive to care for the repressed, poor, downtrodden. As Jesus said, "whatever you do to the least of these, so you do to me." It means extending the hand of friendship and compassion to all, in our own neighborhood and around the world. It means taking good care of the resources we have, acting responsibly, and affirming and supporting others so they can do the same. It means that, as our founding fathers emphasized, remembering that all people are created equal, are equally deserving of a good life, and deserve liberty and freedom. Finally, it means a constant realization that we are creating a human institution, and will always have an imperfect answer to these ideals, but that we can -- and must -- recognize our faults and strive to make things better.

How do these apply to our time?

We must start with the poor, the repressed, and habitually think of their situation in everything we do. That means remembering that when we drop a bomb in Afghanistan to kill a terrorist, we also usually kill 50 innocent bystanders, and devastate their families. It means remembering that illegal immigrants from Mexico come here because all they want is refuge from drug wars, food on the table, and a roof over their head. It means showing compassion in deportation proceedings: when illegal immigrant parents have a child born in the United States, the child is an American citizen and can't be deported, but deporting the parents will create an orphan. It means actively helping the repressed people of the world, whether they be in Sudan, Georgia, or AIDS victims in Africa, Muslims in New York. It means reducing taxes on the poor, giving them the skills and tools they need to make their way in life. It means caring for those with alcohol drug addictions, helping them to summon the strength to get past those problems, rather than locking them up or throwing them out on the street. In days past, this might have meant sharing firewood with the family down the road that was at risk of freezing in winter. Today it might mean assistance with winter heating bills.

Remembering that all people are created equal means that we must provide good education for everyone, whether they live in suburban California, inner city Detroit, or rural Appalachia. We owe quality health care to everyone; those without means to pay for health care, or to pay for a car to get to a clinic, should be treated with dignity and respect, and have equal access to medicine.

Remembering that all people are created equal also means that we must provide equal justice under law, and give everyone a fair trail. We must abandon the death penalty, because we have a shocking number of people on death row -- hugely disproportionately black and poor -- that have been shown innocent of their crimes thanks to advances in DNA testing. We must maintain the integrity of checks and balances in government, and support judicial oversight over search and seizure. We must avoid warrantless wiretapping because it subverts judicial oversight and corrupts our justice system by making the exercise of power secret. We must denounce torture, and refuse to employ it, because no human, being created equal, deserves to be treated in such a way -- and we have been applying it to innocent humans.

We owe the opportunity to grow up in a loving family, in a safe community, to every child. We must make sure that gangs no longer have the run of our streets, that drugs aren't displacing hard work as the currency of the community, and that adoption is inexpensive and practical for more families, rather than costing thousands of dollars. Doing so will help every child grow up knowing that they are valued, are important, rather than being unwanted and therefore abused or neglected.

Extending the hand of friendship and compassion to all starts with being a good example -- that shining city on a hill that Reagan talked about. We have to run an open, just, and fair society ourselves. We must not fear those that are different than us, just because they're different. We have to recognize that citizens of Iran, Russia, North Korea, Palestine, and the United States fundamentally are humans, created equal, seeking the same thing: a safe and secure future for themselves and their families. Being able to coexist peacefully means starting from that point, and being willing to talk to them, and yes, even their leaders, regardless of how distasteful they may be.

Acting responsibly with our resources starts at home -- things like not driving up credit card debt, not living outside our means. The same applies to government: massive deficits each year are exceptionally irresponsible and place us at great risk both at the present and in the future. We also have a duty to care for the planet and the environment in which we live, which means actively working to curb the things we do to harm the planet and cause global warming.

What about recognizing our faults? Perhaps the most patriotic duty asked of Americans is dissent. It is never easy, but is essential to keeping our democracy functioning. This country has a long history of successes, and also a long history of failures. We failed so many by keeping slavery legal for so long, and discrimination and lynching legal for even longer. We failed that Native Americans by forcing them from their lands and treating them with brutality. We have, to some extent, risen above these failures thanks to the ability to recognize them and try, to the best of our ability, to fix them. This is what the civil rights movement was about, and why we have a holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr. He spoke out against a society that said some couldn't eat in a restaurant because of the color of their skin, or who were repressed because of their economic status. He recognized that problem in America, and by speaking out against it, helped to change this country for the better.

Today we have to recognize the things we are doing wrong, and try to change them. We are torturing potentially innocent people. We are discriminating against Muslims and homosexuals in our midst. We are giving extraordinary power to big media companies through changes in copyright law, to big communications companies through failure to enact network neutrality laws. And we are labeling people that disagree with war as unpatriotic.

Notice some things I didn't mention, such as abortion. It's not really relevant, and the lines we are fed by both sides present us with this false pro choice vs. pro life debate. In reality, it seems to me that both sides want the best for the children: for every child to grow up in a loving family, where he or she is wanted. We all know from research that laws banning abortion do not actually reduce it. So we ought all to come together and try to make it more rare by providing more support to single parents, by making it easier to adopt children, by trying to make the perceived need for an abortion to go away.

So, in this election, I look at the candidates and it seems pretty clear which one is promoting traditional values and which one isn't. Obama is actively trying to reach across the aisle and find common ground. Even in his convention speech, he suggested ways to work together on abortion like I just mentioned. In the debate, he listened carefully to his opponent and acknowledged when he thought McCain was right. This is a necessary first step in working together to move forward. McCain subsequently released an ad mocking Obama for this.

What about caring for the poor? Again, Obama's tax policies, education policies, and health care policies take care of them far better than McCain's. About responsibility? McCain supported these deficit-busting budgets of the last 6 years, supported the oil-centric energy policies, and has been only lukewarm towards dealing with global warming. McCain and Palin mock Obama for trying to help poor Chicago neighborhoods 20 years ago, for being willing to just talk to our supposed enemies, for actually reaching across the aisle.

So yes, I am a values voter, and that's why I can't possibly do anything but vote for Obama.

A common way to debug a network server is to use 'telnet' or 'nc' to connect to the server and issue some commands in the protocol to verify whether everything is working correctly. That obviously only works for ASCII protocols (as opposed to binary protocols), and it obviously also only works if you're not using any encryption. But that doesn't mean you can't test an encrypted protocol in a similar way, thanks to openssl's s_client:

wouter@country:~$ openssl s_client -host samba.grep.be -port 443
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=0 /C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
verify error:num=18:self signed certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 /C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
verify return:1
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
   i:/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
---
Server certificate
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIDXDCCAsWgAwIBAgIJAITRhiXp+37JMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNV
BAYTAkJFMRAwDgYDVQQIEwdBbnR3ZXJwMREwDwYDVQQHEwhNZWNoZWxlbjEUMBIG
A1UEChMLTml4U3lzIEJWQkExFDASBgNVBAMTC3N2bi5ncmVwLmJlMR0wGwYJKoZI
hvcNAQkBFg53b3V0ZXJAZ3JlcC5iZTAeFw0wNTA1MjEwOTMwMDFaFw0xNTA1MTkw
OTMwMDFaMH0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAkJFMRAwDgYDVQQIEwdBbnR3ZXJwMREwDwYDVQQH
EwhNZWNoZWxlbjEUMBIGA1UEChMLTml4U3lzIEJWQkExFDASBgNVBAMTC3N2bi5n
cmVwLmJlMR0wGwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg53b3V0ZXJAZ3JlcC5iZTCBnzANBgkqhkiG
9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAsGTECq0VXyw09Zcg/OBijP1LALMh9InyU0Ebe2HH
NEQ605mfyjAENG8rKxrjOQyZzD25K5Oh56/F+clMNtKAfs6OuA2NygD1/y4w7Gcq
1kXhsM1MOIOBdtXAFi9s9i5ZATAgmDRIzuKZ6c2YJxJfyVbU+Pthr6L1SFftEdfb
L7MCAwEAAaOB4zCB4DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUtUK7aapBDaCoSFRWTf1wRauCmdowgbAG
A1UdIwSBqDCBpYAUtUK7aapBDaCoSFRWTf1wRauCmdqhgYGkfzB9MQswCQYDVQQG
EwJCRTEQMA4GA1UECBMHQW50d2VycDERMA8GA1UEBxMITWVjaGVsZW4xFDASBgNV
BAoTC05peFN5cyBCVkJBMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtzdm4uZ3JlcC5iZTEdMBsGCSqGSIb3
DQEJARYOd291dGVyQGdyZXAuYmWCCQCE0YYl6ft+yTAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MA0G
CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBADGkLc+CWWbfpBpY2+Pmknsz01CK8P5qCX3XBt4OtZLZ
NYKdrqleYq7r7H8PHJbTTiGOv9L56B84QPGwAzGxw/GzblrqR67iIo8e5reGbvXl
s1TFqKyvoXy9LJoGecMwjznAEulw9cYcFz+VuV5xnYPyJMLWk4Bo9WCVKGuAqVdw
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
subject=/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
issuer=/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=svn.grep.be/emailAddress=wouter@grep.be
---
No client certificate CA names sent
---
SSL handshake has read 1428 bytes and written 316 bytes
---
New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
Server public key is 1024 bit
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
SSL-Session:
    Protocol  : TLSv1
    Cipher    : DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
    Session-ID: 65E69139622D06B9D284AEDFBFC1969FE14E826FAD01FB45E51F1020B4CEA42C
    Session-ID-ctx: 
    Master-Key: 606553D558AF15491FEF6FD1A523E16D2E40A8A005A358DF9A756A21FC05DFAF2C9985ABE109DCD29DD5D77BE6BC5C4F
    Key-Arg   : None
    Start Time: 1222001082
    Timeout   : 300 (sec)
    Verify return code: 18 (self signed certificate)
---
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: svn.grep.be
User-Agent: openssl s_client
Connection: close
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:44:55 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_auth_kerb/5.3 DAV/2 SVN/1.4.2 PHP/5.2.0-8+etch11 mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8c
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
closed
wouter@country:~$ 

As you can see, we connect to an HTTPS server, get to see what the server's certificate looks like, issue some commands, and the server responds properly. It also works for (some) protocols who work in a STARTTLS kind of way:

wouter@country:~$ openssl s_client -host samba.grep.be -port 587 -starttls smtp
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=0 /C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
verify error:num=18:self signed certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 /C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
verify return:1
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
   i:/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
---
Server certificate
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
subject=/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
issuer=/C=BE/ST=Antwerp/L=Mechelen/O=NixSys BVBA/CN=samba.grep.be
---
No client certificate CA names sent
---
SSL handshake has read 1707 bytes and written 351 bytes
---
New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
Server public key is 1024 bit
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
SSL-Session:
    Protocol  : TLSv1
    Cipher    : DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
    Session-ID: 6D28368494A3879054143C7C6B926C9BDCDBA20F1E099BF4BA7E76FCF357FD55
    Session-ID-ctx: 
    Master-Key: B246EA50357EAA6C335B50B67AE8CE41635EBCA6EFF7EFCE082225C4EFF5CFBB2E50C07D8320E0EFCBFABDCDF8A9A851
    Key-Arg   : None
    Start Time: 1222000892
    Timeout   : 300 (sec)
    Verify return code: 18 (self signed certificate)
---
250 HELP
quit
221 samba.grep.be closing connection
closed
wouter@country:~$ 

OpenSSL here connects to the server, issues a proper EHLO command, does STARTTLS, and then gives me the same data as it did for the HTTPS connection. Isn't that nice.

Via Ars Technica, yet another social networking site, this time for academics with extensive support for classifying yourself down to the most microscopic of subfields. So far it seems a little less sterile than LinkedIn, which is probably a good thing. My profile is here, if you haven’t been blasted by an invite from me already.

Ok, this is really funny

Martin Kraft talking about swinegate asks:

Is the next thing we'll see tears on stage?

No we already did that. I'm sure the international press featured lots of discussion of the gender card at the time that I missed. Oh by the way did I mention we just bought a 40 inch high definition plasma tv? It's awesome. Anyway if you read Republican commentators such as here you would see that many of them think it isn't a good idea to dwell on this topic. If Obama says he didn't intend to attack Gov. Palin I for one believe him but he really didn't forsee his remarks would have this result? Really?

I wonder what would have happened if Obama had put lipstick on a pitbull would there be any less of this circus put up by the Republican monkeys? Are we back in Kindergarten? Mom! Mom! He hit me! . Is the next thing we ll see tears on stage? Or some sort of fake emotional outbreak? Anything goes in America, I say Both, Obama and McCain have used the lipstick analogy in the past (see previously linked article, and this AP writeup), so why are the Republican monkeys trying to nail him on sexism? They are (trying to) play the gender card (thanks to Erinn Clark for the link). Sexism surely is a word to grab attention, especially in the Excited States of America. By shifting attention to sexism, the Republican monkeys are not only stealing Obama s show and dragging the short-attention-span media (and populace) away from any Palin-related scandals, they are also covering up that they don t have anything else to say. Finally, sexism is an emotional topic, unlike the other political and policy crap the entertainment-hungry television crowd has to put up with, so hooray for excitement! I am disgusted by this American election circus. And I wish we d get about as much coverage of American news in these times as international news gets airtime on American TV. Even though I hope Obama wins for no other reason than that he s not in the same political camp as George W. International Terrorist and War Criminal Bush, I couldn t really care less and don t have any reason to believe that things will improve when the Democrats move back into the White House. And neither do lobbyists care who s sitting at the top. Idiots exist on every level and all over the globe. The rich will still pull the strings. The capitalist avalanche (euphemistically called the strive for democracy ) doesn t slow down. Other countries political monkeys have tasted totalitarianism and lost their senses, and no US government will get them back on track. And the media, who controls it all anyway, is just cashing in on the whole spectacle, which is why I have to continue to be subjected to it. Which brings us back to the rich I wouldn t be surprised to find the likes of Haliburton in the financial support list of the Republican monkeys. PS: I know and respect many American citizens, and I know most of them think like me. Nevertheless, I feel it necessary to point out that none of the above is an attack on those of you with a clue. I feel sympathy at the same time as I feel the rage expressed in the above, but this rage is solely with the political monkeys, the media, and merciless capitalists. None of those are US-specific, it just happens that you seem to have the most pronounced combinations. NP: Mogwai: Come On Die Young

I am still laughing of IdolHands comparison between Obama and McCain. Watching how people can make tech-fun out of absolutely anything is amazing Maybe I can put a similar comparison of Porto Alegre mayor election in the pt-BR section

It may come as no surprise to some of you that I actually enjoy -- yes, enjoy -- watching political conventions. I've spent some time watching them over the past two weeks.

McCain has yet to speak tonight as I write this, but I've got to get out a few comments.

First of all, both parties of course were attacking the presidential candidate of the other. But did you notice a key difference? The Democrats attacked McCain on policy, while the McCain people attacked Obama on biography. VP nominee Palin even went so far as to mock Obama's work 20 years ago as a community organizer. I think that is incredibly telling. It seems to me to indicate that the Republicans know that their policies aren't working, and are grasping at straws to find something else. There is plenty in McCain's biography that the Democrats could go after -- his involvement in one of the worst scandals in the Senate, for instance -- but they aren't.

What about the other difference? Hope vs. fear. Obama's speech last week was truly inspiring. I don't think I've ever been inspired by a politician before. Make no mistake about it, he set the bar for himself incredibly high. I don't think anybody since Kennedy has done that. Obama realizes that there are things we must do as a country, and he also emphasized that the "ask not what your country can do for you" theme. Watching Giulianni and Palin was an exercise in fear-mongering. It's a constant stream of "9/11 MUSLIM OIL SHORTAGE TERRORISM NUCLEAR BIN LADEN IRAN GAS PRICES RED ALERT PANIC PANIC PANIC MEXICANS 9/11 9/11 9/11 SCARY WAR WAR WAR." It's as if they have discovered M-x spook RET in Emacs.

The Democrats, on the other hand, are talking about reducing health care costs, making sure everyone is covered, ending war, making the economy better for working-class people. It's an interesting disconnect that Obama highlighted well: McCain has said that the American economy has done well over the past 8 years. And indeed, by some "traditional" measures, such as productivity or GDP, it has. But the vast majority of Americans are not better off today than they were 8 years ago. Obama argues that the way McCain measures economic success is way off; our economy is not doing well if the vast majority of regular Americans are not doing well.

Also telling was how both candidates promised to reach across party lines (Bush promised that too). One actually is working to do it. Take abortion, for example. Obama said that he doesn't agree with the pro-lifers, but surely everyone can agree that providing better funding and support for alternatives to abortion such that it becomes incredibly rare is a good thing. Where's McCain looking for common ground? And then, of course, we have Palin wanting her family to be off limits -- but only when it's convenient to her.

I've voted in the past, but usually as a vote against someone rather than a vote for someone. This year, I'll make a single vote and do both.

The McCain campaign made a great tactical move by choosing Sarah Palin. She appeals to all the constituencies where McCain was weak: women, Christians, Libertarians, small state residents, energy policy wonks, corruption fighters, capitalists, gun enthusiasts, and Tina Fey fetishists. Downsides? She is inexperienced in national affairs but I really don't think the average voter will care. After all many of them were willing to overlook a similar level of inexperience in Obama. And there is one minor possible ethics situation which again will only excite the true believers. When it turns out to be overblown it may actually rebound in Palins favor as an example of MSM manipulation. She can also take the change meme away from the Democrats though that was already on the rocks what with the FISA vote and the choice of Neil Kinnock as his VP nominee. No, the lacklustre convention in Denver clearly showed that far from being the post-ideological, audaciously hopeful candidate of the future, Barack Obama is merely John Kerry with rhythm. So what do the Dems have have left? The traditional Democratic themes of "We're not Bush" (that worked sooo well the last two times didn't it?) and "The Earth is about to explode in a fiery cataclysm." As the situation in Iraq improves, the economy climbs upwards from recession and petrol prices continue to come down its going to be harder to sustain the necessary level of gloom and doom. While Republicans shouldn't exhale just yet (and the title of this post is just a teensy bit hyperbolic,) things are looking pretty good for us at the moment.

A sure sign of the long road ahead of us to pull together in this election: Can’t we all just join forces? Technorati Tags: Obama, Biden, Facebook

Share This

Via Steve — this is nearly perfect. It is immensely satisfying to see a Democratic presidential candidate gracefully obliterate frivolous attacks rather than cower under them. Technorati Tags: Politics, Obama, Energy

Share This

Steven Levitt gave an interesting talk for TED about the economics of a crack-dealing gang [1]. He makes some interesting comparisons with the way that corporations work. Top 10 strangest terrorism patents [2]. Items 1 and 4 have been implemented many years ago, item 5 was probably implemented by the CIA decades ago (they did many similar things), item 7 will probably kill a significant portion of the passengers (bummer if it goes off accidentally), item 8 has the same problem but will only target nervous people (calm terrorists can do what they want), and the creator of item 9 doesn’t seem to have much idea about how much energy is contained by high explosive. Supporters of Barack Obama are adopting Hussein as their middle-name to support him and oppose some of the unreasonable claims from extremists [3]. I’m not planning to call myself Russell Hussein Coker. Chris Samuel summarises the latest CSIRO report about droughts caused by climate change [4]. He notes that most simulations are based on lower levels of CO2 than we are expecting… Interesting article in the Guardian about car use in the US [5]. It suggests that soon suburbs will be slums occupied by the poor an unemployed and inner city areas will experience a revival. Recently I’ve been putting the papers I’ve presented at conferences online on my documents blog (see this link for the “papers” category) [6]. The papers are almost unchanged from when I published them, I fixed up some broken URLs and made some notes on relevant things that have happened since publication but made no essential changes to the text. Linux.com article about Bonnie++ [7]. It’s well written and covers most of the features quite well. An unfortunate omission is the fact that if you want to run Bonnie++ from the root account you can specify “-u user” on the command-line to run the test as a different user, or you can use “-u root” if you REALLY want to run it as root. A Linux.com article with the source code for a Perl script to create charts from Bonnie++ results [8]. I had always planned that other people would write programs like this, I’m glad to see someone finally publish the source to one!

• [1] http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/29


• [2] http://www.neatorama.com/2008/06/27/top-10-strangest-anti-terrorism-patents/


• [3] http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html


• [4] http://www.csamuel.org/2008/07/06/csiro-bom-report-drought-exceptional-circumstances-not


• [5] http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jul/06/travelandtransport.usa?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront


• [6] http://doc.coker.com.au/category/papers/


• [7] http://www.linux.com/feature/139742


• [8] http://www.linux.com/feature/139743

Share This

Dear CNN,

The US presidential election race between senators McCain and Obama is not a "battleground". Battlegrounds are where people get killed. Using the same words for what passes as democracy in this country as for the military massacres in foreign countries is incredibly sad and disgusting.

That, and it's only vaguely less stupid than Toronto's "War on Fire".

I think that for the first time, when I go to vote this November, I will probably not have to hold my nose as I make a selection for president. I don't agree with Obama on everything, of course, but the core of what he stands for -- that it is time to enter a post-racial, post-partisan time -- and that putting the interests of the people before those of the corporation -- is a powerful message.

And I'm not the only one that thinks so. One interesting read is Why This 55-Year-Old White Lifelong Republican Wants Obama To Win by Frank Schaeffer. He's a pro-life, pro-military Republican that actually campaigned for McCain in 2000, and this year he's supporting Obama. He pointed out another key point: Obama does not play on our fears.

Then there's A Transformational Moment by Jim Wallis, who grew up in a time when white people that supported civil rights were literally putting their lives on the line. He ends with:

This morning I heard several interviews on NPR with black Americans about their response to Obama's nomination. One older woman said, "A black man running for president, did you hear what just I said? A black man running for president of the United States ...." She just kept repeating the words, and succinctly captured my own personal feelings.

Yes, it is truly historic, and the U.K. newspaper headlines captured that sentiment as did papers around the world. Nothing could change the image of America around the world more than this. But it is more than historic; it is very personal for many of my generation. A new generation just sees this as natural -- he's an inspirational leader who happens to be black, which matters little to them. But for my generation -- I'm dating myself now -- this is a transformational moment, one we didn't think would come in our lifetimes. Race was the issue that changed us, shaped us, determined our path, and even defined the meaning of our faith. Now a black man is running for president of the United States. Amazing grace.

Tom Hayden reflects on the similarities between Obama and RFK, another interesting read. He concludes with:

Those who denounce Obama -- and the possibilities of all electoral politics- - should ponder the effectiveness of sitting judgmentally on the sidelines while an Unexpected Future arrives through the sheer will of a new generation. They should consider whether politics and history can be reduced to a fixed determinism that is endlessly repeated, as if there are no surprises. We can have our differences with Obama's specific policies, as I certainly do, but those should be measured against the prospect that a movement might transform him even as his very rise continues to transform the rest of us.

And now for something less inspiring. If you go look over at the latest blog entry at hillaryclinton.com and read the comments, these readers frankly sound more than a little loony. There are rampant accusations that Obama "stole the election" with the help of the DNC. That makes no sense to me; he followed the rules, and the DNC gave Clinton more delegates than she should have had with the rules as they were at the start of the game (which she supported then). The Obama campaign even rejected a plan that was less favorable to Clinton at the DNC rules committee meeting on Saturday. They also go on and on about how Obama has had so many scandals (though the Clinton real estate scandals really are far more serious than a former pastor). It all looks so very petty, and I wonder why Clinton has whipped up her supporters to such a fervent extent. Perhaps it was an accident, but you'd think things like this are rarely an accident with her.

At first I thought this was all I'd get to see. But after baking in the sun in line for a few hours, I got in. (Thanks, Nic!) Like that little blue car, my little camera might be outclassed, but it did its plucky best, and I have some pictures of the event.

So Obama will be (sorta) kicking off the general election campaign in Bristol VA, right down the road from JR's produce and just over the state line from me in Bristol TN. Why here? It's an interesting, quirky choice. They seem to have put this town hall togther at the last minute, renting VA high's gym only yesterday. The small number of tickets went fast (gone at 10 am this morning), so I didn't hear in time to get one, or even get on the waiting list. I'll try to get up early enough to see the circus outside tomorrow morning.

Ars has an article Previewing McCain and Obama on geek issues that is a thoroughly good read. I find myself agreeing with Obama on everything from net neutrality to privacy rights. I find it interesting that Republicans like to run as advocates of individual liberties but are the ones pushing laws that restrict them the most.

One gripe though: these are issues that are important to everyone. To call them "geek" issues implies that they are only of interest to some, and thus cheapens them. Ars ought to have a better title for their article.