Colson Whitehead's latest novel, Harlem Shuffle, was always going to be widely reviewed, if only because his last two books won Pulitzer prizes. Still, after enjoying both The Underground Railroad and The Nickel Boys, I was certainly going to read his next book, regardless of what the critics were saying indeed, it was actually quite agreeable to float above the manufactured energy of the book's launch.
Saying that, I was encouraged to listen to an interview with the author by Ezra Klein. Now I had heard Whitehead speak once before when he accepted the Orwell Prize in 2020, and once again he came across as a pretty down-to-earth guy. Or if I were to emulate the detached and cynical tone Whitehead embodied in The Nickel Boys, after winning so many literary prizes in the past few years, he has clearly rehearsed how to respond to the cliched questions authors must be asked in every interview. With the obligatory throat-clearing of 'so, how did you get into writing?', for instance, Whitehead replies with his part of the catechism that 'It seemed like being a writer could be a cool job. You could work from home and not talk to people.' The response is the right combination of cute and self-effacing... and with its slight tone-deafness towards enforced isolation, it was no doubt honed before Covid-19.
Harlem Shuffle tells three separate stories about Ray Carney, a furniture salesman and 'fence' for stolen goods in New York in the 1960s. Carney doesn't consider himself a genuine criminal though, and there's a certain logic to his relativistic morality. After all, everyone in New York City is on the take in some way, and if some 'lightly used items' in Carney's shop happened to have had 'previous owners', well, that's not quite his problem. 'Nothing solid in the city but the bedrock,' as one character dryly observes. Yet as Ezra pounces on in his NYT interview mentioned abov, the focus on the Harlem underworld means there are very few women in the book, and Whitehead's circular response ah well, it's a book about the criminals at that time! was a little unsatisfying. Not only did it feel uncharacteristically slippery of someone justly lauded for his unflinching power of observation (after all, it was the author who decided what to write about in the first place), it foreclosed on the opportunity to delve into why the heist and caper genres (from The Killing, The Feather Thief, Ocean's 11, etc.) have historically been a 'male' mode of storytelling.
Perhaps knowing this to be the case, the conversation quickly steered towards Ray Carney's wife, Elizabeth, the only woman in the book who could be said possesses some plausible interiority. The following off-hand remark from Whitehead caught my attention:
My wife is convinced that [Elizabeth] knows everything about Carney's criminal life, and is sort of giving him a pass. And I'm not sure if that's true. I have to have to figure out exactly what she knows and when she knows it and how she feels about it.
I was quite taken by this, although not simply due to its effect on the story it self. As in, it immediately conjured up a charming picture of Whitehead's domestic arrangements: not only does Whitehead's wife feel free to disagree with what one of Whitehead's 'own' characters knows or believes, but that Colson has no problem whatsoever sharing that disagreement with the public at large. (It feels somehow natural that Whitehead's wife believes her counterpart knows more than she lets on, whilst Whitehead himself imbues the protagonist's wife with a kind of neo-Victorian innocence.) I'm minded to agree with Whitehead's partner myself, if only due to the passages where Elizabeth is studiously ignoring Carney's otherwise unexplained freak-outs.
But all of these meta-thoughts simply underline just how emancipatory the Death of the Author can be. This product of academic literary criticism (the term was coined by Roland Barthes' 1967 essay of the same name) holds that the original author's intentions, ideas or biographical background carry no especial weight in determining how others should interpret their work. It is usually understood as meaning that a writer's own views are no more valid or 'correct' than the views held by someone else. (As an aside, I've found that most readers who encounter this concept for the first time have been reading books in this way since they were young. But the opposite is invariably true with cinephiles, who often have a bizarre obsession with researching or deciphering the 'true' interpretation of a film.) And with all that in mind, can you think of a more wry example of how freeing (and fun) nature of the Death of the Author than an author's own partner dissenting with their (Pulitzer Prize-winning) husband on the position of a lynchpin character?
The 1964 Harlem riot began after James Powell, a 15-year-old African American, was shot and killed by Thomas Gilligan, an NYPD police officer in front of 10s of witnesses. Gilligan was subsequently cleared by a grand jury.
As it turns out, the reviews for Harlem Shuffle have been almost universally positive, and after reading it in the two days after its release, I would certainly agree it is an above-average book. But it didn't quite take hold of me in the way that The Underground Railroad or The Nickel Boys did, especially the later chapters of The Nickel Boys that were set in contemporary New York and could thus make some (admittedly fairly explicit) connections from the 1960s to the present day that kind of connection is not there in Harlem Shuffle, or at least I did not pick up on it during my reading.
I can see why one might take exception to that, though. For instance, it is certainly true that the week-long Harlem Riot forms a significant part of the plot, and some events in particular are entirely contingent on the ramifications of this momentous event. But it's difficult to argue the riot's impact are truly integral to the story, so not only is this uprising against police brutality almost regarded as a background event, any contemporary allusion to the murder of George Floyd is subsequently watered down. It's nowhere near the historical rubbernecking of Forrest Gump (1994), of course, but that's not a battle you should ever be fighting.
Indeed, whilst a certain smoothness of affect is to be priced into the Whitehead reading experience, my initial overall reaction to Harlem Shuffle was fairly flat, despite all the action and intrigue on the page. The book perhaps belies its origins as a work conceived during quarantine after all, the book is essentially comprised of three loosely connected novellas, almost as if the unreality and mental turbulence of lockdown prevented the author from performing the psychological 'deep work' of producing a novel-length text with his usual depth of craft. A few other elements chimed with this being a 'lockdown novel' as well, particularly the book's preoccupation with the sheer physicality of the city compared to the usual complex interplay between its architecture and its inhabitants. This felt like it had been directly absorbed into the book from the author walking around his deserted city, and thus being able to take in details for the first time:
The doorways were entrances into different cities no, different entrances into one vast, secret city. Ever close, adjacent to all you know, just underneath. If you know where to look.
And I can't fail to mention that you can almost touch Whitehead's sublimated hunger to eat out again as well:
Stickups were chops they cook fast and hot, you re in and out. A stakeout was ribs fire down low, slow, taking your time.
[ ]
Sometimes when Carney jumped into the Hudson when he was a kid, some of that stuff got into his mouth. The Big Apple Diner served it up and called it coffee.
More seriously, however, the relatively thin personalities of minor characters then reminded me of the simulacrum of Zoom-based relationships, and the essentially unsatisfactory endings to the novellas felt reminiscent of lockdown pseudo-events that simply fizzle out without a bang. One of the stories ties up loose ends with: 'These things were usually enough to terminate a mob war, and they appeared to end the hostilities in this case as well.' They did? Well, okay, I guess.
The corner of 125th Street and Morningside Avenue in 2019, the purported location of Carney's fictional furniture store. Signage plays a prominent role in Harlem Shuffle, possibly due to the author's quarantine walks.
Still, it would be unfair to characterise myself as 'disappointed' with the novel, and none of this piece should be taken as really deep criticism. The book certainly was entertaining enough, and pretty funny in places as well:
Carney didn t have an etiquette book in front of him, but he was sure it was bad manners to sit on a man s safe.
[ ]
The manager of the laundromat was a scrawny man in a saggy undershirt painted with sweat stains. Launderer, heal thyself.
Yet I can't shake the feeling that every book you write is a book that you don't, and so we might need to hold out a little longer for Whitehead's 'George Floyd novel'. (Although it is for others to say how much of this sentiment is the expectations of a White Reader for The Black Author to ventriloquise the pain of 'their' community.)
Some room for personal critique is surely permitted. I dearly missed the junk food energy of the dry and acerbic observations that run through Whitehead's previous work. At one point he had a good line on the model tokenisation that lurks behind 'The First Negro to...' labels, but the callbacks to this idea ceased without any payoff. Similar things happened with the not-so-subtle critiques of the American Dream:
Entrepreneur? Pepper said the last part like manure. That s just a
hustler who pays taxes.
[ ]
One thing I ve learned in my job is that life is cheap, and when things start getting expensive, it gets cheaper still.
Ultimately, though, I think I just wanted more. I wanted a deeper exploration of how the real power in New York is not wielded by individual street hoodlums or even the cops but in the form of real estate, essentially serving as a synecdoche for Capital as a whole. (A recent take of this can be felt in Jed Rothstein's 2021 documentary, WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn and it is perhaps pertinent to remember that the US President at the time this novel was written was affecting to be a real estate tycoon.). Indeed, just like the concluding scenes of J. J. Connolly's Layer Cake, although you can certainly pull off a cool heist against the Man, power ultimately resides in those who control the means of production... and a homespun furniture salesman on the corner of 125 & Morningside just ain't that. There are some nods to kind of analysis in the conclusion of the final story ('Their heist unwound as if it had never happened, and Van Wyck kept throwing up buildings.'), but, again, I would have simply liked more.
And when I attempted then file this book away into the broader media landscape, given the current cultural visibility of 1960s pop culture (e.g. One Night in Miami (2020), Judas and the Black Messiah (2021), Summer of Soul (2021), etc.), Harlem Shuffle also seemed like a missed opportunity to critically analyse our (highly-qualified) longing for the civil rights era. I can certainly understand why we might look fondly on the cultural products from a period when politics was less alienated, when society was less atomised, and when it was still possible to imagine meaningful change, but in this dimension at least, Harlem Shuffle seems to merely contribute to this nostalgic escapism.
This is the fifth and final post in a series about the interface description language Candid.
If you made it this far, you now have a good understanding of what Candid is, what it is for and how it is used. For this final post, I ll put the spotlight on specific aspects of Candid that are maybe surprising, or odd, or quirky. This section will be quite opinionated, and could maybe be called what I d do differently if I d re-do the whole thing .
Note that these quirks are not serious problems, and they don t invalidate the overall design. I am writing this up not to discourage the use of Candid, but merely help interested parties to understand it better.
References in the wire format
When the work on Candid began at DFINITY, the Internet Computer was still far away from being a thing, and many fundamental aspects about it were still in the air. I particular, there was still talk about embracing capabilities as a core feature of the application model, which would be implemented as opaque references on the system level, likely building on WebAssembly s host reference type proposal (which only landed recently), and could be used to model access permissions, custom tokens and many other things.
So Candid is designed with that in mind, and you ll find that its wire format is not just a type table and a value table, but actually
a triple (T, M, R), where T ( type ) and M ( memory ) are sequences of bytes and R ( references ) is a sequence of references.
Also the wire format for values of function service tyeps have an extra byte to distinguish between public references (represented by a principal and possible a method name in the data part), and these opaque references.
Alas, references never made it into the Internet Computer, so all Candid implementations simply ignore that part of the specification. But it s still in the spec, and if it confused you before, now you know why.
Hashed field names
Candid record and variant types look like they have textual field names:
type T = record syndactyle : nat; trustbuster: bool
But that is actually only true superficially. The wire format for Candid only stores hashes of field names. So the above is actually equivalent to
type T = record 4260381820 : nat; 3504418361 : bool
or, for that matter, to
type T = record destroys : bool; rectum : nat
(Yes, I used an english word list to find these hash collisions. There aren t that many actually.)
The benefit of such hashing is that the messages are a bit smaller in most (not all) cases, but it is a big annoyance for dynamic uses of Candid. It s the reason why tools like dfx, if they don t know the Candid interface of a service, will print the result with just the numerical hash, letting you guess which field is which.
It also complicates host languages that derive Candid types from the host language, like Motoko, as some records (e.g. record trustbuster: bool; destroys : int ) with field name hash collisions can not be represented in Candid, and either the host language s type system needs to be Candid aware now (as is the case of Motoko), or serialization/deserialization will fail at runtime, or odd bugs can happen.
(More discussion of this issue).
Tuples
Many languages have a built-in notion of a tuple type (e.g. (Int, Bool)), but Candid does not have such a type. The only first class product type is records.
This means that tuples have to encoded as records somehow. Conveniently(?) record fields are just numbers after all, so the type (Int, Bool) would be mapped to the type
record 0 : int; 1 : bool
So tuples can be expressed. But from my experience implementing the type mappings for Motoko and Haskell this is causing headaches. To get a good experience when importing from Candid, the tools have to try to reconstruct which records may have been tuples originally, and turn them into tuples.
The main argument for the status quo is that Candid types should be canonical, and there should not be more than one product type, and records are fine, and there needs to be no anonymous product type. But that has never quite resonated with me, given the practical reality of tuple types in many host languages.
Argument sequences
Did I say that Candid does not have tuple types? Turns out it does, sort of. There is no first class anonymous product, but since functions take sequences of arguments and results, there is a tuple type right there:
func foo : (bool, int) -> (int, bool)
Again, I found that ergonomic interaction with host languages becomes relatively unwieldy by requiring functions to take and return sequences of values. This is especially true for languages where functions take one argument value or return one result type (the latter being very common). Here, return sequences of length one are turned into that type directly, longer argument sequences turn into the host language s tuple type, and nullary argument sequences turn into the idiomatic unit type. But this means that the types (int, bool) -> () and (record 0: int, 1: bool ) -> () may be mapped to the same host language type, which causes problems when you hope to encode all necessary Candid type information in the host language.
Another oddity with argument and result sequences is that you can give names to the entries, e.g. write
without breaking clients, this does not have the effect you think it has and will likely break.
My suggestion is to never put names on function arguments and result values in Candid interfaces, and for anything that might be extended with new fields or where you want to name the arguments, use a single record type as the only argument:
This allows you to add and remove arguments more easily and reliably.
Type shorthands
The Candid specification defines a system of types, and then adds a number of syntactic short-hands . For example, if you write blob in a Candid type description, it ought to means the same as vec nat8.
My qualm with that is that it doesn t always mean the same. A Candid type description is interpreted by a number of, say, consumers . Two such consumers are part of the Candid specification:
The specification that defines the wire format for that type
The upgrading (subtyping) rules
But there are more! For every host language, there is some mapping from Candid types to host language types, and also generic tools like Candid UI are consumers of the type algebra. If these were to take the Candid specification as gospel, they would be forced to treat blob and vec nat8 the same, but that would be quite unergonomic and might cause performance regressions (most language try to map blob to some compact binary data type, while vec t tends to turn into some form of array structure).
So they need to be pragmatic and treat blob and vec nat8 differently. But then, for all practical purposes, blob is not just a short-hand of vec nat8. They are different types that just happens to have the same wire representations and subtyping relations.
This affects not just blob, but also tuples (record blob; int; bool ) and field names , as discussed above.
The value text format
For a while after defining Candid, the only implementation was in Motoko, and all the plumbing was automatic, so there was never a need for users to to explicitly handle Candid values, as all values were Motoko values. Still, for debugging and testing and such things, we eventually needed a way to print out Candid values, so the text format was defined ( To enable convenient debugging, the following grammar specifies a text format for values ).
But soon the dfx tool learned to talk to canisters, and now users needed to enter Candid value on the command line, possibly even when talking to canisters for which the interface was not known to dfx. And, sure enough, the textual interface defined in the Candid spec was used.
Unfortunately, since it was not designed for that use case, it is rather unwieldy:
It is quite verbose. You have to write record , not just . Vectors are written vec ; instead of some conventional syntax like [ , ]. Variants are written as variant error = " " with braces that don t any value here, and something like #error " " might have worked as well.
With a bit more care, a more concise and ergonomic syntax might have been possible.
It wasn t designed to be sufficient to create a Candid value from it. If you write 5 it s unclear whether that s a nat or an int16 or what (and all of these have different wire representations). Type annotations were later added, but are relatively unwieldy, and don t cover all cases (e.g. a service reference with a recursive type cannot be represented in the textual format at the moment).
Not really the fault of the textual format, but some useful information about the types is not reflected in the type description that s part of the wire format. In particular not the field names, and whether a value was intended to be binary data (blob) or a list of small numbers (vec nat8), so pretty-printing such values requires guesswork. The Haskell library even tries to brute-force the hash to guess the field name, if it is short or in a english word list!
In hindsight I think it was too optimistic to assume that correct static type information is always available, and instead of actively trying to discourage dynamic use, Candid might be better if we had taken these (unavoidable?) use cases into account.
Custom wire format
At the beginning of this post, I have a Candid is list. The list is relatively long, and the actual wire format is just one bullet point. Yes, defining a wire format that works isn t rocket science, and it was easiest to just make one up. But since most of the interesting meat of Candid is in other aspects (subtyping rules, host language integration), I wonder if it would have been better to use an existing, generic wire format, such as CBOR, and build Candid as a layer on top.
This would give us plenty of tools and libraries to begin with. And maybe it would have reduced barrier of entry for developers, which now led to the very strange situation that DFINITY advocates for the universal use of Candid on the Internet Computer, so that all services can smoothly interact, but two of the most important services on the Internet Computer (the registry and the ledger) use Protobuf as their primary interface format, with Candid interfaces missing or an afterthought.
Sideways Interface Evolution
This is not a quirk of Candid itself, but rather an idiom of how you can use Candid that emerged from our solution for record extensions and upgrades.
Consider our example from before, a service with interface
service add_user : (record login : text; name : text ) -> ()
where you want to add an age field, which should be a number.
The official way of doing that is to add that field with an optional type:
service add_user : (record login : text; name : text; age : opt nat ) -> ()
As explained above, this will not break old clients, as the decoder will treat a missing argument as null. So far so good.
But often when adding such a field you don t want to bother new clients with the fact that this age was, at some point in the past, not there yet. And you can do that! The trick is to distinguish between the interface you publish and the interface you implement. You can (for example in your documentation) state that the interface is
service add_user : (record login : text; name : text; age : nat ) -> ()
which is not a subtype of the old type, but it is the interface you want new clients to work with. And then your implementation uses the type with opt nat. Calls from old clients will come through as null, and calls from new clients will come through as opt 42.
We can see this idiom used in the Management Canister of the Internet Computer. The current documented interface only mentions a controllers : vec principal field in the settings, but the implementation still can handle both the old controller : principal and the new controllers field.
It s probably advisable to let your CI system check that new versions of your service continue to implement all published interfaces, including past interfaces. But as long as the actual implementation s interface is a subtype of all interfaces ever published, this works fine.
This pattern is related to when your service implements, say, http_request (so its implemented interface is a subtype of that common interface), but does not include that method in the published documentation (because clients of your service don t need to call it).
Self-describing Services
As you have noticed, Candid was very much designed assuming that all parties always have the service type of services they want to interact with. But the Candid specification does not define how one can obtain the interface of a given service, and there isn t really a an official way to do that on the Internet Computer.
That is unfortunate, because many interesting features depend on that: Such as writing import C "ic:7e6iv-biaaa-aaaaf-aaada-cai" in your Motoko program, and having it s type right there. Or tools like ic.rocks, that allow you to interact with any canister right there.
One reason why we don t really have that feature yet is because of disagreements about how dynamic that feature should be. Should you be able to just ask the canister for its interface (and allow the canister to vary the response, for example if it can change its functionality over time, even without changing the actual wasm code)? Or is the interface a static property of the code, and one should be able to query the system for that data, without the canister s active involvement. Or, completely different, should interfaces be distributed out of band, maybe together with API documentation, or in some canister registry somewhere else?
I always leaned towards the first of these options, but not convincingly enough. The second options requires system assistance, so more components to change, more teams to be involved that maybe intrinsically don t care a lot about this feature. And the third might have emerged as the community matures and builds such infrastructure, but that did not happen yet.
In the end I sneaked in an implementation of the first into Motoko, arguing that even if we don t know yet how this feature will be implemented eventually, we all want the feature to exist somehow, and we really really want to unblock all the interesting applications it enables (e.g. Candid UI). That s why every Motoko canister, and some rust canisters too, implements a method
__get_candid_interface_tmp_hack : () -> (text)
that one can use to get the Candid interface file.
The name was chosen to signal that this may not be the final interface, but like all good provisional solutions, it may last longer than intended. If that s the case, I m not sorry.
This concludes my blog post series about Candid, for now. If you want to know more, feel free to post your question on the DFINTY developer forum, and I ll probably answer.
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC) has support for user-supplied rewrite rules,
which applied during one of the compiler optimisation stages. An example rule is
-# RULES
"streamFilter fuse" forall f g xs.
streamFilter f (streamFilter g xs) = streamFilter (f.g) xs
#-
I spent some time today looking at these more closely.
In order for rewrite rules to be applied, optimisation needs to be enabled. This
conflicts with interactive use of GHC, so you can't explore these things in GHCi.
I think rewrite rules are enabled by default (with optimisation), but you can ask
for them explicitly. When investigating these it's also useful to ask ghc to
always recompile, otherwise you have to change the source or manually remove .hi
or .o files (etc.) between invocations.
A starting set of command-line options to use then, are
-O -fenable-rewrite-rules -fforce-recomp
GHC runs several compilation stages, and the source program is transformed into
several different languages or language dialects as it goes. Before the phase
where rewrite rules are applied, some other optimisations take place, and the
source gets desugared. You can see the results of the desugaring by passing the
argument -ddump-ds. Here's an example program
main = print (unStream (streamFilter (>3) (streamFilter (<10)
(mkStream [0..20]))))
And here's what it looks like after the first pass optimisation and desugaring:
(Note: I used -dsuppress-all and -dsuppress-uniques to improve the clarity
of the above output. See Suppressing unwanted
information for further details).
Those short-hand sections ((<3)) in the input program are expanded to
something quite a lot longer. Out of curiosity I tried it again with plain
lambdas, not sections, and the result was smaller
main
= print
($fShow[] $fShowInteger)
(unStream
(streamFilter
(\ x -> > $fOrdInteger x 3)
(streamFilter
(\ x -> < $fOrdInteger x 10)
(mkStream (enumFromTo $fEnumInteger 0 20)))))
Rewrite rules happen after this. Once they're done (and several other passes),
the program is translated into an intermediate representation called Tiny
Core. This language
faintly resembles the input Haskell. GHC will output the Tiny Core program
if you supply the argument -ddump-simpl. Here's (most) of the program in Tiny
Core (I've substituted some constants for clarity):
main = hPutStr' stdout main1 True
main1 = $fShowInteger_$cshowList (catMaybes1 (main_go 0)) []
main_go
= \ x ->
case gtInteger# x 20 of
DEFAULT ->
case ltInteger# x 10 of
DEFAULT -> main_go (plusInteger x 1);
1# ->
case gtInteger# x 3 of
DEFAULT -> main_go (plusInteger x 1);
1# -> : (Just x) (main_go (plusInteger x 1))
;
1# -> []
After Tiny Core, GHC continues to translate the program into other forms
(including STG, CMM, ASM) and you can ask GHC to dump those representations too,
but this is all downstream from the rewrites so not relevant to them.
The rewrite rule at the top of this blog post is never applied: It doesn't get
a chance, because the function it operates on (streamFilter) is inlined by
GHC. GHC can detect this in some circumstances (-Winline-rule-shadowing). You
instruct GHC to report on which rules fired with -ddump-rule-firings and can
see before-and-after snippets of Tiny Core for each rule applied with
-ddump-rule-rewrites.
I played around with adding -# NOINLINE functionName #- pragmas to disable
inlining various functions to try and provoke a situation where the above rule
could match, but it was a losing battle: GHC's built-in optimisations are just
too good. But, it's also moot: the outcome I want (the filters to be fused) is
happening, it's just the built-in rewrite rules are achieving it,
once striot's functions
have been inlined away.
This is the forth post in a series about the interface description language Candid.
Now for something completely different: How does Candid interact with the various host languages, i.e. the actual programming languages that you write your services and clients in?
There are two facets to that question:
How is the Candid interface represented inside the language?
Some languages with rich type systems can express all relevant information about a Candid method or service within its own type system, and then the concrete serialization/deserialization code can be derived from that type (e.g. using type classes in Haskell, Traits in Rust, or built into the compiler in Motoko).
Other languages have a less rich type system (e.g. C), no type-driven generic programming or are simply dynamically typed. In these cases, the Candid type has to be either transformed into specific code for that service by some external tool (e.g. JavaScript and TypeScript) or the Candid description has to be parsed and interpreted at runtime.
Either approach will give rise to a type mapping between the Candid types and the host language types. Developers will likely have to know which types correspond to which, which is why the Candid manual s section on types explicitly lists that.
How is the Candid interface description produced and consumed?
This is maybe the even more important question; what comes first: The code written in the host language, or the Candid description. There are multiple ways to tackle this, all of which have their merits, so I let s look at some typical approaches.
Generating candid from the host language
In many case you don t care too much about the interface of your service, and you just want to write the functionality, and get the interface definition for free. This is what you get when you write Motoko services, where the compiler calculates the Candid interface based on the Motoko types of your actor methods, and the build tool (dfx) puts that Candid file where it needs to go. You can thus develop services without ever writing or even looking at Candid type definitions.
The Candid library for Rust supports that mode as well, although you have to add some macros to your program to use it.
A downside of this model is that you have only indirect control over the generated Candid. Since it is type-driven, whenever there is more than one sensible Candid type for a given host language type, the translation tool has to make a choice, and if that does not suit you, that can be a problem.
In the case of Motoko we were able to co-design it with Candid, and their type systems are similar enough that this works well in practice. We have a specification of Candid-Motoko-type-mappings, and the type export from from Motoko to Candid is almost surjective. (Almost, because of Candid s float32 type, which Motoko simply does not have, and because of service types with methods names that are not valid Motoko identifiers.)
Checking host language against Candid
The above works well when you (as the service developer) get to define the service s interface as you go. But sometimes you want to develop a service that adheres to a given Candid interface. For example, in order to respond to HTTP requests in an Internet Computer service, you should provide a method http_request that implements this interface (simplified):
type HeaderField = record text; text; ;
type HttpRequest = record
method: text;
url: text;
headers: vec HeaderField;
body: blob;
;
type HttpResponse = record
status_code: nat16;
headers: vec HeaderField;
body: blob;
;
service :
http_request: (request: HttpRequest) -> (HttpResponse) query;
Here, a suitable mode of operation is to generate the Candid description of the service that you built, and then compare it against this expected interface with a tool that implements the Candid subtyping relation. This would then complain if what you wrote was not compatible with the above interface. The didc check tool that comes with the Rust library can do that. If your service has to implement multiple such pre-defined interfaces, its actual interface will end up being a subtype of each of these interfaces.
Importing Candid
If you already have a Candid file, in particular if you are writing a client that wants to talk to an existing service, you can also import that Candid file into your language. This is a very common mode of operation for such interface descriptions languages (e.g. Protobuf). The details depend a lot on the host language, though:
In Motoko, you can import typed actor references: Just write import C "canister:foo" where foo is the name of another canister in your project, and your build tool (dfx) will pass the Candid interface of foo to the Motoko compiler, which then translates that Candid service type into a Motoko actor type for you to use.
The mapping from Candid types to Motoko types is specified in IDL-Motoko.md as well, via the function i( ).
The vision was always that you can import a reference to any canister on the Internet Computer this way (import C "ic:7e6iv-biaaa-aaaaf-aaada-cai"), and the build tool would fetch the interface automatically, but that has not been implemented yet, partly because of disagreement about how canisters expose their interface (see below). The Motoko compiler is ready, though, as described in its build tool interface specification.
What is still missing in Motoko is a way to import a Candid type alone (without a concrete canister reference), to use the types somewhere (in function arguments, or to assert the type of the full canister).
The Rust library does not support importing Candid, as far as I know. If you write a service client in Rust, you have to know which Rust types map to the right Candid types, and manually get that right.
For JavaScript and TypeScript, the didc tool that comes with the Rust library can take a Candid file and produce JS resp. TS code that gives you an object representing the service with properly typed methods that you can easily interact with.
With the Haskell Candid library you can import Candid inline or from a file, and it uses metaprogramming (Template Haskell) to generate suitable Haskell types for you, which you can encode/decode at. This is for example used in the test suite of the Internet Identity, which executes that service in a simulated Internet Computer environment.
Generic and dynamic use
Finally, it s worth mentioning that Candid can be used generically and dynamically:
Since Canisters can indicate their interface, a website like ic.rocks that enumerates Canisters can read that interface, and provide a fully automatically generated UI for them. For example, you can not only see the Candid interface of the Internet Identity canister at https://ic.rocks/principal/rdmx6-jaaaa-aaaaa-aaadq-cai, but actually interact with it!
Similarly, during development of a service, it is very useful to be able to interact with it before you have written your actual front-end. The Candid UI tool provides that functionality, and can be used during local development or on-chain. It is also integrated into the Internet Computer playground.
Command line tools like dfx allow you to make calls to services, even without having their actual Candid interface description around. However, such dynamic use was never part of the original design of Candid, so it is a bit rough around the edges the textual format is a bit unwieldy, you need to get the types right, and field name in the responses may be missing.
Do you want to know why field names are missing then? Then check out the next and final post of this series, where I discuss a number of Candid s quirks.
Cisco pyATS is a framework for network automation and testing. It
includes, among other things, an open-source multi-vendor set of
parsers and models, Genie Parser. It features 2700 parsers for
various commands over many network OS. On the paper, this seems a
great tool!
>>> fromgenie.conf.baseimportDevice>>> device=Device("router",os="iosxr")>>> # Hack to parse outputs without connecting to a device>>> device.custom.setdefault("abstraction", )["order"]=["os","platform"]>>> cmd="show route ipv4 unicast">>> output="""... Tue Oct 29 21:29:10.924 UTC...... O 10.13.110.0/24 [110/2] via 10.12.110.1, 5d23h, GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.110... """>>> device.parse(cmd,output=output) 'vrf': 'default': 'address_family': 'ipv4': 'routes': '10.13.110.0/24': 'route': '10.13.110.0/24', 'active': True, 'route_preference': 110, 'metric': 2, 'source_protocol': 'ospf', 'source_protocol_codes': 'O', 'next_hop': 'next_hop_list': 1: 'index': 1, 'next_hop': '10.12.110.1', 'outgoing_interface': 'GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.110', 'updated': '5d23h'
First deception: pyATS is closed-source with some exceptions. This
is quite annoying if you run into some issues outside Genie Parser.
For example, although pyATS is using the ssh command, it cannot
leverage my ssh_config file: pyATSresolves hostnames before
providing them to ssh. There is no plan to open source
pyATS.
Then, Genie Parser has two problems:
The data models used are dependent on the vendor and OS,
despite the documentation saying otherwise. For
example, the data model used for IPv4 interfaces is different
between NX-OS and IOS-XR.
The parsers rely on line-by-line regular expressions to extract
data and some Python code as glue. This is fragile and may break
silently.
To illustrate the second point, let s assume the output of show ipv4
vrf all interface is:
Loopback10 is Up, ipv4 protocol is Up
Vrf is default (vrfid 0x60000000)
Internet protocol processing disabled
Loopback30 is Up, ipv4 protocol is Down [VRF in FWD reference]
Vrf is ran (vrfid 0x0)
Internet address is 203.0.113.17/32
MTU is 1500 (1500 is available to IP)
Helper address is not set
Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
Outgoing access list is not set
Inbound common access list is not set, access list is not set
Proxy ARP is disabled
ICMP redirects are never sent
ICMP unreachables are always sent
ICMP mask replies are never sent
Table Id is 0x0
Because the regular expression to parse an interface name does not
expect the extra data after the interface state, Genie Parser
ignores the line starting the definition of Loopback30 and parses
the output to this structure:1
While this bug is simple to fix, this is an uphill battle. Any
existing or future slight variation in the output of a command could
trigger another similar undetected bug, despite the extended test
coverage. I have reported and fixed several other silent parsing
errors: #516, #529, and #530. A more robust alternative
would have been to use TextFSM and to trigger a warning when some
output is not recognized, like Batfish, a configuration analysis
tool, does.
In the future, we should rely on YANG for data extraction, but it
is currently not widely supported. SNMP is still a valid possibility
but much information is not accessible through this protocol. In the
meantime, I would advise you to only use Genie Parser with caution.
As an exercise, the astute reader is asked to write the code
to extract the IPv4 from this structure.
This Perl module converts POD documents to thread, the macro language I
use for my static site builder (about which, more in another software
release coming up shortly). This release fixes a whole ton of
long-standing problems.
Remove support for parsing CVS $Id$ strings and emitting
\id commands.
Stop wrapping output text.
Fix internal section links.
Fix conversion of nested =over blocks.
Fix conversion of =over blocks without an =item.
Fix links to headings containing markup.
Fix metacharacter escaping in headings, contents, and navbar.
Fix handling of =for thread and =begin thread.
Fix non-breaking spaces in navbar section names.
Fix internal links whose anchors are wrapped.
Output the document before erroring out if POD errors were seen.
Suppress \signature if the input document was empty.
Add bugtracker, homepage, and repository package metadata.
In brief, a lot of the POD implementation was previously done by chasing
bugs rather than testing comprehensively, as reflected by the 65% code
coverage in the previous release. The test suite now achieves about 95%
code coverage (most of the rest is obscure error handling around
encoding) and cleans up a bunch of long-standing problems with internal
links.
I had previously punted entirely on section links containing markup, and
as a result the section links shown in the navigation bar or table of
contents were missing the markup and headings containing thread
metacharacters were mangled beyond recognition. That was because I was
trying to handle resolving links using regexes (after I got rid of the
original two-pass approach that required a driver script). This release
uses Text::Balanced instead, the same parsing module used by my static
site generator, to solve the problem (mostly) correctly. (I think there
may still be a few very obscure edge cases, but I probably won't encounter
them.)
The net result should hopefully be better conversion of my software
documentation, including INN documentation, when I regenerate my site
(which will be coming soon).
You can get the latest release from CPAN or from the
Pod::Thread distribution page.
Update: Facebook has reversed itself over this censorship, but I maintain that whether the censorship was algorithmic or human, it was intentional either way. Details in my new post.
Last November, I made a brief post to Facebook about Mastodon. Mastodon is an open-source and open social network, which is decentralized and all about user control instead of corporate control. I ve blogged about Mastodon and the dangers of Facebook before, but rarely mentioned Mastodon on Facebook itself.
Today, I received this notice that Facebook had censored my post about Mastodon:
Wonder with me for a second what this one-off post I composed myself might have done to trip Facebook s filter . and it is probably obvious that what tripped the filter was the mention of an open source competitor, even though Facebook is much more enormous than Mastodon. I have been a member of Facebook for many years, and this is the one and only time anything like that has happened.
Why they decided today to take down that post I have no idea.
In case you wondered about their sincerity towards stamping out misinformation which, on the rare occasions they do something about, they deprioritize rather than remove as they did here this probably answers your question. Or, are they sincere about thinking they re such a force for good by connecting the world s people? Well, only so long as the world s people don t say nice things about alternatives to Facebook, I guess.
Well, you might be wondering, Why not appeal, since they obviously made a mistake? Because, of course, you can t:
Indeed I did tick a box that said I disagreed, but there was no place to ask why or to question their action.
So what would cause a non-controversial post from a long-time Facebook member that has never had anything like this happen, to disappear?
Greed. Also fear.
Maybe I d feel sorry for them if they weren t acting like a bully.
Edit: There are reports from several others on Mastodon of the same happening this week. I am trying to gather more information. It sounds like it may be happening on Twitter as well.
Edit 2: And here are some other reports from both Facebook and Twitter. Definitely not just me.
Edit 3: While trying to reply to someone on Facebook, that was trying to defend Facebook, I mentioned joinmastodon.org and got this:
Anyone else seeing it?
Edit 4: It is far more than just me, clearly. More reports are out there; for instance, this one and that one.
I had this nightmare where I had a very, very important confcall.
I joined with Chrome. Chrome said Failed to access your microphone -
Cannot use microphone for an unknown reason. Could not start audio source.
I joined with Firefox. Firefox chose Monitor of Built-in Audio Analog Stereo
as a microphone, and did not let me change it. Not in the browser, not in
pavucontrol.
I joined with the browser on my phone, and the webpage said This meeting needs
to use your microphone and camera. Select *Allow* when your browser asks for
permissions. But the question never came.
I could hear people talking. I had very important things to say. I tried typing
them in the chat window, but they weren't seeing it. The meeting ended. I was
on the verge of tears.
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a phone call when you are unable to speak?
Since this nightmare happened for real, including the bit about tears in the
end, let's see that it doesn't happen again. I should now have three working
systems, which hopefully won't all break again all at the same time.
Fixing Chrome
I can reproduce this reliably, on Bullseye's standard Chromium
90.0.4430.212-1, just launched on an empty profile, no extensions.
The webpage has camera and microphone allowed. Chrome doesn't show up in the
recording tab of pulseaudio. Nothing on Chrome's stdout/stderr.
JavaScript console has:
Logger.js:154 2021-09-10Txx:xx:xx.xxxZ [features/base/tracks] Failed to create local tracks
Array(2)
DOMException: Could not start audio source
I had the similar problem once with chromium.
i could solve it by switching in preferences->microphone-> from "default" to "intern analog stereo".
Opening the little popup next to the microphone/mute button allows choosing
other microphones, which work. Only "Same as system (Default)" does not work.
Fixing Firefox
I have firefox-esr 78.13.0esr-1~deb11u1. In Jitsi, microphone selection is
disabled on the toolbar and in the settings menu. In pavucontrol, changing the
recording device for Firefox has no effect. If for some reason the wrong
microphone got chosen, those are not ways of fixing it.
What I found works is to click on the camera permission icon, remove microphone
permission, then reload the page. At that point Firefox will ask for permission
again, and that microphone selection seems to work.
Relevant bugs: on Jitsi and
on Firefox. Since this
is well known (once you find the relevant issues), I'd have appreciated Jitsi
at least showing a link to an explanation of workarounds on Firefox, instead of
just disabling microphone selection.
Fixing Jitsi on the phone side
I really don't want to preemptively give camera and microphone permissions to
my phone browser. I noticed that there's the Jitsi app on F-Droid
and much as I hate to use an app when a website would work, at least in this
case it's a way to keep the permission sets separate, so I installed that.
Fixing pavucontrol?
I tried to find out why I can't change input device for FireFox on pavucontrol.
I only managed to find an Ask Ubuntu question with no answer
and a Unix StackExchange question with no answer.
The RcppSimdJson team is happy to share that a new version 0.1.6 arrived on CRAN earlier today. Its release coincides with release 1.0.0 of simdjson itself, which is included in this release too!
RcppSimdJson wraps the fantastic and genuinely impressive simdjson library by Daniel Lemire and collaborators. Via very clever algorithmic engineering to obtain largely branch-free code, coupled with modern C++ and newer compiler instructions, it results in parsing gigabytes of JSON parsed per second which is quite mindboggling. The best-case performance is faster than CPU speed as use of parallel SIMD instructions and careful branch avoidance can lead to less than one cpu cycle per byte parsed; see the video of the talk by Daniel Lemire at QCon (also voted best talk).
This version brings the new upstream release, thanks to a comprehensive pull request by Daniel Lemire. The short NEWS entry follows.
Changes in version 0.1.6 (2021-09-07)
The C++17 dependency was stated more clearly in the DESCRIPTION file (Dirk)
The simdjson version was updated to release 1.0.0 (Daniel Lemire in #70)
We should point out that the package still has a dependency on C++17 even though simdjson no longer does. Some of our earlier wrapping code uses it, this could be changed. If you, dear reader, would like to work on this please get in touch.
Courtesy of my CRANberries, there is also a diffstat report for this release.
For questions, suggestions, or issues please use the issue tracker at the GitHub repo.
If you like this or other open-source work I do, you can now sponsor me at GitHub.
The record extension problem
Initially, the upgrade rules of Candid were a straight-forward application of the canonical subtyping rules. This worked and was sound, but it forbid one very commonly requested use case: Extending records in argument position.
The subtyping rule for records say that
record old_field : nat; new_field : int
<: record old_field : nat
or, in words, that subtypes can have more field than supertypes. This makes intuitive sense: A user of a such a record value that only expects old_field to be there is not bothered if suddenly a new_field appears. But a user who expects new_field to be there is thrown off if it suddenly isn t anymore. Therefore it is ok to extend the records returned by a service with new fields, but not to extend the record in your methods s argument types.
But users want to extend their record types over time, also in argument position!
In fact, they often want to extend them in both positions. Consider a service with the following interface, where the CUser record appears both in argument and result position:
type CUser = record login : text; name : text ;
service C :
register_user : (CUser) -> ();
get_user_data : (text) -> (CUser);
It seems quite natural to want to extend the record with a new field (say, the age of the user). But simply changing the definition of CUser to
type CUser = record login : text; name : text; age : nat
is not ok, because now register_user requires the age field, but old clients don t provide it.
So how can we allow developers to make changes like this (because they really really want that), while keeping the soundness guarantees made by Candid (because we really really want that)? This question has bothered us for over two years, and we even created a meta issue that records the dozen approached we considered, discussed and eventually ditched.
Dynamic subtyping checks in opt
I will spare you the history lesson, though, and explain the solution we eventually came up with.
In the example above it seems unreasonable to let the developer add a field age of type nat. Since there may be old clients around, the service unavoidably has to deal with records that don t have an age field. If the code expects an age value, what should it do in that case?
But one can argue that changing the record type to
type CUser = record login : text; name : text; age : opt nat
could work: If the age field is present, use the value. If the field is absent, inject a null value during decoding.
In the first-order case, this rather obvious solution would work just fine, and we d be done. But Candid aims to solve the higher order case, and I said things get tricky here, didn t I?
Consider another, independent service D with the following interface:
type DUser = record login : text; name : text ;
service D :
on_user_added : (func (DUser) -> ()) -> ()
This service has a method that takes a method reference, presumably with the intention of calling it whenever a new user was added to service D. And because the types line up nicely, we can compose these two services, by once calling D.on_user_added(C.register_user), so that from now on D calls C.register_user( ). These kind of service mesh-ups are central to the vision of the Internet Computer!
But what happens if the services now evolve their types in different ways, e.g. towards
type CUser = record login : text; name : text; age : opt nat
and
type DUser = record login : text; name : text; age : opt variant under_age; adult
Individually, these are type changes that we want to allow. But now the call from D to C may transmit a value of record ; age = opt variant under_age when C expects a natural number! This is precisely what we want to prevent by introducing types, and it seems we have lost soundness.
The best solution we could find is to make the opt type somewhat special, and apply these extra rules when decoding at an expected type of opt t.
If this was a record field, and the provided record value doesn t even have a field of that name, don t fail but instead treat this as null. This handles the first-order example above.
If there is a value, look at its type (which, in Candid, is part of the message).
If it is opt t' and t' <: t, then decode as normal.
If it is opt t' but t' <: t does not hold, then treat that as null.
This should only happen in these relatively obscure higher-order cases where services evolved differently and incompatibly, and makes sure that the calls that worked before the upgrades will continue to work afterwards.
It is not advisable to actually use that rule when changing your service s interface. Tools that assist the developer with an upgrade check should prevent or warn about the use of this rule.
Not strictly required here, but since we are making opt special anyways:
If its type t' is not of the form opt , pretend it was opt t', and also pretend that the given value was wrapped in opt.
This allows services to make record field in arguments that were required in the old version optional in a new version, e.g. as a way to deprecated them. So it is mildly useful, although I can report that it makes the meta-theory and implementation rather complex, in particular together with equirecursion and beasts like type O = opt O. See this discussion for a glimpse of that.
In the above I stress that we look at the type of the provided value, and not just the value. For example, if the sender sends the value opt vec at type opt vec nat, and the recipient expects opt vec bool, then this will decode as null, even though one could argue that the value opt vec could easily be understood at type opt vec bool. We initially had that, but then noticed that this still breaks soundness when there are references inside, and we have to do a full subtyping check in the decoder. This is very unfortunate, because it makes writing a Candid decoder a noticeably harder task that requires complicated graph algorithms with memoization (which I must admit Motoko has not implemented yet), but it s the least bad solution we could find so far.
Isn t that just dynamic typing?
You might have noticed that with these rules, t <: opt t' holds for all types t and t'. In other words, every opt is a top type (like reserved), thus all optional types are equivalent. One could argue that we are throwing all of the benefits of static typing over board this way. But it s not quite as bad: It s true that decoding Candid values now involves a dynamic check inserting null values in certain situations, but as long as everyone plays by the rules (i.e. upgrades their services according to the Candid safe upgrade rules, and heeds the warning alluded to above), these certain situations will only happen in the obscurest of cases.
It is, by the way, not material to this solution that the special subtyping behavior is applied to the opt type, and a neighboring point in the design space would be a dedicated upgraded t type constructor. That would allow developers to use the canonical opt type with the usual subtyping rules and communicate their intent ( clients should consider this field optional vs. old clients don t know about this field, but new clients should use it ) more cleanly at the expense of having more non-canonical types in the type system.
To see why it is convenient if Candid has mostly just the normal types, read the next post, which will describe how Candid can be integrated into a host language.
Debian 11 (codename Bullseye) was recently released. This was the smoothest upgrade I've experienced in some 20 years as a Debian user. In my haste, I completely forgot to first upgrade dpkg and apt, doing a straight dist-upgrade. Nonetheless, everything worked out of the box. No unresolved dependency cycles. Via my last-mile Gigabit connection, it took about 5 minutes to upgrade and reboot. Congratulations to everyone who made this possible!
Since the upgrade, only a handful of bugs were found. I filed bug reports. Over these past few days, maintainers have started responding. In once particular case, my report exposed a CVE caused by copy-pasted code between two similar packages. The source package fixed their code to something more secure a few years ago, while the destination package missed it. The situation has been brought to Debian's security team's attention and should be fixed over the next few days.
Afterthoughts
Having recently experienced hard-disk problems on my main desktop, upgrading to Bullseye made me revisit a few issues. One of these was the possibility of transiting to BTRFS. Last time I investigated the possibility was back when Ubuntu briefly switched their default filesystem to BRTFS. Back then, my feeling was that BRTFS wasn't ready for mainstream. For instance, the utility to convert an EXT2/3/4 partition to BTRFS corrupted the end of the partition. No thanks. However, in recent years, many large-scale online services have migrated to BRTFS and seem to be extremely happy with the result. Additionally, Linux kernel 5 added useful features such as background defragmentation. This got me pondering whether now would be a good time to migrate to BRTFS. Sadly it seems that the stock kernel shipping with Bullseye doesn't have any of these advanced features enabled in its configuration. Oh well.
Geode
The only point that has become problematic is my Geode hosts. For one things, upstream Rust maintainers have decided to ignore the fact that i686 is a specification and arbitrarily added compiler flags for more recent x86-32 CPUs to their i686 target. While Debian Rust maintainers have purposely downgraded the target, RustC still produces binaries that the Geode LX (essentially an i686 without PAE) cannot process. This affects fairly basic packages such as librsvg, which breaks SVG image support for a number of dependencies. Additionally, there's been persistent problems with systemd crashing on my Geode hosts whenever daemon-reload is issued. Then, a few days ago, problems started occurring with C++ binaries, because GCC-11 upstream enabled flags for more recent CPUs in their default i686 target. While I realize that SSE and similar recent CPU features produce better binaries, I cannot help but feel that treating CPU targets as anything else than a specification is a mistake. i686 is a specification. It is not a generic equivalent to x86-32.
I have been using the awesome window manager for 10 years. It is a
tiling window manager, configurable and extendable with the
Lua language. Using a general-purpose programming language to
configure every aspect is a double-edged sword. Due to laziness and
the apparent difficulty of adapting my configuration about 3000 lines to newer releases, I was stuck with the 3.4
version, whose last release is from 2013.
It was time for a rewrite. Instead, I have switched to the i3 window
manager, lured by the possibility to migrate to Wayland and
Sway later with minimal pain. Using an embedded interpreter for
configuration is not as important to me as it was in the past: it
brings both complexity and brittleness.
Dual screen desktop running i3, Emacs, some terminals, including a Quake console, Firefox, Polybar as the status bar, and Dunst as the notification daemon.
The window manager is only one part of a desktop environment. There
are several options for the other components. I am also introducing
them in this post.
i3: the window manageri3 aims to be a minimal tiling window manager. Its documentation
can be read from top to bottom in less than an hour. i3 organize
windows in a tree. Each non-leaf node contains one or several
windows and has an orientation and a layout. This information
arbitrates the window positions. i3 features three layouts: split,
stacking, and tabbed. They are demonstrated in the below screenshot:
Demonstration of the layouts available in i3. The main container is split horizontally. The first child is split vertically. The second one is tabbed. The last one is stacking.
Tree representation of the previous screenshot.
Most of the other tiling window managers, including the awesome
window manager, use predefined layouts. They usually feature a large
area for the main window and another area divided among the remaining
windows. These layouts can be tuned a bit, but you mostly stick to a
couple of them. When a new window is added, the behavior is quite
predictable. Moreover, you can cycle through the various windows
without thinking too much as they are ordered.
i3 is more flexible with its ability to build any layout on the fly,
it can feel quite overwhelming as you need to visualize the tree in
your head. At first, it is not unusual to find yourself with a complex
tree with many useless nested containers. Moreover, you have to
navigate windows using directions. It takes some time to get used to.
I set up a split layout for Emacs and a few terminals, but most of the
other workspaces are using a tabbed layout. I don t use the stacking
layout. You can find many scripts trying to emulate other tiling
window managers but I did try to get my setup pristine of these
tentatives and get a chance to familiarize myself. i3 can also save
and restore layouts, which is quite a powerful feature.
My configuration is quite similar to the default one and has
less than 200 lines.
i3 companion: the missing bitsi3 philosophy is to keep a minimal core and let the user implements
missing features using the IPC protocol:
Do not add further complexity when it can be avoided. We are
generally happy with the feature set of i3 and instead focus on
fixing bugs and maintaining it for stability. New features will
therefore only be considered if the benefit outweighs the additional
complexity, and we encourage users to implement features using the
IPC whenever possible.
Introduction to the i3 window manager
While this is not as powerful as an embedded language, it is enough
for many cases. Moreover, as high-level features may be opinionated,
delegating them to small, loosely coupled pieces of code keeps them
more maintainable. Libraries exist for this purpose in several
languages. Users have published many scripts to extend i3:
automatic layout and window promotion to mimic the behavior
of other tiling window managers, window swallowing to put a new
app on top of the terminal launching it, and cycling between
windows with Alt+Tab.
Instead of maintaining a script for each feature, I have centralized
everything into a single Python process,
i3-companion using asyncio and the
i3ipc-python library. Each feature is self-contained into a
function. It implements the following components:
make a workspace exclusive to an application
When a workspace contains Emacs or Firefox, I would like other
applications to move to another workspace, except for the terminal
which is allowed to intrude into any workspace. The
workspace_exclusive() function monitors new windows and moves them
if needed to an empty workspace or to one with the same application
already running.
implement a Quake console
The quake_console() function implements a drop-down console
available from any workspace. It can be toggled with
Mod+. This is implemented as a scratchpad
window.
back and forth workspace switching on the same output
With the workspace back_and_forth command, we can ask i3 to
switch to the previous workspace. However, this feature is not
restricted to the current output. I prefer to have one keybinding to
switch to the workspace on the next output and one keybinding to
switch to the previous workspace on the same output. This behavior
is implemented in the previous_workspace() function by keeping a
per-output history of the focused workspaces.
create a new empty workspace or move a window to an empty workspace
To create a new empty workspace or move a window to an empty
workspace, you have to locate a free slot and use workspace number
4 or move container to workspace number 4. The new_workspace()
function finds a free number and use it as the target workspace.
restart some services on output change
When adding or removing an output, some actions need to be executed:
refresh the wallpaper, restart some components unable to adapt their
configuration on their own, etc. i3 triggers an event for this
purpose. The output_update() function also takes an extra step to
coalesce multiple consecutive events and to check if there is a real
change with the low-level library xcffib.
I will detail the other features as this post goes on. On the
technical side, each function is decorated with the events it should
react to:
@on(CommandEvent("previous-workspace"),I3Event.WORKSPACE_FOCUS)asyncdefprevious_workspace(i3,event):"""Go to previous workspace on the same output."""
The CommandEvent() event class is my way to send a command to the
companion, using either i3-msg -t send_tick or binding a key to a
nop command. The latter is used to avoid spawning a shell and a
i3-msg process just to send a message. The companion listens to
binding events and checks if this is a nop command.
bindsym $mod+Tab nop "previous-workspace"
There are other decorators to avoid code duplication: @debounce() to
coalesce multiple consecutive calls, @static() to define a static
variable, and @retry() to retry a function on failure. The whole
script is a bit more than 1000 lines. I think this is
worth a read as I am quite happy with the result.
dunst: the notification daemon
Unlike the awesome window manager, i3 does not come with a built-in
notification system. Dunst is a lightweight notification daemon. I
am running a modified version with HiDPI support for X11 and
recursive icon lookup. The i3 companion has a helper function,
notify(), to send notifications using DBus. container_info() and
workspace_info() uses it to display information about the container
or the tree for a workspace.
Notification showing i3 s tree for a workspace
polybar: the status bari3 bundles i3bar, a versatile status bar, but I have opted for
Polybar. A wrapper script runs one instance for
each monitor.
The first module is the built-in support for i3 workspaces. To not
have to remember which application is running in a workspace, the i3
companion renames workspaces to include an icon for each application.
This is done in the workspace_rename() function. The icons are from
the Font Awesome project. I maintain a mapping between applications
and icons. This is a bit cumbersome but it looks great.
i3 workspaces in Polybar
For CPU, memory, brightness, battery, disk, and audio volume, I am
relying on the built-in modules. Polybar s wrapper script generates the list of filesystems to monitor and they get only
displayed when available space is low. The battery widget turns red
and blinks slowly when running out of power. Check my Polybar
configuration for more details.
Polybar displaying various information: CPU usage, memory usage, screen brightness, battery status, Bluetooth status (with a connected headset), network status (connected to a wireless network and to a VPN), notification status, and speaker volume.
For Bluetooh, network, and notification statuses, I am using Polybar s
ipc module: the next version of Polybar can receive
an arbitrary text on an IPC socket. The module is defined with a
single hook to be executed at the start to restore the latest status.
It can be updated with polybar-msg action "#network.send.XXXX". In
the i3 companion, the @polybar() decorator takes the string
returned by a function and pushes the update through the IPC socket.
The i3 companion reacts to DBus signals to update the Bluetooth and
network icons. The @on() decorator accepts a DBusSignal() object:
@on(StartEvent,DBusSignal(path="/org/bluez",interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties",member="PropertiesChanged",signature="sa sv as",onlyif=lambdaargs:(args[0]=="org.bluez.Device1"and"Connected"inargs[1]orargs[0]=="org.bluez.Adapter1"and"Powered"inargs[1]),),)@retry(2)@debounce(0.2)@polybar("bluetooth")asyncdefbluetooth_status(i3,event,*args):"""Update bluetooth status for Polybar."""
The middle of the bar is occupied by the date and a weather forecast.
The latest also uses the IPC mechanism, but the source is a Python
script triggered by a timer.
Current date and weather forecast for the day in Polybar. The data is retrieved with the OpenWeather API.
I don t use the system tray integrated with Polybar. The embedded
icons usually look horrible and they all behave differently. A few
years back, Gnome has removed the system tray. Most of the
problems are fixed by the DBus-based Status Notifier Item
protocol also known as Application Indicators or Ayatana
Indicators for GNOME. However, Polybar does not support this
protocol. In the i3 companion, The implementation of Bluetooth
and network icons, including displaying notifications on change, takes
about 200 lines. I got to learn a bit about how DBus works and I get exactly
the info I want.
picom: the compositor
I like having slightly transparent backgrounds for terminals and to
reduce the opacity of unfocused windows. This requires a
compositor.1picom is a lightweight compositor. It works
well for me, but it may need some tweaking depending on your graphic
card.2 Unlike the awesome window manager, i3 does not handle
transparency, so the compositor needs to decide by itself the opacity
of each window. Check my configuration for details.
systemd: the service manager
I use systemd to start i3 and the various services around it. My
xsession script only sets some environment variables and lets
systemd handles everything else. Have a look at this article from
Micha G ral for the rationale. Notably, each component can be
easily restarted and their logs are not mangled inside the
~/.xsession-errors file.3
I am using a two-stage setup: i3.service depends on
xsession.target to start services before
i3:
rofi: the application launcherRofi is an application launcher. Its appearance can be customized
through a CSS-like language and it comes with several themes. Have a
look at my configuration for mine.
Rofi as an application launcher
It can also act as a generic menu application. I have a script
to control a media player and another one to
select the wifi network. It is quite a flexible
application.
Rofi to select a wireless network
xss-lock and i3lock: the screen lockeri3lock is a simple screen locker. xss-lock invokes it reliably
on inactivity or before a system suspend. For inactivity, it uses the
XScreenSaver events. The delay is configured using the xset s
command. The locker can be invoked immediately with xset s activate.
X11 applications know how to prevent the screen saver from running. I
have also developed a small dimmer application that is executed 20
seconds before the locker to give me a chance to move the mouse if I
am not away.4 Have a look at my configuration
script.
Demonstration of xss-lock, xss-dimmer and i3lock with a 4 speedup.
The remaining components
autorandr is a tool to detect the connected display, match them
against a set of profiles, and configure them with xrandr.
inputplug executes a script for each new mouse and keyboard
plugged. This is quite useful to load the appropriate the keyboard
map. See my configuration.
xsettingsd provides settings to X11 applications, not unlike
xrdb but it notifies applications for changes. The main use is
to configure the Gtk and DPI settings. See my article on HiDPI
support on Linux with X11.
Redshift adjusts the color temperature of the screen according
to the time of day.
maim is a utility to take screenshots. I use Prt Scn
to trigger a screenshot of a window or a specific area and
Mod+Prt Scn to capture the whole desktop to a
file. Check the helper script for details.
I have a collection of wallpapers I rotate every hour. A
script selects them using advanced machine learning
algorithms and stitches them together on multi-screen setups. The
selected wallpaper is reused by i3lock.
Apart from the eye candy, a compositor also helps to get
tear-free video playbacks.
My configuration works with both Haswell (2014) and Whiskey
Lake (2018) Intel GPUs. It also works with AMD GPU based on the
Polaris chipset (2017).
You cannot manage two different displays this way e.g.
:0 and :1. In the first implementation, I did try to
parametrize each service with the associated display, but this is
useless: there is only one DBus user session and many services
rely on it. For example, you cannot run two notification daemons.
I have only discovered later that XSecureLock ships
such a dimmer with a similar implementation. But mine has a cool
countdown!
Another release of the tidyCpp package arrived on CRAN earlier today. The packages offers a clean C++ layer on top of the C API for R which aims to make its use a little easier and more consistent.
The vignette has been extended once more with a new example, and added a table of contents. The package now supports a (truly minimal) C++ class for a numeric vector which is the most likely use case.
The NEWS entry follows and includes the 0.0.3 release earlier in the year which did not get the usual attention of post-release blog post.
Changes in tidyCpp version 0.0.4 (2021-09-05)
Minor updates to DESCRIPTION
New snippet rollminmaxExample with simple vector use
New class NumVec motivated from rolling min/max example
Expand the vignette with C++ example based on NumVec
It's major upgrade time again! The Debian project just published
the Debian 11 "bullseye" release, and it's pretty awesome! This
makes me realized that I have never written here about my peculiar
upgrade process, and figured it was worth
bringing that up to a wider audience.
My upgrade process also has a
notable changes section
which includes major version changes (e.g. Inkscape 1.0!), new
packages (e.g. podman!) and important behavior changes
(e.g. driverless scanning and printing!).
I'm particularly interested to hear about any significant change I
might have missed. If you know of a cool new package that shipped with
bullseye and that I forgot, do let me know!
But that's for the cool new stuff. We need to talk about the problems
with Debian major upgrades.
Background
I have been maintaining detailed upgrade guides,
on my wiki, starting with the jessie
release, but I have actually written such
guides for Koumbit.org as far back as Debian squeeze in 2011
(another worker wrote the older Debian lenny upgrade guide in
2009). Koumbit, since then, has kept maintaining those guides all the
way to the latest bullseye upgrade, through 7 major releases!
Over the years, those guides evolved from a quick "cheat-sheet" format
copied from the release notes into a more or less "scripted" form
that I currently use.
Each guide has a procedure made of a few steps that can be basically
copy-pasted to batch-upgrade a host (or multiple hosts in parallel) as
quickly as possible. There is also the predict-os script which
allows you to keep track of progress of the upgrades in a Puppet cluster.
Limitations of the official procedure
In comparison with my procedure, the official upgrade guide is
mostly designed to upgrade a single machine, typically a workstation,
with a rather slow and exhaustive process. The PDF version of the
upgrade guide is 14 pages long! This, obviously, does not work
when you have tens or hundreds of machines to upgrade.
Debian upgrades are notorious for being extremely reliable, but we
have a lot of packages, and there are always corner cases where
the upgrade will just fail because of a bug specific to your
environment. Those will only be fixed after some back and forth in the
community (and that's assuming users report those bugs, which is not
always the case). There's no obvious way to deploy "hot fixes" in this
context, at least not without fixing the package and publishing it
on an unofficial Debian archive while the official ones catch up. This
is slow and difficult.
Or some packages require manual labor. Examples of this are the
PostgreSQL or Ganeti packages which require you to upgrade your
clusters by hand, while the old and new packages live side by
side. Debian packages bring you far in the upgrade process, but
sometimes not all the way.
Which means every Debian install needs to be manually upgraded and
inspected when a new release comes out. That's slow and error prone
and we can do better.
How to automate major upgrades
I have a proposal to automate this. It's been mostly dormant in
the Debian wiki, for 5 years now. Fundamentally, this is a hard
problem: Debian gets installed in so many different environments, from
workstations to physical servers to virtual machines, embedded systems
and so on, that it's extremely hard to come up with a "one size fits
all" system.
The (manual) procedure I'm using is mostly targeting servers, but I'm
also using it on workstations. And I'll note that it's specific to my
home setup: I have a different procedure at work, although it has
a lot of common code.
To automate this, I would factor out that common code with hooks where
you could easily inject special code like "you need to upgrade ferm
first", "you need an extra reboot here", or "this is how you finish
the PostgreSQL upgrade".
With Debian getting closer to a 2 year release cycle, with the
previous release being supported basically only one year after the
new stable comes out, I feel more and more strongly that this needs
better automation.
So I'm thinking that I should write a prototype for this. Ubuntu has
do-release-upgrade that is too Ubuntu-specific to be reused. An
attempt at collaborating on this has been mostly met with silence
from Ubuntu's side as well.
I'm thinking that using something like Fabric, Mitogen, or
Transilience: anything that will allow me to write simple,
portable Python code that can run transparently on a local machine
(for single systems upgrades, possibly with a GUI frontend) to remote
servers (for large clusters of servers, maybe with canaries and
grouping using Cumin). I'll note that Koumbit started
experimenting with Puppet Bolt in the bullseye upgrade process,
but that feels too site-specific to be useful more broadly.
Trade-offs
I am not sure where this stands in the XKCD time trade-off
evaluation, because the table doesn't actually cover the time
frequency of Debian release (which is basically "biennial") and the
amount of time the upgrade would take across a cluster (which varies a
lot, but that I estimate to be between one to 6 hours per machine).
Assuming I have 80 machines to upgrade, that is 80 to 480 hours
(between ~3 to 20 days) of work! It's unclear how much work such an
automated system would shave off, however. Assuming things are an
order of magnitude faster (say I upgrade 10 machines at a time), I
would shave off between 3 and 18 days of work, which implies I might
allow myself to spend a minimum of 5 days working on such a
project.
The other option: never upgrade
Before people mention those: I am aware of containers, Kubernetes, and
other deployment mechanisms. Indeed, those may be a long-term
solution, we currently can't afford to migrate everything over to
containers right now: that is a huge migration and a total paradigm
shift. At that point, whatever is left might not even be Debian in the
first place. And besides, if you run Kubernetes, you still need to run
some OS underneath and upgrade that, so that problem never
completely disappears.
Still, maybe that's the final answer: never upgrade.
For some stateless machines like DNS replicas or load balancers, that
might make a lot of sense as there's no or little data to carry to the
new host. But this implies a seamless and fast provisioning process,
and we don't have that either: at my work, installing a machine takes
about as long as upgrading it, and that's after a significant amount
of work automating that process, partly writing my own Debian
installer with Fabric (!).
What is your process?
I'm curious to hear what people think of those ideas. It strikes me as
really odd that no one has really tackled that problem yet,
considering how many clusters of Debian machines are out there. Surely
people are upgrading those, and not following that slow step by step
guide, right?
I suspect everyone is doing the same thing: we all have our little
copy-paste script we batch onto multiple machines, sometimes in
parallel. That is what the Debian.org sysadmins are doing as well.
There must be a better way. What is yours?
My upgrades so far
So far, I have upgraded 2 out of my 3 home machines running buster --
others have been installed directly in bullseye -- with only my main,
old, messy server left. Upgrades have been pretty painless so far (see
another report, for example), much better than the previous
buster upgrade. Obviously, for me personal
use, automating this is pointless.
Work-side, however, is another story: we have over 80 boxes to
upgrade there and that will take a while. The last stretch to buster
cycle took about two years to complete, so we might be done by the
time the next release (12, "bookworm") is released, but that's
actually a full year after "buster" becomes EOL, so it's actually
too late...
At least I fixed the installers so that new the machines we create all
ship with bullseye, so we stopped accumulating new buster hosts...
Thanks to lelutin and pabs for reviewing a draft of this post.
Welcome to the latest report from the Reproducible Builds project. In this post, we round up the important things that happened in the world of reproducible builds in August 2021. As always, if you are interested in contributing to the project, please visit the Contribute page on our website.
There were a large number of talks related to reproducible builds at DebConf21 this year, the 21st annual conference of the Debian Linux distribution (full schedule):
Secondly, Vagrant Cascadian gave a talk titled Looking Forward to Reproducible Builds which mentions some historic blockers within Debian that have been solved, worked around or which are still in progress. It also touched on some recent developments, with an eye to what might happen as Debian embarks upon the new Bookworm development cycle after the release of Bullseye.
Lastly, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues & Fr d ric Pierret gave a joint talk on Making use of snapshot.debian.org for fun and profit about various tools they have developed to interact with the snapshot.debian.org wayback machine for Debian packages. In particular, they mention how they are using the service to reproduce and validate builds as well as touch on an alternative snapshot service that has been mentioned in previous reports.
PackagingCon (@PackagingCon) is new conference for developers of package management software as well as their related communities and stakeholders. The virtual event, which is scheduled to take place on the 9th and 10th November 2021, has a mission is to bring different ecosystems together: from Python s pip to Rust s cargo to Julia s Pkg, from Debian apt over Nix to conda and mamba, and from vcpkg to Spack we hope to have many different approaches to package management at the conference . A number of people from reproducible builds community are planning on attending this new conference, and some may even present. Tickets start at $20 USD.
As reported in our May report, the president of the United States signed an executive order outlining policies aimed to improve the cybersecurity in the US. The executive order comes after a number of highly-publicised security problems such as a ransomware attack that affected an oil pipeline between Texas and New York and the SolarWinds hack that affected a large number of US federal agencies. As a followup this month, however, a detailed fact sheet was released announcing a number large-scale initiatives and that will undoubtedly be related to software supply chain security and, as a result, reproducible builds.
Lastly, We ran another productive meeting on IRC in August (original announcement) which ran for just short of two hours. A full set of notes from the meeting is available.
Software development
kpcyrd announced an interesting new project this month called I probably didn t backdoor this which is an attempt to be:
a practical attempt at shipping a program and having reasonably solid evidence there s probably no backdoor. All source code is annotated and there are instructions explaining how to use reproducible builds to rebuild the artifacts distributed in this repository from source.
The idea is shifting the burden of proof from you need to prove there s a backdoor to we need to prove there s probably no backdoor . This repository is less about code (we re going to try to keep code at a minimum actually) and instead contains technical writing that explains why these controls are effective and how to verify them. You are very welcome to adopt the techniques used here in your projects. ()
As the project s README goes on the mention: the techniques used to rebuild the binary artifacts are only possible because the builds for this project are reproducible . This was also announced on our mailing list this month in a thread titled i-probably-didnt-backdoor-this: Reproducible Builds for upstreams.
kpcyrd also wrote a detailed blog post about the problems surrounding Linux distributions (such as Alpine and Arch Linux) that distribute compiled Python bytecode in the form of .pyc files generated during the build process.
diffoscopediffoscope is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility. Not only can it locate and diagnose reproducibility issues, it can provide human-readable diffs from many kinds of binary formats. This month, Chris Lamb made a number of changes, including releasing version 180), version 181) and version 182) as well as the following changes:
New features:
Add support for extracting the signing block from Android APKs. []
If we specify a suffix for a temporary file or directory within the code, ensure it starts with an underscore (ie. _ ) to make the generated filenames more human-readable. []
Don t include short GCC lines that differ on a single prefix byte either. These are distracting, not very useful and are simply the strings(1) command s idea of the build ID, which is displayed elsewhere in the diff. [][]
Don t include specific .debug-like lines in the ELF-related output, as it is invariably a duplicate of the debug ID that exists better in the readelf(1) differences for this file. []
Bug fixes:
Add a special case to SquashFS image extraction to not fail if we aren t the superuser. []
Only use java -jar /path/to/apksigner.jar if we have an apksigner.jar as newer versions of apksigner in Debian use a shell wrapper script which will be rejected if passed directly to the JVM. []
Reduce the maximum line length for calculating Wagner-Fischer, improving the speed of output generation a lot. []
Don t require apksigner in order to compare .apk files using apktool. []
Update calls (and tests) for the new version of odt2txt. []
Output improvements:
Mention in the output if the apksigner tool is missing. []
Profile diffoscope.diff.linediff and specialize. [][]
Logging improvements:
Format debug-level messages related to ELF sections using the diffoscope.utils.format_class. []
Print the size of generated reports in the logs (if possible). []
Include profiling information in --debug output if --profile is not set. []
Codebase improvements:
Clarify a comment about the HUGE_TOOLS Python dictionary. []
We can pass -f to apktool to avoid creating a strangely-named subdirectory. []
Drop an unused File import. []
Update the supported & minimum version of Black. []
We don t use the logging variable in a specific place, so alias it to an underscore (ie. _ ) instead. []
Update some various copyright years. []
Clarify a comment. []
Test improvements:
Update a test to check specific contents of SquashFS listings, otherwise it fails depending on the test systems user ID to username passwd(5) mapping. []
Assign seen and expected values to local variables to improve contextual information in failed tests. []
Don t print an orphan newline when the source code formatting test passes. []
In addition Santiago Torres Arias added support for Squashfs version 4.5 [] and Felix C. Stegerman suggested a number of small improvements to the output of the new APK signing block []. Lastly, Chris Lamb uploaded python-libarchive-c version 3.1-1 to Debian experimental for the new 3.x branch python-libarchive-c is used by diffoscope.
Upstream patches
The Reproducible Builds project detects, dissects and attempts to fix as many currently-unreproducible packages as possible. We endeavour to send all of our patches upstream where appropriate. This month, we wrote a large number of such patches, including:
Update the website self-build process to not use the buster-backports suite now that Debian Bullseye is the stable release. []
Holger Levsen:
Add a new page documenting various package rebuilder solutions. []
Add some historical talks and slides from DebConf20. [][]
Various improvements to the history page. [][][]
Rename the Comparison protocol documentation category to Verification . []
Update links to F-Droid documentation. []
Ian Muchina:
Increase the font size of titles and de-emphasize event details on the talk page. []
Rename the README file to README.md to improve the user experience when browsing the Git repository in a web browser. []
Mattia Rizzolo:
Drop a position:fixed CSS statement that is negatively affecting with some width settings. []
Fix the sizing of the elements inside the side navigation bar. []
Show gold level sponsors and above in the sidebar. []
Updated the documentation within reprotest to mention how ldconfig conflicts with the kernel variation. []
Roland Clobus:
Added a ticket number for the issue with the live Cinnamon image and diffoscope. []
Testing framework
The Reproducible Builds project runs a testing framework at tests.reproducible-builds.org, to check packages and other artifacts for reproducibility. This month, the following changes were made:
Make a large number of changes to support the new Debian bookworm release, including adding it to the dashboard [], start scheduling tests [], adding suitable Apache redirects [] etc. [][][][][]
Make the first build use LANG=C.UTF-8 to match the official Debian build servers. []
Only test Debian Live images once a week. []
Upgrade all nodes to use Debian Bullseye [] []
Update README documentation for the Debian Bullseye release. []
Other changes:
Only include rsync output if the $DEBUG variable is enabled. []
Don t try to install mock, a tool used to build Fedora packages some time ago. []
Drop an unused function. []
Various documentation improvements. [][]
Improve the node health check to detect zombie jobs. []
Update the location and branch name for the main FreeBSD Git repository. []
Correctly ignore the source tarball when comparing build results. []
Drop an outdated version number from the documentation. []
Mattia Rizzolo:
Block F-Droid jobs from running whilst the setup is running. []
Enable debugging for the rsync job related to Debian Live images. []
Pass BUILD_TAG and BUILD_URL environment for the Debian Live jobs. []
Refactor the master_wrapper script to use a Bash array for the parameters. []
Prefer YAML s safe_load() function over the unsafe variant. []
Use the correct variable in the Apache config to match possible existing files on disk. []
Stop issuing HTTP 301 redirects for things that not actually permanent. []
Roland Clobus (Debian live image generation):
Increase the diffoscope timeout from 120 to 240 minutes; the Cinnamon image should now be able to finish. []
Use the new snapshot service. []
Make a number of improvements to artifact handling, such as moving the artifacts to the Jenkins host [] and correctly cleaning them up at the right time. [][][]
Where possible, link to the Jenkins build URL that created the artifacts. [][]
Only allow only one job to run at the same time. []
Vagrant Cascadian:
Temporarily disable armhf nodes for DebConf21. [][]
Lastly, if you are interested in contributing to the Reproducible Builds project, please visit the Contribute page on our website. You can get in touch with us via:
I have been Debian Stretch running on my HP Pavilion 14-ce0000nq laptop since buying it back in April 2019, just before my presence at Oxidizeconf where I presented "How to Rust When Standards Are Defined in C".Debian Buster (aka Debian 10) was released about 4 months later and I've been postponing the upgrade as my free time isn't what it used to be. I also tend to wait for the first or even second update of the release to avoid any sharp edges.As this laptop has a Realtek 8821CE wireless card that wasn't officially supported in the Linux kernel, I had to use an out-of-tree hacked driver to have the wireless work on Stretch kernels such as 4.19, it didn't even got along with DKMS, so all compilations and installations of it, I did them manually. More reason to wait for a newer release that would contain a driver inside the official kernel.I was waiting for the inevitable and dreading the wireless issues, but since mid-august Bullseye became stable, turning Stretch into oldoldstable, I decided that I had to do the upgrade, at least to buster.The Grub error and the fix Everything went quite smooth, except that after the reboot, the laptop failed to boot with this Grub error:
error: symbol grub_is_lockdown not found
I looked for a solution and it seemed everyone was stuckor the solution was unclear.There is even a bug report in Debian about this error, bug #984760. Adding to the pile of confusion my own confused solution: I tried supergrubdisk2/rescatux, it didn't work for me, it might have been a combination of me using LVM and grub-efi-amd64. I also tried to boot in rescue mode the Buster first DVD (to avoid the need for network), I was able to enter the partition, mount the EFI partition, too, but since I didn't want to mess the setup even more or depend on an external USB stick, I didn't know where should I try to write the Grub EFI config - the root partition is on an NVME storage.When buying the laptop it had FreeDOS installed on it and some HP rescue app, which I did not wipe when installing Debian. I even forgot where or how was the EFI installed on the disk and EFI, even if it should be more reliable and simpler, I never got the hang of it. In the end, I realized that I could via BIOS actually select manually which EFI executable should be booted into, so I was able to boot with some manual intervention during boot into the regular system.I tried regenerating the grub configuration, installing it and also tried restoring the default proper boot sequence (and I even installed refind in the system during my fumbling), but I think somewhere between grub-efi-amd64 reconfiguration and its reinstallation I managed to do the right thing, as the default boot screen is the Grub one now.Hints for anyone reading this in the hope to fix the same issue, hopefully it will make things better, not worse (see the text below):1) regenerate the grub config:
update-grub2
2) reinstall grub-efi-amd64 and make Debian the default
dpkg-reconfigure -plow grub-efi-amd64
When reinstalling grub-efi-amd64 onto the disk, I think the scariest questions were to these:
Force extra installation to the EFI removable media path?
Some EFI-based systems are buggy and do not handle new bootloaders correctly. If you force an extra installation of GRUB to the EFI removable media path, this should ensure that this system will boot Debian correctly despite such a problem. However, it may remove the ability to boot any other operating systems that also depend on this path. If so, you will need to make sure that GRUB is configured successfully to be able to boot any other OS installations correctly.
and
Update NVRAM variables to automatically boot into Debian?
GRUB can configure your platform's NVRAM variables so that it boots into Debian automatically when powered on. However, you may prefer to disable this behavior and avoid changes to your boot configuration. For example, if your NVRAM variables have been set up such that your system contacts a PXE server on every boot, this would preserve that behavior.
I think the first can be safely answered "No" if you don't plan on booting via a removable USB stick, while the second is the one that does the restoring.The second question is probably safe if you don't use PXE boot or other boot method, at least that's what I understand. But if you do, I suspect by installing refind, by playing with the multiple efi* named packages and tools, you can restore that, or it might be that your BIOS allows that directly. I just did a walk through of these 2 steps again on my laptop and answered "No" to the removable media question as it leads to errors when the media was not inserted (in my case the internal SD card reader), and "Yes" to making Debian the default.It seems that for me this broke the FreeDOS and HP utilities boot entries from Grub, but I still can boot via the BIOS options and my goal was to have Debian boot correctly by default. Fixing the missing RTL811/8168/8411 Ethernet card issue As a side note for people with computers having Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 Gigabit Ethernet Controller and upgrading to Buster or switching to a newer kernel, please note that you might end up having the unpleasant surprise even your Ethernet card to disappear because the r8169 driver is not loader by default.I had to add it to /etc/modules so is loaded by default:
eddy@aptonia:/ $ cat /etc/modules # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded # at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored. r8169
The 5.10 compatible driver for RTL8821CE wireless adapterAfter the upgrade to Buster, the oldstable version of the kernel, 4.19, the hacked version of the driver I've been using on Stretch on 4.9 kernels was no longer compatible - failed to compile due to missing symbols.The fix for me was to switch to the DKMS compatible driver from https://github.com/tomaspinho/rtl8821ce, as this seems to work for both 4.19 and 5.10 kernels (installed from backports). I installed it via a modification of the manual install method only for the 4.19 and 5.10 kernels, leaving the legacy 4.9 kernels working with the hacked driver. You can do the same if instead of running the provided script, you do its steps manually and you install only for the kernel versions you want, instead of the default to install for all:I looked inside the dkms-install.sh script to do the required steps:Copy the driver, add it to the dkms set of known drivers:
dkms status should confirm everything is in place and I think you need to update grub2 again after this. Please note this driver is no longer maintained and the 5.10 tree should support the RTL8821CE wireless card with the rtw88 driver from the kernel, but for me it did not. I'll probably try this at a later time, or after I upgrade to the current Debian stable, Bullseye.
tl;dr:
With these two crazy proc-macros you can
hand out multipe (perhaps mutable) references to suitable subsets/views of the same struct.
Why
In Otter I have adopted
a style where I try to avoid giving code mutable access that doesn't need it, and try to make mutable access come with some code structures to prevent "oh I forgot a thing" type mistakes. For example, mutable access to a game state is only available in contexts that have to return a value for the updates to send to the players. This makes it harder to forget to send the update.
But there is a downside. The game state is inside another struct, an Instance, and much code needs (immutable) access to it. I can't pass both &Instance and &mut GameState because one is inside the other.
My workaround involves passing separate references to the other fields of Instance, leading to some functions taking far too many arguments. 14 in one case. (They're all different types so argument ordering mistakes just result in compiler errors talking about arguments 9 and 11 having wrong types, rather than actual bugs.)
I felt this problem was purely a restriction arising from limitations of the borrow checker. I thought it might be possible to improve on it. Weeks passed and the question gradually wormed its way into my consciousness. Eventually, I tried some experiments. Encouraged, I persisted.
What and how
partial-borrow is a Rust library which solves this problem. You sprinkle #[Derive(PartialBorrow)] and
partial!(...) and then you can
pass a reference which grants mutable access to only some of the fields. You can also pass a reference through which some fields are inaccessible. You can even split a single mut reference into multiple compatible references, for example granting mut access to mutually-nonverlapping subsets.
The core type is Struct__Partial (for some Struct).
It is a zero-sized type, but we prevent anyone from constructing one.
Instead we magic up references to it, always ensuring that they have the same address as some Struct.
The fields of Struct__Partial are also ZSTs that exist ony as references, and they Deref to the actual field (subject to compile-type borrow compatibility checking).
Soundness and testing
partial-borrow is primarily a nontrivial procedural macro which autogenerates reams of unsafe.
Of course I think it's sound, but I thought that the last two times before I added a test which demonstrated otherwise. So it might be fairer to say that I have tried to make it sound and that I don't know of any problems...
Reasoning about the correctness of macro-generated code is not so easy. One problem is that there is nowhere good to put the kind of soundness arguments you would normally add near uses of unsafe.
I decided to solve this by annotating an instance of the macro output. There's a not very complicated script using diff3 to help fold in changes if the macro output changes - merge conflicts there mean a possible re-review of the argument text. Of course I also have test cases that run with miri, and test cases for expected compiler errors for uses that need to be forbidden for soundness.
But this is quite hairy and I'm worried that it might be rather "my first insane unsafe contraption".
Also the pointer/reference trickery is definitely subtle, and depends heavily on knowing what Rust's aliasing and pointer provenance rules really are. Stacked Borrows is not entirely trivial to reason about in fiddly corner cases.
So for now I have only called it 0.1.0 and left a note in the docs. I haven't actually made Otter use it yet but that's the rather more boring software integration part, not the fun "can I do this mad thing" part so I will probably leave that for a rainy day. Possibly a rainy day after someone other than me has looked at partial-borrow (preferably someone who understands Stacked Borrows...).
Fun!
This was great fun. I even enjoyed writing the docs.
The proc-macro programming environment is not entirely straightforward and there are a number of things to watch out for. For my first non-adhoc proc-macro this was, perhaps, ambitious. But you don't learn anything without trying...
edited 2021-09-02 16:28 UTC to fix a typo
Since joining Fujitsu I am permanently running a VM (kvm/qemu) with Windows 10 (unfortunately necessary). While the usaged disk space is about 50G, the actual qcow2 file had grown to over 180G, not good.
Searching the web the very promising virt-sparsify is mentioned again and again, and the man page gives hope, but as it turns out it is broken and calls qemu-img with incorrect/not-working arguments (see this bug).
Another problem seems to be that by default the discard mode seems not to be set to unmap.
So here are the stages how I reduced the size of the qcow2 image back down to around 60G.
Turn off the VM
Make sure you are using VirtIO for the disk, select Discard mode: unmap
Boot into Windows, and from an elevated prompt run: Optimize-Volume -DriveLetter C -ReTrim -Verbose
Shut down the VM
Run a dummy conversion which sparsifies the image: qemu-img convert -O qcow2 orig.qcow2 sparse.qcow2
Rename/Backup the images and boot back into Windows.
That helped in my case, without any consequences (till now) for the Windows installation.
Safe upgrades
A central idea behind Candid is that services evolve over time, and so also their interfaces evolve. As they do, it is desirable to keep the interface usable by clients who have not been updated. In particular on a blockchainy platform like the Internet Computer, where some programs are immutable and cannot be changed to accommodate changes in the interface of the services they use, this is of importance.
Therefore, Candid defines which changes to an interface are guaranteed to be backward compatible. Of course it s compatible to add new methods to a service, but some changes to a method signature can also be ok. For example, changing
service A1 :
get_value : (variant current; previous : nat )
-> (record value : int; last_change : nat )
is fine: It doesn t matter that clients that still use the old interface don t know about the new constructor of the argument variant. And the extra field in the result record will silently be ignored by old clients.
In the Candid spec, this relation is written as A2 <: A1 (note the order!), and the formal footing this builds on is subtyping. We thus say that it is safe to upgrade a service to a subtype , and that A2 s interface is a subtype of A1 s.
In small examples, I often use nat and int, because every nat is also a int, but some int values are not not nat values, namely the negative ones. We say nat is a subtype of int, nat <: int. So a function that in the first returns a int can in the new version return a nat without breaking old clients. But the other direction doesn t work: If the old version s method had a return type of nat, then changing that to int would be a breaking change, as old clients would not be prepared to handle negative numbers.
Note that arguments of function types follow different rules. In fact, the rules are simply turned around, and in argument position (also called negative position ), we can evolve the interface to accept supertypes. Concretely, a function that originally expected an nat can be changed to expect an int, but the other direction doesn t work, because there might still be old clients around that send negative numbers. This reversing-of-the-rules is called contravariance.
The vision is that the developer s tooling will warn the developer before they upgrade the code of a running service to a type that is not a subtype of the old interface.
Let me stress, though, that all this is about not breaking existing clients that use the old interface. It does not mean that a client developer who fetches the new interface for your service won t have to change their code to make his programs compile again.
Higher order composition
So far, we considered the simple case of one service with a bunch of clients, i.e. the first order situation. Things get much more interesting if we have multiple services that are composed, and that pass around references to each other, and we still want everything to be nicely typed and never fail even as we upgrade services.
Therefore, Candid s type system can express that a service s method expects or a returns a reference to another service or method, and the type that this service or method should have. For example
service B : add_listener : (text, func (int) -> ()) -> ()
says that the service with interface B has a method called add_listener which takes two arguments, a plain value of type text and a reference to a function that itself expects a int-typed argument.
The contravariance of the subtyping rules explained above also applies to the types of these function reference. And because the int in the above type is on the left of two function arrows, the subtyping rule direction flips twice, and it is therefore safe to upgrade the service to accept the following interface:
service B : add_listener : (text, func (nat) -> ()) -> ()
Soundness theorem and Coq proof
The combination of these higher order features and the safe upgrade mechanism is maybe the unique selling point of Candid, but also what made its design quite tricky sometimes. And although the conventional subtyping rules work well, we wanted to do some less conventional things (more on that below), and more than once thought we had a good solution, only to notice that it did not hold water in complicated higher-order cases.
But what does it mean to hold water? I felt the need to precisely define a soundness criteria for higher order interface description languages, which you can find in the document An IDL Soundness Proposition. This is a general framework which you can instantiate with your concrete IDL language and rules, and then it tells you what you have to prove to consider your language to be sound. Intuitively, it simulates all possible ways in which services can be defined and upgraded, and in which they can pass around references to each other, and the soundness property is that then that for all messages sent between services, they can always be understood.
The document also shows, in general, that any system that builds on canonical subtyping in sound, as expected. That is still a generic theorem that you can instantiate with a concrete system, but now there is less to do.
Because these proofs can get tricky in corner cases, it is valuable to mechanize them in an interactive theorem prover and have the computer check the proofs. So I have created a Coq formalization that defines the soundness criteria, including the reduction to canonical subtyping. It also defines MiniCandid, a greatly simplified variant of Candid, proves various properties about it (transitivity etc.) and finally instantiates the soundness theorem.
I am particularly fond of the use of coinduction to model the equirecursive types, and the use of named cases, as we know them from Isabelle, to make the proofs a bit more readable and maintainable.
I am less fond of how much work it seems to be to extend MiniCandid with more of Candid s types. Already adding vec was more work than it s worth it, and I defensively blame Coq s not-so-great support for nested recursion.
The soundness relies on subtyping, and that is all fine and well as long as we stick to canonical rules. Unfortunately, practical considerations force us to deviate from these a bit, as we see in the next post of this series.
I'm guessing the last glasses will be through the dishwasher (again) and Pepper the dog can settle down without having to cope with so many people.For those who don't know - Steve and his wife Jo (Sledge and Randombird) hold a barbeque in their garden every August Bank Holiday weekend [UK Bank Holiday on the last Monday in August]. The barbeque is not small - it's the dominating feature in the suburban garden, brick built, with a dedication stone, lights, electricity. The garden is small, generally made smaller by forty or so Debian friends and allies standing and sitting around. People are talking, arguing, hugging people they've not seen for (literal) years and putting the world to rights. This is Debian central point - with large quantities of meat and salads, an amount of beer/alcohol and "Cambridge gin" and general goodwill. This year was more than usually atmospheric because for some of us it was the first time with a large group of people in a while. Side conversations abound: for me it was learning something about the high energy particle physics community, how to precision build helicopters, fly quadcopters and precision 3D print anything, the maths of Isy counting crochet stitches to sew together randomly sized squares ... and, of course, obligatory things like how random is random and what's good enough entropy. And a few sessions of the game of our leader. This is also a place for stuff to get done: I was unashamedly using this to upgrade the storage in my laptop while there were sensible engineers around. A corner of the table, a RattusRattus and it was quickly sorted - then a discussion around the internals of Thinkpads as he took his apart. Then getting a full install - Gb Ethernet to the Debian mirror in the cupboard six feet away is faster bandwidth than a jumbo jet full of tapes. Then getting mail to work again - it's handy when the mailserver owner is next to you, having come in from the garden to help, and finally IRC. And not just me: "You need a GPG key signed - there's three DPLs here, there's a release manager - but you've just missed one of the DAMs." plus an in-depth GPG how-to session on the other side of the table.I was the luckiest one with the most comfortable bed in the house overnight but I couldn't stay for last night. Thanks once again to all involved but especially Steve and Jo who do this for the love of it, and the fun, and the community and the family. Oh, and thanks to Lenovo - not just for being a platinum sponsor of Debconf but also for providing the official laptop of this and most Debian occasions