When you start using Linux' logical volume manager, one of the first question you have to answer is: what name will you give to your volume group? The usual answer is: vg1, vg2, etc. Although it does not bear any specific meaning, this naming convention is simple and seems functional enough. In fact, this is a bad idea, which can have nasty consequences on the long term. Here is why: one day, your computer will eventually give out. To save your precious data, you will remove its drives and plug them into another computer. If you are using LVM with the same naming convention on that second computer, you will then get a name conflict, which will prevent you from seeing the volume group you want to recover. The solution is to name volume groups uniquely across all your computers, and if possible other people's. An elegant way to achieve this is to use your host names as a basis. For instance, on a machine called Pi acolada , you would name a single volume group pinacolada , or two volume groups pinacolada1 and pinacolada2 . Or perhaps vg-pinacolada0 or whatever, you get the idea.

Today I ll be telling you about an interesting way to build your Debian packages using Deb-o-Matic, a tool developed and maintained by Luca Falavigna. Some more details about this tool from the package s description:

Deb-o-Matic is an easy to use build machine for Debian source packages based on pbuilder, written in Python. It provides a simple tool to automate build of source packages with limited user interaction and a simple configuration. It has some useful features such as automatic update of pbuilder, automatic scan and selection of source packages to build and modules support.

The setup. 1. Download the package.

apt-get install debomatic

2. Modify the main configuration file as follows:

[default]
builder: pbuilder
packagedir: /home/john/debomatic # Take note of the following path since we'll need it for later use.
configdir: /etc/debomatic/distributions
pbuilderhooks: /usr/share/debomatic/pbuilderhooks
maxbuilds: 3 # The number of builds you can perform at the same time.
inotify: 1
sleep: 60 # The sleep time between one build and another.
logfile: /var/log/debomatic.log
[gpg]
gpg: 0 # Change to 1 if you want Deb-O-Matic to check the GPG signature of the uploaded packages.
keyring: /etc/debomatic/debomatic.gpg # Add the GPG Keys you want Deb-O-Matic to accept in this keyring.
[modules]
modules: 1 # A list of all the available modules will follow right after.
modulespath: /usr/share/debomatic/modules
[runtime]
alwaysupdate: unstable experimental precise
distblacklist:
modulesblacklist: Lintian Mailer
mapper:  'sid': 'unstable',
'wheezy': 'testing',
'squeeze': 'stable' 
[lintian]
lintopts: -i -I -E --pedantic # Run Lintian in Pedantic mode.
[mailer] # You need an SMTP server running on your machine for the mailer to work. You can have a look at the 'Ssmtp' daemon which is a one-minute-setup MTA, check an example over here.
fromaddr: debomatic@localhost
smtphost: localhost
smtpport: 25
authrequired: 0
smtpuser: user
smtppass: pass
success: /etc/debomatic/mailer/build_success.mail-template # Update the build success or failure mails as you wish by modifying the relevant files.
failure: /etc/debomatic/mailer/build_failure.mail-template
[internals]
configversion = 010a

The available modules are:

1. Contents , which acts as a dpkg -c over the built packages.
2. DateStamp , which displays build start and finish times into a file in the build directory.
3. Lintian , which stores Lintian output on top of the built package in the pool directory.
4. Mailer , which sends a reply to the uploader once the build has finished.
5. PrevBuildCleaner , which deletes all files generated by the previous build.
6. Repository , which generates a local repository of built packages.

2. Configure dput to upload package s sources to your local repository, edit the /etc/dput.cf file and add this entry:

[debomatic]
method = local
incoming = /home/john/debomatic

or the following if you are going to upload the files to a different machine through SSH:

[debomatic]
login = john
fqdn = debomatic.example.net
method = scp
incoming = /debomatic

3. Add a new Virtual Host on Apache and access the repository / built packages directly through your browser:

<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerAdmin john@example.net
ServerName debomatic.example.net
DocumentRoot /home/john/debomatic
<Directory /home/john/debomatic>
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
AllowOverride None
Order allow,deny
allow from all
</Directory>
</VirtualHost>

4. Start the daemon:

sudo /etc/init.d/debomatic start

5. (Optional) Add your repository to APT s sources.list:

deb http://debomatic.example.net/ unstable main contrib non-free

6. (Optional) Start Deb-O-Matic at system s startup by modifying the /etc/init.d/debomatic file at line 21:

- [ -x "$DAEMON" ]   exit 0
- [ "$DEBOMATIC_AUTOSTART" = 0 ] && exit 0
+ [ -x "$DAEMON" ]   exit 0
+ [ "$DEBOMATIC_AUTOSTART" = 1 ] && exit 0

and finally add it to the desired runlevels:

update-rc.d debomatic defaults

Enjoy!

Quick question, what is the lowest Process ID you will find? Most people (myself included until recently) would be able to say that the lowest number is 1 for the init process. Plenty of programs including ps and pstree have this assumption. This assumption bit me this week with Debian Bug 687829 where pstree on a kFreeBSD would not return and used 100% CPU. What was happening? Well it seems that kFreeBSD has a process ID of 0 and pstree used 0 for a fake root to the tree. So with a real and fake process #0 hanging around in pstree there was a strange parent-child circle (I m my own grandad!) between init and process 0 meaning when the tree was walked things go around in circles. The fix is basically to assume the tree starts at 0 and not 1 and that keeps things into perspective. So if you are wondering how inconsistent this goes, here is the list.

• Linux has init with PID 1 and PPID 0. There is no process 0
• FreeBSD has init with PID 1 and PPID 0. Process 0 is kernel and exists and has PPID 0
• Hurd has init at 1 with PPID 1. Process 0 is proc and has PPID 1

So Linux the root is init PID 1, FreeBSD it is kernel PID 0 and Hurd its init PID 1 with a child with PID 0. Nothing like consistency! I do like the crazyness of Hurd where a child is created before a parent; nothing is normal in Hurd-land. I have some temporary code going proving the problem with psmisc and FreeBSD, the tree now looks like what you can see below. This fix will also show up processes hidden under init that were previously hiding.

?()-+-acpi_cooling0(16)
     -acpi_thermal(15)
     -audit(10)
     -bufdaemon(18)
     -flowcleaner(22)
     -g_down(4)
     -g_event(2)
     -g_up(3)
     -hald-runner(547)---hald-addon-storag(569)
     -hald(546)-+-hald(548)---hald(549)
                 -hald-runner(547)---hald-addon-storag(569)
     -hald(548)---hald(549)
     -idle(11)
     -init(1)-+-etc....

Related articles

• An overview of Linux processes (ibm.com)
• What s a process? (acertifiednut.typepad.com)
• Hide process information for other users (linux-dev.org)
• What can you do with a PID? (acertifiednut.typepad.com)

After a long break in my row of interviews with people in the Debian Edu and Skolelinux community, I finally found time to wrap up another. This time it is Giorgio Pioda, which showed up on the mailing list at the start of this year, asking questions and inspiring us to improve the first time administrators experience with Skolelinux. :) The interview was conduced in May, but I only found time to publish it now. Who are you, and how do you spend your days? I have a PhD in chemistry but since several years I work as teacher in secondary (15-18 year old students) and tertiary (a kind of "light" university) schools. Five years ago I started to manage a Learning Management Service server and slowly I got more and more involved with IT. 3 years ago the graduating schools moved completely to Linux and I got the head of the IT for this. The experience collected in chemistry labs computers (for example NMR analysis of protein folding) and in the IT-courses during university where sufficient to start. Self training is anyway very important I live in the Italian speaking part of Switzerland, and the SPSE school (secondary) is a very special sport school for young people who try to became sport pro (for all sports, we have dozens of disciplines represented) and we are recognised by the Olympic Swiss Organisation. How did you get in contact with the Skolelinux/Debian Edu project? Looking for Linux / Primary Domain Controller (PDC) I found it already several years ago. But since the system was still not Kerberized and since our schools relies strongly on laptops I didn't use it. I plan to introduce it in the next future, probably for the next school year, since the squeeze release solved this security hole. What do you see as the advantages of Skolelinux/Debian Edu? Many. First of all there is a strong and living community that is very generous for help and hints. Chat help is crucial, together with the mailing list. Second. With Skolelinux you get an already well engineered platform and you don't have to start to build up your PDC and your clients from GNU/scratch; I've already done this once and I can tell it, it is hard. Third, since Skolelinux is a standard platform, it is way easier to educate other IT people and even if the head IT is sick another one could pick up the task without too much hassle. What do you see as the disadvantages of Skolelinux/Debian Edu? The only real problem I see is that it is a little too less flexible at client level. Debian stable is rocky and desirable, but there are many reasons that force for another choice. For example the need of new drivers for new PC, or the need for a specific OS for some devices that have specific software packages for another specific distribution (I have such a case for whiteboards that have only Ubuntu packages). Thus, I prepared compatibility packages educlient and eduroaming, hoping not to use them ;-) Which free software do you use daily? I have a Debian Stable PDC at school (Kerberos, NIS, NFS) with mixed Debian and Ubuntu clients. If you think that this triad combination is exotic... well I discovered right yesterday that Perceus has the same... For myself I run Debian wheezy/sid, but this combination is good only I you have enough competence to fix stuff for yourself, if something breaks. Daily I use texmacs, gnumeric, a little bit of R statistics, kmplot, and less frequently OpenOffice.org. Which strategy do you believe is the right one to use to get schools to use free software? I think that the only real argument that school managers "hear" is cost reduction. They don't give too much weight on quality, stability, just because they are normally not open to change. Students adapts very quickly to GNU/Linux (and for them being able to switch between different OS is a plus value); teachers and managers don't. We decided to move to Linux because students at our school have own laptop and we have the responsibility to keep the laptop ready to use; we were really unsatisfied with Microsoft since every Monday we had 20 machine to fix for viral infections... With Linux this has been reduced to zero, since people installs almost only from official repositories. I think that our special needs brought us to Linux. Those who don't have such needs will hardly move to Linux.

Yesterday, Kirsten Flipkens, after having had a pretty bad year in which she couldn't even enter the Wimbledon qualifiers, reached and won her first-ever WTA finals, in Quebec City. Flipkens, who was a junior world number 1 when she won the junior US open and Wimbledon tournaments in 2003, has had a fairly troublesome career, with some injuries at some bad times, and some bad luck as well, culminating in a career-high ranking of 59. In that light, it's refreshing to see everything finally coming together for her, and having her finally clinch that well-deserved title. With today's win, she jumps from a 102nd position to a whopping 69 in a single week. So again: Congratulations, Kirsten!

I didn't get very far this week with my RCBW efforts, but luckily we have BSPs going on :) Here's my short list:

• #639565 liboauth-dev: "liboauth-dev: please make loose libcurl dependency"
  further investigation
• #642903 nodm: "nodm: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10"
  fix .config, upload to DELAYED/5
• #652084 gosmore: "gosmore use 100% CPU and does nothing"
  sponsor NMU from Kai L ke, upload to DELAYED/2
• #657465 conserver-client: "conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user"
  private mail from maintainer
• #682412 dynamips: "dynamips: FTBFS with multiarch paths: cc: error: /usr/lib/libelf.a: No such file or directory"
  uploaded to DELAYED/3 with my patch by a fellow DD during the Berlin BSP
• #683925 src:ocp: "FTBFS with gcc-4.7 on i386"
  add patch from Kumar Appaiah, upload to DELAYED/2
• #684144 sauerbraten: "sauerbraten: security issues with transmitted map cfgs"
  unsuccessfully apply upstream patch

I just had a conversation with someone who thinks that their office should have no servers. The office in question has four servers, an Internet gateway/firewall system, the old file server (and also Xen server), the new file server, and the VOIP server. The Internet gateway system could possibly be replaced by a suitably smart ADSL modem type device, but that would reduce the control over the network and wouldn t provide much of a benefit. The VOIP server has to be a separate system for low latency IMHO. In theory you could use a Xen DomU for running Asterisk or you could run Asterisk on the Dom0 of the file/Xen server. But that just makes things difficult. A VOIP server needs to be reliable and is something that you typically don t want to touch once it s working, in this case the Asterisk server has been a few more years without upgrades than the Xen server. An Asterisk system could be replaced by a dedicated telephony device which some people might consider to be removing a server, but really a dedicated VOIP server device is just as much of a server as a P4 running Asterisk but with greater expense. A major advantage of a P4 running Asterisk is that you can easily replace the system at no cost if there is a hardware problem. Having two file servers is excessive for a relatively small office. But running two servers is the common practice when one server is being replaced. The alternative is to just immediately cut things over which has the potential for a lot of people to arrive at work on Monday and find multiple things not working as desired. Having two file servers is a temporary problem. File Servers The first real problem when trying to remove servers from an office is the file server. ADSL links with Annex M can theoretically upload data at 3Mb/s which means almost 400KB/s. So if you have an office with a theoretically perfect ADSL2+ Annex M installation then you could save a 4MB file to a file server on the Internet in not much more than 10 seconds if no-one else is using the Internet connection. Note that 4MB isn t THAT big by today s standards, the organisation in question has many files which are considerably bigger than that. Large files include TIFF and RAW files used for high quality image processing, MS-Office documents, and data files for most accounting programs. Saving a 65MB quick-books file in 3 minutes (assuming that your Annex M connection is perfect and no-one else is using the Internet) would have to suck. Then there s the issue of reading files, video files (which are often used for training and promotion) are generally larger than 100MB which would be more than 30 seconds of download time at ADSL2+ speed but if someone sends an email to everyone in the office saying please watch this video then the average time to load it would be a lot more. Through quickly examining my collection of Youtube downloads I found a video which averaged 590KB/s, if an office using a theoretically perfect ADSL2+ connection giving 24Mb/s (3MB/s) download speed had such a file on a remote file server then a maximum of five people could view it at one time if no-one else in the office was using the Internet. Now when the NBN is connected (which won t happen in areas like the Melbourne CBD for at least another 3 years) it will be possible to get speeds like 100Mb/s download and 25Mb/s upload. That would allow up to 20 people to view videos at once and a 65MB quick-books file could be saved in a mere 22 seconds if everyone else was idle. Of course that relies on the size of data files remaining the same for another 3 years which seems unlikely, currently no Youtube videos use resolutions higher than 1920*1080 (so they don t take full advantage of a $400 Dell monitor) and there s always potential for storing more financial data. I expect that by the time we all have 100Mb/25Mb speeds on the NBN it will be as useful to us as 24Mb/3Mb ADSL2+ Annex M speeds are today (great for home use but limited for an office full of people). There are of course various ways of caching data, but all of them involve something which would be considered to be a server and I expect that all of them are more difficult to install and manage than just having a local file server. Of course instead of crunching the numbers for ADSL speeds etc you could just think for a moment about the way that 100baseT networking to the desktop has been replaced by Gigabit networking. When people expect each workstation to have 1000Mb/s send and receive speed it seems quite obvious that one ADSL connection shared by an entire office isn t going to work well if all the work that is done depends on it. Management could dictate that there is to be no server in the office, but if that was to happen then the users would create file shares on their workstations so you would end up with ad-hoc servers which aren t correctly managed or backed up. That wouldn t be an improvement and technically wouldn t achieve the goal of not having servers. Home Networking Without Servers It is becoming increasingly common to have various servers in a home network. Due to a lack of space and power and the low requirements a home file server will usually be a workstation with some big disks, but there are cheap NAS devices which some people are installing at home. I don t recommend the cheap NAS devices, I m merely noting that they are being used. Home entertainment is also something that can benefit from a server. A MythTV system for recording TV and playing music has more features than a dedicated PVR box. But even the most basic PVR ($169 for a 1TB device in Aldi now) is still a fairly complex computer which would probably conflict with any aim to have a house free of servers. The home network design of having a workstation run as a file and print server can work reasonably well as long as the desktop tasks aren t particularly demanding (IE no games) and the system doesn t change much (IE don t track Debian/Testing or otherwise have new versions of software). But this is really something that only works if you only have a few workstations. Running an office without servers seems rather silly as it seems that none of my friends are able to have a home without a server. Running Internet Services Hypothetically speaking if one was to run an office without servers then that would require running all the servers in question on the Internet somewhere. For some things this can work better than a local server, for example most of my clients who insist on running a mail server in their office would probably get a better result if they had a mail server running on Linode or Hetzner or one of the Hosted Exchange offerings if they want a Windows mail sever. But for a file server if you were to get around the issue of bandwidth required to access the files in normal use there s the issue of managing a server (which is going to take more effort and expense than for a server on the LAN). Then there s the issue of backups. In my previous post about Hard Drives for Backup [1] I considered some of the issues related to backing data up over the Internet. The big problem however is a complete restore, if you have even a few dozen gigs of data that you want to transfer to a remote server in a hurry it can be a difficult problem. If you have hundreds of gigs then it becomes a very difficult problem. I m sure that I could find a Melbourne based Data Center (DC) that gives the option of bringing a USB attached SATA disk for a restore but even that case would give a significant delay when compared to backing things up on a LAN. If a server on the office LAN breaks in the afternoon my client can make arrangements to let me work in their office in the evening to fix it, but sometimes DCs don t allow 24*7 access and sometimes when they do allow access there are organisational problems that make it impossible when you want it (EG the people at the client company who are authorised become unavailable). The Growth of Servers Generally it s a really bad idea to build a server that has exactly the hardware you need. The smart thing to do is to install more of every resource (disk, RAM, CPU, etc) than is needed and to allow expansion when possible (EG have some RAM slots and drive bays free). No matter how well you know your environment and it s users you can get surprised by the way that requirements change. Buying a slightly bigger server at the start costs hardly any money but upgrading a server will cost a lot. Once you have a server that s somewhat over-specced you will always find other things to run on it. Many things could be run elsewhere at some cost, but if you have unused hardware then you may as well use it. Xen and other virtualisation systems are really good in this regard as they allow you to add more services without making upgrades difficult. This means that it s quite common to have a server that is purchased for one task but which ends up being used for many tasks. Anyone who would aspire to an office without servers would probably regard adding extra features in such a manner to be a problem. But really if you want to allow the workers to do their jobs then it s best to be able to add new services as needed without going through a budget approval process for each one. Conclusion There probably are some offices where no-one does any serious file access and everyone s work is based around a web browser or some client software that is suited to storing data on the Internet. But for an office where the workers use traditional Office software such as MS-Office or Libre-Office a file server is necessary. Some sort of telephony server is necessary no matter how you do things. If you have a traditional telephone system then you might try not to call the PABX a server , but really that s what it is. Then when the traditional phone service becomes too expensive you have to consider whether to use Asterisk or a proprietary system, in either case it s really a server. In almost every case the issue isn t whether to have a server in the office, but how many servers to have and how to manage them.

• [1] http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/08/08/hard-drives-backup/

Related posts:

1. Planning Servers for Failure Sometimes computers fail. If you run enough computers then you...
2. a good security design for an office One issue that is rarely considered is how to...
3. Efficiency of Cooling Servers One thing I had wondered was why home air-conditioning systems...

After the Opus codec made it into IETF as RFC 6716, I had a look to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardise a video codec too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this area. A non-"working group" mailing list video-codec was created 2012-08-20. It is intended to discuss the topic and if a formal working group should be formed. I look forward to see how this plays out. There is already an email from someone in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much. If one of my readers is involved with codec work, I hope she will join this work to standardise a royalty free video codec within IETF.

Over the past few days, I decided to purge Gnash and LightSpark from my laptop to see whether my Internet experience would be affected in any dramatic way. Amazingly, a number of sites seem to offer video content encoded in Theora (VP3) or WebM (VP8). Sadly, a handful of popular sites such as Vimeo insist upon using the H.264 (MPEG-4) CODEC, which cannot be safely supported on Free Software because of unclear licensing issues that might impose an ulterior usage fee onto the end-users.

The good news is that the Mozilla Foundation has decided to avoid the issue together: starting with the most recent release of the mobile version of Firefox, content decoding is offloaded to the platform's native media CODEC library. On most Free Software platforms, this means that Gstreamer will handle the content and, in turn, use gstreamer-plugins-bad to perform the decoding. However, Gstreamer support is still rather sketchy, as attested by this Debian bug report and thus disabled by default. This leaves me wondering how little is missing for this to properly work. Would either Canonical or Red Hat perhaps be interested in funding this?

Ever wondered how you can update your website (in our case a static website with a bunch of HTML and PHP files) by committing to a Git repository hosted on a different server? if the answer to the previous question is yes, then you are in the right place. The scenario: - Website hosted on server A.
- Git repository hosted on server B. and a few details about why would you opt for maintaining your website through Git:

1. You need multiple people to access the static content of your website and you also want to maintain all the history of changes together with all the Git s magic.
2. You think using an FTP server is not secure enough.
3. You think giving out SSH access or more permissions on the server to multiple users it s not what you want. (also using scp will overwrite the files directly with all its consequences)

the setup, on server A: 1. Clone the Git repository over the directory that your Web server will serve.

cd /srv/www.domain.com/http && sudo git clone http://git.example.com/git/domain.git

2. Grab the needed package:

apt-get install fishpolld or yum install fishpolld

3. Set up a topic (called website_update) that will call a git pull each time the repository hosted on server B receives an update. (the file has to be placed into the /etc/fishpoll.d directory)

#!/bin/bash
PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin"
WEBSITEDIR="/srv/www.domain.com/http"
if [ -d "$ WEBSITEDIR " ]; then
cd "$ WEBSITEDIR "
else
echo "Unable to access theme directory. Failing."
exit 1
fi
git pull

4. Add a little configuration file that will enable the website_update s topic at daemon s startup. (you should name it website_update.conf)

[fishpoll]
on_start = True

5. Open the relevant port on Iptables so that server A and server B can communicate as expected, the daemon runs over port 27527.

-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -s server-B-IP --dport 27527 -j ACCEPT

6. Start the daemon. (by default, logs are sent to syslog but you can run the daemon in Debug mode by using the -D flag)

sudo /etc/init.d/fishpolld start or sudo systemctl start fishpolld.service or sudo /usr/sbin/fishpolld -D

and on server B: 1. Grab the needed package:

apt-get install fishpoke or yum install fishpoke

2. Configure the relevant Git hook (post-update, located into the hooks directory) and make it executable.

#!/bin/sh
echo "Triggering update of configuration on server A"
fishpoke server-A-IP-or-DNS website_update

Finally test the whole setup by committing to the repository hosted on server B and verify your changes being sent live on your website!

Right now, in many parts of the world, people are celebrating the Software Freedom Day 2012. The Debian project as well is participating to some of these events with talks, demos and partying. In particular, you can find our project members actively involved in different locations and activies, among which: Brazil Novo Hamburgo, RS

• BASH for sysadmins
• What is the Debian Project?
• ZFS: quick presentation for sysadmins.

Italy Quiliano, SV

• Introduction to the Debian Project

UK Rugby A series of hands-on live demonstrations, including:

• Linux-based machines running Debian or Debian-derived distributions
• FreedomBox for visitors to check out
• Raspberry Pi machines running Raspbian, used to help local children and parents learn Scratch

Personally, right now I m celebrating in Italy, attending a talk by the famous kernel hacker Alessandro Rubini (a really great speech about our freedom and how software impacts it). Cheers from the Italian Riviera!

Some of my Romanian readers might know that for the last two years I've got involved in the skeptical movement to such a degree that I am a co-producer of a bi-weekly podcast on science and skepticism (in Romanian) called Skeptics in Romania . Some might even be regular listeners of the show.

(There isn't much to see now visually on the site, but me and the other people behind the project have some ongoing plans to change that.)

In spite of our modest site, up until now we had some successes, one of them being the publication of an article on us in a known Romanian printed publication and another being the invitation to a live show face to face with Oreste Teodorescu, a well known Romanian mysticist and woo promoter.

During that live show we managed to show a demonstration (video below, in Romanian) of how astrology gives the impression of working, without actually working, and, taking into account we had no prior TV camera experience and that it was a live show, I think we managed an honourable presence.


We also have a series of interviews in English with some really interesting people: Dr. Eugenie Scott, Prof. Christopher French, Prof. Edzard Ernst, Samantha Stein and others. We did these interviews at Denkfest 2011, in Zurich, and we integrated the translated (voice over) interviews in our podcast. The conlusion is that most of our activities revolve around the podcast, so let me tell you more about that.

The podcast has a somewhat fixed structure, it starts with a conversation between ourselves, then we have a segment on the history of science, technology, skepticism and woo, and then we have a segment called The dangers of not being skeptical . In this segment we present cases of people who lost their lives, their health, their money or any combination of the former because they were duped into some scam, science-y sounding non-science, unfounded claim or some other woo.

Having lost recently my brother-in-law to a form of cancer known as Hodgkin lymphoma, I became especially sensitive about miracle-cure claims for cancer, and this section of the show has lately seen its fair share of such cases. Honestly, if there could be a way to prosecute the irresponsible, ignorant and/or cynical people promoting all sorts of quack "therapies", especially for cancer*, I would really like to see it happen. But there isn't, and we're trying the best accessible approach, informing the public.

During my brother-in-law's last two years of his life, he went through lots of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions, repeated periods of hospitalisation, and lots of drugs. This is the best of what we currently have for treating and curing most forms of cancer, and too many times this isn't enough. I can't even imagine how stressful and discouraging it must feel when the best of what we have doesn't help.

Here is where the desperation and hopes of patients and their families meet the purely irresponsible cynical or ignorant promoters of woo and quack therapies. Because it takes either an ignorant or a really cynical (I really feel this word isn't enough) person to prey on the suffering of other people to make easy money under the false pretence of offering a cure.

It almost happened to my brother-in-law and his family, because they almost went for some herbal concoction promoted as a cancer cure on some forum, blog or page of a seller of this fake therapy. It was really hard for me to make them understand why using such a product it not advisable, not even in parallel with the medical treatment due its possible counter effect or interactions with the real medical treatment, without them getting the wrong idea that I wasn't trying to help. While trying to be brief and informative not to lose their attention, I told them how "natural" doesn't necessarily mean "good" (uranium, lead and Irukandji's venom are all natural), and how plants are drugs because they all contain chemical substances (and no, "chemical" does not mean "human made" or "artificial") which could interact with the medical treatment.


But most people don't even have the chance of having close by a person with a more science-leaning thought process and a skeptical mind. Those unfortunate people are the most vulnerable people and constitute the biggest chunk of the victims of baseless pseudo-cures or pseudo-treatments.

On our last show, I presented the case of Yvonne Main, a cancer suffering patient who mistook an invasive carcinoma for a cyst, and irdologist Ruth Nelson for a real healthcare giver.

Yvonne Main, died from an invasive carcinoma after seeking help from a iridologist, and delaying real medical treament for 18 months

Yvonne, after seeking medical advice from a person that essentially promotes the dead idea of guessing diseases by looking at the eyes**, used natural treatments for about 18 months and, after all this time, her carcinoma grew to a size of 10 to 11 cm, eating through her skull and causing damage which was later attempted to be countered through bone transplant from her ribs.

Ruth Nelson wasn't prosecuted in any way and continues her practice of quackery unharmed.

This is not the only case, nor even one case from a select few where woo and quackery lead to grave consequences for patients. There are many, many more; they're so many that even after splitting them in categories they seem too many per category, especially when you realise these are only the findings of, essentially, a single man:




This is part of what I have been doing in the last few years, instead of working on Debian. Is it a good thing? Is it a bad thing? Maybe it's good. I want to know what do you think?


* you will, most likely, never hear such a promoter of non-therapies say that there isn't just one cancer, and that, in fact, cancer is a name for a certain family of diseases which are all called cancer - that's a first sign that you might be dealing with quack
** probably in the line of thought that the eyes are the gates to the soul so they must tell something significant about health

In the light of the recent announcement by the European central bank to bail out states without limits which is breaking the very law that the EU was built upon Italy s stock market supervisors have removed the restriction on short sales. In Italy, you may now again sell stuff on the financial market that you don t have. The only condition is that you have to be able to prove that you could currently buy it. But that, of course, is not a guarantee for you to be able to buy the good/stock/whatever when the person you sold it to actually wants it, given the volatility of the markets. I expect other countries to follow suit. Currencies and especially the Euro was made by bankers for bankers to earn money. Who actually believes that the ESM, to which Germany enslaved itself this week would fix anything is simply na ve. Temporarily, the markets were on hold, how convenient that this coincided with summer break. Now everything is back to normal and the next financial crisis is being built. NP: Porcupine Tree: Stupid Dream

I recently blogged about 3 languages reaching 100% translation for debconf templates in wheezy. Today, two more languages joined the club: French and Portuguese. We're still on our way to get seven or even eight complete translations in wheezy. Czech is now only missing "linux-latest" and Spanish waits for sysvinit (which I just NMU'ed) and nova (unfortunately an error in former translation was unnoticed and I discovered it quite late). David Pr vot is still trying to get Danish complete, by doing many fast update rounds and NMUs. I hope he succeeds in this.

I have been toying around with Erlang since quiet some time and finally made something that could be considered the de facto Hello World of Erlang. Unlike most of the other programming languages where concurrency is an added feature, Erlang was built around the concept of concurrent programming. If you love functional programming and can get over the weird Erlang syntax, learning Erlang will not be very difficult and is definitely worth the effort. I have been reading Joe Armstrong s Programming Erlang: Software for a Concurrent World and will definitely recommend it to anyone starting out with Erlang. I am yet to dive into OTP, but so far, so good. :) I have taken the naive recursive factorial algorithm and parallelized it to take advantage of multiple cores available on average system these days. Lets assume that we need to distribute the task of calculating N factorial over K processes. To do that, I have divided the set of integer 1 N to K subsets, say S , S , ., S_k, such that S S S_k = 1 N and S S S_k = Where, S = [ 1, K+1, 2K+1, , (x )*K+1 ];
x : (x )*K + 1 <= N and (x +1)*K + 1 > N and x S = [ 2, K+2, 2K+2, , (x )*K+2 ];
x : (x )*K + 2 <= N and (x +1)*K + 1 > N and x

S_k = [ K, K+K, 2K+K, , (x_k)*K+2 ];
x_k : (x_k)*K + 2 <= N and (x_k+1)*K + 1 > N and x_k Product of all the elements in each of the sets in calculated in a separate thread and all these calculations, theoretically, can be done in parallel. These sub-products are then multiplied together to get the final factorial. *Update*: The algorithm described above works but is not the best way to find the factorial of a number and after some time on Google, I am convinced that Luschny s is the resource on the internet if you are looking for something faster and has a factorial somewhere in it. I am an Erlang beginner, and this could be very well a sub-optimal implementation. Comment and let me know, what you think of it and if you enjoyed reading this, you should follow me on twitter.

Start the Erlang shell
$ erl
Compile the code
1> c(factorial).
Call the calculate function
2> factorial:calculate(10000).

<script src="https://gist.github.com/3715155.js"> </script>

Two bits here - debuild.me I ve started working on a site to host my build stuff, and i ve called it debuild.me None of it s active, and I m going to be slowly using it more as it becomes more, well, implemented. atlantic, etc I ve been working (mostly quietly) on a cut down buildd, to test packages I intend to sponsor over a couple of different conditions. I m going to run deep source checks, build the package a few different ways, check the basics (lintian, piuparts, etc) and lots of other stuff I might think is a good idea while doing it. At it s core, it doens t use buildd nodes like the archive, rather, it uses aws. When I dput a package, it spins up at least one AWS instance, based on an AMI I set up (and update frequently), and builds on that. This means yes! No queues! :) It also means I need careful oversight of the nodes, and pay attention to not running up a big bill. It should also be noted, this is not for uploading a built package to the archive, this is for testing packages before uploading them to the archive. Ideas / patches welcome

AltOS 1.1 Bug fixes and some nice new features Bdale and I are pleased to announce the release of AltOS version 1.1. AltOS is the core of the software for all of the Altus Metrum products. It consists of cc1111-based micro-controller firmware and Java-based ground station software. We ve spent the last flying season chatting with people flying TeleMetrum and TeleMini boards and they came up with some great ideas to add to the system. AltOS Firmware Features and fixes There are bug fixes in both ground station and flight software, so you should plan on re-flashing both units at some point. However, there aren t any incompatible changes, so you don t have to do it all at once. New features:

• Apogee-lockout timer. For situations where the normal apogee determination algorithm could be fooled, we ve added a timeout value to prevent premature firing of the apogee charge. Normal flights won t need this, but a couple of users asked for this feature.
• RSSI value for Monitor Idle mode. The TeleDongle firmware has been updated to report signal strength information for data received from the altimeter. This allows the user to see how well the radio is working without having to switch to flight mode.
• Force the radio to 434.550MHz. This is useful with TeleMini devices where the only way to talk to the device is through the radio. If you don t know the frequency, it s really hard to make that work.

Bug fixes:

• Stale telemetry data reported when switching frequencies. TeleDongle would accidentally re-transmit old telemetry packets when the radio frequency was changed. This would be harmless except that when scanning to find the frequency used by an altimeter, you d appear to get packets at every frequency.

AltosUI Easier to use AltosUI has also seen quite a bit of work for the 1.1 release. There aren t any huge new features, but some activities are restructured to make them easier to navigate. And, of course, we ve fixed a bunch of bugs. New features:

• Configure Ground Station activity. This provides a way to set the default radio frequency for each TeleDongle. This replicates the frequency menu present in the Monitor Flight activity, but doesn t also bring up that giant window.
• Support the apogee lockout timer. This just adds another entry in the dialog for configuring the altimeter to configure the new timer. By default, the timer is disabled, allowing the apogee detection code in the flight computer to operate normally.
• Add imperial units option. When enabled, this uses imperial units (feet and miles) for all values on the screen and in the voice announcements.

User interface changes:

• Make the look-n-feel configurable. Java offers many different user interface styles on each platform. This exposes the available set and lets the user pick one. By default, we continue to use the native platform appearance.
• Add an Age element to the Monitor Flight UI. This shows how long it has been since the last valid telemetry packet was received, making it easy to tell when communications are lost.
• Change flight data downloading. Instead of selecting which to download and which to delete at the same time, the interface now has separate steps for downloading and then deleting files. This makes it easier to verify that the files were downloaded before deleting flights from the on-board memory.
• Re-compute boost and landing times. Given the whole flight history, it s easy to find the time when the rocket started and stopped flying. Having these get recomputed means the boost time, acceleration values and main descent rates are computed more accurately.

Bug fixes:

• Wait for 10 valid GPS messages before marking GPS as ready. Before this fix, GPS was marked as ready when 10 valid packets were received from the flight computer after the first valid GPS data arrived. This waits for 10 valid GPS packets instead.
• Fix Google Earth file export. The format requirements for Google Earth files became more strict in recent releases; this patch changes how the files are formatted to make them work again.
• Make AltosUI run on Mac OS X Lion . Apple changed the default heap size for Java applications with this release, dramatically reducing the memory available to applications. This would cause map tiles to fail to load and other random problems.
• Improve COM port handling on Windows. This eliminates the need to wait 5 seconds between closing and re-opening devices, and also eliminates other spurious errors when opening devices.

My email's been out of control for a while now. I've noticed a correlation between the state of my email and my state of mind - I don't know which way the causation flows, if any. At the weekend (after assembling the shelves), I archived my entire inbox. Again. But I find the hard part with email bankruptcy is preventing the entire cycle recurring. This time, I was more drastic. I deleted all my labels, and all but three of my filters. I removed the Smart Labels, the chat widget, the calendar integration, the Google+ circles (more on that soon). There are no distractions in my inbox any more. I'm forcing myself to process every non-spam email that comes to my address. (Yes, I'm embarassed to say that I use Gmail - it seemed like a good idea at the time, because of the spam filtering. I occasionally notice bugs with ancient emails becoming unarchived or unread, and wonder if Google uses a probabilistic data structure to access all those attributes quickly enough. Can't investigate, though, because it's Gmail. Consider this the first step towards moving away.) So rather than hiding the deluge in the background, I'm unsubscribing from a lot of mailing lists, and informing marketers that I don't want their communications. It turns out that I get a lot less email than I feared - and processing them this way means that high-traffic sources get removed first. My remaining problem is what to do with email from mailing lists like debian-private - I don't really care enough to read everyone's vacation plans, but unsubscribing doesn't seem like the right thing either - there's (obviously) no online archive for this type of mailing list. For the moment, I've added a filter back to hide just vacation messages, but there's a more general problem lurking here.

I was pointed at a great online course If you are into e-voting analysis (or, more broadly, into democratic processes' history, evolution and future), I strongly suggest you to take a look at Securing Digital Democracy . Just the name of the teacher should be enough to make it interesting: University of Michigan professor J. Alex Halderman, the guy who has analized/hacked several electronic booths, and one of the clearest, smartest voices to explain what should we require of a voting system and how electronic booths are the worst fit for any purpose. The course is delivered through Coursera; I have found Coursera to be an effective, usable, unobtrusive platform So much I even signed up for another course. I am not so happy with online courses requiring to wait so much between lessons, but after all, it tries to mimic what we see at "regular" (i.e. classroom) teaching settings. And, after all, we autodidacts are still a minority. The course in question started ten days ago, but you can still perfectly join. Each week has two lessons, worth of approximately 40 minutes of video each, and are "graded" through a quiz. Lets see how this evolves.