Meet the Italian income agency The Italian income agency decided to publish online all the income levels for each and every single citizen and company in the country. I did not manage to see the actual data, because the entire income agency website was swamped with request and timing out all the time. You should have heard the comments of my accountant, who every day needs to access other parts of the website for work. That service is supposed to have been taken offline now, after the Italian privacy watchdog issued a polite What The Fuck! Why Didn't You Tell Us Anything About This? sort of note. The minister defended himself by saying "I can't see what is the problem, it's the same in all the world: if you want proof just watch any American TV series". What a wise man. I should watch some of The Greatest American Hero again. Since I could not see the actual data, I could not verify if what people were saying was actually true, that is that income information were published together with the full home address, providing a nice shopping list for house robbers, kidnappers and the other kind of professionals that would politely wait next to your door for you to come home late in the night. But fear not, the website was protected from bots: it used a captcha. Not only that: in order to comply with standard accessibility rules, the website used a perfectly accessible captcha: You can't get more accessible than that: the captcha is displayed in plain text, so any accessibility technology will be able to read it. Plus, anyone can easily copy and paste it into the text box. And if someone needs to do it often, it's even trivial to write a script that does it for you! But it's unfair to say that it was just plain text: it was cleverly encrypted:

<div class="educaptcha"><label for="educaptcha">I<!-- id9113507 -->nser<span>ire </span><span>nel c</span><span>ampo</span> di <!-- id5058508 -->v<span>erific</span><span>a suc</span><!-- id2643358 -->ces<span>sivo i</span><!-- id2500023 -->l valore <span>695</span><span>8571</span>4<!-- id3588853 -->:</label>
<input id="educaptcha" type="text" name="ucaptcha" value="" maxlength="10" size="20" /></div>

For your convenience, here is the version cracked with a malicious :%s/<[^>]\+>//g in vim. If you do not speak Italian, you can still look for this phrase in the screenshot above:

Inserire nel campo di verifica successivo il valore 69585714:

The meaning is of course:

Insert the value 69585714 in the following verification field:

It's been a fun day for Italians online.

These last two weeks most of my time has been sucked into getting Python 2.5 as default into testing. That’s done now. I made use of the block uploads thingie ftpmaster implemented for the release team to use. Basically, if your package could disrupt an “almost there” transition, the upload will be rejected. The blocks were in place for 5 days, which I think it’s acceptable. As long as we don’t end blocking stuff for very long, I think we should be fine. See the end of this post for more about this. Though it was quite a bit of work, I’m very glad I took care it myself, since now I really feel I’m 100% back to Debian, after the time I spent off for health reasons. Update: Oh, and I forgot to say: having control over britney has really really helped. Thanks a lot Joerg for that.

---

Dudesconf Tomorrow I’m leaving to Coru a for Dudesconf, which is a kind of Debconf-ES. I’m giving an introductory talk to Git, a semi-lighting talk about grep-dctrl (30 min.), and (gasp) a talk about Debian packaging with a VCS. We may have a Debian Quiz as well. I’m so looking forward to it, since many people who’ll attend are amongst my most loved ones, and I already missed last year’s since I wasn’t fully recovered yet. See you there!

---

Minirok and Sevilla One of the reasons I wasn’t fully back to release management during the past 5 months or so is because I spent as much time as I had doing development for Minirok. I don’t think I mentioned here before, but I was participating in a Free Software Contest for college students organized by the University of Sevilla, Spain. Such effort finally paid off, since Minirok was elected as one of the finalists. This means next week I’ll go to Sevilla, to make a presentation of the project, and who knows what more. ;-) I’m very excited.

---

Finally, more on blocking uploads This Python 2.5 transition was the first time the block uploads feature was used, and there were a couple bumps along the way. In particular, a couple packages were blocked, when they shouldn’t have been (libqt4-ruby and evolution-sharp), and one needed package was not blocked, though Rene Engelhard thankfully spotted it very quickly (mono). The problem is it’s not completely straightforward to generate a list of all the stuff that could possibly affect the transition. What I did was to make a run of britney on an arch that had all the needed bits in place, and block all the packages that migrated together as a result of the hint. This fails in two ways:

• it can include stuff that is not needed for the transition, namely unrelated packages that happen to become candidates for testing by one of the their dependencies having migrated as part of the hint. This is what happened with libqt4-ruby and evolution-sharp.
• it can miss stuff that is needed, like packages that can migrate by themselves, so the main run prior to the hint migrates them, and hence do not show up as part of the hint, but that some package of the transition depend on. This is what happened with mono.

The second problem, though, can be fixed by parsing the excuses list and blocking stuff that some bits of the transition depends on. Easy enough. Yet, there are more cases when things can go wrong, for example a shlibs-bumping upload of a package (say, sqlite3) linked against by some package still needing a couple of builds (say, qt4-x11). For that, blocking uploads is not an option, since that’d be an insane amounts of packages that, furthermore, can be uploaded if they don’t bump shlibs, so I guess we’ll have to ask in the next release update that shlibs-bumping uploads are coordinated in -release too, at least when close to finishing a transition.

A few weeks ago, NYU hosted an interesting event about the future of the Internet, appropriately tittled The Futures of the Internet, the video of which is now available here. One of the panelists was Jonathan Zittrain (who recently wrote an important new book bearing the same name as the event) and during the talk he provided a few ideas about how geeks and developers can help secure the Future of the Internet. While I agree with a lot in fact most of his assessments about the state and fate of the Internet as he lays out in his book and his talks, his characterization of geek/hacker/developer politics is not one of them. Basically, one of Zittrain’s claims is that developers are not doing enough to save the Future of the Internet and it is their rampant, Atlas-like libertarianism, which is, in part, to blame (first made 37:20 minutes into the video for those who want to listen to the actual comments). They have little-to-no political consciousness, are too cool to care about the fine print and they don’t care about the broader politics of the the Internet because they assume that they can just hack around any sort of barrier and impediment. While we can, without a doubt, identify a strain of libertarianism among hackers, it is by no means representative of all of geekdom and in fact, is becoming more and more a worn out 1990s stereotype/clich as time passes than an accurate representation of what is a far more variegated set of ethics and practices among hackers (and I will soon publish an article on this topic). It also completely fails to capture the ethical spirit as well as sociological, and political workings of one of the most important strains of hacking free and open source software which not only powers most of our (open) Internet but which in fact has provided a pretty hefty ethical backbone by which to conceptualize one of the ways we should think about the fight for the future of the Internet. Ok, time for a rant now Geeks not only designed the Internet, an indisputably revolutionary medium, but also implemented, and continue to maintain it, and then in their copious spare time, also engage in fighting back the political, legal and corporate encroachment which threatens to limit the very revolutionary nature of the Internet (as Chris Kelty’s new book on Free Software argues). If these acts by geeks are not enough political action, then maybe the development of not just one, but multiple entirely open and free alternatives to the only two proprietary operating systems that exist today might be a political act that would satisfy? Many would agree that even simply using a free operating system is a political act. It would be better to claim that individuals, lawyers and other political actors are not doing enough to save the Future of the Internet, rather than imploring the already overtaxed geeks to set aside everything that they are already doing to do something even more. (end rant) It also seems that when it comes to political questions related to the Internet, net neutrality being the hot topic now, or fighting restrictive and problematic laws like the DMCA, one of the only groups of people (outside of lawyers and librarians) to actually understand and dissect the fine print (and geeks actually are pretty attuned to and like to dissect the fine legal print), to protest these unsavory laws, and to support the organizations who are doing something about it (like the EFF), are geeks and hackers. While many geeks are not necessarily keen on conceptualizing their labor in traditional political terms, or aligning their technical projects with a political affiliation, and yes would rather just be writing good code, they do fight for their productive freedom and this productive freedom just happens to relate to most questions and concerns related to an open, accessible, and tweakable Internet, built by the geeks, lest we forget What was perhaps most surprising was that he also seemed to think that geeks and developers have not turned to “apprenticeship,” nor policies and procedure to coordinate their development projects, unlike Wikipedia, which he considers a shining example that geeks should look towards as a beacon of policy that geeks should consider emulating in their projects (comments made answering my question). He clearly has not been hanging out with any Debian developers in the last 10 years nor has he gone through their New Maintainer Process In other words, he seems to think they are allergic to regulation due to their accentuated libertarianism, or are against structure because of their anarchism, neither which is remotely true. I think I found this characterization most ironic and problematic for before Wikipedia was even an entry on a Wiki, projects like Debian (and most other F/OSS projects) were transforming and changing to integrate normative procedures and policies that allowed a group of people to work together, scale, grow and deal with crises’. No, they don’t have the Wikipedia badge system, but that system is emblematic of Wikipedia’s own transformation into integrating its own normative procedures and policies for working together, not an example of an idealized policy system that other projects are too primitive to have evolved into yet. About one hour into the talk when questions opened up, I objected to his characterization, but given his answer back to me, I did not make much of a dent in his thinking. Another lawyer Tim Wu (who also wrote a wonderful book on the Internet) chimed in to give me some props and also made a good point that even if geeks are the only groups of people who would storm AT&T and know intimately about the importance of net neutrality, there is a lot of room for thinking about how to strengthen and improve the tactics and politics among geeks and developers so that we can ensure the type of open and generative Internet and set of technologies we value. As part of thinking and rethinking new strategies, it is as key to acknowledge and honor the past. In this regard, free software development has been pivotal both in terms of providing software (and making it is an important political act as is choosing to use free software over propriety software) and a set of important set of ideas that a lot of lawyers like Yochai Benkler and Lawrence Lessig have run with to make some important political claims of their own. So despite my rant above, which was a rant and thus exaggerates things to some degree, I do think there is much more that geeks and non-geeks can do, such as help translate these uber-geeky issues into less geeky terms (and actually this is already being done by some geeks as the work of Jelena Karanovic has shown, or translate the technical issues into new domains as the uber-geek Karl Fogel is doing with question copyright but first lets give credit where credit it due and recognize that labor is political

I gave Brenda a Palm TX, so she can better organize her life. As a plus, it is wi-fi aware, so all sorts of interesting things can be done. Sadly, though, it doesn t ship with a microphone (I still wonder why it s large enough to hold an embedded mic, just as Palm smartphones have). Lately, Brenda was talking about recording some sessions or holding her thoughts in one of those tiny memo-recorders, and this promptly stroke me as another gadget to stuff her purse ... then I remembered having read that Palm TX have all that is required to hold a microphone, but the microphone I retrieved the Palm Multi-Connector pinout from Wikipedia and realized that all I had to do was attach an electret microphone to 16 and 17 pins and there we go. I ordered a charging cable just for the connector and here are the pictures I took of the building process: The tools and pieces I used: It s easy to disassemble the connector. Take a close look at the attaching plastic hooks there are four of them: two outside, near the pins, and two inside near the cable. Last two are harder to detach, but once you ve detached the first ones, just hold the two pieces of the connector and easily shear them: one side will detach first. The microphone have two terminals that already hold enough soldering tin. Beware to solder the blue cable (the one that goes with pin 16 AGND) to the marked terminal of the microphone, and the red one (the one that goes with pin 17 MIC_IN) to the unmarked one. (In the picture, my cables are all black, but the wires inside are red or blue . I could not get a good picture of the terminal markings). I have dissolded the charging cables from pins 1, 3, 5, and 8, but that is up to you (you can just cut the main cable and leave the pins untouched). Also, while soldering the microphone cables to the connector, beware of using as little tin as possible. It ll be even easier if you remove the pin from the connector it s easy to do if you have small pliers and careful fingers. Try first with one of the other pins that will not be used. Solder the red one to pin 17 and the blue one to pin 16. I cut a piece of an old earphone cushion to close the charging cable hole (and to protect the microphone). Here is the final result: Now, for the recording software, there s a nice free software that does that perfectly for PalmOS: Better Recorder. Now Brenda can record her mind!

With Hans Reiser convicted for murder, some seem to feel that reiserfs is more or less dead. Jason Perlow writes a very strange article on ZDNet to which I'm replying to it mainly because he alludes that Debian so far has failed to react. First, default installations of Debian create ext3 and not reiserfs filesystems (Please correct me if I'm wrong. I've just recently installed a fresh etch, but I didn't specifically look at the fs.) And even if it were reiserfs (v3), I don't see why a reaction would be called for now. The stability of reiserfs has come up every once, before the whole murderer story begun, and that the interaction between the reiserfs developers (including, of course, Hans Reiser) and the kernel team were always difficult has also been known for a long time. This is the kind of reason where I think it's appropriate for Debian to take steps (i.e. switching to a different filesystem), not a single event, where it is not even clear yet how the reiserfs (v3 and v4) efforts will move on. On to the technical stuff: Perlow tries, but doesn't really arrive at understanding the issues he's writing about. Reiser 4 is discounted without a single remark on its technical merits (I can't comment either as I have not looked at it so far.) Why he discounts ext4 is not clear to me (because it is not ripe for production use yet — but that's even more true of ZFS and this Linux-NTFS thingy he rambles about further down...) He discounts JFS2 because it hasn't got a new release for several years (is that bad in a filesystem?) but then touts ZFS as a great idea with minor licensing problems, without speaking of patents which is where the real problems lie (not to mention the fact that the Linux ZFS port probably is much less tested than ext4 or JFS.) And in a final jump into fantasy-land he mentions that NTFS might just be ideal for Linux, and Microsoft is said to have started cooperating nicely with the Free Software world, so all licensing and patent issues are certainly going away Real Soon Now™. At least for Novell, these issues shouldn't be a problem, I guess. Not mentioned by Jason are btrfs (which has a quite tightly coupled network filesystem brother, crfs and is in a very early state of development), and hammer, which comes from the BSD world and currently lacks a Linux port. Both efforts are probably more likely to replace ext3 or reiser on Linux than both ZFS and NTFS: no patent issues, no license issues, and the development is actually done by a community and not a single company. Update: Julien Blanche ha a much more succinct response to Jason Perlow. More intersting to read than mine, too.

Here's a nice toy I added to mpdtoys this evening. vipl allows editing mpd's playlist in a standard text editor. Reorder or delete songs, etc. Enter ">" in front of the song you want to play. Type in partial song, album, or artist names and it will expand them to any matches. :wq to start the music playing.

In the last week, Nicholas Negroponte gave this unfortunate interview decrying "open source fundamentalism" and hinting the possibility of a warmer relationship with Microsoft. Predictably, this has elicited an ongoing response by OLPC News and on the OLPC development mailing lists. Just a few days before Negroponte's statements hit the press, I gave a talk at Penguicon called Laptop Liberation where I talked about why I thought that OLPC's use of a free software operating system and embrace of free software principles was essential for the initiative's success and its own goals of education reform and empowerment. I've been saying similar things for some time. My main point boiled down to something that, appropriately enough, Nicholas Negroponte was fond of saying back when the project was still called the $100 laptop: an extremely cheap laptop is not a matter of if, but of when and how. This technology will define the terms on which students communicate, collaborate, create, and learn. These terms are dictated by those with the ability to change the software -- by those with access to computers, the source necessary to make changes, and the freedom to share and collaborate. Constructionism -- OLPC's educational philosophy -- is about putting powerful tools and control over those tools into the hands of learners. It is about learning through exploration and creation -- about shaping one's own educational environment. Constructionist principles bear no small similarity to free software principles. Indeed, OLPC's stated commitment to free software did not happen by accident. OLPC convincingly argued that a free system was essential for creating a learning environment that could be used, tweaked, reinvented, and reapplied by its young users. Through these processes, the XO becomes a force for learning about computation and an environment through which children and their communities can use technology on their terms and in ways that are appropriate and self-directed. We know that laptop recipients will benefit from being able to fix, improve, and translate the software on their laptops into their own languages and contexts. Much more importantly, however, are all of the uses for the laptops that OLPC has not -- and can not -- think up. OLPC is a powerful tool for learning, but ultimate power is only in the hands of those that can freely use, change, and collaborate in defining the terms of their learning environments. In its commitment to software freedom, OLPC chose not to be arrogant by assuming that it knows how its users will use their laptops. Flexible environments designed for constructionist learning and a free software platform protect against this arrogance. Constructionism and free software, implemented and taught in a classroom, offer a profound potential for exploration, creation, and learning. If you don't like something, change it. If something doesn't work right, fix it. Free software and constructionism put learners in charge of their educational environment in the most explicit and important way possible. They create a culture of empowerment. Creation, collaboration, and critical engagement becomes the norm. OLPC does not get to choose if educational technology happens. If we work hard at it though we might get to influence the "how" and the "who." Proprietary software vendors like Microsoft want the "who" to be them. With free software, users can be in power. What's at stake is nothing less than autonomy. We can help foster a world where technology is under the control of its users, and where learning is under the terms of its students -- a world where every laptop owner has freedom through control over the technology they use to communicate, collaborate, create, and learn. This, to me, is the promise of OLPC and its mission. It is the reason I've been involved and in support of the project since nearly day one. It is the reason I left Canonical and Ubuntu to come back to school at MIT to be closer to the then nascent unincorporated project. It is the reason that OLPC's embrace of constructionist philosophy is so deeply important to its mission and the reason that its mission needs to continue to be executed with free and open source software. It is why OLPC needs to be uncompromising about software freedom. As an adviser and sometimes contractor to OLPC, OLPC does not need to listen to me. But I hope, for all our sake, that they do.

Update: Richard Stallman and the FSF have published another essay on the same topic focused more on pure free software (i.e., less education specific) objections.

I installed Debian upon a new desktop machine yesterday, via a PXE network boot. It was painless. Getting xen up and running, with a 32-bit guest and a 64-bit guest each running XDMCP & VNC was also pretty straightforward. There is a minor outstanding problem with the 32-bit xen guest though; connecting to it from dom0, via XDMCP, I see only a blank window - no login manager running. GDM appears painlessly when I connect via VNC. The relevent configuration file looks like this:

# /etc/gdm/gdm.conf
[security]
AllowRoot=true
AllowRemoteRoot=true
[xdmcp]
Enable=true

The same configuration on the 64-bit guest works OK for both cases. (I like to use XDMCP for accessing the desktop of Xen guests, since it means that I get it all full-screen, and don't have to worry about shortcuts affecting the host system and not the guest - as is the case if you're connecting via VNC, etc). Weirdness. Help welcome; I'm not 100% sure where to look Anyway, once again, a huge thank you to the Debian Developers, bug submitters, and anybody else involved peripherally (such as myself!) with Debian! I love it when a plan comes together. SSL ObRandom: Where is the cheapest place to get an SSL certificate, for two years, which will work with my shiny Apache2 install? Somebody, rightly, called me for not having SSL available as an option on my mail filtering website. I've installed a self-signed certificate just now, but I will need to pay the money and buy a "real" one shortly. So far completessl.com seems to be high in the running:

• 1 year - 26
• 2 years - 49

For double-bonus points they accept Paypal which most of my customers pay with .. ObQuote: The Princess Bride

The recent announcements by McCain and Clinton of their support for a temporary repeal of the Federal gas tax make me sick. More on why later, but first, I want to put forth my idea. I think both Republicans and Democrats would like it -- as it's based on market principles and achieves a reduction in costs to the average household, while simultaneously helping the environment and reducing our dependency on foreign oil. But of course, it's courageous, and we don't have many politicians of that type anymore.

What we need is a large, revenue-neutral, gas tax increase. Now, before people go nuts, let's explore what this means.

Revenue-neutral means that it doesn't result in a net increase of monies going to the government. The increase in the gas tax rate is offset by a decrease in the income tax, tied to the cost of direct and indirect taxable gasoline each family or business consumes. So on day 1, if you cost of filling up at the tank goes up by $10 in a week, if you are an average family, your total paychecks also go up by $10. Your cost for receiving a package might go up by $1, and your paycheck goes up by the same amount. So you're no worse off than before -- if you're average.

Let's look at the pros and cons of this sort of plan:

• The economic incentive to be efficient consumers of gas is magnified. This will eventually lead to Americans having more money in their pockets, increasing market incentives for fuel efficiency, and a decreasing (or increasing slower) price of oil as demand slows.


• Economic incentives to use mass transit, live close to urban centers, or drive fuel-efficient vehicles are magnified. Likewise, the economic incentives to invest in mass transit and efficient automobiles are also magnified.


• As more efficient technologies come on the market, and Americans decide that they'd like to pad their bank accounts by hundreds or thousands of dollars a year, more sustainable and environmentally-friendly development patterns will emerge. Also, the price of oil will be kept low. Of course, people that choose not to change will, on average, be no worse off than before.


• Alternative choices to the automobile will have a greater incentive to develop. Think the return of a fast, speedy national passenger and freight network, greater mass transit options, etc.


• The marketplace will drive Detroit to love making fuel-efficient vehicles, because they will be the new profit centers.


• This sort of thing is known to work well in other countries around the world.

If we think more long-term, we see even more positive effects:

• The return to local agriculture and manufacturing. Due to lower transportation costs, local farmers and manufacturers will be able to undercut Walmart's prices due to the larger relative costs of Walmart's much-vaunted national distribution network. Unless, that is, Walmart starts buying local -- which is a good thing too. This is a good thing for American jobs.


• Keeping all that oil money in the domestic economy is a good thing for American jobs, too.


• Our businesses will have a jump start on being competitive in the increasingly carbon-regulated global marketplace.

As for the cons:

• Eventually this will lead to a net reduction in Federal revenues as efficiencies develop in the marketplace and people save money on gas. Corresponding budget cuts will be required. (A good thing, I figure)


• Implementing this all at once would be a shock to some people living inefficiently now -- those that are far above average. It would have to be implemented gradually to avoid being a shock to the economy.

Now, for the McCain/Clinton plan: it's a farce. Reducing the gas taxes means more efficient gas, which means more consumption of gas, which in turn leads to -- yes -- higher gas prices. Its real effect will be minimal, and is a terrible long-term policy. It charges tens of billions of dollars to the national credit card (which we, and our children, will have to repay) while achieving almost no benefit now. It's a gimmick through and through, and something that says loud and clear that neither candidate is on track for the "Straight Talk Express".

Update 4/29/2008: One potential solution for the problem of declining revenues over time is to periodically re-index the averages to mirror current usage. Assuming this does really lead to the expected drop in consumption, there is no sense in 2020 of paying people for how much gas they would have used in 2008.

When I heard that there will be a miniseries based on “The Andromeda Strain” book, I was very exited. That was one of my favorite sci-fi books in my childhood. After watching the miniseries I must conclude that this is another book perverted and trivialized by Hollywood. SPOILERS AHEAD! They created some crazy pseido-sci-fi idea that humans from the future sent Andromeda back from the future via a wormhole in a container that contained a message which was then picked up by a satellite that was sent up to investigate the wormhole. No wormhole was there in the book. The book had a much more modest idea - a Scoop satellite was to skim the outer layers of the atmosphere for mutations of common Earth bacteria for military purposes when it was impacted my a micrometeorite carrying the Andromeda. Much more probable, no need to involve wormholes, time travel, ASCII messages, eco-terrorists and a sub-plot on conservation of marine species. Due to extreme modernization of the script, the whole subplot of the teletype mechanical failure was omitted. Andromeda was made sentient instead and communicated via ’some kind of inductive field’ to shoot down a fighter jet and activate a nuke. The survivors and their pH levels got barely a glance. Also the amount of destruction was obviously too low for the movie, so the Andromeda was made to mutate more, spread out of containment easily and even make a flock of birds attack a squad of solders ‘Hitchcock style’. Disgustingly cheap scriptwriting. Huge chunks of plot were ripped out (searching for the micro-meteorite impact crater with different lenses, central core security) and the two hours were filled with Rembo style journalism vs. black ops, selfless president and scenes of animals eating each other and dieing. At the end they ran out of budget and just made it look like presence of Andromeda made air and water bright red so that people would have something to run away from in fear. Oh and the scientists are allowed to freely talk about the event after it’s done. Yeah, right. In my book this movie rates very close to the infamous “The Core” with the only difference that they managed to fuck up a really good book. Do not watch it and read the book instead.

Ira Pramanick talks in her weblog about a mentorship program targeted towards middle and high school girls to foster in them a positive attitude towards computing. The program is called MAGIC, which stands for More Active Girls In Computing, and tries to address the issue of the low number of girls entering the computing and high tech world. As they say, it is a serious issue caused not by then lack of talent, but due to a bunch of discouraging factors that exist in our culture and society. Right now, women represent only about 28% of the technology workforce. I don’t know if a mentorship program dedicated to these girls would be enough to increase the number of women participating in the technology workforce, but it will probably help to improve the situation. It would be nice to import the project model into Spanish speaking countries if it’s successful. The Mentor Qualification Process is quite strange anyway. It might be that we europeans have cultural differences, but I find some of the questions there quite disturbing, like “Are you willing to be finger-printed and screened?”. I don’t exactly know what they might want such a sensitive data for.

As Linux-VServer is currently asleep, I thought about what may be possible only with the functionality the upstream Linux kernel provides and a helper module.

Something pretty helpful in irssi is the capability to get output from multiple channels into one window. While thats totally insane for normal channels, it is really nice if you have a split channel situation like

• #something-admin, which has the usual admin communication from your admin team
• #something-nagios, which has nagios status output piped into IRC.

Some people might like to read the stuff in two windows, I don't. Irssi to the rescue. Join #something-admin like you always do and then type /wjoin #something-nagios. Or, if you love to type more (or for some reason do not have the wjoin alias defined), type /join -window #something-nagios Net effect: You have one window that contains two channels. You can switch between them using Ctrl-X. Stuff said in the currently not selected channel will be shown as coming from <nick:#otherchannel> foo. Comments: 3

I've got most of the build system / packaging stuff done for estron now. There's a basic Yelp manual pending completion of the Estron GNOME application, there are some refreshed screenshots, updated the website CSS and added an icon, updated Glade files using Gtk stock items for the buttons.

http://estron.alioth.debian.org/

It's grown into yet more packages from the one source:

ii  estron                0.7.0-1  data-centric development interpreter for GNOME

ii  estron-doc            0.7.0-1  data-centric development interpreter (help files)

ii  estron-gnome          0.7.0-1  data-centric development environment for GNOME

ii  libestron-dbg         0.7.0-1  estron debugging library

ii  libestron-dbi-driver  0.7.0-1  DBI driver for estron

ii  libestron-dev         0.7.0-1  estron development interface

ii  libestron-doc         0.7.0-1  libestron development documentation

ii  libestron-odbc-driver 0.7.0-1  ODBC driver for estron

ii  libestron-pg-driver   0.7.0-1  PostgreSQL driver for estron

ii  libestron0            0.7.0-1  data-centric interface support library

Only the docs are of any particular size - the interpreter is tiny. (estron-gnome is simply an estron file and companion glade file, run by the estron interpreter so it's Architecture: all like all estron applications.)

Lots to do still - upgrading the Gtk code, adding new features to the interpreter to fully support the development environment and finally putting some details into the user manual (estron-doc) - but at least the package builds easily and cleanly. Once I have a working estron-gnome setup, I'll put the POT file out for translation too (around 120 messages so far).

There isn't any need for debconf and things, this will use existing database configuration tools like mergeant - that needs work too because current estron example files have hardcoded database connection strings.

PTS bit of the day: show testing transitions Tiny teeny PTS bit of the day: the PTS now provides information about testing transitions. If your package is part of an ongoing transition its uploads to unstable will be blocked by DAK. The PTS informs you about that and points to extra information and upload alternatives. At the time of writing a couple of examples are: aubio and dballe. Though now that we have such powerful tools, Debian will be so fast at completing the python2.5 transition that you won't have time to see the new PTS messages

Just a quick note: I've updated my sid kernel repository (the one which the only change of enabling the old firewire stack along with the new one) to 2.6.24-6, the old instructions still apply.

Unfortunatly my pegasos2 died after building that package in march, so from now on I will only provide packages for amd64 and i386. But you can use my sources and trivially rebuild them :-)

I hope someone will upload it to experimental by the moment and see how works, in the meanwhile you can find it here. Goes to experimental because is the unstable branch of libtorrent/rtorrent.Want the debs? Then do:

$ dget http://debian.ghostbar.ath.cx/libtorrent/0.12.1-1/libtorrent_0.12.1-1.dsc
$ dpkg-source -x libtorrent_0.12.1-1.dsc
$ cd libtorrent-0.12.1; dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot

You'll end with two debs, enjoy them :)

I'm currently facing a problem I just can't solve, involving pango and GMarkup's glib API. I currently use pango markup in awesome, but I'd like to extend it to support more attributes. Pango markup uses GMarkup API to parse the formatted string. The problem is that there's no way to extend what is parsed, and if a tag is unknown in the pango parser, it will just fail. I've tried to implement my own parser with GMarkup, but When I encounter a tag I don't know but that pango does, I just can't pass it to the pango parser function for this tag, since this pango function is private. There was a try to extends the markup parser 2 years ago, but the patch was crappy since it exposed the private elements of pango markup parsing, which is the bad way to solve this. So for now, I've no idea how to do this. I was first using the bad parsing method with string.h's functions which I for now reverted, because I do not really like that.

Since I didn't find a similar tool for Linux, I've hacked together a tiny tool to do BPM counting. The usual stuff: tap any key with the music to get a BPM estimation. There is no music analysis done.To achieve better results, my tool uses an exponentially weighted average. It also computes a confidence interval. So if the song changes tempo (and quite some jazz songs do) or doesn't keep the tempo constantly (live music with human drummers often shows some tempo drift. It's just the drum computers that keep their speed very well...) - the tool can handle that quite well, while also not being overly sensitive to tapping errors (as you can see in the image).I figure there might be even better estimation tricks (e.g. doing some error detection and removing them), but this one was just very simple to implement. And by looking at the graph and the error interval it's quite easy to check that you didn't any recent mistakes and the result is okay.The Python code is about 158 lines SLOC, and a small UI description generated with Glade. It's built with PyGTK and uses Cairo for the plots, so it should be very platform independant and even run on Windows.Download will be available sometime when I get around to clean it up a little. There is for example still the code in there to compute plain averages, which can't handle songs with multiple tempos at all.[Update: it now also has a tiny 'flasher' icon that will show you the current tempo estimation. This is great for checking the quality of the result - if it keeps on flashing in sync with the music after you've stopped tapping, it's good. I was also pointed to GNU GTick which is a full featured metronome application and also has a tap button.]