Search Results: "rul"

Hello Config::Model::Dpkg project (a Debian source package model based on Config::Model) is partly based on a ParseRec::Descent grammar. This grammar is used to parse the dependency of a Debian source package. This article will show how such a grammar is written, its limitation regarding error handling and how to improve the situation. Debian package main data is described in debian/control file. This file can feature a list of dependencies, i.e. a list of package that must be installed for the package to work. These dependencies are declared in fields like Build-Depends , or Depends as a list of package. For Dpkg model purpose, I needed only to parse one item of a dependency list at a time. This dependency item can be a simple package name: foo or a package name with a version requirement: foo ( > 1.24 ) or a package name with architectures restrictions: foo [alpha amd64 hurd-arm linux-armeb] or both: foo ( > 1.24 ) [alpha amd64 hurd-arm linux-armeb] or a list of alternate choices combining the possibilities above: foo ( > 1.24 ) bar [ linux-any] baz ( << 3.14 ) [ ! hurd-armel !hurd-armeb ] or a variable that is replaced during package build: $ perl-depends Writing a Parse::RecDescent grammar to parse this is relatively straightforward. The first production handles alternate dependencies separated by and raises an error if some text was not consumed by the dependencies:

dependency_item: depend(s /\ /) eofile

A dependency as explained above is expressed as:

depend: pkg_dep   variable

A variable like $ foo or $ bar -1.24~ is parsed with:

variable: /\$ [\w:\-]+ [\w\.\-~+]*/

This rule handles a package name with optional version or arch restriction:

pkg_dep: pkg_name dep_version(?) arch_restriction(?) 
pkg_name: /[a-z0-9][a-z0-9\+\-\.]+/

The remaining rules are quite simple:

dep_version: '(' oper version ')' 
oper: '<<'   '<='   '='   '>='   '>>'
version: variable   /[\w\.\-~:+]+/
arch_restriction: '[' arch(s) ']'
arch:  /!?[\w-]+/
eofile: /^\Z/

The grammar above works well to parse the dependency. You can test it with this small Perl script:

#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.010 ;
use Parse::RecDescent ;
my $parser = Parse::RecDescent->new(join('',));
my $dep = shift ;
say "parsing '$dep'";
my $ret = $parser->dependency_item($dep) ;
say "result is ", $ret if $ref ;
__DATA__
# insert grammar here !!!

Unfortunately, any error in the optional parts (i.e version requirements and arch restriction) leads to an error message which is not very helpful. The error message only mention that some text could not be parsed:

parsing 'foo ( != 1.24 )   bar'
       ERROR (line 1): Invalid dependency item: Was expecting /\ / but found
                       "( != 1.24 )   bar" instead

parsing 'foo [ arm & armel]   bar'
       ERROR (line 1): Invalid dependency item: Was expecting /\ / but found
                       "[ arm & armel]   bar" instead

The problem comes from the fact that version requirements or arch restrictions are optional. For instance if a version requirement has a syntax error, Parse::RecDescent will try to parse it as an arch restriction. This arch restriction rule will also fail and the last terminal ( eofile ) will fail. So the error message does not hint at the actual syntax problem. To generate better error messages, I improved the suggestion made in Parse::RecDescent FAQ. Instead of calling a plain subroutine, I use a sub reference that will store the error messages in a closure. This sub ref is declared in a start-up action. Note that the sub ref explicitly returns undef. I ll explain why later.

 
    my @dep_errors ;
    my $add_error = sub  
        my ($err, $txt) = @_ ;
        push @dep_errors, "$err: '$txt'" ;
        return ;
      ;

The following production always fails while ensuring that the error list is reset. This production is always run at the beginning of the dependency parsing:

dependency:   @dep_errors = ();

Here s the actual dependency production that is run when dependency method is called on the parser. It will return an array ref containing (1, data) if the dependency is valid or (0, errors) otherwise:

dependency: depend(s /\ /) eofile
   
    $return = [ 1 , @ $item[1]  ] ;
   
   
   
    push( @dep_errors, "Cannot parse: '$text'" ) unless @dep_errors ;
    $return =  [ 0, @dep_errors ];

The following productions don t change much:

depend: pkg_dep   variable
variable: /\$ [\w:\-]+ [\w\.\-~+]*/
pkg_dep: pkg_name dep_version(?) arch_restriction(?) 
dep_version: '(' oper version ')'

The first rule of this production parses the package name which must be followed by a space, end of string ( or ['. A positive look-ahead assertion is used so only the package name is consumed. If the first rule fails, the second rule provides a meaningful error message. The second rule will match anything which is not a space and create an error message. Since $add_error returns undef, the second rule returns undef and the production fails. So the text stored in the error message is not consumed:

pkg_name: /[a-z0-9][a-z0-9\+\-\.]+(?=\s \Z \( \[)/
      /\S+/   $add_error->("bad package name", $item[1]) ;

The same trick is used with these productions:

oper: '<<'   '='   '>>'
      /\S+/   $add_error->("bad dependency version operator", $item[1]) ; 
version: variable   /[\w\.\-~:+]+(?=\s \) \Z)/
      /\S+/   $add_error->("bad dependency version", $item[1]) ;

The action of this production is a little bit more tricky. The action ensures that '!' are either added before all arch or not at all. Otherwise an error message is generated and added to the list of errors:

arch_restriction: '[' osarch(s) ']'
     
        my $mismatch = 0;
        # $ref contains ['!',os,arch] or ['',os,arch]
        my $ref = $item[2] ;
        for (my $i = 0; $i < $#$ref -1 ; $i++ )  
            $mismatch  = ($ref->[$i][0] xor $ref->[$i+1][0]) ;
         
        my @a = map   ($_->[0]   '') . ($_->[1]   '') . $_->[2]   @$ref ;
        if ($mismatch)  
            $add_error->("some names are prepended with '!' while others aren't.", "@a") ;
         
        else  
            $return = 1 ;

The check above is possible only if the "osarch" production returns an array ref containing something like ('!','linux','any') for "!linux-any' or ('','linux','any') for "linux-any":

osarch: not(?) os(?) arch
     
        $return =  [ $item[1][0], $item[2][0], $item[3] ];
     
      /.?(?=\s \] \Z)/   $add_error->("bad arch specification: ", $item[1]) ;  
not: '!'

Here's the remaining of the grammar:

os: /(any uclibc-linux linux kfreebsd knetbsd etc...)-/
     /\w+/ '-'   $add_error->("bad os in architecture specification", $item[1]) ; 
arch: / (any  alpha amd64  arm\b  arm64  etc... )
        (?=(\]  ))
      /x
        /\w+/   $add_error->("bad arch in architecture specification", $item[1]) ; 
eofile: /^\Z/

That's all for grammar 2.0... Before someone yells: "Show me the message ! ", here are some example of bad dependencies and their error message generated by the parser:

parse 'foo ( != 1.24 )   bar'
result is: 0 bad dependency version operator: '!='
parsing 'foo [ arm & armel]   bar'
result is: 0 bad arch specification: : '&'
parsing 'foo [ arm armel ]   bar [!moo]'
result is: 0 bad arch specification: : ']' bad arch in architecture specification: 'moo'

The 2 first error messages are spot on the actual error. The second one has a false positive (']' is correct) but correctly highlights the wrong arch name ('moo'). Mission accomplished. In order to keep this post (relatively) simple, I've removed the part that actually store parsed data. They don't really matter for error handling. Nevertheless, you may see the whole grammar in Config::Model::Dpkg::Dependency module. All the best
Tagged: Config::Model, debian, dpkg, package, Parse::RecDescent, Perl

Migrating a Debian installation between architectures has always been difficult. The recommended way to crossgrade an i386 Debian to amd64 Debian was to reinstall the system, move over data and configuration. For the more brave, in-place crossgrades usually involved chroots, rescue CDs, a lot of ar p tar xf - data.tar.gz and luck. I have never been brave when it comes to system administration, have done a lot of architecture migrations with reinstallation, and have always taken the opportunity to clear out the contamination that accumulates itself when a system is running for a long time. I would even recommend doing this to most people even now. However, I have a few very ugly systems in place that are still on i386 because I didn t dare going the reinstallation path. Doing in-place crossgrades has become a lot easier since wheezy s release, since once now can have both i386 and amd64 libraries installed in parallel, which allows to replace foo:i386 with foo:amd64 without influencing the other parts of the system. The process is still full of pitfalls:

apt removes a package before it reinstalls its new counterpart. This results in apt calling dpkg to remove dpkg, and then calling dpkg again to install dpkg. Guess which operation fails and the state of the system after this failure. Same applies to coreutils, which leaves the system without rm, which in turn dpkg of either architecture doesn t like. Using apt-get --download-only install to resolve dependencies and downloading the debs, followed by a traditional dpkg --install solves this issue since multiarch dpkg will replace a package with another one without deinstalling the first one first.
At least for the process, you need a kernel that can run both 32bit and 64bit binaries for the i386 architecture. AFAIR, setting CONFIG_64BIT, CONFIG_X86_64 and CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION in the kernel configuration takes care of this.
During the process, apt wants to remove the better part of your system. It is important to not let it do this, as it wants to deinstall essential packages as well.
It looks like the process is not always exactly reproducible. During the first tries, I found myself without an initrd at all, with an initrd that lacked the ext[234].ko kernel modules, without working e2fstools and in a number of other undesireable states of the system.

I have only tried this yet with a freshly installed minimal wheezy server system. I do not, however, expect surprises when it comes to using this process with real life systems. I will document other pitfalls I have fallen into here at a later time. My minimal wheezy system was running in a KVM VM with its virtual disk as a LVM LV in the host system. I took a snapshot before beginning and used lvconvert --merge numerous time to return my LV to the original state. Be aware that lvconvert --merge removes the snapshot after merging it, so you ll need to re-create the snapshot before trying again. During the process, I discussed things with Paul Tagliamonte, who has done this before, but on a live system and with a slightly more invasive approach. He has blogged about this. Thank you very much, your hints were very helpful. Here is a commented typescript of what I have done. Be warned: This was a lab setting with a rather minimal system. If you re going to try this with a production system, have a backup, or, if you re on snapshottable infrastructure, take snapshots and be prepared to roll back if anything goes wrong. First let s see what we have and save a list of installed packages.

mh@swivel:~$ ssh wheezyarch.zugschlus.de
$ uname -a
Linux wheezyarch 3.9.4-zgsrv2008064 #2 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 5 12:57:51 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
175
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
0
$ sudo dpkg --get-selections   grep install   awk  print $1    sed  s/:.*//;s/$/:amd64
install/;  > get-selections.pre

So we have an i386 system running an x86_64 kernel. Next, we add amd64 as an additional architecture which allows us to install amd64 packages. We download the amd64 packages files. Note that dpkg still considers this an i386 system with amd64 as a foreign arch.

$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture amd64
$ sudo apt-get update
Get:1 http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B]
( )
Fetched 6.155 kB in 4s (1.400 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
amd64
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
175
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
0

Next, download everything that is necessary to migrate dpkg and apt from i386 and amd64. We cannot directly apt things as the remove-install cycle used by apt will leave us without working dpkg. One could work around this by un-aring the dpkg.deb and directly forcing the amd64 files upon the system, but I think this approach is much cleaner. apt-get download will not resolve dependices while apt-get --download install does. After the download, dpkg --install the packages. dpkg is not particularly smart about installation order, so Pre-Depends may fail or not. If they fail, dpkg will give a list of deb files that were affected, which is an easy help to finish their installation. One could also choose the easy way (which I did here) and repeat the dpkg --install *.deb command. Since the Pre-Depends will already be installed, the second install run will succeed.

$ sudo apt-get --download-only install dpkg:amd64 apt:amd64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gcc-4.7-base:amd64 libapt-pkg4.12:amd64 libbz2-1.0:amd64 libc6:amd64
  libgcc1:amd64 liblzma5:amd64 libselinux1:amd64 libstdc++6:amd64
  zlib1g:amd64
Suggested packages:
  aptitude:amd64 synaptic:amd64 wajig:amd64 dpkg-dev:amd64 apt-doc:amd64
  python-apt:amd64 glibc-doc:amd64 locales:amd64
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  apt cron-apt dpkg
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apt:amd64 dpkg:amd64 gcc-4.7-base:amd64 libapt-pkg4.12:amd64
  libbz2-1.0:amd64 libc6:amd64 libgcc1:amd64 liblzma5:amd64 libselinux1:amd64
  libstdc++6:amd64 zlib1g:amd64
0 upgraded, 11 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 10,0 MB of archives.
After this operation, 14,9 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://debian.debian.zugschlus.de/debian/ wheezy/main gcc-4.7-base amd64 4.7.2-5 [144 kB]
( )
Fetched 10,0 MB in 2s (3.535 kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
(Reading database ... 16586 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace apt 0.9.7.8 (using .../archives/apt_0.9.7.8_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement apt ...
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.10_amd64.deb containing dpkg, pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on libbz2-1.0
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.16.10_amd64.deb (--install):
 pre-dependency problem - not installing dpkg
Selecting previously unselected package gcc-4.7-base:amd64.
( )
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.16.10_amd64.deb
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
(Reading database ... 16905 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace apt 0.9.7.8 (using .../archives/apt_0.9.7.8_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement apt ...
( )
$

From dpkg s point of view, the system is now already amd64, with i386 being a foreign arch. However, the majory of packages is still i386.

$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
173
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
11
$

The apt resolver is currently in a very bad broken state since the system is missing most essential packages in its native architecture. This is not easily solved by apt-get -f install, as this would zap most of the existing system . We let apt-get --download-only -f install download the packages that it wants to replace with its amd64 counterparts and their dependencies, and, again, use dpkg --install *.deb to install them.

$ sudo apt-get --download-only -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  cpio gettext-base:i386 klibc-utils libapt-inst1.5 libasprintf0c2:i386
  libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386 libklibc
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  acpid aide bsd-mailx cpio cron curl daemon dctrl-tools exim4-base
  exim4-daemon-light initscripts insserv kbd klibc-utils less libbsd0
  libcomerr2 libcurl3 libdb5.1 libexpat1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgnutls26
  libgpg-error0 libgssapi-krb5-2 libidn11 libk5crypto3 libkeyutils1 libklibc
  libkmod2 libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 libldap-2.4-2 liblockfile1 libncursesw5
  libnewt0.52 libp11-kit0 libpam-modules libpam0g libpcre3 libpopt0
  libreadline6 librtmp0 libsasl2-2 libslang2 libsqlite3-0 libssh2-1
  libssl1.0.0 libtasn1-3 libterm-readkey-perl libtinfo5 openssl perl
  perl-base python2.7 python2.7-minimal sysvinit-utils whiptail
Suggested packages:
  libarchive1 anacron logrotate checksecurity debtags mail-reader eximon4
  exim4-doc-html exim4-doc-info spf-tools-perl swaks bootchart2 rng-tools
  krb5-doc krb5-user libpam-doc perl-doc make python2.7-doc binutils
  binfmt-support bootlogd sash
Recommended packages:
  exim4 postfix mail-transport-agent psmisc mailx ca-certificates
  krb5-locales libgpm2 libfribidi0 libsasl2-modules libpng12-0
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  acpid:i386 aide:i386 aptitude:i386 bsd-mailx:i386 cpio:i386 cron:i386
  curl:i386 daemon:i386 dctrl-tools:i386 debsecan dmsetup:i386 e2fsprogs:i386
  exim4-base:i386 exim4-daemon-light:i386 git:i386 grub-common:i386
  grub-pc:i386 grub-pc-bin:i386 grub2-common:i386 ifupdown:i386
  initramfs-tools initscripts:i386 insserv:i386 ippl:i386 jed:i386 kbd:i386
  klibc-utils:i386 less:i386 libdevmapper-event1.02.1:i386
  libdevmapper1.02.1:i386 libklibc:i386 libnewt0.52:i386
  libparted0debian1:i386 libterm-readkey-perl:i386 lsof:i386 lvm2:i386
  molly-guard ntp:i386 openssh-server:i386 openssl:i386 parted:i386 perl:i386
  perl-base:i386 procps:i386 python-apt:i386 python2.7:i386
  python2.7-minimal:i386 rsyslog:i386 sysvinit:i386 sysvinit-utils:i386
  udev:i386 util-linux:i386 whiptail:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  acpid aide bsd-mailx cpio cron curl daemon dctrl-tools exim4-base
  exim4-daemon-light initscripts insserv kbd klibc-utils less libbsd0
  libcomerr2 libcurl3 libdb5.1 libexpat1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgnutls26
  libgpg-error0 libgssapi-krb5-2 libidn11 libk5crypto3 libkeyutils1 libklibc
  libkmod2 libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 libldap-2.4-2 liblockfile1 libncursesw5
  libnewt0.52 libp11-kit0 libpam-modules libpam0g libpcre3 libpopt0
  libreadline6 librtmp0 libsasl2-2 libslang2 libsqlite3-0 libssh2-1
  libssl1.0.0 libtasn1-3 libterm-readkey-perl libtinfo5 openssl perl
  perl-base python2.7 python2.7-minimal sysvinit-utils whiptail
0 upgraded, 58 newly installed, 53 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 23,4 MB of archives.
After this operation, 17,5 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ wheezy/updates/main libgnutls26 amd64 2.12.20-7 [619 kB]
( )
Fetched 23,4 MB in 11s (2.038 kB/s)                                           
Download complete and in download only mode
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
(Reading database ... 16905 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace acpid 1:2.0.16-1+deb7u1 (using .../acpid_1%3a2.0.16-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb) ...
( )
Selecting previously unselected package libpam-modules:amd64.
dpkg: regarding .../libpam-modules_1.1.3-7.1_amd64.deb containing libpam-modules:amd64, pre-dependency problem:
 libpam-modules pre-depends on libdb5.1
  libdb5.1:amd64 is unpacked, but has never been configured.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.1.3-7.1_amd64.deb (--install):
 pre-dependency problem - not installing libpam-modules:amd64
Selecting previously unselected package libpcre3:amd64.
Unpacking libpcre3:amd64 (from .../libpcre3_1%3a8.30-5_amd64.deb) ...
( )
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.1.3-7.1_amd64.deb
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.1.3-7.1_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 17007 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libpam-modules:amd64 (from .../libpam-modules_1.1.3-7.1_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up libpam-modules:amd64 (1.1.3-7.1) ...
$ sudo apt-get clean
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
151
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
66
$

The concluding apt-get clean prevents packages from being reinstalled again in the next dpkg --install *.deb run. Now, the apt resolver is kind of fixed, but apt will still want to remove most of the system. I haven t found a way to get out of this mess short of allowing apt to de-install those packages and to manually install their amd64 counterparts later. First, we see what apt wants to do, and paste the The following packages will be removed part of apt-get s output into a sed expression which fixes the architecture strings for us so that we can use the resulting file as input for the following installation procedure. After that, we let apt-get do what itself considers a bad thing and requires us to type a consent sentence. The key is that this deinstallation of essential packages breaks the system, but not apt and dpkg, which allows us to un-break the system afterwards.

$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  gettext-base:i386 libapt-inst1.5 libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386
  libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386 libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils:i386
Suggested packages:
  bootlogd:i386 sash:i386
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  adduser aide-common aptitude:i386 bsd-mailx console-common console-data
  console-log cron curl debian-goodies debsecan dmsetup:i386 e2fsprogs:i386
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light git:i386 grub-common:i386
  grub-pc:i386 grub-pc-bin:i386 grub2-common:i386 ifupdown:i386
  initramfs-tools initscripts ippl:i386 jed:i386 libcurl3
  libdevmapper-event1.02.1:i386 libdevmapper1.02.1:i386 liberror-perl
  libfile-find-rule-perl libnumber-compare-perl libparted0debian1:i386
  libswitch-perl libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl
  libtext-glob-perl libtimedate-perl locales lsof:i386 lvm2:i386 molly-guard
  ntp:i386 openssh-client:i386 openssh-server:i386 openssl openssl-blacklist
  openssl-blacklist-extra parted:i386 perl perl-modules procps:i386
  python-apt:i386 rsyslog:i386 stow sysv-rc sysvinit:i386 sysvinit-utils
  tzdata ucf udev:i386 util-linux:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils:i386
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  e2fsprogs:i386 util-linux:i386 (due to e2fsprogs:i386) sysvinit:i386
  sysvinit-utils tzdata (due to util-linux:i386)
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 62 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 97,1 kB of archives.
After this operation, 131 MB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase  Yes, do as I say!  ? (abort with Ctrl-C)
$ sed  s/:i386//g  > removedpkg (paste  The following packages will be REMOVED:  stanza here and
type Ctrl-D afterwards)
  adduser aide-common aptitude:i386 bsd-mailx console-common console-data
  console-log cron curl debian-goodies debsecan dmsetup:i386 e2fsprogs:i386
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light git:i386 grub-common:i386
  grub-pc:i386 grub-pc-bin:i386 grub2-common:i386 ifupdown:i386
  initramfs-tools initscripts ippl:i386 jed:i386 libcurl3
  libdevmapper-event1.02.1:i386 libdevmapper1.02.1:i386 liberror-perl
  libfile-find-rule-perl libnumber-compare-perl libparted0debian1:i386
  libswitch-perl libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl
  libtext-glob-perl libtimedate-perl locales lsof:i386 lvm2:i386 molly-guard
  ntp:i386 openssh-client:i386 openssh-server:i386 openssl openssl-blacklist
  openssl-blacklist-extra parted:i386 perl perl-modules procps:i386
  python-apt:i386 rsyslog:i386 stow sysv-rc sysvinit:i386 sysvinit-utils
  tzdata ucf udev:i386 util-linux:i386
$ cat removedpkg 
  adduser aide-common aptitude bsd-mailx console-common console-data
  console-log cron curl debian-goodies debsecan dmsetup e2fsprogs
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light git grub-common
  grub-pc grub-pc-bin grub2-common ifupdown
  initramfs-tools initscripts ippl jed libcurl3
  libdevmapper-event1.02.1 libdevmapper1.02.1 liberror-perl
  libfile-find-rule-perl libnumber-compare-perl libparted0debian1
  libswitch-perl libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl
  libtext-glob-perl libtimedate-perl locales lsof lvm2 molly-guard
  ntp openssh-client openssh-server openssl openssl-blacklist
  openssl-blacklist-extra parted perl perl-modules procps
  python-apt rsyslog stow sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils
  tzdata ucf udev util-linux
$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  gettext-base:i386 libapt-inst1.5 libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386
  libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386 libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils:i386
Suggested packages:
  bootlogd:i386 sash:i386
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  adduser aide-common aptitude:i386 bsd-mailx console-common console-data
  console-log cron curl debian-goodies debsecan dmsetup:i386 e2fsprogs:i386
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light git:i386 grub-common:i386
  grub-pc:i386 grub-pc-bin:i386 grub2-common:i386 ifupdown:i386
  initramfs-tools initscripts ippl:i386 jed:i386 libcurl3
  libdevmapper-event1.02.1:i386 libdevmapper1.02.1:i386 liberror-perl
  libfile-find-rule-perl libnumber-compare-perl libparted0debian1:i386
  libswitch-perl libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl
  libtext-glob-perl libtimedate-perl locales lsof:i386 lvm2:i386 molly-guard
  ntp:i386 openssh-client:i386 openssh-server:i386 openssl openssl-blacklist
  openssl-blacklist-extra parted:i386 perl perl-modules procps:i386
  python-apt:i386 rsyslog:i386 stow sysv-rc sysvinit:i386 sysvinit-utils
  tzdata ucf udev:i386 util-linux:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils:i386
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  e2fsprogs:i386 util-linux:i386 (due to e2fsprogs:i386) sysvinit:i386
  sysvinit-utils tzdata (due to util-linux:i386)
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 62 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 97,1 kB of archives.
After this operation, 131 MB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase  Yes, do as I say! 
 ?] Yes, do as I say! (actually type this!)
Get:1 http://debian.debian.zugschlus.de/debian/ wheezy/main sysvinit-utils i386 2.88dsf-41 [97,1 kB]
Fetched 97,1 kB in 0s (687 kB/s)    
(Reading database ... 17050 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing aide-common ...
( )
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing e2fsprogs ...
Removing sysv-rc ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing sysvinit ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing sysvinit-utils ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing ucf ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing libdevmapper1.02.1:i386 ...
Removing libswitch-perl ...
Removing perl ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing dmsetup ...
Removing perl-modules ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
Removing util-linux ...
Removing tzdata ...
Processing triggers for mime-support ...
Selecting previously unselected package sysvinit-utils.
(Reading database ... 9802 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking sysvinit-utils (from .../sysvinit-utils_2.88dsf-41_i386.deb) ...
Setting up sysvinit-utils (2.88dsf-41) ...
$ sudo apt-get install $(cat removedpkg)
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  e2fslibs gettext-base libapt-inst1.5 libasprintf0c2 libattr1 libblkid1
  libboost-iostreams1.49.0 libcap2 libcurl3-gnutls libcwidget3 libedit2
  libept1.4.12 libfreetype6 libfuse2 libgpm2 libncurses5 libopts25 libprocps0
  libreadline5 libsepol1 libsigc++-2.0-0c2a libss2 libudev0 libuuid1 libwrap0
  libxapian22 logrotate
Suggested packages:
  liblocale-gettext-perl tasksel debtags unicode-data anacron checksecurity
  popularity-contest xdg-utils zenity gpart e2fsck-static mail-reader eximon4
  exim4-doc-html exim4-doc-info spf-tools-perl swaks git-daemon-run
  git-daemon-sysvinit git-doc git-el git-arch git-cvs git-svn git-email
  git-gui gitk gitweb multiboot-doc grub-emu xorriso desktop-base
  isc-dhcp-client dhcp-client ppp rdnssd net-tools gpm libcwidget-dev fuse
  libparted0-dev libparted0-i18n xapian-tools ntp-doc ssh-askpass libpam-ssh
  keychain monkeysphere rssh ufw parted-doc perl-doc make libpod-plainer-perl
  python-apt-dbg python-gtk2 python-vte python-apt-doc rsyslog-mysql
  rsyslog-pgsql rsyslog-doc rsyslog-gnutls rsyslog-gssapi rsyslog-relp
  doc-base sysv-rc-conf bum bootlogd sash util-linux-locales dosfstools
Recommended packages:
  aptitude-doc-en aptitude-doc apt-xapian-index libparse-debianchangelog-perl
  exim4 postfix mail-transport-agent psmisc mailx patch rsync ssh-client
  os-prober busybox busybox-initramfs busybox-static ca-certificates
  uuid-runtime xauth ncurses-term iso-codes usbutils
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  gettext-base:i386 libboost-iostreams1.49.0:i386 libcwidget3:i386
  libept1.4.12:i386 libopts25:i386 libxapian22:i386 logrotate:i386
  sysvinit-utils:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  adduser aide-common aptitude bsd-mailx console-common console-data
  console-log cron curl debian-goodies debsecan dmsetup e2fslibs e2fsprogs
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light gettext-base git grub-common
  grub-pc grub-pc-bin grub2-common ifupdown initramfs-tools initscripts ippl
  jed libapt-inst1.5 libasprintf0c2 libattr1 libblkid1
  libboost-iostreams1.49.0 libcap2 libcurl3 libcurl3-gnutls libcwidget3
  libdevmapper-event1.02.1 libdevmapper1.02.1 libedit2 libept1.4.12
  liberror-perl libfile-find-rule-perl libfreetype6 libfuse2 libgpm2
  libncurses5 libnumber-compare-perl libopts25 libparted0debian1 libprocps0
  libreadline5 libsepol1 libsigc++-2.0-0c2a libss2 libswitch-perl
  libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-perl-perl libtext-glob-perl
  libtimedate-perl libudev0 libuuid1 libwrap0 libxapian22 locales logrotate
  lsof lvm2 molly-guard ntp openssh-client openssh-server openssl
  openssl-blacklist openssl-blacklist-extra parted perl perl-modules procps
  python-apt rsyslog stow sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tzdata ucf udev
  util-linux
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  sysvinit-utils:i386
0 upgraded, 89 newly installed, 8 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 55.3 MB of archives.
After this operation, 134 MB of additional disk space will be used.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase  Yes, do as I say! 
 ?] Yes, do as I say! (actually type this!)
Get:1 http://debian.debian.zugschlus.de/debian/ wheezy/main e2fslibs amd64 1.42.5-1.1 [197 kB]
( )
Fetched 55.3 MB in 20s (2648 kB/s)                                            
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
( )

This process may re-ask some debconf questions that you have already answered during initial system setup. I find it comforting to actually see that my answers were preserved, but you can always export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive if you want installation to be silent. If you know how this step can be done more elegantly, please comment. We now, finally, have the resolver in a consistent state.

$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
121
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
119
$

Now we can force-crossgrade all i386 packages that are still left on the system. Again, we use the apt-get --download install, dpkg --install stunt as coreutils gets crossgraded at this step and dpkg is less than happy if it finds itself without /bin/rm. Remember, with --download, nothing is actually removed during this step even if apt-get claims to remove things. Apt will also complain that many of these packages are already installed. Those are libs that were pulled in previously. The first dpkg --install run in this step will complain about gazillions of dependency problems, which will all be resolved in concluding apt-get -f install after the second dpkg --install run, this time a manual one.

$ sudo apt-get --download-only install $(dpkg --list   awk  if( $1 ==  ii  && $4 ==
 i386  )   print $2     sed  s/:i386// )
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
( )
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
Suggested packages:
  powermgmt-base bash-doc bzip2-doc diffutils-doc wdiff mlocate locate
  gnupg-doc xloadimage imagemagick eog libpcsclite1 iproute-doc resolvconf
  avahi-autoipd nfs-common ncompress indent
Recommended packages:
  bsdmainutils gnupg-curl libatm1
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  anacron:i386 apt-utils:i386 base-files:i386 base-passwd:i386 bash:i386
( )
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  anacron apt-utils base-files base-passwd bash bsdutils busybox bzip2
( )
0 upgraded, 56 newly installed, 49 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 24,1 MB of archives.
After this operation, 2.030 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://debian.debian.zugschlus.de/debian/ wheezy/main kmod amd64 9-3 [60,5 kB]
( )
Fetched 24,1 MB in 11s (2.120 kB/s)                                           
Download complete and in download only mode
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
(Reading database ... 17098 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace adduser 3.113+nmu3 (using .../adduser_3.113+nmu3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement adduser ...
( )
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1_amd64.deb
 /var/cache/apt/archives/coreutils_8.13-3.5_amd64.deb
 initscripts
 lvm2
 procps
 rsyslog
 sysvinit
 sysv-rc
 udev
 util-linux
 aide-common
 dmsetup
 e2fsprogs
 ifupdown
 initramfs-tools
 libdevmapper1.02.1:amd64
 libdevmapper-event1.02.1:amd64
 libparted0debian1:amd64
 molly-guard
 openssh-server
 parted
 grub-common
 grub-pc
 grub-pc-bin
 grub2-common
$ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1_amd64.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/coreutils_8.13-3.5_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 17129 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace bash 4.2+dfsg-0.1 (using .../bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement bash ...
Preparing to replace coreutils 8.13-3.5 (using .../coreutils_8.13-3.5_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement coreutils ...
Setting up bash (4.2+dfsg-0.1) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/share/man/man7/bash-builtins.7.gz to provide /usr/share/man/man7/builtins.7.gz
(builtins.7.gz) in auto mode
Setting up coreutils (8.13-3.5) ...
$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils
Suggested packages:
  bootlogd sash
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libslang2-modules:i386 sysvinit-utils:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  sysvinit-utils
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  sysvinit-utils:i386
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
23 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/99,5 kB of archives.
After this operation, 328 kB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase  Yes, do as I say! 
 ?] Yes, do as I say! (actually type this!)
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
 This is an essential package - it should not be removed.
(Reading database ... 17129 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing sysvinit-utils ...
Selecting previously unselected package sysvinit-utils.
(Reading database ... 17105 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking sysvinit-utils (from .../sysvinit-utils_2.88dsf-41_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up sysvinit-utils (2.88dsf-41) ...
Setting up sysv-rc (2.88dsf-41) ...
Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-41) ...
Setting up util-linux (2.20.1-5.3) ...
Setting up e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) ...
Setting up sysvinit (2.88dsf-41) ...
sysvinit: restarting... done.
(Reading database ... 17129 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libslang2-modules:i386 ...
Setting up ifupdown (0.7.8) ...
Setting up procps (1:3.3.3-3) ...
[ ok ] Setting kernel variables ... /etc/sysctl.conf...done.
Setting up udev (175-7.2) ...
[ ok ] Stopping the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd.
[ ok ] Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd.
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Setting up rsyslog (5.8.11-3) ...
[ ok ] Stopping enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd.
[ ok ] Starting enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd.
Setting up aide-common (0.15.1-8) ...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.109.1) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Setting up openssh-server (1:6.0p1-4) ...
[ ok ] Restarting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.
Setting up molly-guard (0.4.5-1) ...
Setting up libdevmapper1.02.1:amd64 (2:1.02.74-7) ...
Setting up libdevmapper-event1.02.1:amd64 (2:1.02.74-7) ...
Setting up libparted0debian1:amd64 (2.3-12) ...
Setting up grub-common (1.99-27+deb7u1) ...
Setting up grub2-common (1.99-27+deb7u1) ...
Setting up grub-pc-bin (1.99-27+deb7u1) ...
Setting up grub-pc (1.99-27+deb7u1) ...
Installation finished. No error reported.
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.9.4-zgsrv2008064
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.9.4-zgsrv2008064
done
Setting up parted (2.3-12) ...
Setting up dmsetup (2:1.02.74-7) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Setting up lvm2 (2.02.95-7) ...
[ ok ] Setting up LVM Volume Groups...done.
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.9.4-zgsrv2008064
Found 12 processes using old versions of upgraded files
( )
$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libasprintf0c2:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386
  libreadline5:i386
Use  apt-get autoremove  to remove them.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
72
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
175
$

We have completed the actual crossgrade. All non-multiarch packages are now amd64. The resolver is now fine as well. At this current state, all i386 packages that are still installed should be unneeded libs. We can safely nuke them. Careful minds may inspect the list of packages to be removed for important or non-lib items. After completion of the command, a second call of the same command verifies that we were successful.

$ sudo apt-get remove $(dpkg --list   awk  if( $1 ==  ii  && $4 ==  i386  )   print $2
  )
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  e2fslibs:i386 gcc-4.7-base:i386 libacl1:i386 libapt-inst1.5:i386
  libapt-pkg4.12:i386 libasprintf0c2:i386 libattr1:i386 libblkid1:i386
  libbsd0:i386 libbz2-1.0:i386 libc6:i386 libcap2:i386 libcomerr2:i386
  libcurl3:i386 libcurl3-gnutls:i386 libdb5.1:i386 libedit2:i386
  libexpat1:i386 libfreetype6:i386 libfuse2:i386 libgcc1:i386
  libgcrypt11:i386 libgdbm3:i386 libgnutls26:i386 libgpg-error0:i386
  libgpm2:i386 libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 libidn11:i386 libk5crypto3:i386
  libkeyutils1:i386 libkmod2:i386 libkrb5-3:i386 libkrb5support0:i386
  libldap-2.4-2:i386 liblockfile1:i386 liblzma5:i386 libmagic1:i386
  libncurses5:i386 libncursesw5:i386 libp11-kit0:i386 libpam-modules:i386
  libpam0g:i386 libpci3:i386 libpcre3:i386 libpng12-0:i386 libpopt0:i386
  libprocps0:i386 libreadline5:i386 libreadline6:i386 librtmp0:i386
  libsasl2-2:i386 libselinux1:i386 libsemanage1:i386 libsepol1:i386
  libsigc++-2.0-0c2a:i386 libslang2:i386 libsqlite3-0:i386 libss2:i386
  libssh2-1:i386 libssl1.0.0:i386 libstdc++6:i386 libtasn1-3:i386
  libtinfo5:i386 libudev0:i386 libusb-0.1-4:i386 libustr-1.0-1:i386
  libuuid1:i386 libwrap0:i386 linux-image-3.9.4-zgsrv2008064:i386 zlib1g:i386
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 70 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 67,5 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
(Reading database ... 17111 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing e2fslibs:i386 ...
( )
$ sudo apt-get remove $(dpkg --list   awk  if( $1 ==  ii  && $4 ==  i386  )   print $2
  )
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
70
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
175
$

To finally make the packages really vanish from the system, we purge all packages that dpkg --list still reports in state rc , which means removed, configuration still present . Thankfully, dpkg seems to handle the case where a dpkg-conffile belongs to a transitioned package gracefully.

$ sudo dpkg --purge $(dpkg --list   awk  if ($1 ==  rc )   print $2  )
(Reading database ... 15868 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing e2fslibs:i386 ...
Purging configuration files for e2fslibs:i386 ...
( )
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
i386
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
0
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
175
$

We now verify that all packages we have are either arch all or arch amd64.

$ dpkg --list   grep -v  \(amd64 all\) 
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
  Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
 / Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
 / Name                            Version                   Architecture Description
+++-===============================-=========================-============-========================================================================

As I found myself suddenly without e2fsprogs during one of my experiments, I check for e2fsprogs being present. If this package is missing, you ll only find out after rebooting.

$ dpkg --list e2fsprogs
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
  Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
 / Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
 / Name           Version      Architecture Description
+++-==============-============-============-=================================
ii  e2fsprogs      1.42.5-1.1   amd64        ext2/ext3/ext4 file system utilit

My locally built amd64 kernel with 32 bit support was an arch i386 package as well, so it got zapped in the migration process. Replace it with a real amd64 kernel. This step will vary if you use Debian kernels. Do not forget the firmwares.

$ sudo apt-get -t wheezy-zg-experimental install kernel-image-zgserver linux-firmware-image
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  cpio initramfs-tools kernel-image-zgsrv20080 klibc-utils libklibc
  linux-image-3.9.4-zgsrv20080
Suggested packages:
  libarchive1
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  cpio initramfs-tools kernel-image-zgserver kernel-image-zgsrv20080
  klibc-utils libklibc linux-firmware-image linux-image-3.9.4-zgsrv20080
0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 11,2 MB of archives.
After this operation, 30,5 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://zg20110.debian.zugschlus.de/ wheezy-zg-experimental/main linux-image-3.9.4-zgsrv20080 amd64
3.9.4.20130605.0 [10,4 MB]
( )

I now make sure that the initrd I have built contains all file system modules and is of the right architecture:

$ cd /tmp
$ < /boot/initrd.img-3.9.4-zgsrv20080 gunzip   cpio -i
32053 blocks
$ find . -name  *ext*.ko 
./lib/modules/3.9.4-zgsrv20080/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.ko
./lib/modules/3.9.4-zgsrv20080/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.ko
./lib/modules/3.9.4-zgsrv20080/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko
$ file ./lib/modules/3.9.4-zgsrv20080/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko
./lib/modules/3.9.4-zgsrv20080/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
BuildID[sha1]=0x259a642448805c9597932ee25c62c8e6a00a32ad, not stripped
$ cd

As the last step, remove i386 as an architecture and reboot into the newly migrated system. We verify that the system considers itself amd64 with no foreign architectures.

$ sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$ 
$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
$ dpkg --list   grep i386   wc -l
0
$ dpkg --list   grep amd64   wc -l
181
$ sudo shutdown -r now
Broadcast message from root@wheezyarch (pts/0) (Wed Jun 12 16:09:24 2013):
The system is going down for reboot NOW!
$ Connection to wheezyarch.zugschlus.de closed by remote host.
Connection to wheezyarch.zugschlus.de closed.
$ ssh wheezyarch.zugschlus.de
Linux wheezyarch 3.9.4-zgsrv20080 #2 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 5 13:12:04 UTC 2013 x86_64
$ dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
$

We now check whether we have lost any packages in this process:

$ sudo dpkg --get-selections   grep install   awk  print $1    sed  s/:.*//;s/$/:amd64
install/;  > get-selections.post
$ wc -l get-selections.*
  234 get-selections.post
  226 get-selections.pre
$ diff --unified=0 get-selections.pre get-selections.post 
--- get-selections.pre  2013-06-12 19:47:40.278176000 +0200
+++ get-selections.post 2013-06-12 20:28:51.389874000 +0200
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+cpio:amd64 install
@@ -58,0 +60 @@
+initramfs-tools:amd64 install
@@ -68,0 +71,3 @@
+kernel-image-zgserver:amd64 install
+kernel-image-zgsrv20080:amd64 install
+klibc-utils:amd64 install
@@ -108,0 +114 @@
+libklibc:amd64 install
@@ -163,0 +170,2 @@
+linux-firmware-image:amd64 install
+linux-image-3.9.4-zgsrv20080:amd64 install

So we have not actually lost things, but we have gained the pure amd64 kernel and the packages that are needed to build a proper initrd. These were missing from the initial install of the i386 test VM. The downside of the process is that we have lost most of the automatically installed markers in aptitude which make sure to remove a library once nothing depends on it any more. If you make a point in having those markers correctly set, as I do, this is tedious work to set it on every package in the aptitude curses interface, making aptitude suggest removing the entire system, and then again remove it from the packages you actually intend to keep. This should not result in anything being removed, otherwise you have goofed previously. All Done! I am now off perfecting my upgrade process so that the i386 lenny and squeeze machines can first be moved to wheezy and then to amd64.

Sometimes there are true heros. Even today. Like Edward Snowden who made PRISM publically known. There's an interview by The Guardian with Edward Snowden:

In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote: "I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions," but "I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant." [...] He has had "a very comfortable life" that included a salary of roughly $200,000, a girlfriend with whom he shared a home in Hawaii, a stable career, and a family he loves. "I'm willing to sacrifice all of that because I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building."

Neither Bradley Manning nor Edward Snowden should be sentenced, but the Government that is responsible for such surveilance programs like PRISM should.

Kategorie:

Debian

Tags:

Debian

This blog post is the first of a series of posts dealing with the results of the Debian systemd survey. I intend to give a presentation at DebConf 2013, too, so you could either read my posts, or watch the talk, or both :-). The top concern shared by most people is:

systemd has too many dependencies, or it is bloated, or it does too many things, or is too complex

Now this concern actually has a lot of different facets, and I am trying to share my opinion on each of them. systemd has too many dependencies First, let s start with too many dependencies , because that is easy to check and reason about. I have created a document which lists all dependencies of the systemd binary itself (pid 1) and all the binaries which are currently shipped by the systemd Debian package. If you don t want to take my word for granted, please read that document. Have you read the document? Very nice! As you can see, the systemd binary itself has 10 dependencies (excluding libc). Now, the question is, what is bad about dependencies? Why do people list dependencies as a top concern?

Cyclic dependencies. When you hear that your init system depends on DBus, you might argue that there is a cyclic dependency here, because DBus needs to be started by the init system. However, systemd does NOT depend on dbus-daemon (!) to boot your machine. Instead of using the system bus, it uses a private UNIX socket. Therefore, systemd uses DBus merely as a serialization format for IPC between its different processes. Only when you want to access systemd via its API as a user (non-root), you actually use the system bus. Since we are talking about DBus: DBus provides a well-tested serialization format and IPC mechanism so that systemd doesn t have to reinvent the wheel and instead benefits from wide support within languages.
Complicated code. I feel like there is the implicit assumption that lots of dependencies correlate with complicated code that is easy to break. I encourage you to have a look at systemd s source code: look for the places where specific libraries are used, e.g. enforce_user which uses libcap. You ll notice that the code is not complex and usage of the libraries is clear.
Software dragging in lots of library packages. The libraries which systemd uses are already in widespread use (e.g. DBus, udev, selinux, libcap, pcre, ). On a typical Debian installation, only very few of them will be dragged in by systemd, if at all. As an example, on a fresh Debian Wheezy installation, less than 10 packages will end up on your machine when running apt-get install systemd .
More memory use. The Linux kernel maps libraries into memory only once, no matter how many processes use them. As stated in the dependency list, on machines where the libraries are not already loaded, systemd brings in about 500 KiB of additional memory-mapped libraries in the worst case. On the machines we have these days, this is a reasonable cost to pay for all the benefits systemd gets us. This holds true on embedded systems with only a few MiB of RAM and especially on typical workstations with 8+ GiB of RAM.

systemd is bloated Now, let s talk about bloat. Again, this is a point which has many facets. I d like to quote the Wikipedia definition of software bloat:

Software bloat is a process whereby successive versions of a computer program become perceptibly slower, use more memory or processing power, or have higher hardware requirements than the previous version whilst making only dubious user-perceptible improvements.

The first part of the definition certainly does not match systemd it is measurably faster than sysvinit. As for memory usage: systemd s RSS is 1.8 MiB, whereas sysvinit uses 0.8 MiB. As I argued on the More memory use point in the dependencies section, I think the additional resource cost is well worth the benefits. Also note that systemd s features are NOT all implemented in the binary which is PID 1. As explained in the dependency list, systemd consists of many cleanly separated binaries. So if a new version of systemd gathers an additional feature, this does not mean that your PID 1 will be bigger. While systemd runs on any hardware, it has an indirect hardware requirement: it requires some Linux kernel features (which are all enabled in Debian kernels). That might rule out usage of systemd on really old embedded hardware where you don t have a chance to update the kernel. While it is sad that those machines cannot profit from systemd, switching to systemd as a default has no downside either: Debian continues to support sysvinit for quite some time, so these machines will continue to work even with upcoming Debian versions. systemd does too many things The Wikipedia definition continues:

[ ] perceived bloat can occur from the software servicing a large, diverse marketplace with many differing requirements. Most end users will feel they only need some limited subset of the available functions and will regard the others as unnecessary bloat, even if people with different requirements do use them.

I think the last part of the Wikipedia definition applies to systemd: it does service a large and diverse marketplace . That marketplace is the entirety of existing software which is started by an init system. Also, systemd can be used on a wide range of hardware (embedded devices, tablets, phones, notebooks, desktops, servers) which requires different features. As an example: on a desktop system you typically don t care strongly about a watchdog feature, but on embedded or servers that feature is very handy. Similarly, on a tablet, forward secure sealing of logfiles is not as important as on a server. Therefore, I can understand if you feel that you don t need many of the features systemd provides. But please think of other users and maintainers who are very happy with systemd s benefits. Also note that while systemd supports many things (in separate binaries!), you don t have to use them all. It still makes sense to ship them all in the same package. Take coreutils as another example in that area. The binaries belong together, even though you most likely haven t used all of them (e.g. od, pr, ptx, :-)). systemd is too complex The remaining concern is that systemd is too complex. In my experience, complexity is often inherent to a specific area and one cannot simply make it go away. Instead, there are different models of how that complexity is represented. Think of the monolithic Linux kernel versus the MINIX microkernel. The latter has a very small amount of lines of source in the kernel, but puts the complexity into userspace. The former uses a different approach with more source in the kernel. The arguments between both camps show that neither is clearly right or clearly wrong. In a way, sysvinit represents the MINIX model: it has a small core (the init binary itself), but a lot of complexity in shell scripts and external programs. The fact that solutions are copied from one init script to another leads to lots of subtle errors and makes code reuse really hard. systemd however has more source code in the binaries, but requires only very simple, descriptive, textual configuration instead of complex init scripts. To me, it seems preferable to have the complexity in a single place instead of distributed across lots of people and projects. Conclusion In a way, you are right. systemd centralizes complexity from tons of init scripts into a single place. However, it therefore makes it very easy for maintainers to write service files (equivalent of an init script) and provides a consistent and reliable interface for service management. Furthermore, it is different than sysvinit, and different solutions often seem complex at first. While systemd consumes more resources than sysvinit, it uses them to make more information available about services; its finer-grained service management requires more state-keeping, but in turn offers you more control over your services.

udisks2 was uploaded recently to Debian sid. With this, people might have seen hidden encrypted disks reappear in Thunar. Hiding disks in udisks was previously done by setting an udev propery. For example, I did this using /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hide-disks.rules:

KERNEL=="sda2", ENV UDISKS_PRESENTATION_HIDE ="1" This is not valid anymore in udisks2, but only the property name has changed. You can simply replace by:

KERNEL=="sda2", ENV UDISKS_IGNORE ="1"

I'm not too sure yet if it has side-effects (PRESENTATION_HIDE seems pretty harmless, but IGNORE might be a bit more invasive) but for now it seems to work just fine.

Slashdot recently picked out Federated VoIP as one of the compelling features in the upcoming Fedora 19 (Schrodinger's Cat) release. The same capability was recently part of the Debian 7 (wheezy) release and it is in Ubuntu too. It is ironic that the debates about Federated VoIP have long mirrored the debate about Schrodinger's famous feline - is it dead, is it alive, or is it just a theory? Well, the answer is here today (for VoIP, not the cat).

Does it work? Yes, it does work. Even better, users on all the supported platforms can call each other, for example, user1@debian.org should be able to seamlessly and securely place a call to user2@fedoraproject.org What is involved? Server: Each domain needs a SIP proxy, XMPP server or preferably both. They are alternatives and they happily co-exist. For convenience, they can run on an existing mail server as long as the load is not excessive. See the Real-time communcations (RTC) quick start guide for setting up the server, firewall rules, DNS entries and all other details Clients: Each user can have a hard phone, softphone such as Jitsi or Empathy or a mobile VoIP client like Lumicall. Each of these projects has their own email support lists where users can ask any questions about getting started. Is the server difficult to set up and maintain? Setting up fully featured Asterisk or FreeSWITCH servers and keeping them secure for public Internet use is a daunting task. That's why federated VoIP with a basic SIP proxy is so compelling. It is possible to set up the SIP proxy now, get people talking, and add in a soft PBX later if optional features like queues or menus are needed. The repro SIP proxy from reSIProcate is one of the easiest to set up. It can be configured through a web interface or directly entering users into the MySQL tables. Here is a screenshot:

Where to next for federated VoIP? People should not be waiting for their ISP to deploy federated VoIP. Many of them are either looking for ways to monetize VoIP, or keen to keep costs low by just selling bandwidth. Rather, it will be up to power users (like those of us who run their own mail server at home), corporate IT departments and also the IT departments of universities and other large, distributed organisations to take leadership. There is huge opportunity here: by displacing the phone companies, IT departments can provide a wider range of services to their organisations. Money previously lost in contracts for phone systems can bolster the IT department as the one-stop-shop for technology, giving IT workers greater career opportunities and stability in their organisation. The organisation benefits from having a system designed and operated around their business needs with much better value for money and a visible support team.

Review: Get Everything Done, by Mark Forster

Publisher:	Hodder & Stoughton
Copyright:	2000
ISBN:	0-340-74620-3
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	190

Mark Forster is the author of my (current) favorite time management book, Do It Tomorrow, and several excellent blog posts. I've therefore been rather curious about some of his earlier books, and finally decided to order this one. It appears to only have been published in the UK, so it can be a bit expensive in the US unless you can find it used. The main reason why I like Forster's writing so much is that he's a theory and neat trick sort of author instead of a single system author. A lot of time management writing (such as Getting Things Done) presents a single system that's supposedly universal. If that system happens to work for you, great. If it doesn't, the usefulness of the book drops off rapidly. You have to work through the basic principles, which are often sidelined in the book, and come up with variations on your own. Forster is the other sort of time management author: he throws out a flurry of tricks and tactics and lets you see which ones stick. He doesn't have a single system; indeed, one of the most entertaining parts of Get Everything Done is a parable about following many of the common time management systems and having one's life get worse and worse. Instead, he talks about the underlying theory, about the different approaches he's tried and their tradeoffs, and about lots of little tricks that he's found help in one situation or another. It's more of a toolkit than a system. This is, of course, only as good as the clarity of presentation. In both Do It Tomorrow and here, the clarity is excellent. For example, one of the most eye-opening ideas he explores in this book is that time management is a horrible name for the field. Time continues on no matter what you do; you can't increase it, and you can't save it. Rather, what you're actually doing is attention management: for each moment, you're deciding where to direct your attention. Things to which you turn your attention will change; things that you don't pay attention to will not change (except possibly for the worse). I'm quite fond of this reframing of the problem. Forster's thinking about time, or, rather, attention management is not as fully-developed here as in the later Do It Tomorrow. Much of the latter book is about the theory and practice of to-do lists. The techniques presented here were, at least for me, less immediately inspiring, although still thought-provoking. Much of the book focuses on internal resistance and procrastination, on the concept of self-control and decision-making as a mental "muscle" that has to be exercised, and on a philosophy of attention management that slowly builds up to doing whatever one is resisting the most at the moment. I haven't had a chance to work through the exercises that he offers (Forster's books tend to be full of illuminating exercises), so I don't have a fully-formed opinion on their efficacy. I was able to put Do It Tomorrow into practice more immediately. However, one thing this book does do is tackle directly the problem of trying to do too many things. Since this, more than organization, is the heart of my personal attention management problems, I was delighted to see this. Most attention management books at least give lip service to the problem, but they provide little useful guidance. David Allen's Getting Things Done effectively rules it out of scope: the goal of the system is to free you to act on your decisions, but there's little or no attention paid to the practical problem of making those decisions. As a result, I had serious trouble with GTD when I tried to use it. My project and next action lists would simply grow without bound, and GTD offered no useful assistance with culling them. Deciding what to do is, of course, a hard problem, but Forster here offers some specific and useful techniques and spends some time on the necessity of culling one's backlog. He also states directly the problem that everyone else seems to dance around: if you don't cull your committments, no attention management system will actually help you. It will just enable you to do trivia more efficiently, and therefore allow you to fill your life with even more of it, while still feeling just as overwhelmed as before. The bluntness is refreshing, and the exercises in cataloging commitments with time values and then forcing yourself to reduce the commitment list to the doable look quite helpful. I would still start with Do It Tomorrow rather than this book, since I think some practical approaches to to-do list management are one of the best places to start with attention management. But I'm glad I picked up this book as well, despite the cost of the UK import, and I plan on working through the exercises in it. Unlike David Allen, who has one basic system and whose other book was interesting but not as helpful, Forster's toolkit approach means that more books mean more ideas and more possible tools. He doesn't stick with one concept and polish it; he tries a lot of different ideas and then analyzes their strengths and weaknesses. If Do It Tomorrow spoke to you, I recommend grabbing this one as well. (Yes, it's somewhat amusing for me to read and review this book immediately after The Making of the Indebted Man, since to an extent attention management is part of the remaking of the self that's the obligation of the debtor in Lazzarato's construction of the nature of debt. It was something that occurred to me while reading this book. But I think Forster does a good job of showing attention management as a tool to direct one's efforts towards an internal goal rather than externally-imposed goals.) Rating: 8 out of 10

Review: The Making of the Indebted Man, by Maurizio Lazzarato

Translator:	Joshua David Jordan
Publisher:	Semiotext(e)
Copyright:	2011, 2012
Printing:	2012
ISBN:	1-58435-115-2
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	199

This is a continuation of my effort to catch up on Marxist thought while pondering workplace governance, this time following the recommendations of a friend after a related conversation (about pension systems and basic income guarantee in a Usenet group Usenet isn't dead yet). As opposed to Democracy at Work, which is a popularization, The Making of the Indebted Man has more of the density of a scholarly text. The version I'm reading is also in translation, which I suspect makes it even harder going in places. The basic thesis, though, is clear: debt is far more central to the way that we construct not only economic systems but social systems and even internal models of our own nature than is often realized. We prefer to think of societies as structured around mutual exchange, but in practice they're more often constructed around concepts of debt and credit that have been fully internalized and used to construct a moral code for a responsible debtor. And this is not a neutral construction; rather, it is a key support mechanism of capitalism and of the financial and economic status quo, used (both intentionally and accidentally) to reduce uncertainty and to support exploitation and economic domination. This is one of those perspectives that didn't occur to me prior to reading this book but which is startlingly obvious in retrospect. Once Lazzarato starts pointing it out, the prevelance and universality of debt as a basic structure of social and economic life is striking. The creditor and debtor concept extends not just to obvious examples, such as consumer credit or mortgages, but also to education (via student loans), law enforcement ("pay one's debt to society"), employment (most employers, particularly during economic downturns, have successfully inverted the natural direction of the creditor relationship and have made employees feel in debt to the employer for having a job), and social services (unemployment and welfare benefits come with significant, if often unstated, debt-like requirements). Debt is also the great leveller. It now cuts across race, gender, and social class. Apart from a small handful of extremely rich individuals and corporations, Lazzarato claims, convincingly, that nearly everyone is enmeshed to some extent in a network of debt, or at least in in attitudes and moral pressures of a debtor. Nor is this a static situation. The role of debt in our social lives seems to be constantly increasing. The past fifteen years in particular have seen drastic increases in debt during a debt-funded economic boom combined with debt-funded asset bubbles. Even after the financial collapse, much of that growth of debt persists. Lazzarato, probably in part because he's Italian, focuses on national debt (more on that in a moment); as an American, I'd identify student loan debt as a more compelling example in the United States. Other countries probably have their own examples. For a system to be this widespread, it must serve some social purpose. Lazzarato sees it as an instrument of control. Debt has been very effectively built up as a moral obligation, and (unlike a society of mutual support) it's a very one-sided moral obligation that strongly favors existing power. The debtor is held to a tight moral standard of repayment of debts, and is morally condemned by all of society, including their peers, for a failure to repay. But there is little or no corresponding moral pressure on the creditor: perhaps a half-hearted dislike of high interest rates or occasional pressure to not change previously agreed terms, but nothing like the moral pressure applied to the debtor. To be a creditor is to have an agreed-upon, one-sided right to dictate to the debtor the terms on which they must conduct a portion of their life, and the larger the debt, the larger the portion. The debtor is expected to realign their life, at least in part, around paying off the debt, including choice of profession, decisions about when to quit a job, about how to prioritize personal spending, and so forth. This is all so automatic and so deeply ingrained that, even while writing this, I'm nodding along and thinking "well, of course." Lazzarato offers an opportunity to take a step back and think about the implications, particularly of the deeply one-sided web of obligations this creates. A Marxist analysis adds another level of consideration. One of the basic questions of Marxist thought is why workers put up with exploitation by capitalists. In a Marxist analysis, workers provide the productive output of society, which is then redirected and controlled by a relatively small capitalists. The workers massively outnumber the capitalists. Why would they be content for this situation to continue? Marx, of course, thought they wouldn't be, that the periodic crises of capitalism would eventually result in a socialist revolution by the workers. But by and large this hasn't happened. Why? Lazzarato offers debt as a partial explanation. The profits redirected by capitalists are returned to workers to some extent, but as debt rather than payment. This allows workers to participate to some extent in the growth of societal wealth from constantly increasing productivity, while simultaneously entangling workers in a system of moral control. Company stores, starvation wages, and other confiscatory practices are clear mechanisms of external control that provoke directed outrage. Debt is something that the debtor has nominally agreed to (however much the situation is manipulated to make that agreement almost inevitable), and to which attaches a deep tradition of moral responsibility. The worker has respected grounds on which to object to inequitable treatment; the debtor is wholly responsible for repayment, and is rarely considered to have grounds to complain about the debt. Most of the historical attempts to balance those scales, such as laws and religious rules against usury or the historical Jewish rule of Jubilee, have fallen by the wayside. This is a rather extended summary of what I got out of the book. I'm doing that in part because the book itself is somewhat heavy going. Lazzarato makes extensive use of specialized terms (often not defined) and fills the book with references to other works without much in the way of useful summary. It's the sort of book where, if you're not already well-versed in the field, you may need to just keep reading through some passages to find a point of reference that makes the argument retroactively make sense. I had a particular difficulty with "subjectivation," a term that Wikipedia tells me is from the writings of Michel Foucault (a major source for this book), which Lazzarato uses extensively but never adequately defines. Some external research indicates that this is a very difficult term to define, which explains why I was never quite comfortable with my understanding. I think Lazzarato is using it to get at the process of internalization of the morality of debt and the way that a debt society forces individuals into a mode of economic individualism in which many of their personal choices are bent towards making themselves better (more reliable, more trustworthy) debtors. But I'm not completely sure. There are also places in which I think Lazzarato takes his argument too far, although one of those, I think, reflects a difference in national economic status. He makes quite a lot of national debt in this book, placing it in the universal position of the overarching debt that turns every citizen into a debtor even if they've avoided other debts. This is possibly true in countries whose national debts are held in other currencies, or in countries like Italy that are part of the Euro (which, if one is not Germany or France, amounts to much the same thing). It's a dubious assertion for countries like the UK, Japan, or the United States, where the national debt is held in their own free-floating currency and is largely owed domestically, and partly plays into some frustratingly incorrect political rhetoric. One of the key dynamics of debt, namely the extreme power imbalance between debtor and creditor, is missing in countries with sovereign debt in their own currency, since those countries can always (if they're willing to pay the inflation price) simply print money to pay off national debt. Creditors know this, and therefore interest rates are much lower, the amount of leverage the creditor has is quite limited, and the sorts of debt crises seen in Italy and elsewhere in the Euro periphery are not seen. Lazzarato is understandably writing from the Italian perspective, but I think he weakens his argument by lumping national debt so completely into the same category as the other types of exploitative debt he discusses. The principle does feel universal to me, but the best examples of debt vary by country, so one has to be careful about generalizing specific examples. Another place where I simply disagree with his conclusions is around some of the more dramatic presentations of subjectivation. Lazzarato talks, at one point, about how debt reduces debtors to mechanical components, and uses as an example an ATM machine, which he portrays as uniquely dehumanizing through the mechanical process that someone has to follow to withdraw money. There may be some point here about the dehumanization of debt and its subsumption into the foundation of day-to-day social interaction, but he lost me entirely with the unwarranted technophobia of the specific example. The idea that machines and automation make us less human is an old argument that's orthogonal to the thrust of his argument. It reminded me of old contentions that human relationships made on-line aren't real, which is nonsense. Overall, this is a fascinating and insightful discussion hampered by a difficult and sometimes overly elliptical presentation, a bit too much drama and grand theorizing, and a few poor choices of examples. I found the basic idea extremely valuable, but the amount of work required to extract it occasionally irritating. (This could be partly due to the limits of translation, but I suspect most of the difficulty was present in the original.) I'm not sure that I would recommend the book, but I definitely recommend considering the underlying ideas. Debt now works alongside the employment relationship as a primary means of reinforcing economic and social control and hierarchy. This is likely via accidental development rather than any grand plan, but it's now being actively exploited by the creditors of society, large corporations most notably. Viewed in that light, the explosive growth of student loan debt in the United States is particularly frightening. After Lazzarato's extensive examination of the distortive effects of permanent debt, not just on economics and society but on our own conceptions of our selves and our duties and roles in life, the idea of trapping a generation in debt from the moment of their financial independence is deeply troubling, even nauseating. Rating: 6 out of 10

Many large, successful, de-centralised software projects have a suite of their own packages maintained with their own platform-independent tools. Typical examples are Drupal's collection of module and theme packages, the R Project packages (CRAN) and the Central Repository for Maven packages (Java). In the case of Drupal:

Debian only really packages the core Drupal system and not the modules and themes
Gunnar's dh-make-drupal can easily Debianize many of the modules from Drupal's collection
Drupal has strict rules about the contents of packages distributed from their official collection. In particular, they must all be 100% compatible with the GPL v2 or later.
Another rule that is particularly exciting for Debian is that Drupal's hosted modules may not duplicate code (particularly JavaScript) from other projects/repositories: everyone installing a module must download and unpack the required JavaScript, often adding many steps to the module installation.

This is a particular opportunity for Debian to demonstrate it's strengths. Debian's pkg-javascript team has been busy packaging a huge collection of popular JavaScript libraries in a 100% free manner that guarantees adherence to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. This means that they have already done a lot of the groundwork to weed out minified (obfuscated) code that isn't accompanied by readable source code and ensure that there is a mechanism for conveniently and promptly distributing security fixes. The Drupal Libraries API module has now been packaged for Debian and is available in the unstable archive. The goal of this package is to facilitate the automated use of Debian's high-quality JavaScript packages to fulfill the dependency requirements of Drupal modules. Exact details of how these components fit together is currently explained in the README.Debian file distributed in the package. People packaging JavaScript for use by Drupal modules need to consider making a small glue' package to help Drupal's Libraries API discover the JavaScript. In many cases the glue package needs to do little more than creating a symlink from /usr/share/javascript to /usr/share/drupal7/libraries - this process can also potentially be automated by a future version of dh-make-drupal

like last week, I was working on the preparation of the Perl 5.18 transition. besides that I also uploaded some RC bug fixes, mostly by taking patches that came from Ubuntu (kudos!):

~~#683512~~ biogenesis: "biogenesis: Transition package to use default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#683519~~ bytecode: "bytecode: Transition package to default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#683522~~ coco-java: "coco-java: Transition package to use default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#683525~~ collectd: "collectd: Transition package to use default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#683543~~ jasmin-sable: "jasmin-sable: Transition package to default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2, then uploaded by maintainer
~~#683550~~ jfractionlab: "jfractionlab: Transition package to default java implementation; fix java7 compatibility"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#684154~~ libusb-java: "libusb-java: Transition package to use default java implementation + java 7 compatibility"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#684155~~ mockito: "mockito: Drop BD on openjdk-6-jdk"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#684162~~ neobio: "neobio: Transition package to default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#684378~~ x11vnc: "x11vnc: Transition package to use default java implementation"
apply patch from Ubuntu / James Page, upload to DELAYED/2
~~#708766~~ libimager-qrcode-perl: "libimager-qrcode-perl: Update for newer libimager-perl needed"
upload with my patch from last week to DELAYED/2
~~#708840~~ src:owl: "owl: FTBFS: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system"
upload with my patch from last week to DELAYED/2
~~#709676~~ src:libapache-authenhook-perl: "libapache-authenhook-perl: FTBFS on i386: $Config ccflags lost"
fix *FLAGS in debian/rules (pkg-perl)

as a side note (or better: question): why are the bugs for the upcoming Apache 2.4 and openjdk-7 transitions classified as 'serious', instead of as 'important', like the Perl 5.18 ones?

On saturday 25. of May I gave a talk about FreedomBox at the "Claim back your device" track of LinuxTag in Berlin. LinuxTag is a fairly big annual conference about (yes, you guessed right) Linux and related topics. The FreedomBox is a project to help non-geeks care about their personal privacy when online, same ways as geeks have practiced for a decade or more. Concrete goal is to design a small, cheap physical box similar to an internet gateway or wifi router but with three additions:

Easy and intuitive to setup and personalize for non-geeks
Offers routines to help you protect your privacy
Offers routines to let you help others in need of privacy

"Privacy" is commonly mistaken as "secrecy": Privacy is to keep you in control of your information, so that sharing or keeping to yourself is truly your own choice. Thanks a lot especially to Matthias Kirschner for inviting me as a speaker! Slides (sources) for the event.

Review: Asimov's Science Fiction, July 2011

Editor:	Sheila Williams
Issue:	Volume 35, No. 7
ISSN:	1065-2698
Pages:	112

Williams's editorial is a mildly interesting piece about story titles. Silverberg's column is a more interesting (and rather convincing) rebuttal of the joke that fiction authors are "professional liars," combined with an examination of a fake and fantastic 14th travelogue that (at least in Silverberg's telling) was widely believed at the time. The precis of Silverberg's argument is that lying requires an intent to deceive, which is a property of deceptive memoir writers but not of fiction authors. Di Filippo's review column, as usual, is devoted almost entirely to esoterica, although I was moderately interested to hear of Stableford's continued work on translating early French SF. None of it seems compelling enough to go buy, but good translations of early works seem like a good thing to have in the world. "Day 29" by Chris Beckett: The conceit of this novelette is an interstellar travel system akin to a transporter that allows near-instantaneous travel between worlds. The drawback is that all memories from somewhere between 40 and 29 days before transit up until transit are wiped. The progatonist is a data analyst who is about to travel, and therefore by agency rule is required to stop doing work on day 40 before transmission since he can't be held legally liable for anything he has no recollection of doing. (I would like to say that I find this implausible, since one could always keep records, but it's exactly the sort of ass-covering regulation that a human resources department would come up with.) The premise is quite interesting: what do you do during that period that you're going to forget? Beckett wisely mixes Stephen's current waiting period on the colony world with his diary of his original waiting period on Earth the first time he went through the transmission process, and the latter adds greatly to the reader's appreciation of the weirdness of the forgotten interval. Unfortunately, this is a story more about psychological exploration than about plot, and Stephen just isn't very interesting. The telepathic but possibly nonsentient aliens add weirdness but not much else, and the ending of the story provided little sense of closure or conclusion for me. A good idea, but not the execution I wanted. (5) "Pug" by Theodora Goss: Since I grew up with a pug, I have a soft spot for a story featuring one; sadly, though, this story has insufficient pug in it. This is a quiet fantasy (Asimov's calls it SF, presumably on the basis of parallel worlds and a hypothesized scientific explanation, but it reads like fantasy to me) featuring Victorian girls, including one with a bad heart. They discover a hidden door to other versions of their world and do some minor exploration. There's little or nothing in the way of plot; the story is more of an attempt to capture a mood. It's mildly diverting, but I wish it had gone somewhere more substantial. (5) "Dunyon" by Kristine Kathryn Rusch: A Rusch story is often the highlight of an issue, and this is no exception. The protagonist is the owner of a bar in a space station that's become a combination of a refugee camp and a slum. War and chaos have created desperate people, most of whom are attempting to find some way to resources and get out of the bottom of society. The story is about a rumor: a mythical system named Dunyon that's safe and far away. And it's about how people react to that rumor. There's nothing particularly surprising about the direction the story goes (it's fairly short), but Rusch is always a good storyteller. (7) "The Music of the Sphere" by Norman Spinrad: I've had mixed feelings about Spinrad's fiction (and some of his essays), but I liked this story, despite its implausibility. It's set in the near future, featuring an expert in cetaceans and dolphin perception and a composer obsessed with both loud music and classical musical style. Just from that description, you can probably predict much of the story, but I thought it had some neat ideas about dolphins, whales, and alternate perception and aesthetics. (Note: neat, not necessarily biologically plausible.) Enjoyable. (6) "Bring on the Rain" by Josh Roseman: In a change of pace from the rest of the issue, this is a post-apocalyptic story of caravans of wheeled ships traversing a scorched and ruined landscape in search of weather systems and rain. The feel is of an inverted Waterworld, but with more emphasis on military tactics and cooperating fleets. The transposition of fleet maneuvers to huge ground vehicles adds some extra fun. The plot has little to do with the background and is a fairly stock military adventure scenario, but it's reasonably well-told. The story feels like an excerpt from a larger military-SF-inspired adventure, but the length keeps the quantity of tactics and maneuvering below the threshold where I would get bored. (6) "Twelvers" by Leah Cypess: This is a sharp and occasionally mean story of adolescent cruelty and alienation. Darla is a "twelver," a child who was carried an extra three months in the womb using newly-invented medical technology because of a belief in the advantages this would bring in later life. Unfortunately for all those who used this technique, what it also brought was a preternatural calm and an unusual reaction to emotions. Darla finds it almost impossible to get upset at anything, and that, of course, prompts the cruelty and abuse of other children. Most of the story is a description of that abuse, leading up to Darla stumbling into a nasty solution to her immediate problem. It's all very believable (well, apart from the motivating biology), but I didn't enjoy reading about it, and I'm certainly not convinced that the ending will lead to anything good. (5) "The Messenger" by Bruce McAllister: This is a very short time travel story, where time travel is used to try to unwind old family pain. This world follows the unalterable history model: no changes to the past are possible, and anything you do in the past has already happened. The mechanics are mostly avoided. Instead, McAllister concentrates on his mother, his father, and their complex relationship. I would have needed a bit more background on the characters to care enough about them for the story to be fully effective, but while the heartstring-pulling is kind of obvious, it's still a solid story. (6) "The Copenhagen Interpretation" by Paul Cornell: This is the most ingenious of the stories in this issue. It's set in a future world that extends what seemed to me to be pre-World-War-I great power politics, although there may be a hint of the Cold War. Great nations have reached a careful balance of power, and spies and secret services work to sustain that balance. The progatonist is one of those agents, making use of advanced technology like space folds in the service of a cause that he doesn't entirely believe in. Cornell mixes in mental conditioning, artificial people, space travel, and even aliens (maybe) in a taut thriller plot that, for me, gained a great deal from the unexplained strangeness of its background. If you like diving into the deep end and following a fast-moving plot against a background of strangeness, this is the sort of SF you'll enjoy. (7) Rating: 6 out of 10

Most OpenPGP User IDs look like this:

Jane Q. Public <jane@example.org>

This is clean, clear, and unambiguous. However, some tools (gpg, enigmail among others) ask the user to provide a "Comment:" field when they are choosing a new User ID (e.g. when making a new key). These UI prompts are evil. The savvy user knows to avoid entering anything in this field, so that they can end up with a User ID like the one above. The user who provides something here (perhaps even something inconsequential like "I like strawberries", due to not being sure what should go in this little box) will instead end up with a User ID like:

Jane Q. Public (I like strawberries) <jane@example.org>

This is bad. This means that Jane is asking the people who certify her key+userid to certify whether she actually likes strawberries (how could they know? what if she changes her mind? should they revoke their certifications?) and anywhere that she is referred to by name will include this mention of strawberries. This is not Jane's identity, and it doesn't belong in an OpenPGP User ID packet. Furthermore, since User IDs are atomic, if Jane wants to change the comment field (but leave her name and e-mail address the same), she will instead need to create a new User ID, publish it, get everyone who has certified her old key+userid to certify the key+newuserid, and then revoke the old one. It is difficult already to help people understand and participate in the certification network that forms that backbone of OpenPGP's so-called "web of trust". These bogus comment fields make an already-difficult task harder. And all because of strawberries! Tools like enigmail and gpg should not expose the "Comment:" field to users who are generating keys or choosing new User IDs. If they feel it absolutely must be present for some weird corner case that 0.1% of their users will have, they could require that the user enters some sort of "expert mode" before prompting the user to do something that is likely to be a mistake. There is almost no legitimate reason for anyone to use this field. Let's go through some examples of this people use, taken from some examples i have lying around (identifying marks have been changed to protect the innocent who were duped by this bad UI choice, but you can probably find them on the public keyserver network if you want to hunt around):

domain repetition

John Q. Public (Debian) <johnqpublic@debian.org>

We know you're with debian already from the @debian.org address. If this is in contrast to your other address (johnqpublic@example.org) so that people know where to send you debian-related e-mail, this is still not necessary. Lest you think i'm just calling out debian developers, people with @ubuntu.com addresses and (Ubuntu) comments (as well as @example.edu addresses and (Example University) comments and @example.com addresses and (Example Corp) comments) are out there too.

nicknames already evident

John Q. Public (Johnny) <johnqpublic@example.net>
John Q. Public (wackydude) <wackydude@example.net>

Again, the information these comments are providing offers no clear disambiguation from the info already contained in the name and e-mail address, and just muddies the water about what the people who certify this identity should actually be trying to verify before they make their certification.

"Work"

John Q. Public (Work) <johnqpublic@example.com>

if John's correspondents know that he works for Example Corp, then "Work" isn't helpful to them, because they already know this as the address that they're writing to him with. If they don't know that, then they probably aren't writing to him at work, so they don't need this comment either. The same problem appears (for example) with literal comments of (School) next to their @example.edu address.

This is my nth try at this crazy system!

John Q. Public (This is my second key) <johnqpublic@example.com>
John Q. Public (This is my primary key) <johnqpublic@example.com>
John Q. Public (No wait really use this one) <johnqpublic@example.com>

OpenPGP is confusing, and it can be tricky to get it right. We all know :) This is still not part of John's identity. If you want to designate a key as your preferred key, keep it up-to-date, get people to certify it, and revoke or expire your old keys. People who care can look at the timestamps on your keys and tell which ones are the most recent ones. You do have a revocation certificate for your key handy just in case you lose it, right?

Don't use this key

John Q. Public (Old key, do not use) <johnqpublic@example.com>
John Q. Public (Please only use this through September 2004) <johnqpublic@example.com>

This kind of sentiment is better expressed by revoking the key in question or setting an expiration time on the key or User ID self-sig directly. This sentiment is not part of John's identity, and shouldn't be included as though it were.

"none"

John Q. Public (none) <johnqpublic@example.com>

sigh. This is clearly someone getting mixed up by the UI.

I use strong crypto!

John Q. Public (3092 bits of RSA) <johnqpublic@example.com>

This comment refers to the strength of the key material, or the algorithms preferred by the user. Since the User ID is associated with the key material already, people who care about this information can get it from the key directly. This is also not part of the user's actual identity.

"no comment"

John Q. Public (no comment) <johnqpublic@example.com>

This is actually not uncommon (some keyservers reply "too many matches!"). It shows that the user is witty and can think on their feet (at least once), but it is still not part of the user's identity.

But wait (i hear you say)! I have a special case that actually is a legitimate use of the comment field that cannot be expressed in OpenPGP in any other way! I'm sure that such cases exist. I've even seen one or two of them. The fact that one or two cases exist does not excuse the fact that that overwhelming majority of these comments in OpenPGP User IDs are a mistake, caused only by bad UI design that prompts people to put something (anything!) in the empty box (or on the command prompt, depending on your preference). And this mistake is one of the thousand papercuts that inhibits the robust growth of the OpenPGP certification network that some people call the "web of trust". Let's avoid them so we can focus on the other 999 papercuts. Please don't use comments in your OpenPGP User ID. And if you make a user interface for OpenPGP that prompts the user to decide on a new User ID, please don't include a prompt for "Comment" unless the user has already certified that they are really and truly a special special snowflake. Thanks!Tags: openpgp, ui

Debian wheezy has been released (yay!), so I've updated my backport script to backport to wheezy by default and shuffled the meanings of stable and oldstable. The whole script badly needs a rewrite and needs to become more configuration-driven, but I sadly don't have the time at the moment, so will have to make do with this. If anyone else is using it, you can get the latest copy from my scripts page. Also done: suite names changed for local Stanford repositories. jessie added to our local Debian mirroring. reprepro pull rules changed accordingly. All local build chroots updated, with new ones created for wheezy and wheezy-backports. Still to do: update suite names and pull rules for the eyrie.org Debian repository (which isn't used much any more). Delete the old per-service lenny-based distributions, since we've gotten everything off of lenny that cared about them. Add a new jessie build chroot to our local build servers. Update our FAI installation to build wheezy by default and to use a wheezy NFS root. reprepro makes this whole process so massively easier than it was with debarchiver.

One of my recent innocent tweet about Gerrit vs Github triggered much more reponses and debate that I expected it to. I realize that it might be worth explaining a bit what I meant, in a text longer than 140 characters.

I'm having a hard time now contributing to projects not using Gerrit. Github isn't that good. Julien Danjou (@juldanjou) May 8, 2013

I always looked at Github from a distant eye, mainly because I always disliked their pull-request handling, and saw no value in the social hype it brings. Why? One click away isn't one click effort The pull-request system looks like an incredible easy way to contribute to any project hosted on Github. You're a click away to send your contribution to any software. But the problem is that any worthy contribution isn't an effort of a single click. Doing any proper and useful contribution to a software is never done right the first time. There's a dance you will have to play. A slowly rhythmed back and forth between you and the software maintainer or team. You'll have to dance it until your contribution is correct and can be merged. But as a software maintainer, not everybody is going to follow you on this choregraphy, and you'll end up with pull-request you'll never get finished unless you wrap things up yourself. So the gain in pull-requests here, isn't really bigger than a good bug report in most cases. This is where the social argument of Github isn't anymore. As soon as you're talking about projects bigger than a color theme for your favorite text editor, this feature is overrated. Contribution rework If you're lucky enough, your contributor will play along and follow you on this pull-request review process. You'll make suggestions, he will listen and will modify his pull-request to follow your advice. At this point, there's two technics he can use to please you. Technic #1: the Topping Github's pull-requests invite you to send an entire branch, eclipsing the fact that it is composed of several commits. The problem is that a lot of one-click-away contributors do not masterize Git and/or do not make efforts to build a logical patchset, and nothing warns them that their branch history is wrong. So they tend to change stuff around, commit, make a mistake, commit, fix this mistake, commit, etc. This kind of branch is composed of the whole brain's construction process of your contributor, and is a real pain to review. To the point I quite often give up. <figure>

<figcaption> A typical case: 3 commits to build a 4 lines long file. </figcaption> </figure> Without Github, the old method that all software used, and that many software still use (e.g. Linux), is to send a patch set over e-mail (or any other medium like Gerrit). This method has one positive effect, that it forces the contributor to acknowledge the list of commits he is going to publish. So, if the contributor he has fixup commits in his history, they are going to be seen as first class citizen. And nobody is going to want to see that, neither your contributor, nor the software maintainers. Therefore, such a system tend to push contributors to write atomic, logical and self-contained patchset that can be more easily reviewed. Technic #2: the History Rewriter This is actually the good way to build a working and logical patchset using Git. Rewriting history and amending problematic patches using the famous git rebase --interactive trick. The problem is that if your contributor does this and then repush the branch composing your pull-request to Github, you will both lose the previous review done, each time. There's no history on the different versions of the branch that has been pushed. In the old alternative system like e-mail, no information is lost when reworked patches are resent, obviously. This is far better because it eases the following of the iterative discussions that the patch triggered. Of course, it would be possible for Github to enhance this and fix it, but currently it doesn't handle this use case correctly.. <figure>

<figcaption> Exercise for the doubtful readers: good luck finding all revisions of my patch in the pull-request #157 of Hy.</figcaption> </figure> A quick look at OpenStack workflow

It's not a secret for anyone that I've been contributing to OpenStack as a daily routine for the last 18 months. The more I contribute, the more I like the contribution workflow and process. It's already well and longly described on the wiki, so I'll summarize here my view and what I like about it. Gerrit To send a contribution to any OpenStack project, you need to pass via Gerrit. This is way simpler than doing a pull-request on Github actually, all you have to do is do your commit(s), and type git review. That's it. Your patch will be pushed to Gerrit and available for review. Gerrit allows other developers to review your patch, add comments anywhere on it, and score your patch up or down. You can build any rule you want for the score needed for a patch to be merged; OpenStack requires one positive scoring from two core developers before the patch is merged. Until a patch is validated, it can be reworked and amended locally using Git, and then resent using git review again. That simple. The historic and the different version of the patches are available, with the whole comments. Gerrit doesn't lose any historic information on your workflow. Finally, you'll notice that this is actually the same kind of workflow projects use when they work by patch sent over e-mail. Gerrit just build a single place to regroup and keep track of patchsets, which is really handy. It's also much easier for people to actually send patch using a command line tool than their MUA or git send-email. Gate testing Testing is mandatory for any patch sent to OpenStack. Unit tests and functionnals test are run for each version of each patch of the patchset sent. And until your patch passes all tests, it will be impossible to merge it. Yes, this implies that all patches in a patchset must be working commits and can be merged on their own, without the entire patchset going in! With such a restricution, it's impossible to have "fixup commits" merged in your project and pollute the history and the testability of the project. Once your patch is validated by core developers, the system checks that there is not any merge conflicts. If there's not, tests are re-run, since the branch you are pushing to might have changed, and if everything's fine, the patch is merged. This is an uncredible force for the quality of the project. This implies that no broken patchset can ever sneak in, and that the project pass always all tests. Conclusion: accessibility vs code review In the end, I think that one of the key of any development process, which is code review, is not well covered by Github pull-request system. It is, along with history integrity, damaged by the goal of making contributions easier. Choosing between these features is probably a trade-off that each project should do carefully, considering what are its core goals and the quality of code it want to reach. I tend to find that OpenStack found one of the best trade-off available using Gerrit and plugging testing automation via Jenkins on it, and I would probably recommend it for any project taking seriously code reviews and testing.

During the Wheezy freeze, the Debian release team deployed 3254 hints[1]. This number may include some duplicates (i.e. where two members of the team hinted the same package), it certainly does not include a lot of rejected requests <insert more disclaimers here>. The top hinter was *drum roll* Adam, who did 1799 hints(That is 55% of all hints during the freeze). For comparison, the second and third runner ups added together did 1023 hints (or 31.4%). Put in a different way, on average Julien Cristau and I would both add about 1.5 hints each day and Adam would on his own add 5.6 hints a day. Of course, this is not intended to diminish the work other the rest of the team. Reviewing and unblocking packages is not all there is to a release. Particularly, a great thanks to Cyril Brulebois for his hard work on the Debian Installer (without which Debian Wheezy could not be released at all). Enjoy! [1] Determined by:

  egrep -c 'done 201(3 2-?(07 08 09 10 11 12)) $HINT_FILE

It does not count hints, but the little header we add above our hints. One header can apply to multiple hints (which is good, because udeb unblocks are usually paired with a regular unblock and we don t want to count them as two separate hints).

With wheezy released, the floodgates are opened on a lot of debhelper changes that have been piling up. Most of these should be pretty minor, but I released one yesterday that will affect all users of dh. Hopefully in a good way. I made dh smarter about selecting which debhelper commands it runs. It can tell when a package does not use the stuff done by a particular command, and skips running the command entirely. So the debian/rules binary of a package using dh will now often look like this:

dh binary
   dh_testroot
   dh_prep
   dh_auto_install
   dh_installdocs
   dh_installchangelogs
   dh_perl
   dh_link
   dh_compress
   dh_fixperms
   dh_installdeb
   dh_gencontrol
   dh_md5sums
   dh_builddeb

Which is pretty close to the optimal hand-crafted debian/rules file (and just about as fast, too). But with the benefit that if you later add, say, cron job files, dh_installcron will automatically start being run too. Hopefully this will not result in any behavior changes, other than packages building faster and with less noise. If there is a bug it'll probably be something missing in the specification of when a command needs to be run. Beyond speed, I hope that this will help to lower the bar to adding new commands to debhelper, and to the default dh sequences. Before, every such new command slowed things down and was annoying. Now more special-purpose commands won't get in the way of packages that don't need them.

The way this works is that debhelper commands can include a "PROMISE" directive. An example from dh_installexamples

# PROMISE: DH NOOP WITHOUT examples

Mostly this specifies the files in debian/ that are used by the command, and whose presence triggers the command to run. There is also a syntax to specify items that can be present in the package build directory to trigger the command to run. (Unfortunatly, dh_perl can't use this. There's no good way to specify when dh_perl needs to run, short of doing nearly as much work as dh_perl would do when run. Oh well.) Note that third-party dh_ commands can include these directives too, if that makes sense.

I'm happy how this turned out, but I could be happier about the implementation. The PROMISE directives need to be maintained along with the code of the command. If another config file is added, they obviously must be updated. Other changes to a command can invalidate the PROMISE directive, and cause unexpected bugs. What would be ideal is to not repeat the inputs of the command in these directives, but instead write the command such that its inputs can be automatically extracted. I played around with some code like this:

$behavior = main_behavior("docs tmp(usr/share/doc/)", sub  
       my $package=shift;
       my $docs=shift;
       my $docdir=shift;
       install($docs, $docdir);
 );
$behavior->($package);

But refactoring all debhelper commands to be written in this style would be a big job. And I was not happy enough with the flexability and expressiveness of this to continue with it. I can however, dream about what this would look like if debhelper were written in Haskell. Then I would have a Debhelper a monad, within which each command executes.

main = runDebhelperIO installDocs
installDocs :: Monad a => Debhelper a
installDocs = do
    docs <- configFile "docs"
    docdir <- tmpDir "usr/share/doc"
    lift $ install docs docdir

To run the command, runDebhelperIO would loop over all the packages and run the action, in the Debhelper IO monad. But, this also allows making an examineDebhelper that takes an action like installDocs, and runs it in a Debhelper Writer monad. That would accumulate a list of all the inputs used by the action, and return it, without performing any side effecting IO actions. It's been 15 years since I last changed the language debhelper was written in. I did that for less gains than this, really. (The issue back then was that shell getopt sucked.) IIRC it was not very hard, and only took a few days. Still, I don't really anticipate reimplementing debhelper in Haskell any time soon. For one thing, individual Haskell binaries are quite large, statically linking all Haskell libraries they use, and so the installed size of debhelper would go up quite a bit. I hope that forthcoming changes will move things toward dynamically linked haskell libraries, and make it more appealing for projects that involve a lot of small commands. So, just a thought experiment for now..

Congrats to the Debian release team on the new release of Debian 7.0 (wheezy)! Leading up to the release, a meme making the rounds on Planet Debian has been to play a #newinwheezy game, calling out some of the many new packages in 7.0 that may be interesting to users. While upstart as a package is nothing new in wheezy, the jump to upstart 1.6.1 from 0.6.6 is quite a substantial change. It does bring with it a new package, mountall, which by itself isn't terribly interesting because it just provides an upstart-ish replacement for some core scripts from the initscripts package (essentially, /etc/rcS.d/*mount*). Where things get interesting (and, typically, controversial) is the way in which mountall leverages plymouth to achieve this. What is plymouth? There is a great deal of misunderstanding around plymouth, a fact I was reminded of again while working to get a modern version of upstart into wheezy. When Ubuntu first started requiring plymouth as an essential component of the boot infrastructure, there was a lot of outrage from users, particularly from Ubuntu Server users, who believed this was an attempt to force pretty splash screen graphics down their throats. Nothing could be further from the truth. Plymouth provides a splash screen, but that's not what plymouth is. What plymouth is, is a boot-time I/O multiplexer. And why, you ask, would upstart - or mountall, whose job is just to get the filesystem mounted at boot - need a boot-time I/O multiplexer? Why use plymouth? The simple answer is that, like everything else in a truly event-driven boot system, filesystem mounting is handled in parallel - with no defined order. If a filesystem is missing or fails an fsck, mountall may need to interact with the user to decide how to handle it. And if there's more than one missing or broken filesystem, and these are all being found in parallel, there needs to be a way to associate each answer from the user to the corresponding question from mountall, to avoid crossed signals... and lost data. One possible way to handle this would be for mountall to serialize the fsck's / mounts. But this is a pretty unsatisfactory answer; all other things (that is, boot reliability) being equal, admins would prefer their systems to boot as fast as possible, so that they can get back to being useful to users. So we reject the idea of solving the problem of serializing prompts by making mountall serialize all its filesystem checks. Another option would be to have mountall prompt directly on the console, doing its own serialization of the prompts (even though successful mounts / fscks continue to be run in parallel). This, too, is not desirable in the general case, both because some users actually would like to have pretty splash screens at boot time, and this would be incompatible with direct console prompting; and because mountall is not the only piece of software that need to prompt at boot time (see also: cryptsetup). Plymouth: not just a pretty face Enter plymouth, which provides the framework for serializing requests to the user while booting. It can provide a graphical boot splash, yes; ironically, even its own homepage suggests that this is its purpose. But it can also provide a text-only console interface, which is what you get automatically when booting without a splash boot argument, or even handle I/O over a serial console. Which is why, contrary to the initial intuitions of the s390 porters upon seeing this package, plymouth is available for all of Debian's Linux architectures in wheezy, s390 and s390x included, providing a consistent architecture for boot-time I/O for systems that need it - which is any machine using a modern boot system, such as upstart or systemd. Room for improvement Now, having a coherent architecture for your boot I/O is one thing; having a bug-free splash screen is another. The experience of plymouth in Ubuntu has certainly not been bug-free, with plymouth making significant demands of the kernel video layer. Recently, the binary video driver packages in Ubuntu have started to blacklist the framebuffer kernel driver entirely due to stability concerns, making plymouth splash screens a non-starter for users of these drivers and regressing the boot experience. One solution for this would be to have plymouth offload the video handling complexity to something more reliable and better tested. Plymouth does already have an X backend, but we don't use that in Ubuntu because even if we do have an X server, it normally starts much later than when we would want to display the splash screen. With Mir on the horizon for Ubuntu, however, and its clean separation between system and session compositors, it's possible that using a Mir backend - that can continue running even after the greeter has started, unlike the current situation where plymouth has to cede the console to the display manager when it starts - will become an appealing option. This, too, is not without its downsides. Needing to load plymouth when using crypted root filesystems already makes for a bloated initramfs; adding a system compositor to the initramfs won't make it any better, and introduces further questions about how to hand off between initramfs and root fs. Keeping your system compositor running from the initramfs post-boot isn't really ideal, particularly for low-memory systems; whereas killing the system compositor and restarting it will make it harder to provide a flicker-free experience. But for all that, it does have its architectural appeal, as it lets us use plymouth as long as we need to after boot. As the concept of static runlevels becomes increasingly obsolete in the face of dynamic systems, we need to design for the world where the distinction between "booting" and "booted" doesn't mean what it once did.

(It took me a while to come up with new CDBS packaging series post not because I stopped using CDBS just because I was procrastinating myself as busy) This is the second post in the CDBS packaging series. In this series I'm going to talk about package relationship management. The better example where this feature is useful is packages where build-depends and run-time dependencies overlap. Most of the Perl modules which have test suites have build-depend and run-time dependency intersection. So let me take example of a Perl module. First lets see control file of a Perl package which is not using CDBS and then let me explain how CDBS can help you improve the situation. I choose libxml-libxml-perl lets see part of control file which includes Build-Depends Depends Suggests Recommends.

Source: libxml-libxml-perl
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group <pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Jonathan Yu <jawnsy@cpan.org>,
 gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>,
 Chris Butler <chrisb@debian.org>
Section: perl
Priority: optional
Build-Depends: perl (>= 5.12),
 debhelper (>= 9.20120312),
 libtest-pod-perl,
 libxml2-dev,
 libxml-namespacesupport-perl,
 libxml-sax-perl,
 zlib1g-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.4
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libxml-libxml-perl.git
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-perl/packages/libxml-libxml-perl.git
Homepage: https://metacpan.org/release/XML-LibXML/
Package: libxml-libxml-perl
Architecture: any
Depends: $ shlibs:Depends , $ misc:Depends , $ perl:Depends ,
 libxml-namespacesupport-perl,
 libxml-sax-perl
Breaks: libxml-libxml-common-perl
Replaces: libxml-libxml-common-perl
Description: Perl interface to the libxml2 library
 XML::LibXML is a Perl interface to the GNOME libxml2 library, which provides
 interfaces for parsing and manipulating XML files. This module allows Perl
 programmers to make use of the highly capable validating XML parser and the
 high performance Document Object Model (DOM) implementation. Additionally, it
 supports using the XML Path Language (XPath) to find and extract information.

So 2 packages are both in Build-Depends and Depends field

libsax-xml-perl
libxml-namespacesupport-perl

So in this situation there is a possibility that we miss to add one or both of these packages into Depends field, I'm not saying we will surely miss but we might after all we are all human beings. So how can we improve the situation using CDBS? Let me go through step by step on what we need to do.

Create a file called control.in with same above contents but slight modification in Build-Depends and Depends section. I will display the diff below to avoid re-pasting entire file again and again.

--- debian/control      2013-04-28 23:08:11.930082600 +0530
+++ debian/control.in   2013-05-04 20:51:18.849680419 +0530
@@ -5,13 +5,7 @@
  Chris Butler <chrisb@debian.org>
 Section: perl
 Priority: optional
-Build-Depends: perl (>= 5.12),
- debhelper (>= 9.20120312),
- libtest-pod-perl,
- libxml2-dev,
- libxml-namespacesupport-perl,
- libxml-sax-perl,
- zlib1g-dev
+Build-Depends: @cdbs@
 Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libxml-libxml-perl.git
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-perl/packages/libxml-libxml-perl.git
@@ -20,8 +14,7 @@
 Package: libxml-libxml-perl
 Architecture: any
 Depends: $ shlibs:Depends , $ misc:Depends , $ perl:Depends ,
- libxml-namespacesupport-perl,
- libxml-sax-perl
+ $ cdbs:Depends 
 Breaks: libxml-libxml-common-perl
 Replaces: libxml-libxml-common-perl
 Description: Perl interface to the libxml2 library
@@ -30,4 +23,3 @@
  programmers to make use of the highly capable validating XML parser and the
  high performance Document Object Model (DOM) implementation. Additionally, it
  supports using the XML Path Language (XPath) to find and extract information.
-

Next we need to have something like below in the rule files

#!/usr/bin/make -f
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/utils.mk
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/upstream-tarball.mk
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/perl-makemaker.mk
pkg = $(DEB_SOURCE_PACKAGE)
deps = libxml-libxml-perl libxml-sax-perl
deps-test = libtest-pod-perl
CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS +=, $(deps), $(deps-test)
CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS +=, zlib1g-dev, libxml2-dev, perl (>= 5.12)
CDBS_DEPENDS_$(pkg) = , $(deps)

So basically we moved all Build-Depends and Depends to rules file. The common ones are placed in deps variable and assigned to both Build-Depends and Depends. CDBS uses following variables for package relationship management.

CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS: This variable helps you manage Build-Depends field and all you need to do is in your control.in files Build-Depends field put place holder @cdbs@
CDBS_DEPENDS: This field can be used to manage Depends field of binary package for each binary package you need to have one CDBS_DEPENDS_pkgname variable with depends assigned to it. And in your control.in append $ cdbs:Depends to Depends field.
CDBS_PROVIDES, CDBS_BREAKS, CDBS_RECOMMENDS, CDBS_PREDEPENDS, CDBS_SUGGESTS, CDBS_REPLACES: all these does the job what you think it does :-).

Other than CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS all other variables work using substvars i.e. CDBS will put the respective substitutions in pkgname.substvars file which will be used during deb creation to replace things in control file. So to make CDBS generate new control file run the below command

DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules debian/control

Basically this command needs to be executed before starting build process if you miss your changes will not be reflected into debian/control. Additionally this feature is Maintainer Mode helper tool because Debian policy prohibits change of debian/control during normal package build. So what is the benefit of using this feature of CDBS? I've listed some of them which I felt are obvious.

When there is intersection in Build-Depends and Depends this feature from CDBS is helpful. As I shown above put all intersecting dependencies in common variable and appropriately assign them wherever it is required. Thus we can avoid possible missing of some of run-time dependencies due to human error.
It is also possible that newer version of package requires specific version of some package (mostly libraries) and we updated build dependencies but we might forget to do the same in Depends, by using this feature we can make sure we will not miss such minute details.

One last thing I want to point out is if you are NMUing a CDBS package

NMUs need not (but are encouraged to) make special use of these tools. In particular, the debian/control.in file can be completely ignored.

Before closing down the post, If you find some mistake in the post please let me know either through comments or through the email. Soon I will be back with new CDBS recipes till then cya.

Search Results: "rul"

12 June 2013

Dominique Dumont: Improving error messages of Dpkg dependency parser

Marc 'Zugschlus' Haber: How to amd64 an i386 Debian installation with multiarch

9 June 2013

Ingo Juergensmann: Edward Snowden whistleblowed PRISM

8 June 2013

Michael Stapelberg: Survey answers part 1: systemd has too many dependencies, or it is bloated, or it does too many things, or is too complex

2 June 2013

Yves-Alexis Perez: Hiding encrypted disks in Thunar with udisks2

31 May 2013

Daniel Pocock: VoIP federation: another milestone

30 May 2013

Russ Allbery: Review: Get Everything Done

29 May 2013

Russ Allbery: Review: The Making of the Indebted Man

27 May 2013

Daniel Pocock: Upstream packaging and Debian: Drupal third-party libraries API

26 May 2013

Gregor Herrmann: RC bugs 2013/21

Andrew Pollock: [life] Maker Fair 2013 virtual trip report

25 May 2013

Jonas Smedegaard: FreedomBox - Helps You Stay Free!

16 May 2013

Russ Allbery: Review: Asimov's, July 2011

15 May 2013

Daniel Kahn Gillmor: OpenPGP User ID Comments considered harmful

14 May 2013

Russ Allbery: backport 1.30

10 May 2013

Julien Danjou: Rant about Github pull-request workflow implementation

9 May 2013

Niels Thykier: Wheezy was brought to you by

8 May 2013

Joey Hess: faster dh

Steve Langasek: Plymouth is not a bootsplash

5 May 2013

Vasudev Kamath: CDBS Packaging: package relationship management