Doing code reviews is a great way to discover things that people might
struggle to comprehend. While proof-reading
OpenStack patches recently, I spotted that
people were not using correctly the various decorators Python provides for
methods. So here's my attempt at providing me a link to send them to in my
next code reviews. :-)
How methods work in Python
A method is a function that is stored as a class attribute. You can declare
and access such a function this way:
>>> class Pizza(object):
... def __init__(self, size):
... self.size = size
... def get_size(self):
... return self.size
...
>>> Pizza.get_size
<unbound method Pizza.get_size>
What Python tells you here, is that the attribute
get_size of the class
Pizza is a method that is unbound. What does this mean? We'll know as
soon as we'll try to call it:
>>> Pizza.get_size()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: unbound method get_size() must be called with Pizza instance as first argument (got nothing instead)
We can't call it because it's not bound to any instance of
Pizza. And a
method wants an instance as its first argument (in Python 2 it must be
an instance of that class; in Python 3 it could be anything). Let's try to
do that then:
>>> Pizza.get_size(Pizza(42))
42
It worked! We called the method with an instance as its first argument, so
everything's fine. But you will agree with me if I say this is not a very
handy way to call methods; we have to refer to the class each time we want
to call a method. And if we don't know what class is our object, this is not
going to work for very long.
So what Python does for us, is that it binds all the methods from the class
Pizza to any instance of this class. This means that the attribute
get_size of an instance of
Pizza is a bound method: a method for
which the first argument will be the instance itself.
>>> Pizza(42).get_size
<bound method Pizza.get_size of <__main__.Pizza object at 0x7f3138827910>>
>>> Pizza(42).get_size()
42
As expected, we don't have to provide any argument to
get_size, since
it's bound, its
self argument is automatically set to our
Pizza
instance. Here's a even better proof of that:
>>> m = Pizza(42).get_size
>>> m()
42
Indeed, you don't even have to keep a reference to your
Pizza object. Its
method is bound to the object, so the method is sufficient to itself.
But what if you wanted to know which object this bound method is bound to?
Here's a little trick:
>>> m = Pizza(42).get_size
>>> m.__self__
<__main__.Pizza object at 0x7f3138827910>
>>> # You could guess, look at this:
...
>>> m == m.__self__.get_size
True
Obviously, we still have a reference to our object, and we can find it back
if we want.
In Python 3, the functions attached to a class are not considered as
unbound method anymore, but as simple functions, that are bound to an
object if required. So the principle stays the same, the model is just
simplified.
>>> class Pizza(object):
... def __init__(self, size):
... self.size = size
... def get_size(self):
... return self.size
...
>>> Pizza.get_size
<function Pizza.get_size at 0x7f307f984dd0>
Static methods
Static methods are a special case of methods. Sometimes, you'll write code
that belongs to a class, but that doesn't use the object itself at all. For
example:
class Pizza(object):
@staticmethod
def mix_ingredients(x, y):
return x + y
def cook(self):
return self.mix_ingredients(self.cheese, self.vegetables)
In such a case, writing
mix_ingredients as a non-static method would work
too, but it would provide it a
self argument that would not be used. Here,
the decorator
@staticmethod buys us several things:
- Python doesn't have to instantiate a bound-method for each Pizza object
we instiantiate. Bound methods are objects too, and creating them has a
cost. Having a static method avoids that:
>>> Pizza().cook is Pizza().cook
False
>>> Pizza().mix_ingredients is Pizza.mix_ingredients
True
>>> Pizza().mix_ingredients is Pizza().mix_ingredients
True
-
It eases the readability of the code: seeing @staticmethod, we know that
the method does not depend on the state of object itself;
-
It allows us to override the mix_ingredients method in a subclass. If we
used a function mix_ingredients defined at the top-level of our module, a
class inheriting from Pizza wouln't be able to change the way we mix
ingredients for our pizza without overriding cook itself.
Class methods
Having said that, what are class methods? Class methods are methods that are
not bound to an object, but to a class!
>>> class Pizza(object):
... radius = 42
... @classmethod
... def get_radius(cls):
... return cls.radius
...
>>>
>>> Pizza.get_radius
<bound method type.get_radius of <class '__main__.Pizza'>>
>>> Pizza().get_radius
<bound method type.get_radius of <class '__main__.Pizza'>>
>>> Pizza.get_radius is Pizza().get_radius
True
>>> Pizza.get_radius()
42
Whatever the way you use to access this method, it will be always bound to
the class it is attached too, and its first argument will be the class
itself (remember that classes are objects too).
When to use this kind of methods? Well class methods are mostly useful for
two types of methods:
- Factory methods, that are used to create an instance for a class using for
example some sort of pre-processing. If we use a @staticmethod instead, we
would have to hardcode the Pizza class name in our function, making any
class inheriting from Pizza unable to use our factory for its own use.
class Pizza(object):
def __init__(self, ingredients):
self.ingredients = ingredients
@classmethod
def from_fridge(cls, fridge):
return cls(fridge.get_cheese() + fridge.get_vegetables())
- Static methods calling static methods: if you split a static methods in
several static methods, you shouldn't hard-code the class name but use class
methods. Using this way to declare ou method, the Pizza name is never
directly
referenced and inheritance and method overriding will work flawlessly
class Pizza(object):
def __init__(self, radius, height):
self.radius = radius
self.height = height
@staticmethod
def compute_circumference(radius):
return math.pi * (radius ** 2)
@classmethod
def compute_volume(cls, height, radius):
return height * cls.compute_circumference(radius)
def get_volume(self):
return self.compute_volume(self.height, self.radius)
Abstract methods
An abstract method is a method defined in a base class, but that may not
provide any implementation. In Java, it would describe the methods of an
interface.
So the simplest way to write an abstract method in Python is:
class Pizza(object):
def get_radius(self):
raise NotImplementedError
Any class inheriting from
Pizza should implement and override the
get_radius method, otherwise an exception would be raised.
This particular way of implementing abstract method has a drawback. If you
write a class that inherits from
Pizza and forget to implement
get_radius, the error will only be raised when you'll try to use that
method.
>>> Pizza()
<__main__.Pizza object at 0x7fb747353d90>
>>> Pizza().get_radius()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in get_radius
NotImplementedError
There's a way to triggers this way earlier, when the object is being
instantiated, using the
abc
module that's provided with Python.
import abc
class BasePizza(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
def get_radius(self):
"""Method that should do something."""
Using
abc and its special class, as soon as you'll try to instantiate
BasePizza or any class inheriting from it, you'll get a
TypeError.
>>> BasePizza()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: Can't instantiate abstract class BasePizza with abstract methods get_radius
Mixing static, class and abstract methods
When building classes and inheritances, the time will come where you will
have to mix all these methods decorators. So here's some tips about it.
Keep in mind that declaring a class as being abstract, doesn't freeze the
prototype of that method. That means that it must be implemented, but i can
be implemented with any argument list.
import abc
class BasePizza(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
def get_ingredients(self):
"""Returns the ingredient list."""
class Calzone(BasePizza):
def get_ingredients(self, with_egg=False):
egg = Egg() if with_egg else None
return self.ingredients + egg
This is valid, since
Calzone fulfil the interface requirement we defined
for
BasePizza objects. That means that we could also implement it as being
a class or a static method, for example:
import abc
class BasePizza(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
def get_ingredients(self):
"""Returns the ingredient list."""
class DietPizza(BasePizza):
@staticmethod
def get_ingredients():
return None
This is also correct and fulfil the contract we have with our abstract
BasePizza class. The fact that the
get_ingredients method don't need to know
about the object to return result is an implementation detail, not a
criteria to have our contract fulfilled.
Therefore, you can't force an implementation of your abstract method to be a
regular, class or static method, and arguably you shouldn't. Starting with
Python 3 (this won't work as you would expect in Python 2, see
issue5867), it's now possible to use the
@staticmethod and
@classmethod decorators on top of
@abstractmethod:
import abc
class BasePizza(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
ingredient = ['cheese']
@classmethod
@abc.abstractmethod
def get_ingredients(cls):
"""Returns the ingredient list."""
return cls.ingredients
Don't misread this: if you think this going to force your subclasses to
implement
get_ingredients as a class method, you are wrong. This simply
implies that your implementation of
get_ingredients in the
BasePizza
class is a class method.
An implementation in an abstract method? Yes! In Python, contrary to methods
in Java interfaces, you can have code in your abstract methods and call it
via
super():
import abc
class BasePizza(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
default_ingredients = ['cheese']
@classmethod
@abc.abstractmethod
def get_ingredients(cls):
"""Returns the ingredient list."""
return cls.default_ingredients
class DietPizza(BasePizza):
def get_ingredients(self):
return ['egg'] + super(DietPizza, self).get_ingredients()
In such a case, every pizza you will build by inheriting from
BasePizza
will have to override the
get_ingredients method, but will be able to use
the default mechanism to get the ingredient list by using
super().
When the first draft is done, the translated text need to be
proof read, and the remaining formatting problems with images and SVG
drawings need to be fixed. There are probably also some index entries
missing that need to be added. This can be done by comparing the
index entries listed in the SiSU version of the book, or comparing the
English docbook version with the paper version. Last, the colophon
page with ISBN numbers etc need to be wrapped up before the release is
done. I should also figure out how to get correct Norwegian sorting
of the index pages. All docbook tools I have tried so far (xmlto,
docbook-xsl, dblatex) get the order of symbols and the special
Norwegian letters wrong.
There is still need for translators and people with docbook
knowledge, to be able to get a good looking book (I still struggle
with dblatex, xmlto and docbook-xsl) as well as to do the draft
translation and proof reading. And I would like the figures to be
redrawn as SVGs to make it easy to translate them. Any SVG master
around? There are also some legal terms that are unfamiliar to me.
If you want to help, please get in touch with me, and check out the
project files currently available from
github.
If you are curious what the translated book currently look like,
the updated
PDF
and
EPUB
are published on github. The HTML version is published as well, but
github hand it out with MIME type text/plain, confusing browsers, so I
saw no point in linking to that version.
Well, my 
Finally, 
Shipping a UEFI-bootable Linux distribution is a touch awkward[1], with the main sticking point being the necessity to produce boot media with multiple El-Torito images. An El-Torito image is either an image of a floppy disk or a small hard drive, embedded into the ISO. This allows BIOS systems to look for an El Torito image, hook some interrupts and then boot without the BIOS having to care about the fact that the image is embedded in an ISO-9660 filesystem. UEFI systems will look for an El-Torito image with a special tag - if they find it they'll mount it as a FAT filesystem and look for a bootloader, and if not they'll fall back to BIOS compatibility.
Following an idea by Ansgar Burchardt, I've done some digging on version numbers in Debian:
Most common version numbers:
